Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·
Open Challenge
Many years ago, in North Carolina, I was sitting at a table in front of an open window looking out onto a covered veranda and gardens beyond.
My companion was a retired Judge from South Carolina, who was in his nineties and still sharp as a tack. He drank "coffee" made from dried dandelion roots.
It may strike people as odd, but the Civil War wasn't really so long ago. My Grandfather was born during the Civil War, and this man, old enough to have been my Grandfather, was born twenty-five years after it ended. For him as a child growing up, the wounds and events were still fresh. His Grandparents lived through it. One of his Grandfathers died in it. His Father remembered the Carpetbagger Era that followed.
Our conversation that day and for several days following was meandering and thoughtful as he paged through his memories, often pausing to pick and choose his words as well as his topics. He was a careful, methodical, logical man with a shrewd view of the world well-honed from fifty years on the bench.
At one point, he stopped and shot me a glance and said, "You don't like lawyers much, do you?" And then he tilted back his head and looked at the ceiling and said, "I can't much blame you, but remember--- it's the sins you commit that you aren't even aware of that damn you. Pray to be forgiven for them."
We ranged far and wide and deep through the history of the South after the Civil War, and also, unavoidably, through the history of jurisprudence in the South from the Civil War Era through the 1970's. He wouldn't allow a tape recorder so all I have are notes I took down.
Among the other things he told me was the fact that the actual States never allowed Dual Citizenship, even though the States of States did.
I underlined that in my notes, because he said it with great emphasis and intensity and roused himself to lean forward as he said it. There's no doubt that he meant for me to catch that bit of information and keep it.
The reason, he said, was to forestall conflict of interest. No man can serve two Masters. So the land law, which is based on the Bible, dictates that if we serve the land, we have to give up any other political affiliation and stand as State Citizens, not Federal Citizens, aka, United States Citizens or Citizens of the United States.
Almost fifty years have passed and I have been down many, many rabbit holes since then. I have never once in all my researches nor in the research of others who have probed these issues, encountered any contrary evidence.
No actual State ever allowed Dual Citizenship.
Nothing that man told me has ever proven to be anything but 100% correct and true. Nothing in my own research contradicts him. Nothing in any other research about this topic that I know of contradicts him.
So I am more than willing to stand here and say--- if you have proof that any actual land jurisdiction State in this country ever allowed Dual Citizenship (allowing Federal Citizens to act as State Citizens)--- bring it now, and I will eat all the crow you want.
I'll put a big banner on my website saying, "I Was Wrong About This!" and I will write an article explaining why I was wrong and how many ways I was wrong. But I don't believe I am wrong about this one.
And I do believe it matters, because if you assemble oranges you get a bushel of oranges, and if you assemble apples you get a bushel of apples.
I am not going to waste my time or anyone else's doing things that can't be done or don't need to be done.
If some foreign corporation wants to come in here and call itself a "State" and try to foist that off onto the gullible public, they can do so on their own dime and our team will continue to expose them for what they are.
No need for a bunch of well-meaning Americans to get sidetracked by something like that.
So let's drop the dime and get to the Finish Line. We have all these people claiming that you can be a Federal Citizen aka United States Citizen or Citizen of the United States and at the same time act as a State Citizen, and I am saying no actual land jurisdiction State ever allowed that.
Since we are looking for "negative evidence" and they made the claim, it's up to them to find a valid exception: at least one pre-Civil War State that allowed Dual Citizenship.
I certainly don't know of one, but maybe the people bad-mouthing me do. Maybe that old judge from South Carolina was senile and didn't really know what he was talking about.
But I wouldn't bet my life, my land, or my Bill of Rights on that, if I were you.
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
14 hrs ·
Hats Off
There are people who touch our lives in gentle ways. Often, we don't know the impact they've had at the time, so of course, we don't thank them. Then life "happens" and time flows on, your paths don't meet, and then someday you hear their name or something jogs your brain and you think: I never said thank you. Too often, it's too late.
About a dozen years ago, one of those Special People crossed my path here in Alaska. I'd just lost another friend to cancer and saw a poster for a cooking class centered around an anti-cancer diet. It was free. I had time on my hands and a grudge to settle with the disease. So I went to class for six weeks. It was my introduction to Vegan cooking.
That class was taught by Delisa Renideo, otherwise known as The Barefoot Gardener. She recently published some of her best recipes in a new book, The Barefoot Gardener in the Kitchen Cookbook.
Vegans, as I was to learn, don't use animal products at all. Their diet is entirely plant-based. No milk, no eggs, no cheese. And of course, no meat.
Nonetheless, everyone seemed sane and healthy, and I was intrigued.
Like most of you reading this I briefly entertained the image of my life with food being reduced to gnawing on stalks of celery and maybe a baked potato with salt for Sunday dinner. I also had a twinge of the, "oh, no, not some kind of weird vegetarian cult!" suspicion, but I suppressed those biases and fears: with people dropping like flies from cancer and suffering from awful chronic diseases, it was obviously time to look for answers.
And anyway, a free cooking class where you get to taste the results seemed harmless enough for a respectable Granny to indulge in. Indulge, I did. It was all delicious.
I learned how to "massage" kale -- and otherwise, would probably have never eaten it. I learned lots of other wonderful things--- how to make a delicious cheese sauce without cheese, how to sweeten things without sugar (or nasty unnatural substitutes), and miracle of miracles, a healthy cookie recipe that my son liked better than standard Chocolate Chip Cookies.
If the benefits had stopped there, I would have called it one of the Top Ten Freebie Bargains in my whole life, but it didn't end with that.
As I s-l-o-w-l-y adjusted to my new knowledge base and began to implement what I had been taught, I also began to think more about nutrition and what I was eating and about how food is produced, and why so much of what we eat is nothing but air: empty calories, that is, calories that add to our waistlines, but don't nourish us at all.
It would take a miracle of Biblical proportions to turn my husband into a vegetarian, much less a vegan, but nonetheless the "little seed" Delisa planted in my brain persisted and bore more fruit. I began growing basil for pesto and other kitchen herbs and adding them to salads and soups. I whittled down the amount of meat the family was eating and soon, I was able to sneak in entire vegetarian meals without anyone noticing.
They all just adjusted and chowed down and didn't seem to notice that...bit by bit, we were converting from a Standard American Diet (SAD in more ways than one) to a better diet, a more nourishing diet, and did I mention-- a cheaper diet?
Oh, yes, even though I took the pledge and converted to 100% organic and non-GMO, our food budget went down by a whopping 25%. I can't even imagine how much money that has saved us over the last twelve years, but it is a lot of money. A lot.
And, the adventure continued. Somehow that little cooking class with Delisa Renideo hit the reset button on my relationship with food. No more limits! I threw Nasturtium blossoms and sweet violets into my salads. I rediscovered mushrooms and olives. I made Artisan Bread. And it was all good. And it was all better.
And it was all because of Delisa and Charlie and a cooking class.
I am still not a 100% vegetarian, much less can I call myself a Vegan, but I am a lot closer to being a vegetarian than I could ever imagine being and my old "whiskey and corn chips for breakfast" diet (somewhat of an exaggeration, but not much!) is a distant memory.
The benefits from that little cooking class just keep ticking along, year after year, paying dividends in new choices, new experiences, better health and better food.
Not everyone will be lucky enough to get a cooking class with Delisa, but everyone can buy her cookbook and use it as a portal to a whole new world of food. It's not a cheap book at $29.00, but that's nothing compared to the cost of a single doctor visit.
Hats off, to Delisa and Charlie Renideo, for being the difference and making the difference. I want to thank them and pass on the gift they gave me to you.
You can learn more at their website: Yes to life solution
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
Do I Have to Draw You Guys a Picture?
Addressed to the Oregon Assembly, March 10, 2019:
Do I have to draw you guys a picture?
You are mucking around in THEIR system instead of building your own.
You are going to get into trouble just like the Colorado Nine and for the same reason.
Thomas Deegan spent two years in jail already.
He was released for reasons he doesn't comprehend.
Now he is leading all the rest of you right back into the same trap again.
How many times does this have to happen and how many people have to suffer before you knotheads get it through your thick skulls?
They aren't us.
Repeat: they aren't us.
They never have been. They still aren't.
Their court system isn't our court system.
US Citizens aren't Americans, even if they were born
and bred here in the States.
