They don't need anything on Jewish candidates. Their loyalty to international Jewry is without question.
Printable View
If I remember correctly Ron Paul polled high in Iowa before but got much lower figures in the caucus in both 2008 and 2012, is it a good place to destroy the people's choice?
http://images.publicradio.org/conten..._obama3_33.jpg6 delegates to Cruz <-- Canadian anchor baby Latino
Look at all those White smiling faces. Elected a negro. Twice.
5 delegates to Trump
5 delegates to Rubio <-- Latino
1 delegate to Carson <-- Negro
Iowa is 89% White and less than a third voted for the only White candidate...Trump
:rolleyes:
For one thing, he doesn't want to dominate the middle east, in fact he wants to work with russia. Who else is saying that?
Who else would immediately deport all refugees out of this country?
Who else would actually secure the border? Others say they will, but who would actually do it?
And tariffs? Do you believe zionists want countries to have tariffs? They do not want this at all. They want gobalization.
Sez Trump lost on purpose to motivate his base.
Sez Trump will totally win.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERwKZM03GMY
I don't think he lost on purpose, but I also agree that he focused a significantly smaller percentage of his time in Iowa compared to most of the other candidates.
I think the big takeaway from this loss is that the Trump campaign will not trust the polls as much in the future. They will put more work and money into ground operations going forward. Previously they assumed that high poll numbers would negate the need to go through the traditional ground operations.