-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
It's time to collect.
For them, for all those Americans who were cheated and whose lives were truncated.
Sounds good but if anyone was cheated then it is incumbent upon them to find their own relief. I suspect nobody has been cheated simply because they chose limited liability as their course rather than full responsibility.
Is an action ever founded on the basis that that the one you are taking action for was stupid? Who appointed you as guardian in such a case?
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ziero0
Sounds good but if anyone was cheated then it is incumbent upon them to find their own relief. I suspect nobody has been cheated simply because they chose limited liability as their course rather than full responsibility.
Is an action ever founded on the basis that that the one you are taking action for was stupid? Who appointed you as guardian in such a case?
I would say those who set up the rules to begin The United States of America.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
I would say those who set up the rules to begin The United States of America.
When it comes to the practice of shearing sheep I am as inclined to blame the sheep for growing wool as the guy who takes it upon himself to clip it. Without the concept of 'TRUTH' there can be concept of 'FALSE'. Without 'GOOD' there can be no 'EVIL'.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ziero0
Sounds good but if anyone was cheated then it is incumbent upon them to find their own relief. I suspect nobody has been cheated simply because they chose limited liability as their course rather than full responsibility.
Is an action ever founded on the basis that that the one you are taking action for was stupid? Who appointed you as guardian in such a case?
I rather doubt the sheep knew there was a choice.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
I rather doubt the sheep knew there was a choice.
Yes. That is why they are sheep and not wolves.
Now if they had the ability to imagine themselves as wolves the story might be different.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
17 hrs ·
No Hate or Fear Mongering Here
I don't hate monger or fear monger. I don't feel either one of those emotions and it is certainly not my intention to engender them.
My point is to wake people up.
They have fallen asleep on a railroad track, so the fear in the situation isn't caused by me grabbing them by the shoulder and saying. "Hey, Buddy, you gotta move!"
The fear is caused by the approaching train and the whistle blowing in the background.
Many people--millions of people worldwide-- are hearing what I am saying, but they are suffering cognitive dissonance.
I am telling them that they have to reclaim their Good Name and estate and have to declare their political status on the public record to protect themselves and their assets--- and they say, "What? I am Jane Marie Parker, an American from Point Hope, Indiana. Isn't that self-evident???"
It should be, but it is not. Others have made sure to muddy the water, so that they can take advantage of you and steal from you, Jane Marie.
They say you are a different Jane Marie Parker, one born in the British Territorial "State of Indiana".
According to their Master File, you make your living peddling drugs. If that's not you, you have to get evidence of who you really are on the Public Record.
And yes, you do need to wake up and do the paperwork and educate yourself and get off the railroad track. Or these criminals and liars and thieves will happily prosecute you as a criminal.
Then stand there when they are caught and say, "Oops! I made a mistake!"
See how they are working it? The pot always calls the kettle black. They are criminals so they accuse you of being a criminal. And they concoct evidence against you the better to grease their scam.
I tell people, hey, you have to get busy and self-govern. You have to organize your own Jural Assemblies and operate your own separate land jurisdiction court system.
They look at me and say, "I am already paying through the nose for those government services! Why should I have to volunteer and organize Jural Assemblies and volunteer to serve and provide another whole court system on top of what we've already got? We have too many lawyers and statutes already!"
Understandably, they are incredulous and not happy, but-- hear that train whistle? It is getting closer.
All those courts you are paying for aren't your courts. They are the King's courts.
And that "United States" they are talking about? That's not your "United States" either.
What? What! What???
It's all hidden in plain view. I have explained it until I am blue. The Brits acted in Breach of Trust, commandeered the so-called federal government under conditions of fraud and deceit 150 years ago, and have been bilking and abusing Americans ever since.
And now they say that you abandoned your estate and that it is fair game for their creditors to come collect against you and your assets.
After all, you just voluntarily donated all your assets, even your name to QE II, didn't you?
Well, if not, it's time to speak up.
Entire Counties in this country are tagged for sale as "real estate". You know what "real estate" is? It's "royal estate"--property belonging to the British King.
And you? You are all deemed to be sharecroppers, mere feudal tenants living on the King's land, ready to be evicted under Color of Law when his creditors show up on your doorsteps.
There's a train coming and you are still standing there in the middle of the tracks, disoriented, wondering what to do.
Our legal team is running full out, doing all that they can do to protect everyone. But you do have to wake up. Because you are still standing on the railroad tracks.
You have to get your own paperwork on the record as evidence countering their false claims and presumptions.
You have to organize your own lawful land jurisdiction courts so that you have the means to arrest and try these criminals.
Some of our guys jumped the train and pulled the brake switch. Hear all that screeching? That's the sound of the guilty banks howling.
The Big Sting isn't going as planned.
But there are still millions of people in harm's way. And these venal foreign courts are still operating on our shores.
And you are still on the tracks being "mistaken" for a British Territorial Citizen, an "inhabitant", a "dependent", a "resident", a "person", a "volunteer"--- anything and everything but a living breathing American, one of the free, sovereign and independent people owed every square centimeter of this country.
That's the one thing you are not being labeled as: an American.
So you have to label yourself, Jane Marie. Like this:
Say it loud and strong: "Exempt. Unincorporated. American."
Not real estate. Land. My land and soil. Not the Queen's. Not the Pope's. Not anything subject to the Territorial United States or the District of Columbia or any corporation anywhere.
I am a private "person" and this is "private property" and I will ream anyone who says anything otherwise. And no, it is not mortgaged. I am very much alive.
Did you all hear that loud and clear? Alive. Not decedent. Not incompetent. Here in the flesh.
This is an American State not a British "Commonwealth".
If I wanted to be a Communist, I'd move to China, thank you.
And I am not a resident. Not an inhabitant. I am Native to this country and my State of the Union. I am not a Territorial or Municipal Citizen.
I am not registered to vote. I am a Sovereign body politic elector.
I am not a volunteer in the British Merchant Marine Service, not a voluntary "Taxpayer", not a Withholding Agent, either.
I enrolled in Social Security by mistake, based on false information given to me by undeclared foreign agents.
I am retired from any and all federal service whatsoever. I waive all benefits.
I simply require the return of everything that was purloined from me under conditions of fraud and deceit.
My Indemnity Bond is posted and my Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act Notice is recorded.
I own my own name and all variations of it.
And if any Prosecutor wants to address me, he'd better address my Proper Name and he had better have evidence of authority to address me and he had better have his bonds in place because I am going to take him to task.
And whip his butt bloody from here to Texas.
Yours truly,
Jane Marie Parker, born July 11, 1975, Point Hope, Indiana, United States of America (Unincorporated)
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
16 hrs ·
Get It Together, People
I can't believe some of the nonsense I am hearing. Cart in front of the horse doesn't begin to describe it.
For beginners, people living as British Territorial "inhabitants" have no standing, right, or power to organize anything pretending to represent this country.
We are here, present, acting for ourselves now.
No "representatives" needed, thanks.
This is the reason why you all have to make your declarations of political status and move your Good Name back onto the land jurisdiction of this country officially BEFORE you can set up and operate a lawful Jural Assembly.
British Territorial "inhabitants" function as "persons" and when they set up a court they act as a "Jural Society". Okay? Two different groups, two different political statuses, two different jurisdictions.
They occupy a part of the sea jurisdiction and the rest of us, the "people" as opposed to the "persons" occupy the land.
Without land, you don't have a country.
Without a country, you have nothing to stand upon, therefore, you have "no standing".
Without land, you are just a "legal fiction entity"--- a "person", a business, a THING -- with no port to call home, no Public Law, and no way to operate effectively in your own best interest.
There is no such thing as "Nation States" as in "Nation States Assembly" or "Congress" or anything of the sort. Never mentioned in any historical documents, no history, no standing to act for any State of the Union. Just something someone heard and misunderstood and then bulled ahead without thinking and tried to apply.
I cannot stress enough that there is a logic to everything.
There is a history to everything. And until you have it straight, you can't build a solid foundation to act upon.
International law is thousands of years old. It has its own conventions. It has definitions. A "nation" is not a "state, through several "nations" can occupy a "state" and we sometimes talk for convenience sake about nation-states, there is no such thing as a Nation State in international law and it is completely silly to think that you are going to found some new "Republic" on verbiage you pulled out of a hat and made up that has no history, no provenance, and no authority as a result.
In international law, it's first in time, first in line. The government of this country in international jurisdiction has been established for over 200 years and has never changed, never been affected by all the frou-frou-rah and changes and disasters of the so-called "Federal Government" which is a subservient government under contract to provide nineteen services as a subcontractor.
The "Federal Government" as is well-known operates under "Delegated Powers" --- well, folks, who or what do you think "delegated" those powers? And obviously, if there are "delegated powers", that implies that there are "non-delegated powers", too?
The entity that delegated those powers was The United States of America [Unincorporated] and when the subcontractors go tits up, as they just did, and we step forward to receive back our Delegated Powers as we just did--- guess what? By Operation of Law, the Delegated Powers return to us, not some new version of federal contractor that wants to get a new contract by assumption.
There is no way that some Johnny-come-lately cobbled together effort made by British Territorial Citizens dba "Republic" can "stand for" this country any longer. That part of our history and that kind of usurpation is over.
The actual living people who are not "persons" and not "citizens" of the watery realm have shown up and taken back their "delegated powers" and are here to conduct their own business.
We are not confused and we are not deceived. We don't mistake any foreign wannabe subcontractors for our own land jurisdiction government and we won't accept any more British or French cuckoo bird operations usurping against our actual government and pretending to "represent" us.
We woke up. All the way up. And now, Federales, you need to negotiate a new contract --- not try to bluff your way into usurping against our lawful government again.
The United States of America is the sovereign government of this country in international jurisdiction and it always has been and God-willing, it always will be. We operate as States populated by people, not as "States of States" inhabited by persons.
Furthermore, we are the ones who hold and are owed the credit side of the ledger --- the National Credit our country is owed. The "Federal" entities only have access to the debt side of the ledger and responsibility for paying the National debt.
So if you want to get through this and have jobs and be free of the debt, wake up!