Ask yourselves --- how could a political status that is literally created by the Constitutions be the same political status creating the Constitutions?
Americans are Parties to the Constitutions. US Citizens are subject to the Constitutions.
While acting as US Citizens (Federal Employees, Dependents, and Franchisees) you have no rights or guarantees provided by the Constitutions, you have only obligations and duties under the Constitutions.
So if you want to exercise your guarantees and exemptions you have to: (1) reclaim your birthright political status as an American State National/American State Citizen; (2) repopulate your States of the Union; (3) boot up your own court system to enforce the Public Law, including the Constitutions.
Instead of doing what needs to be done, you guys keep on thinking that you are going to use their court system against them.
You think that your Common Law Grand Jury is going to "put them in their place", when in fact all you are going to do is transgress onto their turf and get yourselves into trouble just like the Colorado Nine did.
That's why I drew the line against Bruce Doucette and that's why I am drawing the line against Deegan, Destry, Sun-Tzu, et alia.
You are wasting your time and your energy doing something that: (1) is never going to work; and (2) that needlessly endangers innocent people; and (3) has already been demonstrated as a dead end; and (4) detracts focus and energy away from what actually needs to be done.
If you are all stupid enough to go down that path in view of what I have forthrightly placed in front of you, and despite the demonstrated results of what happened to the Colorado Nine who did the same thing as you are promoting now, then you have only yourselves to blame and you can in no way blame me or take reference to anything I have said or done in your defense.
(Probably more agents that want to fail, so they can claim this stuff does not work by BJ)
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
Don't Blame Trump --- Blame the Pig Farmers
Day after day I listen to people spewing hate speech against Donald Trump, and the vast majority of the time, they are complaining about things that are being done to them by the Municipal Government.
Get a clue.
Donald Trump is not in control of the Municipal Government.
The members of Congress acting "as" the Municipal United States Congress under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 are the problem. And they are acting as part of the Holy Roman Empire --- so blame the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church and the UN CORP and the Lord Mayor of London and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Benelux Governments, the Bank of France, and the IMF, World Bank, and BIS.
They are the ones causing unemployment, economic decline, horrible educational standards, wars for profit, moral depravity and promotion of human and drug trafficking ---not to mention the identity theft and fraud that has been practiced against us all--- you can take 95% of the rot and lay it at their feet.
The only way that the British Territorial Government (Trump's Baileywick) can be blamed for this current situation is that they have been entrusted with riding herd on the Municipal Government and have failed to do so. They have too often been bought off by co-option and bribes.
Trump isn't being bought off.
If he was, then everything would be roses and champagne for him inside the Beltway and the Mainstream Media would be slavering over him and licking his butt like they did with Barack Obama.
It's the people you are sending to Congress (albeit by voting in elections that were never meant for you and which aren't yours to vote in) that are operating as renegades and causing the foul stench coming out of Washington.
What else can you expect, when you let two political lobbies rule the roost and run everything? Lobbyists. Think about that word. You have lobbyists running what passes for a government.
In a normal government, a lobbyist is a member of a private interest organization that tries to influence the decisions of government. What we have instead are two such private interest organizations running the government.
Imagine two tribes of pigs, one pink and one brown, swarming over the trough and fighting each other over each piece of slop ---and you will have the picture of what is going on year after year in Washington, DC.
Standing around thinking that things are ever going to be better or different depending on which brand of pig you support is delusional at best.
A pig is still a pig, and the purpose of a pig is to eat, eat, eat.
So, Mr. Farmer, do you want to raise pigs at all? Is that what the government is supposed to be in business for? If not, why are you allowing this to go on?
A third of the Federal Government --- and the most important part of it from our perspective --- is gone. Missing in action. It's been this way for 150 years. It has never been "reconstructed".
And in the meantime, the Hired Help has had a hey day of unbelievable proportions at our expense. The Lobbyists occupied the empty chairs of the actual Federal Congress, and here we are, seemingly stuck between a chocolate-flavored Pig Poop Cocktail and a raspberry rendition of the same.
There is, of course, a Third Option. We could do what we are supposed to do, what we brag to the rest of the world about doing. We could self-govern.
