Printable View
So then you admit that you bring a negative, personal bias against me when you read my posts? Gee, thanks. At least I know for sure what I'm dealing with now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Awoke
It's kinda sad, really. That you allow your personal bias' to cloud your vision.
BTW, so you can see this? lol
I must say that I think you were happier when you had me on ignore.
Don't let him get to ya, Awoke.
Holy shit Joe, if you're just figuring out that I think you're a khazar piece of shit, then you're not nearly as intelligent as I gave you credit for. I've made that 110% crystal clear in many posts in the past.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe King
And yes, I was happier with you on ignore.
But all that aside, as much as you feign docility and innocence, your trolling stands out like a Mossad Operative among Palistinian children. Gaillo knows it, Madfranks knows it, Magnes knows it, I know it, (hell I think most discerning people on this forum know it) and you know it.
No one else in this thread belittled Beef by minimizing the issues he is going through.
Spectrism told Beef he was wound up too tight, but confessed that he did not know what was eating him. You can not make the same confession, because you did know.
It wasn't your original comment that fired me up, it was your followup post #44 in which you cry out as you strike beefsteak. You marginalize his situation and use your new buzzwords "Too focused on the doooom" (A basic re-hashing of the usual "You're a conspiracy nut" line used by your ilk)
Once I called out your programming, you again put on your meekness cape and admit you were a douche, in so many words.
My example of Princess Trololo perfectly sums up your MO around here, and anyone who pays attention can see it. Everything you say is loaded with a double meaning. You are trained by the best, but it's the same typical training as every other dis-info agent.
No problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by sirgonzo420
I was just givin' you the benefit of the doubt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Awoke
ie a concept that seems to be completely foreign to you.
Then do it again. I really don't care.Quote:
And yes, I was happier with you on ignore.
IMHO, needing to use ignore says a lot about ones lack of self control.
...but hey, have at it.
Well, then you don't know nearly as much as you pride yourself on knowing, and you know what they say about pride.Quote:
But all that aside, as much as you feign docility and innocence, your trolling stands out like a Mossad Operative among Palistinian children. Gaillo knows it, Madfranks knows it, Magnes knows it, I know it, (hell I think most discerning people on this forum know it) and you know it.
In fact, you seem to know very little on certain subjects.....but hey, there's still opportunities to learn. Pay attention and perhaps you will. lol
And I apologized for the over-sight, too.Quote:
No one else in this thread belittled Beef by minimizing the issues he is going through.
Spectrism told Beef he was wound up too tight, but confessed that he did not know what was eating him. You can not make the same confession, because you did know.
Besides, in my first comment I wasn't even addressing Beef, but rather responding to what someone else said.
...and then Beef goes over the top in his response to me. Which is why I may have come across a bit short with him. ie I was reacting to his over reaction to my prior comment.
After he stuck me for no good reason.Quote:
It wasn't your original comment that fired me up, it was your followup post #44 in which you cry out as you strike beefsteak.
I didn't marginalize anything. If you got that out of what I wrote, then it's obvious that you read into my posts whatever you want them to say.Quote:
You marginalize his situation and use your new buzzwords "Too focused on the doooom" (A basic re-hashing of the usual "You're a conspiracy nut" line used by your ilk)
ie your bias is showing again.
After all, it is a fact that the dooom can eat at some people. As I said, in chat the other night there was someone there that that has seemed to happen to. So it was fresh on my mind and I mentioned it about Beef only as a possible answer for his seemingly touchyness here lately.
Touchyness that I was not the only one to have noticed, I might add.
"Programing"? lolQuote:
Once I called out your programming, you again put on your meekness cape and admit you were a douche, in so many words.
I admit I have programmed things, and quite well I might add, but never people.
...but if you'd like to be a subject, I suppose could always try. What is it that you'd like in your programming? lol [/sarc]
Only because you want to see a double meaning.Quote:
My example of Princess Trololo perfectly sums up your MO around here, and anyone who pays attention can see it. Everything you say is loaded with a double meaning.
