Coronavirus

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

Comirnaty, Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine: The name represents a combination of the terms COVID-19, mRNA, community and immunity.

Spikevax, Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine: The first part of the name refers to the “spike” glycoprotein on the coronavirus.

Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine: Including the "evri" sound in the name is intended to communicate that the vaccine is for everyone.

Nuvaxovid, Novavax's COVID-19 vaccine: The vaccine's name was designed to share a similar cadence to the drugmaker's name without an explicit association.

Vidprevtyn, Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline's COVID-19 vaccine: The first syllable of the name likely refers to COVID-19, and the second syllable is likely meant to represent disease prevention, according to the report.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...covid-vaccine/

02/02/22
•
COVID › Views

FDA Grants Full Approval of Moderna’s Spikevax COVID Vaccine — Another ‘Bait-and-Switch?’


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval of Moderna’s Spikevax COVID vaccine for people 18 and older. Similar to the agency’s licensing last year of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, the approval raised a number of legal questions.
By
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Monday granted full approval of Moderna’s Spikevax COVID vaccine for people 18 and older.

Similar to the agency’s licensing last year of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, the approval raised a number of legal questions related to mandates and product availability.

Spikevax is a two-dose primary series, approved also for administration as part of a heterologous (“mix and match”) single booster dose for individuals who previously completed their original series of vaccinations with the Pfizer or Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccines.

According to the FDA, Spikevax “has the same formulation as the [Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)] Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine and … can be used interchangeably with the EUA Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series.”

However, in its approval letter, the FDA said Spikevax is “legally distinct” from the Moderna EUA vaccine:
“The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness.”

BUY TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s New Book — 'The Real Anthony Fauci'

The FDA made the same distinction between the Pfizer-BioNTech EUA vaccine and the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine, which the agency fully licensed in August, 2021, a move that raised questions about liability and the legality of vaccine mandates.

After Monday’s announcement, media outlets were quick to reassure the public the two Moderna vaccines are the same and that this was just a marketing ploy, where Moderna simply “rebranded” what is otherwise the same vaccine.

No ‘fully licensed’ COVID vaccine actually available

While Moderna’s Spikevax vaccine is now fully licensed, the original Moderna vaccine will remain under EUA. Indeed, the FDA on Jan. 7 reissued the EUA.

The FDA has also made it clear the Spikevax vaccine will not be available to the American public, announcing:

“Although SPIKEVAX (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) and Comirnaty (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) are approved to prevent COVID-19 in certain individuals within the scope of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine authorization, there is not sufficient approved vaccine available for distribution to this population in its entirety at the time of reissuance of this EUA.”

These claims parallel the chain of events that followed the FDA’s full approval of the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine in August 2021.

At the time, Pfizer and the FDA claimed Comirnaty was not yet available, as there were sufficient stocks of the Pfizer-BioNTech EUA vaccine still available to be administered.

As of this writing, the FDA states, via its website, that Comirnaty products are “not orderable at this time.”
The FDA has not indicated when, or if, the Spikevax and Comirnaty vaccines will be available for distribution in the U.S.

Are EUA and fully licensed vaccines really interchangeable?

As reported by The Defender, there is a significant legal distinction between products authorized under EUA and those fully licensed by the FDA.

EUA products are experimental under U.S. law. Under the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations, no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment.

Specifically, under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines.

That’s an issue military members, unable to find any vaccination sites that offer the fully licensed Comirnaty vaccine, cited in various lawsuits challenging vaccine mandates.

Notably, on Nov. 12, 2021, a federal judge rejected an argument by the U.S. Department of Defense, in defending the military’s vaccine mandate, that the Pfizer Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines are “interchangeable.”

U.S. law also requires the EUA designation be used only when “there is no adequate, approved and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing or treating such disease or condition.”

This means that, in legal terms, all EUA products should be withdrawn once alternative products have received full approval.

Perhaps the most significant legal distinction, however, pertains to the legal protections afforded vaccine manufacturers, depending on how their product is classified.


__________________

Dr. Meryl Nass M.D. is expert on the Comirnaty deception and FDA and US government appear to be carrying out a similar deception for their own nefarious purposes on the full FDA approval of a Moderna vaccine called Spikevax.

The ostensible motivation of the U S government and BigPharma entities is to hurry up and get everyone vaccinated under EUA vaccines that have no liability for the vacine manufacturer. Whitney Webb interview spoke about Moderna company insolvent and about to go bankrupt a coupe of times in the past and were always bailed out but maybe this mysterious ploy to have Moderna offering a fully available in the uSA fully FDA licensed and approved vaccine for which the Moderna company has no liability shield is a plan to sacrifice Moderna company and do some kind of bait and switch with names and products.

However, the real goal is far beyond protecting the health of people by protecting them from "Covid 19".

I suggest the goal is a One World Death and Slavery System for all of humankind.

____________________

Here are two great interviews of Dr. Meryl Nass M.D., one by Whitney Webb

https://unlimitedhangout.com/

podcast

https://rokfin.com/post/61739

podcast runtime 1:26:43

https://img.production.rokfin.com/ey...Jjb3ZlciJ9fX0=

FDA Corruption and Mandate Madness with Meryl Nass, MD
Whitney is joined by Dr. Meryl Nass to discuss the FDA's role in the current COVID-19 vaccine Emergency Use Authorizations and the mandate situation as well as how the FDA's conflicts of interest with Big Pharma led to the creation of the EUA system and has resulted in unethical, illegal behavior from the agency during the COVID-19 crisis. Show notes: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/11...-meryl-nass-md

FDA Corruption and Mandate Madness with Meryl Nass, MD Unlimited Hangout with Whitney Webb
•
o News
Whitney is joined by Dr. Meryl Nass to discuss the FDA’s role in the current COVID-19 vaccine Emergency Use Authorizations and the mandate situation as well as how the FDA’s conflicts of interest with Big Pharma led to the creation of the EUA system and has resulted in unethical, illegal behavior from the agency during the COVID-19 crisis.



_________________
and one by Dr. Joseph Mercola.

FDA, Boosters, and the CDC- Interview with Dr. Meryl Nass

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jtMKzuKfAlR3/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jtMKzuKfAlR3/
FDA, Boosters, and the CDC- Interview with Dr. Meryl Nass

First published at 17:53 UTC on November 3rd, 2021.

1:15:13


Mercola
Mercola
11744 subscribers


In this interview, Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist specializing in toxicology, vaccine-induced illnesses and Gulf War sickness, shares her insights into the dangers of the COVID jab, which October 26, 2021, received emergency use authorization for children as young as 5.
We also discuss the conflicts of interest within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that seem to be behind this reckless decision, and how the agency pulled the wool over our eyes with its approval of Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID injection.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leGdJNElygU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leGdJNElygU

Dr Pierre Kory , President of FLCCC Alliance - Use of Ivermecticin for Covid19 patients

9,306 views
Dec 23, 2020

1:15:58 video runtime

Dr Pierre Kory , President of FLCCC Alliance - Use of Ivermecticin for Covid19 patients
9,306 views
Dec 23, 2020

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...83_320x180.jpg

https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFYkVDZhIj83/

"PEOPLE POWER" COPS OVERPOWERED OUTSIDE GOVERNOR GENERAL'S CANBERRA 07/02/22

3:59 video runtime

irst published at 10:07 UTC on February 7th, 2022.

#australia

channel image

THE CRAZZ FILES

THE CRAZZ FILES

572 subscribers

All Australians who care about this country and want to end the tyranny need to get to Canberra ASAP.

______________________

Dachsie comment:

Here we have people doing the right thing at the right time in the right way. The people who cannot see that what these Australia citizens are doing is courageous, right and true are most probably fascists. communists, Marxists, and/or Leninists who call evil good.

Isaiah 5:20

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who turn darkness to light and light to darkness, who replace bitter with sweet and sweet with bitter.

https://twitter.com/DowdEdward/statu...reater-numbers

Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Ed ☯️Free Thinker & Oracle
@DowdEdward
Malone calling out bump in DOD data & Insurance company results for death & disability.

embedded video52 second video runtime

https://twitter.com/i/status/1489436153719627777

9:10 PM · Feb 3, 2022·Twitter for iPhone
202
Retweets
11
Quote Tweets
363
Likes

_________________________

https://trib247.com/articles/data-as...ign=Newsletter

Data: As vax mandates hit, younger people began dying in greater numbers

by: WorldTribune.com 02/07/2022 Source: WorldTribune.com

https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1644291058

by WorldTribune Staff, February 7, 2022

A new analysis of excess mortality rates compared to pre-pandemic levels shows that younger, working-age people began dying in greater numbers as vaccine mandates were put in place.

Ed Dowd, former fund manager at Blackrock, said the data coming out of the insurance and funeral services industries is painting a disturbing picture.

Dowd reported that his analysis found:

• Mortality worsened in 2021 vs. 2020 despite widespread vaccinations.

• A spike in mortality among younger, working-age individuals coincided with vaccine mandates.

• The spike in younger deaths peaked in Q3 2021 when Covid deaths were extremely low (but rising into the end of September).

"The implication to many was clear — that the Covid-19 vaccine is linked to the excess mortality, and months of vaccine injury reports were now spilling over to actuarial data," Zero Hedge noted, adding that younger people were dying at a greater rate amid "a disease which primarily kills older, non-working age individuals."

Dowd noted in a Feb. 1 tweet that financial insurance company Unum had reported its Life segment saw an increase of 9 percent in the ratio of payouts vs. premiums (benefit ratio), a 17.4 percent increase in 2021 vs. 2020 despite widespread vaccinations.

"In 2021 they saw a 17.4% increase vs 2020. This is higher than the 13.3% increase vs 2019. So the higher payouts in 21 are occurring with a miracle vaccine & less virulent strains," Dowd wrote.

"In 2019 the unit had $266 million profit, last year a profit of $82 million & this year a loss of $192 million. A swing of $458 million lower over 2 years. Important to remember these are employed working age folks," Dowd added.

Funeral home company Carriage Services reported a 28 percent increase in September 2021 vs. 2020, and a 13 percent increase in August vs. the same period. Funerals and cremations are up 12 percent and 13 percent respectively on the quarter.

After seeing an uptick in funeral homes business in Q3, Dowd said he will be closely monitoring Q4 reports which are expected around Feb. 15.

Dowd noted that Carriage Services, a public company, saw its stock rise 106 percent in 2021, tweeting: "Curious no? Guys this is shocking as 89% of Funeral homes are private in U.S. We are seeing the tip of iceberg."

Lincoln National reported its death claims are up 13.7 percent year-to-year and up 57 percent in Q4 vs. 2019. Reinsurance Group of America reported in their earnings call last week that Q4 was impacted by a meaningful level of Covid-19 mortality claims despite the fact that the Covid-19 vaccines have been around for more than a year.

Also noting a spike in younger deaths which peaked in Q3 2022 is Hartford Insurance Group, which reported that mortality is up 32 percent from 2019 pre-covid levels, and 20 percent from 2020 pre-vaccine levels.

"It’s clear as day what changed in second half of 2021," Dowd wrote. "Variants less virulent than original but we had mandates & boosters hitting. This is a total shit show to behold."

Dr. Robert Malone, mRNA inventor, noted the troubling data in a recent appearance on Steve Bannon's "War Room":


embedded video link also to tweet given above

https://beckernews.com/pentagons-lea...hNotifications


Pentagon’s Leaked Data Show Explosion of Vaccine-Related Injuries Among Military Service-Members
February 8, 2022
by Kyle Becker


https://beckernews.com/wp-content/up...w2-810x486.jpg

As the Pentagon begins processing immediate discharges for those who object to the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ to leave the U.S. military, there is new data to support extraordinary concern for the shots’ safety.

Disturbing new data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database shows a startling increase in numerous medical health conditions year-over-year for all age-cohorts — some of these conditions being chronic and life-threatening.

