Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story

Well ain't that the shits!

My link (above) to Deanna's comments on Mami's no longer works!!!
What the fuck? And that posting on Mami's (about the kid that died twice) no longer has ANY COMMENTS posted!!! Did delcroix decide to CENSOR any badmouthing of Deanna? What is this world coming to when Mami's starts censoring comments?
Shore lotta' thangs agoin' round here.

If anyone has any clout over at Mami's, find out what the hell is going on over there?

EDIT: Jerrylynnb: I just saw your post above (which begins a new page of this thread), after I posted the following. Noticed the whole blog entry is nuked.

I haven't posted anything at mami's for at least 1/2 a year; lost the password of the gmail account I was using, and haven't been sufficiently motivated to register a new one with joogle.

Might be worthwhile posting this little mami's/delphi story at Tracy's blog.

EDIT #2: I jumped the gun on saying mami's deleted the whole blog entry; as I was word-searching (CTRL-F) each "Older Posts" page for "Pozner", which does not appear in the headliine or text below the YT video.
Sandy Hook Victim Dies Again In Pakistan Massacre ?!?

All comments are nuked, and it's closed to new comments. Still begs the question, why?!

I did post the story of Delphi/Mami's at the memoryholeblog post for this Pozner story a few hours ago; still "Awaiting Moderation" it seems. If/when it appears, I'll reply to it with that amendment. My same comment there also links to my DelphiCo Shill-A-Thon podcast review here, #156.

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jerrylynnb

Deanna checked in over at Mami's entry exposing that Pozner kid who "died" at Sandy Hook and then again in Pakistan.

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?bl...58153222399931

---

doh! I tried to open your link above again to check Delphi's latest spew, and get:

https://www.blogger.com/img/logo_broken.png

Whoops, that's an error.

We apologise for the inconvenience.

Try refreshing the page to see if things are back in order.

So I go searching mami's for the original blog entry, going back through Dec 27, and it appears it's been REMOVED?! Is some mami's mod trying to "protect" Delphi from her base S.Hoax dishonesty blowing up?? :o

---

Sorry I'm late to the party I loved ya'll's comments. I know this will seem somewhat amateurish having read the comments of Amanda and PatColo but this is my recent contribution written at my site
http://blindlight.org/index.php/shil...-together-shit
http://blindlight.org/index.php/tric...dy-hook-psyops
lots of knowledge here to lap up! :):o

MC Slave - the website you referenced is hard to read - small print and way too much to follow (a very busy website).

If you have any insight as to why Delcroix (over at Mami's) deleted all the comments about the boy who "died twice", please just sum it up for us here.

There were many posts over there about that "boy died twice" posting, including Deanna's (and mine), and the act of just deleting them without further comment left me not wanting to make any comments on Mami's at all - what's the point? I am still waiting for someone to 'splain it to me - I had *thought* that Mami's was open to all comments, and not likely to go around deleting comments that embarrassed anyone (like Deanna).

What do you know about it? Do you, or ANYONE here, have any way of getting Delcroix to cough it up why he did that?
I'm willing to listen, but I smell a RAT!

strange shit happens around here sometimes. Every now and then there is this odd posting activity.

I have a dynamic website. you need to use mouse scroll button while holding the control key to lower or raise the resolution till everything fits. My impression is mami's Shit is a site in the AFP umbrella though trying to disguise it. In other words they are fake resistance trying to make us think they are one of us.Doesn't mean all there know that.Here's a pic how the web page should lookAttachment 7211
The significance of Sandy Hook at this point is the lesson we got of the revealing of a major network providing fake opposition that is basically trusted by a lot of people and we need to out their asses

So why again does that matter? Because if we let that behavior slide, tolerate it and keep going to them for info and hangouts or even just to argue points that will run up against an electric fence, they are basically controlling the message and you never know when they will try and pull another fast one. We need to make them respond to our message. They don't control us, they are irrelevant as is the MSM but they do have to be defined as to what they are, the biggest obstacle to uniting and moving our cause forward because people believe they are us and fall for the fights and misdirection so easily!! You aren't an op sometimes and sometimes not. If you are an op, you are an op, that's it. When they come on to protect Deanna, they are coming on, the admins, to protect the JWO, IMO.We grow slow but we grow strong and who knows, maybe we gather momentum along the way.
By the way, I joined a few months ago but this is the 1st time I noticed I could post

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MC Slave

I have a dynamic website. you need to use mouse scroll button while holding the control key to lower or raise the resolution till everything fits. My impression is mami's Shit is a site in the AFP umbrella though trying to disguise it.

