Printable View
embedded MSNBC video of Fauchi talking with Andrea mitchell.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1468635333961175040
Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
The Post Millennial
@TPostMillennial
Fauci: "I would prefer, and we all would prefer that people would be voluntarily getting vaccinated, but if they'
re not gonna do that, sometimes you've got to do things that are unpopular, but that clearly supersede individual choices..."
Are Xenobots already inside vaccines for COVID-19?
organic robots derived from living cells
Vermont University Synthetic biology team builds first living robots that can reproduce
entirely new form of biological self-replication
TruNews show of December 8, 2021
https://www.trunews.com/stream/synth...id-19-vaccines
Synthetic Biology: Are Xenobots Inside Covid-19 Vaccines?
1:12:21 video runtime
first 24 minutes of this show deal with this interesting subject of xenobots -- to about 1:24:00
Today on TRUNEWS, scientists recently achieved a breakthrough in the new field of synthetic biology. In early 2020, a team of University of Vermont scientists and Harvard University took stem cells from frog embryos and converted them into nano-sized living robots. The never-before-seen type of replication in organic robots created in a laboratory-derived from living cells could have revolutionary applications in the development of new medicines and vaccines.
Rick Wiles and Doc Burkhart have more on this Nephilim-science news story. Airdate 12/8/21
Content Contributed By — TruNews Team
__________________
Dachsie comment:
There have been several things said about the crapshoot injectables that seem to convey that there is something in the injectable's ingredients that a self-aware, or living entity that reproduces or creates yet is something that is part living cell and part something synthetic and engineered to do a task that humans have designed this "new form of life" to do.
Examples.... Dr. Luc Montagnier said something like "the vaccine CREATES the variants."
Dr. Carrie Madej said something like the little things (now called "hydra vulgaris parasites")she viewed in the injectablle's contents under a microscope seemed "self aware."
Also Dr. Richard Flemming explained how a part of the genome of a "virus" can be spliced into a new lab created synthetic genome sequence that is the part that performs the function of replication.
These xenobots are said to be something that may be able to be used in medicine to "create proteins" inside a human body.
All of this sounds to me to be something evil and not good for humankind. I am glad I believe in God because I think if I were hearing about this evil kind of "science" without faith, it would be fear-inducing or depressing.
________
Apocalypse 22:20
He that giveth testimony of these things, saith, Surely I come quickly: Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...d4_320x180.jpg
New Brunswick, New Jersey
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WOEhKF0DQd4/
New Jersey Opens the Door to DENYING GROCERIES to the UnV@xxed?
First published at 22:10 UTC on December 8th, 2021.
HighImpactFlix
HighImpactFlix
71661 subscribers
11:40 video runtime
Senator Ron Johnson reviews and reveals Dr. Fauchi's strategies over the years as being the same strategies Dr. Fauchi employs today, mainly fear mongering to promote his agenda. Senator makes note Dr. Fauchi's 1980s AIDS era actions to hype fear and then completely switching his public messaging. Senator Johnson makes note of how Dr. Fauchi suppressed the medicine Bactrim which would have prevented tens of thousand of deaths in the first years of the AIDS epidemic and which was showing to be very helpful treatment for a kind of pneumonia that AIDS patients were getting. Instead Dr. Fauchi promoted AZT and the deaths escalated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b08Hi3kBpSs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b08Hi3kBpSs
'He Wants To Deny The Reality Of What He Said, What He Did!': Ron Johnson Rips Fauci On Senate Floor
18,950 views
Dec 8, 2021
1.5K
Dislike
Share
Save
Forbes Breaking News
1.12M subscribers
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) assails Dr. Anthony Fauci's record on the Senate floor.
26:56 video runtime
__________________________________________________ ______________
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/whitewashing-aids-history_b_4762295
The Blog
Whitewashing AIDS History
In my book, I recount how slow the federal government was in publicizing the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent PCP (the pneumonia that was then the leading killer of people with AIDS) in addition to its long-time and well-known use to treat PCP.
By
Sean Strub, Contributor
Founder, POZ magazine; Executive Director, Sero Project
02/21/2014 04:10pm EST | Updated December 6, 2017
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Dr. Anthony Fauci is rewriting history. He is doing so to disguise his shameful role in delaying promotion of an AIDS treatment that would have prevented tens of thousands of deaths in the first years of the epidemic.
In my book, Body Counts, A Memoir of Politics, Sex, AIDS, and Survival, I recount how slow the federal government was in publicizing the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent PCP (the pneumonia that was then the leading killer of people with AIDS) in addition to its long-time and well-known use to treat PCP.
Dachsie comment:
I think this video is an important part of the PLANdemic story. First part is very Q oriented. Also strong patriot message and some mention of Christian orientation of narrator. I am somewhat detached and objective about this video's contents but it is part of reality.
Several important short video clips within this video, especially the one of Dr. Ugur Sahin CEO of Bio N TECH of the Pfizer "vaccine" notoriety explaining why he has not taken the jab. Made no sense to me. The man and the company are plain and simple EVIL in my opinion.
Also there is attempt to explain why Trump had to come out in favor of the vaccines and "Operation Warp Speed." It was said that Trump took that position but it was "nothing but optics." Also made no sense to me.
Video said Durham is going to come in and save the day and save the republic. Dachsie says No Sale on that.
____________________________
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...m2_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/plSNsoUBYgm2/
The Genius of Trump! Gives The Enemy Center Stage To Show The World Their Crime!
44:14 video runtime
First published at 07:21 UTC on December 9th, 2021.
#GeniusofTrump
channel image
Chembuster
Chembuster
36479 subscribers
EVEN ATTACKS BY MEANS OF NEGATIVE REVIEWS CANNOT STOP THE TRUTH TO BE EXPOSED
ENGLISH
https://beforeitsnews.com/alternativ...h-3763158.html
----------------------------------------------------------
Tägliche politische und Geoengineering-Nachrichten:
https://vk.com/chembuster
Meine Kanäle:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/chembuster/
https://vimeo.com/chembuster
My personal greetings from Germany go to all patriots in the world:
_______________________________
reference post number 2364 of yesterday.
at 2:00 of the video of Senator Ron Johnson, he stated...
"over 780,000 Americans have lost their lives."
That 780,000 figures is far higher than the latest VAERS number of deaths of 21,154 Deaths .
Just wondering source of Senator Johnson's data.
New VAERS Data as of Nov 26th, 2021 (posted Dec 3)
21,154 Deaths and 997,322 Adverse Events
19,532 Pfizer / Moderna and 1,622 J&J Deaths PLUS 927,740 Pfizer / Moderna and 69,582 J&J Adverse Events
"Just wondering source of Senator Johnson's data"
I expect he was looking at a list of qualified Democratic voters in the last election and got them confused with dead people.
also view Tru|News vaccine coverage on 12-9-21 show video of today
https://www.trunews.com/stream/money...banking-system
begin at abiout 0:43:00
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/renowned-virologist-warns-of-collapse-of-our-health-system-due-to-complications-from-covid-vaccines/
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/renowned-virologist-warns-of-collapse-of-our-health-system-due-to-complications-from-covid-vaccines/
Renowned virologist warns of ‘collapse of our health system’ due to complications from COVID vaccines
https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-cont...-4-810x500.jpg
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche warned of the damage being done to the immune systems of the vaccinated, and the inevitable grave consequences that would result.
Featured Image
YouTube
Patrick
Delaney
78
Fri Dec 3, 2021 - 9:39 pm EST
(LifeSiteNews) — A renowned virologist and former senior officer of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently warned against the dangers of the experimental COVID-19 gene-transfer vaccines, encouraged the un-jabbed to “stay unvaccinated,” and predicted an inevitable “collapse of our health system” due to health complications in the vaccinated.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, who once worked as a senior program manager for the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) and has been considered one of the most talented vaccine creators in the world, issued a video “Message to Austria” on November 20 to coincide with a large rally in Vienna opposing new lockdown measures.
embedded video in article
AND
video also viewable on Rumble
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/re...ovid-vaccines/
As a first priority, he advised the public, “Never, Ever — allow anything, or anybody, to interfere or suppress your innate immune system,” which is the first line of defense human beings have to fight off all infections.
According to Vanden Bossche, the “vaccine antibodies,” which are induced by the current COVID-19 vaccines, suppress innate immunity and they “cannot substitute for it” since they quickly wane in their effectiveness and cannot prevent infection or transmission of the virus.
Thus, these experimental injections, in contrast to innate immunity, “do not contribute to herd immunity,” he said.
Vaccinating children ‘an absolute no go!’
This reality is most important in the case of children whose “innate immunity can easily be suppressed by vaccinal antibodies” since their “antibodies are so young and so naïve that they can easily be outcompeted by vaccinal antibodies,” he said.
And since children are protected from many diseases by their innate immunity, including COVID-19, its suppression by these vaccines exposes them to many more dangers, and “could even lead to autoimmune diseases,” the expert warned.
Therefore, injecting children with these biological agents “is an absolute no go!” the virologist said. “We cannot vaccinate our children with these vaccines.”
Booster shots for the vaccinated ‘absolutely insane!’
Turning his attention to the adult “vaccinees,” those who have been vaccinated, the specialist in microbiology said the suppression of innate immunity has already shown itself to be a problem in this population. “They are indeed going to have a difficult time to control a number of diseases,” including COVID-19.
Yet, since their innate antibodies have previously been trained through years of adapting and maturing, he said “they are usually more resilient to the vaccinal antibodies” than those of children.
However, this resilience can be further deteriorated by additional shots, and thus Vanden Bossche warns that giving these jabbed individuals boosters “is absolutely insane! What this will do is just further increase the immune pressure of the vaccinal antibodies on their innate immunity.” Thus, booster shots are “absolute nonsense! It is dangerous and should not be done!”
To the un-jabbed: ‘For God’s sake, stay unvaccinated!’
As for the unvaccinated, the Belgian physician described why they would fare much better, first breaking them down into three categories:
Those who have experienced no symptoms, who are “most likely simply protected by their innate antibodies;”
Those who have experienced mild symptoms, not having to stay in bed for any time; and
Those who recovered from the disease and may have even had a severe case of it.
Due to what he called the “high infectious pressure” of the Delta variant, the respective innate immunity systems of these unvaccinated may now have to struggle a bit more, and thus the first category may experience mild symptoms, the second, moderate, and the third may have “some higher susceptibility to some other diseases. For example, influenza or the common cold.”
“But very, very importantly, all are protected,” he said. “They all are still protected against severe disease and the majority of them will be protected against very mild or moderate disease.”
This is the case, especially, the virologist said, since COVID-19 “is not a disease of healthy people. People who are in good health have a healthy innate immune system that can deal with a number of respiratory viruses without any problem. These people are not only protected against the disease, but they can even in many cases prevent infection.”
Vaccinees ‘serving as a kind of breeding ground for the virus’
Therefore, in order to maintain their healthy innate immune system as protection against COVID-19 and many other diseases, Dr. Vanden Bossche offered the following three requirements to the unvaccinated:
“For God’s sake, stay unvaccinated! They should stay unvaccinated;”
“Take care of their innate immunity, meaning they should take care of their health … if you do this and you are unvaccinated, you will be spared from severe disease without any vaccine. On the contrary, the vaccine would do the opposite;” and
Those with comorbidities or underlying diseases “should be careful about contacts.”
For this third category of the more vulnerable, the physician said, “This is not to discriminate against the vaccinees, but [the un-jabbed] should especially avoid contact with vaccinees at this point in time.
“Vaccinees are now the people, and there is no doubt about this, who are really serving as a kind of breeding ground for the virus,” he said. “We need to have an extra protection for those who have underlying diseases. Do not vaccinate them, but in fact prevent them from being exposed to high infectious pressure.”
Health issues in the vaxxed ‘will inevitably lead to a collapse of our health system’
He encouraged his Austrian listeners that the only fight they have is “the fight for your health, [in] not getting vaccinated.” In accomplishing this, all of the other measures will not be sustainable.
Though he expressed great concern for “the vaccinees,” stating “we need to help them as much as we can because they will need extensive treatment in many cases,” he observed that the percentage of this group now being hospitalized “is now steadily increasing. Whereas more and more, with training of the innate immune system, with more exposure to the virus, more and more non-vaccinated people get protected.”
“This will lead inevitably — and I am not a doomsday preacher — but this will inevitably lead to a collapse of our health system. It cannot be otherwise,” he said.
‘Strength is found in serenity’
However, in closing, the virologist had a hopeful message, stating the lockdown measures “are not sustainable” and cannot last “for a long time.” He encouraged them to “stay calm,” sharing a German saying that translates, “Strength is found in serenity.”
RELATED:
78
Fri Dec 3, 2021 - 9:39 pm EST
(LifeSiteNews) — A renowned virologist and former senior officer of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently warned against the dangers of the experimental COVID-19 gene-transfer vaccines, encouraged the un-jabbed to “stay unvaccinated,” and predicted an inevitable “collapse of our health system” due to health complications in the vaccinated.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, who once worked as a senior program manager for the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) and has been considered one of the most talented vaccine creators in the world, issued a video “Message to Austria” on November 20 to coincide with a large rally in Vienna opposing new lockdown measures.
As a first priority, he advised the public, “Never, Ever — allow anything, or anybody, to interfere or suppress your innate immune system,” which is the first line of defense human beings have to fight off all infections.
According to Vanden Bossche, the “vaccine antibodies,” which are induced by the current COVID-19 vaccines, suppress innate immunity and they “cannot substitute for it” since they quickly wane in their effectiveness and cannot prevent infection or transmission of the virus.
Thus, these experimental injections, in contrast to innate immunity, “do not contribute to herd immunity,” he said.
Vaccinating children ‘an absolute no go!’
This reality is most important in the case of children whose “innate immunity can easily be suppressed by vaccinal antibodies” since their “antibodies are so young and so naïve that they can easily be outcompeted by vaccinal antibodies,” he said.
And since children are protected from many diseases by their innate immunity, including COVID-19, its suppression by these vaccines exposes them to many more dangers, and “could even lead to autoimmune diseases,” the expert warned.
Therefore, injecting children with these biological agents “is an absolute no go!” the virologist said. “We cannot vaccinate our children with these vaccines.”
Booster shots for the vaccinated ‘absolutely insane!’
subscribe to our daily headlines
US
Canada
Catholic
Turning his attention to the adult “vaccinees,” those who have been vaccinated, the specialist in microbiology said the suppression of innate immunity has already shown itself to be a problem in this population. “They are indeed going to have a difficult time to control a number of diseases,” including COVID-19.
Yet, since their innate antibodies have previously been trained through years of adapting and maturing, he said “they are usually more resilient to the vaccinal antibodies” than those of children.
However, this resilience can be further deteriorated by additional shots, and thus Vanden Bossche warns that giving these jabbed individuals boosters “is absolutely insane! What this will do is just further increase the immune pressure of the vaccinal antibodies on their innate immunity.” Thus, booster shots are “absolute nonsense! It is dangerous and should not be done!”
To the un-jabbed: ‘For God’s sake, stay unvaccinated!’
As for the unvaccinated, the Belgian physician described why they would fare much better, first breaking them down into three categories:
Those who have experienced no symptoms, who are “most likely simply protected by their innate antibodies;”
Those who have experienced mild symptoms, not having to stay in bed for any time; and
Those who recovered from the disease and may have even had a severe case of it.
Due to what he called the “high infectious pressure” of the Delta variant, the respective innate immunity systems of these unvaccinated may now have to struggle a bit more, and thus the first category may experience mild symptoms, the second, moderate, and the third may have “some higher susceptibility to some other diseases. For example, influenza or the common cold.”
“But very, very importantly, all are protected,” he said. “They all are still protected against severe disease and the majority of them will be protected against very mild or moderate disease.”
This is the case, especially, the virologist said, since COVID-19 “is not a disease of healthy people. People who are in good health have a healthy innate immune system that can deal with a number of respiratory viruses without any problem. These people are not only protected against the disease, but they can even in many cases prevent infection.”
Vaccinees ‘serving as a kind of breeding ground for the virus’
Therefore, in order to maintain their healthy innate immune system as protection against COVID-19 and many other diseases, Dr. Vanden Bossche offered the following three requirements to the unvaccinated:
“For God’s sake, stay unvaccinated! They should stay unvaccinated;”
“Take care of their innate immunity, meaning they should take care of their health … if you do this and you are unvaccinated, you will be spared from severe disease without any vaccine. On the contrary, the vaccine would do the opposite;” and
Those with comorbidities or underlying diseases “should be careful about contacts.”
For this third category of the more vulnerable, the physician said, “This is not to discriminate against the vaccinees, but [the un-jabbed] should especially avoid contact with vaccinees at this point in time.
“Vaccinees are now the people, and there is no doubt about this, who are really serving as a kind of breeding ground for the virus,” he said. “We need to have an extra protection for those who have underlying diseases. Do not vaccinate them, but in fact prevent them from being exposed to high infectious pressure.”
Health issues in the vaxxed ‘will inevitably lead to a collapse of our health system’
He encouraged his Austrian listeners that the only fight they have is “the fight for your health, [in] not getting vaccinated.” In accomplishing this, all of the other measures will not be sustainable.
Though he expressed great concern for “the vaccinees,” stating “we need to help them as much as we can because they will need extensive treatment in many cases,” he observed that the percentage of this group now being hospitalized “is now steadily increasing. Whereas more and more, with training of the innate immune system, with more exposure to the virus, more and more non-vaccinated people get protected.”
“This will lead inevitably — and I am not a doomsday preacher — but this will inevitably lead to a collapse of our health system. It cannot be otherwise,” he said.
‘Strength is found in serenity’
However, in closing, the virologist had a hopeful message, stating the lockdown measures “are not sustainable” and cannot last “for a long time.” He encouraged them to “stay calm,” sharing a German saying that translates, “Strength is found in serenity.”
RELATED:
Anti-lockdown scientists challenge theories of Geert Vanden Bossche, though vaccine ‘global catastrophe’ not ruled out
EXCLUSIVE – Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’
Ontario doctor resigns over forced vaccines, says 80% of ER patients with mysterious issues had both shots
COVID shots intended to reduce world’s population by poisoning ‘billions’: South African doctor
Topics
CoronavirusFreedomPolitics - World
Tagged as
AntibodiesBooster shotsCovid-19Geert Vanden Bosscheglobal alliance for vaccines and immunizationimmune systemVaccine Mandates
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...TgT34JxPig--~D
https://www.brighteon.com/6869b039-0ca5-4231-8bda-f6b4b12cb9bf
31:02 video runtime
[SIZE=5]Peter A. McCullough, MD MPH: A Great COVID-19 Physician Discusses Mass COVID-19 Psychosis
550 views
channel image
Peter R. Breggin, MD
Published a day ago |
Refounding America, Reclaiming Ourselves, TV Episode #1
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH—one of the greatest physicians and scientists of our time—is interviewed by Peter R. Breggin, MD on his first one-hour weekly TV show on www.Brighteon.tv and Roku. The inevitable technical glitch happened on the show’s maiden voyage and it was shortened to 30 minutes long, but it’s a stunning uninterrupted dive into the psychological and political of origins and methods for destroying the confidence of Americans and making them passive and docile. It offers a short rendition of the heart of COVID-19 and the Global Predators by Peter and Ginger Breggin and demonstrates the difference between looking at individual conduct as an internal psychological process and instead placing that psychology into a political and economic context. In that context, predatory billionaires and wealthy organizations of all kinds join with government leaders to bring human beings under their control and to crush their freedom. Aired Dec. 1, 2021 on Brighteon.TV.
Dr. Breggin's new ReFounding America will be airing live, weekly at 6 pm eastern time every Wednesday. Join us![/SIZE]
The Science Racket
https://trib247.com/articles/researc...ign=Newsletter
Researcher Andrew Hill's dilemma: A $40 million grant from Bill and Melinda Gates with up to a half million lives in the balance
by: WorldTribune.com 12/09/2021 Source: WorldTribune.com
https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1639102417
by WorldTribune Staff, December 9, 2021
In a stunning admission, virologist Dr. Andrew Hill acknowledged in a zoom call that publication of his study could lead to the deaths of at least a half million people.
In defending his reversal on the effectiveness of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19, he discussed his "difficult situation" and said, "I’ve got this role where I’m supposed to produce this paper and we’re in a very difficult, delicate balance."
The incident is recounted in Robert Kennedy Jr's New York Times Bestseller, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the global war on Democracy and Public Health.
Andrew Hill, MD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in Pharmacology at Liverpool University. He is also an advisor for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. As a researcher for the WHO evaluating ivermectin, Hill wielded enormous influence over international guidance for the drug’s use.
Hill had previously authored a analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective.
On Jan. 6 of 2020, Hill testified enthusiastically before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidlelines Panel in support of ivermectin's use. Within a month, however, Hill found himself in what he describes as a "tricky situation." Under pressure from his funding sponsors, Hill then published an unfavorable study. Ironically, he used the same sources as in the original study. Only the conclusions had changed.
Shortly before he published, Dr. Tess Lawrie, Director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, England, and one of the world's leading medical research analysts, contacted Hill via Zoom and recorded the call (transcript below). Lawrie had learned of his new position and reached out to try to rectify the situation.
In a remarkable exchange, Hill admitted his manipulated study would likely delay the uptake of ivermectin in the UK and United States, but said he hoped his doing so would only set the lifesaving drug’s acceptance back by about “six weeks,” after which he was willing to give his support for its use.
Hill affirmed that the rate of death at that time was 15,000 people per day. At the 80 percent recovery rate using the drug, which Hill and Lawrie discussed earlier in the call, the number of preventable deaths incurred by such a delay would be staggering — as many as 504,000.
Lawrie was unable to persuade Hill, who instead of joining her team as lead author, went ahead and published his manipulated findings. Four days before publication, Hill's sponsor Unitaid gave the University of Liverpool, Hill's employer $40 million. Unitaid, it turns out, was also an author of the conclusions of Hill's study.
In the call, Lawrie berated Hill's study as “flawed,” “rushed,“ “not properly put together,” and “bad research . . . bad research,” which Hill appears not to have denied.
Instead, when pressed he admitted his sponsor, Unitaid, was an unacknowledged author of conclusions.
"Unitaid has a say in the conclusions of the paper. Yeah," he told Lawrie.
Kennedy explained: “Unitaid is a quasi-governmental advocacy organization funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and several countries . . . to lobby governments to finance the purchase of medicines from pharmaceutical multinationals” for distribution in Africa.
