Coronavirus

https://trendingpolitics.com/new-yor...m_source=ElWiz


New York City is Inflating ‘Covid Hospitalizations’ Over 100% to Justify Its Authoritarian Response

by Kyle Becker
a day ago
updated about 5 hours ago



“Data published by New York State’s Department of Health includes the number of Covid patients that were admitted because of severe complications with the virus and the number admitted with Covid who came to wards for another issue, such as a fall, but then tested positive,” the report clarified. “Of the 670 ‘Covid’ patients currently on its wards, there are 293 who were admitted for the virus and 377 who have tested positive but were admitted for something else.”

“The proportion of the city’s ‘Covid’ patients who are ill from the virus has risen slightly from last week, but it has remained well below half of all patients since the start of February,” the report noted.

The Covid hospitalization data is scientifically invalid because it fails the mutual exclusivity test. It misrepresents the data by cherry picking the category and presenting it without necessary additional context.

Thus, it is “missing context” as the ‘fact checker’ racket would say.

The Covid data fraud is consistent with New York’s track record of deceiving the public about the severity of the disease, while implementing scientifically baseless policies such as Covid vaccine passports in New York
City.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/e...tFrfeVnA6M&s=r

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/

Ten different surveys all show the vaccines are not "safe and effective" -- not even close


This is my most important article since I started writing on Substack. It shows how anyone can prove to themselves that I've been telling the truth the whole time.

Steve Kirsch

Summary

I’ve written over 700 articles on my Substack. This is my most important article to date because it provides objective proof, that anyone can verify with their own surveys of their own friends, that I have been telling the truth since I first became a “misinformation spreader” on May 25, 2021 with an article on TrialSite News entitled “Should you get vaccinated?”.

Here is a summary video of the two most recent surveys I did which show the vaccines increase cancer, cause excess deaths comparable to COVID deaths, and dramatically increase miscarriage rates.

If you only watch one video this year, that is the one to watch.

Also recommended is another 17-minute summary video that has the highlights from 8 surveys I recently did earlier.

The surveys are of my readers and some people believe my readers give biased results to these questions. Of course they do. All surveys are biased. That’s why you should repeat these surveys yourself with your friends.

The point of this article is to summarize the results to date from my readers. Even with biases, it would be hard to overcome a signal this large.

For example, how do you explain an embalmer where over 90% of her cases had severe blood clots if the vaccines are perfectly safe. How do you explain that? The survey results need to be consistent with reality.

If people weren’t dying, I’d wait for the survey results on a broader audience (which we began on May 23, 2022 using a third party polling organization). The precautionary principle of medicine compels me to publish these preliminary findings now.

The preliminary findings from these polls show:

The vaccines have already killed about the same number of Americans as COVID has.

For kids 5-11, the 5-11 death report data indicates we are killing 336 kids for every child we might save from COVID if the vaccine was 100% perfect in protecting against death.

The second shot is the most dangerous and appears to increase all-cause mortality (ACM) over the next 30 days by approximately 8X, the first and third shots raise ACM by approximately 6X and 4.8X respectively. Even to me, this seems too high to believe, but that’s what the numbers say.

It appears that the true number of COVID deaths, vaccine deaths, and annual deaths from heart attacks are relatively comparable with each other (within a factor of 2) since January 2020 to the present. This suggests that only around 700,000 people actually died from COVID and a comparable number from the COVID vaccines. This is in line with our VAERS minimum estimate of excess deaths caused by the vaccine: 12,000 VAERS excess deaths in the US * 41 (the minimum under-reporting factor) = 492,000 deaths which we knew was a minimum.

For people who did not die, if you have cancer before the shot, 55% of the people had their cancer got dramatically worse after the shot. In 20% of the cases, the cancer remained the same. Nobody’s cancer got better after the shot. 0%. That is really stunning. How will the CDC explain that one? Check it out, especially the comments to the poll.

Miscarriages aka spontaneous abortions increased dramatically since 2021. Over 80% of the women who miscarried were vaccinated. This should not be a surprise at all since VAERS shows the #1 elevated symptom post vaccine is heavy menstrual bleeding which is elevated at 8,800 times normal. We’ve known that for a long time, but the CDC won’t admit it. Don’t take my word for this. Check out this Gab poll I just did.

The VAERS under-reporting factor for deaths could easily be 100 or more. Of the vaccine deaths that were reported, fewer than 1% were reported to VAERS. However, not all these people were familiar with all details of the death. What we can say is that it appears that at least 0.7% of all deaths and vaccine-related miscarriages were reported to VAERS. None of the 15 deaths of kids 18 and under were reported to VAERS. In other words, the VAERS URF for deaths is highly likely less than 142.

These are all estimates, but the numbers are so absurdly high that even if you factor in survey biases, nobody should be taking these vaccines, especially kids. It’s unethical.

All surveys have biases and confounders. We are certainly open to hearing from anyone who thinks that they have a more accurate survey or analysis method. Instead of shooting holes in the survey, it’s more constructive to show us the “right” way or the “objective” audience for the survey. In order to attack this research, you need to attack the data or the methodology or both using data to prove we got it wrong, not hand-waving arguments.

This work will never be published in a medical journal because it is counter-narrative. Starting on May 23, 2022, it will be “peer-reviewed” by hundreds of thousands of people who will be looking for an error and they will post it here. Check the comments if you want to see the “peer review.”

I encourage you to replicate the surveys yourself if you don’t believe me and publish them.

We are in the process of repeating these questions with a randomly selected group of people with the survey being done by an independent polling company. We should have the results by May 27, 2022. Note that some of the survey firms want to change the questions so that they are biased in favor of making the vaccine look safe. Wow. This is why we encourage you do it yourself.

As I mentioned earlier, the statisticians I work with tell me the signals observed here are too large to be explained by bias and they are also very consistent with previous estimates.

For example, I’ve walked into several large venues I’ve never been in before and asked the audience “how many people do you know who died from any cause right before they were going to get their first vaccine dose? How many after?” The results are always stunning. It’s the quickest way to wake up a group to being receptive to the possibility that they’ve been misled.

If you think that people are primarily honest and answer objective questions honestly, you should keep reading. Also, if you are willing to survey your own followers, keep reading as well.

Finally note that a small fraction of the data is gamed and/or in error.
May 21

SNIP

_________

Dachsie comment:

This is good to have this further confirmation. Actually this is more factual and objective than any statistics peddled to us by our crooked health agencies that are about to hand over our national sovereignty to the One World Death and Slavery System for All.

https://justthenews.com/politics-pol...mit-misconduct


In rebuke to Pentagon, Navy board finds 3-0 for vax objector amid questions of mandate's lawfulness

"[W]e are encouraged that the truth was revealed in this Board, and we hope this ground-breaking case sends a strong message to the Department of Defense," said counsel for Navy Lt. Billy Moseley.


In a stinging rebuke to the Pentagon, a Navy administrative separation board voted unanimously to retain an officer who refused to comply with the military's COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Navy Lt. Billy Moseley, who has been an officer for 22 years, could have chosen to retire from the military when he was ordered to receive the COVID vaccine. He also could have submitted a Religious Accommodation Request, since he objected to the vaccine for religious reasons.

Risking his retirement, Moseley chose instead to take his case to the administrative separation board after learning "that the Navy and the other services intended to implement a blanket denial policy," according to a press release from his attorney, R. Davis Younts.
File
Moseley Press Release.pdf

Moseley consulted with legal and medical experts and "became convinced that as an officer he had an obligation to take a stand against the unlawful order and be a voice for thousands of enlisted Sailors," the press release continued.

Younts told Just the News Moseley is one of the first Navy service members — maybe even the first officer — to go to the board over the COVID vaccine mandate.

Any service member who has been in the military for more than six years is entitled to the board for due process. In the Navy, the board's recommendation on whether to retain or separate (another term for firing) a member of the service is binding.

Younts argued at the board hearing that the mandate for the experimental COVID vaccines was not a lawful order since the military has not made fully FDA-approved versions of the vaccines available to military members.

The military defense attorney told Just the News that the attorneys for the Navy agreed with him that there are no FDA-approved vaccines available, only interchangeable vaccines. Younts added that if there are no FDA-approved vaccines available, then the president would have to authorize the experimental shots that are currently available, which hasn’t happened.

On Friday, the board voted 3-0 that Moseley's failure to follow the COVID vaccine order did not count as misconduct and that he should remain in the Navy. Younts said that the board members weren't convinced that the vaccine order was lawful.

He added that this precedent "puts the Navy in an interesting position" regarding the other service members who have also refused the COVID vaccine.

While this is "only one case of thousands and we have many more clients facing prosecution by the military, we are encouraged that the truth was revealed in this Board, and we hope this ground-breaking case sends a strong message to the Department of Defense," Younts' press release concluded.

____________________


Summary version

In a stinging rebuke to the Pentagon, a Navy administrative separation board voted unanimously to retain an officer who refused to comply with the military’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

Navy Lt. Billy Moseley, who has been an officer for 22 years, could have chosen to retire from the military when he was ordered to receive the COVID vaccine.

Moseley attorney Younts argued at the board hearing that the mandate for the experimental COVID vaccines was not a lawful order since the military has not made fully FDA-approved versions of the vaccines available to military members.

The attorneys for the Navy agreed with him that there are no FDA-approved vaccines available, only interchangeable vaccines. Younts added that if there are no FDA-approved vaccines available, then the president would have to authorize the experimental shots that are currently available, which hasn’t happened.

The board voted 3-0 that Moseley’s failure to follow the COVID vaccine order did not count as misconduct and that he should remain in the Navy. Younts said that the board members weren’t convinced that the vaccine order was lawful.[/SIZE]

https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1653326238


Quote Dr. Robert Malone regarding monkeypox.

"Malone set the propagandists straight, writing:

"The monkeypox virus, which originates in various regions of Africa, is related to SmallPox (Variola), which are both members of the genus Orthopoxvirus. However, it is important to understand that Variola (major or minor) is the species of virus which is responsible for the worst human disease caused by the Orthopox viruses. For example, Cowpox, Horsepox, and Camelpox are also members of this genus, none of which are a major health threat to humans, and one of which (Cowpox) has even been (historically) used as a Smallpox vaccine. My point is that just because Monkeypox is related to Smallpox, this does not in any way mean that it represents a similar public health threat. Anyone who implies otherwise is basically engaged in or otherwise supporting weaponized public health-related propaganda. In other words, spreading public health fearporn."

Source:

https://trib247.com/articles/dr-malo...ign=Newsletter

Dr. Malone separates monkeypox facts from fear porn

by: WorldTribune.com 05/23/2022 Source: WorldTribune.com

Dachsie comment:
This is a very informative comprehensive article. The practice of medicine has been starkly changed in the USA.
I hope to post other excerpts from this article.
______________________________



05/24/22

How COVID Became the Most Manipulated Disease Event in History

Russell L. Blaylock, a retired neurosurgeon, outlines why he believes that throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the media and public health officials have fed the public an unending series of lies, distortions and disinformation.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

By Russell L. Blaylock

Excerpt of this comprehensive article.

"The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream led by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media and international agencies.

We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence.

For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience-based information, but rather to force the acceptance of special forms of care and “prevention” — including remdesivir, use of respirators and ultimately a series of essentially untested messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines.

For the first time in history, medical treatment protocols are not being formulated based on the experience of the physicians treating the largest number of patients successfully, but rather individuals and bureaucracies that have never treated a single patient — including Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, EcoHealth Alliance, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization (WHO), state public health officers and hospital administrators.

The media (TV, newspapers, magazines, etc.), medical societies, state medical boards and the owners of social media have appointed themselves to be the sole source of information concerning this so-called “pandemic.”

Websites have been removed, highly credentialed and experienced clinical doctors and scientific experts in the field of infectious diseases have been demonized, careers have been destroyed and all dissenting information has been labeled “misinformation” and “dangerous lies,” even when sourced from top experts in the fields of virology, infectious diseases, pulmonary critical care and epidemiology.

These blackouts of truth occur even when this information is backed by extensive scientific citations from some of the most qualified medical specialists in the world.

Incredibly, even individuals such as Dr. Michael Yeadon, a retired ex-chief scientist and vice-president for the science division of Pfizer Pharmaceutical company in the U.K., who charged the company with making an extremely dangerous vaccine, is ignored and demonized. Further, he, along with other highly qualified scientists have stated that no one should take this vaccine.

Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most cited experts in his field, who has successfully treated over 2000 COVID patients by using a protocol of early treatment (which the so-called experts completely ignored), has been the victim of a particularly vicious assault by those benefiting financially from the vaccines.

He has published his results in peer-reviewed journals, reporting an 80% reduction in hospitalizations and a 75% reduction in deaths by using early treatment. Despite this, he is under an unrelenting series of attacks by the information controllers, none of which have treated a single patient.

Neither Fauci, the CDC, WHO nor any medical governmental establishment has ever offered any early treatment other than Tylenol, hydration and call an ambulance once you have difficulty breathing. This is unprecedented in the entire history of medical care as early treatment of infections is critical to saving lives and preventing severe complications.

Not only have these medical organizations and federal lapdogs not even suggested early treatment, they attacked anyone who attempted to initiate such treatment with all the weapons at their disposal — loss of license, removal of hospital privileges, shaming, destruction of reputations and even arrest.

A good example of this outrage against freedom of speech and providing informed consent information is the recent suspension by the medical board in Maine of Dr. Meryl Nass’ medical license and the ordering of her to undergo a psychiatric evaluation for prescribing Ivermectin and sharing her expertise in this field.

I know Dr. Nass personally and can vouch for her integrity, brilliance and dedication to truth. Her scientific credentials are impeccable. This behavior by a medical licensing board is reminiscent of the methodology of the Soviet KGB during the period when dissidents were incarcerated in psychiatric gulags to silence their dissent."

SNIP

...
"In addition, it has been proven that the vaccinated asymptomatic person has a nasopharyngeal titer of the virus as high as an infected unvaccinated person.

If the purpose of the vaccine mandate is to prevent viral spread among the hospital staff and patients, then it is the vaccinated who present the greatest risk of transmission, not the unvaccinated. The difference is that a sick unvaccinated person would not go to work, the asymptomatic vaccinated spreader will."

Excerpt of article by Dr. Russell Blaylock


"Within a few minutes of putting on the mask, a number of pathogenic bacteria can be cultured from the masks, putting the immune suppressed person at a high risk of bacterial pneumonia and children at a higher risk of meningitis. A study by researchers at the University of Florida cultured over 11 pathogenic bacteria from the inside of the masks worn by children in schools.

It was also known that children were at essentially no risk of either getting sick from the virus or transmitting it.

In addition, it was also known that wearing a mask for over 4 hours (as occurs in all schools) results in significant hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels) and hypercapnia (high CO2 levels), which have a number of deleterious effects on health, including impairing the development of the child’s brain.

We have known that brain development continues long after the grade school years. A recent study found that children born during the “pandemic” have significantly lower IQs — yet school boards, school principals and other educational bureaucrats are obviously unconcerned."
"

CNN Health

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/20/healt...ity/index.html

https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/asse...m-plus-169.jpg

The quest for longer-lasting Covid-19 vaccines

By Brenda Goodman, Jacqueline Howard and Michael Nedelman, CNN

Updated 6:18 AM ET, Fri May 20, 2022

(CNN)As waves of new coronavirus variants circulate the globe, one thing has become clear: human immunity against the virus fades over time.
To maintain durable protection against the virus that causes Covid-19, scientists are working around the clock to develop next-generation vaccines. But some of the nuances around why and how immunity against Covid-19 fades remain a mystery.

The steepest drops in immunity -- which come about four to five months after vaccination and up to eight months after infection, but can vary -- are against Covid-19 symptoms, getting infected and getting sick. Protection against severe outcomes, hospitalization and death remains much higher for a longer period of time, but even this decays to some degree, especially for the elderly and those with compromised immune function.

Since the early days of the pandemic, scientists have known that the coronavirus carries a structure called the spike protein, and it uses this crown of spikes to get into the cells it attacks. Our Covid-19 vaccines create antibodies to these spike proteins that bind to the docking sites on the virus, blocking them from infecting our cells.

Yet our safety net against the virus is wearing thin, in part because the virus is changing like a fugitive donning a disguise -- picking up mutations that change the shape of its spikes in ways that make it less recognizable to our immune system.

But there's another piece of the immunity puzzle that scientists are urgently trying to solve, and that is whether some of this drop off in our protection may be a result of the mRNA technology used to build some Covid-19 vaccines, such as those developed by Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech, which were the first in the world to use this platform.

Here's how mutations could help the coronavirus evade vaccines

Here's how mutations could help the coronavirus evade vaccines

"Some vaccine platforms give a very high degree of protection but the durability isn't very long," said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in an interview with CNN.

Fauci said that the mRNA platform may be one of those.

In clinical trials, the new mRNA vaccines have proven to be astonishingly good at protecting people against illness, hospitalizations and deaths, at least in the short term. Fauci said mRNA vaccines have other advantages, too. It's relatively fast and easy to redesign them to better protect against new variants, for example.
"We got a really great platform with mRNA," Fauci said. "But let's try to be better.

Because our experience, maybe it's peculiar to coronavirus, but I doubt it, is that the durability of the response you can be better on."

'We've got to get better platforms'

To be fair, Fauci said we won't know how long immunity induced by these kinds of vaccines may last until mRNA is used to make vaccines against a different type of pathogen, perhaps one that doesn't change as much as SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19.

Definitive answers may be years away.

In the meantime, he said, we can't wait. We need to improve the vaccines if we're going to keep Covid-19 at bay.

"We have very good vaccines, but we've got to get better platforms and immunogens, maybe with adjuvants that allow us to have a greater durability of protection," Fauci said. Adjuvants are extra ingredients in vaccines that help them work better.

Other experts agree.

Deepta Bhattacharya heads a lab at the University of Arizona where he studies the lifespan of plasma cells, a type of long-lasting cell that makes protective antibodies. He's also interested in how various vaccine technologies influence the persistence of these cells in our bodies.

What we can tell after more than a year of experience with the mRNA vaccines is that their protection starts high but seems to fade more quickly than the immunity that remains after a Covid-19 infection, according to Bhattacharya.

How much protection does a previous Covid-19 infection provide?

How much protection does a previous Covid-19 infection provide? 03:48

"There have been a few side-by-side studies that have compared the mRNA vaccines to infection-induced immunity, and it seems like it slips a little bit faster than that," Bhattacharya said.

Though he cautioned that protection after an infection varies greatly from person to person just because everyone's immune system is a little different. There's no good way to know, right now, how well any particular person's immune system responds to a vaccine, which is why it's important to be vaccinated, even if you've already had Covid-19.

He added that when comparing the performance of the mRNA vaccines to adenoviral vector vaccines, such as those developed by AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, people initially make a lot more antibodies after vaccination with an mRNA vaccine, but these levels seem to fall pretty steeply by around the six-month mark. Adenovirus vaccines use another virus as a Trojan horse to sneak instructions for making the spike proteins into cells.

With the adenoviral vector vaccines, antibody levels don't seem to climb as high initially as they do with mRNA vaccines, but they do seem to persist for longer periods at these lower levels, pointing to some difference in the body's response to them that we don't fully understand.


Hybrid immunity offers increased protection that is longer-lasting against Covid-19 reinfection, studies show

In a large study of more than 35,000 health care workers in the United Kingdom, compared to those who were unvaccinated, those who had two doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine were about 85% less likely to get a Covid-19 infection, through about two and a half months after their second dose. But by six and a half months, that protection against infection had fallen to about 51%.

The follow up period for the study was between December 7, 2020, when the vaccines were first given to healthcare workers in the UK to Sept. 21, 2021, so it doesn't include Omicron infections.

Health care workers with two doses of the Astrazeneca adenoviral vector vaccine were about 58% less likely to get a Covid-19 infection compared to those who were unvaccinated, through about two and a half months after vaccination, but the effectiveness of that vaccine appeared to increase over time, cutting the risk of infection by more than 70% about seven months after a second dose.

Health care workers who caught a Covid-19 infection, most of them happening in March 2020, before the era of vaccines, were initially about 86% less likely to be reinfected, and that protection lasted up to a year. After a year, it dropped to about 69% in workers who were unvaccinated, which was still better than the protection from mRNA vaccines alone.

