Coronavirus

https://www.americaoutloud.com/us-pa...r-the-exits/US

Pandemic Response Leaders Concede Mistakes and Head for the Exits



by Dr. Peter McCullough | Aug 29, 2022 | Health, Politics,

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed

Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Email | RSS

In the end, false narratives always crumble because they are false, and people ultimately come to that conclusion. Within the past few weeks, the CDC changes its summary of guiding statements regarding the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic with further reductions in the number of people and scenarios where there need to be testing, quarantine, and inconveniences from normal work or school life.1

The most important issue the CDC has resolved is that from a public health perspective, there is no distinguishment between a vaccinated and an unvaccinated citizen. This statement alone, if followed, should end all school, employment, military, and travel vaccine mandates since there is no clinical difference between the two conditions.

This week, the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) division director, Dr. Anthony Fauci, announced his retirement as of December 2022. In the formal NIH announcement, oddly, there is no mention of his largest professional activity, the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak or COVID-19 crisis.2 Complete silence on the past three years and what, if any, involvement he had with SARS in the years prior to 2020.

We have a great show for you this week with some key major media interviews with Dr. McCullough with Roman Balmakov of Facts Matter by Epoch Times, and on FOX News IngrahamAngle with Laura Ingraham and Stanford Professor Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.3 Our music segment is from Dennis of Carothers Parkway, a patriotic song you will love — “God Save America.”4

So let’s get real, let’s get loud; on America Out Loud Talk Radio, this is The McCullough Report!

The McCullough Report: Sat/Sun 2 PM ET Encore 7 PM – Internationally recognized Dr. Peter A. McCullough, known for his iconic views on the state of medical truth in America and around the globe, pierces through the thin veil of mainstream media stories that skirt the significant issues and provide no tractable basis for durable insight. Listen on iHeart Radio, our world-class media player, or our free apps on Apple, Android, or Alexa. Each episode goes to major podcast networks early in the week and can be heard on-demand anywhere in the world.

References:

1 https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2...-guidance.html
2 https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news...ony-s-fauci-md
3 www.petermcculloughmd.com
4 https://carothersparkway.com/

____

Dachsie comment:

I really liked her presentationn, so crystal clear and easy to understand.

She places just about everything on the chopping block --

viruses

current laboratory procedures

peer reviewed articles - crooked medical journals.

the human "natural immune system"

antibodies

antigens my addition, she did not mention antigens but I deduced antigens to be a scam too

antigen diagnosis of COVID 19 home test kits and lab done antigen tests all a scam.

By the way, our government has apparently decided it has fulfilled its money laundering scheme with China for antigen kits, so it is not going to bother with mailing out free kits to people anymore.

Are we thoroughly jaded yet?

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/d...m_source=email

Steve Kirsch's newsletter



Young doctors in Canada are dying at a rate 23X normal after the second booster

We now have all the CMA Canadian doctor death data in a spreadsheet. It shows that doctors 50 and younger are being killed after the second booster a rate that is 23X normal.

55 min ago August 30, 2022

Executive summary



The Canadian Medical Association (CMA) data for 2020 shows doctors in Canada aged 50 and under die at a rate of about 6 per year.

After the latest booster, 6 Canadian doctors, 50 and under, died within a 15 day period.

Something is very wrong here, but nobody wants to talk about it or look into it. They’d rather look the other way.
Introduction

Thanks to the brilliant work of Marc Godard and Brent Kievit-Kylar, we now have the CMA death data that I wrote about earlier in Google spreadsheet format where it can be easily analyzed for the first time. Note that the CMA removed entries prior to 2020 because they said it was too resource intensive to maintain this data. That’s hard to believe, but that’s what they said.

The results are stunning if we look at young doctor deaths: it makes the impact of the vaccines much easier to see because there is more signal and less noise since doctors under 50 rarely die.

We find a 23X increase in the rate of all-cause mortality post-vaccine for Canadian doctors aged 50 and under (compared to the young doctor death rates in 2020).

How can they explain that one?

Well, they can’t.

Those Canadian doctors died after the 2nd booster decades earlier than they should have.

I wanted to talk to the CMA about this, but my request to interview the President of the CMA was ignored. They just don’t want to talk about it. I’m sure they hope nobody sees this article.

So if you are reading this now, you know what to do:

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-co...m_source=email

[SIZE=3]


Open in browser
☕️ Coffee & Courage ☙ Tuesday, August 30, 2022 ☙ MOUSE DATA ��

Biased FBI agent gets the boot; study show bad news for jabbed guys; UK pivots on pregnancy jabs; SADS strikes; 11th Cir. trims contractor mandate; good news for Marines; mouse data; and much more...

Jeff Childers
Aug 30
/SIZE]

Experts from newsletter:

�� TctMD ran a story last week headlined, “Myocarditis Risk Low Overall After COVID-19 Vax, but Higher in Some Groups.” It’s a lot of blah-blah word salad about a new study, but it — finally — admits that myocarditis risk is MUCH higher in one teeny-tiny cohort: all men under 40.

The paper tentatively suggested that SOME PEOPLE might want to consider the pro’s and con’s. One expert quoted for the story, who chairs the American Medical Association’s pediatric committee, said this:

[These results] allow for a frank and transparent discussion on the pros and cons of vaccination. Does a completely healthy teenage male, without high-risk family members or close contacts, require a full set of vaccines at the interval prescribed? Or should he be selective of the vaccine available/accessible to him? For healthcare officials, further assessment of the risk-to-benefit balance regarding age and sex with comorbidities should be done using data from this and other nationwide-based studies.

It’s a nice sentiment, but good luck finding someplace to have a frank and transparent discussion on the pro’s and con’s of vaccination. Let me know how that works out for you.

Notwithstanding that advice, another one of the paper’s cherry-picked experts, whose comment was blown up in a callout in the middle of the article, opined, “The overwhelming recommendation is strongly in favor of COVID vaccination, even when myocarditis is the endpoint.”

I guess they have to say that. After all, what’s a little myocarditis among oh-so-virtuous people who care about grandma and who care about virtue signaling?

�� Jason Jenkins, 47, Miami Dolphins’ senior vice president of communications and community affairs, died suddenly and unexpectedly on Saturday, according to a team announcement.

Dolphins coach Mike McDaniel told reporters that Jason was previously completely healthy. “This was a healthy, healthy guy that just brought it every day. … Just full of life,” McDaniel said. “That’s the hardest part. There’s just no words to describe. He has a great family. His wife’s awesome, and his children. It’s tough. It’s a tough one to swallow. He will be missed. He will not be forgotten, I can tell you that much.”

I hope that Jason won’t be forgotten, but I have my doubts. Of course, Jason’s cause of death was not disclosed. I mean, who’d be interested in knowing why a completely healthy man in the prime of his life would keel over suddenly and unexpectedly? Don’t be ghoulish.


______________

Semper Fi

Marines don't have to take the jab anymore starting right now ff they submit a religious exemption ASSERTION.

Dachsie Note: You don't have to APPLY for a religions exemption, you just only need to ASSERT the paper form and you don't have to take the jab simply by that act. You don't have to wait for approval of an application. You only have to assert and you have the exemption.

________

�� Last week, Florida federal Judge Steven Merryday enjoined the entire Marine Corps from enforcing the Military Mandate against any soldier asserting a religious objection to the jabs. Props to the heroic lawyers who litigated the case.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...c-aa6fdd9ecd0c


08/30/22
Heart Inflammation Risk for Young Men Higher After Vaccination Than After COVID + More

The Defender’s COVID NewsWatch provides a roundup of the latest headlines related to the SARS CoV-2 virus, including its origins and COVID vaccines.
By
The Defender Staff

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

Heart Inflammation Risk for Young Men Higher After Vaccination Than After COVID: Study

The Epoch Times reported:

The risk of heart inflammation is higher for men as old as 39 after Moderna COVID-19 vaccination than after COVID-19 infection, according to a new study.

Researchers in England analyzed hospital admissions with myocarditis, a form of health inflammation, among the vaccinated between Dec. 1, 2020, and Dec. 15, 2021.

They estimated that the second dose of Moderna’s vaccine, which is advised for a two-dose primary series, leads to 97 myocarditis cases per million above baseline in the first 28 days after vaccination for men younger than 40. That’s up from 16 additional cases per million of myocarditis after a positive COVID-19 test and before vaccination.

Both the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines have long been associated with heart inflammation, but Moderna’s has been linked with much higher rates.
Scientists Question Moderna Invention Claim in COVID Vaccine Dispute

Science reported:

One of the three inventions claimed by Moderna in a legal battle that has erupted over the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines against COVID-19 was actually patented years earlier by two university scientists.

In a complaint filed on 26 August in a U.S. district court in Massachusetts, Moderna accuses Pfizer and its partner BioNTech of “co-opting Moderna’s patented inventions” covering different aspects of the two COVID-19 vaccines, which have already earned the companies billions of dollars. Both vaccines rely on mRNA that codes for the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.

BioNTech issued a statement insisting its COVID-19 vaccine work was “original” and said it “will vigorously defend against all allegations of patent infringement.” In a statement to Science, Pfizer said it had “not yet fully reviewed the complaint but we are surprised by the litigation,” adding that the company is “confident in our intellectual property supporting the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.”

At the heart of Moderna’s patent infringement claim are the steps that opened the door for mRNA as a vaccine. Drew Weissman and Katalin Karikó, both at the University of Pennsylvania (Karikó now also works for BioNTech), published the fundamental discovery in 2005: They showed that altering one of the fundamental building blocks of mRNA, the nucleotide uridine, made the molecule less toxic and also more capable of dodging immune destruction.
FDA Expected to Authorize Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech Omicron Boosters

Politico reported:

For those who’ve put off a COVID vaccine booster in hopes of getting a shot tailor-made for the Omicron subvariants that have ripped across the country, the wait may soon be over.

The FDA is expected to authorize a pair of booster shots targeting what appear to be the virus’ most contagious strains as soon as Wednesday, three people with knowledge of the matter told POLITICO.

The move would set the stage for the Biden administration to begin offering the reformulated vaccine shortly after Labor Day, in a bid to bolster Americans’ protection against a potential COVID resurgence later this year.

The government plans to roll out a combined 175 million doses of the new boosters developed by Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech, with Moderna’s shot available to all adults and Pfizer’s offered to those 12 and older, according to a federal planning guide published earlier this month.
Healthcare — White House Fall Booster Push Faces Challenges

The Hill reported:

Taylor Swift announced her new album last night at the VMA’s and the internet is collectively “screaming, crying, throwing up” over the news.

The White House is gearing up to launch a COVID-19 booster campaign this fall to prevent another major surge, but convincing vaccine holdouts to get another dose will be far from easy.

The challenge: Administration officials say these new vaccines will be key to controlling a potential fall surge, but they will need to convince an increasingly checked-out public to get the shots.

Download for Free: Robert F. Kennedy's New Book — ‘A Letter to Liberals’

High Percentage of COVID Deaths Had 3rd Shot, More Excess Deaths After 4th Shot

The Epoch Times reported:

Currently, many countries around the world are promoting the second COVID-19 vaccine booster shots for the elderly, many of whom have already received their first booster shots. Under these circumstances, the transparency and openness of information about the safety of booster shots has become a very important issue.

Amid this discussion, recently, data on the numbers of COVID-19 infections and deaths after vaccine booster injections in two Canadian provinces have been removed.

The author of a Letter to the Editor published in the Prince George Citizen, a long-standing Canadian newspaper, commented, “If you look at the statistics from the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC) site, you will see that there is zero scientific evidence for keeping the vaccine passport in place.”

However, on July 28, 2022, the BCCDC website indicated that their “outcomes by vaccination status” data would be removed as of that date. At present, this data is no longer available on its website.
Increased Disease Potential of COVID Variant BA.5 Currently Circulating in the United States

Forbes reported:

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, many iterations of the SARS-CoV-2 virus have dominated over others. The B.1 variant of 2020 was overtaken by the Alpha variant in early 2021. Alpha was overcome by Delta later that Summer. Next, Delta was pushed aside for Omicron BA.1 in late 2021, followed by BA.2 shortly thereafter. Now, BA.5 dominates the global virus landscape.

There are two driving forces behind the success of a SARS-CoV-2 variant over another. The first is a variant’s ability to infect those previously infected or vaccinated and the second are the virus’s intrinsic pathogenic properties. Here we focus on the latter, specifically in reference to the latest Omicron variants.

A recent study by Tamura et al. focuses on the latter, specifically on how Omicron subvariants, including BA.5, compare pathogenetically to earlier virus variants.

Understanding the pathogenic dynamics of emerging variants may inform drug and vaccine development, treatment regimens for those with moderate to severe disease, and surveillance for variants yet to come.
With Enough Monkeypox Vaccine Finally in Hand, U.S. Seeks to Make More Shots at Home

ABC News reported:

After securing enough doses in the national stockpile to vaccinate the most at-risk Americans against monkeypox, the federal government says it has begun training its sights on the next steps of the outbreak.

“We’re watching this very, very closely and will be prepared to move out against any outbreak that might happen in additional populations,” Assistant Secretary for Response and Preparedness Dawn O’Connell told ABC News.

“If we begin to see an outbreak in a college campus, we will make vaccines available on that college campus — absolutely,” said O’Connell, who leads monkeypox response within the Department of Health and Human Services.
Monkeypox Outbreak Can Be Eliminated in Europe, WHO Says

Reuters reported:

It is possible to eliminate the monkeypox outbreak in Europe, World Health Organization officials said on Tuesday, highlighting evidence that case counts are slowing in a handful of countries.

There are encouraging signs of a sustained week-on-week decline in the onset of cases in many European countries, including France, Germany, Portugal, Spain and Britain, as well as a slowdown in some parts of the United States, despite scarce vaccine supplies.
Small Study Supports TPOXX as Monkeypox Treatment

U.S. News & World Report reported:

The drug tecovirimat appears to be safe and effective for treating the symptoms and skin lesions of monkeypox, a small study suggests.

Tecovirimat (TPOXX) is an antiviral drug for the treatment of smallpox. It works by limiting the spread of the virus in the body. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has allowed doctors to prescribe tecovirimat on a “compassionate use basis” to treat adults and children with orthopoxvirus infections, including monkeypox.

“We have very limited clinical data on the use of tecovirimat for monkeypox infection. There is much to learn about the natural progression of the disease and how tecovirimat and other antivirals may affect it,” researcher Dr. Angel Desai said in a news release from the University of California, Davis. She is an infectious disease specialist at the university.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...b_912x912.jpeg


https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/...m_medium=email

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/wh...m_source=email

Who is "they"

Mapping the institutions and actors involved in the global iatrogenocide

Toby Rogers

2 hr ago, August 31, 2022

One of the weirdest things about the past two years is that it is obvious that there has been a massive power shift in the world, away from national governments towards some supranational collective that is somehow able to force governments throughout the world to all follow the same disastrous policies simultaneously (overriding Constitutions, laws, scientific best practices, and common sense). But it is not entirely clear who “they” are.

So, following up on my last article, I want to take a stab at defining who “they” are — as in, who are the people:
• developing and releasing bioweapons into the population;
• suppressing safe and effective treatments;
• destroying the global economy via lockdowns;
• pushing dangerous shots with negative efficacy that maim, kill, and cause infertility at an astonishing rate; and
• implementing global totalitarianism including the suspension of Constitutional rights and the introduction of central bank digital currencies, 24/7/365 digital surveillance, and vaccine/carbon/ESG passports.

Said simply who are the people pushing the global economy and society towards a permanent pandemic?

I look forward to reading your replies in the comments because I imagine there will be sharp disagreement about the components of the various layers in this schema.

The top of the pyramid

The hardest part to figure out is who is at the top? We know some of the players at the top of the pyramid:

• Pfizer, Moderna, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Merck, J&J, and AstraZeneca — and their 4.4 million employees worldwide and $1 trillion a year in revenue;

• The World Economic Forum and its 1,000 member companies each with $5+ billion a year in revenue that have been meeting for 50 years to synchronize the interests of elites;

• The 2,000 members of the Davos group who meet annually in Switzerland to coordinate global governance and business;

• The World Health Organization that is clearly working for the cartel;

• The 205 members of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and the 539 billionaires in China; and

• The western billionaires — Gates, Zuckerberg, Bezos, Soros, Bloomberg, Steyer — who want to remake the world in their own twisted image.

But who am I leaving out? The bankers? The central banks? Old money?

The Mercenaries

The upper crust then bring in the mercenaries to actually do the work to create the new dystopian reality:

• The consulting firms — McKinsey, Deloitte, Bain, BCG, and PwC — design the global vaccine campaigns;

• The PR firms — Edelman, Ogilvy (that works with the CDC), Hill + Knowlton (that came up with the tobacco playbook that is now used by all toxic industries), Burson Cohn Wolfe (that formerly worked with the Clintons) — create the fictitious reality that forces the peasants to obey and makes the elites richer;

• And for the really heavy lifting they bring in the private intelligence companies — Black Cube, SCL Group, NSO Group, etc. who can do anything from entrapping a politician, rigging an election, or overthrowing a government using the latest military grade tools and human assets.

Our reality is manufactured by these mercenaries.

Asset management firms

The largest shareholders in pharmaceutical companies are the asset management companies — BlackRock ($10 trillion in assets), Vanguard ($7.2 trillion), State Street ($4.14 trillion), etc. These companies are throwing their weight around these days by voting the shares of the assets that they hold on behalf of investors. That gives them the ability to hire and fire the C-suite executives who run these companies.

The paradox though of the asset management companies is that they are investing OUR pension and retirement funds. If you hold any equities in a retirement, mutual, or pension fund chances are that you own shares in the pharmaceutical companies that are trying to enslave and kill us — but BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and the rest are voting YOUR shares at the annual meeting. It’s a crazy system.

CIA, NSA, Department of Defense

This is the part that I cannot figure out. According to Jeffrey Sachs, who is as pro-establishment as they come, SARS-CoV-2 began as a bioweapon developed in the United States. We know that BARDA and DARPA are deep into the development of bioweapons and they fund monsters like Ralph Baric at UNC and Peter Daszak at EcoHealth Alliance (who Fauci used as a pass through to get money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for gain-of-function research when it was officially banned in the United States).

But here’s the thing — CIA, NSA, and DoD have the electronic records that show what was going on at these labs and they have the intercepted phone calls when things go wrong at these labs (because they have a record of all phone calls, emails, and wire transfers in this country). They also have the data that show that these shots do not work and cause harms at unprecedented levels. But instead of doing anything about it — instead of protecting national security — the CIA is using its venture capital company to make the mRNA used in Covid booster shots that are going to kill lots of Americans.

So how are we to understand the official government military and intelligence agencies in light of these facts? In a former era ostensibly they were motivated to defeat the Soviet Union. And now they’re just what — independent autonomous grifters completely unmoored from the countries they claim to represent? Are the CIA, NSA, and DoD just warlords in the global economy trying to secure as much wealth for themselves as possible?

It sure looks that way.

Mainstream media and social media

This is too obvious to even bother to elaborate on. CNN, MSNBC, the Atlantic, New Yorker, Washington Post, Guardian, etc. — all work for the cartel because the cartel pays their bills.

And the social media giants — Facebook/Instagram, Twitter, Google/YouTube — all censor critical thinkers on behalf of the cartel. No reasonable person disputes this.

The useful idiots in white coats

The American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists all work for the cartel.

There are 191,000 professors in American medical schools and, with a few exceptions, they are owned body, mind, and soul by the cartel.

There are about 1 million doctors in the U.S. but only a few hundred have done the right thing and spoken out against the genocide over the past two years.

