Coronavirus

News of Integrity and Product Safety and Efficacy and Transparency - Pfizer Biontech Style

__________________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFOYYpATrBw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFOYYpATrBw

Update to Investigation into the Leaked EMA Emails showing Pfizer Clinical Trial Concerns

20:32 video runtime

Oct 6, 2022

TrialSite News

Join The Conversation! | https://trialsitenews.com/
In June, Trial Site News published a bombshell investigative report on the leaked European Medicine Agency (EMA) emails and other Pfizer-related confidential reports, which exposed concerning facts in the run-up to the authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

https://www.americaoutloud.com/dr-ro...edom-fighters/

Dr. Robert Malone Attacks and Maligns Leading Freedom Fighters - America Out Loud
America's
October 6, 2022 listen to audio reading of this article

Peter Breggin MD & Ginger Breggin

Peter Breggin MD and Ginger Ross Breggin have been married and working together for almost 40 years. Peter is known as "The Conscience of Psychiatry" for his many decades of successful reform work in mental health.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Since he first became involved in the health freedom movement related to COVID-19, I have observed firsthand how Robert W. Malone, MD, has been attacking leaders of the movement in person, in the media, and on his substack. He has made legal threats, and recently his lawyer has sent very threatening formal Demand Letters to at least two health freedom leaders to stop their alleged defamations and to pay him money.1 The Demand Letters will be released later.

Dr. Malone Attacks Physician Scientists Drs. Harvey Risch and Peter A McCullough

Dr. Malone’s attacks on the health freedom leadership massively heated up on May 3, 2022, in his substack titled Power and Strategy of False Narratives (substack.com).2 Dr. Malone angrily tried to discredit and ridicule Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, and Harvey Risch, MD, Ph.D. It is no exaggeration to say that these two men are among the most respected, honorable, and important physicians and scientists in the world today. Many consider them the medical leaders of the health freedom movement. Their credentials and their scientific publications are stunning.

Dr. McCullough is a dear friend and a hero to us. I frequently describe him on the air as the most important and most courageous scientist in the health freedom movement and even in the entire worldwide medical community at this critical time in history. McCullough has endured significant hardships that less courageous and less ethical physicians and scientists have avoided by not speaking out. For Malone to add to Dr. McCullough’s burdens, or even to distract him in any way, is a tragic betrayal of a man who initially welcomed him into the movement.

We do not know Harvey Risch, MD, Ph.D., as well as Dr. McCullough, but I have had the honor to formally interview Dr. Risch and talk with him privately. He shares with Dr. McCullough a genuineness and a gentleness that is uncommon in very successful physicians and academics. Like nearly everyone in the health freedom movement, we have followed his amazingly insightful and accurate analyses of COVID-19. Dr. Risch is one of the most dignified, honorable, brave, and effective physicians and scientists that most of us have ever known. And like Dr. McCullough, he is an outstanding worldwide health freedom movement leader and an individual who cordially tries to avoid professional conflicts.

Malone’s Excuse for Attacking Drs. McCullough and Risch

Malone generally attacks people whom he sees as in professional competition with him or who have criticized him, especially about his concept of “mass psychosis.” Along with many others, we have been concerned that his personally invented diagnosis of “mass psychosis” will be “weaponized” and used to psychiatrically attack those who reject the establishment narrative about its intentions. We are also concerned that Malone’s rejection of research confirming well-established conspiracies among the wealthiest and most powerful elite and institutions will prevent victims of oppression from identifying and dealing with their oppressors. Overall, many are concerned that the concept “mass psychosis” will blunt the health freedom and the overall freedom movement by blaming “totalitarianism” on the victims rather than on enemies we can identify and defeat.3

Despite the importance of the above controversies and criticisms of Malone, Malone’s attacks on his critics are usually on them personally while ignoring the issues. Here are Malone’s expressed reasons for attacking Drs. McCullough and Risch:

“On a related note, I learned last night that Drs. Peter McCullough and Harvey Risch have joined a company that is promoting overpriced vitamins, nutraceuticals, and telemedicine. The Wellness Company. This firm is headed up by a physician formerly with the Global Covid Summit group, and is now quite antagonistic to us. This firm is controlled by Mr. Foster Colson, head of the Colson group…”

Malone probably learned about the new company because Drs. McCullough and Risch were on journalist Christine Dolan’s show, the night of October 2, 2022, openly discussing their project.4

The Wellness Company is based partly on the now-deceased physician Zev Zelenko, his ideas, and his proven supplements: “This was one of Dr. Vladimir Zelenko’s final projects, and something that he strongly believed was necessary to revolutionize the entire landscape of healthcare.” Mission Statement– The Wellness Company (twc.health)

Zev Zelenko, MD, was one of the bravest, most resourceful, and most pioneering members of all the heroes of the freedom movement. He also made among the greatest personal, professional, and financial sacrifices. Along with Dr. McCullough, he was another dear friend of ours—like family to us—and he helped me to reach closer to God.

It is distressing that Malone is now attacking not only a source of income for Drs. McCullough and Risch, but also for Zev Zelenko’s large, bereaved family. The Wellness Company is also a source of valuable, trustworthy services for a public in great need of them.

What also rankles is that Malone’s Deep State connections, which enabled him to gather 10 billion dollars in grants in one five-year period, have almost certainly made him a multi-millionaire.5 Despite his wealth, which in some people produces humility and a desire to help, Malone wants to malign two men who continue to give so much to the freedom health movement and hamper their efforts to participate in an honorable and highly ethical business.

The third Wellness Company member he ridicules, Foster Colson, is a wealthy entrepreneur. He is the Founder and CEO of the company, and the quality of his organization speaks to a substantial investment.

Why is Malone attacking these two men? I suspect it’s because, whatever they thought in the past, they no longer support Malone’s dangerous ideology.

Malone’s History of Attacking Competitors and Critics

In addition to Malone’s recent attacks on Drs. McCullough and Risch, and in addition to attacking me, he has also attacked courageous journalists Stew Peters and pioneering researcher Dr. Jane Ruby, both leaders in the health freedom movement.6 He has also recently attacked Clay Clark,7 developer of the amazing Reawaken America tour. All three have hosted critics of Dr. Malone’s concept of mass psychosis on their shows or venues, and Stew Peters and Jane Ruby have themselves been critical of Malone’s ideology.

According to my recent conversations with Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. and her closest supporters, Malone has attacked the virology researcher. Dr. Mikovits is one the most revered, good-natured, and gentle people in the health freedom movement and star of the documentary film Plandemic, which more than one billion people have seen. She, too has been critical of Malone’s concepts.

Malone has called my relationships with Stew Peters, Dr. Jane Ruby, and Judy Mikovits a conspiracy to attack him. In reality, Dr. Mikovits, who helped orient me to the field of virology in relation to COVID-19, is a longstanding friend; but until Malone recently attacked Judy, we never discussed him. Stew and Dr. Ruby each knew me casually from a few media interviews but never had any serious off-camera discussions until Malone recently attacked the three of us on the same radio show.

Except for Malone’s attack on Drs. Risch and McCullough, I have not discussed the details of his verbal assaults on people. I have cited the sources, but I will not repeat such outlandish slurs.

Malone has also attacked Alex Berenson, hinting that Berenson has a mental disorder, which I will not name.8 It is against the AMA regulations for a physician to diagnose a public figure that the doctor has not evaluated.9 It is even worse for a physician to do it to gain an advantage over the other person in a conflict. Berenson is another leader in the health freedom movement, a former New York Times science writer, and probably the first and most effective mainstream journalist to dare to criticize the prevailing COVID-19 narrative.

At this point, it appears that Dr. Malone is trying to bully the leadership of the movement into stopping any criticism of his ideology.

A Great Journalist—Writer—Historian Was Among the First to Suspect Malone

Malone’s escalating attacks on leaders of the health freedom movement, and the disruption he is causing, are consistent with the early observations and predictions by journalist and researcher Diana West. Diana is the author of American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character (2013), a book that digs deeply into the infiltration of the Roosevelt administration and the West by Communists during World War II and thereafter. It is one of the most important books I have ever read and years ago helped prepare me to research and write COVID-19 and the Global Predators (2021) with my wife, Ginger.

I’m not at all suggesting, and I do not believe that Malone is a Communist. But Malone himself has admitted that many people have feared that his true allegiance is with the establishment, making him “controlled opposition” planted in the group but serving the establishment. Malone occasionally brings up this accusation, and he has tried to defend himself against it.10

On January 28, 2022, Diana published what is still the most ominous and thorough analysis of Malone’s Deep State background and his activities within the health freedom group. She published her report on January 28, 2022, at a time when she and I had lost touch with each other, and we were not aware we were both examining Dr. Malone’s work. She titled her detailed essay “Dr. Robert Malone: A Risk Analysis,” which should be read by all concerned.11 Here is one sequence of her observations:

Did Robert Malone, Mr. mRNA himself, come out and warn the American public against the hasty, unsafe coronavirus mRNA “vaccine”? No. I guess he abandoned his own risk assessment, because he also says he got “jabbed” himself early on and “almost died” of his second Moderna shot.

Did he warn the public about that? No.

I would like to know why not. Listening to that same fall 2021 Malone-Peters interview, I wondered if the reason might be because he did not want to interrupt a sequence of planned events.

Listen to Malone describe what many of us call the “plandemic:”

“Where I’m at now is what we’re observing is a scripted response that has been pioneered in multiple war games by a small cadre of individuals, largely at Johns Hopkins University, largely funded by Bill and Melinda Gates and the World Economic Forum – that’s all true — involving multiple government officials. And as the war games become more sophisticated — and I’ve participated in some of these, too. However, not the Hopkins‘ one, and that’s, that’s why the strategy that Peter [Navarro] and I have advocated (of course, we were labeled right-wing kooks) in the Washington Times is still a very balanced approach: jab the elders and the ones at high risk.”

That’s some pretty jaw-dropping information flowing there, at least right up to a sentence-ending non-sequiturs about his balanced approach to the “jab.”

Diana concludes:

My own “risk assessment”?

Something tells me “the current data” is sure to change, Robert Malone should not be at the helm, and I don’t want to let time go by before mentioning it. [Emphases added]

Malone’s Documented History of Threatening People Who Criticize or Seemingly Compete with Him for Attention

Malone has been attacking and intimidating people who are not even in the freedom movement but who threaten him in some way.

The February 19, 2022, issue of The Scientist summarizes one encounter:12

Malone has also pursued people who have disagreed with him or have not given him what he says is due credit. In mid-2021, biochemist and mRNA-vaccine co-developer Katalin Karikó, who has been featured in multiple news stories about the vaccines, told The Atlantic,13 that Malone had emailed her to accuse her of inflating her accomplishments. “This is not going to end well,” he told her in the email. Malone told the Atlantic that the message was not intended as a threat. [emphases added]

Would you feel threatened if someone who was in angry conflict with you warned you in writing, “This is not going to end well”?

I am not trying to make a personal attack on Malone but to document that he—and not this writer—has been the attacker, not only against me, but against many people in our movement.

We are not motivated by personal animosity. Both my wife Ginger and I have spent many decades standing up for freedom, sometimes at grave risk to ourselves, and we would have burned out if we harbored anger and resentment. I have given more time to my volunteer reform work than to any other single aspect of my life since I began volunteering in a state mental hospital as a Harvard student in 1954.14 And, of course, he only attacked me earlier because my background as a psychiatrist and historian of psychiatry prepared me to see the dangers in his pushing his concept of “mass psychosis” on the world.

Many people are now aware of the dangers in Malone’s concept of “mass psychosis” but did not speak out until we criticized Desmet’s book, The Psychology of Totalitarianism, which provided some of the intellectual basis for Malone’s concept of “mass psychosis.” As we document in this report, even Mattias Desmet is critical of Malone’s use of “mass psychosis” (see below).

Desmet’s Reluctance About Malone’s Invented Concept of Mass Psychosis

We have strong evidence that Dr. Malone did invent “mass psychosis”—or at least is promoting it on someone else’s behalf—but Malone has become increasingly adamant, including currently,15 saying that Desmet and other people invented it. Is he turning on his partner Desmet, and if so, why?

At least two videos in 2022 show conversations between Malone and Desmet, which confirm Malone’s authorship of the concept of “mass psychosis.” In the videos, Desmet tries to distance himself from it by citing “ethical” and other differences in meaning from what Malone is trying to say with the word “psychosis.” This is from a European documentary about Desmet and Malone:16

Headwind 2 – The Round Table

Desmet: And then Robert mentioned me at the Joe Rogan’s [famous podcast], and he added the term to the term mass formation. And that was very successful, I think. It made me famous around the world.

[laughter]

Malone: Or infamous—

Desmet: Or infamous, yes.

Desmet: [to Malone] I doubt it a little bit–

Interviewer: The term, the term that he added was? [over laughter] The term that he added was?

Desmet: Psychosis. Psychosis. So, I always use the term mass formation. Just referring actually–simply to the formation of a mass or a crowd in a society and then Robert added the term psychosis to it. Which made it a little more sensational, I think.

Interviewer: [interrupts and laughs] Edgy—

Desmet: And made it spread around the world, but of course, at the same time, it may be added, well, from an ethical, pragmatic, and intellectual point of view ah it makes the term have a different meaning or a different connotation it depends a little bit. But it was a—a very good move to make the theory famous around the world, yeah?

The mood is light-hearted, with frequent and often self-conscious laughs. Both men seem to agree that the fame more than justifies using the term “mass psychosis” despite Desmet’s “ethical, pragmatic and intellectual” concerns.

Here are Desmet and Malone again in a separate video on January 4, 2022:17

Malone: Ah, that’s my summary of my understanding of his [Desmet’s] teaching. Now please, fix me fix what I got wrong.

Desmet: Ah I agree with pretty much everything you said, Robert. I would underline a few small differences such as the fact—and add some things, of course, here and there. For instance, I didn’t use the term mass formation psychosis. I prefer the term mass formation because in my opinion as a psychologist, a clinical psychologist you have to be very careful with using diagnostic terms because they can easily have a stigmatizing meaning and [Malone vigorously holds his hands up as if to say “stop”] they are both an-an unethical—an unethical—from an ethical and also from a pragmatic perspective can they be a little counterproductive, I think. Um, but a—

Malone: If can interduct [sic] to your point I just had that discussion with Brett Weinstein half an hour ago and he made exactly the same comment is that is that the term psychosis is inherently creating a barrier to ah comprehension and acceptance of the theory by those that might be ah threatened by the use of that term for exactly what you’re saying. So thank you for that reprimanding correction–

In these videos, it is taken for granted that Malone invented the concept and then promoted it, but that Desmet has serious concerns about it. Perhaps Malone is trying to deflect the severe criticism of his using the concept, but he shows no signs of retracting it. This is confusing, of course, but what really matters is that Malone by himself is responsible for getting world attention with the clever but dangerous phrase, “mass psychosis.”

Compared to who is pushing it now, it is not nearly as important to know who invented the term “mass psychosis” or who used it first. What matters now is Dr. Malone has been using his medical authority to make the concept famous and is pushing it with all his might in the face, as he admits, of criticism from many people, including Desmet.

Malone’s Friend Calls on Him to Let Go Of “Mass Psychosis”

In the same recent substack, Malone attacked his own “trusted colleague and supporter,” who suggested that Malone give up the concept of mass psychosis because so many people are concerned about it and urged trying to find common ground. Here is Malone’s excerpt from the message from his close unnamed associate:18

“The addition of psychosis to that phrase has caused psychiatrist[s] like Breggin to protect against what they fear is the “weaponization of psychiatry.” I know Mattias (and I assume you) is against the use of the word, but it needs to be made very clear out there. Apparently, in the documentary that featured the both of you, there was something said in jest about the use of “psychosis.” I’ve not seen this moment, but from what I’ve heard, the way this was expressed, with laughter, has raised concerns that it was an intentional ploy to gain attention. Does Mattias say something to the effect of, “it made me famous?” That’s was [sic] one persons interpretation, which might be totally off. I don’t know.”

After quoting this and other advice from his friend, Malone expresses his hurt and anger, and seemingly tries to make his colleague feel guilty for adding to Malone’s suffering (which is a repeated theme in his substacks):

“Well, there it is. The false narrative being promoted by detractors has come back at me stated as truth from a supporter, who (with the best of intent) is offering to mediate a resolution to a bunch of lies. And having read it while on the stage, getting ready to speak, I decided to respond. That was probably the wrong decision, but this text message was like a mind worm—once infected, my mind could not let it rest.” (bold in original)

Malone quotes his unnamed “trusted colleague and supporter” at such length, it was easy for me to identify him. He, too is very important to the health freedom movement and, like others, we have described as under Malone’s attack, is a very gentle soul who was taking an uncharacteristic risk by making suggestions to his friend Malone about his conduct.

