Printable View
NEURO: I think we should drop unified theory, it hasn't brought us any closer to any solution. (the old is abandoned)
ARES: if E.U. wants to be taken seriously it needs to account for it, this theory is complete and utter hogwash. (the new is mocked)
CONFIRMATION:
Two examples showing that (astro)physics as we know them are about to crash down
:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
We already know you'll believe whatever anyone spoon feeds you. You're a contrarian and for whatever reason, whatever the prevailing thought or rational is you have to contradict it. Even if the contradiction is bat shit crazy lunacy, you'll dive in head first.
Want to be taken seriously with Electric Universe? Explain what the source of Neutrino's are if the Sun is not nuclear.
Until then, kindly sit down and shut up and let the adults talk while you live in your fantasy.
I really have no idea what you are talking about, mainstream science cannot explain 99% of the Cosmos with Big G and Relativity theories. Nothing adds up to equate the observed data.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
Daily observable data, experimental and otherwise proves it incorrect, everything is pointing towards an electrical universe observable and otherwise. I'm not sure you have looked into any of this?
Man's current explanation of the cosmos/universe is patently wrong, not only somewhat unexplained.
Neutrino detection proves 0, and vests 0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyPl2f5dgm8
Earth is hit with about 1200W/m2 in radiation from the sun. What's the surface area of a sphere with a 150 Billion meter radius?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
Got it; 2.83x10^23 m2, so suns power should be in the ballpark of 3.5x10^26 Watts. Assuming some 100 Billion stars of standard sun size in our standard galaxy and a 100 Billion standard galaxies, you should be able to handle the entire Christmas light show of the universe with a mere 10^48 Watt give or take.
http://www.popsci.com/sites/popsci.c...?itok=iGwulEsM
Not too bright as 7th trump constantly reminds me...
Newton versed into hermetic knowledge and I am living in a fantasy for pointing this out again.... everything is falling apart... everything, are you going to deny that perhaps?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
because, I say that the understanding of the universe (mirco and macro) rests on the understanding of the torus, pi and phi, and electricity??? Because I assert that science without its metaphysical component is NOT science ???.
even Telsa contended that sciences will make a huge leap ahead the day it will include the paranormal. And I am the one living in a fantasy?
This forum is under the influence scientism, also part of the problem of the mess we are in on this planet. It was a cake walk for the inquisition to go after holistic thinking. People prefer so much more what they can perceive within their bubble of materialistic experience.
So I am sitting down and watching circular and linear thinking going down.
I never read blavatsky but even she, admitted that electricity and its by product, electro-magnetism, was the Force of God. Time to get serious about defeating the NWO.
to watch while drinking a coffee/tea, sure and I am in a fantasy for posting this vid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwdCryMAwAI
I have, and it doesn't point to an Electric Universe. Outside of a nuclear reaction what is the source of the Neutrino's? We have an observatory in Antarctica buried in the ice there observing Neutrino emissions from the sun. If the sun was electric there would be no Neutrino's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
Nothing points to Electric Universe until an alternative Neutrino source can be identified. Not you or anyone can say "well an alternative source is possible" without identifying it. You'll never satisfy the hard data guys without evidence.
And I have said repeatedly that General Relativity does not explain our universe well. Speed of light as we know is not a constant and can be slowed. That doesn't mean Electric Universe explains our universe when it cannot even back up any of it's theories with data. Mainstream science may be wrong, and data is proving it wrong. If the speed of light is not constant and can be slowed then E=mc2 is also wrong. So what is the Electric Universes answer WITH DATA to back it up?Quote:
Man's current explanation of the cosmos/universe is patently wrong, not only somewhat unexplained.
WRONG, Neutrino detection indicates that there is a nuclear reaction taking place. Until you can identify an alternative source and backed up by hard data then E.U. doesn't hold any water.Quote:
Neutrino detection proves 0, and vests 0
Nice, but I want the input, not the output.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
Input, conversion and Output. The laws of thermodynamics and conservation of energy will prove the input / output correct. But we do not know the input.
And the source of the Neutrinos are??Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
I scanned through looking for the word Neutrino's didn't see it and replied asking for the data that I asked of you previously.
Keep living in your fantasy lady.
Keep quoting Tesla, at least he backed up his findings with data. You've backed up absolutely NOTHING.
On the 120 V grid it would be in the ballpark of 10^46 Amps. I don't want to consider the size of the fuse...Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
Sorry j/k ;D
Smartass!!!! LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Neuro