Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachsie
Absolutely do not venture out into the fresh air and sunshine
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachsie
Absolutely do not venture out into the fresh air and sunshine
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 16
Dachsie comment:
Dr. Robert Califf confirmed to lead the Food and Drug Administration .
The FDA is a corruct politicized "regulatory captured" federal agency.
"New boss same as the old boss."
__________________________
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/p...ff-to-head-fda
Republicans help confirm controversial Biden nominee Robert Califf to head FDA
by Cassidy Morrison, Healthcare Reporter |
| February 15, 2022 01:19 PM
https://s.yimg.com/fz/api/res/1.2/Ch...14&c=14&qlt=90
CALIFF CONFIRMED The Senate on Tuesday narrowly confirmed Dr. Robert Califf to lead the Food and Drug Administration in a 50-46 vote, with several Republicans crossing the aisle to make up for Democratic dissent. Democrats have opposed Califf over his record of siding with pharmaceutical lobbyists and exacerbating the nation’s opioid epidemic. Republicans largely opposed Califf’s confirmation because of his permissive stance on the distribution of dangerous abortion-inducing drugs via online or over-the-phone prescription services. Republicans Mitt Romney, R-UT, Mitch McConnell, R-KY, and Richard Burr, R-NC, joined most Democrats in voting to confirm.
https://trib247.com/articles/columni...ign=Newsletter
Columnist: Half of world's inhabitants took experimental jab which did not undergo proper testing
by: WorldTribune.com 02/15/2022 Source: WorldTribune.com
https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1644987758
by WorldTribune Staff, February 15, 2022
According to Johns Hopkins University, the typical timeline for vaccine development "takes 5 to 10 years, and sometimes longer, to assess whether the vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials, complete the regulatory approval processes, and manufacture sufficient quantity of vaccine doses for widespread distribution."
The Covid vaccines were publicly declared to be “safe and effective” less than 8 months after the start of human clinical trials.
The "safe and effective" claim made by so-called health officials and pushed relentlessly by Big Media "was used as the basis for a worldwide campaign in which more than half of Earth’s inhabitants have been injected with experimental pharmaceuticals that did not undergo proper testing," a columnist wrote.
"The phrase 'safe and effective' became the de-facto slogan of the planet-wide vaccination enterprise. Believing that the vaccines were 'completely safe,' billions of people willingly – and even enthusiastically – lined up to receive their Covid injections," Vasko Kohlmayer wrote for The Covid World on Feb. 15.
On April 23, 2020, Germany launched the first clinical trial of Covid vaccines. On Dec. 2, 2020, the UK became the first country to authorize the use of the vaccine in the general population. The United States issued its emergency use authorization on Dec. 11, 2020.
"This means that the massive global vaccination campaign – which quickly reached a frenzied pitch – was launched less than 8 months from the start of the clinical trials," Kohlmayer noted.
"After receiving full approval, vaccines continue to be carefully monitored for adverse events in case some vaccinal flaw may have escaped detection during the multi-year trial phase," Kohlmayer wrote. "There have been a number of vaccines that were pulled from the market after they received full approval due to unexpected safety issues. Some of these include vaccines for Lyme Disease, Whole-Cell Pertussis and Rotavirus among others."
For a vaccine to be justifiably declared "completely safe," it "must undergo at least five years of intensive testing in clinical trials and then several years of monitoring as it is administered in populations at large," Kohlmayer wrote.
Covid vaccines were declared "completely safe" after just 8 months of trials. "On the normal vaccine trial timeline, month 8 is in Phase 2 of the three-stage clinical trial regime," Kohlmayer noted.
Less than 22 months after the beginning of the clinical trials, "the plurality of mankind" has been injected with the "inadequately tested products," Kohlmayer wrote.
Normally, vaccine developers at 22 months would be gearing for Phase III of clinical trials. Phase III normally takes place between months 24 and 48 after the initiation of the trial process. This is how Johns Hopkins University describes what this stage is about: “Phase III clinical trials are critical to understanding whether vaccines are safe and effective.”
"Phase III is where we now find ourselves on the timeline of vaccine development. In the case of the Covid vaccines, however, the testing of Phase III is not being conducted on a selected group of volunteers but on the world’s population," Kohlmayer wrote.
Under the normal schedule, the Covid vaccines Phase III trials would be completed in April of 2024.
As for the claim that the Covid vaccines are "safe and effective," Kohlmayer wrote that is "not only unsubstantiated but outright false."
Kohlmayer noted that reports of severe adverse reactions and deaths started pouring in soon after the jabs were being administered, (as the below chart from the VAERS database shows).
https://www.worldtribune.com/wp-cont.../vaerschrt.jpg
"In less than twelve months, the number of deaths related to the Covid injections exceeded the death total recorded in connection with all the other vaccines in the last thirty years," Kohlmayer noted. "This is a gruesome count for vaccines that were supposed to be 'completely safe.' "
Kohlmayer added: "Untold millions across the world have already suffered severe side effects from these injections in the short term. And we do not yet know what the medium- or long-term consequences may be because these vaccines have not been trialed for such time frames.
"The Covid-19 vaccination crusade is a global crime the like of which the world has not yet seen.
"Those complicit in this vast crime against humanity are the vaccine manufacturers, the leaders of the regulatory agencies, public health officials, and politicians. Also complicit is the media which endlessly amplified the 'completely safe' claim which became the mantra under which this enterprise has been carried out."
These three shows today will stream live and subscription is free so please sign up now.
Subscribe to The Defender - It's Free
https://live.childrenshealthdefense....3-aed4b86b023b
TODAY'S LINEUP Watch these shows live today, Wednesday, February 16, 2022
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...xShQYxE7yg--~D
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...S4xlb_0wgQ--~D
Having trouble viewing this email? View it in your web browser
February 16, 2022
TODAY'S LINEUP
'This Week' With Mary + Polly - @ 9:00am PT / 12:00pm ET
https://live.childrenshealthdefense....3-aed4b86b023b
“Blood Clots Are Lucrative For The Healthcare System” Normalizing Childhood Vaccine Injury + More
_______________
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...4S658IK83A--~D
Against The Wind - @ 10:30am PT / 1:30pm ET
6 MILLION + SKYROCKETING: How Many Fully Vaccinated People Have Contracted COVID? Vaccine Failure Data With Dr. Henry Ealy
____________________
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...4vS2PTimew--~D
Children's Health Defense
childrenshealthdefense.org
Wednesday's Lineup - CHD.TV
Yahoo/Inbox
Children's Health Defense <team@childrenshealthdefense.org>
To:Jeannon Kralj
Wed, Feb 16 at 9:08 AM
Having trouble viewing this email? View it in your web browser
February 16, 2022
TODAY'S LINEUP
'This Week' With Mary + Polly - @ 9:00am PT / 12:00pm ET
“Blood Clots Are Lucrative For The Healthcare System” Normalizing Childhood Vaccine Injury + More
Against The Wind - @ 10:30am PT / 1:30pm ET
6 MILLION + SKYROCKETING: How Many Fully Vaccinated People Have Contracted COVID? Vaccine Failure Data With Dr. Henry Ealy
‘Medical Racism’ - @ 1:00pm PT / 4:00pm ET
The Film The Medical Establishment Does Not Want You To Know About. Exposing Medical Experimentation On African Americans, Starting With The Post-Civil War Era + Continuing Up To The Present.
CHD TV - Censorship Free Infotainment
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...kB8KIYUBGQ--~D
The Story.
A baby boy born at 31 weeks in New London, CT is spending time in the NICU. Parents are unvaccinated and are regularly tested for COVID-19.
Dad tests positive. Mom tests negative.
Mom is denied access to baby for 10 days, during a critical period of the newborn's life.
Baby is currently fed through a feeding tube. They will be initiating bottle feeds during this 10-day period, despite the mother's plans to breastfeed her child.
And though they deem mom too high of a risk to be around baby, they will continue to give baby the mom's pumped breast milk, giving the baby actual fluids from the mother while denying her the ability to hold her baby's hand.
At We The Patriots USA, Inc. we do NOT condone Medical Kidnapping. We believe every parent has the right to sit by their child's bedside. This premature baby needs advanced treatment only available in an Intensive Care Unit. This baby should not be denied the critical bonding time with his parent.
Accommodations must be made to bring baby and mom back together!
Calling all WTP USA friends from Connecticut and nearby states.
Let's join together and let our voices be heard.
Let's stand for Parental Rights.
Let's peacefully protest.
Thursday, February 17 at 10am.
Bring signs. Bring noise. Bring people.
IMPORTANT: Please remember to stand on public sidewalks only, and do not block any access routes into or out of the hospital.
https://wethepatriotsusa.org/
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...kB8KIYUBGQ--~D
The Story.
A baby boy born at 31 weeks in New London, CT is spending time in the NICU. Parents are unvaccinated and are regularly tested for COVID-19.
Dad tests positive. Mom tests negative.
Mom is denied access to baby for 10 days, during a critical period of the newborn's life.
Baby is currently fed through a feeding tube. They will be initiating bottle feeds during this 10-day period, despite the mother's plans to breastfeed her child.
And though they deem mom too high of a risk to be around baby, they will continue to give baby the mom's pumped breast milk, giving the baby actual fluids from the mother while denying her the ability to hold her baby's hand.
At We The Patriots USA, Inc. we do NOT condone Medical Kidnapping. We believe every parent has the right to sit by their child's bedside. This premature baby needs advanced treatment only available in an Intensive Care Unit. This baby should not be denied the critical bonding time with his parent.
Accommodations must be made to bring baby and mom back together!
Calling all WTP USA friends from Connecticut and nearby states.
Let's join together and let our voices be heard.
Let's stand for Parental Rights.
Let's peacefully protest.
Thursday, February 17 at 10am.
Bring signs. Bring noise. Bring people.
IMPORTANT: Please remember to stand on public sidewalks only, and do not block any access routes into or out of the hospital.
https://wethepatriotsusa.org/
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...PE_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XXBjKR6YSgPE/
COVID LIE EXPOSED: Tom Cowan MD and Andrew Kaufman MD - Feb 11 2022
8:25 video runtime
First published at 03:48 UTC on February 14th, 2022.
jeff491
I somehow made screen prin size mircoscopically small and do not know how to get out of this. So good bye fopr npw/ Dachsie
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur....eFF_QkPBg--~D
Moderna Stock Crash: Losses Top $140 Billion as Insiders Sell Millions of Dollars in Shares
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...2-8753f1a47f04
Moderna Stock Crash: Losses Top $140 Billion as Insiders Sell Millions of Dollars in Shares
Forbes reported:
Shares of Moderna plummeted Monday as COVID-19 vaccine-makers led a turbulent market decline, pushing the stock to its lowest level in nearly a year after disappointing study results and a slew of sales from the firm’s top executives added to concerns that have made one of last year’s top-performing stocks crash more than 70%.
Moderna stock fell as much as 13% on Monday to a 10-month low of less than $140, pushing shares down more than 30% over the past month amid a sell-off largely centered on technology and healthcare firms that skyrocketed in value during the pandemic.
Moderna’s recent losses also follow a slew of regulatory filings released Friday evening which showed four Moderna executives — including billionaire CEO Stéphane Bancel — sold a combined 23,281 shares for about $3.6 million last week.
Pfizer Director Dr. Scott Gottlieb: Shots for Kids Under 5 Delayed Due to Low COVID Cases in Trial
CNBC reported:
The Food and Drug Administration’s plan to fast-track Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for children under 5 years old was delayed because of a “low number of cases overall in the clinical trial,” Dr. Scott Gottlieb told CNBC on Monday.
“Most kids are not getting symptomatic COVID,” said the current Pfizer board member and former head of the FDA. “One case in one direction or another can tip the perception of the vaccine’s overall effectiveness.”
“I suspect there’s only going to be 15% to 20% of parents who go out and get their young kids vaccinated,” should shots for children under 5 get emergency authorization, Gottlieb said.