We could wake up, reclaim our lawful birthright status as Americans, repopulate our land jurisdiction States of the Union, elect all our own officials, including our own peacekeeping officials, reconstruct our Federal-level States of States, and restore our actual government.
We could stop raising pigs. We could get out of the pig business altogether.
But first we have to wake up, and next, we have to get out of bed.
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
46 mins ·
Virtually All Arguments Based On or About The Constitutions....
The Constitutions set up the Federal Government and barely mention us.
We have a bit role in the Preamble as the creators of an Express National Trust. We pop up to restrict Bills of Attainder and arrest and similar abuses in Article IV.
We make a reappearance in Amendment X. And there is a glancing one-step-removed nod to us and our States of America Confederacy in Article 6 where it references the fact that the debts of the original Confederacy (formed 1781) will remain its responsibility--- that is, won't be shared or transferred to the new British Territorial or Holy Roman Empire Municipal Government contractors.
In fact, so little is specifically said about us that as an after-thought and to place more explicit controls on the Federal Government concerning us, the Framers went back and added the Bill of Rights.
People are so egocentric that they assume that the Constitutions have to be about us, but they aren't. They are primarily about the Federal Government and about Federal Citizens.
Look at Amendment VII -- the important words are in parenthesis with numbers that correlate with the explanation below:
Amendment VII. In suits (at)[1] common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no (fact)[2] tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of (the)[3] United States, than according to the (rules)[4] of the common law.
1. It says "at". If this were referring to us, it would say "in" common law.
2. It says "fact". None of the courts of the United States judge the law or the facts.
3. It says "the" United States". This is referring to the Municipal Government.
4. It says "rules" of the common law. This is referring to military common law, not our version of "common law", which does not have "rules".
This is basically saying that when and if a Federal Citizen comes to jury trial in one of our courts ("at" common law from their perspective), our court's decision will not be reviewed by their courts except in the case of martial (common) law where soldiers and sailors are involved.
Look at Article VI:
“The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”
This is again talking about "the" United States --- the Municipal Government thereof, created under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17.
This is basically saying that the judicial power belonging to the Municipal Government will be vested in their own Supreme Court (which is no surprise, as it is a foreign government) and whatever inferior [Municipal] courts that the members of the [Municipal] Congress may ordain....
This is all talking about Municipal United States Government operations and says nothing whatsoever about our American courts at all.
The tragic mistake that so many people continue to make is to think that the Constitutions are talking about us when in fact the Constitutions are 99% about the US Federal Government and its Branches --- Federal, Territorial, and Municipal---that are being established by the Constitutions.
Think about what the Constitutions are designed to do--- they are setting up the parameters of a new (back then) power-sharing split, redelegating and splitting up powers and duties originally all performed by the States of America Confederation, with some of the powers being retained by the American-owned States of America and some powers being delegated to British service providers and some to Holy Roman Empire service providers.
All of the "delegated powers" actually belong to the States, which are subcontracting for services from: (1) the Confederate States of States, (2) the British Territorial Government, and (3) the Municipal United States.
The entire context of the Constitutions has little or nothing to do with us, the American States and People.
Our States agree to receive the stipulated services and agree to pay for them and agree to step aside and let the hired help do the jobs agreed upon. The rest is about the service providers and how they are supposed to function and what limits we placed upon them.
The Constitutions are fundamentally about our Service Providers and not about us at all, so we make a grievous error when we look to the Constitutions as our source of information about our own non-Federal American Government. We fall into the trap of mistaking "them" for us, and vice-versa.
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
11 hrs ·
The Team has been hard at work all week developing the new website and countrywide teleconference for The American States Assembly. Much applause!!!!! And many thanks!!!!!
We decided to call it a "countrywide" call instead of a "nationwide" call, because there is only one country and this organization is devoted to assembling the land and soil jurisdiction States, finishing the Reconstruction of the "missing" Federal States of States, and ultimately convening a Continental Congress to take care of other business that has been left hanging for more than a century.
We are all about the actual, physical, geographically described States -- and our primary Mission is to:
(1) return people to their birthright political status as Americans;
(2) assemble our States of the Union;
(3) enforce the Public Law, including the Constitutions;
(4) take care of the business outlined above.