We are your employers.
We have the money and credit to pay for your services and discharge your debts. All you can do is go ever more deeply into debt and keep on bankrupting yourselves in the vain hope of bankrupting your way to prosperity.
So thanks, but no thanks, Nathan. We figured out the schtick. Another version of the same old crap won't do.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ziero0
Yes. That is why they are sheep and not wolves.
Now if they had the ability to imagine themselves as wolves the story might be different.
Since you admit that the sheep were never given a choice, how can you claim they chose wrong?
I would say this is more illustrative of the malfeasance of the lieyers who knew the choices, but failed in their duty to educate and offer a choice.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
The Paperwork Debate
Incredibly, despite the actual experience of literally millions of Americans, there are still millions more who need to get the message.
These quasi-governments operating on our shores to provide "government services" are not Common Law entities so trying to do anything in Common Law has no effect. None. Writs bounce off. Rights are ignored.
You have all been kidnapped and shanghaied into a foreign jurisdiction with the result that none of these idealistic ideas about "Common Law" and individual rights or Constitutional guarantees apply.
Imagine being kidnapped and finding yourself aboard a Chinese fishing trawler where everyone speaks nothing but Chinese?
That's where we all start out-- in a completely foreign place operating under foreign commercial law and being forced to deal with foreign language.
The situation is only made worse because the foreign language is superficially similar to English and until we learn "Legalese" we are constantly at a disadvantage, because certain words no longer mean what we think they mean.
Who knew, for example, that the word "person" means "corporation"? So your "personal bank account" means "corporate bank account"?
Or that a "not guilty" plea means "guilty" by default? You need to enter a plea of "Innocent" if that's what you mean, but nobody on the opposing team of privateers is going to tell you that.
People who cannot or will not deal with the reality of this situation just get slaughtered by it. They are defenseless and unable to respond and have no evidence on the public record to back up their claims to be treated any differently or under any other law but commercial law.
This is all dictated by the registration of your name and the issuance of a Birth Certificate.
Unless you take steps as outlined to reclaim your own name and establish your permanent domicile on the land and soil of your birth state, you are at the mercy of these fiends and have no recourse.
And no right to participate in the land jurisdiction government, either.
After all, what right does a Chinese fisherman have to serve on an American Jury?
People have got to wake up, face facts, and deal with them. All this airy-fairy 'what I was taught in grade school' and the 'Bible is my defense' stuff does not work against these animals in suits.
They will be quick to prosecute anyone mis-identified as "one of theirs"--- look at what happened to Schaefer Cox and the Colorado Nine?
Even after you do the paperwork, you have to learn how to use it and bring it into evidence and shove it down their throats. These people make their livings off of preying upon defenseless Americans and they don't go down easily. The only thing they are really afraid of is exposure.
They are afraid of having a lot of people know what they are doing and how they are doing it and that is about the only thing they are afraid of.
Which means that all Americans need to wise up. All Americans need to record their actual political status and domicile. All Americans need to push back and getting their own paperwork in order is Job One to be able to do that.
So enough of the "debate" over whether or not you "have to" correct the public record and declare your political status as an American. If you have been issued a British Territorial Birth Certificate there is absolutely no doubt that yes, you do need to record your actual political status on the public record.
Besides, unless you are a Brit trying to infiltrate and otherwise mess up the American Jural Assembly process, why would you have any objection to declaring your political status and nationality as an American?
Why, in God's name, would any American prefer to have the same political status as a Puerto Rican? Especially now that Puerto Rico is bankrupt and at the mercy of Secondary Creditors of the Queen?
Wake up and listen to what I am telling you all--- and get moving. Get your paperwork on the public record so that you have evidence of your claim and stop milling like cattle in a feed lot.
You already know for sure what happens to cattle in a feed lot and I should not have to say one more word.
The paperwork is necessary and the paperwork is only "First Base". Once that is done you have a lot more work to do to educate yourselves and get in position to blow these British Privateers out of the water.
It may well be a daunting task, but it is still a task that has to be done. So buck up and do it. Those of you who have talent for pushing paper, help the others. There is safety in numbers, so the more people you can get on the public record as Americans, the more on your side of the fence.
And the fewer "British inhabitants" there are. Kill them off the same way they have offered to kill you ---- on paper
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·
For the General Staff About Nathan Rothschild:
There are some of you who were very relieved when Nathan Rothschild stepped forward and agreed to front the expenses for the Scottish Interlopers doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LLC.
You were duped into believing that this country was bankrupt and that you had to go lick his boots for funding to "defend" America.
Not so. Mr. Rothschild and the European banking community as a whole are in fact our greatest debtors and owe the most money to this country, and to our lawful government, The United States of America [Unincorporated].
What they are offering is to give you some of our money at interest and let you work for them, instead of us.
Uh-duh.
Did all your mothers drop you on your heads? Simultaneously? Or are you simply traitors in American uniforms?
What should be happening is that you should be pressing Rothschild out of his ill-gotten "middleman" position and forcing him to not only make our American assets available to the actual American Government --- The United States of America [Unincorporated]--- but also make arrangements to start paying back what he owes us and has owed us since 1840.
Furthermore, even if it means "picking shit with the chickens" for a while, no officer in our military should ever agree to place yourselves or our Armed Forces under the thumb and forefinger of any foreign power, much less a foreign banker loyal to a Queen who is in flagrant Breach of Trust and busily defrauding Americans both at home and abroad.
We do not agree to contract with any of the Rothschild interests, British or French, which means that any money they use to support either "The Republic" which I more correctly call "Le Republique" or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LLC from Scotland, had better be their own money and not one penny of ours or any penny derived from our assets.
You should all be most anxious to bust loose our assets which are being unjustifiably and illegally held captive by the same bankers who are trying to seduce you into working for them instead of the American States and People.
Anything less on your parts would be disloyalty to the American States and People, which in our book, counts as mutiny and treason against the sovereign States of the Union.
We will also point out that as our Delegated Powers have returned to us via Operation of Law, you need to get a new contract from us to provide us with military services and absent that, you have no jobs.
We will have to hire other military service providers if you don't get your tails in a knot and go get our assets back from the Queen and these endlessly crafty bankers.
You have thirty (30) days to:
(a) negotiate a new service contract with us;
(b) at our direction and with our help reopen our asset accounts in this country; and
(c) get your heads out of your asses.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·
About Federal Code....
The first thing every American has to know about Federal Code is that only about 10% of all the Federal Code--- only those General Session Laws posted in the Federal Register -- ever applied to us.
The rest is and always was just internal rules and rule-making for federal employees and dependents.
The second thing that every American needs to know is that the "Revised United States Statutes" that would have applied to us were never in fact adopted or "revised" because neither the Territorial Congress nor the Municipal Congress had authority to "revise" anything done by our actual Federal Congress prior to 1860. So the old "unrevised" Federal US Statutes-at-Large still stand.
The third thing every American needs to know is the organization that promoted and developed all the rest of the Federal Code structure from 1860 to 1999, went totally out of business when its bankruptcy settled November 7, 1999, and all those rules --- all fifty (50) "Titles" worth --- became "discretionary" -- that is, something that federal employees are taught as standards, but not obligatory.
The fourth thing that every American needs to know is that you look like complete idiots when you go around quoting these defunct federal rules and codes. Why? Because you are like Dutchmen lecturing Australian Aborigines about their own history, and they could care less.
Just stop.
These people are your employees and that is what you need to drum into their thick, thick, thick heads.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
The first thing every American has to know about Federal Code is that only about 10% of all the Federal Code--- only those General Session Laws posted in the Federal Register -- ever applied to us.
Is that a fact?
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ziero0
Is that a fact?
I would say it is a generality like how much is ten percent? Or is it 10.4562390%?
Otherwise I would say it is true.
Most of the US Code is private contract law.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
I would say it is true.
In the field of Justice it seems there are only two item of interest. One is Law. The other is Fact. Ignorance of Law is not a defense since ignorance of law, consists in the want of knowledge of those laws which it is our duty to understand, and which every man is presumed to know.. Ignorance of a Fact is not a crime. Moreover ignorance of a Fact is the want of knowledge as to the fact in question. It would be an error resulting from ignorance of a fact, if a man believed a certain woman to be unmarried and free, when in fact, she was a married woman; and were he to marry her under that belief, he would not be criminally responsible. Ignorance of the laws of a foreign government, or of another state; is ignorance of a fact.
Now that a background has been established I would ask again: Is the Federal Code a Fact?
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
I would say, that the above depends on being a person as defined by the US Code.
When someone else defines the terms, you have already lost.
I don't volunteer.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
When someone else defines the terms, you have already lost.
What is there to win? Define 'lost'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
I don't KNOW.
I fixed it for you.
It is understanding that is voluntary. When you cease striving to understand then what you know will be without understanding.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ziero0
What is there to win? Define 'lost'.
I fixed it for you.
It is understanding that is voluntary. When you cease striving to understand then what you know will be without understanding.
Still defining the terms I see. I understand you are lost.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
Still defining the terms I see.
Don't you believe a better approach would be to define these terms before you actually use them?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
I understand you are lost.
I know you could do better than regurgitating Reitz articles. Her agenda hasn't been established. Do you have any original thoughts?
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Why would I use your terms?
I believe the agenda began with The Declaration of Independence.
And those terms are well defined.
If they are good enough for Anna they are good enough for me.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
Why would I use your terms?
Just 'cause you have none of your own?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
I believe the agenda began with The Declaration of Independence.
Perhaps it began sooner with the circumstances that led up to the Declaration of Independence? You might look at the ethnic mix of people in the New England area. The Irish have always been at odds with the English and if not the English then anyone who would care to exchange blows.
Merchants routinely adulterated liquor during that period. If it didn't kill you it made you irrational.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
And those terms are well defined.
If this were 1776 you would likely be correct. The Public Fool system has been successful in modifying the English language. That is why you need to nail down the definition of words before you rely upon them.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
17 hrs ·
Helpful Analogies for President Trump and the General Staff
Imagine a checkerboard. Everyone knows it is called a "checkerboard" and that a game called "Checkers" is played on it, but, the same board can also be used to play another game, called "Chess".