---

I use the default text resolution setting and is doesn't look like in your screenshot. You want it setup so the default for most browsers shows how you want it. Basically I'm saying you have a custom setting on your browser and tailored your website to that custom setting rather than using what is the default. I think that's a fair constructive criticism.

Most people don't know that browser font size trick (I do mind you.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MC Slave

By the way, I joined a few months ago but this is the 1st time I noticed I could post

---

Well that might explain it then. I notice a couple times a year we get several new members and first time posters, but then we might not hear from them for 6 or 12 months. must be a window of opportunity.

What makes a good web-site FORM? For my tastes, Mami's FORM is tops (not saying I like the content, nor the high-handed way Delcroix deleted comments), but, for a web-crawler like me (yes, I admit it, guilty as charged), that easy-to-use website by Mami is top tier in its form.

Many website have so much to say and overwhelm the visitor with information that it is like shining a floodlight into your eyes - it makes a visitor like me just pass since I don't know where to start, and, that font trick doesn't work on my old PC's (win98, win2000, and winXP). Plus I browse in PORTRAIT MODE most of the time, and a website fashioned to be viewed in LANDSCAPE mode makes it a burden for me to navigate.

This site is also very well set up to my tastes, since I get a deep view (in portrait mode) and can quickly pick and choose which subjects I want to explore.

I intend to revisit your website and try to read some of the articles, but, I'll have to copy the whole articles and paste them into NOTEPAD so I can see the text without straining my eyes.

(I'm a newbie also, and I got here from reading PatColo's comments over at Mami's concerning Deanna's illogical blowout over Sandy Hook - PatColo referenced this website and I was glad to find it).

they didn't let me post, I don't know why :)

Well, how do you know what default is, again?

hey welcome, I have put so much work and all my articles are formed for desk top-1920-1080 P best usage. However, I bet if you visit regularly, you will acclimate and I will have to consider as I have three websites actually possibly trying something different.Reading Patcolo when I was looking for dirt on infiltrators is why i am here. In fact I made a couple of articles from Pat's links on the history of the cointel pro op AFP

Hi Slave, welcome to GSUS. I replied to your PM, mostly saying I agreed with jerrylynnb above, that your website is hard to deal with coz of the fonts & layout; and I had to close it coz of the auto-play music I couldn't figure out where to turn off, coz it was interrupting another mp3 I was listening to. But good on you for setting something up to help spread the word. It could be that just participating here will be as effective. ?? :)

Well, Mami's just posted a solo by Deanna about Sandy Hook:

http://grizzom.blogspot.ca/

The write-up says:

"Deanna talks about the deceptions, the cover-ups and the operatives surrounding Sandy Hook..."

I wrongly hoped that Deanna had come to here senses and was going to make a "limited hangout" retraction, since she had had James Perloff on the other day and I listened and remembered why I used to like Deanna's shows - the interview with James Perloff was well worth the listen.

Well, I was WRONG. WRONG AGAIN!

I downloaded the latest show (the solo about Sandy Hook) and, right away, I realized she is still under whatever spell she swallowed, and, this show is just more of her lecturing to her detractors (like me and PatColo), as if we were misguided and gullible chidren, about how our thinking is so far off base. She first goes on about how "everyting on mainstream news is NOT always a lie", and "everthing on alternative radio is NOT always the truth..." duh, cheeze, Deanna, I didda not know dat. Thanks for enlightening me.

I should have quit listening already, but, the fool for punishment that I am, I listened to how she compared some amish killing and how that Adam Lanza character was reported to have had mental problems at Yale (or somewhere official sounding), then, I just quit it.

If anyone here has the stomach to listen to the whole thing, and cares to wrap it all up for us, I will read your review.

The only aspect of it that I might be interested in is what kind of incredible twisted logic she will employ to explain about the "boy who died twice", but I don't have the stomach or inclination to sit through her condescending shrieking voice long enough to hear if she even bothers to mention about the magic kid.

But, my advice to those who might be deluded into thinking Deanna was coming to her senses, don't bother - she's flat out hung up over the idea that *children* (oh those poor helpless little darlings...) were the victims. Her female instincts cloud her wisdom, and, whatever else kind of a bug got into her brain over this Sandy Hook hoax.

seeking to enshrine the official zio-sandy-hoax narrative, :rolleyes: 600 pages, ambitious of the CIA ghost writers! :o

Screening Sandy Hook: Causes and Consequences [Kindle Edition]

Deanna Spingola (Author)
Be the first to review this item

[...]