This Mission if you decide to accept it, will return you and your family to the land and soil of your birth. It may surprise you to learn that you ever left it!
So think of it as a homecoming, back to a place where you belong, where your rights and private assets are protected, and you don't have to live in fear of your own public employees.
We will be having our first "Countrywide Call" tomorrow, March 11, 2019.
Join us for the Maiden Voyage. I am recovering from a week long fight with the flu, so my voice sounds like gravel, but it will have to do. We are trying to make this a short but highly productive and informative one hour per week.
You can join via Zoom, or via telephone. Details listed below.
Please send questions to: theamericanstatesassembly@protonmail.com
The new website is: theamericanstatesassembly.net
And the teleconference numbers/addresses are posted below:
You are invited to a Zoom webinar.
When: Mar 11, 2019 6:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada)
Every week on Mon, until Apr 22, 2019, 7 occurrence(s)
Mar 11, 2019 6:00 PM
Mar 18, 2019 6:00 PM
Mar 25, 2019 6:00 PM
Apr 1, 2019 6:00 PM
Apr 8, 2019 6:00 PM
Apr 15, 2019 6:00 PM
Apr 22, 2019 6:00 PM
Please download and import the following iCalendar (.ics) files to your calendar system.
Weekly: https://zoom.us/webinar/597600142/ics…
Topic: Anna
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://zoom.us/j/597600142
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16699006833,,597600142# or +19292056099,,597600142#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 929 205 6099
Webinar ID: 597 600 142
International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/aezuON19iw
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
To The Supreme Commander of the Joint British Armed Forces
With respect to your published comments:
Our American Sovereignty derives from William the Conqueror; our claim of sovereignty is equal to or greater than any claim that Elizabeth Windsor (=Wind-sur) can make.
As your Queen holds authority delegated to her by us and you hold authority delegated by her, simple logic mandates that the management of the US Forces are our joint concern.
We should like to know by what plausible stretch of the imagination the failed military leadership proposes that they should assert authority under a delegated sovereignty in full view of the fact that they gained power by fraud and maintain power by fraud and have:
1. Failed to protect and manage our money since 1863;
2. Undermined the civilian government;
3. Bilked and embezzled their actual employers;
4. Promoted WWI and WWII and countless other atrocities;
5. Now offered us a QFS that works five minutes a day;
6. Proposed that all our economic affairs should be under their control;
7. Subjected our non-domestic population to exotic warfare tests;
8. Press-ganged innocent Americans under force;
9. Mis-characterized our people in violation of the Geneva Conventions;
10. Conspired against The Constitution of the United States of America;
11. Plundered public trusts created under conditions of constructive fraud;
12. Allowed our country to suffer nine decades of inland piracy;
13. Pretended that the word "benevolent" can ever enter into any of this.
This past week you have witnessed a silent, but we trust, effective demonstration of power and determination: World War III will not be allowed, nor will any continued Raj in America.
Most sincerely,
Anna Maria
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
March 12 at 2:06 PM ·
Two "Occupying" Forces
There are a lot of people stomping around blatting about sovereignty.
We, the American people, are recognized sovereigns. For most of us, our sovereignty lasts a few days or weeks at the very beginning of our lives, until the bean-counters get around to "registering" us as property belonging to a foreign corporation.
Because the theft of our sovereignty happens while we are babies, we aren't aware that it has been stolen, and that we, ourselves, have been kidnapped from our birthright political status and mis-identified as "US Citizens".
We've been unable to correct the situation as adults, because we were never made aware of it in the first place. This is a "totally unconscionable" contract. We don't even know it exists.
The evil in this country and in much of the world is because of this fraud practiced against us and our lawful government, but it is also because of our own ignorance and gullibility.
How could we live in fear of the IRS and be coerced to give up to 60% of our earnings, and ever believe that we were "free" in any sense of the word?
No, in order to be free, one must take responsibility and self-govern --- and that we have failed to do. To correct the situation requires us to make a mighty correction and at least in the short term, undertake a lot of work.
There are two foreign occupying forces on our soil, one British, one Holy Roman Empire-based.
The British Territorial Government controls our military and trade functions and runs the military-industrial complex.
The Holy Roman Empire-based organization runs the "civil" government as in Federal Civil Service, under the auspices of the Municipal Congress authorities (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17) operating in gross usurpation.
Both of these entities are foreign subcontractors with respect to our actual government, but we have been lulled to sleep and haven't operated our actual government in 150 years, so they have just made themselves at home and drunk up our wine cellars.
Most of the time they work together hand-in-hand to fleece us blind.
Sometimes they play carrot and stick with us, with one pretending to be the "Good Guy" and the other pretending to be the "Bad Guy".
And sometimes they earnestly fight with each other over turf, over direction, over profits.
They are currently coming up against each other as the "Royalists" of the Monarchies come push to shove against the "Globalist" Holy Roman Empire. Instead of viewing these as anything completely separate from each other, it is more profitable to imagine it as an in-house fight between Cousins.
One Cousin, the Holy Roman Empire, is trying to draw in its carefully constructed net of interlocking trust directorates and rule the whole world via controlling money and commerce, while the other Cousin is objecting to having its share of worldly power subjected to the Globalist scheme.
Both of them mean to do us harm and continue fleecing us, so again, we have a choice between Bad and Bad, just two different flavors thereof, but the circumstance together with growing worldwide awareness of their criminal activities does open up the opportunity for us to shake awake and self-govern.
If we don't have the right to tell our subcontractors how high to jump, who does?
In order to do so, we have to face up to a 150 years of history, have to overcome falsified commercial claims, have to overcome 12 years of public school indoctrination, have to find the courage and energy to act, have to plot a lawful path out of this morass and have to get organized to self-govern.
We are the lawful sovereigns of the land and soil, but sovereignty is hard work.
Self-governance is also deadly serious work, but for some reason, many people go off on tangents.
They scream "Fraud!" at the top of their lungs, which it is.
They dig in and try to cram course it all. And fail.
They endanger themselves and everyone else by making wrong assumptions.
They form little backdoor groups and sneak around.
They use fake names and fake addresses.
They go snake-eyed and paranoid.
Once that happens, they can't reason their way out of a paper bag.
Most of the time they fool around and get themselves arrested.
Or they slink off into the hills and try to hide.
Neither response does anything toward fixing the real problems we are faced with and neither is realistic.
Educating millions of Americans, showing them how to reclaim their birthrights, and then motivating them to restore the lawful government they are owed may not seem realistic, either. But it is still what needs to be done.
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
March 12 at 4:01 PM ·
Outting Arnie Rosner (Scanned Retina)
At first, until he realized that he wasn't going to be able to get me to lead any kind of insurrection, Arnie Rosner befriended me and championed the information I was bringing forward.
But as soon as he realized that I was non-violent and lawful in my approach, he dropped me like a rock and claimed that I was a "Vatican Agent".
Now, just today, I have accused him of being a Zionist Agent, which amounts to the same thing as a Vatican Agent, because in the sense he meant it, both are Satanists and neither are Jews nor Catholics.
So, he did follow their Standard Operating Procedure and accuse me of being what he is himself, and now, I am returning the compliment.
The Zionists have been aching to get something going on our soil --- another mercenary conflict, another civil war. They would like nothing better than a little "insurrection" so they could bring out the canons and SWAT teams and start mowing innocent people down.
That's how they make money. A lot of money.
And killing off their Priority Creditors means that they never have to pay us back.
They can also collect over a million dollars a head for every one of us killed in "Life Force Value Annuities" and "Life Insurance".
Then, once we are dead, they can come in and claim all our "abandoned" property.
Finally, they can charge our grandchildren for the "service" they performed getting rid of us.
That's what they did to the Russians during the Russian Revolution and what they did to the actual Jews in Germany and that is precisely the same song and dance of inciting violence that Arnie Rosner has been doing for the last couple of years.
Anyone promoting violence of any kind should be marked and marked well as an Enemy of our Country and our People. They are promoting action that will provide an excuse for mercenary thugs to invade us under the pretense of "peacekeeping".
Have nothing to do with Arnie Rosner or anyone else like him preaching violent revolt and talking nonsense about "critical mass" and cheerleading to get former veterans involved in marches and other activities calculated to spark tempers and allow violent incidents.
Play cool. Play smart. Get even. Give them no excuse.
And shut your ears to the Arnie Rosners of the world who are trying to get us to revolt and take violent actions. That's what he wants. Not what we need.
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·
Horribly Misrepresented
All information seeming to suggest that I am or ever was an "Agent of the Vatican" comes directly from me, so there is no effort to hide anything I have ever done, nor is there any mystery concerning why I have done what I have done. This particular example that Arnie Rosner is waving around comes from my book, Disclosure 101.
In October 2007, I brought our objections and research directly to the Pope, Benedict XVI.
Why? Because he (and his Successors) are in charge of the Civil Government in this country (not civilian, civil) and as anyone can observe now--- thanks largely to me--- both the Territorial and Municipal (Civil) Governments are functioning in gross Breach of Trust.
It does no good in a compartmentalized hierarchy to attack low level employees; they can do nothing to change anything.
So realizing that the problem with our civil government administration at the federal level was within the Pontificate and its administration, I went straight to the top, because lower authorities would only defer to the Pope.
He heard me out. He was stunned. His answer was, and I quote, "Nobody told me!"
So the Office of Evil was such that even the purported head of the organization wasn't told what was going on.
I was in the midst of giving Notice to his employees and cohorts in the Church concerning the Great Fraud. Benedict asked me to add his authority to that Notice process, as the ultimate employer of the civil (municipal) government.
He asked me to do this for him so that the weight of his office would tell the employees to reform and not just ignore the Notice.
This was an unpaid mission that I was engaged in anyway and his reasoning made sense, so that is what we did.
That Notice process took seven (7) years between October 2007 and April of 2014. In that time period, about 10,000 pieces of mail went out of my home office at my own expense, informing members of the Municipal Governments worldwide, and the Territorial Governments, too.
When Benedict XVI left office in 2013, I had a few months left to do.
Francis did not end the Notice process, nor change the arrangement, so it continued on to its logical end in 2014.
The Final Judgment was issued in April 2014 and is published in my book, Disclosure 101.
A great deal of work has gone into giving every Territorial and Municipal organization on Earth a shot at doing the right thing, or at least not doing the wrong thing.
All these Notices went out via "Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent", so we may assume that far more than 10,000 people worldwide were made aware of the Breach of Trust and criminal mismanagement ongoing in this country and many other countries around the world.
So far as this work was concerned, the Church Officials did what you would expect Church Officials to do. They took steps to correct and then they battened down the hatches and have done what they could to protect the Church. The Office of Pontiff was dissolved and ended in 2011, along with the underlying Trust, the Romanus Pontifex.
I don't know how other people view the current state of the world, but to me it is clear that the Apocalypse --- the Great Revealing --- has come and much of the dirty linen of the Roman Catholic Church has been prominently on display, including this vast exposure of wrong-doing by the Municipal Governments that are supposed to be operated "lawfully" --- not legally.
The Municipal United States Government which administered the civil government here has always been under the ultimate control of the Pontificate and has now, since 2011, been passed on directly to the Holy Roman Empire.
This situation was not the original structure of our government.
That is, the Municipal United States oligarchy run by members of the Territorial Congress, was never meant to run our civil government.
That duty was supposed to be performed by the States of America organization that was destroyed and never reconstructed after the Civil War. The ensuing "emergency" and the rationale that "someone had to do it" while the "government [Federal branch of the Federal Government]" was in "abeyance" led to these abuses.
But in point of fact, the entire circumstance didn't affect our actual government at all, as both the States and the People remained after the Civil War, and all this corruption was based on deliberate misrepresentation and self-interested constructive fraud.
In any event, as my Letter to Cardinal George of Chicago (published on my website) makes clear, the tenor of my communications and Notices throughout this seven year period were highly informative and critical of the Municipal Government and the Church's failure to do right by the States and People of this country and cannot in any way be taken as "pro status quo" or "working for the Pope" in continuance of their bad behavior.
My role for those seven years was to give them Due Process ---and that I surely did. Any misrepresentation of me being "in league" with those forces in the Vatican that were promoting these crimes against Humanity needs to be squelched with prejudice. I was already the driving spearpoint demanding reform and restitution from the Pope(s) when Arnie Rosner was sitting around on his duff watching re-runs of Bonanza.