Coronavirus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=129dCYYT_BE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=129dCYYT_BE

5:43 video runtime

CDC director orders reorganization of agency after COVID pandemic missteps

CBS News
4.53M subscribers
The CDC will be making some changes after criticism over the agency's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health threats. CBS News chief medical correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook sat down for an exclusive interview with CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, and he joins CBS News' Lana Zak with more.

_________________

Dachsie comment:

How truly disgusting!

https://www.theepochtimes.com/whistl...ent=08-18-2022

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...Yn5pDQw7BA--~D

29:22 video runtime

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...8FJW96bNDg--~D




August 18, 2022 Crossroads Views 17.2K
[PREMIERING NOW] Whistleblower: Military Covering Up COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries

Crossroads

JOSHUA PHILIPP

The U.S. military is allegedly covering up data on injuries from the COVID-19 vaccines, according to a whistleblower. Lt. Mark Bashaw, a preventive medicine officer with the U.S. Air Force, has stepped forward to reveal how vaccine injuries are being hidden from the public, and how the military’s database that tracks vaccine injuries has been altering data.

Subscribe to the new Crossroads newsletter and stay up-to-date!

* Click the “Save” button below the video to access it later on “My List“.

Follow Crossroads on social media:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Crossroads.Josh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/crossroads_josh
Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/Crossroads_JoshuaPhilipp
Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@crossroads_josh

Gettr: https://www.gettr.com/user/crossroads_josh
Gab: https://gab.com/Crossroads_Josh
Telegram: https://t.me/Crossroads_josh


__

Dachsie comment:

I have been wanting the correct legal citation for the law that says a military must be given the option to accept or refuse an EUA mRNA vaccine, the "vaccine" that is only "authorized" but never fully approved and given full licensure by the FDA. Also this involves informed consent / Nuremberg Code.

(It is my understanding that this law applies also to all civilian US citizens so, technically, it is really not necessary to apply for a religious exemption when it is already against the law to not allow fully informed consent or refusal option.)



Here is what was said at about 12:$0 on this video

U S C United States Code

Triple Bravo 3 means BBB 3 ?

Paragraph E ! A

I a not completely sure how to format the citation and I would like to copy and paste that law into this posting just for archival purposes.

_______
Dachsie comment:

Also Lt. Mark Bashaw said that they are sending vials of the vaccine to U S military bases that are labeled Comirnaty. There are still many unanswered questions, from a legal standpoint, about what looks to me like the Comirnaty Flim-Flam continues.

Lt. Bashaw has been a good enlisted military man for 17 years and now they are trying to kick him out because he is warning about the law that this vaccine cannot be legally mandated. He may lose is nearing retirement benefits but he knows it his duty to stand up for the truth.

Open in browser

☕️ Coffee & Covid ☙ Thursday, August 18, 2022 ☙ REORGANIZED ��
Alarming rates of cancer in the U.S.; CDC admits it made pandemic mistakes and announces full reorganization; Biden sets up another major public health agency on par with CDC,FDA: and lots more...

Jeff Childers
Aug 18 2022

�� EthicalSkeptic, one of team reality’s most important independent analysts during the pandemic, reported yesterday that the CDC’s weekly deaths report shows cancer deaths flying off the charts. He pulls figures from the CDC’s MMWR — the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report — and graphs them.

Below is the graph of cancer deaths from 2014 through 2022 week 30. As you can see, the chart shows where the deaths basically leap up in a straight line — something that’s never happened during the previous years — on MMWR week 14, 2021. Coincidentally, that week was also the rollout of vaccines to all age groups. As you can also see from the chart, cancer deaths are still rocketing up as of the latest figures (2022 week 30).

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...a5_720x349.png

It’s not just one data point. There are TONS of anecdotal reports from healthcare workers — doctors and nurses all over the country — reporting unprecedented levels of new cancer diagnoses as well as sudden renewals of old cancers. I would say the MMWR numbers corroborate the anecdotal reports.

Nobody is reporting the opposite, that cancer rates are down. Nobody’s even saying cancer rates are flat. They just aren’t saying.

The system is designed to fail. Because the media, the public health agencies, politicians, and even frontline doctors all pushed the probable cause of this disaster, they are now structurally unable to acknowledge there’s even a problem.

https://usawatchdog.com/trump-raid-c...on-increasing/

Trump Raid Coverup, Cheney Blowout, Inflation Increasing


By Greg Hunter On August 19, 2022 In Weekly News Wrap-Ups

https://usawatchdog.com/wp-content/u...az-300x214.jpg

It’s another phony investigation into everything Donald Trump to try to make up another fake crime. They are so scared Trump will take control of America again the Dem Deep State globalists are doing everything possible to try to derail President Trump. AG Merrick Garland does not want to even reveal the contents of the affidavit that allowed the FBI to ransack Trump’s personal Florida residence nearly 2 years after he moved out of the White House. Why the secrecy? They are simply making it all up as they go along—again. Shame on the DOJ, and double shame on the FBI for trying to frame Trump–again.

Liz Cheney is a registered Republican that says she voted with President Trump 93% of the time. I guess voting for Trump’s impeachment for yet another made up crime just does not count as disloyalty. Trump had the last laugh by supporting Harriet Hageman in the GOP primary for the only House seat in Wyoming. Hageman destroyed Cheney, and that marks the eighth House Republican who voted to impeach President Trump to be removed from office. Cheney now says she is going to run for President in 2024—I know you are laughing, but it’s not a joke. It’s more like an embarrassing delusion for Cheney, who is now worth more than $30 million. That’s some strong savings with only a $174,000 a year Congressional job.

Enjoy the slightly lower gasoline prices while you can because all indications are inflation is coming back with a vengeance right along with some sort of market crash. How can both happen? It all hinges around the dollar remaining the world’s reserve currency. If Saudi Arabia (SA) ends up joining the so-called BRIC countries, you can kiss the US dollar good bye. That means SA will no longer sell its oil exclusively in dollars, and the dollar will tank because many will not need to have them to buy oil. Is this why the Fed is hell-bent on raising rates and fighting inflation? Is the Fed really just protecting the dollar?

There is much more in the 59-minute newscast.

Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he talks about these stories and more in the Weekly News Wrap-Up for 8.19.22.

embedded video

59:45 video runtime

"Vax" / "COVID" part begins 11:10 to 33:49

also on Rumble

https://rumble.com/v1giwnh-trump-rai...ncreasing.html

https://www.bitchute.com/video/0wVQQXV1LkVd/

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...Vd_320x180.jpg

1:55:34 video runtime

Dr. Lee Merritt Interview with Poornima Wagh PhD Virology

First published at 15:12 UTC on August 18th, 2022.


channel image

Jim Fetzer

Jim Fetzer

11921 subs

Lee Merritt says this is THE MOST IMPORTANT interview that she’s done in the entire Covid debacle. This woman is fabulous — Indian-American, Dr. Poornima Wagh — she’s a scientist in the mold of Harold Hillman and Tom Cowan who ask “How do we know that?” when told something is so — especially when it's “consensus science.”

Besides calling bullshit on modern virology, she’s also been examining the contents of the vials of the CV19 vaccines along with 17 other researchers.

Source: https://rumble.com/v1ga1e5-dr.-merri...-virology.html

https://www.americaoutloud.com/the-f...ation-program/

The Fourth False Claim of the Indiscriminate COVID-19 Mass Vaccination Program



by Dr. Peter McCullough | Aug 19, 2022 |

https://www.americaoutloud.com/wp-co...ng-150x150.png

Americans and people all over the globe are into the third year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with the COVID-19 crisis being more an epoch of inconvenience and loss of personal freedom rather than a health emergency. One of the most notable parts of the COVID-19 crisis has been the worldwide menace of mass, indiscriminate vaccination.

Once, it was apparent that large numbers of individuals were suffering injury, disability, and death shortly after receiving one of the COVID-19 vaccines, and it didn’t matter which one; most people had their personal safety compass dialed in for a course free of any more injections. Then the crushing mandates came in the summer of 2021, where every pressure point possible was exerted by the government, employers, schools, hospitals, and the military.

Only those healthy, working as entrepreneurs or independent contractors appeared to be spared the threat of COVID-19 vaccination. The biopharmaceutical complex, as outlined in “Courage to Face COVID-19” by Leake and McCullough, is a decades-old private-public partnership dedicated to the response to global health crises largely with the anticipated response of mass vaccination.1

This syndicate has some of the most powerful entities in the world, including the World Economic Forum, World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Wellcome Trust, Center for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, GAVI-The Vaccine Alliance, the US National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the vaccine manufacturers who are positioned as suppliers of pre-purchased vaccine products.

For the biopharmaceutical complex to advance the vaccine agenda of “a needle in every arm,” a series of false claims were put forward behind the slogans of “safe and effective” and “get vaccinated.”2,3

The first false claim was that the COVID-19 vaccines “stopped the infection in its tracks.”This was put out as a talking point for all the late-night talk shows, and Rachel Maddow took the bait, vehemently pressing her audience to take the shot to stop the virus cold.4 By May of 2021, thousands of Americans who were fully vaccinated were pouring into hospitals, and the CDC announced it would no longer track breakthrough infections.5

The second false claim was that the vaccines “stopped transmission.” We heard slogans such as “take a vaccine and protect your loved ones.” Fraudulent television commercials featured concerned young individuals who proudly took a COVID-19 vaccine to protect their parents and grandparents. By the summer of 2021, the CDC director was on national television telling Americans that the vaccines do not stop transmission because of the well-documented spread of SARS-CoV-2 from fully vaccinated host to fully vaccinated susceptible recipient.6

There were a series of embarrassing papers published for the syndicate demonstrating high and equal viral loads in the nasopharynx of the fully vaccinated.7,8,9,10 It was obvious the vaccines were protecting now one in congregate or household settings.

The third false claim in the light of these failures ⏤ is that even though the vaccines will not stop the virus ⏤ if you get it, you will have milder symptoms and be less likely to require hospitalization and death. For this claim to be made, there must be a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with hospitalization and death as the primary endpoint and with a meaningful, statistically significant reduction in those vaccinated. Given a large number of hospitalizations and deaths, there were plenty of opportunities for the vaccine sponsors to perform such a definitive trial.No such trial was undertaken. Even in randomized trials with softer primary endpoints, there was no signal of benefit on hospitalization and death. The US FDA never granted this claim. Nevertheless, in the summer of 2021, a chorus rang on the news that there was a crisis of the “unvaccinated.”

During this time, papers by Havers from the CDC and Fillmore from the Veterans Administration reported that large numbers of Americans hospitalized were fully vaccinated.11,12 Published analyses on vaccines and hospitalization did not account for the two proven factors that reduce the risk of hospitalization, milder variants (Omicron), prior infection with acquired immunity, and early multidrug treatment in the prehospital phase of the illness.13

As with the prior false claims, the third claim fell as more countries reported hospitalization statistics where the vast majority of those hospitalized and dying were fully vaccinated.14 In August of 2022, the US CDC revised its statements and indicated the fully vaccinated and unvaccinated were indistinguishable from a public health perspective.15 A memorable meme posted on the internet depicted a man who died of COVID-19, remarking posthumously, “boy, I am glad I was vaccinated; it could have been worse.”

Americans and people across the globe are wondering, what could be next from the biopharmaceutical complex? We can only just look at the announcement of brand new multivalent COVID-19 vaccines, containing antigens from multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, which through a regulatory coup de gras have been advanced relying solely on measured antibodies and not proven clinical outcomes registrational trials.16 The average person on the street, who is a closet immunologist by this time, knows that measured antibodies are not a sufficient surrogate for clinical outcomes.

So the anticipated fourth false claim will be: “take your new COVID-19 vaccine this fall and keep COVID-19 from coming back.”