Book Description

"Most parents would never consider dispensing deadly addictive “street” drugs to their children but if a trusted physician writes a prescription for an FDA-approved schedule 2 “medication” for their two-year old based on some questionable mental health screening, those unwary parents do not question or object. Despite side effect warnings, regularly revealed during TV ads, parents frequently fail to take those warnings seriously, perhaps presuming that the side effects are happenstance or rarely occur. Over the decades, because organized psychiatry, represented by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), convened numerous consensus panels that designed hundreds of non-biologically-based “disorders” for its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) especially suitable for the pill-for-every-ill pharmaceutical industry that conceivably already had many profitable solutions for the “disorders,” in the pre-production process.

The consequences have been disastrous with no discernable end in sight – some people taking prescription drugs or withdrawing from them have perpetrated school, mall and public shootings. That is in addition to thousands of suicides that the public never hears about, unless the victim is a well-known public figure like Robin Williams. Just the military-related suicide rate is 8,000 per year –untold numbers of these are the result of the psych drug cocktails doled out by psychiatrists working for the VA. The government is big pharma’s largest customer. In addition to the homicides and suicides, irreversible brain damage results from drug remedies to temporary problems that might have been easily resolved through compassionate interaction and talk therapy.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TUXUXCS

Hopefully no one buys this nonsense.

This reminds me of "It's the economy, stupid" comment of one our presidents. Telling us what to focus on because we are not supposed to focus on the real problems.

The shark jumper, just like Jon Rappaport, gets us all focusing on "it's the drugs, stupid" instead of who probably did what. That is deliberately pushing people into a weak rationale compared to trying to learn what really did happen, that is, truth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

seeking to enshrine the official zio-sandy-hoax narrative, :rolleyes: 600 pages, ambitious of the CIA ghost writers! :o

Screening Sandy Hook: Causes and Consequences [Kindle Edition]

Deanna Spingola (Author)
Be the first to review this item

[...]

Book Description

"Most parents would never consider dispensing deadly addictive “street” drugs to their children but if a trusted physician writes a prescription for an FDA-approved schedule 2 “medication” for their two-year old based on some questionable mental health screening, those unwary parents do not question or object. Despite side effect warnings, regularly revealed during TV ads, parents frequently fail to take those warnings seriously, perhaps presuming that the side effects are happenstance or rarely occur. Over the decades, because organized psychiatry, represented by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), convened numerous consensus panels that designed hundreds of non-biologically-based “disorders” for its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) especially suitable for the pill-for-every-ill pharmaceutical industry that conceivably already had many profitable solutions for the “disorders,” in the pre-production process.

The consequences have been disastrous with no discernable end in sight – some people taking prescription drugs or withdrawing from them have perpetrated school, mall and public shootings. That is in addition to thousands of suicides that the public never hears about, unless the victim is a well-known public figure like Robin Williams. Just the military-related suicide rate is 8,000 per year –untold numbers of these are the result of the psych drug cocktails doled out by psychiatrists working for the VA. The government is big pharma’s largest customer. In addition to the homicides and suicides, irreversible brain damage results from drug remedies to temporary problems that might have been easily resolved through compassionate interaction and talk therapy.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TUXUXCS

---

Wholly Sh*t I am almost motivated to buy this garbage so that i can be a verified buyer to review this. Maybe someone can point me to a Torrent to get at this one.....

I haven't & don't plan to suffer through this, but many (22+) comments @ Mami's, incl from Delphi-Deanna,

Spingola and Friends 4/9/2015

Deanna talkes about numerous issues and events, including Sandy Hook. The title of today's program is Okay, let’s talk about Sandy Hook. Please view Deanna's Sandy Hook Research and Notes particularly the page titled Wolfgang Halbig Asks Deanna to Stop Asking Questions and Critiquing Smallstorm's Video Delphi/Censorship Operation. After all, truth does not fear investigation!!!! I recommend that people listen to my program of February 20, 2014 about Sandy Hook. Show-page
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/04/...ds-492015.html

I tried to get Deanna to explain why she claimed that all identifications by next-of-kin of recently deceased was "always by photo", and, she finally, after I had to repeat the question, allowed as she had used "a poor choice of words", and that she really meant "usually", instead of "always". She then claimed that she had already proven that elsewhere with references, which she didn't bother to cite in her answer.

