Coronavirus

Medical Ethics

Johnson: FDA, CDC Refuse To Comply With Senate Oversight On Covid Treatments

By: Shawn Fleetwood

March 24, 2022






https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/24...vid-treatments

Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson is blasting federal health agencies for their continued coverup of data relating to adverse side effects experienced by people who have received the Covid-19 jab.

In a Wednesday letter exclusively obtained by The Federalist, Johnson criticized the federal government for its lack of transparency over the Covid-19 pandemic, saying he has “written 35 letters to the Executive Branch asking questions related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the federal government’s response to it” and that the “grossly inadequate response to [his] legitimate oversight demonstrates a level of arrogance toward the American public that is unacceptable.”

“In particular, the lack of transparency from federal health agencies has eroded public confidence … which will take years, and probably a complete restructuring of them, to repair,” he wrote.

The letter was addressed to Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Robert Califf, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky.

In his criticism of the agencies and their respective leadership, Johnson cited data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which shows that as of March 18, 2022, the database “has received 1,183,495 worldwide reports of adverse events and 25,641 death reports.”

“Of those deaths, 7,382 (28.8%) occurred on day 0, 1, or 2 following vaccination. It is difficult to understand how this growing number of adverse event reports has not resulted in health agencies conducting significant investigation, taking action, and providing detailed explanations to the American people,” Johnson wrote. “Instead, we have gotten the Mad Magazine Alfred E. Neuman response, ‘What, me worry?'”

4 page letter embedded in article

also on Scribd ...




Scribd.com copy of letter 4 pages

https://www.scribd.com/document/5664...rse-Event-Data

file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/566405471-Letter-to-HHS-FDA-NIAID-CDC-Re-Adverse-Event-Data.pdf

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...SDyAIxwEzg--~D

This is free - no cost viewing.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/live-c...v-2022-03-17-2

1:19:37 video runtime

March 17, 2022 American Thought Leaders Views 11.1K

LIVE: Censorship of Science, with Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Dr. Scott Atlas, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

American Thought Leaders American Thought Leaders

JAN JEKIELEK

Over the course of these last two years, doctors and experts have described an unprecedented assault on free and open scientific discourse, with potentially deadly consequences.

In this special episode of American Thought Leaders, we’re at Hillsdale College, which is hosting a conference on the censorship of science during this pandemic.

We’ll be sitting down with three thought leaders that we’ve previously interviewed on our show, namely former Harvard epidemiologist Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Stanford University professor of medicine Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, and public health policy expert Dr. Scott Atlas. All three are fellows of Hillsdale College’s Academy for Science and Freedom.


LIVE: Censorship of Science, with Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Dr. Scott Atlas, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
American Thought Leaders American Thought Leaders

JAN JEKIELEK

Over the course of these last two years, doctors and experts have described an unprecedented assault on free and open scientific discourse, with potentially deadly consequences.

In this special episode of American Thought Leaders, we’re at Hillsdale College, which is hosting a conference on the censorship of science during this pandemic.

We’ll be sitting down with three thought leaders that we’ve previously interviewed on our show, namely former Harvard epidemiologist Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Stanford University professor of medicine Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, and public health policy expert Dr. Scott Atlas. All three are fellows of Hillsdale College’s Academy for Science and Freedom.


Below is a rush transcript of this American Thought Leaders episode from Mar 17, 2022. This transcript may not be in its final form and may be updated.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/live-c...v-2022-03-17-2

https://sp.rmbl.ws/z8/5/N/H/b/5NHba....rs-r335jv.jpeg


Dr. Zev Zelenko and Dr. Bryan Ardis have received threats against their lives delivered in an extortive tone. The messages advise that they should employ strong personal security protections.

Doctors who are helping patients using their own pre-hospital interventions treatments are to me "eliminated."

More proof this has nothing to do with health care.

https://frankspeech.com/video/assass...ecific-doctors


Assassination List Reveals Plan to Kill Specific Doctors

By The Stew Peters Show, 25 March, 2022


watch first 18 minutes of this Stew Peters show,

Self-assembling circuitry is the subject of the remainder of the show. Pfizer vials examined. Geometric rectangular shapes that gradually grow "branches."

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...4J_320x180.jpg

Steve Kirsch Testifies About Spike in Deaths Since Jabs Rolled out


Steve Kirsch Testifies About Spike in Deaths Since Jabs Rolled out

2:19 video runtime


First published at 13:41 UTC on March 27th, 2022.

XANDREWX

One of the United States Minor Outlying Islands




https://stevekirsch.substack.com/


"This is like the greatest cause of death in human history."

"This is the greatest killer of mankind."

"This is the worst cover-up in human history.:

"Probably 400,000 Americans have been killed by the U S government."

___________

Dachsie comment:

New VAERS Data as of Mar. 4th, 2022 (posted Mar. 11, 2022)

27,367 Deaths x 41 = 1,122,047 deaths ?

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/14/do...created-covid/

Listen Now reading of full lengthy article

Whilst you were distracted by the Battle for Ukraine, Documents were published confirming Moderna created the Covid-19 Virus

Here is Steve Kirsch commentary on this article ...

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch...fa_511x731.png

excerpts

By The Exposé on March 14, 2022 • ( 58 Comments )

Evidence has emerged which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the Covid-19 virus was created by the very pharmaceutical giant that has made billions through the sale of an experimental Covid-19 injection; Moderna.

https://i0.wp.com/dailyexpose.uk/wp-...68%2C499&ssl=1

By a concerned reader

On February 23 the Daily Mail ran an article showing that Moderna has patented the 19 base letter (nucleotide) sequence which codes for the Furin Cleavage site in Covid-19.

They cited a Paper by Scientists in India, Switzerland, Italy and the US (cautiously entitled: MSH3 Homology and Potential Recombination Link to SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site) in which they calculated that the chances of a 19 nucleotide sequence patented by Moderna randomly appearing in Covid-19 in circumstances where it does not appear anywhere else in nature are 1 in 3 trillion.

But they failed to make the obvious deduction there from. Had they made said obvious deduction I fear that might have been the last scientific deduction they ever got published!

They decided to investigate the RNA sequence for the Furin cleavage site in the Covid-19 Spike Protein to see if it occurred anywhere else in nature. .

Fortunately the NCBI/NIH have produced the wonderful BLAST database which catalogues every gene sequence in nature known to man and every synthetic patented gene sequence known to the patent office.

The researchers chose the Furin Cleavage sequence because it is the only continuous gene letter sequence (nucleotide sequence) in Covid-19 with more than 3 nucleotides, that differs from the respective letters in its closest natural relative the Bat Coronavirus RaTG13 (all other differences are 3 letters or less long). So it was by far the best candidate for determining whether or not Covid-19 was man made.

The reader might consider it more likely that a Furin Cleavage Site would appear in the Sun than in the Daily Mail. But this cleavage refers to the separation of spike from virus rather than pillow from pillow.

Furthermore the Furin Cleavage Site is key to the pathogenicity of Covid-19. So if there was to be some man made gain of function included in the virus, this is where one might expect to find it.

The Amino Acid sequence of the Furin Cleavage Site is PRRA (Proline Argenine Argenine Alanine). Each Amino Acid is coded for by a Codon, consisting of 3 nucleotides (genetic sequence letters). So all the differences in the genetic code between Covid-19 and RaTG13 are at most one Codon long, one amino acid long, other than the Furin Cleavage Sequence, which is…

CCT CGG CGG GCA

The complimentary sequence (the opposing DNA strand of the double helix is (GGAGCCGCCCGT) because C binds with G and A binds with T

The reverse compliment (the same thing written backwards) is therefore TGCCCGCCGAGG

The researchers did a BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) alignment search (which means they search for the gene sequence, the reverse gene sequence, the complimentary gene sequence and the reverse complimentary gene sequence) through every gene sequence in nature known to man for CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG which is the 19 nucleotide sequence containing the Furin Cleavage Sequence, which also appears in Covid-19, and which is found actually in the reverse compliment form CTACGTGCCCGCCGAGGAG patented by Moderna.

Their search results can be found here.

Table 1 shows that it does exist in the 5 US patents cited below…

US9149506B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding septin-4 – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9149506B2/en

Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc

2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618953P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-05-22 Publication of US20140141067A1
2015-10-06 Publication of US9149506B2
2015-10-06 Application granted
2020-01-10 First worldwide family litigation filed

US9216205B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding granulysin – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9216205B2/en

Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc

2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618873P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-04-24 Publication of US20140113960A1
2015-12-22 Publication of US9216205B2
2015-12-22 Application granted

US9255129B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding SIAH E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9255129B2/en

Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc

2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618868P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-05-22 Publication of US20140141068A1
2016-02-09 Application granted
2016-02-09 Publication of US9255129B2

US9301993B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding apoptosis inducing factor 1 – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9301993B2/en

Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc

2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618957P
2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc
2014-04-17 Publication of US20140107189A1
2016-04-05 Application granted
2016-04-05 Publication of US9301993B2
2020-01-10 First worldwide family litigation filed

US9587003B2: Modified polynucleotides for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides – https://patents.google.com/patent/US9587003B2/en

Inventor: Stephane Bancel, Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles, Sayda M. Elbashir, Matthias John, Atanu Roy, Susan Whoriskey, Kristy M. Wood, Paul Hatala, Jason P. Schrum, Kenechi Ejebe, Jeff Lynn Ellsworth, Justin Guild

Current Assignee: ModernaTx Inc

2012-04-02 Priority to US201261618868P
2016-02-04 Application filed by ModernaTx Inc
2016-06-02 Publication of US20160152678A1
2017-03-07 Publication of US9587003B2
2017-03-07 Application granted

So Moderna first applied for a patent for the 19 nucleotide sequence in 2013 on December 16. Perhaps December25 would have been more appropriate since it was destined to become the Crown of Thorns of Mathew27, Mark15 and John19

Table2: Shows that the sequence occurs in Covid-19 from nucleotide 23601 to 23619.

Table3: Shows that this gene sequence does not exist in nature (but 14 nucleotide parts of it do).

I decided to check their work. Yes. I fact checked them (I will send an invoice to the globalists). This turned out to be a bit of an epic journey. The Google patent page for US9587003B2 does not contain the gene sequence. The pdf of the patent does not contain the gene sequence and is not searchable from pages 101-304. But it does have a link to a lengthy ‘Sequence Listing” section which link one cannot copy. So I manually transcribed it in my fair hand – http://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageReques...D=US09587003B2

From that page you can enter the Sequence ID quoted in the paper as 11652 and get to https://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageReque...B2&seqID=11652 which has the following at Nucleotides 2751-2733 reading backwards…

...

The Time has Come to hold People and Organisations to Account

The Covid19 makers, the genetic vaccine makers. their funders and their promoters, which include almost every government and public sector and health service in the world, are therefore guilty of Genocide and crimes against humanity. They have pushed genetic rape and sickness and death onto half of the population of the world in order to enrich the pockets of Pharmaceutical Companies. Governments and Public sectors around the world have abandoned their health service regulation to billionaires and heartless corporations

In the UK, all of the income tax we pay goes to the health service and all of its protocols are determined by its regulators and all of its regulators are controlled and funded by Big Pharma who seek to damage then manage our health for their profit.

So every penny we spend in income tax brings us one step closer to sickness, to death and to drug dependency.

So why did Prof Montagnier choose to spend the last years of his life proving that Covid-19 was man made and that the spike proteins, and therefore the vaccines, were an existential threat to the species? What did he have left to prove to himself or to anybody else at 87-89? He certainly did not do it to increase his reputation in the profession.

No, he was driven by the same passion that drove him to discover HIV. A passion to SAVE mankind from viruses and those who would engineer them to damage us. And why did he give up the ghost in February 2022? Because he knew that Omicron had the vaccines beat. His job was done by a greater virologist even than him. He could therefore rest in peace and go see some people who understood the magnitude of his contribution.

Covid-19 was not made in 2019. It was made from the 19 nucleotide Moderna specific chimeric (CGG for AGA) furin cleavage site which does not occur anywhere in nature.
And every Covid death and every Covid vaccine death is parked squarely on the doorstep of ModeRNA waiting for justice.

But we shall not execute that justice fast enough. And therefore the final plague upon mankind of Revelation 6:8, delivered by the 4th horseman of the apocalypse, which plague Bill Gates himself has prophesied, will arrive later this year (after War and after Famine, the 2nd and 3rd horsemen).

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch...b8_876x766.png


UK Professor Norman Fenton explains how they manipulate the data

One of my readers brought this wonderful video to my attention. I'm a huge fan of Norman Fenton because he tells the truth, regardless of what it does to his reputation. Worth watching!

Steve Kirsch
5 hr ago


Check out this video, even if you just listen to the first 3 minutes.

He points out that:

He went from a respected expert to censorship and cancellation,

There is no evidence that the vaccines reduce all-cause mortality,

Even if the claims of harm from COVID were true and the vaccines were as safe and effective as claimed, it still doesn’t justify the lockdowns, vaccine passports, and mandates.

And that’s just in the first 2 minutes (after the one minute intro). In the rest of the video he goes into detail and shows you how they trick you with data.

We need more people like Professor Fenton.


embedded video

also viewable on Rumble

https://rumble.com/vtxi1h-open-scien...narrative.html

Open Science Sessions: How flawed data has driven the narrative

pandata19 Published February 3, 2022 7,648 Views


Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Thousands of paid subscribers

I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.

New VAERS Data as of Mar. 18th, 2022 (posted Mar. 25, 2022)

28,345 Deaths and 1,280,640 Adverse Events

26,059 Pfizer/Moderna and 2,295 J&J Deaths

PLUS 1,195,963 / Moderna and 84,677 J&J Adverse Events

Source: https://www.drtenpenny.com/newslette...comp-l101l4uh2

Dr Bryan Ardis on What Really Happened Radio, March 25, 2022

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...9m_320x180.jpg


https://www.bitchute.com/video/EEO4k4wva09m/

First published at 13:55 UTC on March 28th, 2022.

1:00:02 video runtime

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...9m_320x180.jpg


channel image

Jim Fetzer

AMAZING exposition of the genocidal methods being used against the people of the world. AUDIO ONLY. Dr. Ardis and Dr. Zelenko are on death lists from Big Pharma. The names of the "variants" are taken from the constellation, Draco. Bioweapons being added to municipal water systems. Details the massive financial inducements for killing people in hospitals.

Audio from the RBN archives:
https://www.republicbroadcastingarch...5-2022-hour-2/ (1:00:00)
Guest Host: Chris Steiner, host of The Liberation Station welcomes Dr. Ardis — https://TheDrArdisShow.com — to discuss the COVID pandemic, water, health, and COVID treatments. VISIT: https://www.synergyhealthdpc.com/ (mentioned by Dr. Ardis) FOR COVID TREATMENTS, PRESCRIPTIONS, AND GENERAL HEALTH CARE ASSISTANCE

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...9-191b48562fbb

This article originally was published on Mercola.com but it is not findable there now.


03/17/22
•

Big Pharma › Views
Malone, McCullough: Get Politics Out of Healthcare, Let Doctors Practice Medicine

Letting politicians dictate patient care, which prevents physicians from practicing medicine and saving patients’ lives, is a core problem, say Drs. Robert Malone and Peter McCullough.
By
Dr. Joseph Mercola

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

Story at-a-glance:

Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCullough call for politics to get out of the health care arena.
The government controlling health care is a core problem, as politicians have stepped in to dictate patient care, which doesn’t allow physicians to practice medicine and save patients’ lives.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) hasn’t published most of the data it’s been collecting during the pandemic, constituting scientific fraud.
The CDC has become a purely political organization and arm of the executive branch.
Lack of data transparency at the CDC, between the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Pfizer regarding clinical trial data and about injection side effects registered in a Department of Defense database, is putting Americans’ health at risk.


embedded video

11:17 video runtime

video is of Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Robert Malone were speaking on this topic at the CPAC ( Conservative Political Action Committee ) convention.

also video on Ruble

https://rumble.com/vwcr11-drs.-malon...ealthcare.html
____________________


In 1990, a paradigm shift occurred in the development of new medicines and treatments — an idea so big it was supposed to encompass the whole of medicine.

It was to start initially at the level of pre-clinical and clinical trials and work all the way through the system to the care and management of individual patients.

This new concept for how medicine would be developed and conducted is called evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based medicine was to provide a more rigorous foundation for medicine, one based on science and the scientific method.

Truly, this was to be a revolution in medicine — a non-biased way of conducting medical research and treating patients.

What happens when evidence-based medicine is polluted by politics

Evidence-based medicine is “the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients.”

The aim of evidence-based medicine is to integrate the experience of the clinician, the values of the patient and the best available scientific information to guide decision-making about clinical management.

So, what the hell happened?

The authors of a March 15 editorial in The BMJ took on this question.

There is a big flaw in the logic of evidence-based medicine as the basis for the practice of medicine as we know it, a practice based on science — one that determines care down to the level of the individual patient.

This flaw is nestled in the heart and soul of evidence-based medicine, which (as we have seen over the last two years) is not free of politics.

It is naive to think data and the process of licensure of new drugs is free from bias and conflicts of interest.

In fact, this couldn’t be any farther from the truth.

The COVID crisis of 2020 to 2022 has exposed for all to see how evidence-based medicine has been corrupted by the governments, hospitalists, academia, big pharma, tech and social media. They have leveraged the processes and rationale of evidence-based medicine to corrupt the entire medical enterprise.

Evidence-based medicine depends on data. For the most part, the data-gathering and analysis process is conducted by and for the pharmaceutical industry, then reported by senior academics.

The problem, as laid out in a The BMJ editorial, is as follows:

“The release into the public domain of previously confidential pharmaceutical industry documents has given the medical community valuable insight into the degree to which industry-sponsored clinical trials are misrepresented. Until this problem is corrected, evidence-based medicine will remain an illusion.”

The integrity of data and the scientific process is corrupted as long as financial (and government) interests trump the common good.

According to the authors of The BMJ editorial:

“Medicine is largely dominated by a small number of very large pharmaceutical companies that compete for market share, but are effectively united in their efforts to expand that market.

“The short-term stimulus to biomedical research because of privatization has been celebrated by free-market champions, but the unintended, long-term consequences for medicine have been severe.

“Scientific progress is thwarted by the ownership of data and knowledge because industry suppresses negative trial results, fails to report adverse events and does not share raw data with the academic research community.

“Patients die because of the adverse impact of commercial interests on the research agenda, universities and regulators.

“The pharmaceutical industry’s responsibility to its shareholders means that priority must be given to their hierarchical power structures, product loyalty and public relations propaganda over scientific integrity.

“Although universities have always been elite institutions prone to influence through endowments, they have long laid claim to being guardians of truth and the moral conscience of society.

“But in the face of inadequate government funding, they have adopted a neo-liberal market approach, actively seeking pharmaceutical funding on commercial terms.

“As a result, university departments become instruments of industry: Through company control of the research agenda and ghostwriting of medical journal articles and continuing medical education, academics become agents for the promotion of commercial products.

“When scandals involving industry-academe partnership are exposed in the mainstream media, trust in academic institutions is weakened and the vision of an open society is betrayed.”

BUY TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s New Book — 'The Real Anthony Fauci'

The corporate university also compromises the concept of academic leadership. No longer are positions of leadership due to distinguished careers. Instead, the ability to raise funds in the form of donations, grants, royalty revenue and contracts, dominates the requirements for University leaders.

They now must demonstrate their profitability or show how they can attract corporate sponsors.

As the U.S. government, particularly the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, controls a significant amount of the grants and contracts of most academic institutions in the U.S., they also can determine what research is conducted and who is funded to conduct that research.

The U.S. government also controls the narrative. Take for example the use of the media and how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) controlled the narrative about early treatment for COVID.

By now we should all know about the corruption of the early clinical trials of hydroxychloroquine.

On the basis of these faked studies, one of the safest drugs in the world was recommended to not be used in an outpatient setting most likely, in order to increase vaccine acceptance.

Our government used propaganda to control the use of ivermectin by such tactics as calling it unfit for human use and labeling it as a “horse wormer.”

All indications are that these efforts by the U.S. government were to dissuade early treatment to stop vaccine hesitancy.

Beyond our government skewing evidence-based medicine for their own purposes, then there is the university system, which is more interested in generating income than in creating a research program that is free from bias.

As the authors of The BMJ editorial wrote:

“ … those who succeed in academia are likely to be key opinion leaders (KOLs in marketing parlance), whose careers can be advanced through the opportunities provided by industry.

“Potential KOLs are selected based on a complex array of profiling activities carried out by companies, for example, physicians are selected based on their influence on prescribing habits of other physicians.

“KOLs are sought out by industry for this influence and for the prestige that their university affiliation brings to the branding of the company’s products.

“As well paid members of pharmaceutical advisory boards and speakers’ bureaus, KOLs present results of industry trials at medical conferences and in continuing medical education.

“Instead of acting as independent, disinterested scientists and critically evaluating a drug’s performance, they become what marketing executives refer to as “product champions.

“Ironically, industry-sponsored KOLs appear to enjoy many of the advantages of academic freedom, supported as they are by their universities, the industry and journal editors for expressing their views, even when those views are incongruent with the real evidence.

“While universities fail to correct misrepresentations of the science from such collaborations, critics of industry face rejections from journals, legal threats and the potential destruction of their careers.

“This uneven playing field is exactly what concerned [Karl] Popper when he wrote about suppression and control of the means of science communication.

“The preservation of institutions designed to further scientific objectivity and impartiality (i.e., public laboratories, independent scientific periodicals and congresses) is entirely at the mercy of political and commercial power. As the authors of The BMJ editorial wrote, vested interest will always override the rationality of evidence.

“Regulators [ergo the FDA] receive funding from industry and use industry funded and performed trials to approve drugs, without in most cases seeing the raw data. What confidence do we have in a system in which drug companies are permitted to ‘mark their own homework’ rather than having their products tested by independent experts as part of a public regulatory system?

“Unconcerned governments and captured regulators are unlikely to initiate necessary change to remove research from industry altogether and clean up publishing models that depend on reprint revenue, advertising and sponsorship revenue.”

Subscribe to The Defender - It’s Free!

Name*
Email*

So, how do we fix the problem?

Some proposals for reforms include:

Regulators must be freed from drug company funding. This includes the FDA funding — which must come directly from the government, as opposed to pharma fees, as is now the case. Tying employee salaries to pharma fees creates a huge conflict of interest within the FDA.
The revolving door between regulators like the FDA, the CDC and big pharma (as well as tech/media) must stop. Employment contracts for regulatory government positions must have “non-compete” clauses whereby employment opportunities are limited upon leaving these regulatory agencies. Likewise, big pharma executives should not fill leadership positions at regulatory agencies.
Taxation imposed on pharmaceutical companies to allow public funding of independent trials; and perhaps most importantly, anonymized individual patient-level trial data posted, along with study protocols. These data to be provided on suitably accessible websites so that third parties, self-nominated or commissioned by health technology agencies, could rigorously evaluate the methodology and trial results.
Clinical trial data must be made public. Trial consent forms are easily changed to make this anonymized data freely available.
Publication of data must be open and transparent. The government has a moral obligation to trial participants, real people who have been involved in risky treatment and have a right to expect that the results of their participation will be used in keeping with principles of scientific rigor.
The government has a moral obligation to the public to conduct clinical trials in ways that are unbiased by industry.
The Foundation for the CDC and the Foundation for the NIH, which runs clinical trials and studies for these organizations (while their boards are made up of pharma industry executives and employees) must be decommissioned. We have laws in this country whereby the government does not accept volunteer labor, or direct donations to influence government decisions. These NGOs are doing just that. These practices must be stopped. They are intentionally using these organizations to bypass federal laws concerning exertion of undue influence on federal decision-making.
Off-label drugs must continue to be used by the medical community. The early treatment protocols, which have saved countless lives, have documented the important role that physicians have played in finding cheap and effective treatments for COVID as well as many other diseases. Let doctors be doctors.
Scientific and medical journals must be stopped from taking money from big pharma. This includes the sales of reprints, banner ads, print ads, etc.
Government must stop interfering with the publishing of peer-reviewed papers and social media. A free press must remain free from coercion from the government. We all know countless examples, such as the Trusted News Initiative and White House meetings with big tech to influence what is allowed to be printed. And the billions of dollars spent by the U.S. Government to promote these EUA/unlicensed “vaccine” products that do not prevent infection or transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This is a direct assault on our first amendment rights. It also skews evidence-based medicine.
Informed consent, one of the foundations of modern medicine, has been stymied by the FDA, NIH, the CDC hospitalists, big tech and social media. They have been hiding data and skewing results. When people can not get the information they need to make an informed decision, evidence-based medicine can not function correctly.
The government must stop picking winners and losers. Evidence-based medicine requires a non-biased playing field.
Industry concerns about privacy and intellectual property rights should not hold sway.

If we ever trust and support the concept of evidence-based medicine again, significant changes to the system must be enacted. The only question is… is our government up to the job?

Originally published by Robert W. Malone. M.D., M.S. on Substack.

Learn more about the illusion of evidence-based medicine by watching this Dr. John Campbell video:

embedded youtube video

also viewable at

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ature=emb_logo

The illusion of evidence based medicine
607,720 views
Mar 26, 2022

Dr. John Campbell
2.3M subscribers

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.

____

Dachsie:

British Medical Journal
https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o702

Opinion
The illusion of evidence based medicine
BMJ 2022; 376 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o702 (Published 16 March 2022)

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/wh...eally-mrna?s=r

When is mRNA not really mRNA?

Excerpts from full article.

What is pseudouridine, why is it being injected into you, and why should you care.

Robert W Malone MD, MS
3 hr ago

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch...19_380x506.png


"If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the mighty one." "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds”.

J. Robert Oppenheimer, Scientific director of the Manhattan Project (quoting from the Bhagavad Gita)

Last January, Stew Peters decided to roll out the thesis that I have personal responsibility for the morbidity and mortality associated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines consequent to my pioneering work in developing the ideas and reduction to practice of using synthetic mRNA as a transient “gene therapy” method, with the entry level application being for vaccine purposes. This has been echoed by many angry social media detractors seeking to find someone to blame for the lies and adverse events that have been associated with these mRNA vaccines. Mindful of those critics, this Substack essay focuses on some of the differences between what was originally envisioned and the current molecules that are being injected into our bodies. The first section of the essay sets the stage by summarizing (for a general readership) how the whole idea of gene therapy was developed, and then describing how and why this lead to the idea of mRNA as a drug and as a method of generating a vaccine response. The second section gets quite technical, and provides detailed information intended for a scientific audience. The conclusion is written for a general audience.
Gene Therapy, Transhumanism, and the origins of mRNA as a drug or vaccine

The core idea captured in the original nine patents which stem from my work between 1987 and 1989 was that there are multiple key problems with the idea of permanent “gene therapy” as originally envisioned by Richard Roblin, PhD and academic Pediatrician Dr. Theodore Friedman in 1972. The modern embodiment of this concept can be found in the many writings from the WEF and others concerning “Transhumanism” and use of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology. To really understand all of this requires a brief journey through the history and logic of “gene therapy”.

The January 2015 UC San Diego News center piece entitled “Friedman Recognized for Pioneering Gene Therapy Research: School of Medicine professor receives prestigious Japan Prize” nicely summarizes the underlying logic of “Gene Therapy” as envisioned by Friedman and Roblin.

“Though posed as a question, Friedmann and Roblin firmly believed the answer was yes, citing emergent thinking, new studies and growing data that suggested “good DNA” could be used to replace defective DNA in people with inherited conditions.

“In our view,” they wrote, “gene therapy may ameliorate some human genetic diseases in the future. For this reason, we believe that research directed at the development of techniques for gene therapy should continue.”

Though Friedmann said initial response to the paper was “not overwhelming,” it’s now commonly cited as a major milestone in the scientific beginnings of gene therapy research, though Friedmann said it was the Asilomar conference three years later (scientists set safety standards for recombinant DNA technology) where interest really “exploded.”

The idea of gene therapy, which quickly captured the public imagination, was fueled by its appealingly straightforward approach and what Friedmann has described as “obvious correctness”: Disarm a potentially pathogenic virus to make it benign. Stuff these viral particles with normal DNA. Then inject them into patients carrying abnormal genes, where they will deliver their therapeutic cargoes inside the defective target cells. In theory, the good DNA replaces or corrects the abnormal function of the defective genes, rendering previously impaired cells whole, normal and healthy. End of disease.”

Nice theory, what could possibly go wrong? The article continues-

“In 1968, Friedmann, working at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland with the late Jay Seegmiller (a founding faculty member of the School of Medicine) and others, showed that by adding foreign DNA to cultured cells from patients with Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, they could correct genetic defects that caused the rare but devastating neurological disorder. The condition was first described by William Nyhan, MD, a UC San Diego professor of pediatrics, and medical student Michael Lesch in 1964.

The feat was a powerful proof-of-concept, but subsequent efforts to advance the work to human clinical trials stalled. “We began to realize that it would be very complicated to take this idea and make it work in people,” Friedmann said, who joined the School of Medicine faculty in 1969.

In 1990, a 4-year-old girl with a congenital disease called adenoside deaminase (ADA) deficiency, which severely affects immunity and the ability to fight infections, became the first patient treated by gene therapy. White blood cells were taken from her, the normal ADA gene was inserted into them using an engineered and disabled virus and the cells re-injected. Despite initial claims of success, Friedmann said the experiment was eventually deemed a failure. The girl’s condition was not cured, and the research was found wanting.

A report commissioned by National Institutes of Health director Harold Varmus, MD, was highly critical of the entire gene therapy field and the ADA effort in particular, chiding investigators for creating a “mistaken and widespread perception of success.” Friedmann says he took the Varmus report “personally. I felt awful. It almost made me feel like I had been deceiving myself and my colleagues for more than two decades about the promise of gene therapy.” But he also knew there were “many more good people doing gene therapy research than rogues” and continued diligently and conscientiously to pursue his own research.

Nonetheless, media attention and hype about gene therapy continued to be rampant, fueled in part by over-enthusiastic opinions by some scientists. Things crashed in 1999 when an 18-year-old patient named Jesse Gelsinger, who suffered from a genetic disease of the liver, died during a clinical trial at the University of Pennsylvania. Gelsinger’s death was the first directly attributed to gene therapy. Subsequent investigations revealed numerous problems in the experimental design.”

The history of the Varmus report provides an early glimpse of the way things work at NIH and the US HHS. The Scientist appointed to head up the commission to review the science of “Gene Therapy” was none other than my graduate mentor Dr. Inder Verma, who had long been one of the leading proponents of gene therapy, and was subsequently forced to resign from the Salk Institute over a decades long record of what might most gently be called ethical lapses. But this was the scientist appointed by the overall Director of the NIH to “independently” investigate the scientific rigor and merits of the field. One hand washes the other.

What is awry with the original “gene therapy” concept? There are multiple issues, and here are a few-

1) Can you efficiently get genetic material (“polynucleotides”) into the nucleus of the majority of cells in the human body so that any genetic defects (or transhuman genetic improvements) can be made? In short, no. Human cells (and the immune system) have evolved many, many different mechanisms to resist modification by external polynucleotides. Otherwise we would already be overrun by various forms of parasitic DNA and RNA- viral and otherwise. This remains a major technical barrier, one which the “transhumanists” continue to overlook in their enthusiastic but naïve rush to play god with the human species. What are polynucleotides? Basically, the long chain polymers composed of four nucleotide bases (ATGC in the case of DNA, AUGC in the case of RNA) which carry all genetic information (that we know of) across time.

2) What about the immune system? Well, this was one of my breakthroughs way back in the late 1980s. What Ted (Friedman) originally envisioned was the simple idea that if a child had a genetic birth defect causing the body to produce a defective or not produce a critical protein (such as Lesch-Nyhan syndrome or Adenosine Deaminase Deficiency), this could be simply corrected by providing the “good gene” to complement the defect. What was not appreciated was that the immune systems of these children were “educated” during development to either recognize the “bad protein” as normal/self, or to not recognize the absent protein as normal/self. So, introduction of the “go od gene” into a person’s body would cause production of what was essentially a “foreign protein”, resulting in immunologic attack and killing of the cells which now have the ‘good gene”.

3) What happens when things go wrong and the “good gene/protein” is toxic? Well, in the current vaccine situation this is essentially the “Spike protein” problem. I get asked all the time “what can I do to eliminate the RNA vaccines from my body”, to which I have to answer – nothing. There is no technology that I know of which can eliminate these synthetic “mRNA-like” molecules from your body. The same is true for any of the many “gene therapy” methods currently being used. You just have to hope that your immune system will attack the cells that have taken up the polynucleotides and degrade (chew up) the offending large molecule that causes your cells to manufacture the toxic protein. Since virtually all current “gene therapy” methods are inefficient, and essentially deliver the genetic material randomly to a small subset of cells, there is no practical way to surgically remove the scattered, relatively rare transgenic cells. Clearance of genetically modified cells by the cellular immune system (T cells) is the only currently viable method to remove cells that have taken up the foreign genetic information (“transfection” in the case of mRNA or DNA, or “transduction” in the case of a viral vectored gene).

4) What happens if the “good gene” lands in a “bad place” in your genome? It turns out that the structure of our genome is highly evolved, and we are still relative neophytes in our current level of understanding. Despite having sequenced the human genome. The method of “insertional mutagenesis” (sticking genetic information in the form of viral DNA or other ways) has long been one of the leading methods to generate new insights into genetics – from fruit flies to frogs to fish to mice. When new DNA is inserted into chromosomes it can cause many unexpected things to happen. Like development of cancers, for example. This is why there is so much concern about the possibility that the mRNA-like polynucleotides used in the “RNA vaccines” may travel into the nucleus (where the DNA chromosomes reside) and insert or recombine with a cellular genome after reverse transcription (RNA-> DNA). Normally, with DNA-based gene therapy technologies, the FDA requires genotoxicity studies for this reason, but the FDA did not treat the “mRNA vaccine” technology as a gene therapy product.

Based on these risk considerations, the original idea behind using mRNA as a drug (for genetic therapeutic or vaccine purposes) was that mRNA is typically degraded quite rapidly once manufactured or released into a cell. mRNA stability is regulated by a number of genetic elements including the length of the “poly A tail”, but typically ranges from ½ to a couple of hours. Therefore, if natural or synthetic mRNA which is degraded by the usual enzymes is introduced into your body, it should only last for a very short time. And this has been the answer which Pfizer, BioNTech and Moderna have provided to physicians when asked “how long does the injected mRNA last after injection”.

But now we know that the “mRNA” from the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines which incorporates the synthetic nucleotide pseudouridine can persist in lymph nodes for at least 60 days after injection. This is not natural, and this is not really mRNA. These molecules have genetic elements similar to those of natural mRNA, but they are clearly far more resistant to the enzymes which normally degrade natural mRNA, seem to be capable of producing high levels of protein for extended periods, and seem to evade normal immunologic mechanisms for eliminating cells which produce foreign proteins which are not normally observed in the body.

Key findings from this seminal work by Katharina Röltgen et al include the following: SNIP

...

Conclusion

Based on this information, it appears to me that the extensive random incorporation of pseudouridine into the synthetic mRNA-like molecules used for the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna SARS-CoV-2 vaccines may well account for much or all of the observed immunosuppression, DNA virus reactivation, and remarkable persistence of the synthetic “mRNA” molecules observed in lymph node biopsy tissues by Katharina Röltgen et al. Many of these adverse effects were reported by Kariko, Weissman et al in their 2008 paper “Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability” and could have been anticipated by regulatory and toxicology professionals if they had bothered to consider these findings prior to allowing emergency use authorization and widespread (global) deployment of what is truly an immature and previously untested technology. Therefore, neither the FDA, NIH, CDC, nor BioNTech (which employs Dr. Kariko as a Vice President) nor Moderna can claim true ignorance. To my eyes, what we have seen is more appropriately classified as “willful ignorance”.

In conclusion, based on these data it is my opinion that the random and uncontrolled insertion of pseudouridine into the manufactured “mRNA”-like molecules administered to so many of us creates a population of polymers which may resemble natural mRNA, but which have a variety of properties which distinguish them in a variety of aspects which are clinically relevant. These characteristics and activities may account for many of the unusual effects, unusual stability, and striking adverse events associated with this new class of vaccines. These molecules are not natural mRNA, and they do not behave like natural mRNA.

The question that most troubles and perplexes me at this point is why the biological consequences of these modifications and associated clinical adverse effects were not thoroughly investigated before widespread administration of random pseudouridine-incorporating “mRNA”-like molecules to a global population. Biology, and particularly molecular biology, is highly complex and matrix-interrelated. Change one thing over here, and it is really hard to predict what might happen over there. That is why one must do rigorously controlled non-clinical and clinical research. Once again, it appears to me that the hubris of “elite” high status scientists, physicians and governmental “public health” bureaucrats has overcome common sense, well established regulatory norms have been disregarded, and patients have unnecessarily suffered as a consequence.

When will we ever learn.
Subscribe to Who is Robert Malone

By Robert W Malone MD · Thousands of paid subscribers

Medicine, science, bioethics, analytics, politics and life

Biden offering "to give" second booster to people over age 50.



Biden administration ‘plans to give Americans over 50 the option to get a FOURTH Covid shot in the spring and ALL Americans could get a second booster in the fall’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ster-shot.html

The White House will soon be offering Americans 50 years and over a second booster shot of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines
Officials will reportedly be offering everyone 50 and over the option of an additional booster – a fifth jab – in the event the surge occurs before fall
In the fall, Americans of all ages will reportedly be able to get the second booster, even the elderly who already got theirs in the spring
The second booster is meant to save lives from the predicted upcoming Covid surge fueled by the Omicron ‘stealth’ variant
But the Biden administration has faced complications because it has not been able to accurately predict when the next COVID-19 wave will hit
The administration is also struggling with pitching the second booster to Americans who are already dealing with ‘vaccine fatigue’

Dachsie comment:

This seems like baloney to me. Looks like they're trying to explain why it is the unvaccinated people who are not getting sick and dying. mysterious hidden immune system feature - sure, right.

_______________________

_

https://interestingengineering.com/i...d19-infections

• Health

A hidden immune feature may have spared unvaccinated people from COVID-19 infections

It's an antidote in the immune system.



https://inteng-storage.s3.amazonaws....rNWR_thumb.jpg By Derya Ozdemir
Mar 25, 2022







https://inteng-storage.s3.amazonaws....resize_md.jpeg wildpixel/iStock

A team of researchers from the University of Gothenburg has just taken another step toward understanding how the immune system develops resistance against COVID-19.
For six months, the researchers at the University’s Sahlgrenska Academy investigated 156 employees from five primary care health facilities who were recruited during April and May 2020. None of these employees had been vaccinated against COVID-19, and the majority of them had to work with infected patients on a daily basis during the height of the pandemic.
Get more updates on this story and more with The Blueprint, our daily newsletter: Sign up here for free.
They identified IgA (immunoglobulin A) in the respiratory tracts of several of the personnel who didn't catch COVID-19, which could mean they had an antidote in their immune systems all this time.




https://img.connatix.com/pid-98e195e...ty=60&fit=crop

These antibodies are found naturally in mucous membrane secretions in the airways and gastrointestinal tract, where they protect the body by binding to viruses and other invading organisms.
An antidote in the immune system

COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has claimed the lives of more than 6 million people since the start of the pandemic in early 2020. In fact, some researchers say the true number of lives lost to the COVID-19 by 31 December 2021 was 18.2 million, which is more than three times the official death toll.
The disease appears to affect some people more severely than others, with some experiencing very minor symptoms and others being hospitalized and requiring aid in breathing. The current study aimed to uncover health factors that appeared to offer COVID-19 protection for the unvaccinated.

“We all have IgA," said Christine Wennerås, Professor of Clinical Bacteriology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and senior physician at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, who is part of the research team. "It’s found on the mucous membranes, and COVID-19 is an infection that spreads via those membranes. We thought it was important to investigate what happened when completely healthy people encountered the coronavirus, before vaccines became available."
“Of the participants in our study, none whom contracted COVID-19 required hospitalization," she continued. "A lot of other research has concerned the most seriously ill patients, who have been hospitalized and in need of intensive care.”
Health factors

According to the results of the study published in the European Journal of Immunology, a third of the care workers developed antibodies to COVID-19, and they fell into two distinct groups based on antibody patterns and COVID-19 incidence.

One group that exclusively possessed IgA antibodies never succumbed to COVID-19. Participants in the other group had IgG antibodies as well as T cells and got the sickness.
The participants who did not test positive or were unwell all had IgA antibodies. Other characteristics that seemed to provide protection against infection were being female and having a respiratory allergy.
The data, however, does not support the notion that those who do not have antibodies against COVID-19 have protective T cells, which are a part of the immune system that focuses on specific foreign particles.
It should be noted that the majority of the COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective against severe illness, hospitalization, and death. In fact, as the Omicron subvariant BA.2 replaces its sister version, BA.1, as the dominant form of COVID-19 in many countries, researchers have discovered that two doses of COVID vaccination still appear to reduce the risk of infection caused by the new subvariant.

Study Abstract:
The patterns of humoral and cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 were studied in Swedish primary health care workers (n = 156) for 6 months during the Covid-19 pandemic. Serum IgA and IgG to SARS-CoV-2, T-cell proliferation and cytokine secretion, demographic and clinical data, PCR-verified infection, and self-reported symptoms were monitored. The multivariate method OPLS-DA was used to identify immune response patterns coupled to protection from Covid-19. Contracting Covid-19 was associated with SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing serum IgG, T cell, IFN-γ, and granzyme B responses to SARS-CoV-2, self-reported typical Covid-19 symptoms, male sex, higher BMI, and hypertension. Not contracting Covid-19 was associated with female sex, IgA-dominated, or no antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2, airborne allergy, and smoking. The IgG-responders had SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses including a cytotoxic CD4+ T-cell population expressing CD25, CD38, CD69, CD194, CD279, CTLA-4, and granzyme B. IgA-responders with no IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 constituted 10% of the study population. The IgA responses were partially neutralizing and only seen in individuals who did not succumb to Covid-19. To conclude, serum IgG-dominated responses correlated with T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 and PCR-confirmed Covid-19, whereas IgA-dominated responses correlated with not contracting the infection.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaLxhFiOBYk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaLxhFiOBYk

6:23 video runtime

Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
1,460,026 views

Mar 16, 2022

The BMJ

29.1K subscribers

For researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety.

A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial.
Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding.

After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson , emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.

Read the full investigation:
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n...

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...VX7bpGk4kA--~D

Watch this important video from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Chairman and Chief Legal Counsel of Children’s Health Defense to learn why “It’s Time to Follow the Science.”

7:02 video runtime

video also viewable on Rumble

https://rumble.com/vyvqpj-its-time-to-follow-the-science.html
It's Time to Follow the Science
childrenshealthdefense Published March 28, 2022 764 Views




https://childrenshealthdefense.org/c...w-the-science/


March 28, 2022
It’s Time to Follow the Science

Don’t let your guard down! While it may appear that mandates are being lifted, our federal government still hasn’t ended the Emergency Powers Act. Our nation is at a critical crossroads, making it more important than ever for people to follow the science.

Never has there been a more important time for parents to be informed and actively involved in public health policy. Recently the Biden administration announced their intent to ensure children of all ages receive the COVID vaccine:

“We must get a vaccine approved for the youngest children,” President Biden stated in his recent Statement on the White House COVID-⁠19 Response Coordinator.

With risks that outweigh benefits, we must stop this aggressive push on our very youngest children and babies. Now is the time to get involved!

This campaign contains some of the latest science related to the COVID vaccines and masks. Share this content with friends, family, community members, school administrators, Board of Education members, your state Department of Health, local healthcare practitioners and others. Let’s get the real science to those in your community who impact policy and make decisions regarding public health. We have the science, we have the resources–now all we need is you!

Go directly to pages with the referenced science on COVID-19 vaccines and masks:
COVID-19 VACCINE SCIENCE
MASK SCIENCE

Pushing the COVID vaccine on healthy children—or fourth doses of ineffective shots on people of any age—are only attempts to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and others who stand to profit.

It’s time our government officials admit that none of the COVID vaccines are effective.

It’s time our government officials acknowledge the injuries and deaths that are being reported at alarming rates.

It’s time our government officials stop putting profits before people.

It’s time our government officials follow the science!
Here are four ways you can get involved:
① Please Share This Video to Help Shine Light on the Real Science!

Share this video with vital information from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to educate others on the real science behind the COVID vaccine. While the mainstream media ignores the actual data, we can shed light on the truth. Please share the video on social media to get the real science to those who make health decisions for themselves or others. Many of these people have only been exposed to the media’s propaganda proclaiming the vaccine to be “safe and effective.”

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dachsie

Biden offering "to give" second booster to people over age 50.



Biden administration ‘plans to give Americans over 50 the option to get a FOURTH Covid shot in the spring and ALL Americans could get a second booster in the fall’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ster-shot.html

The White House will soon be offering Americans 50 years and over a second booster shot of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines
Officials will reportedly be offering everyone 50 and over the option of an additional booster – a fifth jab – in the event the surge occurs before fall
In the fall, Americans of all ages will reportedly be able to get the second booster, even the elderly who already got theirs in the spring
The second booster is meant to save lives from the predicted upcoming Covid surge fueled by the Omicron ‘stealth’ variant
But the Biden administration has faced complications because it has not been able to accurately predict when the next COVID-19 wave will hit
The administration is also struggling with pitching the second booster to Americans who are already dealing with ‘vaccine fatigue’

---

______________

More FDA CRAY CRAY !

March 29, 2022
"FDA authorizes 5 doses of the COVID vaccine?!? We thought it was four."

Source:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/f...2MFqsAT7Dk&s=r

FDA authorizes 5 doses?

While we all thought the FDA authorized a second booster today (i.e., four doses), check out this article: FDA authorizes 5 doses of the COVID vaccines

Steve Kirsch's Newsletter

March 29, 2022

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/t...oDD1MQfIwE&s=r

The FAA and airlines are violating Federal law

All the focus is on YOU wearing a mask. But this is a distraction. The big violation of federal law is by the FAA and the airlines in allowing vaccinated pilots to operate the plane.


I hate all the nagging whenever I fly that I have to wear a mask. This is nonsensical because the randomized trials all show that masks make no difference (unless you are wearing a P100 respirator or better).

This seems to be a distraction though, because the serious violation is being done by the FAA and airlines themselves in allowing pilots who have been vaccinated with the experimental vaccine to fly. That’s prohibited under federal law.

This was very clearly brought to the attention of the FAA and airlines three and a half months ago on December 15, 2021:

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch..._2190x1374.png

Their response: crickets.

At a minimum, I suggest that the next time you board a plane, point out to the flight attendants that the plane is being operated in violation of federal law.
Time for a TRO?

I guess it is time to file for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction in Federal court to prohibit these vaccinated pilots from flying. I am happy to fund this. It’s the right thing to do.

What do you think?

Please share this article.

Dachsie comment:

FDA has not met the requirements it has clearly set out for EUA status for a vaccine product. Yet, now they are seriously considering giving further EUA status for the EUA Pfizer and Moderna vaccines to very young children.

We have to apply as much pressure as we can to stop this diabolical travesty from happening.

The FDA has been exposed for being a politicized agency that really has little to do with public health and safety to address a "pandemic." Now that we are gaining the upper hand with these harm-causing governmental agencies, we must double down and keep on exposing them as strongly as we can.

I have read several stories about how HCQ and Ivermectin availability has been illegally, and possibly criminally, suppressed and halted for availability in the USA. Bribery, extortion, blackmail and even arson and murder are indicated when reading those stories. All of this to make possible the gaining of the FDA's EUA prized status for vaccine products.

I have personally sought out the original purpose of the invention of mRNA technology as it appears to be a major injurious component of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. In my recent Posting Number 2890 in this thread, I see that Dr. Malone is disappointed in the lack of proper studies for the mRNA technology he invented with others and for which he holds patents. He appears to be now devoting himself to government public health policy matters and no longer doing scientific research.

I do not think it will ever be possible to have properly designed and conducted studies on vaccines and I do not think that biological weapons will ever be taken out of use in the conduct of world war. Vaccines and biological weapons are inextricably connected now and they appear to be truly evil in every way.

There is nothing hopeful or helpful for mankind about these "vaccines" and most certainly not for the Emergency Use Authorization "vaccines."

__________________________


https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...4-77e1862648ce


03/29/22
•

COVID › Views
Why Didn’t Pfizer, Moderna Have to Meet All FDA Criteria for EUA Products?
"The U.S. Food and Drug Administration sets the criteria vaccine makers are supposed to meet in order to obtain Emergency Use Authorization for their products. So why didn’t Pfizer and Moderna have to meet all of those criteria?
By
Meryl Nass, M.D.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) made it very clear what its standards were for COVID vaccines.

The FDA repeatedly told its advisory committee, the public and vaccine manufacturers what the agency required in order to issue an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for a COVID vaccine.

I have copied four of the FDA’s PowerPoint slides below so we can all agree on what, precisely, those standards are.

Then we can all agree on something else.

Those standards turned out to look like a high jumper’s bar. The vaccine, like the high jumper, only has to get up over the bar for a brief moment in time.

For the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines, that moment occurred exactly two months and two weeks after getting a second mRNA shot.

Earlier than that, the vaccine couldn’t reach the bar.

After that brief moment, vaccine efficacy — like the high jumper — came crashing down.

The slides below come from a presentation to the FDA’s Vaccine and Related Biologic Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) on Dec. 10, 2020, when the committee was considering giving Pfizer’s vaccine an Emergency Use Authorization.

The slides echoed what had been said at earlier meetings of the VRBPAC and what the FDA stated in its published guidance for the vaccine industry." SNIP


...

"Fast forward from December 2020 to April 2022. FDA is about to consider issuing an EUA for Moderna and Pfizer vaccines in the 6 months up to 5 year age group.

However, there were no serious cases of COVID in Moderna’s clinical trial, and supposedly there were no severe cases in earlier Pfizer trials of older children.

Therefore, the standard the FDA laid out in 2020 can’t be met.

There is also no 50% efficacy. Moderna claimed its vaccine was 40% efficacious in the littlest kids (they claimed 94.5% for adults).

The CDC claimed Pfizer’s vaccine was 31% effective in 5- to 11-year-olds at about seven weeks, and the New York Department of Health said Pfizer’s vaccine had dropped to 12% efficacy within about seven weeks. Efficacy stayed above 50% for only the first four weeks.

So what’s the FDA to do?

Only we can stop the FDA from issuing that EUA for infants and children under age 5.

Originally published on Meryl Nass’s Substack page."

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.

guest • 2 hours ago

Let's not forget that Trump, via Mark Meadows threatened to fire the head of the FDA if he didn't authorize the EUA by Fri, Dec 11 2020. So following standard protocol didn't matter.

White House threatens to fire FDA chief unless Pfizer Covid vaccine approved Friday, reports say
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/1....

Thought this was funny.

I use Firefox browser.

I received an email from Firefox

with the subject line that read

"Here's how to slow the misinformation roll"

Inside was a message that read....

The headline here is don't just read headlines

We all do it. We hear a thing or read a headline then repeat it to a friend in conversation. Unfortunately, misinformation spreading happens to the best of us.

Check out this quick, refresher guide on how to spot misinformation and make sure the news we're reading is on the up and up.

Clicked on a button that had the hyperlinked words ...

Let's spot some misinfo

was taken to

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/internet...rch-misinfo-na

An illustration of speech balloons

https://blog.mozilla.org/wp-content/...0-1000x563.jpg


Internet Culture

How to make sure you aren’t spreading misinformation online

calendar March 1, 2022

author Kristina Bravo

opening paragraph read...

Facts can be empowering during uncertain times, and perhaps there’s no fact-finding tool more accessible than the internet. But as past years have taught us, the internet can also mislead — to dangerous lengths. We know when world events are scary, the internet gets loud and overwhelming. So here are three best practices to spot misinformation online.

Some of the subheadings in the fairly short article are

Always check the source, then check your source’s sources

Verify videos and images

Go past the headline or caption

________________


embedded video titled ...

Fake news and how to spot it

2:59 video runtime

video also viewable on YouTube at...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiJX...e=emb_imp_woyt

Fake News - and how to spot it

Feb 14, 2020

BBC Monitoring

__________________________

then the article ended thus....

An internet free of misinformation may be impossible, but taking a few extra steps before hitting that share button can help us get closer.

Additional resources:

Mozilla Foundation’s Misinfo Monday series
Mozilla Festival’s Misinfocon events
Pocket collection on how to spot (and fight) Misinformation
The Annenberg Public Policy Center’s FactCheck.org project
The Washington Post’s Fact Checker
PolitiFact.com

___________________________

Here is the kicker...



Under the subheading....

Always check the source, then check your source’s sources


Now onto the stories themselves: Consider the sources. “See where else these experts have been quoted before,” Jakola said. “Though keep in mind this can go both ways. There are some people who make their whole career out of making media appearances and not doing any of the work. On the other hand, you have folks like Dr. Anthony Fauci who does the work and has been trusted by journalists for decades.”

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/i...MQOJpHnVNY&s=r

If you are in med school, I want to pay off your student loans down to zero


All you have to do is answer 20 questions I have about vaccine/mask safety and efficacy and convince us we got it all wrong. What could be easier than that?

Steve Kirsch
9 hr ago

My million dollar offers to the FDA and CDC outside committee members didn’t work, nobody in academia seems to be interested in setting me and my colleagues on the “right” path, the fact checkers won’t set me straight, and the Wikipedia editors who claim I’m lying won’t show me their arguments either.

Frustrating!

Time for Plan B.

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch...1800x1080.jpeg
Image source: Paying off Debt the Smart Way - Wheeler Accountants

Show us how we got it wrong, and I’ll pay down your student debt to zero

I’m hoping that there is a medical student somewhere in the US that is willing to show us how we (listed here) got it all wrong and that the COVID vaccines are safe and effective and that cloth, surgical, and N95 masks are both safe and effective against SARS-CoV-2.

So if you can answer my 20 questions in your sleep and explain how we got it all wrong, you are exactly the person I am looking for.

If you are interested in doing this in a recorded call and believe you can explain all our evidence in a way consistent with the mainstream narrative, I will pay down your student loan debt to zero.

All you have to do is fill out the form.
To my readers, please share widely

Hopefully we can find a med school student who can use the money and will take the time to show all of us how we got it wrong.

_______


Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Thousands of paid subscribers

I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.

"COVID is critical because this is what convinces people to accept, to legitimize, total biometric surveillance.
In order to stop the epidemic, we need to not just monitor people's activities, we need to monitor what's happening under their skin.
Humans are now hackable animals. The whole idea that humans have a "soul" or "spirit" and have free will and nobody knows what's happening inside you so whatever I choose is a matter of my free will, well, that's over."

quote: Yuval Harrari


Source:

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...E7_320x180.jpg

https://www.bitchute.com/video/m6Cea8SxkSE7/

go to 42:42 Michael Ivey speaking


Need to Know News TEXAS TUESDAY (29 March 2022) with Joe Olson and Michael Ivey
Watch

1:19:38 video runtime
First published at 02:40 UTC on March 30th, 2022.
Jim Fetzer
10284 subscribers

"A federal judge in CA (appointed by Bill Clinton) has ruled that *more likely than not* Donald Trump committed a crime in seeking to reverse the outcome of the 2020 election during the 6 January 2021 intrusion into the Capitol. The Federalist long since debunked the idea that Trump had incited an insurrection, because *incitement* requires urging *imminent lawless action*, which was impossible given the distance between the Ellipse where he spoke and the Capitol, 1.5 miles away, and where he urged his followers to *protest peacefully*; and that none of those who were participating in the protest believed they were going to overthrown the government of the United States. It:s poppycock, but that*s all we are going to hear from the Democrats from now to November. Biden:s blunders are getting more and more serious, talking about what our troops will *see in Ukraine*, that there will be massive food shortages (which, alas, is true); and that Putin does not deserve to remain in power. Bad stuff, when it could provoke WWIII. Hunter:s laptop turns out to have 2x as many emails and 4x as many photos, which demonstrate degrees of treason beyond belief and show 2/3 of Congress corrupt beyond measure. Hunter even turns out to be involved in funding those biolabs in Ukraine! The CDC promulgated its directives for students in schools on the basis of old and bad data, which no doubt made no difference, since they knew what they were going to do completely independent of *the science*. Jim will be offering a course on Critical Thinking & Conspiracy Theories beginning on 6 April, a one-hour class each week for 15 weeks. Check it out on his blog at https://jamesfetzer.org/2022/03/conspiracy-101-critical-thinking-conspiracy-theories/"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzCZ6N0tzo8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzCZ6N0tzo8

22:20

First half about "natural immunity" studies in relation to coronavirus.
Second half about Republican party platform as explained by NY congresswoman Elise Stefanik.


Dachsie comment:

I do not see how we can have quality studies on "natural immunity", much less such studies focusing on coronavirus, when the whole germ theory and virus theory and concomitant definitions and understandings appear to be so flawed. ( I do accept the importance of our natural immune system and that "natural immunity" exists and is the preferred form of protection.)

Second half of video is politics and I am burned out on it but we are running up to mid-term elections, and political theater is absolutely everywhere. I personally have lost any hope or confidence in any U S congress or senate members as they have abandoned true representation of their constituency.

Would comment that the Facts Matter on YouTube may be ended by YouTube censorship soon. Epoch Times TV is probably the only place you will find it in the near future, and there is a small subscription fee there.

I have noticed several Epoch Times and Roman and other Epoch Times commentators indicating they are fully against Russia's military action against the Ukraine and this includes their guests such as Victor Davis Hanson who gives very sly covert messaging against Russia and FOR the mainstream narrative of the establishment USA.
I do not like that and may have to stop reposting their ostensibly high-quality objective reporting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVL-4hAxstw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVL-4hAxstw

6:31 video runtime

17,838 views
Mar 28, 2022

Judicial Watch
489K subscribers
READ: https://www.judicialwatch.org/fauci-e...

Judicial Watch received 199 pages of records from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that include emails between National Institutes of Health (NIH) then-Director Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci about hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...f0S8j9Tevg--~D

‘The Defender Show’ with RFK, Jr. - Vaccine Passports Just One Way BlackRock, Vanguard Are Profiting From Pandemic with Dr. Michael Nevradakis



https://live.childrenshealthdefense....0-26f9b64d955c

Live Every Thursday at 9:00am PST/12:00pm EST • Get Text Alerts

46:25 video runtime


The Defender Show

Meet the people who are changing the world one brave step at a time. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. uses his platform to feature the new “profiles in courage” as he interviews people from all walks of life who are demonstrating fortitude and integrity in times of strife and controversy.

competive capitalism or corporate crony capitalism ?

Coke and Pepsi owned by BlackRock

fake fights abound in alternative news inquiries

++++++++++++++
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...rock-vanguard/

02/16/22
•

COVID › Views

Corporate Vaccine Mandates and Vaccine Passports — Brought to You by BlackRock and Vanguard?

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg


Investment giants BlackRock and The Vanguard Group stand to benefit from their ownership stakes in most of the corporations that imposed COVID vaccine mandates, and in some of the technology firms developing vaccine passports.
By
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

https://odysee.com/EP22-Military-Epi...55ff2707c15400

Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

Steve Kirsch founder and CEO

Weekly update

1:39:34

several notices of events and video clips

_______________________________


VSRF call Thurs: Personal injury lawsuits and the COVID vaccine
Join us Thursday, March 31 @7pm EST for the VSRF call, especially if you have a vaccine injury.

Steve Kirsch
Mar 31

Comment

Share

Tomorrow, Thursday, March 31 @7pm Eastern

Register at www.vacsafety.org

Watch the Promo Video Here

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...gQN6D0BHGg--~D



https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...Z09DlGCGpA--~D

Big Pharma companies have a total and complete exemption from lawsuits as a result of any and all injury and death that result from taking their experimental injection. This has led many vaccine injured to believe that they have no recourse to civil litigation as a result of being forced by their school, their employer, their local government, to take the jab. This has led to a great many more vaccine injured just keeping silent about their injuries because….”what’s the point?”

We were also told, by The New York Times last November that

“Employers mandating vaccines are adhering to OSHA’s requirements and most likely can’t be held liable for any adverse effects. Covid-19 vaccines carry little known risk.”

OSHA's Vaccine Mandate: Your Questions Answered - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

But back in May of 2021, OSHA told Employers that they could be liable for COVID vaccine related injuries when these vaccines were mandated as a condition of employment.



OSHA: Employers May Be Held Liable for ‘Any Adverse Reaction’ if They Mandate COVID Vaccines • Children's Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org)

Then something amazing happened. This totally disappeared from OSHA’s website, to be replaced with its declaration that it was no longer collecting information on mandated employee vaccine injuries because it didn’t want to encourage vaccine hesitancy.



Just to make this clear, the Federal agency tasked with keeping workers safe from their employers exempts employers from keeping records on vaccine injuries of workers.

On the VSRF show this Thursday, 7pm Eastern, I’ll be speaking with expert Civil Litigator Robert Krakow, who is representing the vaccine injured in all 50 states, Mother of 3 and vaccine injured Nikki Holland, and author Wayne Rohde who wrote the definitive work on the corruption within our vaccine injury compensation programs.
Defeat the Mandates (April 10, Los Angeles)

We’ll also have updates on the Defeat The Mandate’s Rally coming up on Sunday, April 10th in Grand Park, Los Angeles.

Learn More about the Rally: www.DefeatTheMandatesUS.com

Register for the VSRF Webinar tomorrow night at 7pm Eastern at www.vacsafety.org
Like

CommentComment

ShareShare

You’re a free subscriber to Steve Kirsch's newsletter. For the full experience, become a paid subscriber.

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...shot-for-kids/

Now: Stop FDA authorization of COVID shot for kids
[SIZE=4]
Stand at the gates of Hell[/SIZE]

by Jon Rappoport

March 31, 2022

A faceless Nazi bureaucracy is poised, waiting for the FDA’s signal to advance on small children and infants, with needles of death.

You can find all the government contact info and talking points — as well as the entire time line of developments, here, here, here, and here — in Toby Rogers’ articles. Also read this stunning article by Celia Farber.

And then raise the Alarm on all fronts. Raise holy hell.

The FDA is taking another run at authorizing the horrific COVID vaccine for children, ages 6 months to 4 years. This is murder and maiming right out in the open.

Even from a conventional medical position, it’s senseless: It’s trying to prevent a disease that doesn’t happen in children. It’s straight-out slaughter.

The federal database contains well over a million reports of injuries from the COVID vaccine. And that figure represents vast UNDER-reporting.

The medical apparatus that administers these shots is remorseless. It doesn’t think. It just acts under orders. It doesn’t stop and wonder about the little children and infants. It has no conscience. It doesn’t need to explain itself. It only has to say, “The vaccine was authorized.”

And the body that authorizes it only has to say, “We weighed the benefits against the risks, and came to the conclusion we did.”

And then the new death march begins.

Evidence for the FDA’s decision? There is no evidence. There is only cooked data and hidden data. There is only the FDA hand in glove with Pfizer and Moderna. Partners.

There is only money and greed and control and destruction of life.

The slaughter of the innocents.

Do what they’ve been telling you to do: see something, say something.

THEY are the insurrectionists. THEY are the terrorists.

Dachsie comment:

The reason Thomas Renz has such a strong case against the DOD and their illegal changing of DMED data is that, aside from having sworn statements from four army medical officers, insider DOD whistleblowers, is that he is working with U S Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. Senator Johnson has all the provided data from DMED that was sent to his and other relevant committees over the years beginning in 2016. He has this solid original data from his own records and he and his legal team have carefully studied the data and know that the alteration of the DMED data now because of a "data glitch" is not believable.

___________________________________



https://t.me/WeTheMedia


We The Media ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Mar 30, 2022

The attorney Thomas Renz has just discovered that the Department of Defense is altering data to hide the number of our service members who have been injured by the experimental and deadly COVID vaccines.

Mr. Renz also has the sworn statements of four whistleblowers inside the DoD serving as Army medical officer who have reviewed the relevant information and corraborated that important medical data has been altered. All of them had access to the relevant database — called the Defense Medical Epidemiological Database (“DMED”) — and they independently verified the findings.

What did they find?

They found dramatic increases in serious conditions after vaccination: a 456% increase in acute myocardial infarction, a 468% increase in pulmonary embolism, a 296% increase in all cancers, a 275% increase in myocarditis.

The Department of Defense responded to these whistleblower accounts by claiming that the increases in illness were actually false — due to “previously unreported” errors in the DMED database itself:

Following the exposé, the DOD responded with a statement that the dramatic spike in disease and medical conditions in DOD personnel immediately following the vaccine rollout in DOD was purely coincidental, and the result of a previously unannounced “glitch” in its DMED database, and had nothing to do with the vaccines themselves. The DOD maintains that the database glitch resulted in artificially low incidence numbers in the years 2016-2020, but that the 2021 data is accurate.

According to the whistlebowers, the DoD then took the entire DMED database offline and fraudently altered the information on the database... Moar

https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/th...e-just-got?s=r

Dachsie comment:

Here is the "scientific research" study that was done recently and claims that Ivermectin does no good. I have strong suspicions about the origin of this "research" and believe it was conceived and designed by Fauci and the PLANdemic gang. I have not the least doubt that the financing of the study came from BigPharma

Dr. Pierre Kory of the FLCCC strongly disagrees with these "findings."

In any event, what we have here is a perfect example of how "peer reviewed scientific studies" can be corrupt from beginning to end and are NOT what is to be considered true "SCIENCE."

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869

Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19

List of authors.

Gilmar Reis, M.D., Ph.D., Eduardo A.S.M. Silva, M.D., Ph.D., Daniela C.M. Silva, M.D., Ph.D., Lehana Thabane, Ph.D., Aline C. Milagres, R.N., Thiago S. Ferreira, M.D., Castilho V.Q. dos Santos, Vitoria H.S. Campos, Ana M.R. Nogueira, M.D., Ana P.F.G. de Almeida, M.D., Eduardo D. Callegari, M.D., Adhemar D.F. Neto, M.D., Ph.D., Leonardo C.M. Savassi, M.D., Ph.D., Maria I.C. Simplicio, B.Sc.Pharm., Luciene B. Ribeiro, R.N., Rosemary Oliveira, Ofir Harari, Ph.D., Jamie I. Forrest, Ph.D., M.P.H., Hinda Ruton, M.Sc., Sheila Sprague, Ph.D., Paula McKay, M.Sc., Christina M. Guo, B.Com., Karen Rowland-Yeo, Ph.D., Gordon H. Guyatt, M.D., David R. Boulware, M.D., M.P.H., Craig R. Rayner, Pharm.D., F.R.C.P.Edin., and Edward J. Mills, Ph.D., F.R.C.P.

for the TOGETHER Investigators*

Article
Figures/Media

Metrics

22 References

Abstract
Background

The efficacy of ivermectin in preventing hospitalization or extended observation in an emergency setting among outpatients with acutely symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is unclear.

Methods " SNIP

_____________


Here is an article praising this "scientific research" study.... I would like to find something in writing by "my side."

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/study...071103424.html


Fortune

Study finds ivermectin, the horse drug Joe Rogan championed as a COVID treatment, does nothing to cure the virus

Eamon Barrett
Thu, March 31, 2022, 2:11 AM·2 min read

Todd Calendar, attorney representing US Navy Seals v. Joe Biden

Quote Todd Calendar:

"If you look at all of the documentation, prior to when we did mass spectrometry on their vials, we know what's in these things. And in fact, they even admit that they added an HIV protein into the shots for the purpose of disabling people's auto-immune.

They could not slip these lipid nano-particles, which are in fact little bombers that carry pathogenic proteins, to effectuate gene modification in an individual, "gene therapy" as they call it.

In order to get those lipid particles past your cellular defense, your body's defense, they had to disarm your immune system.

And they did that. It''s in all the scientific papers. What they didn't do is undo that.

And right now, they're coining to understand this -- people showing up with HIV positive, people with three shots had no immune system whatsoever left over.

There are many ways to characterize this as intentional homicide, the unlawful taking of a human life except that it is in large numbers, which makes it genocide.

A vaccine-delivered AIDS epidemic....

That's right. That's correct.

Reporting for Infowars, this is Greg Reese.

_______________

Sources:

Need to Know News (1 April 2022) with Joe Olson and Maryam Henein
about 34:25 to 38:00 on the video track

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uQWUchOHHCiY/

Also this video at
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0cbPolao3wkC/
on Jim Fetzer Bitchute channel.

Also found at...: Todd Calandar quote also is in a recent Greg Reese Infowarrs.com show, a Rick Wiles TruNews show and an interview of Reinhard Fuellmich. I do not have the links for these other sources for this quote

https://americasbestpics.com/video/53XCVDQQ9?s=e

https://img.ifunny.co/videos/00d47ba...8e38f0b6_1.mp4

video meme runtime 1 minute

S_Snake_Stewart S_Snake_Stewart
7d

Mr Ryan Cole: "It's absolutely, scientifically clear [the vaccine] does not prevent acquisition of the disease [coV19], transmission of the disease, illness from the disease, or death from the disease, but in fact, the all-cause mortality rates have been shown to be HIGHER, in numerous studies, in those who received the vaccine than those who did not."

Dr. Zelenko exposes FDA tactics revoking EUA for hydroxychloroquine


https://img.ifunny.co/videos/736d15f...ef4b01ec_1.mp4

https://americasbestpics.com/video/tnSO8DaO9?s=e

https://americasbestpics.com/video/s...tnSO8DaO9?s=cl

OnWatch OnWatch
19d

Scientific Fraud - The FDA Cited a Lancet Study After it Was Retracted to Pull EUA for Hydroxychloroquine Dr. Zev Zelenko: "[The FDA] took a document that was worth less than used toilet paper and used it to block access to a drug that was showing reduction in hospitalization from COVID-19."

Dachsie Comment:

Replying to my number 2507 posting in this thread about ivermectin study published in the British Journal of Medicine.

I expressed my doubts about this study and was hoping someone who had the expertise to elaborate about the study would write something about that.

Well, here it is.

_____________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...a-059557cc3a5e


03/31/22
•

NY Times Latest to Mislead Public on New Ivermectin Study

The New York Times on Wednesday sent an email to subscribers titled: “Breaking News: Ivermectin failed as a Covid treatment . . .” The Times was referring to a study in the New England Journal of Medicine, covered March 18 by The Wall Street Journal. In both cases, the newspapers failed to provide an accurate critical analysis of the study.
By
Madhava Setty, M.D.

Madhava Setty, M.D. is senior science editor for The Defender.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

Excerpts from the article.

The New York Times on Wednesday sent an email blast to subscribers with the subject line: “Breaking News: Ivermectin failed as a Covid treatment, a large clinical trial found.”

The Times was referring to a study I wrote about, that same day, for The Defender.

My article called out the Wall Street Journal for its March 18 reporting on the same study — before the study was even published — for its failure to provide an accurate, critical assessment of the study.

The study in question — “Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19” — was officially published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

In it the authors concluded:

“Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19”

The Times did not critique the study itself, but quoted the opinion of Dr. David Boulware, an infectious-disease expert at the University of Minnesota:

“There’s really no sign of any benefit. Now that people can dive into the details and the data, hopefully that will steer the majority of doctors away from ivermectin towards other therapies.”

Yes. Let us dive into the details and the data and see where it “steers” us, shall we?

A closer look at the details SNIP

...

More questions than answers

Rather than pounding the final nail in the coffin around ivermectin’s utility in treating COVID, the NEJM study raises more questions.

What would the effect have been if a higher dose shown to be effective were administered?

What would be the benefit of this medicine in patients with no risk factors?

How statistically significant would the results have been if more participants were enrolled?

Why weren’t more participants enrolled as the study progressed given the emerging benefit of the drug and the absence of adverse events?

Why did the investigators define a primary outcome with such different real-world implications (ER visits vs hospitalizations)?

With less than 50% of the placebo arm adhering to the study protocol, why were their outcomes included in the analysis?

What effect did vaccination status have on outcome? If this is the primary means endorsed to prevent hospitalization, why wasn’t vaccination status mentioned as a confounder?

Did the investigators choose to limit the study as it became clear that an Ivermectin benefit would be too big to ignore?

Given these obvious issues with the study, it is becoming even more clear where the real story is: Neither The Wall Street Journal or The New York Times are willing to pursue startling details around how corporate interests are corrupting scientific opinion as reported here.

Instead, these iconic journals chose to report on a scientific study on or prior to the day of publication using misleading headlines backed up by flimsy investigations conducted by journalists with no capacity to dissect the analysis or data.

Here’s a bigger question: Are they just incompetent, or complicit, too?

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...a-059557cc3a5e

Excerpts


03/29/22
•

COVID › News

Heart Damage Found in Teens Months After Second Pfizer Shot, Study Shows

A new peer-reviewed study shows more than two-thirds of adolescents with COVID-19 vaccine-related myopericarditis had persistent heart abnormalities months after their initial diagnosis, raising concerns for potential long-term effects and contradicting claims by health officials that the condition is “mild.”

By
Megan Redshaw

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

A new peer-reviewed study shows more than two-thirds of adolescents with COVID-19 vaccine-related myopericarditis had persistent heart abnormalities months after their initial diagnosis, raising concerns for potential long-term effects.

The findings, published March 25 in the Journal of Pediatrics, challenge the position of U.S. health agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which claim heart inflammation associated with the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines is “mild.” SNIP

...

https://twitter.com/MartyMakary/stat...pfizer-shot%2F

Marty Makary MD, MPH
@MartyMakary

CDC has a civic duty to do rigorously study the long-term effects of vaccine-induced myocarditis. New follow-up study 3-8 months after myocarditis shows the MRI heart abnormality of late gadolinium enhancement seen in 63% of children. Merits further study.

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/15088...jpg&name=small


No such thing as ‘mild’ heart damage

A paper published Jan. 14 in Circulation summarized the clinical course of 139 young patients between the ages of 12 and 20 who were hospitalized for myocarditis following COVID vaccination.

Of those patients, 19% were taken into intensive care, two required infusions of potent intravenous drugs used to raise critically low blood pressure and every patient had an elevated troponin level.

Troponin is an enzyme specific to cardiac myocytes. Levels above 0.4 ng/ml are strongly suggestive of heart damage.

The paper concluded, “Most cases of suspected COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis occurring in persons <21 years have a mild clinical course with rapid resolution of symptoms.”

“We suppose [a ‘mild clinical course] refers to the 81% who did not go to the ICU or the fact that none died or required ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, a desperate means to keep the body oxygenated when a patient’s heart or lungs have completely failed),” wrote Setty and Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D., a theoretical physicist, in an article critiquing the Circulation paper.

“When does a ‘mild clinical course’ require hospitalization for a two-day median length of stay?” they asked. “How does anyone know if symptoms rapidly resolve?”

“We don’t know what it will do to young boys in the long term, especially since every patient had some damage to their heart as evidenced by significantly abnormal troponin levels,” Setty and Mitteldorf wrote. “And we don’t fully understand the mechanism by which the vaccines cause myocarditis.”

Here is another response to the British Medical Journal study that concluded that ivermectin does not work, this one by Steve Kirsch email. (Dr. Pierre Kory will have another strong response in support of ivermectin effectiveness very soon in his Substack account.)

Dachsie just had the immediate impression that this BMJ study was deliberately crafted for the intention of producing a specific negative conclusion against ivermectin. We already know who probably did the crafting and who probably paid for the study and for what motivations. It is valuable to expose everything possible about this study. "THEY" have been doing these kinds of "peer-reviewed scientific studies (stories)" for decades and it is why so many young idealistic medical students and doctors become somewhat cynical and jaded early on in their noble profession that is meant to serve medical science and human health and wellbeing.

Excerpts

_________


Whoops! The TOGETHER Trial actually showed that ivermectin worked.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/d...Z1SN4BZ_aA&s=r


Even the author admitted it. The media and medical establishment did not read the study carefully. They seize on anything that supports the narrative and fail to look at the study critically.

Steve Kirsch
Apr 4

Comment

Share

__________________________

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...Z15MXvcOlQ--~D

I just got off the phone with Pierre Kory. He just got back into the country and on Monday, April 4, he will be writing an article on his Substack on the ivermectin arm of the Together Trial. Let’s just say Pierre is not a happy camper. I haven’t seen him this upset ever.

In the meantime, here’s my take on this.
Ivermectin works and this study didn’t prove otherwise

The most important thing is this: The evidence, including this study, consistently shows that ivermectin works against COVID. In one group, as I will explain below (and I’m sure Pierre will explain in more detail), there was a 50% reduction in hospitalization. That’s big.

However, the media (including Alex Berenson) don’t want to look like they were wrong so they simply misinterpret the study results and hope you won’t read the study yourself. SNIP

...

That’s a quick summary of the learnings. The same learnings are true with other drugs like fluvoxamine. However, the medical community is very slow to learn these lessons that timing, dosing, etc. matter. For example, David Wiseman found that HCQ actually worked and it was statistically significant if you analyzed the data correctly and took into account the FedEx shipping delay. Wiseman tried to get his results published, but the journals didn’t want to upset the narrative and rejected his work. I’ve known David since the start of the pandemic and I can tell you he is meticulous. I’ve seen top scientists duck and run for cover when Wiseman asks to see their data.

The key points are:

Be careful not to generalize the result of a trial. A given trial means that drug X given with a delay Y and at a dose Z and duration A and…. is not statistically significant if there are only B people in the trial. Changing one or more of these variables can turn a “not statistically significant result” into something that is statistically significant with a big effect size. The press should never say, “HCQ doesn’t work for COVID.” They should say, “If you give HCQ at dose X for duration Y on Z hospitalized patients, there was not a statistically significant effect.” When you give it early in the appropriate dose and duration and in combination with other drugs, it works great as George Fareed and Bryan Tyson (among many others) will attest to.

Timing, dosing, duration, and combination of drugs all matter. Timing is the most important thing. If you delay for too long, a miracle drug can turn into a dud.

The study also PROVED that the NEJM, mainstream medical community, and the press are incapable of objectively interpreting the results of a study.

It’s important you all know that.

In today’s world, evaluation of studies is driven by agreement with the mainstream narrative, not by a critical look at what the study actually shows. If it agrees with the narrative, the study doesn’t have to be evaluated for flaws.

That is not how science is supposed to work.
Here is what study senior author Ed Mills wrote in a private email to Marc Rendell (used with Ed’s permission) SNIP

...

For further reading

A great analysis of the trial from Phil Harper:
The Digger
The Can't Add TOGETHER Trial
If a study has a press release strategy, it’s fair to assume that its motivations are more aligned with good press rather than good science. On March 18th, the world was treated to another negative headline: “Ivermectin Didn’t Reduce Covid-19 Hospitalizations in Largest Trial to Date”. It wasn’t possible for the journalist to interrogate that claim, because the study hadn’t been published. Nonetheless, the headline was dutifully…
Read more
3 days ago · 25 likes · 21 comments · Phil Harper

Here is another article on the study from another one of my friends:
In G-d’s Army There’s Only Truth
THE ANATOMY OF A VERY, VERY BIG LIE
BS"D Many have questions about the old-but-newly-published TOGETHER trial that just came out in the New England Journal of Medicine and is making gleeful headlines in mainstream media, telling one and all "Ivermectin doesn't work." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.105...ed_home…
Read more
3 days ago · 2 likes · 1 comment · Brucha Weisberger

Pierre’s article should be out shortly. Look for it on his Substack. SNIP

...

My personal feelings about Ed Mills and Pierre Kory

I’ve known Ed since 2020. He’s always been extremely nice to me and has never ducked any questions.

When he started the ivermectin trial, he told me he was skeptical that it worked, but he was willing to go with what the data shows. What’s clear from his email is that at the end, he was convinced it was effective. That’s significant. A dishonest scientist wouldn’t say that.

I’ve known Pierre for about the same amount of time as Ed and I have great respect for him as a man of high integrity and enormous courage to challenge the mainstream narrative. He’s amazing.

So I have a lot of respect for both Ed and Pierre and I’m friends with both.

I encouraged Pierre to call Ed on the phone to talk about his objections and see if they could be resolved. That didn’t happen and that’s unfortunate. I’m sure Ed would have happily taken the call.

We are all in this together and it’s important that we work together to resolve differences of opinion. I am continuing to encourage Pierre to give Ed a call and have a friendly discussion.
Not meeting to resolve differences of opinion is unproductive

In all cases to date, the blue-pill “experts” in the vaccine have steadfastly refused to engage with any of us to resolve our differences. We have reached out countless times, even with offers to “name your price,” to have our questions answered, but to no avail. Nobody wants to explain to us how we got it wrong. Not even for a million dollars. This is astonishing.

We made the same offer to people who claim that masks protect people from getting or spreading SARS-CoV-2. Everyone we contacted refused to defend their position except for just one person: Yale economics Professor Jason Abaluck. Professor Abaluck was the senior author of the Bangladesh mask study. He said he would engage us, but restricted our sessions to one person at a time. We had our first discussion (2 hour recorded zoom call) on April 3, 2022. I’ll be writing a Substack on this tomorrow when the recording is released.

The important lesson is this: when people do agree to come together, differences get resolved. When people refuse to meet to resolve their differences, the differences don’t get resolved. Such a novel concept!

Hence, it is completely unproductive for people who are pro-vaccine to continue to stonewall answering our questions. If they have nothing to hide, why aren’t they willing to meet with us?

What do you think?

Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Thousands of paid subscribers

I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.

Somewhere along the way I saw a graph where a country adopted Ivermectin as a therapy ( I believe it was Japan). The graph just plunged to nothing after the adoption.

https://x22report.com/ds-system-expo...route-ep-2742/

Thomas Massie
@RepThomasMassie
We have filed a lawsuit in federal court against this woman to end the mask mandate on airplanes.

Perhaps someone should sue her over her lies about vaccines… how many thousands of people were infected because they believed her statement that the vaccinated can’t spread covid?
Kyle Martinsen
@KyleMartinsen_
1 YEAR AGO TODAY

Biden's CDC Director: "Vaccinated people do not carry the virus”
Embedded video
8:42 AM · Apr 3, 2022
11.8K
See the latest COVID-19 information on Twitter


https://pbs.twimg.com/amplify_video_...yqzXn4XSYd.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/amplify_video_...yqzXn4XSYd.jpg

embedded video address is

https://twitter.com/i/status/1509206752780238851

https://vimeo.com/694088262

Kevin Shipp is doing a series of videos on vimeo about the vaccine. He also does videos about preparedness.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...PC0EHJLxHQ--~D

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...PC0EHJLxHQ--~D

I received one or two emails a day with articles and news items from Steve Kirsch, who is an engineer and successful business entrepreneur. He knows about data and and how to properly analyze it and he knows statistics. He has taken special interest in "COVID" and the "vaccines" and what is "safe and effective" and what treatments save lives.

In this morning's email he told about an arrogant M.D.'s pronouncements that only those with credentials like his own qualifies them to even have an opinion about the prescription medicine, fluvoxamine, sold under the such brand names as Luvox or Fevarin. Mr. Kirsch shows how the studies prove that that drug is safe and effective and saves lives, I believe mainly during early treatment.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/m...bAMqI7YXec&s=r

Steve Kirsch's Newsletter

Michael Patmas, MD says that only people with CREDENTIALS are qualified to opine on infectious disease issues

Excerpt:

"The IDSA* considers fluvoxamine too speculative to use and says it should only be used in the context of a clinical trial. Wow. 12X mortality reduction in a pandemic and we should do even more clinical trials? They basically don’t care about human life at all. All they care about is not making a mistake. There is no risk-benefit calculation here. They put a zero value on human life. They are only concerned about their reputation. They don’t want to be “wrong.”"

* Infectious Diseases Society of America

just something I came across in my wonderings and wanderings...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WdFxe-xMdY&t=112s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WdFxe-xMdY&t=112s

30 second video clip

Subject: natural immunity, Pfizer scientists, James O'Keefe, First Amendment

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...4JZF_sKwrQ--~D

FAITHFUL FREEDOM WITH TERYN GREGSON

MARCH 2022 MONTH IN REVIEW

Here is a recap of last month's episodes, in case you missed any of them. And don't forget to tune in every Wednesday as Teryn interviews some of the biggest names in the fight for freedom, along with everyday Americans who are pushing back against tyranny in all of its forms!

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...BPG7iUVTHA--~D

https://rumble.com/vw77ox-dr.-pierre...hs-and-mo.html

Dr. Pierre Kory - Ep. 14


Dr. Pierre Kory does not hold back in this week's episode of Faithful Freedom with Teryn Gregson, diving into how and why hospitals are not properly treating patients for COVID, how patients' vaccine status being labeled 'unknown' is manipulating the data, why many doctors only perform treatments supported by certain clinical trials usually conducted by Big Pharma, and so much more.

_____

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...QO8sxuo8IQ--~D


https://rumble.com/vxhonv-a-curious-rise-in-neurodegenerative-diseases-and-detoxing-from-the-vax-dr.-.html

Dr. Stephanie Seneff - Ep. 16


MIT Senior Research Scientist Dr. Stephanie Seneff joins "Faithful Freedom with Teryn Gregson" to explain why we may being seeing a rise in neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson's & Alzheimer's this year, how you can detox naturally after the COVID shot, and warnings for our kids.

_____

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...q0sRJX2S2g--~D

https://rumble.com/vy1fp1-emerald-ro...ative-ep..html


Emerald Robinson - Ep. 17


In what should be one of the biggest stories of the year, Former White House Chief Correspondent and host of “The Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson” joins "Faithful Freedom with Teryn Gregson" to discuss the state of media and the FOIA request that revealed a government-funded propaganda campaign around the COVID vaccine that the likes of FOX News, Newsmax, NBC, and others accepted on YOUR tax dollars.

_____

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...imVMxoKUaQ--~D

https://rumble.com/vypz3e-28-year-ol...ina-herme.html



Katrina Hermez - Ep. 18


28-year-old English woman Katrina Hermez joins "Faithful Freedom with Teryn Gregson" to share her life after the Pfizer COVID-19 jab, one that includes seizures, paralysis, brain fog and more. Few doctors in the UK will treat her. Hear her tragic story and join We The Patriots USA as we help fight against the mandates.


_____

► Subscribe to the podcast newsletter: https://teryngregson.com/podcast

Dachsie heard about this on this video

https://x22report.com/aiovg_videos/e...-the-patriots/


at about 29:40 on the video track.

Dave of x22report seemed to have stated that it was COVID deaths in the hospital that generated the grant for the hospital from the federal government, but technically death did not have to be the outcome of the hospitalization, but as Dachsie sees this data, technically only the diagnosis of "COVID" had to appear in the medical record, along with the listing of the other diagnoses. In fact, this deceptive action by the hospitals was probably most used on terminal patients in the hospital.

Thought this was very interesting information on how hospitals got in on the COVID money game early-on in the USA Part of the PLANdemic.

I found the original list/chart and it is 2020 data.

There was some kind of deal made with hospitals whereby they could receive a certain amount of federal grant dollars for each hospital's (in subject state) patient with a COVID diagnosis. The hospitals were therefore incentivized to have high numbers of COVID cases so they started counting patients with fatal injuries from car accidents etc., fatal illness such as late stage cancer or heart attacks. They just hurried and got positive PCR tests on these patients who were in guarded terminal condition and the hospital put COVID as one of diagnoses, and causes of death on the death certificate, of that patient in the hospital. This generated much income for hospitals and they went along with it, presumably from some written authorization from a federal government agency that this was permissible. (Dachsie documented this in this thread over a year ago.)

As a reminder, the plotters of the PLANdemic had to have high death numbers attributed to COVID in order to generate the degree of fear and panic in the population to make the overall goals of "the Plandemic" go forward successfully.

_________________

https://www.beckershospitalreview.co...d-19-case.html

State-by-state breakdown of federal aid per COVID-19 case

States' hospitals that received grant per patient over $100,000 are bolded.

Ayla Ellison (Twitter) - Tuesday, April 14th, 2020 Print | Email
Listen
Text

HHS recently began distributing the first $30 billion of emergency funding designated for hospitals in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. Some of the states hit hardest by the COVID-19 pandemic will receive less funding than states touched relatively lightly, according to an analysis by Kaiser Health News.

The first round of grants will be distributed based on historical share Medicare revenue, not based on COVID-19 burden. Therefore, hard-hit states like New York will receive far less per COVID-19 case than most other states.

HHS said it doled out the first slice of funding based on Medicare revenue to get support to hospitals as quickly as possible. The agency said the next round of grants "will focus on providers in areas particularly impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak," rural hospitals and other healthcare providers that receive much of their revenues from Medicaid.

Below is a breakdown of how much funding per COVID-19 case each state will receive from the first $30 billion in aid. Kaiser Health News used a state breakdown provided to the House Ways and Means Committee by HHS along with COVID-19 cases tabulated by The New York Times for its analysis.

Alabama
$158,000 per COVID-19 case

Alaska
$306,000

Arizona
$23,000

Arkansas
$285,000

California
$145,000

Colorado
$58,000

Connecticut
$38,000

Delaware
$127,000

District of Columbia
$56,000

Florida
$132,000

Georgia
$73,000

Hawaii
$301,000

Idaho
$100,000

Illinois
$73,000

Indiana
$105,000

Iowa
$235,000

Kansas
$291,000

Kentucky
$297,000

Louisiana
$26,000

Maine
$260,000

Maryland
$120,000

Massachusetts
$44,000

Michigan
$44,000

Minnesota
$380,000

Mississippi
$166,000

Missouri
$175,000

Montana
$315,000

Nebraska
$379,000

Nevada
$98,000

New Hampshire
$201,000

New Jersey
$18,000

New Mexico
$171,000

New York
$12,000

North Carolina
$252,000

North Dakota
$339,000

Ohio
$180,000

Oklahoma
$291,000

Oregon
$220,000

Pennsylvania
$68,000

Rhode Island
$52,000

South Carolina
$186,000

South Dakota
$241,000

Tennessee
$166,000

Texas
$184,000

Utah
$94,000

Vermont
$87,000

Virginia
$201,000

Washington
$58,000

West Virginia
$471,000

Wisconsin
$163,000

Wyoming
$278,000


Latest articles on finance:
Survivors of shootings spend $2.5B in collective health costs in 1st year after injury, study estimates
7 hospitals laying off workers
Senate negotiators reach $10B COVID-19 aid deal

We think you might be interested in this webinar: Postoperative cardiac care: Strategies to eliminate common complications, save lives and reduce costs which will take place on Wednesday, April 27th, 2022 at 12:00 PM CST - Register Now!

Copyright © 2022 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.
Subscribe to the Becker's Hospital Review newsletter for the latest in healthcare news!