If people look for what they want to see, guess what? They typically do see it, and you are apparently no exception.
Training? What training? The only training I've ever gotten is the kind of training a good woman can give. ;DQuote:
You are trained by the best, but it's the same typical training as every other dis-info agent.
You say that, but I really think you do in fact, have a problem.Quote:
No problem.
In fact, you seem wound pretty tight yourself. Doom been gettin' to ya lately? lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by Awoke
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe King
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe King
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe King
http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachme...1&d=1323810350Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe King
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe King
As I said, you obviously do have a problem. You always let things get to you? You seem a bit touchy lately.
Your posts speak for themselves.
Notice my post #33? I saw how Beef misunderstood the intent of Palani's post, and tried my best to diffuse the frustration by attempting to translate the Palanese to English. I made no mention of the "touchiness" or volitility of Beefsteak's reply at all, because that was NOT what the situation needed.
It needed to be clarified, not inflamed. And for the record, I had no idea that Beef was going through the test that he is going through. I just new the appropriate way to respond.
Which, for the record, was exactly the same situation in my post #46.
You are one of Joe Kings biggest supporters, and he yours,Quote:
Originally Posted by sirgonzo420
there is a gang of you that support each other.
You openly proclaim on here, you know Joe King from gim and
he is not a troll. You did the same thing with Santa. And Antonio
too, you egg him on. You seem to know all the main trolls and
support them, I gave you a break for quite a while, but the
rest of your behavior going back I see differently now,
you too are a subtle troll and blatant occult poster.
I was one of your greatest supporters and friends,
trying to get people from gim off your back early.
Boy was I wrong, you made a fool out of me.
You are Joe King.
I want people to understand what you have posted.
Along with the others here I have spoken out about.
I finger you people as Occult posters, many of you my old friends,
giving you a break and the benefit of the doubt, you people prove
how wrong I am by becoming more blatant. Funny shit. I am
supposed to be the madman. LOL. Joke is on the forum members
as it was on me.
@ Awoke, Joe King doesn't bother me because he is blatant going back.
I don't know if you missed my posts on here, there is 5 threads on him.
These people are only here to argue and troll, inflame, and most people
here are not reading these arguments, I know from experience this is the
case, how many people were paying attention to what mayhem was doing ?
So he has that going for him. Like others here.
Awoke, read this carefully, he comes in early on the thread, just like for Santa.
THIS IS SLVRBUGJIM THREAD, Jim is old school gim, he knows what he is reading.Quote:
Originally Posted by sirgonzo420
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...-gov-operative
Joe King reads like Juristic Person from GIM to me, but that is a tough call
because JP never posted much but one liner snide remarks, here he argues,
but it is not mayhem, mayhem is Ulysses/Immanti from gim, that has been
proven.
So you were putting the blame for Beefs over reaction on Palani? Niiice! ::)Quote:
Originally Posted by Awoke
So why was it your job to clarify Palinais comments? You speak for him now? That's really nice of you.Quote:
It needed to be clarified, not inflamed.
I know, because you're perfect, right? {in your own head, perhaps}Quote:
And for the record, I had no idea that Beef was going through the test that he is going through. I just new the appropriate way to respond.
...and don't we all go through tests? Life. Death. It's a circle and it can suck for all of us.
Been there done that and in ways that I'd hope that other people would never come to know.
Post #46? You mean the one where you show your ignorance and hurl insults due to a lack of having so much as one intelligent thought to come back with?Quote:
Which, for the record, was exactly the same situation in my post #46.
haha you're so hilarious, you must be a joke. lol
Quick! Hurl more insults. They might actually start to hurt. You know, at some unknown point in the future perhaps. lol
ie you show your level of intelligence, or rather lack thereof, quite easily Awoke.
Time for a nice song before bed children
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNAkbbKycCM