You're asking the wrong guy, these guys took most of the footage that was never seen again.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Try this link.
/http://vault.fbi.gov/911-videos/security-camera-view-of-pentagon-on-9-11/
Printable View
You're asking the wrong guy, these guys took most of the footage that was never seen again.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Try this link.
/http://vault.fbi.gov/911-videos/security-camera-view-of-pentagon-on-9-11/
You posted it up like you knew all about it, but now you're saying you don't know anything about it. Hmm..Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
You're lying to both yourself, and everyone here if you think you would bet everything you own on a computer simulation v.s. 130+ eye witnesses.
There was another boom 15minutes later, (to take out the floors possibly), all the cell phones went out, all the people were told to get out of the building, and nobody went in, too much smoke for anyone to see anything.
Yet the Pentagonian tie boys were allowed to play around in the yard.
The Wizard of Oz was busy working behind his curtain that day.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Samhqo6KSHc
Joboo, you don't know the difference between a drawing board and a computer simulation, so please don't accuse me of lying to myself,Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
when your ignorance is clearly showing.
On thing with the jewish mindset Joboo is that it is set in concrete and the rest of the world is against them and reason dosnt come into it as the mind is already made up so there is limited flexibility and so really there is no progress or its very limited,.....dont you agree Joboo.
I'm very flexible when the aspects lead to something conclusive. The conspiracy angle for some is very much set in concrete. It seems people keep forgetting I'm not even siding in the official narrative on this, aka it was guided in via the big red easy button. The missile concept just doesn't make any sense, and at the end of the day anyone that thinks all those witnesses are lying, and that anyone would try to pull off such a thing with so many people right there, are not being completely honest with themselves. They're letting their overall suspicions about everything that happened that day cloud their judgement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Serpo
And the physical evidence that a Boeing 757 needs a minimum of 12Gs to make the hole in the wall, when 5 or 6 is the most one could do?Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
How does that fit into your cloudy judgement?
HARK! Our resident kosher-logichttp://gold-silver.us/forum/attachme...1&d=1361024018 expert, Pattern of Projection Girlhttp://gold-silver.us/forum/attachme...1&d=1361024018, has finally broken her long & unusual silence re the question of her dubious "Richard Gage quote":
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...671#post614671
"Double-O-JOObo: Licensed To LIEhttp://gold-silver.us/forum/attachme...1&d=1361024018"Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
;D
Well it's funny, but I don't see good ol Richard promoting the magic missile theory.
It would literally destroy all his work in a matter of days. ....KABOOM...Mushroom Cloud. No huge surprise there.
He won't touch it with a 100 foot pole...for many years now.... and you're like "oh...but...uh...there's..uh...some words he said once....err...one time at band camp" ..... okie dokey.
Endlessly complicated theory that becomes increasingly more improbable the deeper it's analyzed, with 130+ witnesses actually seeing the plane, and seeing it hit the building, but you're all on about disappearing airplanes, disappearing passengers, planted debris with still nobody noticing a thing. What a viable operation. Execute that plan for sure. Fool proof 100%. Middle of rush hour, witnesses all over the place. Sure thing.
Enjoy the fantasy world love affair with the magic missile. My point is well proven, anything beyond this is simply mindless repetition.
Now go ahead and post more nutty pictures of some joo dingbats, and more loopy science mural copy/paste ad homin character attacks etc... it's just knocks home all my points, and observations.
We'll have to respectfully (or not so) disagree on this one.
It's all moot at this point looking forward until something big comes out.
The physical evidence along with the video provided by authorities proves in fact it was as missile, as a Boeing is incapable.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo