Any District Court Judge against who a timely filed affidavit is filed showing bias against a party shall proceed no farther . . .
http://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.h...e=62&page=898#
https://s19.postimg.org/4ffw7jp2b/IMG_1396.png
Printable View
Any District Court Judge against who a timely filed affidavit is filed showing bias against a party shall proceed no farther . . .
http://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.h...e=62&page=898#
https://s19.postimg.org/4ffw7jp2b/IMG_1396.png
Now to make them follow it...
They ignore it just like the jurisdiction issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cebu_4_2
Mrs.B Stacy added a video to her channel re the fed's star witness an FBI agent or informant addressed earlier in this thread
Urgent Nevada case update
http://youtu.be/OCDCog4Akek
https://youtu.be/OCDCog4Akek
MontyQuote:
Originally Posted by monty
It has been shown exhaustively that what Harry S Truman did in July 1948 when he signed that judicial act dividing the several States into federal court districts was done WHILE CONGRESS WAS ON A MAJOR RECESS.
Truman did not sign the act into law while congress was in session. He has no executive branch duties with respect to bills presented to him while congress is not in session. If you were to check the constitution you would see that the president only has LEGISLATIVE section powers to sign bills into law. These powers go bye bye with congress adjourned.
Your argument is that administrative court federal judges must recuse themselves when sufficient affidavit presented. My argument is THERE IS NO FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT BECAUSE HARRY DIDN'T HAVE AUTHORITY TO CREATE ONE.
Funny thing is ... Harry knew what he was doing. After he signed the bill into law he called congress back into session on some trumped up emergency. I know of no U.S. emergency that existed in 1948. I believe he planned to use the emergency he called to give congress the opportunity to counter his unconstitutional actions [la abra silver mining case at supreme court says president may sign a bill into law over a short holiday break].
Adask has material that covers this entire subject. Look for Dennis Craig in his archives.
Video posted on J Grady's channel outside the federal courthouse in Las Vegas during Ryan Bundy' hearing
http://youtu.be/R_NOx1RYpFc
https://youtu.be/R_NOx1RYpFc
Brad Thornton video at the federal courthouse in Las Vegas 20 minutes
http://youtu.be/PnPi7jnZIJ8
https://youtu.be/PnPi7jnZIJ8
Judge Jeanine Pirro - Dirty Harry Reid and BLM LAND GRABS
http://youtu.be/9bJBZTn2lpM
https://youtu.be/9bJBZTn2lpM
Doug Knowles' assessment of Ryan Budy's Dec. 23 hearing
Ryan has challenged the jurisdiction of the court quoting Section 7(3) 62 Statutes at Large page 685 defining Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction in this reply codifed as positive law 18 USC Section 7(3).
https://www.facebook.com/itmattershowyoustand/?ref=py_c
Ryan Bundy’s Filed Response to the Governments Rebuttal from the 12-13-16 Hearing
Posted on December 24, 2016 by Doug Knowles
DEFENDANTS RYAN C. BUNDY REPLY TO GOVERNMENT OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT RYAN BUNDY’S MOTION FOR OWN RECOGNIZANCE OR BAIL PENDING TRIAL (ECF No. 1157)
Ryan Bundy's Hearing on 12-23-16 was a hearing to rule on his Motion to reopen his Detention Hearing. After Government Responded to his Motion, he filed his response to the Government. (attached). It is my opinion as an Observer in the hearings that his actions, response and rebuttal in Court was even more significant.
After requesting permission from the Magistrate, he led the courtroom in a prayer. He was confident and authoritative but respectful in his comments and presentation to the Judge.
The prosecutor, in his presentation, very focused on rules and court room procedure, explained why the original decision was valid and must stand as ordered. It was very matter of fact and appeared to leave no wiggle room for the Magistrate to make any other ruling as seen so many times before in these hearing for our P3s.
Then came Ryan's final rebuttal. He focused on the human rights aspect of the rulings and their impact to his and others natural rights as protected in the Constitution. The Just under a Year in custody, based on Prosecutions lies and no opportunity to exercise his right to face his accusers or to challenge their truth in his own defense.. He talked about his family and the suffering that they are enduring because he is not being allowed to fulfill his god ordained responsibility to provide for and guide them. It was passionate and resolute as the Magistrate listened intently to his words..
The judge thanked Ryan for his presentation and replied that he would take the matter under advisement and issue a ruling from Chambers.
Could this be Ryan's family's Christmas Miracle? Their hopes appeared to be dashed.
As an observer, I believe I saw something different in the hearing than I have yet to see in any of the hearings so far. I saw a Judge that was respectful, attentive and most of all letting it show, just slightly that his heart, perhaps because of the season, perhaps at gods hand, was being tugged at by Ryan's words. I don't like to predict in situations like these. However, I believe that there was more than attorneys and a judge making their cases in the court room. You could feel it in your soul. Could this be a turn in the tide starting with Ryan and his family? I believe there is reason to claim that victory, in the lords name! Please pray that the Magistrate continues to be touched by gods hand in his consideration and decision of these matters.
May the New Year bring Liberty and Freedom for all!
Share this:
27- [COLOR=#777777 !important]Print
[/COLOR]
More on Ryan Bundy's recent reply to prosecution
https://m.facebook.com/groups/850081...&__tn__=%2C%3B
https://s19.postimg.org/paqp2ftsz/IMG_1412.png