-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
31 mins ·
The Wage of Fraud
The wage of fraud is confusion.
Let's straighten out everyone's thinking right here and now.
No actual government can be incorporated.
The reason for this is that the moment you incorporate anything, a charter is issued by another, different sovereign entity---thereby subjecting it to the authority of the other sovereign.
Scotland can't issue a charter for the actual government of America. At most, the nasty vermin can infringe on our international copyright and create a commercial corporation doppelganger. Which is precisely what they did in 1868 and what they are trying to do now.
And as for Keith Livingway and T-Roh they are trying to capitalize on the original Scottish fraud of 1868, trying to say that they bought an interest in that defunct Scottish commercial corporation and therefore now own America.
Good luck with that bull crap.
"The United States of America, Incorporated" created in 1868 in Scotland was chartered by the Scottish Government, not the American Government.
And this defunct Scottish entity owes us a helluva lot of money. It's just a matter of how hard we want to press the issue of their fraud at this late date. Bank of Scotland, do you hear me? BIS?
As you can see, it isn't even possible for any entity incorporated by any other government to be our government.
And it is the same way for the "United States of America" Inc. chartered by the Roman Catholic Church in Delaware in 1925. That entity is subject to Delaware, which is obviously not able to act as "the" government of this country.
There is one and only one lawful government of this country still standing in international jurisdiction, and that is The United States of America [Unincorporated] and the member States ---- Wisconsin, Kentucky, Maine, Texas, and so on.
The Universal Postal Union knows that it has contracts with the unincorporated version so none of the idiocy being promoted by Keith Livingway and "T-Roh" will be honored.
A incorporated entity acting "as" a government is not a government.
Because the fraud artists created all these deceptively named incorporated entities in foreign countries there is a lot of confusion. Most recently we have had to deal with "The Republic of the United States of America" (France) and "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" (Scotland--- again!)
But all these incorporated imposters are not our government and can't be our government. They are merely identity thieves trying to get a governmental services contract by a process of "assumption" long after we have told all of them, including Keith Livingway's group, thanks, but no thanks.
All this fraud has to end.
Apparently, some officers in the military thought that because there was a "Grand Army of the Republic" that there had to be "a" Republic, but in fact, the lawful government of our country in international jurisdiction is now and has always been a Federation of States (not a Confederation of States of States) operated in tandem with state Republics---- fifty of them.
So, please, everyone, get your heads clear on the subject of sovereignty and subjection. Incorporated entities are always 100% of the time subject to a sovereign entity. I think all Americans can agree on the fact that our government is not now and never has been chartered by Scotland or France.
Let's bring all this confusion to a halt and end all the fraud as well.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
$100 Reward: Find the Missing Republic
Times being what they are, and the expenses of The Living Law Firm being what they are, I can't afford to offer a big reward (on the off chance that I have to pay up) but I am sick and tired of having to argue about this with knotheads and I will pay $100 of my own money to anyone who can prove that a singular national "Republic" exists.
Yes, there was/is a "Grand Army of the Republic" --- the Union Army during the Civil War.
Yes, there was/is a song called "The Battle Hymn of the Republic".
Yes, there is an oblique reference in "The Pledge of Allegiance" to "the Republic for which it stands."
Yes, Ben Franklin is reported to have told a by-stander when asked what kind of government we have --- "A Republic. If you can keep it."
And yes, we are guaranteed a "republican form of government" in the Constitution.
We even have "The Supreme Republican Declaration of the United Colonies of America".
But nowhere can I find in any of this any substantiating proof that "a" Republic was ever formed on this Continent to represent all the state republics.
Instead, what I find is a consistent reference to our Federation of States, The United States of America ---- the unincorporated version. And it only operates in international jurisdiction.
If any of you researchers out there can shed light on this question, please weigh in.
The monetary reward is slight, but the satisfaction of proving me wrong might be worth something, right?
I've looked. I can't find it. And until some proof surfaces ---and despite the popular references and belief that "a" Republic exists--- I say "the" Republic is the Civil War Era equivalent of an Urban Myth.
Many of our researchers are hurting financially and having a hard time keeping the lights on and the printer ink in stock. They are asking me for help and so I have to turn to all of you reading this.
If you can see how important it is for us to know the truth about our history and government --- and be able to prove it --- please consider "joining the party" and doing some research yourself or helping to support the expenses of those who do.
We take donations to the cause via my PayPal account:
avannavon@gmail.com and via snail mail: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·
Dual Versus Singular Citizenship
One of the things that sets "U.S. Citizenship" apart from American State Citizenship is duality. The Federales --- from their standpoint anyway --- are content to let you keep your "state citizenship" intact and still also be considered a "U.S. Citizen". As it says in their 14th Amendment --- "citizen of the United States" and "the state in which they reside".
[Please note --- it's their 14th Amendment, not ours, and it's an "Amendment" to their corporation's Articles of Incorporation disguised as "a" Constitution. And you are right, their 14th Amendment was never ratified by the States of the Union, for the simple reason that amending the By-Laws of a Scottish commercial corporation only requires approval by the Board of Directors --- in this case, the Territorial United States Congress.]
The problem is that the Federales can't alter the rules that the States adopted, which require a single State Citizenship.
The actual States don't recognize Dual Citizenship. You are either a Minnesotan or you are not.
It doesn't matter to them if you came from Germany or Zimbabwe. You have the option once you have immigrated through the U.S. and established your new permanent domicile on the land of Minnesota to declare yourself a Minnesotan.
When you do, you have to leave all other claims of foreign allegiance and nationality behind. The Founders considered Dual Citizenship to be "serving two Masters" and an inherent "conflict of interest" that could not be condoned.
So, if you wish to retain your identity as a Wisconsinite, you have to go whole hog or none. Wisconsin will not recognize you as one of its own if you voluntarily retain any other political allegiance, including any allegiance to the Territorial State of Wisconsin or the Municipal STATE OF WISCONSIN. You have to cleave to the actual State and not merely "reside" there on a temporary basis, if you want to be recognized as an American State Citizen.
Throughout most of our history this was clearly understood and it was also understood that our people sometimes migrated back and forth between their State Citizenship and "United States Citizenship". Men who served in the military were considered to be on a temporary "loan" to the United States and to be "residing" in Federal jurisdiction during their period of service obligation, but returned home upon discharge from the service. Same thing with Congressional Delegates, who did their business in the District of Columbia, and then returned home to their home States.
The First Naturalization Act passed by the United States Congress described a lengthy process by which an American State Citizen could transition to permanent United States Citizenship, if they wished to do so. It required posting Notices over time and supporting oneself without public assistance and committing no felonies, etc., There is no doubt that adopting "United States Citizenship" versus birthright citizenship as a Citizen of Maine, was a sober, deliberate, and lengthy process.
Also, all new immigrants had to pass through "United States Citizenship" before adopting a final State Citizenship, and again, the decision to adopt State Citizenship required deliberate action on the part of each one.
Say that you came from Germany originally. You would first pass through the Naturalization process and become a "United States Citizen". You were then free to move about the country and not subject to the INS anymore, no green cards, no quasi-parole status as a visitor--- but you were not a State Citizen.
In order to become a State Citizen, you had to (and still have to) meet other requirements and make the deliberate choice to "declare" your intention and publish it and establish a home in the State of your choice and stay there for a stipulated period of time (usually a year) without committing any felonies or making use of public assistance.
There is a famous case from Minnesota (Rheume) that discusses the necessity of immigrants declaring their State Citizenship.
The fundamental difference is that "U.S. Citizens" occupy the Federal jurisdiction within a State and "reside" in the federated "States of States", whereas State Citizens live in their State of the Union.
Example: An active duty Lieutenant in the US Air Force lives in the State of South Dakota, but my friend Anne lives in South Dakota "proper".
Think in terms of Army bases like Fort Hood, for example, which exists within the borders of Texas. You have people from every State who live within the confines of Fort Hood which is Federal Territory within Texas and for the term of their service obligation, all those active duty personnel are "U.S. Citizens" living in the "State of Texas" even though they may have been born in Texas and have their natural birthright nationality and citizenship as Texans.
When they leave active duty and inform the General Staff of the Army that they are returning home to Texas and their birthright political status, they pop back into view as Texans and as State Citizens of Texas.
The British Territorial United States and the Municipal United States oligarchy run by the members of the Territorial Congress have long sought to keep everyone in the status of "U.S. Citizen" because that allows them to tax and control and make claims against the assets of the people involved. It is that monetary self-interest that has led to most of the abuses we now suffer and also to the corruption of the courts and the obfuscation of the facts about State Citizenship.
They don't want you to know that you can adopt your lawful State Citizenship and enjoy your freedoms and the guarantees of the Constitutions, because they lose money and control when you renounce "U.S. Citizenship" in favor of, for example, Texas Citizenship.
Nonetheless it is your birthright as an American, and so long as you are not a federal employee, dependent, or "voluntarily" operating as a U.S. corporation, THEY have nothing to say about it, except, "Yes, Sir!"
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
November 2 at 10:58 PM ·
Analysis of FDR's First Inaugural Speech: Why No American Should Vote For Democrats. Ever.
This weekend I answered a challenge and analyzed FDR's speech on assuming Office, March 4, 1933.
I went through and de-constructed it with all key legal terms of art noted in purple.
These are all terms that a person with a normal 7th or 8th grade education (the standard for law written at this time) could not possibly be expected to know as legal terms apart from their common meaning.
Please note that two days later on March 6, 1933, FDR addressed The Conference of Governors (private, Territorial) and secured the "pledge" of "their states" and "citizenry thereof"---- which could only and exclusively mean the British Territorial United States and the Territorial States of States put in place during the Reconstruction Era:
You are all invited to go to my website at www.annavonreitz.com where it will shortly be posted and you can see for yourself just how many deceptive legal terms and words of art were employed in this speech to veil its actual meaning and create a "Double-speak" version that only attorneys and other insiders familiar with Federal Code could interpret.
What FDR basically said in "Federal-ese" was that he was going to conscript everyone---as in conscript or press-gang into the Army or Navy, seize upon their lives and property as "gifts", "pledge" it all to royal and religious institutional creditors (primarily the Holy See), regulate everything especially labor and utilities to high Hell for government profits, re-distribute wealth and displace populations, impose gag orders on the media, and prey upon the actual American People for the "good" of the "democracy" of the "United States" ----which virtually everyone in that audience interpreted as meaning The United States and as America, not the separate foreign hegemony of the deceptively similarly-named British Territorial United States.
Anyone still want to claim that it was "our fault" and that we '"voluntarily" "consented" to all of this crap and that we were given "full disclosure" of what FDR set in motion and all the false claims in commerce and the false conscriptions and confiscations that he and his pals in the Democratic Party pulled against the innocent American States and People?
I thought not.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was no hero. He represented the Corporate Government --- British Territorial and Roman Municipal -- at the Geneva Conventions of 1930.
He sold us and most of the innocent poor people of the world down the river as slaves to the bankers and other peddlers of flesh. He was a King Rat in an Age of Vermin, a treasonous betrayer and a cruel, clever, nasty, disloyal POS. And that is why finding his grave and pissing on it at midnight during the Dark of the Moon is still an item on my Bucket List and just one prime example of why no American in their right mind should ever vote for any member of the Democratic Party ever again.
If any of my readers are still involved in the current elections, please take this information to heart and share it with friends, family and co-workers.
The Democrats have been stealing and selling the American People down the river and promoting slavery and lies since 1860. It's high time everyone realized it and came to grips with just HOW bad they really are and how far down the pipes this country has gone because of them.
SATURDAY, MARCH 4, 3319
I am certain that my fellow Americans expect that on my induction into the Presidency I will address them with a candor and a decision which the present situation of our Nation impels.
This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Nor need we shrink from honestly facing conditions in our country today.
This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself -- nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.
In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory. I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days. In such a spirit on my part and on yours we face our common difficulties. They concern, thank God,only material things. Values have shrunken to fantastic levels; taxes have risen; our ability to pay has fallen; government of all kinds is faced by serious curtailment of income; the means of exchange are frozen in the currents of trade; the withered leaves of industrial enterprise lie on every side; farmers find no markets for their produce; the savings of many years in thousands of families are gone.
More important, a host of unemployed citizens face the grim problem of existence, and an equally great number toil with little return. Only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the moment. Yet our distress comes from no failure of substance. We are stricken by no plague of locusts. Compared with the perils which our forefathers conquered because they believed and were not afraid, we have still much to be thankful for. Nature still offers her bounty and human efforts have multiplied it. Plenty is at our doorstep, but a generous use of it languishes in the very sight of the supply. Primarily this is because the rulers of the exchange of mankind's goods have failed, through their own stubbornness and their own incompetence, have admitted their failure, and abdicated.
Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men.
True they have tried, but their efforts have been cast in the pattern of an outworn tradition. Faced by failure of credit they have proposed only the lending of more money. Stripped of the lure of profit by which to induce our people to follow their false leadership, they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored confidence. They know only the rules of a generation of self-seekers. They have no vision, and when there is no vision the people perish. The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit. Happiness lies not in the mere possession of money; it lies in the joy of achievement, in the thrill of creative effort. The joy and moral stimulation of work no longer must be forgotten in the mad chase of evanescent profits. These dark days will be worth all they cost us if they teach us that our true destiny is not to be ministered unto but to minister to ourselves and to our fellow men.
Recognition of the falsity of material wealth as the standard of success goes hand in hand with the abandonment of the false belief that public office and high political position are to be valued only by the standards of pride of place and personal profit; and there must be an end to a conduct in banking and in business which too often has given to a sacred trust the likeness of callous and selfish wrongdoing. Small wonder that confidence languishes, for it thrives only on honesty, on honor, on the sacredness of obligations, on faithful protection, on unselfish performance; without them it cannot live. Restoration calls, however, not for changes in ethics alone.
This Nation asks for action, and action now. Our greatest primary task is to put people to work. This is no unsolvable problem if we face it wisely and courageously. It can be accomplished in part by direct recruiting by the Government itself, treating the task as we would treat the emergency of a war, but at the same time, through this employment, accomplishing greatly needed projects to stimulate and reorganize the use of our natural resources. Hand in hand with this we must frankly recognize the overbalance of population in our industrial centers and, by engaging on a national scale in a redistribution, endeavor to provide a better use of the land for those best fitted for the land. The task can be helped by definite efforts to raise the values of agricultural products and with this the power to purchase the output of our cities. It can be helped by preventing realistically the tragedy of the growing loss through foreclosure of our small homes and our farms. It can be helped by insistence that the Federal, State, and local governments act forthwith on the demand that their cost be drastically reduced. It can be helped by the unifying of relief activities which today are often scattered, uneconomical, and unequal. It can be helped by national planning for and supervision of all forms of transportation and of communications and other utilities which have a definitely public character. There are many ways in which it can be helped, but it can never be helped merely by talking about it. We must act and act quickly. Finally, in our progress toward a resumption of work we require two safeguards against a return of the evils of the old order; there must be a strict supervision of all banking and credits and investments; there must be an end to speculation with other people's money, and there must be provision for an adequate but sound currency.
There are the lines of attack. I shall presently urge upon a new Congress in special session detailed measures for their fulfillment, and I shall seek the immediate assistance of the several States. Through this program of action we address ourselves to putting our own national house in order and making income balance outgo. Our international trade relations, though vastly important, are in point of time and necessity secondary to the establishment of a sound national economy.
I favor as a practical policy the putting of first things first. I shall spare no effort to restore world trade by international economic readjustment, but the emergency at home cannot wait on that accomplishment.
The basic thought that guides these specific means of national recovery is not narrowly nationalistic. It is the insistence, as a first consideration, upon the interdependence of the various elements in all parts of the United States -- a recognition of the old and permanently important manifestation of the American spirit of the pioneer. It is the way to recovery. It is the immediate way. It is the strongest assurance that the recovery will endure. In the field of world policy I would dedicate this Nation to the policy of the good neighbor -- the neighbor who resolutely respects himself and, because he does so, respects the rights of others -- the neighbor who respects his obligations and respects the sanctity of his agreements in and with a world of neighbors. If I read the temper of our people correctly, we now realize as we have never realized before our interdependence on each other; that we can not merely take but we must give as well; that if we are to go forward, we must move as a trained and loyal army willing to sacrifice for the good of a common discipline, because without such discipline no progress is made, no leadership becomes effective. We are, I know, ready and willing to submit our lives and property to such discipline, because it makes possible a leadership which aims at a larger good. This I propose to offer, pledging that the larger purposes will bind upon us all as a sacred obligation with a unity of duty hitherto evoked only in time of armed strife. With this pledge taken, I assume unhesitatingly the leadership of this great army of our people dedicated to a disciplined attack upon our common problems. Action in this image and to this end is feasible under the form of government which we have inherited from our ancestors.
Our Constitution is so simple and practical that it is possible always to meet extraordinary needs by changes in emphasis and arrangement without loss of essential form. That is why our constitutional system has proved itself the most superbly enduring political mechanism the modern world has produced. It has met every stress of vast expansion of territory, of foreign wars, of bitter internal strife, of world relations.It is to be hoped that the normal balance of executive and legislative authority may be wholly adequate to meet the unprecedented task before us. But it may be that an unprecedented demand and need for un-delayed action may call for temporary departure from that normal balance of public procedure.
I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require. These measures, or such other measures as the Congress may build out of its experience and wisdom, I shall seek, within my constitutional authority, to bring to speedy adoption. But in the event that the Congress shall fail to take one of these two courses, and in the event that the national emergency is still critical, I shall not evade the clear course of duty that will then confront me. I shall ask the Congress for the one remaining instrument to meet the crisis -- broad Executive power to wage a war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe. For the trust reposed in me I will return the courage and the devotion that befit the time. I can do no less. We face the arduous days that lie before us in the warm courage of the national unity; with the clear consciousness of seeking old and precious moral values; with the clean satisfaction that comes from the stem performance of duty by old and young alike. We aim at the assurance of a rounded and permanent national life.
We do not distrust the future of essential democracy. The people of the United States have not failed. In their need they have registered a mandate that they want direct, vigorous action. They have asked for discipline and direction under leadership. They have made me the present instrument of their wishes. In the spirit of the gift I take it. In this dedication of a Nation we humbly ask the blessing of God. May He protect each and every one of us. May He guide me in the days to come.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·
Letter of Notice and Demand to Pope Francis and Elizabeth II
Fourth November 2018
Your Holiness, Your Majesty:
We all start to read with the letter "A"..... and in the same way, we all start our understanding with certain key concepts. If the key concepts are flawed, incomplete, deceptive, or untrue, then all that follows afterward is similarly flawed, incomplete, deceptive, or untrue.
This is why the crime of fraud knows no statute of limitations. This is why contracts all fail upon the first defect.
In this case, people have been taught to think of that THING in Washington, DC as their beloved "government of the people, for the people and by the people", but in fact, "the federal government" is an interlocking trust directorate of foreign corporate interests merely in the business of providing "governmental services" for profit. And since 1860, there has been no counter-balance to provide the intended checks-and-balances on their power.
This is the first defect.
The contract between the American States and People and the "federal government" was broken in 1860, but they were left uninformed by their remaining Territorial and Municipal partners. In fact, those same partners who owed them Good Faith and Good Service deliberately hid the situation and profited themselves from the circumstance instead.
It's the same situation as if Ma Bell and Verizon knocked off their competitors and formed a cooperative venture to bilk the public silly and then split the monopoly profits. The British Territorial United States and the Holy Roman Municipal Government have secretively colluded to the same ends.
We have no greater enemies than our supposed friends and trustees.
This is why London and Rome are on the top of the list for demolition, if we cannot secure a right and proper understanding of what their leadership's obligations with respect to The United States of America (Unincorporated) always were and still are.
Once FDR's Inaugural Speech is "decoded" from Federal-speak to actual unimpaired English, all his malice and deceit and his true intentions are revealed and can be matched up against the results we have in fact experienced.
What he actually said was that he would take our lives and property as gifts ---voluntary donations --- to his holy cause.
Conveniently, since none of the actual Americans understood what he said, nobody stepped forward to shoot him and forthrightly counter his offer.
It is exactly the same situation as an armed bandit "offering" to take your purse. If you meekly comply with his demand and don't object, what is intrinsically a crime and an armed robbery is converted by "implication" and "interpreted as" a consensual act under commercial law.
And that is what the Men in Black have been doing. Just "interpreting" themselves into fatter and fatter paychecks and retirement pensions and shipping all the rest of the ill-gotten gains home to Rome and London.
But we, the living people of this country, don't operate under commercial law. We were all clearly standing as men and women in 1860 and in 1933 and not operating under commercial law then, either. So all claims and cobbled together evidence to the contrary are simply self-interested crime.
It isn't until we object that it becomes a crime? We have objected both individually and en masse. Our lawful government objects. Our States object. Our People object. And as our Will in these matters has been clearly published and on the public record for over 200 years, there is no plausible excuse for any of what has gone on here.
So, Whitehall and Rome, here is our objection: not only do we object, we repudiate in all respects all of your presumptions from 1860 onward, including all the Birth Certificates that you have issued to profit yourselves.
The profits of all this infamy must be returned to the rightful government and for the benefit of the rightful owners --our States and our People-- and absolutely no presumption of ownership of these vessels by any foreign commercial corporation is allowed.
Release every single American from these repugnant presumptions or else.
In this case, the people of this country were not even provided with the nicety of a clearly stated "demand" and had no realistic opportunity to respond to FDR's deliberately concealed gibberish.
We trust that this Notice and Demand is clearly stated.
FDR simply "converted" the court system to begin collecting on his "New Deal" ---- which was in the barest sense, "I am requiring you to give me all that you are and all that you have as a gift for my holy cause", with both the nature of the "holiness" and the "cause" left hanging.
It was on this basis that he confiscated privately held gold from the American People. It was on this basis that he required everyone to sign "Birth Certificates" donating our children (though we were not told this) to his corporation as chattel backing his corporate debts. It was on this basis that he exercised the "Trading With the Enemy Act" against his employers.
And all of this now has to end.
All of it, without exception.
The entire Public Charitable Trust must be returned, along with the Puerto Rican Public Transmitting Utilities, the Donor Trusts, the Life Force Value Annuities--- all of it. Now. The pretense that you are not really trafficking people with all your nonsense of incorporating and copyrighting their names has to end, too.
The American States and People did not voluntarily and knowingly acquiesce to FDR's veiled offer. No valid contract exists. No excuse for it can be made. No claim that FDR met the Standard of Law in his communications during the First Inaugural Address nor at any other time can stand.
His very memory should be erased and all his words and actions damned.
He was not our President and did not serve this country nor its people in "Good Faith". Death and destruction on those who wait to deliver the relief and the remedy owed to this country and its people and to all the other countries and peoples around the world who have suffered and been robbed by their own employees bent on criminal deceit.
We have our "A" and we know our "B", our "C", and all the rest of it.
The Trading With the Enemy Act does not apply to us, the American States and People, nor to our lawful Federation of States, The United States of America (Unincorporated) and never did.
It is well-past time that the Holy See and the Queen and the British Crown and the Lords of the Admiralty, all heard the legitimate government of this country tell you --- bugger off. And it is time for Donald J. Trump to act as our actual Commander-in-Chief to make sure that you do so.
Take your New Deal and FDR's corpse with you.
As for the "Democratic Party" in this country, the record of its actions as a seedbed of sedition, criminality, and deceit speaks for itself. It is an outlaw political lobby and is on trial for its crimes against humanity even as we speak.
We highly suggest that people examine the actual facts surrounding the Democratic Party --- its activities and voting records ---and you will see for yourselves that this is literally the Party of Deceit, a political lobbying organization that has preached one set of values and delivered exactly the opposite for over a hundred years.
Your Majesty, you are under demand to remove the present "court system" and re-convert it to its lawful purposes or we will remove it permanently ourselves and never pay another penny for such "services".
Your Holiness, return all the Birth Certificates and Baptismal Certificates you have collected under conditions of fraud and non-disclosure, together with all profit from the rents, leases, insurances, mortgages, etc., etc.
You all must give up the pretenses of the TWEA and consider your "offer" of March 4, 1933 as finally received and firmly rejected; and may the crime of it be upon your heads if you should fail in your duty to comply with this demand to return all the citizenry of our federal states together with their assets and also all the innocent American State natives and their assets. They are all to be safely re-conveyed to our shores and replaced under the protection of our lawful government.
In the meantime, do not talk to us about the "Rule of Law" which you have yourselves breached in finality, but instead talk about the "Rule of Mankind" and the dominion that we are all owed.
The Bills of Lading for the Estate of Yeshuah have been delivered. We expect payment on normal terms.
The Fiduciary,
Anna Maria Riezinger
The United States of America
c/o Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
cc: President Donald J. Trump
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
10 hrs ·
Judge Not, Indeed.
I was sound asleep when heard my Lord say, "Arise, and go answer them."
So here I am.
To those who have complained that I am "playing God" and that I am usurping the position of Him who comes to judge the quick and the dead because I have in fact pronounced a judgment in these recent days:
The judgment I have spoken was spoken long, long ago. You all have cause to know it.
There is a group of men (and women, if the shoe fits) who are pre-judged and who have been condemned since ancient times. They have been judged by Our Father who knows both the beginning and the end.
Who are these people who have been condemned from afar, even from thousands of years in the past?
The ones who meet in secret. The ones who defile the temple. The ones who look to the East for their deliverance. The ones who worship underground. The ones who worship in buildings without windows. The ones who wait for The Father of All Lies. The ones who think that their deeds are secret and unknown. The ones who hide in darkness. The ones who are misled in all their thinking. The ones who shall inherit the consequences of their reckoning.
I have repeated His Judgment upon them so that the minor felons who waver on the brink of the Abyss might yet repent. I have repeated it so that all you people who hear this may not be taken unaware or frightened or mistake His Judgment for anything but what it is.
Strangely, though His Judgment has been set before you in the scripture for thousands of years, yet you do not recognize it and do not expect it.
I am here to tell you --- expect it. Soon.
I have repeated His words and the words of the Prophets against those who delay the salvation of the poor.
In frustration I cry out to Our Father in Heaven against the Evil which destroys the beauty and meaning of Life. Do you not all see that "Evil" is the opposite of "Live"?
Can this be so hard to recognize?
The stench of sin and corruption envelopes the Earth worse than any smog.
The Judgment of the Cedars and the Sycamores also stands against these perpetrators, who raise up their pride and do not repent. They think as they thought in days of old, that they will build towers to Heaven, yet not respect the Earth beneath their feet.
In 9,000 years these sons of Cain have learned nothing.
The Hypocrites, the Annunaki who taught Mankind idolatry and the use of money, who introduced the lures of prostitution and drugs--- have returned. True to form, they have condemned all but 144,000 for succumbing to the evils that they themselves taught and provided. They think its a big joke.
So I pulled back the curtain of the stars and showed them the vastness of the Heavenly Host arrayed against them and suggested that they move on.
Those who wait for Satan shall wait in vain, and those who put their faith in Lucifer will wither, but the Lord of Lords endures forever.
New Guardians have been appointed and the Thousand Years of Peace declared, not from a position of weakness or mere hope, but from a position of overwhelming strength and truth. The Victory of the Lamb is secure.
Turn back and turn away from those who believe in secrets, for there are no secrets. Our Father's Judgment stands against them. Jeremiah said it. John said it. And I have said it.
This is the third and final time.
Let those with ears both hear and listen. I have indeed pronounced a judgment, because the time for it has come, even though the judgment itself is not my own.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
What Elections?
There are "Body Sovereign Electors" in this country, and there are "Voters". Which one are you? The answer determines your political status and Government I.Q.
Political Parties are lobbyist organizations, just like the Tobacco Lobby or the Peanut Lobby or the LGBT Lobby.
That's right.
"Republican" and "Democrat" are both just lobbyist groups. In a sane world, they should be pleading with our Congress to spend money on their causes, not running their "Congress" to benefit a smorgasbord of special interests at our expense.
Their "Party Platforms" are supposed to tell you what perks they will seek in your behalf if you elect them to represent you. More often, they just feed you a pack of lies and do whatever they please with no accountability whatsoever.
All of which means that these things called elections are actually not elections in the sense our Forefather's meant and intended.
These events usurping upon our actual Public Elections are private Shareholder Elections in which people choose proxy voters to cast ballots for them, the purpose of which is to choose new employees to run now-bankrupt federal corporations like the "United States of America, Incorporated" and the "UNITED STATES, INC."
When you "vote" in these Private Shareholder Elections you are actually giving up your right and responsibility to cast your own ballots, and handing off your proxy to a lobbyist, who, you hope, will go to Washington, DC, and bring back a share of the federal corporation bacon.
And by doing this, you lose control of everything, including the actual government owed to this country.
Most of the people reading this are familiar with the concept of proxies and proxy voting. You have the right to cast ballots yourself, but you are too busy and can't be bothered. Your Aunt offered you her beach cabin for the weekend. Your dog needs his toenails clipped. So you hand your "proxy" to Joe Blow and he promises to "vote the way you would" without actually knowing (or caring) how you would vote.
Usually, when we knowingly give someone our proxy the issues are nothing terribly important -- things like how often do the rain gutters get cleaned? --- or we really, truly have no other choice but to trust someone with our vote.
But since the Civil War people have been willy-nilly giving their proxy to run this country to any passing dandy with a nice smile and a political party platform--- a platform that he doesn't have to honor, once he has your proxy.
In this way the entire country gets turned into a roller derby.
And your checkbook is left open to the Four Winds.
And the Creditors of Joe Blow gain a rationale for holding you accountable for his spending.
Why would anyone in their right mind participate in this?
Once you realize what is going on you should run to the Voter Registration Office and annul any record that you were ever a "Voter".
Is it possible to "register" (remember that when you register anything you are giving up an ownership interest in it) to "vote" and give your proxy to someone else ----and still retain your status as a Body Sovereign Elector? No.
You have passed on your rights and your responsibilities to someone else, handed him your checkbook and your future and not even held him accountable for how he votes "in your behalf".
This is not the kind of "representative government" your Forefathers practiced and handed on to you. It's just another usurpation and deceit-- this time by two powerful lobbyist organizations, one funded by the Brits and Barons, one funded by the Roman Catholic Church, both nearly equally bad.
Your representatives in Congress are supposed to be Fiduciary Officers -- Deputies -- held fully accountable to the people of your State of the Union. In the actual government, these Deputies can be recalled and held to account by the State Legislature. And the State Legislatures are accountable to you.
But since you handed your proxy off to Joe Blow by voting in the Shareholder elections instead of holding onto your ballot and sponsoring your own Public Elections, you no longer have a voice or a choice. You gave away your own actual power as a Body Sovereign Elector to a Flim-Flam Man, a lobbyist who isn't even obligated to be honest about what he is lobbying for.
Thus we get RINOS and DINOS and a perennial choice between chocolate feces or vanilla feces and everyone stands around like great dumb brutes, dimly wondering: "What's wrong with this country?"
Now, you know.
And perhaps you also realize the urgent need to organize and restore your actual, factual government and exercise your position as a Body Sovereign Elector and sponsor Public Elections for your State Legislature and fill the long-vacant Deputy offices to serve in your actual Congress.
Those of you who have exercised your reversionary trust rights and re-conveyed your Good Name and assets to the land and soil jurisdiction have the responsibility, right, and power to function as Body Sovereign Electors.
Why would you ever choose to be mere "Voters" and leave your pocketbook and your country to the mercy of thieves and lobbyists?
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
A Note About Roman Civil Law:
Roman Civil Law is foreign to us. It's ancient and schmarmy and elitist compared to our Puritan Common Law.
One of its most infamous Maxims is, "Let him who will be deceived, be deceived."
In other words, under their rules, it's okay to deceive and defraud someone so long as you can get away with it and the victim doesn't object and doesn't take exception to it.
So, now the Municipal Authorities that function under Roman Civil Law have been duly notified of our objection as an entire country. They violated our Public Law and tried to pull a fast one. They got away with it for a period of years, but now that time is over.
We are not deceived. We are not amused. And we are not putting up with any more legal presumptions based on deceit and coercion.
This seems very "strong" language and very short-tempered and abrupt to some people. Bear in mind that we are dealing largely with an audience that knows both Latin and "Federal-Speak". They know far better than the average American what has gone on here and why strong language is appropriate.
Bear in mind, also, that we are at the end of a Due Process and Notice Procedure that has gone on for twenty (20) years. This isn't sudden.
Also bear in mind that if these problems are not responsibly resolved in favor of the living people and the Earth---and resolved soon---we will be facing interplanetary warfare of a kind that has not been seen here for 32,000 years.
This War in the Heavens would mirror the Spiritual Warfare on Earth and would result in very few people being left alive, yet Our Father's Will, is that not one be left behind and not one child should suffer.
Please consider carefully what we are meant to do. The Old Saturnine Guard and the Fallen Angels are being picked up and removed back to their home planets. This process is already well-advanced and it is being accomplished by a coalition of overwhelming force.
The new Guardians from the Aquarius star system are meant to peacefully take their place and open up a whole new way of living and being on the Earth. This Change has been in the works for thousands of years.
"I go now to prepare a place for you, so that where I am, you may be also be."
We are meant "to have life and have it abundantly". We are meant to have plenty of every good thing, including plenty of love and plenty of space. We are not confined to just the Earth.
Those who yearn for peace and brotherhood will not be disappointed. Those who cherish the Earth will rejoice. We will all remember the words, "I make all things new again."
In a way that is not yet comprehensible, we are going home.
But first we must wake up, realize that we have been deceived -- and take exception to it.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
One of its most infamous Maxims is, "Let him who will be deceived, be deceived."
Sometimes maxim state the obvious. It is a law not because of the maxim but because people really seem to want to be deceived. These are called illusions and actions taken upon them are called delusions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
we must wake up, realize that we have been deceived -- and take exception to it.
You can take exception to it all you want but realize it is your OWN actions that you are taking exception to. So what is the answer? Just accept the past as unchangeable and modify your own actions in the future. But realize that your own illusions are still as false as any you have been handed in the past.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
Who Owns the Philippines?
We do.
Of course, the people have their own government, like any other Territorial State of the Union, but in point of fact, we bought the Philippine Island land mass from Spain in exactly the same way that we bought the Louisiana Purchase.
And as long as we, The United States of America [Unincorporated] are the lawful government of the Sovereign States and People operating in international jurisdiction, we might as well also inform the world-at-large that we own virtually all the Territorial and Municipal Governments on Earth, whether they are bankrupt or not --- and we hold them as their Priority Creditor.
As you think about this a little further, you will see that because we own the Territorial and Municipal Government Corporations we also own all the C-Corps, S-Corps, Foundations, Cooperatives, Trusts, LLC's, PC's, etc., that have been chartered and registered under these Territorial and Municipal business structures.
We own 185,000 Territorial and Municipal Government Corporations in the U.S. alone.
All of this is ours in the plain and simple sense of commercial ownership of chattel assets, because all of it has been created via the exercise of our abused Delegated Powers, which have now returned to us by Operation of Law.
This does not mean that we want to keep it all or that we wish to exercise any oppressive political control over any other nation. What it does mean is that while the British Territorial United States is bankrupt (to us) and the Roman Municipal UNITED STATES is bankrupt (to us), The United States of America [Unincorporated] is not bankrupt.
Instead, virtually all the rest of the world (with the exception of Iran, North Korea, the Holy See and a few Pacific Island Kingdoms) are in debt to us.
We are in full control of our assets and enabled to dispose of all international debts owed to us.
Thanks to all the crazy history that we have exposed and the resulting confusions regarding which "United States" and which "United States of America" one is talking about at any given time, these facts have been somewhat obscured, but they remain the facts just the same.
We own it all and the Queen and the Pope are no longer delegated the authority to exercise our interest in these assets "for" us. Before everyone has a heart attack thinking that this is a bad thing, consider that it is in fact a very good thing. Why?
Because the Evil Geniuses that created this System of cradle-to-grave enslavement have been displaced by the operation of their own commercial Rule of Law, and instead of the UN Corp owning everything and everyone, and instead of the Swiss BEAST system keeping title to everything, all that is overturned.
It's all back in the hands of living people again, back in the hands of actual countries. And the actual Americans are not the greedy, nasty, immoral, war-crazed animals that the British Territorial United States portrayed to the rest of the world.
It's just us, Ma and Pa, back on the farm. Good neighbors, generous to a fault. If anything, everyone should be sighing a great big sigh of relief and calming down. The specter of being ruled by heartless, faceless, nameless corporations and living in a computer operated hive society under One World Government is in the rearview mirror.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·
Acceptance of Titles -- International Notice
As of October 6, 2018 our Acceptance cured in all venues of International Trade and Commerce, and as of today, November 6, 2018, we Accept Title and give International Notice of the Acceptance of Title to the assets held in the names of The United States of America [Unincorporated] and the member States of The United States of America [Unincorporated] and to the People of The United States of America [Unincorporated] and to the charters and to the patents and to the copyrights issued under the Delegated Authorities of The United States of America [Unincorporated] and of its member States and of its People.
The United States of America [Unincorporated] accepts the return of the Powers delegated under the agreements of The Constitution for the united States of America (1787) and of The Constitution of the United States of America (1789) and of The Constitution of the United States (1790) and of the sovereign patents upon the intellectual properties, the rights, the titles, and the interests owed to the American States and People and to The United States of America [Unincorporated] effective September 9, 1776 and at all times and at all places since that given effective date.
The Fiduciary
Anna Maria Riezinger
The United States of America [Unincorporated]
c/o Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
Who Owns the Philippines?
We do.
Livery of seisin and perambulation are requisite to owning anything. 'Course she could be talking about a trademark or copyright on the name 'Philippines'.
This is similar to the fiasco on another island. The timeline started around 1492 on this island and involves a series of names. The first is Borinquen. The Spanish then called it 'Porto Rico'. The U.S. defeated the Spanish and as war booty got the island and renamed it Puerto Rico. Now you can still visit Borinquen if you like but I don't believe you could spend any money there. If you do you are likely to be charged with some form of immaculate immigration.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
16 hrs ·
The Iteration Method of Stopping Any Court Action Before It Starts
This must be done at the very outset of any court case, criminal or civil, and you must avoid the whole issue of the "name game" entirely. When asked to "state your name" say only your first name -- "John" for example, or "John Michael" -- and admit that you are here to address the court "in this matter"--- which actually means, in your fleshly body.
There are only three jurisdictions available to the courts now assaulting the American People --- ecclesiastical courts, maritime (commercial) courts, and admiralty (military) courts. To defeat the action against you, you must establish that you are outside all three of these potential jurisdictions.
At each step of the process the jurisdiction changes and the change is signaled when the judge gets up from the bench and leaves the courtroom. When he returns, you have "ratcheted up" into another and more serious jurisdiction.
They always follow the same order and begin in the maritime (commercial) jurisdiction where the answer is to "wish for" remedy.
The second more serious jurisdiction is admiralty (martial law) where the answer is to "wish for" cure and relief.
If the judge dares to leave and come back again, you are both playing for High Stakes, and are now in ecclesiastical court (cannon law)..... where the answer is to identify your self in connection with the Creator. A Judge who violates your sovereignty in this jurisdiction loses his job permanently.
This is the "iteration" method when facing any action in one of their courts. You make these three "iterations" as your only replies.
"Your Honor, for and on the record of this court, I am a living man, the blood flows and the flesh lives and I wish for remedy....."
He will have to get up and leave the courtroom. When he comes back....
"Your Honor, just to reiterate, for and on the record of this court, I am a living man, the blood flows and the flesh lives and I wish for cure and relief...."
He will have to exit again, or dismiss outright. Most judges will dismiss at this point rather than risk the consequences of a final confrontation, but if he comes back a third time, you reiterate.
"Your Honor, to reiterate, for and on the record of this court, I am a living man, the blood flows and the flesh lives, and we are sovereign. Nothing stands between my self and the Divine Creator of All That Is."
And there is the final end of the nightmare. He has no further recourse, no other jurisdiction to exercise, and he has to exit --- permanently.
The DA may be dumb enough to set up another case and the Clerk may attempt to assign another Judge, but after a few judges lose their jobs by pushing the envelope and running afoul in canon law, they all get the message.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
16 hrs ·
Your History
Even today in French, "elle" is the word for "she". And she was Eve. "Eve-El" a name that translates as "Eve, the Goddess" but became our word "evil" because Eve brought death (the opposite of our word "live") into the world.
She confessed and repented and was punished and the Lord of Lords allowed her children to live.
In the same way we have Ba-El and He-El and Be-El and Pe-El. These are just prefixes added to "El" as in "Elohim" -- "the Gods of Heaven to Earth Come Down".
The words ""Belles" and "Helles" and "Pelles" are all related, too.
Notice that these are, again, just prefixes -- "be", "he" and "pe" -- added to "elles", the plural of "el", the word for "god".
"Helles" refers to the Mycenaean Greeks.
"Pelles" refers to the Grail Kings of Ireland, Scotland, and the Isle of Man.
"Belles" refers to the French Kings of Normandy.
These are all branches of Eve's family, the family of Man-kind.
Always remember that both Eve and Satan passed the test and earned the right to rule the Earth by accepting responsibility for Original Sin. It has been a contest between their lineages ever since:
"And you shall bite their heels and they shall bruise your heads."
The descendants of Eve are called "Man" while the descendants of Satan are called "Hu-Man"---literally, "color of Man", but not in the sense of skin color-- in the same sense as "color of law".
They appear to be men, but are not.
This is why you should not use the word "human" to describe yourself.
Obviously, you have all been told many lies and half-truths, but for my money, few are as outrageous and silly as the idea that America was named after Amerigo Vespucci, an early cartographer.
America was named after the Amoricans who settled Canada and the East Coast of the United States. The Amoricans are a French Celtic tribe from the coast of Normandy and part of the Belles Family of Man.
They had lived in England and Ireland for centuries --but in fact most of the Colonists were Norman French, and many of them were Amoricans.
Amoricans are why you are Americans.
And Eve is why you are part of "Mankind" and not "Humans"
You are all quietly entering an Age of Wonders, where many things that were hidden will be revealed and much history that was lost will be found again.
At the same time, if you think about it you can see that nothing I have said is really that strange and in fact, it has been hidden in plain view the whole time.
You were told about the enmity and contest between the children of Eve and Satan.
You were told about both the Roman Conquest and the Norman Conquest of Britain.
You were told about the Founding of America.
Now you just need to think through the facts and the consequences.
November is a great time to learn and think about history. So cuddle up by the fireside and enjoy the opportunity to observe where you are and how you got here-- no thanks to University Publishing.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
14 hrs ·
Special Projects Updates and Appeals
Restoration of Federal Continental Marshals, Bounty Hunters, and Private Attorney Generals -- We are working in collaboration with other researchers and jurists on this one and we are finally all gaining proper traction to implement the credentials needed to interface these needed land jurisdiction peacekeeping officials with the current law enforcement community. Also working on plans for Bounty Hunter and PAG training. All these efforts are aimed at restoring the proper enforcement of the Public Law in this country.
We hope that President Trump will sign an Executive Order soon expediting the deployment of our American domestic peacekeeping forces.
Research into the Trading With the Enemy Act, which is, by the admission of the military officials the "only law and the only federal title" that they have used since the end of the Second World War. This is how Americans were kidnapped and conscripted and the means by which American assets were stolen and dumped into the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) under the control of the U.S. Attorney General as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian. We are working diligently with primary researchers to investigate the remedies offered by the TWEA itself and by international law.
Asset Recovery. Vast amounts of American Assets were entrusted to the Government of the Philippines, which is attempting to claim that those assets have been abandoned. This is untrue and must be countered by the records and the claims and liens which we have placed upon those parties responsible. This is a very urgent circumstance that needs all the manpower and help we can afford.
We need your help, folks, to push these efforts forward and keep our guys going.
Those who can donate, please remember to make Paypal donations for the Living Law Firm directly to my Paypal account: avannavon@gmail.com and to send checks made out directly to me: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652. Every penny counts and helps. Thank you for your support of these current Special Projects.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·
The Brother's Keeper Government
The way our government is supposed to work, the British inhabitants are supposed to perform nineteen governmental services for us, the free, sovereign, and independent people of this country.
We guarantee their liberty and their democracy. They guarantee our freedom and our republican form of government. It's supposed to be Even Steven, mutually beneficial, mutually respected. And mutually understood.
They have their Federal Code and State of State Statutes and we have our Public and General Session Laws in each State of the Union.
The entire structure is supposed to work together peaceably and well, and each one, whether acting as a person or as one of the people, is supposed to be secure and untroubled in our respective capacities.
Supposed to be.
But in 1863, the Grand Army of the Republic under Ulysses S. Grant took control, and in the years since then, the successors of the GAR have failed to do their duty by the States and the People, and have sought to undermine, deceive, and pillage the lawful civil government and the people they are hired to serve.
They have colluded with foreign governments to create a state of permanent war and emergency and have not respected the rights of the States and the People who provide not only their payroll, but the bulk of the personnel staffing their military services organizations.
The British Territorial Government and the Roman Municipal Government which have owed us Good Faith have instead usurped upon our lawful and still-standing government in the international jurisdiction, The United States of America [Unincorporated], and our member States.
Worse, in contravention of the Public Law and in disrespect of the guarantees of the respective Constitutions, they have kidnapped Americans via legal chicanery and practiced extortion against them through the United States Mail.
They have pretended that our Mothers voluntarily donated us and our Good Names and Estates to the Territorial franchises operated as "States of States" on our shores, after soliciting undisclosed and unconscionable adhesion contracts of political subjection and enslavement under color of law.
The U.S. Armed Services have been doing exactly the opposite of what we have paid them to do. They have failed to secure our safety and protect our rights and property interests. They have failed to yield to the direction of the actual Civil Government and have pandered to foreign mercenary interests and to foreign service providers--- instead.
This is how the tail has managed to wag the dog.
This has been going on for 150 years, with the worst of the abuses accelerating under the boot of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's obscene and deliberately obscured "New Deal".
Whereupon, we announce and declare and freely establish that we accept all gifts and waive all benefits. We do not wish to hear any more offers to rob, defraud, or enslave us, nor to suffer the ministrations of the false Trustees who have glutted themselves on our produce, our labor, and our lives.
We wish for the release of all Americans from the Alien Property List, and all the attendant fraudulent false claims in commerce that the practices enshrined by the Trading With the Enemy Act impose upon innocent people who have been harmed and preyed upon as Third Parties.
We wish for the return of our assets, and the repatriation of our lawful titles, Good Names, and Estates without further obstruction, obfuscation, excuses, or delay. We wish for the removal of all blocked accounting structures and return of all escrows, rents, leases, mortgages, insurances, copyrights, patents, trademarks, logos, charters and other assets that are ours. We wish for the removal of all encumbrances, odious debts, and the end of all pretenses of emergency, war, or necessity.
It is against our religion to support immorality, thievery, deceit, slavery, pillaging, unjust enrichment, inland piracy, kidnapping, unlawful conversion, fraud, extortion, treason or any other of the egregious crimes that the British Territorial Government and the Roman Municipal Government have tolerated, promoted and engaged in on our shores.
We are each owed the return of all our assets and full return of all right, title, and interest in all of our natural possessions: our land, our lives, our homes, our natural resources, our identities, our intellectual properties, our relationships, our beneficial contracts, our warranties, our guarantees, our restored and lawful government, our insurances and indemnities. We are also owed recovery from the unjust enrichment and profits made from our purloined credit and assets.
