Printable View
They couldn't have just pressed a button with literally zero risk of being found out?Quote:
Originally Posted by Santa
They had to reinvent the wheel there with this elaborate movie set scenario, and come up with all kinds of lying witnesses all over the place?
Who are these "lotsa people" who saw a missile?
What reality?Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
That DNA was recovered, yet not a single limb was visible in all photos?
Yet they were hauling off one huge coffin under a tarp.
Apples and oranges.Quote:
Originally Posted by Santa
When did they remove the people from the plane, and plant the mangled up chunks of bodies all over the place?
Some crew with meat cleavers, and human catapults splattering people at a brick wall, then they scooped everything all up, drove it on over, and put it all in the building, mixed it all up convincingly with plane debris, then hit it with a missile?
It's gets more insane the longer you hold out on the magic missile theory.
Have you tried to rationalize the timeline, and all the people that would need to be lying in order to pull it all off?
You have to realize they could have just pressed a button here in terms of simplicity.
There's a very good reason people call this missile thing crazy.
Yes, and once that was purchased they knew they could tell everyone Saddam had WMD.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
without further adieu.
Knocking the light poles down during rush hour would be a bigger risk, and PITA over pressing the big red easy button.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
What you said doesn't even make any sense. They have all the rest of 9II to use. I'm discussing the reasoning for a missile specifically.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
I've a sneaking suspicion your are the taxi driver that suffered some sort of brain lapse on the bridge with a light pole protruding thru your windshield into your back seat, while quiet strangers helped you remove said phallic devise from your frontal lobe with greased precision.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Good thing the records of your huge cab fare were misplaced along with the $2.3T, again with such greased precision.
Oh look, it's attack the messenger again, high caliber stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
Let's see....the endless rabbit hole fantasy world conspiracy land explanation v.s. the big read easy button.
Keep pouring that poison in the well. Sorry bro, the sheeples actually got it right this time by default.
Reason being, the owners are inherently lazy by design. They don't like a lot of complicated hard work, and endless chances of being found out.
Win some, lose some.
You want the truth?
This button.....they pressed it:
https://lh3.ggpht.com/-krfdVeM4c0w/T...asy-Button.jpg
That's a big button, but it still ain't big enough to hide 2.3T, and start WWIII
Well they had two rather tall towers to accomplish that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
But nice apples to oranges unrelated topic change in an attempt to prove it wasn't a missile through bait, and switch obfuscation. ;)
Well atleast you're looking at the larger picture, albeit thru the wrong orifice.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Tell me joboo, Why did the second tower struck fall firstly.
Was it due mostly in part to structural failure from the intense fire?
So I guess the missile madness has finally been put to rest.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
My only contention is the missile. It's the poison in the well.
Here's the button for Jooboo:Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3OzEnnuPIY
Opinions are a dime a dozen.
The realities stand for themselves.
All those forensic scientists never noticed anything suspicious while analyzing everything on all those planted "faked" chopped up, passengers.
The coverup keeps growing by leaps, and bounds.
They're all lying, and in on it:
http://ww2.dcmilitary.com/dcmilitary.../12279-1.shtml
But they could have just pressed the auto guidance big easy button, and it's a done deal.
Loose change messed up a lot of people.
Stand down is the poison in the well.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Actually, opinions are like assholes: everybody has one. Now GSUS has one too.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Hahahahahaha..............Quote:
Originally Posted by mamboni
Best post in this thread........thanks mamboni........awesome post!
Where do you get off saying that these people are lying?Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
They're doing there jobs like any other soldier slave in the pecking order would do.
What an asshole!
Quote:
Originally Posted by mamboni
I noticed a lot of a-hole content in your responses lately.
Is it something in your diet?
Donkey erections?
I'm just going by what you yourself are going out of your way to say.
I'm not sure if you noticed. I'm actually asking you/others if they are lying.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
Now, if you get to call me asshole, then I get to call you an overly dramatic pentagon missiletard. It's only fair. ;)
If they are lying, then the passengers got (manually) chopped up, ground up, scooped up, then driven over to the pentagon, and mixed in with all the debris.
But that sounds likely right?
-----------------------
I see cranky people who are angry their beloved missile angle for all these years is slowly fading away.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Who called you an asshole, asshole?;D
WOW this used to be a place where various views are discussed in an effort to find the truth. Now all I see are people calling others they disagree with names and ignoring the discussion of facts? THIS SUCKS! Every F'ng thread almost ends up in name calling not fact discussion! So since I point this out I guess I must be a so called shill. These attacks seem very hebrewistic in nature... where they yell murder as they attack you? Just sayin. I dont know who is or isnt a so called shill... but it seems that the anti social behavior here isnt being started by the so called shill!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celtic Rogue
Its a long story but can be compared to scabies......which get under your skin........basically things are fine and normal on GSUS apart from one small area....OO)~
Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
But its only been over 300 posts surly it cant be that simple.....;D
So why did the buildings fall.........you havnt answered that
LOL. If you gonna go all alpha male on me in all my threads at least have a thick skin about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by mamboni
Nothing more hilarious than an alpha male mindset with thin skinned undertones.
I call it Gino syndrome. Jersey shore. ;)
Your threads?Quote:
If you gonna go all alpha male on me in all my threads
It actually can be that simple, and it was.Quote:
Originally Posted by Serpo
I'm not concerned with the other events. The rest of it is all open/closed imo.
I'm debunking one particular misguided aspect with evidence, and stating the reasons why.
This one isn't mine, but feel free to look for examples in mine of what I'm talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Santa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Santa
It is now..........................
I was gonna say... it kinda is by default at this point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Serpo
Whenever I hear the well poisoning missile angle it's like a forest fire that needs some water. The premise of the OP video was the lady said up front the guy had proven it was a missile.
As great as he is for all his service, and he's entitled to think what he wants without persecution, he's really just a retired senior citizen that hasn't looked into it as much as some people have. It's a little cloudy upstairs for him at that age.
The guy is retired, he probably hits up the net in his spare time, and he got the ol Loose Change, Alex Jones truther combo, and/or the near infinite regurgitation's of that conclusion process found in abundance on the net. It's a deadly 1/2 combination.
Joboo flies an Easy one wing airplane.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daNr_TrBw6E
Again with the personal reference. Are you guys shitting me, or simply shills? The same call out routine, then someone else comes in for a cheap character swipe with nothing constructive as a follow up. Real high caliber situation.
The hole...the real hole...not the loose change version hole, was ample size to fit the plane. It matched, and if the wings were getting banged up smacking down light poles on the way in, can this definitely disprove the plane over a missile? I'm still not seeing it.
$100 says this guy is looking at the same pictures everyone else has access to on the net.
Question is, are your poles clean enough that you should be using them in the first place?Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
http://goodideajohng.files.wordpress...ind-monkey.jpg
Now he's suggesting that a couple breakaway light poles slowed down & further dampened an already impossible flight path of a 757.
"Clean enough"? What does that even mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
Dampened or damaged? Is that a typo?
Go crash a car into an aluminum light pole to see what kind of forces are involved.
Now we're starting to get somewhere.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Imagine traveling at over 500mph and hitting one.
Think they'd risk destroying tracks of 2.3T on a bank shot?
It would knock them over, and mess up the wings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
Do you think they could hit the p-gon with an airplane? I think it would be incredibly easy.
With that much momentum, there is no such concept of a "bank shot" off a light pole.
It's like a dart...(wings or no wings) at that distance...short of a giant hand reaching out of the sky, it's hitting the mark straight on without deviation.
Some people say "aha!...the wings didn't fit perfectly!" Safe to say they weren't looking too profile perfect either after hitting 5 lamp posts.
i listened to the Major General's testimony.
blows the official US gov. conspiracy theory to pieces.
good video !
Nope, not the wall, not at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Maybe the roof if computer guided at a high angle descent, but would have to be plotted perfectly, and corrected in an instant upon approach.
Right angle perpendicular to the wall is an impossibility.
What you see visually, and where the force/momentum vector is pointing over such a short distance is not necessarily conclusive. If the camera was panned out more it would give a much better indication. I don't see it as a smoking gun.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
I don't consider this as smoking gun proof/evidence either, but it does make a point. @26 seconds:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nBaU0vwP-o
That jet might be going 220mph if that, if it impacted anything at the time there would would be large chunks all about the place. You need 500knots to enable the kind of disintegration you are hoping for.
Give it up joboo, no Boeing can do what your asking, its impossible. It is fully conclusive evidence.