Workers who had caught Covid-19 and went on to be vaccinated had the best protection of all, more than a 90% lower risk of getting Covid-19 again, and that combined protection stayed high for the duration of the study, which was more than 9 months.

This evidence and other studies, said Bhattachayra, suggests our immunity against Covid can be tweaked to make it last longer.

"I do think it's fair to ask more of our vaccines and that they sort of maintain that protection for longer," Bhattachayra said.

"I think there's still very clearly room for improvement because there are certain vaccines that do better" in terms of their durability, he said. "There's no question about that."

Other vaccines have needed improvements to help them last longer

Starting at two months of age, doctors recommend that babies get a vaccine against Haemophilus influenzae, or Hib, a common bacteria that can cause serious infections if it invades the lungs, blood or brain. These bacteria are coated with chains of sugars, or polysaccharides, that help mask them to our immune systems.

In the 1980s, scientists figured out that you could use those sugar chains to build a vaccine to protect children from serious infections.

"The initial Hib vaccine was a polysaccharide vaccine, but it did not induce long-lived antibody levels, so we don't even use it now," said Dr. Gregory Poland, an infectious disease expert who studies how the immune system responds to vaccines at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota.

Today's Hib vaccine still contains the sugar chains, but they are linked to protein pieces that stimulate a different part of the immune system to better remember the bacteria. It's called a protein conjugate vaccine.

Another example of a vaccine that didn't ultimately provide long-lasting immunity was the pneumococcal vaccine for pneumonia. It, too, started life as a polysaccharide vaccine, but was changed to a protein conjugate after researchers determined that change could extend its protection.

Some vaccines use extra ingredients, called adjuvants, to hyperstimulate the immune system, which increases the strength of the protection people get from them. These kinds of vaccines are often used for older adults and others whose immune systems need an extra kick in the pants, so to speak, to work.

Certain vaccines inherently do this, just because of the way they are designed, Fauci said, and the nanoparticles being built into some experimental vaccines are an example of this.

Fauci added that he's not sure why the immune response triggered by mRNA vaccines may not be longer lasting. He has some theories, though.

How vaccines stop the spread of viruses

How vaccines stop the spread of viruses 01:26

One of the early failures in developing the mRNA technology was that when the chains of molecules called nucleic acids were injected into animals, they triggered an immune response too quickly. The animals got sick and their immune systems destroyed these chains -- or instructions -- before cells could read them and build the proteins they coded for.

One breakthrough in turning these instructions into vaccines was that the scientists who developed them figured out how to make a chemical change to the mRNA to hide it from the immune system until it could get inside cells, thus, reducing the risk of getting sick.

"They modified the molecule to remove the inflammatory aspect of it, to allow it to be used as a vaccine, that possibly--and I underlined 15 times, possibly--could be reason why," Fauci said.

"Maybe if we use this mRNA, but add a different adjuvant with it, you might get a really good response, the best of both worlds, you might get the real advantage of an mRNA together with a bit more durability, if you add to it an adjuvant as opposed to having the molecule itself be inherently adjuvant."


Now proven against coronavirus, mRNA can do so much more

Bhattachyra has another theory about why the mRNA platform may not be lasting as long.

He said these vaccines instruct cells to build spike proteins from the virus and then display them on their surfaces, where they can be seen by the immune system.

But cells are giant compared to viruses -- about 100 times larger, he said, and viruses pack about 25 spike protein trimers onto their smaller surface, making them pretty densely packed. A trimer is a type of chemical compound or molecule that has three pieces.

"I don't know what the density of spike proteins is on a cell; it may not be as high as what it is on a virus, for instance," Bhattachyra said. No one really knows what the spike-expressing cells look like and how closely they resemble the virus they're targeting.

"It could be that the spacing is pretty infrequent and you're just not getting the level of activation that you would want," he said, adding "that's pure speculation."

Planning for the future

The United States is at a point in the pandemic now where health officials are grappling with the fact that to maintain immunity against Covid-19 in the community, the nation will either need to administer booster shots on a regular -- or possibly annual -- basis, or will need to rollout an entirely new vaccine altogether.


FDA officials say annual Covid-19 shots may be needed in the future

​​All vaccines have strengths and weaknesses -- but some of the nation's leading vaccine experts argue that more research is needed into the durability of the currently used Covid-19 vaccines as a potential weakness, as vaccine-induced immunity can decline within four to six months.

For instance, during the recent Omicron wave in the United States, the protection that vaccine boosters provide fell more than four months later from more than 90% to around 66% for protection against emergency room visits for Covid-19 and 78% against hospitalizations, Dr. Peter Hotez, CNN medical analyst and virologist and co-director of Texas Children's Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, told CNN.

"The big unknown is this: How much of that decline is due to something quirky because of the Omicron variant? Or, is this a weakness in the technology and it's not holding up? And it's very hard to sort out," Hotez said. "All vaccines have strengths and weaknesses, and it may be that for mRNA that it does not produce durable protection. It could be that you go in, use mRNA vaccines to rapidly immunize a population, stabilize it, but then over time, you're going to have to come in with a heterologous boost that's a different technology."

Hotez, whose lab has developed a Covid-19 vaccine called Corbevax, said that the White House should convene vaccine experts in a special meeting to "pin down" whether the technology has that weakness and what it means for future strategies.

A universal vaccine could be the future of the coronavirus fight

In an effort to find the answer to maintaining durable protection against Covid-19, several research groups are working to develop so-called "next-generation vaccines" that aim to induce longer-lasting protection and even "pan-coronavirus" vaccines, ones that offer protection against multiple variants of the coronavirus that causes Covid-19.

"How do you make the Covid responses induced by vaccines more long-lasting? How do you make this process of inducing long-lived plasma cells more efficient? That's the name of the game right now," said Dr. Barton Haynes, director of the Duke Human Vaccine Institute.

"There are a number of groups working on mRNAs for the next generation vaccines full well aware that, for those vaccines to be more long-lasting, breakthroughs need to be made," he said.

Haynes is also working on a different type of vaccine — a nanoparticle containing fragments of the coronavirus' spike protein. This vaccine also includes an ingredient that enhances the immune response, known as an adjuvant.

A key long-term goal is to create a more universal vaccine that can work against new variants of this coronavirus, plus others that cause common colds and even ones we haven't identified yet. The protein-based vaccine is one of several that target conserved sites on the spike protein -- ones that don't mutate, lest they hinder their ability to infect human cells.

And Haynes said research in monkeys appears to show it does a better job than mRNA vaccines at generating those kinds of antibodies that provide broader coverage, as well. This may be due to a combination of how well the adjuvant works to stimulate the immune system, and perhaps the design of the nanoparticle itself, which almost looks like a virus, he added.

Regardless of the vaccine platform, "we're all going after formulations that will induce durable, long-lasting antibody and other types of T-cell immunity."

How antibodies protect us from viruses

How antibodies protect us from viruses 01:37

So far during the coronavirus pandemic, vaccine protection has been measured by the presence of antibodies in the blood. Antibodies are proteins made by the immune system to help fight infections. But there is more to the human immune system than just antibodies.

The immune system involves a host of players, including B cells, which produce antibodies, and T cells, which target infected cells during an infection -- and T cells are often part of emerging discussions around vaccine durability.

A study published in the journal Cell in January showed just how much of a role the other parts of the immune system play in the durability of protection following Covid-19 vaccination.

The study found that, among 96 vaccinated adults, even though antibody levels decreased against coronavirus variants, the T cells induced by various types of Covid-19 vaccines -- the Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech, Johnson & Johnson and Novavax vaccines -- were able to recognize coronavirus variants, including Omicron, even though the vaccines were developed based on the original coronavirus.

"The important thing for our study was we collected all those samples at the same place with the same techniques and ran all the experiments head-to-head so it was really a fair head-to-head test," said Shane Crotty, virologist and professor at La Jolla Institute for Immunology, who was an author of the study.

Plus, those vaccines were developed using different technologies. Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech are mRNA vaccines. Johnson & Johnson is a viral vector vaccine. Novavax, which is not yet authorized for emergency use in the United States, is a protein-based vaccine.

Dr. Sanjay Gupta breaks down how mRNA vaccines work

sanjay gupta mrna vaccine pkg vpx_00025522

Dr. Sanjay Gupta breaks down how mRNA vaccines work 04:00

"The mRNA vaccines, both Moderna and Pfizer, generated these four categories: antibodies, memory B cells, helper T cells and killer T cells. Overall, the mRNA vaccines generated the best of all four of those," Crotty said, adding that among people who were vaccinated with Johnson & Johnson, generally there appeared to be less of all four and Novavax appeared to generate somewhat less memory B cells and significantly less killer T cells.

"So, there were some different mixes there," Crotty said. "Our immunological data are generally consistent with the vaccine efficacy data that's out there from the clinical trials and real-world studies that in general, the mRNA vaccines are better than J&J in terms of protection from infection but also protection from hospitalization, with Novavax being somewhere in between, but doing quite well."
Many experts seem to agree that discussions around future Covid-19 vaccination strategies should hinge on what exactly the goal of the vaccines are -- to prevent the spread of the coronavirus or to keep people out of the hospital.

FDA vaccine advisers say a plan for updating Covid-19 shots is needed

"So if your goal is to prevent any new infections in our society, then yeah, we're going to have to keep boosting, because our antibody levels are going to decline -- no matter what kind of vaccine we get," Jen Gommerman, professor and acting chair in the Department of Immunology at the University of Toronto, told CNN.

She added that, among the vaccines authorized for emergency use in the United States, the rate of decline for the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is a bit lower than for Moderna's and Pfizer/BioNTech's mRNA vaccines. However, the peak level of protection that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine providers is lower than the peak for the mRNA vaccines.

"So, the raw amount of antibody in our serum is going down to a level where you will be susceptible to infection and the only way to get those antibodies back up quickly, is to either get infected or get boosted," Gommerman said.

"However, if we consider efficacy against hospitalization and severe disease, the data coming out show that three doses of the mRNA vaccine confirm excellent protection against hospitalization, ventilation and death," she said. "For me, personally, I would get a fourth dose if I knew it would serve public health reasons. But for me personally, I don't feel I need a fourth dose to protect myself against severe disease, hospitalization or death."

'Many more questions still need answers'

There are still many questions left to answer about Covid-19 vaccines and immunology, John Wherry, director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine, wrote in an email to CNN.

Those questions include: How long do memory B cells and memory T cells last? How do the vaccines containing the original coronavirus, identified in Wuhan, China, induce effective immune memory against all the variants so far? What immune mechanisms provide protection from infection versus protection from severe disease, hospitalization and death? Why do different people respond differently to these vaccines?

"These and many more questions still need answers if we are going to use this platform most effectively," Wherry wrote. Such questions also need answers in the context of vaccine durability, especially as the durability of protection and the durability of immune responses themselves are related -- but not the same, according to Wherry.

For the mRNA vaccines, "durability of protection is on par with other vaccine types from the analyses we have seen on the adenoviral platforms versus mRNA. Durability of immune responses -- it's been difficult to do really precise comparative studies longitudinally over a time frame relevant to answer this question," Wherry wrote in his email.

After all, the vaccines have only been around for about a year and a half, and answering questions around durability precisely can be founded by the introduction of booster shots and the incidence of breakthrough infections.

"This later point is relevant because it dramatically influences the durability to immune responses over time," Wherry wrote about breakthrough infections. "The bottom line is that the data so far look very promising for durability of immune responses and protection from severe disease. Protection from mild disease is much more difficult for this virus and might only be achieved transiently when antibody levels are extremely high."

https://trib247.com/articles/virgini...ign=Newsletter

Virginia doctors refused to treat 8-year-old girl after severe adverse reaction to vaccine

by: WorldTribune.com 05/23/2022 Source: WorldTribune.com

https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1653327214

by WorldTribune Staff, May 23, 2022

Doctors at Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCU) refused to treat an 8-year-old girl experiencing severe adverse events after receiving the Pfizer vaccine.

When the parents inquired about treatment with hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, or monoclonal antibodies, VCU pediatrician Grace Mueller, MD called Child Protective services.

In an interview with John Davidson, Ryleigh Jones and her parents, Jennifer and Ryan, described the shocking mistreatment they received at VCU after their previously healthy young daughter received a Covid-19 vaccine injection. Shortly thereafter Ryleigh experienced severe adverse reactions that have been increasingly linked to the vaccine and discussed by the FDA and CDC as early as October of 2020.

Her adverse events, many of which are ongoing include:

Wheelchair bound due to complete loss of feeling in her legs, walking only with great difficulty using a cane
Feeling like her heart was being ripped out of her chest with a knife
Loss of ability to control urination
Sensitivity of the skin making it painful for Ryleigh to be touched or lie down
Suicidal ideation
Blackouts
Rage episodes
Episodes where she is unable to recognize a parent
Episodes where she is unable to talk

Onset of symptoms started 8 days after she received the vaccine on January 6, 2022, and two days after Ryleigh subsequently contracted Covid-19.

However, instead of treating Ryleigh, doctors at VCU Health Systems attempted to convince the family that her symptoms were all in Ryleigh’s head, Mrs. Jones says.
“All you have to do is just say is was the vaccine, and just help me treat it,” Ryleigh says of the VCU doctors. “That’s all you have to do. But no, you want to protect your fricking job rather than save somebody’s life.”

“We had a nurse laugh at us. We had a doctor laugh at us. We had a doctor tell us we were crazy. We had a nurse laugh at my mom,” Ryleigh said, recounting their experience at VCU.

“Why are you treating human beings like this?” Ryleigh asks. “It makes me very upset that nobody will believe me and just treat it.”

This pattern of diagnosis and personal attack against those reporting vaccine injury is similar to other cases, such as that of 13-year-old Stephanie de Garay and her family, reported on previously by World Tribune, who has experienced many of the symptoms Ryleigh reports, such as her symptoms of skin hypersensitivity, severe cutting pain in her chest, inability to walk or control urination, and neurological issues.
Related: Mom: Pfizer, FDA, CDC concealed adverse reactions ahead of vaccine trials May 8, 2022


A prominent New York doctor did diagnose a physical syndrome: chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy, and small fiber neuropathy after anesthesia and Covid Pfizer vaccination.

That doctor was later professionally attacked for his diagnosis.

“Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy” and “other acute demyelinating diseases” are, in fact, found in the FDA and CDC’s “Working list of possible adverse outcomes” to Covid-19 vaccines presented in two sessions at a joint FDA-CDC conference on Oct. 22, 2020.

After experience the knife-like chest pain, the family returned to VCU Health Systems, where a physician for pneumonia found on a third X-ray, after other physicians there refused to treat her for chest issues.

A member of the emergency room staff tried to help further, saying, “You’ve been here eleven times. This little girl is sick. I know something is wrong, and we are not going to let her leave here until we know what is wrong,” Ryleigh’s mother recounts.

However, when they attempted to escalate Ryleigh’s case, staff seeking a physical diagnosis were shut down by higher ups.

Ryleigh was then given a diagnosis of Functional Neurological Disorder (FND), which appears to be a vague catch-all for a portion of her symptoms and for which there is no treatment. It means the condition is in her head, a mysterious brain disorder.

Dr. Grace Mueller, MD, a pediatrician, then went even further, attempting to professionally discredit the New York doctor who diagnosed demyelinating polyneuropathy linked with the vaccine.

When Ryleigh’s parents asked whether their daughter might receive hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin to treat her symptoms, since they arose after she contracted Covid-19, Dr. Mueller then contacted Child Protective Services.

That Friday, the Jones family received a visit from a CPS worker who attempted to get Ryliegh’s mother to sign a contract stating she would not administer hydroxychloroquin or ivermectin to their daughter.

Ironically, hydroxychloroquine, also known as the brand Plaquenil, and ivermectin both have anti-inflammatory properties relevant to Ryleigh’s symptoms of inflammation.

Related: Researchers: Covid jab deadlier than Covid infection for anyone under the age of 80 May 6, 2022

Inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and other demyelinating diseases feature prominently, as do cardiac issues, convulsions, and even death, in presentations from an FDA-CDC joint conference, the FDA’s 161st meeting of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, which met on October 22, 2020.
The slides from this meeting are shown below, with the names of their presenters. These precede the December 2020 rollout of the vaccine for adults, and clinical trials for children, by more than a month.


Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, Deputy Director of the Immunization Safety Office, CDC:

https://www.worldtribune.com/wp-cont...-Graphic-1.png

https://www.worldtribune.com/wp-cont...-Graphic-2.png

https://www.worldtribune.com/wp-cont...t-11.09.11.png

David Avocado Wolfe, [5/24/22 12:03 PM][ Photo ]

https://i.postimg.cc/Y0GqP9m8/covid-profit.jpg

Oh, that was a good one, Monty!

https://i.postimg.cc/Y0GqP9m8/covid-profit.jpg

Dr. Michael Yeadon recommends we all read this document and he refers to it as the

"The 12 COVID Lies."

It can be found on the web by searching "The COVID Lies"

file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/The-Covid-Lies-updated.pdf

I will post the bare iies but the document in skeletal brief form gives the refutation showing why it is a lie.

I would like to post the document in full in this thread, in two parts maybe, but I will need to work with a MS Word form of the document, not a pdf file. Anyone finds the Word document of this, please post the link where you got it.

_________________________

1. SARS-CoV-2 has such a high lethality that every measure must be taken to save lives.

2. Because this is a new virus, there will be no prior immunity in the population

3. This virus does not discriminate. No one is safe until everyone is safe.

4. People can carry this virus with no signs and infect others asymptomatic transmission.

5. The PCR test selectively identifies people with clinical infections.

6. Masks are effective in preventing the spread of this virus.

7. Lockdowns slow down the spread and reduce the number of cases and deaths.

8. There are unfortunately no treatments for COVID beyond support in hospital.

9. It's not certain if you can get the virus more than once.

10. Variants of the virus appear and are of great concern.

11. The only way to end the pandemic is universal vaccination.

12. Th new vaccines are safe and effective.







https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-c...d_20220412.png


12/04/2022

The Covid Lies

Analysis


Mike Yeadon

In this comprehensive review, Dr. Yeadon argues that all the main narratives about SARS-CoV-2 and imposed “measures” are lies.

Given the foregoing, it is no longer possible to view the last two years as well- intentioned errors. Instead, the objectives of the perpetrators are most likely to be totalitarian control over the population by means of mandatory digital IDs and cashless central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

The-Covid-Lies-updated.pdf download 15 page document.

The Covid Lies
Working Draft, April 10, 2022
By Dr. Mike Yeadon

Summary

I contend that all the main narrative points about the coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2
are lies. Furthermore, all the “measures” imposed on the population are also lies. In
what follows, I support these claims scientifically, mostly by reference to peer-reviewed
journal articles. In 2019, World Health Organization (WHO) scientists reviewed the
evidence for the utility of all non-pharmaceutical interventions, concluding that they
are all without effect.

Given the foregoing, it is no longer possible to view the last two years as well-
intentioned errors. Instead, the objectives of the perpetrators are most likely to be
totalitarian control over the population by means of mandatory digital IDs and cashless
central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

There is no medical or public health emergency. We can and should take back our
freedoms with immediate effect. Testing healthy people stops. If you’re sick, please stay
home. Masks belong in the trash. The Covid-19 gene-based injections are not
recommended and must not be coerced or mandated. Crucially, the vaccine passports
database must be destroyed. Economic rectitude is recommended.

Serious crimes have obviously been committed. It is not the purpose of this document
to accuse anyone or to assemble the evidence against them at this time. However, when
this is all resolved, We the People are strongly recommended to pay much more
attention to Washington than previously.

TABLE OF CONTENTS "

SNIP

https://usawatchdog.com/cv19-virus-v...ichael-yeadon/


CV19 Virus & Vax About Control Not Health – Dr. Michael Yeadon

By Greg Hunter On May 24, 2022 In Political Analysis 92 Comments

The COVID Lies Website
https://doctors4covidethics.org/the-covid-lies/

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com

https://usawatchdog.com/wp-content/u...ic-300x236.png

Dr. Michael Yeadon was a chief scientist in drug discovery research and also a VP at Pfizer for 20 years. He has been sounding the alarm about the Covid “lies” being told and warning the so-called vaccines for CV19 are “neither safe or effective.” Yeadon contends the entire Covid plandemic is just a piece of the puzzle in a much wider plan by “evil” globalists. Yeadon contends, “Governments all around the world have lied to their people in the same set of absurd ways simultaneously. So, it’s not a mistake. It’s not copycat because it’s so obviously stupid that if a neighboring country did it and you weren’t in on it, you would say I don’t want to do that, it’s literally absurd, and yet every country except Sweden did it. . . . Pretty much all the countries of the world did the same absurd things at the same time. The reason why I have said this repeatedly is you will not get stronger evidence of ‘Super-National’ evidence behind the scenes. There ain’t no way this happens by telepathy . . . They must have agreed to do this.”

