Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher

A Bundy affair, letter by Ryan Payne

​http://outpost-of-freedom.com/blog/?p=1715

Bundy Affair #17 – Ryan Payne Explains Some of the Circumstances Surrounding the Bundy Affair in April 2014

October 13, 2016, 7:22 pm
The Bundy Affair – #17
Ryan Payne Explains Some of the Circumstances
Surrounding the Bundy Affair in April 2014

http://outpost-of-freedom.com/blog/w...N-1024x683.jpgGary Hunt
Outpost of Freedom
October 13, 2016

Ryan Payne’s attorneys did not want him to go public with this letter. You will note that it was written on September 19, 2016. He mailed it to me on October 3rd. However, the final decision to go public with it was withheld, at my request, until I received it and then got confirmation that he still wanted it to go public.

Today, October 13, I spoke with Ryan and he is still desirous of the letter going out. This has been edited for clarity, at Ryan’s request. The PDF (linked at the bottom) is as I received it.

As you will see, Ryan’s efforts were an attempt, by setting out false information, to provide a degree of safety for those patriot participants. If the government believed that there were things that really were not, then that would be an incentive to think before acting.

Today, October XX, I spoke with Ryan and he is still desirous of the letter going out. This has been edited for clarity, at Ryan’s request. The PDF (linked at the bottom) is as I received it.

Feel free to share this with anyone who might be interested, especially those that he addresses it to in the first paragraph.

Gary Hunt, Outpost of Freedom

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Monday, September 19th, 2016

To those Patriots, their families, and anyone affected by or involved with the indictment against Cliven Bundy and eighteen others,.This letter is my apology to you all and is open for disclosure to any and all who may have interest.

This letter and apology are necessary due to my negligence and lack of foresight during and after my time at the Bundy Ranch in April and May of 2014. During that time, I acted as a bodyguard to Cliven Bundy and various members of the Bundy Family, as a liaison between the Bundy Family and any unorganized militia concerned with protecting innocent lives, and as a chairman of defensive council meetings which occurred after the 12th of April, 2014.

In a number of interviews after the 12th of April, with a few different media outlets and activist groups, pertaining to the events surrounding the 12th, I made statements that were speculative, inaccurate, fabricated entirely, and others that were all three. The inaccurate, speculative, and/or fabricated statements had to do with:

1) There being a “plan” to accomplish certain objectives that there was never any “plan” to accomplish;
2) Certain capabilities existing that did not actually exist;
3) Circumstances or outcomes which may or may not have existed or been possible;
4) Command of individuals and/or groups in relation to a “plan,” of which there was no such command nor a plan to execute;
5) Any “planning” which was said to have taken place before the 12th of April, of which there was none.

1) There were outcomes that I discussed with Mr. Bundy on the morning of April 8, 2014, upon first meeting him, which were desirable to him and his family. These were then disseminated through conventional and alternative media outlets, in the belief that those who may decide to protest against the Sheriffs apparent lack of involvement, and/or against the brutal and militarized actions of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). This would give them more information to aid in making decisions for themselves and their actions. There was never a plan to accomplish these objectives, in any way, shape, or form, nor was there any intent to support any such plan, by myself, the Bundy’s, or any one else. As there was presumed to be a large protest on April 12th, I discussed, with numerous individuals, some particular things to be watchful for amongst the crowd, for the safety of all involved including law enforcement and federal employees. However, none of these discussions concerned a plan to achieve any objectives. This is true to my knowledge.

2) There were no long-range marksmen present before, during, or after the 12th, except those employed by the BLM as confirmed via photographic evidence disseminated before the 12th. There were no counter-sniper teams or positions, nor was there any plan for such. There were no qualified individuals or teams present to perform such a task, even if there had been a plan for it. Again, there was no such plan, and no orders were ever given in relation to such positions or teams, nor could there have been orders given, as there was no command authority. This is true to my knowledge.

3) There was no “Tactical Superiority,” any intent to achieve “Tactical Superiority,” and there was no plan concerning achieving “Tactical Superiority,” at any time before, during, or after the 12th, relating to the events which took place in and around Bunkerville, Nevada. There could be nothing other than speculation concerning any outcomes or circumstances pertaining to the 12th because there was neither a coordinated nor centralized offensive entity, plan, nor strategy, nor was there any intent to achieve or implement such.