Now imagine that for some reason, you have been confused all your life about which game is which, and when someone wants to play "Checkers" you bring out the Chess pieces, and when someone wants to play "Chess" you bring out the Checkers pieces.
That's the kind of confusion that has had our government running amok for 150 years. It's the same gameboard, but.....
Now imagine that there is a 30 story office building, and the first eighteen floors are serviced by one set of elevators, and the floors 19 through 30 are serviced by another set of elevators.
If you work on any of the floors numbered 1-18 you always use the elevators on the left, and if you work on the floors numbered 19-30, you always use the elevators on the right. Now pretend that for some reason nobody ever crosses over, the people from floors 1-18 never visit floors 19-30, and vice versa.
That's the way the Office of the President is. Mr. Trump can function on Floors 1-18 or he can put on another hat and function on Floors 19-30. But, if he wants to, if he is wise, he can access all 30 floors simply by using both sets of elevators.
This is the kind of barrier that has kept generations of American Presidents from accessing and exercising the full range of powers available to them.
Now imagine that all your employer's actual physical assets are on Special Deposit in Bank A and all your paper debts and loans are lodged with Bank B.
Now pretend that Bank A decides to steal your employer's assets by deceit and colludes with Bank B in this endeavor, so that Bank B calls in your loans while Bank A makes up excuses for not giving your employers access to their own assets-- rendering your employers unable to pay you, and you unable to pay your debt to Bank B.
This situation then gives the false appearance that both you and your employers are insolvent debtors and forces your company into bankruptcy, whereupon "Bankruptcy Trustees" assigned by Bank B take over control of your operations and further pillage and control your operations for the benefit of Bank B while Bank A gleefully sits on the sidelines and makes use of your employers' gold, silver, and other actual assets to benefit itself.
This is, of course, criminal activity on the part of both banks and they should both be addressed as crime syndicates, placed under new management or liquidated.
However, bringing them to justice at your current level of operations is impossible, because you are operating as an incorporated entity--- and as a bankrupt corporation at that.
Even if you boot up a new corporation, it has no new assets to operate upon, so has to borrow from Bank C to get a foothold and is in debt from Day One. And the leadership of the new corporation is still stuck dealing with the bankruptcy of the old corporation and its trustees.
Sound familiar?
So why are you operating as incorporated entities at all?
By working with the actual States and People that you are supposed to be working for instead of dealing with crooked bankers who are playing both ends against the middle, you can operate in unincorporated (sovereign) capacity, and solve the problem.
Arrest the criminals at Bank A and either liquidate their corporation or place it under new management, and thereby expedite your employer's access to their own assets.
Your employer's assets--- which are actual gold and silver and gems, not airy-fairy stuff made of paper, are now accessible ---or to use banker jargon, are "recallable" as a result.
Your actual employers then pay off any actual and valid debts owed to the criminals at Bank B, and send their odious bankruptcy trustees packing.
We, the unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America, have the absolute right under international law to regulate and control all foreign banks operating on our shores and also any banks that are chartered or asset-backed under our delegated authority.
That means just about all of them are at our mercy and either belong to us outright or are subject to us when we put on our Come to Jesus hat.
With the return of the Delegated Powers, The United States of America [Unincorporated] is in direct control of commercial banks and corporations on our shores. And we have the right to liquidate any bank, any corporation, any agency run as a corporation, that is being operated in any unlawful or criminal manner at all.
This means the Federal Reserve, this means the IRS, this means the BLM, this means Target, this means General Electric--- all corporations are subject to us and if they are operated by criminals for criminal purposes, it does not matter how large, how old, how necessary or how powerful they may be.
All these corporations are nothing but a group of people, assets, and some paper organized to provide a lawful product or service.
If they are being misdirected by criminals and operating in a criminal or harmful fashion detrimental to the States and People of this country, the criminals need to be removed and new managers put in place. If a corporation continues a pattern of criminal mismanagement it needs to be liquidated, its assets sold off to satisfy its victims and its stockholders --- in that order.
When corporations harm our States and our People, we pull their charters, arrest their officers, and seize their assets.
This is as true of the banks as it is for any other corporation.
There may be fears that this is "bad for business", but in the end --- as Iceland proves -- it is far better for business when people know that they can depend on the banks to be run honestly and depend on the government of this country to protect their assets against criminals in suits.
So, come on up to the 19th Floor, Mr. Trump. Bring Joe Dunford with you
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
10 mins ·
More Pollocks Needed
Let's start with the Polish farmer's answer --- "I have ten daughters. You can't scare me."
But let's also admit that being Grandma for the whole world --- more than 200 children calling themselves "countries" --- is a scary proposition.
A carpenter views the world in terms of hammer and nails. A doctor views it in terms of disease and health. A Grandma views it in terms of children.
As any parent who has had to deal with more than one child at once can confirm, the first thing you notice is what?
Oh, they are all different.
The second thing is?
They all have their own needs.
The third thing is?
I don't have all the answers or talents or materials to fulfill all these needs.
That pretty much sums up the parent's dilemma worldwide and at all scales, including being Grandma to the whole world.
Now, this may sound odd, but I view war as an attention-seeking behavior.
When I look at history and spin the globe, I see it in terms of erring children trying to get their share.
Let's look at the countries that have started the most wars, shall we? They fall into two groups: those that are small and embattled and don't have enough resources, and those that are large and rich in natural resources, but lacking natural borders.
As representatives of the first group we have England, Israel, and Japan.
England and Japan are small island nations surrounded by the sea, lacking enough arable ground and other materials to sustain themselves without trade. Israel is also small and lacking sufficient natural resources, only instead of being surrounded by the sea, it is surrounded by hostile neighbors. Yikes!
In the second group we have the examples of Germany and the Congo in central Africa. These are relatively large and resource-rich nations, but they have amorphous arbitrary borders and a long history of contracting and expanding like amoebas, causing bloodshed as they do so.
Often, the neediest children in a family are the oldest, and as a result, they are the most likely to give into attention-seeking behavior, just when the embattled parent is most depending on them. They also become experts at quid pro quo bargaining.
"Ah, Mom, I helped you get the three younger kids on the bus, fed the dogs, raked the yard, and took Aunt Sue to her doctor's appointment..... now, about that new saxophone....."
It's the same way with countries. Dealing with the old monarchies of Europe is very much like bargaining with an oldest daughter over a Prom Dress.
If we want to avoid war, we need to deal with these realities. We need to make sure that Israel, England, and Japan can live comfortably without starting a war. We need to help countries like Germany and the Congo to feel safe and complete within their borders.
In Asia and Africa, where the actual oldest countries are, it's different because a different level of maturity has been reached. The hard edges of need and ego have been buffed and rounded.
These countries know who they are, know who their neighbors are, know what their challenges are, are confident in their abilities, know their limitations, and contribute as adults.
They are hard to provoke into a war for the same reason that a forty year-old is less volatile than a teenager, but if they go to war, they are far more dangerous because they aren't doing it to get attention or to create a deal-making situation to get their needs met.
They are doing it to kill or be killed. This is why tiny Vietnam could stymie France and bring the U.S. to a standstill.
So it is four o'clock in the morning.... somewhere in my memory, I am aware that it is time to get up and feed the cows. My dog is hopeful, trying to convince me that he is a cow. I am shaking my head and thinking about Poland.
Poland, like Germany, has no natural borders to speak of. Like Germany, Poland's historical borders have shifted and re-shuffled many times. Unlike Germany, Poland has an admirable record of keeping the peace. Why?
Like the middle child, Poland has to shoulder in between Germany and Russia and make sense of it all, and Poland does that.
Germany may be brilliant, but Poland is wise.
Russia may have all the latest tech, but Poland knows the value of a good outhouse.
At the end of the day, a little vodka and some polka music makes the world a better place.
Me thinks we could all learn a lot from the Pollocks about what is truly valuable and how to keep the peace.
So, I have ten daughters, a herd of cows, and slightly more than 200 countries to feed and care for. And yes, it is still dark every morning when I get up.
I am looking for a few good Pollocks to help me out here.
We need peacekeepers who are comfortable with being at peace, self-sufficient, self-respecting, and willing to nurture the rest of the world because they come from a position of inner strength. We need to observe and learn from all the people and countries that keep the peace and who value peace, because it is not enough to enshrine peace as some airy-fairy ideal.
The time has come to make peace a living, breathing reality, and not be distracted from the goal just because a queen or emperor has an ego-driven meltdown or a neighboring country can't pay its gas bill.
When the small and vulnerable countries throw tantrums, we need to recognize their needs the same way we recognize it when a baby needs changing. When one of the larger "border-less" countries gets confused, we need to help them find workable definitions the same way we help teenagers find their identity.
Through it all we need to act as a family and be aware that we are part of a family -- the family of Mankind. Just step back for a moment and view the world as a Grandmother.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
October 23 at 8:27 AM ·
Abel Danger to the Rescue
For all those who desperately need to know this, there really ARE heroes out there leading the fight for sanity, safety, health, accountable government, and the American Way. Meet Field McConnell and Abel Danger.
This is for all you guys out there who realize that America and the rest of the world have fallen into really deep Kim Chee and who are frustrated by all the legal battles and historical recaps and can't-do-anything-about-it news. Here is where the pedal hits the metal:
SERCO: why is a British conglomerate acting as the Paymaster for our military?
Senior Executive Service? --- The Grand-Daddy of all the unaccountable agencies within agencies exposed at last.
Benghazi ---- you want the real poop? Well, here it is.
Begin with visiting the website: http://www.abeldanger.org
Then sample the vast video archive of over 900 radio shows: Cloud Centric (C2) Crime Scene Investigation
Then kick back and listen to Field's annual addresses straight to you from Canton, Texas, Van Zandt County Veterans Memorial:
2012
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJEXAS_8DCY&t=107s
2013:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NGIFwDTjNw&t=162s
2014:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov92Fi9NHT4
Then learn about the assassination of Pat Tillman and 38 others aboard Extortion 17:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L61UUaQ8n9w&t=5s
If all this evidence and reporting isn't enough to convince you, nothing ever will be enough.
While I and my Living Law Firm have been battling on our front, Abel Danger has been whooping up on another. And just like an Army in the field, we all need your insight, help and support to expose and combat the evils that oppress people worldwide.
I am often criticized because I don't get into political movements. Though it comes as a real jolt to most people, political parties were never part of our lawful government and still aren't. The so-called "Democratic Party" and "Republican Party" are professional lobbying organizations no different than the Tobacco Lobby, and just as corrupt.
So why support or get drawn into all that? Giving it a nice label and calling it a "Party" doesn't cover up the stench. A pig is a pig is a pig, isn't it?
But there are organizations that are worthwhile--- organizations that prevent nasty things from happening, organizations that help find and define solutions, organizations that seek out what is good for all Americans and all mankind. Abel Danger is one of them.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
22 hrs ·
The Accounting
For all the confused people out there:
An accounting ledger traditionally has two sides to it, a plus side, and a minus side.
For 150 years, without our knowledge or consent, the purported "Trustees" have had all American land, property, and assets sequestered and held in trust, accruing credit and interest and lease payments and fees and rents.
All that has been going onto the plus side of the ledger for the benefit of the American States and People ---- supposedly.
In actual fact, the American People were never told a word about this cozy arrangement, with the result that the Trustees (Queens, Kings, and Popes) were able to invest our assets "for" us and benefit themselves and their bankers via having access to this gigantic Slush Fund and control of all our assets.
They borrowed against all our assets and thus created obligations that they forced their own subjects --- the unwitting "U.S. Citizens"--- to pay off as franchise debts.
So, as you can now see, all the debts and costs have been accruing on the minus side of the accounting ledger, against all the "U.S. Citizens".
Americans = credit. U.S. Citizens = debt.
Of course, accidentally on purpose, we, the Americans, were all systematically mis-identified as "U.S. Citizens" and divested of our lawful inheritance and forced to go through an unmarked legal obstacle course to prove who we are and regain what was always rightfully ours.
All of this, everything we have suffered, is nothing but a gigantic Breach of Trust and Identity Theft swindle-- using a bogus accounting system, falsified public records, a rigged foreign court system, and private, foreign mercenaries operating under color of law to provide enforcement.
The bankers have sat in the middle and profited as middlemen, making sure that they had access to all our assets for their investment slush fund, and making it difficult nigh-unto-impossible for people to ever find their way "home" again and reclaim their estates.
What happens when you bring both sides of the ledger together?
The "U.S. National Debt" vanishes like a pfoof-tee in a high wind. It is literally nothing compared to what the Americans are owed.
And that puts an end to the "presumption" that we are bankrupt and that our service providers are bankrupt and also puts an end to U.S. receivership by "U.S. Bankruptcy Trustees" appointed by the guilty banks responsible for this situation.
We, the People, of The United States of America [Unincorporated] are richer than Midas, several times over. They, the "inhabitants" of the British Territorial United States and Municipal United States, are destitute.
And this is all arbitrary, the result of false accounting practices and deliberate self-interested falsification of public records.
Many banks have benefited themselves from this situation --- not just the Federal Reserve. The IMF has been on the receiving end, too. The World Bank. The IBRD. The BIS. J.P. Morgan. Citibank. Wells Fargo. Bank of America. Bank of England. Bank of Scotland. Parabas. UBS. The list goes on and on.
They all lined up at the trough, they all benefited themselves at our expense, they all conspired to rob us blind and leave us mis-characterized as destitute, endlessly indebted "U.S. Citizens". And at the end of the day, even that wasn't enough.
No, this time around, they planned to take it all, and "resettle" America, just as they resettled Ireland 150 years ago, using mercenaries from the Federal Agencies acting under color of law to displace and evict their clueless victims ---- over debts the victims never owed.
What we have done is to reclaim the American Credit side of the ledger and put the screws to these criminals. Now, acting as the Priority Creditors, we are waiting for Mr. Trump to bring us the debt side of the ledger. We will exercise our option to reconcile the books.
By law, we are owed our estates back, free and clear of debt or encumbrance compiled by secondary parties. See the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666, which is still standing and still part of the international probate code. See Article 9, Section 402, of the Uniform Commercial Code.
Not only are we owed back all of our actual factual assets and our Good Names free and clear, we are also owed 150 years worth of fees, leases, rents, accruals, insurance payments, labor contracts, and joint venture proceeds, plus interest.
Thanks to action taken by Living Law Firm members, all the assets of the Territorial and Municipal United States and the Federal State of State Trusts have been rolled over and under the protection of the sovereign unincorporated States.
Thanks to our Living Law Firm, the Constitutions are still in place, and the Queen and the Pope are still obligated, but no longer in control of our contracting process.
Thanks to our Living Law Firm, your lives and your property have been re-secured and returned safely to the land jurisdiction States. All you have to do is the paperwork to identify yourselves as Americans, native to your State of the Union.
Best of all, all our Delegated Powers have returned to our control by Operation of Law. That's the cherry on top of the whipped cream. We are free to determine our own future and enjoy our rightful place as a free and independent country.
It has only taken 242 years.
"But, but, but....don't we have to pay taxes to pay for all the public assistance and welfare and costs of government and the military and....."
No. Not anymore. A new way of financing government is being put into place, one that does not depend upon human trafficking, bogus accounting systems, identity theft, enslavement, or any other evil.
This will bring wonderful changes not only for America, but for the whole world. So, take a moment. Bow your heads. Listen carefully to the silence. The Great Fraud is ending as quietly as it began, with the shuffling of some words on paper, and the reconciliation of an accounting ledger.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
19 hrs ·
About Winston Shrout
So, WINSTON SHROUT was convicted of "income tax" offenses.
You can only be convicted of such offenses if you or your "vessels" owe such taxes--- right?
And no "vessel" permanently domiciled on the land and soil of an American State owes such taxes, because why?
Because all our taxes of every kind on all vessels whether trading vessels or commercial vessels are either tax exempt or tax pre-paid, a condition known as "tax percuse". So long as these "vessels" are operating as American vessels, they are safe.
It's only when these names can be mistaken as British Territorial or Municipal United States VESSELS that they can be taxed.
So---that in turn tells you that Winston never went through the process of reclaiming his Good Name and Estate and re-conveying them to the land and soil of the American State where he was actually born. He never recorded his claim to his own name and estate, or if he did, he didn't bring that recorded information forward to the District Attorney and others responsible----most particularly, the Clerk of Court.
If you have your paperwork in order and on the record and you look the Clerk in the eye and say, "You are operating under the 1933 Amendment to the Trading With the Enemy Act" that is as good as saying, "Caught you. Prove that I am an enemy combatant or yield."
But, Winston never re-flagged his "vessels" in international trade and commerce---- never permanently domiciled these NAMES on the land and soil of one of the sovereign States via a recorded claim presented to the Clerk of Court.
If he had recorded his Re-Conveyance and his Certificate of Assumed Name and his two Witnesses confirming that he was the "Winston Shrout" whose actual birth was recorded on the BC issued by the Territorial State of State --- that is, if he had proof that he was operating as an American Vessel/VESSEL --- their court couldn't say anything to him, much less accuse him of a foreign statutory crime or successfully try him.
From the above, he know that he was operating "WINSTON SHROUT" as a British Territorial Vessel belonging to the British Crown. And none of those vessels are tax pre-paid. All such "U.S. Citizens" operating under the "Diversity Clause" owe federal income taxes.
As a result, his remedies worked as long as the other Party was solvent. Once they declared bankruptcy, no Mutual Offset Credit Exchange was possible, because the bankrupt entity had no credit left to exchange. And as we all know, you can't bring claims against a bankrupt.
This is exactly the reason that I issued the Private Registered Indemnity Bond covering all the unincorporated States of the Union, so that people could switch from remedy based on Mutual Offset Credit Exchange to remedy based on making an insurance claim against the Underwriters of the bankrupt entities.
So --- Mistake Number One --- continuing to operate as a British Territorial Citizen and/or Municipal United States CITIZEN when you don't have to, and thereby subjecting your Name / NAME to their jurisdiction and having no evidence on the public record to counterclaim against their presumptions.
Mistake Number Two --- not claiming exemption and revoking "election" to pay federal income taxes BEFORE they bring their claims. Remember--- first in line, first in time. Hit them BEFORE they hit you.
Mistake Number Three -- continuing to use remedies that became "discretionary" for the Federales in 1999, and using these remedies even after the Federal entities are bankrupted.
Mistake Number Four -- not observing that these vermin are acting under the 1933 Amendment to the Trading With the Enemy Act and holding the actual Holder in Due Course as Surety for their debt, which is a securities fraud of very high order resulting in a war crime that carries a capital crime charge with it.
Read that, they can be hung for doing what they are doing.
It is called "salacious securities fraud with intent to foment sedition". Reduce that to plain English, they are setting up a situation where normal people will start to riot and hang the perpetrators in the streets.
Once you give them Notice of that fact and claim "Habeas Corpus -- deliver the body to me." they are also looking at civil fines described under 18 USC 472 and are in violation of UCC Article 9, Section 402, which clearly states that the Secured Party (the American) is not surety for the DEBTOR (the U.S. Citizen/ CITIZEN) entity.
So, bottom line, as usual, they convicted WINSTON, a Municipal franchise entity, not Winston, the man, and they have offered to incarcerate the man as "cargo" on the foreign Municipal United States VESSEL dba WINSTON SHROUT.
The man can counter-offer at any time, by going directly to the Clerk and the DA and delivering his demand. It's not as strong when he hasn't bothered to do his paperwork to reclaim his birthright political status, but they are still attempting to railroad him under the 1933 Amendment to the Trading with the Enemy Act, they still have no excuse for doing so, they are still subject to all the penalties once he calls them on it, and they are still committing securities fraud by holding the actual Holder in Due Course as surety for WINSTON's debts in violation of UCC 9-402.
WINSTON = "U.S. Citizen" = DEBTOR.
Winston = American (if he claims it properly) = Priority Creditor
We are closing in on the whole lash-up, so I don't expect that Winston or anyone else is going to be held for very much longer, with or without exercising their proper options and claims as Americans. We have returned all the State of State and STATE OF STATE and State Trusts to the control and ownership of the sovereign unincorporated States, so all this horse hooey based on similar names deceits is coming to an end.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
Common Sense 2018
Karen Hudes continues her Big Lie campaign and accuses me of being a "Vatican Agent" and says I "tried to steal" her precious Global Debt Facility a "fourth time".
In actual fact, I have never worked for the Vatican (only for the Pope in a private capacity as detailed in Disclosure 101).
And the only "stealing" that has gone on has been by the banks she works for.
Their theft of largely American and Jewish assets is what resulted in the existence of the "Global Debt Facility" in the first place.
The banks created the Global Debt Facility as a Dropbox for stolen loot. It is their attempt to wash their hands and avoid culpability for having stolen goods in their possession ---- no different than a Pawn Shop owner who gets caught fencing stolen property.
Reclaiming property that belongs to Americans for the Americans from the banks that stole it from us in the first place isn't stealing. It's called asset recovery.
If you reclaim what is yours, is it stealing?
If America demands back what lawfully belongs to Americans who are heirs of the original owners, is that stealing?
The World Bank together with the Federal Reserve and the IBRD were the principal parties responsible for the Great Fraud, They all deserve to be liquidated and placed under completely new management.
And as for Karen the only whistle she is blowing is theirs. If you listen to that woman, you will believe that the banks are great philanthropists and that they just created the Global Debt Facility out of the goodness of their hearts.
If you listen to me, you will see that they are self-interested criminals trying to avoid their culpability for profiting from stolen goods.
Which story rings true in your experience?
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·
A Quick ReCap
In 1933 the vermin in the British Territorial United States Congress amended The Trading With the Enemy Act to include average Americans as "aliens" (which we are, thank God, with respect to their illegal and immoral corporate venture) and as possible "enemies". This gave them an excuse to seize all our assets and roll everything into trusts under The Office of the Alien Property Custodian.
The Territorial States of States "took title" to us and our lands and kept the equitable title to benefit themselves, and they split the takings with the Municipal United States organization run by the Roman Catholic Church by giving them the legal title to everything.
And what did we get out of this cozy arrangement?
The bill.
The schemers abused their position of trust to run up huge debts against our assets, then claimed bankruptcy protection for themselves and left us holding the bag.
They did this in 1907 and in 1933 and have tried to pull it again in 2015 and 2017.
Now the Rothschilds are trying to boot up two new corporate government structures, one British doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LLC chartered in Scotland and one French doing business as The Republic of the United States of America (Inc.) and we are having none of it.
Non-assumpsit. No contract.
And, by the way, all those "Delegated Powers" of ours that they were assuming were there for their new corporations to exercise in our behalf?
The Delegated Powers returned to us by Operation of Law, and we accepted them back. Formally. On the record.
So there is where it stands. Checkmated.
We, the Americans, are owed back all our assets free and clear of debt and encumbrance. We are also owed all the back rent, leases, mortgage escrows, utility payments, labor contracts, life force value annuities, and other assets that are rightfully ours.
We are the Priority Creditors and we are presenting ourselves as the Naked Owners. The banks are only middlemen with little or no bargaining position of their own.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
20 hrs
So Much for the Goldfish Report....
Good intentions have to count for something, even if it would be far better and more effective if those intentions were backed up with actual truth and with right action. So I have refrained from saying anything much about "The Goldfish Report", but finding myself illogically attacked and misrepresented once again, I have decided to take exception.
Not just because "The Goldfish Report" is definitely wrong about me and what I am saying, too. I have to speak up because as long as people believe in lies they are incapable of defending themselves. And that is how and why --- above and beyond all else --- they wind up in jail.
We already know that the "US District Courts" are not operating under any Constitutional power whatsoever.
We know in fact that the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS are ecclesiastical courts --- Star Chambers, Inquisitions --- run under the auspices of the Roman Municipal Government and its franchises.
We have "judges" here in Alaska who are now openly admitting that they are mere "Jurists" --- hired under contract to give opinions about law without having any public office or power at all.
We also know in fact that the United States District Courts are run as private corporate tribunals under the auspices of the British Crown Corp and that these have no power to address anyone or anything but British Crown Corp officers, employees, dependents, and franchisees.
The fact that actual justice will not return until our actual government is restored should also be self-evident.
The question should no longer be: "Why are we being screwed over by these courts?" but rather should be:
(1) Why are we allowing these foreign courts to operate on our soil and address our people? and
(2) Why are we individually subjecting ourselves to these private religious and/or corporate tribunals instead of claiming our actual birthright standing? and
(3) Why are we failing to form our own Jural Assemblies and providing ourselves with our own American Common Law Courts?
Where the @%@#%@ is John Wayne when you need him?
It's largely because everyone involved has their favorite brand of reality that they, like The Goldfish Report, insist on clinging to, even when their theories have long been disproven and even when they fly in the face of the actual facts, the actual experience of patriots, and the historical records, too.
The Goldfish Report would keep us all running in circles looking for answers to questions that have been answered for twenty years, instead of facing facts and dealing with reality.
They don't like to hear that their hero, Winston Shrout, was most likely still operating as a VESSEL owned and operated either by the Holy See or by the British Crown Corp and therefore owed federal taxes. And if so, [because we really don't know the whole story yet] that would be the reason that the DEFENDANT was impounded. Uh-duh.
The answer to the court problem is right in front of us and the success of our effort in the right direction is already assured. I have been harping on it for years. Declare your political status as an American, stop claiming to be a "U.S. Citizen" [which means you have voluntarily adopted the political status of a Puerto Rican], and then organize your Jural Assemblies. Provide your own courts. That is what "self-governance" means.
You haven't been providing your own Courts and enforcing your own Public Law. That's what's missing. That's why we have lawlessness in our courts. That's why people like Winston get railroaded and defamed. Don't believe it?
Read the Supreme Court case Mack and Prinz v. USA, Inc., in which Sheriff Richard Mack imposed upon the court for a finding that yes, Sheriffs hired as Law Enforcement Officers, could if they so choose, actually honor the Constitutional guarantees and enforce the Public Law.
Now, ask yourselves, why on God's Green Earth should it be necessary for a Sheriff to go all the way to the Supreme Court to be told that he can, if he wants to, enforce the Public Law in this country?
It's because there are almost no Public Courts left. It's because the Sheriffs are working as "law enforcement officers" and not as "peacekeeping officers" ---- they are hired by "Counties" operated as corporate franchises of federal "government services corporations", not land jurisdiction Counties owned and operated by the People of our States.
It's because stupid people have been leading stupid people.
It's because these foreign "governmental services organizations" make Big Bucks by entrapping and feeding off of you.
It's because the British Monarchs and Popes have been in Breach of Trust for 150 years and nobody has called them on it.
Except for me and the rest of the Party Hearties.
You can go arrest these vermin who are parading around using commercial "law" as a means to entrap and falsely accuse people. You can kick the Inquisition off shore. You can kick the British Crown Corp Tribunals to Kingdom Come, too.
But the only way to get there from here is by: (1) straightening out the deliberately falsified public records concerning your own political status and (2) booting up your own local County and State Jural Assemblies and (3) operating your unincorporated County and State Governments.
Once you do that, all the treaties and Public Laws come back into view and have enforcement. Until then, the only "law and order" is whatever the priests and pirates want to do.
Now, I am giving it to you all straight up, neat, no ice, no dilution. It's not a pleasant drink. But it is the truth before my Maker. And "The Goldfish Report" and all the other Gossip Sheets are stuck with it, once again, staring them in the face.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
8 hrs
Your Grandfather's Clock
Let's pretend that you inherited a beautiful Grandfather's Clock from your Grandfather. It's big and old and heavy and tall and you have to wind it every day by pulling down a heavy iron weight, but it keeps good time and the chimes marking the hour are quiet and melodious.
You grew up with it, you like it, you decide to keep it, but in your house the only place that it easily fits is in back of a stairwell in a hallway that leads to a back door that you seldom use.
So you put the clock out in that seldom-used entry way and over time, you forget to wind it, so it just sits there day after day, month after month, and year after year. It's still there, still usable, but because of its location and your busy life and the difficulty of moving it into the living room (where it would fit, if you took the time and made the effort to move some other stuff around) --- it just collects dust. You almost forget that its there.
That's the situation with your actual government.
The new hustle-bustle world of commerce butted in and grabbed all the attention, and it was so fast and easy. Just buy a battery and you never have to worry about winding the clock.
All those private, for-profit "government service" corporations nosed in and offered you all their many, many services, and you bought them all (whether or not you realized that you were buying them).
From then on, a "government" employee was always there ready to buy new batteries and change them for you. You didn't even have to think about clocks anymore, except to read the time. Everything just seemed to run by itself and you didn't have to do anything. You didn't even bother to vote in the employee elections.
[To be fair, some of you were aware enough to realize that you weren't government employees and couldn't justify voting in their elections, so you didn't volunteer. And still others realized their mistake and stopped voting for that reason.]
What a shock to find out that all that "government service" is costing you far, far more than anyone ever told you? What a shock that you never actually even thought about it until now?
No doubt it's an even bigger shock that you have to drag the old Grandfather's Clock out from behind the stairs and start winding it again if you want to know what time it actually is.
I just read the paperwork where Obummer and Joe Biden and the rest of the completely insane former "Administration" issued 25,000 trillion "US Dollars" ---- not to be confused with The United States Dollar --- as "US" Treasury Debt Notes.
God only knows which "United States" and which "United States Treasury" was supposed to pay for all this, but it wasn't our United States and it was not our Treasury issuing these "Notes". That much I can assure you.
They have seriously tried to put this country 25,000 trillion dollars in debt. They tried to hang all that on you and your kids. And all because you forgot to wind your own clock.
Get down on your knees and thank your Creator that everyone else in the world --- everyone except the completely insane U.S. Democratic Party ---understands that this is nuts, and knows that the books have to be wiped clean of Odious Debt, and that all the deliberate confusions about who is who and what is what must end.