Expect television commercials reminding Americans of the horrors of hospitalization and death and raising the analogy to polio; now is the time to take a vaccine to keep COVID-19 from sweeping back into communities. It is difficult for people all over the world to realize their governments are conducting propaganda campaigns. The only hope is to gain a more thorough understanding of the problem and begin to anticipate the next move so the countermove can be contemplated.

Dr. McCullough is co-author of “Courage to Face COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalization and Death while Battling the Biopharmaceutical Complex.”

References:

1 https://couragetofacecovid.com/
2 https://www.britannica.com/story/why...out-the-muscle
3 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-...delta-variant/
4 https://www.foxnews.com/media/social...addow-vaccines
5 https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...h-cases-501821
6 https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2...-covid-19.html
7 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/e...423-5/fulltext
8 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992250/
9 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....31.21261387v1
10 https://www.google.com/search?q=acco...hrome&ie=UTF-8
11 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....27.21262356v1
12 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021586/
13 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33792243/
14 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8hziFKi_NE
15 https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2...-guidance.html
16 https://www.fda.gov/media/157466/download

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-co...m_source=email

Coffee & Covid ☙ Friday, August 19, 2022

Jeff Childers
8 hr ago August 19, 2022

Excerpt:



Things are breaking, they’re breaking big, so keep your eyes open.

 There was another huge development in the corporate media’s information embargo yesterday, in the form of a UK Telegraph article headlined “Lockdown Effects Feared to Be Killing More People Than Covid.”

Wow.

And look at the sub-head: “Unexplained excess deaths outstrip those from virus as medics call figures ‘terrifying’.” In other words, although U.S. corporate media is still ignoring them (with some help from the CDC), excess deaths still just went mainstream.

Holy Late Arrivals, Batman! Did you ever think you’d see the day? Before we get to the “lockdown effects” euphemism, let’s first just consider the profound implications of taking this “lockdown effects” nonsense at face value.

The Telegraph article reported that official UK data “suggests” that “the effects of lockdown may now be killing more people than are dying of Covid.” That’s not good. It said the paper “understands that the Department of Health has ordered an investigation into the figures.” The government will have to blame somebody. Somebody else. Maybe someone who gave it bad advice.

It’s pretty bad. The paper admitted “the number of excess deaths not from Covid dwarfs the number linked to the virus.” DWARFS them. People are dying from other things besides covid so much that they DWARF covid deaths. That means it’s SO bad they can’t use any cute non-alarming synonyms anymore. Time for plan B.

The rest of the article deflects the phenomenon right onto deferred care during lockdowns. That will obscure the real problem for a little while longer, but the “deferred care” excuse won’t work twelve months from now. It’s a band-aid, and it’s not free. Not even close.

Even accepting the article’s unlikely premise that “lockdown effects” of deferred care ARE the cause of all the unexplained strokes and clots and heart attacks, “lockdown effects” reflect awfully on public health agencies. That rationale “suggests” that public health experts failed to consider the now-obvious downstream effects; and worse, anybody with a google terminal will pretty much immediately discover scientists like Bhattacharya, Kulldorf, et al who warned about those very same “lockdown effects” back at the time the decisions were made.

So public health experts won’t be able to say they didn’t know. They just “ignored the science,” which is a cardinal sin under Branch Covidia. Once “lockdown effects” becomes the default explanation, there will be a massive backlash against public health, for failing to tailor the covid response to account for side effects like deferred care. OF COURSE, it makes NO SENSE to kill more people with mitigations than die from covid, especially when those mitigations have not shown any clear benefit, and especially considering the vast economic and political costs of those mitigations.

Thanks experts!

The CDC has withheld the excess death figures in the U.S. for two and a half months now, citing a software upgrade or some equally dumb excuse. Do you suppose it’s possible those numbers, like the UK’s, are so obvious and grim and embarrassing that a “complete reorganization” of the CDC would be required, and that, to show fast and effective action, Biden might strip handling pandemics completely away from a disgraced CDC, and re-assign that important job to some other agency?

Good thing we have one waiting and ready to go! The ASPR. The ASPR wouldn’t have made these kinds of mistakes. It’s not all bureaucratically bloated and packed with political hacks, not like the CDC. No, no, never. ASPR employees don’t care about money and stuff, just helping people. They are the very definition of selfless bureaucrats. You’ll see. So … problem solved! You’re welcome.

So, once again we note that the news is not about excess deaths — we’ve known about THAT for months now — the news is that the corporate media embargo on TALKING ABOUT excess deaths — instead of just hoping they’d bugger off — is all over now. We’ve pivoted into the next narrative.

The sleight of hand over “lockdown effects” causing cancer, heart attacks, and strokes (but not other types of injuries) from “deferred care” is just a trade-off. They’re throwing public health officials under the bus instead of considering other, more politically difficult causes. Like causes with needles. But it won’t last; it will catch up with them. First of all, public health MIGHT NOT like being thrown under the bus, and MIGHT fight back, but nothing would surprise me from that squad of masochists.

Second, the “deferred care” excuse can only last so long before it just doesn’t work anymore. Maybe they are hoping that the excess deaths will resolve by themselves after a while, which could happen; nobody knows. Maybe. But they’ll need to stop jabbing people if they want to find THAT out.

____________________

Dachsie comment:

The stark uptick in deaths since early 2021 have become too big to hide anymore. This goes for the UK and the USA and anywhere in the high-jab areas of the world. This issue is the "elephant in the living room" or "the emperor's new clothes" issue.

It is interesting to observe the propaganda strategy being tried in the UK, that is, the the “lockdown effects” have caused and "may now be killing more people than are dying of Covid."

If the deaths keep going up and at increasing rates, obviously this propaganda excuse won't work.

The USA will probably soon be forced to try a similar propaganda strategy. The next strategy has to be one, just like the UK's, that places blame elsewhere and calls for agency changes and drastic reorganization because it is the agencies' fault because of their "missteps."

This will not work for the USA either. The people have already become suspicious of the medical establishment and their apparent lies and highly questionable "science" about SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 and the "vaccines." The people at this time know not to take any more boosters and to stop and "feel the hesitancy" before receiving dose number 1.

It is against the US law to coerce or mandate a person -- military, civilian, anyone -- to take the jab. It is one hundred percent a free fully-informed choice to accept or reject, with no reprisals of any kind, an experimental EUA injection.

Once a few large, multi-billion dollar lawsuits are won in support of that law, we have to see if the republic will stand.

As Dr. Lee Merritt clearly implied in a recent posting here, the reality is they're aiming to kill us all.

Friday, August 19, 2022

Find links to all the latest major news articles from Children's Health Defense HERE.

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3

Rock Singer’s Fatal Brain Injury Caused by AstraZeneca Vaccine, Inquest Concludes

WEF Proposes Globalized Plan to Police Online Content Using Artificial Intelligence


After Data Show Vaccinated at Higher Risk of Dying From COVID, Canadian Province Ends Monthly Reports


Depression and ‘Chemical Imbalance’ — Big Pharma Profits From Theory Scientists Say Doesn’t Exist


75th Anniversary of Nuremberg Code Event — Watch CHD.TV Livestream Aug. 20


Chevron PR Firm Runs Local ‘News’ Site in Journalism-Starved Fracking Hotspot


Big Food Marking Up Prices ‘Again and Again’ Amid Huge Profits, Shareholder Handouts


Fauci Urges Black Americans to Get COVID Booster Shots in Preparation for Fall Surge + More


DC Schools Require COVID Vaccines for 12 and up, Despite New CDC Guidance + More

https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/fauci...m_source=email

Tom’s Newsletter


Fauci is Now Performing Gain-of-Function on the Spanish Flu
Tom Renz
2 hr ago

https://images.unsplash.com/photo-15....1&q=80&w=1080
Photo by CDC on Unsplash

This will be short because it really does not need much comment. In fact, this is so absurd that I am just starting with the reference document because I am concerned no one will believe it. Here it is:
Spanish Flu Gof
2.12MB ∙ PDF File
Read now

Yes, that is right, Fauci and crew are now actively performing gain-of-function (GoF) work and infecting primates with the Spanish Flu. For those of you that are unaware, GoF does not have a single agreed upon definition but, as it relates here, is essentially the modification of the Spanish Flu virus to make “more functional.” In this case, as with COVID, I have little doubt the GoF supporters will argue that this is not GoF but the article actually notes that this disease was created in canine kidneys with supplemental bovine serum. Here is a quote from the document:

Virus and cells. Influenza virus A/South Carolina/1918 (H1N1) was generated by reverse genetics (9) and handled in biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) containment at the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML). Sequences of the 1918 influenza viral segments were based on data reported under GenBank accession numbers DQ208309, DQ208310, DQ208311, AF117241, AY744935, AF250356, AY130766, and AF333238. 1918 influenza virus was cultured usingMadin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) cells. MDCK cells were grown in minimum essential medium (MEM; HyClone) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone) and 1 L-glutamine (L-Glu; Gibco, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA).

A passage 2 (P2) virus stock was prepared using MEM supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (fraction V; HyClone), 1 L-glutamine, and 1 mg/mL N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich). This stock was used for animal inoculation. The mouse 50% lethal dose (MLD50) for this stock was determined previously to be 103.2 PFU (9); this value was confirmed prior to the use of the stock for macaque infection.

Tom’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

I frankly do not care to debate the nuance of whether the recreation of generally extinct virus “generated by reverse genetics” using pieces and parts of other animals qualifies as GoF; what I care about is that we have recreated the Spanish Flu and are experimenting with it on other animals. I also care that one focus of this article is the fact that scientists are frustrated that the recreated Spanish Flu is not dangerous enough. We do not have to get far in this to see this frustration. At the beginning of the article in the summary of its importance this statement is made:

Here, we demonstrate that even at the highest doses tested, 1918 influenza was not lethal in these two macaque species, suggesting that they are not ideal for the development and testing of novel pandemic influenza-specific vaccines and therapies. Therefore, other physiologically relevant nonhuman primate models of pandemic influenza are needed.

At this point I am preparing to release the results of a major investigation we have been undertaking at Renz Law that will demonstrate that SARS-COV2 was in fact created in the Wuhan labs as part of a GoF project. We believe the investigation demonstrates this in a way that far exceeds a preponderance of the evidence standard and probably exceeds reasonable doubt. With that in mind, and given the result of the the previous coronavirus GoF, can ANYONE possibly argue GoF work on the Spanish Flu is a good idea? Even the simple recreation of the disease demonstrates an incredible lack of respect for the disaster created by the coronavirus GoF.

So you may be asking, what moron could possibly be oblivious enough to support GoF work on the Spanish Flu while the world is still dealing with the nightmare that is COVID? The answer should not be surprising and is here:

Mable Chan,ᵃ Meenakshi Tiwary,ᵇ,ᶜ Helen L. Wu,ᵇ,ᶜ Nikesh Tailor,ᵃ Robert Vendramelli,ᵃ Jonathan Audet,ᵃ Bryce M. Warner,ᵃ Kevin Tierney,ᵃ Alix Albietz,ᵃ Thang Truong,ᵃ Kaylie Doan,ᵃ Alexander Bello,ᵃ Marnie Willman,ᵃ Bryan D. Griffin,ᵃ,ᵈ Patrick W. Hanley,ᵉ Jamie Lovaglio,ᵉ David Safronetz,ᵃ,ᶠ Jim Strong,ᵃ,ᶠ Jonah B. Sacha,ᵇ,ᶜ Darwyn Kobasaᵃ,ᶠ

a. Special Pathogens, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

b. Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland,

c. Oregon, USA Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA

d. Vaccine Safety Surveillance, Immunization Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

e. Rocky Mountain Veterinary Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, USA

f. Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

So, NIH and NIAID are involved. Apparently Fauci does not mind what he did with funding the creation of COVID and is at it again. You might also note the vaccine development crew’s involvement. A foundational point in this article is that the newly recreated Spanish Flu is not dangerous enough. Here is a pull-quote:

However, 1918 influenza was uniformly nonlethal in these two species, demonstrating that this isolate is insufficiently pathogenic in rhesus and Mauritian cynomolgus macaques to support testing novel prophylactic influenza approaches where protection from severe disease combined with a lethal outcome is desired as a highly stringent indication of vaccine efficacy.

This means that these people are arguing that we need to make a more dangerous version of the Spanish Flu so they can make “better” vaccines for it… despite the fact that until they recreated it, it likely no longer existed in nature. Much like with COVID, these snake oil salesmen create the disease and then create the cure. Given the complete failure and innumerable dangers of the COVID jabs, the real question is whether the cure will be worse than the disease?

For my part I find the fact that I am even writing this article to be incredible. In this election year I sincerely hope that this article is put in front of every elected official in Washington and they are asked to explain how this is continuing on their watch.

______________

The Fauci-Wuhan gang are at it again.

All Gain-of-Function research should be against U S law immediately and forevermore.
Even if someone could cook up a halfway reasonable argument for allowing some of this kind of research, it is still a no-go because the Level 4 BioLabs in concert with Chinese government and scientists, labs on USA or China soil, have a strong record of accidents and leaks of dangerous live specimens. The subject GoF Spanish Flu could "accidentally" be leaked into the public environment and start another pandemic.*

*An estimated 500 million people across the globe caught the illness, throughout the pandemic. While there are no official figures documenting the exact number of deaths, it is estimated that between 20 million and 50 million people were killed as a result of the deadly virus.

News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.c...m_source=email

Ottawa police detective faces charges of "discreditable conduct" for investigating whether child deaths have been caused by "vaccination"
She may be fired, or demoted, for obstructing Canada's pursuit of Operation Herod

Mark Crispin Miller

1 hr ago August 19, 2022

Scroll down for some recent “sudden deaths” that the police in Justin Trudeau’s Canada are not permitted to investigate, if “vaccination” may have caused them.
Ottawa police detective faces misconduct charges for allegedly seeking links between COVID vaccine and child deaths
Between June 2020 and January 2022, Grus allegedly accessed nine child or infant death cases in which she had no investigative role.

August 8, 2022

News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

An Ottawa police officer is facing misconduct charges for allegedly inserting herself into child death investigations looking for connections to the COVID-19 vaccine.

Investigators with the Ottawa Police Service’s professional standards unit allege Const. Helen Grus committed discreditable conduct when she took on a private investigative project to find the vaccination status of parents whose infants or children had died.

Between June 2020 and January 2022, Grus allegedly accessed nine child or infant death cases in which she had no investigative role. On Jan. 30, 2022, Grus also allegedly interfered directly with an investigation into an infant’s death by contacting the father of a deceased baby to inquire about the mother’s COVID-19 vaccination status without the lead investigator’s knowledge.

The charges against Grus were filed as exhibits at a disciplinary hearing on Monday morning, but she has not yet submitted a plea. Grus has also been served with a notice of increased penalty, meaning that if she is found guilty of discreditable conduct, the service may seek dismissal or demotion as a penalty.

Grus is a detective with the sexual assault and child abuse unit but she has been suspended since Feb. 4, 2022.

After the sudden or unexpected death of an infant or child, the office of the chief coroner will investigate to determine the cause of death and often make recommendations aimed at preventing similar deaths in the future. Police investigate such deaths, but their investigations focus on determining if criminality has played a role.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...9c54fc62a/amp/
This past week in Canada, five babies and children “died suddenly” over three days, no cause of death reported:
Dominic Jacob Paul Kagige Pangowish, 1 day

August 14, 2022

In Loving Memory of Dominic Jacob Paul Kagige Pangowish.He was such a strong fighter. He helped his mom go through natural labour like she wanted from the start, to not have difficulties giving birth with his other brothers and sisters in the future. He stayed with us for a good, long time before he left us. We got to enjoy every minute until he went back to heaven. Precious son. He will be greatly missed by his sister. Cherished grandson. Loved by many aunts, uncles. He will be missed by all of his older cousins.

No cause of death reported.

https://necrocanada.com/obituaries-2...august-9-2022/
Jackson Roy Ouellet, 4 months

August 12, 2022

It is with deep sadness that we announce the sudden death at the age of 4 months of Jackson Roy Ouellet, which occurred on August 7, 2022, in Sherbrooke. He leaves to mourn his mother, his father, and his brothers and sisters. Jackson is also survived by his grandmothers, grandfathers, aunt, cousins ​​and many other relatives and friends.

No cause of death reported.

https://necrocanada.com/obituaries-2...-ouellet-2022/
Joshua James Henderson Deschamps, 2

August 12, 2022

In Godmanchester, on August 6th 2022, at the age of 2 years and 4 months, suddenly died Joshua-James Henderson-Deschamps, son. He leaves to mourn his brothers and sisters, his grandparents, also many cousins, relatives and friends.

No cause of death reported.

https://necrocanada.com/obituaries-2...eschamps-2022/
Victor Berg, 15

August 13, 2022

Victor Rempel Berg, beloved son of William and Tina Berg, passed away unexpectedly on Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at the age of 15 years.

No cause of death reported.

https://www.southlandfuneral.com/obi...=obits&id=3451
Connor Rich, 6 months

August 13, 2022

It is with great sadness that the family of the late Connor Putshi Rich, announce his passing on August 4th, 2022 at the Labrador Health Centre in Happy Valley Goose Bay at the age of 6 months old. Leaving to mourn with fond and loving memories his adoptive parents.

No cause of death reported.

https://necrocanada.com/obituaries-2...ich-2022-2022/

https://beckernews.com/edit-governme...ng-data-46490/

https://beckernews.com/wp-content/up...IH-930x620.jpg

U.S. Government Deleted Covid-19 Data at Behest of Chinese Researchers. Now, a Judge Has Ordered NIH to Turn Over Missing Docs

by Kyle Becker August 19, 2022


The National Institutes of Health (NIH) deleted COVID-19 gene sequences that may have proven valuable to detecting earlier the probability the SARS-CoV-2 virus originated at the Wuhan lab, as was discovered in June 2021.


Now, U.S. district court judge Leonie Brinkema is ordering the NIH to turn over the missing data related to a probe by the group Empower Oversight. The NIH had earlier submitted a motion for summary judgment, which was denied.


“In Empower Oversight’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the Eastern District of Virginia, Empower Oversight has filed its opposition to NIH’s motion for summary judgment. In its motion, the NIH sought to evade accountability for violations of its legal obligations to disclose documents under FOIA,” the group stated in July. “According to Empower Oversight’s filing, NIH improperly withheld information gathered in response to questions from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.). Last year, the Senators asked about the agency’s decision to delete coronavirus genetic sequence information from an NIH database at the request of Chinese researchers. NIH has already admitted in the lawsuit that it failed to meet deadlines required by FOIA in responding to Empower Oversight’s request.”


“The NIH has flouted deadlines and ignored its legal obligations to be transparent with Congress and the public,” said Jason Foster, Founder and President of Empower Oversight. “The agency gathered answers to the Senators’ specific factual question but did not transmit them, and then it blacked-out entire paragraphs rather than disclose the information pursuant to our FOIA request,.”

https://wethepatriotsusa.org/breakin...ectin-lawsuit/

https://wethepatriotsusa.org/breakin...ectin-lawsuit/


BREAKING: MINNESOTA FEDERAL JUDGE GRANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN BILL SALIER IVERMECTIN LAWSUIT


https://wethepatriotsusa.org/wp-cont...ng-768x509.png

A federal judge in Minnesota today granted the motions to dismiss filed by Walmart and Hy-Vee Supermarkets, in the lawsuit funded by We The Patriots USA on behalf of Bill and Karla Salier. Bill, a retired U.S. Marine who served valiantly in Somalia and at Camp David, attempted to get a prescription for ivermectin filled at both Walmart and Hy-Vee after he and his wife became seriously ill with COVID-19 last year. After pharmacists at both stores denied him, he resorted to using horse paste for treatment. After they recovered, Bill turned to We The Patriots USA for help, which funded the lawsuit that was filed earlier this year.

We are not surprised by this decision, especially given the hostility that has been shown to patients across the country who dare to seek treatment that does not conform to the narrative propagated by the mainstream medical establishment mob. In our view, there are a lot of problems with Judge Patrick Schiltz’s decision, but here are some highlights:

“The Saliers have asserted various tort claims related to Walmart’s and Hy‐Vee’s refusals to fill the Saliers’ prescriptions for ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, two drugs that the Saliers wanted to use to treat their COVID‐19 infections, even though virtually every medical and governmental authority to address the issue has said that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine should not be used to treat COVID‐19.”

– Judge Schiltz, Bill Salier et al. v. Walmart et al.

This is a major problem with the American judicial system, one we have highlighted time and again over the years. When the authority of the PERSON is asserted over the authority of the EVIDENCE, the court substitutes lofty titles and educational credentials for actual scientific data. It is irrelevant how many so-called “authorities” have said ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are dangerous or ineffective to treat COVID-19. The evidence shows otherwise. Until we stop elevating public health authorities over the authority of real, scientific evidence, justice will not be served.

“The implications of recognizing the right asserted by the Saliers—not just the right to do whatever you want with your own body, but the right to force others to help you (so much for their right of self‐determination)—would be mind‐boggling, even if it were just limited to medical providers. If a pharmacist at Walmart is legally required to fill a prescription for ivermectin because the patient demands it, then is every doctor in Minnesota legally required to provide an abortion if a patient demands it? Is every nurse legally required to assist a patient in committing suicide?”

– Judge Schiltz, Bill Salier et al. v. Walmart et al.

First of all, the Saliers were not “demanding” or “forcing” the pharmacists to do anything. They were simply requesting that the pharmacist do his job, i.e., fill a prescription ordered for them by a duly licensed physician. Moreover, the fact that the judge would compare a patient requesting that a pharmacist fill his doctor’s prescription to a patient demanding that his doctor commit murder, is utterly reprehensible. A more appropriate comparison would be a doctor refusing to provide medical treatment to a patient bleeding on the ground in front of him. This was a refusal of a pharmacist to provide life-saving treatment, not life-taking treatment. By substituting their judgments for the judgment of the Saliers’ physician, the pharmacists were practicing medicine without a license, a practice apparently endorsed by the court today.

REST ASSURED, WE WILL BE APPEALING THIS DECISION. The medical rights of every individual in this country are at stake, and we will not back down. Please be on the lookout for updates not only here, but on our Telegram channel. Please also consider a donation to our organization, so we can continue to take on many more battles like this from coast to coast. We won’t win every case, and that’s why we need to file as many as possible! Most of all, we ask that you please keep us (and the Saliers) in your prayers.

SUPPORT OUR MISSION

We the Patriots USA, Inc. | 5210 Cleveland Blvd. Bldg. 140, Suite 222, Caldwell, ID 83607

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQBYAjmiLIQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQBYAjmiLIQ

Unvaccinated Workers Win $10 MILLION Settlement In Federal Court Over Mandate


Premiered 3 hours ago August 19, 2022

11:21 video runtime
7.3K

Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov

�� George Soros Buyout of Spanish Media Outlets �� https://ept.ms/RepelingSorosTakeoverRM

Resources:

�� Sekur:

https://ept.ms/3yW0Wul

�� Epoch TV:

https://ept.ms/RepelingSorosTakeoverRM

�� $10M Settlement:

https://ept.ms/3pxvZKa

�� Settlement Details:

https://ept.ms/3K52WXX

�� Air Force Case:

https://ept.ms/3dLaEKI

Irritating, vexing, disgusting and I guess "woke" journalism.

How many "died unexpectedly" news items have we read about when the main important question interested readers want to know is something journalists used to at least say a few words about in an obituary - cause of death, but glaringly omit now? That is the glaring question everyone has. Did this young woman who "died unexpectedly" get the "COVID" "vaccine" recently?

Greg Hunter of USA watchdog commented on this phenomena in a recent weekly news wrap-up he did and that I posted in this thread, and Dachsie has also.

Search in this thread on the name Casten. HERE is the search results.

The U S Congressman and father whose young daughter "died unexpectedly" and the congressman and the obituaries went on and on about what a wonderful beloved family member the deceased person was but not one word about the glaringly omitted cause of death which they are hiding when they ought to be screaming the probable truth from the housetops.

All we want is the TRUTH. These damn Satanically murderous evil and death-dealing "COVID" "Vaccines" need to be halted NOW . All these vaccines do is what Satan specializes in ...

LIE

MURDER

STEAL

DESTROY.

___________________

Here's the article. Read and be made ill.

https://www.crisismagazine.com/2022/the-burial-of-a-young-mother

August 19, 2022

The Burial of a Young Mother

Austin Ruse

(The only thing I know about Crisis magazine is that it is a neocon fake "Catholic" publication that has been rightly lambasted by E. Michael Jones for decades.)

https://www.crisismagazine.com/wp-co...34-660x350.jpg

Audio reading of the article available at site.


______

Here is a brief summary of this news story from

"THE BURIAL OF A YOUNG MOTHER Mary Teller unexpectedly took ill and died just nine months after giving birth to her second child — and only five years after her wedding. She was 26. Austin Ruse attended the funeral Mass and saw things there that he says he will “ponder and ponder,” including a crowd of joyful mourners too great to count, and a miracle. Read Ruse’s beautiful reflection on death, life, family, and faith here. SHARE"

Source: CatholicVote.org Daily email newsletter. August 20, 2022, The Loop

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/p...m_source=email

Podiatrist: Death and devastating injuries linked to the COVID-19 Vaccine in 80% of elderly patients

A podiatrist contacted Wayne Allyn Root to disclose his personal experience. He had to keep his identity confidential because he doesn't want to lose his license. What he said is absolutely stunning.

Steve Kirsch
1 hr ago August 20, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...1500x1001.jpeg



Podiatrist: Death and devastating injuries linked to the COVID-19 Vaccine in 80% of elderly patients

A podiatrist contacted Wayne Allyn Root to disclose his personal experience. He had to keep his identity confidential because he doesn't want to lose his license. What he said is absolutely stunning.

Steve Kirsch
Aug 20

Comment

Share

4 Ways To Find The Best Podiatrist - The Pink Velvet Blog


Check out this story: Finally, One Honest Doctor Comes Forward to Report the Death and Devastating Injuries Linked to the COVID-19 Vaccine.

Do I believe the story? Yes.

I’ve asked Wayne for the contact info of the doctor to verify the story, but I have no reason to doubt it at this point. Why would he risk his license to make up a story like this with such detail? The name of the podiatrist isn’t even revealed. It’s not for fame, not for business. Maybe he’s just malicious, but that seems unlikely. But as I said, I’ll reach out to validate it.

According to Wayne, his podiatrist sees about 80 patients a week. That’s more than enough for strong statistical significance over 20 months (over 5,000 patients) especially with such a large effect size. 95% are vaccinated.

Wayne reports that the podiatrist sees unprecedented rates of injury and death since the vaccines rolled out. He estimates that 80% of his vaccinated elderly are worse off and there is no significant change for his unvaccinated patients.

This isn’t “bad luck” because the p-values are too small to be just “bad luck.” I used Julia’s HypothesisTests library to calculate it and the chance of this happening by bad luck is less than 1e-99. That is the power of a single anecdote. But there are likely hundreds of similar anecdotes with extremely strong p-values. Are they all wrong? It’s very unlikely especially when we aren’t able to find a single anecdote showing the opposite.
All these death and injury reports will be treated by the medical community as anecdotes

Until the medical boards allow doctors to speak out without fear of retribution, these stories will never be published in medical journals and will all be just “anecdotes” that the medical community will ignore.

One doctor asked me “if his story is true, why doesn’t he publish it?”

This shows how naïve doctors are. They think if they submit it to a journal, the journal will publish it and the medical boards will praise the doctor. Neither is true.

In fact, it was the medical boards themselves that told the journal to retract the Lyons-Weiler paper.
“Telling the truth” is not protected speech in medicine: it can lead to license revocation in every state in the US

The HHS agencies, the AMA, the medical journals, or the medical community could speak out about this abuse by the medical boards. They could say that doctors who tell the truth should never be retaliated against.

Not a single doctor or mainstream medical association would dare do that.

Maybe Vinay Prasad might call for this, but he hasn’t AFAIK.

The view of all these people is that it is a state matter and if the states want to punish doctors for telling the truth about what they observe, this is 100% OK with them.

The bottom line is this:

telling the truth about what you observe is NOT protected speech in medicine. It can and will get you retaliated against.

The social media companies, HHS agencies, hospitals, lawmakers, and medical boards all believe it is their duty to silence doctors who tell the truth if what they say goes against the popular narrative.
Summary

Paul Thomas and Andrew Wakefield spoke the truth about what they observed: their reputations and careers were destroyed.

That is how science works today: if you find evidence that disagrees with mainstream opinion, if you don’t keep your mouth shut, you will pay the price for the rest of your life.

“Telling the truth” is not an acceptable defense to a medical license revocation proceeding. No doctor has the courage to speak out against the medical boards seeking retribution against doctors who simply report what they observe. Can you find any op-ed anywhere calling for protection of doctors who speak the truth?

People who tell the truth must be silenced.

Why? Because the medical community cannot explain anecdotes like this one. If the podiatrist isn’t lying, something is causing this, and it is 100% correlated with vaccination.

So if it isn’t the vaccine, what is it?

The medical community doesn’t know and they don’t want to know because it would make them look bad for pushing the vaccine.

Is it any wonder why this doctor is afraid to speak publicly?

https://www.creators.com/read/wayne-...vid-19-vaccine


Finally, One Honest Doctor Comes Forward to Report the Death and Devastating Injuries Linked to the COVID-19 Vaccine

By Wayne Allyn Root

August 21, 2022 6 min read

It's really that bad. I believe the COVID-19 vaccine is clearly the worst medical experiment and health care disaster in history. The results are all around us. Just tune in to the news. Or sports. Or TMZ. Celebrities, athletes, even doctors are dropping dead left and right — in numbers never seen in history.

If you don't believe me, why not ask the life insurance executives? They're reporting deaths up anywhere from 20% to 40% since the vaccines debuted. These are non-COVID-19 deaths. This is a number never seen in history. Even during World War II, deaths were not up by 20% to 40% across the USA. Not even close.

Recently, I reported on my personal experience. So many of my friends and even wedding guests (from just this past November) are dead, dying or very sick. It's a cluster of cancer, heart attacks, strokes and serious illness — but only among the vaccinated. No one I know who is unvaccinated is sick. Not one person.

Then just days ago, I reported on seven doctors who died suddenly in Canada in a 14-day period. All not just vaccinated, but based on Canadian mandates, almost certainly quadruple vaccinated. Included in that remarkable list are five dead doctors — all young — who died within just a few days of one another in one city: Toronto.
FEMA

But the real issue is the ones who aren't dead from the COVID-19 vaccine but are injured and/or disabled. They'll be vulnerable to pain, misery and poverty for the rest of their lives.

Based on what a "trusted source" just disclosed to me, we are in for a world of trouble. A credible doctor has come forward. He/she wants to remain anonymous, for fear of losing his/her medical license for telling the truth about vaccine injuries.

Let's call this doctor Dr. Smith. Let's say he practices on the East Coast. As a podiatrist his practice is over 60% older (65 years old and above). Dr. Smith believes about 95% of his patients are vaccinated. The results are devastating.

The unvaccinated patients are fine — no major illness or problems. But Dr. Smith says over 80% of the vaccinated patients are very sick since vaccination.

What is Dr. Smith seeing? First, the vaccinated are dying off. Second, he's seeing heart attacks, strokes and blood clots in incredible numbers. Third, they're getting rare and advanced (stage 4) forms of cancer. Many of his patients were in cancer remission, but suddenly post-vaccine the cancer has come roaring back — except now it's spread everywhere in their bodies. He used to see skin cancer once or twice a month; now he sees it several times a week. Thyroid cancer has skyrocketed — and he reports that it's always diagnosed after they get the booster jab.

They're suffering terrible neurological disease, such as Parkinson's disease. They're experiencing terrible shingles outbreaks. They're suffering serious intestinal issues like colitis and diverticulitis.

Other strange issues he has never seen before: So many of his patients are experiencing terrible eye issues. One patient went suddenly blind in one eye while driving. He's also seeing more elderly patients experiencing falls than ever before.

After hip or knee replacement, Dr. Smith's patients used to recover quickly. Now if they're vaccinated, they often experience terrible postoperative complications and need to be hospitalized.

After seeing or hearing about all these injuries, Dr. Smith always asks, "What's changed? Are you doing anything different? Are you on any new medications?" The answer is always, "Nothing new, but I just got my COVID-19 booster shot."

Then there's the issue of aging. Dr. Smith's older patients have aged horribly, literally overnight — since being vaccinated. They feel it and say it themselves. They say, "I'm falling apart." "I've aged so badly in the past year. I feel like I'm 100 years old." "What's happening? I feel so old. Nothing in my body works anymore." But everything worked fine one year ago. They were aging slowly and beautifully. What changed so radically? They were vaccinated. It's been all downhill since.

Finally, just today one of Dr. Smith's older patients announced his 4-year-old great granddaughter has cancer. He was devastated. Dr. Smith asked, "Was she vaccinated?" The patient replied, "Yes, why do you ask?"

No one gets it. It's as if everyone is brain-dead, clueless, delusional or brainwashed. The signs are everywhere. How many of you know someone who was vaccinated and died or suffered a bad illness soon thereafter?

We all do.

Wake up, America. I believe this COVID-19 vaccine is the worst medical experiment and health care disaster in history.

And here's the really frightening part: This is just the beginning. The vaccines only became widely available about 18 months ago. It surely is only going to get much worse.

_______________________

Wayne Allyn Root is known as "the Conservative Warrior." Wayne's new No. 1 bestselling book is out, "The Great Patriot Protest and Boycott Book." Wayne is now the host of two new TV shows on Real America's Voice and Mike Lindell TV. He is also host of the nationally syndicated "Wayne Allyn Root: Raw & Unfiltered" on USA Radio Network, daily from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. EST. Visit ROOTforAmerica.com for more information.

https://live.childrenshealthdefense....9-d314a30cdd2b

live show about Neurenberg Now Watch

8/20/22 - 6:00 am•Live
The Nuremberg Code: 75th Annual Commemoration

Your right to Informed Consent. WATCH THIS SHOW.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...xrXaYV4BCA--~D

https://www.judicialwatch.org/videos...crt-continues/

JW: ON THE AIR
FARRELL: “Our Military Will Be Destroyed if CRT Continues”



Judicial Watch Director of Investigations and Research Chris Farrell joins @The Victory Channel to discuss a set of documents we received revealing the Critical Race Theory being taught in our military academies. WATCH NOW!

1:02 video clip runtime

also see YouTube

Very frustrating

Cannot locate the FULL interview of Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch. This is supposed to be on
the YT channel The Victory Channel

sent email to Judicial Watch. Will post full video if I get a reply.

STOP THE SHOTS

https://rumble.com/v1ees0f-right-doc...m_medium=email

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...qG55geVe7w--~D

9:59 Video Runtime

Dachsie followup on
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...avirus/page365

Post Number 3642

Regarding

21 USC 360bbb-3a: Emergency use of medical products

TITLE 21 USC 360bbb-3a: Emergency use of medical products

This is Title 21 of the United States Code.

DO NOT TRUNCATEhttps://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:21%20section:360bbb-3a%20edition:prelim)DONOTTRUNCATE

I am still researching this but it appears that this citation is the basis for charging the US military for breaking the law by mandating or forcing or coercing enlisted soldiers to take the experimental EUA COVID "vaccine."

It appears that the wording of this law applies to all people who are USA citizens, not just to military enlisted soldiers.

Why can't we make them

STOP THE SHOTS !
______________

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?...dition:prelim)

§360bbb–3a. Emergency use of medical products
(a) Definitions

In this section:
(1) Eligible product

The term "eligible product" means a product that-

(A) is approved or cleared under this subchapter, conditionally approved under section 360ccc of this title, or licensed under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262];

(B)(i) is intended for use to prevent, diagnose, or treat a disease or condition involving a biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear agent or agents; or

(ii) is intended for use to prevent, diagnose, or treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product described in clause (i); and

(C) is intended for use during the circumstances under which-

(i) a determination described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 360bbb–3(b)(1) of this title has been made by the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, or the Secretary, respectively; or

(ii) the identification of a material threat described in subparagraph (D) of section 360bbb–3(b)(1) of this title has been made pursuant to section 319F–2 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 247d–6b].
(2) Product

The term "product" means a drug, device, or biological product.
(b) Expiration dating
(1) In general

The Secretary may extend the expiration date and authorize the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of an eligible product after the expiration date provided by the manufacturer if-

(A) the expiration date extension is intended to support the United States ability to protect-

(i) the public health; or

(ii) military preparedness and effectiveness; and

(B) the expiration date extension is supported by an appropriate scientific evaluation that is conducted or accepted by the Secretary.
(2) Requirements and conditions

Any extension of an expiration date under paragraph (1) shall, as part of the extension, identify-

(A) each specific lot, batch, or other unit of the product for which extended expiration is authorized;

(B) the duration of the extension; and

(C) any other requirements or conditions as the Secretary may deem appropriate for the protection of the public health, which may include requirements for, or conditions on, product sampling, storage, packaging or repackaging, transport, labeling, notice to product recipients, recordkeeping, periodic testing or retesting, or product disposition.
(3) Effect

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], an eligible product shall not be considered an unapproved product (as defined in section 360bbb–3(a)(2)(A) of this title) and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because, with respect to such product, the Secretary has, under paragraph (1), extended the expiration date and authorized the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of such product after the expiration date provided by the manufacturer.
(4) Expiration date

For purposes of this subsection, the term "expiration date" means the date established through appropriate stability testing required by the regulations issued by the Secretary to ensure that the product meets applicable standards of identity, strength, quality, and purity at the time of use.
(c) Current good manufacturing practice
(1) In general

The Secretary may, when the circumstances of a domestic, military, or public health emergency or material threat described in subsection (a)(1)(C) so warrant, authorize, with respect to an eligible product, deviations from current good manufacturing practice requirements otherwise applicable to the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of products subject to regulation under this chapter, including requirements under section 351 or 360j(f)(1) of this title or applicable conditions prescribed with respect to the eligible product by an order under section 360j(f)(2) of this title.
(2) Effect

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], an eligible product shall not be considered an unapproved product (as defined in section 360bbb–3(a)(2)(A) of this title) and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because, with respect to such product, the Secretary has authorized deviations from current good manufacturing practices under paragraph (1).
(d) Emergency dispensing

The requirements of subsections (b) and (f) of section 353, section 354, and section 360j(e) of this title shall not apply to an eligible product, and the product shall not be considered an unapproved product (as defined in section 360bbb–3(a)(2)(A) of this title) and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because it is dispensed without an individual prescription, if-

(1) the product is dispensed during the circumstances described in subsection (a)(1)(C); and

(2) such dispensing without an individual prescription occurs-

(A) as permitted under the law of the State in which the product is dispensed; or

(B) in accordance with an order issued by the Secretary, for the purposes and duration of the circumstances described in subsection (a)(1)(C).
(e) Emergency use instructions
(1) In general

The Secretary, acting through an appropriate official within the Department of Health and Human Services, may create and issue emergency use instructions to inform health care providers or individuals to whom an eligible product is to be administered concerning such product's approved, licensed, or cleared conditions of use.
(2) Effect

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter or the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], a product shall not be considered an unapproved product and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because of the issuance of emergency use instructions under paragraph (1) with respect to such product or the introduction or delivery for introduction of such product into interstate commerce accompanied by such instructions-

(A) during an emergency response to an actual emergency that is the basis for a determination described in subsection (a)(1)(C); or

(B) by a government entity (including a Federal, State, local, or tribal government entity), or a person acting on behalf of such a government entity, in preparation for an emergency response.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §564A, as added Pub. L. 113–5, title III, §302(b), Mar. 13, 2013, 127 Stat. 183 ; amended Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title III, §3088(c), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1149 ; Pub. L. 116–22, title VII, §705(c), June 24, 2019, 133 Stat. 964 .)

Editorial Notes
References in Text

The Public Health Service Act, referred to in subsecs. (b)(3), (c)(2), and (e)(2), is act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, 58 Stat. 682 , which is classified generally to chapter 6A (§201 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 201 of Title 42 and Tables.
Amendments

2019-Subsec. (e)(2)(A). Pub. L. 116–22 substituted "subsection (a)(1)(C)" for "subsection (a)(1)(C)(i)".

2016-Subsec. (a)(1)(A). Pub. L. 114–255, §3088(c)(1), inserted ", conditionally approved under section 360ccc of this title," after "subchapter".

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–255, §3088(c)(2), substituted "subsections (b) and (f) of section 353, section 354, and section 360j(e) of this title" for "sections 353(b) and 360j(e) of this title" in introductory provisions.

More on the Nuremberg Code from Dr. James H. Fetzer from his recent show on Bitchute.

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...J7_320x180.jpg

Need to Know News (18 August 2022) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson

TRANSCRIPT @ 33:53 - 34:50

Let me just say how fascinating and revealing that is. And of course they're suppressing it because the Nuremberg Code declares right off the bat that

no person may be subjected to an experimental medical procedure without informed consent which has been violated all over the world, grossly violated.

Individuals have informed consent and must know all the benefits and all the hazards, all the downsides, the risks associated with an experimental vaccine.

They must also be informed about viable available alternatives that are less intrusive like HCQ and Ivermectin, which were massively suppressed because the FDA could never have authorized an experimental vaccine if there were viable, readily available alternatives that were non-intrusive such as HCQ and Ivermectin.

So if you were to highlight the Nuremberg Code, you would expose that the entire American medical establishment has been grossly violating international law and established medical procedure.

So, of course, it's only going to be Crickets.

Carl, your thoughts.

More from Carl Herman on the recent Need to Know News show on Bitchute.

Need to Know News (18 August 2022) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...J7_320x180.jpg

TRANSCRIPT @ 35:00 - 37:23

Yes, there are crimes against humanity. And the Nuremberg Code is reflected in U S CODE Title 21. Article 6 of the United States Constitution has federal law is supreme over any state mandate, order, requirement, whatever they want to do to frame it.

And in the two years that I have challenged Haywood Unified School District as a public school teacher that was one of the arguments that I gave. I said 'hey, you know I happen to know that you administer and defend the Constitution of the United States and of California. That's limited law.

Federal law Title 21 means that I can freely decline any types of EUA, Experimental Use Authorized medical product -- the masks the shots, the tests, but Haywood Unified School District, you tell me that I have to get paid unpaid leave if I refuse these medical experiments.

How can you violate Title 21?

And they didn't want to answer. And in the back-and-forth of over two years of obfuscation, but the official answer I finally got out of them is that they said 'look, we can locally in California, we can supplant Title 21 by giving you broader rights and more stringent compliance than federal law.'

So I said 'So, my forced paid leave is a broader right - that's the argument that you're making?' And then Crickets to that.

So, our opponents aren't able to articulate and defend any position. All they can do is bullshit, obfuscate and then when you really nail them with a sharp question, they have to go silent.

These are crimes against humanity. They have no authority. This issue has been not challenged since World War II that the Nuremberg Code means what it says. Federal Title 21 means what it says. And this is backed up in California laws, and I'm sure most laws in most states that the American public and the global public are free to decline any medical experimental product without any coercion.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...2-e24aab757cb7
video embedded in CHD article

12:31 video runtime

also on YouTube HERE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ature=emb_logo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=117&v=7wVEQfRd4ds&feature=emb_ logo


08/17/22
•

COVID › Views

Kim Iversen: What I Would Have Asked Fauci If I’d Been Allowed to Interview Him

In a recent interview with Russell Brand, Kim Iversen said she’s no longer co-host of The Hill’s “Rising” because she wasn’t allowed to interview Dr. Anthony Fauci.

By
Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.


Political commentator Kim Iversen was excited when she learned the news show she co-hosted, The Hill’s “Rising,” had booked Dr. Anthony Fauci for an interview — until the night before the interview, she learned she wouldn’t be allowed to participate.

“I’m not on ‘The Hill’ because they would not allow me to interview Anthony Fauci,” Kim Iversen told Russell Brand during a recent interview about why she left The Hill.

Iversen said she doesn’t know for certain who was responsible for the decision — whether Fauci’s team said he wouldn’t come on the show if she did the interview, or if her producers didn’t present her name to Fauci’s team, for fear he’d back out.

All she knows is that the night before the interview was to take place, her producers said she wouldn’t be part of it.

Iversen told them, “That’s unacceptable,” because, after all, she’d been covering COVID-19 “at length” for the show.

When she joined The Hill, Iversen said she knew she was “joining corporate media” and therefore “part of the establishment to some degree,” she told Brand.

But she also told her producers, and her audience, that she wouldn’t remain on the show if she were “censored, held back or limited.”

“The minute that was to change was the minute that I would no longer be able to be there,” she said. “That would make me a liar to the audience.”

Download for Free: Robert F. Kennedy's New Book — ‘A Letter to Liberals’

‘Does Anthony Fauci refuse to answer difficult questions?’

Iversen said she was excited to interview Fauci because “he is the person who guided the pandemic that put us in these limitations and mandates.”

She added:

“Our lives have drastically changed since the pandemic in many ways, and Fauci was the guiding force on a lot of that.”

As director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, U.S. government authorities looked to him to manage the pandemic.

Initially an HIV/AIDS researcher — as discussed in Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s book, “The Real Anthony Fauci” — Fauci has advised seven U.S. presidents and is now chief medical advisor to President Biden.

Fauci on Aug. 2 told Fox News he symbolizes “consistency,” “integrity” and “truth.”

Not everyone agrees.

“As the world watched,” Kennedy wrote in his book, “Tony Fauci dictated a series of policies that resulted in by far the most deaths, and one of the highest percentage COVID-19 body counts of any nation on the planet.”

Kennedy added:

“Only relentless propaganda and wall-to-wall censorship could conceal his disastrous mismanagement during COVID-19’s first year.”

Brand said he thinks high-paying public officials like Fauci, who wield great amounts of power, should be held up to public scrutiny.

Brand emphasized the need for “transparency between powerful people that make decisions and the media that report on the decisions that are being made, so that we — the ordinary people of the world — are able to be part of a conversation regarding how we are governed.”

“What interests me about this subject is, Does Anthony Fauci refuse to answer difficult questions?” Brand said.

Brand wondered whether Fauci was avoiding answering tough questions about “things like natural immunity, recommendation of vaccines for those under 5 [years of age], their clinical data and whether the clinical data underwrites the decision to extend the vaccine program to young people.”

What would Iversen have asked Fauci, had she been allowed to interview him?

“What is a ‘vaccine’ to Fauci?”
“How much protection do we get? How long does it last?”
“Why are we not doing comprehensive studies on natural immunity?”
“Why are we not doing studies on comprehensive therapeutics that are out there?”
“Why did you not separate those who are most vulnerable from those who are not, like school children, and why did you instead say, ‘no, everybody has to do this [i.e., wear a mask, get the vaccine]?’”

Iversen expressed frustration at the “narrative” around COVID-19 and the “lack of ability to ask questions.”

“They [Fauci and his team] were not interested, it seems,” Iversen told Brand, “in finding out any of those questions and getting answers for us. Instead, it was just: ‘No, take this,’ make Big Pharma a bunch of money and silence to any of us who actually questioned it.”

Iversen also would like to have asked Fauci if he, himself, could generate any critical questions to ask.

“Does he have any at all?” she asked. “Because it doesn’t feel like there are any coming from him.”

Watch the interview here:
____

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.

Increasing Communist Tyranny and Totalitarianism for Canada

_________________

https://brownstone.org/articles/digi...tm_source=push

Digital ID in Canada. Is the US Next?

https://brownstone.org/wp-content/up...-1-800x469.jpg


Digital ID in Canada. Is the US Next?

By John Mac Ghlionn August 21, 2022

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is actively promoting digital IDs. The Known Traveler Digital Identity (KTDI) is a WEF initiative that, according to its website, “brings together a global consortium of individuals, governments, authorities and the travel industry to enhance security in world travel.”

As you can probably tell by the name of the initiative, digital IDs are a core component of the WEF’s desire to “enhance security.” Canada is KTDI’s most prominent member. Now, Canada, supposedly a country interested in advancing human rights, wants to introduce a federal “Digital Identity Program.”

According to a recent report released by the Canadian government, those in charge want “to make it easier for Canadians to interact with the Government of Canada.” For this to occur, though, “modern, integrated systems and an unwavering focus on the needs and experience of citizens” are required. In plain human language: this will require the introduction of digital IDs. The elites in Davos, one imagines, are excited by the developments in Canada.

Last year, in a rather revealing white paper, the WEF outlined the many ways in which digital IDs will turbocharge our digital future. The authors cite China’s use of digital IDs and biometric technologies; these, they insist, have “transformed consumer habits and delivered tangible benefits” to Chinese citizens. The fact that the WEF is using China as a shining example of why digital IDs work should worry anyone who cherishes the idea of freedom.

Should American citizens be concerned if Canada—the United States’ neighbor—is prepared to roll out digital IDs? The answer is yes. If it can happen in one of the most developed countries in the world, it can happen in the United States. In fact, some Democrats are actively pushing for digital IDs.

In a recent piece for The American Conservative, I asked the question, why are Democrats pushing digital IDs? Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.) first introduced the “Improving Digital Identity Act” back in 2020, but his idea never gathered momentum. Foster decided to reintroduce the measure.

As the author Natalie Aims noted, the bill “would also set up a task force on digital identity and establish a grant program at the Department of Homeland Security to support the creation of interoperable identity credentialing systems for digital identity verification on the state and local level.”

Yes, the DHS, the very same federal executive department that was trying to introduce the Disinformation Governance Board earlier this year.

Foster, as I discussed in The American Conservative piece, is not the only Democrat pushing digital IDs. He’s just one of many. Which begs the question, why are a number of politicians on the left so interested in these problematic IDs? In short, they want to address identity fraud, a growing problem in the United States. In 2021, nearly 42 million Americans were victims of identity fraud. Tens of billions of dollars were lost to opportunistic fraudsters.

Now, only a fool would argue that identity fraud isn’t a problem in the United States; it is. Something must be done. However, we must ensure that the so-called cure is not worse than the disease.

You see, digital IDs are closely associated with social credit systems. When one reads the words “social credit system,” their minds automatically jump to communist China, where 1.4 billion people are constantly monitored and graded. Those who fall short are banned from booking flights and enrolling their children in certain schools. They become prisoners, unable to relocate elsewhere and unable to give their children a better life. Nothing good comes from a social credit system. People are forced to live in a constant state of fear, constantly checking their score to see if they are considered “good” or “bad” by those in charge.

With Canadian authorities creating the infrastructure required to implement a digital identification network, some are concerned that a social credit system similar to the one in China is just around the corner. Their concerns are warranted. Digital IDs lay the path for social credit systems. Without them, a credit system wouldn’t be impossible.

From a globalist takeover perspective, as the author Tim Hinchcliffe put it, digital identity schemes are a must. Although there will never be a good time to introduce digital IDs (at least for us, the citizens), they appear to be unavoidable and inescapable. They are coming. They will play a central role in this world—and the next one.

In the Metaverse—the next iteration of the internet that will see humans inhabit the digital unknown—digital identities will play a starring role. Do you know who else will play a starring role? The WEF. The elites in Davos appear very eager to govern the immersive virtual world, this 3D representation of the internet. The Metaverse includes the use of virtual reality and augmented reality headsets. And if the WEF has its way, it will also include the use of digital identities.

_________________________

Reprinted from Epoch Times

Author

John Mac Ghlionn

With a doctorate in psychosocial studies, John Mac Ghlionn works as both a researcher and essayist. His writing has been published by the likes of Newsweek, NY Post, and The American Conservative. He can be found on Twitter: @ghlionn, and on Gettr: @John_Mac_G

READ MORE

More self-incriminating CDC "cases" GIGO.

________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...2-e24aab757cb7


08/15/22

Hold On! CDC Says COVID No Longer Needs to Disrupt Our Daily Lives … But What Really Changed?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last week said the agency “streamlined” its COVID-19 guidance so the public can better protect itself — but what really changed?

By
Madhava Setty, M.D.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in a press release last week said the agency “streamlined” its COVID-19 guidance so the public can better protect itself.

Of note, the CDC did not mention any different recommendations for unvaccinated individuals than for those who got the jab. Why not?

“We’re in a stronger place today as a nation, with more tools — like vaccination, boosters and treatments — to protect ourselves, and our communities, from severe illness from COVID-19,” said Greta Massetti, Ph.D., MPH, a CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report author.

According to Massetti:

“We also have a better understanding of how to protect people from being exposed to the virus, like wearing high-quality masks, testing, and improved ventilation. This guidance acknowledges that the pandemic is not over, but also helps us move to a point where COVID-19 no longer severely disrupts our daily lives.

Hold on a moment — what new tools is she talking about? We’ve had vaccines for 20 months, boosters for over a year and “treatments” from very early on (if one considers those that the CDC never acknowledged).

Was the CDC against high-quality masks, testing and improved ventilation prior to this bulletin?

What exactly has changed? Are daily cases plummeting?

No, they aren’t much different than they were in the fall of 2021, and are significantly higher than the summer lulls over the past two years:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...t-1024x520.jpg
Credit: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

But more importantly, why does the CDC now regard the unvaccinated in the same way as the jabbed?

Let’s look at the CDC’s COVID-19 death rates in age groups from 18 to 80 (there are too few deaths in people under the age of 18 to report):

18 to 29:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...9-1024x474.jpg
Credit: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

30 to 49:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...9-1024x480.jpg

50 to 64:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...4-1024x475.jpg
Credit: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

65 to 79:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...9-1024x486.jpg
Credit: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

People over 80:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...0-1024x485.jpg
Credit: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

COVID-19 death rates are nearly the same in all age groups reported whether or not a person is vaccinated.

It would be very hard for the CDC to have different guidelines based on vaccination status if there were no benefit to getting jabbed. Isn’t this the real reason for the “streamlined” guidance?

Oh, and one last question for you, Greta: These data are three months old — would you care to tell us how the vaccinated are faring compared to the unvaccinated now?

Or won’t this be necessary now that there are no longer any special impositions placed on the unvaccinated?

One thing is for sure: If this has become a “pandemic of the vaccinated,” we certainly don’t want to see the data that proves it.
_________________________
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.
_________________________

Author:

Madhava Setty, M.D.

Madhava Setty, M.D. is senior science editor for The Defender.

https://beckernews.com/new-nih-inspe...rements-46499/

NIH Inspector General Finds More Than Half of Clinical Trials During Covid ‘Did Not Comply’ with Federal Requirements

by Kyle Becker August 19, 2022


The National Institutes of Health’s Office of the Inspector General has found that more than half the clinical trials funded in response to the Covid-19 pandemic did not comply with federal guidelines.

The OIG report, which was released earlier this week, sheds light on the lax approach that the nation’s premier health institutes took to ensure that the clinical trials met the highest standards for transparency and timely reporting.

“We reviewed all 72 NIH-funded Intramural and Extramural clinical trials for which Federal law and NIH policy required the results to be reported in calendar year 2019 or 2020,” the NIH’s Inspector General stated. “To determine whether responsible parties complied with reporting requirements, we compared the date the results should have been submitted with the date they were submitted. We also determined whether NIH posted the clinical trial results submitted by the responsible parties to ClinicalTrials.gov within 30 days of the submission date.”

The NIH’s IG found that more than half the clinical trials did not meet the requisite federal reporting guidelines, either by failing to meet the deadline or by not reporting the results at all. The Table summarizes the number of clinical trials requiring results to be submitted in 2019 or 2020 that were submitted on time, late, or not submitted at all.

https://beckernews.com/wp-content/up...000-scaled.jpg

The IG’s striking report follows upon the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention admitting that the agency failed to achieve its results during the Covid-19 pandemic and calling for sweeping reorganization.

Source: beckernews.com

BREAKING NEWS:

Whistleblower Report of Illegal DoD Activity The memorandum alleges Department of Defense (DoD) has unlawfully administered Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) products (i.e., products authorized but not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)) as if they were fully licensed FDA approved products. Military members have not been allowed to exercise their legal right to refuse EUA products, despite the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) assertion that “Comirnaty-labeled” vaccines only became available for the DoD to order on 20 May 2022. Evidence also exists that the new “Comirnaty-labeled” products are not FDA approved in accordance with applicable laws.
https://www.truthforhealth.org/2022/...-dod-activity/

Source: newsletter from

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...KvTnsM4Teg--~D

New VAERS Data as of Aug.12, 2022 (posted Aug.19, 2022)

32,775 Total Deaths and 1,478,614 Total Adverse Events

30,347 Pfizer/Moderna and 2,631 J&J Deaths

1,385,401 Pfizer / Moderna and 93,213 J&J Adverse Events


https://drtenpenny.com/newsletter/#vaers
Source: https://drtenpenny.com/newsletter/#vaers

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...i3ckHDstfg--~D

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-co...m_source=email

☕️ Coffee & Covid ☙ Monday, August 22, 2022

More jab injury news makes corporate media; Epoch links cancer to jabs;

Jeff Childers
2 hr ago August 22, 2022

COVID NEWS AND COMMENTARY* ��

�� We’ve been watching the narrative over jab safety and efficacy pivoting for two months now, and then last week we saw the CDC pivoting to drop all its covid restrictions for unjabbed people, and announcing a “top to bottom” reorganization. Weird.

Then over the weekend, Tucker Carlson rounded up jab injury studies.
Twitter avatar for @JustTruthSleuth��Sapere Aude�� @JustTruthSleuth
Tucker SAYS IT about the forced vaccines.

Link to video
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1550466125879582720/pu/vid/1280x720/rY293Elualz5qxUe.mp4?tag=12

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...0zbiH1Xi.w--~D

The Lancet: “Risk of infection, hospitalization, and death up to nine months after second dose of Covid-19 vaccine.”

July 22nd 2022
296 Retweets370 Likes

Tucker’s first study was from the Lancet in February titled “Risk of infection, hospitalisation, and death up to 9 months after a second dose of COVID-19 vaccine: a retrospective, total population cohort study in Sweden - The Lancet”.

So it’s not that Tucker was breaking any new “news.” The real news was that Fox was giving prime-time coverage to direct vaccine injury studies. Tucker’s been warming up to this, I told you in July when he first referenced a study about the jab disrupting interferon signaling. But his tone in July was much more cautious than it was this weekend.

Twitter avatar for @TPostMillennialThe Post Millennial @TPostMillennial
Tucker Carlson takes a look at the effects the COVID vaccine is being shown to have on people.

link to video
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1551729043686531073/vid/642x360/uJvqa65_zzjLRk35.mp4?tag=14

July 26th 2022
5,975 Retweets12,605 Likes

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...9vNtcwlppA--~D

Tucker is getting aggressive about jab risks. The CDC and its allies MUST realize that it’s simply too late to screw a cap onto all the studies — the cat’s already out of the bag, as Dr. McCullough keenly observed yesterday:

Twitter avatar for @P_McCulloughMDPeter McCullough, MD MPH @P_McCulloughMD
Today PUBMED lists ~30K papers on Spike protein. I predict topping > 1M as S-protein drives disease on a mass scale never seen before. Billions have it loaded in their bodies with serial genetic administrations; it resides long-term in organs, tissues, monocytes, and exosomes.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...hjWAAAbZBS.jpg

August 21st 2022
4,333 Retweets7,854 Likes



He’s right — there are more than 30,000 papers and studies now published on the harms caused by spike protein, which is the mRNA shots’ one and only effective by-product. And many of those papers specifically examine jab-induced spike protein rather than just spike generally.

Now Tucker needs to do excess deaths. That’s the government’s weakness, the reality that they won’t be able to dissemble away.

�� In another example, albeit not in corporate media, the Epoch Times ran a story Friday headlined, “New and Recurrent Cancers After mRNA Vaccines, Studies Suggest Immune Changes.”

The article starts with an alarming timeline for former cancer patient Bonnie Eisenberg. She recovered from breast cancer in 2012, and since then has been regularly testing for cancer markers every few months. They’ve always been low, averaging 0.4 ng/mL.

But after Bonnie took the first jab in January 2021, her next cancer marker test showed slightly elevated — but not alarming — levels at 3.7 ng/mL. After her second jab in February 2021, it bumped up again, to 5.2 ng/mL. But after she took the booster in October, her marker shot up to a red-hot 17.6 ng/mL and her doctor called her in for an immediate PET scan.

You guessed it; her breast cancer was back and not only that, it had already metastasized. Bonnie explained, “it went to all my bones … it didn’t go to any of my body organs, but it was over every bone you could think of. On the PET scan I lit up like a Christmas tree.”

She was suddenly and unexpectedly in stage 4. They immediately put her on chemo ($14,000 a month), which got the cancer under control. But Bonnie will remain on serious medication for the rest of her life, and is already experiencing side effects like hair loss, loss of bone mass, and so on.

Epoch quoted MIT’s Dr. Stephanie Seneff, who is apparently doing some great work in this area. Dr. Seneff explained in a recent study, “Impaired type I IFN signaling is linked to many disease risks, most notably cancer, as type 1 IFN signaling suppresses proliferation of both viruses and cancer cells by arresting the cell cycle.”

The paper then pointed out that “research on spike protein and mRNA vaccines suggests that IFN-alpha action may be impaired when exposed to spike protein.”

In other words, they’re saying the shots cause immune system problems, which pave the wave for cancer.

The immune system is what keeps cancer in check in healthy people. Epoch cited an analysis by The Expose on VAERS data that indicated a jab-linked explosion of cancers by 143,233 percent. That’s a lot.

The article cites more examples, like John Rolf, a healthy 68-year-old who suddenly developed stage 3 esophageal cancer after his jab in March 2021. Although doctors were optimistic, and started him on aggressive chemo, John died in his sleep in October. His wife Cheryl said, “I got up and he said ‘I want to sleep some more’ and he didn’t get up. I went and looked [later] and he had passed away.”

Is it possible we’ve finally reached the stage where the problems can no longer reasonably be hidden or denied, and that’s why the CDC is suddenly pivoting so hard, and why the U.S. is signaling that it will stop paying for jabs?

If so, it’s a fabulous development. We need a new Operation Warp Speed 2.0, to develop treatments for what the first Operation Warp Speed came up with. An all-hands-on-deck effort to treat vaccine injuries can’t happen until they admit there’s a problem.

Just admit it! Everybody already knows anyway.

____________________

https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-...ent=08-22-2022

free video

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...Fn5UH7tKkQ--~D

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...y35u48vL7w--~D

President Donald Trump is suggesting he may be preparing a lawsuit following the raid on his Mar-A-Lago residence, which Attorney General Merrick Garland “personally approved.” Trump is alleging the raid was a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution, which forbids illegal searches and seizures.

In other news, Dr. Robert Malone is filing a defamation lawsuit against the Washington Post, alleging that the news outlet published false information about his career and the validity of his warnings over the COVID-19 vaccinations.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/i...m_source=email

Inside the mind of one of my very smart pro-vax friends
Here's how they think. It's 100% based on deference to authority. If you ask them for data to back up their claims, they stop responding.

Steve Kirsch

3 hr ago August 22, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._1200x900.jpeg

I recently talked to a friend of mine at a recent social event. We’ll call him Bob. He’s super smart about most things. But when it comes to the vaccine, he’s blind to the truth.

He was bragging about how he has been vaxxed 6 times with the COVID vax and he’s perfectly healthy. He can’t wait for SB 866 in California to pass so when his kids turn 12, they can decide to get the vaccine over their mother’s objections.

Bob thinks I’m a nut case, cherry picking data. He says I used to be respected, but after turning anti-vax, people have lost all respect for me. He said I have a religious belief about the vaccine and I’m not driven by data.

What he isn’t telling anyone is that he’s been losing his vision ever since he got his first COVID vaccine. He used to have 20/20 vision, but now he wears glasses and can’t drive at night. When I brought up the data showing the connection between the shots and vision loss, he changed the topic.

I showed him two papers showing the more you vaccinate, the sicker you get (see the two papers here). I asked, “Where are the papers that show the opposite?” He ignored my request.

He gets his belief system from the mainstream media. Full stop. He reasons that if I was correct, surely Bill Gates would agree with me and admit they goofed. It’s 100% deference to authority.

Bob will not look at the data himself and he doesn’t want to discuss it. He will not engage. He thinks that if I was right, there would be more than a handful of people speaking out. So he tallies the size of the support base on each side of an issue instead of looking at the data.

I hope this is useful in helping you understand the pro-vaxxers and how they think.

The important thing is you cannot turn these people around. Arguing with them is fruitless because they don’t want to see the data. They will only come around when the people they trust change their position.

This is why we need to focus on protecting doctors who speak out.

Perhaps a state ballot initiative in California providing that doctors cannot be retaliated against when they tell the truth (including having social media accounts taken down, having their license to practice medicine revoked, etc). That would prevent things like this from ever happening again.

_______

Dachsie comment:

One thing that has become very clear to me is that even standard good pre-"pandemic" USA medical practice relies a great deal on data,
and there is good data and bad data and both kinds can get published in good medical journals.

Data comes from research studies.
Studies are paid for, directly or indirectly, through NIH and other governmental entities by BigPharma and then published in journals owned by BigPharma.

Patients with COVID diagnosis codes who are admitted to hospitals are subject to "hospital protocols" treatments, and the hospitals are owned by BigPharma and the doctors who are owned by BigPharma or by state university medical teaching hospitals who are funded by governmental entities who are, directly or indirectly funded by, you guessed it, BigPharma.

Studies can be democratically designed by using the end justifies the means method, which I have been told is not true science.

This speech was epoch! Glad we can replay because live version was a bit glitched.

_________

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3

August 22, 2022

WATCH THE HISTORIC REPLAY

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...0bc1e5ad77.jpg

Now On-Demand: The Nuremberg Code
75th Anniversary Commemoration

On August 20, 2022, a compelling line-up of international speakers traveled to Nuremberg to commemorate the 75th Anniversary of The Nuremberg Code. In its jubilee year, this achievement of mankind faced the greatest hardship since it was written.

Speakers include CHD President Mary Holland, CHD Africa Executive Director Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, Dr. Tess Lawrie, Martin Michealis, Steffi Bresnik, Rolf Kron + more.

For more information visit the 75th Anniversary website: https://www.xn--75jahre-nrnberger-kodex-kpc.de/

embedded video

Watch Video

6:38:02 video runtime

Tony the Rat quits to write a book.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-to-tell-who-is-telling-you-the?utm_source=email

How to tell who is telling you the truth
There is a lot of misinformation out there and sometimes it can be hard to distinguish the good guys from the bad guys. Here's a handy checklist.

Steve Kirsch Newsletter

3 hr ago August 22, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...8_600x338.jpeg
As a kid, I used to watch “To Tell the Truth.” The above is a recreation of the original TV series.

Executive summary

In this article, I provide 5 rules to help you figure out who is telling the truth and who is not. Even if just one rule is true, it’s a very strong indicator. If you hit all five, there’s no doubt.
Introduction

I am a misinformation superspreader. MIT admits it (however, it’s interesting that page doesn’t load anymore whereas the rest of the site works fine).

Here’s how that is defined:

There are other misinformation spreaders who are actually spreading real misinformation. They “look” on the surface like misinformation spreaders such as myself, but they are not. They are trying to mislead people into believing things that just aren’t true.

Consider for example Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey, Mark Bailey, Stefan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Jon Rappaport, and others. Those people all claim, without evidence, that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist. They claim an experiment has not been done to their satisfaction. I have challenged them to debate two of my highly qualified colleagues (James Lyons-Weiler and Kevin McKernan) and they simply stop responding to my emails and refuse to accept the challenge. The reason is obvious: they would be exposed as misleading people. In the meantime, they claim to their followers that my colleagues and I are the ones running for cover.

Here are a few generic techniques you can use to sort out who is telling you the truth and who is not. I’ll use the Cowan et al. gang as examples of each method, but the methods apply also to the CDC, FDA, NIH, members of Congress, the mainstream media, and the mainstream medical community:

What do they do when challenged to a livestream debate on a neutral platform? Ducking and running for cover is a sure sign they are afraid of any challenge. So are ad hominem attacks as excuses for not debating. In the case of our antivirus friends, they won’t appear when challenged. They simply stop responding to emails. So they won’t accept our challenge, nor will they offer a public challenge that we can publicly accept. They are simply not interested in a debate because they know they would lose. Badly.

They make false claims that are easily verifiable regarding the other party. In this case, they claim we are the ones running from a debate when the reality is that they are.

What do they do when offered an opportunity to win $200K or more if they are right? Not taking the bet is a sure sign that they are not confident in their position. Believe me, if they offered me that bet as to whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists, I’d accept in a heartbeat. They won’t take my offer and they won’t make a comparable offer to the public for anyone to accept. Why not? It means they have no confidence in their position because they aren’t willing to risk capital on it. Capital at risk is a very objective way to assess strength of conviction in a belief. Cowan et al. score a 0 on this one.

Can they offer an alternative hypothesis that better fits all the existing data? There is over 100 years of evidence that viruses are real. Cowan et al. have a trivial task to prove their hypothesis is more likely. They can simply go through all the evidence of the last 100 years and prove that each observation is better explained by “viruses don’t exist” than “viruses exist.” They haven’t done that. They cannot even explain the most basic observations like how family member A gets sick, then family member B gets sick and tests positive on the same antigen test that they were negative on before. They also cannot explain how different groups working completely independently found the same viral genetic sequence. These are two simple things and they simply can’t explain them. We even have Patrick Gunnels on video admitting the former.

Do they abruptly shut off communication when the questions get uncomfortable? This is the technique used by government agencies. I spoke with Patrick Gunnels who assured me that viruses don’t exist. But he let slip that bacteriophages have been isolated. I pointed out that bacteriophages are viruses. He then said “nobody has seen them reproduce” so they aren’t viruses. I then said, “OK, so if they don’t use the cell’s machinery to reproduce, then how are all the replicas created?” He requested I stop emailing him at that point.

No amount of evidence will make a difference. Koch’s postulates have been satisfied and there are viruses which are large enough to see with an optical microscope (see this article which covers these topics and references the other 9 articles I’ve written on the topic). None of this makes any difference to Cowan et al. They just ignore it and hope their followers do too. None of them read what I wrote. I could write a hundred more articles on this and it wouldn’t make a difference. They seem to not be able to read or understand any of them.

I can probably think of more ways than these five, but this should cover all the cases.

I don’t know of any case where any of these will lead you astray.

There are also rules which are not as reliable and should not be used alone. One such example is being banned from Twitter. This is normally a badge of honor. Based on what I know, most of the people who have been banned with respect to COVID-19 information were telling the truth. I see them up here in Twitter Heaven all the time, joking around at the bar, or at our nightly dinners. As for me, I’ve had two lifetime bans with the same account, a feat rarely achieved (I was reincarnated once). I’m in Twitter heaven, whereas Tom Cowan is still active on Twitter.

When you get all 5 being satisfied, there should be absolutely no doubt in your mind who is telling the truth.

__________________

Dachsie comment:

I'm not smart enough to take sides in this one.

I don't want to tell if someone is telling "the truth."

All I want is THE truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiG39BbQpOU

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.c...m_source=email

Here is the Mark Crispin Miller's latest "died unexpectedly" report.

Five Salvadorans have dropped dead while walking on the street; 92 fresh graves found in a small New Zealand town
Still more evidence that those "vaccines" are REALLY doing to millions what "the virus" NEVER did to anyone—i.e., causing them to "drop dead in the street" (a Big Lie to be probed at Nuremberg 2.0)

Mark Crispin Miller

19 min ago August 22, 1922

Excerpts of the report.

" And that was just the start; for then came the “vaccines”—which, for some 20 months, have actually been doing what “the virus” was alleged to do, but never did. Now (literally) countless people, all throughout the world, are dropping dead while walking on the street (or on the job, or at the wheel, or on the playing-field, or at the store, or home in bed): a stark fact overwhelmingly confirmed by evidence of every kind—and yet those millions cannot see it, even when their “vaccinated” loved ones drop dead, too, or they themselves collapse (because—they think—of “COVID”).

Thus the Big Lie hatched in China, a fiction inescapably affirmed as “fact” by media throughout the world (especially “our free press”), did not just jump-start this second Holocaust, but, in so doing, also launched the current wave of Holocaust denial, that first traumatic specter of “the virus” perfectly pre-blinding millions to the murderous effects of those “vaccines.”

It’s way past time to recognize the evil genius of such propaganda, both because it might help us to wake some others up (before it is too late for them), and to make ready for the day when all those liars are finally in the dock, whatever that may take. (Scroll down for Vera Sharav’s powerful speech marking the 75th anniversary of the first Nuremberg trial.)"

Vera Sharav’s speech, yesterday in Nuremberg:

https://rumble.com/v1gtl0n-vera-sharav-speech-at-nuremberg-75.html

26:48 video runtime

post # 3038

Regarding Univ of Texas Medical Branch - National Laboratory - Galveston, TX

President of Texas health system abruptly resigns after being placed on leave

Molly Gamble (Twitter) - 4 hours ago August 23, 2022

Ben Raimer, MD, submitted his resignation from the role of president of the University of Texas Medical Branch Aug. 22, two weeks after he was placed on administrative leave for undisclosed reasons, the Houston Chronicle reports.

Charles Mouton, MD, executive vice president, provost and dean of the UTMB John Sealy School of Medicine, will serve as interim president. The system will conduct a national search for a new leader.

The academic health system did not disclose the reason for the longtime UTMB leader's departure. When he was placed on administrative leave Aug. 8, the system only said the move was not "in any way connected to the operations at UTMB or the Galveston National Lab." The lab has drawn scrutiny over agreements with three Chinese research labs, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Houston Chronicle reports.

Dr. Raimer has been with UTMB for decades, including his start as a student in the graduate and medical schools. In 1993, he became the senior vice president of health policy and legislative affairs. He was appointed interim president of UTMB in 2019, assuming the role permanently in 2021.

Clinically, much of Dr. Raimer's practice has been devoted to the evaluation and treatment of children and adolescents with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities.

UTMB includes four hospital campuses and more than 90 primary and specialty care clinics in Southeast Texas.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...ton#post988871

Dave of X22 Report has set out his hypothesis several times recently and I have come to see the wisdom in this idea.

https://x22report.com/aiovg_videos/e...out-to-unlock/

Ep 2856b – Fly Eagle Fly, Transparency Brings Accountability, News About To Unlock

August 22, 2022

TRANSCRIPT:

@ 37:23 to 38:22 on this video track

""Just like the truth is now coming out about election fraud. Every single day there's more and more information coming out showing that the elections were stolen. They cheated in the election. And actually the Deep State players, treasonous individuals, with the help of a foreign government, they overthrew the United States government which triggered the military. We're in a state of war right now.

Actually, they attacked us when they released COVID on the United States.

November 3rd -- that was the insurrection where they actually overthrew the government of the United states.

And then. January 6 was the cover-up for their insurrection on November 3rd. "


Dachsie further comment"

I think it is quite possible that the "COVID pandemic", which hit the MSM late 2019,
was just as long-term strategically planned for and coordinated event as was the November 2020 presidential election, and the January 2021 subsequent cover-up event.

It was an all inclusive - Step 1, Step 2, Step 3 strategy.

There was careful coordinated widespread planning of the "COVID release" far ahead of "Event 201" and it was part of the bigger plan.

There were thousands more than 2,000 mules and the foreign entity, China, helping on the Dominion voting machines breach in the planning far ahead of election day.

Let's not get too hung up on words like COVID and virus and their meaning. People were getting very sick with what may have been only a bad case of the flu but it got the people to clamor in fear and panic to be given experimental mandated jabs, lockdowns and masks. That was always the goal.

Whatever may have come out of Wuhan lab and however it may have come out on to the people, it served as a rabbit trail distraction for the enormity of the greatest atrocity and crimes against humanity ever.

The PLANdemic played perfectly into parts 2 and 3 of the 3-part plan to take down the United States of America. Call it part of the "Create the problem" strategy.

Maybe the resignations of top people in various areas of government can best be explained by foreknowledge that there will be greater and greater exposures of exactly what has been perpetrated, and big governmental entities and businesses and scientific and academic entities are on the brink of collapse. They will no longer have their cover come mid-terms. The rats are jumping ship.

Rand Paul
@RandPaul TWITTER
·
[SIZE=3]Follow
US Senate candidate, KY
Fauci’s resignation will not prevent a full-throated investigation into the origins of the pandemic. He will be asked to testify under oath regarding any discussions he participated in concerning the lab leak.
11:25 AM · Aug 22, 2022
73.5K
/SIZE]

Find live links to the following stories at the one link below.

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...93d0fd1062.jpg

Top News of the Day

Exclusive: Dr. Robert Malone on Why He’s Suing the WaPo, Plus the Future of Corporate Media and What’s Next for Fauci

Too Little Too Late: WSJ Tries to Save Face on Failed COVID Policies


‘Nature Is Not for Sale,’ Vandana Shiva Tells RFK Jr.


Company Linked to CIA Now Making mRNA for Moderna’s Reformulated COVID Booster Shots


Toxic PFAS Chemicals in Fracking Wells Detected in Drinking Water


Moderna Rolls Out Untested ‘Bivalent’ Vaccine for COVID Strains No Longer Circulating


Knowles Hits Fauci for ‘History of Lying’ + More


Meta Reaches $37.5 Million Settlement of Facebook Location Tracking Lawsuit + More

https://usawatchdog.com/mass-medical...lizabeth-eads/

Mass Medical Bankruptcy & Collapse Coming – Dr. Elizabeth Eads
By Greg Hunter On August 24, 2022

https://usawatchdog.com/wp-content/u...ic-300x229.png

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com

In May, Dr. Elizabeth Eads revealed the CV19 vax was causing extreme disease. Few doctors were sounding the alarm on the death and carnage from the bioweapon injections, and it’s going to get much worse before it’s over. Dr. Eads says, “Worldwide there are 10,000 deaths from these Covid vaccines daily. That’s a culmination of data . . . collected from Israel, UK, Canada, the U.S. and Brazil. So,10,000 a day and they are estimating we are already up to 12 million deaths worldwide.” Dr. Eads thinks the death and injuries from the CV19 bioweapon will be orders of magnitude higher in the next five years.

Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx, the FDA and CDC see what is coming. According to Dr. Eads, “They know this. They planned for it. They knew the consequences. They manipulated the vaccines as they went along and what was going into the vaccines . . . to make the booster shots more lethal. . . . Your immune system is absolutely destroyed with these shots. Every time you get a shot, you lose more of your immune system. You lose 30% after the first shot, 60% to 70% after the second shot, 80% or more after the third shot, and you lose 100% of your immune system after the 4th shot. You also have the propensity to develop vaccine induced aids.”

You can also get heart disease, blood clots, strokes, brain disease, extreme shingles and develop fast spreading extreme cancers, just to name a few of the effects of the bioweapon so-called vaccines, according to Dr. Eads.

Dr. Eads goes on to say, “People are waking up and saying, ‘Oh my gosh, what did I do to my immune system,’ and this is irreversible. It’s irreversible because you cannot not turn off the intercellular mechanism. You cannot turn off the nano particle system that is making these long clot-like structures in veins and arteries. . . . There is no such thing as ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome. These are side effects of the vaccine. Nobody dies of ‘Sudden Death’ when they are otherwise healthy adults. There is no such thing. . . . Here are the numbers I pulled off Attorney Todd Callender’s site. (He’s suing the U.S. military over the CV19 vax.) The all-cause mortality rate in the military is up 1,100%. . . . The top five life insurance companies are banding together and are going to file a class-action lawsuit against Big Pharma.”

That’s not all, according to Dr. Eads, as she sees not only Big Pharma liable for damages but hospitals, doctors, nurses, drug store chains and all sorts of people who helped make this bioweapon genocide possible. Dr. Eads says, “You are talking about billions of dollars, and they are not going to be able to afford to pay out all these claims. . . .It’s going to bankrupt Big Pharma, and Big Pharma will end up collapsing. Hospitals will also end up collapsing because they were complicit in death by ventilators and remdesivir. Mass medical bankruptcies are coming 100%. This is going to be the collapse of the Rockefeller medical industry.”

Dr Eads says there are treatments that can help both the vaxed and unvaxed with removing harmful spike proteins. Two she named are Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Dr. Eads says there are some other helpful treatments and procedures as well.

There is much more cutting edge, frontline medical information in the nearly 1-hour and 19-minute interview.

Join Greg Hunter as he talks to 25-year veteran Dr. Elizabeth Eads, DO, as she continues to highlight the worsening, and now obvious, effects of the CV19 bioweapon vax.

embedded video

1:19:15 video runtime

Video also on Rumble

https://rumble.com/v1h3to1-mass-medi...beth-eads.html

Robert Yoho MD (ret)

The original with the commentary is HERE on the CHD website. Subscribe to their newsletter and you will get the top information source in your inbox daily.

For those who have not heard RFK speak before, he has a chronic voice condition called spastic dysphonia. To understand him most easily, I recommend a 1.25 or 1.5 listening speed.

This interview brought tears to my eyes.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...AdzAzH3XdA--~D


https://live.childrenshealthdefense....f-f75506350530

August 23, 2022
Good Morning CHD
‘Good Morning CHD’ Episode 109: Fauci Steps Down — Discussion With Robert F. Kennedy Jr. + More

The tide is turning — will you sit by and watch, or will you take part in this momentous time in history? Special guest Robert F. Kennedy kicks off today’s “Good Morning CHD” will a public statement on Anthony Fauci’s resignation and its significance. Then, two other guests join to share more about their work and how viewers can get involved in the fight for medical freedom. Don’t miss this!

46:30 video runtime -recommend a 1.25 or 1.5 listening speed.RFK Jr comes on at 5:18

Michael Kane is a great host.


References

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Podcast With Jeff Sachs

Fauci Announces Resignation

CHD Legal Victories

Rally - March Over Brooklyn Bridge in NYC

Rally - U.S. Open

‘Families Are Essential’ to Join Rally at U.S. Open

U.S. Marines Win Class Protection in Shot Mandate

Dr. Pierre Kory on Vaxxed Miscarriage Rates - Substack

Speakers for NYC Rally