I also asked her to hone in on ONE particular alleged victim, that boy whose photo was published as one of the victims killed at Sandy Hook, and then again as one of the children killed a couple of years later in Pakistan. I suggested that this ONE case could prove, or disprove the whole Sandy Hook episode, since we know for sure somebody is faking it in this case. She replied that she had already mentioned the "death certificate" and that she had references to it, but, again, she didn't bother to cite her reference in her reply, as if a mere "death certificate" proves anything about the photo of a little boy we all saw in both cases.

I am no longer interested in anything Deanna has to say. She has dug herself into a deep pit of deception by her own gullibility, and she isn't adult enough to get out as that would require a much larger admission than a "poor choice of words". She has made herself not credible. I suspect she got "had" by someone, concerning Sandy Hook, and it would be just too much to her self esteem to have to admit it. Somewhere along the way she jumped from being a true skeptic and truth-seeker to a "true believer" - and you can't have a rational discussion with a "true believer".

Re ^, I'd just note again, I long since stopped wishfully wondering if she'd "been had" re S.Hoax, or if she's being willfully deceptive. It's plainly the latter. :(

It's sad, coz I'm on board with her Evil-Big-Pharma msg... but she's done that msg great harm by her (handlers') textbook deception gambits to place herself as a "KOL" (Key Opinion Leader, which she Flips The Script & Projects onto S.Hoax skeptics, ad nauseam...) re zion.gov's official s.Hoax story.

All Delphi&Co's zio-handlers could have hoped to achieve with this ham-handed op, that is bribing-coercing-threatening the now Delphi&Co Shill-A-Thon into playing for their satanic team re S.Hoax, was to "fracture" the TM. And IMHO, they've even FAILed at that... as all that's happened is Delphi&Co have been laughed out of the TM. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

It's sad...zio-handlers...

---

http://1-ps.googleusercontent.com/xk...VIcqvBS9Ep.jpg

Remember the good ol' days at GIM1 when Ron Paul was gonna save us from the evil jew FED banksters?


:rolleyes:

TyrannyNewsApril 15, 2015 at 9:44 PM
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/04/...99201859882252
I finally had a chance to listen to this program and was compelled to produce a video response with some clarifications and responses to Deanna's comments and assertions. This is limited just to Deanna's discussion of Wolfgang Halbig, Sofia Smallstorm and myself...

Http://youtube.com/watch?v=_rpc05uXzP8
http://youtube.com/watch?v=_rpc05uXzP8

Delphi's handlers' book got itself a single review now, a glowing 5-star shill review! :D
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TUXUXCS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

TyrannyNewsApril 15, 2015 at 9:44 PM
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/04/...99201859882252
I finally had a chance to listen to this program and was compelled to produce a video response with some clarifications and responses to Deanna's comments and assertions. This is limited just to Deanna's discussion of Wolfgang Halbig, Sofia Smallstorm and myself...

Http://youtube.com/watch?v=_rpc05uXzP8
http://youtube.com/watch?v=_rpc05uXzP8

---

This TNN guy's video response got its own Mami's entry now, which is building its own comment thread (7 atm), predictably including from Delphi herself,

http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/04/...of-deanna.html

Quote:

---

7 comments:

ColinApril 16, 2015 at 12:55 PM
SPINGY has repeatedly proven herself an obvious shill/agent etc. She had numerous guests on her show from Sofia (removed her show from her archives too!) to Halbig and nodded like a pigeon echoing that Hook was a Hoax... it’s her prerogative to flop, accepting bribes cash, book deals whatever morphed her to the Dark Side is ok by her and the lackeys such as Mark Glenn, Johnson and MCP ilk … I guess SPINGY would allow her kids to remain in a blood soaked room for 16 hours without need to get them to a hospital—mom of year candidate there! Also what’s wrong with Halbig phoning the crisis actors at Hook, if indeed he did? It’s something SPINGY would never do bc she is on the take. I applaud that gorilla journalism!

Reply

ColinApril 16, 2015 at 1:08 PM
Ps I meant DR K not halbig as a guest on the pigeon nodding ... she had others on too ...have SPINGY answer why she removed the Sofia show.

Reply

SWApril 16, 2015 at 2:04 PM
I can't listen to Spingola because her voice is horrific. I don't know how anyone can endure that shrill for more than 30 seconds. Worse than a crying baby.