Statements about what could or could not have happened if the BLM or Forest Service Tactical Strike Force had opened fire on the innocent protesters they were aiming their AR-15 style rifles at, which included women and children, were, are, and could only ever be speculative and based on opinion, as there was no coordination nor planned response to that scenario. This is true to my knowledge.

4) There was no “command” authority, “on-the-ground commander,” or any agreement to give, to receive, or to follow orders from anyone in the Bundy family, nor myself, nor anyone present or not present in Bunkerville, Nevada, before or on the 12th of April, 2014. Neither myself, nor anyone else, gave orders or instructions regarding fortified positions, or gaining tactical superiority, to anyone present on the 12th. There was certainly no agreement to commit a crime, or multiple crimes. This is true to my knowledge.

5) As stated in (1) above, there was never a plan, nor was there any planning pertaining to the events which took place before and on the 12th of April, aside from being able to provide food and water to protesters. This is true to my knowledge.

After the 12th, there were those of us that stayed with the Bundys for their own comfort and protection, as they related that they still felt that the government might attempt to do them harm again. The rhetoric issuing from Harry Reid about those American citizens that protested on the 12th being, calling them “domestic-terrorists”, led many of us to believe that the stage was being set for a government action reminiscent of Waco, Texas and Ruby Ridge, Idaho. In both instances, FBI agents killed women and children. Continued lies from different government representatives furthered that sentiment, and it was felt that there was not the ability to defend against such an action.

In lieu of the lack of ability, but the desire to defend against, what many felt, would amount to a government-orchestrated execution of the Bundys and others involved, I took it upon myself to disseminate a series of calculated misrepresentations, fabrications, and speculations, concerning the events of the 12th. Others did the same. The facade created by these misrepresentations was intended to make it seem as if the protest on the 12th was planned, orchestrated, and carried out by those who were still protecting the Bundys. This projected the notion that any subsequent aggressive action on the part of the government could be responded to in a similar manner that could quickly and easily be achieved by those still present at the ranch, at that time. I made other statements to present the appearance that government retaliation against the lawful protesters at their homes across the union could result in a similar response.

The government has apparently used my statements, and other’s statements, to justify the present indictment. Although my intentions were to help secure the lives of innocent Americans, my words have probably contributed to their current imprisonment. My altruistic motive does not clear my negligence in using a method, intended to protect; that could later be used against all of those implicated through the method. I did not foresee that the government would use those statements to contrive the intent of committing crimes, and contrive conspiracies to do so via contrived agreements with others.

I am prohibited by a court order from discussing the particulars of the “evidence” the government collected over the last two and a half years in its intrusive investigation into this matter. However, I can relate to you that it has become obvious to those who are reviewing it, that the government found no evidence of any conspiracies to commit any crimes. They have discovered that my statements were not factual, so they fabricated their indictment, using language of their own. Though they mimicked language that I had used, which is essentially proof that their indictment is based on falsity and misrepresentations. They are very crafty in having used a facade intended to protect, in order to create a facade intended to implicate the commission of crimes; yet it is indisputable, that the latter is even further from the truth than the former, given that its credibility relies on previous falsities.

The “evidence” also might reveal, through their own documentation, the blatantly unlawful and overly forceful tactics employed by the BLM and Forest Service, and perhaps even present a mode of indicting employees working for federal bureaucracies for the very crimes they allege against us. Us includes you, the American People, because while there were thousands from across the union that lawfully protested and supported protesting on April 12th, nineteen of us bear the whole weight of the federal government by this prosecution. Perhaps this is why they are keeping it sealed. Perhaps the same is true in the Oregon case as well. I am not allowed to say what the evidence is, but I have reviewed enough to form an opinion. The People should know, and perhaps one day you shall.

I would also take this opportunity to give a few words regarding the federal informant Mark McConnell. Bear no grudge. Harbor no animosity. Exact no vengeance, for vengeance is the L-rd’s. He continues to attempt to justify himself and his actions, which a man is inclined to do by his nature. He continues to lie and mislead; he continues to perform the will of his master. But I forgive Mark, despite the facts that I have become aware of over the last eight months, which are not limited to his dealings in relation to LaVoy Finicum’s murder. I forgive him for what he has done and what he continues to do.

Mr. McConnell: in the words of King Leonidas, to Ephialtes, the traitor who showed the Persians the way to thwart the Spartan led defense of all Greece during the battle of Thermopylae, “May you live forever.” May you be an example to future generations, of the cunning and mischief of a corrupt government and the people it uses and destroys to its own purpose. You are another part of G-d’s perfect plan, which is being revealed, and we all play our part. The “virus,” of truth, liberty, and the power of The People, was spreading from Harney County, Oregon, and you helped stall the tide. But the waters can only be held for so long; the pressure builds, and that which was intended to stall, becomes the means of creating an overwhelming surge.

I also forgive Lt. Needham of the Harney County Sheriff’s Department, for the lies he told, on the stand and under oath, regarding a conversation he and I had in early December of 2015, before the Refuge protest. Perhaps the conversation we had after I was arrested, while in the prisoner transport van, induced him to fabricate such statements. Deputy Lucas McLain was there, and I’m sure he can recall, as can Shawna Cox, Ammon Bundy, Mark McConnell, Victoria Sharp, and Brian Cavalier. One is his comrade-in-blue (Dep. McLain), two that can lie for the government (McConnell & Cavalier), each within something to gain for their efforts. However, the others who are witness to this are incarcerated (Ammon & Shawna), and one is still trying to discern the truth of many things for herself (Victoria Sharp). But, I’m sure they all recall my questions about his past. Or perhaps he was pressured in some way to fabricate those statements. Only he and G-d know the truth as to why he lied, but I know that it is true that he lied. May you also live forever, Sir. And may the light shine…

A man told me once, “Sunlight is the best disinfectant.” I heard the same from his son, and his other son; my friends. That man was Cliven Bundy, and his sons Ammon and Ryan. I believe this is true, and that the light will expose that which was formerly in the dark; and I believe that One created both, and all that they encompass. I am sorry for the pain and suffering caused by our incarceration, and I’m sorry if my words or actions have contributed to it. I have learned that even the best of intentions can result in adverse outcomes, and I will write this lesson on my heart. May our L-rd in heaven let His countenance shine on us all, that we will learn the truth, and know peace. Shalom!

With utmost sincerity, Your faithful and humble servant,/s/ Ryan Payne

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Note: In an article posted today, at “Burns Chronicles“, Ryan Payne has moved to withdraw his plea agreement, partially based upon trial based circumstances in the Nevada trial.

Original in PDF at http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/do...L01-161019.pdf

On TVOI News twitter

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu7OjO2UIAAR_nK.jpg

Gary Hunt, Outpost of Freedom Nye County, Nevada Sheriff Wehrly v. CCA and the feds?

I don't know much about this woman sheriff, but I think she is following the footsteps of former Sheriff Tony DeMeo.




The Bundy Affair #18 – Sheriff Wehrly v. CCA and the feds?

October 16, 2016, 7:13 pm
The Bundy Affair – #18
Sheriff Wehrly v. CCA and the feds?

http://outpost-of-freedom.com/blog/w...nter_-_CCA.jpgGary Hunt
Outpost of Freedom
October 17, 2016

I was asked to forward the following document to Nye County Sheriff Sharon Wehrly. The concern was that if it was sent out by an inmate in the Southern Nevada Detention Center (SNDC), a CCA (Customer base: U.S. Marshals Service – Facility Type: Medium, Owned since 2010) facility, that they would have no way of determining whether it was received by the Sheriff, or not. It could simply end up in the trash bin, or on the desk of the US Marshal Service (USMS).

For the record, it went in the mail about the same time this article is being posted.

So, being the curious sort, I wanted to find more about the SNDC, a went searching for the contract between the CCA and the USMS, or whoever was the party on the government side. I was able to find the highly redacted Solicitation and Contract for the construction of the facility, with an initial price tag of $122,250,660.00. The solicitation also included construction, maintenance, control, prisoner requirements, and a number of change orders -which, obviously allowed them to exceed the $122 million price tag. However, any per bed cost was redacted, as were the other prisoner related expenses.

What is quite clear is that the federal government pays for 750 beds per day, whether occupied, or not. Any additional beds are paid for as long as they are used. Well, that means that until the 750 beds are full, the government is simply throwing away our money. However, being conscious of that, it may well be that they endeavor to keep as many of those beds filled, all of the time.

This, then, would mean that if they can declare someone a “flight risk” or a “danger to the community”, instead of allowing them out on bail, or a more realistic “pre-trial release”, they are not saving many, but they are making CCA earn our money.