Allopathic medicine in the U.S. is now a tool of Pharma Fascism.

We have entered the era of iatrogenocide

My point in mapping out the guilty parties above is to underscore the fact that we live in a society dedicated to iatrogenocide — the mass killing of a population by scientific and medical professionals. (Hat tip to Mathew Crawford for re-introducing us to this term). Our entire economy is built around iatrogenocide — killing, covering it up, and keeping it going, in the name of public health, progress, and science(TM).

As I wrote in my last article, the motivations for these various actors, who walk amongst us and include many of the most respected members of society, include:

1. profit;
2. mental capture (because the base determines the superstructure);
3. an immortality project;
4. mass formation;
5. survival;
6. eugenics;
7. evil itself;
8. excitement/entertainment;
9. depopulation; and
10. the possibility that this is all a play by the Chinese Communist Party for world domination.

Now I wonder though if all of these actors and factors have something in common? What’s the ideology/worldview driving them? Even if we grant that the base determines the superstructure (the mode of production of any era determines the values of that society) what exactly is the ideological superstructure that connects all of this together?

On my notepad I sketched out a possible list: capitalism? winning? success? fitting in? liberalism? post liberalism? postmodernism? colonialism? narcissism? communism? fascism? totalitarianism?

And where I came out is that I think our society is guided by three values:

Idolatry (these people think that they are gods and they really like playing god);

Domination (these people gain pleasure from power over others, in their worldview everyone and everything is an object to be conquered); and

Tribalism (these people operate from the belief that their group must win at all costs, the dendrites necessary to get along with others are dead).

When you combine idolatry, domination, and tribalism, what you get is Pharma Fascism throughout the developed world.

That’s what we’re up against. That’s who and what we must overthrow in the revolution.

So then our antidote becomes:

A reverence for the truly sacred (God, family, nature, and love);

Intersubjectivity — listening to and honoring the spark of the divine in others; and

Ethics, rationality, and science — the means of resolving differences that have been lost in the global coup d’etat by the junk science mass murdering Pharma cartel.

Blessings to the warriors who have been showing the way for two decades. 🙌

Prayers for everyone fighting against Pharma Fascism around the world. 🙏

In the comments, I welcome your thoughts on all of the above.

As always, please alert me to any corrections.

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.c...m_source=email

15 videos of people all around the world just keeling over (maybe dropping dead)

Still more graphic evidence that "COVID vaccination" is now doing to humanity what "our free press," 2+ years ago, kept warning us hysterically that COVID was about to do to all humanity

Mark Crispin Miller

4 hr ago, August 31, 2022

Over the past several weeks, a tweeter who uses the nom de guerre “Aqui Ahora” (“Here Now”) has posted fifteen videos of people keeling over—eight of them in China, and the others in Vietnam, Pakistan, Peru and elsewhere throughout the world (including Orlando, Florida, site of a small plane crash that surely killed all those on board).

Could these videos be fake? Of course. But I don’t think they are, since (a) faking scenes so realistic, and in such far-flung locations, would require a budget far beyond the means of, say, Children’s Health Defense (whose people wouldn’t do that even if they could afford it); and (b) images of “sudden death” contrived for propaganda purposes would not be imperceptibly released by some lone tweeter with relatively few followers (and then belatedly reposted by a marginal “conspiracy theorist” like Mark Crispin Miller), but published thunderously, all at once, by such big “reputable” outlets as the Guardian, the New York Times, the Daily Mail, the New York Post, the Sun, the Mirror, the Telegraph, CNN, the BBC, NBC News, ABC News, CBS News, the Atlantic, and many, many other outlets all throughout the world, along with countless hirelings, bots and useful idiots on “social media”—which is exactly how those bogus images of people “dying suddenly” of COVID, in the streets of Wuhan, were propagated back in January of 2020.

_________________________
https://twitter.com/AquAhora1/status/1563093149626802177?utm_source=substack&utm_medium =email



Aquí Ahora
@AquAhora1
·
Aug 10
#Repentinitis del embajador saudí en El Cairo, con resultado de muerte.[/URL][/SIZE]

Dachsie comment:

This explains a lot of the evil and diabolical iniquity.
_________________________________

https://brownstone.org/articles/it-w...tm_source=push

It Was Birx. All Birx.

https://brownstone.org/wp-content/up...mp-800x469.jpg

By Debbie Lerman August 31, 2022 19 minute read

In two previous articles, I looked into the shady circumstances surrounding Deborah Birx’s appointment to the White House Coronavirus Response Task Force and the laughable lack of actual science behind the claims she used to justify her testing, masking, distancing and lockdown policies.

Considering all that, the questions arise: Who was actually in charge of Deborah Birx and whom was she working with?

But first: Who cares?

Here’s why I think it’s important: If we can show that Birx and the others who imposed totalitarian anti-scientific testing, masking, social distancing, and lockdown policies, knew from the get-go that these policies would not work against an airborne respiratory virus, and nevertheless they imposed them FOR REASONS OTHER THAN PUBLIC HEALTH, then there is no longer acceptable justification for any of those measures.

Furthermore, whatever mountains of post-facto bad science were concocted to rationalize these measures are also completely bunk. Instead of having to go through each ridiculous pseudo-study to demonstrate its scientific worthlessness, we can throw the whole steaming pile in the garbage heap of history, where it belongs, and move on with our lives.

In my admittedly somewhat naive optimism, I also hope that by exposing the non-scientific, anti-public-health origins of the Covid catastrophe, we may lower the chances of it happening again.

And now, back to Birx.
She did not work for or with Trump

We know Birx was definitely not working with President Trump, although she was on a task force ostensibly representing the White House. Trump did not appoint her, nor did the leaders of the Task Force, as Scott Atlas recounts in his revelatory book on White House pandemic lunacy, A Plague Upon Our House. When Atlas asked Task Force members how Birx was appointed, he was surprised to find that “no one seemed to know.” (Atlas, p. 82)

Yet, somehow, Deborah Birx – a former military AIDS researcher and government AIDS ambassador with no training, experience or publications in epidemiology or public health policy – found herself leading a White House Task Force on which she had the power to literally subvert the policy prescriptions of the President of the United States.

As she describes in The Silent Invasion, Birx was shocked when “at the halfway point of our 15 Days to Slow the Spread campaign, President Trump stated that he hoped to lift all restrictions by Easter Sunday.” (Birx, p. 142) She was even more dismayed when “mere days after the president had announced the thirty-day extension of the Slow the Spread campaign to the American public” he became enraged and told her “‘We will never shut down the country again. Never.’” (Birx, p. 152)

Clearly, Trump was not on board with the lockdowns, and every time he was forced to go along with them, he became enraged and lashed out at Birx – the person he believed was forcing him.

Birx laments that “from here on out, everything I worked toward would be harder—in some cases, impossible,” and goes on to say she would basically have to work behind the scenes against the President, having “to adapt to effectively protect the country from the virus that had already silently invaded it.” (Birx, pp. 153-4)

Which brings us back to the question: Where did Birx get the nerve and, more mysteriously, the authority to so blithely act in direct opposition to the President she was supposed to serve, on matters affecting the lives of the entire population of the United States?

Atlas regrets what he thinks was President Trump’s “massive error in judgment.” He argues that Trump acted “against his own gut feeling” and “delegated authority to medical bureaucrats, and then he failed to correct that mistake.” (Atlas, p. 308)

Although I believe massive errors in judgment were not unusual for President Trump, I disagree with Atlas on this one. In the case of the Coronavirus Response Task Force, I actually think there was something much more insidious at play.
Trump had no power over Birx or pandemic response

Dr. Paul Alexander, an epidemiologist and research methodology expert who was recruited to advise the Trump administration on pandemic policy, tells a shocking story in an interview with Jeffrey Tucker, in which bureaucrats at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and lawyers from the Justice Department told him to resign, despite direct orders from President Trump and the White House: “We want you to understand that President Trump has no power,” they reportedly told Alexander. “He cannot tell us what to do.”

Alexander believes these bureaucrats represented the “deep state” which, he was told repeatedly, had decided first not to hire or pay him, and then to get rid of him. Alexander also writes in an upcoming exposé that the entrenched government bureaucracy, particularly at the NIH, CDC, and WHO, used the pandemic response to doom President Trump’s chances for reelection.

Was the entire anti-scientific totalitarian pandemic response, all over the world, a political maneuver to get rid of Trump? It’s possible. I would contend, however, that the politics were only a sideshow to the main event: the engineered virus lab leak and coverup. I believe the “deep state” Alexander repeatedly butted up against was not just the entrenched bureaucracy, but something even deeper and more powerful.

Which brings us back to deep state frontwoman Deborah Birx.

After lamenting Trump’s delegation of authority to “medical bureaucrats,” Scott Atlas also hints at forces beyond Trump’s control. “The Task Force was called ‘the White House Coronavirus Task Force,’” Atlas notes, “but it was not in sync with President Trump. It was directed by Vice President Pence.” (Atlas, p. 306) Yet, whenever Atlas tried to raise questions about Birx’s policies, he was directed to speak with Pence, who then failed to ever address anything with Birx:

“Given that the VP was in charge of the Task Force, shouldn’t the bottom-line advice emanating from it comport with the policies of the administration? But he would never speak with Dr. Birx at all. In fact, (Marc) Short [Pence’s chief of staff], clearly representing the VP’s interests above all else, would do the opposite, telephoning others in the West Wing, imploring friends of mine to tell me to avoid alienating Dr. Birx.” (Atlas, p. 165-6)

Recall that Pence replaced Alex Azar as Task Force director on February 26, 2020 and Birx’s appointment as coordinator, at the instigation of Asst. National Security Advisor Matt Pottinger, came on February 27th. Subsequent to those two appointments, it was Birx who was effectively in charge of United States coronavirus policy.

What was driving that policy, once she took over? As Birx writes, it was the NSC (National Security Council) that appointed her, through Pottinger, and it was her job to “reinforce their warnings” – which, I continue to speculate, were related to the accidental release of an enhanced pandemic potential pathogen from a US-funded lab in Wuhan.

Trump was probably made aware of this, as evidenced not just by his repeated mentions, but by what Time Magazine called his uncharacteristic refusal to explain why he believed it. The magazine quotes Trump saying “I can’t tell you that,” when asked about his belief in the lab leak. And he repeats, “I’m not allowed to tell you that.”

Why in the world was the President of the United States not allowed to override AIDS researcher/diplomat Birx on lockdown policies nor explain to the public why he believed there was a lab leak?

The answer, I believe, is that Trump was uncharacteristically holding back because he was told (by Birx, Pottinger and the military/intelligence/biosecurity interests for whom they worked) that if he did not go along with their policies and proclamations, millions of Americans would die. Why? Because SARS-CoV-2 was not just another zoonotic virus. It was an engineered virus that needed to be contained at all costs.

As Dr. Atlas repeatedly notes with great dismay: “the Task Force doctors were fixated on a single-minded view that all cases of COVID must be stopped or millions of Americans would die.” (Atlas, p. 155-6) [BOLDFACE ADDED]

That was the key message, wielded with great force and success against Trump, his administration, the press, the states, and the public, to suppress any opposition to lockdown policies. Yet the message makes no sense if you believe SARS-CoV-2 is a virus that jumped from a bat to a person in a wet market, severely affecting mostly people who are old and debilitated. It only makes sense if you think, or know, that the virus was engineered to be especially contagious or deadly (even if its behavior in the population at any given moment might not justify that level of alarm).

But, again, before indulging in more speculation, let’s get back to Birx. Who else did she (and her hidden handlers) bulldoze?
She dictated policy to the entire Trump administration

In his book, Atlas observes with puzzlement and consternation that, although Pence was the nominal director of the Task Force, Deborah Birx was the person in charge: “Birx’s policies were enacted throughout the country, in almost every single state, for the entire pandemic—this cannot be denied; it cannot be deflected.” (Atlas, p. 222)

Atlas is “dumbstruck at the lack of leadership in the White House,” in which, “the president was saying one thing while the White House Task Force representative was saying something entirely different, indeed contradictory” and, as he notes, “no one ever set her [Birx] straight on her role.” (Atlas, p. 222-223)

Not only that, but no matter how much Trump, or anyone in the administration, disagreed with Birx, “the White House was held hostage to the anticipated reaction of Dr. Birx” and she “was not to be touched, period.” (Atlas, p. 223)

One explanation for her untouchableness, Atlas suggests, is that Birx and her policies became so popular with the press and public that the administration did not want to “rock the boat” by replacing her before the election. This explanation, however, as Atlas himself realizes, crumbles in the face of what we know about Trump and the media’s hostility towards him:

“They [Trump’s advisors] had convinced him to do exactly the opposite of what he would naturally do in any other circumstance—to disregard his own common sense and allow grossly incorrect policy advice to prevail. … This president, widely known for his signature ‘You’re fired!’ declaration, was misled by his closest political intimates. All for fear of what was inevitable anyway—skewering from an already hostile media.” (Atlas, p. 300-301)

I would suggest, again, the reason for the seemingly inexplicable lack of gumption on Trump’s part to get rid of Birx was not politics, but behind-the-scenes machinations of the (to coin a moniker) lab leak cabal.

Who else was part of this cabal with its hidden agendas and oversized policy influence? Our attention naturally turns to the other members of the Task Force who were presumably co-engineering lockdown policies with Birx. Surprising revelations emerge.
There was no troika. No Birx-Fauci lockdown plan. It was all Birx.

It is universally assumed, by both those in favor and those opposed to the Task Force’s policy prescriptions, that Drs. Deborah Birx, Tony Fauci (head of NIAID at the time) and Bob Redfield (then director of the CDC) worked together to formulate those policies.

The stories told by Birx herself and Task Force infiltrator Scott Atlas suggest otherwise.

Like everyone else, at the onset of his book, Atlas asserts: “The architects of the American lockdown strategy were Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx. With Dr. Robert Redfield… they were the most influential medical members of the White House Coronavirus Task Force.” (Atlas, p. 22)

But as Atlas’s story unfolds, he presents a more nuanced understanding of the power dynamics on the Task Force:

“Fauci’s role surprised me the most. Most of the country, indeed the entire world, assumed that Fauci occupied a directorial role in the Trump administration’s Task Force. I had also thought that from viewing the news,” Atlas admits. However, he continues, “The public presumption of Dr. Fauci’s leadership role on the Task Force itself…could not have been more incorrect. Fauci held massive sway with the public, but he was not in charge of anything specific on the Task Force. He served mainly as a channel for updates on the trials of vaccines and drugs.” (p. 98) [BOLDFACE ADDED]

By the end of the book, Atlas fully revises his initial assessment, strongly emphasizing that, in fact, it was primarily and predominantly Birx who designed and disseminated the lockdown policies:

“Dr. Fauci held court in the public eye on a daily basis, so frequently that many misconstrue his role as being in charge. However, it was really Dr. Birx who articulated Task Force policy. All the advice from the Task Force to the states came from Dr. Birx. All written recommendations about their on-the-ground policies were from Dr. Birx. Dr. Birx conducted almost all the visits to states on behalf of the Task Force.” (Atlas, p. 309-10) [BOLDFACE ADDED]

It may sound jarring and unlikely, given the public perception of Fauci, as Atlas notes. But in Birx’s book the same unexpected picture emerges.
Methinks the lady doth protest too much

As with her bizarrely self-contradictory statements about how she got hired, and her blatantly bogus scientific claims, Birx’s story about her mind-melded closeness with Fauci and Redfield falls apart upon closer examination.

In her book, Birx repeatedly claims she trusts Redfield and Fauci “implicitly to help shape America’s response to the novel coronavirus.” (Birx, p. 31) She says she has “every confidence, based on past performance, that whatever path the virus took, the United States and the CDC would be on top of the situation.” (Birx, p. 32)

Then, almost immediately, she undermines the credibility of those she supposedly trusts, quoting Matt Pottinger as saying she “‘should take over Azar, Fauci, and Redfield’s jobs, because you’re such a better leader than they are.’” (Birx, p. 38-9)

Perhaps she was just giving herself a little pat on the back, one might innocently suggest. But wait. There’s so much more.

Birx claims that in a meeting on January 31 “everything Drs. Fauci and Redfield said about their approach made sense based on the information available to me at that point,” even though “neither of them spoke” about the two issues she was most obsessed with: “asymptomatic silent spread [and] the role testing should play in the response.” (Birx, p. 39)

Then, although she says she “didn’t read too much into this omission,” (p. 39) just two weeks later, “as early as February 13” Birx again mentions “a lack of leadership and direction in the CDC and the White House Coronavirus Task Force.” (p. 54)

So does Debi trust Tony and Bob’s leadership or does she not? The only answer is more self-contradictory obfuscation.

Birx is horrified that nobody is taking the virus as seriously as they should: “then I saw Tony and Bob repeating that the risk to Americans was low,” she reports. “On February 8, Tony said that the chances of contracting the virus were ‘minuscule.’” And, “on February 29, he said, ‘Right now, at this moment, there is no need to change anything you’re doing on a day-to-day basis.’” (Birx, p. 57)

This does not seem like the kind of leader Birx can trust. She half-heartedly tries to excuse Redfield and Fauci, saying “I now believe that Bob and Tony’s words had spoken to the limited data they had access to from the CDC,” and then, in another whiplash moment, “maybe they had data in the United States that I did not.”

Did Tony and Bob provide less dire warnings because they had insufficient data or because they had more data than Birx did? She never clarifies, but regardless, she assures us that she “trusted them” and “felt reassured every day with them on the task force.” (Birx, p. 57)

If I was worried that the virus was not being taken seriously enough, Birx’s reports on Bob and Tony would not be very reassuring, to say the least.

Apparently, Birx herself felt that way too. “I was somewhat disappointed that Bob and Tony weren’t seeing the situation as I was,” she says, when they disagreed with her alarmist assessments of asymptomatic spread. But, she adds, “at least their number supported my belief that this new disease was far more asymptomatic than the flu. I wouldn’t have to push them as far as I needed to push the CDC.” (Birx, p. 78)

Is someone who disagrees with your assessment to the point that you need to push them in your direction also someone you “implicitly trust” to lead the US through the pandemic?

Apparently, not so much.

Although she supposedly trusts Redfield and sleeps well at night knowing he’s on the Task Force, Birx has nothing but disdain and criticism for the CDC – the organization Redfield leads.

“On aggressive testing I planned to have Tom Frieden [CDC director under Obama] help bring the CDC along,” she recounts. “Like me, the CDC wanted to do everything to stop the virus, but the agency needed to align with us on aggressive testing and silent spread.” (p. 122) Which makes one wonder: If she was so closely aligned with Redfield, the head of the CDC, why did Birx need to bring in a former director – in a direct challenge to the sitting one – to “bring the CDC along?” Who is “us” if not Birx, Fauci and Redfield?

Masks were another issue of apparent contention. Birx is frustrated because the CDC, led by her “we’ve-got-each-other’s-back” bestie, Bob Redfield (Birx, p. 31), will not issue strict enough masking guidelines. In fact, she repeatedly throws Bob’s organization under the bus, basically accusing them of causing American deaths: “For many weeks and months to come,” she writes, “I fretted over how many lives could have been saved if the CDC had trusted the public to understand that …masks would do no harm and could potentially do a great deal of good.” (Birx, p. 86)

Apparently, Fauci was not on board with the masking either, as Birx says that “getting the doctors, including Tom [Frieden] and Tony, to be in complete agreement with me about asymptomatic spread was slightly less of a priority. As with masks, I knew I could return to that issue as soon as I got their buy-in on our recommendations.” (Birx, p. 123)

Who is making “our recommendations” if not Birx, Fauci and Redfield?
The myth of the troika

Whether or not she trusted them (and it’s hard to believe, based on her own accounts, that she did), it was apparently very important to Birx that she, Fauci and Redfield appear as a single entity with no disagreements whatsoever.

When Scott Atlas, an outsider not privy to whatever power plays were happening on the Task Force, came in, his presence apparently rattled Birx (Atlas, p. 83-4), and for good reason. Atlas immediately noticed strange goings-on. In his book, he repeatedly uses words like “bizarre,” “odd” and “uncanny” to describe how Fauci, Redfield and Birx behaved. Most notably, they never ever questioned or disagreed with one another in Task Force meetings. Not ever.

“They shared thought processes and views to an uncanny level,” Atlas writes, then reiterates that “there was virtually no disagreement among them.” What he saw “was an amazing consistency, as though there were an agreed-upon complicity” (Atlas, pp. 99-100). They “virtually always agreed, literally never challenging one another.” (p. 101) [BOLDFACE ADDED]

An agreed-upon complicity? Uncanny agreement? Based on all of the disagreements reported by Birx and her repeated questioning and undermining of Bob and Tony’s authority, how can this be explained?

I would contend that in order to obscure the extent to which Birx alone was in charge of Task Force policy, the other doctors were compelled to present a facade of complete agreement. Otherwise, as with any opposition to, or even discussion of, potential harms of lockdown policies, “millions of Amercans would die.”

This assessment is strengthened by Atlas’s ongoing bafflement and distress at how the Task Force – and particularly the doctors/scientists who were presumably formulating policy based on data and research – functioned:

“I never saw them act like scientists, digging into the numbers to verify the very trends that formed the basis of their reactive policy pronouncements. They did not act like researchers, using critical thinking to dissect the published science or differentiate a correlation from a cause. They certainly did not show a physician’s clinical perspective. With their single-minded focus, they did not even act like public health experts.” (Atlas, p. 176)

Atlas was surprised, indeed stunned, that “No one on the Task Force presented any data” to justify lockdowns or to contradict the evidence on lockdown harms that Atlas presented. (Atlas, p. 206) More specifically, no data or research was ever presented (except by Atlas) to contradict or question anything Birx said. “Until I arrived,” Atlas observes, “no one had challenged anything she said during her six months as the Task Force Coordinator.” (Atlas, p. 234) [BOLDFACE ADDED]

Atlas cannot explain what he’s witnessing. “That was all part of the puzzle of the Task Force doctors,” he states. “There was a lack of scientific rigor in meetings I attended. I never saw them question the data. The striking uniformity of opinion by Birx, Redfield, Fauci, and (Brett) Giroir [former Admiral and Task Force “testing czar”] was not anything like what I had seen in my career in academic medicine.” (Atlas, p. 244)

How can we explain the puzzle of this uncanny apparent complicity by the Task Force troika?
Methinks the intelligence agent also doth protest too much

An interesting hint comes from the string of anecdotes comprising Matthew Lawrence’s New Yorker article “The Plague Year.” Lawrence writes that Matt Pottinger (the NSC liaison to Birx) tried to convince Task Force members that masking could stop the virus “‘dead in its tracks’” but his views “stirred up surprisingly rigid responses from the public-health contingent.” Lawrence continues to report that “In Pottinger’s opinion, when Redfield, Fauci, Birx, and (Stephen) Hahn spoke, it could sound like groupthink,” implying that those were the members of the “public-health contingent” who did not agree with Pottinger’s masking ideas.

But wait. We just noted Birx’s frustration, indeed deep regret, that the CDC led by Redfield, as well as Fauci (and even Frieden) did not agree with her ideas on asymptomatic spread and masking. So why does Pottinger imply that she and the “public-health contingent” of the Task Force were group-thinking this issue, against him?

I would suggest that the only way to make sense of these contradictions within Birx’s narrative and between her, Atlas and Pottinger’s stories, is if we understand “align with us” and “our recommendations” to refer not to the perceived Birx-Fauci-Redfield troika, but to the Birx-Pottinger-lab leak cabal that was actually running the show.

In fact, Birx and Pottinger put so much effort into insisting on the solidarity of the troika, even when it contradicts their own statements, that the question inevitably arises: what do they have to gain from it? The benefit of insisting that Birx was allied with Fauci, Redfield and the “public-health contingent” on the Task Force, I would argue, is that this deflects attention from the Birx-Pottinger-cabal non-public-health alliance.
Her authority and policies emanated from a hidden source

The explanation of Atlas’s perceived “puzzle of the Task Force doctors” that makes the most sense to me is that Deborah Birx, in contrast and often in opposition to the other doctors on the Task Force, represented the interests of what I’m calling the lab leak cabal: those not just in the US but in the international intelligence/biosecurity community who needed to cover up a potentially devastating lab leak and who wanted to impose draconian lockdown measures such as the world had never known.

Who exactly they were and why they needed lockdowns are subjects of ongoing investigations.

In the meantime, once we separate Birx from Trump, from the rest of the administration, and from the others on the Task Force, we can see clearly that her single-minded and scientifically nonsensical emphasis on silent spread and asymptomatic testing was geared toward a single goal: to scare everyone so much that lockdowns would appear to be a sensible policy. This is the same strategy that was, uncannily in my opinion, implemented almost to the letter in nearly every other country around the world. But that’s for the next article.

I’ll close this chapter of the Birx riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma, with Scott Atlas’s report of his parting conversation with President Trump:

“‘You were right about everything, all along the way,’” Trump said to Atlas. “‘And you know what? You were also right about something else. Fauci wasn’t the biggest problem of all of them. It really wasn’t him. You were right about that.’ I found myself nodding as I held the phone in my hand,” Atlas says. “I knew exactly whom he was talking about.” (Atlas, p. 300)

And now, so do we.
Author

Debbie Lerman

Debbie Lerman has a degree in English from Harvard. She is a retired science writer and a practicing artist in Philadelphia, PA.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVeeDhZCSws

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVeeDhZCSws

I can't BELIEVE he just said this | Redacted with Clayton Morris
101,816 views
Aug 28, 2022
9.1K
16:24 video runtime

991K subscribers
Dr. Anthony Fauci says that he never ordered lockdowns and he does not regret them anyway because there was no lasting irreparable damage. Really??? Tell that to people who were late to detect cancer, people who died alone in hospitals, children who are painfully behind in school, people who developed addictions, people who suffered from domestic abuse... This list could go on. But yea, no irreparable damage.

"What did they know and when did they know it."
Dr. Stan Monteith M.D.
____________________________

https://brownstone.org/articles/covi...tm_source=push

Covid was Spreading Across the U.S. in 2019

https://brownstone.org/wp-content/up...91-800x469.jpg

By Bill Rice August 31, 2022

If it could be proven that the virus that causes COVID-19 was spreading throughout the world by November 2019 (or even earlier), the shift in the Covid narrative might be seismic.

For example, if the virus had already infected large numbers of people, the justification for the lockdowns of mid-March 2020 to “slow or stop the spread” of a newly arrived virus would be shown to be nonsense.

Estimates of the number of people who had already developed natural immunity as well as of the infection fatality rate (IFR) might be dramatically different. It would suggest the disease was not nearly as lethal as experts proclaimed. The mass fear in the public – a prerequisite for lockdowns and later for mass vaccinations – might be much lower.

Given these points, it’s odd public health officials and investigative journalists have eschewed serious investigations that might confirm this virus had already spread around the world before January 1st 2020.

A commonsense project to ‘prove’ early spread was occurring would be simply to test tranches of blood that were donated before the birth date of the official outbreak (December 31st 2019).

Surprisingly, however, very few antibody studies of archived blood collected before December 31st 2019 have occurred. Will Jones of The Daily Skeptic recently highlighted one such study published by researchers in France as well as a sewage study from Brazil. The first provides antibody evidence and the second RNA evidence the novel coronavirus was spreading by November 2019 in these countries.

To Will’s list, I’d add the only antibody study of archived Red Cross blood conducted by the U.S. CDC to date. This study found 39 antibody-positive serum samples collected December 13th-16th 2019 in California, Washington and Oregon (2% of blood samples collected from these states tested positive for antibodies).

As it takes the human body one to two weeks to produce detectable levels of antibodies, most of these 39 antibody-positive donors had been infected in November 2019 if not earlier.

For some reason, American officials performed only one antibody study of blood collected by blood bank organizations. It’s also strange that results of this study were not published until November 30th 2020 – more than 11 months after the first tranche of archived Red Cross blood had been collected.

In a CDC press briefing held May 29th 2020, CDC officials stated they’d searched for and could find no evidence the novel coronavirus had been “introduced” anywhere in America prior to January 20th 2020.

I believe this statement was false as by the time this press briefing was held, copious evidence of early spread had already been disseminated via published news accounts. For example, I’ve identified at least 17 Americans who were sick with definite Covid symptoms in November and December 2019 and all 17 had antibody evidence of prior infection. Also, all 17 of these reports were published by prominent news organizations at least 13 days before this press conference.

While a source of important evidence, antibody studies are not necessary to prove that early spread almost certainly occurred in America. Close examination of individual case histories also allows one confidently to reach this conclusion. What follows is a summary of three individual histories that lead me to conclude community spread was already occurring in America by November 2019 and probably October 2019.

For details on other American cases that date to December 2019, see this Seattle Times story and a feature story I wrote that, for some reason, was completely ignored by the mainstream press and public health officials, a fact I document in this follow-up article.

Case 1: Michael Melham of Belleville, NJ

Michael Melham, the Mayor of Belleville, NJ, was among a large group of New Jersey municipal employees who attended a conference in Atlantic City on November 19th-21st 2019. While at the conference, Melham experienced symptoms common to COVID-19.

“I was definitely feeling sick when I was there, and fought my way through it,” Mayor Melham told NJ Advance Media on April 30th 2020.

“I have never been sicker in my entire life,” the Mayor said. “These symptoms included a 102-degree fever, chills, hallucinations and a sore throat that lasted for three weeks.” In a story published by Fox News, Mayor Melham said the illness made him feel “like a heroin addict going through withdrawals… I didn’t know what was happening to me. I never felt that I could be so sick.“

Mayor Melham felt sick enough to contact his doctor who diagnosed him with the flu. However, this diagnosis was given “over the phone” and Melham never actually received a flu test.

In late April 2020, Melham visited his doctor for his annual physical and brought up his November illness. The doctor administered an antibody test, which came back positive for Covid antibodies.

Melham later told me he actually received two positive antibody tests (previous reports mentioned just one).

“My first antibody test was a rapid test. My second was a blood test that was sent to a lab. Both were positive for the longer antibody,” Mayor Melham wrote in one email.

Mayor Melham has repeatedly made the important (if ignored) point that he tested positive for the ‘long’ (IgG) antibody. He tested negative for the IgM antibody. The presence of IgM antibodies indicate more recent infection and, per studies, these antibodies fade and are only detectable for about a month after infection.

This combination of antibody results would seem to rule out the possibility Mayor Melham experienced an asymptomatic case of Covid in the month before receiving his first antibody test. The only time Melham was sick was November 2020.

He added: “I will also tell you that since the media attention surrounding my claim, many others have come forward. I have emails from those who were actually at the same conference in Atlantic City NJ, who became just as sick as I was.”

Those who wish to gauge the credibility of the Mayor’s claims can view this four-minute YouTube interview with Mayor Melham.

I also asked Mayor Melham a question no other journalist seems to have asked him. “Did any public health official ever contact you to investigate your possible case?”

Melham’s email response: “No, nothing.”

DISCUSSION

Multiple acquaintances as well as his physician would confirm Melham was sick with symptoms common to Covid victims in November. Since he received two positive antibody tests, if the results were a false positive, he received two false positives.

As noted, Mayor Melham reports receiving emails from “multiple people… who were at the same conference who became just as sick as I was”. This would suggest the presence of community spread – a possibility which might have been confirmed if contact tracers had tested the people who’d been sick at the same conference for antibodies.

We know no public health officials contacted Mayor Melham to investigate his claim. We also know, thanks to nj.com‘s reporting, that state health officials were aware of his claim:

“Asked about the Mayor’s statements, the state health department declined comment. A spokesperson for Gov. Phil Murphy did not immediately respond to a message.”

The following points should also be emphasized. If his diagnosis had been confirmed by public health officials, Mayor Melham would have been the first known Covid case in the world, and would have been the first confirmed case in America by approximately 61 days (the first official case in America is still recorded as January 20th 2020 – a man from Washington state who had recently returned from Wuhan).

Significantly, Mayor Melham can date the onset of his symptoms. Per numerous studies, it takes two to 14 days after infection for symptoms to manifest. This means Mayor Melham would have been infected some time between November 5th and November 19th 2019.

Since Mayor Melham did not give the virus to himself, logic tells us the chain of transmission that ended with Michael Melham being symptomatic around November 20th 2019 very possibly began before November 1st 2019. This would mean that community spread was possibly occurring in New Jersey as early as October 2019.

Case 2: Uf Tukel of Delray Beach, Florida

As reported by Palm Beach Post on May 16th 2020:

“At least 11 people… on two small blocks alone… in a small Delray Beach (Florida) neighborhood tested positive for coronavirus antibodies in April. They felt symptoms as early as November (2019). “It didn’t have a name back then, but I have no doubt now that it was the coronavirus,” one neighbor said.”

The article names seven of these individuals and provides details and quotes about their symptoms. These seven people include Uf Tukel who was “first among (residents of the neighborhood) to feel sick in late November (2019)… For weeks, he had body aches, a severe cough and night sweats/”

While “Tukel is reluctant to say he had the coronavirus a month before Chinese officials reported the outbreak to the World Health Organisation, ‘I had all the symptoms though,’ Tukel said.”

The same logic applied to Michael Melham’s possible case would apply to Mr. Tukel’s possible case. That is, the unknown person who infected Mr. Tukel was infected earlier than Tukel, and the unknown person who infected this person contracted the virus even earlier, suggesting early spread was also happening by some point in November, if not October, in Delray Beach, Florida.

If confirmed, Mr. Tukel’s case would indicate that American cases in November were not isolated to the state of New Jersey.

Several other points included in the Post’s coverage deserve attention.

These possible Delray Beach cases include two couples, with one spouse presumably infecting the other. One child of one of these couples became infected, providing further evidence of community spread.

According to the story, none of the individuals experienced close contacts with other non-family residents of the same neighborhood. That is, there seems to be no evidence of neighbor-to-neighbor transmission.

According to the story, “all (11 individuals) recovered and haven’t been sick since”. None of the 11 had travelled to China.

Like Michael Melham, none of these 11 people tested positive for the ‘short’ (IgM) antibodies – thus none had been recently infected.

The Post article also includes this eye-opening information: “Since March (2020) about two-fifths (approximately 200, 40%) of the 500 antibody tests taken by Xera Med (a DelRay Beach private testing lab/medical clinic) have been positive, said CEO Emily Rentz.” The first two confirmed cases in Florida were recorded March 1st.

The following sentence from this article might be even more significant: “The lab shares its data on positive tests with the state health department, (Rentz) added.”

And from the same article: “The state wouldn’t say whether it is collecting antibody data from hospitals or private laboratories.”

The Post article referenced a May 5th article by the same newspaper:

“In Florida, health department reports show patients who eventually tested positive for the virus experienced symptoms as early as January. The Florida Department of Health hasn’t explained those potential fault lines in the state’s assertion that the first cases didn’t appear in Florida until March.”

The fact 40% of 500 antibody tests administered by the clinic between March and early May 2020 tested positive for Covid antibodies suggests infections were widespread in this community. And according to the CEO of this lab, these antibody results were being shared with Florida State Department of Health officials.

And apparently these weren’t the only positive antibody results that were being reported by testing labs. As reported in the same article:

The University of Miami, in randomly testing Miami-Dade County residents for antibodies, has found that the rate of infection could be 16 times higher than state data suggests, said Dr. Erin Kobetz, a professor and lead researcher on the project …

“Since first publishing her findings, Kobetz has heard from several people who shared experiences similar to the Tropic Isle neighbors… They described being sick in December and later testing positive for antibodies. They asked if what they’d experienced was COVID-19.”

Significantly, if we count possible December 2019 cases, Americans from five geographically-dispersed U.S. states were featured in published articles. An unknown number of Americans who’ve never been featured in a newspaper article undoubtedly fit the same profile. If one adds this unknown number of never-identified people to the list of known individuals, evidence the novel coronavirus was spreading widely across America in November and December 2019 becomes even more compelling.

Not every infectious disease expert agrees with the CDC’s assessment that widespread transmission did not begin until January 20th 2020.

“It’s possible that the disease spread as early as November,” Dr. Kobetz said.

As in New Jersey, apparently no official with the Florida Department of Health contacted any of the 11 people referenced in the Post’s article. Nor have public health officials apparently followed up with Emily Renz, CEO of Xera Med, who stated approximately 200 other local residents received positive Covid antibody tests at the clinic between March and the end of April.

Ms. Renz noted that information on all of these positive test results had been forwarded to officials at the state’s health agency. Which prompts this question: How many clinics and testing labs in America also forwarded positive antibody test results to state health agencies, agencies which presumably could and would pass this information along to their colleagues at the CDC or NIH?

What the public doesn’t know but should is how many other Americans – those with lab results not reported in the press – also tested positive for antibodies between March and early May 2020. Presumably, the CDC and state and local health agencies have these data, which have never been released to the public.

Indeed, I’ve come to believe it’s possible at least some high-ranking officials may have conspired to suppress antibody results which, if published, might have led the public to conclude this virus was spreading widely months before officials said it had been introduced in this country. Such knowledge might have changed the way tens of millions of Americans evaluated their personal Covid risk as well as their support for lockdowns.

Case 3: Shane from Marin County, California

Perhaps the first early case in America (with antibody evidence that would confirm infection) is Shane of Marin County, California. Shane’s possible early case was not featured in a newspaper article, but by Shane himself in the reader comments section that followed a May 7th 2020 New York Times story (the story describes symptoms experienced by Covid patients).

Writes Shane: “I had COVID-19 last fall, far earlier than anyone else I’ve heard of. I suspect I caught it while on an overseas trip to Italy and the Middle East – I’ve taken two antibody tests in the past month, both of which confirmed I was infected.”

As Shane recounts, he was extremely sick with signature Covid symptoms.

“For me the worst symptom by far was the dry, unproductive cough. The cough was so intense, so relentless, it left me with bruised ribs and a horrible searing pain in my chest, which also felt as if someone were sitting on it. The fever at one point reached 104.9 upon which I began hallucinating – seeing my dogs talking to me and forgetting how to open a sliding glass door. Horrible chills which led to my teeth chattering so hard my jaw ached were also another noxious gift of Covid.

“What I most remember about my experience with Covid is pain, pain from coughing, pain in my body and head, pain everywhere around me, like a smothering red blanket. At times I felt I was going to die during that week and even today I must admit I am surprised I didn’t.”

Adding credibility to his claim, Shane’s post cited two labs where he claims to have received his positive antibody tests.

“The local health centre in West Marin is where I took the latest one. The other one I took directly at the manufacturer’s location – ARCpoint Labs in Richmond. That one is only 87% accurate and not FDA approved so that’s why I took the more recent one, which was done through Quest Labs I believe.”

In the comment thread, one poster suggests it’s unlikely Shane developed Covid as there had been no reported confirmed cases from that time. This poster opines that Shane was sick with some other nasty virus and later developed an asymptomatic case of Covid. However, Shane stuck to his theory and presented reasons for his opinion.

“I suppose it’s possible but I tend to think that since what I contracted had the exact same symptoms as COVID-19 – that COVID-19 is what I had. In addition, mid-February through mid-March I was in isolation, caring for my sister who died mid-March from metastatic cervical cancer. When COVID-19 made its first appearance in the U.S. in February we very quickly put in strict isolation protocols as my sister had a compromised immune system due to chemotherapy, further insulating myself from contact and infection as well.”

Shane does not report what month he thinks he had Covid – only that it was “last fall… and far earlier than anyone else I’ve heard.” He could have been sick in November or October (maybe even late September). Shane (if he really had Covid) contracted the virus from an unknown person who would have been infected earlier than him.

Shane shared his belief he might have contracted the virus in Italy or in the Middle East, which, if true, would provide more evidence of early global spread. However, it’s also possible he contracted the virus in California.

Shane’s claim was posted in the moderated New York Times’ comments section, meaning one or more Times employees were aware of Shane’s startling claim. I imagine any Covid article, including the popular reader comments, published by the New York Times was also read by at least some employees of the CDC, NIH etc.

As only paid subscribers can make comments in the New York Times comment section, the newspaper possesses Shane’s subscription information. That is, someone at the newspaper could have easily ascertained Shane’s full name and contact information, including his street and email address.

For what it’s worth, I contacted the NY Times via its news tip email address and suggested a reporter follow up on Shane’s eye-opening claim. I did not receive a reply. This leads me to believe the New York Times is not interested in pursuing evidence of early spread in America, even in the case of a person who very well could be the first known Covid case in the world.

Conclusion

At least three Americans (either known, or in Shane’s case, easily identifiable if effort was made) possessed antibody evidence of Covid in November 2019. The infection chain that ultimately produced these symptomatic individuals likely traces to October 2019. Of note, two of these individuals received two positive antibody tests, making a false positive explanation far less likely. These cases occurred not in one state, but three states (New Jersey, Florida and California). Americans from at least 12 U.S. states had antibody evidence of infection prior to mid-January 2020.

As far as I know, none of these 123 Americans (17 Americans identified in press reports and 106 in the Red Cross antibody study) had travelled to China. All 123 are either known or could be identified. (For unstated reasons, the CDC did not interview any of the 106 Americans who provided positive blood samples to the Red Cross.) The figure 123 does not include the unknown individuals who infected these Americans, nor does it include the possible cases that never became known to reporters or the public.

This antibody evidence strongly suggests the novel coronavirus was being transmitted person-to-person throughout the United States well before January 1st 2020, and was probably occurring by October 2019.

If certain officials concealed this truth or were simply too incompetent to figure it out, any trust placed in such authorities is undermined. The above information also suggests that officials are not interested in conducting serious investigations into early spread of the virus, prompting a skeptic to wonder why this might be the case.

My hope is that journalists with more resources than myself, as well as officials and scientists, will belatedly and seriously investigate the strangely-ignored evidence of early spread.

This story also appeared in The Daily Skeptic.
Author

Bill Rice

Bill Rice, Jr. is a freelance journalist in Troy, Alabama.

Dachsie comment:

Heathrow, “now faced with an ‘airmageddon’ situation

This is a PLANdemic-related story. The woke aiirlines and airports are sinking fast. Summer is over so this action by Heathrow is a day late and a dollar short. The winter probably comes early in Europe and Europe is going to freeze this winter because Russia keeps closing the tap on natural gas for heating for Europe.

_______________

https://americanpatriotdaily.com/lat...iteclick=APD-/


proudamericantraveler.com
Heathrow Airport Is So Understaffed They’ve Ordered Airlines to Stop Selling Tickets
Savannah Jordan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9ROQxu2m3w

This MASSIVE vaccine lawsuit victory changes everything | Redacted with Clayton Morris
215,891 views
Aug 17, 2022

22.42 video runtime


Redacted
991K subscribers
The first class action lawsuit against vaccine mandates in the U.S. was settled for $10 million. But these lawsuits have not been a slam dunk. We discuss what these plaintiffs face and why we think these suits are important to watch.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/e...m_source=email

Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Eric Coppolino exposes Poornima Wagh as a fraud

Poornima says she has two PhDs in virology and the virus doesn't exist. She's lying about both.

Steve Kirsch
26 min ago August 31,

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._1200x859.jpeg

I have been trying to interview Poornima Wagh for weeks because what she said in interviews made no sense to me. I was told by Lee Merritt who interviewed her that she is now camera shy after her interviews and doesn’t want to talk to me.

I checked with Jessica Rose who agreed that what Poornima said didn’t make any sense to her either. She looked up her credentials and found they didn’t exist.

Eric Coppolino found exactly the same thing Jessica did: she’s a total fraud. This is why Poornima was so camera shy.

He wrote a brilliant Substack about it.

What we still don’t know is why she is fabricating all this stuff.

I have the same problem with any of the leaders of the “virus denier” movement. Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey, Mark Bailey, Andrew Kaufman, Jon Rappoport, and others are all camera shy. There’s a reason for that: they would be exposed as frauds in minutes.
Summary

The unwillingness to have a friendly discussion on camera with experts having differing views is generally the most obvious sign you aren’t getting the truth.

See my article on how to tell who is telling you the truth for more info.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...qRm2YL0N1w--~D

Watch Video

This is a presentation by Dr. Andrew Kaufman at the Anarchapulco festival in 2022, discussing vital knowledge about responsibility in health and medicine. From the faulty PCR tests to the unprecedented mandates, Kaufman breaks down the false paradigms around COVID and Germ Theory. Dr. Andy proceeds to offer natural healing solutions for freedom-minded individuals who are ready to take charge of their own health care.

Dachsie comment:

(P S I see a bit of fight brewing. I will engage it a little by choosing what articles and videos I will post. I hope all basic sides will be heard. That can give some comfort in these turbulent times. The trust and respect is gone on this "pandemic and virus" scam. Only God can help the USA and the world now because we wrestle not with flesh and blood but with principalities and powers and wickedness in high places.)


Regarding post #9733 Dr. Poornima Wagh

I had the impression she was speaking her truth and her truth comports with several other M.D.s and PhDs and experienced journalists about the absence of an isolated SARS CoV 2 virus. I do not believe she misrepresented her work history and I know that USA universities verify academic credentials before hiring anyone. I appreciated her clear explanations of standard lab procedures.

There has always been an "emperor has no clothes" characteristic to the entire PLANdemic official narrative. A virus must be natural, from nature, and from a symptomatic human specimen.

The science part of the narrative from USA governmental agencies has been total B S ( Bad Science ).
Of course the bureaucratic speech has also been basically lies and constant changing of the definitions of the terms and change of the policies and recommendations. The example of the lie-nature of the federal governmental presentations has been adopted by all of the state and local governments and required of all businesses that state-licensed businesses in line with state health department requirements. All weak vague nonsense and lies. None of this has the slightest hint of health concerns for the public and for individuals. There is an absence of federal or state codified law and administrative regulations, to say nothing of firm and fair enforcement.

The data, the statistics have been garbage from the beginning, and unmercifully politically manipulated garbage data at that. That alone has killed tens of thousands of people.

We have seen how everything is politicized and taken over by the One World Death and Slavery System for ALL gang, usually called the New World Order gang.

Nothing right, reasonable, balanced and good about the whole evil iniquitous pandemic production. Lie, kill, steal and destroy.

https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/...m_source=email

Jon Rappoport

54 min ago September 1, 2022


The Millionaire blogger, in the Land of Virology
(which is a province in the larger territory of completely Unnecessary Fear)Steve Kirsch writes: "I have the same problem with any of the leaders of the 'virus denier' movement. Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey, Mark Bailey, Andrew Kaufman, Jon Rappoport, and others are all camera shy. There’s a reason for that: they would be exposed as frauds in minutes."

In the land of virology, there was a man who thought he understood viruses.

He liked to talk about his money and how much he was willing to bet that his understanding was correct.

It never occurred to him that people didn’t care about his money and thought he was rather silly for waving it around.

In this land, there were people who asserted that some or all of these viruses didn’t exist. They apparently got under the skin of the man with money, and he challenged them to a debate---and of course, he worked money into his challenge.

Why? Who knows? Perhaps he foolishly thought talking about large sums made him important.

The man with money said he had a team of experts who would prove that these viruses existed. One virus in particular, would be the focus of the debate. Did it exist, or didn’t it?

The man with the money wanted this debate to be conducted via video.

Of course, if the man with the money had gone to actual scientists and asked them how the debate should be conducted, in order to produce a reasonable SCIENTIFIC result, the experts would have told him: IN WRITING. WORDS ON THE PAGE.

After all, science journals don’t publish videos. They publish words.

The man with the money didn’t care. He wanted video.

Why? Who knows? Perhaps he preferred polemic and beauty pageant over reason. A man who makes a show of talking about and waving around his money might well prefer a show business setting for a debate.

At any rate, one of the people who was asserting the particular virus in question didn’t exist criticized the man with the money for insisting on video.

This person held that WRITING/WORDS ON THE PAGE was the proper way and the only way to conduct a scientific debate; and furthermore, money should not be involved.

The man with the money claimed this other person didn’t want to debate at all because this other person knew he would be exposed as a fraud in a debate.

That, of course, was a lie.

Apparently, the man with the money didn’t mind telling the lie, in the same way that politicians don’t mind puffing themselves up and bloviating about people who disagree with them.

Which was yet another reason not to conduct the debate on video.

Share

The man with money has some important things to say (write) about vaccines, but in the area of virology he is acting irrationally. Behaving like a fool.

And there is where the (non-) debate stands.

And if you don’t believe that’s where it stands, I’m willing to debate THAT issue, and I’ll put up $100000000000000000000000000000 for the winner. Contact my lawyers, and they’ll forward contracts to your lawyers and discuss the up-front bond, and the live-stream video details, and whether the participants will be allowed to employ make-up artists and virtual backgrounds and voice-enhancing software and models in bikinis strolling in the background...

-- Jon Rappoport

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dachsie

Dachsie comment:

(P S I see a bit of fight brewing. I will engage it a little by choosing what articles and videos I will post. I hope all basic sides will be heard. That can give some comfort in these turbulent times. The trust and respect is gone on this "pandemic and virus" scam. Only God can help the USA and the world now because we wrestle not with flesh and blood but with principalities and powers and wickedness in high places.)


Regarding post #9733 Dr. Poornima Wagh

I had the impression she was speaking her truth and her truth comports with several other M.D.s and PhDs and experienced journalists about the absence of an isolated SARS CoV 2 virus. I do not believe she misrepresented her work history and I know that USA universities verify academic credentials before hiring anyone. I appreciated her clear explanations of standard lab procedures.

There has always been an "emperor has no clothes" characteristic to the entire PLANdemic official narrative. A virus must be natural, from nature, and from a symptomatic human specimen.

The science part of the narrative from USA governmental agencies has been total B S ( Bad Science ).
Of course the bureaucratic speech has also been basically lies and constant changing of the definitions of the terms and change of the policies and recommendations. The example of the lie-nature of the federal governmental presentations has been adopted by all of the state and local governments and required of all businesses that state-licensed businesses in line with state health department requirements. All weak vague nonsense and lies. None of this has the slightest hint of health concerns for the public and for individuals. There is an absence of federal or state codified law and administrative regulations, to say nothing of firm and fair enforcement.

The data, the statistics have been garbage from the beginning, and unmercifully politically manipulated garbage data at that. That alone has killed tens of thousands of people.

We have seen how everything is politicized and taken over by the One World Death and Slavery System for ALL gang, usually called the New World Order gang.

Nothing right, reasonable, balanced and good about the whole evil iniquitous pandemic production. Lie, kill, steal and destroy.

---

The FDA website confirmed that no isolates of a SARS-CoV-2 were available but the conjured up a model using monkey kidney, lung cancer tissue antibiotic, reagents etc. This gives credibility Poornim Wagh’s and Andrew Kaufman’s work in my opinion.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/t...m_source=email

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...ZzK1LxpVdg--~D

The new ivermectin video is a must see

This video is approved by Doctors Pierre Kory and Paul Marik and many others. The video is NOT approved by the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, CNN, or the White House. Producer: Mikki Willis, Length:

embedded video

also on Rumble

https://rumble.com/v1huyrn-ivermectin-the-truth.html

Steve Kirsch September 1, 2022
12 min ago



Ivermectin: The Truth is an amazing film, less than 15 minutes long! I highly recommend this film. Watch it and share it.

Pierre Kory, Paul Marik, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Chris Martenson, Richard Bartlett, and Mike Yeadon all appear. My name appears briefly at 11:45 in the video. Still trying to get that debate with the mainstream “experts.”

The Ivermectin film is free.

If you’d like to sponsor Plandemic3, you can donate here.
CNN “COVID expert” Leana Wen

Leana Wen appears briefly in this video (at the beginning and near the end) saying “we know it doesn’t work.” She’s total blue pill. If you feel the same way about Lena as I do, you’ll want to watch this excellent Leana Wen takedown video by Kim Iversen. It’s awesome.

The world would be a better place if Kim Iversen was the authority being promoted on CNN instead of Lena Wen.

P.S. Kim should write a book on “How I avoid being censored by YouTube.” She walks as close to the line as you can get. I don’t know how she does it.
Fluvoxamine

Just a footnote here since I was heavily involved in funding the research on fluvoxamine, another highly effective drug for treating COVID. If you take just 50mg of fluvoxamine twice a day for 2 weeks, most everyone avoids long-haul COVID symptoms due to the anti-inflammatory properties of this drug (Prozac also works).

They did the same thing to fluvoxamine as they did with ivermectin. They used the excuse that the US Phase 3 trial was halted for futility as a reason for not recommending the drug, but they never pointed out that the futility was that very few people in the placebo group were being hospitalized because the variants had gotten so mild and people were likely taking ivermectin, so they had no “comparison group” and they did a horrible job at recruiting (we spent gobs of money sending them leads and their enrollment % was horrible).

This doesn’t mean the drug doesn’t work. These are the kinds of games these people play.

Here’s what the reference cited by the NIH said:

The Data Safety Monitoring Board(DSMB) for the study recommended an early stop for futility due to a low case rate and difficulty recruiting patients.

Here’s how the NIH deliberately twisted the facts to make it look like the drug didn’t work:

The subsequent STOP COVID 2, a Phase 3 randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04668950) that enrolled >700 participants in the United States and Canada, was stopped for futility by a data safety monitoring board after lower than expected case rates and treatment effect were observed.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...e-28ad50f9b728

childrenshealthdefense.org

What’s Really Behind CDC’s Plan to Revamp Agency?

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...Tm1yjvpo8A--~D


By Dr. Joseph Mercola

September 1, 2011

After botching the COVID-19 response in every possible and improbable way, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now wants more money — and more power.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free.

Story at a glance:

On Aug. 17, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director Dr. Rochelle Walensky publicly admitted the agency’s COVID-19 response “fell short,” and that an internal reorganization has been launched to improve response times and data sharing, and to make health guidance easier to understand. Six days before this announcement, the CDC published updated COVID-19 guidance, now matching what “misinformation spreaders” have called for all along.
The vow to revamp fails to take into account the real reasons why people no longer trust the CDC, namely their dishonesty, their suppression of science that doesn’t fit the Great Reset narrative and their protection of Big Pharma at the expense of American lives, including children and pregnant women.
Despite widespread failures and blatant corruption within the CDC, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) is asking for a bigger budget. Its proposed budget for 2023 is $1.7 TRILLION in mandatory spending and another $127.3 BILLION in discretionary spending.
Of those budgeted trillions, the CDC will in 2023 receive about 1% of the HHS budget, or $10.6 billion — $2.3 billion more than its 2022 appropriation — and this includes “mandatory funding to establish a Vaccines for Adults program.”
The CDC being wrong on everything about the pandemic — and taking two and a half years to admit even a fraction of it — is proof positive that centralizing health care decisions is a bad idea. Ideally, all that HHS money should be divided among the states. We’d be far better off with local community programs handling current HHS services — including pandemic response.

After botching the COVID-19 response in every possible and improbable way, the CDC now wants more money — and more power.

On Aug. 17, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky publicly admitted the agency’s COVID-19 response “fell short,” and that an internal reorganization has been launched to improve response times and data sharing, and to make health guidance easier to understand.

“My goal is a new, public health action-oriented culture at CDC that emphasizes accountability, collaboration, communication, and timeliness,” Walensky said in a statement.

The problem is that reorganization will not fix the foundational problem, which is that the CDC can’t seem to quit protecting Big Pharma at the expense of public health. Americans have lost faith in the CDC for the simple reason that it’s been lying to us day in and day out for two and a half years.

They’ve flouted basic rules and regulations, they’ve redefined well-established medical terms to suit the chosen narrative, they’ve made recommendations without scientific support while telling us to “trust the science.”

They’ve completely ignored massive, unprecedented safety signals for both the COVID-19 jabs and remdesivir, flatly refusing to answer questions about the mounting deaths and injuries from these drugs.

They’ve refused to take into account other public health parameters such as suicides and alcoholism caused by lockdowns, and deaths due to lack of treatment for chronic conditions such as heart disease, diabetes and cancer. They’re also refusing to address what is clearly deteriorating immune function among the COVID-19-jabbed. The list goes on.

In March, Walensky admitted they “never suspected” the effectiveness of the shots might wane, despite clear and abundant evidence — shared on alternative media platforms — that the shots were not working.

What’s more, she admitted her source for the “95% effective” claim was a CNN report (which in turn pulled its information directly from a Pfizer press release). That’s the level of data gathering for decision-making we’re dealing with here.

I guess that’s what happens when the vast majority of CDC employees, including Walensky herself, work from home for years on end. Considering Walensky STILL works from home to this day, one also wonders how effective these supposed reorganization efforts can actually be.

The CDC is a wholly captured agency, beholden to Big Pharma, and as long as a single decision-maker remains, they can reorganize and restructure to their hearts’ content. It won’t change a thing. As noted by The Defender, the CDC needs to be replaced with “a public health model that operates independently from Big Pharma.”

Health and Human Services to get $1.7 trillion

Failures and ineptitudes be damned, the HHS proposed budget for 2023 is now an eye-popping $1.7 TRILLION in mandatory spending (up from 1.5 trillion in 2022), and another $127.3 BILLION in discretionary spending (down from 131.8 billion in 2022).

Operating divisions under the HHS include not only the CDC and the FDA, but also the NIH, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid and several others. In total, the HHS employs some 80,000 people.

Of those budgeted trillions, the CDC will in 2023 receive 1% of the HHS budget or $10.6 billion — $2.3 billion more than its 2022 appropriation — and this includes “mandatory funding to establish a Vaccines for Adults program.”

Yet with all that supposed brain power and money, what exactly do they accomplish? I would argue “precious little,” and the CDC’s COVID-19 response is a perfect example of how our taxpayer funds are being wasted on advice that ranges from bad to worse.

The problem with concentrated power is that it gets corrupted. After 69 years, it seems the HHS is finally entering its death throes, as corruption within many of its operating divisions is now shockingly blatant.

The same goes for the World Health Organization (WHO). Incidentally, its biannual budget for 2022-2023 of $6.7 billion is dwarfed by the HHS budget. Still, the WHO is now seeking to gain control over health decisions globally. I explain why this is such a horrendous and unworkable idea in “The WHO Is a Corrupt, Unhealthy Organization.”

The CDC being wrong on everything about the pandemic, and taking two and a half years to admit even a fraction of it, is proof positive that centralizing health care decisions is a bad idea. Ideally, all that money should be divided among the states.

We’d be far better off with local community programs handling current HHS services — including pandemic response.

CDC’s botched test kits

The errors of the CDC are too numerous to recount in a single article, but let’s take a look at one of the doozies, namely its botched COVID-19 test.

As reported by HealthDay reporters Robert Preidt and Robin Foster, back in December 2021:

“Along with being contaminated, there was also a basic design flaw in COVID-19 testing kits created by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention early in the pandemic, a new agency review shows.

“It was already known that the PCR kits were contaminated, but the CDC’s findings published Wednesday in the journal PLOS ONE are the first to note a design error that caused false positives.

“When the CDC’s test kits were developed and distributed in the early weeks of the pandemic, there were no other authorized tests available. … The agency started shipping the test kits to public health laboratories in early February 2020, but many labs soon told the CDC that the tests were producing inconclusive results.

“The CDC acknowledged later that month that the kits were flawed, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials said in April that poor manufacturing practices had caused contamination of the kits …”

So, the tests had not just one but two problems. First, they were contaminated with synthetic fragments, sequences of genetic material from the virus that are used to ensure the test is working properly. These synthetic sequences are thought to have contaminated the kits during quality testing, as they were being manufactured in the same CDC lab where quality testing took place.

Secondly, the CDC failed to catch a serious design flaw. The test was designed to detect the presence of three specific genetic regions or sequences of the virus.

The test kit included a set of primers that bound to and made copies of those regions (when they were present in the patient, indicating exposure to the virus), as well as probes that fluoresced to signal that copying was taking place.

To work properly, these primers and probes had to bind to the genetic sequences, but not to each other. Here, one of the probes had a tendency to bind to one of the primers, thereby triggering a fluorescent signal, suggesting a positive result. This is how the test ended up producing an unacceptable number of false positives.

Eventually, smaller private companies ended up providing most of the PCR tests — without encountering these contamination and design flaw problems.

The fact that the PCR test cannot identify an active infection and was used to create a false “casedemic” is another story, which we’ve covered multiple times. Here too, the CDC displayed shocking dishonesty, alternatively hiding and manipulating data to make the pandemic out to be something it really wasn’t.

They also recommended mask wearing despite overwhelming scientific evidence showing masks don’t prevent the spread of viruses.

Time and again, CDC leadership made public health decisions on what appears to have been nothing more than assumption, personal opinion or fear — and that’s if you’re kind enough to exclude the possibility of fraud and collusion to benefit Big Pharma and the globalist Great Reset agenda.

Did HHS create the problem?

As mentioned, the HHS runs the NIH and CDC, both of which are implicated in the creation of SARS-CoV-2. So, basically, the same circle of people who may have created the problem are also in charge of solving it and providing a cure.

We’ve already seen how “effective” they’ve been in that regard. They’ve devastated public health with useless lockdowns, mask mandates and social distancing, and killed an as-yet undetermined but extraordinarily high number of people with improper, dangerous and experimental treatments.

As noted in “Why the COVID Jab Should Be Banned for Pregnant Women,” the CDC to this day insists pregnant women get the COVID-19 shot, despite trial data suggesting it may cause miscarriage in 8 out of 10 cases. Will reorganization eventually correct this murderous advice?

In an Aug. 2 Current Affairs interview, professor Jeffrey Sachs, chair of The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission, said he believes the U.S. government is preventing a thorough investigation into the origin of the pandemic, for the simple reason that the virus was the result of U.S. research.

Indeed, there are patents spanning decades to suggest that’s true (see “Patents Prove SARS-CoV-2 Is a Manufactured Virus”).

If our very worst suspicions are true, then the U.S. government funded not only one bioweapon but two — the original SARS-CoV-2 and the gene transfer injections misrepresented as “COVID vaccines.”

And the HHS divisions of the FDA and CDC went along with all of it, not even pausing at the possibility of killing or injuring 6-month-old infants and toddlers.

Waging war on pathogens is a failed strategy

In an Aug. 10 Brownstone Institute article, Aaron Vandiver, a wildlife conservationist, writer and former litigator, reviews why the global war on pathogens is a failed strategy that needs to end:

“Bill Gates has called the global response to COVID-19 a ‘world war.’ His militaristic language has been echoed by Anthony Fauci and other architects of COVID-19 policy for the last two and half years. …

“I believe that an ecological perspective reveals many of the flaws inherent in an aggressive high-tech attack on a pathogen …

“To me, the ‘war’ on COVID-19 has been characterized by a destructive set of attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors that appear to be deeply engrained in our political and economic institutions, and which form a pattern that should be recognizable to conservationists and ecologists.

“1. Aggressive intervention in complex natural processes using new, poorly understood technologies designed to achieve narrowly defined short-term goals, with disregard for the potential long-term ramifications;

“2. Profiteering by private interests that own the technologies, enabled by government entities and ‘experts’ that have been financially captured by those interests;

“3. Followed by a cascade of unintended consequences.”

In the remainder of the article, Vandiver goes into several aggressive and destructive COVID-19 interventions in greater detail — and their consequences. I recommend reading through it.

Importantly, when we go to war against pathogens, we go to war against ourselves, because without pathogens we cannot exist. The key to health is balanced co-existence with bacteria, viruses and other pathogens, which exist by the trillions in and on our bodies.

The twisted logic behind gain-of-function research

Vandiver, like Sachs, also points out that gain-of-function research funded by the NIH appears to be the most logical and most heavily supported theory as to the origin of the pandemic, and that denial of the lab leak theory is underpinned by reckless scientists unwilling to recognize the risks inherent in their work.

Vandiver writes:

“Most fail to realize that Fauci and other proponents of ‘gain of function’ have long shown reckless disregard for the risks of tampering with natural viruses, expressing a paranoid attitude toward nature that is the antithesis of respect for ecology.

“Fauci and others claim that ‘Mother Nature Is the Ultimate Bioterrorist’ to justify their Frankenstein-like efforts to hunt down the most dangerous viruses that exist in wild nature, take them to labs like the one in Wuhan, and tinker around with them to make them more dangerous and deadly.

“Their twisted logic seems to be that if they intentionally create superviruses, they can somehow anticipate and prepare for natural pandemics. Most objective observers, however, say that ‘gain of function’ is a military-industrial boondoggle that has no practical benefit whatsoever and dramatically increases the risk of pandemics. …

“It remains inconclusive whether ‘gain of function’ research actually caused the COVID-19 pandemic, but its potential to have done so is a vivid example of how powerful actors like Fauci use technological tools to interfere with natural processes, with disregard if not outright contempt for the long-term ecological consequences, thereby creating opportunities to exercise more power.”

In conclusion, Vandiver notes:

“If we carefully analyze each aspect of ‘world war’ on COVID-19, we can see how each tactic and high-tech ‘weapon’ has harmed human health, destabilized civil society, and possibly disrupted the ecological balance between the human population and the virus, while enriching private interests and empowering financially captured government regulators.

“The ‘war’ has been characterized the distinct pattern that I described at the beginning of this essay … This destructive pattern appears to be deeply ingrained in our institutions and in the outlook of our leaders. It largely defines our society’s dysfunctional relationship with the natural world.

“An ecological perspective that keeps this pattern in mind, and takes into account all of the consequences of launching high-tech ‘wars’ on pathogens or any other part of our environment may help us avoid similar catastrophes in the future, or at least to recognize them.”

Death by medicine

In “Are Medical Errors Still the Third Leading Cause of Death?” I review the now decades-long history of modern medicine being a leading cause of death, at times spinning up to take first place, and rarely dipping below fourth.

Several studies and investigations over the years have placed medicine and medical errors as the third leading cause of death in the U.S.

The pandemic has revealed just how dangerous it is to listen to dog whistles like “trust the science.” Which science? The one Big Pharma concocts to make money or the one that double checks and investigates claims independently?

The CDC’s COVID-19 policies were all wrong — consistently 180 degrees from helpful — and have only recently been updated to match what all of us “misinformation spreaders” have been saying for well over two years. That update was published Aug. 11, just six days before Walensky announced the CDC’s reorganization plans.

I’m not buying the idea that the CDC suddenly realized it was going in the wrong direction. They knew it from the start, and they did it intentionally. I suspect they’re only now starting to course correct because mainstream media are losing their grip on the public.

Mainstream media were their cover for every obnoxious, unscientific recommendation, and without that brainwashing arm, the CDC has no way to turn but back.

Like Dr. Anthony Fauci, they probably realize that the political tide is turning, people are fed up with the “1984” double-speak, and if Republicans take the House in November, the CDC could well be facing any number of investigations.

Senators promise investigations

On Aug. 23, two U.S. senators promised a “full-throated investigation” of Fauci’s and former NIH chief Francis Collins’ potential roles in the origin of the pandemic, and issued a formal request for the HHS and NIH to preserve documents and communications.

Leadership at the CDC and FDA also need to be investigated and questioned about the ins and outs of their decision-making. Not that I think they’ll ever admit to “working for the devil,” meaning the Deep State cabal that is using COVID-19 as a cover for a global takeover, but there needs to be a reckoning nonetheless.

Those willing to sacrifice the lives, futures and Constitutional rights of Americans on behalf of these transhumanist psychopaths need to be ruthlessly weeded out. And then, we need to implement new public health systems, perhaps new agencies, with powers that are more limited in scope and state-run rather than federal.

Never, ever, should an agency like the CDC be allowed to ban doctors from treating patients, for example, based on their own expertise and experience. What has happened during this pandemic, and is still happening, is a true crime against humanity.

We must never forget how health officials, government officials, media and other influencers tried to foment hatred against the unvaccinated, and how they’ve been willing to discriminate to the point of death.

The CDC has now backtracked on discrimination, agreeing people should not be treated based on their vaccination status. But we remember the calls for “re-education camps” and no-fly lists. Backtracking is not going to erase the attempts to destroy the lives of those who refused to play their Russian roulette.

I, for one, would love to hear the CDC explain why they have ignored the blaring safety signal of nearly 2.3 MILLION reports of COVID-19 jab injuries in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Wouldn’t you?

Originally published by Mercola.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...e-28ad50f9b728


COVID Vaccines Didn’t Work, so CDC Changed the Definition of Vaccines

The Epoch Times reported:

In early 2020 when the public first learned that a novel virulent virus was making people sick in China and around the world, it made sense to institute public health measures to protect against it.

But, instead of encouraging doctors and scientists to look for ways to treat the virus and ways to keep sick people from healthy people, as has been done with other pandemics in modern human history, government authorities actually actively prevented doctors from treating patients.

Tech companies quickly censored and de-platformed doctors who discussed potentially-effective treatment options. The scientific debate was silenced.

Instead of any open, honest discussion about the effectiveness of preventative measures and the different treatment options, the world was told that the only way out of the coronavirus crisis was via mass vaccination. If the public understood that there were options for treating COVID-19 and that the infection was likely to be mild in over 99% of the people who got it, they wouldn’t be as motivated to get a vaccine.

https://brownstone.org/articles/unco...tm_source=push

Uncovering the Army of Federal Censors

By Aaron Kheriaty September 2, 2022

Excerpt:

"I've recently posted twice on the case of Missouri v. Biden, in which the states of Missouri and Louisiana — along with four private plaintiffs (Jay Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff, the non-profit Health Freedom Louisiana, and yours truly) represented by the New Civil Liberties Alliance — are suing the Biden Administration for alleged free speech violations. Specifically, the executive branch of the federal government has been colluding with social media to censor any content on social media platforms — Twitter, YouTube (owned by Google), and LinkedIn (owned by Microsoft), Facebook and Instagram (both owned by Meta) — any content that questions, challenges, or contradicts the government’s covid policies.

While private companies might arguably choose to censor content on their platforms, the government cannot pressure or coerce private companies to censor disfavored content. Any such action is clearly a violation of the free speech guaranteed by the First Amendment of the US Constitution. As we articulate in our latest legal brief: “Under the First Amendment, the federal Government should have no role in policing private speech or picking winners and losers in the marketplace of ideas. But that is what federal officials are doing, on a massive scale.”

Our joint statement on discovery disputes legal brief, filed with the court and made public today, reveals scores of federal officials across at least eleven federal agencies have secretly communicated with social-media platforms to censor and suppress private speech federal officials disfavor. This unlawful enterprise has been wildly successful. Here are just a few excerpts from this document, which includes attachments of hundreds of pages of emails and other governmental and Big Tech internal communications as supporting evidence. These documents were obtained after we requested the following information on discovery:" SNIP

Author

https://brownstone.org/wp-content/up...4695755245.png
Aaron Kheriaty

Aaron Kheriaty, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a psychiatrist working with the Unity Project. He is a former Professor of Psychiatry at the University of California at Irvine School of Medicine, where he was the director of Medical Ethics.

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3


https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...pgTAlExQ3A--~D

Biden Administration to Shift COVID Vaccine Distribution to Private Sector Despite Plans to Extend Public Health Emergency



https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...jgDDFzvfRw--~D

More Than 1,000 Reports of Adverse Events After COVID-19 Vaccination in Children 5 and Younger, CDC Data Shows

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...SsSjSHT0NA--~D

What Is the Cause of Increased Mortality Rates?



https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...bm55HmxePw--~D

‘America’s Other Drug Problem’ — Overprescribing



https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...3eyWsnEU.g--~D

Here’s Proof Our Government Does Not Want to Compensate for COVID Vaccine Injury

https://usawatchdog.com/fraud-lies-p...dead-more-war/

Fraud, Lies, Psyops, Cheating For Midterms, More Vax Dead, More War

By Greg Hunter On September 2, 2022 In Weekly News Wrap-Ups

https://usawatchdog.com/wp-content/u...qw-300x214.jpg

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com

The amount of psyops for the Deep State Dems to win in November is kicking into high gear. They are way behind in the real polls, but that does not stop them from lying to make you think otherwise in the phony polls. (As I have said in the past, the real approval rating for Biden is 11% to 12%.) This is why the Democrat strategy must include fraud, lies, psyops, cheating and rigging for Midterms come November. They sure as heck do not have any policy to make the lives of ordinary Americans better, unless you think killing your unborn baby or paying much more at the gas pump and grocery store will enrich your life. Don’t fall for the psyops. You are not hearing any good ideas from Democrats because they don’t have any.

Another week and more young healthy people die from “unknown causes.” When are we all going to say enough and call this what it is—people are being murdered from the bioweapon injections they passed off as a “vaccine.”

The War in Ukraine could have been stopped in April, but the UK and the West halted any hint of peace to stop the bloodshed. Meanwhile, Germany’s economy is about to totally shut down and destroy the lives of its citizens all in an effort to support Ukraine. Now, natural gas from Russia has been cut to zero as the Russians say the Nord #1 pipeline is down for repairs. When it reopens (and who knows when that will happen), it will be running at 20% of capacity, just like before. Germans are trying to find coal to burn so they don’t have to burn their furniture to stay warm this winter. If the economy shuts down anymore, can the banks also suffer from this? Deutsche Bank (DB) is in Germany, and the IMF has been calling it “the most systemically dangerous bank in the world” for the past few years. Is the German economic shutdown over this stupid war going to help or hurt DB?

There is much more in the 45-minute newscast.

Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he talks about these stories and more in the Weekly News Wrap-Up for 9.2.22.

(To Donate to USAWatchdog.com Click Here)

Embedded video
video also on Rumble
https://rumble.com/v1ibj8p-fraud-lies-psyops-rigging-cheating-for-midterms-more-vax-dead-more-war.html

45:45 video runtime

After the Interview:

Renowned pulmonary doctor and CV19 expert, Pierre Kory MD, founder of FLCCC.net, will be the guest for the Saturday Night Post. The deaths and injuries are increasing from the failed CV19 bioweapon vax, and Dr. Kory will bring us an update to give you the info to fight this menace.

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...soylent-green/

COVID-19 is the Murder of Old People

Sep 2 2022
by Jon Rappoport

In the 1973 film, Soylent Green, a NY police detective discovers that the vastly overcrowded, poverty–stricken population of the city—who are being sustained on processed government food, called Soylent—are now unknowingly eating humans who have died. That’s what Soylent Green is made of. That’s the terrible secret. What’s the secret now? It’s all there in the open-source literature…

by Jon Rappoport

September 2, 2022

(To join our email list, click here.)

Note: I’m republishing this piece to keep the truth on the record. It can easily slip away.

Here we go:

The SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist.

The supposed diagnostic tests are meaningless.

The case numbers are meaningless.

The people who have died have died for multiple reasons, none of which has anything to do with SARS-CoV-2.

I have spent the past year writing over 300 articles, providing compelling evidence for the above assertions.

There are “people who have died who are LABELED COVID deaths.” AKA “official reality.” AKA “official lies.”

Who are these people? By and large, who are they?

Here are two statements.

The Kaiser Family Foundation, July 24, 2020: “Adults 65 and older account for 16% of the US population but 80% of COVID-19 deaths in the US…”

AARP, April 1, 2021: “95 percent of COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. have occurred among people who were 50 or older.”

A member of Biden’s coronavirus task force, Dr. Zeke Emanuel, once stated there is no reason people should want to live beyond the age of 75. Just go gently into that good night.

Well, what is called COVID is old people.

My first clue about the elderly came from a report published by Italy’s National Institute of Health during the early days of the “pandemic.” It stated that the average age of people dying from COVID in the country was 79.5. That clue was the size of an aircraft carrier parked outside your house.

Soon after the Italian report, the Institute of Health went dark. No more research was released. No updates. They’d spoken out of school, and someone slapped them in the head.

Open-source press reports revealed the “excess mortality” of 2020 was largely the result of elderly people dying in nursing homes.

This has nothing to do with a virus.

It has to do with patients who are ALREADY on a long downward health slide. They ALREADY have multiple health conditions. For years, even decades, they’ve been pounded with toxic medical drugs, weakening their bodies and shredding their immune systems—

And THEN they’re hit with the TERROR of an arbitrary and fake COVID-19 diagnosis—

And THEN they’re isolated and shut off from family and friends—in facilities where gross neglect and indifference are all too often the “standard of care.” THEN they’re treated with toxic and destructive drugs like Remdesivir and Midazolam.

Death is the direct result.

Forced premature death.

These patients just fold up and die.

The managers of pandemic information tell the big lie. They spin tales about “the virus” having a greater impact on the elderly.

No, the STORY about a virus has the impact. The terror has the deadly impact. The isolation has the deadly impact. The terror and the isolation deliver the final blow.

To an astounding extent, COVID-19 is a NURSING HOME DISASTER.

Mass murder by cruelty.

Memo to financial investigators: Calculate how much money government and private insurers are saving, because they don’t have to keep paying for the long-term care of all the old people who are dying premature deaths in nursing homes. The money number will be staggering.

Tony Fauci knows the con. He knows COVID-19 is old people. People are dying from the fear he promotes. Fauci has no shred of shame. He’s a mouthpiece turned out by Bill Gates and David Rockefeller.

Evil permeates the COVID operation. The elderly in nursing homes are the primary target. Getting them to die earlier is the tactic, in order to pump up the fake COVID mortality numbers.

Without those phony numbers, the whole “pandemic” would be exposed in an hour.

I’ve said there were two key events in the foisting of the whole vicious COVID fiction—the Chinese regime locking down 50 million citizens overnight for no good medical reason, giving the green light to the World Health Organization and the CDC to “follow the new model”; and the Bill Gates-financed computer projection of deaths, put together by Neil Ferguson, who lied through his teeth when he claimed half a million people could die in the UK and two million in the US by the summer of 2020—thus supplying the final “rationale” for the lockdowns.

The third key event was and is the sustained attack on the elderly.

Kill these people with terror and isolation, and make the death numbers escalate.

As of May 22, 2020, Forbes reported that, “…in the 43 states that currently report such figures, an astounding 42% of all COVID-19 deaths have taken place in nursing homes and assisted living facilities.”

Washington Post, May 18, 2020: “The World Health Organization said half of Europe’s covid-19 deaths occurred in such facilities.”

Headline of same Post article: “Canada’s nursing home crisis: 81 percent of coronavirus deaths [in the country] are in long-term care facilities.”

The Guardian, May 16, 2020: “About 90% of the 3,700 people who have died from coronavirus in Sweden were over 70, and half were living in care homes, according to a study from Sweden’s National Board of Health and Welfare at the end of April.”

“The country [Spain] was shocked at the end of March when the defence minister revealed that soldiers drafted in to disinfect residential homes had found some elderly people abandoned and dead in their beds.”

“…the regional governments of Madrid and Catalonia have been publishing their own figures on people who have died in care homes…”

“In Madrid, the total for Covid, or suspected Covid, deaths since 8 March stood at 5,886 on Thursday. In Catalonia, it was 3,375. Between them, care home deaths in the two regions account for more than a third of all the coronavirus deaths in the country.”

And there was a great deal of early warning on the subject, if anyone from public health agencies wanted to pay attention—The Guardian, 13 April, 2020: “About half of all Covid-19 deaths appear to be happening in care homes in some European countries…Snapshot data from varying official sources shows that in Italy, Spain, France, Ireland and Belgium between 42% and 57% of deaths from the virus have been happening in homes, according to the report by academics based at the London School of Economics (LSE).”

These nursing home figures only give a partial picture. Consider the HUGE NUMBER of elderly, already-ill people who are basically in the same situation AT HOME—terrified by COVID propaganda, locked down, isolated; and then die—and also those who manage to make it to a hospital, where they are put on breathing ventilators, heavily sedated, and killed.

The Hill, undated (late April 2020), reported on “data…gathered at Northwell Health, New York state’s largest hospital system. The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) examines 5,700 patients hospitalized with coronavirus infections in the New York City region, with final outcomes recorded for 2,634 patients. The average patient age was 63 years old… For the next oldest age group, ages 66 years and older, patients receiving mechanical ventilation recorded a 97.2 percent mortality rate.”

And yet the ventilator death-treatment continues. As does treatment with remdesivir, a highly toxic drug.

The New York Times (June 27, 2020) reported that 43 percent of all US COVID deaths were occurring in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities for the elderly. In at least 24 states, more than 50 percent of all COVID deaths were occurring in these facilities. The Times failed to mention deaths of the elderly at hospitals or, at home, cut off from family and friends. The situation is far worse than the Times made it out to be.

COVID is old people. Pushed into death.

It’s mass murder.

Behind politicians’ and public health officials’ oh so caring directives and demands and declarations and pronouncements, it’s mass murder.

Imagine YOU were 80 years old. For years you’ve been suffering from multiple serious health conditions. For years, doctors have been giving you many toxic drugs, carving up your immune system, weakening your body, affecting your judgement. Along comes a false story about a deadly virus. Every time you turn on the television set, there it is, that fearful story. You’re terrified. Maybe the virus will visit you. And then one day, your doctor gives you a test, or simply eyeballs your clinical symptoms, and says yes, you have it. The virus. You’re infected. Your terror escalates. Your worst nightmare has come true. And suddenly, you’re isolated in your home, alone, or you’re locked up in your room in a nursing home, cut off from family and friends. Day after day, week after week. What would you do?

Chances are, you would see no point in living. You would give up and die.

The operation called COVID is old people. Killing old people.

Dachsie comment:

Anticipate an article analyzing and summarizing the September 2022 latest court-ordered Pfizer document dump which is dropped at the beginning of each month, I think this September 2022 document dump will be the fifth month of a release, if they began in May 2022. Not sure of that.

The two main places from which to anticipate an article any day now are...


https://childrenshealthdefense.org/a...vradakis-ph-d/
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.'s Posts:

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/dea...announce-a?s=w

https://wethepatriotsusa.org/28-seco...marathon-2021/

logo

Home
About
Contact
Legal Updates
Our Content
Stores

Second Annual Vaccine Safety Awareness Marathon - 2021 - Part 28 - James Lyons-Weiler, Founder, IPAK

embedded video from 2021 vaccine conference.

Explains history of COVID crimes and the CDC. Explains the testing scam and gross manipulation and deception.

I think this Dr. Lyons-Weiler is an M.D.

_____________________

https://rumble.com/v1eet1h-third-ann...n-trailer.html

Click https://rumble.com/v1eet1h-third-ann...n-trailer.html to watch the official trailer for upcoming 2022 Conference:

"the fascists who have control of public health"

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...Y.f650.GZA--~D

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...3bhnZBtvxw--~D

THE THIRD ANNUAL VACCINE SAFETY AWARENESS MARATHON IS JUST ONE WEEK AWAY!

Each year we come together to bring you 24 hours of continuous live interviews with some of the biggest names in medical freedom, and this year is no different! Mark your calendars because our flagship annual event, the Vaccine Safety Awareness Marathon, starts Saturday, September 10, 2022 at 10 a.m. ET, and will continue nonstop until 10 a.m. ET on Sunday, September 11, 2022. This year may be our most impressive lineup yet, with a guest list that includes Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Pierre Kory, Attorney Mary Holland, Polly Tommey, Author Zen Honeycutt, Steve Deace, Dr. Bryan Ardis, Kevin Jenkins, Dr. James Lyons-Weiler*, Dr. Brian Hooker, and many, many more! You can watch the live broadcast on our website, our Facebook page, our Twitter page, and our Rumble channel. The event is free, and no advanced registration is required. Please forward this email to everyone you know who may be interested, or to anyone who needs to know the truth about vaccines!

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler*

James Lyons-Weiler is an American scientist who is the CEO of the non-profit organization Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge. He has degrees in zoology, ecology, and conservation biology, and is a former University of Pittsburgh faculty member.


Check out the complete lineup here.

https://live.childrenshealthdefense....1-d338118c98f2

September 2, 2022

Live Every Friday at 11:30a.m. PT, 1:30p.m. CT, 2:30p.m. ET • Get Text Alerts
Friday Roundtable

Inquiring minds wanted. The Children’s Health Defense team answers your questions on the issues of the day. Regular guests include: Polly Tommey, Brian Hooker, Meryl Nass, Liz Mumper and Aimee Villella-Mcbride.

*The opinions expressed by the hosts and guests in this show are not necessarily the views of Children's Health Defense

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...jzGGFpIiNQ--~D

embedded video

1:09:00 video runtime

Most Recent Episode - September 2
‘Friday Roundtable’ Episode 23: Friday Roundtable: New Booster Rollout With No Human Testing With Meryl Nass, MD, Toby Rogers, Ph.D. + Brian Hooker, Ph.D.


“COVID-19 shots are the most dangerous medical products in human history,” says Toby Rogers, Ph.D, in this week’s “Friday Roundtable.” The panel in this episode discusses the upcoming
References

Meryl’s COVID Newsletter - Canada, UK, Switzerland, European Union and US All Authorize Nouvelle Boosters Simultaneously

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/

______________________

Toby Rogers is the moderator of this video discussion. He speaks very simply and clearly.

The American people are going to reject these new shots.

"They" completely skipped all human trials. This new shot to quote Jeff Childrens "FDA, which just approved covid boosters after studying eight mice for about ten minutes"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1n3sUikGWok

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1n3sUikGWok

A Health Issue Has Caused Me To Make This Decision...

35,714 views
Sep 3, 2022

Living Traditions Homestead

After have the virus back in June I have developed some breathing problems that are causing me to make some changes around the homestead.

24:16 video runtime
_________________________

Dachsie comment:

This comment regards first 3 minutes of the video only. He explains that he and his wife "had COVID" back in June, probably the Omicron variant. Ever since then he has started having more and more allergy symptoms and has had to start taking steroids again. He has a history of bad allergeis and asthma as a teenager but went many years with no asthma / allergy problems, up until last June when he "had COVID."

I notice he did not mention whether he had the "COVID vaccine." The only reason I can think he woud leave out that bit of information is that YouTube does not mention any mention of the "COVID vaccine" at all, pro or con.

I think getting the "vaccine" fairly recently could very well start up old asthma / allergy sensitivities. I have never heard of just out of the unknown clear blue sky, the asthma - allergy symptoms come on again, and in a big way so as to require steroids every day.

I have not heard any other people relate a flare up a very old condition of many years ago after only "getting a bout of COVID" but not having the recent "COVID vaccine.

It is the "vaccine" that messes with your own unique line-up of immune defenses.

Just thought this was interesting. Do not know the facts but it seems dishonest to tell his story while knowing he is deliberately omitting a key data point to make his narrative make sense.

On the other hand, it would be interesting to know if just getting a case of "COVID" without ever had any of the "vaccines or boosters" can actually cause asthma - allergy problems that subsided many years ago can just suddenly come on again like gang busters.

https://rumble.com/v1iij4p-global-cv...erre-kory.html

Global CV19 Vax Propaganda Means Mass Casualties – Dr. Pierre Kory

____________________
https://usawatchdog.com/global-cv19-...r-pierre-kory/


Latest Posts
Global CV19 Vax Propaganda Means Mass Casualties – Dr. Pierre Kory
on: 09/3/2022 by Greg Hunter No Comments

https://usawatchdog.com/wp-content/u...2--300x213.png

2 In Political Analysis No Comments

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com (Saturday Night Post)

World renowned CV19 critical care and pulmonary expert Dr. Pierre Kory thinks the CV19 vax is a “humanitarian catastrophe,” and it is being “ignored . . .suppressed and censored” through a well-organized global propaganda campaign. This propaganda will be responsible for millions of deaths that have already happened and many more millions of CV19 vax deaths in the future. Dr. Kory explains, “We have data screaming at us everywhere we look. You can start with the life insurance data, India’s data, Germany’s data, and we know people are dying at unprecedented rates. That is one thing. We know that disability is through the roof. No one has seen VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) with the numbers it is screaming. Now, we . . . are seeing buried miscarriage rates and spontaneous abortion rates 70% and up to 90% in pregnant women. . . . We are still seeing propaganda and all of these messages to get your (CV19) shot even though there is no logic to it. . . . Maybe people are blindly following these instructions and there is no more critical thinking or the control of the information is leading to mass casualties. This is literally a humanitarian catastrophe. . . . We have never seen this. This is a global condition. . . . We have a global catastrophe because the (bad) information has infected almost every country on earth. . . . Wherever you look the data is so ominous. The myocarditis and dropping dead is incessant. It’s from every country in the world. You hear everyday reports of young people doing normal fun activities, like going to the beach or going to the park, and they are dropping dead.”

Dr. Kory is actively trying to find treatments for people harmed by the CV19 vax, but that is not the biggest problem he faces. Dr. Kory says, “People are being told things (like getting CV19 booster shots) that are putting them at grave risk. I don’t know how to combat a global technological propaganda instrument. We have never had that before. I don’t think we have ever had the same messages and the same stories being shot out 24/7. I have been saying this for a while, and the world has gone mad because of unrelenting propaganda and censorship. We have never had this much power and this much propaganda . . . never the same story being told to the entire globe at the same time and the same lie.”

Dr. Kory says, “Not only no more shots, but I would say we need a national cry to stop the vaccine campaign. . . It’s not going to start in America because this is the United States of Pharma.”

This is why cheap, effective drugs such as Ivermectin are being banned here in America and around the world. Dr. Kory says, “We are at war here. You cannot have Ivermectin in the marketplace. It threatens the vaccine, Paxlovid, monoclonal-antibodies and Remdesivir. Ivermectin is a drug that is the biggest financial threat to the biggest market in pharmaceutical history.”

There is much more in the 49-minute interview.

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Dr. Pierre Kory, one of the top pulmonary and Covid Critical Care experts on the planet, who is co-founder of the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (flccc.net) and author of the upcoming book “The War on Ivermectin.”

(To Donate to USAWatchdog.com Click Here)

After the Interview:

All the information is free on the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance website flccc.net.

If you want to preorder Dr. Kory’s book (coming out in October) “The War on Ivermectin,” click here, or click here.

If you want donate to the FLCCC Alliance, click here.

Donate by snail mail below:

FLCCC Alliance

2001 L St NW Suite 500

Washington, DC 20036

The Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC Alliance) is a 501c3 non-profit organization.


48:15 video runtime

Dachsie comment:

Please go to original article for full information as it is way too lengthy for here.

The corruption regarding "vaccines" has been going on in the USA for at least 30 years. The revelations in this article are great but at this point we are dealing with a global geopolitical dynamic that goes far far beyond one country's "vaccine corruption."

_____________________________________

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/e...m_source=email

Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Exclusive: Proof that Israel found serious safety problems with the COVID vaccines then deliberately covered it up

Israel didn't start to gather safety data until a year into the vaccine program. They gathered 6 months worth of data and found that the vaccines weren't safe so they lied to the world about it.

Steve Kirsch

September 2, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...2027x1269.jpeg
Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, the Health Ministry's head of public services and a top COVID adviser to the Israeli government, has no problem withholding vital safety information about the COVID vaccines to make them appear to be safe. Why didn’t they release the original presentation made by the safety team? There needs to be an investigation ASAP into what happened, but the head of the MoH, Nitzan Horowitz, isn’t calling for one. Is he corrupt too?

This is the most IMPORTANT article I’ve written to date

Excerpt:

Summary and recommendations

In writing this article, I have spoken privately to both MIT Professor Retsef Levy and Dr. Yaffa Shir-Raz to make sure I got everything right.

The bottom line is this:

There is clear corruption at the Israeli Ministry of Health and nobody in authority is calling for an investigation.

More importantly, it’s now crystal clear from the preliminary examination of the safety data that the vaccines are far more dangerous than we were told, yet no world government is interested in analyzing the Israel safety data.

Nobody is calling out what happened in Israel as being wrong. That’s stunning. Nobody prominent is speaking out!

Nobody has asked to see the expert panel report or the underlying data. That’s really stunning.

The report is only the tip of the iceberg here since only five adverse event types were analyzed.

The Israeli people should be demanding that Sharon Alroy-Preis resign now as well as all the members of her team who participated in the cover-up. They should be prosecuting all these people as criminals because that’s what they did: they conspired to bury the safety information which could have saved lives.

It is important that honesty and integrity be restored at the MoH as soon as possible, yet nothing is happening.

So the corruption will continue worldwide.

Please share this widely. It is important for this information to get out. Now.

https://www.americaoutloud.com/blood...ovid-vaccines/

Blood Damage Explains Many Harmful Impacts of COVID “Vaccines”

by Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn | Aug 31, 2022

https://www.americaoutloud.com/wp-co...age-COVID.jpeg

[B]Listen to the article [/B]on America Out Loud.
0:00 / 8:36
BeyondWords
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

WARNING: If you have had a COVID vaccine or booster shot, what this article presents may cause you stress and anxiety.

Two key recent medical research articles, one from Italy and one from Germany, are used to document what may be the most critical research finding during the entire COVID pandemic period.

Blood damage that has been detailed through sophisticated research methods is the “missing link” to explain many negative health conditions ranging from heart problems, cancers, reduced immunity, and death. Blood damage is the key biologic explanation for harmful vaccine impacts. Note that I am using the word “vaccine” but fully recognize that COVID vaccines/boosters are not real vaccines, but a form of genetic treatment that, unlike real vaccines, do not actually and truly prevent or cure COVID.

As to deaths, data from Europe, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada on total excess mortality countrywide in 2022 that are greater than in 2020 and 2021 are best explained by widespread COVID vaccine use in 2022 and not COVID infection deaths.

Please understand that ordinary blood testing you may get from your physician’s laboratory orders is not the same as the research techniques used to document vaccine-induced blood damage. Do not let cognitive dissonance stand in the way of your acceptance of these frightening research results.

In both research publications, you must closely examine the many photographs given to prove blood damage; it is infeasible to reproduce them here. It will take time and patience to closely read these two studies. But there is no alternative if you truly want to understand how blood damage has been proven in a compelling way.
Italian study

The title is Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic PersonsAfter Anti-COVIDmRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.

Here is the abstract:

The use of dark-field microscopic analysis of fresh peripheral blood on a slide was once widespread in medicine, allowing a first and immediate assessment of the state of health of the corpuscular components of the blood. In the present study, we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94%of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation. In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.

Here are just a few statements from the conclusions:

With the hematological pictures, we have presented here; it is reasonable to expect reactivation of oncological disease along with blood circulation disorders.

The alterations found after the injection of our patient/cases with mRNA materials (whatever may be in them), we found what we believe is conclusive evidence that the modifications observed, as these persons went from normal blood profiles to very abnormal ones, must be attributed to the proximate mRNA injections.

In conclusion, such abrupt changes, as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients, have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past, according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying hemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented. Such phenomena have never been seen before after any “vaccination” of the past.

In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries. [That last statement is consistent with the research that has found evidence of micro blood clots found after vaccination and in long covid victims.]
German study

The title is German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations. It is available on this site. An abstract and a link to the report can be found on Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea’s Substack HERE (English).

“The German Working Group for Covid-19 Vaccine Analysis has made its ‘Summary of Preliminary Findings’ publicly available. In a wide-ranging report dated 6 July, the Group described the toxic substances found in all Covid-19 “vaccine” samples analysed and the marked changes seen in blood samples taken from vaccinated people. The Group also found that the greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent the vaccine side effects.”

“In order to avert a direct and imminent danger to human life and public safety, we ask that the Covid-19 vaccination programmes be discontinued immediately,” the Group’s report stated.”

The Working Group for Covid Vaccine Analysis is an interdisciplinary working group that has undertaken the task of analysing the contents and the effects of the novel Covid-19 “vaccines.” The group is an internationally networked working group with a core team of more than 60 doctors, physicians, pharmacists, scientists, mathematicians, alternative health practitioners, lawyers, and journalists.

This summary is a preliminary, continuously evolving presentation of our research and findings on the so-called Covid-19 vaccines, as well as the effects we found on the human body and the blood in particular. The summary is intended for the public interest and to encourage further scientific discussion.

The comparison of blood samples from unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals by means of dark-field microscopy showed noticeable changes in the blood of each person who had been vaccinated with the Covid-19 vaccines. This was evident even if those people hadn’t at that point displayed any visible reaction to the vaccinations. Complex structures similar to those in the vaccines were found in the blood samples of the vaccinated. Using artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis, the difference between the blood of vaccinated and unvaccinated people was confirmed.

Using a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, they determined that artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This indicates that the Covid-19 vaccines can effect long-term changes in the composition of the blood of the person vaccinated without that person being aware of these changes.

Crystalline formations were found in all of the blood samples taken from vaccinated people. “We are continuing to analyse these formations,” the authors noted. The Group also observed rouleaux formations of red blood cells in all vaccinated samples and “frequently observed an unusually rapid disintegration of the different types of cells in the vaccinated blood.”

The stability of the lipid nanoparticle envelope is closely correlated with the incidence of vaccine side effects and injury. The more stable this envelope, the greater the amount of mRNA that penetrates cells, where the production of spike proteins then takes place. These results correspond with the findings of pathologists who have carried out autopsies on people who died due to vaccine injury. Spike proteins were detected in damaged tissue. Researchers suspect that the spike protein is, in itself, toxic.

The following predominantly metallic elements were unexpectedly detected in the doses from AstraZeneca, BioNTech/Pfizer, and Moderna:

• Alkali metals: caesium (Cs), potassium (K),
• Alkaline earth metals: calcium (Ca), barium (Ba),
• Transition metals: cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti),
• Rare earth metals: cerium (Ce), gadolinium (Gd),
• Mining group/metal: aluminium (Al),
• Carbon group: silicon (Si) (partly support material/slide),
• Oxygen group: sulphur (S)
Conclusion

The blood damage caused by COVID “vaccines” is best seen by the public as the key “missing link” that can explain what I and many others have been reporting on for many months. Namely, the multitude of adverse health impacts and deaths from what the medical and public health establishment, the mainstream media, and government agencies are still pushing on the public.

Eventually, history will show that all the powers forcing COVID “vaccines” on the public do not have the courage and integrity to admit that the “vaccines” were a dangerous and false pandemic solution that ultimately will explain millions of deaths. They can be seen as part of the Bio-War forced upon humanity – a true crime against humanity. And the principal force that created the phony vaccine movement was Anthony Fauci, for home prosecution as a criminal is sorely needed.

https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/...m_source=email

The Defeat Of COVID

Is Medicare a Slow-Kill Program?

Is this seemingly benevolent reward offered to seniors for a lifetime of work, rather, a guiding hand to the grave?

ColleenHuberNMD
18 min ago September 4, 2022

Excerpts from excellent article



The new “Inflation Reduction Act” (IRA) has a name that is highly questionable, given its profligate and inflation-stimulating government spending, such as one quarter trillion dollars for climate change tax credits for corporations, and for 87,000 additional IRS agents. The falsification of the name of this Act alone rings alarm bells for violation of 18 USC Section 1001, which makes it a felony for any government actor to falsify a material fact in a document related to a federal matter. This crime carries up to five years in prison.

...

Freely breathing creatures of the human variety were criticized and shamed for our unobstructed respiratory practices, through the COVID era, for ‘killing Grandma’ by lack of mask-wearing. But was it us, the relentlessly unmasked, who were killing Grandma?

Scrutiny of Medicare’s mission might have been seen as preposterous before COVID, a respiratory viral disease for which the world went crazy, but actually had no greater mortality than the flu virus. Infection fatality for COVID is 0.15%, and for a typical annual flu is usually about 0.17% (Statista data from 2006 to 2008, back when the counting was more straightforward.) COVID symptoms varied from typical flu, especially loss of smell and reduced oxygenation, but otherwise the death rate remained about the same as most years.

Yet for this typical seasonal viral mortality, hospital protocols, among much else in our world, have transformed to something utterly unrecognizable from the recent past. Ventilators were ordered, distributed and quickly connected to many tracheas, to a worldwide chorus of muffled protests, both from the victims of an over-pressurized tube rammed down the throat, and from their family members who were made to wait outside. More about this bizarre new protocol below.

...

Now let’s go back to how COVID changed hospitalization and particularly “healthcare” and its creeping inclusion of euthanasia, in the case of seniors.

Since COVID came along, the public has had brief, not-well-publicized glimpses into the much-altered lives and health of hospital patient escapees, and we have heard some horrendous stories of how they were treated while there. As a physician, I have heard through the stethoscope radically altered heart rhythms of such escapees who managed to survive a Remdesivir assault. Remdesivir is a drug that is known to be highly toxic to the liver and the kidneys and the lungs. Multiple organ failure was repeatedly observed after use of this drug. Yet it is Anthony Fauci’s drug of choice for treating COVID. Remdesivir has been observed to lead to respiratory failure in 11% of the patients who are on it for 10 days (“commonly reported,”) even to the point of then requiring intubation.

So Remdesivir is clearly contraindicated in COVID patients, yet in the upside-down world of hospital medicine, it is “standard of care.”

Hospital COVID procedures in the US have been revealed in horrifying anecdotes, empirical observations by very rare whisteblower nurses and doctors. For example, in 2020, ER physician Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell blew the whistle on ventilators that had an 80% mortality rate within a couple days of use with COVID patients. He asked why it was expected for him to be blowing patients’ functional lung tissue out with way over-pressurized ventilators, noting the high mortality. Nurses would mention hospital patients who in 2020-2021 were deprived of both food and water, with a story of a hospitalized man who had to crawl on hands and knees to not be seen by the staff, to the toilet bowl, in order to get a drink of water, and others’ similar desperate grasps for survival. This was especially the case with seniors who were positive for COVID, and even more discriminatory for patients with multiple co-morbidities.

With COVID, came the 2020 US CARES Act, a little-mentioned $160 billion, then $178 billion, boondoggle (more than double the cost of the Ukraine boondoggle so far, AND before intense recent inflation). This Act funded some very peculiar hospital protocols – with tens of millions, and hundreds of millions, of dollars going to the biggest hospitals for COVID treatment.

Yet, in the US, we still have little system-wide testimony or evidence of brutality to hospitalized COVID patients revealed in the mass media to the public. Unfortunately, many of the closest witnesses are now dead.

The UK has revealed more of the financial and political involvement in euthanasia decisions in high-risk hospital situations, in publicly available documents.

Journalist Maajid Nawaz spoke with UK medical researcher Stuart Wilkie. https://odysee.com/@MaajidNawaz:d/Radical-Episode-17:d

Wilkie told Nawaz, “Hundreds of thousands of people are being routinely murdered in the National Health Service.” Where does he get that information? Well, he found in the House of Lords Library and the House of Commons Library some revealing documents.

Chris Whitty, England’s Chief Medical Officer, in a document that he insisted not be released to the public, wrote of “consideration of mass burials and the potential use of population triage by the NHS . . . [which raised questions of] potential responses of the general population upon hearing that such measures were being considered or used.” This document is in the House of Lords Library.

Euthanasia has been openly discussed and openly practiced. Here we see a House of Commons definition: “A good death requires three things: syringe drivers, the medications, and the staff to administer it.” Euthanasia is from the Greek for “good death.” This mass killing was financially incentivized, and lack of cooperation was disincentivized in UK hospitals.

UK patients are also disincentivized from choosing to live. When a hospital patient is pressured to sign a Do Not Resuscitate order, they are told ‘if we try to resuscitate you, we will break your ribs.’ You don’t want painful broken ribs, do you? At every step, from hospital triage and admittance to treatment, seniors suffered by far the worst of any age group.

It is not in dispute that the UK government ordered an inordinately large amount of Midazolam in the COVID era. By the time peak COVID mania had crested, 27 months of drugs were used within 9 months in the UK. Somehow Midazolam was added to treatment for COVID disease protocol. As Nawaz asks, “Why add a drug that makes it harder for you to breathe?” when COVID already impairs oxygenation?

Midazolam should have been the LAST thing a COVID patient would be given.

The amount of Midazolam needed to kill a person within 24 hours is about 9.5 mg, and this was used in UK hospitals, where 83% of those died within 24 hours on that dose, together with 14 mg morphine, which has a highly dangerous synergistic effect, when dosed together with Midazolam, of respiratory depression. It has been known for decades that these drugs used together risk respiratory arrest, which is lethal.

In the United States, where states permit execution by lethal injection, Midazolam is one of the major drugs used for that purpose.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...f9_542x528.png

Again, this lethal drug, used on death row to kill by lethal injection, is what UK and US hospitals gave routinely to COVID patients.

Here is what Wilkie found of the extravagant drug purchases made in the UK, divided by the number of UK hospital patients projected here to be killed by it = 549,000. This left a highly lethal 18 mg of Midazolam per patient, nearly twice the known lethal dose being used in UK hospitals. Meanwhile, prior manufacturer protocols for patients over 60 years of age, for alleged therapeutic use, is closer to only one milligram.

Keep in mind that Midazolam has nothing at all to do with treating a respiratory condition; quite the opposite, it is a respiratory depressant. Its use, besides killing those on death row, is in “end-of-life care.” And it interferes with memory and with speech, both of which actions have a well-known inhibitory effect on protest, the reporting of crimes or assertion of one’s choices. How convenient. Worse, the new COVID protocols forced family members and other patient advocates to wait outside, unable to observe the atrocities committed inside.

Worse still, the commonplace withholding of food and water from hospitalized COVID patients in the UK as well as the US was widely reported. Resulting dehydration interferes with liver processing of any drugs given, which heightens risk of toxicity.

As Maajid Nawaz says in the above interview with researcher Stuart Wilkie, “This takes us to Nuremberg level crimes against humanity.”

But the promotion of “palliative,” “end-of-life,” and other compassionate-sounding terms for the killing of sick and hospitalized patients has become more commonplace, since 2011, both in the UK and in the US. Further, the particularly lethal combination of Midazolam and morphine used in UK care homes, was authorized – not just for doctors to carry out, but also nurses and medical assistant staff – and it was authorized by the UK government in this document. And not to worry, because this document says clearly: “Sedation and opioid use should not be withheld because of a fear of causing respiratory depression.”

Why did this happen?

Number crunchers had apparently decided that seniors were too expensive for a country to support in their senior years. “Savings in pensions, reductions in costs for health care” are motives that journalist Stuart Wilkie attributes to risk-benefit calculations. “Britain is killing our old people on a mass scale.”

The Times of London on July 26 2022 reported a brutal triage system termed “Exercise Cygnus” of scoring patients according to number of co-morbidities and deliberately leaving some to die without food or water, and hastening the deaths of others. All 80 year olds were and most over age 75 were targeted.

Back in the early 2010’s, a program named Liverpool Care Pathway forced a similar regimen of dehydration and starvation on British seniors. Much bad press and uproar among the public led to talk of that program’s being shut down. However, it was not shut down. Instead, it was sold to 22 countries, including the US. The US then re-named it the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, which then took an interest in “end of life care.” Then President Obama noted during his promotion of his signature program that one quarter of all healthcare spending for an individual takes place during the final year of life, and he spoke of end-of-life counseling.

Well, Obamacare was a renamed Liverpool Care Pathway, a notorious program, now acknowledged to be a slow-kill machine for seniors, and is now widely criticized throughout Europe. In the COVID era, this has become a slow-kill weapon against all patients over 60, who find themselves in the extreme misfortune of going to a hospital for any reason, being pronounced as a COVID patient, and then finding themselves on drugs that impair anterograde memory, that is, new memories, memory of anything happening at the time or afterward. Midazolam just so happens to have that known effect. Both hospitalized seniors and those in care homes are in the crosshairs of such programs. Many were not at the end of their lives, nor had life-terminating conditions, but were targeted nevertheless. In the UK, Liverpool Care Pathway was continued, but its essence was renamed to NG-163.

In the US, the killing program of seniors was given the benevolent sounding name of the US CARES Act, the massive boondoggle COVID hospital program that taxpayers would not have heard about, were it not for MN State Senator Scott Jenson, MD, who blew the whistle to the public. No one else talks about the US CARES Act, which funded the genocide of seniors in the US under the pretext of anti-viral efforts. Remdesivir, a drug that causes kidney failure, but for some insane or malevolent reason has been given to hospitalized COVID patients, was offered at first, but then if that drug, nicknamed by hospital personnel, “run, death is near” did not finish the job, then Midazolam and morphine were offered as follow-up.

Let us all now ask: If 1) Medicare has affiliated with risk-benefit experts who decide what another year of life for a random patient is worth, and 2) If the US CARES Act funded such deadly hospital protocols as Remdesivir, Midazolam and ventilators, which were mostly used on seniors (average age of COVID death was 81 in 2020), and 3) Medicare is now mandatory, with penalties for not going along with it, then is Medicare in every senior citizen’s best interest? Should a person be able to opt out of it? Or to have a person’s Medicare funds directed to a form of healthcare of each person’s own choosing?

And by the way, are existing laws and the Constitution ever going to be enforced against the lawbreakers? Or are they too big and too numerous to jail?

Share

Jon Rappoport

https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/...m_source=email

Why Serious Scientific Debates Are Conducted In Writing, Not On-camera

Unless you're pandering to video junkies

Jon Rappoport

18 min ago, September 5, 2022

Last week, I set the record straight on why a proposed debate about the existence of SARS-CoV-2 is not happening.

That was MY position and mine alone.

So is this.

Steve Kirsch insists the debate should be held on-camera.

True scientific debates would never take place in that fashion.

Video flows by. Speakers talk. Viewers build up IMPRESSIONS of what’s going on---there is no meticulous examination of facts and fantasies.

Yes, people are solidly addicted to video as a way of obtaining their news; but that doesn’t mean it’s a proper medium for vital debates about science.

WRITTEN WORD is how you conduct scientific debates, if truth is the objective. Then the reader can FORGET ABOUT tone of voice, charm of delivery, physical appearance of the debaters, and various tricks of that trade.

A reader can focus on every important detail on the page. He can spot gaps in logic, errors of fact, unwarranted assumptions. He can deploy the trait called REASON, which since the time of Aristotle, has been the hallmark of good science.

He isn’t WATCHING people talk. He’s poring over what they claim, every bit of it. “The devil is in the details” isn’t an off-the-cuff maxim. It’s core reality, once you get down to the serious business of deciding what science is and isn’t.

This is why such debates should be carried out on the page.

Of course, people addicted to video are going to argue for video, just as the junkie will argue in every possible way for his next fix. He has a need. He has to satisfy it. When confronted by someone who tells him he’s heading down the wrong path, he’ll lash out. He’ll accuse. He’ll lie.

And if he’s pandering to junkies, he’ll describe the virtues of the drug. In this case, video:

“You see, you sit there and watch, and you can TELL who’s speaking the truth and who isn’t. You can look at their eyes. You can see the way they make gestures. You can hear the hills and valleys in their way of talking…”

Yes, and so perhaps Walter Cronkite would be the ideal man to have on board arguing that SARS-CoV-2 exists. He was everybody’s wise old uncle. Whatever Walter uttered was an automatic slam-dunk.

The lovers of video also tend to favor science as democracy. “Let the people watch and decide who’s right…”

“Well, the debate was very interesting. Dr. Conglomerate really knew his stuff. He was rattling off facts like a pro. And the woman who backed him up, Dr. Pants Suit, looked straight at the camera the whole time. Wow. I was extremely impressed when she said over four hundred virologists were on record agreeing with her. If I recall, she cited Professor Moishe Meshugge, the Bulgarian, whose great grandfather discovered one of the first viruses…”

Whereas, IN WRITING, Dr. Pants Suit penned this: “…We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”

To which Dr. Andrew Kaufman replied, in writing: “How do you confirm something that was never previously shown to exist? What did you compare the genetic sequences to? How do you know the origin of the genetic material since it came from a cell culture containing material from humans and all their microflora, fetal cows, and monkeys?”

Oops. Wait. What? Now, we’re getting technical. Now we’re digging down into the actual lab procedure by which virologists claim they’re discovering viruses never seen before.

There is where the devil is, in the details. And as you can see, we have a problem. The language of the lab is very dense. It’s going take quite an effort to translate it into terms non-virologists can understand.

The effort is vital. It’s absolutely necessary, because THERE is where the debate actually takes place. Are these lab virologists on the money, or are they leaping from one unwarranted assumption to another?

You decide that on the page, in writing, not on a screen with moving mouths.

“But wait…I don’t want that technical debate. I want to watch people talking on video. I want to see who seems to be right. I want to figure out who the heroes and villains are. I want to sip my coffee and find out how the plot turns out. How the story ends. I want to be watching an episode of Law & Order. Otherwise IT’S NOT FAIR. Keep it simple. When you drop the apple, does it fall to the ground, or does it hover in the air?”

Yes, well, no one said this debate would be easy---except for the people who want video and talking heads and a poll when it’s over.

Share

As I just mentioned, one of the big challenges of a true debate is taking that lab language and making it comprehensible for non-virologists. And if doing that seems somehow distracting or troublesome or irritating or annoying or “an intentional diversion” from an easy walk in the park that winds up, in a few hours, with THE FINAL ANSWER, well, you can’t always ingest the truth like a candy bar or a fast-food cardboard burger.

If you think you can, you’re a misguided child of the culture, and one of the prime convincers of this modern instant culture is VIDEO.

It’s the absolute wrong way to go in this case. It gives you a corn dog on a stick in a mall.

It gives you somebody in your ear telling you the corn dog is all you need to munch, to reach the bottom line.

But hey, if you want to see men and women on a screen talking and arguing in generalities and claiming they have the upper hand, go for it.

You won’t find me there. I’ve got other big game to hunt.

Mr. Steve Kirsch has turned himself into a rank carnival barker, peddling a distorted and deformed product sitting behind a cheap curtain. He knows many people want to see what’s behind the curtain, because whatever it is, it’s video, and that’s what they need.

Does he know what he’s doing, or is he another junkie with the same need?

You’d have to ask him. But I believe in his more sober moments, he understands an on-camera debate on the virus issue solves nothing.

It’s just show business. It’s a crap low-rent carnival in a dried-up field on a slow Saturday afternoon.

https://www.americaoutloud.com/expos...inical-trials/

Exposing Criminal Data Fraud from the Pfizer Clinical Trials

For more info, go to…

To sign on in support of the Grand Jury Petition, go to www.BeyondTheCon.com.

Join The Fight!

by Dr. Henry Ealy | Sep 5, 2022 | Health, Politics

https://www.americaoutloud.com/wp-co...Show-Image.jpg

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

58:52 audio runtime

In this episode of Energetic Health Radio, Dr. H welcomes special guests Brook Jackson, the brave whistleblower, exposing more criminal data fraud from the Pfizer clinical trials, and her powerhouse attorney Warner Mendenhall. Together, they share facts about what happened that will drop your jaw. When wrongdoing became the new normal, the wrongdoers never imagined they’d face someone like Brook Jackson. Listens to what she and Warner have to share that can bring hope to even the most skeptical mind.

For more info, go to…

To sign on in support of the Grand Jury Petition, go to www.BeyondTheCon.com.

Dr. Henry Ealy

Dr. Henry Ealy (Dr. H) is the Founder of, & Executive Community Director for, the Energetic Health Institute. He holds a Doctorate in Naturopathic Medicine from SCNM, a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from UCLA, is Board Certified in Holistic Nutrition by the NANP and a proud Jackie Robinson Scholarship Alumnus. He has over 20 years of teaching & clinical experience helping people care for their amazing body by unlocking the healing potential of Natural Medicines.

see embedded image on Telegram
https://t.me/realKarliBonne/118077

Midnight Rider Channel ����
The Entire Vaxx Event has to be one of the central parts of the upcoming Fauci Investigation—second only to Wuhan/Gain-of-Function
t.me/realKarliBonne/118077
80.0K viewsKarli Bonne,
Sep 4 at 19:09

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.c...m_source=email

News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller

Oklahoma news anchor has stroke on-air; Ohio high school football player has 6 feet of "blood clots" pulled from legs; Seattle ferry crashes for (apparently) no reason; and so on

Another spate of (what appear to be) NON-fatal post-jab mishaps from all over the US, with one in the UK and three in (where else?) Italy

7 hr ago September 5, 2022

I had not intended to post this next batch until next week, but so many such reports have just come in these last two days that I decided not to wait.

UNITED STATES
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...b_634x367.jpeg

This article includes the video of Julie Chin’s disorientation as she tried to read the teleprompter:
'I'm sorry, something is going on with me this morning': Oklahoma news anchor suffers a STROKE live on air as she stumbles over her words

September 5, 2022

News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Chin appeared bewildered by herself as she was suddenly unable to speak the simple words she was reading off the teleprompter in front of her

Chin appeared bewildered by herself as she was suddenly unable to speak the simple words she was reading off the teleprompter in front of her

Julie Chin, of Tulsa NBC affiliate KJRH suddenly found herself unable to speak the words she was reading off her teleprompter while on air

Bewildered and stuttering, Chin tried to push ahead with the broadcast but soon found herself completely unable to speak what she was reading

Chin finally said she couldn't go on and sent the broadcast over to the weather team

The anchor didn't return once the weather was done, however, as co-workers had called 9-11 and she was sent away to a hospital

On Sunday Chin said doctors told her she had suffered the 'beginnings' of a stroke, and confirmed she was okay and would be returning to work soon

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-live-air.html
'It could've been so much worse' | Wauseon football player's career abruptly ends

Kaden Clymer, a junior lineman, had six feet of blood clots removed from his legs just days before the season kicked off.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...1920x1080.jpeg


September 3, 2022

WAUSEON, Ohio — It's difficult to match the level of excitement for high school football players when their season is about to start. Yet, imagine all that build come crashing down on you.

Unfortunately, that turned out to be the reality one Wauseon junior had to tackle.

There was never a doubt, Kaden Clymer would have impact on the field. Yet, to do so without pads on came without warning.

"It started on August 1st," Kaden's mother Maurine Clymer said. "His dad took him to the emergency room after he was having severe pain in his back and legs."

Teammate Tyson Rodriguez added "I was a bit confused because I didn't really know what was happening. He just told me that he wasn't feeling good."

The night before the Wauseon Indians took to the field for their first Fall team practice, Clymer unexpectedly had to be taken to Toledo Children's Hospital.

"His calves were swelled up four inches larger, in circumference, than they are now," Maurine Clymer said. "So, he was very uncomfortable."

Kaden Clymer added "I just wanted to go home honestly. I didn't really care what they did to me, I just wanted to go home."

Full of pain and uncertainty, Clymer received word that he had blood clots in his legs.

"I was really sad. I was crying and upset because I've played football my whole life and I just wanted to play with my friends," the junior lineman said.

Six feet of blood clots were removed and because of the blood thinners he now has to take, Clymer's football career is over.

"Was just getting ready to start practice, we were really looking forward to seeing him on Friday nights," his mother said.

Following nine days in the hospital, Clymer returned to the team despite barely being able to walk.

"I'm really happy to be able to spend time with my friends," Kaden said. "It means a lot to me to be able to be back on the field and have fun with them."

Rodriguez added "It was weird not seeing him, but it's good that he's back. He's our guy, so it's nice seeing him here."

A life-changing experience that has proven the toughness of this young man.

"I'm very strong and well-minded because it took a lot of effort to be able to stay in the hospital for nine days straight," Clymer said. "Eat the hospital food and go through all those procedures, it really sucked."

Unfortunately, Clymer's path to recovery is far from over. Not only are doctors still trying to figure out exactly what happened to Kaden [!], but re-gaining strength into his legs each day comes at a price.

"He gets shots in his stomach every day, twice a day, which is not something fun," Maurine Clymer said. "I don't enjoy giving them to him and I know he doesn't like getting them. Yet, he does it with a smile and we appreciate that. It could've been so much worse."

There is good news to share, Clymer has shown improvement each day and is expected to still play baseball, his favorite sport.

Until then, his role on the team is to continue progressing and inspire.

https://www.wtol.com/article/sports/...6-74079f8c9049
Litchfield motorcyclist suffers head injury in Palmyra crash

Police are investigating the collision of a motorcycle and SUV at the intersection of Routes 2 and 152 which sent two to the hospital, including one by LifeFlight of Maine.

September 4, 2022

Palmyra, Maine - A Litchfield man suffered a serious head injury in a collision with an SUV at the intersection of Routes 2 and 152 Saturday morning.

Kevin Pulk, 59, of Litchfield, was taken from the scene by ambulance to Sebasticook Valley Hospital in Pittsfield, then subsequently taken by LifeFlight helicopter to Eastern Maine Medical Center in Bangor for treatment of a serious head injury, according to a news release from Somerset County Sheriff’s Office.

Police said the investigation so far indicated Lisa Veazie, 61, of Scarborough, was driving a 2015 Honda CRV SUV heading north on Route 152, which is also known as Ell Hill Road. She stopped at the intersection of Routes 2 and 152 then allegedly pulled out in front of Pulk’s 1988 Honda Goldwing, which was headed east on Route 2.

Veazie was also taken to Sebasticook Valley Hospital, for a possible shoulder injury.

The crash remains under investigation but police said initially it appeared neither alcohol nor speed contributed to the crash.

https://www.centralmaine.com/2022/09...palmyra-crash/
Follow-up on an incident reported on July 24:
New footage shows Washington ferry crash that caused millions of dollars in damages

The state ferry that was damaged during a "hard landing" at the Fauntleroy Ferry Terminal on July 24 could be out of service for the rest of the year.

August 29, 2022

SEATTLE — New footage from Washington State Ferries (WSF) shows the moment of impact when the Cathlamet crashed into a terminal in west Seattle.

The state ferry that was damaged during a “hard landing” at the Fauntleroy Ferry Terminal on July 24 could be out of service for the rest of the year.

According to WSF, the monetary damage to the ferry is "well into the millions" and the damage to the Fauntleroy terminal structure will be "in the hundreds of thousands."

The Cathlamet was docking at the Fauntleroy ferry terminal when it collided with an offshore dolphin - a structure that guides docking ferries. The collision caused significant damage to the vessel.

The dolphin, primarily made from a wood piling with steel and concrete, made a sizeable tear in the ferry’s front right side. In addition to the ferry itself, several vehicles on the ferry were also damaged, with one trapped in the wreckage.

The crash was classified by the US Coast Guard as a "major marine casualty."

Following the crash, the captain of the ferry at the time of the collision resigned.

The entire crew was tested for drugs and alcohol. All tests came back negative, according to WSF.

No injuries were reported.

https://www.king5.com/article/news/l...0-8f6825a1f0aa

UNITED KINGDOM

Schoolboy, 8, saved mum's life when she collapsed and fell down flight of stairs

September 3, 2022

A schoolboy saved his mum’s life after she collapsed at the top of a flight of stairs.

Regan Deeley tumbled to the ground after losing consciousness and awoke with her eight-year-old son checking her vital signs.

Grayson Stewart sprung into action and called 999, helping paramedics to assess her condition by monitoring his mum’s pulse and breathing.

The 30-year-old has no idea why she passed out but knows it could have been very different without the quick actions of her boy.

She said: ‘I just woke up at about three o’clock in the morning and I felt a bit sick and dizzy.

‘I don’t remember anything after that until I woke up and my little boy was on the phone to the ambulance crew.

I was at the bottom of the stairs. I think I had fainted at the top of the stairs and taken a fall.

I had landed head first, so my body was still halfway up the stairs and my arms were trapped under me. I had quite a knock to the head.'

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...80839b5c19939a

ITALY

Illness in the field on his 14th birthday: the doctors save him, but now has guarded prognosis

September 3, 2022

On his fourteenth birthday he was on the pitch playing football with his friends. What was supposed to be an evening of sport and party, has turned into a drama, with the ending still to be written. The unfortunate protagonist is a boy from Verolavecchia who was on the pitch for a game last night. During the game the young man collapsed in a sudden illness. The team's doctors with extreme promptness undertook life-saving maneuvers pending the arrival of the doctors, managing to reanimate the boy. When the air ambulance arrived, the young man was rushed to the Civil of Brescia, where he is hospitalized in serious condition. The doctors' prognosis was guarded.

https://www.bresciatoday.it/cronaca/...lavecchia.html
Accident at Lake Segrino, 22 year old underwater in cardiac arrest

September 2, 2022

Unfortunately, the 22-year-old who remained underwater at Lake Segrino pours in very serious conditions. The terrible accident, yet another of this summer 2022, took place at 3.15 pm today, Friday 2 September 2022 in the municipality of Longone al Segrino. . Some passersby gave the alarm because a 22-year-old boy ended up underwater in the Segrino lake and did not resurface. An ambulance from the Sos di Canzo and a medical car rushed to the scene but the situation immediately appeared very critical: the boy was in fact in cardiac arrest. For this reason the Como helicopter rescue was also alerted. The dynamics of what happened are still to be clarified.

https://primalecco.it/cronaca/incide...esto-cardiaco/
He dives into the water at the lake and almost drowned

September 3, 2022

An afternoon with friends cost a 22-year-old dearly, who fell ill while he was swimming and disappeared underwater. The companions who were observing him from the shore jumped and fished him out, but the young man remained underwater for a few minutes and when he was brought back to shore his heart was no longer beating. To revive him, the doctors of the SOS di Canzo who gave him heart massage, despite his heart having started beating again, his conditions appeared desperate. Unconscious brought by the helicopter rescue to the hospital in Legnano.

https://www.ilgiorno.it/sondrio/cron...gare-1.8040191

Dachsie comment:

This is an important article. I may edit this later to add a few comments.

I notice the final paragraph in this article is ...

"Although all these rights are recognized under the Universal Declaration for Human Rights, the authors and The Lancet consider them insufficiently serious to dwell upon.


Dachsie submits to all thinking persons here that the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights IS "medical fascism" and is Bad Science.

Here's the rub!

https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/043/88/PDF/NR004388.pdf?OpenElement

ARTICLE 8
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy
by the competent national tribunals for acts
violating the fundamental rights granted him by
the constitution or by law.


http://www.jbs.org/artman/publish/article_318.shtml

The UN’s International Bill of Rights — which consists of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights — is a case in point. The UDHR stipulates that "in the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law." Moreover, these rights, the UDHR explains in Article 8, are "granted [to everyone] by the constitution or law." (Emphasis added.) Under the ICCPR, the UN presumes to subject the God-given rights of freedom of religion, of speech, and of assembly — freedoms generally taken for granted by many Americans — to such regulation as the world body sees fit. This is, of course, in stark contrast to our own Bill of Rights, in which Congress is prohibited, without qualification, from infringing on rights such as the right to free speech and the right to keep and bear arms, and in which all powers not expressly delegated to the United States government nor prohibited to the States are presumed to appertain to the several states or to the people.
____________________________
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-...tm_source=push


The Experts Still Pushing Coerced Jabs

https://brownstone.org/wp-content/up...51-800x469.jpg

The Experts Still Pushing Coerced Jabs

By David Bell September 6, 2022

Medical ethics is about protecting society from medical malfeasance and the self-interest of the humans whom we trust to manage health. It is therefore disturbing when prominent people, in a prominent journal, tear up the concept of medical ethics and human rights norms. It is worse when they ignore broad swathes of evidence, and misrepresent their own sources to do so.

On July 8th 2022, The Lancet published a ‘Viewpoint’ article online: “Effectiveness of vaccination mandates in improving uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in the USA.” The article, which acknowledges the controversial nature of vaccine mandates, primarily concludes that coercing people to take a medical product, and reducing options for refusal, increases product uptake.

It further concludes that the best way to implement such mandates is for employers and educational institutions to threaten job security and the right to education.

The use of coercion goes against the established ethics and morals of Public Health, and could be argued to be anti-health. In this case, the article justifies it by stating that “the current evidence regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in adults is sufficient to support mandates.” However, it offers scant evidence to back this assertion, and ignores all evidence to the contrary. They apparently consider the ability to work and support a family, or gain formal education, as something that is to be granted or taken away, not a human right.

The Lancet was once a credible journal with a rigorous policy of peer review. However, in this article it appears to have dropped its former standards, promoting medical fascism (coercion, threat and division to achieve compliance with authority) without insisting on a rigorous evidence base to justify such an approach. This suggests an attempt to normalize such approaches in mainstream public health.

Past experience has shown us where fascism behind a façade of public health can lead. The sterilization campaigns aimed at coloured and low-income populations of the US Eugenicist era, and the extensions of similar programs under Nazism in 1930s and 1940s Europe, relied heavily on the normalization of such approaches.

Leading public health voices from Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and other institutions championed a public health approach of sanitizing populations rather than environments, encouraging the idea of a tiered society where health ‘experts’ determine the rights and medical management of those deemed less worthy.
Avoiding the discomfort of evidence

The authors of this Lancet paper, ranging from academics and medical consultants to the daughter of a prominent politician, attempt to rewrite human rights in medicine as if precedent never existed. Their argument for coercion in mass vaccination recognizes that ‘vaccine mandates,’ whether issued by governments, employers or schools, all involve a loss of rights. No serious attempt is made to provide a medical justification for mass vaccination with a non-transmission-blocking vaccine.

The paper focuses on the premise that coercion, commonly considered a form of force, makes humans do things they would not otherwise do. Banning fellow humans from making their own health choices on pain of loss of normal participation in society has an impact on increasing vaccine uptake. This is hardly a revelation to any thinking human, but clearly important enough to justify publication in The Lancet.

The article links to evidence of vaccine mandates used for state school entry that show higher compliance when the right of religious and personal belief exemption is removed, or where onerous requirements for exemptions are put in place. Leaving ethical questions aside, the obvious lack of similarity between the authors’ predicate childhood vaccinations that block transmission and COVID-19 vaccines that have minimal impact on transmission, and may even promote it, is ignored. The one mandated adult vaccine predicate referenced in the article, the influenza vaccine, provides only a 2.5% reduction in pneumonia ‘when the (mandated) vaccine was well matched to circulating strains’ in the reference quoted.

When raising the sacking of non-vaccinated workers, the authors seem comfortable with the approach but coy in admitting its consequences. Their admission that “a few large US employers have terminated hundreds of workers for non-compliance references an article in Money magazine which actually paints a bleaker picture, characterizing it as a ‘great resignation.’

The authors will also have been aware of mass layoffs by large employers such as New York City (over 9,000 sacked or placed on leave), the US Department of Defense (DoD, which sacked 3,400), Kaiser Permanente (laid off 2,200), and the tens of thousands of staff lost from the UK care-home sector . Extrapolated across countries and society to actually provide credible data may have been too uncomfortable for the authors and Lancet editors.

High efficacy and safety are an obvious (though on their own, insufficient) prerequisite for any mandated product. This entire area of safety is dealt with by stating; “The current evidence on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in adults is sufficient to support mandates,” supported by a single study comparing vaccinated individuals 1-3 weeks and 3-6 weeks post-vaccination, revealing low levels of myocardial infarction, appendicitis and stroke.

The claim that “widespread administration in adults has quickly generated a large evidence base supporting the vaccines’ safety, including evidence from active surveillance studies” suggests that both the authors and The Lancet are unaware of the VAERS and Eudravigilance databases set up for exactly this purpose. No mention is made of growing data on myocarditis, menstrual irregularities, or the excess all-cause mortality and severe outcomes in vaccinated groups in the Pfizer randomised control trials on which the FDA emergency registration was based. Were The Lancet’s reviewers unaware of these sources?

The sole reference to vaccine efficacy discusses COVID-19 ventilated patient outcomes, It ignores the period to 14 days post-previous dose that Pfizer acknowledges can be associated with immune suppression. Fenton et al. have noted that classing a vaccinated person as unvaccinated in the first 14 days post-injection has profound impacts on vaccine effectiveness data.
Ignoring the awkwardness of reality

Post-infection immunity in the unvaccinated is a threat to arguments for mandates. The authors disingenuously state that “evidence suggests that the immunity produced by natural infection varies by individual, and that people with previous infection benefit from vaccination. New variants further undercut the case for adequacy of previous infection.

Two references are used here: one from a study in Qatar and the other a study from Kentucky. The Qatar study finds that “the protection of previous infection against hospitalization or death caused by reinfection appeared to be robust, regardless of variant,” whilst the Kentucky study found Covid reinfection was reduced by vaccination over a 2-month period in the months soon after vaccination, prior to the waning and then reversal of this protection as demonstrated in studies of longer duration elsewhere.

The vast breadth of evidence on relative effectiveness of post-infection immunity is ignored. Either the authors failed to read their references and are unaware of waning and of the vast literature on post-infection immunity, or they do not consider demonstration of efficacy important for coerced medical treatments.

In a previous era, or in a previously credible medical journal, an argument for coercion to support a medical procedure would have required very high standards of evidence of efficacy and safety. It is arguing for the abrogation of fundamental principles such as informed consent that are at the core of modern medical ethics. Failure to address well-known contrary data should prevent an article from even reaching the peer-review stage.
Degrading public health degrades society

We are left with a paper stating that coercion is a good path to increase compliance for a product that does not reduce community infection risk, and has potentially serious side effects. Ignoring both of these aspects of COVID-19 vaccines is a poor approach to justifying mass vaccination. The sole nod to any human rights concern – “Some objectors argue mandates represent undue encroachment on individual liberty” – is an interesting way to characterize removal of the right to income, education and the ability to socialize with others.

Although all these rights are recognized under the Universal Declaration for Human Rights, the authors and The Lancet consider them insufficiently serious to dwell upon.

Public health has been down this road before. We have seen the path society takes when basic public health principles are subverted to achieve an aim that some perceive as ‘good.’ We have also seen how most health professionals will comply, however horrific the actions involved. There is no reason to believe that this round of medical fascism will end differently.

We rely on medical journals such as The Lancet to apply at least the same standards to the purveyors of such doctrines as they do to others and demand a rational and honest evidence base. Anything less would raise legitimate questions as to the role the journal is taking in promoting these doctrines, and their place in a free, evidence-based and rights-respecting society.

This piece written in cooperation with Domini Gordon who coordinates the Open Science program for PANDA.

_________________________
Author

David Bell

David Bell, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health. He is the former Program Head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland.

READ MORE

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cof...m_source=email

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/coffee-and-covid-tuesday-september?utm_source=email

Jeff Childers September 6, 2022

So.

�� You may have seen articles this weekend about a new peer-reviewed study of over 80,000 patients taking Ivermectin in Brazil, published in Cureus, titled “Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Led Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects.”

In short, and unsurprisingly, the researchers found a blockbuster NINETY-TWO PERCENT reduction in mortality from covid in the group taking Ivermectin as opposed to the group not taking the drug.

What you may not have heard is that they are now going after the lead researcher on the study, Flavio Cadegiani. Brazilian police indicted the scientist for “crimes against humanity,” for conducting a 2021 study on a chloroquine-like drug in the Amazon. Ironically, they alleged Flavio failed to get full informed consent from his patients.

I know. The irony. You can’t make this stuff up.

The charges are that 200 of Flavio’s 600 study patents died during the study, which sounds pretty awful. But Flavio defends that outcome, pointing out that at the time, hospitals in the Amazon were experiencing 50% covid mortality. So Flavio says his study actually showed a benefit. And he says his study was pre-approved by government agencies before he began.

It can’t possibly be that they are weaponizing law enforcement against the researcher because he wrote about Ivermectin. That would be bonkers. Be serious.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cof...m_source=email



💉 Communist sympathizer and activist Jane Fonda, 84, who famously labeled covid as “the best thing that ever happened to the Left,” and who enthusiastically advocated for vaccine mandates, announced this weekend she has been newly diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and has started chemo treatment.

Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma is a blood cancer, usually in the immune cells, that tends to grow in the lymph nodes. It’s another weird coincidence, given the nature of jab injuries.

Fonda says she remains optimistic and we wish her a speedy recovery.

Pennsylvania Lieutenant Governor John Fetterman

Age 53, Democrat candidate for U S Senator for Pennsylvania
Opponent is Dr. Oz

Date of Birth August 15, 1969

No article will tell us if Mr. Fetterman had the clot shot.

High probability he did get the clot shot.

He had a stroke and that is probably because of mRNA clot shot he got.

"Since suffering a stroke in May, Fetterman is essentially an invalid."

The news stories will not comment on the seriousness of his condition nor, of course, whether he got the clot shot.

I just provide this gossipy news speculation to show how the evil clot shots affect every aspect of our society including elections and politics.

A stroke and some other medical conditions can impair mental function. The people have a right to be represented in congress by someone who is mentally fully functioning. Major issues need to be vigorously argued and debated. This representation cannot happen if represenative's mental function is impaired.