It was first brought to public light in a February 1, 2022 letter to Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin from the U.S. Senate. Senator Ron Johnson cited the “dramatic increases in medical diagnoses among military personnel,” as well as evidence “diagnoses of myocarditis had been removed from the database.”



https://twitter.com/akheriaty/status...hNotifications

Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Aaron Kheriaty, MD
@akheriaty
Keep an eye on this story as it develops. I presented at the Senate panel where Renz presented this disturbing data.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLF6BSTV...g&name=900x900

Below are summarized 2021 (with vaccines) numbers with percentage changes relative to 2020 (without vaccines), as recently noted by mRNA vaccine expert Dr. Robert Malone.

Total Number of Diseases & Injuries Reported By Year (Ambulatory) up 988% in “uncorrected” data, down 3% in “corrected” data(this is basically a control for the data set).
Total Number of Diseases & Injuries Reported By Year (Hospitalization) up 37%
Total Number of Diseases of the Nervous System By Year up 968%
Total Number of Malignant Neuroendocrine Tumor Reports By Year up 276%
Total Number of Acute Myocardial Infarct Reports By Year up 343%
Total Number of Acute Myocarditis Reports By Year up 184%
Total Number of Acute Pericarditis Reports By Year up 70%
Total Number of Pulmonary Embolism Reports By Year up 260%
Total Number of Congenital Malformations Reports By Year up 87%
Total Number of Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrage Reports By Year up 227%
Total Number of Anxiety Reports By Year up 2,361%
Total Number of Suicide Reports By Year up 227%
Total Number of Neoplasms for All Cancers By Year up 218%
Total Number of Malignant Neoplasms for Digestive Organs By Year up 477%
Total Number of Neoplasms for Breast Cancer By Year up 469%
Total Number of Neoplasms for Testicular Cancer By Year up 298%
Total Number of Female Infertility Reports By Year up 419%
Total Number of Dysmenorrhea Reports By Year up 221.5%
Total Number of Ovarian Dysfunction Reports By Year up 299%
Total Number of Spontaneous Abortion Reports By Year DOWN by 10%
Total Number of Male Infertility Reports By Year up 320%
Total Number of Guillian-Bare Syndrome Reports By Year up 520%
Total Number of Acute Transverse Myelitis Reports By Year up 494%
Total Number of Seizure Reports By Year up 298%
Total Number of Narcolepsy & Cataplexy Reports By Year up 352%
Total Number of Rhabdomyolysis By Year up 672%
Total Number of Multiple Sclerosis Reports By Year up 614%
Total Number of Migraine Reports By Year up 352%
Total Number of Blood Disorder Reports By Year up 204%
Total Number of Hypertension (High Blood Pressure) Reports By Year up 2,130%
Total Number of Cerebral Infarct Reports By Year up 294%

Instead of responding to Senator Ron Johnson, the DoD contacted discredited, partisan “fact checker” Politifact:

“But Peter Graves, spokesperson for the Defense Health Agency’s Armed Forces Surveillance Division, told PolitiFact by email that “in response to concerns mentioned in news reports” the division reviewed data in the DMED “and found that the data was incorrect for the years 2016-2020.”

Officials compared numbers in the DMED with source data in the DMSS and found that the total number of medical diagnoses from those years “represented only a small fraction of actual medical diagnoses.” The 2021 numbers, however, were up-to-date, giving the “appearance of significant increased occurrence of all medical diagnoses in 2021 because of the underreported data for 2016-2020,” Graves said.

The DMED system has been taken offline to “identify and correct the root-cause of the data corruption,” Graves said.

Thus, similarly to VAERS, when the data do not support authoritarian measures, the data ‘can’t be trusted.’ When they do support government coercion, the data is as infallible as “the science.”

Thomas Renz’s website Renz Law, however, shows that the Department of Defense appears to be fiddling with the data to allay concerns about vaccines and its misguided mandate.


https://beckernews.com/wp-content/up...-PM-scaled.jpg

Dr. Robert Malone had some pointed questions about the DOD’s purported explanation for the huge spike in cases”

So, what do the original data show (prior to Defense Health Agency’s Armed Forces Surveillance Division correction of the “data corruption”).

In reviewing these data, what we see are baseline data from 2016 to 2019 (pre SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19), 2020 (the first year of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 when no vaccines were available), and 2021 (the year that vaccines were available and mandated for the US Military).

As noted above, there are many potential confounding variables, but whatever the cause, if these data are not due to longstanding and previously undiscovered “data corruption”, then we have a major issue with the overall health of our armed services.

And if they are due to previously undiscovered “data corruption”, why wasn’t someone running around with their pants on fire trying to figure out what is going on here long before the whistleblowers brought this to national attention?

A U.S. federal district court judge in early February halted the Department of Defense’s rejection of soldiers’ exemption requests on religious objection grounds, and went even further by stating that the objectors’ case is likely to prevail upon appeal.

“Finally, the military is most likely unable to establish, and certainly has not established, that permitting the relatively small number of RFRA objectors, even if every request for exemption (much less the two at issue in this motion) were sincere and successful, to serve without adverse consequences to their standing and the terms and conditions of their service will adversely affect the public’s interest in the maintenance and readiness of the nation’s military forces,” Judge Steven D. Merryday ruled. “In fact, the public undoubtedly has some considerable interest in maintaining the services of skilled, experienced, highly trained, patriotic, courageous, and esteemed service members, such as the two moving service members, in whom the public has an immense financial investment and who are not, to say the least, readily replaceable.”

Every U.S. service-member deserves such respect, particularly as the vaccines have failed to slow the spread of the disease, and according to an initial reading of the Department of Defense’s own data, is leading to an explosion of adverse effects cases.

The U S Military has just been caught in the most horrendous murderous lie and coverup in our nation's history.

According this Telegram post a criminal case has been opened in the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office for charges of murder and crimes against humanity



https://t.me/drchristianenorthrup/4080

This just in.


From Michelle Ford


I have a HUGE DEVELOPMENT I get to report.
The Sonoma County Sheriff has officially opened a criminal investigation into the charges of MURDER and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY regarding the Covid injections after I petitioned them to stand up for the PEOPLE and enforce the law.
We have a case number!!!!


So similar to the UK we can now place ads in papers in local Nextdoor listings - essentially EVERYWHERE and ask anyone who has experienced adverse effects to the injections that they can now report it as evidence OF A CRIME.


I need help creating an action team ASAP to help get this information OUT TO THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA in short order
I think we need to notify all our connections and truther groups across the state
I’m thinking Childrens Defense Fund, ICAN, who else?!?
THIS IS HUGE.


We need to be very specific about what people are contacting the Sheriff’s office about - for
Specifically ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS or DEATHS OR FOR FAMILY OR FRIENDS THAT HAVE BEEN ADVERSELY EFFECTED


KINDA LIKE THAT AD IN UK PAPERS!!!


Omg. This is big, big.


The case # is 220125009


Do not contact them for any other reason than to report adverse effects - as I suspect their office will soon to be INUNDATED.


Sonoma County Sheriff’s office.


Marcia and Andy! Let’s connect!!!
This is a direct action that will implicate ANYONE PUSHING THE INJECTIONS


I HAVE PUT BOTH THE SONOMA COUNTY AND MARIN COUNTY HEALTH BOARDS ON NOTICE. And sent the directors the criminal case number.


Please get this out to any CA groups who can help us get the word out!!


If the Sheriff’s find enough compelling evidence , I demanded that they SEIZE ALL THE VIALS AS EVIDENCE. A chain of custody seizure from every hospital, doctors office or pop up clinic. The proof is in the vials. Anywhere issuing the ‘injection’. IMMEDIATELY.


This is helpful to have a case number because we as individuals can now call up our doctors offices or anywhere and let them know they may be held personally liable for conducting crimes against humanity to the FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW by issuing or even RECOMMENDING these injections TO ANYONE MOVING FORWARD!!

This is huge, huge!! Bigly huge.


Congratulations. Now let’s get to work!!
Share this everywhere.





More information:

https://jdfor2024.com/2022/02/update...accine-injury/

UPDATED February 7, 2022:

**Note: This news story is still unfolding.

The case # 220125009, has been verified
.
However, please be aware that Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office stated that they are not conducting an investigation into vaccine side effects or mandates and the case number is informational only to document a number of emails submitted on this topic.


Keep checking back for updates and please let us know if you have more information. Thanks.

---

California: Criminal investigation opened in Sonoma on vaccine injury


February 6, 2022 | by Steve Kirsch |

“I just got this today and haven’t had a chance to find out if this will go anywhere, but it is an interesting development that if successful can be repeated everywhere in the US.
This is breaking news. I will have more on this later, but wanted to get this out now.

This post is in two parts: a message from Michelle Ford and then a supplementary statement from an unknown source which may not be credible, but certainly worthy of discussion.

What is odd to me is that I’m just hearing this now (Feb 6), yet the case was opened on January 25, 2022 which was almost 2 weeks ago.

I am (currently) skeptical that this will go anywhere

For someone to be convicted of a crime, there must be criminal intent. The people who are giving the vaccine and mandating its use have been brainwashed into believing the vaccine is safe and effective. Same is true of judges who happily get their booster shots. There is a provision in the law about “reasonable minds can differ” which means in this case that if a lot of people think the vaccines are perfectly safe and effective, anyone giving them can’t be convicted of a crime. When you have judges who willingly took the vaccine, it’s going to be a tough case to prosecute.

So take everything below with a huge grain of salt and consider this “news” as for discussion purposes only at this point.
Note that the case number is legitimate and a friend of mine validated it with the Sheriff’s department in Sonoma.
With that intro, here’s the scoop.

https://i0.wp.com/cdn.substack.com/i...00%2C750&ssl=1
A message from Michelle Ford

Michelle Ford, is a nurse and founder of VIAL – Vaccine Injury Awareness League sent out the following message:
I have a HUGE DEVELOPMENT I get to report.

The Sonoma County Sheriff has officially opened a criminal investigation into the charges of MURDER and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY regarding the Covid injections after I petitioned them to stand up for the PEOPLE and enforce the law.

We have a case number!!!!

So similar to the UK we can now place ads in papers in local Nextdoor listings – essentially EVERYWHERE and ask anyone who has experienced adverse effects to the injections that they can now report it as evidence OF A CRIME.

I need help creating an action team ASAP to help get this information OUT TO THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA in short order I think we need to notify all our connections and truther groups across the state I’m thinking Childrens Defense Fund, ICAN, who else?!?

THIS IS HUGE.

We need to be very specific about what people are contacting the Sheriff’s office about – for Specifically ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS or DEATHS OR FOR FAMILY OR FRIENDS THAT HAVE BEEN ADVERSELY EFFECTED
KINDA LIKE THAT AD IN UK PAPERS!!!

Omg. This is big, big.

The case # is 220125009 (i.e., the 9th case opened on Jan 25)

Do not contact them for any other reason than to report adverse effects – as I suspect their office will soon to be INUNDATED.

Sonoma County Sheriff’s office.

Munchausen by proxy is a felony. The victims are minors and seniors. The perps are 'caregivers'.

Adults are not under the control of caregivers and hence MUNCHAUSEN'S is not a felony when an adult is the victim.

Dachsie comment:

I wrote the author to ask why "the government" is attempting the same deception it pulled with Comirnaty. SpkeVax is also a product that is not now available in the USA. We the people do not know all we need to know about these FDA machinations.

(See original site for full hyperlinks in article.)

______________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...c-f0221a80e575


02/08/22
•

COVID › Views

Please Don’t Call This ‘Science’: How FDA, CDC Justified Approval of Moderna’s Spikevax

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval last week of Moderna’s Spikevax COVID vaccine — backed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — made a mockery of science and the regulatory process.

By
Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D.


https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) did it again.

The FDA last week granted its seal of approval for a ghost vaccine that is unavailable in the United States — and it did so using a preordained process that made a mockery of “science” and of “regulation.”

Days later, the CDC backed the FDA’s decision, using similarly flawed data and reasoning.

The approval of Moderna’s Spikevax COVID-19 vaccine was an even greater travesty than the FDA’s approval last August of Pfizer’s Comirnaty shot.