However, in reviewing the information I had gleaned and from the letter (below) the is being sent to the Sheriff, other questions arose that I wish to lay before you, the People..First is what the intent was in the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution when it says:
No person shall… be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

Simply with the opinion of the Prosecutor, who claims that those who have families and homes to tie them to the land, which pretty much assures that they will not abandon their life’s work, are “flight risks”; or, that those who have never harmed anyone are “a “danger to the community”, begins a process. This, then, results in the deprivation of liberty, with the simple concurrence of the judge. It seems more like collusion to me.However, we can’t just leave the question at that.
We need to also look at the intent of the Eighth Amendment, which says:
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Now, that says “Excessive bail“. What can we conclude, with regard to intent? The implication is clear — that for one to retain that “liberty“, that he is not to “be deprived of“, the bail is a requisite, and only an “Excessive bail” is prohibited. So, by what perverse interpretation can that bail be denied and those who have been in custody for over eight months, be consistent with the limitations imposed on the government by the Constitution?

Now, the final consideration is the additional limitation imposed on the government by another provision in that Amendment, and relies, also, on the whole concept of “innocent until proven guilty”. If one is innocent, then is it not cruel, though unfortunately in this modern police state not necessarily unusual, to imprison someone on such meager pretenses?

Now, the final consideration is one of jurisdiction, and that is where the “inmate’s” letter comes in to play. The SNDC is a privately owned facility, under contract to the federal government. It is on privately owned land that has left the federal public lands, years ago. It was never ceded back to the federal government, as required by Article I, § 8, clause 17, so it clearly is under the jurisdiction of ONLY Nevada and Nye County.

Now, if we stand back and look with an objective eye, perhaps we should really see that these 12 people have been deprived of their liberty as a consequence of being kidnapped by the federal government, in violation of the Constitution. They are detained by a co-conspirator, the CCA, in violation of the Constitution, and absent any legal authority on the part of the CCA — simply a contract to deprive them of their rights. And, finally, within the jurisdiction of Nye County, Nevada and Sheriff Sharon Wehrly.

This, of course, leaves us to ponder whether the state and local governments will conform to their state constitutional duties and protect people within their jurisdiction against overreach, and criminal acts, of the federal government and its co-conspirators.

Now, considering the matter carefully, all that is necessary is for the Sheriff to take protective custody of the inmates, and then present them to a local court to determine if the State Constitution prohibits the acts mentioned above. And, if so, to release them on their own recognizance, subject, of course, to them agreeing to appear to present their case under the pending federal Indictment.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Defendants in the Bundy Case
Nevada Southern Detention Center
2190 E. Mesquite Ave.
Pahrump, Nevada, 89060

October 11, 2016
Sheriff Sharon Wehrly
1520 E. Basin Rd
Pahrump, Nevada, 89060

Subject: Emergency Request for Protective Custody

Dear Sheriff Wehrly,

As you may already be aware, the discovery/evidence obtained by the government in the Bundy case has been subjected to a secretive “Protective Order” prohibiting the public release of information which would prove our innocence, and contradict the government and court justifications for our current captivity. Now that we’ve had an opportunity to review the U.S. government’s body cam, dash-cam, video, photographic, and audio evidence, we believe that the protective order was put in place so that the government can continue to deceive the public, without any disclosure of the truth, tainting the perspective jury pool.

We currently possess evidence which shows, with no doubt what so ever, that we defendants have essentially been kidnapped and held against our will, the only explanation for such being some political malfeasance. We have indisputable photographic and audio evidence which totally exonerates us, and we would like to share this information with you as soon as possible.

We have begged the court to release us from pre-trial detention, and we have all been denied. The prosecution has literally trumped up accusations in order to justify labeling each of us “a danger to the community” and “a flight risk”. The US Government obviously knows that we are all innocent and is now using pre-trial detention as a punishment for us and our families while we are supposedly “ presumed innocent”, and as a tool to intimidate others who might be inclined to protest against government actions the disagree with. This appears to be a political conspiracy to chill any future effort by the people to redress grievances regarding increasingly heavy-handed tactics and militarization of law enforcement, both of which are clearly portrayed by the government’s discovery productions.

We are respectfully submitting this emergency request for your intervention; and we also request to immediately be placed in your protective custody, within your county jurisdiction, while our attorneys prepare an emergency request for the dismissal of all charges against us. We are currently held prisoner at a private facility, Nevada Southern Detention Center, which is within your constitutional jurisdiction to uphold the law. The federal government can by no means justify our current captivity on lawful grounds, and is making a great effort to hide this fact. This alludes to a conspiracy between two separate branches of government; executive, and judicial.

Please assert your constitutional authority, as the chief law enforcement officer in your county, and demand an in-person meeting with any one of the defendants named below. The federal government is detaining many presumably innocent citizens within counties across the Union, and will continue to do so as long as county Sheriffs, the highest elected law enforcement officers of the land, allow this atrocious unlawful practice, which amounts to kidnapping, to persist. We assume that action would be taken if there was awareness of the situation, and a very brief investigation into the facts we can present you with will expose the matters succinctly, at least in regards to our case.We thank you in advance, with faith that your interest in upholding the law and the Constitution will compel your involvement in this matter.

Respectfully Submitted,

Jason Woods, Eric Parker, Ryan Payne, Mel Bundy, Dave Bundy, Cliven Bundy, Rick Lovelien,Steve Stewart, Joseph O’Shaughnessy, Todd Engel, Micah McGuire, Peter Santilli

Share this:

• Email
• Print
• Facebook
  55
• Google
• Pinterest
  1

Lawyer in Bundy Ranch standoff wants evidence gatherd by FBI masquerading as movie company blocked.

Excerpt: "A defense lawyer in the Bunkerville standoff case has filed court papers seeking to toss out evidence obtained against his client by undercover “law enforcement agents” posing as a video production crew.

Terrence Jackson says in the court papers that he wants a hearing on whether to bar federal prosecutors from using an interview his client Gregory Burleson gave to the undercover company Longbow Productions in October 2014.

“An evidentiary hearing will establish that Longbow Productions had supplied Burleson multiple alcoholic drinks before the interview, then continued supplying him with alcohol with the deliberate intent to induce him to make incriminating admissions,” Jackson wrote.

“The evidentiary hearing will also show that Longbow Productions is a quasi law enforcement group designed to investigate the Bundy ranch standoff occurring in April 2014.”

Other defense lawyers in the case told the Las Vegas Review-Journal last month that they believed FBI agents had posed as a documentary film crew for Longbow Productions during the investigation. One lawyer made the same assertion in court documents."

Full Story: http://m.reviewjournal.com/news/bund...over-film-crew

A 40 minute video, "Bundy Ranch, The Aftermath"

http://youtu.be/8iIbBXrp5wY

https://youtu.be/8iIbBXrp5wY

Blaine Cooper to testify against Bundy's in Nevada. Personally I have always felt Blaine Cooper was a snitch, now I am even more convinced. I think he is one of the 12 unidentified government informants in the Malheur Protest.

http://youtu.be/1J7rSPhnmDU

https://youtu.be/1J7rSPhnmDU

From facebook, re Blaine Cooper and a blip about grand jury indictement re FBI HRT team that murdered LaVoy

The Truth Is Viral7 hrs ·

Blaine Cooper has proffered a deal with federal prosecutors in which he would testify against the five members of the Bundy family, along with 13 others including independent journalist Peter T. Santilli. All of the men have been charged with at 16 federal felonies, and if found guilty could spend 50 years to life in prison.

Cooper called Patriot activist Jaime Spears from a federal detention facility in Nevada to tell her he had decided to make the deal so that he could, "go home to see my children." It is unknown at this time if prosecutors will accept the proffer, or what concessions they may be prepared to make in exchange for Cooper's testimony.

The trial is scheduled to begin on February 6th, more than a year since the group was arrested for their activities at the Bundy Ranch Standoff in 2014 and the occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in January of 2016 which ended in the death of Robert "LaVoy" Finicum at an ambush set by the FBI and Oregon State Police.

At least 2 members of the FBI's Hostage Rescue Team are under investigation by the DOJ's Office of the Inspector General and the FBI's Office of Professional Responsibility for shooting at Finicum from elevated sniper positions, and then lying about having taken the shots to Oregon investigators.

Well-sourced information from inside the Department of Justice indicates that indictments of the HRT snipers are expected to be filed, but the exact charges have yet to be determined.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1J7rSPhnmDU

Todd Mafarlane has posted several new videos on the RangFire youtube channel on grazing rights adverse possesion etc.. This one he talks about grazing rights, for the uninformed
Edit: grazing fees, on BLM allotments, not grazing rights

http://youtu.be/2fXZHTaYrFs https://youtu.be/2fXZHTaYrFs

The Democratic Party taints jury pool against Cliven Bundy

http://thepetesantillishow.com/no-fa...l-contaminated

No Fair Trial For Cliven Bundy – Perspective Jury Pool Contaminated After Democrats send 700,000 Reasons To Connect Him to Las Vegas Cop Killers

No Fair Trial For Cliven Bundy – Perspective Jury Pool Contaminated After Democrats send 700,000 Reasons To Connect Him to Las Vegas Cop Killers.

Guerilla Media Network LLC – Las Vegas Nevada – Monday – October 25th 2016

Deb Jordan Reports: Chris Rasmussen, attorney for jailed journalist Pete Santilli, has joined the Nevada Public Defenders Motion to Compel the Court for a “Change of Venue” after he received a mailer that was sent to over 700,000 households across the State. Rasmussen supplemented the Public Defenders motion by entering in as evidence several pieces of propaganda he feels supports the claim that defendants in the case of The United States vs Cliven Bundy et, al – will not receive a fair trial in Nevada.l

The flyer mailed by the Nevada Democratic party for Ruben Kihuen, done in the style of a wanted poster, depicts Cliven Bundy as being directly responsible for the murders of two Las Vegas Metro Police Officers in the summer of 2014.

http://thepetesantillishow.com/wp-co...1-676x1024.jpg

Jerad and Amanda Miller were briefly present at the April 2014 civil rights protest held on Cliven Bundy’s private property before they were asked to leave by security. It would be over two months later before the couple would carry out the brutal and perplexing murders of two Metro Officers while they were eating lunch at a CiCi’s pizza.
In November of 2013, just a few short months before the Bundy Ranch civil rights protest, the Millers were involved in the “Occupy Movement.” Occupy Protests tend to be attributed to the left. Bundy Ranch tends to be associated with the right. In both cases there are acts of civil disobedience, but the Democratic Party for Ruben Kihuen fails to mention the Miller’s close association with Occupy Wall Street, the extreme left leaning organization where civil disobedience often results in violence and chaos followed by destruction of property, looting, shattered storefronts, and multiple assaults on Law Enforcement Officers.

Instead Democrats, who overwhelmingly support causes for the left while demonizing the right, completely ignore the Miller’s connection to the Occupy Movement and choose not to explore the possibility the shooters were more steeped in the extreme left phenomenon of Anarchist behavior, than they were of the Patriot Movement’s ideology concerning abusive Government overreach when it comes to ranchers rights in Western States.

Las Vegas Metro Police and the Clark County Sheriffs Department cannot produce any report of violence or destruction of property during the Bundy Civil Rights Protest, except in those instances where the Bureau of Land Management were the perpetrators.

Sheriff Douglas Gillespi, the then Sheriff of Clarke County said at the time, there was no direct link to the couple’s killing spree and Cliven Bundy – noting that the two had arrived in Las Vegas in January of 2014 and that they had their own agenda for starting a revolution. Gillespi made clear he had seen NO evidence that the Miller’s had come to Nevada seeking out Cliven Bundy.

The couple had told friends they were disappointed in the Occupy Movement and Cliven Bundy because neither protest went far enough. Jerad Miller’s comments on YouTube and Facebook concerning his expulsion from Bundy Ranch echoed that sentiment:

http://thepetesantillishow.com/wp-co...er-300x173.png

MICHELE FIORE ROUNDING UP POLITICIANS AND HOLDING THEM ACCOUNTABLE

http://thepetesantillishow.com/wp-co...1-1024x684.jpg

Elected officials who supported Cliven Bundy during his 2014 civil rights protest in Bunkerville, Nevada, are not surprised the Federal Government chose to seek an indictment against Cliven Bundy during an election year, and alerted attorneys working on the case when they saw one of the “mailers” that had been showing up in mailboxes throughout the State.

While there are a handful of hopefuls who have kept their word and refused to abandon the Bundy Family, many more have not. Instead of standing up to the powerful Democratic Party they chose to distance themselves from controversy and deny they ever took part in the protest at all; Nevada State Assembly Woman Michele Fiore, would not be one of them.

Michele Fiore spoke to Senator Ruben Kihuen, who is now running for Congress and connected to the propaganda piece by the Democratic Party, about her concerns over the mailer and he told her that: His campaign had not generated the mailer and that the Nevada Democratic Party, who must ultimately take responsibility, did not “nor did they have to” seek his approval before sending them out.

Fiore is furious that Political Leaders who empowered the people to protest in 2014 are now acting like cowards and choosing political careers over doing the right thing when it comes to Cliven Bundy. “This mailer is completely unacceptable she said, and somebody needs to be held accountable for putting this false narrative in Nevada mailboxes”

“Clearly the Bundy’s Civil Rights were being violated by a United States Government – Terrorist Organization – known as the BLM, and we all saw it happening with our own eyes. I was not the only elected official at that protest and what I want to know is; Where the hell are they now?”

Fiore admits that her own losing run for Congress was deeply affected because of her affiliation with the Bundy Protest, but that she has no regrets;

The level of propaganda being allowed by the Democratic party must come to an end. We have men whose lives are on the line here in Nevada, and poisoning the jury pool with a downright lie must be dealt with. Not only do we have a case here that is already out of balance because it is being overseen by Judge Gloria Navarro, a left winger who was recommended by Harry Reid and appointed by Barack Obama, and Steven Myhre a Liberal Prosecutor who could obviously care less about fairness and truth, now we add to that more unfairness by allowing a left-wing propaganda machine to send out the message, that Cliven Bundy is directly responsible for the death of two of our Metro Police officers.

This case should be awarded a change in venue in the fairness of law, and my peers should stop being cowards and get back to representing the truth about this case.

Cliven Bundy held a peaceful protest on his own property and even though the Federal Government was not invited, they came anyway.
They literally beat up on his family, set trained snipers on hillsides overlooking his ranch, came at them with stun guns and dogs, tried to restrict them to a first amendment area, killed and buried their cattle on public lands – in mass graves, threatened everyone who came to a lawful protest with lethal force, had armed helicopters and drones flying all over the place, and now they honestly want the American people to believe the Bundy’s were the bad guys — come on …

The Government has stacked the odds against these men, and I am telling you right now;

I will not stand by and watch them be railroaded by a bunch of left-wing extremist and sent to prison for crimes they did not commit.
This case should not only be moved out of the State of Nevada, it should be dismissed altogether.
I have no regrets for doing the right thing here when it comes to the Bundy’s — As hard as it is, I would rather lose every single race for office, before I would lose one nights sleep knowing I had betrayed them .”

Sheriff of Nye County Has Deep Concerns

Sharon Wehrly, the Sheriff of Nye County Nevada says she has received and taken seriously a request for intervention written to her by defendants in the case of United States vs Cliven Bundy Et Al, and is moving forward with a request to have the prisoners moved to her Nye County facility.

“We are almost there,” said Sheriff Sharon Wehrly, who explained she has already requested transfer of the defendants to the Nye County Jail.

Among concerns of the men being housed in a corporate owned facility, is that their phone calls with attorneys are listened to and recorded by employees and they have little faith that men and women who do not take an oath to the Constitution, will abide by the law and not give that information to the Prosecution.

Sheriff Wehrly admits that confidentiality between a lawyer and his client is a basic human right, and that among other abuses being committed, would not be happening in her jail.

There is no doubt we have seen a stark change in the attitudes of guards since the mailers have been sent out across the State, said Pete Santilli, a journalist who was indicted in the case.

It’s hard enough to mount a decent defense behind bars and now we have a political party who publishes a complete lie and poisons our potential jury pool. Because the judge has already created a strong public bias by deeming us all too violent for pre-trial release, and now mailers in hundreds of thousands Nevadan mailboxes are calling us cop killers — there is no way we can get a fair trial with an unbiased jury in Nevada.

Journalists and defendants, along with their attorneys agree that this case is being shrouded in secrecy for a reason, and the idea of a coverup up for wrongdoing by Public Officials – including the FBI and the BLM – is not that far fetched.

All of the men being charged are still adamant that discovery (evidence) if allowed to be seen by the media and scrutinized by the public, would sway judicial and public opinion and force their pre-trial release.

If you would like to speak with Seantor Ruben and demand he publicly hold his party accountable and apologize to Cliven Cliven Bundy – Please do so:

Contact:

Ruben.Kihuen@sen.state.nv.us
P.O. Box 427
Las Vegas, NV 89125-0427
702-274-1707

To contact party responsible and demand a public retraction and apology:



Address: 6233 Dean Martin Dr, Las Vegas, NV 89118


Phone: (702) 737-8683




http://nvdems.com/contact-us/

More dirt from the Nevada Democrats

https://scontent-mia1-1.xx.fbcdn.net...3c&oe=58930784