Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
joboo
If the parents are acting (or staged actors)...where are the kids?
Teachers, friends, aunts, uncles, brothers, sisters, grandparents, cousins, neighbors?
They're all in on it?
Who said those are the names of kids that are actually dead? Little Joey Smith died, son of the Smiths of Newtown Ct. No address, contact phone number and no neighbors recognize the family - so what, right? They're being protected from paprazzi and media scrutiny by sheriff's deputies because the Feds care - right?
All the kids in little Joey's class - dead, teacher - dead, school records, video surveilance tapes - all sealed... We've allowed this bullshit since the OKC assault
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
collector
Who said those are the names of kids that are actually dead? Little Joey Smith died, son of the Smiths of Newtown Ct. No address, contact phone number and no neighbors recognize the family - so what, right? They're being protected from paprazzi and media scrutiny by sheriff's deputies because the Feds care - right?
So X number of kids died, their names are listed all over the place, and none of the teachers, parents, friends etc... etc... etc... would know anything about it, or realize it?
Do you think that is possible? If so, how?
Who went missing in the school? How does one cover that up?
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
joboo
So X number of kids died, their names, and pictures are listed all over the place, and none of the teachers, parents, friends etc... etc... etc... would know anything about it, or realize it?
Do you think that is possible? If so, how?
Do you realize how easy it is to create a photo of a person with software? The parent actors are actors because they didn't really lose a child. The friends, aunts, uncles and grandparents - more actors. They aren't very good at it, probably because they aren't really actors. They could be people willing to do this in exchange for not serving time in prison or paying a lot of back taxes or they could just be government agents. There are many possibilities.
I don't know exactly how they do this but I can tell you that this incident isn't the first time I've seen signs of fake victims.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sunshine05
Do you realize how easy it is to create a photo of a person with software? The parent actors are actors because they didn't really lose a child. The friends, aunts, uncles and grandparents - more actors. They aren't very good at it, probably because they aren't really actors. They could be people willing to do this in exchange for not serving time in prison or paying a lot of back taxes or they could just be government agents. There are many possibilities.
I don't know exactly how they do this but I can tell you that this incident isn't the first time I've seen signs of fake victims.
So you think everyone is just pretending. All those people?
Does that sound remotely logical to you?
So they didn't shoot the kids, just made them up, and convinced hundreds of people to go along with it?
Why go through all that extravagant fakery when you can just shoot?
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
So how do you convince an entire school, and everyone connected to it, their friends disappeared when they didn't?
In the same regard, how do you prevent an entire school, and everyone connected to it, from realizing nobody is dead, or missing?
...and if they're missing, how do you get all those people to suddenly become actors, and never talk about it. Hundreds of people.
What kind of "op" would that be to think of doing?
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
joboo
So X number of kids died, their names are listed all over the place, and none of the teachers, parents, friends etc... etc... etc... would know anything about it, or realize it?
Do you think that is possible? If so, how?
Who went missing in the school? How does one cover that up?
Do you personally know any of the victims? Yes or no?
Can you post one video with a neighbor discussing one of the victims in detail, as a close acquaintance or friend?
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mamboni
Do you personally know any of the victims? Yes or no?
Can you post one video with a neighbor discussing one of the victims in detail, as a close acquaintance or friend?
But that doesn't prove anything other than they weren't put on TV.
How is it possible to control that many people forever?
When coming up with an idea for an "op" would that seem realistic to you? An entire school, and all those connected to it?
Why bother to fake so many deaths, and hope out of hundreds of people nobody says anything?
Why not just do it?
Why bother to fake any of the deaths?
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
joboo
But that doesn't prove anything other than they weren't put on TV.
How is it possible to control that many people forever?
When coming up with an idea for an "op" would that seem realistic to you? An entire school, and all those connected to it?
Why bother to fake so many deaths, and hope out of hundreds of people nobody says anything?
Why not just do it?
Why bother to fake any of the deaths?
Good, you admit to knowing nothing more about the shootings than what has been reported on the MSM. So you know nothing of fact and only MSM-approved info. In short, you know nothing of substance. So shut your piehole unless you have anything useful to add. A hypothesis, that shooting was a hoax, is being examined. As no one has seen a single victim's body, photos of the crime scene, and there is no eye witness to the purported shootings, and the victims are just photos on a TV screen, I say the hoax hypothesis remains viable until disproven.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mamboni
Good, you admit to knowing nothing more about the shootings than what has been reported on the MSM. So you know nothing of fact and only MSM-approved info. In short, you know nothing of substance. So shut your piehole unless you have anything useful to add. A hypothesis, that shooting was a hoax, is being examined. As no one has seen a single victim's body, photos of the crime scene, and there is no eye witness to the purported shootings, and the victims are just photos on a TV screen, I say the hoax hypothesis remains viable until disproven.
It doesn't need to have anything to do with me.
If you can't logistically answer the questions what else is there?
If you can't use logic to deduce anything obvious, something is definitely wrong somewhere.
It would help if you were able to at least remain civil in the process of coming to a better understanding. If you're a doctor you should know this.
Do you think it's even possible to mind control an entire school, and everyone connected to it, is what it all boils down to.
That much is a given. It will never change if one was to believe the fakery hypothesis.
You simply can't toss away one reality to suit another.