Reply

DeannaApril 16, 2015 at 3:26 PM
Sofia Smallstorm has never been a guest on my radio program. She declined when I invited her to talk about her views of Sandy Hook.

Reply

1melahatApril 16, 2015 at 6:47 PM
I'm just going to cut and paste my comment from 4/6/15 because you've ignored it. I hprobably hope you see it this time and respond. I and the iranian community are losing respect for you by the minute as you fail to own up and apologize for the slanderous comments you let your caller friend make.

Dear Deanna Spingola, As an IranIan I am mortified by the exchange that took place between yourself and a female Iraqi caller who you seemed to know on your 3/12/2015 show. The caller made the following proclamations which are all demonstrably false: 1) that Iran was the aggressor who started the Iran Iraq war that claimed the lives of a million Iranians and and left many more disabled from chemical weapons given to Saddam by the U.S. : 2) That most of the fighting in Iraq today is between the Iraqi citizens and the Iranians Revolutionary guard : 3) That Iran today is in the pocket of England. The caller ends with a factoid that is meant to prove that Iran is guilty and that revelation is that John Kerry's daughter married an Iranians doctor as if that proves something. You just went along with these slanderous lies and didn't correct the caller on any of the three points or even ask what she meant by that last comment. As a person who seems to know something about world events I am shocked you let such ugly untruths air on your show. I am hoping that was a mistake on your part and not a deliberate action. If you read my comment can you please address this in a future show? Thank you

Reply

lindseynarratesApril 16, 2015 at 7:13 PM
You people are treating and betraying this woman like you did me, and I TOLD HER THAT WAS INEVITABLY GOING TO HAPPEN, YEARS AGO.

You fucking miscreants, deviants, drug-addicts, alcoholics, and the like, do NOTHING, and I mean NO THING, but criticize, insult, slander/libel, and antagonize, anyone and everyone you feel is more intelligent than you, more motivated than you, more successful than you, or, HEAVEN-FORBID!!!, DIS-AGREES WITH EVEN ONE ISSUE, WITH YOU!!!!

You fucking people are the reason why this "movement" will never go anywhere, and I can only thank Mrs. Deanna Spingola for FINALLY realizing the truths of what this "movement" truly is, and has been for a long time.

You cretins and malefactors should be absolutely ashamed of yourselves for your treatment of this woman. Mis-treating, slandering/libeling, and antaganizing, me is one thing, but to do this kind of shit to someone like Mrs. Deanna Spingola...that is as low as you fuckers could possibly sink.

I will never rescind a single word that I have stated here, and have sent this comment to Mrs. Deanna Spingola, herself, so that she knows that at least one person HAS THE COURAGE AND WHERE-WITH-ALL TO DEFEND HER.

Despicable. Not even the jews have treated her as badly as you creatures have, and that is my experience, too, so take that as you fuckers will.

Lindsey

Reply

1melahatApril 16, 2015 at 7:25 PM
Lindsey, I don't know if your ugly comment was meant for me but I am not attacking like you are. I am respectfully asking a question about outright lies which were aired on her show. I am asking her to make it right. Your comment is way out of line. I guess you want to get in to a name calling match and ignore the points I made.

---

^ too bad 'Colin' got his facts wrong, mixing up Delphi's absurdly incongruous positions on the S.HOAX vs the BMB Hoax. Too bad 'Lindsey' is screeching like a little bitch.

Check the latest comments now b4 delcroix deletes & locks everything AGAIN. :(
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/04/...of-deanna.html

This is the first time I have listened to DS in many months. Was amazed at the raspy hoarse quality to her already intolerable radio voice, just like Alex Jones' voice only worse.

They have permanently injured their vocal chords. Sacrifice one's voice for truth, not lies.

I think far too much energy is spent on this woman. Shes gone. Move on.

Oh gawd... I've listened to about half of this; can jump to about 40 mins for beginning of SH part. Delphi's droning on about some question she asked Halbig during her disgraceful "interview" of him last year, and discharacterizing him as having "evaded answering." Plus, Delphi reflects on her anal quality. More after I've suffered through the remainder... :(


Mami's Shit
Friday, April 17, 2015
Spingola and Friends 4/16/2015

Bring in the Clowns, Distractions and Deceptions: Deanna talks about Sandy Hook, offers a few health tips, and shares some background. About those death certificates that people are not able to find: Death Certificates are NOT Public Records; Deanna's Sandy Hook Research and Notes.

http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/04/...s-4162015.html

Death certificates are generally not public record for some number of years after the death. In my state I think it is 30 years, then they can be accessed by anyone. I know this from recent experience. It is to prevent people scamming.

This woman is really just being sticky paper, catching moths "of truth", using up their energy and focus, wasting peoples time.

I'm not convinced that Harbig is not the same. He is the "Superman" leading the fight for justice and I think no one else is doing anything because He's got it covered. I think he is using up the legal avenues.

I don't have any faith in either of them.

As to Delphi's angelic, melodic voice, recall the ole joke, "they've got a good face for radio!" Well, she's got a good voice for... being a street mime! :D Someone @ mami' said, "Too bad she isn't Victoria Jackson. Then we would all understand."

If u enjoy fingernails on the chalkboard, listen to the handful of shows she did after her 1/15/14 show described in this thread's OP, when she did several consecutive solo shows reciting her spook/handler-prepared scripts attacking Smallstorm's SH video & ad-hom'ing her personally. Delphi had become sick, and hoarse-voiced, no doubt from the stress of having sold out to the satanists so spectacularly wrt S.Hoax. Again: Delphi, HOARSE, & SOLO-- no guest to give listeners any relief! OMG!! :o I know I couldn't take more than a few minutes of it... and that's apart from her ridiculous "discredit Smallstorm!" script! :(

Quote:

---

I think far too much energy is spent on this woman. Shes gone. Move on.

---

Point taken. But also bear in mind, she's, at least I fear, still a "KOL" to use Delphi's own expert Delphi Technique lingo, esp amongst those perhaps earlier along in the wake-up curve; who may be more prone to falling for her/Shill-A-Thon tribe's textbook joojitsu hustle maneuvers.

So I think it's worthwhile to maintain this thread deconstructing the S.Hoax re-bunker shills' game, to give a "hand up" to those less experienced, trapped in a fog of cognitive dissonance over "how could these super bright & aware Truther KOLs (compromised/flipped zion.gov whores ;) ) be so BLIND re S.Hoax?!"

And this thread's reach isn't confined to gsus members who care. I link back to here all over: Mami's, JFriend, fetzer, memoryholeblog; from where readers can freely relink to other venues.

http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/04/...69763381389749

12,296 thread views now, up >100 since yesterday. That's much broader than gsus' small elite membership of drunks, cons & degenerates. :cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

That's much broader than gsus' small elite membership of drunks, cons & degenerates. :cool:

---

What?

ok, no you're right PC...:p

http://www.survivaloutdoorskills.com...keys-SMALL.jpg

It seems Delphi doesn't want her shows reposted at venues allowing (most of the time...) free & uncensored discussion re her (s.hoax re-bunking) shows any more. :rolleyes:

Check link for 8+ comments,
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/04/...-20150418.html

Recall, comments at her sites are very much censored. From now on, hers are the only sites where her shows & dedicated comment threads will be posted. Telling...

Quote:

---

Spingola Speaks 2015.04.18

Victor Fletcher of the Toronto Street News

NB: This is the last Spingola weekend show that I post as per her request. This also applies to all the weekday shows that WHOOLI has been posting.

---

Pretty good show above btw; another zio-persecuted Canuck. A music snafu around the middle drives Delphi nuts. :D

Uh bowee... :rolleyes:

plus, a retread of Delphi's 12/14/14 Sandy Hoax Re-Bunker Shill-A-Thon.

don't miss the mami's 16 (and growing) comments; I've posted there as 'zeetip'.

Quote:

---

Spingola and Friends 4/20/2015

http://antinwo.com/files/Deanna%20Spingola%202.jpg

Note from Deanna: I have reconsidered my stance about the posting of my programs at Mami's site. I have never run from a fight and recognize that my previous request to Mami's might appear as a surrender on my part. I believe in free speech including the speech of those who disagree with me. I recognize that Mami's posts shows that cover various subjects that may not appeal to everyone. It is like a cafeteria where one may select according to their interests or beliefs.

C. W. Wade of Sandy Hook Facts and journalist, Keith Johnson joined Deanna on December 14, 2014. Today's program is a replay of that very informative RBN program. Read Deanna’s critique of Sofia Smallstorm’s video and notes on Wolfgang Halbig. People can easily ascertain that the Sandy Hook Hoax ~ Walking In Circles Around Sandy Hook Firehouse is a looped video. View the repetitive motion of the silver vehicle in the upper left-hand corner of the video from 1:13-1:32, 2:40-2:50, 4:13-4:23, 4:52-5:02, 5:07-5:18, and 5:27-6:14 minutes. This program was originally aired at RBN and then edited to exclude the commercial breaks resulting in a program that lasted 2 hours and 5 minutes. To listen to the last five minutes which has some very good information about censorship click this link (MP3). Sandy Hook Analysis, Newtown Post-Examiner, Sandy Hook Lighthouse People have asked Deanna if she would have allowed her daughter to lay in a pool of blood for sixteen hours. She answered that question in this show.

Show-page

Download





Posted by WHOOLI at 3:59 PM 16 comments:

---

Quote:

---

one may select according to their interests or beliefs

---

Not truth then.

Another 10 comment thread about Deanna - will it ever end. This time ZAPOPER (a Mami's moderator) is praising Deanna for her "research" and chiding all the "hoaxers" as being twerps who sit in front of a PC but won't go do any real "research". He offers thanks to Deanna for her valiant and valuable "work".

I can't bring myself to listen to her anymore - has anyone (PatColo?) bothered to listen to that show? I am guessing that her "research" is reading government reports, not in going there and actually interviewing and recording any impartial witnesses. Of course, she dismisses the "boy who died twice" as a mere ploy by the press to goad hoaxers so as to divert attention away from the dangers of prescribing drugs to children.

If anyone here has plodded through it all, what does her "research" consist of, besides "government" reports and documents? If she has any "research" about the "boy who died twice", now that would be something I'd want to look at.

Jerrylynnb: yeah I heard her last 2 SHoax shows... the replay of the 12/14/14 show, I heard when it was fresh, but have no desire to hear that tag-team SHoax rebunking show again!

Her "research" definitely relies most heavily on the zion.gov "report", but other anomalies, like the SH property records, and the internet traffic to SHES ceasing completely in 2008, she just cites a hodge podge of implausible "explanations." :(

here's one I won't be listening to; as KJohnstein is prolly the most odious of the S.Hoax rebunkers... just documenting here for posterity.

Spingola and Friends 4/30/2015

Keith Johnson of the Newtown Post-Examiner talks about the Sandy Hook hoaxers in general and about his recently-released videos, Wolfgang Halbig's FOIA "Security System" Blunder! and Sandy Hook: Wolfgang Halbig's Far Away Eyes, both part of his WOLFgang Watch series. One might even refer to Wolfgang Halbig as the High Priest of the Hoaxer movement. He is certainly taking the focus off of the real victims.

Show-pagewww.spingola.comAdolf Hitler Mega-postThe Holocaust Mega-postThe New Babylon - PDFWho Controls America?Download Posted by WHOOLI at 8:46 PM No comments:

I have gotten a gristle stuck in my craw over "the boy who died twice", and I did a quick google about it, but came up very disappointed. There were some hits back in January, and some real hard hitting, outspoken, criticism that this anomaly seems to have been swept under the rug. But it seems little follow up, and, like the posters I found, I am irate about that also.

Some suggested that the photo was of a boy named Kevin, taken six years earlier, and only used like a model from a pool of photogenic children whenever it would be needed by the press (in other words, the photo is NOT of one "Noah Pozner" at all, but a child model from six years earlier). The second showing of that photo, in Pakistan (as one of the victims in that "shooting"), was such a blunder that it SHOULD be cause for concern for all Sandy Hook skeptics, but it seems it hasn't gotten much traction. The BBC, and the international branch of the New York Times, which reproduced the photo also, only state that it appears to have been used "elsewhere", with no further explanation.

DUH!

I would have expected the REAL parents of whoever that child is in the photo, to have filed a massive lawsuit, at least against the BBC and the newspaper, for slander. Something is really amiss in the land when something so blatant as this just slides right on by and little is said, or done, about it. Deanna is satisfied with her theory that the BBC and that newspaper did it on purpose to fan the flames of Sandy Hook hoaxers so as to draw attention away from the dangers involved with prescribing strong medicines to children (the alleged shooter, Adam Lanza, allegedly took strong prescriptions and went berserk because of it). So Deanna sees no reason to investigate this any further, since this unlikely theory she embraces compliments her pet theory about the government's Sandy Hook reports being spot-on, believable, and the end-all, be-all, god's truth.

If anyone has any updated information about the boy in that photo, and any well-researched (not mere speculation) evidence as to who he really is (or was), and the details, please advise - this could break the Sandy Hook hoax wide open if someone could positively identify the boy in that photo as being someone other than Noah Pozner, and having been a child model or in some such business. This shouldn't be that hard to confirm, or deny, and it leaves me miffed that this clear case, on which Sandy Hook pivots, gets little or no attention.

"If anyone has any updated information about the boy in that photo, and any well-researched (not mere speculation) evidence as to who he really is (or was), and the details, please advise - this could break the Sandy Hook hoax wide open if someone could positively identify the boy in that photo as being someone other than Noah Pozner, and having been a child model or in some such business. This shouldn't be that hard to confirm, or deny, and it leaves me miffed that this clear case, on which Sandy Hook pivots, gets little or no attention. "

Jerrylynnb, I appreciate and agree with most of your great comment.

I have studied Sandy Hook but only moderately compared to the amount of study I gave to 9-11 and one aspect of Boston Marathon Bombing.

MemoryHoleBlog of Professor James Tracy has a search facility so I would search for good up-to-date information about by doing a search there. Also the folks who did the famous video "We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook" have a website where you might also find more good info about "Noah Pozner."

One important fact about Noah is that he appears as an older live version of Noah when he was singing at that national sports event (Super Bowl?) where the Sandy Hook School singing group traveled to the event. There are several videos on YT that show photos of these children who sang at the sports event and several of these children appear to be older versions of several of the children that were said to have been killed at the Sandy Hook event.

"this could break the Sandy Hook hoax wide open if someone could positively identify the boy"

The problem is that we can't "positively identify" a whole host of players in almost all of these false events that happened on U.S. soil in the last 25 years, not only the people said to have been killed but the parents and relatives said to be related to the people killed.

Another thing is that there are many problems with videographic and photographic records of these events, the ones we the people are allowed to see as well as the records we thing ought to be available somewhere but are closed off to us.

It is even possible that some of the photos we see are composits with parts of someone's face with other parts from someone else's face. Just sayin' Not sure of anything.

"This shouldn't be that hard to confirm, or deny, and it leaves me miffed that this clear case, on which Sandy Hook pivots, gets little or no attention. "

It IS that hard to confirm. As stated earlier we do not have any way of prositively confirming if someone is a real person and whether that real person is living or dead. We have things like the Social Security Deceased Index but that is a private data base and it is only as good as the data it gets from the government.

This matter is not something I would call the " clear case, on which Sandy Hook pivots". The case of Noah Pozner is of that CATEGORY of issues that is indeed crucial to breaking open the Sandy Hook hoax.

Every time I or others try to search around of the web and find out anything about where a parent is now or anything about one of the "victims" everything just ends up in a meaningless rabbit trail. NOTHING pans out. Nothing makes sense in all the info we discover.

Thanks, Daschie, I hadn't considered the idea of that photo being a photoshopped composite - not a real boy at all. I am not an expert at photoshop, but I have dabbled enough to know that you can actually create a edited version of one or more photos and there are tools to smooth out even single pixel sized telltale signs of editing, so that it would be undetectable as being an edited composite - provided you "flatten" all the "layers" before publishing your final jpg (which the photoeditors of Obama's fake birth certificate 'forgot' to do - remember that?). This option just blows away any hope of getting to the bottom of it, as far as that photo is concerned, and I don't know how anyone (besides the photoeditor and his employer) would ever know.

The reason I focused in on that one photo ("Noah Pozner", allegedly) is because that same photo was used two years later in an alleged Pakistani "shooting". So, unlike the other photos, we have here a case where we know for a fact that somebody, somewhere, in at least one of those two cases (Sandy Hook vs. Pakitan) hoaxed it (or committed a sloppy bumbling "mistake").

Knowing for sure that one or the other, OR BOTH, used a phony photo, and then not seeing the error exposed for all to see, makes me doubt both episodes. I would expect that the one which is true (if either one is), would insist on having the other one prosecuted in a very loudly publicized manner.

That ain't happening, so I got doubts about both episodes.

That is what I was thinking when I described that photo as being "pivotal" - it is the only one that is factually known to have been a phony at least once, so one can reasonably suspect this photo was up for grabs whenever the press needed a photo of a six year old boy for publication for whatever reason.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

here's one I won't be listening to; as KJohnstein is prolly the most odious of the S.Hoax rebunkers... just documenting here for posterity.

Spingola and Friends 4/30/2015

---

after sitting at Mamis for about 24 hours with no comments, this has begun to percolate, with Delphi participating, debasing her cred further, and getting slammed. check it out: 12 comments: