Jesus Christ, The Way, The Truth, and The Life

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IJLQVe_qPM

at about 06:58 on this video track,

about "the brothers and sisters of Jesus"

Here is the answer against that bible question.

Dr. Bergsma explains that neither of these ancient Hebrew and A They just have words for brother and sister and father and mother. As shorthand they just called all their male relatives "brother" and all their female relatives "sister.

Listen to the short video clip.

How Do You Recognize a True Prophet?
5,465 views
Jul 31, 2020
310
Dislike
Share
Save
St. Paul Center
92.9K subscribers
Dr. John Bergsma, author of "Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls", reflects on the mass readings for July 31, 2020.

JER 26:1-9
69:5, 8-10, 14
1 PT 1:25
MT 13:54-58

Learn more about Dr. Bergsma's books at https://bit.ly/2ZXlJPQ

https://vaticancatholic.com/a-short-summary-covering-the-lefts-astounding-hypocrisy-video/

https://vaticancatholic.com/a-short-...pocrisy-video/

4:15 video runtime
https://vaticancatholic.com/images/a...risy-video.jpg

A short summary covering the Left's astounding hypocrisy - video
August 22, 2022

For those interested:

Rick Wiles and Doc Burkhart

https://www.trunews.com/live

one hour video runtime

Rapture vs. Second Coming: Does Jesus Christ Return Once or Twice?

August 23, 2022 TruNews show.



The live video will reload for replay at about 5:00pm Central time

https://trumptrainnews.com/2022/08/2...s-from-a-to-z/

President Trump’s Policy Victories, From A to Z

August 22, 2022
| By: Deroy Murdock

Excerpt

"...Whatever one thinks about President Donald J. Trump’s one-of-a-kind personality, his policies were the most conservative reforms that America has seen since President Ronald Wilson Reagan left office — and perhaps even before he arrived.

Here is a partial list of the wins he secured for individual freedom, personal responsibility, limited government, free enterprise, and peace through strength during one term in the White House. Imagine how many more spectacular things Trump could have done for the American people in just four years if he were not impeded by a totally unhinged Democrat Party, the ferocious news media, the vicious Deep State (including a virulently hostile FBI), and enough Trump-hating lies to stretch Pinocchio’s nose to the size of a javelin.

a) The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act— a massive tax reduction that largely remains in place: Authorized.

b) A 21 percent top-corporate tax rate: Chopped from 35 percent.

c) Eight regulations: Erased — for every new one imposed.

d) Keystone XL Pipeline: Approved.

e) Oil drilling in a small, specific portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Authorized.

f) U.S. energy independence and production dominance: Achieved.

g) Operation Warp Speed’s three COVID-19 vaccines: Delivered in record time via White House collaboration with the private sector.

h) A Right to Try law giving terminally ill patients access to experimental drugs: Enacted.

i) An executive order requiring that new federal buildings be designed in classical Greco-Roman style: Signed.

j) Three constitutionalist justices on the U.S. Supreme Court:Added.

k) Some 200 conservative judges in lower federal courts:Placed.

l) Planned Parenthood: Partially

m) The National March for Life: Addressed in person— a presidential first.

n) Critical Race Theory in federal agencies: Dumped.

o) The Washington, D.C. school voucher program: Reauthorized and funded.

p) Some 8,000 Opportunity Zones to revitalize low-income areas through tax relief and free-market incentives: Activated.

q) About 500 miles of southern-border wall: Constructed.

r) North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA): Replaced withthe U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement — a new-and-improved free-trade pact.

s) Free-trade agreement with South Korea: Launched.

t) Paris Climate Agreement: Abandoned.

u) Iran Nuclear Deal: Ditched.

v) U.S. embassy in Israel: Moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

w) The Abraham Accords — four Middle Eastern peace dealswith Israel and its neighbors: Signed.

x) Islamic State group caliphate: Obliterated.

y) Chinese Communist Party: Confronted, discredited, and sanctioned.

z) American diplomatic prestige and military prowess: Restored and funded.

Donald J. Trump engineered enough victories to match the number of letters in the English alphabet. These 26 policy achievements are all conservative. And there are many more (Space Force! Record-low black and Hispanic unemployment! Due process restored to college campuses!).

Critics correctly argue that Trump’s spending curve should have been flatter. Yes, and he saw higher domestic outlays as the price required to get Congressional Democrats to pay the price for defense modernization.

Trump also could have been more of a free-trader. That said, the sanctions on China were the two-by-fours across the forehead needed to teach Beijing some basic manners about intellectual property theft and other commercial crimes.

This room for improvement notwithstanding, those who claim that President Trump is not a conservative and did not govern as one are either totally ignorant or wildly dishonest.

Fox News Contributor Deroy Murdock writes from Manhattan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8p0-0kvOW4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8p0-0kvOW4

17:49 video runtime

warning @17:32 graphic violence shown

Tucker Carlson: This is a clear indication of things unraveling

223,869 views

Aug 23, 2022

191 car jackings so far this year in New Orleans.


9.83M subscribers
WARNING-Graphic footage: Fox News host Tucker Carlson voices his concerns over national rise in carjackings on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.' #FoxNews #tucker

Remembering Doctor Stan...

https://newswithviews.com/Monteith/I...th_com_hdr.gif

https://newswithviews.com/Monteith/stanley5.htm

THE TRUE STORY OF 9-11
PART 2 of 2

By Dr. Stanley Monteith
June 3, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

My previous article (The True Story of 9/11, Part I) closed with Professor Carroll Quigley�s revelation that:

"There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. . . . I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. . . ."[1]

When I researched Colonel House's papers at Yale University, I found a copy of a letter that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt sent Colonel House on November 21, 1933, that contained the following statement:

"I had a nice talk with Jack Morgan the other day. . . . J.P.M. (J.P. Morgan, ed) did not seem much troubled over the gold purchasing. . . . The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson. . . . The country is going through a repetition of Jackson's fight with the Bank of the United States - - only on a far bigger and broader basis."[2]

[Advertisement: Read Dr. Stanley Montieth's book, "Brotherhood of Darkness"]

Who controls the U.S. government today? Members of David Rockefeller's Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderbergers (BdB), the Trilateral Commission (TC), the Club of Rome (CR), leading Masons, occult groups, and the Spiritual Hierarchy that energizes them. I call them the "Brotherhood of Darkness." They control both political parties, the presidency, the mass media, most major banks, most major corporations, and most of the wealth of the world.[3] If that is true, why hasn't someone told the American people? Because most journalists and most media pundits want to keep their jobs, and don't want to end up like Gary Webb, a Pulitzer prize winning columnist who exposed the CIA's involvement in the drug trade, who shot himself in the head twice to make certain he was dead.

Richard Harwood, the former editorial page editor of The Washington Post, tried to expose the CFR's control of our government in 1993 when he wrote:

"The president is a member. So is his secretary of state, the deputy secretary of state, all five of the undersecretaries, several of the assistant secretaries and the department's legal adviser. The president's national security adviser and his deputy are members. The director of Central Intelligence (like all previous directors) and the chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board are members. The secretary of defense, three undersecretaries and at least four assistant secretaries are members. The secretaries of the departments of housing and urban development, interior, health and human services and the chief White House public relations man, David Gergen, are members, along with the speaker of the House and the majority leader of the Senate."[4]

The Washington Post article continued (October 30, 1993):

"In the past 15 years, council directors have included Hedley Donovan of Time Inc, Elizabeth Drew of the New Yorker, Philip Geyelin of The Washington Post, Karen Elliott House of the Wall Street Journal and Strobe Talbott of Time magazine, who is now President Clinton's ambassador at large in the Slavic world. The editorial page editor, deputy editorial page editor, executive editor, managing editor, foreign editor, national affairs editor, business and financial editor and various writers as well as Katherine Graham, the paper's principal owner, represent The Washington Post in the council's membership. The executive editor, managing editor and foreign editor of the New York Times are members, along with executives of such other large newspapers as the Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times, the weekly newsmagazines, network television executives and celebrities - Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw and Jim Lehrer, for example - and various columnists, among them Charles Krauthammer, William Buckley, George Will and Jim Hoagland."[5]

Professor Ben Bagdikian's book, The New Media Monopoly, documents the fact that five mega corporations control 90% of the American media. The book is available from Radio Liberty. Lt. General William Odom headed the NSA, the intelligence organization that tracks our phone calls, our e-mails, our faxes, and our activities. The "Secrecy Agreement" he signed prevents him from revealing what is taking place, but his book, Fixing Intelligence (2003) noted:

". . . should the CIA be permitted to carry out assassinations? Should Army Counter- intelligence be involved in domestic surveillance of civilians? Should CIA clandestine officers be allowed to have cover as journalists?"[6]

If those things are taking place, what can we do? Members of the BOD control most media outlets, the police, the military, the government, the religious establishment, and most of the wealth of the world, but they fear the public will learn the truth about the events that took place on 9/11, so they have launched a massive media campaign to convince the public the "official version of 9/11" is correct. The September 11, 2006, issue of U.S. News and World Report published an article that laments:

"Even as conspiracy theories thrived abroad, they mostly fell on deaf ears in the first years after the attacks. But as the fifth anniversary nears, 9/11 Truth and its outlandish claims have become an online phenomenon - and are proving startlingly persuasive. In a July 2006 Scripps Howard poll, 16 percent of respondents said it was 'very likely' that federal officials either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or allowed them to happen to justify war in the Middle East, while a further 20 percent said it was 'somewhat likely.'"[7]

The September 8, 2006 edition of World Affairs Brief states:

"Current polls put the numbers as high as 39% of Americans believe the US government was in some way complicit in the terror attack of 9/11. That's a very high number, surpassed only by the percentage of people that disbelieve the official government version about the assassination of JFK - 69%."[8]

Joel Skousen cited a recent article in the UK Daily Mail that states:

"The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an 'inside job,' according to a group of leading academics. Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries. The claims have caused outrage and anger in the US which marks the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Monday. But leading scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetrated."[9]

Millions of Americans saw the C-Span broadcast of the "American Scholars Symposium," and learned about the 9/11 military exercises that simulated terrorist hijackings, and the fact that most of the fighter planes that were supposed to guard Washington, D.C. that morning were participating in military exercises in Canada.[10]

The U.S. News and World Report article continued:

"There are some divergent strands among the conspiracy theorists, but for most of them, the story has two major tenets: The World Trade Center towers and nearby Building 7, though struck by planes, were brought down by controlled demolitions, and the Pentagon was struck by a missile, not a plane."[11]

Why did the author suggest Building 7 was struck by a plane? No plane struck Building 7, and no reinforced steel building has ever collapsed because of a fire. You can watch the professionally controlled collapse of Building 7 at: [Read].

The Bush administration tried to block the effort to determine what happened because they claimed a lengthy investigation would "detract from the war on terrorism." When that argument failed to dissuade the public, the BOD organized two investigations: "The Joint Intelligence Committee" and the "9/11 Commission."

The Joint Intelligence Committee didn't try to determine why Building 7 collapsed because both Senator Bob Graham and Congressman Porter Goss, the co-chairmen of the committee, are members of the CFR. In addition, the Bush administration censored the report.[12]

The 9/11 Commission didn't determine why Building 7 collapsed because the Chairman, Thomas Kean, the vice-Chairman, Lee Hamilton, two members, Jamie Gorelick and John Lehman, and the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow, are members of the CFR.[13] Former Senator Max Cleland was a member, but when it became obvious he wouldn't participate in the charade, he was replaced. Again, the Bush administration censored the report.[14] Since there are almost 300 million people living in the U.S., and there are only 4000 members of the CFR, do you honestly believe the CFR's control of both investigations was an accident?



THE TRUE STORY OF 9-11
PART 2 of 2





By Dr. Stanley Monteith
June 3, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

My previous article (The True Story of 9/11, Part I) closed with Professor Carroll Quigley�s revelation that:

"There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. . . . I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. . . ."[1]

When I researched Colonel House's papers at Yale University, I found a copy of a letter that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt sent Colonel House on November 21, 1933, that contained the following statement:

"I had a nice talk with Jack Morgan the other day. . . . J.P.M. (J.P. Morgan, ed) did not seem much troubled over the gold purchasing. . . . The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson. . . . The country is going through a repetition of Jackson's fight with the Bank of the United States - - only on a far bigger and broader basis."[2]

[Advertisement: Read Dr. Stanley Montieth's book, "Brotherhood of Darkness"]

Who controls the U.S. government today? Members of David Rockefeller's Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderbergers (BdB), the Trilateral Commission (TC), the Club of Rome (CR), leading Masons, occult groups, and the Spiritual Hierarchy that energizes them. I call them the "Brotherhood of Darkness." They control both political parties, the presidency, the mass media, most major banks, most major corporations, and most of the wealth of the world.[3] If that is true, why hasn't someone told the American people? Because most journalists and most media pundits want to keep their jobs, and don't want to end up like Gary Webb, a Pulitzer prize winning columnist who exposed the CIA's involvement in the drug trade, who shot himself in the head twice to make certain he was dead.

Richard Harwood, the former editorial page editor of The Washington Post, tried to expose the CFR's control of our government in 1993 when he wrote:

"The president is a member. So is his secretary of state, the deputy secretary of state, all five of the undersecretaries, several of the assistant secretaries and the department's legal adviser. The president's national security adviser and his deputy are members. The director of Central Intelligence (like all previous directors) and the chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board are members. The secretary of defense, three undersecretaries and at least four assistant secretaries are members. The secretaries of the departments of housing and urban development, interior, health and human services and the chief White House public relations man, David Gergen, are members, along with the speaker of the House and the majority leader of the Senate."[4]

The Washington Post article continued (October 30, 1993):

"In the past 15 years, council directors have included Hedley Donovan of Time Inc, Elizabeth Drew of the New Yorker, Philip Geyelin of The Washington Post, Karen Elliott House of the Wall Street Journal and Strobe Talbott of Time magazine, who is now President Clinton's ambassador at large in the Slavic world. The editorial page editor, deputy editorial page editor, executive editor, managing editor, foreign editor, national affairs editor, business and financial editor and various writers as well as Katherine Graham, the paper's principal owner, represent The Washington Post in the council's membership. The executive editor, managing editor and foreign editor of the New York Times are members, along with executives of such other large newspapers as the Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times, the weekly newsmagazines, network television executives and celebrities - Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw and Jim Lehrer, for example - and various columnists, among them Charles Krauthammer, William Buckley, George Will and Jim Hoagland."[5]

Professor Ben Bagdikian's book, The New Media Monopoly, documents the fact that five mega corporations control 90% of the American media. The book is available from Radio Liberty. Lt. General William Odom headed the NSA, the intelligence organization that tracks our phone calls, our e-mails, our faxes, and our activities. The "Secrecy Agreement" he signed prevents him from revealing what is taking place, but his book, Fixing Intelligence (2003) noted:

". . . should the CIA be permitted to carry out assassinations? Should Army Counter- intelligence be involved in domestic surveillance of civilians? Should CIA clandestine officers be allowed to have cover as journalists?"[6]

If those things are taking place, what can we do? Members of the BOD control most media outlets, the police, the military, the government, the religious establishment, and most of the wealth of the world, but they fear the public will learn the truth about the events that took place on 9/11, so they have launched a massive media campaign to convince the public the "official version of 9/11" is correct. The September 11, 2006, issue of U.S. News and World Report published an article that laments:

"Even as conspiracy theories thrived abroad, they mostly fell on deaf ears in the first years after the attacks. But as the fifth anniversary nears, 9/11 Truth and its outlandish claims have become an online phenomenon - and are proving startlingly persuasive. In a July 2006 Scripps Howard poll, 16 percent of respondents said it was 'very likely' that federal officials either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or allowed them to happen to justify war in the Middle East, while a further 20 percent said it was 'somewhat likely.'"[7]

The September 8, 2006 edition of World Affairs Brief states:

"Current polls put the numbers as high as 39% of Americans believe the US government was in some way complicit in the terror attack of 9/11. That's a very high number, surpassed only by the percentage of people that disbelieve the official government version about the assassination of JFK - 69%."[8]

Joel Skousen cited a recent article in the UK Daily Mail that states:

"The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an 'inside job,' according to a group of leading academics. Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries. The claims have caused outrage and anger in the US which marks the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Monday. But leading scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetrated."[9]

Millions of Americans saw the C-Span broadcast of the "American Scholars Symposium," and learned about the 9/11 military exercises that simulated terrorist hijackings, and the fact that most of the fighter planes that were supposed to guard Washington, D.C. that morning were participating in military exercises in Canada.[10]

The U.S. News and World Report article continued:

"There are some divergent strands among the conspiracy theorists, but for most of them, the story has two major tenets: The World Trade Center towers and nearby Building 7, though struck by planes, were brought down by controlled demolitions, and the Pentagon was struck by a missile, not a plane."[11]

Why did the author suggest Building 7 was struck by a plane? No plane struck Building 7, and no reinforced steel building has ever collapsed because of a fire. You can watch the professionally controlled collapse of Building 7 at: [Read].

The Bush administration tried to block the effort to determine what happened because they claimed a lengthy investigation would "detract from the war on terrorism." When that argument failed to dissuade the public, the BOD organized two investigations: "The Joint Intelligence Committee" and the "9/11 Commission."

The Joint Intelligence Committee didn't try to determine why Building 7 collapsed because both Senator Bob Graham and Congressman Porter Goss, the co-chairmen of the committee, are members of the CFR. In addition, the Bush administration censored the report.[12]

The 9/11 Commission didn't determine why Building 7 collapsed because the Chairman, Thomas Kean, the vice-Chairman, Lee Hamilton, two members, Jamie Gorelick and John Lehman, and the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow, are members of the CFR.[13] Former Senator Max Cleland was a member, but when it became obvious he wouldn't participate in the charade, he was replaced. Again, the Bush administration censored the report.[14] Since there are almost 300 million people living in the U.S., and there are only 4000 members of the CFR, do you honestly believe the CFR's control of both investigations was an accident?

I will continue my discussion of the 9/11 attack, and the coming war with Iran, in Part III of this article. If we can convince the American people they haven't been told the truth about the events that took place on 9/11, we may be able to prevent World War III, and preserve our nation.

The current situation reminds me of Martin Luther's immortal words,


"A mighty fortress is our God, A bulwark never failing; Our helper He, amid the flood Of mortal ills prevailing: For still our ancient foe Doth seek to work us woe; His craft and power are great, And, armed with cruel hate, On earth is not his equal."(14)

I believe we are engaged in a spiritual battle for the souls of men and the survival of Christian civilization. Our task is to do our best. For part 1 click below.

Click here for part -----> 1, 2, 3,

Dachsie comment:

Very interesting. This was originally produced and posted on YouTube in 2018. I provided a brief summary of Father Ripperger's education at end.

____________________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnVG5yiaO7k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnVG5yiaO7k


38:17 video runtime

[SIZE=3]Dangers of Modern Psychology ~ Father Chad Ripperger * [/SIZE]

Sensus Fidelium
222K subscribers
Why modern pyschology is dangerous. The history behind psychology. For more sermons & lectures please visit
http://sensustraditionis.org/ & remember to do the PenanceWare Fr asks for

Fr Ripperger's order of exorcists http://dolorans.org/

The website https://sensusfidelium.us/
To donate please visit https://sensusfidelium.us/donate-supp...

Donations to Sensus Fidelium is 501(c)3 tax deductibleFor his book on Psychology http://www.sensustraditionis.org/psyc...

___________________

* Father Ripperger was born in Casper, Wyoming on October 11, 1964. He earned two bachelor's degrees, in theology and philosophy, from the University of San Francisco; and two master's degrees, one in philosophy from the Center for Thomistic Studies of the University of St. Thomas in Houston, Texas, and another in theology from Holy Apostles College and Seminary in Cromwell, Connecticut. He joined the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP), which sent him to Rome to receive his doctorate in philosophy from the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross
Wikipedia

_______________________

Dachsie comment:

Father Ripperger said two times in this video that your thoughts can alter you physical brain structure. I call that very interesting.

I was always taught that we can sin in our thoughts, words, and deeds. So it is wise for one's spiritual welfare to avoid situations, places and things that cause your thoughts to lead to immoral actions and pathways. Sounds right to me.

https://jermwarfare.com/podcast/james-fetzer-sandy-hook

go to link above to play 2 embedded videos and the podcast

James Fetzer on the Sandy Hook coverup
What actually happened at the school, and was it a false flag operation to usher in stricter gun laws?

JermBy Jerm25 Aug 2022

[/SIZE]
https://jermwarfare.com/wp-content/u...k-1200x675.jpg

James Fetzer is a researcher who was previously on my podcast in which he discussed the JFK assassination coverup.

I enjoy a good conspiracy as much as the next theorist, and have welcomed some pretty eye-opening conversations in recent months, from Marilyn Monroe to 9/11 to the Titanic, but this one about Sandy Hook is absolutely next level.
Was Alex Jones right?

After reading the memoranda that compose this series, how could anyone doubt that Alex had it right and the mainstream media had it wrong? That the vilification of Alex has no basis in fact and appears to be a massive propaganda campaign on behalf of the Deep State? At this point in time – with massive and compelling evidence available – what remains up for debate? Nothing! As he observed, it was a hoax.
James Fetzer, circa 2018

James reckons that Alex was right all along, despite all the legal and political backgammon currently being played.

The jury’s decision Friday came the day after it awarded the parents of slain first grader $4.1 million for mental anguish, bringing the total damages against the InfoWars founder to $49.3 million.
NPR, circa 2022

As James notes in our conversation, the “slain first grader” doesn’t exist. Or, rather, he does exist, but not in the way the mainstream narrative has been constructed.
What actually happened?

I don’t know.

But, once again, trusting the legitimacy of official stories is not a good strategy in piecing together puzzles. And being labelled a “conspiracy theorist” is empty and just an attempt to discredit, silence critical thinking, and perpetuate established views. Ignore such labels.

[IMG]Share. Telegram WhatsApp Facebook Twitter Email[/IMG]

The Sandy Hook school.

And when censorship becomes the dominating force, like in the case with this particular event, alarm bells should ring. After all, why would “crazy conspiracy theories” need to be censored if they’re clearly crap? And why would people need to be protected and sheltered from them?

The following documentary (which, obviously, is not on YouTube) is long but superb.

embedded video 2:46:43 video runtime

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...rminaveXIQ--~D
Our conversation

James showed some photos in this podcast, so watching it might be preferable to listening to it. He covers a lot of ground, including questions around

the absence of blood;
the car park;
broken windows;
furniture;
actors and fake identities; and
gun laws.

One needs a strong drink for this one.

embedded video 1:33:21 video runtime on odysee

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...koF9Vs0Sfw--~D

Please support Jerm's work by joining our community of like-minded people from around the world.

Jerm

Website
Twitter

I'm a political cartoonist; I am a podcast host; and I have my own international talk radio show. My wife and I live in Cape Town (South Africa) with our pets and alcohol.

RELATED WARFARE

attorney Jeff Childers gives more inside story on the Mar a Lago and affidavit matter.


excerpt:

🔥 As I’m sure you’ve already heard, the Affidavit is heavily redacted:

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...7_1178x660.png

That’s not surprising, we expected heavy redaction. The Affidavit’s introduction, which contains a bunch of conclusory statements about probable cause, defamatory remarks about Trump, and the early case timeline, is mostly intact. But in every single instance where the FBI cited to any FACT that could support the Affidavit, that fact is completely redacted.

Because of this, possibly the most important thing to know about the Affidavit is that there are NO FACTS supporting the need for the raid. We must assume that some relevant facts are concealed in the redacted parts. In other words, the redacted Affidavit does NOT establish probable cause for the raid, which was what everyone was waiting to see.

SNIP Read the entire thing HERE. Educational and entertaining.


...

🔥 Finally, President Trump’s characteristic response:
Twitter avatar for @HarrisonKrank██████ ████ @HarrisonKrank
Trumps response to the redacted affidavit.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...sKUsAEzeLm.jpg

August 27th 2022

nice rant about the resident's student load forgiveness proposal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98UiNexZgZk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98UiNexZgZk

11:24 video runtime

Who I Blame For The STUDENT LOAN FIASCO

Aug 26, 2022


Living On A Dime To Grow Rich

Bible Study

Dachsie Aug. 28, 2022

Jeremiah Chapter 31, verses 31, 32, 33, 24

https://drbo.org/cgi-bin/s?q=Jeremiah+31&b=drb&t=1

Jeremiah 31:31-34

31] Behold the days shall come, saith the Lord, and I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Juda: [32] Not according to the covenant which I made with their fathers, in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt: the covenant which they made void, and I had dominion over them, saith the Lord. [33] But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel, after those days, saith the Lord: I will give my law in their bowels, and I will write it in their heart: and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. [34] And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying: Know the Lord: for all shall know me from the least of them even to the greatest, saith the Lord: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.

___


George Haydock's Catholic Commentary
https://www.bibliaplus.org/en/commen...ble-commentary

The Haydock's Catholic Bible Commentary, following the Douay-Rheims Bible text, was originally compiled by Catholic priest and biblical scholar Reverend George Leo Haydock.

https://www.bibliaplus.org/en/commen...ry/jeremiah/31


Jeremiah Chapter 31, verse 31

Jeremiah Chapter 31 verse 31

https://www.bibliaplus.org/en/commen.../jeremiah/31/1

Israel. The ten tribes returned as well as Juda, &c. (Calmet) --- They were more ready to receive Christ than the other two tribes, Matthew xiii., &c. (Worthington)

Covenant. That made with the captives was not such. Their covenant is grown old, and at an end, as St. Paul shews, Hebrews viii. 8. They were not indeed divided, as they had been, Ezechiel xxxvii. 16.
________________

https://www.bibliaplus.org/en/commen...jeremiah/31/32

Jeremiah Chapter 31 verse 32


George Haydock's Catholic Commentary
Jeremiah 31:32

Dominion. As a husband, (Hebrew; Calmet) or "Lord." (Haydock) --- "I despised them." (Septuagint) (Hebrews viii.)

____________________

https://www.bibliaplus.org/en/commen...jeremiah/31/33

George Haydock's Catholic Commentary
Jeremiah Chapter 31 verse 33

Heart. They were more docile after their return: yet still their service was very imperfect and forced. How many false traditions were received, at the coming of Christ! This of course, regards his disciples.

________________

Jeremiah https://www.bibliaplus.org/en/commen...jeremiah/31/34
Jeremiah Chaper 31 verse 34

Lord. Christ himself came to instruct mankind. The true God was better known than ever, even by the illiterate. Yet God requires us to have recourse to men, in order to know his truths, as St. Paul was sent to Hananias, and the eunuch to Philip. [Acts viii., and ix.] (Haydock) --- The apostles were enlightened by the Holy Ghost, (John vi. 45.; St. Augustine, de Spir.; Calmet) who still guides the flock by his pastors. The private spirit is too fanatical and delusive. (Haydock) --- The most ignorant shall easily become acquainted with the truths of salvation. External preaching is requisite, though of little use unless grace touch the mind and the heart. (Tirinus) --- All will hear successively, (Haydock) or embrace the gospel at the same time, for several years before the last day. (Houbigant, pref. in Prop. 356) (Isaias xi. 9., and xlv. 23., and Sophonias iii. 9., &c.) (Haydock)





_____________

Here is the Catholic Answers commentary on Jeremiah Chapter 31, verses 31 - 34

Catholic Answers

Audio and
https://www.catholic.com/qa/jeremiah...e-new-covenant


Question:
How does the church interpret Jeremiah 31-31-34 ?

Answer:
The prophet Jeremiah foretells the fulfillment of the kingdom of Israel via the establishment of a New Covenant:

31 “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, 32 not like the covenant which I made with their fathers when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant which they broke, though I was their husband, says the Lord. 33 But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it upon their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And no longer shall each man teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, says the Lord; for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.”

Jesus Christ institutes the New Covenant in establishing his Church, which restores and fulfills the kingdom of Israel (Luke 1:32-33; Matt. 16:18-19; see Gal. 6:14-16). Jesus fulfills the Old Covenant through his one redemptive Sacrifice of Calvary, which provides definitive atonement for our sins, and then by sending the Holy Spirit on Pentecost, which applies the merits of Christ’s Sacrifice, beginning with the baptism of the Jewish faithful (Acts. 37-42)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zo5MRe0IJ8M

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zo5MRe0IJ8M


Modernism is a Denial of Reality - Bishop Williamson

Jan 20, 2020

11:26 video runtime

Promotor Fidei

Bishop Williamson talks about how the modern world has lost its grip on reality by rejecting God, and how this has affected the Catholic Church through the heresy of Modernism.

Taken from this video: Confusion Now Hath Made His Masterpiece Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3edsQ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQaHJz8nZyQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQaHJz8nZyQ

Bishop Donald Sanborn Explains The Cassiciacum Thesis

Catholic Family Podcast

We were honored to interview his Excellency, Bishop Donald Sanborn, about the "Cassiciacum Thesis". The good Bishop set aside an hour of his valuable time to describe it in simple layman's terms, but also in detail. The Thesis is a theological explanation of how Sedevacantism can come to an end in a seemingly hopeless scenario. The interview sheds light on a confusing topic and we hope more clarity helps bring unity among the faithful, bringing souls ever closer to God and His True Church.

AMDG!


39:29 video runtime

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIT3AZd37II

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIT3AZd37II

"Biahoo" Barron calls Martin Luther "a mystic of grace."

The Vortex—Martin Luther & Bishop Barron

103,380 views
Jun 28, 2017

Church Militant

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW3PRR8INvA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW3PRR8INvA

36:11 video runtime

Roman Catholic Media channel (sedevacantist traditional)

Feast of Saint James, Apostle. Epistle: I Cor. 4:9-15. Gospel: Matth. 20:20-23

Visit our website: https://mostholytrinityseminary.org/​

THANK YOU FOR ALL THE SUPPORT!

We are EXPANDING the Seminary. Next year we expect to have a record number of Seminarians. We are moving soon to Reading, Pennsylvania. But the new building is not ready. We have Seminarians living off campus. Your help is needed more than ever. Please send us a donation via: https://mostholytrinityseminary.org/d...

BITCOIN donations received here: bc1q2e30s56qxkv284csfrvr5d7r9g0k09rwyyhfpe

NOTICE: We have TWO more channels: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuux...
and
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4tn...

Dave Mr. X22report, gives his take on today's news stories.

https://x22report.com/aiovg_videos/e...able-in-court/


Ep 2861b – Election Fraud Stage Set,Must Be Done Right,According To The Rule Of Law,Provable In Court

https://x22report.com/wp-content/upl...l_election.jpg

53:22 video runtime

Philosophy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOXkQAPY2tM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOXkQAPY2tM

9:35 video runtime

Only One Truth - The Vortex

Church Militant
286K subscribers
Most people can't think straight.

Go Premium! Click Here!

https://www.churchmilitant.com/gopremium

_______________________


TRANSCRIPT

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video...only-one-truth

TRANSCRIPT


We are in a political war these days. It is a war being fought on the battlefield of politics because we have lost on the battlefields of culture — and theology before that and philosophy before that. So politics is the only remaining battlefield left before civil war.

But notice, the first skirmish to have been lost was on the battlefield of philosophy. In truth, once you lose that battle, it's impossible to win any future ones because philosophy sets the parameters of all remaining battles. It defines language, morals, laws — everything. In short, the object of philosophy is truth itself.

A person's philosophy determines how he sees the world and then corresponds actions to that worldview. As we see so frequently, and with increasing frequency these days, the very concept of truth in and of itself is almost completely gone.

So, we get ridiculous scenes like a Supreme Court nominee who is a woman being unable to provide a definition of "woman." The determinants of sex, male and female, are simply jettisoned in favor of whatever a person wants them to be and then relabeled as gender. For the record, human beings don't have "genders." We have either the male sex or the female sex, but even that concept has fallen prey to the "there is no such thing as truth" crowd.

Of course, the philosophical war against truth has been centuries in the making. Like all cancers, it started slowly at first, barely perceptible. But once a foothold is established — a base of operations, we might say — then things pick up and advance more and more rapidly.
The philosophical war against truth has been centuries in the making.
Gab
Tweet

The "anti-truthers" are also hypocritical in their declaration that there is no such thing as objective or absolute truth, even as they declare "their truth" in an absolute manner. They say you can't hold to an objective truth because there is no such thing, even as they push the opposite and declare it to be objectively true. That is a philosophical contradiction designed to arrive at a desired outcome, not the truth.

For centuries, the Catholic Church trained its future priests in philosophy and critical thinking, which they would need in order to help guide their flocks to Heaven where the final attainment of such is the apprehension of pure truth. But roughly a century ago, the importance of proper thinking ordered to truth began to be abandoned by the clergy until we have reached a stage where vast swaths of bishops and priests no longer accept various teachings of the Church because they do not accept the philosophical underpinnings, the foundations of those teachings.

Life can be very difficult at times and human beings are a combination of intellect and emotions, but we can never forget that those aspects were severely damaged in the fall from grace. So finding the truth, even understanding that there is a truth, can become a struggle. Reason must dominate and be placed at the service of truth. This is the core, the purpose of philosophy.

Recognizing the dearth of philosophical training and catechesis influencing most Catholics, Church Militant produced multiple programs with this specific goal in mind, to help form critical thinking skills and apply them to the truths of the Faith. This is why so many of our Premium programs focus on philosophy or its application. For example, we have 26 30-minute episodes (that's 13 hours) of Right Reason with Dr. Charles Rice (God rest his soul), one of the more brilliant Catholic minds of the past century. Likewise, another Premium show, Armor of God, also deals directly with how to think critically and ask the right questions. Just as with Right Reason, we have 26 30-minute episodes of this show, for another 13 hours of content.

Of course, at some point, all these sharpened critical-thinking skills based on correct philosophy have to be applied. That's why we produced another program, Houses Built on Sand, of 13 episodes dealing with the philosophical flaws evident in the theology of Protestantism. Yes, it does matter that you are a Catholic and not just a Christian. Along those same lines, and because of the prevailing-yet-poorly-reasoned conclusion among so many baptized that we get to decide what Scripture means, we produced our highly popular three-part program Where Did the Bible Come From?

Ultimately, the goal of philosophy is not just to arrive at some academic point about truth, but to live that truth out in our daily lives so as to merit salvation. For this reason, in our apologetics classes, we focused the last two hours specifically on morality.
The goal of philosophy is not just to arrive at some academic point about truth, but to live that truth out in our daily lives.
Gab
Tweet

No Catholic apostolate has the resources Church Militant has available to you at the click of a button. The reason for the disastrous state we find ourselves in today, culturally and in the Church, is that Catholic leaders simply stopped teaching the truth. Some, of course, went on to actually teach lies, but that's another topic for another day.

Church Militant is committed to presenting the teachings of the Church and teaching them in clear, decisive, irrefutable and, of course, easily understood fashion. The truths of the Holy Catholic faith must be intellectually accessible to everyone at all times. So, we'd like to ask you to become a Premium member today. It's just $10 a month, much less than you spend on a couple of cups of coffee in a week.

In the face of the colossal failure on the part of Church leaders, the laity must step up and own responsibility for their own spiritual welfare. All this week, the last week of the summer, we are going to be highlighting the treasure trove that is the Premium channel of Church Militant: 100% faithful to the Magisterium, easily understood and, most important, revealing aspects of Church teaching you've likely never heard before.

The spiritual war in which the world is involved right now demands that Catholics know their Faith. Becoming Premium is a fantastic way to begin. Again, please just click on the link and sign up today for your monthly Premium subscription.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtnTiFHcVsIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtnTiFHcVsI
This may be America's 'next national security crisis'
104,924 views
Aug 25, 2022
3K
Dislike
Share
Save
Fox Business
1.95M subscribers
California Rep. Darrell Issa urges President Biden to take action against China for its lack of oversight over chemicals used in fentanyl and other drugs on 'The Evening Edit.' #foxbusiness #theeveningedit

_____________
Dachsie comment:

This Issa guy is doing dragon speech. Twisted false assumptions and false conclusions.

"President Biden does NOT have it in his power and authority to solve the fentanyl-China probable.


Biden is a pitiful excuse for a human being and is thoroughly owned and operated by the deepest darkest deep state.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqWKx1u3GlM

where are we now in the book of revelation and or the prophecies of our lady of fatima 360p

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqWKx1u3GlM

8:13 VIDEO runtime

Confraternity of Our Lady of Fatima
3.32K subscribers

Bishop Athanasius Schneider, O.R.C.
Auxiliary Bishop of Maria Santissima in Astana, Kazakhstan
Titular Bishop of Celerina

A very holy man. He is still within the "Novus ordo" , in communion with Vatican "pope" in Rome.
Not sedevacantist.

We are not advised anywhere in the bilble to set exact timeline for the "end times" events - called eschatology.

We are advised to watch for the signs of the apocalyptic times.

The signs are so clear right now.

Pray and expose the Truth of the One Who is Truth.

You will never go wrong if you venerate and pray for the intercession of the Blessed Mother.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ny5r9YphxHg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ny5r9YphxHg

17:27 video runtime

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ny5r9YphxHg

Mar 24, 2018


Roman Catholic Media

A brief analysis of the different positions regarding the status of Vatican II and the Novus Ordo hierarchy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GcSG_1maEU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GcSG_1maEU

17:06 video runtime

Christ, the Good Samaritan, by Rev. Michael DeSaye

Aug 28, 2022

Visit our website: https://mostholytrinityseminary.org/​

THANK YOU FOR ALL THE SUPPORT!

We are EXPANDING the Seminary. Your help is needed more than ever. Please send us a donation via: https://mostholytrinityseminary.org/d...

BITCOIN donations received here: bc1q2e30s56qxkv284csfrvr5d7r9g0k09rwyyhfpe

ETHEREUM donations received here: 0x69b62FC93D079D16e3688695dfc1A1EdAE3aa2A0

NOTICE: We have TWO more channels:

MHT Seminary Live-Streaming
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuux...


and

MHT Seminary Courses Online
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4tn...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhpJpZkBCks

VigaNÒ! Renouncing Satan and his works

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhpJpZkBCks

1:07:28 video tumble

Sep 6, 2018


What Catholics Believe


18.1K subscribers
In the newest episode of What Catholics Believe, Fr. Jenkins: updates listeners on latest fallout concerning Abp. Viganò’s Dossier; discusses the roles of Vittorio Ettore Tedeschi & Abp. Viganò at the Vatican; how Abp. Viganò’s letter is related to VatiLeaks; talks about the Kim Davis story; examines the responsibility of Vatican II and the bishops who participated for this ‘New Springtime’ of sexual abuse; listens to Tom read emails from viewers and offers pertinent Catholic commentary; briefly reviews two papal encyclicals, Pascendi dominici gregis (http://tiny.cc/Pascendi) and Acerbo nimis (http://tiny.cc/Acerbo); and speaks of St. John Bosco’s vision in the Basilica of the Sacred Heart.

https://vaticancatholic.com/is-china...e-world-video/

https://vaticancatholic.com/images/i...orld-video.jpg

Is China controlling the Great Reset? Are they working with the WEF to enslave the world? - video
August 29, 20221 Comment

3:20 runtime

also on Rumble

https://rumble.com/v1ftrjf-is-china-controlling-the-great-reset-and-manufactured-food-shortages-check-.html

Antonia • a day ago

Thank you, MHFM, for this posting. It should be very clear just from watching this short but concise history, with the obervations and questions asked, that there are many close similarities to the modern Communist/Marxist regimes of "recent" past and what we see currently; especially with the formation of the EU and what looks like its evil step-sister, the WEF. Again, we see our fallen nature, very prone to grandiose promises of luxury, power (for individuals) and benevolent control (by governments) which sway the natural man's thinking and passions; we see also the peoples of the earth choosing to live in accord with these systems: stumbling, headlong, into chaos and unremitting evils overrunning countries and cultures. "Come out from among them and be ye separate " saith the Lord.

2
•
Reply
•
Share ›

https://vaticancatholic.com/images/b...t-go-there.jpg

https://vaticancatholic.com/buzz-ald...idnt-go-there/

Buzz Aldrin admits we didn't go to the moon? Aldrin says: "... we didn't go there"
August 29, 20223 Comments

Also on Rumble

https://rumble.com/v1hnw8z-buzz-aldr...s-stagg.htmlso on Rumble

Please consider sending Dr. James Fetzer a donation of any amount at

GiveSendGo.com/fundingfetzer

I have listened to Dr. Fetzer pretty steadily since he first came on as a guest with Dr. Stan Monteith, back in 2004.

He has always pursued evidence and truth and sticks with the facts without compromise.
Dr. Fetzer has a case that maybe will go to the U S Supreme Court and he is pro se on his own case at this time and could use any help with funds because he has exhausted his funds for lawyers at this time. He has a strong case and we patriots who care about the rule of law and the Constitution and the survival of our great United States of America should support him.

There must be truth and facts in our courts about the many false (flag) events that have taken place here and we cannot have false events accepted as the basis of law suits.
Dr. Fetzer has established the facts about the Sandy Hook School false event*.

Dr. Fetzer has not caved in and waffled and betrayed his country and the truth.

Dr. Fetzer taught me everything I never wanted to know about 9-11-01 and that is when I was set firmly on the truth seeker journey and have been there ever since.

God bless us each and every one in the Name of the One Who is Truth.


https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...tY_640x360.jpg

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...tY_640x360.jpg

Need to Know News (29 August 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman

1:04:20 video runtime

First published at 16:10 UTC on August 30th, 2022.

channel image

Jim Fetzer

Jim Fetzer

12071 subscribers

Even though massively redacted, the Mar-a-Lago affidavit suggests the FBI was there to confiscate documents and records related to Russiagate and thereby cover their own malfeasance. Even the judge who signed the warrant had previously posted anti-Trump attacks on Facebook, which hints that he ought to have recused himself. More than that, we know the Presidential Records act and the President's inherent Constitutional authority as the Declassifier-in-Chief renders these allegations meritless. Alan Dershowitz adds that even an indictment of Trump could not keep him off the ballot in 2024. Judicial Watch continues its superb record of legal vigilance on behalf of the people and Rand Paul calls out the FBI for its failure to show any proof of guilt. The Babylon Bee sums it up: The only 3 words not redacted were, ORANGE MAN BAD! Former head of NSA and CIA Michael Hayden goes all in suggesting Trump supporters are violent, domestic extremists and that Trump ought to be executed for his crimes, echoed by faux historian Michael Beschloss, whom I have suspected to be massively biased in the past. Due to programs called ERIC and CEIR, it looks as though Democrats control the voter rolls in 31 states, which indicates they may be able to steal the midterm just as they did the 2020 election. Disgusting! Biden's Student Loan Forgiveness Program, touted as running $330,000,000, may actually top out at over $1,000,000,000. Surprise! Surprise! And the Alex Jones' fiascos is being used to discredit the Sandy Hook hoax, while citing other "conspiracy theories"--including JFK, and Russigate--which are no longer remotely "theories" but conspiracy facts! With my Petition before SCOTUS, Sandy Hook will not be going away any time soon.

First 32 minutes of show about Mar a Lago raid

Suggest great comments from all three from that point on.

Mark 14:22

While they were eating, He took some bread, and after a blessing He broke it, and gave it to them, and said, “Take it; this is My body.”

Luke 22:19

And when He had taken some bread and given thanks, He broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me.”

1 Corinthians 11:24

and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, “This is My body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of Me.”

1 Corinthians 10:16

Is not the cup of blessing which we bless a sharing in the blood of Christ? Is not the bread which we break a sharing in the body of Christ?

John 6:54

He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.


John 6:56

He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him.

John 6:51

I am the living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread also which I will give for the life of the world is My flesh.”

John 6:52

Then the Jews began to argue with one another, saying, “How can this man give us His flesh to eat?”

John 6:55

For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink.

1 Corinthians 10:16 ESV /

The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ?

Source: https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topi...-Christ~s-Body

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0951E42IWA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0951E42IWA

8:23 video runtime

The Vortex — Pure and Simple

Aug 30, 2022

Church Militant

God is pure and simple.

Click Here and Consider Going Premium!
https://www.churchmilitant.com/gopremium

_________________________



TRANSCRIPT


One of the glories of the Catholic faith is its pure simplicity and its simple purity. And this is all that is required of us: purity of heart and a single-minded desire for Heaven. Purity and simplicity share in common with each other the notion of clarity. Everything we need to know in the Catholic Church is very clear.

Purity and simplicity are bound together with clarity. For example, the teaching on the Blessed Sacrament, the Real Presence, is just that. Jesus Christ is really, truly and substantially present — body, blood, soul and divinity — under the appearance of bread and wine.

Simple does not mean not deep. But it does mean clear. You can't get much more straightforward than that. And don't make the mistake of thinking that just because something is cloaked in mystery, it isn't clear. The "how" or "why" or even the "what" of something doesn't detract from its simplicity or purity.

The Host, which looks and tastes like bread, is Jesus Christ, pure and simple. So too is the Church's teaching that if a person is to be saved, then he must not die in a state of mortal sin. He must die in a state of grace, meaning, sanctifying grace, having the Holy Trinity living and abiding in him.
Everything we need to know in the Catholic Church is very clear.

This, too, is a pure and simple teaching. Depart from this life without the indwelling of the Holy Trinity, and a person remains in that state forever, without end — this is Hell. At death, the soul experiences an illumination of reality, of the truth that what really mattered was its condition before God.

God does not know a soul without Himself present in that soul at the moment of death. He Himself attests to this in the gospels when He says, quite clearly, to those knocking on the door to get in, "Go away, I tell you. I do not know you."

God is life. A person that dies in mortal sin has a soul without life, the requisite spirituality of the Holy Trinity. If one dies in that state, then his soul is forever sealed in that state. It's like a team losing a game because it has fewer points than its opponent when the final gun sounds.

That loss is forever sealed, locked and unchangeable. The competition is unrepeatable. The loss stands forever as a sign of failure to achieve the goal of victory. So many people struggle with the concept of eternal damnation, but salvation and damnation are pure and simple concepts.

It's a very simple and pure concept, and it's extremely straightforward. Reject God and His loving commandments in this life and a person is forever sealed in that condition of rejection of God. Likewise, if one lives a life of desire to cling to God in this life by following the commandments of love, then that choice is ratified for eternity.

The Son of God commanded that a person be baptized and eat His Body and drink His Blood. He then underscored that if you don't do this, then you have no life within you. So how could a soul that departs this life without the life of God suddenly attain the life of God after death? The time for choosing is this side of death, not the next. It's pure and simple.

A soul must depart this life in a state of grace, with the life of God within. And the surest means to do that is as a baptized receiver of Holy Communion, who has no conscious knowledge of mortal sin on his soul. Everything else for a rational, non-invincibly ignorant person is a gamble in the extreme and, more than likely, a losing proposition.

The line from the psalms is most instructive here: "Deep is calling on deep." When we stand before Almighty God, what He will search us for is the image of Himself. To the degree that we image Him, then deep calls on deep, and deep responds and goes to deep — like things to like things.

But when God calls out to the soul before Him at the judgment and that soul is spiritually dead — in a state of deadly sin — then there is nothing deep within that soul to respond. Here, we have two things that are not alike, and, as such, the soul with death flees from the God of life and prefers the torments of eternal loss to the even greater torments of being in a state of constant death surrounded by life.

This is why the Church's members and leaders must never retreat from the truth — from its purity, simplicity and clarity. The Faith is simple because it flows from and back to God, Who is simple in Himself. The Faith is pure because God is one. The Faith is blinding in its clarity because so is God.

Church Militant is committed to presenting the teachings of the Church and teaching them in a clear, decisive, irrefutable and, of course, easily understood fashion. The truths of the holy Catholic faith must be intellectually accessible to everyone at all times.

So we'd like to ask you to become a Premium member today. It's just $10 a month. That's less than almost everyone spends on a cup of coffee in a week.

In the face of the colossal failure on the part of Church leaders, the laity must step up and take responsibility for their own spiritual welfare. It's why we produced 13 episodes of our program Fr. Pablo Says. It's straight talk about the Church from a very well-known priest that Mother Angelica considered near and dear to her heart.

The Faith is simple because it flows from and back to God, Who is simple in Himself.


Likewise, we produced 26 episodes of a show everyone loved, The Majesty of the Faith. They were produced specifically to be short, single-minded episodes, easily understood.

And, in this same vein, we produced a really good show with Fr. Louis Guardiola of the Fathers of Mercy, Losing My Religion, on the necessity of Catholicism for salvation.

All this week (the last week of the summer) we are going to be highlighting the treasure trove that is the Premium channel of Church Militant. It's 100% faithful to the Magisterium, easily understood, and, most importantly, it reveals aspects of Church teaching you've likely never heard before.

The spiritual war the world is involved in right now demands that Catholics know the Faith down cold. Becoming Premium is a fantastic way to begin. Again, please just click on the link and sign up today for your monthly Premium subscription. Our call is to conform to God in the way He commands us, pure and simple.

Raid comedy / drama continues...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-XdgAWI7Oo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-XdgAWI7Oo

12:15 video runtime

DOJ Makes Bombshell Revelation After FBI Trump Raid: Judge Signals Intent to Back Trump’s Request

169,026 views

Premiered 17 hours ago September 1, 2011



�� Watch the Raid on America �� https://ept.ms/3R3RYUZ

Resources:

�� American Hartford Gold (866-242-2352):

https://ept.ms/3biH9MN

�� Picture of Documents:

https://ept.ms/3AGr8vv

�� Trump Filing:

https://ept.ms/3Avbp1W

https://ept.ms/3RaPHYj

�� DOJ Response:

https://ept.ms/3Q3JvjE

https://ept.ms/3KxIM9f

�� Judge Order:

https://ept.ms/3ee4RgZ

�� Anti-Trump Special Master:

https://ept.ms/3Ky5Ep2

https://ept.ms/3wKrpvX

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZtlbWi7ASE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZtlbWi7ASE

8:09 video runtime

Aug 31, 2022
830
Dislike
Share
Save
Church Militant
286K subscribers
No soldier goes into battle unprepared and untrained.

Click Here To Go Premium!
https://www.churchmilitant.com/gopremium

_______________________

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video...r-to-the-death

TRANSCRIPT

If you haven't noticed yet, then you need to soon — there is a war going on, and it is a war to the death. Two giant armies are marshaling their forces. When all of this is done, only one side will be left standing.

In short, it is evil versus God. Period. Even the Marxist media have picked up the theme, with their nonstop propaganda about Christian nationalism. While it is sad that it has come to this, it has to be accepted and embraced. Whether this is the beginning of the final battle on earth or just the final battle of this age we do not know. Frankly, it does not matter. What matters is that you join the war.

Every spiritual good, every divine utterance and every moral virtue is under assault by the purveyors of evil. Every institution has been perverted or nearly perverted: law, medicine, education, the arts, the media, government, the military and, yes, even — most importantly — religion. Make no mistake that the supreme target is the complete refashioning of the Catholic Church. To the extent that leaders in the Church fail to recognize this and act accordingly, they will have to answer to Almighty God when they die, or perhaps even before they die.

The Marxists will not stop until, through whatever means they can — violence, law, politics, social engineering, all of them — they force the Catholic Church to either embrace or surrender to their agenda of evil. But this will never happen. The sun will never rise on the day that the Church accepts child murder, euthanasia, sodomite marriage and the whole list of these wicked ends.
The sun will never rise on the day that the Church accepts child murder, euthanasia, sodomite marriage and the whole list of these wicked ends.
Gab
Tweet

Hear it loud and clear, enemies of Christ and His Catholic Church. Ain't. Gonna. Happen.

We have been through this many times before, with evil empires and lovers of wickedness trying to crush the truth. But the Church always buries Her enemies. You will never succeed because our Father is God and your father is the Devil. No matter what you do, say or plot, or even whatever temporary successes you may have, you will never achieve final victory. We pray that you see the light, come to the side of goodness and repent, just as many of us did.

A very large number of us used to be on the side you're on now. We had walked away from the truth, however much it may have torn us up inside. We embraced and loved our sin more than the truth. But through the power of divine love and supernatural grace, all that changed. We looked at ourselves in the mirror, realized our awful conditions, came to our senses and repented. Now we are here. We deserted the Devil, rejected him, and found peace and calm.

We don't claim to be morally superior as individuals, but we do claim — because it's true — that what we support is a morality given to mankind by a loving heavenly Father. If it comes to it, we are willing to die for it. We don't want you to die in your sin, but we will never allow you to impose those sins on us as a cost of living.

So continue on with your fake news attacks and distortions, your rage-filled rallies in favor of child murder and sodomy, pretending it's all about the environment and social justice and illegal immigration and animal rights and whatever other cover you can dream up and use to pretend to seize the moral high ground. You are all liars, which is why your father is the Devil. He has no truth in him, and as long as you remain on his side and embrace sin, you are children of darkness and offspring of the Serpent. You need to reject his patrimony and walk away while there is still time to save your souls. You will lose this war even as you win some battles.

The Catholic Church will never accept your evil. Never. You will either repent, as huge numbers of us did, or you will be damned. In the end, your rage-venting and the hatred you hold in your hearts against all that is good will have amounted to nothing. All your wicked plans will be gone in an instant. As the psalms say, "Great men are only an illusion; take their breath and they return to nothing."

What will be left standing — no matter how betrayed from within, or how battered, smashed and tattered — will be the Holy Catholic Church. The war will end, and all your machinations will have come to nothing. Repent. Switch sides and repent. Despite all efforts, truth, like water, always finds a way.

For those of us who believe and know the truth, we are commanded to announce it. That means we must know it ourselves. After all, you can't give what you don't have. The truths of the holy Catholic faith must be intellectually accessible to everyone, at all times.
For those of us who believe and know the truth, we are commanded to announce it.
Gab
Tweet

So, we ask you to become a Premium member today. It is just $10 a month, less than almost everyone spends on coffee in a week. The laity must step up and fill in the gap where the clergy have so spectacularly failed these many decades. This is why we produced 25 episodes of our program Wisdom of the Fathers, hosted by my dad a number of years ago. In Wisdom of the Fathers, my dad goes into detail about the lives of various Church Fathers, the Patristics, whose writings and lives helped transform the world from paganism.

Likewise, Simon Rafe and I co-hosted a fun little program back in the day called Moral Compass, providing a clear look at the Church's moral teaching on a wide variety of topics. We also produced 13 episodes of a program called Baptize All Nations, on the subject of evangelization. Those shows alone amount to more than 24 hours on faith and evangelization.

All this week, the last week of the summer, we are highlighting the treasure trove that is the Premium channel of Church Militant, with hundreds of hours of programs touching on everything you can imagine about the Faith. All are 100% faithful to the Magisterium, easily understood and laden with aspects of Church teaching you have likely never heard before.

The spiritual war the world is involved in right now demands that Catholics know their Faith. Becoming a Premium member is a fantastic way to begin. Again, please just click on the link and sign up today for your monthly Premium subscription.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...als-obliged-2/

Fully hyperliniked original HERE

Why John Brennan, Peter Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange Arrested – And Why UK Officials Obliged

August 18, 2020 | Sundance | 504 Comments

According to reports in November of 2019, U.S Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were spending time on a narrowed focus looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election. One recent quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state notes:

“One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that “it is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services””. (Link)

It is interesting that quote came from a British intelligence official, as there appears to be evidence of an extensive CIA operation that likely involved U.K. intelligence services. In addition, and as a direct outcome, there is an aspect to the CIA operation that overlaps with both a U.S. and U.K. need to keep Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under tight control. In this outline we will explain where corrupt U.S. and U.K. interests merge.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...ok-768x518.jpg

To understand the risk that Julian Assange represented to CIA interests, it is important to understand just how extensive the operations of the CIA were in 2016. It is within this network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok is clearly working as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations.

By now people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese professor now generally admitted/identified as a western intelligence operative who was tasked by the CIA (John Brennan) to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep}

In a similar fashion the CIA tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent under the false name Azra Turk, Halper also targeted Papadopoulos.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...eme-team-2.jpg

The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes the CIA exploitation of the assets and the targets much easier.

One of the more interesting aspects to the Durham probe is a possibility of a paper-trail created as a result of the tasking operations. We should watch closely for more evidence of a paper trail as some congressional reps have hinted toward documented evidence (transcripts, recordings, reports) that are exculpatory to the targets (Page & Papadop). HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes has strongly hinted that very specific exculpatory evidence was known to the FBI and yet withheld from the FISA application used against Carter Page that also mentions George Papadopoulos. I digress…

However, there is an aspect to the domestic U.S. operation that also bears the fingerprints of the CIA; only this time due to the restrictive laws on targets inside the U.S. the CIA aspect is less prominent. This is where FBI Agent Peter Strzok working for both agencies starts to become important.

Remember, it’s clear in the text messages Strzok has a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA. Additionally, Brennan has admitted Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative; and it is almost guaranteed the July 31st, 2016, “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI that originated FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane” was co-authored from the CIA by Strzok…. and Strzok immediately used that EC to travel to London to debrief intelligence officials around Australian Ambassador to the U.K. Alexander Downer.

In short, Peter Strzok appears to be the very eager, profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe, who acted as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for CIA Director John Brennan to utilize.

Fusion-GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015; at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons.

It was also Fusion-GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working double-agents for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S.

Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the CIA/Fusion-GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting… back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan fell out of a helicopter to his death (just before it crashed).

Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, it was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}

All of this context outlines the extent to which the CIA was openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit.

International operations directed by the CIA, and domestic operations seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin]

Recap: ♦Mifsud tasked against Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Halper tasked against Flynn (CIA), Page (CIA), and Papadopoulos (CIA). ♦Azra Turk, pretending to be Halper asst, tasked against Papadopoulos (FBI). ♦Veselnitskaya tasked against Donald Trump Jr (CIA, Fusion-GPS). ♦Butina tasked against Trump, and Donald Trump Jr (FBI).

Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer, hired by Fusion-GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch, who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.

All of this engagement directly controlled by U.S. intelligence; and all of this intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate is presumably what John Durham is currently reviewing.

The key point of all that background is to see how committed the CIA and FBI were to the constructed narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ, put a hell of a lot of work into it. Intelligence community work that Durham is now unraveling.

We also know specifically that John Durham is looking at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This is important because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks.

On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the EDVA. From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:

(Link to pdf)

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...indictment.jpg

On Tuesday April 15th more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...on-assange.jpg

The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...-2-768x434.jpg

Why the delay?

What was the DOJ waiting for?

Here’s where it gets interesting….

The FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”

(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.

Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.

“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”

Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)

Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative, it would make sense for the FBI to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange; and why the FBI would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.

Within three months of the grand jury the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018. The EDVA sat on the indictment while the Mueller probe was ongoing.

As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).

As a person who has researched this three year fiasco; including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16; and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17; this timing against Assange is too coincidental.

It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes.

This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record statements.

The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election. The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment; and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from Crowdstrike, a DNC contractor.

The CIA holds a massive conflict of self-interest in upholding the Russian hacking claim. The FBI holds a massive interest in maintaining that claim. All of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also have a vested self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.

Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack.

This Russian “hacking” claim is ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K intelligence apparatus…. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public.

Now, if we know this, and you know this; and everything is cited and factual… well, then certainly AG Bill Barr knows this.

The $64,000 dollar question is: will they say so publicly?

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...-3-768x539.jpg

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...el-768x784.jpg

brennan and haspel
Posted in 1st Amendment, 4th Amendment, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, media bias, Phase 1, Phase 2, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized
Share
Why John Brennan, Peter Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange Arrested – And Why UK Officials Obliged…
August 18, 2020 | Sundance | 504 Comments

According to reports in November of 2019, U.S Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were spending time on a narrowed focus looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election. One recent quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state notes:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...urt-martialed/

Excerpt from article

washingtontimes.com
Why Gen. Mark Milley should be court-martialed
Chris Farrell
10-12 minutes September 1, 2022


Gen. Milley must be held to account for his conduct and selectively leaked statements. His conduct goes far beyond the controversy of the Mitchell court-martial. Mitchell pales by comparison. His reported actions, if true, are the most egregious examples of treasonous subversion by a commissioned officer of the United States since Maj. Gen. Benedict Arnold.

• Chris Farrell is the Director of Investigations & Research for Judicial Watch and a former U.S. Army Counterintelligence Officer.

Dachsie comment:

Agenda 2030 / Klaus Schwab Great Reset gang totalitarian actions to starve and freeze or melt the people.

__________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB9YwhnEmCs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB9YwhnEmCs

Putin just EVISCERATED the WEF great reset with this move | Redacted with Clayton Morris

Started streaming 2 hours ago

Russian President Putin just turned off gas flows to Europe upending the liberal world order. Germany remains defiant calling for even more sanctions against Russia. FAA whistleblowers come forward to expose troubles with vaccine mandates. And Zelensky rents his Italian villa for 50K a month!

https://prolifeupdate.com/2022/08/31...conservatives/

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...BSXzlNscHg--~D
Jeremy Boland, Screenshot from Project Veritas via Rumble

August 31, 2022

In Connecticut, an assistant principal bragged about his discriminatory hiring practices. He explicitly, unapologetically, and proudly discriminates against conservatives, Catholics, and people over the age of 30. These prospects are too difficult for him to manipulate and often don’t comply with his wretched ideologies. I had to see it myself to believe it:

embedded video

1:52 video runtime

Assistant Principal Brags About Religious Discrimination

Assistant Principal Brags About Discrimination Against Catholics and Conservatives

It’s impossible to say how many other teachers act and think like Boland. He even said that parents are a huge obstacle to his teaching. It’s very fortunate that he got himself caught. If only we could be so lucky with the rest.

As reported by LifeNews:

Project Veritas, a guerilla journalism outlet, spoke with Cos Cob Elementary School Assistant Principal Jeremy Boland about his hiring process for elementary school teachers in newly released video footage. Boland said in multiple undercover interviews that he does not hire Catholic or conservative educators and attempts to hire candidates exclusively under the age of 30.

The undercover journalist asked Boland whether he found that individuals with religious views “tend to be more right-wing?”

“Almost all of them,” Boland said. “I’m not a huge expert on religion, but Protestants in this area are probably the most liberal. But if they’re Catholic — conservative.”

Boland dubbed Catholics “brainwashed.” When asked what Boland does when he finds out that a candidate is Catholic, he said, “You don’t hire them.”

He stated that younger candidates were much more liberal and malleable. Older candidates, he said, are set in their ways, and significantly more likely to be conservative. He even said that he trains and conditions his staff to think in a more liberal way. He works to cultivate an environment that would naturally brainwash students toward the left of center.

“Believe it or not, the open-minded, more progressive teachers are actually more savvy about delivering a Democratic message without really ever having to mention their politics. They’ll never say, ‘Oh, this is a liberal or Democratic way of doing this.’ They just make that the norm.”

Greenwich Public Schools placed Jeremy Boland on leave until further notice.

A spokesman for Greenwich Public Schools told the Daily Caller the following:

“Late last evening, we were made aware of a video that had gone viral with a current administrator from Cos Cob School. We intend to do a full investigation and until that time, we will not make any public statements. We ask that you respect the investigation process during this time,” the spokesman said.

“We do not, however, support any opinions that promote discriminatory hiring practices based on race, religion, gender, or age in any way, and we want to remind our entire community that our curriculum policies and procedures are strictly enforced by our Board,” he concluded.

We cannot stand for this madness. It’s time to take back our education system.

_________________

Here is the video and comments James O'Keefe mailed out to his Project Veritas organization.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...7GRf.U8VGA--~D

The full video is here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3_5KEfc3Zc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3_5KEfc3Zc

Trinity School NYC Director of Student Activities Touts Sneaking Political Agenda Into Classrooms
19,118 views
Sep 1, 2022
14K
Dislike
Share
Save
Project Veritas
1.53M subscribers
Prestigious NYC Private School Director Touts ‘Sneaking’ Her Political ‘Agenda’ into Classrooms: ‘Disrupt Wherever I Can’ … ‘I Felt Like a Double Agent’ … ‘Huge Contingent’ of White Boys ‘Are Just Horrible’

• Jennifer Norris, Director of Student Activities, Trinity School NYC: “I just keep trying to disrupt wherever I can. And now that I'm in this position, I have so many opportunities to do that.”

• Norris: “I don’t hide how I feel, but I can’t pretend I’m [not] promoting an agenda even though I clearly am with all the stuff I’m doing.”

• Norris: “There’s always groups of teachers who want to do these [activist] things, but the administration just wouldn’t let us. So, we’ve been just sneaking things in [through] the cracks.”

• Norris: “When I first started there [at Trinity School NYC], I hid my whole life. I felt like a double agent or something.”

• Norris: “Unfortunately, it’s the white boys who feel very entitled to express their opposite opinions and just push back. There’s a huge contingent of them that are just horrible. And you’re like, ‘Are you always going to be horrible, or are you just going to be horrible right now?’ Don’t know…I think they need to go. I think they’re really awful people…They’re so protected by capitalism. It makes me sad.”

• Norris: Trinity School NYC is “definitely a school where conservatives would not feel comfortable.”

• Norris: “I’m in charge” and “I won’t” allow Republican perspectives on campus. “Not on my watch.”

• Norris: “I talked to the [Trinity NYC high school] principal and I was like, ‘So, if I’m running this, I’m 100% democratic with the students. I will tell them the [speaker] options and they are voting.’ I’m not going to just be like, ‘These are our speakers for the year.’ I want to make sure the kids are engaged and care. So, I do put a lot of it on them, but I said, ‘There are some speakers I am not even going to put on the plate for them [students], and if that’s a problem, I cannot be in charge of that.’ And he [principal] was like, ‘No.’ He said, ‘This isn’t the time for both [political] sides.’ He said, ‘We’re not in that place in our society.’”

And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

Mthew 16:18
Douay-Rheims Bible

_________________________


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvPs6CCacRA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvPs6CCacRA

Sedevacantism in Three Minutes

Sep 30, 2016

Roman Catholic Media
9.59K subscribers
Sedevacantism in three minutes.

Sedevacantism is the position of those Catholics who refuse to recognize Jorge Bergoglio as a true pope.
The sedevacantists affirm that the See of Peter is vacant, on account of the apostasy from the faith on the part of the official hierarchy, since the promulgation, in 1965, of the documents of the Second Vatican Council.

The sedevacantist reasoning is quite simple, and the facts on which it is based are empirically verifiable.
When one compares the teachings of the Church before and after Vatican II, it is easy to realize that there was a substantial change in doctrine.

But the Church cannot substantially change its own teaching, since it enjoys a special assistance of the Holy Ghost by which it is infallible in questions of faith and morals, and therefore indefectible, that is, the Church will remain the same, as Christ founded it, until the end of times.

By the way, the infallibility and indefectibility of the Church are truths of faith, that is, if someone were to deny it its prerogatives, he would cease, by that very fact, to be a Roman Catholic.

The only valid conclusion is that the hierarchy responsible for the doctrinal rupture in Vatican II, lacks all ecclesiastical authority. If we apply this to the papacy, it simply means that the See of Peter is vacant. Thus the term “sedevacantism”.

But, how is it that the See of Peter has been vacant for such a long time?

Even though Vatican II gave origin to a new religion, it nevertheless did not found, in a juridical sense, a new church.

The faculty to designate the pope belongs still today to the cardinals.

Heresy, which is an obstacle to jurisdiction or ecclesiastical authority, is not an obstacle to the power of designation, which is a human faculty.

Since the cardinals, responsible for electing the pope, also adhere to the Vatican II teachings, the vacancy of the See will continue as long as this situation remains unchanged, that is, until the election of a candidate capable of receiving authority.

For that to happen, one or more Cardinals must return to the Catholic faith. Well… difficult… yes… But let us remember that what is impossible for men, is easy for God.

Why does God permit this situation? A general principle is valid here: God allows evil to happen in order to draw from it a greater good.

Sacred Scripture speaks about a general apostasy, a defection of the Christian West, which in turn will be the occasion for the conversion of the Jewish People.

Let us not forget that the rejection of Christ by the Jews became the occasion for the spread of the true faith among the Gentiles.

If we look at it with the eyes of faith, living in these times is quite a privilege for true Catholics.
If this is the first time you have heard about sedevacantism, read more about it, do some research. As you can see, there is much at stake.

Dachsie comment:

Just thought I would post this little note and article because I think people may not understand that people with personality disorders are people said to be a "psychopath" but they generally are not "psycho" or a person who has lost contact with reality.

Thought I would share this article about "psychopaths" / psychopathy.
The url is no longer working and it may be somewhere on the web now with a different url.

Psychopath / Psychopathy and Sociopath / sociopathy are classified as "personality disorders."
There is no medication to be taken for this condition. There have been very few studies or proofs that personality disorders can be related to a physical brain or nervous system disorder. Patients with this diagnosis can live in society and do not generally require confinement in a mental institution. However some of them can end up in prison for various kinds of crimes committed. Some of them can end up with a highly paid position in a large corporation or other kind of large organization, such as an agency of the government. It is my understanding that people who have this condition can be quite aware that they have something "wrong or different" with themselves and they need to keep it hidden. They can successfully hide the fact that they have the features, described in the article below. Those diagnosed with a personality disorder and are referred to as psychopaths do not qualify for government disability assistance and may or may not receive counseling from a psychologist rather than a psychiatrist.

_______________

Another mental disorder classification is Psychosis. It has five or six sub-classifications and is generally a condition in which there are episodes of loss of contact with reality and there are hallucinations and delusions and extreme episodes that can involve violent behavior. One of the subclassifications is "schizophrenia" and another is Bi-polar disorder (or manic - depressive disorder).
Psychoses usually require prescription medication and it is extremely important for these diagnosed patients to take their medicine in order to remain in society with basic food and shelter accommodations. These diagnosed people usually do qualify for "permanent disability" government assistance.
I believe that there is growing evidence of physical brain - neuropathy involvement that causes the condition. This is also referred to as "a chemical imbalance in the brain.
End of Dachsie comments.




https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/b...s-psychopath-0

psychologytoday.com
What Is a Psychopath?
Online: My home page
11-14 minutes

First, a bit of terminological history to clear up any confusion about the meanings of “sociopath,” “psychopath,” and related terms. In the early 1800s, doctors who worked with mental patients began to notice that some of their patients who appeared outwardly normal had what they termed a “moral depravity” or “moral insanity,” in that they seemed to possess no sense of ethics or of the rights of other people. The term “psychopath” was first applied to these people around 1900. The term was changed to “sociopath” in the 1930s to emphasize the damage they do to society. Currently, researchers have returned to using the term “psychopath.”

Some researchers use the term "psychopath" to refer to a more serious disorder, linked to genetic traits, which produces more dangerous individuals, while continuing to use “sociopath” to refer to less dangerous people who are seen more as products of their environment, including their upbringing. Other researchers make a distinction between “primary psychopaths,” who are thought to be genetically caused, and “secondary psychopaths,” seen more as a product of their environments.
The current approach to defining psychopathy and the related concepts is to use a list of criteria. The first such list was developed by Hervey Cleckley (1941), who is known as the first person to describe the condition in detail. Anyone fitting enough of these criteria counted as a psychopath or sociopath. There are several such lists in use. The most commonly used is called the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), developed by Robert Hare and his colleagues. An alternative version, called the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI), was developed in 1996 by Lilienfeld and Andrews.

The book that psychologists and psychiatrists use to categorize and diagnose mental illness, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, contains a category for something called “antisocial personality disorder” (APD), while the World Health Organization delineates a similar category it calls "dissocial personality disorder." These are much broader categories than psychopathy. The category of psychopath is seen as included within this category, but considerably smaller so that only roughly 1 in 5 people with APD is a psychopath (Kiehl and Buckholtz, 2010).

If we overlay all of these lists of criteria, we can see them coalescing into the following core set:

Uncaring

The PCL describes psychopaths as being callous and showing a lack of empathy, traits which the PPI describes as “coldheartedness.” The criteria for dissocial personality disorder include a “callous unconcern for the feelings of others.” There are now several lines of evidence that point to the biological grounding for the uncaring nature of the psychopath. For most people, caring is a largely emotion-driven enterprise. The brains of psychopaths have been found to have weak connections among the components of the brain’s emotional systems. These disconnects seem to be responsible for the psychopath’s inability to feel emotions deeply. Psychopaths are also not good at detecting fear in the faces of other people (Blair et al., 2004). The emotion of disgust also plays an important role in our ethical sense. We find certain types of unethical actions disgusting, and this works to keep us from engaging in them and makes us express disapproval of them. But psychopaths have extremely high thresholds for disgust, as measured by their reactions when shown disgusting photos of mutilated faces or exposed to foul odors.

One promising new line of research is based on the discovery of a brain network responsible for understanding the minds of others. Called the default mode network (because it also performs other tasks and is operating most of the time when we are awake), it involves a cluster of several different areas in the brain’s cortex. The first studies have been done on the function of this network in psychopaths, and as expected, there are problems there. Different studies have noted “aberrant functional connectivity” among the parts of the network, along with reduced volume in some of the network's crucial areas.

Shallow emotions

Psychopaths show a lack of emotion, especially social emotions such as shame, guilt, and embarrassment. Cleckley said that the psychopaths he came into contact with showed a “general poverty in major affective reactions” and a “lack of remorse or shame.” The PCL describes psychopaths as “emotionally shallow” and showing a lack of guilt. Psychopaths are notorious for their lack of fear. When normal people are put into an experimental situation where they anticipate that something painful will happen, such as a mild electric shock or a mildly aversive pressure applied to a limb, a brain network activates. Normal people will also show a clear skin conductance response produced by sweat gland activity. In psychopathic subjects, however, this brain network showed no activity, and no skin conductance responses were emitted (Birbaumer et al., 2012).

• What Is Psychopathy?
• Find a therapist who understands personality disorders

Irresponsibility

According to Cleckley psychopaths show unreliability, while the PCL mentions “irresponsibility,” and the PPI describes psychopaths as showing “blame externalization” (i.e., they blame others for events that are actually their fault). They may admit blame when forced into a corner, but these admissions are not accompanied by a sense of shame or remorse, and they have no power to change the sociopath’s future behavior.

Insincere speech

Ranging from what the PCL describes as “glibness” and “superficial charm,” to Cleckley’s “untruthfulness” and “insincerity,” to outright “pathological lying,” there is a trend toward devaluing speech among psychopaths by inflating and distorting it toward selfish ends. The criteria for APD include “conning others for personal profit or pleasure.” One concerned father of a young sociopathic woman said, “I can't understand the girl, no matter how hard I try. It's not that she seems bad or exactly that she means to do wrong. She can lie with the straightest face, and after she's found in the most outlandish lies she still seems perfectly easy in her own mind” (Cleckley, 1941, p. 47). This casual use of words may be attributable to what some researchers call a shallow sense of word meaning. Psychopaths do not show the same differential brain response to emotional terms over neutral terms that normal people do (Williamson et al., 1991). They also have trouble understanding metaphors and abstract words.

Psychopathy Essential Reads

Overconfidence

The PCL describes sociopaths as possessing a “grandiose sense of self-worth.” Cleckley speaks frequently of the boastfulness of his patients. Hare (1993) describes an imprisoned sociopath who believed he was a world-class swimmer.

Narrowing of attention

According to Newman and his colleagues, the core deficit in psychopathy is a failure of what they call response modulation (Hiatt and Newman, 2006). When normal people engage in a task, we are able to alter our activity or modulate our responses, depending on relevant peripheral information that appears after the task has begun. Psychopaths are specifically deficient in this ability, and according to Newman, this explains the impulsivity of psychopaths, a trait that shows up in several of the lists of criteria, as well as their problems with passive avoidance and with processing emotions.

Top-down attention tends to be under voluntary control, whereas bottom-up attention happens involuntarily. But bottom-up attention can temporarily capture top-down attention, as when movement in the periphery of our visual field attracts our attention. Psychopaths have trouble using top-down attention to accommodate information that activates bottom-up attention during a task. In normal people, this process tends to happen automatically. When the hunter is scanning for deer, a rabbit hopping into the periphery of his visual field automatically attracts his attention. Top-down attentional processes monitor the field of attention for conflicts and resolve them. The standard task for assessing this is called the Stroop task, in which the subject must state which color words are printed in. The problem is that the words themselves are conflicting color words, such as “red” printed in blue ink, so the subjects must suppress a strong inclination to read the words. There are now several studies indicating that psychopaths actually perform better than normal people on these tasks, perhaps because they are not distracted by the discrepant color (Hiatt et al., 2004; Newman et al., 1997).

Selfishness

Cleckley spoke of his psychopaths showing a “pathologic egocentricity [and incapacity for love],” which is affirmed in the PPI by its inclusion of egocentricity among its criteria. The PCL also mentions a “parasitic lifestyle.”

Inability to plan for the future

Cleckley said that his psychopaths showed a “failure to follow any life plan.” According to the PCL, psychopaths have a “lack of realistic long-term goals,” while the PPI describes them as showing a “carefree nonplanness.”

Violence

The criteria for dissocial personality include a “very low tolerance to frustration and a low threshold for discharge of aggression, including violence.” The criteria for antisocial personality disorder include: "irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults.”

Philosophers can play a valuable role here in discerning the consequences of all of these findings for our attempts to build an ethical society. Several questions need addressing. What does the possibility that psychopathy is genetic say about human nature? What steps can we take to “correct” psychopaths, and which of these is the most ethical? If it is true that psychopaths have damaged or abnormal brains, can we hold them responsible for what they do? Are there degrees of psychopathy, so that normal people may possess psychopathic traits?

References

Birbaumer, N, Veit, R, Lotze, M, Erb, M, Hermann, C., Grodd, W., and Flor, H. 2005. Deficient fear conditioning in psychopath: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Archives of General Psychiatry 62: 799-805.
Cleckley, Hervey. 1941. The Mask of Sanity. C. V. Mosby Co.
Hiatt KD, Schmitt WA, Newman JP. 2004. Stroop tasks reveal abnormal selective attention among psychopathic offenders. Neuropsychology 18:50–9.
Hare, RD. 1993. Without Conscience. Guilford Press: New York, NY.
Hiatt KD, Newman JP. 2006. Understanding psychopathy: The cognitive side. In: Patrick CJ, editor. Handbook of Psychopathy. Guilford Press; New York, NY, pp. 334–352.
Kiehl, KA., and Buckholtz, JW. 2010. Inside the mind of a psychopath. Scientific American Mind, September/October: 22-29.
Lilienfeld SO, Andrews BP. 1996. Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal populations. Journal of Personality Assessment 66:488–524.
Newman JP, Schmitt WA, Voss WD. 1997. The impact of motivationally neutral cues on psychopathic individuals: Assessing the generality of the response modulation hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 106:563–575.
Williamson S, Harpur TJ, Hare RD. 1991. Abnormal processing of affective words by psychopaths. Psychophysiology 28(3): 260-73

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5CzFMfImAQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5CzFMfImAQ

FBI director Christopher Wray reportedly under fire from bureau whistleblowers
794,486 views
Sep 1, 2022
26K
Dislike
Share
Save
Fox News

House Judiciary Committee member Darrell Issa, R-Calif., tells 'Jesse Watters Primetime' lawmakers are hearing from employees.

https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxzFQ_Jci24yb2YcizxBl6--Pfus3AAXV_

Jeremiah Alphonsus YouTube channel
2 hours ago (edited)
There are times, in dealing with evil people of bad will, when charity demands speaking and acting harshly. Thus Jesus Christ called the scribes and pharisees “blind guides,” “whitewashed tombs,” “a brood of vipers,” and violently overturned the tables in the temple and drove out the merchants. The deeply evil Antipope Francis and the rest of his fellow wolves in shepherds’ clothing have also shown themselves deserving of the harshest words and punishment, because, while posing as angels of light, they’re relentlessly assaulting the actual Catholic Church and leading millions upon millions upon hundreds of millions upon billions of souls to hell.

Harsh words against them and punishment of them would be quite consistent with charity; indeed, charity demands it. In a healthier age, Francis and his ilk would long ago have been burned at the stake.

“Where there is no hatred of heresy, there is no holiness.“

-Fr. Faber

“The declared enemies of God and His Church, heretics and schismatics, must be criticized as much as possible, as long as truth is not denied. It is a work of charity to shout: ‘Here is the wolf!’ when it enters the flock or anywhere else.”

-St. Francis de Sales

One Sins by Not Becoming Duly Irate
https://www.traditioninaction.org/re...07rp_Irate.htm

The liberal myth spreads that a man should never become irate; he should always be mild-mannered and unruffled. This is not, however, the teaching of the Church. St. John Chrysostom and St. Thomas Aquinas explain that it is not only good, but also necessary to become irate for a due cause. Doing this, a man acts according to reason, not passion. If he fails to be irate before evil and punish it as it should be punished, then he sins.

St. John Chrysostom

Only the person who becomes irate without reason, sins. Whoever becomes irate for a just reason is not guilty. Because, if ire were lacking, the science of God would not progress, judgments would not be sound, and crimes would not be repressed.

Further, the person who does not become irate when he has cause to be, sins. For an unreasonable patience is the hotbed of many vices: it fosters negligence, and stimulates not only the wicked, but above all the good, to do wrong.

(Homily XI super Matheum, 1c, nt.7)


St. Thomas Aquinas

Ire may be understood in two ways.

In one way, as a simple movement of the will that inflicts punishment not through passion, but by virtue of a judgment of the reason: and in this case, without a doubt, lack of ire is a sin. This is how Chrysostom understands ire when he says: ‘Ire, when it has a cause, is not ire but judgment. For properly speaking, ire is a movement of passion. And when a man is irate with just cause, his ire does not derive from passion. Rather, it is an act of judgment, not of ire.”

In another way, ire can be understood as a movement of the sensitive appetite agitated by passion with bodily excitation. This movement is a necessary sequel in man to the previous movement of his will, since the lower appetite naturally follows the movement of the higher appetite unless some obstacle prevents it. Hence the movement of ire in the sensitive appetite cannot be lacking altogether, unless the movement of the will is altogether lacking or weak. Consequently, the lack of the passion of ire is also a vice, as it is the lack of movement in the will to punish according to the judgment of reason.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Email
Print
(Summa Theologiae, II, II, q. 158, art. 8)

Posted April 12, 2006

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjacc1o066A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjacc1o066A

Who wrote this and came up with the venue? Satan?: Mike Huckabee

8:40 video runtime

Sep 3, 2022
2.3K
Dislike
Share
Save
Fox Business

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee dissects the president's ‘incredibly divisive speech’ in Philadelphia and how he spoke about Marines on ‘Fox Business Tonight.'

____________________________
Dacshsie comment:

I like Jeff Childer's words on that little crafted farce of a speech by the usurper. In a way it is something to make good jokes about. In a way everyone should just completely ignore it. While this miserable old is corrupt enough, the resident is not compos mentis enough to threaten dark red satanic and police state themes.

___________________

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cof...m_source=email

Open in browser
☕️ Coffee & Covid ☙ Friday, September 2, 2022 ☙ GASLIT ��
Today I (reluctantly) cover Biden’s latest MAGA Rant, and discuss the latest hint at the real purpose for the next covid pivot. You're not going to believe it.

Jeff Childers
Sep 2

Comment

Share

Happy Friday C&C! It’s been a great week with lots of encouraging news. Today I will (reluctantly) cover Biden’s MAGA Rant and then sneak in a little roundup that hints at the purpose for what appears to be the new covid pivot.


��*COVID NEWS AND COMMENTARY* ��

�� Last night, shattering more presidential precedents and traditions, former U.S. Senator Joe Biden gave an historic speech in Philadelphia in which he labeled a sizable number of the country’s citizens a pack of rascally ne’er-do-wells that he likes to refer to as, “MAGA Republicans.”

I watched a few painful minutes just to get the flavor, and then waited for the transcript. You’re welcome. You’ve probably already heard all about the demonic red uplighting and Joe’s Hitleresque fist shaking and his lunatic inflammatory rhetoric, all of which was clearly designed for shock value, so I’m going to just bypass all that psyop nonsense.

According to Joe, he’s not alone; it’s not just him who thinks MAGA Republicans are dangerous to democracy. He said “even prominent conservatives” agree, citing a single example of a prominent conservative: DC Federal Circuit Court Judge Michael Luttig. Luttig would have like to attend the speech but has been so, so busy lately sentencing first-time offending J6 prisoners to years-long jail terms for misdemeanor trespass.

You’ve heard of “prominent conservative” Luttig, right? He’s VERY prominent. Prominent in SOMETHING.

Anyway, I want to begin by saying something NICE about the speech, because that’s the polite thing to do, apparently. Anyway, Joe actually gave credit to God. It only happened once, late in the speech, but there it was: “The soul of America is defined by the sacred proposition that all are created equal in the image of God,” Joe mumbled.

So I’m giving him credit. He could’ve stopped at “created equal.”

And that’s about it for things to compliment. Apart from that, the speech seemed carefully crafted to create political cover for something big the Biden Administration is about to do next. In other words, the speech’s literal words don’t add up to anything rational.

For example, after about two-thirds through the nasty part of the speech, Joe’s MILINT speechwriters transitioned to the uplifting message part, where Joe referenced what he has planned for the future during the second half of his term. But he could only come up with two things. I’m going to quote them:

“We’re going to end cancer as we know it. Mark my words. (Applause.)”

“We are going to create millions of new jobs in a clean energy economy.”

That’s it. And even those two goals are fabulously flimsy; weak tea. Regarding the laughable war on cancer, we don’t even need to get into all the news about skyrocketing cancer rates because of the [CENSORED]. The Cancer Moon Shot is a Utopian impossibility, and was neatly framed by lawyer weasel words anyway (“as we know it”). The audience betrayed its ignorance by clapping for this one.

Joe’s second goal of creating green jobs is a fuzzy paradoxical impossibility devoid of detail. Nobody even WANTS a “clean energy economy,” whatever that is, except elites who’ve invested in (or been gifted stock in) green tech. A clean energy economy, if that’s even possible, can only arise via mandates, which are job KILLERS. The audience was smart not to clap for that one, even if it made them seem unappreciative of the Big Guy’s genius.

Anyway, that’s the whole plan. In other words, the lazy speechwriters grabbed two amorphous, unaccountable aspirations and jammed them into the speech to suggest they were actually a fantastic, well-thought-out agenda of some kind. But it backfired, because it just proves Joe has no plan. At least, no plan he wants to tell us about. (Obama probably doesn’t give him the details anyway, because everybody knows Joe can’t keep a secret.)

In case you’re stationed in Antarctica or something, right after all the throat-clearing stuff, Joe kicked off the main theme of the speech, that was obviously meant to rile everybody up:

“Too much of what’s happening in our country today is not normal. Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.”

He continued for a while in that line, hilariously calling MAGA Republicans everything bad he could think of: election deniers, disrespecters of the Constitution and the rule of law, promoters of authoritarian leaders, fanners of the flames of political violence, posers of a “clear and present danger” to democracy, and contrivers of “a threat to our personal rights, to the pursuit of justice, to the rule of law, to the very soul of this country.”

You naughty, naughty MAGA people.

Joe even said MAGA people don’t believe the January 6th stormtroopers were trained and well-funded insurrectionists hell-bent on overthrowing the government. Can you imagine that?

So the hot take, the one we’re SUPPOSED TO immediately latch onto, is that this impotent, demented nursing home patient is about to declare martial law or something and start rounding up everyone who voted for Trump the last time around. Don’t buy it. It’s like the scene from the excellent Mad Max remake, Fury Road, where Tom Hardy glances up at the fit naked woman crying for help atop the tower, and flatly says, “that’s bait.”



More thoughtful social media pundits also recognized this evident truth last night and offered theories about what the speech is REALLY covering for. The truth is, who knows what those idiots are planning next. But I realize that truth is not particularly satisfying, so here are some speculative options.

Jack Posobiec not only opined, but actually claims to have a White House source saying, that Biden plans to pardon Trump today (Friday). In this hypothetical, Biden’s maniacal speech was intended to inform and offset what will be a very angry and disappointed Democrat base. In other words, Biden gave them a little, by officially labeling MAGAs a “clear and present danger” to democracy, but will also take away, by pardoning Trump in a generous, majestic,Ulysses Grant-style national re-unification effort.

It’s possible, who knows, and it would definitely help carve Biden out of a burgeoning political super-pickle that’s already the size of greater Manhattan, currently sprouting out of the raised garden in Mar-a-Lago’s backyard.

Or, it could be that they plan to arrest Trump this weekend, and need a better cover story than ‘he had some overdue National Library materials.’ This is probably less likely; but again, consider who we’re dealing with. They’re not rocket surgeons.

Those are some options. But here’s what I think.

Forget about REPUBLICANS possibly overreacting to the speech. This speech WAS a Biden overreaction. Whatever else it was, it betrayed the fact that Trump is somehow getting to them. BIDEN should have the upper hand right now. He should be able to sit back and enjoy the show. His DOJ just raided Trump’s home, scooped up lots of “incriminating material,” leaked damning photos of Trump’s personal office and, according to all of corporate media, Joe holds all the cards.

Joe could’ve played the statesman, letting the DOJ investigation play out, saying he was surprised and appalled at what he was learning through the newspapers like everybody else.

But somehow — somehow — Trump has once again outflanked his enemies and shoved Biden and his handlers into producing THIS revolting spectacle. Say what you like about that devil Hitler but at least the guy could give a speech. Biden can’t even read the teleprompter without gaffes and stutters. Outside the python-infested inner acres of the leftist fever swamp, ordinary Democrats who watched that mockery of governance last night are, in their hearts, appalled.

They know Joe’s speech was a painful eyesore and a mistake.

In my view, Republicans’ best response to last night’s speech is no response. It was an embarrassingly bad joke. When someone tells an off-color joke, you ignore it and move on. I’m ignoring this bad joke. I suggest you consider doing so as well. Let Joe pickle himself in it.

from attorney Tom Renz

September 3, 2022

https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/was-b...m_source=email

Was Biden's Speech In Line With the Purpose of the Constitution?
Tom Renz

https://images.unsplash.com/photo-15....1&q=80&w=1080

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

For anyone that does not recognize that, the preceding is the preamble to the Constitution. The role of this critical piece of our nation’s history provides context for the rest of the document, it provides context for interpretation. This is similar to the role of legislative history in interpreting a statute; the process of interpretation begins with looking at the plain language of the text, and then, where the plain text is ambiguous, we look for context. So let’s look at the context this provides for the foundation of our nation’s legal system.

The first and most important phrase here is “we the people.” This is the foundation of freedom and is the ultimate guard against tyranny. Our nation was founded on the basis of a representative government. A government in which the people were represented rather than lead. Everything else that follows stems from the premise that our government is a representative form of government who’s purpose is…

After “we the people” the preamble continues to explain the purpose of the government being formed. “In order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity…” This is the explanation for why “we the people” decided to form this nation and represents the foundation for which the rest of the Constitution should be interpreted.

By no means do I have the time to argue the implications of this interpretive approach to all of the laws of the nation in this piece but, in light of current events, I think it important to remind people that this line of thinking is critical. Further, to support that this approach is not outdated, I remind everyone of Article V of the Constitution that provides for the amendment process. Our founders were brilliant enough to allow for changes to be made should the document become outdated but made sure the process was difficult enough that it could not occur arbitrarily.

With all this in mind, let’s talk about current events. On September 1, 2022, Joe Biden gave a political speech with a military presence in an ominous red background. He appeared more dictator than President and quite clearly positioned himself as an appointed leader rather than a representative of the people. In fact, he actually suggested that approximately half of the people in this country were potential threats to our nation’s security. I am unsure how this fits with a government formed by “we the people” in which he is to be a representative of our nation’s interests.

"Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our Republic," said Biden. "MAGA Republicans do not respect the Constitution. They do not believe in the rule of the law. They do not recognize the will of the people. They refuse to accept the results of a free election." Does this sound like he is working to “establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity?” If you think so I would have to question your integrity.

There are serious threats to the foundations of our republic at this point, but they are not coming from “MAGA Republicans” that are engaging in their responsibility to preserve freedom by remaining eternally vigilant; it is coming from those that state that questioning the government of “we the people” is somehow wrong. Not only did Biden’s speech represent a real threat to our republic, it also was the epitome of hypocrisy. After 4 years of endless attacks on the Trump administration, the people most behind it are now stating that we “do not recognize the will of the people.” Were they recognizing the will of the people when facilitating Russiagate? How about when they were trying to impeach Trump on false charges… multiple times?

In light of this, I ask whether Joe Biden’s speech or recent actions has been in line with anything in the purpose statement of our Constitution? Has his FBI raid on Mar O Lago established justice? Did the divisive nature of his speech or implied threats against a huge portion of Americans ensure domestic tranquility? Did the military presence at his speech demonstrate a common defense? Have his numerous policies promoting censorship and discrimination based on ideology, religion, or health promoted general welfare as opposed to resulting in people with differing views losing their jobs and being ostracized? And most importantly, have his constant attacks on the First Amendment (and the rest of the Constitution) done ANYTHING to secure the BLESSINGS of liberty (I think he would reject the word blessings)? Ultimately, I would say the answer is clear, the question is what are you doing about it?

Share

51 likes
3 Comments

https://mommyunderground.com/it-was-...e-word-female/

Hyperlinks in original.


mommyunderground.com

It Was Bound To Happen – Merriam-Webster Officially Redefines The Word Female

- Mommy Underground

https://mommyunderground.com/wp-cont...n-1024x768.jpg

Photo by 3nglishN3rd on Flickr.com

Every human being is born either male or female, and defining the word female never used to be controversial – until now.

LGBT activists have become utterly obsessed with claiming a male can be a female if he “identifies” as one – regardless of his biological sex.

And now, Merriam Webster’s online dictionary has jumped on the “transgender” bandwagon and officially changed the definition of female – and just wait until you hear what they added.

Merriam Webster has added a secondary definition under female which states a female is “having a gender identity that is opposite of male.”

Of course – the key phrase here is “gender identity” – and assumes that a male can simply “decide” he’s a female because that’s what he “identifies” with.

But they took things even further – and even edited the primary definition of female which used to state “of, relating to, or being the sex that bears young or produces eggs” and changed it to “of, relating to, or being the sex that TYPICALLY HAS THE CAPACITY to bear young or produces eggs.”

The National Review reported:

“The change in the online edition to include the phrase, “typically has the capacity” shows Merriam-Webster’s attempt to include trans-identifying males in the definition of female.

While this phrase may refer to women who cannot bear children due to infertility, given their nod to “gender identity” in defining the word “female,” it is most likely another way to appease the trans community.”

Yet all across the country – this new definition has been adopted by the radical left – and seen as the new normal.

You may remember during the Supreme Court nominations – D.C. Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson couldn’t even define the word woman!

She claimed since she “wasn’t a biologist” she was ill-equipped to define the term.

Absolute madness.

But this is what the left does.

They hijack language and communication to set the narrative and demand the rest of the world adopt to their terminology.

New Jersey mandates kids be taught their biological sex can differ from their “gender identity.”

Kellogg’s had an pro-LGBT cereal box activity for kids where they were told to “choose their own gender.”

Some liberals even got mad at moms for hosting gender reveal parties – claiming “biological gender” doesn’t really exist.

And these days, no longer do leftists claim there are simply two genders… they think there are hundreds!

Students are going back to school and being asked to “choose their gender.”

Books are being forced upon them that make the LGBT lifestyle seem like something normal, and common.

But instead of holding the line of sanity, it seems Merriam-Webster has too jumped on the LGBT bandwagon – and went so far as to redefine what it means to be a woman.

The madness continues, and with Biden leading the charge, things are only going to get worse.

Please take a moment to forward this article on to your family and friends and let them know they can sign up to receive our newsletter directly to their inbox by clicking here!