Jlynn Littleberry said... All of us, including Deanna, have the
*right* to choose when we will, and when
we will NOT, believe a government report.
Deanna had gotten a good reputation for
not accepting mainstream versions of
historical events, and, when she DECIDED
to embrace the government report, and
for the flimsiest of reasons ("...it was
just the officers on the scene writing down
what the saw..."), that knocked me
(and many others, I suspect) off the bus
(the bus of former admirers of Deanna
as a researcher, podcast host, and truth-seeker).
That hurt!
But, in the end, she exercised her right
to choose to believe a government report,
and, nobody is going to change that.
So be it.
I, along with many former admirers, choose
to discount anything she has to say about
anything, after her stubbornness in adhering
to the pretense that the government report
stands as solid evidence, worthy of being
believed on its own.
By now, even when she has interesting
guests on, I just can't get worked up enough
to listen. I suppose if she were to have
John Kaminski on her show, I'd probably
listen but he wouldn't let her off the hook
on Sandy Hook (that poetic phrase was not
intentional - it just came out).
We may never know just what happened
to Deanna - she may not even know herself,
but, she obviously doesn't see, or won't
admit, that her willingness to believe
the government report discredits her as
a spokesman for those seeking truth
in today's world of so much deception
and fakery, especially by government
public releases.