Gottlieb said he expects the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to institute a “permissive recommendation,” rather than a mandate for children under 5 to get vaccinated.
02/16/22
•
Corporate Vaccine Mandates and Vaccine Passports — Brought to You by BlackRock and Vanguard?
Investment giants BlackRock and The Vanguard Group stand to benefit from their ownership stakes in most of the corporations that imposed COVID vaccine mandates, and in some of the technology firms developing vaccine passports.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/corporate-vaccine-mandates-passports-blackrock-vanguard/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=6ecd 719a-a41c-4b9a-8de2-8753f1a47f04
By
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg
After the U.S. Supreme Court last month froze the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for large private employers, some companies — including Boeing, General Electric and Starbucks — dropped plans to implement the mandate.
Others, based on guidance issued in 2020 by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, left the mandates in place.
Most of the large employers that opted to mandate COVID vaccines for their employees, even though the Supreme Court ruled they didn’t have to, have something in common: BlackRock and The Vanguard Group have ownership stakes in them.
BlackRock and Vanguard, two of the world’s “Big Three” asset managers, also are among the top three shareholders of COVID vaccine makers Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson — which means the two investment giants stand to benefit from these companies’ soaring profits and the resulting rise in those companies’ stock prices.
BlackRock and Vanguard don’t just benefit from sales of COVID vaccines. As it turns out, they also have ownership stakes in technology companies developing vaccine passports and digital wallets.
BlackRock: the ‘fourth branch of government’?
Combined, BlackRock and Vanguard manage more than $15 trillion in global assets.
To put this figure into perspective, that amounts to more than three-fourths of the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) and more than triple the GDP of the European Union’s economic powerhouse, Germany.
BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager, with more than $9.5 trillion in assets as of July 2021, while Vanguard held more than $7 trillion in assets as of January 2021.
Notably, Vanguard is the largest stockholder in BlackRock (7.61%), while BlackRock is the biggest stockholder in Vanguard (13.06%) — though the actual ownership structure of these companies has been described as “dark.”
In an August 2021 article about the two firms, Dr. Joseph Mercola pointed out that, far from the appearance of competition promised by capitalism, BlackRock and Vanguard own significant shares in companies that ostensibly compete directly with each other, such as Google, Apple and Microsoft, or Coca-Cola and PepsiCo.
This influence extends to the media. BlackRock alone owns significant shares in supposed “competitors” such as Fox News, CBS, Comcast (NBC), CNN, Disney (ABC), Gannett (USA TODAY and 250 daily newspapers throughout the U.S.), Sinclair Media (whose television stations reach 72% of the American public), and the Graham Media Group (Slate, Foreign Policy).
BlackRock is also politically influential and well-connected, having been chosen by the Obama administration to buy up toxic assets following the 2007-2008 financial collapse.
In 2020, BlackRock received a no-bid contract from the U.S. Treasury Department to manage a $454 billion fund, under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), for businesses adversely impacted by the COVID lockdowns early that year. It wasn’t the first time BlackRock had been granted a no-bid contract from the federal government.
BlackRock along with other firms also is engaged in a real estate purchasing spree, buying up entire neighborhoods of single-family homes and converting them to rentals, driving up home prices by reducing supply on the marketplace.
BlackRock’s real estate strategy echoes the words of the World Economic Forum: “You’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy.”
This level of power and influence promoted none other than Bloomberg in 2020 to characterize BlackRock as the “fourth branch of government.”
BlackRock, Vanguard among top 10 stockholders in most companies mandating vaccines
It is unclear to what extent BlackRock and Vanguard are able to dictate the vaccination policies of the companies in which they hold a stake — but what is clear is that the two investment firms are among the top 10 stockholders in most of these companies.
Here’s a rundown of major U.S. employers that continue to mandate COVID vaccines for their employers [sic - employees], and these companies’ relationships with BlackRock and/or Vanguard (all ownership figures are accurate as of this writing): (SNIP - article excerpted from this point forward)
Abbvie,
Albertsons,
American Express
Anthem Inc.,
AstraZeneca
AT&T,
Blackstone
CapitalOne
Carhartt,
Centene,
Chevron
Cigna,
Cisco
Citigroup
Columbia Sportswear
CVS Health
Deloitte,
Delta Air Lines indirectly imposed a vaccine mandate for its employees, charging those who are not vaccinated a $200 monthly health insurance surcharge.
DoorDash
Eli Lilly,
Emergent BioSolutions,
The Equinox Group,
Facebook, now known as Meta,
The Ford Motor Company
Frontier Airlines
Gap
Gilead Sciences Inc.,
Goldman Sachs
Google, also known as Alphabet, Inc.,
Hasbro
Hawaiian Airlines
Hershey
Hess, a petroleum company,
Humana,
IBM,
Intel
Jefferies, a financial services company,
Johnson & Johnson
KraftHeinz
Lyft
McDonald’s
MGM Resorts International
Microsoft
Moderna
.
Morgan Stanley
NBC Universal
Comcast
Netflix
The New York Times Company
Nike
Novartis,
Pfizer
Pioneer Natural Resources
Roblox,
Roche,
Salesforce, a cloud software provider,
TJX, the parent company of HomeGoods, Marshalls T.J. Maxx,
T-Mobile
Tyson Foods
United Airlines
UPS
Valero
Verizon
Viacom CBS
Walgreens
Walmart
The Walt Disney Company
Warner Media,
The Washington Post
What about the two asset management companies, BlackRock and Vanguard?
Of the two, only BlackRock has implemented a vaccine mandate, allowing vaccinated staff to return to the office in July 2021.
Vanguard has not implemented a mandate, but offered a $1,000 incentive to its employees to encourage them to get vaccinated.
Vaccine passport technology — another way BlackRock, Vanguard profit from vaccines
BlackRock and Vanguard also are stakeholders in tech companies involved in the development of digital vaccine passports or “digital wallets” and technology that can track and allocate “personal carbon allowances.”
These companies include:
Apple, which is collaborating with several U.S. states to make official documents such as drivers’ licenses and medical records available digitally via Apple Wallet. Vanguard is its top shareholder (7.35%) and BlackRock is its third-biggest (4.12%).
Mastercard, which supports the Good Health Pass vaccine passport initiative that is also backed by the ID2020 alliance, and promoted technology that can be embedded into the DO Card, a credit/debit card that can keep track of one’s “personal carbon allowance.” Its top two stockholders are Vanguard (6.82%) and BlackRock (4.13%).
In turn, Mastercard is the fifth largest investor in Doconomy, a Swedish “FinTech” firm that is also heavily involved in the development of the DO Card.
Doconomy, in turn, collaborates with another Swedish “FinTech” firm, Klarna, in providing 90 million customers with “carbon footprint insights” based on their Doconomy transactions. While Klarna is privately held, its top investors include BlackRock and Visa.
Oracle is a backer of the SMART Health Card, which is gaining prominence in the U.S. as a de facto national digital vaccine ‘passport’, and also is a provider of cloud services to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its top two stockholders are Vanguard and BlackRock, with 5.16% and 2.99%, respectively.
Thales Group, is a founding member of the Security Identity Alliance, which is a stakeholder in the UN’s Legal Identity Agenda Task Force that has set the establishment of digital identification for all by 2030. Thales Group has also developed a “smart health card” and digital ID wallet technology.
While the government of France, which has imposed among the strictest COVID-19 restrictions in Europe and has used ‘vaccine passports’ to shut the unvaccinated out of many public spaces and activities, is Thales’ top shareholder (25.7%), Vanguard is the sixth largest, at 1.31%.
No moral core . . . no moral purpose
In podcaster Joe Rogan’s interview last month with Dr. Robert Malone — the interview that triggered the exodus of musicians and others from Spotify — Malone described companies like BlackRock and Vanguard as “large massive funds that are completely decoupled from nation states” and that “have no moral core … no moral purpose,” their only purpose being a “return on investment.”
As it turns out, BlackRock and Vanguard — and Moderna — also have ties to Spotify.
BlackRock is Spotify’s seventh-largest shareholder (1.37%), while Vanguard manages the top mutual fund holding Spotify Technology SA.
Baillie Gifford, a Scotland-based asset management firm in existence since 1909, is the top institutional stockholder (11.60%) in Spotify — and the top stockholder of Moderna (11.29%), the company that carries the largest overall weight in the firm’s portfolio, at $12 billion in holdings.
Other major Baillie Gifford holdings — including some companies listed above among those mandating COVID vaccines — include Tesla (second highest at 6.3% of its portfolio’s value), Amazon (fourth highest at 3.8%), Spotify (seventh highest at 2.8%), Netflix (ninth highest at 2.6%), Meta (12th, 1.4%), Microsoft (16th, 1.3%), Anthem (21st, 1.2%), Alphabet Inc. (22nd, 1.1%), BioNTech (29th, 0.9%), Mastercard (39th, 0.6%), DoorDash (45th, 0.6%), Salesforce (53rd, 0.5%), and Lyft (93rd, 0.2%).
Baillie Gifford, through its Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust, also maintains a significant stake in Palantir (0.2% of the firm’s net asset value, or NAV).
As reported by The Defender, Palantir developed the Tiberius vaccine allocation planning system operated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal (which terminated the contracts of nonprofits opposed to vaccine mandates) and a Facebook board member, also is a co-founder of Palantir and serves on its board of directors.
Palantir’s top two stockholders are Vanguard (6.08%) and BlackRock (3.31%).
In turn, the top stockholders of BioNTech, Pfizer’s partner in the development of its COVID vaccine, include Baillie Gifford (biggest stockholder, 2.69%) and BlackRock (seventh highest, 0.59%), while Vanguard manages the top mutual fund with holdings in BioNTech (0.92%), and Baillie Gifford the ninth biggest (0.23%).
Tangled web of corporate connections raises host of questions
BlackRock and Vanguard are poised to continue expanding— as far back as 2017, Bloomberg predicted that by 2028, these two companies would be managing $20 trillion worth of investments.
The size and scope of the firms’ investments raise questions about how much influence BlackRock and Vanguard can wield over the formulation of corporate policies by the companies in which the two firms are heavily invested.
This ever-growing influence has led some analysts to describe the two firms as “kingmakers,” arguing their growing voting share in an increasing number of corporations would “hand them a de-facto veto on all major corporate decisions by 2040.
To what extent do companies mandating COVID vaccines have the best interest of their employees in mind? Or are these companies implementing policies under the guise of “protecting” employees, when in fact they are more concerned about appeasing major investors?
What else might these companies do, if “encouraged” in some way by major stockholders?
Moreover, do mandatory (or strongly encouraged) vaccination policies reflect the worldview of funds such as BlackRock and Vanguard, and their managers — in much the same way major corporations have embraced purportedly “green” policies which only barely cloak potentially totalitarian restrictions on civil liberties, such as “personal carbon allowances” and digital “vaccine passports”?
The answers may lie, in part, in the words of BlackRock CEO and chairman, Larry Fink.
In his 2022 annual letter to CEOs, Fink wrote that “employees are increasingly looking to their employer as the most trusted, competent and ethical source of information — more so than government, the media and NGOs.”
Fink said, “workers demanding more from their employers is an essential feature of effective capitalism” — an interesting viewpoint given that the BlackRock and Vanguard strategy to control as many corporations as possible, including competing ones, would seem to contradict the principles of capitalism, competition, and a free market.
Fink also warned that “companies not adjusting to this new reality and responding to their workers do so at their own peril.”
In other words, employees and workers of companies that have imposed vaccine mandates should take comfort in such policies, as their employer appears to know what’s best for them — at least according to Fink.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...Ha_320x180.jpg
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...Ha_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WJJ7tMGKNRHa/
Breaking Exclusive: Former Blackrock Portfolio Manager Exposes Pfizer Fraud
First published at 15:12 UTC on February 17th, 2022.
Edward Dowd former Blackrock executive
46:09 video runtime
channel image
Jim Fetzer
Jim Fetzer
First published at 15:12 UTC on February 17th, 2022.
channel image
Jim Fetzer
_____________
also view video on rumble
https://rumble.com/vv1adx-breaking-e...zer-fraud.html
KLIM.news channel
________________
This rforum has covered the early stages of this Ventavia fraud from the beginning.
29th December 2021, 06:10 AM
Thread: Coronavirus
by Dachsie
Replies
2,730
Views
187,094
Re: Coronavirus
12/22/21
•
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...?itm_term=home
COVID › Views
Pfizer Vaccine Clinical Trials Poorly Designed From the...
8th December 2021, 01:04 PM
Thread: Coronavirus
by Dachsie
Replies
2,730
Views
187,094
Re: Coronavirus
https://vaxxter.com/the-fda-and-pfiz...ces-to-murder/
The FDA and Pfizer: Accomplices to Murder
TOPICS:Coronaviruscovid vaccineCOVID19
...
14th November 2021, 02:18 PM
Thread: Coronavirus
by Dachsie
Replies
2,730
Views
187,094
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LzcGOjDl8Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LzcGOjDl8Q
8:03 video runtime
Gravitas: Was Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine trial "compromised"?
Nov 5, 2021
_______________
Brook Jackson is the Pfizer Ventavia whistleblower.
see this posting
14th November 2021, 02:18 PM #2235
Dachsie
Dachsie is online now
Iridium
Dachsie's Avatar
Join Date
Mar 2014
Posts
5,495
Thanks
1,168
Thanked 2,252 Times in 1,623 Posts
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LzcGOjDl8Q
Mel & Pharma Analyst Whistleblower Karen Kingston On Medical Killing Fields & Transhumanism 2-16-22
https://rumble.com/vv1xhk-karen-kingston.html
Mel is pleased to have her friend Karen Kingston back, a former Pfizer employee and analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries share some of her shocking research on the medical industrial complex and their ultimate eugenics goals. Demons are everywhere but we the people are awake and do not consent. God Wins! Follow The Grand Jury Crimes Against Humanity Mock Trial Dr. & Lawyer Reiner Fuellmich
https://www.grand-jury.net
Dachsie comment:
I posted an interview of Dr. Meryl Nass by Dr. Joseph Mercola about two weeks ago in this thread and commented then that Dr. Nass said the FDA had given "full approval" status to remdesivir "without any data." This full approval, licensure, of was granted for this drug, which is only administered to in-hospitalized patients by I V drip.
I recall Dr. Pierre Kory saying remdesivir, rem death is near, saying, as I recall, that a high percentage of patients who receive it experience fatal renal failure. Stew Peters and other doctors have said similar things about remdesivir. This approval by FDA is highly suspicious and needs full investigation NOW.
Thanks to Dr. Vladimir Zelenko for sharing this article.
_______________________________
https://www.science.org/content/arti...-covid-19-drug
The ‘very, very bad look' of remdesivir, the first FDA-approved COVID-19 drug
The Food and Drug Administration held no advisory meeting on antiviral, and the European Union signed contract without knowing of failed trial
28 Oct 2020 ByJon Cohen, Kai Kupferschmidt
https://www.science.org/do/10.1126/s...fice_1280p.jpg
President Donald Trump and Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Stephen Hahn (right) met with Daniel O'Day (left), CEO of Gilead Sciences, when remdesivir received an emergency use authorization in May.AP Photo/Alex Brandon
Science's COVID-19 reporting is supported by the Pulitzer Center and the Heising-Simons Foundation.
October was a good month for Gilead Sciences, the giant manufacturer of antivirals headquartered in Foster City, California. On 8 October, the company inked an agreement to supply the European Union with its drug remdesivir as a treatment for COVID-19—a deal potentially worth more than $1 billion. Two weeks later, on 22 October, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved remdesivir for use against the pandemic coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in the United States—the first drug to receive that status. The EU and U.S. decisions pave the way for Gilead's drug into two major markets, both with soaring COVID-19 cases.
But both decisions baffled scientists who have closely watched the clinical trials of remdesivir unfold over the past 6 months—and who have many questions about remdesivir's worth. At best, one large, well-designed study found remdesivir modestly reduced the time to recover from COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with severe illness. A few smaller studies found no impact of treatment on the disease whatsoever. Then, on 15 October—in this month's decidedly unfavorable news for Gilead—the fourth and largest controlled study delivered what some believed was a coup de grâce: The World Health Organization's (WHO's) Solidarity trial showed that remdesivir does not reduce mortality or the time COVID-19 patients take to recover.
Science has learned that both FDA's decision and the EU deal came about under unusual circumstances that gave the company important advantages. FDA never consulted a group of outside experts that it has at the ready to weigh in on complicated antiviral drug issues. That group, the Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee (AMDAC), mixes infectious disease clinicians with biostatisticians, pharmacists, and a consumer representative to review all available data on experimental treatments and make recommendations to FDA about drug approvals—yet it has not convened once during the pandemic.
The European Union, meanwhile, decided to settle on the remdesivir pricing exactly 1 week before the disappointing Solidarity trial results came out. It was unaware of those results, although Gilead, having donated remdesivir to the trial, was informed of the data on 23 September and knew the trial was a bust.
"This is a very, very bad look for the FDA, and the dealings between Gilead and EU make it another layer of badness," says Eric Topol, a cardiologist at the Scripps Research Translational Institute who objected to remdesivir's FDA approval.
Advertisement
FDA has no obligation to convene outside panels for its decisions, stresses AMDAC member David Hardy, an HIV/AIDS scientist of the University of California, Los Angeles. Yet the agency often does so for tricky drug approvals and Hardy is "amazed" the agency didn't consult the panel in this case. "This sets the standard for the first COVID-19 antiviral," he says. "When it comes to the point of giving pharmaceutical companies exclusive marketing rights in this area, that really is something that's very, very important. And there does need to be more than just governmental input."
FDA did not respond to Science's request to discuss why it opted against convening the committee, noting only that it is "at the discretion" of division directors. But FDA's inaction stands in sharp contrast to its handling of potential COVID-19 vaccines. Last week, the agency convened an advisory group to discuss the mere possibility of such a vaccine passing regulatory muster.
As to the EU agreement, Gilead confirmed to Science that WHO in "late September" provided the company with a manuscript about the study results, but a spokesperson for the European Commission, the EU executive arm, said these weren't revealed during its negotiations. The company has aggressively called into question the validity of the Solidarity data, in part because the study was carried out in vastly different countries around the world with different health care standards. In a 15 October statement, Gilead went so far as to say "it is unclear if any conclusive findings can be drawn from the study results."
That criticism has angered investigators in the Solidarity study, including Marie-Paule Kieny, director of research at the French medical research agency INSERM and a former WHO officer. "It's appalling to see how Gilead tries to badmouth the Solidarity trial," Kieny says. "Pretending the trial has no value because it is in low-income countries is just prejudice."
Disappointing trials
On 10 January, 2 days after SARS-CoV-2 was proved to be the cause of COVID-19, researchers published a study in Nature Communications that showed remdesivir had powerful inhibitory effects in both test tube and mouse studies on the related coronavirus that is responsible for Middle East respiratory syndrome. Two weeks later, doctors treated the first confirmed case of COVID-19 in the United States with the drug and reported that the 35-year-old man improved rapidly.
An interim analysis from a large-scale, placebo-controlled clinical trial carried out by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), announced on 29 April, tempered expectations but also emphasized that remdesivir had promise. The drug reduced the median time that severely ill, hospitalized COVID-19 patients took to recover from 15 days to 11 days. It was a modest gain, but NIH noted in a press release that treated patients "had a 31% faster time to recovery than those who received placebo." Remdesivir, which must be repeatedly infused intravenously, also seemed to lower the risk of death, but that difference could have arisen by chance. (A peer-reviewed, final report of the study published 8 October in The New England Journal of Medicine reduced the time to recovery for the 531 treated patients to 10 days.)
A second, smaller placebo-controlled study of remdesivir on hospitalized COVID-19 patients in China, published online by The Lancet also on 29 April, found no statistically significant benefit from the treatment—and the antiviral surprisingly had no impact on levels of the coronavirus.
Two days after the results from China and the United States came out, FDA granted remdesivir an emergency use authorization (EUA)—a temporary status that is far from full approval—for use in severe COVID-19 patients. The agency cited the NIH trial data, but not the other study. President Donald Trump praised the EUA in an Oval Office press event with Daniel O'Day, CEO of Gilead.
quotation mark
It's appalling to see how Gilead tries to badmouth the Solidarity trial. Pretending the trial has no value because it is in low-income countries is just prejudice.
Marie-Paule Kieny, INSERM
On 21 August, a Gilead-sponsored study published online in JAMA compared hospitalized COVID-19 patients with moderate pneumonia who received remdesivir for 5 days or 10 days versus those treated with the standard of care. The 5-day remdesivir group improved more quickly, but, oddly, the 10-day group did not. (An earlier published study sponsored by Gilead found no difference between the two treatment courses.)
The next week, FDA expanded remdesivir's EUA to include all hospitalized COVID-19 patients. That led Topol to publish a scathing open letter to FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn on Medscape, a popular medical website of which Topol is editor-in-chief. Under the headline "Tell the Truth or Resign," Topol lumped the decision together with heavily criticized EUAs issued earlier for the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine—which the agency later rescinded—and antibody-rich "convalescent" plasma obtained from the blood of recovered COVID-19 patients. "These repeated breaches demonstrate your willingness to ignore the lack of scientific evidence, and to be complicit with the Trump Administration's politicization of America's healthcare institutions," Topol wrote.
Debating the evidence
WHO's Solidarity trial, conducted in 405 hospitals in 30 countries, is about three times as large as the other three trials together and many scientists expected it to better resolve remdesivir's worth. Solidarity did not use a placebo, but instead compared remdesivir and three other repurposed drugs with each other and the standard of care. The Solidarity trial investigators described the study results to FDA representatives on 10 October and posted a preprint on them on medRxiv 5 days later. Solidarity mainly aimed to determine whether the drugs lowered mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, which none of them did. The researchers also noted that remdesivir did not affect "the duration of hospitalization" or whether COVID-19 patients required ventilators, which are only used when people advance to very serious disease.
The release of the Solidarity data has triggered a fresh debate about the relative value of each remdesivir trial—and whether FDA should have aired that discussion in public instead of weighing the data privately. In its review that recommended remdesivir's approval, the agency only included data from three trials: the NIH study and two Gilead-sponsored trials, ignoring the Solidarity data as well as the findings from the other placebo-controlled trial in China.
That infuriated the Solidarity team. "The mantra I've always heard as a joke about the FDA is that they say ‘In God we trust, everyone else has to provide data,'" Kieny says. "So look at all the data."
As far as Gilead is concerned, the Solidarity data should not play an important role. "We are concerned that the data from this open-label global trial have not undergone the rigorous review required to allow for constructive scientific discussion, particularly given the limitations of the trial design," the company wrote in its statement.
quotation mark
The argument that the earlier you use it, the better is great until you realize what the implications of that are: You won't save many lives, and you'll have to treat a lot of patients. It's very inconvenient, and it'll cost you a fortune.
Martin Landray, University of Oxford
Gilead Chief Medical Officer Merdad Parsey wrote in an open letter posted the day of FDA's remdesivir approval that Solidarity "does not negate other study results—particularly from a trial designed with the strictest of scientific standards, as is the case with" NIH's study. Gilead has also raised questions about the availability of Solidarity's data, telling Science it has requested from WHO, but has yet to receive, "the underlying data sets or statistical analysis plan" for the trial.
WHO counters that Gilead knew the statistical analysis plan before joining the trial and will receive the full data set once the study is complete. It does not matter that the data have not yet been peer reviewed, WHO scientists say, because FDA traditionally reviews all available data, including unpublished findings. As to the disparity in health systems that Gilead cites as a confounding factor in Solidarity's findings, WHO's chief scientist, Soumya Swaminathan, notes that 50% of the 2750 patients who received remdesivir in the trial were from Canada and Europe, places recognized for high-quality health care. And she stresses that the other participating countries do not necessarily have substandard care.
Clifford Lane of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who helped run the NIH study, says its main difference with Solidarity is "the degree of granularity" of the analyses of subgroups that may have benefited. "I think the Solidarity data are fine," Lane says. "It's a very large study and it has a very robust endpoint."
Martin Landray of the University of Oxford, who is co-leading the world's largest study of various COVID-19 treatments, says remdesivir "definitely doesn't work in the sickest patients where the biggest gains would be" but might help people at earlier stages of disease. Further complicating the matter, most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 recover without any intervention. "The argument that the earlier you use it the better is great until you realize what the implications of that are: You won't save many lives, and you'll have to treat a lot of patients," Landray says. "It's very inconvenient, and it'll cost you a fortune."
Questions have also arisen about the potential of remdesivir to do harm. WHO has a regular overview of possible adverse drug events related to COVID-19 treatments. In late August it noted a disproportionately high number of reports of liver and kidney problems in patients receiving remdesivir compared with patients receiving other drugs for COVID-19. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) also announced this month that its safety committee had started a review to assess reports of acute kidney injuries in some patients taking remdesivir.
workers inspect vials and equipment in a manufacturing facility.
Gilead Sciences's remdesivir has become part of the standard of care for many COVID-19 patients in the United States and the company has been increasing production of the antiviral to meet increasing demand.Gilead
Many researchers point out that another crucial piece of data is missing entirely from FDA's statement on remdesivir's approval: evidence the drug reduces the amount of SARS-CoV-2 in the body, the viral load. "I've been working in antivirals for 30 years. Every time you study an antiviral, you show an effect on the virus and you publish it," says Andrew Hill, a clinical pharmacologist at the University of Liverpool. "Surely Gilead has done that. Where are the data? It is very, very strange."
Richard Peto, an Oxford statistician and epidemiologist who helped design Solidarity and analyze the data, stresses that the WHO trial cannot prove whether remdesivir has zero benefit for COVID-19. "Trials produce confidence intervals, not just point estimates and this is actually the difficulty in trying to discuss this," Peto says. "Gilead and the FDA have sort of maneuvered us into a position where we're being asked to try and prove remdesivir does nothing rather than asking the usual way round, which is, ‘Can the manufacturers prove it does something?'"
To many scientists, such complexities underscore that FDA should have consulted ADAC, its panel of outside experts, for a vigorous debate. It could have "elevated the discussion," says ADAC Chair Lindsey Baden, an infectious disease specialist at Brigham and Women's Hospital. "Hydroxychloroquine, convalescent plasma, remdesivir—these are complicated decisions given the imperfect nature of the data upon which the decisions are being made, and the urgency of the clinical use gives all the more reasons to have an open discussion," says Baden, whose group last met in October 2019.
"This was not a straightforward approval and this is not an ordinary time," adds Luciana Borio, a former acting chief scientist at FDA who now works at a not-for-profit venture capital firm. "It would have been helpful to have a public discussion on the matter."
Georgetown University's Jesse Goodman, a former chief scientist at FDA, notes that it is complicated to organize advisory committee meetings, but adds that the agency obviously just arranged one for COVID-19 vaccines. "Although it's a pandemic and everybody is super busy, it's something … you can do virtually," he says. "It would have been an opportunity to make clear publicly the rationale and their risk-benefit assessment."
European Commission in the dark
EMA, Europe's FDA counterpart, in July gave "conditional approval" to remdesivir—which is similar to an EUA—but it has yet to give its full blessing. The European Union nevertheless has negotiated a "joint procurement agreement" with Gilead that offers 500,000 treatment courses over the next 6 months for $1.2 billion. A spokesperson of the Commission confirms to Science it was not informed of the drug's failure in the Solidarity trial until the day after the new contract was signed on 8 October.
"The Commission became aware of the results of the Solidarity trial on 9 October from the reporting of [EMA] at the COVID task force meeting on the same day," the spokesperson says. "There was no discussion with WHO about the ongoing study prior to signing the contract with Gilead."
When Science asked Gilead why it didn't disclose the Solidarity data during its negotiations with the Commission, the company acknowledged it received a draft manuscript from WHO in late September but said it was "heavily redacted." WHO says the only information blacked out was results relating to the other drugs used in the trial because of confidentiality agreements with their manufacturers.
quotation mark
This was not a straightforward approval and this is not an ordinary time. It would have been helpful to have a public discussion on the matter.
Luciana Borio, former acting chief scientist at FDA
Although the agreement with Gilead locks EU members into a price of about $2400 for a full course of remdesivir, it does not obligate any countries to purchase the drug, the Commission spokesperson tells Science. "The EU needs to publish the deal with Gilead," says Yannis Natsis of the nonprofit European Public Health Alliance. "It should at least renegotiate the volume of the doses and the price per treatment." Gilead says it doesn't plan to adjust its negotiated price in the wake of the Solidarity data.
Kieny says it's an "enormous" waste for EU countries to invest in remdesivir based on the idea that it might help a small subset of patients. "You can always say, ‘OK, now, if I disaggregate the population and if I take only those who have a blue eye and a wooden leg, maybe this is very effective,'" she says.
Indeed, some advocates of remdesivir point to analyses of Solidarity patient subgroups that suggest a mortality benefit in those who received supplemental oxygen but were not on ventilators. But accepting that would also mean accepting that remdesivir harmed those who were on ventilators, Hill says. "You can't do a subgroup analysis and only believe half the story."
The bottom line from the trials so far is there simply isn't enough evidence that remdesivir works, says Jason Pogue, a University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, researcher who is president of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pogue believes FDA made a mistake and, unless more data emerge, EMA should not give the drug full approval. "There are more questions than answers about the efficacy of remdesivir in hospitalized patients," he says.
*Correction, 30 October, noon: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that Gilead was the sponsor of the Solidarity trial. It has been corrected to note that the company supported the study by donating the drug.
doi: 10.1126/science.abf4549
About the author
Jon Cohen
Jon Cohen
Author
Jon is a staff writer for Science.
Kai Kupferschmidt
Kai Kupferschmidt
Author
Kai is a contributing correspondent for Science magazine based in Berlin, Germany. He is the author of a book about the color blue, published in 2019.
Interesting conversation with much about Canada truckers.
Some choice nuggets from this interview.
China and Russia won't take these mRNA vaccines.
Viral Based Genetic Therapies VGBT s is the FDA term for the not-vaccines.
You can buy Z-Pak, Ivermectin and HCQ over-the-counter everywhere south of the Rio Grande.
Now we have a 42 percent increase in all-cause fatality.
____________
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...uW_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/S7yTZvWcYjuW/
Dr. Lee Merritt with Matthew Bracken: Merritt Medical Hour, Feb 16, 2022
50:13 video runtime
skip first 4 minutes for beginning after opening ad.
First published at 21:01 UTC on February 17th, 2022.
channel image
Jim Fetzer
Jim Fetzer
9582 subscribers
AMAZINGLY GOOD conversation between Dr. Lee Merritt and Matthew Bracken, retired Navy SEAL officer! They cover the waterfront on the obvious damage done by the vaxxines, the agenda for depopulation, the attack on our military with the Vax bioweapons -- HIGHLY recommended!
Watch "Merritt Medical Hour" on Brighteon.tv every Wednesday from 7:00 pm - 8:00 pm est
Matthew Bracken: enemiesforeignanddomestic.com
Dr. Merritt's website: themedicalrebel.com
From:
https://www.brighteon.com/b2ea1a66-3...8-ed557df8b6d5 (50:14)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5pRacFfkzM
Dr. Fauci explains why you need MORE shots
2:27 video runtime--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5pRacFfkzM
In reference to posting number 2731 of yesterday in this thread.
_________________
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...cial-collapse/
Open Letter to Edward Dowd: the financial collapse
Questions for this former portfolio manager at BlackRock, the investment management company; Dowd has gone public with his assessments...
by Jon Rappoport
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
Edward,
After listening to a recent interview you did, I have questions. I’m taking your remarks quite seriously, because you’re a financial insider.
You appear to be saying government debt has finally, after decades, reached an end point. Governments can no longer handle the interest payments. COVID will be their cover story. They will say, “Because of the extraordinary outlays of money to support companies and individuals during the pandemic crisis and the necessary lockdowns, we’ve gone into a very deep hole. Therefore, we have to rework the whole financial system.”
Correct?
But this con will not be played out smoothly. People’s savings and investments will be wiped out. Once the news is leaked confirming governments are broke, all trading markets will crash. Government pension funds---gone.
Is this the scenario you envision?
What about individual bank accounts? Will they survive? If not, why not?
Up to now, governments have invented money out of thin air. Why can’t they keep printing it and further rig the system by declaring (with their creditors) that interest payments on government debt will be lowered and extended further into the future?
I fully understand the points you’re making about Pfizer and Moderna possibly going down, as Enron did. They committed, in collusion with the FDA, massive fraud vis-à-vis their vaccine clinical trials. Their safety data were lies.
I also can see, as you predict, a war between insurance companies and vaccine manufacturers, based on huge upswings in deaths as a result of the vaccines. The insurance companies have to pay out all those unexpected death claims.
But I want to form a clearer picture of your predictions about the financial collapse. I agree that The Great Reset is real. The powers-that-be fully intend to make it happen. A currency reset is one of their main objectives.
You seem to be saying that 2022 or 2023 is the year for the financial reset; and there will be much chaos and many riots. “Turbulence” would be a vast understatement.
So I’d like to see, in writing, the details on how you think this is going to play out.
For example, do you believe new sweeping lockdowns---blamed on “COVID”---will actually keep people in their homes and off the streets rioting---as they discover their savings and investments have been wiped out?
A new state of emergency amounting to martial law will be declared?
Government leaders will actually admit, publicly, that their debt is insupportable, and a new system must be put in place, NOW?
It would be valuable to read your fleshed-out scenario of the reset. Then we could SEE what might be in store for all of us.
The difference between an overall plan to wage war against the people and the battle strategy itself is enormous.
Looking at the strategy tends to wake people up.
“You mean they’re going to do THAT? And if we respond with THIS, they’ll do THAT…?”
Your position within the system gives you an important perspective. I hope to hear from you.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...regnant-women/
Vaccine shedding spreads disaster to unvaccinated pregnant women?
by Jon Rappoport
Since the COVID vaccines were authorized, MANY women have posted reports of disrupted and unusual menstrual cycles, heavy bleeding, and miscarriages.
What’s more, some of these women state they haven’t received the COVID vaccine, but they’ve been in close contact with others who have been vaccinated---leading to the question:
Can the COVID RNA vaccine (which is actually an experimental genetic treatment) “shed” something harmful that can be passed from person to person?
Perhaps that sounds impossible, but…
What does Pfizer say about the dangers to pregnant women?
Let’s consider a key Pfizer document, describing procedures to be followed in its clinical trial of the COVID vaccine. The document is titled:
“A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS.”
On page 67, we find a warning about potential adverse effects of the vaccine. The abstruse term “study intervention” pops up. It surely means “vaccination.” “Environmental exposure” means contact with elements of the vaccine other than by injection.
Warning of adverse effect: “A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:”
“A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.”
“A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”
These warnings, from the vaccine manufacturer, Pfizer, are shocking. They imply that pregnant women can be harmed by breathing in, or contacting by skin, the vaccine as it moves from person to person. Which would be “shedding.”
And what is being transferred from person to person? What is in the vaccine? Genetic material. RNA. RNA encapsulated in toxic lipid nanoparticles.
The Pfizer document states that, if any of these “adverse events” involving pregnant women occur during the clinical trial of the vaccine, they must be reported.
Chilling.
_________________
Dachsie comment:
These Viral Based Genetic Therapies VGBTs are administered to anybody and everybody, indiscriminately and erratically, no questions asked, to whoever happens upon the tables set up at CVS and Wallmart. Records of adverse events to injected and placebo'd people in VGBT trials are deliberately and wantonly not being kept and lawsuits about this are just beginning the long litigation process.
Meanwhile, Pfizer-subsidiary FDA is busy in their secret meetings giving full approval and licensure to drugs like RemDeathIsNear.
And the beat goes on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachsie
After my experience with Covid-19 I have to believe shedding is real
and this is the question I would like answered
Quote:
And what is being transferred from person to person? What is in the vaccine? Genetic material. RNA. RNA encapsulated in toxic lipid nanoparticles.
Another bombshell report from TruNews.com show today, Friday February 18, 2022.
Attorney Todd Coliender who is co-counselor with Thomas Renz
i am listening live now so cannot give full url now but you can go to
https://www.trunews.com
and click on show title...
Todd Callender: Genetic-altering Vaccines Could Nullify Human Rights
Will fill in full url for replays later.
https://www.trunews.com/stream/todd-callender-genetic-altering-vaccines-could-nullify-human-rights
1:02:50 video runtime
Todd Callender: Genetic-altering Vaccines Could Nullify Human Rights
Today on TruNews, founder and host Rick Wiles is joined by disabled rights activist attorney Todd Callender, who is actively defending US servicemen from being forced to take the operating system jab. They also discuss the history of the development of mRNA injections, and their future in altering human DNA, ending in the nullification of human rights.
Rick Wiles. Airdate 2/18/22
Content Contributed By — TruNews Team
Sunday evenng at 8:00 pm Eastern Time
Epoch Times will do an investigative report covering why the U S Military is denying Religious Exemptions for U S. military enlistees who do not want to take the Experimental, not-FDA aopproved Viral Based Genetic Therapies VGBTs .
One explanation is that somebody wants to weaken and kill of the United States of America Defense forces and leave the USA weakened and defenseless.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/invest...r_4285531.html
[Live Premiere on Feb 20 at 8PM ET] INVESTIGATIVE REPORT: Military Whistleblowers Reveal Religious Discrimination Under Covid-19, and Prior
Crossroads
Crossroads
JOSHUA PHILIPP
There is widespread discrimination in the US armed forces. This is despite claims that the military has been making a push to eliminate discrimination from its ranks. Whistleblowers have stepped forward to reveal what they say is religious discrimination, and what are also possible violations of both military law and Constitutional law. In this exclusive investigative report, we look into possible reasons on why the military has largely denied religious exemptions for COVID-19 Vaccines, and we uncover a longer history of discriminatory practices targeting the expression of belief.
Subscribe to the new Crossroads newsletter and stay up-to-date!
Follow EpochTV on social media:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8GmmR...andomize=false
MASS DEATH INCOMING? CDC Data Show over 100K DEAD from the Vaccine
First published at 06:46 UTC on February 19th, 2022.
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...ko_320x180.jpg
The Red Elephants - Vincent James
The Red Elephants
24:44 video runtime
Also see article at
https://www.dailyveracity.com/2022/0...pted-as-truth/
Three Things That Were Considered ‘Dangerous Misinformation’ Last Year Which are Now Widely Accepted as Truth
byDaily Veracity Staff
February 7, 2022
8 minute read
No comments
___________
Dachsie comment:
at 15:43
"we all got COVID, or whatever it is"
Vincent James in this video seems to indicate that his older sister who did not also join the family Christmas get-together happened to "get COVID" too and that this older sister of his who is a teacher in Chicago got more serious symptoms of the illness than he and his other family members got while on their Christmas holiday gathering.
That is an important insight. People ARE catching something. It is convenient to refer to " it " as "COVID" but technically that is not accurate and precise as far as the science is concerned. COVID has never been a thing that is scientifically identified. It's not a thing.
Vincent James were not overly scared when the family all caught "COVID." They just regarded it as an uneventful case of something like "the flu" or "a cold" and they took some vitamin C and Zinc (no ivermectin) and they all went on with their Christmas gathering and all got over a brief mild illness with no problems.
But his sister is said to have contracted "COVID" with more severe symptoms (@ 19:42 ) and she was the only person in his family who was "vaccinated". The symptoms of whatever is contracted seems to hit vaccinated people harder and they have more severe symptoms. That seems to sum things up very nicely.
I would go on to say that the "vaccines" especially the mRNA ones, really seem to immediately change the person's immune system's anibodies defenses so that natural immunity to mild pathogens going around is substantially impaired from the first 2-shot doses of "the vaccine." His sister had the 2-shot vaccine plus one booster. But apparently she pulled through OK, which many people do, especially younger people.
Getting the vaccine is when big problems can start, however, when older people get the shot, and/or people of any age who already have some other medical condition when already causes them to have somewhat weakened immune systems.
We still can't "follow the science" on this illness because the Devil has written the "genetic code" for this illness.
_________________________
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...X9_320x180.jpg
Dachsie comment:
Janice McGheachin, current Lt. Gov. of Idaho, is running as Republican candidate for Idaho governor. She has an excellent record of fighting current Idaho governor Little on mask mandates, lockdowns and other PLANdemic evil.
I hope she wins the candidacy and I hope true patriots get out and vote for her in the primary election voting day of May 17, 2022.
I try to avoid politics as much as possible but I believe this lady will fight for all true American patriots know is most important in this crucial time.
Run for office NOW.
Political candidates for any office, federal, state or local, need to take advantage of the awakening that is happening right now in the USA regarding how
how The masks are a joke and do not work and never did work and the science proves it...
how the VACCINES are what are causing the serious serious sickness that some people are getting,
The Vaccines don't work and do not meet the scientific definition of what a vaccine is.
Many truths coming out in the mainstream media right now blowing the lid off all the lives of the fake pandemic , PLANdemic, that Michael Yeadon, reired Pfizer top executive, says are logically only for the purpose of
DEPOPULATION.
__________________________
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...X9_320x180.jpg
https://rumble.com/vv1emi-live-trude...cs-drug-b.html
LIVE: Trudeau Declares War on God, McGeachin Fights to Save Idaho, Docs Drug Babies
Janice McGheachin was running for Idaho governor and was in the Republican primary election, but do not know how this excellent politician did in that primary election.
The Idaho primary voting day will occur on May 17, 2022. The general election will occur on November 8, 2022. Additional general election candidates will be added here following the primary.
Republican primary election
Republican primary for Governor of Idaho
The following candidates are running in the Republican primary for Governor of Idaho on May 17, 2022.
Candidate
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia...nBradshaw2.jpg
Steven Bradshaw
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia...mmonBundy2.jpg
Ammon Bundy
Silhouette Placeholder Image.png
Chris Hammond
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia...umphreysed.jpg
Ed Humphreys
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia...Lisa-Marie.jpg
Lisa Marie
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia...cGeachin41.jpg
Janice McGeachin
Silhouette Placeholder Image.png
Cody Usabel
Stew Peters Show
Published February 15, 2022 18,415 Views
This ENTIRE Stew Peters show of Feb. 15. 2022 is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT.
WATCH IT NOW.
https://rumble.com/vv1emi-live-trude...cs-drug-b.html
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...MM_320x180.jpg
Watch guest Ali Schultz J.D. tell about a USA hospital kidnapping a new born baby and Life Flighting the baby to another hospital without telling the mother and then trying to give baby on Remdesivir. but that atrocity killshot had not happened at time of this stew Peters show.
This is RACKETEERING and multiple felony CRIMES !!!!!!!
https://christianresearchnetwork.org...e-catastrophe/
https://christianresearchnetwork.org...crn-header.png
CDC data signaling vaccine catastrophe
CDC data signaling vaccine catastrophe
https://i0.wp.com/christianresearchn...00%2C201&ssl=1
Posted by Marsha West ∙ February 16, 2022 ∙ In News ∙ Coronavirus - COVID-19, Cover up, Death, Democrat, Health, Research, Science, Truth, United States Government, Vaccine, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System-VAERS, Biden Joe ∙ Bookmark permalink
(Art Moore – WND) In 1976, after 32 deaths were attributed to the swine flu vaccine, the U.S. government halted the mass vaccination campaign.
But now, despite the VAERS database run by the CDC and the FDA reporting more than 23,000 deaths related to the COVID-19 vaccines, the messaging from establishment media and top health officials such as Dr. Rochelle Walensky and Dr. Anthony Fauci essentially is that no one has died or suffered severe adverse effects from the largest rollout of an experimental vaccine in world history.
When confronted more than one month ago in a Senate hearing, Walensky and Fauci both dodged a direct question about the number of vaccine deaths and injuries by undermining the validity of the VAERS data, which is compiled to monitor vaccine safety. And “fact checkers” repeatedly have cited the CDC saying it can’t be proved that any of the deaths record in VAERS were caused by the vaccines. To date, as WND reported, Walensky still has not fulfilled her promise to a Republican senator to provide the American people with the government’s evidence-based estimate of vaccine-related deaths and adverse events.
https://www.wnd.com/wp-content/uploa...ky-hearing.jpg
CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky during a Jan. 11 Senate hearing (Video screenshot)
View article →
https://www.wnd.com/2022/02/cdc-data-signaling-vaccine-catastrophe/
WND EXCLUSIVE
CDC data signaling vaccine catastrophe
It took only 32 deaths to halt 1976 shot campaign
Art Moore By Art Moore
Published February 14, 2022 at 7:14pm
DISCLAIMER: This news story is posted for informational and research purposes and is not in any way intended as an endorsement of WND.
The conservative voice and Christian content are being silenced more and more. CRN offers a lifeline to conservative people of faith who are disgusted with Facebook, Twitter and the MSM for failing to report, even blocking, important news stories that don’t comport with the far left’s narrative. We urge you to sign up to receive our FREE need to read articles. NO ADS! NO VIDEOS! NO POPUPS! JUST STRAIGHT NEWS.
Join Marsha West on MeWe
_________________
Dachsie comment:
See full hyperlinks at original posted site...
https://christianresearchnetwork.org...e-catastrophe/
https://rumble.com/vuxr6i-phd-biolog...tastrophe.html
Video of Dr. Rose,
PHD : CDC figures signal vaccine catastrophe
arthurdmoore Published February 14, 2022
1:02:33 video runtime
in reference to this artcle
https://www.wnd.com/2022/02/cdc-data...e-catastrophe/ also containing this embedded video
excerpt from last part of WND article
"There is something going on'
Rose gave testimony in October to an FDA panel in which members said they reluctantly approved the shots for children 5-11 because they wanted high-risk children to have access. Panel member Dr. Eric Rubin, editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, famously said: "We're never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it. That's just the way it goes."
In testimony in September to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee when it was considering Pfizer's request for authorization of booster shots, Rose emphasized that there are more VAERS death reports in 2biological data analyst021 than the last 10 years combined.
The FDA's vaccine panel was scheduled to vote this Tuesday on whether to recommend authorization of the shot for children under 5. But the FDA announced last Friday that the decision will be postponed for at least two months because more data is needed.
That’s a significant sign, Rose said, that the tide may be turning.
"There is something going on there. We are all holding our breath hoping that maybe we have presented enough data now and maybe enough people have said said the right things to the right people," she said.
"Or maybe some people's consciences are starting to wake up."
Rose said children, who have zero chance statistically of dying from COVID-19, do not need to be vaccinated for the virus.
“Ask any immunologist, any vaccinologist, any person who knows anything about epidemiology, immunology, viral dynamics. Anyone who knows what herd immunity actually means," she said. "I mean, come on!"
Pointing to the Canadian trucker protest, she sees "a groundswell of people who are united in wanting this to end."
"They're not going to be able to keep hiding the adverse event data," she said.
"It's going to be so in your face soon – I think probably by the fall of this year – that nobody's going to be able to hide this."
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...NF0IjTTBuw--~D
source: usawatchdog.com
Dachsie comment:
The case of whistleblower Brook Jackson
and
Pfraudulent Pfizer marches on.
Pfizer provides half of the funding for the FDA and a large number of the FDA, NIH, NIAID and CDC top level executives and administrators own vaccine-related patents and stocks which greatly personally enriches this gang of criminals.
_____________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BXrz91nHms
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BXrz91nHms
16:14 video runtime
15:26 / 16:14
COVID-19 vaccine
Get the latest information from the CDC.
See more resources on Google
#EpochTV
EXCLUSIVE: Pfizer Clinical Trial Whistleblower's Lawsuit Presses Ahead Without Government’s Help
143,356 views
Premiered Feb 16, 2022
25K
Dislike
Share
Save
Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
748K subscribers
�� Try #EpochTV ��https://ept.ms/3raGlBg
⭕️ Sign up for our NEWSLETTER and stay in touch �� https://ept.ms/3wWdBwe
------------------
Resources:
�� American Hartford Gold (866-242-2352):
https://ept.ms/3biH9MN
�� Whistleblower:
https://ept.ms/3uVoBfn
https://ept.ms/3rTwX5m
�� Pfizer Financials:
https://ept.ms/34RmZZs
https://ept.ms/3JsSc3U
https://ept.ms/351MGXg
https://ept.ms/34ZS90A
https://ept.ms/3LISztk
�� Children Under 5:
https://ept.ms/3LF4ecf
------------------
Content:
------------------
⭕️ Subscribe for updates: https://ept.ms/2Tu9clR
⭕️ Support us: https://donorbox.org/facts_matter
⭕️ Listen to Podcasts:
-
�� iTunes Podcast: https://ept.ms/FactsMatterApplePodcast
�� Spotify Podcast: https://ept.ms/FactsMatterSpotifyPodcast
�� Google Podcast: https://ept.ms/FactsMatterGooglePodcast
-------------------------------------------------
© All Rights Reserved.
Dachsie comment:
I notice in this report that they consistently use the term "lab leak" with no explanation of the term.
There is an[B] leak , which implies accidental leak /B]or escape of the pathogen from a lab,
and there is a [B]release, which implies intentional release /B] of a pathogen in a deliberate way as to place and time of release.
Both a "leak" and a "release" imply the "virus" or pathogen is outside / not confined of the laboratory where it is supposed to be.
I still think this unfolding narrative and aspect of the origins of the "COVID-19 virus" is a story that is not about FACT and TRUTH. (Epoch Times is careful in their reporting so everything they report is founded in fact and delivered objrctively, but the overall effect of this reporting appears to support the political narrative that is being built or developed now to make is appear that Fouci's dismissal ("firing") look like a "feather in the cap" of Biden and congress.
It does appear that Fauci story is being "set up" so as to set up Fauci for his fall, his dismissal by what will appear in the media as his "firing."
This will be a very useful distraction media story as well, distracting from the total collapse of the Biden administration debacle. (I also found it very telling that Fauci, in ore of his contentious political theater episodes with Senator Rand Paul , countered with something about the January 6 2021 Pelosi "insurrection" false event as being true and what Senator Paul's real problem was /is. That placed Fauci firmly in the Deep State Destroy the USA Republic camp, in my opinion.)
One other important "take-away" ---
It is indisputably possible for secret government laboratories to create lethal pandemic-level pathogens and to deliberately release them on the populace. This capability to make and use bioweapons and to make "medicines" and "vaccines" for puposes of killing people can be used any time again in the future. What is also knowable from this "PLANdemic" is that it is possible to permanently change the genetic make-up of humans with synthetic lab-created substances and products so that a human can become an owned and controlled patented entity, no longer homo sapiens.
______________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR5r...jSoEDkp8Ze9Hxm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR5rUzdrKe0&list=PLM3fq8FbhwLzd6_5ZZBjSoED kp8Ze9Hxm
13:47 video runtime
Fauci Knew About Virus Lab Origin Via Secret Teleconference, Pushed Alternate Narrative
Fauci Knew About Virus Lab Origin Via Secret Teleconference, Pushed Alternate Narrative
Crossroads Highlights
43.3K subscribers
⭕ Get EpochTV EXCLUSIVES for only $1 (Limited Time Offer) �� https://ept.ms/1DollarNOW1
��Sign up for the Crossroads exclusive newsletter and get even more insights from Josh�� https://ept.ms/CrossroadsExclusiveNew...
_____________________
This is the FULL VIDEO Report -
...https://www.theepochtimes.com/fauci-...ent=01-31-2022...
Dachsie comment:
Just to archive one of Pfizer's communications with the FDA. Note how "vaccines" in children age 6 months through 4 years of age age are considered to be needed "to address the urgent public health need".
This is pure E V I L
The meeting that was recently scheduled to discuss and approve these Emergency Use Authorization "vaccines" for very young children was canceled and it is unknown why but we can hope and pray that these evildoers will grow a conscience and never follow through with this evil plan.
____________
Excerpt:
https://investors.pfizer.com/Investo...A/default.aspx
Investor Relations > News > News Details
Pfizer and BioNTech Initiate Rolling Submission for Emergency Use Authorization of Their COVID-19 Vaccine in Children 6 Months Through 4 Years of Age Following Request From U.S. FDA
02.01.2022 "to address the urgent public health need."
[B]With pediatric COVID-19 cases surpassing 10 million and at the request of the FDA, the companies have submitted available data on the safety and efficacy of two 3 µg doses as part of a three-dose primary series for this age group to address the urgent public health need[/B]
Companies plan to submit additional data on a third 3 µg dose in this age group in the coming months
If authorization is granted, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine would be the first COVID-19 vaccine available for pediatric populations under 5 years of age
NEW YORK & MAINZ, Germany--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE) and BioNTech SE (Nasdaq: BNTX) today announced that following a request from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the companies have initiated a rolling submission seeking to amend the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to include children 6 months through 4 years of age (6 months to <5 years of age), in response to the urgent public health need in this population. The companies expect to complete the EUA submission in the coming days. This application is for authorization of the first two 3 µg doses of a planned three-dose primary series in this age group. Data on a third dose given at least 8 weeks after completion of the second dose are expected in the coming months and will be submitted to the FDA to support a potential expansion of this requested EUA.
Since the pandemic began, more than 10.6 million children have tested positive for COVID-19 in the U.S.,1 with children under 4 accounting for more than 1.6 million of those cases.2 Further, reported COVID-19 cases and related hospitalization among children have spiked dramatically across the United States during the Omicron variant surge. For the week ending January 22, children under 4 accounted for 3.2% of the total hospitalizations due to COVID-19.2 If authorization is granted, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine would be the first vaccine available to help protect children under 5 years of age from this disease, potentially including future emerging variants of concern.
“As hospitalizations of children under 5 due to COVID-19 have soared, our mutual goal with the FDA is to prepare for future variant surges and provide parents with an option to help protect their children from this virus,” said Albert Bourla, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Pfizer. “Ultimately, we believe that three doses of the vaccine will be needed for children 6 months through 4 years of age to achieve high levels of protection against current and potential future variants. If two doses are authorized, parents will have the opportunity to begin a COVID-19 vaccination series for their children while awaiting potential authorization of a third dose.”
“Our vaccine has already demonstrated a favorable safety, tolerability and efficacy profile in multiple clinical trials and real-world studies for all age groups starting from 5 years old,” said Ugur Sahin, M.D., CEO and Co-founder of BioNTech. “If authorized, we are very excited about the prospect of offering parents the opportunity to help protect their children 6 months through 4 years of age from COVID-19 and the potentially severe consequences of infection.”
The request to amend the EUA is based on the totality of data on the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and available efficacy of two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. The companies also plan to share these data with the European Medicines Agency and other regulatory agencies around the world.
The companies plan to provide ample supply of the 3 µg dose to meet demand should the FDA approve the EUA application. The companies previously announced planned global supply capacity of approximately four billion doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in 2022. The companies continue to supply the vaccine under their existing supply agreement with the U.S. government, which continues through April 2022.
About the Phase 1/2/3 Trial in Children
The Phase 1/2/3 trial initially enrolled 4,500 children ages 6 months to under 12 years of age in the United States, Finland, Poland, and Spain from more than 90 clinical trial sites. Additional children have been enrolled in all age groups following study amendments and the trial currently includes approximately 8,300 children. It was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on a two-dose schedule (approximately 21 days apart) in three age groups: ages 5 to under 12 years; ages 2 to under 5 years; and ages 6 months to under 2 years. Based on the Phase 1 dose-escalation portion of the trial, children ages 5 to under 12 years received a two-dose schedule of 10 µg each while children under age 5 received a lower 3 µg dose for each injection in the Phase 2/3 study. The trial enrolled children with or without prior evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. On December 17, 2021, Pfizer and BioNTech announced the companies would test a third 3 µg dose given at least two months after the second dose in children under age 5 and a third dose of the 10 µg formulation in children 5 to under 12 years of age.
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, which is based on BioNTech’s proprietary mRNA technology, was developed by both BioNTech and Pfizer. BioNTech is the Marketing Authorization Holder in the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada and other countries, and the holder of emergency use authorizations or equivalents in the United States (jointly with Pfizer) and other countries. Submissions to pursue regulatory approvals in those countries where emergency use authorizations or equivalent were initially granted are planned.
U.S. Indication & Authorized Use
HOW IS THE VACCINE GIVEN?
The vaccine will be given as an injection into the muscle.
Primary Series:
In individuals 5 years of age and older, the vaccine is administered as a 2-dose series, 3 weeks apart. In individuals 5 years of age and older, a third primary series dose may be administered at least 28 days after the second dose to individuals who are determined to have certain kinds of immunocompromise.
Booster Dose:
A single booster dose of the vaccine may be administered at least 5 months after completion of a primary series of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine or COMIRNATY® (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) to individuals 12 years of age and older
A single booster dose of the vaccine may be administered to individuals 18 years of age and older who have completed primary vaccination with a different authorized COVID-19 vaccine. Individuals should check with their healthcare provider regarding timing of the booster dose
WHAT IS THE INDICATION AND AUTHORIZED USE?
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has received EUA from FDA to provide:
a 2-dose primary series to individuals 5 years of age and older
a third primary series dose to individuals 5 years of age and older who have been determined to have certain kinds of immunocompromise
a single booster dose to individuals 12 years of age and older who have completed a primary series with Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine or COMIRNATY® (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA)
a single booster dose to individuals 18 years of age and older who have completed primary vaccination with a different authorized COVID-19 vaccine. The booster schedule is based on the labeling information of the vaccine used for the primary series
COMIRNATY® (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is an FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine made by Pfizer for BioNTech.
It is approved as a 2-dose series for prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age and older
It is also authorized under EUA to provide:
a 2-dose primary series to individuals 12 through 15 years of age
a third primary series dose to individuals 12 years of age and older who have been determined to have certain kinds of immunocompromise
a single booster dose to individuals 12 years of age and older who have completed a primary series with Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine or COMIRNATY® (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA)
a single booster dose to individuals 18 years of age and older who have completed primary vaccination with a different authorized COVID-19 vaccine. The booster schedule is based on the labeling information of the vaccine used for the primary series
EUA Statement
Emergency uses of the vaccine have not been approved or licensed by FDA, but have been authorized by FDA, under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in individuals 5 years of age and older. The emergency uses are only authorized for the duration of the declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of the medical product under Section 564(b)(1) of the FD&C Act unless the declaration is terminated or authorization revoked sooner. Please see EUA Fact Sheets at www.cvdvaccine-us.com.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
Individuals should not get the vaccine if they:
had a severe allergic reaction after a previous dose of this vaccine
had a severe allergic reaction to any ingredient of this vaccine
Individuals should tell the vaccination provider about all of their medical conditions, including if they:
have any allergies
have had myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) or pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart)
have a fever
have a bleeding disorder or are on a blood thinner
are immunocompromised or are on a medicine that affects the immune system
are pregnant, plan to become pregnant, or are breastfeeding
have received another COVID-19 vaccine
have ever fainted in association with an injection
The vaccine may not protect everyone.
Side effects reported with the vaccine include:
There is a remote chance that the vaccine could cause a severe allergic reaction
A severe allergic reaction would usually occur within a few minutes to 1 hour after getting a dose of the vaccine. For this reason, vaccination providers may ask individuals to stay at the place where they received the vaccine for monitoring after vaccination
Signs of a severe allergic reaction can include difficulty breathing, swelling of the face and throat, a fast heartbeat, a bad rash all over the body, dizziness, and weakness
If an individual experiences a severe allergic reaction, they should call 9-1-1 or go to the nearest hospital
Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) have occurred in some people who have received the vaccine, more commonly in males under 40 years of age than among females and older males. In most of these people, symptoms began within a few days following receipt of the second dose of the vaccine. The chance of having this occur is very low. Individuals should seek medical attention right away if they have any of the following symptoms after receiving the vaccine:
chest pain
shortness of breath
feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart
Additional side effects that have been reported with the vaccine include:
severe allergic reactions; non-severe allergic reactions such as rash, itching, hives, or swelling of the face; myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle); pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart); injection site pain; tiredness; headache; muscle pain; chills; joint pain; fever; injection site swelling; injection site redness; nausea; feeling unwell; swollen lymph nodes (lymphadenopathy); decreased appetite;diarrhea; vomiting; arm pain; fainting in association with injection of the vaccine
These may not be all the possible side effects of the vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. The possible side effects of the vaccine are still being studied in clinical trials. Call the vaccination provider or healthcare provider about bothersome side effects or side effects that do not go away
Data on administration of this vaccine at the same time as other vaccines have not yet been submitted to FDA. Individuals considering receiving this vaccine with other vaccines, should discuss their options with their healthcare provider.
Patients should always ask their healthcare providers for medical advice about adverse events. Individuals are encouraged to report negative side effects of vaccines to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Visit https://www.vaers.hhs.gov or call 1‐800‐822‐7967. In addition, side effects can be reported to Pfizer Inc. at www.pfizersafetyreporting.com or by calling 1-800-438-1985.
Click for
Fact Sheets and Prescribing Information for individuals 12 years of age and older
Full Prescribing Information (16 years of age and older) DILUTE BEFORE USE, Purple Cap
Full Prescribing Information (16 years of age and older) DO NOT DILUTE, Gray Cap
EUA Fact Sheet for Vaccination Providers (12 years of age and older), Purple Cap
EUA Fact Sheet for Vaccination Providers (12 years of age and older), Gray Cap
Recipients and Caregivers Fact Sheet (12 years of age and older)
Fact Sheets for individuals 5 through 11 years of age
EUA Fact Sheet for Vaccination Providers (5 through 11 years of age), Orange Cap
Recipients and Caregivers Fact Sheet (5 through 11 years of age)
About Pfizer: Breakthroughs That Change Patients’ Lives
At Pfizer, we apply science and our global resources to bring therapies to people that extend and significantly improve their lives. We strive to set the standard for quality, safety and value in the discovery, development and manufacture of health care products, including innovative medicines and vaccines. Every day, Pfizer colleagues work across developed and emerging markets to advance wellness, prevention, treatments and cures that challenge the most feared diseases of our time. Consistent with our responsibility as one of the world's premier innovative biopharmaceutical companies, we collaborate with health care providers, governments and local communities to support and expand access to reliable, affordable health care around the world. For more than 170 years, we have worked to make a difference for all who rely on us. We routinely post information that may be important to investors on our website at www.Pfizer.com. In addition, to learn more, please visit us on www.Pfizer.com and follow us on Twitter at @Pfizer and @Pfizer News, LinkedIn, YouTube and like us on Facebook at Facebook.com/Pfizer.
Pfizer Disclosure Notice
The information contained in this release is as of February 1, 2022. Pfizer assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements contained in this release as the result of new information or future events or developments.
SNIP
A further description of risks and uncertainties can be found in Pfizer’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and in its subsequent reports on Form 10-Q, including in the sections thereof captioned “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Information and Factors That May Affect Future Results”, as well as in its subsequent reports on Form 8-K, all of which are filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and available at www.sec.gov and www.pfizer.com.
SNIP
For a discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties, see BioNTech’s Annual Report as Form 20-F for the Year Ended December 31, 2020, filed with the SEC on March 30, 2021, which is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. All information in this press release is as of the date of the release, and BioNTech undertakes no duty to update this information unless required by law.
_____________________________
1 Children and COVID-19: State-Level Data Report. American Academy of Pediatrics. https://www.aap.org/en/pages/2019-no...l-data-report/. Updated January 20, 2022. Accessed January 28, 2022.
2 Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/covidnet/covid19_5.html. Updated January 22, 2022. Accessed January 28, 2022.
Pfizer:
Media Relations
+1 (212) 733-7410
PfizerMediaRelations@pfizer.com
Investor Relations
+1 (212) 733-4848
IR@pfizer.com
BioNTech:
Media Relations
Jasmina Alatovic
+49 (0)6131 9084 1513
Media@biontech.de
Investor Relations
Sylke Maas, Ph.D.
+49 (0)6131 9084 1074
Investors@biontech.de
Source: Pfizer Inc.
Dachsie comment:
I have been counting the instances of cover-up and non-response to FOIA requests and other kinds of unprofessional and dishonest practices of the CDC HHS / NIH / NIAID, and FDA.
My list of such instances is growing rapidly.
"shot cover-up shows the FILL IN THE BLANK is politicized and corrupt" sums up the general tone and demeanor of these federal Justin-Castro -style "federal public health agencies."
I regret to say this practice of keeping the public locked out of information about their individual health care matters is now manifesting in our contacts with our local doctors' offices and hospitals, the same totalitarian style and treatment of the patients.
The quality of medical care in the USA has deteriorated substantially and is widely noticeable for the reason that the entire "pandemic" and "virus" and COVID-19 narrative was full of big lies from the beginning. This has put our entire healthcare system in the position of having to lie and lock the patients out of information and "non-protocol" care of their health issues.
The "Emergency Use Authorization" of procedure and vaccines and tests may technically removes your health and life insurance companies for paying on claims related to death or injury from anything related to "COVID." I think most insurance policy contracts have wording to the effect that they do not have to pay on claims where there is reckless or risky dehavior on the insured part, and taking EUA medical procedures (including the nasal swab test) that can cause injury and death could come under that rule.
____________________
https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxlSm...xny9TlKSvRT1mS
Judicial Watch 2 days ago
From Judicial Watch President @TomFitton: RELENTLESS: @JudicialWatch Sues HHS for Records of Communication from Top FDA Officials Who Resigned Reportedly over COVID Booster Shots "This booster shot cover-up shows the FDA is politicized and corrupt." https://judicialwatch.org/covid-boost...
____________________
https://www.judicialwatch.org/covid-booster-shots/
February 10, 2022 | Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch Sues HHS for Records of Communication from Top FDA Officials Who Resigned Reportedly over COVID Booster Shots
https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...-1-768x401.jpg
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for records of communication from Dr. Marion Gruber and Dr. Philip Krause, the former director and deputy director of the US. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Office of Vaccines Research and Review, who reportedly resigned during the White House’s push to approve the COVID-19 “booster shot” (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (No. 1:22-cv-00292)).
The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court of the District of Columbia after HHS failed to respond to a September 3, 2021, FOIA request for:
All emails sent to and from Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Marion Gruber regarding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/CDC, the Advisory Committee on Immunization (ACIP), and/or “booster vaccines” for the prevention and/or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19.
All emails sent to and from Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Deputy Director Phil Krause regarding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/CDC, the Advisory Committee on Immunization (ACIP), and/or “booster vaccines” for the prevention and/or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and/or COVID-19.
On September 22, 2021, the FDA approved use of a booster dose of the Pfizer drug. According to the organization’s news release, the FDA, “amended the emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to allow for use of a single booster dose, to be administered at least six months after completion of the primary series” for people at “high risk” of “severe COVID-19.”
On September 13, 2021, Gruber and Krause were among a group of resigning doctors who agreed that, “Available evidence doesn’t yet indicate a need for COVID-19 vaccine booster shots among the general population …”
Also on September 13, 2021, The Lancet published a paper to which Gruber and Krause contributed that noted:
Careful and public scrutiny of the evolving data will be needed to assure that decisions about boosting are informed by reliable science more than by politics.… Widespread boosting should be undertaken only if there is clear evidence that it is appropriate.
“This booster shot cover-up shows the FDA is politicized and corrupt,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The American people have a right to know about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines – especially given that officials in the FDA seem to have objected to the agency’s recommendations about the vaccines.”
_____________________
https://www.linkedin.com/in/marion-gruber/
Marion F. Gruber, Ph.D., MS
Vaccine Regulation | Clinical Trial Design | Global Public Health | Leadership | Policy and Guidance Development
IAVI
The University of Kiel
United States
______________
https://www.linkedin.com/in/phil-krause-b9668875/
Phil Krause 3rd degree connection 3rd
Deputy Director at FDA/CBER/OVRR
Yale University School of Medicine
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
_________
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...046-8/fulltext
"Careful and public scrutiny of the evolving data will be needed to assure that decisions about boosting are informed by reliable science more than by politics.… Widespread boosting should be undertaken only if there is clear evidence that it is appropriate."
Dachsie comment:
All of these ROTTEN RINOs want for the USA is exactly what Canada is experiencing right now.
They have betrayed their oath of office and their country and their fellow citizens for filthy lucre.
Senator Mitt Romney of Utah
Senator Jim Inhofe on Oklahoma
Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina,
Senator Richard Burr on North Carolina
__________________________________________________ __
https://trib247.com/articles/amendme...ign=Newsletter
An amendment to defund vaccine mandates died in the Senate after four GOP senators bailed.
by WorldTribune Staff, February 20, 2022
The Senate on Thursday narrowly killed an amendment to the 2022 Continuing Resolution that would have defunded vaccine mandates.
The amendment, proposed by Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, failed by a vote of 47-46 after four Republicans skipped the vote.
Sens. Mitt Romney of Utah, Jim Inhofe on Oklahoma, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Richard Burr on North Carolina did not show up for the vote, giving Democrats, who were missing three votes themselves, the majority they needed to ensure that Team Biden's vaccine mandates would continue to receive funding.
A more narrow amendment proposed by Texas Republican Sen. Tex Cruz would have barred federal funding from going to schools and other child-care facilities that impose Covid vaccine mandates. Cruz's amendment was defeated, 49-44, with GOP Sens. Roy Blunt of Missouri and Susan Collins of Maine joining all Democrats in opposition.
"The only way Dems win the vote is if Rs skip town. Don't!," Cruz tweeted Thursday.
Had the amendments by Lee or Cruz passed, the continuing resolution to fund the government, or stop-gap spending bill, would have had to go back to the Democrat-controlled House, which is out of session for the remainder of February.
In December, the Supreme Court blocked Joe Biden’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) vaccine mandate for private employers. Team Biden, however, can still enforce mandates in certain employment sectors, including medical workers, military personnel, federal employees, and federal contractors.
South Dakota Republican Sen. John Thune attributed the situation to senators wanting to leave for the Munich Security Conference.
"Those folks are leaving later this afternoon," he said.
The Republicans who bailed on the vote were slammed by GOP House members.
“Scumbags,” Florida Republican Rep. Anthony Sabatini bluntly stated in reference to the missing Senators, as well as the 19 Republican Senators who voted to fund the government. “The 19 @SenateGOP RINOs that voted to fund the Federal Government while it’s pushing vaccine mandates must each be primaried & ELIMINATED from the @GOP immediately,” Sabatini added in a later tweet.
“Missing R’s keeping vax mandates alive? Romney (UT), Inhofe (OK), Burr (NC), & Graham (SC). No excuses – they should all be shamed,” tweeted Texas Republican Rep. Chip Roy.
Daniel Horowitz, a senior editor at the Blaze, tweeted: “Imagine Burr, Inhofe, Romney and Graham thinking that they had something more important than defeating sickening mandates on human bodies. If they don’t want to be there for the most important votes they should resign.”
More Bad Joke Data
_______________________
New VAERS Data as of Feb 11, 2021
26,111 Deaths and 1,200,452 Adverse Events
23,990 Pfizer/Moderna and 2,121 J&J Deaths
PLUS 1,119,063 Pfizer / Moderna and 81,389 J&J Adverse Events
Source: https://www.drtenpenny.com/newslette...#comp-kzu5a30z
Queen of England taking "horse paste" - Ivermectin --Even though she is fully vaxx'd and boosted, she is said to now have "COVID."
https://rumble.com/vvietj-realist-ne...-dewormer.html
Jsnip4 explains that we are watching a movie. He believes this is a set-up to bring Trump back into presidency.
Paul Joseph Watson shows video of Queen and her doctors praising Stromectin
https://mobile.twitter.com/PrisonPla...84811121762304
35 second video
Interesting. This is on Rumble and Twitter.
Rumble — https://mobile.twitter.com/PrisonPla...84811121762304
Join my Woo Woo Crypto Patreon https://www.patreon.com/jsnip4/memberships
Trade crypto on Mandala: https://trade.mandala.exchange/accou...p?ref=H65L7144
(Need NordVPN from Germany or Spain)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYI...Xz99QPAVAPIG5Q
https://rumble.com/user/Jsnip4
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/jsnip4/
https://twitter.com/realistnews
http://www.realistnews.net
https://www.theta.tv/jsnip4
2 COMMENTS
It became crystal clear to me today that the COVID policy of our nation, as for other nations, is for use to institute tyrannical authoritarianism and a police state. This has nothing to do with science or health. This is to install the one world death and slavery system for all people of the world.
Last 15 minutes of TruNews show for today, February 21, is important to listen to.
It shows how China is putting in a police state in Hong Kong and they are going to test each citizen for COVID, and regardless of whether the person feels sick or is sick, they will put in a detention center for 30 days. They intend to test and then test some more every one of the 7.4 million inhabitants of Hong Kong.
Rick Wiles advises that the Canadian truckers park their trucks legally somewhere in Canada and not drive them AT ALL for two whole weeks. That will take the nation of Canada to its knees. No food or supplies of any kind. That sounds like a good thing to do. The mayor of Ottawa is already mentioning confiscating the trucks and sells them to cover expenses of police department. They have already confiscated donations and bank accounts or more and more citizens.
Pray for the people of Canada. It is clear that our USA system is about to fall too. Fight back in every way you can think of. Mainly just expose the truth. The truth always wins because the One Who is Truth always wins
https://www.trunews.com/stream/nato-challenged-putin-recognizes-independence-of-ukrainian-separatists
0:57:00
to
1:09:51
.
NATO Challenged: Putin Recognizes Independence of Ukrainian Separatists
Russian President Vladimir Putin addressed his nation’s citizens today in a long-televised address in response to the Ukrainian crisis. Mr. Putin presented a lengthy history of Ukraine’s connection to Russia. At the end of his remarks, the Russian president recognized two pro-Russia Ukrainian provinces as independent states. His action immediately set up a showdown with NATO.
Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 2/21/22.
Content Contributed By — TruNews Team
Take the broadcast with you!
https://vokalnow.com/video/4626?utm_...PTnQ%3D.SwvL6p
Dr. Ardis, DC Interviews Dr. Paul...
Dr. Paul Elias Alexander discusses failed public health agencies and decisions, catastrophic
49:16 video runtime
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...ZBqlyqRHNw--~D
"WE ARE DEALING WITH FAILED PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCIES!" Dr. Paul Elias Alexander
Dachsie comment:
Dr. Alexander said "Omicron is like a vaccine in itself." ( 21:54)
That's the same thing Bill Gates said recently.
It appears that this bowing to the Omicron variant is equal to acknowledging, all of a sudden, natural immunity and the power and value of our own immune systems. This story, which some truth in it, is the way that the weasels who have been running this COVID mass murdering scheme have of now retreating from their scam program. It is the excuse they are going to use. All these people can do is lie and lie. We may be being granted a reprieve from all this vaccine and testing and masking nonsense FOR A WHILE , but wait there's more. Gates is already talking about the next virus and the next pandemic.
One last thing...Yes our individual God-given immune system is important and powerful and helpful and we should do what we can to take care of it. However, I do not understand talk of "natural immunity" when we are dealing with mysterious unknown concoctions brewed in a foreign lab and are not at all "natural." So how can our "natural immunity" work against them? Also the current vaccines permanently destroy the recipient's own natural antibodies and immune defenses. That may not technically be the same as "changing our DNA, but it seems very close to it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7nN7nTiSmU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7nN7nTiSmU
22:32 video runtime
CDC Spending $5,000 Per Shot to Convince Minorities; Bill Gates Calls Omicron ‘Type of Vaccine’
110,957 views
Premiered 19 hours ago
19K
Dislike
Share
Save
Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
749K subscribers
Try Epoch TV https://ept.ms/3raGlBg
⭕️ Sign up for our NEWSLETTER and stay in touch https://ept.ms/3wWdBwe
------------------
Resources:
AMAC:
https://ept.ms/3bzYr8f
Pfizer criminal penalty:
https://ept.ms/3s7stZ7
CDC $6M program
https://ept.ms/3M0TAgq
Pfizer Demanding €54:
https://ept.ms/3v2DDjH
Bill Gates:
https://ept.ms/3s9wxbq
Nature Magazine
https://ept.ms/3p7h9Kq
Cell Magazine
https://ept.ms/34VigpP
Pastor Che Ahn Interview:
https://ept.ms/3BBCEs0
------------------
Content:
------------------
⭕️ Subscribe for updates: https://ept.ms/2Tu9clR
⭕️ Support us: https://donorbox.org/facts_matter
⭕️ Listen to Podcasts:
-
iTunes Podcast: https://ept.ms/FactsMatterApplePodcast
Spotify Podcast: https://ept.ms/FactsMatterSpotifyPodcast
Google Podcast: https://ept.ms/FactsMatterGooglePodcast
-------------------------------------------------
© All Rights Reserved.
___________________________
Dachsie comment:
This video was banned by YouTube but Roman appealed and video allowed back up , but this one will probably be banned again. YouTube is not banning for "medical misinformation" but for showing the evil and hypocrisy of the Marxist COVID policies in the USA.
Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
20 hours ago
�� New episode �� https://youtu.be/f7nN7nTiSmU Today's episode was REMOVED (before the premier) due to "medical misinformation" �� Everything in that episode was factual: But I guess reading the CDC's own documents out-loud triggers the YT algorithms. We appealed, and overturned the strike. Watch the episode now before it's taken down again.
Two interesting items I heard about on
X22 Report today
https://x22report.com/wp-content/upl...2222022_lg.jpg
https://x22report.com/ukraine-is-a-m...oming-ep-2709/
Ukraine Is A Money Laundering Machine For The [DS], Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming – Ep. 2709
part about "Covid" and "vaccine"
begin at 26:19 end 32:31
1.
FDA Warns of Vaccine Induced Positive Syphilis Test
As if there wasn’t enough sketchy stuff amid positive HIV tests as a result of the COVID-19 vaccination program, apparently now there’s a vaccine induced positive syphilis result.
CDC document warning about syphilis
https://www.cdc.gov/std/FDA-alert-12-20-2021.pdf
Dear Partners in Prevention,
December 20, 2021
I’m writing to share the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) alert sent to clinical laboratory staff and health
care providers about a syphilis test. The alert reports that false reactivity, or "false-positive," Rapid Plasma Reagin
(RPR; non-treponemal) test results, when using the Bio-Rad Laboratories BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Total & RPR kit,
can occur in some people who received a COVID-19 vaccine and includes recommendations for addressing these
potential false positives.
Historically, false-reactive RPR test results have been observed in people with systemic infections unrelated to
syphilis, such as tuberculosis, rickettsial diseases, and endocarditis. False-reactive RPR testing also has been
previously observed following immunization (specifically following smallpox vaccine). False reactivity with RPR
can also occur during pregnancy.
Per CDC’s 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines, reactive RPR results should always be confirmed with treponemal
testing (e.g., Treponema pallidum particle agglutination, TP-PA). This is, in part, because of the above-mentioned
issue: false-positive nontreponemal test results can be associated with multiple medical conditions and factors
unrelated to syphilis. According to FDA’s alert, treponemal testing for syphilis does not appear to be impacted by
this issue.
As syphilis continues to increase in our nation, it is critical that patients receive timely and adequate treatment.
According to CDC guidance, some people may need presumptive treatment for early syphilis, even if test results
are not immediately available. Providers should consider the patient’s risk factors, as well as local epidemiology,
when making treatment decisions.
If you need clinical decision-making support, you can reach out to CDC clinicians via CDC-INFO, or you can
contact the STD Clinical Consultation Network. For general laboratory information or additional support/guidance
on specific testing requirements, please contact DSTDP’s STD Laboratory Reference and Research Branch via
Weiping Cao (jgz9@cdc.gov), Syphilis/Emerging STIs Team Lead, or Ellen Kersh (egk6@cdc.gov), Branch Chief.
FDA encourages health care providers to report adverse events or suspected adverse events experienced with
medical devices, including in vitro diagnostic tests, and the alert linked above includes contact information.
Thank you for your continued collaboration,
/Leandro Mena/
Leandro Mena, MD, MPH
Director, Division of STD Prevention
National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FDA LINK
LINK TO PDF
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...Syphillis-.jpg
_______________________
2.
https://t.me/BLUEPRINT_Q/857
Telegram
embedded video
https://t.me/BLUEPRINT_Q/857
click on video and play in Telegram
This is attorney Leigh Dundas testifying and Senator Ron Johnson healing about "Covid" issues.
BLUEPRINT ����
1:23
VAERS data has been scrubbed from the military database (DMED) following congressional hearings revealing a 300%
VAERS data has been scrubbed from the military database (DMED) following congressional hearings revealing a 300% spike in illnesses after jab mandates.
Crimes Against Humanity.
Full article: https://uncoverdc.com/2022/02/09/vae...n-data-glitch/
I am a little puzzled about this because I thought DMed database, not VAERS database, is the one that the military is "amending" their alarming data of great increases in numbers after military began being forced to take the jab.
CDC found again to be hiding data.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcgppoM5X5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcgppoM5X5s
CDC Caught Hiding Troves of Data: Not Publishing Critical Hospitalization, Booster, and Virus Data
Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
749K subscribers
�� Try #EpochTV ��https://ept.ms/3raGlBg
⭕️ Sign up for our NEWSLETTER and stay in touch �� https://ept.ms/3wWdBwe
------------------
Resources:
�� Sekur (promo code: Roman)
https://ept.ms/3yW0Wul
�� CDC article:
https://ept.ms/3JKuMaq
�� Scotland
https://ept.ms/3HckZYU
�� CDC Mask Guidance:
https://ept.ms/34TXvuN
https://ept.ms/36ApUGH
�� Speech Standards:
https://ept.ms/3sbqJ0Z
https://ept.ms/3LQCuSd
�� AAP study:
https://ept.ms/3IdxrsV
The big chain drug stores that are giving "vaccines" in the stores are set to start handing out "for free" next week the 400 million N95 masks Biden bought from China with our tax dollars next week in USA.
I am curious as to what "consideration" will have to be paid to receive these "free" masks. Each person can have up to 3 masks. I suspect the gullibles will have to give much personal data about themselves, so data is the cost of the free masks.
BigData is the currency of the Fascist and Communist takeover of the USA now in progress.
I am also curious how the 400 million masks made a successful trip to the USA on those slow boats from China, most of which are stalled out in the Pacific off the USA coast.
The N95 masks are good for one thing at least - payoffs and money laundering using our USA tax dollars.
I redid this positing because I got weird message that flipped off the page and thought it was erased, but double posting on this subject is worth it.