Certain criminals who have sought to defraud not only all the Americans, but everyone else for the past 150 years, must be brought to justice. The banks that colluded in all of this fraud, have to be shut down and placed under new management. All the currencies in the world need to be "reset" against the value of an actual American Dollar--- our actual, factual silver dollar.
All you government employees and volunteers and dependents out there? All you welfare recipients and pensioners? Vote Republican. It's your only chance of survival. And I mean that literally.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
12 hrs
It's Almost Dark
It's almost dark. Just a faint orange strip of sunset sky remains, with a dark purple band of clouds and and a slash of dazzling stars far above. It's cold, but not uncomfortable as I work, harvesting the last of the Swiss Chard, chives, and herbs.
This has been a beautiful fall this year in Alaska, all amber and gold and warm lingering days, but at last all the leaves are on the ground and the weatherman says it will snow for the first time tomorrow.
It won't stay long. We will have a few days yet to dump out flower pots and pile up leaves. There will be a few more days, maybe a couple weeks-- before the real snows of winter arrive. I know I should be thinking about burning a certain brush pile, but a family of rabbits moved in a couple weeks ago and I'll just leave it until spring.
Coming home tonight the in the dusk the road was empty, just a dull silver ribbon making a straight line among the fading colors of the day. I came to the familiar turn off and paused. There's a rough wooden cross at the corner there, in memory of Garrett Seurat. I never knew him. I knew his Father, Jay.
I briefly remember the summer day, maybe fifteen years ago, when I heard tires squealing wildly in the very early morning, and later, the sight of his shiny black sports car hanging nearly upside down and halfway up a stand of birch and spruce trees, like an airplane that didn't make take off. He was dead on the scene.
Shortly thereafter the wooden cross appeared, and it has been there ever since. This late summer I saw a woman and a girl there putting new silk flowers around the cross arms. I suppose the girl was his daughter, too young at the time of the accident to ever remember her father or know his face.
I've marked the passage of the years and noted the days when old flowers have been taken away and new flowers come to take their place, and nodded to his loved ones who have kept their faithful tending of his memorial as I went upon my way.
Tonight I stopped, the cross was awry, knocked about by wind and rain perhaps, or some careless accident of passing moose or motor bike. I parked and set it straight again, piling up the stones around the base of wood and replaced the silk flowers that love left there a couple months ago.
Not a soul passed by and hardly a leaf stirred in the fading light. I thought about this young man that I never knew. I thought about how loved he was, and is, even now. It seemed like setting his cross straight in time for the winter was the least I could do, if only to comfort those who remain and who will come again and look for it at Christmas and again in the spring.
Then I hurried on home and put dinner in the oven and tended to the last of my green garden tasks, quickly heeling in the potted perennials, cutting the Swiss Chard and herbs, taking in a couple wine-colored petunias that will live on for a couple months and bloom in a glass of water long after the rest of this year's garden is gone or sleeping.
Chives and spearmint, bee balm and oregano, sweet verbena and lemon balm, hyssop and cone flower; I have already and long-since potted up the lemon balm and parsley for the indoor garden. These are just the straggle ends that will go into a salad or top a baked potato or make a cup of tea. My teapot is sitting on the table, center stage, a cast-iron pot on a cast-iron tea candle-powered base, guaranteed to keep the tea warm for an hour or two while I work deep into the night.
I have more sympathy for autumn now, that like the year, I am older, too. Life oddly seems more precious and love more miraculous now, when nothing is guaranteed and beauty is gone past remembering and every day that dawns appears in its true colors as a blessing.
The great struggles of kings and queens and countries and empires shrink down to the embers of the fire on my hearth and the wind blowing around the chimney. All day long v's of Canada Geese have been passing over, their mournful honking like a friend calling good-bye over their shoulder, and now, at this time of night, the bats, too, are taking to the sky in search of what scant insect dinners may be left.
The resident bunnies are snuggled in their brush pile beds after a hard day of munching sweet autumn clover.
I hope that all those who are reading this will take Nature's message to heart and re-connect to the times and where we are. Make the effort now to shore up your world, and to do what you can to prepare for dark, cold days ahead, to be ready for yourself and your family and your friends, and to be able to assist others who are less fortunate.
We especially want to thank the many people all over this country who have eased our days and budgets by sharing the good produce of the land and the things they have made. Cheese curds and mustard from Wisconsin. Vanilla beans from Hawaii. Cucumbers and squash and tomatoes from Washington. Herbs and honey from Oregon. Mushrooms from Pennsylvania. Lobster from Maine. Vidalia onions from Georgia. Buffalo jerky from the Great Plains. Pistachios from California. Apples from Eastern Washington. Cheddar from Iowa. Ham from Virginia. And so much more. These gifts of the land and the people mean so much to us and to other members of The Living Law Firm who get their share of this bounty, too.
It helps a lot in many ways and we want you to know that we are grateful and we have shared and we give deep thanks in our hearts for all of you and for this abundant land we share.
As winter closes in our days grow rapidly colder and darker. By mid-December we will be down to about four hours of daylight per day. It becomes increasingly difficult for mail and deliveries of packages to get to us in Big Lake. Anything but First Class Letters and packages of dry goods get problematic this time of year, so please be aware that you shouldn't send anything that can freeze or break in transit, and if you send meat or other frozen perishables, the best way to send it is to the office in Anchorage: The Living Law Firm, 1336 Staubbach Circle, Anchorage, Alaska 99508.
We are deeply truly grateful for all of you and everything you send, whether it is cash or radishes. It all gets put to good purpose and good use by good people for a good cause. God bless and keep you all.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·
Good News
Lord, love a patriot..... I do believe that the proverbial "Enforcement Nut" has finally been cracked wide open, and that we are now in position to fully credential our Continental Marshals and unleash the Bounty Hunter Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the British Territorial United States Constitution known--deceptively enough --- as "The Constitution of the United States of America" first published in 1868.
This will have four more or less immediate and much-longed for affects:
(1) An end to the crooked court system. We will be able to enter, catch the Vermin evading or dishonoring the Constitutional provisions, arrest them on the spot, and turn them over to the military authorities for trial and execution for treason and other capital crimes including inland piracy, kidnapping, and fraud.
(2) An end to the crooked banks. We will be able to enter, catch the Vermin refusing to let depositors have access to their deposits, creating improper mortgages, manipulating credit to benefit themselves at other's expense and boom! --- replace the erring bankers with honest men much sobered up by their predecessor's experience.
(3) An end to the crooked commodity markets. We will be able to enter, catch the brokers fixing prices and supplies and running up situations like The Big Short, and arrest them by the boat loads, along with all the SEC functionaries that sold out and allowed all this crappola.
(4) An end to the crooked double accrual accounting and budgetary system. We will be able to review the books in sum total and recapture the sequestered assets, aka, Slush Funds --that these Vermin have been creating and manipulating for their own unjust enrichment.
And none of the phony local "law enforcement" fat asses who haven't done their duty by the Public and none of the "federal agencies" including the FBI and DHS and Homeland Security and all the rest will have a word to say about it, because we are the superior jurisdiction and we mandate the action.
What was that I said the other day about --- where in the @$!$!@$ is John Wayne when you need him?
I think we just found out.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·
Regarding the Treaty of Paris 1947
What you are looking at is another attempted unlawful conversion of national authorities by the globalists, however, no government anywhere has any right to give away anything that we are owed. Ever. They can falsely claim that we "volunteered" to give up our birthrights, but cannot stand in the face of our denial of their actions. This is particularly true of The United States of America, as we never conformed, confirmed, not accepted any fall-out occasioned by or created by the British Territorial United States nor the Municipal United States (Roman Catholic/Municipal/Pontifical "Government") purportedly "in our behalf", including any such Peace Treaty, and we don't do so now.
Here are the kind of "citizens" that these vermin are offering to claim and subject to the tender mercies of the "UN Corporation" ---- not the United Nations organization. See the succinct definition of "U.S. citizens" given below:
"The U.S. citizens [citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the union are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an “individual entity”. Wheeling Steel Corporation v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L. Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773."
So are you a "U.S. citizen" and does any of this verbiage apply to you?
Note the key words of deceit --- "residing" and "individual" -- more words that have been twisted and corrupted into "words of art" by the legal chicanery professionals. British Territorial and Municipal "citizens" merely "reside" here in the actual geographically defined States temporarily. And we, the actual People, are said to "reside" --- also temporarily in their "States of State" and "STATES OF STATE" jurisdictions.
To illustrate: A living Californian walks into a STATE OF CALIFORNIA court. He is entering a foreign municipal "STATE" and for the time being, is considered to "reside" there. The same thing can be said if he enters a State of California court --- he is temporarily "residing" in the foreign domain of the British Territorial "State of California".
But flip that around, and any Municipal or Territorial "citizen" entering upon California's land jurisdiction is "residing" in California --- just there temporarily to provide "essential government services".
British Territorial United States and Municipal United States citizens cannot own land in our States and we choose not to own anything in their "states of states", so it is important that you deny "residing" in the State of Ohio or the STATE OF IOWA or wherever you happen to be, and draw the distinction that you live in California, or Ohio, or Iowa.
The word "individual" has also been much abused. They use the word "individual" as shown above to denote single franchises and single franchisees of their corporations, while we use it to describe single unique living people. These two usages of the same word which are almost diametrically opposed then give rise to endless opportunities to confuse identities and capacities of both people and things.
To illustrate: "On the night of July 7th, 1951, JOHN MAYNARD DOE, was involved in a car accident that netted the largest single auto insurance claim in Arkansas history." translates in Federal-ese to "On the night of July 7th, 1951, JOHN MAYNARD DOE [Foreign Grantor Trust from Puerto Rico] was involved in a car accident....." Everyone automatically and reasonably enough assumes that "JOHN MAYNARD DOE" is a living man, when in fact, for the purposes of the MUNICIPAL COURT, we are talking about a constructive ESTATE trust "residing" in Puerto Rico.
In the same way, look at this: "The "individuals" involved, JOHN MAYNARD DOE and ELIZABETH "LIBBY" MAE HUNT, were severely injured." Again, we assume that only living people can be injured and interpret the verbiage accordingly, but in Federal-speak, two foreign ESTATE trusts have been "injured".
All this language is deliberately used to deceive and confuse and alienate people from their identity and their nationality and most importantly, their rights and their property assets. This can only be interpreted as deliberate and self-interested criminal activity on the part of politicians, courts, government agencies, international governments, banks, and military personnel involved in these schemes, which are capital crimes under the terms of the Geneva Conventions.
The attitude and practice of the Vermin has been ---- "Oh, it's against the law to shoot grouse? Well, we will just call them "Spruce Hens" instead and blast away...."
Still a grouse by any other name is still a grouse and it is still against the Public Law to shoot them.
And nobody can make you a "citizen" of the UNITED NATIONS or any other criminal organization absent your knowing and willing participation and agreement. I would strongly suggest that anyone raising this issue should be pinned to the wall and educated on the fine points. And just to be absolutely and doubly sure, you might all add a "Declaration" to your recorded documents making it perfectly clear that you do not subscribe to any element of the Treaty of Paris 1947.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·
Bretton Woods 2?
Let's get this straight. There should never have been a Bretton Woods 1.
What came out of Bretton Woods 1 was a total airy-fairy disaster, an economic plan and theory so flawed that a zombie with an I.Q. of 10 would give it a thumbs down.
The centerpiece of Bretton Woods 1 was the idea that if we can keep the world economy constantly expanding at a given rate per capita we will never have to pay our debts. Never. Ever.
Isn't that just a nice example of "sophistication" ---- ? And I do not mean that as a compliment.
It's also emblematic of a bizarre kind of out-of-touch-with-reality Wishful Thinking that seemed to invade the planet after the hostilities of the Second World War.
Anything seemed possible --- apparently even such known impossibilities as a constantly expanding world economy.
Big surprise. It didn't work.
The world economy has sputtered along as it always has, and the weight of the first Bretton Woods Conference has fallen on America and we have taken it in the shorts for every discrepancy between Keynes' "Ideal World" and actual fact ever since, and now, we have Bretton Woods 2, which if possible, is even worse.
Remember that I told you the plan of the Vermin a hundred and twenty years ago was to force us all to use fiat currencies, inflate them so as to make them worthless and meanwhile collect all the gold, silver, and platinum reserves in one huge stockpile, so that the Rats could sell it all back to the grandsons and granddaughters of the people they stole it from? At a vastly inflated profit?
Well, that is in fact what they are still pushing for.
Thanks to Obummer and Biden and Company signing off on 25,000 trillion "dollars" in debt cast as "US Treasury Notes" the last viable fiat currency was tanked --- with or without the Midterm Election results.
We have repudiated any suggestion that their actions pertain to us or any American or any "United States" related to us, and we have invited all their Creditors to collect from them directly. Semantics being what they are, there are bound to be misunderstandings.
I keep remembering Hillary Clinton saying, "If he [Donald Trump] gets elected, we will all hang!" It's the only cheerful thought in all of this. I keep imagining the criminals in bright orange, hand-cuffed, awaiting the gallows.
Bretton Woods 2 produced two answers to the dilemma the Fraud Artists have created:
(1) Depopulation of the Earth (not the first time this has happened) down to a tiny fraction of the current population, so as to "collapse the debt pressure"--- which is in fact just killing off one's Priority Creditors, as I have also described, and
(2) Arbitrarily setting the "value" of an ounce of gold at $25,000 per ounce.
Considering that the Vermin stole most of this gold and paid around $40 per ounce for the bulk of the remainder I will leave it to you to do the math and figure out what percentage of profit they are anticipating.
As one Bretton Woods 2 Attendee snickered, "It's going to be a "killing" either way!"
We have a different plan and vision for the world. If you despised Bretton Woods 1 and hate Bretton Woods 2, it's time to be pro-active.
Our government hasn't been paid for all the American soldiers who were used as mercenaries and sent out to fight under Color of Law, having been told plenty of Big, Fat Lies on their way to the Front of two World Wars and endless other wars and conflicts. I think it's time to present our bill to the schemers responsible for all this --- $250 trillion per life lost under such conditions sounds about right, doesn't it? Who knows? With a push it might be enough to buy some comforts and consolations for all those left behind.
Paid in gold.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
Paid in gold.
Notice how most analysis come back to how you are going to get paid?
Hopefully ya know how the universe works. You establish a debt of $250 trillion x number of lives invested in war divided by $42.22 per ounce (the official government price for gold) and demand payment and the universe is likely to send a meteorite your way at 150,000 mph of that exact weight composed of gold.
In astronomy they call these type of meteorites 'planet killers' but that shouldn't really matter as the debt is now paid in full.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
20 hrs ·
Getting Wise to It
The Satanists worship duality. They only think and act in terms of "either/or". And that is how they train you, like a salivating dog, to think and act, too.
Ever wonder why they constantly prod little kids to segregate objects according to their differences and not their similarities?
The better to divide and to conquer. The better to "habituate" conflict and thinking patterns that support conflict.
If they can get the white people to hate the Jews and the Jews to hate the blacks and the blacks to hate the whites and the Hispanics and the Hispanics to hate everyone else who isn't Hispanic and the Asians to despise whites, blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and Palestinians, and the Saudis to hate the folks from Yemen.... hey, it's a lot less likely that everyone is going to sober up from the Hate Fest and notice who and what is actually manipulating all of it.
And the easier it is for the actual culprits to take advantage of the polarity they have created: sell arms to both sides, put both sides in debt, collect on the life insurance policies, foreclose on the widows.....
Am I wrong?
We have one common enemy, and though they are slippery as eels and masters of disguises and deceits, you can tell them by their fruits.
It's always the same stinking May Apples. Always the same trick: find a difference and exploit it. People are too stupid to see through this, which allows the Vermin to profit.
So, by all means, wake up and see the way this works to our mutual detriment.
When the Jews are gone, it will be the blacks, and after the blacks it will be the Hispanics, and in between it will be the old and the fragile and the unborn babies and the Jehovah's Witnesses and the LGBT crowd and all the Archie Bunkers, and at the end, there will be just one big ball of hate and fear destroying everyone and everything that is "different".
That's the snake oil the reptiles are selling. It's what they always sell. And we will not be free of them until we all learn better and say, "No, not falling for it anymore."
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
Yes, He Can and No, He Can't
There is a big flap this morning because President Trump is trying to end the "Anchor Baby" provisions that immigrants and the INS have been abusing, by ending birthright citizenship claims related to "U.S. Citizenship".
Many people have reacted in alarm and thought that this means that he has power to end their birthright claims of nationality and State Citizenship.
The real answer is: yes, he can, and no, he can't.
As President of a corporation, already empowered by over 350 "emergency powers" granted to his Office by the British Territorial United States Congress back in the 1930's and continued by their Successors, Donald J. Trump can do darn near anything in the wide world he wants to do with respect to the day to day operations of that corporation, its subsidiaries, its subcontractors, its employees, its policies, and its statutory "laws".
It was, after all, their policy to allow "Anchor Babies" to provide their families with instant access to our country in the first place, and many would argue an irresponsible policy, too. It is Mr. Trump's job as President to alter corporate policies as necessary to deal with emergencies. The "National Emergency" status as already been declared. He is already in position to move. God bless him. Being born on American soil makes the baby an American, but doesn't (necessarily) make him a "U.S. Citizen".
I have been trying to get exactly this point across for many months.
That said, as President of a foreign corporation, Donald J. Trump has no ability or authorization to tamper with any aspect of American nationality or American State Citizenship.
As above, it is entirely possible for a baby born on the soil of California to be a Californian, but there is nothing that makes his Mother or Father a Californian, too. They have already been born on the soil of Honduras or Mexico or wherever else, which establishes their nationality and citizenship obligations, if any.
This idea that they could busload hundreds of women in late pregnancy to the border, offload them like cattle, and then simply wait for them to give birth on American soil and thereby get a free pass for everyone in the family all the way back to the grandparents to become "U.S. citizens" was always crackpot and a means to end run around the Public Law.
It is also a cruelly deceptive means to entrap these people who are seeking freedom in the corporate enslavement racket instead.
Mexicans and Hondurans are not worth as much as slaves in the international slave market, but when they cross our border they magically gain in value astronomically, simply by having the label "U.S. citizen" attached to them. This sets up a situation where both the corporations serving "as" governments can profit by their migration.
All the U.S. Government has to do is provide a cut of the resulting profit to the Honduran or Mexican or other "government" corporation, and they will be happy to send an unending supply of new "U.S. citizens" to our borders. This is profitable for both corporations, because the value of an average "U.S. citizen" is far and away above any welfare costs or benefits the people ever receive, and the "U.S." Inc. can borrow against the value of its "citizenry" in the world slave market, thus providing extra income for the vermin in DC.
That is the dirty reason for all the dirty Democrats supporting mass immigration.
It's also the reason for all the forced immigration of Muslims -- quite apart from the wars in the Middle East -- into Europe.
A German "citizen" is worth a lot more than a Yemen "citizen" and the guilty governments are profiting themselves without regard for the people they are supposed to serve.
I gave a citation yesterday regarding "U.S. citizenship" and got back a response that someone went online and couldn't find it.
First, be aware that if you want to read law you have to go to a Law Library and read the hard copy, and if you want to know what really happened you have to go into the case files. What appears online is often heavily redacted, simplified, and annotated in various ways. Second, it has been profitable to the knaves to hide key citations and they have done so, just as they have burned books and suppressed treaties throughout their history. Third, that's far, far from the only citation giving you the same facts (and more) about the issue of "citizenship".
Here's a few more to cut your teeth on, for all of you who aren't sure that there is a difference between being an American and being a "U.S. citizen":
“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own...” United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
“...he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,...” “One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States”. McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)
“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state,...” Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)
"A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government ..." Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383
"On the other hand, there is a significant historical fact in all of this. Clearly, one of the purposes of the 13th and 14th Amendments and of the 1866 act and of section 1982 was to give the Negro citizenship. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1967), 379 F.2d 33, 43.
"The object of the 14th Amendment, as is well known, was to confer upon the colored race the right of citizenship. " United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 692.
“The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other”. Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935)
“There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such”.
Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41 (1900)
“The rights and privileges, and immunities which the fourteenth constitutional amendment and Rev. St. section 1979 [U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1262], for its enforcement, were designated to protect, are such as belonging to citizens of the United States as such, and not as citizens of a state”. Wadleigh v. Newhall 136 F. 941 (1905)
“...rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship”. Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)
----And, always note, that the so-called "Revised Statutes" were never actually enrolled on the Federal Register, that is, never actually "Revised" except for internal corporate use, because those making the revisions never had the power or authority to make them apply generally.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
23 mins ·
Notice to All Wannabe Interlopers:
There is no way in Hell that Keith Livingway bought "The United States of America" or any special right related to it at a Naval Auction or via any other action he has pretended to take. Our actual copyright to that name is held in sovereign jurisdiction and is not transferable or for sale to any commercial entity whatsoever.
Livingway picked up on pieces of the Scottish interloper that infringed on our copyrights in 1868: The United States of America, Incorporated, not The United States of America [Unincorporated]. The Scottish corporation was bankrupted in 1907. The bankruptcy settled in 1953. The Navy was selling off whatever scrap was left. Keith totally misunderstood what he was buying and the provenance of it, and therefore misinterpreted the meaning of it.
Our actual government is a government of, for, and by the people ----- not a government of, for, and by the persons.
This is a fundamental understanding that must be accepted by everyone concerned. And the Maxim of Law that applies, as I noted yesterday, is: "Possession by pirates does not change ownership."
The Scottish corporation deceitfully calling itself "The United States of America" for purposes of pillaging and press-ganging, kidnapping our people into foreign conscription, and seizing false title to our assets, was a criminal operation intent on inland piracy. If the Navy had been worth beans, it would have intercepted and prosecuted this Pretender.
That it succeeded in its fraud is of no concern to us at this point, as there is no statute of limitation on the crime of fraud and there is no cessation of probate related to any estate.
We are here to collect our assets and we will prosecute any and all foreign corporations infringing upon our copyrights, titles, and interests or attempting to insinuate themselves as Successors to any constitutional contract by a process of assumption.
I hope that makes it all abundantly clear to everyone, including the supporters of the French corporation attempting to do business as "The Republic" and the Scottish doppleganger attempting to do business as "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA".
We are all thoroughly sick of these deceits, this disservice, and this dishonor. We want no more Pretenders of any kind or stripe. Moreover, as of October 9, 2018, the Delegated Powers returned to us by Operation of Law, as I have explained elsewhere.
What this means is that there is no longer any "federal" government of the kind we have been dealing with. The only actual government left standing in international jurisdiction is our lawful Federation of States formed September 9, 1776.
Go figure.
There aren't going to be any new interlopers picking up "governmental services contracts" by assumption here.
And all the BS is at an end. All the Europeans can go home and read their tea leaves from now on, and horribly confused people like Keith Livingway can stand down.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
Urgent Message to Americans Age 80 and Over
We need your help.
False claims are being made to the effect that we consented to being British subjects, that we willingly consigned all our assets and land and homes as chattel backing the debts of the British Crown Corporation and voluntarily adopted a Commonwealth as our form of government, that we gave up our constitutional guarantees, and that we agreed to be considered "citizens" of the British Territorial United States, purportedly in equitable exchange for welfare benefits that we financed and paid for ourselves.
In fact, we were never told about any of these false claims.
This Hogwash being promoted by the guilty parties needs to be rebutted and rebuked by the eye-witnesses who were alive at the time and who have first-hand knowledge of the facts and events.
We have abundant evidence that on March 6, 1933, at a private meeting of the Conference of Governors, the British Territorial Governors "pledged" the assets of "their states and the citizenry thereof" to pay off the debts of the "United States of America" Incorporated, a religious non-profit corporation fronted by the Roman Catholic Church as a Delaware Corporation in 1925 and bankrupted in 1933.
Of course, their "States of States" had nothing whatsoever to do with our States and their "citizenry" had nothing to do with our State Citizens.
Nonetheless, as a result of this "pledge" of foreign assets, Americans were deliberately mistaken-on-purpose as British Subjects, and kidnapped into the foreign jurisdiction of the British Territorial United States, there to be plundered and conscripted and divested of their rights, property assets, and other guarantees in Gross Breach of Trust.
We have abundant evidence that Franklin Delano Roosevelt lied through his teeth to the American People and never disclosed the meaning, intent, or result of his New Deal---- which was treason wrapped in a blanket, a self-serving and odious plot to further undermine our national sovereignty and rob us blind for the sake of foreign interests.
And now they want to claim that we all knew what was going on and willingly, voluntarily consented to all this abuse and damned lies and false claims and foreign Inquisitors occupying our courtrooms to collect debts we never owed.
There can be no words competent to describe the infamy of the British Territorial United States or the criminality of the Holy See for allowing any of these practices against The United States of America and the innocent American People.
According to their deeds, Rome, Westminster, and London should all be turned to sheets of glass, with Hong Kong and Washington, DC and Ontario, Canada, to follow.
We stood by these wretched bastards through two World Wars, and this is the thanks we get for it. They have attempted to genocide us on paper and leave us holding the bag for all their debts, all their war-mongering, all their sins.
So now is the time for pay back and an end to all this self-serving drivel that we "consented" to any of this abuse and theft.
We are calling upon those Americans who are 80 years of age and above to come forward and give testimony based on their living recollection of the events taking place in the 1930's and 40's. We are calling upon their sons and daughters to help them do the paperwork and get their testimony witnessed by a Public Notary and recorded at the local land recording offices. We are asking that you all send a certified copy to: The Living Law Firm, 1336 Staubbach Circle, Anchorage, Alaska 99508.
In doing this, you will also create a Public Record in defense of your own property and establish evidence to protect your whole family from these vermin and their lies.
We realize that this may be a bit difficult to organize, so we have created and attached a basic template that can be used all over the country. For those who have more specific information to bring forward and who feel competent to do so, please add and adjust. For convenience sake, we colored the specific information you need to change in the template red.
Please discuss the situation with your Elders and those who understand the situation, please encourage them to come forward and testify in behalf of all Americans. And get it on the record, so we can shove it down their throats.
[Facebook Friends -- please go to my website, www.annavonreitz.com to download the template example and ignore the stupid "security challenge". My website is safe. ]
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·
IMF "Take Over" of Federal Reserve
Most people will be alarmed to hear rumors of an IMF take over of the Federal Reserve.
The IMF organized and promoted by the Rockefeller interests and Oil Barons has been functioning as the "U.S. Treasury" since shortly after the Second World War. They have used the IMF for no end of market manipulations and political intrigues and false claims in commerce.
That said, the Federal Reserve fronted by the Warburgs and Rothschilds is even older and worse in its own sluggish nasty way.
So you have the spectacle of the snakes eating each other, and quarreling over which tail is which.
The important take home point is that despite the pandering and plumage, they are all snakes, they are all criminals, and a choice between raspberry feces and vanilla feces is still an insane non-choice scenario for the rest of us.
Asked by a friend this afternoon to name a bank with "clean hands" I couldn't name one major international bank that is less than pitch black filthy. None.
Asked what I would do, I said --- take them over, establish new management, establish new regulatory agencies, and stand with both feet on their necks until the end of time.
Until we all grow up and get rid of the entire concept of money and "representations of value" and adopt a sane worldwide currency based on all commodities, all natural resources, and all labor assets, keeping both feet on the banker's necks is the only answer.
The moment you let up on one of them, he sets out to free all the rest of them from competent regulation. They are like gang members. They have the Big "B" tattoo on their chests.
A bunch of silly Nellies are running around predicting chaos and meltdowns and rioting in the streets if the Federal Reserve is taken down. I got news for them. They bankrupted the "Federal Reserve System" in 2009, so all that was protected by Mama Vatican and the Slime Balls in the United States Bar Association, instead of being returned to the lawful Priority Creditors ----us.
The time for rioting and giving a damn about the "Federal Reserve" was ten years ago or more. The time to liquidate the IMF and blast the Rockefeller Mobsters off their French thrones is right about now.
All those assets ---- all of them ---- belong to us. The "National Debt" belongs to us. The Bid Bonds and labor contracts --- ours, ours, ours. The indemnity bonds and guarantees and bottomry bonds and "Life Force Value Annuities" ---- all ours. The CUSIP bonds --- ours, again. All the Puerto Rican Foreign Grantor Trusts ---- ours, nobody else's. All the IRS collections, all the Internal Revenue Service collections, and all the property taxes and mortgages ---- all of it, is owed to us, minus a relatively small fee for services we actually contracted for and actually received under the stipulations of our Constitutions.
And these criminals, including the IMF, are trying to say that they are our Trustees and that they are collecting "for" us.
Have you heard enough of this chant and rant? We don't have any Trustees.
The Trustees who were supposed to be safeguarding our interests were worse than common thieves. So..... guess what?
We are standing here on our own flat little feet demanding the return of our rights, titles, and interests, our assets, our labor, our rents and leases, our fees, our property in sum total. Now.
No Karen Hudes, no Kim Goguen, no IMF, no middlemen "representing" us and administrating our estates "for" us. They are nothing but Executors de Son Tort --- a phrase that can only be answered for with Autrefois Convict.
Just dump it all into our bank and we will tend to our own business from now on.
We will sort through the horrible mess that all these very competent and important and highly educated people have made, and bring relief at last, with decency and common sense that has been completely lacking for decades.
Let the IMF be forewarned---- they aren't our Treasury and they aren't our Trustees and as much as we despise and care nothing for the Federal Reserve, in our view, the IMF is not a bit better.
We will nail them both to the wall for fraud and mis-representation with equal alacrity and we will demand their liquidation if they steal one peso from any American and that means all the Americans who have been mis-identified on purpose as British Territorial "Citizens", too.
Got that, Butch?
I can't think of a single international commercial bank that deserves to survive a liquidation challenge for criminal activity. Not one.