That’s because Moderna has been even more secretive than Pfizer about its trial data, and because Moderna’s shot is linked to an even higher rate of heart disease than Pfizer’s.

The FDA’s approval of the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine led people to believe they would get a fully licensed, FDA-approved vaccine — when in fact they were still getting the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine distributed under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

People can ask for the Comirnaty vaccine as often as they like — but it is not being distributed in the U.S. The Comirnaty vaccine is supposed to be the same formulation as the old Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, but the vials labeled “Comirnaty” are in a legal class of their own.

BUY TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s New Book — 'The Real Anthony Fauci'

Why this Kabuki theater?

Because any adult who is harmed or killed as a side effect of an “FDA-approved” vaccine can sue the manufacturer. But if you are harmed in exactly the same way by an EUA vaccine, you are out of luck — the manufacturer and everyone in the chain of delivery has full immunity from lawsuits. The law depends on the label.

Now Moderna has the same legal advantage as Pfizer. Its “Spikevax” is the same formula as the old Moderna vaccine, but only if you are dosed with a vial bearing the “Spikevax” label can you sue for bodily harm. So, of course, the Moderna vaccine continues to be distributed, but Spikevax is not available in the U.S.

The approval of Spikevax is not just a legal sham. It’s also a scientific sham. FDA approval is supposed to include long-term safety testing, but there is no long-term data available for a product that has been in existence less than a year.

The FDA hearings on the licensing of Spikevax were one-sided and dominated by self-congratulatory rhetoric. They also raised more questions than answers.

Questions for the FDA

Besides offering publicity to the manufacturer and sowing confusion in the public mind, why would the manufacturers want FDA approval for a vaccine that is not available in the U.S.?
Neither Pfizer nor Moderna explicitly specified the content of their placebos, but a published review claims they were simple saline. If this is the case, why is the rate of medical problems following injection with a “placebo” so much higher with Moderna’s placebo compared to Pfizer’s placebo?

For example, 18 people out of 15,000 in the Moderna placebo group died before the start of the trial (2 weeks from the second vaccination), while only 4 people out of 22,000 who received Pfizer’s placebo dose died in a comparable period. There were 31 “severe adverse events” in the placebo group of the Moderna trial, and zero in the (larger) Pfizer placebo group. What was in that “placebo” that killed 18 people and sent 31 to the hospital?

The FDA relies on the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to help assess the safety of vaccines before approval. There was an animated debate at the VRBPAC meeting for the Pfizer vaccine. Why was VRBPAC not invited to convene for the Moderna vaccine? The answer is given in this letter of approval from the FDA to Moderna (January 31, 2022):

“We did not refer your application to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee because our review of information submitted in your BLA [Biologics License Application], including the clinical study design and trial results, did not raise concerns or controversial issues that would have benefited from an advisory committee discussion.”

The FDA plainly states that it limited the scope of its analysis to the trial data alone. Why isn’t the FDA interested in the enormous amount of data that has become available in the last year?

Safety: Did FDA cook the books?

Deaths and disabilities associated with the mRNA “vaccines” have occurred with shocking frequency, 90 times as many as the worst vaccine in the past. There have been more than 1 million COVID vaccine reactions reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), compared to 11,000 for the worst vaccine in 2020 (Shingrix).

There were more than twice as many deaths related to the COVID vaccines this year as the sum total of all vaccine deaths in the 30-year history of VAERS.

To rig the approval process in favor of such a product, the FDA needed to rewrite the rule book. The agency did this with a new statistical criterion, masking murder with mathematics. I am grateful to Matthew Crawford for having decoded the algebra and sounded the alarm.

The safety criterion chosen by the FDA is an obscure computation called PRR, which stands for Proportional Reporting Ratio. As the name implies, it is based on RATIOS of different event types and is utterly blind to the ABSOLUTE RATE of such events.

PRR measures the distribution of different kinds of adverse events, e.g. blood clots, heart attacks and deaths. If those ratios are severely out of line with the great variety of vaccine reactions in the past, PRR would detect that.

For example, if the new vaccines caused an extraordinary risk of myocarditis, but everything else was low, then PRR would flag that. But if myocarditis was just one risk among many that have been reported from past vaccines, then PRR would not pick that up.

The real scandal is that PRR is blind to the absolute risk numbers. PRR is defined in such a way as to look for unusual PATTERNS of adverse events, but it is completely insensitive to unusual RATES of adverse events.

Of course, it is the rates and not the patterns that are of primary concern, and the PRR is designed NOT to reflect that.

Subscribe to The Defender - It’s Free!

Name*
Email*

For example, suppose we have two vaccines:

Vaccine A has 1 reported death per million vaccinations, 3 reported heart attacks per million, and 20 reported headaches per million.
Vaccine B has 1 reported death per hundred vaccinations, 3 reported heart attacks per hundred, and 20 reported headaches per hundred.

Vaccine A is quite safe, and vaccine B is extremely dangerous. And yet the formula for PRR will produce the same result for vaccine A and B!

Clearly, PRR is not an appropriate criterion for evaluating the safety of any particular vaccine. Did the FDA use PRR in order to cook the books?

In Moderna’s own trials, 1.3% of vaccine recipients had a reaction to the vaccine that was severe enough to require medical attention. The following possible side effects were listed in information given to doctors:

“Anaphylaxis and other severe allergic reactions, myocarditis, pericarditis, and syncope have been reported following administration of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine during mass vaccination outside of clinical trials.”

Off with his head! — the CDC’s ACIP hearings

In Alice’s Wonderland, the Red Queen’s justice began with the execution, then there was a verdict — and finally a trial.

The FDA hearing was followed by a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which reports to the CDC.

The committee on Feb. 4 voted to recommend the Moderna Spikevax. Only after that action step had been secured did the committee hear testimony from the Public Health Agency of Canada that Moderna’s vaccine was associated with a myocarditis risk five times higher than Pfizer’s.

Questions for the CDC

All-cause mortality was equal in both placebo and vaccine groups (16 deaths in each). In the midst of a pandemic, Moderna’s vaccine demonstrated no survival benefit. This should have been enough to end any further consideration of approval.
We have detailed data on myocarditis from decades of past history. One-fourth of myocarditis patients are dead within 5 years, but the same study reports that if the myocarditis is caused by human immunodeficiency virus, then three-fourths die in the same 5 years.

We have no long-term data on vaccine-induced myocarditis, but we do have some 6-month data, which show 39% of cases still had their activity restricted by their doctors, 20% were still on heart medication, 32% still reported chest pain, 22% still had shortness of breath, 22% had palpitations and 25% still reported fatigue. Thirteen vaccine recipients died. (All these numbers were presented at the ACIP hearing on Feb. 4.)

Why should we have confidence that the course of vaccine-induced myocarditis will be much less severe than other forms of the disease?

The Moderna trial, like the Pfizer trial, was limited to healthy people, mostly young, with no pre-existing problems. Pregnant women were explicitly excluded. Why is the vaccine being approved as safe for everyone, including diabetics and immune-compromised, elderly and pregnant women?
When mRNA vaccines were approved on an emergency basis, the FDA promised to track all safety concerns with a new cell phone app called V-Safe. Why are the results of V-Safe being withheld from the public?
The FDA was considering approval of Moderna’s vaccine in January 2022. There was a full year’s experience with side effects reported from nearly 200 million doses of the Moderna vaccine in the U.S. alone. But the FDA limited its consideration to the 15,000 subjects who were in the Moderna trial, ending March 26, 2021. Why was this huge trove of data on vaccine safety not reviewed by the FDA?
Yes, we understand that the vaccine doesn’t become fully effective until 2 weeks after the second shot. But is that a reason to exclude from consideration the damage that is inflicted by enhanced vulnerability to disease during those two weeks, or, for that matter, the four weeks between shots? These have been counted as diseases of the “unvaccinated,” but in fact, people in this stage of treatment are much more vulnerable than the truly unvaccinated.
France and Germany do not recommend Moderna’s vaccination for young people, presumably because the Moderna vaccine is associated with a higher rate of myocarditis than the Pfizer vaccine. How did our FDA come to a different conclusion?
Anaphylaxis following vaccination is an immediate, life-threatening and an undeniable consequence of the vaccine. The CDC claimed the rate of anaphylaxis is 6 per 1 million.

However, in March of 2021, an examination of anaphylaxis following mRNA vaccines revealed a much higher incidence of this adverse event. In fact, 9 of 38,971 Moderna vaccine recipients suffered documented anaphylaxis. This equates to 230 per million, or 38 times higher than the CDC estimate.

BUY TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s New Book — 'The Real Anthony Fauci'

Efficacy — but at what cost?

The proper measure of the efficacy of any medication is how it affects all aspects of a patient’s health. But in evaluating the Moderna vaccine, the FDA looked only at its effect on COVID.

There are early but disturbing indications that vaccination worldwide has had dramatic effects on other aspects of health, unrelated to COVID. Insurance company trade journals report that they are paying life insurance claims for adults 18-64 years of age at a rate 40% higher than during any normal year.

This number from OneAmerica (Indianapolis) has been echoed by other studies in Europe. A leaked spreadsheet from the Defense Medical Epidemiological Database showed that incidences of many medical problems in the U.S. military surged in this year of vaccination. For example, heart attacks were up 343%, cancers up 218%, among many other disorders.

Could it be that the vaccines have had a small benefit for COVID severity and disastrous impact on other aspects of human health?

We now have some real-world experience with the efficacy of vaccines. For example, we know the virus mutated to a more contagious, less lethal form. Omicron is now the dominant form of the virus in the U.S. and most other parts of the world today.

The Omicron mutations are concentrated in the spike protein — the only part of the virus to which the vaccinated population has immunity. This suggests the virus is mutating in response to the vaccine, and mutations are an important factor affecting efficacy in the long run

Nevertheless, the FDA considered efficacy data predominantly from the first five months of data (through March 26, 2021) in making its decision to fully license Spikevax, with an absolute cutoff in November, before Omicron became dominant.

More questions

Almost all subjects in the original Moderna trial who received placebo initially were subsequently given the vaccine. How will we ever know the long-term effects of the vaccine if we have no controls with which to compare?
Why do CDC studies of death rates based on vaccination status differ so markedly from the same question asked by independent groups in other countries?

Here, for example, is a report from Public Health Scotland stating that vaccination increases vulnerability to Omicron. Here is a similar report from England. This study shows countries with higher vaccination rates tend to have higher rates of COVID, and this one confirms the same result for U.S. states.

We are now in an era dominated by the Omicron variant, against which all the vaccines seem much less effective. But even “follow-up data” was analyzed only through March 26, 2021, nine months before Omicron took over. Why did the FDA base its decision on data only from older variants?
The secondary efficacy endpoint was the prevention of severe COVID-19. Now that it is accepted that there is little, if any, protective effect of mRNA vaccines from infection, the prevention of severe disease should be the primary focus of approval determination.

Moderna claims its vaccine efficacy is an astonishing 98.2% in preventing severe COVID-19 (Table 8). Pfizer’s was 96.7% (Table S6).

The reason for the calculated difference in efficacy between these two products was not from a lower incidence of severe disease in the vaccine arm of Moderna’s trial (it was lower in Pfizer’s trial). It was because the incidence of severe disease in Moderna’s placebo group was much higher than in Pfizer’s.

Severe COVID-19 in Pfizer’s placebo group occurred in 30 participants out of 23,0379. In Moderna’s, severe disease occurred in 106 participants out of 14,164 that received a placebo. Why was the incidence of severe COVID-19 nearly six times higher in Moderna’s placebo group than Pfizer’s?

Postscript: Failure was never an option

In America, why are clinical trials for new drugs run by the same companies that own the drugs, and will profit from them if the trial is successful?

It’s a glaring conflict of interest, but necessary within a capitalist system. Since the trials cost, typically, hundreds of millions of dollars, only the company that will profit from the drug is motivated to invest such huge sums in testing.

In the case of the COVID vaccines, however, the development and the trials were both publicly funded. There was no excuse for contracting the same organization both to develop and test their own product.

Moderna’s development cost was funded through Operation Warp Speed in the U.S. and Pfizer through the German government. Now, the companies are reaping windfall profits, though they risked no money of their own.

This leaves us wondering, did our government ever want a fair and unbiased evaluation of the COVID vaccines? Or — after a full year of telling the public that vaccines were the only path out of the COVID crisis — did NIH feel they could not risk the possibility that the trials might fail?

There were no animal tests. There was no time to experimentally optimize dosage and delivery. They had to guess right the first time.

Maybe they thought this is what the exigency of a pandemic required — but please don’t call it “science.”

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.



Suggest a Correction
Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D.'s avatar

Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D.

Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D., has a background in theoretical physics. Since the 1990s, he is best known for his contributions to the biology of aging, including many articles and two books.

So much for science based decisions.
CDC just adopts "whatever we think we can get away with" policy.

https://vaticancatholic.com/cdc-dire...e-1-min-video/

https://vaticancatholic.com/images/c...-min-video.jpg


"CDC Director" admits they are making up rules based on how much citizens can tolerate - 1 min video

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...18_320x180.jpg



https://www.bitchute.com/video/HCgFO...andomize=false


The Collapse of their Narrative is IMMINENT, and They Know it

14:01 video runtime

Watch

First published at 06:04 UTC on February 9th, 2022.

The Red Elephants - Vincent James

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Zore6noOVY

New CDC Study Shows Infection and Hospitalization Gap Narrowing Between Unvaccinated and Vaccinated

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Zore6noOVY

21:17 video runtime

Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
745K subscribers


Resources:

�� Sekur (promo code: Roman)

https://ept.ms/3yW0Wul

�� Children:

https://ept.ms/3LnjAC4

https://ept.ms/3oBV4Uh

�� CDC Report

https://ept.ms/34qvxGE

https://ept.ms/3srgkwX

�� Michigan:

https://ept.ms/3gBdAYt

�� University Puts Trigger-Warning On George Orwell's '1984'

https://ept.ms/3GB9sSW

https://ept.ms/3LkKlHj

�� Feminist 1984:

https://ept.ms/3susV2o

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...JOQu.Mk1qg--~D

Protect Our Children: Don't Break Our Hearts

https://rumble.com/vuid4y-protect-ou...3-770bdba7a912

embedded video
3:44 video runtime

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3

On February 15, the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) is scheduled to meet to deliberate granting Emergency Use Authorization to Pfizer’s BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for babies aged six-months and children up to five years old despite the lack of safety and efficacy to support its use.

If the committee grants the EUA to Pfizer for this age group, nearly 20 million American infants and preschool-aged children could be at risk of vaccine injury based on the indicators we’re seeing in the published medical literature.

Please listen to the critical message in this video from Mary Holland, President and General Counsel of Children’s Health Defense, who explains why we need to speak up now to protect our children.

There is no COVID emergency for children under five years old. Children have a 99.995% recovery rate from COVID and healthy children are not dying from COVID. Not only is this injection medically unnecessary for this younger age group, but there are clear signals coming from U.S. government sources that the risk to human health is real, and that adverse events to this vaccine are not rare.

There’s enough evidence of harm to exercise caution when it comes to these vaccines and we need your help to sound the alarm!



Take Action: Four Ways to Get Involved

We have four different areas that you can participate in to express your opposition to the FDA in potentially granting Emergency Use Authorization to Pfizer’s vaccine for this younger age group. This also bolsters efforts to educate friends, family and people in your community that will extend beyond next Tuesday’s meeting, no matter the outcome.

① Letter Writing Campaign: Don’t Break our Hearts, Protect our Health!

We're encouraging everyone to send a letter of opposition, mailed in red envelopes (to signify urgency and the risk of heart health concerns of babies and young children), to the public health officials and VRBPAC members involved in this decision making process.

We want their desks covered in a sea of red envelopes! You can use our letter that we’re sending to the members of the VRBPAC committee from our advocacy portal or you can write your own. Phone calls and emails are important as well. The more contact we can make before next Tuesday, February 15, the better. Have your kids send notes as well — let them hear directly from those who potentially would be impacted by their decision. Let’s keep the pressure on!

To urge each VRBPAC member plus other public health officials involved in the process to deny EUA to Pfizer’s vaccine for infants and young children, join CHD in the Red Envelope Campaign.

Share your letters! To encourage people to join in, post pictures of your red envelopes to social media before you mail them with #DontBreakOurHearts and #SeeingRed and let's get these hashtags trending!
TELL THE FDA VOTE NO ON EUA FOR BABIES AND CHILDREN UNDER 5!

② Get Set, Get Ready…Tweet!

Take part in our Twitter storm. Follow the CHD Twitter account and re-tweet our tweets that target the FDA, public health officials and VRBPAC members to convince them to vote no at the February 15th meeting. Let’s let them know we are watching and be sure to use the hashtags #DontBreakOurHearts and #SeeingRed.

③ Convoy for Kids

You can Keep on Truckin’ in your own neighborhood. Join friends and neighbors to organize your own convoy. Decorate your cars with red signs and messages, including the hashtags #DontBreakMyHeart #SeeingRed, and drive to the FDA, Pfizer Headquarters, Washington, DC, your state capital, legislative offices, or your Board of Health meetings. Wear red and wave red signs. Deliver handmade “Don’t Break My Heart” Valentine messages and hand out CHD’s Second Opinion educational flyers.

Many parents are not aware of these risks as they are bombarded daily with a different “safe and effective” narrative from mainstream media and the captured agencies. Let’s break through this propaganda with our new educational flyer “Children and the COVID Vaccine: A Second Opinion” that contains the facts about real indicators of risk and harm that are occurring. Informed consent is the basis of all healthcare decisions, and if the general public is not aware of these risks, they’re not making truly informed decisions.




Use this cited and referenced flyer, available in both color and black & white, to educate your state legislators, especially in states fighting bills for mandatory COVID vaccines for school and to educate others within your community, at Board of Education meetings, pediatrician’s offices, pharmacies and more. Create “Defender Days” within your community and go out and do this in teams! Be our army of truth and help get this information out there.

④ Get Social: Share! Share! Share!

Over the next few days, you’ll see a series of social media graphics as well as this video from Mary Holland. Share any content we put out there to combat the censorship and help educate others.

Help us sound the alarm. The science is clear. If the FDA grants EUA status for this vaccine targeting this age group, our very youngest children and babies will be at risk. Let’s do everything we can to stop that from happening.

Be a defender of truth, freedom and health!

Thank you,

The Children’s Health Defense Team

You Make It Possible

Children's Health Defense depends on generous donations from our community. Large or small, every donation gets us closer to achieving our goals.

Listen to what RFK, Jr. has to say.

Become a Member | Donate Now
Facebook Twitter Instagram Mewe Telgram Gab Parler

Children’s Health Defense | ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Our mission is to end the childhood health epidemics by working aggressively to eliminate harmful exposures, hold those responsible accountable, and establish safeguards so this never happens again.


Children’s Health Defense

1227 North Peachtree Pkwy, Suite 202
Peachtree City, Georgia 30269

https://frankspeech.com/video/biden-...octors-asylums

Stew peters interviews Dr. Meryl Nass.

first 18 minutes and 42 seconds of this

58:02 video runtime

Dr. Nass had her M.D. license to practice medicine revoked in the state of Maine. They say her prescribing of ivermectin to her patients was violation of their state law. Horrible travesty!

It was interesting that at about15:59 on this video track, Dr. Nass said Rendesivir is now "fully licensed for use for patients admitted to the hospital. I do not know if this is only for the state of Maine or for the entire nation. The FDA is a federal agency and I think the FDA has to make the decision whether a drug product is fullly licensed, and up until this time Rendesivir has always been EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) classification by the FDA.

Toward the end of her interview she advised that patients have to fight too just as she has had to fight to get her lM.D. license restored. She said we should stand up for our right with any medical officials we must deal with to tell them what my doctor and I agrree upon what is right in my case has always been the standard and you expect to hold on to that right.

What is so bad is that your attending doctor while you are an in- patient is not longer your doctor that treats you first as an outpatient and decides that you need treatment in a hospital. Now the admitting doctor is a hospital-assigned "hospitalist" doctor, and it is increasingly appearing that the "hopitalist doctois deciding the medical treatments you may receive, not your regular doctor that knows your full case.
This is why people are afraid to go into the hospital for any procedure, regardless of whether a positive "PCR" test is involved. The hospitals take full control of you as a patient and, as Stew Peters explains often on his recent shows, hospitals can get as much compensation from various government programs as $100 thousand dollars if the patient dies in the hospital.

Stew Peters has successfully used his power as a very popular reporter to obtain lawyers and doctors to transfer certain patients transferred to the care of another doctor and treated at home. Stew Peters has saved many lives as have several good doctors and attorneys.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...CSvcQcZjLg--~D

Heather McDonald Passes Out after Mocking God

After bragging about getting the jab, and then mocking God, Heather McDonald fainted on stage and cracked her skull.

How many will be injured and / perish? The jab is poison and causes blood clots, strokes and and thrombosis blood ruptures in the skull.

Please share.

God bless,

Nathan Leal

Dachsie comment:

More Pfizer criminal racketeering behavior.

The devil is in the details. An independent "auditing" gives a close look at the Pfizer financial reports and found some very sneaky wording.

Again, Roman of Epoch Times does very high quality journalism.

Criminal Covid Cabal is rushing to kill babies and they seem to be following some time deadlines we the people are not privy to.
They need to hurry up and kill the most number of people before their whole empire comes tumbling down.

_______________________

Pfizer Quietly Adds Warning That 'Unfavorable Pre-Clinical, Clinical Or Safety Data' May Impact Biz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5OEDC4jnQA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5OEDC4jnQA


16:29 is full video runtime, but

This posting relates only to the first half of the video, up to 8:40 on the track.

Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov

Resources:

�� Pfizer:

https://ept.ms/3rEi6f3

�� Q4 Report:

https://ept.ms/3rGlJRQ

�� Q3 Report:

https://ept.ms/3B8HlsU

�� Babies:

https://ept.ms/3GJcxjI

https://ept.ms/3JfYt30

Regarding my posting # 2695

regarding

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...gue#post986693




Dachsie
Dachsie is online now
Iridium
Dachsie's Avatar

Join Date
Mar 2014
Posts
5,449
Thanks
1,163
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,618 Posts

Re: Coronavirus



https://www.bitchute.com/video/GjEgSnACO93V/


From The Hague. International Trials Day One -Crimes Against Humanity

18:11 video runtime

_______________

Jane Ruby on the Stew Peters show of yesterday said these videos we have of Rinehard Fuellmich and his group do their impressive presentations at "The Hague" is not the real deal. It is a "simulation" and sort of a "dry run" or "rehearsal" should their effort to get their case tried at The Hague. I have not looked into this but that was certainly news to me. I thought it was the real deal.

https://frankspeech.com/video/california-commies-ropes

go 46:46 on this video to hear Dr. Jane Ruby say it was a "simulation."

Comment from a local domestic threat actor:

1984, here we are !!!!!

"online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors. "
__________________________



https://jamesfetzer.org/2022/02/revolver-investigates-disturbing-link-between-dhs-and-the-domestic-war-on-maga/

https://jamesfetzer.org/wp-content/u...--1024x557.jpg

Revolver Investigates Disturbing Link Between DHS and The Domestic War On MAGA

February 10, 2022 James Fetzerblog

REVOLVER

(https://www.revolver.news/2022/02/bi...stry-of-truth/ )

excerpt

"In a move that is Orwellian even by the current year’s dystopian standards, Biden’s Department of Homeland Security on Monday issued a heightened terrorist threat assessment centered around “online misinformation:”

The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors. [DHS]

That’s right, folks, the Ministry of Truth is officially here, under the auspices of the government’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency:

CISA’s Mis-, Dis-, and Malinformation (MDM) team is charged with building national resilience to mis-, dis-, and malinformation and foreign influence activities. Through these efforts, CISA helps the American people understand the scope and scale of MDM activities targeting elections and critical infrastructure, and enables them to take actions to mitigate associated risks. The MDM team was formerly known as the Countering Foreign Influence Task Force (CFITF). [CISA]

While the official announcement concedes that there has been no underlying change in threat conditions over the past year (leaving aside the threat the Regime poses to the American people), it nonetheless emphasizes the urgent danger of “false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions.” In the land of freedom, democracy, and drag queen supremacy, how fortunate to have a US government national security bureaucracy to warn against the dire national security threat of… Americans who more and more do not trust their government.

The Department of Homeland Security threat assessment goes on to highlight specific concerns related to so-called “misinformation” on Covid-19 and election integrity issues. But of course!

Key factors contributing to the current heightened threat environment include:

The proliferation of false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions:
For example, there is widespread online proliferation of false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19. Grievances associated with these themes inspired violent extremist attacks during 2021.
Malign foreign powers have and continue to amplify these false or misleading narratives in efforts to damage the United States.

[DHS]

Even more disturbingly, the DHS announcement cites as a potential national security threat the lifting of Covid restrictions such as lockdowns. After all, when the cattle are allowed outside of their homes without restriction, there’s a greater likelihood of a terrorist attack!

As COVID-19 restrictions continue to decrease nationwide, increased access to commercial and government facilities and the rising number of mass gatherings could provide increased opportunities for individuals looking to commit acts of violence to do so, often with little or no warning.

It is worth processing this remarkable statement. The completely unnecessary Covid-lockdown restrictions have become normalized to the point that the Department of Homeland Security considers the removal of such restrictions as a national security threat. This is a development almost too dark for satire. Of course, the Covid restrictions that remain in place, such as vaccine mandates, also pose a national security threat — because Americans might dare to object to such measures:

Meanwhile, COVID-19 mitigation measures—particularly COVID-19 vaccine and mask mandates—have been used by domestic violent extremists to justify violence since 2020 and could continue to inspire these extremists to target government, healthcare, and academic institutions that they associate with those measures.

Lifting Covid restrictions is a security threat, keeping restrictions in place is a security threat — everything is a security threat so long as the American people dare to question their government on matters related to Covid, election integrity, or anything else for that matter. So long as free speech hasn’t been entirely crushed online, and so long as free assembly hasn’t been entirely suppressed in the outside world, the American people pose a de facto terrorist threat, at least as far as the Department of Homeland Security is concerned. " SNIP

Dachsie comment:

They're losing the narrative. Notice how all of them are slyly telling you exactly the opposite of what they were telling you a week ago. That entity named Dr. Leanna Wen is a case in point. What a joke!

There is a big chess game going on and iit's clear and all sides know who the loser is long before the game is actually over. The losing side is just doing everything they can think of to lessen the impact of their fall. It is OK to enjoy watching them fall because they have done such unmitigated evil.

I think there is proof now in documents that have been made available that the Fauci gang followed the DMED data from the beginning and knew the horrible deaths and permanent severe injury being done to our soldiers by the vaccine.

Another big reveal that will start happening very soon is when Pfizer will release the first large tranche of Trial data of the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine, the entire quantity of which must be released to the public within an eight moth period beginning in March 2022. That information will also damn all the liars in our government and BigPharma companies and should open them up to massive class action law suits. The thing is THEY know this big bad news right now and Pfizer is trying every last ditch effort to not have to release the court-ordered data release.

Like Dr. Stan used to say -- What Did They Know and When Did They Know It ?

What all of this clearly means is that Dr. Fauci and gang knew the lethality of the vaccines all along and yet kept lying and lying to the public and kept pushing the vaccine and boosters anyway. That is nothing other than

CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY !

_________________________________

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...iF_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/profile/mbVsqsUlNPlP/

They Just Admitted ALL OF IT and are Trying to Bail from a Sinking Ship

15:33 video runtime

First published at 05:13 UTC on February 11th, 2022.


channel image

The Red Elephants - Vincent James

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...-into-volcano/


FDA ready to OK the vaxx for babies; why not just throw the babies off a cliff into a volcano?

by Jon Rappoport

And the answer to that question is obvious. Throwing babies into a volcano makes no money for Pfizer.

On Feb. 15, the FDA will decide whether to approve the Pfizer COVID shot for children between the ages of six months and four years. The press and gov’t. spokespeople predict it’s a GO.

This is murder.

The FDA approval committee members will come in several categories: those who’ve been paid off; those who’ve been threatened; straight-out cold Nazi bureaucrats; those who’ve been blackmailed; and those who WANT TO murder babies.

You can’t get around this. Given the mainstream view of COVID, these FDA/CDC people KNOW the risk of the disease to babies is non-existent, and risks of the vaccine are absolutely devastating.

---Over a million vaccine injuries have already been reported to the US federal database; and this number represents vast UNDER-REPORTING.

Nevertheless, the FDA deciders are ready to say, unless exposed for what they are: inject the babies; kill the babies.

If you still think the government COVID response had anything to do with science or public health or human concern, if you’re still making excuses for Fauci and the whole rogue crew of predators and maniacs at the FDA and CDC, you’re an automatic robot; you just don’t know it.

Get a load of this. CNBC: “Pfizer amended its clinical trial in December to evaluate a third dose after two shots did not induce an adequate immune response in children 2- to 4-years-old. Pfizer and BioNTech said they will submit data on the third dose to the FDA in the coming months.”

I see. The vaccine didn’t work after 2 shots, but it’ll be approved anyway in few days, and Pfizer will let us know IN A FEW MONTHS how the third shot worked.

And that’s science. That’s the bullshit the educated class believes in. That’s the bullshit the deaf, dumb, and blind believe in.

And THE TRUCKERS are the terrorists. Sure. The government is righteous and just. Of course.

People “who spread misinformation about COVID” are terrorists. The government is righteous and just.

Love the government. Hate the terrorists.

Memo to parents: if you’ve been crazy enough to take the shots yourselves, are you ready to deliver your innocent babies into the hands of doctors and nurses who’ll spin the roulette wheel of death and inject their bodies? Is that what you’re going to do?

If so, why? Do you think it’ll make a nice talking point when you get together with friends? Do you think it’s a potent virtue signal? Do you think it proves you’re a loyal subject of the king?

Perhaps you can show up at a local school board meeting, with your infant in your arms; and you can look at the doughy morbid faces of the low-rent grifters sitting behind their long table, and you can say, “Look! I just had my baby shot with the vaccine! It’s wonderful!” And they’ll nod approvingly.

And some piece of dreck who picks up a paycheck as a city public health official will speak at the meeting. He might say vaccinated babies should wear masks. Ask him and find out. Look at his eyes. His brother-in-law, who knows the mayor, rescued him from a career as a gravedigger.

I want to know what the Pope thinks. He’s already stated taking the vaccine is a loving gift to God. What about the babies? Does Popius Maximus Jesuiticus believe The Lord wants infants injected? Let’s get this Pontiff on the record.

Would Mary, in her hut, have told the local doc to inject baby Jesus? Perhaps her husband Joseph, a minor character in the story up to that point, would have brandished a Glock and motioned the sawbones to the door.

Speaking of guns, I think four or five Secret Service agents, their weapons drawn, should usher Nurse Jill to the White House residence, where she will speak candidly and starkly to old Joe---spending as much time as necessary informing him about what the FDA is ready to do, until he UNDERSTANDS.

Then, the agents will force Joe in front of a camera---going live on major channels---where he will unambiguously declare his position on injecting babies.

If he supports the program, he will take full responsibility for the consequences.

After all, the FDA is an agency in the Executive Branch, under the President.

The buck stops with him. It should stop under harsh television spotlights, where no tap-dancing is permitted.

Of course, you parents will have the last word. Unless the guns of the State are pointed at you. If that comes to pass, are you ready to die fighting for your children?

Or will you sacrifice them on the altar of your own passivity and cowardice?

I STRONGLY suggest you make your position clear now.

Publically.

Leave no doubt.

Before it’s too late.

WE NEED AN UPROAR.

Are you standing up? Or are you grinning and virtue signaling---down on your knees?

~~~

(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)

(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)

___________

Here is one of several great comments.

[SIZE=3]Tom Bernard says:
February 11, 2022 at 9:49 am

Yes, of course, parents will willingly have their babies injected… Which is one reason the FDA and CDC have no problem with this… If parents don’t give a shit about their children enough to do ten minutes of research… If they aren’t willing to actually protect them from OBVIOUS MURDERERS… Then why the fuck should the FDA and CDC, Bill Gates, and Fauci give a shit? After all, isn’t it their belief that most people are useless parasites, bleeding the system rather than making a contribution to it? …or isn’t that at least a convenient, and almost convincing argument to murder people? The Bible lays out the basics of human behavior, and in The Old Testament parents willingly sacrificed their children in a fire ritual… because they believed it would keep THEM, (the parents) safe… and my guess is it’s the same story now… If the parents are going to be truly protected from covid, then EVERYONE has to get the injection… even if the vaccine doesn’t work, or their children suffer and die… So, again, of course parents are going to, (enthusiastically, with fear and trembling of covid,) line up their children… and may God have mercy on their ignorant,faithless,useless,selfish souls.
Reply
[/SIZE

__________________

Dachsie comment:

The more I understand about how the FDA operates, the more I think "regulatory capture" is too nice a reference for this organized criminal syndicate.

It would be better for a millstone be tied around their necks and they be dropped into the deep blue sea.

With no data whatsoever, the FDA just, rather secretly, fully licensed Remdesivir (say Rem death is near). The data I have heard about this poison is that it gives about 40 percent of its recipients fatal renal failure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dachsie

Dachsie comment:

They're losing the narrative. Notice how all of them are slyly telling you exactly the opposite of what they were telling you a week ago. That entity named Dr. Leanna Wen is a case in point. What a joke!

There is a big chess game going on and iit's clear and all sides know who the loser is long before the game is actually over. The losing side is just doing everything they can think of to lessen the impact of their fall. It is OK to enjoy watching them fall because they have done such unmitigated evil.

I think there is proof now in documents that have been made available that the Fauci gang followed the DMED data from the beginning and knew the horrible deaths and permanent severe injury being done to our soldiers by the vaccine.

Another big reveal that will start happening very soon is when Pfizer will release the first large tranche of Trial data of the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine, the entire quantity of which must be released to the public within an eight moth period beginning in March 2022. That information will also damn all the liars in our government and BigPharma companies and should open them up to massive class action law suits. The thing is THEY know this big bad news right now and Pfizer is trying every last ditch effort to not have to release the court-ordered data release.

Like Dr. Stan used to say -- What Did They Know and When Did They Know It ?

What all of this clearly means is that Dr. Fauci and gang knew the lethality of the vaccines all along and yet kept lying and lying to the public and kept pushing the vaccine and boosters anyway. That is nothing other than

CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY !

_________________________________

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...iF_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/profile/mbVsqsUlNPlP/

They Just Admitted ALL OF IT and are Trying to Ba il from a Sinking Ship

15:33 video runtime

First published at 05:13 UTC on February 11th, 2022.


channel image

The Red Elephants - Vincent James

---

"That entity named Dr. Leanna Wen is a case in point. What a joke!"

I grew up in a time when communists, particularly Communist China were recognized as our mortal enemies. Now it is completely opposite with .gov welcoming them with open arms.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...4-4fb3c3f96f32


02/11/22
•

COVID › Views
Breaking: FDA Postpones Meeting on COVID Shots for Kids Under 5 After Pfizer Says Not Enough Data. But Don’t Let Up!

Citing insufficient data, Pfizer today said it will delay applying for Emergency Use Authorization of its COVID vaccine for infants and children 6 months to 4 years old.

Pfizer today said it will delay applying for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of its COVID vaccine for infants and children 6 months to 4 years old stating there’s not enough data on the efficiency of a third dose.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in response postponed a meeting that had been scheduled for Feb. 15 to review Pfizer’s application for the pediatric vaccine.

Two separate clinical trials of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID vaccine for the younger age group are in progress: one involving children between the ages of 6 months to 2 years old, the other involving children between ages 2 and 4.

CNBC last month reported two shots did not induce an adequate immune response in children 2 to 4 years old in Pfizer’s clinical trials, leading Dr. Anthony Fauci to predict children in that age group would need a three-dose regimen of the vaccine.

In what the New York Times described as a “highly unusual move,” the FDA urged Pfizer to apply for EUA of the vaccine, even though two doses failed to produce the hoped-for immune response among children 2 to 4 years old and the vaccine maker did not yet have data on the efficacy of a third shot.

Pfizer had planned to submit its application to the FDA next week, then provide additional data in the coming weeks on a third dose, NBC reported.

The FDA did not say when the Feb. 15 meeting would be rescheduled, and Pfizer did not indicate when it would submit the application.

URGENT! TAKE ACTION: Tell the FDA Don't Approve Pfizer’s mRNA Shots for Infants and Children under 5

Keep up the pressure! Tell the FDA ‘Don’t Break Our Hearts’

Despite today’s news that Pfizer is delaying its application, Children’s Health Defense is asking everyone to send a message to the FDA asking the agency to Protect the Kids.

The National Institutes of Health on Feb. 4 urged the public to participate in National Wear Red Day as part of an American Heart Month initiative to spotlight heart disease as the number one killer of Americans.

That same day, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices overlooked thousands of reports of myocarditis, heart attacks and other cardiovascular events experienced by people who received COVID vaccines as the panel voted unanimously to recommend Moderna ‘Spikevax’ vaccine for people 18 and older.

These experimental COVID vaccines may pose more risk than benefit to the nearly 20 million American infants and preschool-aged children who will be eligible.

The shots don’t work

Pfizer’s clinical trial data showed that two doses failed to produce a “non-inferiority” immune response in 2- to 4 year-olds. According to partner BioNtech’s press release:

“Compared to the 16- to 25-year-old population in which high efficacy was demonstrated, non-inferiority was met for the 6- to 24-month-old population but not for the 2- to under 5-year-old population in this analysis …The decision to evaluate a third dose of 3 µg for children 6 months to under 5 years of age reflects the companies’ commitment to carefully select the right dose to maximize the risk-benefit profile. If the three-dose study is successful, Pfizer and BioNTech expect to submit data to regulators to support an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for children 6 months to under 5 years of age in the first half of 2022.”

In other words, Pfizer and BioNTech are evaluating a third dose because they have not yet found the right dose to maximize the risk-benefit profile for our youngest vaccine recipients.

And they won’t know if three doses will work until after the first two doses are approved. This is concerning. These are our babies.

Pfizer’s December 2021 press release noted the updates to its clinical trial were “informed by the effectiveness data for three doses of the vaccine for people 16 years and older, and the early laboratory data observed with Delta and other variants of concern, including Omicron, which suggest that people vaccinated with three doses of a COVID- 19 vaccine may have a higher degree of protection.”

However, breakthrough infections and hospitalizations have become commonplace among the vaccinated since that time. And we don’t know whether a third dose of this vaccine will increase the likelihood of adverse events.

What we do know is that there is no public health emergency for this age group. Children are at extremely low risk of serious outcomes from COVID.

Multiple studies attribute this to a stronger innate immune response in the upper respiratory tract that prevents viral replication early on. This may explain why children are also far less likely to contribute to disease transmission.

CDC data indicate deaths among children make up a fraction of a percentage of those who have died from COVID.

A study by Johns Hopkins showed a mortality rate of zero among 48,000 children without preexisting conditions and a large COVID study conducted in Germany found the case fatality rate among children is three out of a million, and zero deaths occurred in children under five.

But data about adverse events following Pfizer’s COVID vaccines continues to accumulate.

A Hong Kong study showed 1 out of 2,700 boys got myocarditis after receiving the Comirnaty vaccine. Among male adolescents, the incidence of myocarditis after the second dose was 37.32% per 100,000 people vaccinated.

A study from Kaiser found the same rate of myocarditis in 12- to 17-year-old American boys, 1 out of 2,700. This is alarming.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has recorded more than 1,000,000 adverse events following COVID vaccinations: 31,545 of those were in children 17 and under.

Of the more than 23,000 reported deaths, including U.S. and foreign reports, 62 were children under age 17. VAERS also lists 829 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in children following COVID shots.

With long-term health impacts still unknown and growing evidence of risks of myocarditis, neurological events, thrombosis and other serious side effects, the potential risks to our children likely outweigh any potential benefits.

We must act now!

Pfizer’s pediatric vaccine, if the FDA authorizes it for emergency use, will be available to more than 19 million children under the age of 5, many of whom already have robust natural immunity.

It also will be an important milestone in the pharmaceutical industry’s ultimate goal of getting COVID shots added to the CDC’s recommended childhood vaccine schedule, which means vaccine makers will have permanent immunity from liability for injuries and deaths caused by the vaccines.

If you’re seeing red, you’re not alone.

If the color red and the month of February are about love and heart health, then it’s time we reclaim those values to protect the hearts and health of those we love the most: our children.

What can you do?

Reach out to the regulatory authorities, local health departments, legislative offices and public officials and demand they join the “Don’t Break Our Heart. Protect our Health” campaign to stop the EUA of these experimental pediatric shots.

URGENT! TAKE ACTION: Tell the FDA Don't Approve Pfizer’s mRNA Shots for Infants and Children under 5

Here are five ways to remind regulators that red also means STOP:

1. Send a letter of opposition, mailed in red envelopes to the public health officials and VRBPAC members involved in this decision-making process. Cover their desks in a sea of red envelopes! Use this letter CHD sent to the members of the VRBPAC committee from our advocacy portal or write your own.

To encourage people to join in, post a picture of your red envelope to social media before you mail them with #DontBreakOurHearts and #SeeingRed and let’s get these hashtags trending! Red envelopes are available at many retailers including Staples, Office Depot, Walmart and Amazon.

Phone calls and emails also are important.

2. Email all the decision-makers directly from our Advocacy Portal. Fill out this form to email all the members of the VRBPAC committee and the other public officials listed on this page. Make sure to follow up with phone calls to each person asking if they’ve received your email. Phone numbers can be found at the bottom of this page.

3. Get Ready, Get Set … TWEET! Take part in our Twitter storm. Follow the CHD Twitter account and re-tweet our tweets targeting the FDA, public health officials and VRBPAC members to convince them to vote no at the likely upcoming meeting. Be sure to use the hashtags #DontBreakOurHearts and #SeeingRed.

4. Organize a Convoy for Kids. Keep on Truckin’ in your own neighborhood by organizing your own convoy. Decorate your cars with red signs and messages, including the hashtags #DontBreakOurHearts #SeeingRed. Drive to the FDA, Pfizer Headquarters, Washington, DC, your state capital, legislative offices or your Board of Health meetings. Wear red and wave red signs. Deliver handmade “Don’t Break Our Hearts, Protect Our Health” Valentine messages and hand out CHD’s Second Opinion Fact Sheets.

5. Get Social and Share, Share, Share! Over the next few days, you’ll see a series of social media graphics as well as our video from Mary Holland, CHD president and general counsel. Share any content we put out there to combat censorship and help educate others. Be our army of truth and help get this crucial information to the world.

Let’s make Valentine’s Day a “Red Letter Day” for children’s health! You can find a sample letter in CHD’s Protect the Kids Campaign page.


By
The Defender Staff


https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

https://catholicvote.org/dhs-to-inve...al-terrorists/

https://catholicvote.org/wp-content/...ce-800x467.jpg
https://catholicvote.org/dhs-to-inve...al-terrorists/

DHS To Investigate Vaccine Dissenters As Potential Terrorists

CV NEWS FEED // The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a new national terrorism advisory statement Monday that suggests federal law enforcement will investigate and monitor citizens who share so-called “misinformation” about COVID-19.

“The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors,” the advisory states:

These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence.

The advisory goes on to state that factors such as “the proliferation of false or misleading narratives,” calls for “violence directed at” both government institutions and “the media,” and “calls by foreign terrorist organizations for attacks on the United States based on recent events” have “increased the volatility, unpredictability, and complexity of the threat environment.”

“The convergence of violent extremist ideologies, false or misleading narratives, and conspiracy theories have and will continue to contribute to a heightened threat of violence in the United States,” the advisory states. “For example, there is widespread online proliferation of false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19.”

The document also notes that “COVID-19 mitigation measures—particularly COVID-19 vaccine and mask mandates—have been used by domestic violent extremists to justify violence since 2020 and could continue to inspire these extremists to target government, healthcare, and academic institutions that they associate with those measures.”

In addition:

Some domestic violent extremists have continued to advocate for violence in response to false or misleading narratives about unsubstantiated election fraud. The months preceding the upcoming 2022 midterm elections could provide additional opportunities for these extremists and other individuals to call for violence directed at democratic institutions, political candidates, party offices, election events, and election workers.

The DHS document has riled many commentators, who point out that the agency seems to be threatening to take action against people who merely share information and opinions on social media or between friends.

Throughout the DHS statement, there are many indications that the federal government intends to monitor or investigate citizens who have not committed crimes, framing them as “potential” terrorist threats because of their public speech on controversial topics such as election integrity and COVID-19 mandates.

“Domestic threat actors who seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence,” wrote CatholicVote President Brian Burch, citing the DHS statement. “In other words, if you criticize the government, as determined by the government, you are a terrorist. Basically the exact opposite of everything America was founded on.”

Feb. 11 Friday 7:00 pm 186,271

Feb. 12 Saturday 5:15 am 186,267 ? ? ? total down 4 points (second time this happened recently)
__________________________________________________ __

Coronavirus
Started by Dachsie, 23rd January 2020 08:25 PM

1 2 3 ... 271

18 Deleted Post(s) You are subscribed to this thread

Replies: 2,702
Views: 186,267

Dachsie
Today, 05:04 AM Go to last post

THIS IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT VIDEO.

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...ql_320x180.jpg

https://x22report.com/aiovg_videos/t...g-pharma-fauci

36:54 VIDEO RUNTIME

VIDEO IS AL SO ON RUMBLE

https://rumble.com/vurelj-thomas-ren...wn-big-ph.html

X22 Report Published February 12, 2022

also viewable on x22report Bitchute channel

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6EkGUlABGgql/





Thomas Renz – The Coverup Phase Has Begun, The Evidence Will Bring Down Big Pharma & Fauci




Today’s Guest: Thomas Renz
Website: Renz Law
https://renz-law.com

Attorney Thomas Renz is the lead Attorney in several major cases brought in Ohio, New Mexico, Maine, and Nationally against the CDC and DHHS regarding the COVID-19 lockdowns, mask mandates, business closures, false PCR data, fraudulent death numbers and more. Thomas begins the conversation discussing DOD database and how they are tracking the effects of the vaccine. Big Pharma has been forced to produce the documentation in 6-8 months. Big Pharma, the [DS] are now trying to cover it all up, the coverup always gets you in the end.
SPREAD THE WORD

Prepare Today
$50 OFF 4-WEEK KIT
My Patriot Supply
http://preparewithx22.com

Today’s Guest: Thomas Renz
Website: Renz Law
https://renz-law.com

Regarding posting # 2705


Partial transcript:
Video
https://x22report.com/aiovg_videos/t...g-pharma-fauci

Thomas Renz – The Coverup Phase Has Begun, The Evidence Will Bring Down Big Pharma & Fauci

Video posted on February 12, 2022

Begin transcript at 27:12 of the video track
____________
Tom Renz: Because remember, the PCR test, most of them, are in “Class 1 Recall” * because the PCR was testing for the presence of the spike protein. Well, if your body is producing it, of course you’re going to test positive. Right?

And even though they changed it –one of the things really interesting-- …

So with Fauci, being the crook that he is, he’s running those PCR tests for unvaccinated people at around 45 cycles. Each cycle is an amplification, so every time you run a cycle, it’s like blowing up the number of these particles, you know, bigger. Right?

For vaccinated people, he only running it at 28 cycles, yet they’re still having all these vaccinated people show up COVID-positive. Ask the NFL.

Dave of X22 Report: I can see why he’s doing it, because he wants to show the unvaccinated –‘You have COVID’ – and he was trying to minimize the people that got the vaccine – ‘Oh no, they don’t have it.’ But it seems like it backfired on him.
End of transcript at 28:19

__________________________________

*


https://www.newswars.com/fda-announces-that-cdcs-pcr-test-failed-review-will-have-emergency-use-authorization-revoked/

By Jamie White | INFOWARS.COM Sunday, July 25, 2021

https://www.newswars.com/wp-content/...cr-test325.jpg

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced this week that its PCR test has failed its full review and will have its Emergency Use Authorization revoked.

The Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test, the CDC’s benchmark COVID diagnostic testing system, will be withdrawn for Emergency Use by the end of 2021 due to an inordinate frequency of false positive and negative results.

“The FDA has identified this as a Class I recall, the most serious type of recall. Use of these devices may cause serious injuries or death,” the FDA stated on its website.

__________________


https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-recalls/innova-medical-group-recalls-unauthorized-sars-cov-2-antigen-rapid-qualitative-test-risk-false-test

Innova Medical Group Recalls Unauthorized SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test with Risk of False Test Results


The FDA has identified this as a Class I recall, the most serious type of recall. Use of these devices may cause serious injuries or death.
Recalled Product

Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test (also distributed under the names Innova COVID-19 Self-Test Kit (3T Configuration), Innova SARS-CoV-2-Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test (7T Configuration), and Innova SARS-CoV-2-Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test (25T Configuration))
Lot codes:
25T (25 tests per box) - U2101750, U2101751, X2006004, X2008001, X2008010, X2009002, X2009004, X2009013, X2009016, X2010004, X2010010, X2011005, X2011006, X2011007, X2011008, X2011009, X2011012, X2011013, X2011015, X2011016, X2011017, X2011025, X2011051, X2011052, X2012001, X2012002, X2012004, X2012005, X2012008, X2101002, X2101004, X2101014, X2101031, X2101038
3T (3 tests per box) - U2102003, X2012310
7T (7 tests per box) - U2101748, U2102001, U2102002, X2012711, X2103792
Manufacturing Dates: September 1, 2020 to March 3, 2021
Distribution Dates: November 2, 2020 to March 22, 2021
Devices Recalled in the U.S.: At least 77,339
Date Initiated by Firm: March 24, 2021

Device Description

The Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test claimed to determine if a person has an active COVID-19 infection. The test used a nasal swab sample and test strip to detect specific proteins, called antigens, from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. If the nasal sample had SARS-CoV-2 antigens, a colored test line should have appeared on the test strip, indicating that the person may have COVID-19. If the nasal sample did not have SARS-CoV-2 antigens, a colored line should not have appeared on the test strip. The test has not been authorized, cleared, or approved by FDA for commercial distribution in the United States.
Reason for Recall

Innova Medical Group is recalling its SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test. Labeling distributed with certain configurations of the test includes performance claims that did not accurately reflect the performance estimates observed during the clinical studies of the tests. The performance characteristics of the test have not been adequately established, presenting a risk of false results.

False-negative results may lead to delayed diagnosis or inappropriate treatment of SARS-CoV-2, which may cause patient harm including serious illness and death. False-negative results can also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including when presumed negative patients are grouped into cohorts in health care, long-term care, and other facilities based on false test results.
False-positive results could lead to a delay in the correct diagnosis and the initiation of an appropriate treatment for the actual cause of patient illness, which could be another life-threatening disease that is not SARS-CoV-2. False-positive results could also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when presumed positive patients are grouped into cohorts based on false test results.

Who May Be Affected

People who were tested using these devices
Health care providers who may have access to and use these tests or whose patients have used these tests
Organizers of large testing programs, such as on college campuses, who may be using and distributing these tests for diagnostic use

What to Do

On April 23, 2021, Innova Medical Group sent all affected device users an Urgent Medical Device Recall letter. The letter provided the following information:

Do not use these tests to screen for or diagnose COVID-19.
Identify and remove all affected tests from inventory.
Either destroy the tests by placing them in the trash or return the tests using the FedEx return label that was included with the letter Innova sent to its customers.
Complete and return the form Innova sent to its customers, indicating the number of destroyed or returned tests.

The FDA also recommends:

Test users and caregivers: Talk to your health care provider if you think you were tested with the Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test and you have concerns about your test results.
Health care providers: If the test was given less than two weeks ago, consider retesting your patients using a different SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test if you suspect an inaccurate result. If testing was performed more than two weeks ago and there is no reason to suspect current SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is not necessary to retest.
Testing program organizers: Notify participants in your testing program to discontinue diagnostic use of these tests and to use an FDA-authorized test to continue testing. For listings of FDA-authorized tests, see:
FDA-Authorized Molecular Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2
FDA-Authorized Antigen Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2
Report any problems you experience with the Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Test to the FDA, including suspected false results.

For more information, please see the FDA's June 2021 safety communication, Stop Using Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test.
Contact Information

Customers with questions about this recall should contact Linda Weinreb at Linda.Weinreb@innovamedgroup.com or call 747-494-0852.
How do I report a problem?

Health care professionals and consumers may report adverse reactions or quality problems they experienced using these devices to MedWatch: The FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program using an online form, regular mail, or FAX.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dachsie

https://catholicvote.org/dhs-to-inve...al-terrorists/

https://catholicvote.org/wp-content/...ce-800x467.jpg
https://catholicvote.org/dhs-to-inve...al-terrorists/

DHS To Investigate Vaccine Dissenters As Potential Terrorists

CV NEWS FEED // The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a new national terrorism advisory statement Monday that suggests federal law enforcement will investigate and monitor citizens who share so-called “misinformation” about COVID-19.

“The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors,” the advisory states:

These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence.

The advisory goes on to state that factors such as “the proliferation of false or misleading narratives,” calls for “violence directed at” both government institutions and “the media,” and “calls by foreign terrorist organizations for attacks on the United States based on recent events” have “increased the volatility, unpredictability, and complexity of the threat environment.”

“The convergence of violent extremist ideologies, false or misleading narratives, and conspiracy theories have and will continue to contribute to a heightened threat of violence in the United States,” the advisory states. “For example, there is widespread online proliferation of false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19.”

The document also notes that “COVID-19 mitigation measures—particularly COVID-19 vaccine and mask mandates—have been used by domestic violent extremists to justify violence since 2020 and could continue to inspire these extremists to target government, healthcare, and academic institutions that they associate with those measures.”

In addition:

Some domestic violent extremists have continued to advocate for violence in response to false or misleading narratives about unsubstantiated election fraud. The months preceding the upcoming 2022 midterm elections could provide additional opportunities for these extremists and other individuals to call for violence directed at democratic institutions, political candidates, party offices, election events, and election workers.

The DHS document has riled many commentators, who point out that the agency seems to be threatening to take action against people who merely share information and opinions on social media or between friends.

Throughout the DHS statement, there are many indications that the federal government intends to monitor or investigate citizens who have not committed crimes, framing them as “potential” terrorist threats because of their public speech on controversial topics such as election integrity and COVID-19 mandates.

“Domestic threat actors who seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence,” wrote CatholicVote President Brian Burch, citing the DHS statement. “In other words, if you criticize the government, as determined by the government, you are a terrorist. Basically the exact opposite of everything America was founded on.”

---

This should drive home the reason the Founders declared the #2A Militia of the several States are NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE, and as Art. II §2 Clause 1,Art. I §8 Clauses 15, 16 indicate the Milita are supposed to be permanent institutions of the federal system, as permanent as Congress but were unconstitutionally disestablished and replaced by the National Guard, an adjunct of the military, Troops and Ships of War.

Any State can revitalize her #2A Constitutional Militia without the consent of Congress.

The #2A Militia composed of a great body of the people possess police powers, and have the power to arrest and remove from office tyrants who violate the Constitution. With what we have been put through the last 2 years it should be a wake up call

Mis dos centavos.

Edit: As the Freedom Convoys are proving it is obvious what may be accomplished by the People uniting.

Dachsie comment:

It's too late for these serial killers.

These people will be held to account.

This is a war against humanity.

We need Nuremberg 2 trials.


__________________________________________________ ____________________

https://www.newswars.com/not-normal-...e-on-same-day/

There are three embedded videos in this article.

[SIZE=4]https://www.newswars.com/wp-content/...-alto-chic.jpg

By Kelen McBreen | INFOWARS.COM Thursday, February 10, 2022

A pair of teenagers from different states both collapsed and died during their high school basketball games on Tuesday.

embedded video

By Kelen McBreen | INFOWARS.COM Thursday, February 10, 2022

A pair of teenagers from different states both collapsed and died during their high school basketball games on Tuesday.

Texas sophomore Devonte Mumphrey and Illinois Senior Cameran Wheatley tragically passed away while doing what they loved.

Mumphrey, who attended Alto High School, was named All-District 22-2A Newcomer of the Year in 2021.

“You couldn’t have met a better kid,” Mumphrey’s cousin Jessica told the Tyler Morning Telegraph. “He had respect. I never saw him with an attitude.”

“He was the kind of kid that touched everybody. Family and friends were most important to Vonte,” she added. “He was a good kid. This all feels like a dream; it doesn’t feel real.”

The same night Mumphrey collapsed, nearly one thousand miles away, Bremen High School’s Cameran Wheatley also fell onto the court and was later pronounced dead.

“That’s tragic as I don’t know what,” a parent with children attending the school said. “I wouldn’t think anything like that would happen at a high school to anyone that young.”
Release the warrior in you by capitalizing on hot deals you won't find anywhere else!

ABC 7 reported that Wheatley’s father confirmed his son had a clean bill of health and had played several sports for almost 10 years.

Cameran’s friend Hugo Silva remembered his pal, saying, “You could always go up to him, say hi to him, ask him how he was, how are you feeling. He was always there for you if you needed him as well, and I will miss him.”

The teens’ vaccination statuses are unknown, and autopsy reports have yet to be released.

However, healthy athletes don’t often collapse and die, and cases of this happening have been increasing since the experimental vaccine rollout began.

Earlier this week, Infowars covered a County Coroner’s autopsy report claiming 24-year-old New York college student George Watts Jr. died in direct relation to the Pfizer Covid shot.

Last month, Infowars reported on a 26-year-old man named Joseph Keating who died from myocarditis after a Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine booster jab.

According to the certificate of death, Keating died from “multifocal myocarditis involving the left ventricle and septum,” with the second cause of death listed as “Recent Pfizer Covid-19 booster vaccine.”

In October of 2021, Police in Sonoma County, California blamed Pfizer’s experimental mRNA jab for causing the sudden death of a local teen.

The teenager’s death report states that after a postmortem examination was conducted by a forensic pathologist, “the cause of death was determined to be: ‘STRESS CARDIOMYOPATHY WITH PERIVASCULAR CORONARY ARTERY INFLAMMATION (hours to days), due to, UNKOWN ETIOLOGY IN SETTING OF RECENT PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINATION (days).’” [emphasis theirs]

http://By Kelen McBreen | INFOWARS.C...phasis theirs]

Texas sophomore Devonte Mumphrey and Illinois Senior Cameran Wheatley tragically passed away while doing what they loved.

Pasting the article 3 times seems excessive. Sort of like repeating gossip.

Look at these filthy lying murdering bottom dwelling slugs !

The Surgeon General is going to murder his 5-year old too.

_________________________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owy8uHfFo4s&list=PLbpi6ZahtOH71a6AQn1p3XGQ 2CQSlfPIU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owy8uHfFo4s&list=PLbpi6ZahtOH71a6AQn1p3XGQ 2CQSlfPIU

The Truth About COVID Vaccines For Kids ft. Surgeon General

Doctor Mike

8.89M subscribers

Dr. Vivek Murthy is the Surgeon General of the United States and a leading expert on COVID-19. I sat down with him to discuss his recently released A Community Toolkit for Addressing Health Misinformation which provides resources and education to battle medical misinformation, such as how to spot bad actors and even talk to loved ones when we believe they’re being mislead. We also dove deep into the recently approved COVID-19 vaccine from Pfizer that has been approved for children ages 5-11. We talked about side effects, myocarditis, the quality of the research, and so much more. We’re simply here to provide you with as many facts as possible so you can make the best decision for you and your family.

A Community Toolkit for Addressing Health Misinformation: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/fil...

More information on COVID-19 vaccination for children: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-...

"Look at these filthy lying murdering bottom dwelling slugs !

The Surgeon General is going to murder his 5-year old too."

Parents have been passing the souls of their children through the fires of Moloch since time immemorial.

"We didn't study the "real" virus, but a virus we built in the lab" Albert Bourla

https://t.me/silverreportforum/24409

Pfizer's CEO Lets It Slip Embded Video


edNEWS AND COMMENTARY

Pfizer’s CEO Lets It Slip, Reveals What They’re Studying & Where The Data Really Came From [VIDEO]

Did Pfizer's CEO Albert Bourla really say what I think he just said?

BY ZACH HEILMAN
FEBRUARY 13, 2022

• Share
• Share
• Share
• Share
• Share
• Tweet
• Share
• Share
• Flip It
• Comment
• Print

Although his medical background includes being an American veterinarian, Albert Bourla has found himself as the chairman and chief executive officer for the pharmaceutical company Pfizer. While other experts like Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCullough have devoted their lives to science, they find themselves de-platformed and censured for going against the COVID-19 agenda. As for Bourla, he continues to promote the drug as just a few days ago, he admitted the chances were high for the FDA to approve the COVID-19 jab for children under 5. And while the science has proven the drug to do little to stop the virus from being contracted or spread, Bourla also surprisingly added to be working with a virus that was developed in a lab.

Tired of the ads? Go Ad-Free and Get EXCLUSIVE Content, Become a PREMIUM USER

In the video, which is featured below, CNBC was discussing the importance of jab and booster shots when Bourla appeared to admit that they have been studying a virus that was created in a lab. This narrative that COVID-19 might have leaked from the Wuhan Lab in China has been severely criticized by the Biden administration, yet Bourla, talking about additional boosters, showed how working with engineered viruses isn’t that uncommon.

** Join Our Community **

MORE NEWS: Mass Formation Psychosis – 5 Things You Need to Know! – Awaken With JP [VIDEO]

As for the next phase for the COVID-19 jab being approved for children under 5, Bourla noted, “I think the chances are very high for FDA to approve it. I think that they will be pleased with the data and they will approve.”

https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.O...95&w=137&h=103

As of August 2021, his net worth was estimated at US$12.5 billion, owning a roughly 8% stake in Moderna.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stéphane_Bancel

The CEO of Moderna pharmaceutical company has been selling off his millions of dollars Moderna stock holdings for the last two years.

https://x22report.com/be-alert-next-...urham-ep-2701/

The head of Moderna, @sbancel has deleted his Twitter account, it appears.
Over the past two years, on a weekly basis, Bancel has dumped Moderna stock. He's now cashed out hundreds of





Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.substack.com


@JordanSchachtel

The head of Moderna, @sbancel has deleted his Twitter account, it appears. Over the past two years, on a weekly basis, Bancel has dumped Moderna stock. He's now cashed out hundreds of millions of dollars. He's sold about $20 million worth of shares in 2022.
7:55 AM • Feb 12, 2022

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...3x_320x180.jpg

Dachsie comment:

While I am of late becoming very appreciative of the commentary given by Dave of X22 Report in general, I was impressed by his insight regarding how "they are losing the narrative about the "COVID pandemic."

From about 16:44 to 17:20 on this video track, Dave explains that even though the PCR test has been officially halted on December 31, 2021 by the CDC, the new test, that does distinguish between the flu (influenza virus) and COVID , is not yet in use.

They do not want the new test to be used because then the data and the control groups would clearly show that the people who got the COVID vaccine are the people who are getting COVID. Naturally that destroys their official narrative about the COVID jab being so good.

_________________________
https://www.bitchute.com/video/yfxx3h948h3x/


Ep. 2701b - Be Alert Next 10 Days, [FF], We Caught Them All, Treason, A Traitor’s Justice, Durham


Ep. 2701b - Be Alert Next 10 Days, [FF], We Caught Them All, Treason, A Traitor’s Justice, Durham

New VAERS Data as of Feb 4, 2021 (posted Jan 28)

25,713 Deaths and 1,184,736 Adverse Events

23,615 Pfizer/Moderna and 2,098 J&J Deaths

PLUS 1,103,893 Pfizer / Moderna and 80,843 J&J Adverse Events

Source: Dr. Tenpenny's newsletter

I agree that something is seeming wrong around the Moderna vaccine. Like some bad news is going to make people dread having received the Moderna Vaccine. Jsnip 4 only guesses what could go wrong about the vaccine.

Aside from that billionaire executive with Moderna selling off "hundreds of millions" of dollars worth of his Moderna stock holdings, I recall Whitney Webb's interview of Dr. Meryl Nass, which I posted about 10 days ago in this thread, that some entity bailed out and rescued Moderna from serious financial problems.

IT may be that Moderna needs to still exist when and if the time comes that it needs to be "sacrificed." Just another guess.

I have kind of observed in a vague way that the 4 main COVID vaccines for USA that there appears to be ONE entity that is controlling every move that is done by or relates to something about those 4 companies. It is like they are playing a chess game and they have Plan B and Plan C if things go south financially big time. They need to keep certain companies propped up financially because its survival and existence may be needed as a pawn to move around to deal with certain bad happenings to the whole market in the future. To me, IT IS NOT LIKE there are four separate pharma companies and each more or less operates independently and there is some competition for contracts. No the entire vaccine industry and BigPharma operates as one entity.

Anyway, just my hunch.


Another comment...

Moderna has been removed in Australia because it h as HIV in it. Seems like Moderna first gives you HIV and now they're coming out soon with another vaccine, this one for HIV.

Listen to Joe Olsen at about 05:39

0n today's Need to Know show.


Need to Know News (14 February 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman

________________________



Jsnip4

https://rumble.com/vusv0s-realist-news-50-million-doses-of-vaccine-recalled-as-they-triggered-false-p.html

REALIST NEWS - 50 MILLION doses of vaccine recalled as they triggered 'false positives' in HIV tests


Jsnip4 Published February 12, 2022 1,063 Views


https://rumble.com/vusv0s-realist-ne...d-false-p.html

6:19 viedo runtime

Rumble — https://twitter.com/unhealthytruth/s...58234698248192
Join my Woo Woo Crypto Patreon https://www.patreon.com/jsnip4/memberships
Trade crypto on Mandala: https://trade.mandala.exchange/accou...p?ref=H65L7144
(Need NordVPN from Germany or Spain)

__________

https://dailynewsbreak.org/massive-5...-in-hiv-tests/


Best of Daily
MASSIVE 50 MILLION C0VID VACCINES RECALLED AS THEY TRIGGER FALSE POSITIVES IN HIV TESTS


https://dailynewsbreak.org/wp-conten...C4D800BCE.jpeg

Fifty million Covid vaccine doses recalled, as they triggered “false positives” in HIV tests. The magnitude of this is beyond massive, as those Covid shots really were full of nasty surprises after all. No wonder so many crooked politicians like Justin Trudeau, faked their own vaccination. Earlier, Japan pulled 1 million contaminated Covid vaccines, after alarming numbers of deaths and injuries, and like India, started to prescribe effective anti-viral Ivermectin tablets. By revealing to the world, that people are falsely or genuinely testing positive for HIV, after taking these controversial Covid vaccines, that already cause unacceptable levels of deaths and injuries, they are in fact indirectly admitting that HIV is being used in the making of those already toxic experimental injections, fraudulently mislabeled as vaccine.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYI...Xz99QPAVAPIG5Q
https://rumble.com/user/Jsnip4
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/jsnip4/
https://twitter.com/realistnews
http://www.realistnews.net
https://www.theta.tv/jsnip4

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...w9_320x180.jpg

https://www.bitchute.com/video/tW3Z7629g1w9/


BOMBSHELL - Fauci says this is not the first time a vaccine made people worse than the disease.

1 minute video

https://www.bitchute.com/video/tW3Z7629g1w9/

Some however are going to have a "red pill" moment and get what is really going on. Others will have a "red pill enema" moment and they are going to be really pissed and may get violent. Source: Sixth Sense. More videos you may want to check out:
Cliff High - Vax Issues, Assassinations, Death Count The Next 3 Years, Restrictions Lifted And More
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FFY6HSCxLNTU/

Dachsie comment:

It is good to expose the corruption and politicization of the FDA, but we have not explored all the possible real reasons these officials at the FDA quit because of the way the booster shots were authorized.

No, the primary reason is not for public-private partnership of government-BigPharma to take advantage to rake in more obscene profits.

I fear the motivations of all U S. government actions in regard to this "pandemic" more closely coincide with the motivations of the actions of Justin Castro in Canada.

Emergency Use Authorization / Emergencies Act

____________________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZA56NBg1sM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZA56NBg1sM

FITTON: FDA Cover-Up on Covid Booster Documents!

16,323 views
Feb 14, 2022

6:44 video runtime

Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for records of communication from Dr. Marion Gruber and Dr. Philip Krause, the former director and deputy director of the US. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Office of Vaccines Research and Review, who reportedly resigned during the White House’s push to approve the COVID-19 “booster shot” (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1:22-cv-00292)). READ: https://www.judicialwatch.org/covid-b...

We have joined Telegram, Parler, Rumble, and Gettr! Follow us @JudicialWatch to stay updated on the latest news from Judicial Watch--

Telegram: https://t.me/JudicialWatch

Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/judicialwatch

Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/JudicialWatch

__________________

https://www.judicialwatch.org/covid-booster-shots/

February 10, 2022 | Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch Sues HHS for Records of Communication from Top FDA Officials Who Resigned Reportedly over COVID Booster Shots

https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...-1-768x401.jpg

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for records of communication from Dr. Marion Gruber and Dr. Philip Krause, the former director and deputy director of the US. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Office of Vaccines Research and Review, who reportedly resigned during the White House’s push to approve the COVID-19 “booster shot” (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1:22-cv-00292)).

The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court of the District of Columbia after HHS failed to respond to a September 3, 2021, FOIA request for:

All emails sent to and from Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Marion Gruber regarding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/CDC, the Advisory Committee on Immunization (ACIP), and/or “booster vaccines” for the prevention and/or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19.
All emails sent to and from Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Deputy Director Phil Krause regarding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/CDC, the Advisory Committee on Immunization (ACIP), and/or “booster vaccines” for the prevention and/or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19.

On September 22, 2021, the FDA approved use of a booster dose of the Pfizer drug. According to the organization’s news release, the FDA, “amended the emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to allow for use of a single booster dose, to be administered at least six months after completion of the primary series” for people at “high risk” of “severe COVID-19.”

On September 13, 2021, Gruber and Krause were among a group of resigning doctors who agreed that, “Available evidence doesn’t yet indicate a need for COVID-19 vaccine booster shots among the general population …”

Also on September 13, 2021, The Lancet published a paper to which Gruber and Krause contributed that noted:

Careful and public scrutiny of the evolving data will be needed to assure that decisions about boosting are informed by reliable science more than by politics.… Widespread boosting should be undertaken only if there is clear evidence that it is appropriate.

“This booster shot cover-up shows the FDA is politicized and corrupt,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The American people have a right to know about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines – especially given that officials in the FDA seem to have objected to the agency’s recommendations about the vaccines.”

LIES TO STEAL, KILL AND DESTROY

________________________________________


SARS2 Coronavirus has a far higher fatality rate than the flu by several orders of magnitude

Everyone has a significant risk to die

No one has immunity because the virus is new (“novel”)

Everyone is dangerous and spreads the infection

Asymptomatic people are major drivers of the spread

Locking down, which means confining people to their homes, stopping non-COVID medical care, and eliminating travel will stop/eliminate the virus

Masks will protect everyone and stop the spread

Immune protection is only from a vaccine