Printable View
True to form... confirms my observations.
The clan of ultra conspiracy, no rabbit hole is ever deep enough, immediately believe the ultra conspiracy angle first, then maybe try to figure it out later as long as it still a deep conspiracy, and maintains the comfort zone.
What of the dancing Islamic Israeli's armed with boxcutters taking control of four jetliners, previously planting thermite in undisclosed locations throughout new york?Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Shouldn't a nuclear sub takeover been more "easier" to coordinate?
Facts are facts, jetliners can not fly the course, and the target could only be guaranteed with a missile. The Pentagon's accounting office was the main target that day.
Lots of things would have been easier, but pressing a button on an airplane to roll out a host of new security protocols all over the place was the plan. They even got rid of some construction costs at the same time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
They had them all up in the air at their disposal, and they used them. This much is 100% proven and widely acknowledged. Funny thing is some still deny even that.
Press a button, Done. That's exactly what they did, so why change one part of the plan when it wasn't even necessary?
To make it out as though they were invisible running around all over the place undetected during rush hour, planting hamburger chunks of people, and fake debris...it's so far out there if falls over the edge.
Because it is an impossible flight path, with near -0% success rate.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
How many times has this been repeated yet you refuse to comprehend,
and go on to discredit others statements who you don't even know through slanderous verbiage.
So where did the plane go, and how did all the passengers turn up as hamburger in the building?Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
I haven't heard anyone try to explain that part yet.
Some said it flew on by, were you in the building making patties that day?Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Would it have been more appropriate for the 2.3T missing to turn up missing the day after the "attacks"?
And a bunch of people said it hit the building like the flight recorder shows. So if the flight recorder data is all fake, then how is the flight path impossible if all the data is a fabrication? Right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
So what about passengers?
So they flew past it, and landed the plane where?...then hauled everyone off, convincingly ground them up at a level to bear forensic analysis, then drove it all back at warp speed, and scattered it everywhere with all that commotion going on without anyone noticing anything? In a burning building mind you.
Who in their right mind would even consider that as a legitimate course of action, and hope to get away with it...even if they did have some kind of mass memory erasing device?
See what I mean?
Haven't you thought about this yourself already when considering everything?
Its been explained a number of times that many people died that day.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Even Pat Colo has explained how 11 Saud's DNA was matched up through improper process of elimination.
All other evidence is inconsequential to the impossible flight path and subject to tampering.
Just as it is impossible for modern steel buildings to fall many hours after impact straight onto their footprint from residual fires.
Go through the logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
If the flight recorder shows the plane stopped there, but it didn't, then the flight recorder data is a fabrication. There is no impossible flight path data that you should be believing, it's all fabricated.
This is what I was talking about earlier with cherry picking information.
So what's up with the passengers then. Were they ever on the plane to begin with? Was it empty?
Did they fly an empty plane right over top? What would be the purpose of doing that?
Then you have all these alive people rounded up somewhere, and you have to make it look like they were in a 500mph collision at a forensic level, and get them onsite undetected.
Does that make any sense as a legitimate plan over simply pressing a button?
Yes, because it is illogical to conclude that you could achieve the high priority target with a Boeing 757.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Stopped at 460ft above sea level.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uPN3XNTdv8