Sexual abuse in Nevada detention centers, John Lamb, Orange Hat Man Kenny, Lazaro and Joshua Martinez - Nevada Updates
http://youtu.be/Uexkg_jfRaU
https://youtu.be/Uexkg_jfRaU
Printable View
Sexual abuse in Nevada detention centers, John Lamb, Orange Hat Man Kenny, Lazaro and Joshua Martinez - Nevada Updates
http://youtu.be/Uexkg_jfRaU
https://youtu.be/Uexkg_jfRaU
Mel Bundy's wife and daughters were denied a visit after she drove 2 hours so they could see their dad after on year of being jailed
Videos won't embed
Mel Bundy’s Wife Updates us on Reactions and responses from CCA Nevada Southern Detention Center
Posted on February 4, 2017 by Doug Knowles
Briana Bundy updates us on the follow-up from CCA Privately Operated Nevada Southern Detention Center.In yesterday's article, she explained her bad experience she had when she tried to visit her Husband Mel Bundy with here children. They had driven over two hours to the facility and because of her children which are permitted and have never been an issue in the past.
She shares a lot. She touches on the response of staff to our calls and complaints share by her husband Mel Bundy in a phone conversation Today. She also elaborates on many of the abusive issues in this and other facilities and why they occur.
The federal government prosecutors, actively intimidate and scare the detainees without pre-trial release in and effort to obtain plea agreements from the detainees, that they would not otherwise make. The US Marshals and CCA are active participants in the process.
https://i1.wp.com/www.itmattershowyo...20%2C589&ssl=1Facebook Post from Briana Bundy
Video Player
00:00
20:08
Video Player
00:00
07:45
Share this:
Jury selection for first six in Bundy Ranch trial has begun.
These reporters want to ignore or are ignorant of the fact that many of these old ranches have forage and water rights that predate the Taylor Grazing Act. The ownership of the land is mute. If the jury were made aware of that fact the Bureau of Land Management is guilty of cattle rustling.
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/art...y-10911941.php
Jury selection begins for trial of 6 in Bundy ranch standoff
Ken Ritter, Associated Press
Updated 1:14 pm, Monday, February 6, 2017
LAS VEGAS (AP) — Jury selection has begun in federal court in Nevada for trial of the first six defendants accused of taking up arms against federal agents herding cattle off public land near cattleman Cliven Bundy's ranch in April 2014.
About 10 flag-waving protesters marked the start of proceedings Monday outside the courthouse in Las Vegas, showing support for the jailed rancher and his philosophy that states own the land, not the federal government.
A similar number of counter-protesters organized by a conservation advocacy group brought a bullhorn and signs declaring public lands should stay public.
In the courtroom, openings are expected later this week for a trial that's expected to take weeks or months.
The six facing the jury first are characterized as the least culpable "followers and gunmen" among the 19 defendants the case.
BLM misconduct will be admissible, but court granted most of govt. motion
https://bundyranchstandoff.info/evid...bility-ruling/
Evidence Admissibility Ruling
Government Misconduct Admissible…
Chief Judge Gloria Navarro ruled on the Government’s motion to preclude certain evidence. The Government raised concern that certain arguments could lead to jury nullification. The Court granted most of the Government’s motion but did deny one element critical to the defendant’s strategy. Namely, defendant’s can introduce Government misconduct into their arguments according to the evidence admissibility ruling.
No mention of Malheur Occupation permitted…
Drexler argued in favor of allowing references to the Malheur Occupation trial, but did not (according to the Court) present substantive reasons for why such arguments would be relevant. Consequently, the Court ruled that references to the Malheur trial are irrelevant and inadmissible.
Third party opinions inadmissible…
Defendants will not be able to introduce the opinions of third-party individuals as evidence. Subsequently, statements made by individuals such as Governor Brian Sandoval or then Senator Harry Reid will not be admissible. Sandoval publicly referred to the operation and First Amendment areas as “offensive”. Reid publicly labeled defendants as “domestic terrorists”. The Government argued that these opinions could confuse the jury, especially if a juror happened to respect the opinion of the individual.
Opinions on legality precluded…
Defendants will not be able to present as evidence personal opinions about the validity (or lack thereof) with regard to existing laws. Consequently, any personally-held beliefs about the BLM, Federal land “ownership”, or anything of the like are not admissible. The Court uses the example of taxes. The Court says that a citizen cannot present a belief that taxes are illegal as a good faith defense for why they stop paying them.
Evidence Admissibility Ruling
The Government sought far-reaching limits of what evidence should be admissible. The Court ruled mostly in favor of the Government, but did open the door for defendants to present evidence and argument related to Government misconduct. This will be key in helping jurors understand the defendant’s state of mind on Saturday, 12 April 2014.
State of mind is a key element in understanding why defendants postured defensively. Excessively militarized land management agents deployed tactically an evinced a posture indicating that they might exact lethal force on unarmed protesters. Consequently, many thought they were going to observe a release of cattle. Instead, the Bundy Ranch Tyrant (SAC Daniel P. Love) senselessly escalated a peaceful protest into a potentially deadly standoff. The evidence admissibility ruling by the Court will allow defendants to present these arguments as long as they can reasonably articulate it’s relevance.
Scribd, 7 page court ruling on bottom ov page
https://bundyranchstandoff.info/wp-c...4/facebook.pnghttps://bundyranchstandoff.info/wp-c...64/twitter.png
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b...?s=49&d=mm&r=g
Author anthony-dephuePosted on February 6, 2017Categories Trial UpdatesLeave a Reply
Shawna Cox says Oregon verdict bolters Nevada case
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...8c&oe=5905524B
John Lamb with first 1/2 day report on jury selection for Bundy Ranch trial Feb. 6, 2017
http://youtu.be/5l3C2c5FsDE
Youtube link
John Lamb end of first day of jury selection for first Bundy trial
http://youtu.be/hAJDAkAuFDw
https://youtu.be/hAJDAkAuFDw
This is a very good video.
There is no doubt that these people are speaking truth from the facts and from the heart.
I feel just sick about the evil and corruption happening within the legal and law enforcement system.
I hope Trump does something about this hideous situation.
It really bothers me that these prosecutors and judges proceed against these people when they must know they are prosecuting innocent people. This bunch in Las Las Vegas were all hand picked by Harry Reid. They all seem to defy the law with the exception of the magistrate judge George Foley. He appears to be a little bit honest.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachsie
The Bundy Ranch Song
http://youtu.be/oObQKEEjN8k
https://youtu.be/oObQKEEjN8k