He reports:
“Dr. Lawrie knew that to make its ivermectin determination, WHO would rely on Hill’s study and another study from McMaster University known as the “Together Trial.” McMaster was hopelessly and irredeemably conflicted. NIH gave McMaster $1,081,541 in 2020 and 2021.61 A separate group of McMaster University scientists was, at that time, engaged in developing their own COVID vaccine—an effort that would never pay dividends if WHO recommended ivermectin as Standard of Care. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was funding the massive “Together Trial” testing ivermectin, HCQ, and other potential drugs against COVID, in Brazil and other locations. Critics accused Gates and the McMaster researchers of designing that study to make ivermectin fail.”
In other words, the McMaster researchers, just like Andrew Hill, knew that a positive appraisal of ivermectin would cost their university millions of dollars.
In a terse exchange, Lawrie laid out the ethical and personal risks for Hill:
Lawrie: I really, really wish, and you’ve explained quite clearly to me, in both what you’ve been saying and in your body language that you’re not entirely comfortable with your conclusions, and that you’re in a tricky position because of whatever influence people are having on you, and including the people who have paid you and who have basically written that conclusion for you.
Hill: You’ve just got to understand I’m in a difficult position. I’m trying to steer a middle ground and it’s extremely hard.
Lawrie: Yeah. Middle ground. The middle ground is not a middle ground …You’ve taken a position right to the other extreme calling for further trials that are going to kill people. So this will come out, and you will be culpable.
Much like “two weeks to flatten the curve,” in the intervening year Hill appears to have gone all-in on a deception originally envisioned to last only six weeks.
Kennedy reports that on Oct. 1, 2021, “Hill resurfaced on Twitter touting his upcoming lecture, ironically titled, ‘Effects of Bias and Potential Medical Fraud in the Promotion of Ivermectin.’”
Dr. Pierre Kory, of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, commented, “Andrew is apparently making a living now accusing the doctors and scientists who support ivermectin of medical fraud.”
Kory added, “Hill and his backers are some of the worst people in human history. They are responsible for the deaths of millions.”
Related: 'Literally criminal': Supressing data on ivermectin 'cost half a million lives' doctor charges, May 26, 2021
Related: Indian Bar Assoc moves against WHO scientist: 'Deliberately suppressed' ivermectin data , June 11, 2021
Related: Better than vaccines? Frontline doctors prescribe ivermectin to treat Covid-19 , March 25, 2021
[For further analysis, see Neville Hodgkinson’s article at the Defender, and Robert Kennedy, Jr.’s New York Times bestseller, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the global war on Democracy and Public Health.]
Here is the transcript of the conversation between Lawrie and Hill:
Lawrie: Lots of people are in sensitive positions; they’re in hospital, in ICUs dying, and they need this medicine.
Hill: Well …
Lawrie: This is what I don’t get, you know, because you’re not a clinician. You’re not seeing people dying every day. And this medicine prevents deaths by 80 percent. So 80 percent of those people who are dying today don’t need to die because there’s ivermectin.
Hill: There are a lot, as I said, there are a lot of different opinions about this. As I say, some people simply …
Lawrie: We are looking at the data; it doesn’t matter what other people say. We are the ones who are tasked with looking at the data and reassuring everybody that this cheap and effective treatment will save lives. It’s clear. You don’t have to say, well, so-and-so says this, and so-and-so says that. It’s absolutely crystal clear. We can save lives today. If we can get the government to buy ivermectin.
Hill: Well, I don’t think it’s as simple as that, because you’ve got trials …
Lawrie: It is as simple as that. We don’t have to wait for studies … we have enough evidence now that shows that ivermectin saves lives, it prevents hospitalization. It saves the clinical staff going to work every day and being exposed. And frankly, I’m shocked at how you are not taking responsibility for that decision.
And you still haven’t told me who is [influencing you]? Who is giving you that opinion? Because you keep saying you’re in a sensitive position. I appreciate you are in a sensitive position, if you’re being paid for something and you’re being told [to support] a certain narrative … that is a sensitive position.
So, then you kind of have to decide, well, do I take this payment? Because in actual fact, [you] can see [your false] conclusions are going to harm people. So maybe you need to say, I’m not going to be paid for this.
I can see the evidence, and I will join the Cochrane team as a volunteer, like everybody on the Cochrane team is a volunteer. Nobody’s being paid for this work.
Hill: I think fundamentally, we’re reaching the [same] conclusion about the survival benefit. We’re both finding a significant effect on survival.
Lawrie: No, I’m grading my evidence. I’m saying I’m sure of this evidence. I’m saying I’m absolutely sure it prevents deaths. There is nothing as effective as this treatment. What is your reluctance? Whose conclusion is that?
Hill complains again that outsiders are influencing him.
Lawrie: You keep referring to other people. It’s like you don’t trust yourself. If you were to trust yourself, you would know that you have made an error and you need to correct it because you know, in your heart, that this treatment prevents death.
Hill: Well, I know, I know for a fact that the data right now is not going to get the drug approved.
Lawrie: But, Andy — know this will come out. It will come out that there were all these barriers to the truth being told to the public and to the evidence being presented. So please, this is your opportunity just to acknowledge [the truth] in your review, change your conclusions, and come on board with this Cochrane Review, which will be definitive. It will be the review that shows the evidence and gives the proof. This was the consensus on Wednesday night’s meeting with 20 experts.
Hill protests that the U.S. National Institutes of Health will not agree to recommend ivermectin.
Lawrie: Yeah, because the NIH is owned by the vaccine lobby.
Hill: That’s not something I know about.
Lawrie: Well, all I’m saying is this smacks of corruption and you are being played.
Hill: I don’t think so.
Lawrie: Well then, you have no excuse because your work in that review is flawed. It’s rushed. It is not properly put together.
Lawrie points out that Hill’s study ignores a host of clinical outcomes that affect patients. She scolds Hill for ignoring the beneficial effects of ivermectin as prophylaxis, its effect on speed to testing negative for the virus, on the need for mechanical ventilation, on reduced admissions to intensive care, and other outcomes that are clinically meaningful.
This is bad research … bad research. So, at this point, I don’t know … you seem like a nice guy, but I am really, really worried about you.
Hill: Okay. Yeah. I mean, it’s, it’s a difficult situation.
Lawrie: No, you might be in a difficult situation. I’m not, because I have no paymaster. I can tell the truth. How can you deliberately try and mess it up … you know?
Hill: It’s not messing it up. It’s saying that we need, we need a short time to look at some more studies.
Lawrie: So, how long are you going to let people carry on dying unnecessarily – up to you? What is, what is the timeline that you’ve allowed for this, then?
Hill: Well, I think . . . I think that it goes to WHO [World Health Organization]and the NIH [National Institutes of Health]and the FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] and the EMA [European Medicines Agency]. And they’ve got to decide when they think enough’s enough.
Lawrie: How do they decide? Because there’s nobody giving them good evidence synthesis, because yours is certainly not good.
Hill: Well, when yours comes out, which will be in the very near future … at the same time, there’ll be other trials producing results, which will nail it with a bit of luck. And we’ll be there.
Lawrie: It’s already nailed.
Hill: No, that’s, that’s not the view of the WHO and the FDA.
Lawrie: You’d rather risk loads of people’s lives. Do you know if you and I stood together on this, we could present a united front and we could get this thing. We could make it happen. We could save lives; we could prevent [British National Health Service doctors and nurses] people from getting infected. We could prevent the elderly from dying.
These are studies conducted around the world in several different countries. And they’re all saying the same thing. Plus there’s all sorts of other evidence to show that it works. Randomized controlled trials do not need to be the be-all and end-all. But [even] based on the randomized controlled trials, it is clear that ivermectin works. It prevents deaths and it prevents harms and it improves outcomes for people …
I can see we’re getting nowhere because you have an agenda, whether you like it or not, whether you admit to it or not, you have an agenda. And the agenda is to kick this down the road as far as you can. So … we are trying to save lives. That’s what we do.
I’m a doctor and I’m going to save as many lives as I can. And I’m going to do that through getting the message [out] on ivermectin. Okay. Unfortunately, your work is going to impair that, and you seem to be able to bear the burden of many, many deaths, which I cannot do.
Lawrie then asks again: Would you tell me? I would like to know who pays you as a consultant through WHO?
Hill: It’s Unitaid.
Lawrie: All right. So who helped to … Whose conclusions are those on the review that you’ve done? Who is not listed as an author? Who’s actually contributed?
Hill: Well, I mean, I don’t really want to get into, I mean, it … Unitaid …
Lawrie: I think that . . . it needs to be clear. I would like to know who, who are these other voices that are in your paper that are not acknowledged? Does Unitaid have a say? Do they influence what you write?
Hill: Unitaid has a say in the conclusions of the paper. Yeah.
Lawrie: Okay. So, who is it in Unitaid, then? Who is giving you opinions on your evidence?
Hill: Well, it’s just the people there. I don’t …
Lawrie: So they have a say in your conclusions.
Hill: Yeah.
Lawrie: Could you please give me a name of someone in Unitaid I could speak to, so that I can share my evidence and hope to try and persuade them to understand it?
Hill: Oh, I’ll have a think about who to, to offer you with a name … but I mean, this is very difficult because I’m, you know, I’ve, I’ve got this role where I’m supposed to produce this paper and we’re in a very difficult, delicate balance …
Lawrie: Who are these people? Who are these people saying this?
Hill: Yeah … it’s a very strong lobby …
Lawrie: Okay. Look, I think I can see kind of a dead end, because you seem to have a whole lot of excuses, but, um, you know, that to, to justify bad research practice. So I’m really, really sorry about this, Andy.
I really, really wish, and you’ve explained quite clearly to me, in both what you’ve been saying and in your body language that you’re not entirely comfortable with your conclusions, and that you’re in a tricky position because of whatever influence people are having on you, and including the people who have paid you and who have basically written that conclusion for you.
Hill: You’ve just got to understand I’m in a difficult position. I’m trying to steer a middle ground and it’s extremely hard.
Lawrie: Yeah. Middle ground. The middle ground is not a middle ground … You’ve taken a position right to the other extreme calling for further trials that are going to kill people. So this will come out, and you will be culpable.
And I can’t understand why you don’t see that, because the evidence is there and you are not just denying it, but your work’s actually actively obfuscating the truth. And this will come out. So I’m really sorry … As I say, you seem like a nice guy, but I think you’ve just kind of been misled somehow.
Hill promises he will do everything in his power to get ivermectin approved if she will give him six weeks.
Hill: Well, what I hope is that this, this stalemate that we’re in doesn’t last very long. It lasts a matter of weeks. And I guarantee I will push for this to last for as short amount of time as possible.
Lawrie: So, how long do you think the stalemate will go on for? How long do you think you will be paid to [make] the stalemate go on?
Hill: From my side. Okay … I think end of February, we will be there, six weeks.’
Lawrie: How many people die every day?
Hill: Oh, sure. I mean, you know, 15,000 people a day.
Lawrie: Fifteen thousand people a day times six weeks … because at this rate, all other countries are getting ivermectin except the UK and the USA, because the UK and the USA and Europe are owned by the vaccine lobby.
Hill: My goal is to get the drug approved and to do everything I can to get it approved so that it reaches the maximum …
Lawrie: You’re not doing everything you can, because everything you can would involve saying to those people who are paying you, “I can see this prevents deaths. So I’m not going to support this conclusion any more, and I’m going to tell the truth.”
Hill: What, I’ve got to do my responsibilities to get as much support as I can to get this drug approved as quickly as possible.
Lawrie: Well, you’re not going to get it approved the way you’ve written that conclusion. You’ve actually shot yourself in the foot, and you’ve shot us all in the foot. All of … everybody trying to do something good. You have actually completely destroyed it.
Hill: Okay. Well, that’s where we’ll, I guess we’ll have to agree to differ.
Lawrie: Yeah. Well, I don’t know how you sleep at night, honestly.
https://i.ytimg.com/an_webp/MpBpT3bj...F8RuZGWrAgfFNg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpBpT3bjxtg
10:00 to 26:47 about coronavirus and gain-of-function research
Fauci-Gain-of-Function Secrets Exposed, Legal Win against Biden Secrecy, Ashley Biden Docs
Premiered 54 minutes ago
Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch President @TomFitton discusses new documents we obtained about Dr. Fauci and COVID gain-of-function research, Biden's secret Senate records, and much more!
_________
https://www.judicialwatch.org/fauci-...eekly%20update
December 10, 2021 | Judicial Watch
Fauci Gain of Function Docs!https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...v1-768x401.jpg
New Documents Seem to Detail Fauci Agency Funding of Gain of Function Research in China
We now have proof that our tax dollars were dishonestly used by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s agency to fund “gain of function” coronavirus research.
We learned this in 221 pages of records we received from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that include a 2018 grant application for research involving the coronavirus.
The grant application appears to describe “gain of function” research involving RNA extractions from bats, experiments on viruses, attempts to develop a chimeric virus, and efforts to genetically manipulate the full-length bat SARSr-CoV WIV1 strain molecular clone.
WeThePatriotsUSA.org
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...qqp9xaLp4A--~D
Listen to this audio. This is important.
https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/i...04_17_51-08_00
Marine Veteran Denied Ivermectin by Walmart, Your Rights If You are Refused Care | Guest: Bill Salier |...
by Faithful Freedom with Teryn Gregson
Time length icon 37m 45s
Publish date icon December 10
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...JW_640x360.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/27x4eKsx31JW/
RFK Jr. Discusses The Real Anthony Fauci by The Highwire with Del Bigtree
RFK Jr. Discusses The Real Anthony Fauci by The Highwire with Del Bigtree
43:55 video runtime
First published at 08:57 UTC on December 11th, 2021.
#thehighwirewithdelbigtree #robertfkennedyjr #earthnewspaper
EarthNewspaper.com
All The Honest News Fit To Publish
28418 subscribers
Children's Health Defense: https://childrenshealthdefense.org
The Highwire with Del Bigtree: https://thehighwire.com
Donate And Support My Work: https://earthnewspaper.com/donate
Dozens Of Articles And Videos Published Daily: https://EarthNewspape…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5ug...vitkCuaoQI--Ju
https://yt3.ggpht.com/JMXHAv7ykuzawM...ffe1ffff-nd-v1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5ugGoWBtT0&list=PLeOjpfZ-4AmGPw-lvywvitkCuaoQI--Ju
8:42 video runtime
False Security, Why Vaccination Can’t End Pandemic with Dr. Paul Alexander | The Nation Speaks
136 views
Premiered 2 hours ago
34
Dislike
Share
Save
The Nation Speaks
13.9K subscribers
��Watch the full video on #EpochTV�� https://ept.ms/CovidPolicies
��Watch even more in-depth investigative videos at #EpochTV�� https://ept.ms/3BYcrU2
In this episode, we take a deep look at current COVID-19 mitigation policies and what lies behind them. Are they based on the latest science? And are they based on the right assumptions? We examine these questions with the Brownstone Institute’s Dr. Paul Alexander, a Trump administration COVID-19 policy adviser and expert in epidemiology and evidence-based medicine.
Then in America Q&A we ask what people across the country think of strict pandemic policies like locking down only unvaccinated people in Germany, and establishing quarantine camps in Australia.
#Covid#PandemicPolicies
-
Hi everyone!
We are currently implementing some big very big and exciting changes!
As you may already know, NTD shows are often demonetized and censored by YouTube. So to ensure we can continue to report in an uncensored environment, The Nation Speaks is moving to a new premium subscription platform launched by The Epoch Times: EpochTV.
This YouTube channel will continue to publish clips from all our interviews, plus our special feature, America Q&A. Full episodes will be available on-demand on EpochTV.
You can also watch us live every Sat. 11am-12pm (ET) on Ntd.com or check to see if your local cable or free-to-air provider carries NTD here: https://www.ntd.com/tv-providers.html
Thank you for supporting our efforts to continue reporting the truth—and help spread the word!
We are looking forward to making this new platform flourish together with you!
⭕️ Get Access Now �� https://ept.ms/3np86Th
-
Subscribe for updates: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvG1...
-
Youmaker: https://www.youmaker.com/c/TheNationS...
-
https://www.theepochtimes.com/false-...ent=12-11-2021
27:14 full video runtime
Video may not be free so just check and see.
https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxDvC...-OA1F_uAw3KWD-
Judicial Watch
18 hours ago
Judicial Watch Weekend Highlight: Judicial Watch received 221 pages of records from HHS which include a grant application for research involving the coronavirus that was submitted in 2018.
Read More at JudicialWatch.org
https://yt3.ggpht.com/z19pl20gUOekuq...o0A=s640-nd-v1
Dachsie comment:
I could not hear the first question posed by some lady in the audience but I assume she was asking why some Democrats in the House are now opposing "President" Biden's "Vaccine Mandate."
Biden is a totally owned fake entity and his handlers KNOW that this "vaccine mandate" is totally bogus and unconstitutional but they know that enough people will bite the fear porn bait and go ahead and get the vaccination, the jab, in fear that they may lose their job. And after all, Biden's handler's don't care a whit about how ridiculous Biden looks to all of the public, they only want the largest numbers of people possible to go and get the phone injury and death causing jab. They will achieve their real goal no matter how miserably Biden's proposed "vaccine mandate" fails. Biden's handlers desire a One World Death and Slavery System for All because that is what the Marxists globalist NAZI / Communist goals are. Lie, Kill, Cheat, Still and Murder no matter the cost in human lives.
Enjoy watching the ENTIRE PLANdemic going down in ashes right now.
Do not fear.
________________________
P.S. Do not be afraid of losing your job. If you do your job in an honest hard-working capable way, make your employers fire you and ask them to give you the reason for dismissal on the letter. They may give you the letter but they will never put the reason because they know they cannot gin up a fake reason for firing you such as you were not doing your job properly because you were. You should be able to qualify for state unemployment compensation if you were dismissed without just cause, that is, you were fired for something that you have a perfectly Constitutional legal right to do - refuse to agree to taking an medical procedure on your body that you do not want and was never a part of the agreement you made when you agreed to go to work for the company. (Remember that the nasal swab test is a medical procedure on your body that could cause severe injury too.)
Don't be afraid and don't be forced to allow something that is WRONG on every level, most certainly morally wrong for Christians to get the crapshoot shot and gamble with their lives because they fear anti|Christ, anti-USA employers.
_________________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iei6IUbG4M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iei6IUbG4M
'More People Are Realizing It's Just Fundamentally Unfair': GOP Senators Slam Biden Vaccine Mandate
Dec 12, 2021
Forbes Breaking News
At Wednesday's Senate GOP press briefing, Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and other Republican Senators expressed their opposition to President Biden's vaccine mandate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxwrJMQrpXk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxwrJMQrpXk
Top GOP Senator Quotes Biden, Who Last Year Said He Opposed Vaccine Mandates
2,205 views
Dec 12, 2021
205
Dislike
Share
Save
Forbes Breaking News
1.14M subscribers
Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY) speaks on the Senate floor on Wednesday about vaccine mandates.
_____________________
Dachsie comment:
Here's another congressman APPEARING to be doing the right thing.
But, like all the others, he makes sure to tell you he's not "anti-vaccine" and the only reason he is against the "vaccine mandate" is that it destroys jobs and the economy.
I see no reason to be impressed with Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY).
None of these guys can do the right thing for the RIGHT REASON.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5OD...k-Fzoj5-FB5rEY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5OD97Ydp2Q&list=PLPqaNOYa2O2x1tkCfBOk-Fzoj5-FB5rEY
8:33 video runtime
James Le Duc has been collaborating with the Wuhan lab since 1986 | CLIP | Truth Over News
2,205 views
Premiered 12 hours ago December 12, 2021
Epoch TV
4.61K subscribers
�� Watch the full episode�� https://ept.ms/TopUsLabBlamedWuhan
�� Get 60% OFF plus $10 credit NOW on Epoch TV ���� https://ept.ms/HolidayOfferEpochTV Limited time offer. First come first served!!
In early February 2020, James Le Duc, the prominent Fauci-funded virologist who personally trained staff at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, privately voiced his concerns that the pandemic had originated from the Wuhan lab.
As Anthony Fauci and his small circle of collaborating scientists were in the process of publicly promoting the natural origin narrative, Le Duc was privately asking the vice-director of the Wuhan Institute if the COVID-19 pandemic was the result of a release from one of the Wuhan labs.
Le Duc isn’t just another Fauci-funded scientist. He is the director of the Galveston National Lab, one of our nation’s most sophisticated biocontainment research facilities, and he has been collaborating with the Wuhan lab since 1986.
_____________________
Dachsie Comment:
At 2:27
"The questions LaDuc asked were very specific and to the point including ...
at 2:46
'Was the Wuihan Lab conductiong gain-of-function experiments that may have resulted in the creation of COVID?' "
That question appears to be phrased in a way that confuses what exactly "COVID" is by the way the term "COVID" is used in this question.
All of the scientists and doctors have used the term "COVID" in different ways to imply different meanings of the term.
Dr. Le Duc appears to be using the term to convey they meaning that "COVID" was something that may have been created in the Wuhan lab. Dr. Le Duc also seems to be indicating this or a lab creation was something that could be put in as one of the ingredients in a vaccine formula.
Dr. Richarcd Flmeming said on his first interview with Del Bigtree that it was important to make a distinction between SARS-CoV-2 and "CoVID-19" indicating that "CoVID" was the active illness and set of symptoms that had developed to the point of being serious and life-threatening and necessitating hospitalization.
Dachsie has noticed the varying usage of the several key words in the terminology of this "pandemic" by several professional commentators from the beginning of the "pandemic." That is what made Dachsie suspicious of the official narrative or story from the beginning and the idea that the "pandemic" may be of the nature of another "false flag" geopolitical strategy for globalist purposes and that the "pandemic" was mainly about fear and panic and little or nothing to do with public health and safety.
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...2h_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jqb04lWjmE2h/
Kid Gets COVID Vaccine in School for Pizza While Countless Kindergarteners Get Vaccine 'On Accident'
Kid Gets COVID Vaccine in School for Pizza While Countless Kindergarteners Get Vaccine 'On Accident'
First published at 18:25 UTC on December 13th, 2021.
#vaccines #covid #coronavirus
channel image
The Red Elephants - Vincent James
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...HR_640x360.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5N2kneG815HR/
What's The Covid Jab Doing To The Brain? by Dr. Vernon Coleman
What's The Covid Jab Doing To The Brain? by Dr. Vernon Coleman
rst published at 20:22 UTC on December 13th, 2021.
#drvernoncoleman #whatsthejabdoingtothebrain #earthnewspaper
channel image
EarthNewspaper.com
All The Honest News Fit To Publish
28731 subscribers
Dr Vernon Coleman: https://VernonColeman.com https://VernonColeman.org
TruNews.com show for Monday, December 13, 2021
first half of show on "Pandemic" matters.
Pharmaceutical Fascism: Bleeding-From-Mouth Newborn Died From Mom’s Vaccination
Dachsie Comment:
YouTube (algorithm) getting more vague and dodgy every day, as are CDC and state health department data. There is no good reason to assume anything at all about "SARS-CoV-2" and "COVID-19".
_______________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elRVM03duMY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elRVM03duMY
CDC Admits Having No Records of 'Naturally Immune People' Transmitting Virus | Facts Matter
Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov 694K subscribers
��WATCH: Hunt for the Virus Origin �� https://ept.ms/3HoErDa
Resources:
�� Epoch TV:
https://ept.ms/3HoErDa
�� Sekur (promo code: Roman)
https://ept.ms/3yW0Wul
�� CDC Article:
https://ept.ms/32a1Ecl
�� Letter from Lawyer:
https://ept.ms/3kIexjY
�� Letter from CDC:
https://ept.ms/3ovXanQ
�� Statement from Lawyer:
https://ept.ms/3cw77Mx
�� Pennsylvania Report:
https://ept.ms/3kFCete
�� Pennsylvania Article:
https://ept.ms/3Fldkac
------------------
Content:
00:00 - Intro
01:00 - CDC Letter
07:50 - SEKUR
09:55 - Pennsylvania DOH
20:23 - EpochTV
------------------
⭕️ Try #EpochTV �� https://ept.ms/3xVsr7v
⭕️ Sign up for our NEWSLETTER and stay in touch �� https://ept.ms/3wWdBwe
⭕️ Subscribe for updates: https://ept.ms/2Tu9clR
⭕️ Follow on INSTAGRAM �� https://ept.ms/2VW5HST
⭕️ Listen to Podcasts: https://blubrry.com/factsmatterwithro...
------------------
��For more news and videos visit: https://www.theepochtimes.com/c-facts...
��Get real news other media outlets don’t report: https://bit.ly/EpochNews1
-
Support us: https://donorbox.org/facts_matter
Join us on Telegram: https://t.me/FactsMatter_Roman
Contact us: FactsMatterRoman@gmail.com
-
Parler: https://parler.com/profile/FactsMatte...
Gab: https://gab.com/factsmatterroman
Twitter: https://twitter.com/FactsMatterRB
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/epoch.times...
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/FactsMatterWithR...
------------------
CDC Admits They Have No Records of Naturally Immune People Transmitting Virus | Facts Matter
1,945 Comments
Default profile photo
Add a public comment...
Knifeguy1a
Knifeguy1a
4 weeks ago
The burden of proof is on those who would restrict freedom, not on those who would exercise it.
961
Dachsie comments:
If is very unprofessional for doctors to "sell" or storngly promote and advise their patients to take any of the "COVID shots." It is equally ignorant and irresponsible for anyone to choose to take any of the "COVID shots" in a spur-of-the-moment decision. A woman who experiences a stillbirth (a spontaneous abortion) is in very life-threatening condition because her body contains dead tissue of the unborn child. These women require emergency surgery in the form of a Dilation and Curettage (D&C) procedure. It is a matter of life or death for the patient that this surgical procedure be done in the most professional proper way.
After this stillborn experience of a "fully vaccinated" woman, it is completely unknown medically and scientifically whether fertilization and implantation in the uterus can happen, but if it can, then the patient could experience this same stillborn medical emergency again in the future.
___________________________________
https://trib247.com/articles/alarm-s...ign=Newsletter
Alarm sounded on increased incidence of stillborns reported among vaccinated mothers
Alarm sounded on increased incidence of stillborns reported among vaccinated mothers
by: WorldTribune.com 12/13/2021 Source: WorldTribune.com
https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1639456712
by WorldTribune Staff, December 13, 2021
Canadian doctor Daniel Nagase, MD, responded to questions about a sudden increase in stillborn babies being reported in Canadian hospitals among pregnant mothers who received the COVID vaccines. Two months prior, Great Britain’s Dr. Michael Yeadon, PhD, warned the science pointed to pregnancy losses among the vaccinated.
Speaking with a reporter on Nov. 20, Dr. Nagase indicated he believes Canadian health officials are using their positions to block the necessary information from view of medical professionals and the public, The Gateway Pundit reports. Peter McCullough, MD, an American cardiologist who is the world’s most cited authority on COVID-19 treatment, expressed the same concern regarding U.S. government authorities at a LifeSiteNews/Truth for Health Foundation online conference on Aug. 4.
Dr. Nagase said part of this information comes from a fellow MD with contacts throughout the Vancouver medical system, who reported doulas who work in women and children’s hospitals in one of the birthing centers for Vancouver “had 13 stillbirths in a 24-hour period.” “In Waterloo, Ontario, I have a more reliable statistic, that there were 86 stillbirths between January and July,” Dr. Nagase declared.
If true, that is an extraordinary increase in fetal deaths.
“Normally, it’s only five or six stillbirths every year. So, about one stillbirth every two months is the usual rate. To suddenly get to 86 stillbirths in six months, that’s highly unusual,” Dr. Nagase said.
The common denominator appears clear: COVID-19 vaccination.
“The most important confirmation that we have from the Waterloo, Ontario report was that all of the 86 stillbirths were fully vaccinated,” Dr. Nagase said. “We are seeing a correlation.... You have to ask yourself, what is going on that is both in Waterloo, Ontario and Vancouver that is suddenly causing an increase in stillbirths?”
The stillbirths that Dr. Nagase’s colleagues are reporting appear to have been anticipated by Dr. Michael Yeadon, PhD, earlier this year. Dr. Yeadon, is the former Chief Scientific Officer at Pfizer, UK. He laid out the science behind the risks mRNA COVID-19 vaccines pose for women’s reproduction during the Aug. 4 online conference.
Dr. Yeadon called attention to a study the Japanese medicines regulator required of Pfizer on how the vaccine distributed through the body in rats, something that is not required in the U.S. and Europe.
“To my horror, what we find is the vaccine [in rats] doesn’t just distribute around the body and then wash out again, which is what you’d hope,” Dr. Yeadon said. “It concentrates in ovaries of rats, and it concentrates at least 20-fold over the concentration in other background tissues like muscles.”
“In toxicology, if you don’t have any data to contradict what you’ve learned [in the animal study], that is the assumption you make for humans,” he continued. “So, my assumption at the moment is that that is what is happening to every female who’s been given these vaccines. These vaccines are concentrating in her ovaries. That is very worrying. We don’t know what that will do, but it cannot be benign, and it could be seriously harmful, because the vaccines will then express the coronavirus spike protein and we know that there are unwanted biologies from that spike protein.”
Another significant concern is that the coronavirus protein is “faintly similar, not very strongly, but faintly similar to an essential protein in your placenta, something that is absolutely required for fertilization, for formation, and maintenance of the placenta. So, you can’t get pregnant and have a successful pregnancy if this protein is damaged in any way. And we noticed that the coronavirus spike protein was similar, similar enough that I was worried,” Dr. Yeadon said.
Eight months earlier, he and a German doctor had petitioned the European Medicines Agency to perform experiments to rule out the possibility that the vaccines would produce an immune response that would attack this essential protein in the placenta.
“Now a study has just come out a few weeks ago and it says exactly what I was worried about,” Dr. Yeadon explained. “Fifteen women were given Pfizer vaccine. They drew blood samples every few days, and they measured antibodies against the spike protein, which took several weeks to appear, and they also measured antibodies against the placenta. They found within the first one to four days an increase of two and a half to three times. An increase of 300% in antibodies against their own placenta in the first four days.”
“I’m sorry to say this,” Dr. Yeadon continued, “but that is a vaccine-induced autoimmune attack on their own placenta. I think you can only expect that that is happening in every woman of childbearing potential – is generating antibodies against this critical protein required for fertilization and successful pregnancy. Now, what the effect will be, we can’t be certain. It can’t be benign.”
Whether it would cause loss of pregnancies, Dr. Yeadon concluded, “I don’t know if it would be enough to cause first trimester losses, but I would think it would. I’ve looked at the literature. Women who are unfortunate enough to have autoimmune diseases tend to have high rates of first trimester losses. What this vaccine has done is induced an autoimmune response. I’m here to warn you if you are of childbearing potential or younger, not at menopause, I would strongly recommend you do not accept these vaccines.”
Ultimately, the records needed to answer these questions, Dr. Nagase says, are in the hands of the health authorities and they are refusing to release them without legal coercion.
Dr. Nagase believes health authorities may be dodging the correlation by using the technical definitions of “vaccinated” to avoid scrutiny. At less than two weeks after the second shot, an individual is still considered "unvaccinated" because the vaccine is not yet fully effective. “They’re saying it’s ‘unvaccinated people,’ but there are so many people who are within two weeks of their second shot and they are getting deathly ill.”
“We deserve to know how many percent of the ICU is filled with people who are having side effects within one week of the injection. And then, if they are clogging the ICUs because they are getting a vaccine injury, but then they’re being labeled as unvaccinated, that is an absolute lie.”
“We need to get Freedom of Information Requests. We need doctors, nurses, unit clerks at hospitals to start printing out the statistics because we know if we ask the health authorities to print out the statistics they will refuse and that is absolutely criminal,” Dr. Nagase said. “We should not be asking some administrator for permission to get the death statistics,” he continued. “We should not have to ask some kind of health minister for permission to get the actual rate of [intensive care unit] stays.”
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...-hire-program/
US hospitals: fraud, murder, cash; federal assassination-for-hire program
Dec 14, 2021
by Jon Rappoport
“Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] whistleblowers have calculated a total [federal] payment [to hospitals] of at least $100,000 per [COVID] patient.”
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a private medical organization founded in 1943, has the story — “Biden’s Bounty on Your Life: Hospitals’ Incentive Payments for COVID-19” (11/17/21), authored by Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D. and Ali Shultz, J.D.
Here are stunning excerpts:
“Upon admission to a once-trusted hospital, American patients with COVID-19 become virtual prisoners, subjected to a rigid treatment protocol…for rationing medical care in those over age 50. They have a shockingly high mortality rate…”
“As exposed in audio recordings, hospital executives in Arizona admitted meeting several times a week to lower standards of care, with coordinated restrictions on visitation rights. Most COVID-19 patients’ families are deliberately kept in the dark about what is really being done to their loved ones.”
“The combination that enables this tragic and avoidable loss of hundreds of thousands of lives includes (1) The CARES Act, which provides hospitals with bonus incentive payments for all things related to COVID-19 (testing, diagnosing, admitting to hospital, use of remdesivir and ventilators, reporting COVID-19 deaths, and vaccinations) and (2) waivers of customary and long-standing patient rights by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”
“In 2020, the Texas Hospital Association submitted requests for waivers to CMS. According to Texas attorney Jerri Ward, ‘CMS has granted “waivers” of federal law regarding patient rights. Specifically, CMS purports to allow hospitals to violate the rights of patients or their surrogates with regard to medical record access, to have patient visitation, and to be free from seclusion.’…The purported waivers are meant to isolate and gain total control over the patient and to deny patient and patient’s decision-maker the ability to exercise informed consent.”
“Creating a ‘National Pandemic Emergency’ provided justification for such sweeping actions that override individual physician medical decision-making and patients’ rights. The CARES Act provides incentives for hospitals to use treatments dictated solely by the federal government under the auspices of the NIH. These ‘bounties’ must paid back if not ‘earned’ by making the COVID-19 diagnosis and following the COVID-19 protocol.”
“The hospital payments include:
* A ‘free’ required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.
* Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.
* Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.
* A 20 percent ‘boost’ bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.
* Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.
* More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.
* A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.”
“CMS implemented ‘value-based’ payment programs that track data such as how many workers at a healthcare facility receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Now we see why many hospitals implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They are paid more.”
“Outside hospitals, physician MIPS [Merit-based Incentive Payment System] quality metrics link doctors’ income to performance-based pay for treating patients with COVID-19 EUA drugs. Failure to report information to CMS can cost the physician 4% of reimbursement.”
“Because of obfuscation with medical coding and legal jargon, we cannot be certain of the actual amount each hospital receives per COVID-19 patient. But Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers have calculated a total payment of at least $100,000 per patient.”
“There are deaths from the government-directed COVID treatments. For remdesivir, studies show that 71–75 percent of patients suffer an adverse effect, and the drug often had to be stopped after five to ten days because of these effects, such as kidney and liver damage, and death. Remdesivir trials during the 2018 West African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued because death rate exceeded 50%. Yet, in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals use to treat COVID-19, even when the COVID clinical trials of remdesivir showed similar adverse effects. In ventilated patients, the death toll is staggering. A National Library of Medicine January 2021 report of 69 studies involving more than 57,000 patients concluded that fatality rates were 45 percent in COVID-19 patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, increasing to 84 percent in older patients. Renz announced at a Truth for Health Foundation Press Conference that CMS data showed that in Texas hospitals, 84.9% percent of all patients died after more than 96 hours on a ventilator.”
“Then there are deaths from restrictions on effective treatments for hospitalized patients. Renz and a team of data analysts have estimated that more than 800,000 deaths in America’s hospitals, in COVID-19 and other patients, have been caused by approaches restricting fluids, nutrition, antibiotics, effective antivirals, anti-inflammatories, and therapeutic doses of anti-coagulants.”
—end of article excerpt—
This is basically a federally incentivized protocol for murder.
To say it violates every code of medical ethics would be a vast understatement.
Cash for death.
There are MANY doctors and nurses who work in these hospitals who know what they’re doing, who know they’re following orders that result in the deaths of their patients; but they keep doing it.
They would rather murder their patients than lose their jobs.
And there are MANY employees at the FDA, NIH, and other public health agencies who also know the score, keep their heads down, and facilitate murder.
There are MANY so-called journalists who work at mainstream outlets who know what’s going on and say nothing.
Mass murder is central to the overall COVID program. But feel free to think that the vaccine, on the other hand, is pure and safe and essential. The people running the show just want to kill some and save others. Sure, that makes perfect sense.
If they’re all schizophrenic messiahs-and-killers and you’re schizophrenic for believing in them.
https://nationalfile.com/fauci-covid...nvaxxed-blame/
FAUCI: COVID-19 Is 'Much More Formidable' After Mass Vaccination Campaign, Unvaxxed To Blame
Tom Elliott
@tomselliott
Fauci claims the reason his handling of Covid is backfiring, with more deaths in 2021 than 2020, is due to “Delta” and "60 million people in this country who are eligible to be vaccinated, who have not gotten vaccinated"
10:58 AM · Dec 14, 2021
watch embedded vide0 in Twitter
https://twitter.com/i/status/1470800498253250560
1:23 video runtime
143
https://www.citizensjournal.us/the-c...d-vaccination/
The CDC Suddenly Changes the Definition of ‘Vaccine’ and ‘Vaccination’
Added by Johanna Anim Caviezel on September 13, 2021.
Saved under Columns, COVID Pandemic, National
Tags: Nick Arama, Red State, vaccination, vaccine
By Nick Arama, Red State
Matt Margolis over at our sister site PJ Media has picked up on a very interesting change on the CDC website when it comes to the definitions for “vaccine” and “vaccination.”
The timing of the change is very interesting.
He notes that it would appear that the CDC is trying to change how we understand the concept of vaccinations.
He highlights the definition of terms on August 26, 2021.*
Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.
Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.
Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.
That had been their definition since at least May 16, 2018, according to PJ Media.
But then, come September 1, suddenly there was a big change.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm *
Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.
Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.
Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.
Why are they trying to back off of what the definitions used to be? Now they are talking about a vaccine stimulating the immune response but not to “produce immunity.” Now they’re saying a vaccination doesn’t produce immunity but will “produce protection.”
Thomas Massie
@RepThomasMassie
Check out @CDCgov’s
https://twitter.com/CDCgov?ref_src=t...440015evolving definition of “vaccination.” They’ve been busy at the Ministry of Truth:
https://www.citizensjournal.us/wp-co...et-600x475.jpg
They appear to be changing the definition to fit what we’re being told about the COVID-19 vaccines — that they don’t necessarily provide immunity but just “protection” from more serious illness. Meanwhile, it fits with the push for more “booster” shots, to keep up the continued “protection.” So they’ve changed the definition of vaccines so that it no longer means preventing the disease or producing immunity. Whereas before it wouldn’t necessarily meet their definition of a vaccine, now it meets the new definition.
We’ve seen the CDC have wrong (bigger) numbers for COVID deaths in Florida (what a coincidence). We’ve seen them falsely claim that the Delta variant is as contagious as chicken pox. Now we see them redefining words to better fit what they’re pushing with the COVID “vaccine.” Is this one more effort to control the narrative?
_________________
The old - Before September 1, 2021 definitions.
*
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/terms/glossary.html
V
Vaccination: Listen media icon[MP3]
The physical act of administering any vaccine or toxoid.
Vaccinia: Listen media icon[MP3]
A virus related to the smallpox and cowpox viruses, which is used in smallpox vaccine.
Vaccine: Listen media icon[MP3]
A suspension of live (usually attenuated) or inactivated microorganisms (e.g. bacteria or viruses) or fractions thereof administered to induce immunity and prevent infectious diseases and their sequelae. Some vaccines contain highly defined antigens (e.g., the polysaccharide of Haemophilus influenzae type b or the surface antigen of hepatitis B); others have antigens that are complex or incompletely defined (e.g. Bordetella pertussis antigens or live attenuated viruses).
Page last reviewed: July 30, 2020
Content source: National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
_____
**
The new - After September 1, 2021 definitions.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
Immunization: The Basics
Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines
mRNA vaccines are a new type of vaccine to protect against infectious diseases. Learn about how COVID-19 mRNA vaccines work.
Definition of Terms
Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.
Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.
Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.
Page last reviewed: September 1, 2021
Content source: National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
https://mailchi.mp/aapsonline/no-to-hr-55?e=e5323d9f11
https://mcusercontent.com/30a32513ae...c9228a84ca.jpg
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/30a325...2376e2bccf.png
Dear AAPS Members and Friends,
Late last month the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 550, the "Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2021."
Proponents in Congress criticized for voting for the bill, spin their action with slippery statements like it, "does not create a federal vaccine database," "information in state-run systems is kept private," and there will be "guardrails" to "protect against abuse."
While the bill does not explicitly create a "federal vaccine database," it does lay the groundwork for federal influence and control over the tracking of immunization records of American citizens and will coerce states to adopt systems that comply with the goals of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The bill also makes clear that the federal government expects the records and information will be accessible by a wide range of government entities, "non-governmental entities," and "other persons." Protection from "guardrails" appears to be guided by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, currently a Biden-appointee, who has stated, "it is absolutely the government's business" to know people's vaccine status.
Here are excerpts directly from the text of H.R. 550 that explain some of what the $400,000,000 in taxpayer funds appropriated by bill is intended to accomplish:
The Secretary [of HHS] shall: conduct activities to expand, enhance, and improve immunization information systems.
And [the Secretary shall] award grants or cooperative agreements:
to improve and increase consistency in patient matching, data collection, reporting, bidirectional exchange, and analysis of immunization-related information;
for improving the secure bidirectional exchange of immunization record data among Federal, State, local, Tribal, and territorial governmental entities and non-governmental entities;
for improving such exchange among public health officials in multiple jurisdictions within a State;
for simplifying and supporting electronic reporting by any health care provider;
for supporting the standardization of immunization information systems to accelerate interoperability; and,
for developing information related to the use and importance of immunization record data and disseminating such information to health care providers and other persons authorized under State law to access such information, including payors [your insurance company and government health programs for example] and health care facilities.
In an era where vaccination status increasingly determines an individual's ability to simply participate in society, are the above activities that undermine patient privacy something the federal government should be involved in supporting and directing?
Please help speak out against H.R. 550 as it moves to the U.S. Senate for consideration. In addition to the serious concerns outlined above, passage may open the door wider to government intrusion into medical privacy in other areas as well, so stopping this bill is critical.
CLICK HERE or visit https://p2a.co/MBIkHNv to get a message on the way to your Senators asking them to oppose H.R. 550.
Thank you for your help in standing up for patient privacy and individual rights! Your voice makes a difference.
~AAPS
____
This week's physician-written op-ed distributed by AAPS to media outlets across the United States is a featured article at WND.com.
By Jane M. Orient, M.D.
In addition to being subjected to various forms of censorship, for the first time in living memory American doctors are getting threat letters from licensure boards warning them against distributing "harmful misinformation." Medical boards in 12 states have disciplined doctors because of this allegation. While it is claimed that there's an epidemic of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic, the warnings don't spell out what that means.
We don't have an epidemic of patients dying because doctors told them to refuse treatment or to drink Clorox or aquarium cleaner.
In fact, no patients need to have suffered any harm at all for the medical board to investigate a doctor's no-longer-free speech. All it takes is an anonymous complaint.
Pharmacists that were converted into the overseers of physicians' prescribing practices will complain that a doctor had prescribed ivermectin for COVID-19. ...
"Harmful misinformation" appears to mean anything that contradicts or asks questions or raises doubt about the dogma that "vaccines are safe and effective," or suggests a treatment not endorsed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and their corporate sponsors.
One source of the allegedly "harmful misinformation" is a database created and maintained by the CDC, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
READ FULL ARTICLE: https://www.wnd.com/2021/12/delicens...isinformation/
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...DV_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EejVOCzaXGDV/
The New Normal-Dead Babies, Vaxxed Moms Are Delivering Injured, Dead-Stew Peters
10:04 video runtime
The New Normal-Dead Babies, Vaxxed Moms Are Delivering Injured, Dead-Stew Peters
First published at 00:21 UTC on December 15th, 2021.
Jim_Crenshaw
This unnamed guest is a nurse and has been for fifteen years. She currently practices in her hospital’s postpartum unit, where she cares for newborn infants. She says she’s seen disturbing things among the newborns born to vaccinated moms. Here’s a partial list: heart murmurs, unusually red skin, jaundice, and shrunken genitals in male infants. More videos you may want to take a look at:
Mother uses shotgun to remove her kids from social media. BANG!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/pjxF01Hn1qO6/
Airline Pilot Magazine shows a staggering amount of pilot deaths for 2021
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MY4jDRFd5jly/
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...qX_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JSXAHHwKLTqX/
Dr Robert Malone's Warning To All Parents On mRNA Vaccines - Global Covid Summit
Dr Robert Malone's Warning To All Parents On mRNA Vaccines - Global Covid Summit
First published at 03:38 UTC on December 14th, 2021.
ja37
Dr Robert Malone, the person who created the RNA Vaccine technology, advises AGAINST giving your children the GENE THERAPY FRAUDULENTLY being pushed as a COVID-19 VACCINE.
If you understand all he is saying, you will understand it is a MISTAKE FOR EVERYONE that accepts it. IT CANNOT BE UNDONE.
Full text of Dr. Robert Malone's statement is here:
https://globalcovidsummit.org/news/l...erting-parents
This video explains why so many are dying from it, and exactly why EVERYONE will die from it.
Dr Noack Killed 4 Days After Posting This Vid on How Graphene Hydroxide Nano-razors Destroy Body
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vOgX8FTMiJCn/
____________________
Full text of Dr. Robert Malone's statement is here:
https://globalcovidsummit.org/news/l...erting-parents
https://globalcovidsummit.org/news/l...erting-parents
Updated:
Dec 13, 2021
Original:
Dec 11, 2021
Before your child is injected, watch Dr. Robert Malone’s statement on child COVID vaccinations
Before you vaccinate your child, which is irreversible and potentially permanently damaging, find out why 15,000 physicians and medical scientists around the world signed a declaration publicly declaring that healthy children should NOT be vaccinated for COVID-19. On behalf of these MDs and PhDs, Dr. Robert Malone, who has devoted his career to vaccine development, provides parents a clear statement outlining the scientific facts behind this decision.
Physicians and Medical Scientists
Full Text of Malone Statement
My name is Robert Malone, and I am speaking to you as a parent, grandparent, physician and scientist. I don’t usually read from a prepared speech, but this is so important that I wanted to make sure that I get every single word and scientific fact correct.
I stand by this statement with a career dedicated to vaccine research and development. I’m vaccinated for COVID and I'm generally pro-vaccination. I have devoted my entire career to developing safe and effective ways to prevent and treat infectious diseases.
After this, I will be posting the text of this statement so you can share it with your friends and family.
Before you inject your child - a decision that is irreversible - I wanted to let you know the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I created:
There are three issues parents need to understand:
The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your children's cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs, including
Their brain and nervous system
Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots
Their reproductive system, and
This vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system
The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable
You can’t fix the lesions within their brain
You can’t repair heart tissue scarring
You can’t repair a genetically reset immune system, and
This vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family
The second thing you need to know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested.
We need at least 5 years of testing/research before we can really understand the risks
Harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later
Ask yourself if you want your own child to be part of the most radical medical experiment in human history
One final point: the reason they’re giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie.
Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents
It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to save your family if not the world from this disease
In summary: there is no benefit for your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of their lives.
The risk/benefit analysis isn’t even close.
As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.
The statement was delivered at a livestream event on December 12 for which Unity Project partnered with the Global Covid Summit. Dr. Robert Malone and other leading physicians discussed their recent Physicians' Declaration update, why healthy children should not be vaccinated and the associated risks. Read supporting evidence here.
This is wild. Police pelted with large rocks in Greece during protest.
https://rumble.com/embed/vmx4xl/?pub=4
https://trib247.com/articles/reports...ign=Newsletter
Reports: FDA blocking shipments of ivermectin; Japan, African nations are not
by: WorldTribune.com 12/14/2021 Source: WorldTribune.com
https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1639543703
by WorldTribune Staff, December 14, 2021
While other nations green-light the use of ivermectin to treat Covid-19, the FDA appears to be working with the United States Postal Service to block shipments of the drug which many nations have found to be highly effective against the virus.
Attorney Aaron Siri, managing partner of Siri & Glimstad, posted a letter in which the post office at the FDA's behest held a shipment of ivermectin at the JFK Ariport in New York that had been mailed from a foreign nation and was destined for an address in New Mexico.
Aaron Siri
@AaronSiriSG
The FDA is working with the post office to hold packages containing ivermectin. The FDA could better use its resources to, I don’t know, publicly release the docs submitted by Pfizer to license its mandated liability-free V earlier than 75 years from now! http://bit.ly/3oMU53S
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGcivHMU...g&name=900x900
In Japan, the chairman of the Tokyo Metropolitan Medical Association has given the go ahead for ivermectin as a Covid treatment.
Citing successful use of ivermectin in India, Bangladesh, Argentina, and Mexico, Dr. Haruo Ozaki called for the immediate use of the drug in Japan as cases surge.
Since August, Ozaki said that some 18,000 new infections were being reported daily in Japan.
Dr. Ozaki also declared that ivermectin has demonstrated significant benefits in reducing infections and deaths where the regimen is prophylactically administered.
Meanwhile, the below chart from Johns Hopkins shows how African nations which widely distribute ivermectin have had drastically lower death rates than those which do not.
https://www.worldtribune.com/wp-cont...2/ivafrica.jpg
Not only are U.S. officials continuing to block the use of a drug that has proven to be effective and a life saver, but they also continue to push the vaccines on young children despite emerging evidence that the jab can be more harmful to the young than the virus.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a top U.S. cardiologist, slammed the FDA for downplaying vaccine-induced myocarditis, saying an "extraordinary number" of young people will end up with "permanent heart damage."
In an interview with the DarkHorse podcast, McCullough cited several studies to back his claim that vaccine-induced myocarditis is a rapidly growing problem. The condition has become so prevalent, he says, that children aged 12 to 17 are actually “more likely to be hospitalized with myocarditis” after taking the vaccine than the virus itself.
The risk of the young being hospitalized for Covid is nearly zero and the risk of the young dying from Covid-19 is effectively zero, with a 99.995 percent recovery rate.
Still, the FDA approved the vaccine for children aged 5 to 11, spurring a wave of mandates in school districts across the nation. McCullough says that these mandates will inevitably cause the already high number of myocarditis cases to “skyrocket” over the next few months.
Even more concerning, McCullough said, is that people under 50 who develop a minor myocarditis condition will end up with permanent heart damage around 13 percent of the time – which will likely remain the case in individuals who develop vaccine-induced myocarditis, resulting in a shocking number of young people who will be forced to fight heart problems for their entire lives.
https://banned.video/watch?id=61a79f1beed1d377c65b7e90
Fauci's Dead Babies and Mass Graves From the Past
5:10 video runtime
426,783 views
·
Dec 1, 2021
Download
Greg Reese
A look back at some of Anthony Fauci’s crimes against humanity
https://banned.video/watch?id=61ba36e0f3b3b420a03f936b
Top Doctor Tells Joe Rogan That Covid-19 was a Premeditated Attack on Civilization
Dr. Peter McCullough M.D.
30:40 video runtime
12,521 views
·
Dec 15, 2021
15
Share
Download
The American Journal
The American Journal
Top Doctor Tells Joe Rogan That Covid-19 was a Premeditated Attack on Civilization
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...qH_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/itQmN...andomize=false
CDC Admits Most New Cases Are Fully Vaccinated, Just in Time for Pfizer's Brand New Vaccine for 2022
CDC Admits Most New Cases Are Fully Vaccinated, Just in Time for Pfizer's Brand New Vaccine for 2022
First published at 22:43 UTC on December 15th, 2021.
channel image
The Red Elephants - Vincent James
The Red Elephants
64061 subscribers
16:50 video runtim
Dachsie comments:
I do not know anything about the German Cardinal who appears to be speaking truth. The Brotherhood of Darkness is the global form of the Deep State in the USA. I have read or heard recently that the top hierarchy of the German Roman Catholic Church is very left wing and novus ordo so I do not know how this top Cardinal can be the real deal, but I hope so.
What I wonder about is why do not Catholic clerics who know the truth about our world situation pray fervently and encourage groups to pray fervently for God's help. I never hear anything about that.
________________________________________________
Several major "virus" related stories in this edition of the show.
https://www.trunews.com/stream/catho...takeover-world
Catholic Cardinal: Global Elite Using Covid to Takeover World
1:06:04 video runtime
Dec 15, 2021 TruNews show
A Roman Catholic Cardinal in Germany accused the world’s ruling classes of using the Covid-19 pandemic to usher in a global surveillance state. In an interview with Austria’s St Boniface Institute last week, Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Mueller said the pandemic was used by the world’s super-rich as an opportunity to bring people in line with their agenda.
Cardinal Mueller is the highest-ranking judge at the Vatican Court. Rick Wiles and Doc Burkhart will offer commentary and analysis on this story and many more on this Wednesday, December 15, 2021 edition of TruNews.
Content Contributed By — TruNews Team
Dachsie comment:
More political, Bad Science, donations solicitation manipulation to make people believe this politician is going to actually "Do Something" and make people believe that by donating they themselves are "doing something."
Senator Paul's version of "doing something" is proposing legislation for the firing of Dr. Fauchi.
One interesting insight he shared was that there is, after extensive investigation, no evidence that "this virus" came from an animal.
The CDC has from the beginning of this PLANdemic pushed the idea that ...
"The virus that causes COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, is a zoonotic virus, which means it can spread between people and animals."
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2...ne-health.html
__________________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCHoojt-QVw&t=1s
4:42 video runtime
Dr. Paul Joins Bill Hemmer on Fox News
Dec 8, 2021
Rand Paul
On December 8, 2021, Dr. Paul joined Bill Hemmer on Fox News to discuss the Omicron variant and the Chinese Communist Party's lies over the origins of COVID-19.
Comments are turned off. Learn more
https://nationalfile.com/exclusive-p...ble-americans/
EXCLUSIVE: Pfizer Won't Confirm FDA-Approved Comirnaty Vaccine Is Available To Americans
EXCLUSIVE: Pfizer Won't Confirm FDA-Approved Comirnaty Vaccine Is Available To Americans
https://nationalfile.com/wp-content/...e-1024x538.jpg
By Tom Pappert December 16, 2021 at 3:55pm
Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, Inc. has repeatedly refused to confirm whether it has shipped any of the Comirnaty vaccine to the United States. In some cases, vaccine mandates require an FDA-approved vaccine to be administered, prompting further potential legal hurdles for the White House’s vaccine agenda.
Earlier today The Ohio Star exclusively reported that one of the state’s largest hospital systems is not distributing the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Pfizer vaccine, labeled as Comirnaty, but is instead distributing the previous labeled versions of the vaccine that are only approved for emergency use via an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).
Pfizer refused to tell reporter Peter D’Abrosca whether Comirnaty was being shipped to Ohio.
Meanwhile, the FDA has conceded that Comirnaty and the two versions of the Pfizer vaccine given emergency use authorization are “legally distinct.”
National File contacted Pfizer to ascertain whether vials of Comirtnaty where being distributed anywhere inside the United States or any of its territories.
Pfizer did not respond to our question, but the big pharmaceutical company’s response seemed to suggest that it is presently unavailable.
“The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 EUA labeled product will still be shipped and usable until its expiry date,” a Pfizer spokesperson told National File.
National File contacted Pfizer a second time to offer them to opportunity to clarify whether Comirtnaty is available within the United States or any of its territories.
The pharmaceutical giant did not respond when given nearly three hours to provide comment.
We will update this article if Pfizer clarifies whether Comirnaty has been shipped to any destination within the United States or its territories.
In the company’s first response to National File, its spokesperson also attempted to clarify the FDA’s statement that the Comirnaty vaccine is “legally distinct” from the EUA vaccines:
“The statement that the products are “legally distinct with certain differences” refers to the differences in manufacturing information included in the respective regulatory submissions. Specifically,
While the products are manufactured using the same processes, they may have been manufactured at different sites or using raw materials from different approved suppliers.
FDA closely reviews all manufacturing steps, and has found explicitly that the EUA and BLA products are equivalent.
Approval of site transfers and changes in ingredient supplies are common for licensed vaccines. The FDA’s approval provides additional assurance of consistent product performance.”
According to FDA’s statement to The Ohio Star, the pharmaceutical company’s definition of “legally distinct” may also be imperfect (emphasis added by National File):
“The statutory authorities governing BLAs and EUAs are distinct and provide different legal requirements. The vaccine distributed pursuant to the BLA approval is subject to the requirements of the BLA under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act, while the EUA vaccine is subject to the requirements of the EUA issued pursuant to section 564 of the FD&C Act. For example, EUA Fact Sheets must be provided for the EUA product but not for the approved BLA product.
The FDA-approved Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) and the two EUA authorized formulations of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for ages 12 years and older, when prepared according to their respective instructions for use, can be used interchangeably without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. For purposes of administration, doses distributed under the EUA are interchangeable with the licensed doses. The Vaccine Information Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers provides additional information about both the approved and authorized vaccines.
Information regarding manufacturing locations and materials is generally considered non-public information under disclosure statutes and FDA regulations, unless previously disclosed by the manufacturer. Certain facilities involved in the manufacture of Comirnaty have been made public in the Summary Basis for Regulatory Action posted on FDA’s website. Please contact Pfizer directly to inquire about the manufacture of Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.
FDA does not oversee the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. Please contact Pfizer and/or HHS’s Countermeasures Acceleration Group.”
While the vaccines may not be fundamentally different in their contents, the FDA makes it clear that the vaccines are “legally distinct” due to potential differences in manufacturing environments, and the laws with which they were approved for use.
In its statement to D’Abrosca, the FDA seemed to suggest that – medically – the vaccines are interchangeable and will provide the same benefits or adverse effects, though the law may not agree.
Military Members Mandated To Take FDA-Approved Vax, Not EUA Vax
As The Ohio Star noted, “Military members were also required to take the COVID-19 vaccine based on the premise that it had been fully approved by the FDA.”
This was referenced in a lawsuit against the Department of Defense filed by multiple military members.
Ultimately, the judge appeared sympathetic to the plaintiffs, but threw the lawsuit out because it was filed anonymously due to fear for reprisal.
As The Ohio Star reported:
“In a 32-page ruling handed down on Nov. 12, Federal Judge Allen Winsor of the United States District Court for the District of Northern Florida noted that “Pfizer continues to produce vials of vaccine that are labeled as an EUA drug with packaging material saying, ‘This product has not been approved or licensed by the FDA…’”
“In short, what people think of as the Pfizer vaccine has two distinct FDA approval statuses,” Winsor wrote. “It is licensed—that is, fully approved—for the two-dose application in those 16 and older. But it is unlicensed and operating under an EUA— that is, an emergency use authorization—for other applications, like for children under 16 and for certain third shots. Nonetheless, the FDA describes the two as the ‘same formulation’ and ‘interchangeabl[e]’ for medical purposes.”
Later in the ruling, Winsor wrote that the DOD provided no evidence that Pfizer was actually distributing Comirnaty instead of the original EUA vaccine.”
Similarly, Republican Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine signed legislation that prohibits “a public school or state institution of higher education shall not . . . Require an individual to receive a vaccine for which the United States food and drug administration has not granted full approval.”
If the Comirnaty vaccine – the only fully FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine – is not available inside Ohio, then it would seem impossible for any entity within the state to legally mandate a COVID-19 vaccine.
Pfizer Repeatedly Criticized For Secrecy
In October of this year, under cover videos showing Pfizer scientist Nick Karl admit that the vaccines are less effective than natural COVID-19 antibodies surfaced.
When Karl was confronted by Project Veritas journalists, he physically fled the building.
In other Project Veritas videos, one scientist described Pfizer as an “evil corporation,” even as Karl openly endorsed vaccine passports and severe restrictions on the unvaccinated to motivate them to consent to his company’s product.
embedded tweet with video
https://twitter.com/EricSpracklen/st...2F%3Fp%3D38152
Eric Spracklen����
@EricSpracklen
This might be one of James’ [O'Keefe - Project Veritas ] best confrontations of all time
“Basically our organization is run on COVID money now,” said Chris Croce, a Senior Associate Scientist for Pfizer. “You don’t talk about anything that can possibly implicate you or, like, Big Pharma. Even if you shut the door to the office it’s like, who is listening?”
Earlier this month, The Guardian criticized the “wall of secrecy” created by Pfizer’s “secrecy clause” in its deal with the United Kingdom.
“The revelation comes as Pfizer is accused by a former senior US health official of ‘war profiteering’ during the pandemic,” the newspaper noted.
“In a Channel 4 Dispatches investigation to be broadcast this week, Tom Frieden, who was director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under Barack Obama, said: ‘If you’re just focusing on maximising your profits and you’re a vaccine manufacturer … you are war profiteering.'”
FDA Has Major Ties To Pfizer
At least six of the FDA committee members who made the decision to make the Pfizer vaccine available for children have worked for Pfizer, had research funded by Pfizer, or are otherwise connected to the company.
The Acting Chair of the committee was a paid Pfizer consultant as recently as 2018, another worked on a Pfizer-sponsored research project related to vaccines for infants, a third mentored Pfizer’s Senior Director of Vaccine Research, a fourth is listed on a committee sponsored by Pfizer, a fifth openly previously served as a Vice President for Pfizer Vaccines, and a sixth proudly photographed himself receiving the Pfizer vaccine.
https://nationalfile.com/wp-content/...am-600x482.jpg
About the Author:
Tom Pappert
SummaryRecentContact
Tom Pappert is the editor-in-chief of National File. Follow him on Twitter @realTomPappert, or follow Tom Pappert on Gab. Tips can be sent securely to nationalfile@protonmail.com.
__________________
Dachsie comment:
Looks like this is way we can bring down this whole nightmare fraud. I put in red print the typical non-answer Pfizer provided to the question. I have bolded some other areas of text that are important.
It was news to me that the U S military was requiring that the vaccines that enlistees are being mandated to take must be fully licensed and fully approved by the FDA, not the EUA vaccines - Pfizer, Moderna, J&J curently in use in USA.
Pfizer and their "FDA fully approved and licensed Comirnaty vaccine was a shell game and extremely deceptive. News of Comirnaty was published in a manner and time to make the public think that the EUA vaccines were fully approved by the FDA too and to present the impression that the Comirnaty actually vacine vial contents being administered to patients in the USA was actually what was being administered. I cannot see how that is not FRAUD. The way I understand the law, which is sorely lacking I admit, but ...
Not all things that are legal are fraud,
but
All fraudulent things are illegal.
No and then we need a little humor
https://structurecms-production-psyc...peg?1639669156
Hospital personnel by Hush Naidoo Jade Photography is licensed under Unsplash unsplash.com
__________________________________________________ ___________
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/p...fing-shortages
Hospitals reconsider vaccine mandate amid staffing shortages
Hospitals reconsider vaccine mandate amid staffing shortages
by Sarah Westwood, Investigative Reporter |
| December 15, 2021 07:00 AM
Major hospital systems across the country are quietly scrapping their vaccine mandates amid worker shortages and growing confusion as to whether such requirements on the national level are even legal.
Two separate federal courts found in late November that President Joe Biden’s attempt to impose a nationwide vaccine requirement for healthcare workers likely exceeded the authority of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which were meant to implement the rule. That mandate is currently paused, along with two others the Biden administration had hoped to impose at the federal level.
BIDEN'S LEGAL LOSSES: SEVEN TIMES COURTS HAVE STRUCK AGAINST ADMINISTRATION
A number of major hospital companies quickly moved to reverse the mandates they had announced in anticipation of the Biden administration rule coming into effect on schedule.
The rule changes will affect hundreds of thousands of healthcare workers.
Cleveland Clinic, a sprawling hospital system that employs nearly 70,000 people, announced on Dec. 2 that it would stop enforcing its vaccine mandate due to the federal judge’s ruling.
Cleveland Clinic employees who choose not to get vaccinated will now have the option to rely on “additional safety requirements” in lieu of the shot, according to the company, including “periodic testing.”
HCA Healthcare, which operates more than 180 hospitals in 20 states, froze its vaccine mandate for employees in states without individual requirements shortly after the ruling against the CMMS mandate.
The system, which employs more than 270,000 people, had already been suffering from staffing shortages.
The CEO of Ballad Health, a Tennessee-based hospital system with roughly 14,000 employees, said the effects of the mandate could have been “devastating” to the company had the federal government implemented it on schedule. Roughly 2,000 of Ballad’s employees remained unvaccinated.
Ballad’s CEO warned over the summer that a mandate could prevent the system from having enough workers to meet basic needs like staffing the emergency room.
AdventHealth suspended its vaccine mandate for employees across its 50 hospitals after the court rulings.
Officials at the Florida-based company testified before the state Legislature in September that staffing shortages had begun to create dire circumstances in their hospitals, particularly among nurses, many of whom have been forced to take on additional patients.
InterMountain Healthcare, a hospital system with nearly 40,000 workers, joined other hospital organizations in stopping the implementation of its vaccine mandate in early December, when it said 95% of its workforce had taken the shot.
That could have left hundreds, or potentially thousands, of its workers vulnerable to disciplinary action if not for the court rulings that have given strained healthcare systems breathing room.
Hospitals aren’t the only organizations backing away from vaccine mandates for fear of creating or worsening staff shortages.
Southwest Airlines in late October abandoned a plan to place unvaccinated employees on leave without pay, even before the Biden administration’s federal contractor vaccine mandate was paused by the courts.
American Airlines similarly delayed enforcing its vaccine mandate after the Biden administration first pushed back its deadline, which has since been thrown into even more uncertainty thanks to legal losses.
The Richmond School Board voted in November to stop disciplining school employees who refused the vaccine after facing dozens of resignations over the mandate.
In some places where vaccine mandates were allowed to proceed despite operational concerns, difficulties have ensued.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
The Seattle Police Department, already hampered by a severe officer shortage, was forced to place 100 employees on leave by November after the city’s vaccination requirements took effect.
The vacancies, 93 of which were among sworn officers, triggered an emergency staffing plan on the police force that the department warned could create “some impacts to our service levels.”
After significant numbers of New York City teachers and other workers declined to get vaccinated despite announced mandates, Mayor Bill de Blasio announced he would pay holdouts $500 to take the shot, which teachers union leaders said was unfair to those who followed the rules initially.
_______________________
Dachsie comments:
All hospitals that accept payment from Medicare or Medicaid are subject to this federal rule change.
In my opinion all state hospitals that have implemented some form of mandates regarding the "vaccines" and the mandatory taking of the PCR tests, and the new test as of January 1, 2022, are equally illegal.
The nasal swab ests themselves are a medical procedure on the body and they have been proven to deliver massively meaningless, but not nondetrimental, positive and negative results.