When will the medical tyranny be over? Dr. Yeadon says, “It’s never going to be over. . . . Why would they do this? I think it’s to end the model of free humanity. It’s literally going to do that. It’s going to smash the currency, and that will bring an end to the economic system that has taken 300 or 400 years to build, and we don’t have a suitable replacement. Let’s say the currency does not buy anything. What will governments do? Let them starve or ration the food that is remaining? I think they will do the latter, and then they will need an ID system to make sure you don’t get two rations. You see where this is going? I think this was designed to end the world we just came out of. The objective is control. It’s not about money. . . . It’s not about to make a bit more loot out of our hides. I am not saying some people have not made money. Yes, they have, but is it the driving underlying motive? I don’t think it is in any way, shape or form. It’s control. How would they get control? I think ultimately by marking you with a vaccine, and you don’t need a vaccine.”

On the mRNA first-of-a-kind gene therapy vaccines, Dr. Yeadon, who was chief Pfizer scientist in drug discovery research, warns, “We have no mass market so-called gene-based vaccines. They use DNA and messenger RNA to encode a piece of the virus, and then it hijacks your cells to become factories for a bit of the virus. There is no precedent for that whatsoever. It’s a hideous, dangerous thing. Why? I describe it like a little go-cart or racing cart. The engine is running, and someone puts a big house brick on the throttle and then lets it go. That’s like these gene-based vaccines. There is no off switch! Some people will make lots and lots of whatever it’s coding, which is the virus or spike protein. They will make loads of it for ages. . . . none of the manufacturers were required to study how long their material would stay in the body. . . . So, when people rolled up their sleeve, my word, they were trusting. I read the packages, and I said I am not going to have this stuff . . . When they say the CV19 vax is safe, I say you have no idea if it is safe. You have literally not done the experiments.”

Dr. Yeadon also talks about Monkey Pox, more lies on future vaccines, mass murder and the fight we face, which Dr. Yeadon describes as, “It’s evil what has gone on, and I do think this is a diabolical push.”

There is much more in the in-depth 1 hour and 18 minute interview.

Join Greg Hunter as he talks to Dr. Michael Yeadon, former 20-year Pfizer VP, as he explains why the so-called CV19 vax is “dangerous,” “not effective” and is “being used for control,” not your health.

embedded video

1:16:04 video runtime

also viewable on Rumble

https://rumble.com/v15yzd4-cv19-viru...el-yeadon.html

Gabriela Bucher, Executive Director of Oxfam International

https://i.postimg.cc/Y0GqP9m8/covid-profit.jpg



https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-84449a4474fc


05/25/22
•

Pandemic Created 1 New Billionaire Every 30 Hours, Now Millions Could Face ‘Extreme’ Poverty

For every new billionaire created during the pandemic — one every 30 hours — nearly a million people could be pushed into extreme poverty in 2022 at nearly the same rate, according to Oxfam.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

By Oxfam International

For every new billionaire created during the pandemic — one every 30 hours — nearly a million people could be pushed into extreme poverty in 2022 at nearly the same rate, reveals a new Oxfam brief May 23.

“Profiting from Pain” is published as the World Economic Forum — the exclusive get-together of the global elite in Davos — takes place for the first time face-to-face since COVID-19, a period during which billionaires have enjoyed a huge boost to their fortunes.

“Billionaires are arriving in Davos to celebrate an incredible surge in their fortunes. The pandemic and now the steep increases in food and energy prices have, simply put, been a bonanza for them. Meanwhile, decades of progress on extreme poverty are now in reverse and millions of people are facing impossible rises in the cost of simply staying alive,” said Gabriela Bucher, Executive Director of Oxfam International.

The brief shows that 573 people became new billionaires during the pandemic, at the rate of one every 30 hours. We expect this year that 263 million more people will crash into extreme poverty, at a rate of a million people every 33 hours.

Billionaires’ wealth has risen more in the first 24 months of COVID-19 than in 23 years combined. The total wealth of the world’s billionaires is now equivalent to 13.9% of global GDP. This is a three-fold increase (up from 4.4%) in 2000.

Bucher said:

“Billionaires’ fortunes have not increased because they are now smarter or working harder. Workers are working harder, for less pay and in worse conditions.

“The super-rich have rigged the system with impunity for decades and they are now reaping the benefits.

“They have seized a shocking amount of the world’s wealth as a result of privatization and monopolies, gutting regulation and workers’ rights while stashing their cash in tax havens — all with the complicity of governments.

“Meanwhile, millions of others are skipping meals, turning off the heating, falling behind on bills and wondering what they can possibly do next to survive. Across East Africa, one person is likely dying every minute from hunger.

“This grotesque inequality is breaking the bonds that hold us together as humanity. It is divisive, corrosive and dangerous. This is inequality that literally kills.”

Oxfam’s new research also reveals that corporations in the energy, food and pharmaceutical sectors — where monopolies are especially common — are posting record-high profits, even as wages have barely budged and workers struggle with decades-high prices amid COVID-19.

The fortunes of food and energy billionaires have risen by $453 billion in the last two years, equivalent to $1 billion every two days.

Five of the largest energy companies (BP, Shell, TotalEnergies, Exxon and Chevron) are together making $2,600 profit every second, and there are now 62 new food billionaires.

Together with just three other companies, the Cargill family controls 70% of the global agricultural market.

Last year Cargill made the biggest profit in its history ($5 billion in net income) and the company is expected to beat its record profit again in 2022. The Cargill family alone now has 12 billionaires, up from eight before the pandemic.

From Sri Lanka to Sudan, record-high global food prices are sparking social and political upheaval. Sixty percent of low-income countries are on the brink of debt distress.

While inflation is rising everywhere, price hikes are particularly devastating for low-wage workers whose health and livelihoods were already most vulnerable to COVID-19, particularly women, racialized and marginalized people.

People in poorer countries spend more than twice as much of their income on food than those in rich countries.

Today, 2,668 billionaires — 573 more than in 2020 — own $12.7 trillion, an increase of $3.78 trillion.
The world’s ten richest men own more wealth than the bottom 40% of humanity, 3.1 billion people.
The richest 20 billionaires are worth more than the entire GDP of Sub-Saharan Africa.
A worker in the bottom 50% would have to work for 112 years to earn what a person in the top 1% gets in a single year.
High informality and overload due to care tasks have kept 4 million women in Latin America and the Caribbean out of the workforce. Half of working women of color in the U.S. earn less than $15 an hour.

The pandemic has created 40 new pharma billionaires. Pharmaceutical corporations like Moderna and Pfizer are making $1,000 profit every second just from their monopoly control of the COVID-19 vaccine, despite its development having been supported by billions of dollars in public investments.

They are charging governments up to 24 times more than the potential cost of generic production.

Bucher said:

“The extremely rich and powerful are profiting from pain and suffering. This is unconscionable. … They are paying out massive bonuses and dividends while paying as little tax as possible.

“This rising wealth and rising poverty are two sides of the same coin, proof that our economic system is functioning exactly how the rich and powerful designed it to do.

“Over two years since the pandemic began, after more than 20 million estimated deaths from COVID-19 and widespread economic destruction, government leaders in Davos face a choice: act as proxies for the billionaire class who plunder their economies, or take bold steps to act in the interests of their great majorities.

“One common economic sense measure above all will put this to the test: whether governments will finally tax billionaire wealth.”

It's Time to Follow the Science. Join our Campaign!

Oxfam recommends that governments urgently:

Introduce one-off solidarity taxes on billionaires’ pandemic windfalls to fund support for people facing rising food and energy costs and a fair and sustainable recovery from COVID-19.

Argentina adopted a one-off special levy dubbed the “millionaire’s tax” and is now considering introducing a windfall tax on energy profits as well as a tax on undeclared assets held overseas to repay International Monetary Fund debt. The super-rich have stashed nearly $8 trillion in tax havens.

End crisis profiteering by introducing a temporary excess profit tax of 90% to capture the windfall profits of big corporations across all industries. Oxfam estimated that such a tax on just 32 super-profitable multinational companies could have generated $104 billion in revenue in 2020.

Introduce permanent wealth taxes to rein in extreme wealth and monopoly power, as well as the outsized carbon emissions of the super-rich.

An annual wealth tax on millionaires starting at just 2%, and 5% on billionaires, could generate $2.52 trillion a year — enough to lift 2.3 billion people out of poverty, make enough vaccines for the world, and deliver universal healthcare and social protection for everyone living in low- and lower-middle-income countries.

How we did the math

Read the methodology document outlining how Oxfam calculated the statistics in the brief.

Oxfam’s calculations are based on the most up-to-date and comprehensive data sources available. Figures on the very richest in society come from the Forbes billionaire list.

All amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars and, where relevant, have been adjusted for inflation using the U.S. consumer price index.

The World Bank defines extreme poverty as living on less than $1.90 per day.

One person is likely to die of hunger every 48 seconds in drought-ravaged Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia, according to estimates by Oxfam and Save the Children.

Half of working women of color in the U.S. earn less than $15 an hour. This is not enough to cover cost-of-living for most households and leaves millions of families in the U.S. below the poverty line.

According to Gabriel Zucman, the super-rich have stashed nearly $8 trillion in tax havens.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/monkey...m_medium=emailhttps://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...apCs2.IzlQ--~D

https://img.theepochtimes.com/assets.../23/1-mpox.jpg



Monkeypox Was a Table-Top Simulation Only Last Year

BY Michael Senger TIME May 23, 2022

0:003:18

Elite media outlets around the world are on red alert over the world’s first-ever global outbreak of Monkeypox in mid-May 2022—just one year after an international biosecurity conference in Munich held a simulation of a “global pandemic involving an unusual strain of Monkeypox” beginning in mid-May 2022.

Monkeypox was first identified in 1958, but there’s never been a global Monkeypox outbreak outside of Africa until now—in the exact week of the exact month predicted by the biosecurity folks in their pandemic simulation. Take these guys to Vegas!
Ed Yong, who’s penned dozens of hysterical articles on Covid for The Atlantic including such gems as “COVID-19 Long-Haulers Are Fighting for Their Future,” “Even Health-Care Workers With Long COVID Are Being Dismissed,” “How Did This Many Deaths Become Normal?“, and “The Final Pandemic Betrayal,” is hot on the scene of the new Monkeypox outbreak.
Eric Feigl-Ding is also all over this.
Epidemiologists Jennifer Nuzzo and Bill Hanage are on the scene—but still no word from them as to whether they see anything strange about the first-ever global Monkeypox outbreak occurring in mid-May 2022, a year after they acted as advisers on an international biosecurity simulation of a global Monkeypox outbreak occurring in mid-May 2022.

The U.S. government is hot on the scene with an order of 13 million Monkeypox vaccine doses from Bavarian Nordic.
The WHO is on the scene.

[IMG]The global Monkeypox outbreak—occurring on the exact timeline predicted by a biosecurity simulation of a global Monkeypox outbreak a year prior—bears a striking resemblance to the outbreak of COVID-19 just months after Event 201, a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic almost exactly like COVID-19. Event 201 was hosted in October 2019—just two months before the coronavirus was first revealed in Wuhan—by the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum, Bloomberg, and Johns Hopkins. As with the Event 201, the participants at the Monkeypox simulation have thus far been stone silent as to their having participated in a pandemic simulation the facts of which happened to come true in real life just months later. One person who was present at both Event 201 and the Monkeypox simulation is George Fu Gao, director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control. At event 201, Gao specifically raised the point of countering “misinformation” during a “hypothetical” coronavirus pandemic. Here’s Gao at Event 201 right next to our very own Avril Haines, Director of National Intelligence—technically the highest-level intelligence official in the United States. Look at these cuties. Doesn’t that make you feel all warm and fuzzy? Phew. Making Kim Philby jealous.[/IMG]

That said, I won’t sit here and debate wild conspiracy theories that there might be anything unusual about a global pandemic occurring just months after a simulation of a global pandemic of exactly that kind, followed shortly after by the first-ever global outbreak of an even-more-obscure virus just months after a simulation of an outbreak of exactly that kind.
If you want to be a good American and make a six-figure salary—or be friends with people who make six-figure salaries—then do as your government tells you: Sit down, shut up, stay home, save lives, take your shots, show your papers, and muzzle your kids.
Originally published on the author’s Substack, reposted from the Brownstone Institute
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

[SIZE=4]MODERNA TRASHES VAXES Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel this week lamented the company's “big demand problem” after having produced millions of COVID-19 shots that no one wanted. “It’s sad to say, I’m in the process of throwing 30 million doses into the garbage because nobody wants them,” he said. Bancel told an audience at the World Economic Forum that Moderna has reached out to numerous countries for contracts, only to be rebuffed. “The issue in many countries is that people don’t want vaccines.” READ[/SIZE]

https://www.dailywire.com/news/nobod...doses-ceo-says

‘Nobody Wants Them’: Moderna Throwing Out 30 Million Vaccine Doses, CEO Says

By Joseph Curl
•
May 25, 2022 DailyWire.com

https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2...ib=react-9.3.0

After two-and-a-half years of COVID-19, we’re all moving on. Sure, the virus is still there, albeit generally less dangerous with the Omicron variant, but many Americans no longer don masks and regular life has mostly returned.

The whole “moving on” thing has one serious effect on vaccine makers.

“It’s sad to say, I’m in the process of throwing 30 million doses into the garbage because nobody wants them,” Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said this week. “We have a big demand problem.”


Efron Monsanto ��������
@realmonsanto
Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna:

"it's sad to say, I'm in the process of throwing 30 million doses in the garbage because nobody wants them. We have a big demand problem."

Notes that China doesn't want any MRNA products and how there's 7 billion doses.

http://WEFreports.com


embedded video

https://twitter.com/i/status/1528887133263450112

also on youtube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6N2...ature=emb_logo

Bancel’s announcement comes just after the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a stern warning: the COVID-19 pandemic is “most certainly not over,” warned WHO head Tedros Ghebreyesus.

Although deaths from a current variant of SARS-CoV-2 , known as Omicron, have dropped precipitously, the WHO head said “we lower our guard at our peril,” according to the United Nations.

“So, is COVID-19 over? No, it’s most certainly not over. I know that’s not the message you want to hear, and it’s definitely not the message I want to deliver,” he said.

Ghebreyesus on Sunday told officials gathered in Geneva for the opening of the World Health Assembly’s annual meeting that declining testing and sequencing means “we are blinding ourselves to the evolution of the virus.” In addition, he said that while billions are vaccinated against the virus, nearly one billion people in lower-income countries still are not.

While some 60% of the world’s population is vaccinated, he said, “it’s not over anywhere until it’s over everywhere.”

Ghebreyesus mentioned that “reported cases are increasing in almost 70 countries in all regions,” the U.N. reported.

He noted that the virus is spreading rapidly in Africa, where the vaccination rate is the lowest worldwide. And he said while there appears to be ample supply of the vaccine, there is “insufficient political commitment to roll out vaccines” in some countries according to the U.N., while there remain gaps in “operational or financial capacity” in other nations.

“In all, we see vaccine hesitancy driven by misinformation and disinformation,” Ghebreyesus said. “The pandemic will not magically disappear. But we can end it. We have the knowledge. We have the tools. Science has given us the upper hand,” he said, calling on countries to work together to reach 70% of vaccination coverage.

Ghebreyesus also said the virus is staying ahead of vaccines. “This virus has surprised us at every turn – a storm that has torn through communities again and again, and we still can’t predict its path, or its intensity,” he said.

“The WHO chief also warned that increasing transmission means more deaths and more risk of a new variant emerging, and the current decline of testing and sequencing means ‘we are blinding ourselves to the evolution of the virus,'” the UN said in its statement.

Joseph Curl has covered politics for 35 years, including 12 years as White House correspondent for a national newspaper. He was also the a.m. editor of the Drudge Report for four years. Send tips to josephcurl@dailywire.com and follow him on Twitter @josephcurl.

Here ie the official narrative on

Antigens & Antibodies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCRwuxDpthY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCRwuxDpthY

no questions entertained.

3:38 video runtime

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion...a-global-coup/

Abp. Viganò: World Health Organization treaty is an attack on national sovereignty, part of a ‘global coup’

Global health governance is one of the fundamental elements of the New World Order and as such it must be rejected and opposed.


https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-cont...ic-810x500.jpg



Sat May 21, 2022 - 4:57 pm EDT

Life Site News, at least on words from Archbishop Vigano, provides an audio English translation reading.


Listen to this article

6:41 audio runtime


(LifeSiteNews) – In the coming days, the nations that adhere to the World Health Organization (WHO) will vote on resolutions regarding the WHO’s management of pandemics. These resolutions will transfer sovereignty regarding the health of citizens to a supranational body that is largely financed by the pharmaceutical industry and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

https://ads.lifesitenews.com/www/ima...8e067f61a.jpeg

If these resolutions are approved by a majority, the WHO will have exclusive international authority in the case of a pandemic to impose all the rules, including quarantines, lockdowns, obligatory vaccinations, and vaccine passports. It should also be borne in mind that this organization enjoys immunity, and thus its members cannot be either tried or convicted if they commit crimes. Unelected technocrats will paradoxically have more power than that which citizens confer on their representatives by means of their democratic vote.

embedded video

https://rumble.com/v15tasy-reggie.html

also on Rumble here

BOMBSHELL: Biden surrendering US sovereignty to World Health Organization
LifeSiteNews
Published May 23, 2022 20,320 Views

Given that the yielding of sovereignty is considered the crime of high treason by the laws of every nation, and that parliaments may not legislate against the interests of the nation, much less violate the natural liberties and fundamental rights of the citizens whom they represent, I believe that it will not escape anyone’s notice that this attempt by the WHO to appropriate a power that properly belongs to individual nations is intended to impede any sort of opposition to the “Agenda 2030,” which in the field of healthcare also aims to accomplish the drastic reduction of medical and hospital services, the privatization of the health industry, and disease prevention by means of vaccines.

READ: Biden is handing over American sovereignty with proposed World Health Organization treaty
— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
86818 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 90000!
Add your signature:
Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Pandemic treaty empowers criminal WHO over nations

The psycho-pandemic has demonstrated the enslavement of rulers, the political system, the media, the judiciary, the entire medical industry, and even the Holy See itself to the diktats of a group of functionaries of a supranational entity that has a blatant conflict of interest. The disastrous adverse effects of the experimental mRNA serum are only now being recognized, while there are many who rightly expect that those responsible for these decisions ought to be held accountable before an independent court.

It therefore sounds absurd, to say the least, that there is now a desire to give binding decision-making power to the WHO, when in its management of the recent pandemic emergency and the vaccine campaign the greatest damage was done in terms of the number of deaths and of patients who have suffered permanent damage to their health. In addition to the impunity it enjoyed for the crimes it has committed thanks to the silence of the mainstream media, the WHO also has total discretion over how to respond to the upcoming emergencies that are obviously being planned by the pharmaceutical lobby. The marginalization of health personnel who appeal to the Hippocratic Oath risks becoming the norm by which to eliminate every voice of dissent.

In this regard, it is significant that the nations that oppose the New World Order – like Russia and Brazil – are aware of the very serious consequences that the ratification of these resolutions would entail, and for this reason they are opposed to their approval. During his term of office, President Donald Trump also sent an unequivocal signal by halting funding from the U.S. Treasury to the WHO. This was one of the reasons why the deep state blocked his re-election in 2020, supporting a compromised and corrupt individual whose son Hunter is involved in financing American biolabs in Ukraine.

RELATED: Updated: 65,000 have already signed LifeSite’s petition to stop the World Health Organization pandemic treaty

I therefore express my full support for the citizens – especially scientists, doctors, and legal experts – who are denouncing this threat to the national sovereignty of the adhering nations, and who are asking for light to be shed on past events and on the consequences that the decisions of the WHO have caused for the health of the world population. I exhort heads of state and government leaders who will be called to express their views about the ratification of these resolutions to reject them, since they are contrary to the common good and intended to carry out the global coup that the WHO and the World Economic Forum (WEF) have planned for years under the names of the “Agenda 2030” and the “Great Reset.”

Global health governance is one of the fundamental elements of the New World Order, as has been made clear by authoritative experts who are not compromised with the system, and as such it must be rejected and opposed. The logic of control, profit, and mass pathologization must be replaced with a public health policy that has as its primary goal the health of citizens and the protection of their inalienable rights.
Holy See must reaffirm rights, protect the defenseless

The Holy See – which is a Permanent Observer at the United Nations and also at the WHO for one year now – has the duty to reaffirm the right of individuals to accept or refuse health treatments, especially in the face of the concrete danger of adverse effects, which are still partly unknown, from this experimental genetic treatment. And if up until now Bergoglio and his cabal have indulged the delusions of Gates, Schwab, and Soros, the time has come for the Catholic Church to defend the weakest, the defenseless unborn, children, and the elderly, as well as those who have been blackmailed by the cynicism of businessmen and conspirators in order to force them to be inoculated with a serum contaminated by aborted fetal cell lines.

subscribe to our daily headlines

US
Canada
Catholic

The present conspiratorial silence of the Vatican, after the hasty pronouncements it made at the beginning of the pandemic and its shameful endorsements of Big Pharma, will be imputed to the condemnation of the Roman Sanhedrin, which has made itself an accomplice in a crime against God and man. Never in all of history has the Hierarchy prostituted itself to temporal power in such a servile and abject way. Let us pray that some Bishops will find the courage to distance themselves from Bergoglio’s collaborationist line and find the words to open the eyes of those good people who have thus far been deceived by globalist propaganda.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

May 21, 2022

RELATED:

Proposed US amendments to World Health Organization treaty would erode American sovereignty

EU politician: WHO pandemic treaty would mean ‘the abolition of democracy’

‘An impeachable offense’: Dr. Robert Malone slams Biden admin-proposed WHO amendments

Australian PM: ‘I’ve always been supportive’ of a pandemic treaty giving World Health Org. more power

Leslyn Lewis launches petition demanding Canada not to sign World Health Organization pandemic treaty

We must reject the World Health Organization’s ‘science’ based power grab
Topics

https://www.bitchute.com/video/O3GeRZX6OvGs/

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...Gs_320x180.jpg


Vax Reaction? Band member drops to the stage in convulsions - band plays on like nothing is wrong.

First published at 17:48 UTC on May 26th, 2022.

0:39 video runtime


channel image

Jim Crenshaw

Jim_Crenshaw

61177 subscribers

It was North Korea after all. I mean why would they care? The just drag her away and keep on jamin! Shit hole place = Shit hole behavior. Unfortunately we are not far from this here in the U.S. if we don't get a grip on things quickly.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...9-74d068e4f1cb


05/26/22

Deaths, Injuries and Waning Efficacy: The Latest Bad News on COVID Vaccines

Considering the mounting evidence of adverse effects and lack of effectiveness, some physicians and health agencies are calling for the immediate withdrawal of the COVID-19 vaccines.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

Story at a glance:

A previously healthy 36-year-old mother of two died 11 days after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 shot; her death was deemed to be caused by myocarditis due to the shot.

Emergency calls for cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome increased more than 25% among 16- to 39-year-olds from January to May 2021, compared to the same time period in 2019 and 2020.

Pfizer deliberately excluded pregnant women from COVID-19 shot trials; the recommendation that the shots are safe and effective for pregnant women was based on a 42-day study involving 44 rats.

Research conducted by the New York State Department of Health found the shots’ effectiveness declined rapidly among 5- to 11-year-olds, falling from 68% to just 12%.

Considering the adverse effects and lack of effectiveness, many have called for an immediate withdrawal of the shots.

A previously healthy 36-year-old mother of two died 11 days after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 shot. Initially, her cause of death was deemed inconclusive, but at an inquest, pathologist Dr. Sukhvinder Ghataura explained that he believes the COVID-19 shot was to blame.

He told the coroner:

“On the balance of probabilities, she had vaccine-related problems. There is nothing else for me to hang my hat on. It is the most likely reason, in my conclusion. It is more than likely Dawn died in response to the Covid jab.”

Government officials continue to deny deaths linked to Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 shot.

In the U.S., they’ve acknowledged only nine deaths as causally associated with Johnson and Johnson’s COVID-19 shot as of May 10. But this case, which occurred in the U.K., highlights the potential dangers of shot-induced myocarditis.

According to Ghataura, the woman had several signs of myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, including inflammation of the heart, fluid in the lungs and a small clot in her lungs.

She had also reported menstrual irregularities, jaw pain and arm pain. When asked by a family member whether he believed the woman would still be alive today if she hadn’t received the shot, Ghataura said, “It’s a difficult question but I would say yes.”

COVID-19 shots increase heart attack risk by 25% in youth

At the conclusion of the inquest regarding the woman’s death, assistant coroner Alison McCormick stated, “I give the narrative conclusion that her death was caused by acute myocarditis, due to recent Covid-19 immunization.”

Myocarditis is a recognized adverse effect of mRNA COVID-19 shots and one that has been named in other deaths.

Dr. Neil Singh Dhalla, a CEO of a major health clinic, fell asleep four days after he got a COVID-19 booster shot — and died from a heart attack.

The autopsy stated myocarditis. He was only 48 years old and had never had heart problems in his life. In another example, epidemiologists confirmed that two teenage boys from different U.S. states died of myocarditis days after getting the Pfizer shot.

Both had received second doses of the shot. In a study that examined the autopsy findings, it’s reported that the “myocarditis” described in the boys’ deaths is “not typical myocarditis pathology”:

“The myocardial injury seen in these post-vaccine hearts is different from typical myocarditis and has an appearance most closely resembling a catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy. Understanding that these instances are different from typical myocarditis and that cytokine storm has a known feedback loop with catecholamines may help guide screening and therapy.”

An astounding study published in Scientific Reports further revealed that calls to Israel’s National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome increased more than 25% among 16- to 39-year-olds from January 2021 to May 2021, compared to the same time period in 2019 and 2020.

The researchers evaluated the association between the volume of the calls and other factors, including COVID-19 shots and COVID-19 infection, but a link was only found for the shots:

“[T]he weekly emergency call counts were significantly associated with the rates of 1st and 2nd vaccine doses administered to this age group but were not with COVID-19 infection rates.

“While not establishing causal relationships, the findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects and underscore the already established causal relationship between vaccines and myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young individuals.”

COVID shots weren’t tested on pregnant women

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Pfizer attempted to hide COVID-19 shot clinical trial data for 75 years. “When I saw that, that’s when I got very vocal and said fraud has occurred. How do I know that? They won’t show us the clinical data,” former Blackrock portfolio manager Edward Dowd said.

This should be a red flag for all Americans.

Now that a lawsuit forced the FDA to release thousands of the documents, data about what they were trying to hide is coming out. Among the revelations is evidence that Pfizer deliberately excluded pregnant women from COVID-19 shot trials.

So how did they make the recommendation that the shots are safe and effective for pregnant women? This was based on a 42-day study involving 44 rats.

What’s more, a Pfizer-BioNTech rat study revealed the shot more than doubled the incidence of preimplantation loss and also led to a low incidence of mouth/jaw malformations, gastroschisis (a birth defect of the abdominal wall) and abnormalities in the right-sided aortic arch and cervical vertebrae in the fetuses.

A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sponsored study that was widely used to support the U.S. recommendation for pregnant women to get injected “presents falsely reassuring statistics related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in early pregnancy,” according to the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK).

When the risk of miscarriage was recalculated to include all women injected prior to 20 weeks gestation, the incidence was seven to eight times higher than the original study indicated, with a cumulative incidence of miscarriage ranging from 82% to 91%.

Also buried in one of the documents is the statement, “Clinical laboratory evaluation showed a transient decrease in lymphocytes that was observed in all age and dose groups after Dose 1, which resolved within approximately one week …”

What this means is Pfizer knew that in the first week after the shot, people of all ages experienced transient immunosuppression, or put another way, a temporary weakening of the immune system, after the first dose.

Pfizer and FDA knew vaccines were not ‘safe and effective’

“It looks to me — this is not an overstatement from what I’ve seen — that this was a clinical trial that by August 2021, Pfizer and the FDA knew was failed, the vaccines were not safe and effective,” said investigative author Naomi Wolf. “That they weren’t working. That the efficacy was waning … and that they were seriously dangerous. And they rolled it out anyway.”

Regarding the shots for pregnant women, Wolf said, in an interview with Stephen Bannon on “War Room,” that a spike in severe adverse events among pregnant women coincides with the rollout of COVID-19 shots.

U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) whistleblowers datamined the DOD health database, revealing significant increases in rates of miscarriage and stillbirths, along with cancer and neurological disease, since COVID-19 jabs rolled out. “This is honestly one of the wors[t] things I’ve ever, ever seen in my 35 years as a reporter,” Wolf said.

Not only does IPAK’s data show COVID-19 injections prior to 20 weeks are unsafe for pregnant women, but 12.6% of women who received it in the third trimester reported Grade 3 adverse events, which are severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening.

Another 8% also reported a fever of 38 degrees C (100.4 degrees F), which can lead to miscarriage or premature labor.

Young children are also developing severe hepatitis and nobody knows why.

COVID-19 shots have been linked to cases of liver disease and liver damage following the shots has been deemed “plausible.”

Confirmed: COVID shots affect menstrual cycles

It’s clear that there are many unknowns about how COVID-19 shots affect pregnancy and reproduction, including their effects on menstrual cycles. Women around the globe have reported changes in their menstrual cycles following COVID-19 shots, and health officials have tried to brush off the reports or label them all as anecdotal.

But a study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology — and funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) Office of Research on Women’s Health — confirms an association between menstrual cycle length and COVID-19 shots.

Clinical trials for COVID-19 shots did not collect data about menstrual cycles following injection, and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) does not actively collect menstrual cycle information either, making it difficult to initially determine whether the shots were having an effect.

Anecdotal reports on social media, however, are numerous and, according to the study, “suggest menstrual disturbances are much more common …”

The Obstetrics & Gynecology study involved 3,959 individuals between the ages of 18 and 45 years. Those who had not received a COVID-19 shot noted no significant changes in cycle four during the study compared to their first three cycles.

Those who received COVID-19 shots, however, had longer menstrual cycles, typically by less than one day, when they received the shots. The longer cycles were noted for both doses of the injection, with a 0.71-day increase after the first dose and 0.91-day increase after the second dose.

While the researchers described the change as not clinically significant, meaning it’s not notable from a health standpoint, there were some women who experienced even greater menstrual changes, particularly those who received two shots in the same menstrual cycle.

These changes included a two-day increase in cycle length and, in some cases, changes in cycle length of eight days or more.

Pfizer shot only 12% effective in children

Adding insult to injury, research conducted by the New York State Department of Health shows the dismal reality about the effectiveness of COVID-19 shots in children.

From Dec. 13, 2021, to Jan. 24, 2022, they analyzed outcomes among 852,384 children aged 12 to 17 years, and 365,502 children aged 5 to 11 years, who had received two doses of the shots.

Effectiveness declined rapidly among 5- to 11-year-olds, falling from 68% to just 12%.

Protection against hospitalization also dropped, from 100% to 48%. Among 11-year-olds alone, vaccine effectiveness plunged to 11%.

The lackluster response was blamed on the dosage discrepancies among the age groups, as 5- to 11-year-olds receive two 10-microgram Pfizer shots, while 12- to 17-year-olds receive 30-microgram shots.

In the younger age group, the shots provided almost no protection at all.

And it’s not only children who are affected by the shots’ rapidly waning effectiveness.

COVID-19 booster shots also lose effectiveness rapidly, with protection plummeting by the fourth-month post-shot. One CDC-funded study involved data from 10 states collected from Aug. 26, 2021, to Jan. 22, 2022, periods during which both delta and omicron variants were circulating.

Visits to emergency rooms and urgent care facilities, as well as hospitalizations, among people seeking medical care for COVID-19, were analyzed. The study did not include milder COVID-19 cases, for which no medical attention was sought.

While initially vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated emergency department or urgent care visits and hospitalizations was higher after the booster shot, compared to the second COVID-19 injection, effectiveness waned as time passed since vaccination.

Within two months of the second COVID-19 shot, protection against the emergency department and urgent care visits related to COVID-19 was at 69%. This dropped to 37% after five months post-shot. The low effectiveness five months after the initial shot series is what prompted officials to recommend a booster dose — and the third shot “boosted” effectiveness to 87%.

This boost was short-lived, however. Within four to five months post-booster, protection against the emergency department and urgent care visits decreased to 66%, then fell to just 31% after five months or more post-booster.

Considering the adverse effects and lack of effectiveness, many have called for an immediate withdrawal of the shots.

IPAK believes the data are already compelling enough to withdraw the shots for vulnerable populations, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, children and those of child-bearing age.

Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D., a prominent toxicologist and molecular biologist who works with M.D. Anderson Cancer Center-Houston spoke at the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting held on April 23, 2021, and also called for “all gene therapy vaccines” to “be halted immediately due to safety concerns on several fronts,” including fertility.

Originally published by Mercola.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.

By
Dr. Joseph Mercola

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2kBhcHX8vs

"HERE IS THE CONTENT ON HUNTER'S LAPTOP" - Brave Jim Jordan LEAKS Dr Fauci And Hunter Biden Dealings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2kBhcHX8vs

17:58 video runtime


United Patriots

"HERE IS THE CONTENT ON HUNTER'S LAPTOP" - Brave Jim Jordan LEAKS Dr Fauci And Hunter Biden Business Dealings
6,022 views
May 26, 2022

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...9-74d068e4f1cb


05/26/22

Dr. Ryan Cole: ‘The Shots Need to Stop’

Pushing the gene-based COVID-19 vaccine on an entire population made no scientific sense, Dr. Ryan Cole told host Brian Hooker, Ph.D., on CHD.TV’s “Doctors & Scientists.”

By
Children's Health Defense Team
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

“A pathologist is the quality control of medicine,” Dr. Ryan Cole told Brian Hooker, Ph.D., on a recent episode of CHD.TV’s “Doctors & Scientists.”

Cole is the founder, chief medical officer and laboratory director of Cole Diagnostics, an independent medical laboratory in Garden City, Idaho.

He joined Hooker to discuss the pathology of COVID-19, changes in pathological patterns he saw during the rollout of the COVID-19 jab, and speaking the truth while standing for true science.

In the pre-COVID era, Cole’s daily routine included evaluating biopsies, Pap smears, and other samples while overseeing microbiology and molecular biology labs. He also was responsible for overseeing bloodwork, analyzing data patterns and consulting with doctors and clinicians about tumors and infections.

It was apparent to Cole from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic that SARS-CoV-1 affected primarily the elderly and those with comorbidities. Society overreacted despite these early signals, he said.

Cole told Hooker he was extremely concerned when vaccines for the COVID-19 virus were proposed because it was “completely against what good science indicated.”

Hooker asked Cole, “As the vaccine was rolling out, what were you seeing in the pathology laboratory?”

Cole said before the vaccine, he saw plenty of sick patients and his lab swabbed and processed more than 150,000 COVID-19 specimens. However, after the COVID-19 shot rolled out in December 2020, he started to see an unusual change in patterns under the microscope.

When he started noticing distinct childhood viruses appearing in adult pathological cultures, Cole attributed this to immunosuppression as a result of the spike protein in the COVID-19 jab.

Several months after the rollout of the vaccine, Cole became extremely concerned about a surge in rates of endometrial cancer and other cancers, noting the patterns were congruent to the rollout of the shot.

He told Hooker the “smoking gun” came when he testified in a Senate committee this year with Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). At the meeting, a whistleblower came forward with the epidemiology database for the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), which showed an uptick in various cancers.

Cole said the DOD then “froze” the epidemiology database and altered four to five years of data, an act which will inevitably generate “legal wranglings and investigations.”

“It’s almost Watergate-esque,” Cole said. The DOD changed data from 2016 to 2020 to make the 2021 data look as if they were not as bad as they really were, he said.

Cole and Hooker discussed how immunosuppression is induced by the COVID jab.

“Is this something that could have been anticipated and screened for in a normal clinical trial?” Hooker asked.

“Absolutely,” Cole said.

He explained that because the COVID-19 jab is a gene product rather than a true vaccine, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should have reviewed the jab as a gene-based therapy, not a traditional vaccine.

Adverse effects from the shot could have been anticipated, he said, if COVID-19 jab researchers had performed the animal studies that are routinely done for FDA-approved gene-based products on the market.

“To push a gene-based product like this onto an entire population with no idea what the long-term sequelae [will] be made no scientific sense whatsoever,” Cole said.

Hooker and Cole discussed the phenomenon of fibrous clots in living patients and cadavers. These are not typical blood clots, they said. Cole said these clotting problems also could have been anticipated in proper animal studies.

Cole pointed out the shots that are on the market were made for the Wuhan virus. He said he asks people two questions: “Is Wuhan [virus] present in humanity?” and “Do the shots cover Omicron?”

The answers are “No, it’s extinct,” and “No, they don’t.”

“The shots need to stop because of these clotting pathways, immune suppression and cancer-inducing pathways,” Cole said. “They’re all risk with no benefit at this point.”

Hooker also asked Cole about the reproductive consequences of lipid nanoparticles in the ovaries and if he was seeing these issues in the laboratory.

Cole said in his laboratory he witnessed an increase in decidual cast shedding, a typically rare phenomenon that increased tremendously during the COVID-19 pandemic.

He noted that in many studies claiming no reproductive risk with the shots, the abstract and conclusion do not match the data.

Cole also talked about his theories of spike protein shedding, grounding his hypotheses in the literature of the Pfizer application for emergency use and other studies that established the use of self-spreading vaccines for population control in rabbits.

When Hooker and Cole discussed the FDA’s approval of remdesivir for emergency use in babies as young as one month, Hooker stated, “Remdesivir is a huge problem; it is all downside, no upside.”

Cole added that in animal trials, up to one-third of animals experienced kidney failure after being injected with remdesivir.

Even though the World Health Organization criticized the use of remdesivir in 2020 due to its toxic effects and no survival benefit, “hospitals receive a 20% bonus on the hospitalization” if they treat a patient with the drug, he said.

“There is a huge financial incentive to administer remdesivir,” Cole said, despite the existence of many other safe therapeutics for COVID-19.

Hooker and Cole commended colleagues such as Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Paul Marik, who saved the lives of countless patients by using therapeutics during the first months of COVID-19. They agreed the focus from the beginning should have been on adequate therapeutics.

“What has been the response to you telling the truth regarding COVID-19?” Hooker asked Cole.

Cole said he has been attacked by the media, the American Board of Pathology and the College of American Pathologists.

Yet everywhere he goes, he said, he is thanked by countless doctors, families and patients for sharing the truth.

“With what I know, the knowledge I’ve been blessed with, the thousands upon thousands of papers that I’ve read and the patterns I’ve seen in the lab, to only help humanity … is my job,” said Cole.

“That’s my calling, that’s what I do,” he said.

Watch the episode here:

embedded video[/SIZE]

video also on Rumble

https://rumble.com/v167cvu-doctors-and-scientists-episode-30-interview-with-stephanie-seneff.html

https://uploads.boxcast.com/re8w0v8h...2rq6/BH_RC.jpg

Much about vaccines and Dr. Michael's Yeadon's recent show Posted here with him in this week's 5-27-22 news wrap-up show.https://usawatchdog.com/wp-content/u...-2-300x214.jpg


Mysterious Vax Deaths?, Gun Control Diversion & Food Crisis

By Greg Hunter On May 27, 2022 In Weekly News Wrap-Ups 3 Comments

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com

(WNW 531 5.27.22)

Every week we are seeing what the legacy/mainstream media describe as “mysterious deaths” or “died suddenly.” There is no other explanation ever given. The latest is actor Ray Liotta who “suddenly” dies in his sleep. As a reporter, the question is a simple why? What is the cause of death? Sometimes you get the family wanting “privacy.” It’s almost a sort of “Stockholm Syndrome” where the victims protect their abusers. In this case, is it the vax makers? Does it have something to do with the global experiment of so-called CV19 vaccines? Does simply asking the question mean you are an “anti-vaxer” or a “conspiracy theorist”?

The school shooting in Texas took the lives of almost two dozen people, mostly children. The Democrats wasted no time in making gun control their new campaign rallying cry, and, thus, creating a huge diversion for all the problems they caused. I guess they cannot talk about out of control inflation, record fuel prices, a failing housing market, sky high rising crime, a wide open southern border and the real possibility of nuclear war they are trying to start with Russia. Hard to run on that. Instead, they want to run on killing less people with guns while they fight to kill babies with unrestricted abortion up until the day of birth. What a campaign platform!!!

There is no doubt a food crisis is coming with planting problems in the USA, a fertilizer shortage and war in Ukraine restricting the export of wheat. Russia wants to make a deal to stop the food shortage in exchange for what it calls politically motivated restrictions by the West. The response by NATO and the U.S. is to send more weapons and money to Ukraine to keep the war going. Count on higher and higher food and fuel prices for as far as the eye can see.

Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he talks about these stories and more in the Weekly News Wrap-Up for 5.27.22.

embedded video

video also on Rumble

48:13 runtime

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWGTciX795o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWGTciX795o

How vaccines work against COVID-19: Science, Simplified

2:15 video runtime

1,075,554 views
Dec 18, 2020


Scripps Research
15.1K subscribers

After we have been exposed to an infection, our immune system remembers the threat, in particular by producing antibodies. These are proteins that circulate in the blood and throughout the body; they quickly recognize and disable the invader upon contact, thereby preventing or minimizing illness. This is why we usually do not get sick with the same bug twice; we are immune. Vaccines mimic this process, encouraging the immune system to make antibodies without us having to go through the illness.

Some of the leading SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates are “mRNA vaccines,” based on incorporating the genetic blueprint for the key spike protein on the virus surface into a formula that when injected into humans instructs our own cells to make the spike protein. In turn, the body then makes antibodies against the spike protein and they protect us against viral infection.
This strategy is faster than more traditional approaches, which often involve generating weakened or inactivated forms of a live virus or making large amounts of the spike protein to determine whether they can prompt an antibody response.

Once a potential vaccine is discovered, a number of checkpoints exist before it can be administered to people. First are preclinical tests, which involve experiments in a laboratory and with animals. Scientists must ensure the vaccine candidate is not only effective, but also safe. For example, an antibody response to an imperfect vaccine could, under extremely rare circumstances, end up increasing the danger of becoming infected.
When the potential vaccine achieves the necessary preclinical results, clinical trials can begin in a small group of people. As the vaccine candidate advances, it is tested on increasing numbers of people, with scientists and doctors closely monitoring safety, efficacy and dosing. Upon successful completion of clinical trials, the vaccine candidate must be reviewed and approved by regulatory agencies such as the FDA before large-scale manufacturing and distribution gets underway and the licensed vaccine is administered widely.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...8-44a79b0d2748


05/27/22
•

COVID › News

Young Boy Died of Myocarditis After Pfizer Vaccine, Says CDC Before Signing Off on 3rd Shot for Kids 5-11

VAERS data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show 1,277,980 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID-19 vaccines, including 28,312 deaths and 232,694 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and May 20, 2022.

By
Megan Redshaw

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,277,980 reports of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and May 20, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). That’s an increase of 9,972 adverse events over the previous week.

VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 28,312 reports of deaths — an increase of 171 over the previous week — and 232,694 serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 2,330 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 820,788 adverse events, including 13,045 deaths and 82,974 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and May 20, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 13,045 U.S. deaths reported as of May 20, 16% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 20% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 59% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 583 million COVID-19 vaccine doses had been administered as of May 20, including 344 million doses of Pfizer, 220 million doses of Moderna and 19 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...7-1024x655.jpg

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to May 20, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

10,820 adverse events, including 285 rated as serious and 5 reported deaths.

22 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation).

The CDC uses a narrowed case definition of “myocarditis,” which excludes cases of cardiac arrest, ischemic strokes and deaths due to heart problems that occur before one has the chance to go to the emergency department.

The Defender has noticed over previous weeks that reports of myocarditis and pericarditis have been removed by the CDC from the VAERS system in this age group. No explanation was provided.

43 reports of blood clotting disorders.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to May 20, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

31,762 adverse events, including 1,828 rated as serious and 44 reported deaths. VAERS reported 44 deaths in the 12- to 17-year-old age group last week.

63 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

652 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis with 639 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.

168 reports of blood clotting disorders with all cases attributed to Pfizer.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to May 20, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:

20% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.

54% of those who died were male, 41% were female and the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased.

The average age of death was 73.

As of May 20, 5,542 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccines, including 1,736 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.

Of the 3,618 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 40% to Moderna and 8% to J&J.

882 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome, with 42% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 30% to Moderna and 28% to J&J.

2,301 reports of anaphylaxis where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.

1,716 reports of myocardial infarction.

14,035 reports of blood-clotting disorders in the U.S. Of those, 6,283 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 5,020 reports to Moderna and 2,694 reports to J&J.

4,204 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 2,578 cases attributed to Pfizer’s, 1,428 cases to Moderna’s and 184 cases to J&J’s COVID-19 vaccines.

CDC acknowledges boy died of myocarditis, signs off on COVID for kids 5 to 11

A young boy between the age of 5 and 11 died after receiving his first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, according to the CDC.

Yet, the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel and its director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, signed off on a third dose for the young age group despite their knowledge of the boy’s death.

Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, a member of the agency’s vaccine safety team, said during a virtual meeting held by the Advisory Committee on Immunization and Practices (ACIP) a young male died 13 days after receiving his first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.

The boy experienced a fever 12 days after his first dose. A day later, he experienced abdominal pain and vomiting. He passed away the same day. Evidence showed the boy suffered from heart inflammation known as myocarditis.

“This patient had a rapid clinical course. From the time they started experiencing their abdominal pain day 13 after dose one until the time they were brought into the [emergency department] and subsequently died was on the order of a couple of hours,” Shimabukuro said.

“Histopathological evidence of myocarditis was present on autopsy, and that was resolved to be the cause of death,” he added.

The death was reported to VAERS and verified by the CDC through an interview with the healthcare provider.

Tests conducted on the boy by the CDC’s infectious disease pathology branch “did not find evidence of viral infection at the time of death,” Shimabukuro said.

The ACIP did not ask questions or discuss the death, but instead, determined the benefits of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine outweigh the risks.

Family of 26-year-old who died 13 days after AstraZeneca shot weighs legal action

A final hearing began on May 23 in the investigation into the death of a 26-year-old man who died last year from “catastrophic” blood clots in his brain 13 days after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.

The family of Jack Hurn hopes the inquest will answer questions about the circumstances of his death — including why healthcare providers declined Hurn’s request for a Pfizer vaccine instead of the AstraZeneca shot, which is associated with blood clots in individuals under age 30.

Staff at the vaccine center where Hurn and his girlfriend received their vaccines allegedly told them the Pfizer vaccine was not available and assured them the AstraZeneca jab was safe.

Coroners in England and Wales must hold inquests in cases where deaths are sudden, unexplained or could have resulted from medical errors or negligence. The final hearing is expected to last three days.

A spokesperson for Portman-Hann’s law firm told the Daily Mail, “The family are looking at a clinical negligence claim but are waiting for the results of the inquest to decide on next steps.”

Increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome following J&J COVID vaccination

According to Neurology Advisor, the incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) was elevated following vaccination with the J&J’s COVID-19 vaccine — made by Janssen.

A new study published in JAMA Open Network analyzed Safety Datalink records of 10,158,003 people in the U.S. as of November 2021.

Researchers sought to evaluate the rate of GBS after receiving any COVID-19 vaccine. Incidence rates of GBS up to 84 days after vaccination were evaluated for each of the three vaccines — Pfizer, Moderna and J&J. Although both mRNA vaccines showed elevated incidence rates of GBS, in a head-to-head comparison, the J&J shot was associated with a higher incidence of GBS compared with the mRNA vaccines.

Risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in children and adolescents

As The Defender reported on May 26, an up-to-date document provides a comprehensive risk-benefit analysis of the use of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in children and adolescents.

It argues that the vaccines:

are not necessary, because the risk of severe disease or death due to COVID in children and adolescents is very low;

have not been proven efficacious in clinical trials, or in recently published studies on the now-predominant Omicron variant;

have not been proven safe; to the contrary, there is ample evidence of grave harm due to vaccination.

The document also addresses the risk of genotoxicity of the mRNA vaccines, which according to recent experimental evidence of their integration into host cell genomes, must be considered urgent.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

Suggest a Correction

Megan Redshaw is a staff attorney for Children's Health Defense and a reporter for The Defender.

Dr. Zelenko’s Interrogation



https://rumble.com/v15pz06-dr.-zelenkos-interrogation.html


How will he answer for his crimes against the narrative?
______________

Dr. Vladimir Zev Zelenko 05/23/22 Health Update

https://rumble.com/v15uwt1-dr.-vladimir-zev-zelenko-052322-update.html

Sunfellow on COVID-19 Published May 23, 2022 1,117 Views

Dr. Vladimir Zev Zelenko publishes an update on the status of his health from his hospital bed. May 23, 2022.

To learn more about Dr. Zelenko and The Zelenko COVID-19 Protocol, go here:

https://sunfellow.com/dr-vladimir-ze...d-19-protocol/

................

See Also:

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko – "Please Don't Live In Fear..."
https://rumble.com/vlkf94-dr.-vladim...n-fear....html

Dr. Zelenko Talks To Israeli Politicians And Health Minister About COVID Vaccines
https://rumble.com/vm0w7p-dr.-zelenk...-covid-va.html

Mercola & Zelenko: Treating COVID-19 & Healing Vaccine Damage
https://rumble.com/vlbara-mercola-an...ne-damage.html

The Zelenko COVID-19 Protocol
https://rumble.com/vl5xim-the-zelenk...-protocol.html

COVID-19 Healing Resources
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-healing-resources/



How will he answer for his crimes against the narrative?

embedded video

DrVladimirZelenkoMD

Published May 22, 2022

327 rumbles

2:55 video runtime

Get Me Out of Twitter Jail With Z-Stack.

My team has been very busy in the past weeks. You may have seen my fun “interrogation video,” where Agent Joe Psaki of the now-defunct DHS Disinformation Board sentences me to life in Twitter jail. You can watch it here if you missed it: Dr. Zelenko’s Interrogation (rumble.com). I had a lot of fun making the video. If you like it, please share and we may make another one soon.

______________

Pray for Dr. Zelenko.

See a listing of Dr. Zelenko's video here

https://rumble.com/search/video?q=vladimir%20zelenko

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6MTA2JBQB8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6MTA2JBQB8

'Why Did You Conclude That Religious People Can Be Singled Out?': Hawley Grills Biden Judicial Nom

May 11, 2022

Forbes Breaking News

At today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) asked nominees about their judicial records.




Also Senator Blackburn on the same issue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEDPX8Jxdiw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEDPX8Jxdiw

I am hoping that proof that FRAUD has been committed by the FDA and NIH and NIAID and the pharmaceutical companiest that made the "COVID" injectables.

What did they know and when did they know it?

Then the liability shield is no longer in effect and these entities can be disbanded and put out of business and all of the injured people and those who had to lose employment, such as airline pilots and all injured people and all military people who were unlawfully forced to take an unapproved "vaccine." I suggest damages be in the amount of one million dollars apiece to each injured person and a larger award for the families of persons killed by the experimental injectable and treatments in hospitals using EUA unapproved medicine and withholding known helpful approved medicines It was extremely reckless and dishonest to use an experimental mRNA technology that had never been tested on an EUA basis on humans. Immune defenses in the in the vaccinated individuals have been permanently changed and made less effective and the DNA of the vaccinated individual has been, according to more than one study, permanently changed.

__________________

Here is some good news.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/1...ccine-mandates

18 Major Airlines, FAA, And DOT To Be Sued Over COVID Vaccine Mandates

John Pierce Law has filed a lawsuit against Atlas Air, on behalf of US Freedom Flyers (USFF) and Atlas employees, and plans to sue all major airlines, 18 altogether, plus the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT), contending that the vaccine mandates imposed by these agencies on the airlines’ employees infringed on their constitutional, religious, and medical liberties.

The lawsuit against Atlas Air was filed in federal court in the Southern District of Florida, with over 100 plaintiffs pursuing litigation.

“Fundamentally, this case is about whether Americans should be required to choose between their livelihoods and being coerced into taking an experimental, dangerous medical treatment,” reads the lawsuit (pdf).

Plaintiffs are mostly unvaccinated pilots, flight attendants, as well as other Atlas staff.


___https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22035148-usff-v-atlas-air-complaint-final

Dachssie comment:

Important information missing from this report. Describe the exact behavior that is said to have warranted subject being forcibly hospitalizedl.

I hope the offended party sues the FDA for enough money and retirement benefits to allow him to retire from employment comfortably. His employer is a hostile actor.
___________________




World Health Organization Temporarily Withdraws Biden’s ‘Public Health Emergency’ Amendments

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...cy-amendments/

The World Health Organization withdrew 12 of the 13 amendments submitted by the Biden administration to alter the International Health Regulations at the World Health Assembly annual meeting, Reuters confirmed on Thursday.
The amendments would reform the International Health Regulations of 2005 to delegate U.S. medical sovereignty to the WHO during a “public health emergency” or outbreak.
Brazil, Iran, Malaysia and some African nations reportedly objected to incorporating the amendments and insists the modifications proposed by Biden should be consolidated in a new “Pandemic Treaty.”
Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro was the only leader to oppose the pandemic treaty and rebuked Biden’s amendments, assuring his country would not surrender its sovereignty to the globalist institution.
e had to take care of the elderly and people with co-morbidities, and today studies outside of Brazil especially show that I was right.”




But the U.N. agency is slated to readdress Biden’s amendments at its upcoming meeting on June 16 to 17.
The WHO will also consider the separate Pandemic Treaty, which is currently being drafted, when it reconvenes on August 1.

https://twitter.com/backtolife_2022/...his-ep-2785%2F

Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Wittgenstein
@backtolife_2022

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla explains to the WEF there's a surplus of 7,000,000,000 doses of his COVID vaccine sitting in warehouses because there aren't enough "educated populations that believe the vaccines are doing well.."
11:30 PM · May 26, 2022·Twitter Web App

embedded video in Tweet

https://twitter.com/i/status/1530043619545124871

____________

Dahsie comment:

"educated populations that believe the vaccines are doing well.."

We large numbers of people in the USA who still have a First Amendment are becoming educated, Mr. Bourla, and our belief system has become medicated with the truth.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/fda-o...thank-goodness

FDA Official In Charge Of Evaluating New Drugs Hospitalized For ‘Mental Disorder’

Lashes out that his "job carries a lot of responsibilities -- I'm an office director at FDA making major decisions every day that impact the public health."

https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2...ib=react-9.3.0

[SIZE=3]A top federal official in charge of evaluating the safety of drugs was hospitalized against his will this month for an unspecified “mental disorder,” prompting concern over his fitness for the role he said includes making “major decisions that impact on public health,” The Daily Wire has learned.

Dr. Jeffrey Siegel, director of the Food and Drug Administration’s Office of Drug Evaluation Sciences, was transported from his home to a hospital for “mental disorder” at 3 a.m. on May 9, according to Montgomery County, Maryland, police dispatch logs reviewed by The Daily Wire. Police declined to release a report on the incident despite a Freedom of Information Act request, but Siegel wrote about being taken from his home in a rambling note left on a neighborhood listserv.

“15 minutes later I saw bright red and blue lights (I may have the colors wrong) outside the house and then EMTs in our house who started to ask me to please come with them,” Siegel wrote in the note, more than a week after his hospitalization. “Thinking I was being asked to go voluntarily I politely declined. They insisted. Finally, they turned me around in the steps of my front hallway on Moorland Lane, handcuffed me, forced me unto a gurney, tied me down, took me in the ambulance to the hospital.”

One neighbor who received the missive via Nextdoor expressed concern about Siegel’s ability to do his job, given that Siegel also wrote that he makes ‘major decisions that impact on public health.'”

“I am frankly left a little bit worried for the soundness of operations at our FDA, if indeed that is true,” the neighbor wrote.

A biography of Siegel states that he leads the office that “oversees Clinical Outcome Assessments, Biomarker Qualification, Research and Bioinformatics” in the Office of New Drugs. An FDA org chart says that the deputy director position is vacant, and that he is also leading the “Division of Biomecial [sic] Informaci [sic], Research & Biomaker [sic] Dev.”

Siegel posted the note with pictures of bruised wrists, apparently sustained during a struggle with paramedics who were restraining him, complained about “brain fog,” and lashed out out a particular doctor for not giving him drugs he was seeking.

https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/05/bruises.png

Siegel did not respond to requests for comment.

In his note, Siegel boasted how his “job carries a lot of responsibilities.”

“Finally, I realized this was not voluntary but had been ordered by someone against my will… so I stopped resisting. When in the hospital I was given a clean bill of heath [sic] including CT and MRI and they sent me home on Tuesday with no diagnosis,” he wrote.

“Unfortunately, the problem didn’t end there. I had trouble sleeping so I asked [the doctor] for something to sleep. She refused,” he said. He claimed he paid her practice between $12,000 and $18,000 a year and asked “if anyone knows of a good lawyer (and I’m not the litigious type, but I feel I’m the injured party ]here).”

https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2022/05/comment.png

Neighbors responded by questioning his account, with saying that someone had filed an “emergency petition” against him, and another speculating that it was his wife, not the doctor.

“This glass of juice has leaks in it, I would suggest a psychologist, rather than a lawyer. Good luck getting the mental health help you need,” another said.

Siegel, for his part, commented on the thread that he had “No COVID. Thank goodness.”

A Science.org article titled “FDA’s revolving door: Companies often hire agency staffers who managed their successful drug reviews,” published in 2018, reported that Siegel back in 2010 oversaw the approval of an arthritis drug from Genentech, and months later left the agency to join the company and represented it “before his former FDA colleagues when the company sought approval” to promote the drug for other conditions. He said the timing of his decision was coincidental.
Read more in:

Coronavirus,Fauci,FDA

Dachsie comment:

This experimental non-approved mRNA technology has just about killed or injured all the people it can in the USA and the rest of the world so now its time to pawn off this lethal stuff on to Africa.

The obscene money profits is not the real story here. It is about imposing the One World Death and Slavery System for ALL on the WHOLE world. Africa was one of the lat country holdouts against this evil.

________________________


Pfizer and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced on Wednesday that they have entered a partnership to bring mRNA to Africa. The announcement was made at the World Economic Forum (WEF), the gathering in Davos, Switzerland of political and business elites, many of whom reaped a cash windfall from the Covid pandemic.

https://trib247.com/articles/match-m...ign=Newsletter

'Match made in Hell': In Davos, Gates and Pfizer announce partnership targeting Africa

by: WorldTribune.com 05/27/2022 Source: WorldTribune.com

https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1653665594
Bill Gates

by WorldTribune Staff, May 27, 2022

Pfizer and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced on Wednesday that they have entered a partnership to bring mRNA to Africa.

The announcement was made at the World Economic Forum (WEF), the gathering in Davos, Switzerland of political and business elites, many of whom reaped a cash windfall from the Covid pandemic.

"The issue is that Africa doesn't want their product, and many African leaders are well aware of the nefarious activities of Gates Inc. These doses will probably end up disappearing and being used as tax write offs. Pfizer and Gates will celebrate the 'donation,' " noted independent journalist Jordan Schachtel, who dubbed the Gates-Pfizer partnership "a match made in Hell."

Related: ‘Nobody wants them’: Moderna throwing out 30 million vaccine doses, May 25, 2022

In November, South Africa's leadership turned down Team Biden's offer to send Pfizer vaccine doses.

"Pfizer says they're not taking profits on these shots. With record profits already, they prefer to rob the U.S. taxpayer blind instead, " Schachtel tweeted.

Elsewhere in Davos on Wednesday, George Poe Williams, a nurse from Liberia, protested the profits made by Big Pharma, including Pfizer, who refuse to waive patents on Covid-19 vaccines.

Williams said: “If I wanted to earn what Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla made last year, I would have to work every single day until 6100 AD. But what makes me really furious is that Bourla and many of his billionaire buddies here at WEF are doing all they can to block our demands for a patent waiver – just so they can make even more money.”

Bourla received $24 million in pay, perks and stock options for 2021 when the company’s full-year profit more than doubled.

embedded Tweet with embedded video

On Thursday, former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark implored the gathering of elites not to let Covid die lest the WEF lose its grip on transforming the world.

https://twitter.com/apexworldnews/st...rgeting-africa

Apex World News
@apexworldnews
Former New Zealand PM Helen Clark said covid is not over adding: "We are in danger of losing this moment for transformative change..."

embedded video in this Tweet

https://twitter.com/i/status/1529735395168161793

https://twoplustwoequalsfournews.wor...inst-covid-19/

TWO PLUS TWO EQUALS FOUR

A Review of Potential Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19

https://twoplustwoequalsfournews.fil...1200x800-1.jpg

A comprehensive description of the many possible consequences of the mRNA gene transfer technologies incorrectly referred to as “COVID vaccines.”

...https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/...load/23/51/107...

https://twoplustwoequalsfournews.fil...ng?w=529&h=592

The Epoch Times – Mar 03 2022

BY Joseph Mercola

MIT scientist Stephanie Seneff’s paper, “Worse Than the Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research in collaboration with Dr. Greg Nigh, is still one of the best, most comprehensive descriptions of the many possible unintended consequences of the mRNA gene transfer technologies incorrectly referred to as “COVID vaccines.”
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/...load/23/51/107

December 9, 2021, their paper was reprinted in the Townsend Letter, the Examiner of Alternative Medicine. Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT who has been conducting research at MIT for over five decades, has spent a large portion of her career investigating the hazards and mechanisms of action of glyphosate.

Her attention was diverted to the science of mRNA gene transfer technologies in early 2020, when Operation Warp Speed was announced. As noted in her paper, many factors that lacked precedent, yet were being implemented at breakneck speed, included:

The first-ever use of PEG in an injection
The first-ever use of mRNA gene transfer technology against an infectious agent
The first-ever “vaccine” to make no clear claims about reducing infection, transmissibility or death
The first-ever coronavirus vaccine ever tested on humans (and previous coronavirus vaccines all failed due to antibody-dependent enhancement, a condition in which the antibodies actually facilitate infection rather than defend against it)
The first-ever use of genetically modified polynucleotides in the general population

Calculations performed by Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, and his team of statisticians suggest VAERS COVID-related reports are underreported by a factor of 41.

An Insanely Reckless Process

In a May 2021 interview with me, Seneff said:

“To have developed this incredibly new technology so quickly, and to skip so many steps in the process of evaluating [its safety], it’s an insanely reckless thing that they’ve done. My instinct was that this is bad, and I needed to know [the truth].

So, I really dug into the research literature by the people who’ve developed these vaccines, and then more extensive research literature around those topics. And I don’t see how these vaccines can possibly be doing anything good …”

At the time, just five months into the mass inoculation campaign, Seneff suspected the COVID shots would end up killing far more people than the infection itself. Today, a full year into it, the statistics are grim beyond belief, proving her educated prediction to have been an astute one.
mRNA Jabs Are Shockingly Hazardous

As of December 3, 2021, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has logged an astounding 927,738 COVID jab related adverse events, including 19,886 deaths. VAERS can receive reports from vaccine manufacturers and other international sources, and if we exclude those, the death toll reported in U.S. territories exclusively stands at 9,136.

Of the total death reports, Pfizer — the only company that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has granted full licensing for an as-yet unavailable COVID shot — accounts for the vast majority: 13,268, compared to 4,894 for Moderna, 1,651 for Janssen and 73 for an undisclosed brand.

Pfizer also accounts for the vast majority of hospitalizations post-injection, and while those over the age of 66 make up the bulk of deaths, the 25-to-50 age group accounts for most of the hospitalizations. Key side effects that are now being reported in massive numbers include:

Miscarriages
Heart problems such as heart attacks and myopericarditis
Thrombocytopenia (low platelet count)
Shingles
Bell’s palsy
A variety of permanent disabilities, many of which involve neurological dysfunction

All of these consequences were predicted by Seneff and Nigh in their paper, which makes the events all the more tragic. Importantly, VAERS is notoriously underreported, so the real-world impact of these shots is far greater than what those data suggest.
The Cure Is Indeed Worse Than the Disease

Calculations performed by Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, and his team of statisticians suggest VAERS COVID-related reports are underreported by a factor of 41. This is a conservative estimate, supported by calculations using a variety of sources besides VAERS itself.

That means that in the U.S. alone (using the data for U.S. territories only), the actual death toll may be closer to 374,576 (including international deaths reported to VAERS would put the death toll at 815,326), and those are deaths that occurred within days or weeks post-injection.

As Seneff and Nigh explain in their paper, there’s overwhelming reason to suspect that these gene transfer injections will have devastating impacts in the long term, resulting in excess deaths over the next decade.

What’s more, it’s clear that the death toll from the COVID-19 infection itself in the U.S. has been vastly exaggerated, as it’s based on positive PCR tests and even mere suspicion of COVID in the absence of testing. Many died from other causes and just happened to have a positive COVID test at the time of death.

Kirsch estimates the real death tally from COVID-19 to be about 50% of the reported number (which is likely conservative). This means about 380,000 Americans died from COVID-19 (rather than with COVID), whereas the COVID shots may have killed more than 374,570 in the first 11 months alone.
“Seneff suspects that in the next 10 to 15 years, we’ll see a dramatic spike in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure.”

As predicted in the title of Seneff’s paper, it seems the cure may indeed end up being worse than the disease. This is particularly true for children and young adults, who have either died or been permanently disabled by the shots by the thousands, while having an extraordinarily low risk of dying from or being seriously harmed by the infection itself.

Seneff suspects that in the next 10 to 15 years, we’ll see a dramatic spike in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure.
The Spike Protein Is the Most Dangerous Part of SARS-CoV-2

The reason we’re seeing all these problems from the COVID shots is because they program your cells to continuously produce SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which we now know is the most dangerous part of the virus. Many experts noted this from the start, wondering what the vaccine developers could possibly be thinking, selecting this as the antigen for their shots.

While the mRNA injections can cause harm in many different ways, one basic problem is that they can overstimulate your immune system to the point of failure. In summary, as your cells start producing the viral spike proteins, your immune cells rally to mop up the proteins and dump them into your lymphatic system. (This is why many report swollen lymph nodes under the arms.)

The antibody response is part of your humoral immunity. You also have cellular immunity, which is part of your innate immune system. Your innate immune system is very powerful. If you’re healthy, it can clear viruses without ever producing a single antibody. Antibodies are actually a second-tier effect when your innate immune system fails.

The problem is that your innate immune system will not be activated and likely will fail to protect you if you get a COVID-19 shot, because it’s bypassing all of the areas where your innate immune system would be brought to bear.

Normally you breathe the virus in and stimulate the production secretory IgA antibodies that protect your respiratory system. When you bypass that route of exposure with a jab in the arm, no secretory IgA antibodies are produced, leaving you susceptible to the infection.

As explained by Ronald Kostoff in an excellent December 8, 2021, Trial Site News article, “COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’: The Wrong Bomb Over the Wrong Target at the Wrong Time”:

“An effective vaccine would focus on cellular immunity in the respiratory and intestinal tract, in which secretory IgA is produced by your lymphocytes that are located directly underneath the mucous membranes that line the respiratory and intestinal tract.

The antibodies produced by these lymphocytes are ejected through and to the surface of the linings. These antibodies are thus on site to meet air-borne viruses and they may be able to prevent viral binding and infection of the cells.

Unfortunately, the main inoculants used presently for COVID-19 focus on antibodies (IgG and circulating IgA) that occur in the bloodstream. These antibodies protect the internal organs of the body from infectious agents that try to spread via the bloodstream.”

When you are injected with the COVID jab, your body will only induce IgG and circulating IgA — not secretory IgA, and these types of antibodies do not effectively protect your mucous membranes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. So, as noted by Kostoff, the breakthrough infections we’re now seeing “confirm the fundamental design flaws” of this gene transfer technology.

“A natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) will in most individuals remain localized to the respiratory tract,” Kostoff writes. “The vaccines used presently cause cells deep inside our body to express the viral spike protein, which they were never meant to do by nature.

Any cell which expresses this foreign antigen on its surface will come under attack by the immune system, which will involve both IgG antibodies and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. This may occur in any organ, but the damage will be most severe in vital organs.

We are seeing now that the heart is affected in many young people, leading to myocarditis or even sudden cardiac arrest and death. In other words, we are dropping the wrong bomb on the wrong target at the wrong time!”

In the end, your body will essentially believe that your innate immune system has failed, which means it must bring in the backup cavalry. In essence, your body is now overreacting to something that isn’t true. You’re not actually infected with a virus and your innate immune system has not failed, but your body is forced to respond as if both are true.
Effects Likely to Persist Long Term

What’s more, the synthetic RNA in the mRNA vaccines contains a nucleotide called methyl-pseudouridine, which your body cannot break down, and the RNA is programmed to trigger maximum protein production. So, we’re looking at completely untested manipulation of RNA.

It is very important to recognize that this is a genetically engineered mRNA for the spike protein. It is not identical to the spike protein mRNA that SARS-Cov-2 produces. It’s been significantly altered to avoid being metabolized by your body.

The spike protein your body produces in response to the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA locks into your ACE2 receptor. This is because the genetically engineered new spike protein has additional prolines inserted that prevent the receptors from properly closing, which then cause you to downregulate ACE2. That’s partially how you end up with problems such as pulmonary hypertension, ventricular heart failure and stroke.

As noted in a 2020 paper, there’s a “pivotal link” between ACE2 deficiency and SARS-CoV-2 infection. People with ACE2 deficiency tend to be more prone to severe COVID-19. The spike protein suppresses ACE2, making the deficiency even worse. According to Seneff, the gene transfer injections essentially do the same thing, and we still don’t know how long the effects last.

Manufacturers initially guessed the synthetic RNA might survive in the human body for about six months. A more recent investigation found the spike protein persisted in recovered COVID patients for 15 months.

This raises the suspicion that the synthetic and more persistent mRNA in the COVID shots may trigger spike protein production for at least as long, and probably longer. What’s more, the number of spike proteins produced by the shots is far greater than what you experience in natural infection.

As explained by Dr. Peter McCullough, this means that after your first shot, your body will produce spike protein for at least 15 months. But, when you get shot No. 2 a few weeks later, that shot will cause spike protein production to go on for 15 months or longer. With shot No. 3 six months after that, you produce spike protein for yet another 15 months.

With regular boosters, you may never rid your body of the spike protein. All the while, it’s wreaking havoc with your biology. McCullough likens it to “a permanent install of an inflammatory protein in the human body,” and inflammation is at the heart of most if not all chronic diseases. There’s simply no possible way for these gene transfer shots to improve public health. They’re going to decimate it.
Long-Term Neurological Damage Is To Be Expected

In her paper, Seneff describes several key characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that suggests it acts as a prion. This could help explain why we’re seeing so many neurological side effects from the shots. According to Seneff, the spike protein produced by the COVID shot, due to the modifications made, may actually make it more of a prion than the spike protein in the actual virus, and a more effective one.

For a detailed technical description of this you can read through Seneff’s paper, but the take-home message is that COVID-19 shots are instruction sets for your body to make a toxic protein that will eventually wind up concentrated in your spleen, from where prion-like protein instructions will be sent out, radically increasing your risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases.
Lung, Heart and Brain Diseases Are Predictable Consequences

Seneff also goes into great detail describing how the spike protein acts as a metabolic poison. While I recommend reading Seneff’s paper in its entirety, I’ve extracted some key sections below, starting with how the spike protein can trigger pathological damage leading to lung damage and heart and brain diseases:

“The picture is now emerging that SARS-CoV-2 has serious effects on the vasculature in multiple organs, including the brain vasculature … In a series of papers, Yuichiro Suzuki in collaboration with other authors presented a strong argument that the spike protein by itself can cause a signaling response in the vasculature with potentially widespread consequences.

These authors observed that, in severe cases of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 causes significant morphological changes to the pulmonary vasculature … Furthermore, they showed that exposure of cultured human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit was sufficient to promote cell signaling without the rest of the virus components.

Follow-on papers showed that the spike protein S1 subunit suppresses ACE2, causing a condition resembling pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a severe lung disease with very high mortality … The ‘in vivo studies’ they referred to … had shown that SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury was primarily due to inhibition of ACE2 by the SARS-CoV spike protein, causing a large increase in angiotensin-II.

Suzuki et al. (2021) went on to demonstrate experimentally that the S1 component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, at a low concentration … activated the MEK/ERK/MAPK signaling pathway to promote cell growth. They speculated that these effects would not be restricted to the lung vasculature.

The signaling cascade triggered in the heart vasculature would cause coronary artery disease, and activation in the brain could lead to stroke. Systemic hypertension would also be predicted. They hypothesized that this ability of the spike protein to promote pulmonary arterial hypertension could predispose patients who recover from SARS-CoV-2 to later develop right ventricular heart failure.

Furthermore, they suggested that a similar effect could happen in response to the mRNA vaccines, and they warned of potential long-term consequences to both children and adults who received COVID-19 vaccines based on the spike protein.

An interesting study by Lei et. al. (2021) found that pseudovirus — spheres decorated with the SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein but lacking any viral DNA in their core — caused inflammation and damage in both the arteries and lungs of mice exposed intratracheally.

They then exposed healthy human endothelial cells to the same pseudovirus particles. Binding of these particles to endothelial ACE2 receptors led to mitochondrial damage and fragmentation in those endothelial cells, leading to the characteristic pathological changes in the associated tissue.

This study makes it clear that spike protein alone, unassociated with the rest of the viral genome, is sufficient to cause the endothelial damage associated with COVID-19. The implications for vaccines intended to cause cells to manufacture the spike protein are clear and are an obvious cause for concern.”

The COVID Shots Activate Latent Viruses

As mentioned earlier, shingles infection is turning out to be a rather common side effect of the COVID shot, and like the neurological, vascular and cardiac damage we’re seeing, activation of latent viral infections was also predicted.

One reason why latent viral infections are cropping up in response to the shots is because the shots disable your type I interferon pathway. A second reason is because your immune system is overburdened trying to deal with the inflammatory spike proteins flowing through your body. Something’s got to give, so latent viruses are allowed to break through.

That’s not the end of your potential troubles, however, as these coinfections may worsen or accelerate other conditions, such as Bell’s Palsy, myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Herpes viruses, for example, have been implicated as a trigger of both AIDS and chronic fatigue syndrome. Some research suggests these diseases don’t appear until viruses from different families partner up and the type 1 interferon pathway is disabled.

With all of that in mind, it seems inevitable that, long term, the COVID mass injection campaign will result in an avalanche of a wide range of debilitating chronic illnesses.

References

International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research May 10, 2021; 2(1): 38-79

Townsend Letter December 9, 2021

OpenVAERS data as of December 3, 2021

OpenVAERS data as of December 3, 2021. For US only data, flip the selection switch at top

OpenVAERS Adverse Event Reports Breakdown

SKirsch.io/vaccine-resources

Trial Site News December 8, 2021

Trial Site News December 8, 2021

European Heart Journal July 20, 2020: ehaa534

Circulation Research 2021; 128: 1323-1326

European Journal of Internal Medicine June 2020; 76:14-20

Circulation Research 2021; 128: 1323-1326

bioRxiv June 25, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.25.449905

New American November 8, 2021 , video at circa 8 minutes

New American November 8, 2021 , video at circa 8 minutes

International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research May 10, 2021; 2(1): 402-444

International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research May 10, 2021; 2(1): 402-444

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1996 37. Suppl B, 87-95

ImmunoHorizons April 1, 2020

Also watch embedded video here...

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/doctors-and-scientists-with-brian-hooker-phd/BNRAGEYxsF

at 34:26 for discussion with Dr. Seneff by Dr. Brian Hooker of Children's Health Defense

refer to previous post number https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...yCa9u9Sfaw--~D


Join host Dr. Brian Hooker as he interviews guest Dr. Stephanie Seneff on all things glyphosate — in vaccines, in food, in every aspect of our lives. How does toxic glyphosate affect development of the brain and body? Can we heal ourselves from this poisoning? Who is profiting off of our deterioration in health? Watch to find out!

https://live.childrenshealthdefense....phd/BNRAGEYxsF

May 26, 2022

‘Doctors & Scientists’ With Brian Hooker, Ph.D.

‘Doctors & Scientists' Episode 30: Glyphosate’ Effect on the Microbiome, mRNA Entering the Human Genome + More Interview with Dr. Stephanie Seneff

52:34 video runtime


https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...yCa9u9Sfaw--~D


Join host Dr. Brian Hooker as he interviews guest Dr. Stephanie Seneff on all things glyphosate — in vaccines, in food, in every aspect of our lives. How does toxic glyphosate affect development of the brain and body? Can we heal ourselves from this poisoning? Who is profiting off of our deterioration in health? Watch to find out!

https://live.childrenshealthdefense....phd/BNRAGEYxsF

May 26, 2022

‘Doctors & Scientists’ With Brian Hooker, Ph.D.

‘Doctors & Scientists' Episode 30: Glyphosate’ Effect on the Microbiome, mRNA Entering the Human Genome + More Interview with Dr. Stephanie Seneff

52:34 video runtime

Please pay particular attention beginning at

34:26

mRNA used in the "COVID 19 vaccines" changes the mircobiome and the DNA permanently.

the mRNA used in the vaccines is not the exact RNA that is in the "COVID 19 virus."

Way too many spike proteins being manufactures depositing all over the body especially starting in the lymph nodes and then on from there.

___

Dachsie comment:

I could not find the "show notes" that go with this episode of Dr. Hookers show on CHD platform. Will keep looking as he gives links to Dr. Seneff's journal articles.

This is a very important matter.

The net take-away is that

All of these Covid 19 vaccines should be stopped immediately.

DO NO HARM

https://jamesfetzer.org/2022/05/as-monkeypox-cases-spread-report-shows-gates-foundation-who-pharma-execs-took-part-in-monkeypox-pandemic-simulation/

As Monkeypox Cases Spread, Report Shows Gates Foundation, WHO, Pharma Execs Took Part in Monkeypox Pandemic ‘Simulation’

May 29, 2022 James Fetzer

https://jamesfetzer.org/wp-content/u...--1024x543.jpg


Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

The World Health Organization on Friday held an emergency meeting to discuss the outbreak of monkeypox after more than 100 cases were reported across 12 countries, as a report surfaced showing the Gates Foundation, WHO and Pharma execs in March 2021 conducted a monkeypox pandemic “simulation.”

The World Health Organization (WHO) on Friday held an emergency meeting to discuss the outbreak of monkeypox after more than 100 cases were reported across 12 countries.

Days before the WHO convened, the Biden administration placed a $119 million order for monkeypox vaccines after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed six people in the U.S. were being monitored for the viral infection, and one person had tested positive.

Belgium on Sunday became the first country to introduce a compulsory 21-day quarantine for monkeypox patients after reporting four cases of the disease in the last week, Politico reported.

The 100 newly reported cases, or suspected cases, garnered attention because many of them do not appear to be linked to travel to Africa, where in some regions, monkeypox is endemic.

Cases were reported in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the U.K. No deaths are reported as of yet.

The number of identified cases in Europe is a record, described by Germany’s armed forces medical services as “the largest and most widespread outbreak … ever seen in Europe,” while its spread in the U.K. was described as “unprecedented.”

U.K. public health officials warned more monkeypox cases are being detected “on a daily basis” and that there “could be really significant numbers over the next two or three weeks,” though they did not specify what “numbers” would be considered “really significant.”

The manner in which monkeypox may have spread — through sexual health services and sexual contact between men — also may have helped to heap attention on this new outbreak.

Many of the recent cases were traced to two “superspreader” events that involved situations in which men came into close physical contact, including 30 monkeypox cases in Spain traced to a single adult sauna in Madrid.

Monkeypox cases reported in Belgium appear to be connected to a recent gay “fetish festival.”

For some, these developments may bring to mind the early onset of HIV, which at the time was connected to sexual contact among males, and to remarks by Dr. Anthony Fauci that he visited gay saunas and bars during the early years of the HIV outbreak to understand how the virus was spreading.

WHO Europe regional director Hans Kluge last week expressed concerns about transmission at “mass gatherings, festivals, and parties.”

However, other public health professionals said there is a low risk to the public and a low likelihood that the epidemic will last long.

Meanwhile, questions are popping up about the similarity between a March 2021 tabletop “simulation” of a monkeypox outbreak and a similar simulation in 2019 — Event 201 — which correctly “predicted” the COVID-19 pandemic
Monkeypox — what is it?

Monkeypox was first discovered in 1958 in monkeys, although they are not the source of the virus. It was first identified in humans in 1970.

The virus is particularly prevalent in Central and West Africa and is considered a rare zoonotic disease, which means that it is caused by germs that spread between animals and people.

Monkeypox typically is spread by wild animals, such as in instances when a human is bitten or comes into contact with animal blood or bodily fluids. However, human-to-human transmission, while rare, is possible.

The virus is known to enter the human body through broken skin, the respiratory tract, or the eyes, nose or mouth, for instance through large respiratory droplets or through contact — including sexual contact — with bodily fluids or lesions, or indirectly through contaminated clothing or linens.

However, “common household disinfectants can kill it.”

A prior outbreak — the first to occur outside of the African continent — occurred in the U.S. in 2003, linked to animals shipped to Texas from Ghana.

And in July 2021, monkeypox was confirmed in a Texas individual who had returned to Dallas from Nigeria, according to the CDC.

Symptoms of monkeypox infection tend to be mild, and include fever, rash and swollen lymph nodes, and occasionally intense headache, back pain, muscle aches, lack of energy and skin eruptions which can cause painful lesions, scabs or crusts.

There are two strains of monkeypox: the West African and Central African strains. The latter is known as the deadlier of the two, but the cases identified in the recent outbreak all appear to have been caused by the milder West African strain.
Did March 2021 ‘pandemic exercise’ predict monkeypox outbreak?

In October 2019, just weeks before the outbreak of COVID-19, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, along with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, organized “Event 201,” a “high-level pandemic exercise” that mirrored what later followed with COVID-19 pandemic.

In March 2021, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), in conjunction with the Munich Security Conference, held a “tabletop exercise on reducing high-consequence biological threats.”

This “fictional exercise scenario” involved the simulation of “a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that first emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months.”

According to NTI, this exercise, which was “[d]eveloped in consultation with technical and policy experts,” brought together “19 senior leaders and experts from across Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europe with decades of combined experience in public health, biotechnology industry, international security, and philanthropy.”

The exercise culminated in a report, published November 2021, titled “Strengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats: Results from the 2021 Tabletop Exercise Conducted in Partnership with the Munich Security Conference.”

This report contains key findings from the exercise, as well as “actionable recommendations for the international community.”

The outcome of this “exercise scenario” found the fictional pandemic, “caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate biosafety and biosecurity provisions and weak oversight,” led to “more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide.”

The fictional start date of the monkeypox pandemic in this exercise was May 15, 2022. The first European case of monkeypox was identified on May 7, 2022.

Key findings from the report included:

The “need” for “a more robust, transparent detection, evaluation, and early warning system that can rapidly communicate actionable information about pandemic risks.”
“Gaps in national-level preparedness,” which will require national governments to “improve preparedness by developing national-level pandemic response plans built upon a coherent system of ‘triggers’ that prompt anticipatory action, despite uncertainty and near-term costs,” described as a “no-regrets” policymaking basis.
“Gaps in biological research governance” in order to “meet today’s security requirements” and be “ready for significantly expanded challenges in the future.”
“Insufficient financing of international preparedness for pandemics,” and a lack of financing for countries to “make the essential national investments in pandemic preparedness.”

Key recommendations included:

Bolstering international systems “for pandemic risk assessment, warning, and investigating outbreak origins,” calling upon the WHO to “establish a graded, transparent, international public health alert system” and the United Nations system to “establish a new mechanism for investigating high-consequence biological events of unknown origin.”
The development and implementation of “national-level triggers for early, proactive pandemic response,” including the adaptation of the “no-regrets” approach to responding to pandemics via “anticipatory action” based on “triggers” that would automatically generate a response to “high-consequence biological events.”
The establishment of “an international entity dedicated to reducing emerging biological risks associated with rapid technology advances,” that would “support interventions throughout the bioscience and biotechnology research and development life cycle — from funding, through execution, and on to publication or commercialization.”
The development of “a catalytic global health security fund to accelerate pandemic preparedness capacity building in countries around the world,” which would include “[n]ational leaders, development banks, philanthropic donors, and the private sector” with the aim of establishing and funding “a new financing mechanism to bolster global health security and pandemic preparedness” and that would incentivize “national governments to invest in their own preparedness over the long term.”
The establishment of “a robust international process to tackle the challenge of supply chain resilience,” based on a “high-level panel’ that would be convened by the UN secretary-general “to develop recommendations for critical measures to bolster global supply chain resilience for medical and public health supplies.”

The above recommendations were borne out in practice during the simulated monkeypox pandemic scenario.

As stated in the report:

“In national pandemic response plans, specific readiness measures would be ‘triggered’ based on factors related to the potential severity of the outbreak, expected delays in situational awareness, and the time it would take to implement response measures and see results.”

What would be “triggered” bears a remarkable similarity to the COVID-19-related measures of the past two-plus years.

The report states:

“Although triggered actions would vary depending upon the particular needs of the country, in most cases the goals are the same: slow the spread of disease to buy time and flatten the epidemiological curve, while using that time to scale up public health and medical systems to keep up with growing caseloads and save lives.

“NPIs [non-pharmaceutical interventions] such as mask mandates and ceasing mass gatherings were deemed to be critical for blocking chains of disease transmission.

“Participants generally did not endorse travel restrictions such as border closures, but travel health screening measures [i.e., vaccine passports] were viewed as valuable.”

According to the results of the simulated scenario, the fictional countries that “prioritized keeping their economies open, undertaking little-to-no NPIs, and downplaying the virus and its potential impacts … have experienced much worse outcomes in terms of illness and mortality” than those fictional countries that “promptly adopted aggressive measures to slow virus transmission,” such as “shutting down mass gatherings, imposing social-distancing measures, and implementing mask mandates,” in addition to establishing “large-scale testing and contact-tracing operations.”
Gates Foundation, pharma execs, WHO participated in monkeypox pandemic simulation

Who took part in the NTI’s monkeypox pandemic simulation?

Key participants included:

Dr. Ruxandra Draghia-Akli, global head of Johnson & Johnson Global Public Health R&D and Janssen Research & Development.
Dr. Chris Elias, president of the global development division of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Dr. George Gao, director-general of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (the Chinese CDC).
Dr. Margaret (Peggy) A. Hamburg, interim vice president for global biological policy and programs at NTI, a member of the global health scientific advisory committee for the Gates Foundation and a member of the board of GAVI-The Vaccine Alliance.
Sam Nunn, a former U.S. senator who is the founder and co-chair of NTI.
Dr. Michael Ryan, executive director of the WHO Health Emergencies Program and a highly visible figure during COVID-19 times.
Dr. Petra Wicklandt, head of corporate affairs for Merck.

Several of the participants listed above also “participated” in Event 201.

The authors of the report also stand out for their background.

For example, Dr. Jaime M. Yassif, vice president of NTI global biological policy and programs, holds a Ph.D. in biophysics from the University of California-Berkeley and a master’s degree in science and security from the King’s College, London, war studies department.

Yassif previously led the initiative on biosecurity and pandemic preparedness at the Open Philanthropy Project, including the management of nearly $40 million in biosecurity grants, the “initiation of new biosecurity work in China and India,” and “establishment of the Global Health Security Index.”

She also previously advised the U.S. Department of Defense on science and technology policy and worked on the Global Health Security Agenda at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Co-author Chris Isaac, program officer for NTI’s Global Biological Policy and Programs team, “has been involved with synthetic biology through the Internationally Genetically Engineered Machines Competition since the start of his scientific career” and “is an alumnus of the Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity Fellowship at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.”

The report is the product of a partnership between NTI, co-founded by Nunn and Ted Turner, and the Munich Security Conference.

Both NTI ($3.5 million, for “vaccine development”) and the Munich Security conference ($1.2 million) received funding from the Gates Foundation.

The report itself was funded by the Open Philanthropy project, one of whose main funders is Dustin Moscovitz, co-founder of Facebook along with Mark Zuckerberg.

Open Philanthropy, over the past decade, has provided donations and grants to the following entities and for the following purposes:

$166.9 million for “global health.”
$90.2 million for “biosecurity and pandemic preparedness.”
$18 million for “global catastrophic risks.”
$40.2 to Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
$17.9 to NTI.
$2.2 to The Guardian.
$1.6 to Rockefeller University.

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at center of multiple tabletop exercises

NTI and the Munich Security Conference are not new to “tabletop exercises” — their report highlights previous simulations, including a 2019 report titled “A Spreading Plague,” and a 2020 report titled “Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological Risks.”

Other simulations in the recent past, in addition to Event 201, include:

Operation Dark Winter (June 2001, less than three months before the 9/11 attacks and subsequent anthrax scare, “examining the national security, intergovernmental, and information challenges of a biological attack on the American homeland”).
Operation Atlantic Storm (January 2005, “designed to mimic a summit of transatlantic leaders forced to respond to a bioterrorist attack”).
The Clade X exercise (May 2018, “to illustrate high-level strategic decisions and policies that the United States and the world will need to pursue in order to prevent a pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail”). Yassif helped develop the Clade X exercise.

The common denominator among all of these simulations? The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, which published a document titled “The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028,” comprising “a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future.”

Predictions for the future don’t end there, however. For instance, in September 2017, NTI and the WEF organized a roundtable discussion on the current state of biological risks presented by technology advancement in light of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

And in January 2020, NTI and the WEF again joined forces, issuing a report titled “Biosecurity Innovation and Risk Reduction: A Global Framework for Accessible, Safe and Secure DNA Synthesis.”

According to the report:

“Rapid advancements in commercially available DNA synthesis technologies — used for example to artificially create gene sequences for clinical diagnosis and treatment — pose growing risks, with the potential to cause a catastrophic biological security threat if accidentally or deliberately misused.”

Merck, whose head of corporate affairs participated in the monkeypox simulation, was the subject of an FBI and CDC investigation in November 2021 regarding 15 suspicious vials labeled “smallpox” at a Merck facility in Philadelphia.
Bill Gates no stranger to predicting the future

Bill Gates has himself been remarkably prescient with his predictions of future events.

Here are some of Gates’ predictions:

In a November 2015 TED talk, he stated “[i]f anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes.”
In a 2017 speech at that year’s Munich Security Conference, he said “the next epidemic could originate on the computer screen of a terrorist intent on using genetic engineering to create a synthetic version of the smallpox virus,” arguing in favor of the merger of “health security” and “international security.”
In May 2021, Gates said “[s]omebody who wants to cause damage could engineer a virus so that the cost, the chance of running into this is more than that of naturally-caused epidemics such as the current one … [t]he ways the humans interact with other species, these viruses are coming across the species barriers whether it’s bats or monkeys.”
In November 2021, Gates publicly pondered, “[y]ou say, OK, what if a bioterrorist brought smallpox to 10 airports? You know, how would the world respond to that? There’s naturally-caused epidemics and bioterrorism-caused epidemics that could even be way worse than what we experienced today.”
In February 2022, Gates warned that the next pandemic “… won’t necessarily be a coronavirus or even the flu. It is likely to be a respiratory virus. Because, with all the human travel we have now, that’s the one that can spread in such a rapid way,” emphasizing the significance of providing sufficient funds to the private sector and academia to build better vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics.
Earlier this month, Gates called for the development of a so-called “Global Epidemic Response and Mobilization” (GERM) initiative, stating that present WHO funding was “not at all serious about pandemics” and that $1 billion a year would be needed to operate this initiative.
Also this month, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced “a new financial commitment of up to US$125 million to help end the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future pandemics,” with much of the money going toward “strengthening health systems in low-income countries, enhancing integrated disease monitoring, expanding access to pandemic tools, and helping countries manage COVID-19 alongside other pressing health needs.”
In his new book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic,” Gates argues that, despite COVID fatigue, the world must focus on preparing for future pandemics, regardless of whether a disease is circulating.


Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
Thanks #JamesCorbett for reading Bill Gates’ new book so we don't have to!

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/15299...jpg&name=small

8:07 AM · May 13, 2022

https://jamesfetzer.org/2022/05/as-monkeypox-cases-spread-report-shows-gates-foundation-who-pharma-execs-took-part-in-monkeypox-pandemic-simulation/

As Monkeypox Cases Spread, Report Shows Gates Foundation, WHO, Pharma Execs Took Part in Monkeypox Pandemic ‘Simulation’

May 29, 2022 James Fetzer

https://jamesfetzer.org/wp-content/u...--1024x543.jpg


Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

The World Health Organization on Friday held an emergency meeting to discuss the outbreak of monkeypox after more than 100 cases were reported across 12 countries, as a report surfaced showing the Gates Foundation, WHO and Pharma execs in March 2021 conducted a monkeypox pandemic “simulation.”

The World Health Organization (WHO) on Friday held an emergency meeting to discuss the outbreak of monkeypox after more than 100 cases were reported across 12 countries.

Days before the WHO convened, the Biden administration placed a $119 million order for monkeypox vaccines after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed six people in the U.S. were being monitored for the viral infection, and one person had tested positive.

Belgium on Sunday became the first country to introduce a compulsory 21-day quarantine for monkeypox patients after reporting four cases of the disease in the last week, Politico reported.

The 100 newly reported cases, or suspected cases, garnered attention because many of them do not appear to be linked to travel to Africa, where in some regions, monkeypox is endemic.

Cases were reported in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the U.K. No deaths are reported as of yet.

The number of identified cases in Europe is a record, described by Germany’s armed forces medical services as “the largest and most widespread outbreak … ever seen in Europe,” while its spread in the U.K. was described as “unprecedented.”

U.K. public health officials warned more monkeypox cases are being detected “on a daily basis” and that there “could be really significant numbers over the next two or three weeks,” though they did not specify what “numbers” would be considered “really significant.”

The manner in which monkeypox may have spread — through sexual health services and sexual contact between men — also may have helped to heap attention on this new outbreak.

Many of the recent cases were traced to two “superspreader” events that involved situations in which men came into close physical contact, including 30 monkeypox cases in Spain traced to a single adult sauna in Madrid.

Monkeypox cases reported in Belgium appear to be connected to a recent gay “fetish festival.”

For some, these developments may bring to mind the early onset of HIV, which at the time was connected to sexual contact among males, and to remarks by Dr. Anthony Fauci that he visited gay saunas and bars during the early years of the HIV outbreak to understand how the virus was spreading.

WHO Europe regional director Hans Kluge last week expressed concerns about transmission at “mass gatherings, festivals, and parties.”

However, other public health professionals said there is a low risk to the public and a low likelihood that the epidemic will last long.

Meanwhile, questions are popping up about the similarity between a March 2021 tabletop “simulation” of a monkeypox outbreak and a similar simulation in 2019 — Event 201 — which correctly “predicted” the COVID-19 pandemic
Monkeypox — what is it?

Monkeypox was first discovered in 1958 in monkeys, although they are not the source of the virus. It was first identified in humans in 1970.

The virus is particularly prevalent in Central and West Africa and is considered a rare zoonotic disease, which means that it is caused by germs that spread between animals and people.

Monkeypox typically is spread by wild animals, such as in instances when a human is bitten or comes into contact with animal blood or bodily fluids. However, human-to-human transmission, while rare, is possible.

The virus is known to enter the human body through broken skin, the respiratory tract, or the eyes, nose or mouth, for instance through large respiratory droplets or through contact — including sexual contact — with bodily fluids or lesions, or indirectly through contaminated clothing or linens.

However, “common household disinfectants can kill it.”

A prior outbreak — the first to occur outside of the African continent — occurred in the U.S. in 2003, linked to animals shipped to Texas from Ghana.

And in July 2021, monkeypox was confirmed in a Texas individual who had returned to Dallas from Nigeria, according to the CDC.

Symptoms of monkeypox infection tend to be mild, and include fever, rash and swollen lymph nodes, and occasionally intense headache, back pain, muscle aches, lack of energy and skin eruptions which can cause painful lesions, scabs or crusts.

There are two strains of monkeypox: the West African and Central African strains. The latter is known as the deadlier of the two, but the cases identified in the recent outbreak all appear to have been caused by the milder West African strain.
Did March 2021 ‘pandemic exercise’ predict monkeypox outbreak?

In October 2019, just weeks before the outbreak of COVID-19, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, along with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, organized “Event 201,” a “high-level pandemic exercise” that mirrored what later followed with COVID-19 pandemic.

In March 2021, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), in conjunction with the Munich Security Conference, held a “tabletop exercise on reducing high-consequence biological threats.”

This “fictional exercise scenario” involved the simulation of “a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that first emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months.”

According to NTI, this exercise, which was “[d]eveloped in consultation with technical and policy experts,” brought together “19 senior leaders and experts from across Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europe with decades of combined experience in public health, biotechnology industry, international security, and philanthropy.”

The exercise culminated in a report, published November 2021, titled “Strengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats: Results from the 2021 Tabletop Exercise Conducted in Partnership with the Munich Security Conference.”

This report contains key findings from the exercise, as well as “actionable recommendations for the international community.”

The outcome of this “exercise scenario” found the fictional pandemic, “caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate biosafety and biosecurity provisions and weak oversight,” led to “more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide.”

The fictional start date of the monkeypox pandemic in this exercise was May 15, 2022. The first European case of monkeypox was identified on May 7, 2022.

Key findings from the report included:

The “need” for “a more robust, transparent detection, evaluation, and early warning system that can rapidly communicate actionable information about pandemic risks.”
“Gaps in national-level preparedness,” which will require national governments to “improve preparedness by developing national-level pandemic response plans built upon a coherent system of ‘triggers’ that prompt anticipatory action, despite uncertainty and near-term costs,” described as a “no-regrets” policymaking basis.
“Gaps in biological research governance” in order to “meet today’s security requirements” and be “ready for significantly expanded challenges in the future.”
“Insufficient financing of international preparedness for pandemics,” and a lack of financing for countries to “make the essential national investments in pandemic preparedness.”

Key recommendations included:

Bolstering international systems “for pandemic risk assessment, warning, and investigating outbreak origins,” calling upon the WHO to “establish a graded, transparent, international public health alert system” and the United Nations system to “establish a new mechanism for investigating high-consequence biological events of unknown origin.”
The development and implementation of “national-level triggers for early, proactive pandemic response,” including the adaptation of the “no-regrets” approach to responding to pandemics via “anticipatory action” based on “triggers” that would automatically generate a response to “high-consequence biological events.”
The establishment of “an international entity dedicated to reducing emerging biological risks associated with rapid technology advances,” that would “support interventions throughout the bioscience and biotechnology research and development life cycle — from funding, through execution, and on to publication or commercialization.”
The development of “a catalytic global health security fund to accelerate pandemic preparedness capacity building in countries around the world,” which would include “[n]ational leaders, development banks, philanthropic donors, and the private sector” with the aim of establishing and funding “a new financing mechanism to bolster global health security and pandemic preparedness” and that would incentivize “national governments to invest in their own preparedness over the long term.”
The establishment of “a robust international process to tackle the challenge of supply chain resilience,” based on a “high-level panel’ that would be convened by the UN secretary-general “to develop recommendations for critical measures to bolster global supply chain resilience for medical and public health supplies.”

The above recommendations were borne out in practice during the simulated monkeypox pandemic scenario.

As stated in the report:

“In national pandemic response plans, specific readiness measures would be ‘triggered’ based on factors related to the potential severity of the outbreak, expected delays in situational awareness, and the time it would take to implement response measures and see results.”

What would be “triggered” bears a remarkable similarity to the COVID-19-related measures of the past two-plus years.

The report states:

“Although triggered actions would vary depending upon the particular needs of the country, in most cases the goals are the same: slow the spread of disease to buy time and flatten the epidemiological curve, while using that time to scale up public health and medical systems to keep up with growing caseloads and save lives.

“NPIs [non-pharmaceutical interventions] such as mask mandates and ceasing mass gatherings were deemed to be critical for blocking chains of disease transmission.

“Participants generally did not endorse travel restrictions such as border closures, but travel health screening measures [i.e., vaccine passports] were viewed as valuable.”

According to the results of the simulated scenario, the fictional countries that “prioritized keeping their economies open, undertaking little-to-no NPIs, and downplaying the virus and its potential impacts … have experienced much worse outcomes in terms of illness and mortality” than those fictional countries that “promptly adopted aggressive measures to slow virus transmission,” such as “shutting down mass gatherings, imposing social-distancing measures, and implementing mask mandates,” in addition to establishing “large-scale testing and contact-tracing operations.”
Gates Foundation, pharma execs, WHO participated in monkeypox pandemic simulation

Who took part in the NTI’s monkeypox pandemic simulation?

Key participants included:

Dr. Ruxandra Draghia-Akli, global head of Johnson & Johnson Global Public Health R&D and Janssen Research & Development.
Dr. Chris Elias, president of the global development division of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Dr. George Gao, director-general of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (the Chinese CDC).
Dr. Margaret (Peggy) A. Hamburg, interim vice president for global biological policy and programs at NTI, a member of the global health scientific advisory committee for the Gates Foundation and a member of the board of GAVI-The Vaccine Alliance.
Sam Nunn, a former U.S. senator who is the founder and co-chair of NTI.
Dr. Michael Ryan, executive director of the WHO Health Emergencies Program and a highly visible figure during COVID-19 times.
Dr. Petra Wicklandt, head of corporate affairs for Merck.

Several of the participants listed above also “participated” in Event 201.

The authors of the report also stand out for their background.

For example, Dr. Jaime M. Yassif, vice president of NTI global biological policy and programs, holds a Ph.D. in biophysics from the University of California-Berkeley and a master’s degree in science and security from the King’s College, London, war studies department.

Yassif previously led the initiative on biosecurity and pandemic preparedness at the Open Philanthropy Project, including the management of nearly $40 million in biosecurity grants, the “initiation of new biosecurity work in China and India,” and “establishment of the Global Health Security Index.”

She also previously advised the U.S. Department of Defense on science and technology policy and worked on the Global Health Security Agenda at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Co-author Chris Isaac, program officer for NTI’s Global Biological Policy and Programs team, “has been involved with synthetic biology through the Internationally Genetically Engineered Machines Competition since the start of his scientific career” and “is an alumnus of the Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity Fellowship at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.”

The report is the product of a partnership between NTI, co-founded by Nunn and Ted Turner, and the Munich Security Conference.

Both NTI ($3.5 million, for “vaccine development”) and the Munich Security conference ($1.2 million) received funding from the Gates Foundation.

The report itself was funded by the Open Philanthropy project, one of whose main funders is Dustin Moscovitz, co-founder of Facebook along with Mark Zuckerberg.

Open Philanthropy, over the past decade, has provided donations and grants to the following entities and for the following purposes:

$166.9 million for “global health.”
$90.2 million for “biosecurity and pandemic preparedness.”
$18 million for “global catastrophic risks.”
$40.2 to Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
$17.9 to NTI.
$2.2 to The Guardian.
$1.6 to Rockefeller University.

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at center of multiple tabletop exercises

NTI and the Munich Security Conference are not new to “tabletop exercises” — their report highlights previous simulations, including a 2019 report titled “A Spreading Plague,” and a 2020 report titled “Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological Risks.”

Other simulations in the recent past, in addition to Event 201, include:

Operation Dark Winter (June 2001, less than three months before the 9/11 attacks and subsequent anthrax scare, “examining the national security, intergovernmental, and information challenges of a biological attack on the American homeland”).
Operation Atlantic Storm (January 2005, “designed to mimic a summit of transatlantic leaders forced to respond to a bioterrorist attack”).
The Clade X exercise (May 2018, “to illustrate high-level strategic decisions and policies that the United States and the world will need to pursue in order to prevent a pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail”). Yassif helped develop the Clade X exercise.

The common denominator among all of these simulations? The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, which published a document titled “The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028,” comprising “a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future.”

Predictions for the future don’t end there, however. For instance, in September 2017, NTI and the WEF organized a roundtable discussion on the current state of biological risks presented by technology advancement in light of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

And in January 2020, NTI and the WEF again joined forces, issuing a report titled “Biosecurity Innovation and Risk Reduction: A Global Framework for Accessible, Safe and Secure DNA Synthesis.”

According to the report:

“Rapid advancements in commercially available DNA synthesis technologies — used for example to artificially create gene sequences for clinical diagnosis and treatment — pose growing risks, with the potential to cause a catastrophic biological security threat if accidentally or deliberately misused.”

Merck, whose head of corporate affairs participated in the monkeypox simulation, was the subject of an FBI and CDC investigation in November 2021 regarding 15 suspicious vials labeled “smallpox” at a Merck facility in Philadelphia.
Bill Gates no stranger to predicting the future

Bill Gates has himself been remarkably prescient with his predictions of future events.

Here are some of Gates’ predictions:

In a November 2015 TED talk, he stated “[i]f anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes.”
In a 2017 speech at that year’s Munich Security Conference, he said “the next epidemic could originate on the computer screen of a terrorist intent on using genetic engineering to create a synthetic version of the smallpox virus,” arguing in favor of the merger of “health security” and “international security.”
In May 2021, Gates said “[s]omebody who wants to cause damage could engineer a virus so that the cost, the chance of running into this is more than that of naturally-caused epidemics such as the current one … [t]he ways the humans interact with other species, these viruses are coming across the species barriers whether it’s bats or monkeys.”
In November 2021, Gates publicly pondered, “[y]ou say, OK, what if a bioterrorist brought smallpox to 10 airports? You know, how would the world respond to that? There’s naturally-caused epidemics and bioterrorism-caused epidemics that could even be way worse than what we experienced today.”
In February 2022, Gates warned that the next pandemic “… won’t necessarily be a coronavirus or even the flu. It is likely to be a respiratory virus. Because, with all the human travel we have now, that’s the one that can spread in such a rapid way,” emphasizing the significance of providing sufficient funds to the private sector and academia to build better vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics.
Earlier this month, Gates called for the development of a so-called “Global Epidemic Response and Mobilization” (GERM) initiative, stating that present WHO funding was “not at all serious about pandemics” and that $1 billion a year would be needed to operate this initiative.
Also this month, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced “a new financial commitment of up to US$125 million to help end the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future pandemics,” with much of the money going toward “strengthening health systems in low-income countries, enhancing integrated disease monitoring, expanding access to pandemic tools, and helping countries manage COVID-19 alongside other pressing health needs.”
In his new book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic,” Gates argues that, despite COVID fatigue, the world must focus on preparing for future pandemics, regardless of whether a disease is circulating.


Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
Thanks #JamesCorbett for reading Bill Gates’ new book so we don't have to!

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/15299...jpg&name=small

8:07 AM · May 13, 2022

https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/pf...-data-dump?s=r

Pfizer's New 80,000-Page Data Dump Is A Nightmare

Pfizer tested their COVID vaccine on rats and then let pregnant women take it

Emerald Robinson

May 5 2022

You probably didn’t know that Pfizer dumped 80,000 pages of documents this week.

That’s because the American corporate media refused to cover it — and that’s because almost all of them took money from the Biden regime to promote the experimental vaccines and kill any critical coverage of them.

Anyway, it turns out that Pfizer’s COVID vaccine was not 95% effective: the data shows it has a 12% efficacy rate.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...0_1533x161.png


Let me repeat: 12%. That’s a “1” followed by a “2.”

But wait: it gets worse.

There were no human clinical trials to determine if the experimental COVID vaccines were safe for pregnant women. They were excluded from all the trials.

None. Zero. Zilch. Nada.

Instead, they tested it on 44 rats.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1521717438982680576

Twitter avatar for @seancondevSean Conway - UAP ���� ACT Bean Candidate @seancondev
What was the basis for Pfizer and the FDA to declare the mRNA vaccine ‘safe and effective’ for pregnant and breastfeeding women?

Just 44 rats.

May 4th 2022
2,203 Retweets3,271 Likes

Pfizer deliberately cut off the clinical data trial before the bad news could be collected. We already know that Pfizer vaccine’s RNA is reverse-transcribing itself into your DNA. We already know that the vaccines increased the risk of getting COVID in children, the CDC intentionally withheld clinical data from the public, and a Moderna gene sequence patented in 2017 was found in the COVID virus spike protein.
Twitter avatar for @CramerSezCramerSez @CramerSez
#PfizerDump #Pfizer #BREAKING #BreakingNews

PFIZER DATA DUMP PROVES THEY KNEW DRUG WAS ONLY 12% EFFECTIVE, AT BEST.

embedded video in tweet

They also knew it could cause harm to the unborn.

May 3rd 2022
200 Retweets304 Likes

Pregnant women in the U.S. military who were coerced into taking the jab have suffered horrific side effects and “congenital malformations” in their babies. There were more than 18,900 babies born with abnormalities in 2021.

We know this because a few brave whistleblowers got their hands on the Deparment of Defense’s medical database.

Twitter avatar for @seancondevSean Conway - UAP ���� ACT Bean Candidate @seancondev
What was the basis for Pfizer and the FDA to declare the mRNA vaccine ‘safe and effective’ for pregnant and breastfeeding women?

Just 44 rats.

May 4th 2022
2,203 Retweets3,271 Likes

More than 18,900 babies. Just think about that.

There’s much more news to come out about the COVID vaccines — and all of it is bad. For example, doctors around the world are starting to notice an explosion in the cancer rates among the vaccinated.

Twitter avatar for @Psu10231Psu1023 @Psu10231
Covid Vaccines are causing cancer.

embedded video

May 3rd 2022
1 Retweet1 Like

Like I said: lots of doctors are noticing that cancers are increasing dramatically. Here’s a chart with data pulled from VAERS that will make your heart sink.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...fb_535x626.png

Let me finish with this thought: perhaps it wasn’t a good idea to re-program the DNA of half the world to produce spike proteins to “fight” a virus with a 99% survival rate?

https://vaticancatholic.com/after-mo...-new-pandemic/

"After monkeypox, leopardpox simulation – G7 health ministers simulate new pandemic"

detv.usMay 27, 20220 Comments

https://vaticancatholic.com/images/a...w-pandemic.jpg

The German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (SPD) is hosting the meeting of the health ministers of the G7 countries for two days. The “Leopard Pox” scenario is intended to simulate the outbreak of a pandemic at the conference. The Bild newspaper came into possession of the “documents for the exercise of the ministers”... The text says:

“On Thursday, the seven ministers will meet with Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (59, SPD) in Berlin and play through the course of a smallpox pandemic in 2023.”

Karl Lauterbach formulated in a press conference on May 18:

“My colleagues and I are promoting that we conclude a pandemic pact, this pandemic pact should be able to identify future outbreaks more quickly and react to them more effectively.”

The results of this upcoming “pandemic pact” require a separate and thorough analytical work-up. So-called business games have already been carried out regularly over the past few years by interested groups from the world of politics, science, money and philanthropy. However, rather unnoticed by the public. Due to the corona crisis and the constantly growing need of many people to understand the connections, the reasons and motivations of the politically prescribed catalog of measures, they became the focus of attention. So investigative journalists could proven pandemic simulation games of the above groups. These had names like:

Dark Winter (2001), Global Mercury (2003), Atlantic Storm (2005), Clade X (2018), the pivotal Event 201 (October 2019), based on the events of the previous two years and SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028 (May 2020)

The name of the current simulation game in Berlin is “Scenario ‘Leopard Pox'”. The script reads: “The organization announces a ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern'”. “The Organization” can only mean the World Health Organization (WHO).

The scenario begins with the event “a leopard bites a human, transmits a dangerous smallpox virus to him”. Unfortunately, since the picture article does not reveal where the encounter between animal and human took place (in the zoo, on a safari hunt, by a Bundeswehr mascot, a Animal Armor Unit?), research shows that most leopards today live in sub-Saharan Africa. According to estimates, only about 14,000 of these assumed smallpox carriers still live in India.

The “infection caused by the bite then spreads extremely quickly and from person to person worldwide. In three short videos, the ministers are given a description of possible developments in the pandemic. Then they each have around 25 minutes to discuss,” according to further details from the Scenario Paper. At the one mentioned event 201 it sounded like this in 2019:

“The disease starts on Brazilian pig farms, quietly and slowly at first, but then spreads faster and faster in healthcare facilities. If it spreads efficiently from person to person in the low-income, densely populated neighborhoods of some South American megacities, the epidemic will explode. It will initially exported by air to Portugal, the United States and China, and then to many other countries.”

The cited paper then goes on to say:

“The World Health Organization (WHO) names the new disease in the scenario ‘Leopard Pox’. The organization announces a ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern'”.

Leopard pox is not real. They’re a fiction, they don’t exist. On the other hand, the monkeypox that has just surfaced in the media certainly does. How did the scriptwriters of the scenario come up with the idea of ​​naming it?...

The image article spoils the end of the “leopard pox” scenario. It is not really innovative or surprising in the solution model, but it reflects the attitude of the authors of the G7 paper:

“Twelve weeks after the virus was discovered, there is hope in the scenario: A vaccine is being developed. But: The “leopard pox” apparently causes long-term damage, and many people continue to die from the virus.”

embedded video

6:23:47

Australia Enslaved & The Plan for the World


Video also on Rumble here

G7 Health Ministers will launch their next pandemic after completing simulation exercises.

New VAERS Data as of May 20, 2022 (posted May 27, 2022)

30,749 Deaths and 1,365,996 Adverse Events

28,312 Pfizer/Moderna and 2,437 J&J Deaths

PLUS 1,277,980 Pfizer / Moderna and 88,016 J&J Adverse Events

_____

Source:
https://www.drtenpenny.com/newslette...comp-l3rz734w1

Dachsie comment:
Sorry for long comment but just thought my thoughts should be posted. I respect Dr. Mikovits and I did not like the video channel's negative commentary.

I am posting this just to allow for videos displaying many different perspectives on this topic, kind of a library thread here.
I only listened to the first few minutes of this and noticed there were snarky commentary words displayed on top of the actual video.

My personal main concern is what doctors are doing the most to help very sick people right now. Most of those doctors are okay with the whole concept of vaccines and vaccines are always for viruses.

But most of those doctors who are actually helping to save sick people's lives right now are, though not "anti-vax", are not in favor at all of the current COVID-19 vaccines, none of them, all of them.

Dr. Kaufman, from the few minutes I listened appears to know exactly what questions and how to ask them of Dr. Mikovits. Dr. Kaufman is a psychiatrist who is no longer in practice as I understand it. He and Dr. Thomas Cowan are very focused on whether the SARS-COV-2 / COVID-19 pathogen has been scientifically isolated. Their work so far has led them so far to conclude that this pathogen has never been isolated from a sick human being's bodily samples.

They also do not believe there is such a thing as a virus at all. They do not accept the Edward Jenner "Germ theory". Though these two M.D.s do not say much about vaccines, I would say it follows that if they do not believe in the "germ theory" and in the existence of any virus then they do not believe in vaccines because vaccines to my knowledge are only for the immunization against viruses.

While the many articles and videos I've taken in over the last two years have made me keep coming down to the questions of what basically is the "pathogen" referred to as SARS-COV-2 and COVID-19, so naturally I find Dr. Kaufman's and Dr. Cowan's work very interesting.

My study also so far has made it clear to me that there are very few "sure" disease diagnoses with sure clear treatment protocols. The practice of medicine very much depends on the research and publications of medical and science journals. That was also enlightening to me.

I just have to take what sounds right to me, no matter what the position of the author or doctor or scientist, and leave aside what does not sound right to me. Again, I care about those doctors who are working directly with patients to try to save their lives and make them well and do no harm.

The reality is that many unvaccinated people got very very sick with a respiratory illness.
We can't go by the book on this illness because it is not acting like how we have been taught a bad virus acts.
The new hospitalist doctors and hospital treatment protocols have made it very difficult for the good caring doctors to practice medicine in my opinion.
There is increasing evidence that if there is one pathogen at the basis of all of this that it is a pathogen created in a laboratory and not a natural pathogen and contagion that a human contracts in any of the known ways.
There is something very odd and irregular about this pathogen.

We have experienced extreme totalitarian dictates and rules and censorship from our government which have greatly hindered the saving of lives, and of course, as always, the mainstream media plays the same old "presstitute" role it has for nigh unto a century in the USA, offering no helpful reliable information at all to the public.

____________________________



https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...2g_640x360.jpg

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HOo7mnMgVw2g/

Judy Mikovits Is Discredited

First published at 17:55 UTC on May 29th, 2022.

25:44 video runtime


channel image

XANDREWX

One of the United States Minor Outlying Islands

24611 subscribers

https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/solvi...urce=email&s=r

See original source for full hyperlinks.

Solving the World's Problems Over a Beer (PBR?)

Yes, I am being sarcastic and obnoxious here



Tom Renz
May 30

So how is it going for you? I’m a bit annoyed. Over the last several weeks the O’Biden war on America has escalated. Clearly, I am not suggesting the nearly universal attacks on all traditional American values and institutions are intentional (insert eye-roll here), but there are just a few minor issues that seem to make that possible. Things like pushing gender identity garbage on kids so young they shouldn’t even know what sex is, the COVID death jabs, the demonizing of masculinity, school shootings, gas prices and inflation in general, the upcoming food crisis, massive election fraud, censorship, and dozen other issues are clearly all Russia’s fault but they do constitute negatives. So, given these little speedbumps our nation is facing I decided to put on my beer dispensing cap (a red one with a beer can on each side and straws running to my mouth) and figure out some real clever solutions… stuff that O’Biden and the numerous PhD level advisors he has must be overlooking.

I want to start out with one of the toughest problems to solve - gas prices. It’s obvious to anyone watching that the high gas prices in America are solely because of the Russian/Ukrainian conflict and that this is completely out of O’Biden’s hands. Clearly, we the people cannot fathom the complexity of this situation (you know - we do not have enough oil but to get more we need to drill), but I think I have a solution. What if, instead of doing everything possible to put regulatory hurdles in front of oil companies we drilled for American oil? I know that probably sounds silly because even though we have the largest oil reserves in the world (look here), they are way under the ground so that makes them hard to get but who knows what would happen if we tried.

One of the other issues that seems to have come out of nowhere is the mental health problems that keep arising in kids. I simply cannot understand where these issues are coming from. With all that we have done to introduce transgender studies to kindergartners, teaching all kids that they are racist with CRT, and telling all male kids that they are evil because they are male, I would think kids would be doing great. This combined with telling kids that there is no right and wrong and destroying families seems like it should make life great for kids. But, since we still have these baffling issues I will propose a - slurp (sorry taking a drink from my beer dispensing cap) solution. What if, slurp - sorry another drink, what if we let kids be kids and avoided grooming them, let parents teach kids about sex in whatever way they chose, stopped telling boys they should not be boys, and avoided teaching kids to be racists? If we really wanted to be crazy, maybe we could even tell kids that some things are right and some are wrong (you know, like slavery is wrong and helping people in need is right).

You know, this beer dispensing cap may be making me crazy, but what if along with my crazy ideas above, we also took some steps to stop these school shootings? Clearly the only smart way to do that is with gun control, but I have my hat on and am leaning a different direction. What if we did something radical and secured the entrances to the schools? We could go all in and hire armed vets as guards or maybe we lock the doors and not buzz people in that are carrying guns. I know leaving the doors open and implementing gun control would work better, but I am just throwing it out there.

Going back to money issues, this inflation thing is a real problem. Obviously, we need to keep printing money we don’t have so we can send money to Ukraine and fund other programs that have nothing to do with helping Americans but what if we didn’t? Is it possible that not printing and not giving more to foreign nations than American states (see here) could lessen inflation? I could be wrong but printing money seems like one of the quickest ways to facilitate inflation.

So what about COVID and the death jabs? We know that the jabs do not stop the spread of COVID (this article mentions that) and that the government is covering up all sorts of side effects (I did some work on this). We also know that COVID has a 99%+ recovery rate for most of the population and that cases spiked when the jabs came out (take a look here). So what if we got rid of these jabs and tried treatments that work (you can find a few here) rather than experiments that don’t?

My beer-cap is running out of juice so I will now endeavor to solve the unsolvable problem- election fraud. Obviously, the elections are safe and secure but let’s pretend they are not, and we need to fix the issues because there are some crazy people (here goes my last slurp) that just don’t know that O’Biden clearly got the most votes in American history despite not being able to get more than 7 people to show up at a rally. Here is my suggestion, what if we had paper ballots that were counted by real people (instead of machines connected to the internet).

Also, what if we made people vote in person where they are registered and show an ID that would verify who they are?

My beer dispensing cap is now empty and so I am out of silly ideas. It seems obvious to me that most of these issues are unsolvable and that there are no common-sense ways to help our country, so I am going to refill my cap and watch some CNN while I contemplate how much smarter the Biden crew-members are than the rest of us.