This is what we are owed no less than we may be owed from any other debt. This is a commercial affidavit. Not a point of Law.
There are Points of Law to be addressed with the Government of the Philippines, the Government of the Netherlands, the Government of Switzerland, the Government of France, the Government of Scotland, and the Government of the United Kingdom, all of which have sought to benefit themselves and blame us for their own criminality, gross breaches of trust, and failure to take immediate and effective steps to correct their operations with respect to The United States of America [Unincorporated], our States, and our People.
This is internationally published Due Process and Notice to all British Territorial Government and Roman Municipal Government departments, agencies, officials and employees, to all foreign governments, including the Government of the Philippines, and the Municipal Government of Vatican City, also fair and adequate Due Process and Notice to the members of the Territorial United States Congress, to their State of State Governors, to the Municipal United States Congress and to their STATE OF STATE GOVERNORS, to all banks, most especially the Federal Reserve, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the Bank of International Settlements, the British Crown, the Bank of Scotland, the Government of Westminster, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and to the other Governments of the World, including the Spanish Monarchy, the Holy See, and the United Kingdom ---- that our lawful Government, The United States of America [Unincorporated[ and our unincorporated sovereign States of the Union, still stand and still make claim upon all the Treaties, commercial contracts, guarantees and assurances, and all material rights, patents, and other assets naturally belonging to us.
There are no unclaimed or abandoned American assets anywhere in the world. Any claim that we have now or have ever "voluntarily" given away our Good Names and Estates is false and self-interested hokum promoted by would-be criminals, and we hereby take exception to it as attempted unlawful conversion, piracy, theft and fraud.
We have not accepted any representation in these matters at all; by our Public Law members of the Bar Associations are precluded and prohibited from occupying any public office or position of trust related to us, our lawful Government, and our assets. This has been plainly stated on the Public Record since 1819.
We remind all parties that all laws and legislation that are repugnant to our Constitution are null and void from inception, including those elements of The Trading With the Enemy Act which would include us in the same category as Enemies and would seek to secretively enslave and subject Americans via unconscionable and undisclosed adhesion contracts solicited under color of law and color of these actions by the British Territorial Congress as being any mandate associated with our lawful government at all.
Finally, we reserve the right and duty to issue our credentials and commission to Federal Marshals known as Continental Marshals, to act as peacekeeping officers serving the international land jurisdiction of this country, to enforce the Public Law, to combat widespread interstate securities and bank fraud, to prevent human trafficking, kidnapping, racketeering, and unlawful arrest and detainment of Private American Nationals, who are in fact internationally Protected Persons.
We rely upon President Donald J. Trump to instruct the American Armed Services and conduct business as a cooperative and mutually beneficial administrative service, for we are inevitably our brother's keeper, and the welfare of our employees ultimately depends on the welfare and safety of their actual employers.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
18 mins ·
The Trial of the Century
Is it plausible that the American People just sat on their thumbs for 150 years and willfully, knowingly, never did the work of "reconstructing" the Federal States of States?
Or is it more plausible that self-interested parties never forthrightly explained the situation to the American People, never followed through on their duty to assist the American People, and instead, used the resulting inaction of the American States and People as an excuse to substitute their own foreign organs of government to replace the Federal States of States in fact mandated by the American States and People?
Having been informed that exactly such substitutions have occurred, that is, that Territorial "States of States" and even Municipal "STATES OF STATES" organizations have been substituted for the lawfully and contractually mandated Federal States of States organizations, do you suspect that this violates the original intent and substance of The Constitution for the united States of America, and thereby also violates all contracts and agreements deriving from it---including any form ("form" is being used in the legal sense here) of "The Constitution of the United States of America"?
Would you consider such secretive substitutions of foreign governmental organizations for American organizations to be treason on the part of those members of the "United States" Congress promoting these actions and also a gross Breach of Trust on the part of the British Monarchs and the Popes responsible for acting as our Trustees on the "High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways" and in the Global Jurisdiction of the Air, respectively?
We have noted via reference above that there are two "forms" of constitution called "The Constitution of the United States of America". The first, completed in 1789, is a tri-lateral international treaty and trust indenture supporting the execution of a commercial services contract. The second document, published in 1868, which is almost verbatim the same--- so as to promote deliberate confusion with the original, is used as Articles of Incorporation for a Scottish Commercial Corporation doing business as "The United States of America, Incorporated".
Would you consider this substitution of Scottish Articles of Incorporation for the actual Territorial United States Constitution to be a deliberate concealment and act of self-interested fraud, both contrary to the international law established by the actual Territorial Constitution and in violation and Breach of the Public Trust established by the original tri-lateral international treaty?
Having seen two such examples of secretive substitution, first the substitution of British Territorial States of States for American States of States, and secondly, the substitution of the Articles of Incorporation of a Scottish Commercial Corporation for the actual Constitution creating the British Territorial United States --- would you say that we have ample evidence of Breach of Trust and purposeful deception amounting to fraud against the American States and People?
Please note that the Scottish Commercial Corporation doing business as "The United States of America, Incorporated", was deliberately and outrageously infringing on the name of our lawful Government in international jurisdiction, The United States of America [Unincorporated], so as to deliberately confuse them and their commercial corporation with us, and our unincorporated Federation of States. The historical record shows that this deliberately created confusion led to the Scottish corporation accessing our credit and other assets and allowed them to run up debt against our assets as a result. This is clearly nothing but identity theft and credit theft on a national scale, all promoted under the auspices of the United Kingdom. Do you think that this large scale identity and credit theft should be treated any differently than the small scale thefts that occur when credit card thieves do the same thing?
Continuing on, the Scottish Commercial Corporation declared bankruptcy in 1907 and skated off with a large portion of its ill-gotten loot transferred to (mostly Belgian, French, and Swiss) shell companies prior to the bankruptcy. In this way, it shed its debts, sheltered its gains, and left us holding the bag to pay off their creditors. This was the responsibility of the British Monarch and the Government of Westminster, both of which have had and have exercised and enjoyed treaties of peace and positions of delegated authority dependent on their trust obligations owed to The United States of America and the States of the Union Federation and the American People since the 1780's. Should this Scottish Corporation have been granted bankruptcy protection, considering its criminal acts of fraud and misrepresentation? Should the American States and People have been held accountable for the debts of this Scottish interloper, when they and their lawful Government were Third Party victims of misrepresentation, Breach of Trust, and identity theft?
The Schemers and their international collaborators, the banks, "took title" to the land holdings of the American States and People as "security" for the debts of the bankrupt Scottish Corporation in 1907. We, our grandparents, and parents worked hard and paid off this bogus debt in 1953, when the bankruptcy of the Scottish usurpers was settled. Instead of returning the title to our land to us, the British Territorial United States Congress voted to roll our land titles into Federal State Trusts under their control and operated for their benefit.
Conveniently, the actual unincorporated Government, The United States of America, and the American States and People, were told none of this. We were all kept in the dark like mushrooms and fed a steady diet of patriotism and red-white-and-blue flim-flam. In view of these circumstances, should the land titles and Federal State Trusts be dissolved and all right, title, and interest be returned to The United States of America [Unincorporated], the member States, and People of this country?
Meanwhile, in 1925, the Roman Catholic Church and the Office of the Roman Pontiff got into the act and did their own dirty little "business" on our shores. They set up a Delaware Corporation doing business as the "United States of America" Inc. This is essentially the same con game the Scottish corporation played. The only difference is the definite article "the". The Scottish usurper called itself "The United States of America" and the RC version called itself the "United States of America" and both were phony, unauthorized, and criminal as three dollar bills.
This "religious non-profit" ran up bills against our remaining assets (remember our land had already been seized upon as security for the debts of the Scottish corporation) --- our bodies, our life force energy, our private businesses and homes, our copyrights and patents, our labor, everything that you might consider to be your own property. They played hard and fast and bankrupted "the" United States of America, Inc. in 1933. And they followed the same play script, of leaving us to pay their bills.
Given these facts in evidence, do you think that any commercial claims against the American States and People which were established by the Scottish look-alike, sound-alike corporation infringing upon the name of our lawful unincorporated government, have any validity then or now? Do your think that the nearly identical claims in commerce established on the same basis by the Roman Catholic Church operating as "the" United States of America, have any validity then or now?
If Franklin Delano Roosevelt had on the occasion of his First Inaugural Speech stood up in public and said, "I am making you an offer in the commercial sense. That offer is to take everything you are and everything you own, your Good Name and Estate, as a gift to my [unstated] holy cause."----do you have any reason to think that the American People would voluntarily accept and act upon such an offer?
Do you, upon reading FDR's First Inaugural Speech, derive the above meaning and intent from it? If not, do you think that it met the Law Standard in effect in 1935, that all laws and public notices had to be written so as to be understood by an average seventh or eighth grader?
After reading the preface and notes of the Trading With the Enemy Act (TWEA) and the Congressional debates underlying each Amendment to the TWEA, do you think that the Congressional Intent was to declare war on the American States and People?
Do you think that it is possible in any sense of the word for the British Territorial United States to declare "war" on its creator and employer, The United States of America [Unincorporated}, its member States of the Union, or the American People, via any possible act of legislation or internal Federal Code, without breaching the Constitution and the Public Trust --- and thereby nullifying every word of such repugnant legislation?
Do you think that when the Territorial United States Congress included the one-sentence long section 50 USC 4307 (d) "Voluntary payment, conveyance, transfer, assignment or delivery by holder not an enemy" was intended to facilitate trafficking in babies and their enslavement via a process of registering their Good Names and Estates as "gifts" made to the usurping British Territorial States of States organizations?
Do you think that trafficking babies born in America into the jurisdiction of the British Territorial United States as if they had been born in the British Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and laying claim to them as British Subjects and subjecting them and their property to the British Commonwealth system and claiming that they were all "voluntarily" gifted by unwed Mothers as "wards of the state" to the Office of the Alien Property Custodian (later the U.S. Attorney General) is anything but yet another totally unlawful, illegal, Gross Breach of Trust being promulgated by the British Monarch and the Government of Westminster in violation of the Treaties and Commercial Service Contracts (Constitutions) owed to The United States of America, the American States, and the American People?
Do you see any reason in law or fact or sanity, that these false claims and all the mechanisms and agencies including the "Internal Revenue Service" and the licenses issued to the "Uniformed Officers" (doctors and nurses and dentists) attached to them, should not be summarily liquidated? And the property of the American States and People extracted from the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) managed by the U.S. Attorney General?
These claims are all nothing but self-interested lies and false claims in commerce. In order to take them seriously, you would have to believe that every woman giving birth in America (including, BTW, the Catholics) is an unwed Mother, and that all these Mothers "voluntarily" gifted their babies to the British Crown and obligated their assets for the benefit of the British Commonwealth. Do you believe this? Do you see any reason why everyone on Earth who has been similarly "seized upon" by these fraud artists--- and that includes the Canadians, Australians, New Zealanders, Germans, Japanese, and nearly every country in between --- should not simply stand up and say, "Hell, no, we don't agree to this bunko." and walk out the door? Who but lawless pirates and dishonorable mercenaries and gangsters could ever defend any of this?
All of this criminality has been supported by politicians and by the banks, and unfortunately, by some military commanders working for the "United States".
Donald J. Trump has been left holding the bag, without any of the actual facts of the situation being made available to him. Of course, the criminals responsible have been unwilling to step forward and admit the depths of the depravity to which they have sunk---stealing and enslaving babies--- but it is all there on the Public Record of several countries, exactly what they have done, and how they have worked this grotesque bunko scheme against the interests of all free men and women everywhere---- and all while singing "Yankee Doodle Dandy" and blaming us, the American States and People for these crimes against humanity. Having seen the longevity of the crimes and the purposeful step-by-step execution of these crimes against humanity, do you have any questions about why these criminals need to be arrested and punished?
In 2014 we finished giving Due Notice and Due Process and issued our Final Judgment and Civil Orders related to these subjects. In 2015, we re-issued our Sovereign Letters Patent and published them worldwide. In 2015, Barack Hussein Obama bankrupted the Municipal United States Corporations and thereby vacated the Municipal United States Government. In 2017, via a domino effect, the Territorial United States Government was also bankrupted and vacated. These organizations had maintained a claim of "successor-ship" by a process of assumption of contract inherited from the Roman Catholic and Scottish usurpers -- a process of pirates making claims based on the claims of other pirates going back to 1868.
But now, finally, they have outsmarted themselves. By vacating the last two remaining federal contracts and doing so at the same time, we have been able to end any further "assumption" of contract and to acknowledge and accept back our formerly delegated powers.
As a result, The United States of America {Unincorporated] stands as it has since September 9, 1776, as the Federation of Sovereign States representing the American States and People in international jurisdiction, and is the only actual Government still standing. Any further exercise of our once-delegated powers by any commercial corporation on Earth without our written and express consent is unlawful, unacceptable and denied. Any claim that our persons are now or have ever been subject to the Queen in any relationship apart from those established by the original Constitution of the United States of America is null and void. This has happened by Operation of Law and is the result of the incapacity of the delegates in bankruptcy and also as a result of the corrupt and criminal basis of the former claims to "represent" us and to own us as property in violation of international law, the Geneva Conventions, common decency, and Good Faith. Do you see any reason why the American States and People should continue to put up with dis-service, incompetence, fraud, false claims in commerce against us and against our assets, and other double-dealing crime on the part of our hirelings?
Most recently, there has been an attempt by hackers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and certain offices of the Department of Defense (DOD) to gin up a "new" computer system based on re-hashing old Binary System Data Processing ideas, calling it the "Quantum Financial System" and seizing upon all the off-ledger Special Deposit Accounts in the world banking system. They then propose to roll all these assets which in fact belong to other people and which are supposed to be under the control of other Trustees into what they are calling the "Manna World Holding Trust" --- which is just another pirate operation based on seizing other people's assets and calling them yours or, to be more exact, claiming that they are or should be under your control.
About half of all the assets seized in this latest round of criminality belong to Americans. We have located the rightful owners of about 30% of the remainder. We have also tracked down the actual paperwork and the receipts demonstrating actual ownerships and trusteeships. Our best advice to all those trying to re-establish a world financial system on a basis of theft and lies is to stop. Just stop right now. You are only making a bad situation worse. You cannot hope to establish anything good based on more crime.
The world going forward needs a rock solid foundation, not more piles of sand.
And this needs to be done via cooperation and honest dealings among the actual Trustees, not by one micro-chipped female A-1 experiment chosen by a King Rat.
The actual Trustees, as opposed to the Middlemen Bankers and politicians responsible for this ghastly mess, have nothing but Good Will toward the Earth and its peoples. They are agreed that there is more than enough for everyone to do all the many, many things that have to be done to restore Good Faith and Credit, to restore the Earth, to restore rightful Government, and to restore sanity. Do you see any reason why the people who created and prolonged this mess should be the ones trusted to resolve it?
Do you agree that the actual trustees of the assets that have been dumped into the Manna World Holding Trust should be allowed to do their jobs and the actual wishes of the owners and beneficiaries of these assets should be honored, insofar as they seek to heal and reform and restore and put an end to lawlessness and criminality and oppression of the living people?
We can see no reason to allow these private trust assets to be commandeered by the Hired Help, especially after their performance record over the past 150 years. WDYT?
Mr. Trump must feel like a man surrounded in a Crocodile Pit, not knowing where to turn or who to believe. We don't blame him for that. The fraud and the lies and the identity thefts and forgeries and counterfeits and all the rest of it run deep and run long. Still, at the end of the day, the Public Records are the Public Records, the Public Laws are still the Public Laws, the actual ownerships of all the assets still are what they are, the treaties and the contracts say what they say.
The American States and People have been victimized by European Sharpies for far too long. The Flim-Flam has to end, and the actual work of the Government of the People, by the People, and for the People has to begin. All the debts of the Shysters are not being accepted by us again and we do not propose to validate their theft of private trust assets or Public Trust Assets as a means to pay their debts, either. Those debts have to be offset and/or forgiven, and the actual Employers, Trustees, and Fiduciaries have to make that possible, because the only other option is more criminality.
All those that agree that more false claims and more extortion and more crime is not the way to go forward, raise your hands......
All those that want their names and their property formally removed from the Alien Property List and extracted out of the Public Charitable Trust (PCT) managed by the U.S. Attorney General and returned to them and their States of the Union, raise your hands......
All those who are fed up with lies and criminality from your Employees, raise your hands.....
All those who are fed up with what appear to be public courts acting as private bill collectors for foreign interests, raise your hands....
All those who are fed up with the British Monarchs promoting Commercial Feudalism and seeking to indebt others for their madness, raise your hands....
All those who are owed tons upon tons of services and goods that were provided in Good Faith on the basis of I.O.U's issued by the various banks, and never received any actual remedy or relief.... raise your hands....
All those living people who were taken in by false advertising of "Home Loans" when the perpetrators were actually proposing that you loan your homes to them for their investment and profit.... raise your hands.....
All those that feel that the Governments and Institutions and Commercial Corporations including banks and churches that have acted in Breach of Trust owed to the American People, the Canadians, the Australians, the Japanese, the Germans, and all other populations that have been subjected and abused by this same brand of legal chicanery ---should be (a) held accountable and obligated to reform and makes amends or (b) outlawed and liquidated and no longer allowed to exist.... raise your hands....
All those that feel that seizing upon private trust assets and converting them into "holdings" of the "Manna World Holding Trust" as a means of paying for public debts, is not a viable or honorable or lawful means to dealing with the situation, raise your hands....
All those who are sick of being kept in the dark and fed horse manure by foreign media cartels jamming up our national airwaves....raise your hands....
All those who have had enough of military officers failing to honor their oaths to defend us against all enemies both foreign and domestic, (please note that--- "and domestic") --raise your hands....
All those who are stunned and amazed that this level of fraud and abuse could go on right under our noses for the better part of two centuries before push came to shove ---- raise your hands.....
All those who are determined that this rampant criminality has to stop---raise your hands....and get your own records straight and join your Jural Assemblies and send a donation in support of the position and work of the lawful Government of this country:
I am still acting as Paymaster after all these months. My PayPal is: avannavon@gmail.com and we accept other donations via Snail Mail. Please make checks payable to: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652.
There's nobody here but us chickens. If you want reform and relief and restitution, you have to get busy and organize and demand it. You have to share this information and take action against the false claims that have been and are being made against you and your country. And, unfortunately, until we route through all the false claims and interference from our own misguided employees, you have to support with your prayers and your cookie jar money, too. Thank you, and God bless the men and women of the Jury.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
8 hrs ·
Moms of America
When my Mother (born 1920) discovered what the Vermin had alleged against my sister and I and our children as a result of her signature on the hospital records, she wrote a scathing rebuttal and explained the source of the "misunderstanding" -- the failure of the perpetrators to fairly and fully disclose which "United States" they were talking about.
She filed her Testimony on the land jurisdiction record and revoked her signature and her purported election to have herself or anyone in her family "considered to be" a federal citizen of any kind.
Thus when the U.S. Attorney General comes to me and pretends that my Mother "gifted" me to their corporation, the opposite set of facts and counter-claim is already part of the international land jurisdiction record.
And he can go blow.
I shall never forget the look on my Mother's face when she understood what these Vermin have done. It was a look of sheer outrage, and I have felt it myself, because the same extortion and the same repugnant demands were made upon me by hospital personnel when my son was born.
I repudiated them on the public record, too, and gave full testimony of how a huge male nurse and two female accomplices came to my hospital room which I paid for--- and demanded that I complete their paperwork, or they would seize my son and never let him come home from the hospital.
This is what is going on in America. Unfortunately, it's going on all over the world. A giant crime syndicate has built this "system" and administered it via an interlocking trust directorate.
They are stealing our babies and using them as slaves and as chattel backing their corporate debts.
If you can think of anything more repugnant, more un-American, more inhumane, more evil or more false --- let me know.
Now, all you women, all you Mothers out there --- the U.S. Attorney General is holding your babies to this unconscionable "contract" based on your signature.
They, the Vermin, are claiming that you "willfully" and "voluntarily" donated your children as gifts to their corporation. Just like they are claiming that your Mother's donated you.
Is that true?
Are you mad?
You ought to be.
This evil system has been clicking along for decades, like a lawn mower, cutting the living people down to mere corporate franchises. Their corporation has been racking up debts against you and your children purportedly with your "voluntary" and knowing consent.
Is that true?
Are you mad?
You ought to be.
Who owns your children? You, or the foreign government service providers?
Your children are being stolen by racketeers and as, in my case, by extortionists, threatening actual physical kidnap.
Your children are being sold into debt slavery and your rightful ownership of your minor children is being by-passed to the State of Whatever. Even your marriage is being "interpreted" as a "licensed" Joint Venture, with the State of Whatever playing an undisclosed Third Party role with an interest in the "products" of your JV -- your children.
The men and women who are supporting this unconscionable theft and this whole system of enslavement are lower than snakes bellies in deep, deep wagon ruts, and they need to be stopped. Permanently.
So what are we going to do about it, Moms of America?
Are you content to have your children stolen and sold into debt slavery to benefit foreign corporations? How about having yourselves identified as "Unwed Mothers" who are "voluntarily" donating your kids as "wards of the State of State" and delivering them to the U.S. Attorney General as "Alien Property"?
Isn't it more than past time for all this CRAP to end?
So let's begin with the U.S. Attorney General, who is an Officer of Interpol, not an American at all, and not even a "U.S. Citizen" anymore.
Let's ask him what in the %1$!#%^^@ he thinks he is doing seizing upon our children via false commercial claims solicited under color of law?
He's got a lot more to think about and answer for than any Russia Investigation.
And so does Donald J. Trump.
We can address the long-running international fraud and we can reclaim our assets from the Philippines and elsewhere and we can settle all and any lawful debts that are owed by anyone on Earth, but in order to do that, the political lobbyists occupying Capitol Hill and other "administrative agencies" like the DOJ, FBI, DOD, IRS, et alia, have to be brought to heel.
And that's where you come through the door, Moms of America.
This is where you grab those political lobbyists by the crotch in your Mama Bear jaws. This is where you nail the "U.S. Attorney General" and all his stinking little minions to the wall. This is where you tear up and return all the licenses. This is where you pigeon-hole the local country and State of State vermin and tell them: (1) what is going on and (2) where to get off.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·
Fraud, Piracy, and Manna World Holdings Trust
First, the crime of fraud has no statute of limitations. If I discover a fraud that happened in 1860 (and I have) and I report it and take exception to it today, the crime and all the subsequent history tainted by it, is still very much alive, still actionable, and still deserving remedy, cure, and divine service.
As a result, when something begins in error and fraud, it ends in the same status. No progress toward any actual and honest solution is made until the fraud comes to an end.
As long as FDR's "Bank Holiday" continues, the fraud continues. As long as the "State of Emergency" continues, the fraud continues. As long as the "United States" continues to run amok, so does the rest of the world. And there is no way to fix this or end this condition absent the end of the fraud itself.
Second, the crime of piracy also has no statute of limitations. If my great-grandfather's gold was stolen by pirates (thieves of any sort acting in international jurisdiction) he is still the lawful owner and I, as his heir, am still owed the return of that gold from Interpol or any other international law enforcement agency that obtains custody of the stolen property.
Now those who are responsible for this ongoing Mess have sought to make things easy on themselves and difficult for the rest of us by trying to seize all private assets and to dump our private assets into trusts, which are then combined and commingled into larger trusts----all controlled by them.
While they try to justify this as the act of valid Trustees, the actual owners and purported donors never elected them to the job and this is in fact just more piracy, more unlawful seizure of our assets in international jurisdiction, more false claims of rights and interests that do not exist.
The fact that the theft is more sophisticated and accomplished by paper transactions and keyboard strokes instead of cutlasses or broad axes, does not change the nature of the theft itself. Nor its affects on actual people.
In the case of actual private assets (gold, silver, jewels, etc., ) that were deposited in Good Faith as Special Deposits in the banks, Manna World Holdings Trust is trying to claim control of those accounts and those assets with no valid authority at all.
It's simply more piracy, more commandeering of assets, rights, and responsibilities that belong to others.
Those assets belong to the people and/or organizations that deposited them.
Is that concept somehow suddenly difficult for everyone to understand?
And most especially, is it difficult for the bankers to understand?
Because if our deposits are not secure, what do we need banks for?
As holding tanks serving to make consolidated theft easier on the criminals?
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
If Anna has all this figured out and remedied .... then what drives her to share this outrage?
I am tired of reading how everyone has damaged me. Could she please write about some good things that the system has brought about?
Quote:
Happy
Pharrell Williams
It might seem crazy what I'm 'bout to say
Sunshine she's here, you can take a break
I'm a hot air balloon that could go to space
With the air, like I don't care baby by the way
Huh, because I'm happy
Clap along if you feel like a room without a roof
Because I'm happy
Clap along if you feel like happiness is the truth
Because I'm happy
Clap along if you know what happiness is to you
Because I'm happy
Clap along if you feel like that's what you wanna do
Here come bad news, talking this and that
(Yeah) Well, give me all you got, and don't hold it back
(Yeah) Well, I should probably warn you I'll be just fine
(Yeah) No offense to you, don't waste your time
Here's why
Because I'm happy
Clap along if you feel like a room without a roof
Because I'm happy
Clap along…
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ziero0
If Anna has all this figured out and remedied .... then what drives her to share this outrage?
I am tired of reading how everyone has damaged me. Could she please write about some good things that the system has brought about?
Looks to me like you want someone to tell you, you are free. That's all it took for our slave masters before. We paid our taxes and said hip hip hooray, we are a free people who live in the land of the brave.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
Looks to me like you want someone to tell you, you are free.
I might be cheap but I am not free!
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ziero0
I might be cheap but I am not free!
Chuckle, good one, broke me up.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
36 mins ·
The Missing Republic Found!
The prize goes to my friend, Tom, a long-distance trucker based out of Phoenix, Arizona. You gotta watch those truckers. They have a lot of time on their hands to just sit and think....
Many good theories were proposed, many people drawing a connect between the old Roman Republic and the Municipal Government, but still, nothing very conclusive in terms of any official singular "Republic" associated with any level of our Government.
Until Tom said to himself.... well, what else is missing that should be there?
The original Confederation of Federal States-of-States is missing. And sure enough, if you dig around a bit, you find that the Confederation of States was sometimes referred to as the "Federal Republic".
We still have to be very careful to define what we are talking about.
Just because there was once "a" Federal Republic doesn't mean that there is one now, and it doesn't mean that any organization calling itself "the" Republic has any relationship to the original Federal Republic, either.
It all depends on how such an organization is structured, what its articles are, what its purposes and leadership and ownership interests are.
Is it American?
Is it really our Federal Republic being restored? Or another look-alike, sound-alike Ringer trying to sneak in the back door?
Obviously, a French commercial corporation calling itself "The Republic of the United States of America" is no more our Federal Republic than a Scottish commercial corporation calling itself "The United States of America, Incorporated" is our Federation of States.
And any foreign government infringing on our copyrights and promoting any such confusion needs to have its ass kicked, Mr. President.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
More Smoke and Mirrors from Manna World Holdings Trust
So now Kim Goguen aka "Kim Possible" is going all the way back to Ramses to try to justify her position.
Ramses was my Uncle. We used to call him "Ram-bubba" behind his back. Take a
look at my slanted toes and the gold flecks in my eyes. No, that isn't a sign of liver trouble. It's royal Egyptian DNA .
But nobody cares and neither do I.
When people die in actual fact --- as opposed to dying on paper due to government-led legal chicanery --- they leave behind their earthly possessions. By laws long established, their assets are passed on to their heirs. And that's that.
If their heirs lose those inherited possessions by fair means, there is no recourse for that.
If their heirs are the victims of fraud, however, there is recourse.
We, the American States and People, have been the victims of fraud.
Ramses and his Heirs just had bad luck.
They ran into the Romans, remember? And then the Romans ran into the Visigoths? (They were also my ancestors, BTW.) And then the Visigoths married into the French Celtic Kingdoms and that gave rise to the trans-English Channel Kingdom of Camailoth circa 500 A.D. ..... and that gave rise to William of Normandy.... who controlled both England and large sections of France...and that led to the Amoricans settling in England and Ireland and to their eventual migration to guess where?
America!
Oh, who knew?
And as interesting as all this is, it doesn't have a thing to do with the price of beans in China, except in terms of intellectual property rights and whatever physical assets actual heirs have been able to maintain.
Please note that Elizabeth II isn't an actual heir to the British throne. She's a German married to a Greek. Go figure.
So now the children of Hiram Abiff, King of Tyre, come forward with their long, long story of how they should have the right to everything on Earth and I say-- it's just more crime and piracy.
Many of the trusts that Kim and her buddies have "seized upon" belong -- and I do mean, legitimately belong -- to families and people that live and breathe and have the right to their assets just like you have the natural right to own your Great-Great-Grandmother's diamond ring. And all the excuses otherwise don't matter.
She and her buddy Thomas have used computer keystrokes and programs to steal the bulk of the world's private wealth, which they now proudly claim to control.
But whose wealth is it? Not his. Not hers. Except in the sense of them getting a share of the purloined goods, they are just thieves and despots once again.
Most of the private assets they have stolen are American assets, including gold owed to the American States and People.
Which means that Mr. Trump should be holding both of them upside down by their heels and shaking hard, not bowing down to their B.S.
There is always a right way and a wrong way to do anything.
The right way is to concentrate on getting back the 10 million metric tons of American gold (granted, a good portion of that is gold that was simply on deposit here, but it is our responsibility nonetheless) that the U.S. Army and Navy deposited "for" us in the Philippines, and recouping our share of the $950 trillion dollars worth of "Life Force Value Annuities" that Prince Philip absconded with, and also go after our estimated $387 billion worth of gold being held captive in the World Bank's drop box.
It's not as quick and dirty as stealing from the mouths of Navajo Grandmothers or defrauding people from Spain, but it's the right way to do things, as opposed to using some computer program to steal private assets held in banks and then trying to justify it with some cooked up story about trusts existing thousands and thousands of years ago.
There may be assets among the assets that Kim and her group have stolen that belong to Bad Guys or which are in the possession of Bad Guys as a result of earlier acts of piracy. If so, both Kim and the U.S. Government should be able to prove that the heirs involved actually committed crimes and they should then be brought to trial and if found guilty, convicted and punished.
That's how we do things in a lawful society operating under Public Law. Otherwise, we are just criminals ourselves, doing the same thing that we are accusing others of doing to us.
Harming thousands of legitimate trustees and potentially billions of people who aren't Bad Guys can't be condoned on the basis of "suspicion" or vague historical claims.
The United States of America, the American States, and the American People have been grossly defrauded and that is a matter of both public and private record. There is no doubt about what we are owed, including the American private assets that Kim has claimed control of. Those assets need to be returned to our own National (State) Banks and to our International Banks--- that is, banks operated by The United States of America and our States, for our People.
At which point we will gladly fund our restored government the honest old-fashioned way --- with actual American silver and gold and credit that is owed to us by the rest of the world.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
7 hrs ·
What ISN'T There 2.0
As I have noted before, many of the most interesting discoveries in the long bunny hole romp come from what ISN'T there.... that should be.
We have discussed the missing Declaration of War related to the Civil War and the lack of a Peace Treaty ending it. We have noted the lack of an Executive Order ending FDR's "Bank Holiday" before, but let's examine that a bit more. What does it mean?
What it means is that the banks we are familiar with aren't banks.
They are securities investment and holding companies.
And what have they "securitized" to promote their business and trade?
Securitization is a process of assigning a value to an asset and then trading certificates, stocks, bonds, mortgages and other "tokens" of ownership interest.
As our research into the Birth Certificate issue and our research into Foreclosures has yielded, the "U.S. Attorney Generals" have "securitized" the living people of this country and all our private property, too.
But "securitizing" living people is against the law and is both illegal and unlawful, because doing so enslaves them.
Both the international law and the Public Law of this country very clearly forbids it.
Not only is slavery forbidden, but since 1926, voluntary peonage is also forbidden by Public Law. You can't volunteer yourself into indentured servitude, even if you wanted to.
So how is it possible that since 1934 America has been the site of a booming slave industry based on "securitzing" living people and their private property?
Answer: FDR's Bank Holiday, which is still in effect. You are all challenged to find any action anywhere rescinding or ending the so-called "Bank Holiday" via Executive Order (by which it was created) or Congressional Act or by any other means.
The Bank Holiday ended "the normal course of business" in this country. Imagine that you are playing a game of checkers, and without overtly changing the playing pieces, the game is converted into a game of chess instead ---- all without any fully disclosed explanation or warning?
That's what happened in 1934.
And that is what is still going on today. We are led to believe that normal business practices and procedures and assumptions apply, but in fact, they don't.
When these banks that aren't banks offer "home loans" what they are really "offering" is that you "voluntarily" loan your home to them for their benefit.
They then conveniently create credit on an accounting ledger --- all out of thin air, with nothing but the value of your home and labor at risk --- and set up an escrow ACCOUNT in your Name, without telling you. They charge you on average five times the value of any loan as interest and demand an unearned security interest in your labor and assets on top of it. Then, when you mysteriously fail to come forward and collect on the escrow ACCOUNT (that you know nothing about) they declare the funds "abandoned" and take all the mortgage payments that you paid to YOURSELF for their profit, too.
Nice.
This scam has been going on since 1934 and it still is. And that's just the mortgage-foreclosure scam. It gets worse. Much worse.
See the next article for more.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·
What ISN'T There 3.0
So we continue our investigation into missing pieces of history and also missing pieces related to the present circumstance.
We left off with the fact that FDR'S Banking Holiday has never ended, with the affect that what we know as banks aren't really banks--- they are deceptively operating under the names of old banks, but in fact they are securities investment, trading, and holding companies.
We briefly discussed how these "banks that aren't banks" have created securities to trade by "securitizing" living people which is grossly unlawful, and how they have profited themselves by false advertising and undisclosed mortgage escrow practices.
So let's look at how they have contrived to do all this.
Go back to the Trading with the Enemy Act and 50 USC 4307 (d) which allows the "voluntary" donation of property belonging to parties who are not enemies to the Alien Property Custodian (now the U.S. Attorney General).
Now add that exactly such a contract is "offered" to your Mother at the hospital under color of law. She is coerced under false pretenses to sign a totally undisclosed and repugnant contract donating her child as a ward of the British Territorial State of State.
So, the U.S. Attorney General takes the new "donation" and "enfranchises" it and copyrights its Name. As a result, the Trade Name our parents gave us is now "interpreted" as the name of a British Territorial Commonwealth Public Trust, instead of the Trade Name of a living American.
All the assets attached to the Trade Name are now dumped into the Public Trust.
And since Your Name is now registered as a Public Trust and no longer recognized as the Name of a Living Man, it can be "securitized" --- so they unlawfully convert Your Trade Name into the Name of a Public Trust, and that then ends the prohibition against slavery and involuntary peonage.
You can do whatever you want to do to a corporation. It's just a legal fiction after all.
What they try to ignore is that the legal fiction is now attached to a living man and a living man's assets, and they then act as Executors de son Tort to administer and manipulate both the man and the assets via the unlawful conversion of his American Trade Name to the name of a British Commonwealth Public Trust.
This is a known crime called "personage".
It gets worse. They don't stop there. The U.S. Attorney General then spins off two more primary corporations under variations of your Trade Name. There's a British Commonwealth Public Transmitting Utility operating under Your Name in this form: Michael R. Doe and a Cestui Que Vie Estate Trust operating under Your Name in the form: Michael Ransom Doe.
Then the Roman Catholic Church gets into the act and spins off its own versions of corporate municipal franchises operating under your name. And here, if possible, is where things take an even worse turn, because they define "your" Municipal PERSON as a criminal.
And under the 14th Amendment of the British Territorial United States Constitution, criminals can be enslaved. And they can be subjected to Bounty Hunting by the British Territorial Government and its assigns.
So here you are, hapless Joe American, naturally an innocent Third Party, being ruthlessly subjected to all this fraud and confidence crime by foreign governments that are both under obligations public and private to protect you and which are instead conniving to pillage and plunder and enslave you.
Perhaps the only question in your mind right now is --- why isn't President Trump nuking Rome and London?
See the next article in this series.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·
What ISN'T There 4.0
One of the things that "isn't" there is any conscious agreement by our Mothers or Fathers consenting to any of this.
The entire process is predicated on forcing unknowing women to sign away their children into lives of debt slavery, and doing it under color of law --- pretending that there is some mandate by their lawful government demanding this, while on the other side of their lying mouths, the miscreants responsible are claiming that this is all "voluntary".
It's not mandated by our government. It's not allowed by our government. It's against our Public Law and against the Geneva Conventions and against at least a dozen United Nations Declarations.
Maybe someone should inform the Government of Westminster what their American Bar Association and United States Bar Association members are doing here?
Oh, wait, we did that twenty years ago....
Maybe someone should tell the Roman Catholic Church?
Oh, wait, we did that twenty years ago, too....
Maybe someone should complain to the U.S. President?
Ah, yes, well, did that more than twenty years ago....
It's racketeering, identity theft, and credit theft on a vast international scale, carried out by private, for-profit governmental services corporations and members of the Bar Associations, and all supported by the treasonous and/or clueless Generals and Admirals of the U.S. Army and Navy and clerics of the Roman Catholic Church.
So let's look for some other missing elements.
Does anyone have a peace treaty ending the Second World War with Hungary or Bulgaria? No? Curiously, they are both named as "enemies" in the Trading with the Enemy Act and are the only parties that could still be considered "Enemies".
Which means, baldly, that these animals have been knowingly preying upon their friends and Allies in gross breach of trust and violation of their commercial contract obligations--- exactly as our Final Civil Judgment of 2014 finds. And they have no plausible excuse.
It means that this is the thanks that we get for saving Britain's butt in World War II, and the thanks we get for our religious tolerance of the Roman Catholic Church, too.
So, Campers, are you inspired enough to sit down and write some nasty notes and take action to clean up this mess? Peaceful actions of course. They've only killed us on paper so far, so it's time to return the favor and take out the entire B.E.A.S.T. System.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·
The Capper --- What ISN'T There 5.0
We aren't "there".
Not even in the so-called Civil War.
Our States and our lawful Federation of States doing business as The United States of America were never involved in the Civil War. We were Third Parties throughout. The entire action involved The Federal States of States, not the States.
That is, the Civil War was fought over and by the Confederation of States, not the Federation of States.
Georgia never fought in the Civil War. The State of Georgia did.
Note that it is the original Federal State of State --- "The State of Georgia" we are talking about, not the Territorial franchise doing business as "the State of Georgia" --which did not exist prior to the Civil War. And should not have existed afterward.
Two different Unions. Two different jurisdictions. Two different populations.
And they, Britain and Rome, knowingly came in here and pretended that we were part of their mess and subject to their debt collections. They "sponsored" their commercial mercenary conflict on our shores without our participation or consent and then blamed us and billed us for it, as if we were parties to any of this.
Then they just continued their abuses and "presumptions" through the First World War and the Second World War and all their endless warmongering ever since.
It had nothing to do with us, then or now, except that we have been unconscionably presumed upon and imposed upon by the most obnoxious guests --- pirates and con artists --- ever since.
So all the miseries that have been visited on us as innocent Third Parties being dis-served by treaty partners who owed us far better, are crimes. Pure and simple. It has nothing to do with politics, though it does have something to do with diplomacy --- or lack of it.
As a Christian nation --- which we are, and they aren't --- we could forgive them, but only if they repent and stop their reiteration of crimes: put an end to false claims against our assets and our people, properly discharge their duties and obligations, hand over the physical assets and profits naturally belonging to our States and People and stop interfering with and misrepresenting and imposing upon us.
The United States of America is a unincorporated Federation of fifty noble State republics, the lawful government of a generous and gallant and peaceful people.
The U.S. is a Confederation of States of States that went off track a long time ago under the guidance of the British Monarchs and the Popes of Rome and treasonous members of Congress.
The original Confederation of Federal States of States disbanded in 1860 and the members, all Federal States of States, fought the Civil War. The surviving Federal States of States entered a process of "Reconstruction" that has never been completed. British Territorial States of States usurped at this point and began a rampage of criminality and Roman Municipal STATES OF STATES joined the fray.
Our country has been in a crisis ever since because our Hired Help can't obey their treaty obligations, the Public Law, or find their butts with both hands.
Time to wake up, Virginia. And that includes the General Staff, the President, and members of Congress.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigjon
[SIZE=2]The entire process is predicated on forcing unknowing women to sign away their children into lives of debt slavery, and doing it under color of law
Actually there has never been a woman in law who ever had title to her own child. You cannot sign away anything you don't possess or own.
Law has always been a male institution. Equity is a female concept. In the case of freemen the condition of the child follows that of the father. In the case of slaves the condition of the child follows that of the mother.
https://books.google.com/books?id=zd...father&f=false
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
November 11 at 7:38 PM ·
For the Bar Members to See and Know--- And Everyone Else, Too
This is from a member of the Living Law Team a couple years ago. Read it, Bar Members, and weep.
The Role of Counselors-at—Law and The [unincorporated] Delaware Statutory Trusts
Remember when you were told you that you "had to have a Social Security Number"?
Sometimes, that is true, but only if you are applying for employment with the federal government. For of course, you would need it to enroll in their retirement and employee benefits program....but you don’t have to have one otherwise.
It is the same scenario with the Bar Associations telling new JD graduates that they have to have a Bar Card....again, that is true, if they want to be a prosecutor for the federal government corporations and their "federated state of state franchises" and become an employee of the court…………but not otherwise.
The fact is that there is no requirement for anyone to be a Bar Association Member to engage in the profession of law in this country and there never have been.
I challenge anyone anywhere to prove that there is any general requirement to be a Bar Member, in order to use the court facilities, present cases, or offer effective counsel to others with or without pay.
The fact is that the perpetuation of these "mandatory" Social Security enrollment and Bar Association Membership half-truths are undertaken in self-interest by undeclared foreign interests.
Research the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) if you have doubts and also see Trinsey v. Pagliaro and the cases that Robert F. Kennedy fought pertaining to these very issues.
Happily, quite a number of some of the best minds working in the profession of law today have awakened to this realization and they are turning in their Bar cards and leaving the association to stew in its own juice.
This was precipitated as a direct result of Bar Associations kicking members out for committing the sin of actually defending and protecting their clients' best interest, as well as, a result of lawyers waking up and going, "OMG!" -- and exiting as fast as their feet would get them out the door.
The lawyers among us are waking up along with the rest of the populace and realizing that they have been sold a total bill of goods, and don’t have to spend their lives being professional “liars”.
The fact is, lawyers can function either as attorneys-at-law or as counselors-at-law. These are "capacities" within the profession in which a lawyer can choose to work, [just as you can choose to work in the capacity of a hotel manager or a hotel bartender and still be working in a hotel].
Attorneys join the Bar to gain group insurance and bonding benefits. [Also so their buddies in the fraternity will gang up on any outsiders].
Counselors pay their own insurance and bonds and otherwise don't have any reason to join the Bar, because they aren't involved in the disposition of public property or addressing issues related to public employees-- that is, they aren't working in administrative capacities as members of an administrative court.
Attorneys-at-law traditionally function as property managers involved in the administration of civil cases in Article I courts dealing with in-house legislative "laws" and statutes.
This is why those working in administrative courts supported by the United States Districts, the Territorial States of States, and the Municipal STATES OF STATES are all required to be "attorneys" and Bar Members by their employers.
Attorneys work in administrative tribunals. Not judicial courts.
This fact accounts for these frank admissions about the nature of the federal territorial and municipal courts and their various state-of-state franchises operating on our shores:
"There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789, Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statues and Codes. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators." FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178.
"Courts are Administrative Tribunals" Clearfield Trust, et al v. United States 318 U.S. 363 (1943).
Counselors-at-law traditionally function in judicial court capacities and have the duty to protect and defend their living clientele, unlike their attorney-at-law brethren who are limited to dealing with public property and public employees and incorporated "things", either belonging to or working for or working with the government corporations.
Naturally, when a counselor-at-law appears a number of things are different about the nature and tenor of the proceedings:
A counselor-at-law is not required to enter an appearance prior to a court date and may simply walk in with a brief explanation to the judge that he or she is working in the capacity of a counselor-at-law and providing effective assistance to the Plaintiff or Defendant.
Often, to further clarify things, the judge will ask if the counselor-at-law is a member of the Bar Association…….If not, the proper response is simply, "I don't have a card (or more properly, a "ticket") with the Bar."
This is referring obliquely to the Bid Bond that the Bar Associations post in maritime cases involving incorporated entities, thus, further signaling to the judge that the Plaintiff or Defendant is appearing in the capacity of a living man or woman and that the court has to shift gears from international sea jurisdiction to international land jurisdiction.
The first difference for the court's notice when a counselor-at-law appears is the explicit revelation of the capacity in which the Plaintiff/Defendant is operating.
If he or she is operating in their actual, living capacity as a man or woman standing on the land jurisdiction of the United States, they are owed all their constitutional rights and guarantees including a counselor-at-law who can advise them but not "represent" them, because they are presumed to be free people above the age of twenty-one and competent to make their own decisions. That's why they have hired a counselor-at-law instead of an attorney.
That is also why they are forcing the court to engage them as people under the Public Law of the
United States or the General Session Law of the State instead of as "things" subject to the Private Administrative Law of any foreign territorial or municipal corporation or state of state or incorporated county franchise tribunal.
Attorneys represent "things" --- corporate franchises, wards of the state, bankrupt businesses, murdered victims of crime, mentally incompetent people, --all things that cannot "stand for" or answer for themselves. That is why they have to be "re-presented" by a substitute acting "for" them.
Counselors-at-law assist in presenting cases for living people.
Notice the difference: attorneys "represent" and administer the affairs of their clients often without regard for or even consulting with their clients. For example, they cut plea-bargains and waive rights and sell off property in whatever way best benefits the court.
This is because they work for the court and the client is at best considered a public trust subject to the court's administration. [And this is true whether you pay the traitor or not].
Notice that counselors-at-law "present" cases with and for their patrons, who administer their own affairs and make their own decisions throughout the proceedings, retain all their rights and prerogatives and do not willingly subject themselves to the court's administration.
Now, obviously, from the court's standpoint, it is very convenient to be able to dictate whatever happens in each and every case, so as to "administer" it as best suits the "public good" and the "good of the court" ---and the court's corporate employers, of course, without regard for any such niceties as equity owed to living people, or any rights owed to living people.
Just as obviously, it is a death knell to justice and an end to all freedom for living people to allow this state of affairs to go on.
When even the lawyers among us are so dumbed down and ignorant that they think the Bar Association has the power to obstruct them from pursuing their vocation, it's time to outlaw the Bar Associations, because they are clearly over-stepping any rational function or status that they have.
U.S. District, State of State and STATE OF STATE courts can demand whatever credentials they wish from people that they hire to represent their interests, just as other private and public interests can demand whatever credentials they desire from their employees.
If a "State of State" Legislature can pass a statutory "law" saying that all its court officials have to be Bar Association Members, our State Legislatures can just as easily pass a General Session law saying that none of our courts will allow Bar Association Members.
Take Note:
State of Wyoming is a Territorial Franchise Court. STATE OF WYOMING is a Municipal Franchise Court…………. Both of these are foreign corporation franchises like the local Target store.
They are limited to running administrative tribunals and they can require all the people in their "court system" to be Bar Association members until the cows come home, because these are private administrative tribunals.
But the Wyoming State Court belongs to the people of Wyoming and they run judicial courts of record that are superior to any private administrative tribunals and they can mandate that no Bar Association members are allowed to practice law in their venue ---thereby providing plenty of work for counselors-at-law.
That this great country and its people have been hoodwinked and pulled off course for so long by selfish private interests is an immense and horrifying Breach of Trust, but it is one that is being swiftly rectified, when we change/correct our own presumed political status and consequently change the "presumed" capacity in which we choose to act in court; while changing the capacity in which lawyers act.
To all former Bar Attorneys and those who are [currently] thinking seriously of tearing up their [fraud] cards?
It is time to face the truth and set yourselves free of the imaginary shackles that the Bar Associations have placed on you.
You can enter any court in this country in the capacity of a Counselor-at-Law and there is nothing any of the courts can say except, "Yes, of course...."
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
November 11 at 6:05 PM ·
Great Quotes:
My detractors always try to make it seem like I am the only one out here saying these things, but that is untrue, too.
From Brian Kelly:
“When the UNITED STATES declared bankruptcy, it pledged all Americans as collateral against the national debt, and confiscated all gold, eliminating the means by which you could pay, it also assumed legal responsibility for providing a new way for you to pay, and it did that by providing what is known as the Exemption, an exemption from having to pay for anything. In practical terms, though, this meant giving each American something to pay with, and that ”something” is your [own] credit."
From Mr. Richard James, McDonald, former law enforcement, California:
“Unbeknownst to most people, the class termed “US citizen” did not exist as a political status until 1866. It was a class and “political status” created for the newly freed slaves and did not apply to the people inhabiting the states of the union who were at that time state Citizens.”
This is what people were talking about when they referred to a "second class citizen" ---- Negroes and other people of color including American Indians had this newly created status of "US citizen" conferred on them without their knowledge or consent. Over time, the Vermin have tried to extend this political status to everyone.
From Debt Discharge:
"The original birth or naturalization record for every U.S. Citizen is held with Washington, D.C. and the property and assets of every living U.S. Citizen is pledged as collateral for the National Debt."
"You" are being mis-characterized as a "second class citizen" traded as a commodity on the U.S. Stock Exchange.
Slaves, slaves for sale! Black slaves! White slaves! Red slaves! Slaves of every age, sex, and color!
This is why they want all the Hondurans they can get to come to this country---- U.S. citizens are worth more in the slave market than Hondurans. So for every Mexican or Honduran that crosses the Border and gets labeled as a "U.S. citizen" the cash registers go "Ca-Ching!" and the difference in value gets deposited in the coffers of the Queen, the Roman Catholic Church, and the worthless, feckless traitors in Washington, DC.
Can you think of anything more rotten? Telling these poor people from Honduras and Mexico that they are coming to the "Land of the Free" --- to purposefully enslave them and sell them at a higher price on the "U.S. Stock Exchange"?
It's time to make the soldiers and the politicians and the bankers and the stock brokers and the SEC regulators and the "U.S. Attorney General" and the Government of Westminster and Her Royal Majesty and the Pope and all the rest of them account for this criminality.
Because criminality, it is.
Personage is a crime. Knowing mis-characterization of our political status is a capital crime under the Geneva Conventions. They can hang for this.
Literally.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
November 11 at 7:09 PM ·
P.S. About Ram-Bubba....and My Position Regarding Manna Trust
I made a joke and said, "Ramses was my Uncle. We used to call him "Ram-Bubba" behind his back."
My point is to shed light on the ridiculousness of claiming to be heirs to ancient trusts that are--purportedly-- thousands of years old, and claiming to be heirs of Ramses and heirs of Montezuma and heirs of Big King Put and Tut.
The actual history is written in stone in Ten Mile Canyon, if anyone can still read it and needs to know. But it doesn't matter.
Because life goes on. People die, possessions are recycled, new generations take over and make their mistakes and their good decisions, too.
What we are left with is the present moment and the fact that some people gained more than others by fraud and deceit, and others gained more than others by hard work and diligence, and still others gained more than others by sheer luck and blessing.
It's not okay to universally hate and rob from rich people on the presumption that they all got what they got by crime and cruelty. Some of them did, but many of them didn't.
Why should the good suffer with the bad?
And what kind of judge would I be to stand here and agree to some kind of mindless pogrom against "the rich" any more than I should stand here and agree with some mindless pogrom against "the poor"?
Each situation has to be considered on its merits for justice to be done.
We all know that, as inconvenient as that may be.
So, no, I won't give a Green Light and Happy Happy to Kim Goguen seizing 5,000 private trusts that belong to families and organizations that deposited those assets in Good Faith, and just letting her decide who gets what.
These are private property assets and if you disrespect someone else's private property, you know what you can expect when it comes to your own.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
November 11 at 11:22 PM ·
Veteran's Day 2018
When my brothers came home
I was sixteen years old
And I didn't know why
They looked so haunted.
Now I know
The years have flown
I still see their faces
Etched with pain.
The weeds and flowers
Ramble over their graves
And the flag still waves
Over their heads.
I have to wonder what
Might have been
For all of us
For all of them.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
Yesterday at 3:09 AM ·
Securitization is Illegal and Unlawful
Securitization is illegal and unlawful. And it has been the backbone of the world economy since 1934. Think about that.
I have pointed out that securitization of a man's Good Name and Estate is completely illegal and unlawful because it is an act of personage and results in enslavement --- both of which are crimes.
And here to discuss the point further is an excerpt from British researchers published in 2010, with more explicit detail of exactly why securitization, or, as the Brits write it, "securitisation" is illegal in the U.S. and throughout most the world:
WHY SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW
Securitisation is illegal under US legislation – primarily because it is fraudulent and causes specific violations of R.I.C.O., usury, Antitrust and bankruptcy laws. And it flies in the face of public policy in numerous ways, as is expounded in extensive detail in an analysis to be published in our journal Economic Intelligence Review 2009Q1 (7) with several pages of book, article and case references.
To begin with, securitisation violates US State usury legislation. Secondly, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ as well as ‘assignment’ securitisations are essentially tax evasion schemes, and the penalties for tax evasion in the United States are excessively severe.
Thirdly, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, the conflict of interest inherent in the sponsor also serving as the servicer constitutes fraud and conversion. In the fourth place, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations where the Special Purpose Vehicle [SPV] is a trust, the declaration of trust is void, as it exists for an illegal purpose.
In the fifth place, off-balance sheet treatment of asset-backed securities (both for ‘true-sale’ and for assignment transactions) constitutes fraud.
Sixth, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations involve blatant fraudulent conveyances. In the seventh place, securitisation usurps United States bankruptcy laws and is accordingly illegal, as well as being also demonstrably contrary to public policy.
SECURITISATION ENTAILS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF R.I.C.O. STATUTES
In ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, there are fraudulent transactions which serve as ‘predicate acts’ under US Federal R.I.C.O. statutes.
The specific R.I.C.O. sections are: Section 1341 (mail fraud); Section 1343 (wire fraud); Section 1344 (financial institution fraud); Section 1957 (engaging in monetary transactions improperly derived from specified unlawful activity) [‘the money you make from the illegal exploitation of my money, is my money’]; and Section 1952 (racketeering).
Furthermore, securitisation constitutes violations of American antitrust statutes through market integration, syndicate collusion, price formation, vertical foreclosure, tying, price-fixing, predatory pricing, and the rigging of allocations.
Securitisation also involves void contracts, given the lack of consideration, illusory promises, the absence of any actual bargain, the absence of mutuality – and finally illegal subject matter and the contravention of public policy.
Securitisation is riddled with Fraudulent Transfer, Fraud in the Inducement, Fraud in Fact by Deceit, Theft by Deception (Fraudulent Concealment) and Fraudulent Conveyance: see the US securities regulations routinely breached in such activity, listed at the foot of this report and of most of these reports for THE PAST THREE YEARS, and other laws also routinely flouted in this context.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
15 hrs ·
Counter-Offer to Manna World Holdings Trust, November 11, 2018
1. Perhaps you could explain how Marduk had any legitimate right of control or ownership of the assets he transferred to you? Because to my certain knowledge, you are claiming control of assets that weren't his and aren't yours to meddle with. The law is: possession by pirates does not change ownership. He could not give you authority or legitimacy he didn't have himself. So let's see Marduk's chain of provenance and bona fides establishing his interest and role in assets like the V.K. Durham Trust and the D'Avila Trust .... all approximately 5,000 of the private trusts that have been swept up in a big bag and handed to you to dispose of.
2. Renaming a trust or group of trusts to create a new legal person, e.g., changing the name of Alpha and Omega Trust to Manna World Holdings Trust doesn't give you any new authority or grant any new authority to the trust you made up out of thin air. Remember that these trusts contain actual assets, not digits, and fall under the Law of the Land, not legal and statutory provisions.
3. I didn't credit or accuse you of creating the QFS--- simply using it with Marduk's help--- to purloin control of approximately 5,000 Special Deposit Accounts, the actual donors of which never elected you (or him) as trustees. This is a sticking point. Actual assets deposited by people and organizations in Good Faith in a bank should not be seized upon by anyone but the lawful depositors. Interference with these assets and normal bank protocols is a threat to all private property rights and also whatever public confidence people can still have in the banks.
4. You are not the only good person out there. I have met plenty of good solid people who are legitimate private trustees with proof of trusteeship over accounts you are now controlling as an Executor de Son Tort. You blame them for not deploying assets to help Mankind sooner --- but surely you know or have cause to know that these same Trustees have been blocked from having access to their accounts for decades?
The Committee of 300, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderburgers, the Roman Cartel, and the guilty banks were all too busy using these private assets to make money for themselves.
The actual trustees AND beneficiaries went hungry to bed ---- some, like the intended beneficiaries of the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty Trust have been kept waiting for relief for literally hundreds of years and anyone who stepped forward as a Fiduciary to deploy the funding has been refused access, too. So it isn't like you can sit there and blame the people I am talking about. They have been victims as much as anyone else. Their Good Will should not be impugned for not doing something that they couldn't do through no fault of their own.
5. Generally speaking, the assets in the trusts you are seizing upon belong to private people, not "the People". Special Deposits belong to the Depositors, unless you can prove that the funds are the fruit of money laundering or other serious crimes---- and unless you have a receipt that says, "The People" on it, "The People" don't have anything to say. There are some trusts like those belonging to The United States of America [Unincorporated] and our member States that actually do belong to The People, but these are dedicated trusts in the National Interest.
In our case the plan is simply to transfer the assets to our International Trade Bank and from there disperse into fifty State accounts on a per capita basis. Each State Account will be assigned a competent Fiduciary CFO and from there, "The People" will be fully informed about their inheritance and enabled to make choices individually and via plebiscite. Each State Fiduciary issues a yearly online report and an abstract report. In this way each State is responsible for maintaining accountability to "The People" and reflecting the actual Will of the People in that State.
(6) Trust beneficiaries are not and cannot be "required" to appoint agents with plenary control over their assets, especially when the Donors didn't mandate any such condition. Rather, it's your job to liquidate or rollover the public trusts to the actual states and actual people and to return the private property trusts to their own trustees. If you want to help, you would be welcome by our Trust Association Members to do so.
Everyone understands the need for disciplined and organized deployment of relief efforts and infrastructure development
funding, so you might logically start with people who: (1) have valid claims and clear, public aims; (2) have already agreed to work cooperatively for the common good of all. I will point out that expecting one woman to act as Trustee of 5,000 trust accounts is sheer lunacy. The private trust trustees can help you as much as you can help them.
(7) As for getting four countries to release control of their trusts "back to their former trustees" --- there are no such valid trustees that I know of, because any valid Public Trusteeships have been usurped (in most cases) for over a hundred years. So why make such a reference to a system that was of the pirates, by the pirates and for for the pirates? It isn't like countries can go back to anything like a valid Public Trusteeship, and you know that. In virtually all cases, the purported trustees of the incorporated governments weren't even functioning in a fiduciary capacity--- and you presumably know that, too.
In the world I live in, rights go hand-in-hand with responsibilities. Anyone who doesn't take responsibility under The Prudent Man Standard has no right to act as a Public Trustee. By that standard virtually none of the incorporated governments on Earth even have Fiduciary Trustees---- the "United States" certainly hasn't bothered to have Fiduciary Trustees for decades--- and when you are talking about actual National Trust assets, Fiduciary Trustees are required. The United States of America [Unincorporated] does have Fiduciary Trustees in place, so we have our horses in front of our cart.
(8) As for the Indian Nations, most of them did sign deals with the Devil, but it is also true that most of those deals (similar to the U.S. Attorney General's claim to own all of us via donation) are fraudulent, void for non-disclosure, etc. We call such nations "dependent sovereignties" because some entity has to hold the responsibility in order to exercise the rights of the landlord, but many nations can co-habit the same geographical space.
We, The United States of America [Unincorporated], are the recognized landlords of this country since 1776. In 2015, we opened up the land jurisdiction to put an end to second class citizenship in this country. Those Native Americans who elect State Citizenship instead of U.S. citizenship have been free to come home to the land jurisdiction of this country since November 6, 2016, and once separated from the international jurisdiction of the sea, they own their own bodies, so also own soil.
Michael Stephen Young exercised this option in 2015, thus securing standing as an American and as a Tribal Chief in America. He waived his rights as a beneficiary of the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty Trust, formed a plan, established it as his Irrevocable Will on the Public Record, and has stood ready to begin implementation with our full support and approval for three years.
And here we are, looking at another bitter winter, still fuss-farting around and trading insults about this situation. A lot of good, worthy --- and needy --- people have been waiting over 200 years to see any benefit from that trust, and they are still waiting. One must ask if the trustees have any concern for the intended beneficiaries --- Native Americans, Hispanics and Cowboys and Traders in seven western states --- or sense of "reasonable urgency" in the performance of their duties at all. I certainly consider promptness an element of Fiduciary Duty and am bewildered how a Treaty Trust with us could remain in limbo, gathering interest and dust for over 200 years. And still isn't deployed.
(9) Since we are discussing actual, factual assets the legal/lawful requirements are a bit different than you suppose. For example, we don't need to be in good "legal standing". We need to be in good "lawful standing".
Actual assets exist in the realm of sovereignty, not the realm of legal fictions. We are the ones that give corporations licenses -- that is, corporations are licensed by us, not the other way around.
(10) It appears that you have your heart in the right place but are confused about various points of law and nobody is blaming you for that. It is confusing. You have also come out of ---and cut your teeth inside of--- a criminally malfunctioning system, so it's not like you have any experience or knowledge of what a correctly functioning world economy looks like or how it is SUPPOSED to function. Perhaps, just maybe, if we got together face to face we could iron it all out enough to MAKE A START.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·
Dear Kim – A Reply, November 12, 2018
First, I had visitors come here today and threaten to kill me over this conversation.
Ever see what happens when arrogant idiots get the attention of a Battle Class Seraph from the Age of Storms? Let’s just say that they left here considerably faster than they came. I doubt that you will get a full and honest report about this from them, but the Galactic Council certainly will hear about it.
Second, we are the “unknown country” --- the "dust that returneth to dust" (land and soil) fixed in “a time that is not a time and a place that is not a place”. We are not his dominion and the unknown country has nothing whatsoever to do with the family business of Marduk, Satan, and Sons, which was supposed to be turned over to new management circa 500 AD. They decided not to keep their end of the bargain they made with The Anointed One, so that resulted in a major diplomatic faux pas. New Precessional Guardians have been dispatched to replace the Saturnine Brotherhood and more than sufficient firepower is present to blow any resistance clear out of this sector of the Galaxy.
They are not going to get their way. In fact, they are just going to sit down and shut up and observe basic math. A negative seven plus a negative seven equals negative fourteen. They are, by my count, 1500 years and counting behind on their rent. And this planet, which actually belongs to the people and other beings who live here, is long past due for maintenance and renewal.
Third, you must realize that “money” is a child’s game where I come from. It’s like everyone is expecting me to play Barbie’s Pet Shop with them, which is very frustrating for me. Money and routing it around and sharing it out so that people can live decent lives should be the least of our problems. It's like telling me people can't move widgets from Point A to Point B because Standard Oil still controls the oil pipelines in Texas. Say what?
Fourth, there’s no need for all this distress. I already have what you need as a system to trade freely and to get relief to everyone on the planet. It’s already here, ready to deploy, safe, private, seamless and 200 years ahead of anything that now exists. A brand new clean and supremely user-friendly worldwide system could have been in place months ago---- which is what winds my clock. We can simply bypass the existing banks.
Fifth, each one is indeed sacred and doesn’t need “management” in the form of oppression and Group Think, however, until education and emotional support catches up with everyone -- there has to be a transition. We both know that. Thanks to the way this world has been plundered and mismanaged, the majority of adults are like children ---scared, miserable, confused children. And you know that, too.
These people need help establishing self-rule because they have been abused and oppressed and not just for a little while –for generations.
Sixth, Bank of Dene is not my bank and never has been. Our International Trade Bank is called The American States and Nations Bank, “ASAN” for short. It isn’t part of the commercial system. As you have so clearly described the endless rabbit warren of their corruption, I don’t have to explain the desirability and even the necessity of starting over.
Seventh, like most of those who have fought with this “System” Michael has had his share of troubles and run-ins with what passes for law here in a country which depends on securitization --- completely illegal and unlawful processes--- to generate an economy for itself. Most of my friends have spent time in jail, been hauled over the coals, and many have suffered alcoholism, drug addictions, broken marriages and heartbreak of all sorts, because they haven’t meekly gone along with injustice and criminality.
I don’t know where you are getting your DNA results, because I have seen reports confirming not only his Native heritage, but everything else he has claimed in his book, The Shekinah Prophecy. Maybe you are the one that needs to take a second look? In any event, my support of Michael is based on his heart, not his war record. I can see his heart. I know what he wants. And he truly wants nothing for himself, but to share in building something beautiful for all the people he loves --- which is darn near everyone. Not just the Natives. Not just the Hispanics. Not just the Cowboys. And that, IMHO, is exactly the kind of man that is needed to build a new world --- a man who still has his heart intact. Think closely --- there aren’t that many of them left.
Eighth, my political system and their political system are two different things, operating under different forms of law --- and they are subservient to my system which is sovereign. We charter and license and if they misbehave, we liquidate corporations, not the other way around. Now, that is hard for people to understand because they are used to being bullied by corporate bureaucrats, but it is nonetheless the truth. We have Law. They have what passes for Law. So when you are dealing with huge issues like rebuilding the entire world and providing new banking services and new medical tech and all the rest of what needs to go on ----
it’s my brand of Law that you need to be using, not theirs. I am sorry if you got the impression that I wasn’t willing to help you, because I am willing to help anyone (see above) who wants to do the right thing by the Earth and its people.
Ninth, for the purposes of the current discussion I am not talking about all the accounts. I am talking about the approximately 4,800 Historic Trust and Private Accounts held as Special Deposits that contain the bulk of the precious metal assets on Earth. What we are left with are two basic kinds of accounts containing large quantities of gold, silver, and other assets that people have traditionally used as tokens and commodities in trade that have been left on deposit in banks and which you have gained control of via computer programs. Control of the assets needs to be returned to the Depositors, both Public and Private. There needs to be a cooperative but honest effort on all parts to resolve these issues.
Tenth, one of the exit interviews I had with Marduk and with Satan was about the Big Lies they have told. If you listen to them, black will be white and up will be down, because truly, actually, factually---- and despite all their intellect and knowledge --- the Truth is not in them. Even basic logic such as Who Owns What gets distorted in their presence. This is because the Truth departed from them when they rebelled, and has never returned. This leaves them and their progeny in the unenviable position of being permanently out of tune with the Universe, living in their own self-created and egotistical world, separated from All That Is.
Eleventh, if we were to allow all their premises and what they have taught about the “Unknown Country”--- which is not their dominion, then this alienation and separation from the Truth would continue for more generations on Earth. I don't want that. I don't get the impression you want that, either. So why not focus on resolving the nuts and bolts and getting on with it?
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
46 mins ·
Clarifications About Kim's Problem, Oil, and Money Systems
Yesterday, in my Reply to Kim Goguen aka "Kim Possible" I noted my frustration with the whole topic of money and moving it around by saying that, "It's like telling me that people can't move widgets from Point A to Point B because Standard Oil still owns all the pipelines in Texas."
Apparently, that flew over many people's heads and caused confusion ---- what was I talking about?
J.D. Rockefeller made his fortune --- not on oil, but on oil pipelines. That is, he didn't get rich on oil, the product, whether crude or finished commodity. What he made his money on was a monopoly of pipeline infrastructure. This was the basis of "Standard Oil". By controlling the pipeline infrastructure old J.D. could move or block the flow of oil and by controlling monopoly interest, he could grant favors to whomever he chose in terms of access to getting oil to refineries and to markets --- both. He could also charge as little or as much as he liked for the pipeline service he provided.
Thus, by controlling the pipelines he could make or break any oil company and even manipulate the prices of crude oil and finished products.
What finally caused the "busting up" of Standard Oil was that they went too far in their monopoly interest activities and their coercive control of the commodity transport and therefore, the commodity supplies.
What I meant by my comment was--- we have the same problem now, with the banks. This is exactly what Kim was describing as her problem --- owning the commodity (oil) and not being able to move it reliably (through the pipeline) because those controlling the transport system (Standard Oil) were blocking and shunting and causing problems.
So, in banking terms, Kim, the Comptroller, is having trouble moving the commodity (money) through the transport system (banks) because the people that own the transport system are, like old J.D., playing games -- blocking, locking, shunting deliveries, etc,, etc,. etc, ------ so I was, in essence, saying ---WTF?
We have been here before. We know how to solve this particular problem. Why isn't someone doing what needs to be done?
And what needs to be done is that Interpol (which controls the U.S. Attorney General's Office) needs to be outted as a criminal organization and shut down. The USAG works for them since 1976, not the President, even though the Department of Justice is a Federal Agency and even though the President appoints the Attorney General.
So we have a key Office in our government under the blatant control of Globalist interests and those Globalist interests have been running a white collar slave market on our shores and harming our people, which is both illegal and unlawful.
Shut the rats down. Kick them out. No more participation in Interpol. No more kidnapping American babies as "alien property" donated to the U.S. Attorney General.
If necessary, do what they do: rename the "Department of Justice" and rename the "Office of the Attorney General" ---- shift the contract over to the "new" Agency and place it back under American control. Just vacate what is there now.
That's Job One. Regain control of the Justice System in this country and stop all the game playing.
So, now we move on to Job Two.
Job Two is analogous to busting Standard Oil. We need to bust the banks that are abusing their privileges and acting as obstructive monopoly interests.
We know how to do that.
We liquidate them --- or threaten them with liquidation --- under a vast variety of laws and regulations that forbid what they are doing already. If they won't play ball according to the rules, we take the ball away. Boom. Shut their doors, take over their operations, and that is that.
And all that is just a matter of correcting the existing system and bringing the oversight tools (the Justice System) and the commodity transport (the Banking System) back into alignment and control.
If I were President, I believe I could have this problem fixed in less than a week. So.....once again, if a Grandma in Big Lake, Alaska, can see the problem, analyze it in fifteen minutes, develop a general plan of action and be ready to move on it ---- why in blazes is the entire federal "system" all bolluxed up and constipated over this nonsense?
And that's just the existing system. Who says we have to stick with the existing system?
We have the technology and the means to deliver a totally new and "fool proof" banking system to the entire Earth and everyone on it. Kim can just move the old accounts over to the new tech and that really solves the problem once and for all.
Put the records onto a new communications platform that is so transparent and user friendly and yet so private and seamless that all the banks will be begging to use it.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
12 mins ·
Ah-ha Moment Regarding Health and the DOD
Now, I know that my Readers are not coming to this page for health advice. They want to know what-the is wrong with the government and what to do about it. This article only obliquely addresses a problem with the government, which is the over-protection of Aluminum Industry profits by the Defense Department at the expense of public health ----but read it anyway, because it could save your life and improve the quality of your life and the lives of those you love.
I've thought for years that there is an obvious link between the proliferation of aluminum cookware and the vast "mysterious" increase in Alzheimer's Disease which involves plaque deposits in the brain containing --- what? Aluminum.
The Aluminum Industry has a very shady history of pollution and self-interest going back many decades. It got its big boost (not with Reynold's Wrap) with the use of Aluminum in air craft sheet metal during World War II. Because it was a necessary "war material" the industry as a whole got all sorts of perks and open doors. After the war, the growth of the commercial airlines and the need for new commercial transport planes continued to guarantee the demand for aluminum.
Almost as an afterthought a burgeoning business in aluminum cookware and disposable bake ware sprang up after the Second World War as aluminum manufacturers sought to increase demand for new aluminum-containing products.
Aluminum has several properties that are good for cookware -- it is light weight, fairly rigid, and a good even heat conductor.
Unfortunately, it is also quite poisonous when ingested. That's hardly a concern for airplane fuselages but is a concern when you are boiling water in an aluminum tea kettle day after day. While the amount of aluminum ingested as part of a cake baked in an aluminum pan is truly minute, aluminum is very hard for our bodies to get rid of once ingested, and builds up causing an anti-poison inflammatory reaction. The body tries to save itself by insulating the aluminum in a blanket of fatty acids ---- plaque.
When you consider the exact correlation between the increase in the use of aluminum cookware and the increase in Alzheimer's in the adult population --- it does not take rocket science to figure this out, even if it does take aluminum to make rockets.
Another way that the Aluminum Industry harms our health is the addition of Fluoride to toothpaste and to our community water systems. Fluoride is touted (ironically enough) for its anti-bacterial and plaque-fighting abilities without any disclosure of why Fluoride has these properties. Fluoride is a low-level poison, just like the aluminum ore it comes from, and while it "kills" the kind of bacterial plaque that forms in our mouths, once ingested, it forms the other kind of plaque that gunks up our vascular systems and brain synapses.
The Aluminum Industry thus found a highly profitable market for its poisonous waste products at our expense, and it was allowed to promote this because aluminum is a protected "Defense Material" and the mining and manufacturing related to aluminum has been a protected industry ever since WWII.
Now, I have nothing against the use of aluminum in conjunction with aerospace and the airplane industry generally, and I see nothing wrong with the government protecting the Aluminum Industry in regard to its importance to the military --- but I draw the line when the known ill-health affects of aluminum are ignored and people's lives are ruined and truncated because aluminum is being used in inappropriate ways (such as cookware and bake ware) and its poisonous by-products are being marketed (and even mandated!) for use in toothpaste and added to municipal water supplies.
I count myself extremely lucky that my Mother stuck to black cast iron and stainless steel and I highly recommend that everyone else do the same.
There are other cookware dangers from non-stick and ceramic surfaces, too. A friend forwarded this little gem to me from Buzz Video this morning:
Four Types of Toxic Cookware to Avoid and Four Safe Alternatives:
https://www.buzzvideo.com/a/6561018307401482762…
So to help my Readers have healthier and happier lives, here is a piece of Ancient Chinese Wisdom passed on from my Mother, LaVera, to all of you:
"Hot pan, cold oil, food won't stick."
That is, you don't need non-stick cookware to enjoy non-stick food. You just heat your pan up BEFORE you add the cooking oil. This causes the cooking oil to form a protective layer of natural non-stick between the food and the pan, and you can have fuss-free scrambled eggs and pork chops to your heart's delight.
Buy cast iron and stainless steel and the other safe alternatives and use this little trick to make your own safe "non-stick" cookware.
Also, you can get all the benefits of Fluoride-containing toothpaste with none of the nasty risks and side effect by buying Flouride-free toothpaste and simply rinsing your mouth with a couple tablespoons of coconut oil mixed with a couple drops of cinnamon or clove essential oil. Just swish the oil around like you would use any mouthwash, then hold in your mouth for 30 seconds.
This oil combination is naturally anti-bacterial and anti-plaque and gets under your gums more efficiently than any toothpaste --- and unlike Fluoride-containing toothpaste, this option continues to fight plaque-forming bacterial for many hours afterward.
You can also lobby for the end of adding Fluoride to municipal water treatment programs and expose the Dirty Little Secret of the DOD connect via its protection of the the Aluminum Industry and therefore, Aluminum Industry profits. They are, after all, supposed to be protecting us, not poisoning us.
-
Re: Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions
Anna von Reitz
14 hrs ·
RFID? Beat Them With Their Own Stick.
For reasons that should now be self-evident, Satanists have been persecuted and suppressed for centuries. This is part of the reason that they hide and pretend to be Christians, Muslims, and Methodists, Greek Orthodox and Korean Buddhists and adherents of every other religion you can name.
It's cover for what they really are, and gives them a means to undermine and steal from and gain the confidence of the people who really ARE Christians, Muslims, Methodists, Jews, and so on.... and they exercise the influence they gain however they will.
This is how the "Jews" were successful in bringing America into World War I. They weren't really Jews, but they influenced people who were Jews under the pretense of being Jews themselves.
They can do the same thing with Germans or Chinese or anyone else. Same Schtick.
Once you are aware of that and how effectively these quick-change artists have defrauded and made use of the rest of the world for their own profit, you are prepared to take advantage of them in the same way.
What? What?
The one tenet derived from the actual Constitution that they adhere to rigidly and which remains the ONLY exemption to the gross military dictum that was established here after the Civil War, is the Freedom of Religion exemption.
Because they fear being found out and having their religion suppressed again as it was under the Romans and later under the Holy Roman Empire, they are always in the forefront of the Religious Freedom bandwagon.
You can rely on the fact that Freedom of Religion will remain a rock solid guarantee, because if it were not: (1) they would face the possibility of governmental suppression and (2) they could face suppression against other religious groups that they are sheltering under and that would be bad for business.
This then becomes your shield as well as theirs. And they can't take it away without exposing their own backsides and business interests.
Now, here's how we apply it to the "Real ID" and the RFID chipping of people like cattle with ear tags:
"I'm sorry, but the 'chipping' of living people is against my religion and dignity."
Period.
Christians and Muslims can both legitimately claim that it is against their religion.
Christians because of the warnings against the Mark of the Beast and Muslims because they accept Jesus as a Great Prophet. Hindus and Buddhists, Shintos and Sikhs can object to it as a desecration of the body.
We can all find plenty of religious reasons to say no to RFIDs.
The Vermin among us who have no respect for themselves and certainly no respect for others, will try to push it, and will argue it and attempt to force feed this final devaluation of our uniqueness and sacredness, but if enough people remove themselves it will undermine the marketplace, and there will be no "Real ID" and the rats in the legislatures will have to go to bed without supper.
They only do things that are profitable for them, so make the RFID idea as unprofitable as possible and voice your objections loud and strong.
And now, prepare yourselves for a delicious irony: the people who are responsible for all the gross identity theft that has gone on for the last 150 years, will try to sell you RFID chipping as a solution to the problem they caused: identity theft.
However, the answer to this is easy, too. RFID's can be duplicated and forged and counterfeited like any other product. And the potential end result is even worse than having some transvestite from New Jersey pretending to be Anna von Reitz.
Imagine a few hundred thousand impostors claiming to be you and accessing your credit on the same day?
Tell that to your legislators.
And as for the "Mark of the Beast", which in these days is actually the "Mark of the B.E.A.S.T" ---let's just skip it, and for the sake of the prophets, say we did.
The B.E.A.S.T. is the Belgian Electronic Asset tracking system. Because you have been misidentified as an "asset" --- a chattel slave in their "System"---- they want to use the RFID chip to locate you in their worldwide warehouse, like a lump of cheddar cheese.
Just say no, it's against your religion.