A Final Question

Finally, we must ask, “Why would Robert Malone—who has shown no prior interest in the psychological basis of politics, or in either psychology or politics for that matter—seem to invent and then insist on publicizing such an extreme and even bizarre concept? Why would he do so, even to the point of unethically attacking others who are critical of it? How has this concept become so central to his identity, purposes, or goals?

It seems unlikely he is promoting and so vigorously defending mass psychosis out of his own self-interest or personal commitment. As far as we can ascertain, this kind of subject is not a part of his lifestyle or history, and, as documented in this report, he even denies what seems to be his admitted authorship of it.

But as a psychiatrist with decades of expertise in the arena of politicizing and weaponizing psychiatry, I am deeply concerned that the diagnosis of mass psychosis is ideal for weaponizing psychiatry for the diagnosis of dissenters for mass incarceration and abuse. Many of us in the U.S. and Europe suspect that the origin of “mass psychosis” is from within the establishment enemies of individual and political freedom—from the same government and industry connections which Malone himself has thoroughly documented and even boasted about in his resumes and elsewhere.19

It is becoming more apparent that Malone’s agenda goes beyond supporting the dangerous concept of “mass psychosis.” It now appears that he is trying, one by one, to take down the leadership of the health freedom movement. This would fit with the suspicions that others, like Diana West, have had about him—that he is here precisely to undermine the health freedom movement. If so, he is now zeroing in on the goal by attacking the leaders, hoping to demoralize and divide them.

1 “A demand letter is a formal notice sent to request assets, money, or legal action from another person as a last attempt to solve an issue without going to court.” https://www.thedemandletters.com/ I have read one letter.
2 Power and Strategy of False Narratives (substack.com). See the third from last paragraph.
3 For our publications and other resources on Desmet and Malone, go to our special section on our website (www.breggin.com) at https://breggin.com/Threats-from-the...Mass-Psychosis. Unless he’s somehow lost all his money, he is a multi-millionaire based on working for the drug companies and the Deep State, which are crushing America and which the freedom movements are fighting.
4 LIVESTREAM REPLAY: The Globalists In Plain Sight! 10/2/22 – CD Media (creativedestructionmedia.com)
5 Breggin.com | Threats from Mass Formations and Mass Psychosis Entry No. 8 on the page.
6 Two of the recent attacks on many leaders, including Peters and Ruby are (1) Malone’s substack https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/po...lse-narratives (2) his radio interview by John B. Wells. Intellectual Rape – John B Wells LIVE (rumble.com). It also aired on many radio stations: Classic Late Night Talk Radio Archives | Ark Midnight
7 I have seen the emails and talked with Clay Clark.
8 https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/we...g-stoking-rage
9 Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 8.12. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-...-conduct-media
10 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...arrative-cola/
11 https://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/...-Analysis.aspx
12 https://www.the-scientist.com/news-o...ormation-69719
13 Robert Malone: Vaccine Scientist, Vaccine Skeptic – The Atlantic
14 Here’s are introductions to my reform work on www.breggin.com from the “About” section. My extensive resume: https://z0sqrs-a.akamaihd.net/6905_b...MD-resume.pdf; a short bio: https://breggin.com/article-detail/p...ail/brief-bio; psychiatric reform accomplishments: https://breggin.com/article-detail/p...ter-r-breggin; what people say about Dr. Breggin: https://breggin.com/article-detail/p...out-dr-breggin.
15 Power and Strategy of False Narratives (substack.com)
16 Original full feature with Mattias Desmet, Robert Malone and Geert Vanden Bossche. Headwind 2 – The Round Table on Headwind.TV. 2022 https://www.headwind.tv/headwind2epi...tvandenbossche
17 https://www.bitchute.com/video/yyQw0GsVfCl7/ January 4, 2022.
18 https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/po...lse-narratives
19 Malone’s contacts over his professional lifetime are extremely extensive with institutions unfriendly or hostile to the freedom movement, including Big Pharma, Deep State (including Fauci’s and NIAID), and Big Government (including Department of Defense funding of his personal consulting firm and publically discussed CIA contacts). He says he has been shedding these contacts and when we found his connection to NIH ACTIV (the Great Reset organized within the government), he claimed he has recently given up that one, too. Documentation of his affiliations and sources of income can be found in items 5-8 at https://breggin.com/Threats-from-the...Mass-Psychosis

___________________

Please read Dr. Desmet's side of the story.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-...tm_source=push

The Attempt to Burn Me at the Stake
The Attempt to Burn Me at the Stake

By Mattias Desmet October 7, 2022 Philosophy 18 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Shocking Email: Feds Purposefully Made Kids Miserable During Covid Pandemic to Coerce Them Into Getting Vaxxed

An August 2021 email by the U.S. Department of Education’s Anne Hartge, of the Office of Communications and Outreach, following up on a conversation between Eric Hagarty, who is now Pennsylvania’s current Secretary of Education; Tara Piechowicz, Deputy Chief Of Staff for Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf; and Jack Groarke, Deputy Chief of Staff for Federal Affairs for Gov. Wolf, sheds an ugly spotlight on the behind-the-scenes decisionmaking that led to the current crisis in education among America’s schoolchildren.
https://beckernews.com/wp-content/up...g9M-scaled.jpg


“Not sure if you saw yesterday, but President Biden along with [Education] Secretary Cardoina in addition to calling for every school district to host a vaccine clinic, announced next week as a national Back to School Week of Action and introduced a slew of initiatives on youth vaccinations the Administration will be making including high profile trips acrosss the country…” Hartge wrote.

Then comes an absolutely brutal revelation about how the vaccine requirements were used to punish children who did not want the jabs, or whose parents did not want them to have them, and limited many children’s ability to socialize, get sunshine, and exercise.

“Public record emails show the Biden administration wanted to ‘leverage’ school sports and activities to coerce vaccination amongst students,” Megan Eileen noted. “… we have seen leveraging athletics and extracurriculars as a way to boost you vaccination as an effective tactic across the county.”


“They used the threat of students missing games due to Covid-19 exposure and long quarantines,” Eileen added.

“Your federal government purposefully made kids lives more miserable during covid by using official “guidance” to ham-handedly drive people to vaxx their kids “leveraging..extracurriculars..as an effective tactic.”

The truly appalling aspect to the U.S. Department of Education’s childhood ‘vaccination’ drive is that there is now plentiful evidence that the mRNA shots cause known side effects, particularly for young persons.

https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/...m_source=email

The Defeat Of COVID
"A fish can't see the water..."
Jennifer Margulis examines some likely motivations of those who lied to the public about the COVID vaccines.
ColleenHuberNMD
19 min ago

The following is entirely Jennifer Margulis' writing. You can subscribe to her newsletter here:

https://jennifermargulis.net/

By Jennifer Margulis

Some of us are immovable in our beliefs. Others constantly search out new information and change our minds about things.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...3f_600x427.png


Like everyone else, I have strong biases — I'm biased in favor of women being empowered to have their babies where and how they feel most comfortable (home birth anyone?!). I believe that kindness matters and that we should parent children gently and also be gentle with ourselves. And I also believe that medical doctors have an ethical responsibility to tell patients all of their options when it comes to making health decisions. And, I don’t like prejudice, misogyny, or hypocrisy.

I also strive, imperfectly, to be open-minded, and willing to listen to new information on any given subject, and to change my mind or refine my ideas based on new information

But changing a belief is very difficult. When scientists began realizing that the COVID-19 vaccines did not work to prevent COVID or stop its spread, instead of halting the vaccine program—which would have been the most scientific and healthiest choice—they changed the definition of vaccines.

You probably know this already: We’ve been lied to about masking, social distancing, and about the safety, efficacy, and necessity of mRNA vaccines.

But why? Why do people lie?

Before I answer this, I think we need to put aside our feeling that the public health officials and medical doctors who have been lying to us for two and a half years now are evil people doing Satan’s work.

Just for a moment, let’s give them all the benefit of the doubt. Let’s insist on believing that these are well-intentioned people who care as deeply about the nation’s health and any individual’s wellbeing as you and I do.

But, wait. If these aren't evil people perpetuating a depopulation agenda, then why are they lying, censoring science, and shutting down honest and open discussions about vaccine safety? (And if you got the vaccines and you’re feeling sorry you did so, how did you get so duped?)

1. A fish can’t see the water it swims in.

When you spend your life in an echo chamber, speaking only to people who share your beliefs, it doesn’t even cross your mind that you may be wrong. The idea that the human immune system is inherently flawed and that modern science must rescue it is so deeply engrained in the Big Pharma-funded world view that most people in medicine cannot even entertain the idea that there are ways to support healthy immunity that have nothing to do with vaccines.

2. They have too much skin in the game.

Follow the money. When everything you espouse not only resonates with all the people around you but also benefits you financially, professionally, and socially, it’s very hard to see anything else (see #1). The mRNA vaccines have generated mind-boggling amounts of money for the elite. C-section birth is much more lucrative for hospitals and doctors than vaginal birth, so of course that “emergency” C-section your doctor was paid double to perform was absolutely medically necessary. At least that’s what he thinks. Chronically ill people make big money for Big Medicine.

So if you're wondering who to trust and who to believe, I recommend finding out what hands are feeding them. The CDC takes a huge amount of money from Big Pharma. Big Pharma and other Big Industry are also funding most of our legacy media outlets.

Medical doctors also benefit enormously from giving vaccines. Ka-ching! Dissidents, on the other hand, usually have very little to gain and EVERYTHING to lose by speaking out against a broken system.

Sure, there are lots of snake oil salesmen in both camps. But most of the people fighting against forced vaccination have nothing to sell you and nothing to gain. Joshua Coleman came to Maine to speak at Health Choice Maine's Find Your Light conference. He was a regular Joe, happily and unquestioningly going along with the system. Until his son was permanently paralyzed by his toddler vaccinations. Otto, who's almost 13, has been unable to walk ever since. Parents like Joshua have nothing to gain from speaking up about vaccine safety; they get ridiculed, vilified, discriminated against, and shunned. Moderna and Pfizer employees want to buy luxury penthouses in Boston. Parents of children who have brain and immune damage from vaccines want to help other families avoid the unbelievable amounts of suffering they've gone through. THEIR children have already been damaged; now they’re fighting for YOURS. You decide who you want to believe.

3. Their oversized egos won’t let them stop lying.

If you agree with me that most people are trying to do good, then you will understand why it’s so hard for them to stop lying, to the public and to themselves. Admitting you’ve done something wrong, however inadvertently, is really painful. Your ego can’t let you recognize the truth. So in order to save your own face, you continue to perpetuate lies. Until, that is, the evidence against what you’ve been telling people—or a personal disaster—is so overwhelming that even your ego can no longer prevent you from seeing it.

Dr. Gregory Poland, M.D., is now suffering from life-disabling tinnitus, courtesy of the mRNA vaccines.

Dr. Michel Goldman, a Belgian immunologist who has been promoting vaccines his entire career, is having a resurgence of aggressive cancer, courtesy of the mRNA vaccines.

A mom who told me she used to ridicule “anti-vaxxers” on Twitter has a teenage son whose heart has been damaged by the mRNA vaccines.

All of these are insiders, people who have never had a reason to question medicine's cultural assumptions. But now they're facing a crisis of confidence. They may not see that the entire COVID-19 vaccine program needs to be halted, but they're beginning to understand—albeit slowly—that they’ve been horribly duped.

This got long. If you made it this far, thanks for reading. You may have noticed an empty inbox the last two Thursdays. I’ve been having a hard time keeping up with real-life events, article deadlines, editing work, as well as caring for a loved one having some health challenges. I haven’t quite been able to keep up with everything. Forgive me.

❤️ Love,

Jennifer

p.s. If you’re reading closely, you will have noticed that I have nothing to sell you but my thoughts and ideas.

Subscribe to Jennifer Margulis newsletter here:

https://jennifermargulis.net/

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/n...ce-membershtml

National Guard Gives Service Members COVID-19 Vaccine Instead Of Influenza Shot

Planet Today
Oct 6, 2022

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The National Guard administered the COVID-19 vaccine to multiple service members who were lined up for the influenza vaccine, including a member who objected to the COVID-19 vaccine on religious grounds, according to officials and one of the members.
A COVID-19 vaccine is prepared in a file image.

A COVID-19 vaccine is prepared in a file image. (Stephen Zenner/Getty Images)

The incident took place in late 2021.

Share Planet Today

During a vaccination clinic where both flu and COVID-19 vaccines were being administered, “three service members were accidently given a COVID vaccine,” Maj. Carl Lamb, a spokesman for the Maine National Guard, told The Epoch Times in an email.

Mathew Bouchard, who is no longer with the Guard, has identified himself as one of the members.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...1_500x300.jpeg

Bouchard said he was ordered to receive an annual flu vaccine and went to the clinic to get that vaccine. He verified his name, date of birth, and part of his social security number, and told officials at the clinic he was there for the flu vaccine. But he was injected with a dose of a messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine, officials told him.

“‘You know how you went in for the flu shot? Well, that wasn’t a flu shot. That was a COVID-19 vaccine,'” Bouchard told The Epoch Times, recounting the meeting with superiors.

“I think, in my mind, at that point, it was like, I completely didn’t know if I trusted any people in the military,” he added.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...e_500x625.jpeg

Former Maine National Guardsman Mathew Bouchard.

Former Maine National Guardsman Mathew Bouchard. (Courtesy of Mathew Bouchard)
Religious Objections

Each branch of the military ordered members to get vaccinated, after Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, a Biden appointee, in August of 2021 directed them to do so.

Under federal law, medical and religious exemptions can be sought. The military has been using form letters with striking similarities to deny many religious exemption requests, federal judges have found, and several branches are blocked from taking punitive action against religious objectors.

Bouchard says he was pursuing a religious exemption due to his Christian faith when he was injected with a vaccine against his will. At the time, he only had several months left before his enlistment was over.

Donate Subscriptions

Bouchard believes the vaccine mixup was intentional, noting how the military has aggressively tried to pressure members to get vaccinated. The purpose would be to get members to re-enlist, he thinks.

“I think what they did was they thought soldiers who don’t want it and they accidentally get it are just going to come around and continue their service. So I feel like that was a way to vaccinate people,” Bouchard said.

Read more here...

Thanks for reading Planet Today! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

By clicking on the link below you will find links to the several news stories listed below.

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3


U.S. Stockpiles $290 Million in NIH-Funded Radiation Sickness Drug

Hearing on Dr. Nass Suspension Set for Oct. 11 After Maine Medical Board Withdraws ‘Misinformation’ Allegations

FDA, CDC Urge All Adults to Get 5th COVID Shot Despite No Safety or Efficacy Data


The Origins of COVID: All Evidence Points to a Cover-Up


Chemical Found in Common Household Products Linked to Arthritis


Feds Cooked Up Detailed Propaganda Plan to Push COVID Shots, Documents Reveal


CDC Will Stop Issuing Daily Updates of COVID Cases, Deaths + More


BlackRock Invests in Censorship + More

https://www.americaoutloud.com/covid...home-to-roost/

An AI audio reading of this article is available at original site.

americaoutloud.com

COVID-19: The Chickens are Now Coming Home to Roost - America Out Loud
America's
9-11 minutes

by Rogier Fentener van Vlissingen
read about author at end

October 7, 2022

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The chickens are now coming home to roost. Big pharma, as well as the politicians, the doctors, and the regulators who supported the vax campaign, have lost a lot of credibility, even before facing probably two decades of lawsuits and potentially criminal prosecutions (Bill Gates is already up on charges for murder by the vaccine in India).

You said you could not see the elephant in the room? Neither could I! It’s supposed to be a virus, too small to see, but I am also getting a lot of static. Growing dissent among the Covid dissenters is not helping, but it is a fact of life and to be expected. One of the bright lights has been the US/German Corona Investigative Committee, started by Reiner Fuellmich and Viviane Fischer. They have produced hundreds of hours of expert testimony relative to the Corona crisis.

They now seem to be having a falling out, resulting in the ouster of Fuellmich. It is questionable how long the committee can remain viable after this, but its work will stand. Meanwhile, it does not sound like Fuellmich will sit still, either. It’ll take some time for the dust to settle, but Fuellmich is now organizing a new entity, ICIC (International Crimes Investigative Committee). Also, Fuellmich is getting some criticism from other areas as well, with Eric Coppolino questioning why he has avoided the question of the existence of the virus, which seems critical. I previously wrote about the controversy between Breggin and Desmet, with Robert Malone caught in the crossfire. Last but not least, there is the question of lab origins or otherwise, which merely reaffirms the reality of the virus.

Unfortunately, these types of developments always get the headlines, but we are well advised to dig deeper and look into what may be really happening. The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. “One word of truth outweighs the world.” – Aleksander Solzhenitsyn.

We have arrived at the point where statistics from around the world (see a.o. the recent work of Denis Rancourt) show that all of the Corona measures have been grossly counter-productive, from the lockdowns to social distancing and masks to the vaccines. Also, the suppression of viable, cheap, and effective early treatments in favor of expensive, and far riskier drugs, such as Remdesvir, is now beginning to be understood, and the idea of putting all our eggs in one basket with the “warp speed” vaccine seems more deranged by the day. Very few things could be more dramatic than the recent testimony of Army Lt. Col. Theresa Long, MD. She was one such individual who stood up among the consensus culture of the army.

However, all this is much ado about nothing once you realize what is going on, which is our medical model is simply falling apart. One of the more insightful things to surface recently is the work of Denis Rancourt, who analyzed the whole process across all fifty states from the beginning until mid-2022. To put it bluntly, the data (excess mortality) suggests that the virus observed stop signs and political boundaries, given the differences in state-to-state outcomes. Since that was a bit unlikely, Rancourt concludes that the model of how a respiratory virus might spread does not line up with the actual facts on the ground, leading to the conclusion that human interventions are more to blame for the problem than any virus, if ever there was one.

Jonathan Engler over at Panda came to the same conclusions about the initial “spread” in Northern Italy. I.e., careful statistical analysis revealed that the spread was more about differential policies in different communities than a normal viral spread model, which would not make observer political differences, bringing us to the final point, the virus itself. The statistical analysis by Rancourt is based on the data after it was all (mostly) over.

Had the world been more educated about vitamin D (sunshine!), as well as nasal flushes and gargling, there would never have been a pandemic. For high-risk patients, there were early treatment protocols that could have saved millions around the world. The universal fear campaign and the house arrest of the population (lockdowns) did more damage than any virus. Curiously, in the 1918 Spanish flu, NYC developed the infamous steam radiator, which produced enough heat so you could have fresh air and be comfortable at the same time. But we forgot all the lessons of history.

Germ Theory versus Terrain Theory

Before Anthony Fauci, Louis Pasteur had held the world title for scientific fraud, always brown-nosing at the French court and failing upward based on bamboozling his political patrons with false claims that were never fully understood, until the publication of his diaries, long after his death. Still, towards the end of his life, he is reported to have endorsed the ideas of his rival Antoine Béchamp: “The microbe is nothing, the terrain is everything.” Without even getting into the matter of the physical proof of the existence of a virus, the issue was if diseased tissue attracted viruses or viruses caused healthy tissue to be diseased. Or, to put it more crudely: will killing the flies solve your garbage problem? Clearly not. Which is not to say you might not have to kill some flies even if you solve your garbage problem. During this particular go-around, there were perhaps two major issues that entered the discussion, one being vitamin D, and the other some research that was reported in the British Medical Journal into the reduction of the risk of “moderate to severe” Covid outcomes based on diets.

Unsurprisingly, anti-inflammatory diets were the winners, as was explained in a lovely video by Dr. Brooke Goldner: a 73% risk reduction for plant-based diets; a 59% reduction for pescetarian (plants + fish), to a 20% increased risk for the ever popular low carb, high-fat diets (Atkins, Paleo, Keto). The upshot is that if nutrition plays such a huge role, the signs now point to terrain theory, not germ theory. We know that from the mortality from the virus also: the preponderance of deaths in 2020 were older, sicker people, above average life expectancy, and comorbidities (95% with 4+ comorbidities, 67% with 6+ comorbidities). This was evident from the outset, even from the earliest analyses, like the Diamond Princess.

As to the elephant itself, or rather, the virus – you can’t see it, because it is imaginary, that is the message of the growing cadre of doctors and scientists who are favoring terrain theory and the legacy of Béchamp over Pasteur’s brainchild of germ theory, which he ended up doubting himself. This growing groundswell is quickly becoming unstoppable; perhaps this particular round gained strength with Dr. Samantha Bailey from New Zealand joining the German authors for a third edition of the book Virus Mania. Eventually, a formal scientific challenge was developed by a group of doctors who shared these views, such as The Virus Challenge, which is accessible to anybody on the website of Dr. Tom Cowan. More popular material exists in the form of the documentary by Steve Falconer/Spacebusters: The End of Germ Theory, and a longer (7.5 hours) documentary, The Viral Delusion, eminently worth watching.

Lastly, there is Christine Massey, who has obtained records from over 200 institutions in 40+ countries, and nobody, but nobody, has ever isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus anywhere; it is only theoretical in a computer model. Sol Luckman is launching an initiative to Join the terrain train for all of us who would question the germ theory of disease. The longer you think about it, the more ridiculous it gets, there was an absolutely dogmatic determination to see something, and when they did not, they simply decided it must be too small to see. Still, that argument became untenable with electron microscopes. No problem, now we resort to computer simulations to sustain the belief in a singular cause.

The punch line: Pharmageddon

If these things are so obvious, how come most people still don’t know? Changing the paradigm takes time and effort, and there are psychological and economic reasons why the germ theory paradigm is attractive and has a lot of stickiness. Psychologically, it is easier to accept the idea of a single cause, preferably one external to me. Diet and lifestyle mean I am responsible for my health. A virus means I get off scot-free; I get to have my cake and eat it too: live on Coke and potato chips and aim my anti-aircraft fire at the virus.

It gets worse: with the Rockefeller medicine reforms about one hundred years ago, germ theory was raised to the official dogma, and allopathic medicine was the new catechism, with the AMA as the co-conspirator who served their own interest of keeping women, children, and the poor out of medicine while raising doctor’s incomes (see the book Rockefeller’s Medicine Men). More importantly, it would sell more oil, as petrochemical feedstock was the major input to the pharmaceutical industry. Reason enough to like it, at least for Rockefeller, although he preferred to see a homeopathic physician.

The time for a drastic overhaul of healthcare is here, and numerous developments around the country and the world are underway. It is no longer about “drug prices” or “access” but about the fact that the healthcare system post-Covid is itself the first or second leading cause of premature death.

_______________

Rogier Fentener van Vlissingen

Rogier Fentener van Vlissingen is a Dutch native, living in America since 1979, in both Connecticut and New York. He has worked in international shipping and most recently he has mostly been involved in energy efficiency and retrofitting. He is also a co-founder of a biotech, BCM Industries, which develops autologous organ repair tissues, and also a line of revolutionary IT equipment, computers and storage appliances, running on live neurons. He is an eager student of business, literature, history and spiritual traditions. He also teaches whole foods, plant-based nutrition and cooking. He published his first book in Holland in 1973.

In 2007, Rogier published the book Closing the Circle: The Gospel of Thomas and A Course in Miracles. He blogs about energy retrofitting, energy finance, spirituality and whole-foods, plant-based nutrition and healthcare.

________________

Dachsie comment:

I must admit that I was very intrigued by this article and was going along great until I got to the end and saw this about the author: "In 2007, Rogier published the book Closing the Circle: The Gospel of Thomas and A Course in Miracles. "

I am too left brain to appreciate this what I consider to be a foray into woo woo land.

I agree with this statement.

"The time for a drastic overhaul of healthcare is here, and numerous developments around the country and the world are underway. It is no longer about “drug prices” or “access” but about the fact that the healthcare system post-Covid is itself the first or second leading cause of premature death. "

I question every term of the official narrative and I appreciate open discussion and consider it to be a necessary part of science and reason and common sense. It seems to me in our arguing against the official narrative we have fallen into some kind of trap or trick.

The healthcare system was in serious trouble for several decades before "COVID."

All I care about is honest professionals to use their knowledge in a practical way to help people who become very ill from the diseases they call "COVID" or are like "COVID." Whatever forces working for the official "pandemic" narrative are either about to succeed splendidly or fail colossally, and our country and the world will go along that direction.

I know Who is ultimately in charge of everything.

I suspected this was a complete scam the day they announced the first case in the USA arriving in Washington state. I had seen the 'Event 201' video, then Ares posting about the financial debacle in the overnight repo market put the 'icing on the cake' so to speak. It was all about transferring the wealth from the middle class to the billionaire class.

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/g...m_source=email

Groundbreaking lawsuit filed against Peter Daszak, Ralph Baric over SARS-CoV-2 gain of function research and hazardous RELEASE

Planet Today
2 hr ago, October 8, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._1280x720.jpeg

(Planet Today) A groundbreaking lawsuit has been filed by attorney Thomas Renz, naming EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak and University of North Carolina researcher Ralph Baric as defendants, claiming they are responsible for the deaths of plaintiffs due to their involvement in funding gain-of-function research of the SARS-CoV-2 virus which is believed to be responsible for the “covid pandemic.”

Share Planet Today

According to the lawsuit, a copy of which is posted at Renz-Law.com, Daszak and Baric conspired to circumvent gain-of-function funding restrictions and transfer both money and technology to Dr. Zheng-Li (the so-called “Bat Lady”) at the Wuhan bioweapons research facility in China, where the final work on SARS-CoV-2 was conducted, weaponizing it against humanity. Once completed, the weapon was released upon the world, causing the deaths of plaintiffs.

We welcome responses from both Daszak and Baric if they disagree with these claims and wish to offer their own explanation for the events in which they have involvement.

See a backup copy of the lawsuit papers at this NaturalNews files location (PDF).
CDC engaged in criminal conspiracy cover-up to hide V-safe data

In addition to the bombshell lawsuit against Daszak and Baric, the CDC has been caught red-handed, engaged in what I would classify as a criminal conspiracy cover-up to withhold V-safe data from the public for nearly two years.

This data set from the V-Safe app has just been acquired by ICAN (Del Bigtree and attorney Aaron Siri), and is revealing that 7.7% of people who took covid vaccines suffered so many injuries that they needed medical care, while another 25% had their lives turned upside down as vaccine side effects caused them to miss work or to halt “normal life activities.”

As The Epoch Times reports:

Hundreds of thousands of Americans sought medical care after getting a COVID-19 vaccine, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data released on Oct. 3.

Roughly 782,900 people reported seeking medical attention, emergency room care, and/or hospitalization following COVID-19 vaccination. Another 2.5 million people reported needing to miss school, work, or other normal activities as a result of a health event after getting a COVID-19 vaccine.

You can see the full data set via ICAN’s website at this dashboard link:
https://www.icandecide.org/v-safe-data/

It shows that out of about 10 million vaccine recipients who used the V-safe app, 33% were impacted with injuries or other interruptions, and nearly 6.5 million health impacts were reported.

The CDC fought hard to prevent this information from being released to the public, proving that Walensky and others engaged in a criminal conspiracy cover-up to hide the truth about vaccine injuries from the public, resulting in potentially millions of additional deaths or injuries taking place that would have otherwise been averted if people knew the truth.
The CDC is a corrupt, criminal organization

We now know without any question that the CDC is a crime cartel that promotes Big Pharma’s death shots which are injuring or killing millions of Americans. At every opportunity, the CDC will hide the truth about vaccine injuries and deceive the public, all while promoting more shots for everyone, including children.

CDC director Walensky should be immediately arrested by the DOJ and charged with at least one count of criminal fraud and negligence for each and every American who was injured or killed by these hazardous covid vaccines.

Instead, the White House and a complicit mass media will call for more censorship of anyone who talks about vaccines being dangerous, falsely claiming that such talk is “disinformation” when, in reality, the CDC’s own data now shows that covid vaccines are the most dangerous medical intervention ever administered to the public at large… far more dangerous than Thalidomide, Vioxx, statins or any other drug that has maimed or killed innocent people over the decades.

These deadly, hazardous vaccines must be stopped, and those who dishonestly pushed them must be held accountable through arrest and prosecution for their heinous crimes against children and all of humanity.

Learn more in today’s Situation Update podcast, which contains yet more bombshell information:

– Lawsuit claims Peter Daszak and Ralph Baric are responsible for DEATHS from covid
– Claims they funneled money into gain-of-function research in Wuhan
– Could set legal precedent for massive wave of lawsuits against Fauci, Walensky and others
– CDC (Walensky) conspiracy confirmed: They covered up V-Safe data showing widespread vaccine injuries
– 7.7% of those who took vaccine were injured, 25% couldn’t work
– Bank of England admits it was only HOURS away from total collapse
– European gold and silver mints will CEASE operations due to energy shortage
– Biden pardons marijuana possession (federal) but still criminalizes CBD
– China military drones air lift armed robot dogs into battle zones
– US buys anti-radiation drugs to prepare for nuclear war
– Germany to become “industrial museum” as energy supply collapses
– Interview with Tom Luongo on currency wars, Europe vs. the Fed

Video: https://www.planet-today.com/2022/10...d-against.html

See more stories about vaccines at Vaccines.news

(Article by Mike Adams republished from Citizens.news)

Thanks for reading Planet Today! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/7...m_source=email

700 million people will DIE from COVID injections, says Dr. David Martin

Planet Today
3 hr ago, October 8, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._1000x563.jpeg

(Planet Today) It is a chilling thought to think of just how many people in the coming months and years are going to die because of getting “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).

Share Planet Today

According to Dr. David Martin, as many as 700 million people worldwide will succumb to an early grave because of the shots, which we know flood a person’s body with deadly, clot-forming spike proteins (Related: Fauci Flu shots are also causing people to go bald).

Martin came up with this number after poring through data from the World Health Organization’s (WHO) “Decade of Vaccines” vision, which was put together in collaboration with billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates, who lives to vaccinate.

It was in 2011 when the WHO announced the Decade of Vaccines plan, which aims to depopulate the world by about 15 percent. That figure amounts to about 700 million people.

Back in August 2021, Dr. Robert Young estimated that 500 million people worldwide had already at that time been injured by the jabs, with possibly 35 million deaths.

This past August, Steve Kirsch threw out a more conservative ballpark figure of 12 million deaths from covid jabbing, based on an estimate of one death per 1,000 doses.

“We are killing nearly close to 10,000 people every single day,” Kirsch wrote.
“It’s going to get much worse,” Martin warns

That same month, Peter Halligan pieced together data suggesting that as many as 20 million people have thus far died from the shots, while a whopping 2.2 billion have suffered at least one injury.

All of this suggests that things are only just getting started in terms of the fallout from these mystery injections. Assuming only 20 million people have died, we are only about three percent of the way there to the full death count.

To think that hundreds of millions of people are now the walking dead – meaning they could drop dead at any moment once the clots fully form in just the right spot – is nothing short of disturbing.

“It’s going to get much worse,” warned Martin during an hourlong interview with USA Watchdog back in June, referring to the injections as “bioweapons.”

“It is not a coronavirus vaccine. It is a spike protein instruction manual to make the human body produce a toxin.”

“The fact of the matter is the injections are an act of biomicroweapons and bioterrorism. They are not a public health measure. The facts are very simple. This was premeditated … This was a campaign of domestic terror to get the public to accept the universal vaccine platform using a known biological weapon. That is their own words and not my interpretation.”

In the United States, Martin expects up to one-third of the entire population to be dead by the time this is all said and done. Anywhere from 75 million to 100 million people who took the jabs will have passed away by the time these injections run their course around 2028.

“There are a lot of reasons why they hope it will be between now and 2028 because there is this tiny little glitch of the illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs,” Martin says.

“So, the fewer recipients of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the better. Not surprisingly, the recommendation was people over the age of 65 were the first ones to get injected.”

Martin also spoke about all the pilots who are suffering microvascular and clotting problems due to all their time up in the air. This is, of course, dangerous for both passengers and folks on the ground who could end up becoming the unlucky ones with an airplane through their roof.

The latest news about Chinese Virus shots can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

(Article by Ethan Huff republished from Citizens.news)

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/t...m_source=email

TICKING TIME BOMB: Swedish study presents evidence that mRNA COVID “vaccines” progressively increase hospitalization and death risk over time

Planet Today
4 hr ago

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._1000x563.jpeg

(Planet Today) New research out of Sweden shows that people who get “vaccinated” with messenger RNA (mRNA) Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines” end up with a severely degraded immune system in the months that follow.

Share Planet Today

Not only are the “fully vaccinated” more prone to catching the so-called “omicron” (aka moronic) variant of the Chinese Virus, the study found that they also suffer an increased risk of hospitalization or death roughly a year after their second dose.

This means that getting jabbed for COVID leaves a person more likely to get sick or die, not less likely like Joe Biden, Tony Fauci and others in government insist. (Related: Spike proteins from mRNA injections accumulate in the heart and brain.)

After about five months post-injection, an mRNA-injected person starts to show serious signs of immune degradation. By nine months, immune capacity plunges to extreme lows, followed by negative efficacy at the one-year mark and beyond.

“This data provides real-world evidence of possible vaccine-caused ‘antibody dependent enhancement,'” wrote Alex Berenson on his Substack. “In ADE, vaccines cause our immune systems to produce antibodies that help a virus or other pathogen to attack us.”
British data confirms that COVID injections have negative efficacy

Berenson noted that the number of actual deaths assessed in the study during the later time periods are admittedly small, which means the findings “should not be viewed as definitive.”

The confidence intervals, he added, “widen hugely after 40 weeks.”

On the other hand, the findings corroborate those put together by Exposé News, which has been reporting on the negative efficacy of COVID injections for quite some time now using data out of England.

By all appearances, COVID injections do little, if anything, to provide protection against any kind of infection. They actually seem to damage the immune system, leaving it more prone to disease.

According to Dr. Yiyi Xi, the paper’s lead author, more data is needed to determine with pinpoint accuracy the true risk severity of post-injection hospitalization and/or death at the one-year mark and beyond.

There is also the matter of which statistical method is best for such calculations. A different one from the one used in the study, described as standard polynomial regression, found the jabs to be moderately effective against hospitalization and death, which skews the results.

“With ‘standard’ (a.k.a. single polynomial) regression … you can fit any data, if you give it enough freedom,” Berenson explained, quoting an independent expert. “The price for that, is that the better it fits the data you give it, the worse it will be at explaining new data, and especially so at the edges.”

“Splines, due to the way they are built, avoid this problem and produce more sensical (hence more useful) predictive models.”

Another independent expert who “happen[s] to believe strongly that these vaccines will have negative efficacy” said that as a statistician, it would be remiss to make that claim with confidence “off the back of a spline like this.”

So, all that to say, the Swedish study may or may not prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Fauci Flu shots degrade immunity and leave a person worse off than if he had simply left his immune system alone. It does, however, add to a growing body of evidence that suggests that very thing.

“Sadly, I suspect for many of the deeply hypnotized, this information (assuming they ever are allowed, or allow themselves, to see it), even though I suspect it overstates any protection offered, will probably just reinforce their conviction that getting a ‘booster’ every three months or so makes sense, and is the way to go,” wrote one of Berenson’s readers.

The latest news about injuries and deaths caused by Chinese Virus shots can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

(Article by Ethan Huff, republished from Citizens.news)

_____________

Dachsie comment:

Always click on title of article posted as it is a link that will take you to the article at the original site of posting and there you will find the fully hyperlinked article that will provide deeper sources of information relating to the article contents.

Apocalypse 6:8
Douay-Rheims Bible

And behold a pale horse, and he that sat upon him, his name was Death, and hell followed him. And power was given to him over the four parts of the earth, to kill with sword, with famine, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.
_____

Revelation 6:8
King James Bible

And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

_______________________
Apocalypse 9:15
Douay-Rheims Bible

And the four angels were loosed, who were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year: for to kill the third part of men.
____
Revelation 9:15
King James Bible

And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men.

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/s...m_source=email

Scientific experiments show it is nearly IMPOSSIBLE to transmit a respiratory virus to another person


Planet Today
5 hr ago October 8, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...4a_550x309.png

(Planet Today) Believe it or not, respiratory viruses like rhinoviridae (the common cold) and coronaviridae (coronaviruses such as covid) do not transmit from person to person as is commonly believed.

Share Planet Today

Back in March, the UK Vaccine Taskforce funded a human challenge study for SARS-CoV-2, published in the journal Nature Medicine, that exposed unvaccinated participants to a “wild-type” version of the alleged covid virus intranasally. Out of 34 participants, only 18 of them, or 53 percent, developed what researchers described as “PCR-confirmed infection” – all with mild-to-moderate symptoms.

PCR testing, just to be clear, is not a valid way to detect viruses. As we reported late last year, PCR testing for the Fauci Flu is inherently fraudulent. So even those who tested “positive” may or may not have actually had COVID.

Whatever was sprayed into the participants’ noses, assuming it was the infamous COVID, clearly did not affect all of them. And even those it did affect made out just fine in the end.

Another study conducted back in 1984 exposed a small group of 14 volunteers, five of which were dubbed “donors” since they had been infected with rhinovirus as the selected “shedding agent.” The other nine were dubbed as “recipients.”

All of the volunteers were confined to a small room with no outside ventilation. They interacted, sang together, and played cards, all activities that based on common knowledge today should have resulted in the nine recipients becoming infected, right? It turns out that not a single one of them became infected.

Other similar experiments as part of the same study were conducted as well, including a 12-day evaluation in a sealed dormitory. Only a couple of recipients in those scenarios developed cold symptoms, however, it is important to note that researchers were never able to isolate any rhinovirus from the air. (Related: The covid “virus” has never been proven to exist.)
Don’t be fearful of other people – their breath can’t make you sick

Prof. Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson conducted their own review into the transmission ability of influenza-like illnesses (ILI) based on these various studies and confirmed that it is next to impossible for someone to “catch” a respiratory illness from someone else – which means face masks and other mitigatory measures are useless.

“If you have followed these experiments and paid attention, just like the authors, you might conclude how difficult it is to transmit ILI experimentally, even in everyday work that includes close contact and touching,” the duo writes.

“These famous experiments are relevant to coronaviridae transmission. Although rhinoviridae and coronaviridae lock on cell membranes using different receptors … the only difference … seems to be the length of incubation and shedding.”

Heneghan, by the way, teaches evidence-based medicine at the University of Oxford. He is also the director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) and regularly appears in the media.

Jefferson is a clinical epidemiologist and senior associate tutor at the University of Oxford. He and Heneghan together write articles for the “Trust the Evidence” Substack.

Their article about respiratory virus transmission is one part in a seven-part series entitled “The SARS-CoV-2 transmission riddle,” which unpacks how poor-quality and superficial science was used to basically destroy the world with the covid scamdemic.

“Is anyone really surprised by this research?” asked a reader in response to the revelation. “The whole pandemic was a farce.”

“A cold or ‘ILIs’ have not unequivocally been proven to exist or to be the cause of cold-like symptoms,” said another. “To believe otherwise is to solely rely on germ theory, ignoring all others.”

Interesting in learning more about Chinese Virus injections? Visit ChemicalViolence.com.

(Article by Ethan Huff republished from Citizens.news)

Dachsie update edit:

Dachsie transcript --
video clip that got Dr. Peter McCullough permanently banned from Twitter.
_____

“…When the Republicans come in to power in the House, they’re set to have strong subpoena power, investigation power, …

Senator Ron Johson posted over 40 senatorial letters which are bascially plce-holders for investigations…

And I think the FDA commissioner is in deep trouble, and the NIH division director are in deep trouble, CDC director.. you know..

They’re going to have nowhere to hide to.

The publications make it clear.

It was a government operation that created SARS-CoV-2 and the spike protein.

It’s the U S government that did it.

And they were working on the threat and working on the response, which was various forms of antigens to be injected or monoclonal antibodies.

But it’s clear it was a U S government operation. The work was done in China and there was Chinese collaboration.

You know, Maderna CEO, Stephan Bancel, he was the CEO of was the CEO BioMerieux,
And he built the Wuhan bio-security lab with the Chinese when he was leading that French company. He built that lab. Then he leaves in 2015, and he joins Maderna.
And then Maderna co-writes the patent with the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

You probably heard me say Maderna is suing Pfizer over the patent…
Yes, people ask my opinion …
So people ask my opinion –
I said yes.

You know, this will all come to light. It takes a long time to write a patent. Patent prosecution takes a long time.
Maderna and the U S government wrote the patent on the product a long time ago. And we knew this because when the crisis was announced in the United States three days later, Maderna announces they have a product.

How can they have a product in three days? You can’t invent something in three days.
This was planned.
This was all planned.

And Peter Breggin, who you mentioned, in his Global Predators book*, Breggin says – he puts this in his timeline –

36 pandemic preparedness events since 2012 - --36---, 25 of which generated documents and then…”

*book -- COVID-19 and the Global Predators

By Peter Breggin and Ginger Breggin






____________________


WATCH THIS 2:20 video clip.. Why Dr. Peter McCullough was permanently banned from Twitter.

https://twitter.com/SJWilliams123/st...m_medium=emailhttps://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...i4qpoqg1TA--~D

Sarah Jane ��
@SJWilliams123
This is why they took him down

From
Sophia Dahl
5:37 AM · Oct 7, 2022
·Twitter for iPhone
7,863
Retweets
567

_________

Source

Jeff Childers' Substack
October 8, 2022

In the clip, Dr. McCullough persuasively accused the U.S. government of having created SARS-CoV-2 and the spike protein. No wonder twitter deleted him. This stuff is very dangerous to the narrative.

But the information is getting out anyway, faster than they can pass laws to prevent it.

Go HERE to access links to each of the stories below.

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3

Recommended Media

Financial Rebellion: One Nation Under Blackmail With Whitney Webb

Friday Roundtable: Remdesivir Lawsuit, Vaccine-related Aluminum Exposure Linked to Asthma

WATCH TODAY:

Good Morning CHD With Paul Marik, M.D. + With Pierre Kory, M.D., M.P.A. — 10am ET // 7am PT

An Informed Life Radio: James Lyons-Weiler Responds to Paul Offit’s Aluminum Misinformation

Good Morning CHD: Can We Talk About It? With Bri Dressen, Cat Parker + Aga Wilson

Tea Time: Unvaxxed Kids Healthier Than Vaxxed With Russell Blaylock, M.D.

The Solution: We Need to Wake Up With Dr. Jason Dean — Watch Today 12pm PT // 3pm ET

Good Morning CHD: Why Homeschool? Hosted by Sarah Kenoyer

TUESDAY: Meryl Nass, M.D. Official Hearing — WATCH LIVE 1pm ET // 10am PT

Dachsie -- IMPORTANT Gracious Update

We can watch the entire Epoch TV show with Jeff Childers this evening, October 8, 2022, at 6:30 pm Central for me.

HERE

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/c-a...m_source=email

Coffee & Covid 2022 ��
☕️ C&C NEWS UPDATE ☙ Saturday, October 8, 2022 ☙ FREE LINK FOR EPOCH INTERVIEW ��
A no-subscription-required link to my Epoch Times interview tonight
Jeff Childers
25 min ago

After noticing some questions about access in the comments, I made a few inquiries and was able to obtain a “free” link to my American Thought Leaders interview tonight on Epoch TV. They told me this link does not require a subscription for viewing, and said it was okay to share it with anyone you think might need to, or want to, see it.

PREMIERING 7:30PM ET: Attorney Jeff Childers on How He Won Against Mask and Vaccine Mandates, and Inspired Other Lawyers to Do the Same

https://www.theepochtimes.com/attorn...n=JeffChilders

Hope it works and is helpful.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._2080x1124.png

_______________________


Dachsie request: Sunday, October 8, 2022

It sure would be awful nice if someone who is a paid member of Epoch TV and when they start watching this show this evening to copy and paste the full URL into a reply post in this thread so we all can watch the full live video too.

Hoping and thanking you kind soul in advance.
___________________

https://www.theepochtimes.com/attorn...e-btn-copylink

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/c-a...m_source=email

 *THE C&C ARMY POST* 

殺 But first! I’ll be appearing on Epoch TV tonight, in a terrific one-on-one interview on “American Thought Leaders.” They did a fantastic job, and you guys will just love the subject matter. It ties in nicely with today’s epic post.

This is a preview clip only.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/attorn...e-btn-copylink

I’ll admit that I’m a little self-conscious about it because that was the first interview where they plastered make-up on me. Ugh. I’m pretty enough, at least Michelle thinks so.

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/chan...dures-469a8014

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...r9P1_wzy.g--~D

Changes in Red Cross Blood Screening Procedures

Simay B
Squad Leader at Diverse Articulation | Evidence-based Science Journalism
Oct. 7, 2022, 10:00 a.m.
Journalist Article

Changes in the medical screening practices of the Red Cross for blood donor eligibility have been observed. The questionnaires now include the record of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. The medication deferral list includes the experimental vaccines as they may affect a person’s eligibility to donate blood. When the pandemic began in 2020, the Red Cross began testing blood donors for COVID-19 antibodies but they have completely stopped the procedure and now focus on vaccines.

A person who would like to donate blood to the Red Cross needs to read and answer a list of questions to find out if they are eligible. The Red Cross assures the public that donors who received COVID-19 shots can still give blood as long as they are symptom-free and feeling well at the time of donation. However, under the eligibility guidelines applied to vaccine recipients, a donor needs to provide the name of the manufacturer of the vaccine received to determine the deferral time to be implemented.
A Need for a Greater Blood Supply

Challenges in the blood supply were already present even before the emergence of COVID-19. The pandemic brought about a crisis for blood services as the spread of infection caused cancellations of blood drives. In 2022, the number of weekly cases has continued to decrease, and local governments have started to loosen public health restrictions. The worst part of the pandemic appears to have passed, but crises in the blood supply have not ended.

The concern about blood availability is not due to increased demand for transfusion, but because of the decline in supply due to reduced donations. As a result of the unprecedented blood supply shortage, hospitals are forced to delay or reschedule surgeries. To prevent these problems, the Red Cross continues to encourage the public to donate blood.
COVID-19 Vaccine and Blood Donation

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted an emergency use authorization (EUA) to Pfizer-BioNTech on December 11, 2020. Since then, different varieties of vaccines have been developed against COVID-19 such as messenger RNA (mRNA), vector vaccine, and protein subunit vaccine. As of October 1, 2022, about 68% of the world’s population has received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.

With the majority of the population receiving jabs, the screening process for blood now includes the donors’ vaccination status. As part of the Red Cross screening process, the blood donor is asked a series of personal questions to ensure that it is safe for patients to receive their blood and that it is safe for the donor to give blood on the appointed day.

On March 17, 2020, Gail McGovern, president and chief executive officer of the American Red Cross reassured the public that “blood donation is a safe process, and that we have put additional precautions in place at our drive drives.”
Eligibility Guidelines Concerning COVID Shots

Ten organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), FDA, and Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB), released various recommendations on the deferral periods for blood donors who had received COVID-19 vaccine. The deferral periods range from zero to 28 days, depending on whether the donor received a live or inactivated vaccine.

Among these organizations, the Red Cross follows the eligibility guidelines set by the FDA. Updated information for blood establishments regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and blood donation was released by the FDA on January 11, 2022. It suggests that individuals who received a nonreplicating, inactivated, or mRNA-based vaccine can give blood without a waiting period, and there’s a short waiting period (e.g., 14 days) for donors who received a live-attenuated shot. As a response to these requirements, the Red Cross released the COVID-19 Vaccine & Booster Blood Donation Guide for Donors where the donor is expected to report the name of the vaccine manufacturer during the screening process.
Concerns for the Blood Recipients

There are significant differences in the public’s acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines, and this has also affected the acceptance of blood transfusions from COVID-19 vaccinated donors. Some patients refuse blood transfusions and demand physicians to disclose details of the donor, including whether the donor received a COVID-19 vaccine.

As reported in TrialSite, there are concerns about why vaccinated individuals are allowed to donate blood within two weeks after receiving the shot if the spike proteins circulate in the body for up to a month after mRNA vaccination. A study by the Stanford University Department of Pathology revealed that the blood of Pfizer vaccine recipients contains at least as much spike protein as unvaccinated individuals who were infected by the virus.

The Australian Red Cross advises donors to wait three days after receiving each jab before donating blood, plasma, or platelets regardless of the type of vaccine received because of the possible side effects such as mild fever.
Antibody Testing for Blood Donors

In the early period of the pandemic, the Red Cross tested all blood, platelet, and plasma donations for COVID-19 antibodies. The result helped inform the donors whether they have been exposed to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS Cov-2), the virus that carries COVID-19.

The antibody test was authorized by the FDA and helped indicate if the donor’s immune system had produced antibodies to the coronavirus, regardless of the development of symptoms. It was implemented for a limited time from June 15 – 30, 2020. They discontinued the program when infection rates decreased and new treatment options became available.

A positive result from the antibody test does not confirm infection or immunity, as it only indicates potential exposure to the virus.
Are We Repeating History?

Blood transfusion is one of the most frequently performed medical procedures, yet this practice has historically been mired in controversy such as when African-Americans were banned from donating blood during World War II. This was followed by a lifetime ban on blood donations on men who had sex with men (MSM) during the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the 1980s. During the mid-twentieth century, the U.S. National Blood Program encouraged blood donation and ensured that gender, race, and sexuality would not influence the transfusion process.

Practices in blood donation have improved, but the societal views of it remain controversial. The issues surrounding COVID-19 vaccines have led some patients to get worried about becoming infected with COVID-19 or developing long-term effects from the vaccine itself.

According to the AABB, there is no evidence that donated blood from COVID-19-vaccinated donors may pose a risk to recipients. It recognizes the importance of protecting blood donors and the blood supply by maintaining donor anonymity. Data privacy is also acknowledged by numerous organizations, as they consider it to be crucial in maintaining the relationship between volunteer blood donors and blood transfusion services.
COVID-19
Vaccines


_________

Dachsie comment:

I submitted a comment on this article but it is in review and I am not sure it will be published so I will share it with you here.

dachsie In review
Oct. 8, 2022, 12:16 p.m.

Everything about SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 and any and all of the COVID vaccines has been secret and emergency-use and experimental and liability shielded. We the people wisely no longer trust and have confidence in anything related to blood transfusions of blood donated by anyone based on any of the screening policies revealed in this article.

Anyone can see all the "holes" in these policies, even if there were no inaccuracies or manipulations in the data and no "mistakes" in their implementation.

Revelation 6:8
and
Revelation 9:15

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/c-a...m_source=email

Jeff Childers Substack newsletter October 8, 2022

Excerpt:

Related to lawsuit by Pam Popper's legal team. Dachsie thinks this is the same lawsuit Thomas Renz is involved in and that I posted about a few posts back. I think that posting included a link to the actual legal document, located on Thomas Renz website.

____


�� Yesterday, anti-vaccine activist Pam Popper announced that her lawyers successfully served Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance with a new “mass torts” lawsuit. http://drpampopper.com/about-pam/

Link: https://rumble.com/v1mwcg6-the-big-a...g-to-make.html (The lawsuit news starts at 2:25.)

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...c_1600x666.png

Popper said the lawsuit alleges that Daszak and EcoHealth are responsible for infecting people with an engineered virus, covid-19, and many people died. Imagine that. The lawsuit also sues 100 “John Does,” or as-yet-unidentified co-defendants who can be added later depending on what comes out of discovery.

It’s genius! This is the very first covid liability lawsuit that I am actually excited about. This one has a LOT of potential that previous lawsuits lacked, for several reasons.

First, Daszak and EcoHealth are not protected by the PREP Act or any other covid liability shield. They are alleged to have made a VIRUS, not a vaccine. Haha, there’s no liability protection for making viruses. So this lawsuit won’t have to navigate all legal landmines blocking lawsuits against agencies and pharma companies.

Second, even though I’ve not seen the actual complaint yet, I can easily imagine what it alleges. It will almost certainly survive the initial hurdle of dismissal, which means … discovery. Imagine, for a moment, how little a deep-state cockroach like Daszak will enjoy the excruciating scrutiny of producing under court order records, emails, and text messages that he never in a million years thought would ever see daylight.

Not to mention his deposition. How I long to attend that delightful interview.

Third, Daszak was almost certainly in close contact with top NIH scientists and bureaucrats, maybe intelligence agents, many of whom we do not yet know about. Assuming it plays out like I expect, we’re about to learn some new names, because the discovery will inevitably lead down the rabbit hole of all Daszak’s contacts and connections to government.

I would not be surprised if Daszak suddenly claims he is a paid government employee entitled to various protections, and claims that his communications and documents are classified government secrets. Wouldn’t that be something.

Let us not forget the Chinese. I think we might be on the verge of finally finding out EXACTLY why the NIH was using a Chinese lab to evade Obama-era bans on gain-of-function research. I’ll bet you a beagle puppy that none of the millions of relevant communications with U.S. health officials will include the statement, “Peter, be SURE you aren’t doing any gain of function research over there.”

I’d stake my life on it.

Fourth, and not even finally, the cover-ups will almost certainly be relevant in discovery. So the coordinated effort to bury the “lab leak” hypothesis will also be fair game in the lawsuit. Which means depositions of Fauci, Collins, and the rest of their devil’s gallery. The reason it’s relevant is simple; as I have told you many times, evidence of an attempt to conceal something provides a valid inference of consciousness of guilt.

Which makes the cover-up relevant evidence.

I could go on. But the takeaway for this morning is: this is the most important pandemic lawsuit filed to date, bar none. It probably couldn’t have been successfully filed any earlier than now. But now, the amount of evidence already available in the public record will put Popper’s lawyers on solid ground.

Popper’s team might need a multiplier. I’ll find out.

Dachsie comment:
There are apparently 3 or 4 different videos of Dr. McCullough that he discusses in this video that took place right before and it is speculation as which exact one video is the one that caused his suspension. Any video, is a good candidate and there are different "bombshell" data points mentioned variously among the videos. Naming of a specific video that triggered the suspension action by Twitter is speculation because we do not have that information.

Here is a Substack posting by Seve Kirsh of today, October 8, 2022, that relates to Dr. McCullough important recent videos.

I do not know the exact date of the Twitter suspension action but that would have to determine the "Dr. Peter McCullough's last tweet".

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/t...m_source=email

Excerpted video from that posting is included below.

This one gives important information, especially beginning around 13:19 onward.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...N_4Q70RN6Q--~D

https://rumble.com/v1n1066-the-video...m_medium=email

https://rumble.com/v1n1066-the-video...m_medium=email
Allison Royal
Published October 7, 2022 7,895 Views

21:46 video runtime

_______________

Dachsie comment - Part 2:

What Dr. McCullough stated in my early video of his of today in posting #3933, that I thought was extremely important was the
exact nature of SARS-VoV-2 . He provided important data points that shows that SARS-CoV-2 was CREATED in a laboratory. I believe that is an important contradiction to the official narrative that was provided to the public in late 2019 or early 2020.

"In late 2019, a new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was
identified in Wuhan, China. The virus, which causes
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), has contributed to
significant morbidity (illness) and mortality (death), as well
as severe public health and economic effects, among other
impacts.
In other words this contradicts the official narrative that SARS-CoV-2.

" In late 2019, a new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was
identified in Wuhan, China. The virus, which causes
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), has contributed to
significant morbidity (illness) and mortality (death), as well
as severe public health and economic effects, among other
impacts. "
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/if/if11822

https://crsreports.congress.gov
Updated June 11, 2021

_________

The original "official narrative about the pandemic" told us this SARS CoV-2 virus was

"zoonotic." a zoonotic disease (i.e.,
one that originated in animals) that mutated along with other coronaviruses over the hundreds of years.

"Mutation and adaptation have driven the co-evolution of coronaviruses (CoVs) and their hosts, including human beings, for thousands of years."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32226286/

This departure from the official narrative about SARS-CoV-2 meets my definition of "bombshell."
_________________

https://www.theepochtimes.com/attorn...n=JeffChilders

Am watching attorney Jeff Childers right now and his revelations are so helpful to those of us who want to understand attorneys/ our legal community and government.

Dachsie,
Out of curiosity, just wondering if you have a job? It seems like every time I come on to GIM , there are about 20 post from you. How do you find the time ? I usually don’t read a lot of what you post as most of the articles are from well known paid opposition types, . People like Rick Wiles have been around for a long time. I use to be into him and others like Linsey Williams. I started writing down all their predictions, or in Wiles case “visions” and none of them ever came true. I came to the conclusion that all they are doing is “ look at my left hand “ and getting your attention off of what the right hand is doing.
Have you ever read the book, “Come Out Of Her My People”? Now that is something that will open your eyes!
https://isr-messianic.org/publicatio...my-people.html

They also sell the Scriptures where they have replaced the Father and Sons name with the original Hebrew text writing.
https://isr-messianic.org/publicatio...criptures.html
It’s a lot easier to understand who did what or who was who!

no, i don''t have a job. I worked for 30 years and now I just occupy myself with posting all kinds of articles about coronavirus and religion articles. Was a long time patriot- false flag events follower even while I was still working.
Used to read a lot of books and listen to patriot radio shows but can only read articles on the computer now where I can magnify the print because of eye problems.

https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/justi...m_source=email

Tom’s Newsletter

Justice - Accountability is Coming for All Things COVID

Tom Renz

October 8, 2022

[IMG]woman in gold dress holding sword figurine[/IMG]
Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash

In my last article I asked what would be done about the creation of SARS-COV2. That article (read here) focused on political and public aspects of the question. I have and will continue to offer - for free - my assistance to any elected official that credibly wants to fight this but here am going to answer my own question on the private side of things. The answer to who and what will be done about the death and carnage released on the people of the world is that we the people will do things like this: Renz Files Lawsuit on the Creation of SARS-COV2, and we will keep doing it until there is real accountability.

Let me begin this by telling you a bit about the case. First, please understand that this is a real lawsuit and so it must be treated with respect. My ability to comment on it is limited and it is far too important for us to fail to be careful. That said, we have filed this case in a state court in New York and it lists a handful of defendants that we allege were responsible for creating the disease that has, according to the WHO, killed over 6.5 million people globally. We also list “John and Jane Doe” because it may well be that as the case progresses there will be other “necessary defendants” that we will add to the lawsuit.

Within the complaint we discuss the creation of the disease and the injuries it created in our plaintiffs. We then talk about the legal mechanisms (counts) by which we are basing the case. Even though we have not really publicized this much yet, I am already getting a lot of questions. I am glad the case is resonating and hope people keep asking. While I cannot answer most of the questions because it would disclose legal strategy, I can tell you that I have been working on this case for months and we have a TON of reasons for everything we did. No one knows what will happen when you file a suit like this but my team (thank you MAFA, Patty, and others) and I have done EVERYTHING we could to research every detail and ensure there are no holes in the larger litigation strategy.

In terms of the accountability, please know that this is only the first step. On a personal level I do not know that I will ever fully recover from the hundreds or thousands of people I spoke to, begging for help, that ended up dying or losing loved ones because I simply could not make more time in the day. For my part, this simply cannot end until there is accountability for all involved and I have many more things I’m working on to ensure it. With that said, please understand that I am one person, with a small team, very limited funding, and cannot make more time in the day so this will not happen tomorrow. I pray frequently for strength to continue the fight and that God keeps me from deviating from the path (I would be honored by prayers from anyone reading this that is inclined to provide them).

At the end of the day, the crime that was and is COVID-19 will be revealed. We will win this fight and there will be accountability. There will be accountability for the disease, the hospital murders, the jabs, the lockdowns, and everything else and we will do everything we can to ensure that EVERY single person that profited from this crime against humanity pays the price.

I end this article with this: for all of you that have made the trillions of dollars off of the death and carnage that is COVID in ANY sort of corrupt way, know this, it may not be today, it may not be tomorrow, but we the people are coming for you. We will not deviate from our peaceful path towards accountability and you WILL be held accountable. So enjoy your ill-gotten wealth for today but make sure you NEVER stop looking over your shoulders because the millions dead demand accountability and whether from me or my betters, you will pay.

Please share and support our work. This post is public and we want everyone to see it.

Share

Donate Subscriptions

255 likes
29 Comments

Amy thompson
Writes Amy’s Newsletter
22 hr ago

Prayer To Saint Michael, St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle. Be our protection against the wickedness and snares of the devil. May God rebuke him we humbly pray; and do thou, O Prince of the Heavenly host, by the power of God, cast into hell Satan and all the evil spirits who prowl about the world seeking the ruin of souls. Amen
40ReplyCollapse
1 reply

EXTREMELY concerned
21 hr ago

I just became a paid subscriber to your newsletter-- thank you for your unbelievable courage and hard work. You're a total hero. ��
24ReplyCollapse
1 reply
27 more comments…
Fauci is Now Performing Gain-of-Function on the Spanish Flu
This will be short because it really does not need much comment. In fact, this is so absurd that I am just starting with the reference document because…
Tom Renz
Aug 19
217
19
Jabs - the Secret Weapon Against Trump 2024
I am going to premise this article with the fact that this is based on my analysis. Obviously, I cannot prove what will happen in the next two years…
Tom Renz

The Creation of SARS-COV2 & What Will Be Done About It
A little over a week ago we released a report that provided nearly indisputable evidence that SARS-COV2 was created in a laboratory in Wuhan, China in…
Tom Renz
Oct 2
240
23
See all
Ready for more?
© 2022 Tom Renz
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack
Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOOOvTeqq3s&t=0s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOOOvTeqq3s&t=0s

Watch Senator Paul clashing with Dr Fauci TODAY on Capitol Hill
6:39 video runtime

Dr. Suneel Dhand
272K subscribers
Video of today’s testimony on Capitol Hill, courtesy of C-Span. What are your thoughts on this?

This is a link to the pdf file for the new October 2022 Covid mRNA vaccine guidelines by the Florida Health Department. I highlighted and copied and pasted the text below but there is no formatting.

https://www.floridahealth.gov/_docum...accines.pr.pdf

Friday, October 7, 2022

__________

Friday, October 7, 2022
STATE SURGEON GENERAL DR. JOSEPH A.
LADAPO ISSUES NEW MRNA COVID-19
VACCINE GUIDANCE
Contact:
Communications Office
NewsMedia@flhealth.gov,
850-245-4111

Tallahassee, Fla.— Today, State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo has announced new
guidance regarding mRNA vaccines. The Florida Department of Health (Department) conducted an
analysis through a self-controlled case series, which is a technique originally developed to evaluate
vaccine safety.
This analysis found that there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death
among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination. With a high level of global
immunity to COVID-19, the benefit of vaccination is likely outweighed by this abnormally high risk of
cardiac-related death among men in this age group. Non-mRNA vaccines were not found to have
these increased risks.
As such, the State Surgeon General recommends against males aged 18 to 39 from receiving
mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Those with preexisting cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and
pericarditis, should take particular caution when making this decision.
“Studying the safety and efficacy of any medications, including vaccines, is an important component
of public health,” said Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. “Far less attention has been paid to
safety and the concerns of many individuals have been dismissed – these are important findings that
should be communicated to Floridians.”
The analysis can be found here. The guidance can be found here.
About the Florida Department of Health
The Florida Department of Health, nationally accredited by the Public Health Accreditation
Board, works to protect, promote and improve the health of all people in Florida through
integrated state, county and community efforts.
Follow us on Twitter at @HealthyFla and on Facebook. For more information about the Florida
Department of Health please visit www.FloridaHealth.gov.
STATE SURGEON GENERAL DR. JOSEPH A.
LADAPO ISSUES NEW MRNA COVID-19
VACCINE GUIDANCE
Contact:
Communications Office
NewsMedia@flhealth.gov,
850-245-4111

Friday, October 7, 2022
STATE SURGEON GENERAL DR. JOSEPH A.
LADAPO ISSUES NEW MRNA COVID-19
VACCINE GUIDANCE
Contact:
Communications Office
NewsMedia@flhealth.gov,
850-245-4111

https://www.americaoutloud.com/gover...nduced-deaths/

Government Agencies Play Many Games to Hide Vaccine-Induced Deaths

by Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn | Oct 9, 2022 | Health, Politics

https://www.americaoutloud.com/wp-co...CDC-health.png

The COVID pandemic has two new forms, in addition to continuing preventable deaths from viral infection – nearly 3,000 a week in the US. One is increasing levels of long COVID that does not kill, but ruin quality of life. I have already published articles on this. Here I explore the second new manifestation, namely excess deaths not due to infection but resulting from vaccines. How are vaccines killing large numbers of people? In brief, vaccines ruin immune systems and damage blood. So people are dying from various ailments and diseases, including cardiac problems.

Government agencies have played many games to hide vaccine-induced excess deaths.

A large medical literature continues to evolve on these excess deaths, meaning death rates in 2021 and 2022 are significantly above rates prior to the pandemic. And many studies have linked vaccines to these high excess death rates. Below I cite several sources where details have been published. Though it takes time, reading these sources will enlighten you about vaccine-induced deaths.

Mathew Crawford, a great analyst, said: “that vaccine deaths were seemingly classified as COVID-19 deaths, [and] my estimation of the death toll quickly grew. Now I personally suspect that over 100,000 Americans have been killed by the experimental vaccines. Others I know think the number may be as large as a quarter of a million.” Based on my extensive reading I think the latter is likely.

Single best review article;

From the introduction:

“Official all-cause mortality statistics that get released to the public are often delayed 6-12 months after year end, and even then they can be designated interim – subject to change. So if you want to identify a spike in deaths within a population how would you get an early warning signal?

Boots-on-the-ground organizations notice up ticks and spikes in sales or staffing numbers. When this happens in industries that deal with deaths, alarm bells should be going off, especially when these deaths are in healthy working age groups, children and near births, and where COVID-19 has not been attributed to their death!

Some whistleblowers have been speaking out about anomalies in their work space since mid 2021, but when in late 2021 the data came out from an insurance company that they had experienced a 40% increase in life insurance payouts in the working age group in 2021, equivalent to 4 times a 200 year catastrophic event, that got Wall Street’s attention.

The unprecedented death numbers were not COVID-19, but happened to coincide with the timing of the roll-out of the experimental, brand new technology, emergency use COVID-19 vaccines. The catastrophic effect of the draconian “mitigation” rules imposed on the healthy population of the world had already been in place for a year, it may be a contributing factor, but doesn’t necessarily explain the timing. And if that was the explanation, then the “cure” is excessively worse than the burden of the disease.

Using other means to identify excess mortality

Particular industries that work with death statistics, there is both anecdotal information, and hard statistics, that expose alarming death numbers, which sadly is now showing up in little children, and expected to get worse.

Life Insurance companies
Funeral directors
Embalmers
Coffin manufacturers and suppliers
Florists – baby wreath demand
Airline pilots
Military database
Disability data

Below I try to focus on links to Excess Mortality information. Visit other posts on this site to find out the types of vaccine adverse events that can lead to death – blood clotting and heart inflammation seem to be highest on the list.

Sudden deaths and deaths of unknown causes will be captured on another page coming soon.

Also check out these pages for more information:

Insurance companies, Death & Disability payouts – Edward Dowd – HERE
Embalmer whistleblowers – HERE
Funeral Director – John O’Looney – HERE
Information on Pilots and the Jab – HERE
Miscarriage and Infertility – HERE”

The rest of the article presents many excellent sources of excess death information.

Here are two figures of many in the article that tell the story:

https://www.americaoutloud.com/wp-co...2d_768x450.jpg


https://www.americaoutloud.com/wp-co...bb_768x421.jpg

Great analysis by Igor Chudov: “PROVEN RELATIONSHIP: COVID Boosters and Excess Mortality in 2022.”

He used data from a large number of countries. For the above graph showing booster correlation this was noted: “It shows that booster uptake was extremely strongly (and positively) related to excess mortality, with P value being 0.0002. Mind you, anything with P below 0.05 is considered statistically significant — so P=0.0002 is ironclad.

Since most of my readers are not statisticians, let me explain. The graph above means that the more boosters are taken, the greater was excess mortality for the countries in the graph. The P=0.0002 means that this association is extremely unlikely to be a random coincidence.

More boosters — more deaths!”

Excellent analysis by Daniel Horowitz

“If you just take the data from VAERS and the EudraVigilance system of the European Medicines Agency, there were a total of 76,253 dead and 6,033,218 injured, as of mid-July. That in itself is mind-blowing, but if you adjust for an underreporting factor of 41, that would total nearly 1.9 million deaths and 247 million injuries! Amazingly, yet sickeningly, 247 million injuries would equal 4.6% of all the people jabbed on this third rock from the sun – nearly exactly the extrapolated rate of injury from the German medical billing data!”

Results of national US poll

“More than twice as many Americans have lost a household member to a Covid vaccine injury as have lost one to Covid.

That’s the shocking finding of a new poll of 1,500 Americans carried out by the polling company Pollfish.

While 3.6% of respondents said someone in their household had died from COVID-19, 7.9% said one had died as a result of Covid vaccination.”

“The people polled were a randomly selected, representative sample of the U.S. public, of whom 74.3% were vaccinated, so the sample was not inherently biased towards or against the reporting of vaccine problems, though as in all opinion polls there may be an issue of self-selection bias.”

Analysis by Steve Kirsch:

“Executive Summary

Many people assumed the vaccine kills you quickly (in the first two weeks) because that’s when people notice the association and report it to VAERS. This is still true; it does kill some people quickly: half of the deaths reported in VAERS are in the first few weeks.

But the key words are “reported in VAERS.” It turns out that if we don’t have that restriction but are just wondering when most of the deaths after COVID vaccination happen, the answer is different.

Thanks to a helper who works at HHS, we can now clearly see that most of the deaths from the vaccine are happening an average of 5 months from the last dose. That is for the second dose; it may be getting shorter the more shots you get but there are arguments both ways (since there can be survivor bias). Using data from the UK, we can see more clearly that the delay time is around 23 weeks (so a bit more than 5 weeks). We’ll dive into that shortly.

This delay explains why the life insurance companies got off-the-charts all-cause mortality peaks for people under 60 in Q3 and Q4 rather than right after the shots rolled out.

The five month delay is also consistent with death reports where people are developing new aggressive cancers that are killing them over a 4 to 6 month period.

The 5 month death delay was also confirmed using only European data. That analysis was posted Aug 11, but I learned about it after I wrote this post.

So when you hear of a death from stroke, cardiac arrest, heart attack, cancer, and suicide that is happening around 5 months after vaccination, it could very well be a vaccine-related death.”

Conclusion

In the US and worldwide, many people who obeyed public health agencies and got COVID vaccine shots are dying from them. This is how the pandemic lives on by killing people from the supposed “solution” to COVID. And authorities are still pushing vaccines. This is tragic.

Also tragic is that most excess deaths are for relatively young people, considered working age, not the elderly. Finally, this is what CDC says: “Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare.”

Keep in mind that the pandemic could have been better addressed by strongly pushing use of high dose vitamin D and even nasal saline sprays. COVID vaccines were always a terrible strategy but a huge money-maker for Big Pharma.

______

Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn

Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn, author of Pandemic Blunder and many articles and podcasts on the pandemic, worked on health issues for decades, and his Pandemic Blunder Newsletter is on Substack. As a full professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, he directed a medical research program between the colleges of engineering and medicine.

Dr. Hirschhorn worked on public policy for the US Congress for many years. As a senior official at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and the National Governors Association, he directed major studies on health-related subjects; he testified at over 50 US Senate and House hearings and authored hundreds of articles and op-ed articles in major newspapers. He has served as an executive volunteer at a major hospital for more than 10 years. He is a member of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and America’s Frontline Doctors.

New VAERS Data as of Sept.30, 2022 (posted Oct.7, 2022)

34,055 Total Deaths

and 1,527,700 Total Adverse Events

31,332 Pfizer/Moderna and 2,723 J&J Deaths

1,432,505 Pfizer / Moderna and 95,195 J&J Adverse Events

Source: https://drtenpenny.com/newsletter10/#vaers

Excerpt from

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...CnTA_Yzjcg--~D

☕️ C&C NEWS ☙ Monday, October 10, 2022 ☙ BELLE’S PALSY ��
Jeff Childers
2 hr ago October 10, 2022


�� Last Thursday, CBS ran a long-overdue story headlined, “CDC Ends Daily Reporting of Covid Case and Death Data, in Shift to Weekly Updates.” Finally!

The massive health bureaucracy explained the shift would “allow for additional reporting flexibility, reduce the reporting burden on states and jurisdictions, and maximize surveillance resources.” Sounds good. The new guidance states that from October 20th, state and local health departments will now only need to report new covid cases and deaths to the agency every week, on Wednesdays.

I thought it was good news, but Twitter covid experts were “furious:”
Twitter avatar for @DrJoanieTool
Dr. Joanie Tool @DrJoanieTool
@DataDrivenMD MAKES ME SO FURIOUS. RIGHTVAS ALL SIGNS POINT TO A BUG SURGE AND THOUSANDS STILL DYING EVERY WEEK IN US. Furious at CDC. This will take lives.
8:01 PM ∙ Oct 9, 2022
Twitter avatar for @JenAnsbach
Jennifer Ansbach @JenAnsbach
@DataDrivenMD They don't care if we die. They don't care if more people are disabled by this. They don't care if kids have to live with knowing that they gave a virus to a family member and it killed them or disabled them.
9:54 PM ∙ Oct 9, 2022

I don’t know. Maybe these fearful folks should be more a smidge more concerned about the risk of global thermonuclear war, rather than fretting about getting their daily updates on a bad cold that has a ton of available treatments at this point?

Just asking. Don’t cancel me.

____________________

Dachsie comment:

However, Dachsie can't say "sounds good" about the veracity of the CDC's stated reasons for the change in policy. This story about CDC only reporting their garbage data once a week rather than the previous daily reporting. And I agree with there is a hierarchy of news stories that are above this matter in importance, that is, if we want to worry about something or anything.

I disagree with the stated "reasons" for the CDC change of reporting policy.

The CDC's stated reasons for the change are...

the shift would

“allow for additional reporting flexibility,

reduce the reporting burden on states and jurisdictions,

and maximize surveillance resources.”

Now, don't we know by now that that is buraucratese speak, or what I call DragonSpeak.

The CDC does not and cannot tell the real reasons for anything, any little thing.

Here are some suggested real reasons for this change.

It gives the CDC more time to mess around with the data.

It gives a lag time or delay in possible having to put out some very grim looking data.

It delays some COVID PLANdemic sleuths' picking up on the subtleties of what the data portends and gives solid talking / pouncing points for counter-attack in the media.

Dachsie has gained strong suspicion of anything in medicine that is "peer reviewed" and totally "data driven."

Dachsie comment:

You should be able to access any of the articles listed below by going to and copy and looking for title of story you are interested in

https://www.trialsitenews.com/

or by signing up for their free emails with individual links in these daily news stories.

No way to view this daily email in my browser.

(P S wonder if TrialSiteNews is Church of Latter Day Saints operation since they are based in Salt Lake City, Utah? Just wonderin'.)




Daily Digest

Unbiased news & analysis from trial sites around the globe.
Observational Study: COVID-19 Vaccines Reduce Long COVID Risks for Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases
By trialsitenews on 09/10/2022


Read in browser »

Is the XBB SARS-CoV-2 Mutant Behind Singapore’s Emerging Surge in COVID-19 Cases?
By trialsitenews on 09/10/2022


Read in browser »

UCSF-Led Study Reveals Vaccination & Boosters Significantly Reduce COVID-19 Risk for Severe Illness
By trialsitenews on 09/10/2022


Read in browser »

COVID-19 Pandemic Over? Doesn’t Appear So in Europe as New COVID-19 Cases & Hospitalization Surge
By trialsitenews on 09/10/2022


Read in browser »

American Emergency Care Infrastructure Reveals Rising Strain
By trialsitenews on 09/10/2022


Read in browser »

First Time Released to the Public: PrePrint Study Reveals Shocking Truth of 1954 Poliomyelitis Vaccine Field Trial Results
By dr_ron_brown on 09/10/2022


Read in browser »

Arkansas Prison Inmates Claim They Were Given Ivermectin to Treat Covid Without Consent. ACLU Pushes Lawsuit Onward
By amazer31 on 09/10/2022


Read in browser »

Subscribe to our YouTube
100,000 subscribers and growing
Subscribe
Copyright © 2022 TrialSite News, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted in via our website.

Our mailing address is:
TrialSite News
307 W 200 S Ste 5002
Salt Lake City, UT 84101-1268

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/c-a...m_source=email

Excerpt from

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...CnTA_Yzjcg--~D

☕️ C&C NEWS ☙ Monday, October 10, 2022 ☙ BELLE’S PALSY ��
Jeff Childers
9 hr ago October 10, 2020


Then yesterday, Twitter jailed as “misinformation” Friday’s tweet by Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, wherein he announced Florida’s new guidance advising against vaccination for males under 40, citing drastically high rates of cardiac death following the jabs.
Twitter avatar for @disclosetv
Disclose.tv @disclosetv
JUST IN - Twitter has removed a tweet from Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo about mRNA vaccines for violating the platform's rules.
Image
1:58 PM ∙ Oct 9, 2022
28,185Likes10,249Retweets

You can imagine what people were saying. Ladapo is a STATE OFFICIAL. His agency’s guidance is OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION. Who is Twitter to decide that official government information is MISinformation? Who died and made Twitter king?

Apparently Florida asked twitter to explain themselves. Then — whoops! sorry! — by the end of the day yesterday, without explanation, Twitter un-jailed Dr. Ladapo’s official tweet:
Twitter avatar for @kylamb8
Kyle Lamb @kylamb8
For a time today, @TwitterSafety decided they knew health guidance better than the Surgeon General of the third largest state in the country, and had removed this tweet warning 18-39 year old males of potential dangers to mRNA vaccines being seen in data.

The tweet is back.
Twitter avatar for @FLSurgeonGen
Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD @FLSurgeonGen
Today, we released an analysis on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines the public needs to be aware of. This analysis showed an increased risk of cardiac-related death among men 18-39. FL will not be silent on the truth.

Guidance: https://t.co/DcWZLoMU5E
Press Release: https://t.co/Y0r9yepi7F
3:55 PM ∙ Oct 9, 2022
1,335Likes373Retweets

Twitter really needs to get its act together. What the heck.

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...f8c6cb0738.png

Florida Surgeon General: 84% increase in cardiac-related deaths in vaxxed men aged 18-39

The Covid mRNA vaccines have caused a massive increase in cardiac-related deaths among men aged 18 to 39, Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo said on Friday.

The evaluation found that “there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination.”

_____

Dachsie comment:

Could it be that they want to kill off our men of military fighting force age?

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-...tm_source=push


The Quarantine of Health Populations

By Aaron Kheriaty October 11, 2022 History, Public Health 14 minute read


A few weeks ago I had the pleasure of speaking at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles alongside my friend and colleague, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. A month prior, we had also lectured together also at a conference in Rome (which, alas, was not recorded). Fortunately, the LA talks were—link below.

When the COVID-19 pandemic began, Dr. Bhattacharya turned his attention to the epidemiology of the virus and the effects of lockdown policies. He was one of three co-authors—along with Martin Kulldorff of Stanford and Sunetra Gupta of Oxford—of the Great Barrington Declaration. Many more lives would have been saved, and much misery avoided, had we followed the time-tested public health principles laid out in this document. Jay is professor of health policy at Stanford and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. He earned his M.D. and Ph.D. in economics at Stanford.

In recognition of his consequential research focusing on the economics of health care around the world with a particular emphasis on the health and well-being of vulnerable populations, Loyola Marymount University presented him with the 16th Doshi Bridgebuilder Award on September. Named for benefactors Navin and Pratima Doshi, the award is given annually to individuals or organizations dedicated to fostering understanding between cultures, peoples and disciplines.

Upon receipt of the award, Jay gave a lecture exploring “The Economic and Human Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Policy Responses.” I was invited to give a twenty-minute commentary following Jay’s lecture. You can find both talks here (after a long introduction, Jay’s lecture starts at 27:50 and my remarks start at 1:18:30):

I don’t have a transcript of Jay’s talk, but for those who prefer to read rather than watch or listen, here is a longer version of my remarks:

From the lepers in the Old Testament to the Plague of Justinian in Ancient Rome to the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic, covid represents the first time ever in the history of managing pandemics that we quarantined healthy populations. While the ancients did not understand the mechanisms of infectious disease—they knew nothing of viruses and bacteria—they nevertheless figured out many ways to mitigate the spread of contagion during epidemics. These time-tested measures ranged from isolating the symptomatic to enlisting those with natural immunity, who had recovered from the illness, to care for the sick.[i]

Lockdowns were never part of conventional public health measures. In 1968, an estimated one to four million people died in the H2N3 influenza pandemic; businesses and schools stayed open and large events were never cancelled. Until 2020 we had not previously locked down entire populations. We did not do this before because it does not work; and it inflicts enormous collateral damage (as we just heard from my colleague Dr. Bhattacharya).

When Drs. Fauci and Birx, leading the U.S. President’s coronavirus task force, decided in February 2020 that lockdowns were the way to go, the New York Timeswas tasked with explaining this approach to Americans. On February 27, the Timespublished a podcast, which began with science reporter Donald McNeil explaining that civil rights had to be suspended if we were going to stop the spread of covid. The following day, the Times published McNeil’s article, “To Take On the Coronavirus, Go Medieval on It.”[ii]

The article did not give enough credit to Medieval society, which sometimes locked the gates of walled cities or closed borders during epidemics, but never ordered people to stay in their homes, never stopped people from plying their trade, and never isolated asymptomatic individuals. No, Mr. McNeil, lockdowns were not a Medieval throwback but a wholly modern invention. In March of 2020, lockdowns were an entirely de novo experiment, untested on human populations.

Alexis De Tocqueville warned us that democracy contains built-in vulnerabilities that can lead democratic nations to deteriorate into despotism. New levels of political irresponsibility in Europe and America came when we took an authoritarian communist state as the model for managing a pandemic. Recall that China was the birthplace of lockdowns. The first state-ordered lockdown occurred in Wuhan and other Chinese cities.

The Chinese Communist Party advertised that they had stamped out the virus in the regions where they had locked down. This was utterly false advertising, but the WHO and most nations bought it. The U.S. and U.K. followed Italy’s lockdown, which had followed China, and all but a handful of countries around the globe followed our lead. Within weeks the whole world was locked down.

It’s hard to overstate the novelty and folly of what happened worldwide in March of 2020. We were introduced not just to a new and previously untested method of infection control. More than this, we embraced a new paradigm for society—one that had been decades in the making, but that would have been impossible just a few years prior. What descended upon us was not just a novel virus but a novel mode of social organization and control—what I call the biomedical security state, the “New Abnormal”

The term “lockdown” originated not in medicine or public health but the penal system. Prisons go into lockdown to restore order and security when prisoners riot. In situations where the most tightly controlled and surveilled environment on the planet erupts into dangerous chaos, order is restored by asserting swift and complete control of the entire prison population by force. Only strictly surveilled confinement can keep the dangerous and unruly population in check. Prisoners cannot be permitted to riot; inmates cannot run the asylum.

Changes ushered during lockdowns were signs of a broader social and political experiment, “in which a new paradigm of governance over people and things is at play,” in the words of Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben.[iii] This new biosecurity paradigm began to emerge twenty years earlier in the wake of the terrorist attacks in the U.S. on September 11, 2001.

Biomedical security was previously a marginal part of political life and international relations but assumed a central place in political strategies and calculations after these attacks. Already in 2005, for example, the WHO grossly over-predicted that the bird flu (avian influenza) would kill two to fifty million people. To prevent this impending disaster, the WHO made recommendations that no nation was prepared to accept at the time, which included the proposal of population-wide lockdowns.

Even earlier, in 2001, Richard Hatchett, a CIA member who served on George W. Bush’s National Security Council, was already recommending obligatory confinement of the entire population in response to biological threats. Dr. Hatchett now directs the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), an influential entity coordinating global vaccine investment in close collaboration with the pharmaceutical industry, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Like many other public health officials, today Hatchett regards the fight against Covid-19 as a “war,” on the analogy to the war on terror.[iv]

Although lockdowns and other biosecurity proposals were circulating by 2005, mainstream public health did not embrace the biosecurity model until covid. Donald Henderson, who died in 2016, was a giant in the field of epidemiology and public health. He was also a man whose prophetic warnings in 2006 we chose to ignore in 2020. Dr. Henderson directed the ten-year international effort from 1967–1977 that successfully eradicated smallpox, then served 20 years as Dean of Public Health at Johns Hopkins. Toward the end of his career, Henderson worked on national programs for public health preparedness and response following biological attacks and national disasters.

In 2006, Henderson and his colleagues published a landmark paper.[v] This article reviewed what was known about the effectiveness and practical feasibility of a range of actions that might be taken in response to a respiratory virus pandemic. This included a review of proposed biosecurity measures—later utilized for the first time during covid—including “large scale or home quarantine of people believed to have been exposed, travel restrictions, prohibitions of social gatherings, school closures, maintaining personal distance, and the use of masks”. Even assuming an infection fatality rate of 2.5%, roughly equal to the 1918 Spanish flu but far higher than the IFR for covid, Henderson and his colleagues nevertheless concluded that all these mitigation measures would do far more harm than good.

Henderson and his colleagues concluded their review by endorsing this traditional principle of good public health: “Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted.” Quite obviously, we did not heed any of this advice in March of 2020. We instead forged ahead with lockdowns, masks, school closures, social distancing, and the rest. When faced with covid, we rejected time-tested principles of public health and embraced instead the untested biosecurity model.

According to the biosecurity paradigm, a kind of overbearing medical terror was deemed necessary to deal with worst-case scenarios, whether for naturally occurring pandemics or biological weapons. Drawing on the work of French historian of medicine Patrick Zylberman, we can summarize the characteristics of the emerging biosecurity model, in which the political recommendations had three basic characteristics:

measures were formulated based on possible risk in a hypothetical scenario, with data presented to promote behavior permitting management of an extreme situation;
“worst case” logic was adopted as a key element of political rationality;
a systematic organization of the entire body of citizens was required to reinforce adhesion to the institutions of government as much as possible.

The intended result was a sort of super civic spirit, with imposed obligations presented as demonstrations of altruism. Under such control, citizens no longer have a right to health safety; instead, health is imposed on them as a legal obligation (biosecurity).[vi]

This precisely describes the pandemic strategy we adopted in 2020.

Lockdowns were formulated based on discredited worst-case-scenario modeling from the Imperial College London.
This failed model predicted 2.2 million immediate deaths in the U.S.
Consequently, the entire body of citizens, as a manifestation of civic spirit, gave up freedoms and rights that were not relinquished even by the citizens of London during the bombing of the city in World War II (London adopted curfews but never locked down).

The new imposition of health as a legal obligation—biomedical security—was accepted with little resistance. Even now, for many citizens it seems not to matter that these impositions failed to deliver the public health outcomes that were promised.

The full significance of what transpired in 2020 may have escaped our attention. Perhaps without realizing it, we lived through the design and implementation of not just a novel pandemic strategy but a new political paradigm. This system is far more effective at controlling populations than anything previously attempted by Western nations. Under this novel biosecurity model, “the total cessation of every form of political activity and social relationship [became] the ultimate act of civic participation.”[vii]Quite the contradiction.

Neither the pre-war Fascist government in Italy nor the Communist nations of the Eastern Bloc ever dreamed of implementing such restrictions. Social distancing became a political model, the new paradigm for social interactions, “with a digital matrix replacing human interaction, which by definition from now on will be regarded as fundamentally suspicious and politically ‘contagious’.”[viii]

It is instructive to reflect on the chosen term, social distancing, which is not a medical term but a political one. A medical or scientific paradigm would have deployed a term like physical distancing or personal distancing, but not socialdistancing. The word social communicates that this is a new model for organizing society, one that limits human interactions by six feet of space and masks that cover the face—our locus of interpersonal connection and communication. The six-foot distancing rule was supposedly premised on the spread of covid through respiratory droplets, though the practice continued even after it became clear that it spread through aerosolized mechanisms.

Actual contagion risk depended on the total time spent in a room with an infected person and was mitigated by opening windows and other methods of improved ventilation, not by staying six feet apart. Plastic protective barriers erected everywhere actually increased the risk of viral spread by impeding good ventilation. We had already been psychologically primed for over a decade to accept pseudo-scientific practices of social distancing by using digital devices to limit human interactions.

The myth of asymptomatic viral spread was another key element in our adoption of the biosecurity paradigm. Asymptomatic spread was not a driver of the pandemic, as research confirmed.[ix] Given that no respiratory virus in history has been known to spread asymptomatically, this should not have surprised anyone. But the media ran with the hypothetical asymptomatic threat story. The specter of people with no symptoms being potentially dangerous—which never had any scientific basis—turned every fellow citizen into a possible threat to one’s existence.

Notice the complete reversal that this effected in our thinking about health and illness. In the past, a person was assumed to be healthy until proven sick. If one missed work for a prolonged period, one needed a note from a doctor establishing an illness. During covid, the criteria was turned upside-down: we began to assume that people were sick until proven healthy. One needed a negative covid test to return to work.

It would be hard to devise a better method than the widespread myth of asymptomatic spread, combined with the practice of confining the healthy, to destroy the fabric of society and to divide us. People who are afraid of everyone, who are locked down, who are isolated for months behind screens, are easier to control. A society grounded on “social distancing” is a manifest contradiction—it’s a kind of anti-society.

Consider what happened to us—consider the human and spiritual goods we sacrificed to preserve bare life at all costs: friendships, holidays with family, work, visiting and providing the sacraments to the sick and dying, worshipping God, burying the dead. Physical human presence was confined to the enclosure of domestic walls, and even that was discouraged: in the U.S. state governors and our president attempted to prohibit or at least strongly discouraged family holiday gatherings.

In those dizzying days of 2020, we lived through the swift and sustained abolition of public spaces and the squeezing even of private ones. Ordinary human contact—our most basic human need, was redefined as contagion—a threat to our existence.

We already knew that social isolation could kill. Loneliness and social fragmentation were endemic in the West even prior to the coronavirus pandemic. As Nobel Prize winning Princeton researchers Ann Case and Angus Deaton had demonstrated, these factors were contributing to rising rates of deaths of despair—death by suicide, drugs, and alcohol related illnesses. Deaths of despair rose dramatically during lockdowns, which poured gasoline on that fire.

Since the 1980s, reported loneliness among adults in the U.S. increased from 20 percent to 40 percent even before the pandemic. Loneliness is associated with increased risk of heart disease, stroke, premature death, and violence. It affects health in ways comparable to smoking or obesity, increasing a whole host of health risks and decreasing life expectancy. It is no accident that one of the most severe punishments we inflict on prisoners is solitary confinement—a condition that eventually leads to sensory disintegration and psychosis. As we hear on the first pages of Sacred Scripture, “it is not good for man to be alone.” But with the acquiescence of the Church, during lockdowns we embraced and actively promoted what philosopher Hannah Arendt called “organized loneliness,” a social state she identified as a precondition for totalitarianism in her seminal book, The Origins of Totalitarianism.[x]

Consider for example the “Alone Together” public service announcement produced for the U.S. government in March of 2020.[xi] The ad read, “Staying home saves lives. Whether you have Covid-19 or not, stay home! We’re in this together. #AloneTogether.” The very conjunction of these two words, a manifest contradiction, is enough to demonstrate the absurdity. Besides not actually saving lives, being told that we were fulfilling a social duty by being alone did not mitigate any of the adverse consequences of loneliness. A hashtag where we could be “alone together” on screens was no remedy.

Lockdowns were the first and decisive step in our embrace of the biomedical security state. This continued with forced vaccinations & discriminatory vaccine passports, mandated for novel products with minimal safety and efficacy testing.

The resultant carnage—some of which Dr. Bhattacharya has summarized—was not, as many news reports misleadingly suggested, collateral damage inflicted by coronavirus. No, this was collateral damage inflicted by our policy response to the coronavirus. Unless we learn from these policy failures we will be doomed to repeat them.

[i] Harper, K. The Fate of Rome: Climate, disease, and the End of an Empire. Princeton University Press, 2019.

[ii] McNeil, D. “To Take On the Coronavirus, Go Medieval on It ,” New York Times, February 28, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/28/s...uarantine.html

[iii] Agamben, G. (2021). “Biosecurity and Politics.” Strategic Culture.

[iv] Escobar, P. (2021). “How Biosecurity Is Enabling Digital Neo-Feudalism.” Strategic Culture.

[v] Inglesby, T; Henderson, D.A.; et al., “Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic Influenza,” Control of Pandemic Influenza,” Biosecurity and Terrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 2006;4(4):366-75. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2006.4.366. PMID: 17238820

[vi] Agamben, G. (2021). “Biosecurity and Politics.” Strategic Culture.

[vii] Ibid.

[viii] Escobar, P. (2021). “How Biosecurity Is Enabling Digital Neo-Feudalism.” Strategic Culture.

[ix] Madewell ZJ, Yang Y, Longini IM Jr, Halloran ME, Dean NE. “Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” JAMA Network Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031756. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31756. PMID: 33315116; PMCID: PMC7737089.

Cao, S., Gan, Y., Wang, C. et al. “Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China.” Nature Communications 11, 5917 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19802-w

[x] Arendt, H. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New Ed. with Added Prefaces, New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1973, p. 478.

[xi] “Covid-19 PSA – Alone Together – Youtube,” May 24, 2020:

Reprinted from the author’s Substack
Author

Aaron Kheriaty

https://brownstone.org/articles/covi...tm_source=push

Covid Fraud: A Staggering $600 Billion

https://brownstone.org/wp-content/up...36-800x469.jpg

By James Bovard October 11, 2022

[SIZE=3]COVID fraud is at this point a redundant phrase. Congress appropriated more than $5 trillion for COVID relief but almost $600 billion may have been lost to fraud — an astounding 12%. Washington’s pandemic pratfalls are the greatest federal boondoggle of this century.

Prosecutors are having a turkey shoot nailing COVID crooks: More than 1,500 have been indicted and almost 500 have been convicted. On September 14, the Justice Department announced the creation of three COVID-19 fraud strike force teams.

When President Biden recently signed a law to extend the time to prosecute COVID fraud, he declared, “My message to those cheats out there is this: You can’t hide. We’re going to find you.” But the sheer amount of fraud makes it unlikely that the vast majority of thieves will be charged.

Policymakers acted as if waiving standard federal fraud protections would somehow thwart the COVID virus. On September 22, the Labor Department inspector general estimated that COVID-19 unemployment fraud amounted to $45 billion and could exceed $163 billion.

“Overseas organized crime groups flooded state unemployment systems with bogus online claims, overwhelming antiquated computer software benefits in blunt-force attacks that siphoned out millions of dollars,” NBC News reported.

Prison inmates, drug gangs and Nigerian racketeers easily plundered the program. One swindler collected unemployment benefits from 29 different states. In the first year of the pandemic, Maryland detected more than 1.3 million fraudulent unemployment claims — equal to 20% of the state’s population

Beginning in June 2020, the feds distributed $813 billion in Paycheck Protection Program loans to businesses. President Donald Trump’s Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin boasted that PPP is “supporting an estimated 50 million jobs.” But many of those jobs existed solely in the imagination of political appointees.

The Small Business Administration (SBA), which administered the program, effectively told people, “Apply and sign and tell us that you’re really entitled to the money,” according to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz. The SBA camouflaged its “don’t ask, don’t tell” loan standard by claiming to perform economic miracles. The SBA ludicrously boasted that PPP loans saved more jobs than the total number of employees in at least 15 industries.

Yet CBS News found that PPP loans had gone to more than a thousand “ghost businesses” in Markham, Illinois — indicative of a nationwide problem of deluging non-existent companies with federal cash. The feds gave “loans to 342 people who said their name was ‘N/A,’” the New York Times reported.

Fraud permeated relief programs of practically every federal agency that gushered money. On September 20, the feds charged 47 people in Minnesota with looting $250 million from the federal child nutrition programs’ COVID aid. Prosecutors denounced the “brazen scheme of staggering proportions” but federal and state bureaucrats should have stopped the pilfering from the start. “Feeding Our Future,” a nonprofit organization, pocketed $300,000 in subsidies in 2018 and a windfall of almost $200 million in 2021. Fraud snowballed because the US Department of Agriculture issued waivers to “suspend all on-site monitoring of providers” of children’s meals.

Instead of feeding hungry kids, tax dollars were pilfered using a list of phony recipients generated by the website listofrandomnames.com. (No wonder Feeding Our Future wasn’t invited to attend Biden’s White House Summit on Hunger last week.) When the state of Minnesota sought to cut off funding, Feeding Our Future sued, claiming the action “discriminated against a nonprofit that worked with racial minorities,” the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported. Leftist firebrand Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) received thousands of dollars in donations from individuals indicted in the scandal.

Fighting fraud is tricky for federal investigators when some politicians openly used COVID stimulus money to bribe voters. In the January 2021 Georgia runoff race for US Senate, the campaign of Democratic candidate Raphael Warnock distributed fliers declaring, “Want a $2,000 Check? Vote Warnock.” That promise helped Warnock win, sealing Democratic control of the Senate and opening the floodgates for trillions of dollars of additional Biden administration spending.

The single biggest COVID fraud will never show up in triumphal press releases issued by federal prosecutors. On August 24, Biden invoked the COVID-19 emergency to justify canceling $400 billion in student loans. A few weeks ago, Biden told “60 Minutes” that the pandemic was over — thus invalidating his justification for loan forgiveness.

But Team Biden signaled that it was entitled to spend hundreds of billions of tax dollars to purchase Democratic votes in the midterm congressional elections regardless of the president’s admission.

Plenty of scoundrels will be convicted in the coming months for stealing COVID money. But it was the politicians of both parties who unleashed the reckless spending that left us with a soaring national debt, roaring inflation, and a fading mirage of prosperity.

Americans should never permit politicians to absolve themselves by uncorking geysers of tax dollars.

Reposted with author permission from NYPost[/SIZE]

https://www.americaoutloud.com/big-p...ty-violations/

Big Pharma Insiders Reveal Shocking Insight on Vaccine Safety Violations


Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP, GLP, GCP, GDP) standards and pharmacovigilance oversight have been flagrantly ignored by the SARS-CoV-2 injection manufacturers, and FDA, EMA, and MHRA have waved the evil jabs through to the public, which is horrifying. The catastrophic death and disability happening to people around the world after receiving the COVID shots is directly related to US, European, and other countries’ regulators completely abdicating their safety and quality oversight function and duty to the public.

Truth for Health Foundation Whistleblower Report team reveals shocking information from BIG Pharma career insiders that are urgent for the public to understand – the information you take time to read NOW may save your life! The latest publication by Alexandra Latypova on Trial Site News exposes several staggering conclusions about safety violations that apply in particular to the largest scale “production” batches.

> Not a single vial tested had ingredients or doses that conformed to labeling requirements.

> Some vials contained NO mRNA, and others contained massive doses far exceeding stated amounts…is this a cause of “sudden death” soon after vaccination?

> 10,000 % variability in potency.

> Frozen vaccines delivered to vaccination centers in the UNFINISHED state, which means “finishing” procedures had to be carried out on sites that were not equipped to do safely and properly.

Based on documents received from FOIA requests, the implausible scale of Pfizer mRNA manufacturing shows lot size shipments in the United States of up to 12 million doses, which means 900 liters of product per batch! Experts in manufacturing and distribution conclude that Pfizer is either combining batches, diluting to an unprecedented degree, relabeling older products, or something even more fraudulent since there is no way with current production capacity to reach that scale of production and maintain reliable safety or quality.

Whistleblowers conclude that the criminal enterprises involved with these experimental mRNA shots don’t seem to care what people get injected with, and are knowingly and intentionally lying. With these new revelations, it is unsurprising that these COVID shots have been ineffective in preventing COVID illness in those who received them. As one said, “Dose to dose lack of conformity is terrible at any time, but with an experimental product like this, it is at the nastiest end of pharma abuses.”

The even more ominous concern is the severe injuries and skyrocketing deaths seen worldwide in all age groups after the COVID shots. Doctors are still trying to determine how this occurs and why there is such individual variability in how damage occurs in people. Partial explanations may lie in the over 10,000% variability in potency among the vials tested.

And then there is this stunning revelation from pharma insider, Hedley Rees from the UK: “Over a period of 40 years, Big Pharma has outsourced every physical activity it possibly could, until it has lost its ability to develop new drugs—drug development, manufacture, and distribution is now in the hands of third party organisations.”

In his INSIDE PHARMA article, Mr. Rees explains: THE ONE THING BIG PHARMA CAN’T OUTSOURCE—CULPABILITY. This extract is key: “Outsourcing manufacture can work so long as the development process and control are in the hands of the developer and the developer allows detailed instructions and specifications to be handed down to contractors and suppliers.”

Hedley goes on to give examples of the outsourcing of critical phases of drug and vaccine development, manufacturing, research, and distribution:

Contract Development and Manufacturing Organisations (CDMOs). Examples include Lonza, Catalent Pharma Solutions, and Oxford BioMedica (AZ vaccine).
Contract Research Organisations (CROs): Examples include IQVIA, Parexel, and ICON (CRO to Pfizer, appointed Ventavia as site management organisation where whistleblower Brook Jackson worked).
Wholesale distributors. Examples include McKesson, Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen.

Another key point is the frozen vaccines (Pfizer/c) are a gross breach of GMP, see INSIDE PHARMA: DIY FROZEN JABS BROKE PHARMACEUTICAL LAW

Their analysis of the dangerous and potentially life-threatening violations of safety and quality oversight in the development, manufacturing and distribution of these mRNA gene therapy shots, and other pharmaceutical products, is a critical wake up call to ALL Americans that we must hold our tax-payer funded regulatory agencies accountable for their gross failures to protect an unsuspecting public.

Listen to the podcast with the following Whistleblowers below entitled:

FDA’s Catastrophic Safety and Quality Oversight Failures on COVID Vaccines

Adding credibility to the shocking revelations from our Whistleblowers is their extensive backgrounds as Pharma insiders:

Alexandra Latypova has a career in research, toxicology, analysis, and research design. She is a former pharmaceutical research and development executive who co-founded and managed several contract research organizations in pharmaceutical clinical trials. She worked for sixty major pharmaceutical clients, including Pfizer. These pharmaceutical clients were her research and development partner. The area of her focus has been safety assessments, what was done in the Covid shots, especially what Pfizer tried to cover up. She looks at not only the safety assessments but regulatory compliance and has interacted with the FDA and worked on FDA and Industry consortiums who are putting together the approaches proper approaches to clinical trials. Follow her research and publications on www.trialsitenews.com.

Hedley Rees, based in the United Kingdom. Mr. Rees has been providing consultancy on the development, manufacture and distribution of drugs that are fully compliant with the GMP requirements of 21 CFR Title 21, since 2005 through his company, PharmaFlow. Prior to that, he spent 16 years in senior roles in Big Pharma (Bayer) and 10 years in biotech (British Biotech, Vernalis and OSI Pharmaceuticals (now Astellas). Mr. Rees also authored Supply Chain Management in the Drug Industry: Delivering Patient Value for Pharmaceuticals and Biologics for Wiley, NJ in 2011. His expertise is in the area of anything to do with manufacture through the three phases of clinical trials (and preclinical if required) and ongoing distribution of the commercial supply. Follow Hedley Rees on his Substack column, INSIDE PHARMA, where he shares all he can to expose the lies and deceptions that are costing lives and jeopardizing public safety. Watch his interview here.

Janci C. Lindsay, PhD., Toxicologist, Molecular Biologist. Director of Toxicology and Molecular Biology, Toxicology Support Services, LLC. Dr. Lindsay is a Toxicologist and Molecular Biologist with over 30 years of scientific research experience. She regularly consults as an expert witness in legal matters relating to the toxicity of chemicals, biologics and particulates as well as consults on biologic mechanism of action pathways in varying cancers and lung disease. She regularly researchers and warns about the potential for acute and long-term reproductive toxicity of these shots and is known for her early and public warnings to the CDC ACIP committee that these shots could “sterilize an entire generation”.

Michael Yeadon, PhD, Former Pfizer Chief Scientist Worldwide, Respiratory Pharmacology and product development. Dr. Mike Yeadon is now one of the few senior pharma executives speaking out about the dangers of the experimental COVID shots. Dr. Yeadon has a thirty-year career in research and development and product development. He has been a courageous Whistleblower since fall of 2020 warning about the damage to pregnancy development with the spike protein similarity to critical placental proteins needed to establish and maintain pregnancy. He is Chief Scientific Advisor to Truth for Health Foundation and has testified as an expert in vaccine damage in international, UK and US courts.

DrLee4America
DrLee4America

Elizabeth Lee Vliet MD is President and CEO of Truth for Health Foundation, a 501(c)(3) public charity (www.TruthForHealth.org) advocating for early COVID home-based treatment


by DrLee4America | Oct 11, 2022

Election Wizard ����
@ElectionWiz
WATCH — Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo: "If it had been known two years ago or so, that this vaccine would increase cardiac deaths in young men by 84%, would they have approved it? The obvious answer is no."
go to twitter to watch embedded video with this tweet
https://twitter.com/i/status/1579653043897139201

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...cbGu.2_qbA--~D

Dachsie comment:

Dr. Ladapo thinks logically and assumes the best about the FDA , the NIH and the CDC.

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/u...m_source=email

University Medical Students Must Take Oath To Fight ‘White Supremacy and Gender Binary’

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...2_678x381.jpeg

Planet Today
Oct 10, 2022

Updating daily: Daily updates on UFO sightings, conspiracies, political, geopolitical, medicine and everything crazy and weird. (Planet-Today)

University Medical Students Must Take Oath To Fight ‘White Supremacy and Gender Binary’

Planet Today
Oct 11




SAVE


University Medical Students Must Take Oath To Fight ‘White Supremacy and Gender Binary’



Medical students at the University of Minnesota must now take an oath to “honor all Indigenous ways of healing that have been historically marginalized by Western medicine” and fight “white supremacy, colonialism, [and] the gender binary.”

Share Planet Today

The University of Minnesota Medical School (UMMS) class of 2026 recited an oath during the white coat ceremony that included pledges to dedicate their careers to activist causes including anti-racism, climate advocacy, and the LGBTQ+ agenda.

A handout provided at the ceremony indicated the oath was written by the oath writing committee, which is comprised of 15 medical students enrolled in the class.

Students began the woke oath by chanting, “Our institution is located on Dakota land…We commit to uprooting the legacy and perpetuation of structural violence deeply embedded within the health care system.”

“We recognize the inequities built by past and present traumas rooted in white supremacy, colonialism, the gender binary, ableism, and all other forms of oppression,” the oath continued.

Medical students at the University of Minnesota must now take an oath to "honor all Indigenous ways of healing that have been historically marginalized by Western medicine" and fight "white supremacy, colonialism, [and] the gender binary." pic.twitter.com/DSiQz9BUx8

— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) October 9, 2022

Here’s the program from University of Minnesota’s white coat ceremony for the incoming class. You’ll notice that the closing is from the “Vice Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” Ana Núñez who—wait for it—specializes in “gender medicine.” pic.twitter.com/jwibk6KTiD

— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) October 9, 2022

Campus Reform report: UMMS Media Relations Manager Kat Dodge said that “[i]t is a common practice at medical schools in the United States to build upon the intent of the Hippocratic Oath to promote humility, integrity, and beneficence.”

“Each year at the University of Minnesota Medical School, the incoming students work with faculty to write an oath that reflects these core elements, values, and ethics the class aspires to uphold,” Dodge explained.

The medical students pledged “to honor all Indigenous ways of healing” that are “historically marginalized by Western medicine.”

UMMS students also committed to climate advocacy stating, “health is intimately connected to our environment, we commit to healing our planet and communities.”

“In light of [the white coats’ Heal] legacy as a symbol of power, prestige, and dominance, we strive to reclaim their identity as a symbol of responsibility, humility, and loving-kindness,” the oath concluded.

______________
Dachsie comment:
Sorry to veer from the topic a bit, but not much.
SOFT Kill OATH for present and future doctors and present and future hospitals. The state of Oregon abandoned the Hippocratic Oath a long time ago and Oregon doctors and hospitals murder with loving-kindness, aka legal euthanasia or valid informed consent or valid Do Not Resusitate DNR forms)

No state funding to go to any of these medical universities and no federal funding should go to any of these states and universities.

One suggestion for we the people -- nevermind.

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/b...m_source=email

BREAKING: Pfizer Director Admits Vaccine was Never Tested on Preventing Transmission

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...2560x1393.jpeg
During EU Hearing Contrary to What was Previously Advertised (VIDEO)
Planet Today
1 hr ago
BREAKING: Pfizer Director Admits Vaccine was Never Tested on Preventing Transmission During EU Hearing Contrary to What was Previously Advertised (VIDEO)


During the COVID-19 EU hearing, Pfizer’s president of international developed markets, Janine Small, admitted that the vaccine had never been tested on its ability to prevent transmission, contrary to what was previously advertised.

Share Planet Today

Robert “Rob” Roos, a politician from the Netherlands who is also a member of the European Parliament, exposed the lie that people from all over the world had been led to believe.

“If you don’t get vaccinated, you’re antisocial. This is what the Dutch prime minister and health minister told us. You don’t get vaccinated just for yourself, but also for others. You do it for all of society, that’s what they said. Today, this turned out to be complete nonsense. ” Roos said in his viral bombshell video posted on Twitter.

“In a COVID hearing in the European Parliament, one of the Pfizer directors just admitted to me at the time of introduction, the vaccine had never been tested on stopping the transmission of the virus,” Roos said.

In one of the most atrocious crimes against humanity, all the government officials worked together with big pharma to deceive the general public into taking the COVID shot.

They lied to us. They coerced millions of people into being vaccinated on the lie of preventing transmission.

“This removed the entire legal basis for the covert passport. The COVID passport that led to massive institutional discrimination as people lost access to essential parts of society. I find this to be shocking, even criminal,” Roos added.

During the hearing, when asked by Ross if the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market, Janine Small responded while smiling:

“Regarding the question around did we know about stopping immunization before it entered the market? No. We have to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market.”

Watch the video below:

�� BREAKING:

In COVID hearing, #Pfizer director admits: #vaccine was never tested on preventing transmission.

"Get vaccinated for others" was always a lie.

The only purpose of the #COVID passport: forcing people to get vaccinated.

The world needs to know. Share this video! ⤵️ pic.twitter.com/su1WqgB4dO

— Rob Roos MEP ���� (@Rob_Roos) October 11, 2022

Remember when the globalists and elites told us to take the vaccine to stop the transmission? This is scandalous.

Watch the video below:

https://youtu.be/hp9xhOYlrEA video url

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=hp9xhOYlrEA&feature=emb_lo go

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ature=emb_logo

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/inje...ystem-1ed1a4cd

Injecting Children with the mRNA COVID Gene Injection or Any of the COVID Injections Can be Very Damaging to Their Developing Innate Immune System


Paul Alexander, PhD
Evidence-based medicine researcher, a professor university at The UNITY Project, C19 collaborator, consultant
Oct. 10, 2022, 8:00 a.m.

Before I unfold this offering, a critical point must be tabled. This is that we have underestimated the evolutionary biology and the dynamics at play between the COVID virus (coronavirus, respiratory virus) and the resulting immune response from the population, either via natural infection or vaccine. Those making decisions have disregarded the evolutionary capacity of the virus to adapt and evolve due to the population immune pressure (mounting). This is especially if the immune response is sub-optimal and immature with immune fixation and priming (prejudice) that has induced vaccinal antibodies that do not neutralize the antigen (in this case, Wuhan vaccine spike antibodies facing omicron BA.5 spike/clade). This interplay and dance between virus and host immune system should have been the cardinal issue on day one, for today, we are faced with infectious variant after infectious variant due to the non-sterilizing, non-neutralizing vaccine (vaccinal antibodies) that do not stop infection or transmission, placing the spike and binding domains under massive Darwinian selection pressure to select for the more ‘fitter’ infectious variants. The danger is that we can drive the emergence of a more virulent lethal sub-variant clade.

The COVID pandemic would have been over, yet it is continuing to expand due to the use of the existing non-neutralizing COVID injections that do not stop infection, replication, or transmission, and in fact, drive emergence of infectious sub-variants (and a potentially virulent/lethal one). The Omicron virus (sub-variants) is largely resistant to the potentially neutralizing and non-neutralizing antigen-specific, vaccine induced antibodies (Abs).

First, this COVID gene injection must be stopped! It has failed and is ineffective and harmful. There is no other way for me to say it other than it must be stopped. The vaccine is driving massive infectious pressure and keeping the virus circulating. Ultimately, vaccinated persons are becoming infected and spreading the virus. It is that simple and ominous. Very early on I wrote a review in Brownstone showing that there was no difference between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated and that the vaccine was failing.

Omicron is the latest variant (and it’s subvariants/clades) since the initial Wuhan legacy strain (some estimates are that the initial emergence could be sometime late 2018 and early to mid-2019) and has evolved into a mild ‘common cold’ sub-variant (BA.4 & BA.5) that one can argue could become (or already is) endemic and circulate seasonally as a common cold like coronavirus (e.g., OC43 and 229E common cold coronaviruses.) However, the high specificity and largely resistant, vaccinal Abs are placing the spike glyco-protein (binding sites such as the receptor binding domain and the N-terminal domain) of the SARS-CoV-2 virus under sub-optimal immune pressure. This pressure on the spike is causing the selection (via Darwinian natural selection) of more infectious (evolutionary fittest) variants that could overcome the pressure with viral immune escape (antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (ADEI) as well as antibody-dependent enhancement of disease (ADED) and original antigenic sin (whereby there is immune fixation or immune locking or priming or prejudicing based on the initial prime or exposure).

The result is that those who are vaccinated are at enhanced risk of infection (due to infection-enhancing vaccinal antibodies), and those who are not vaccinated have benefitted from infection-mediated training of innate cell-mediated immunity (the training, education, and instructing of the innate immunity and the critical role of the innate antibodies in this training). This training is based on massive infectious pressure. Theoretically, this pandemic can continue for many years if the use of these sub-optimal non-neutralizing gene injections is not stopped. Infectious variant after infection variant will emerge, and a potentially infectious variant that is more virulent and severe will result.

i)Liu et al. “An infectivity-enhancing site on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein targeted by antibodies”
ii)Fantini & Yahi et al. “Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination?

While there was some protection of the upper respiratory airways in the pre-Omicron era, with the exiting (dominant) Omicron sub-variants (BA.4 & BA.5) that are largely resistant to vaccinal neutralizing antibodies, the vaccinated persons have become more susceptible to infection, and we are witnessing more virulent variants becoming dominant (Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5). “Neutralization experiments revealed that the immunity induced by BA.1 and BA.2 infections is less effective against BA.4/5. Cell culture experiments showed that BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5 replicate more efficiently in human alveolar epithelial cells than BA.2, and particularly, BA.4/5 is more fusogenic than BA.2.” Importantly, virulence-neutralizing antibodies (Abs) (these are the same as those enhancing/facilitating infection at the upper respiratory tract) still protect against severe disease in the vaccinated person (e.g., in the case of BA.1 and BA.2) in the lower respiratory tract. However, it is very likely that with the growing resistance of BA.4 and BA.5 clades to the virulence-neutralizing Abs, then vaccinated persons will quickly become more susceptible to virulence. This is a major concern.

Widespread asymptomatic transmission in highly vaccinated nations and the subsequent rise in infectious pressure (due to circulating virus in the midst of the pandemic) is causing infection-mediated immunity in certain subsets of the population to no longer suffice to prevent productive infection. As a result, we are seeing a rise in the global spread of a number of acute, self-limiting microbial infections (e.g., ‘seasonal’ flu, RSV but also vaccine-preventable viral and bacterial infections in countries that interrupted their childhood vax program due to Covid crisis) and also of some acute, self-limiting viral diseases (e.g., monkeypox, potentially pandemic [avian H5N1] flu). In addition, depletion (and immune exhaustion) of cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells due to repetitive cycles of re-infection has also led to an increased recurrence/reactivation rate of chronic infections (e.g., herpetic diseases, CMV, EBV, CMV, HIV, tuberculosis etc.) and relapse or metastasis of certain cancers in vaccinees.
What are we saying about these COVID injections (mass vaccination) for children?

A rapid mass vaccination campaign that utilizes a sub-optimal, antigen-specific non-neutralizing vaccine (such as the COVID vaccines) across all age groups in the pandemic (in the midst of an active pandemic of a highly mutable and highly infectious respiratory virus with high infectious pressure) can only generate a continued series of dominating new variants that are increasingly infectious, increasingly vaccine-resistant (due to “immune escape”), and inevitably more virulent (potentially lethal). In short, the mass vaccination campaign that has been implemented during the COVID pandemic can potentially keep the pandemic going for many years with the potential of more virulent sub-variants emerging.

Importantly, children bring statistical zero risk of severe illness or death from this COVID virus, and this was the same across near 3 years. The data is stable. In the US, as well as in Sweden and Germany, no healthy child has died from COVID due to being infected, in nearly 3 years. Not one! This is the data the media will not tell you. The immune system of children needs to be educated and trained for life-long optimal functionality. The vaccine implementation will damage and subvert the initiation of education and instruction of the innate immune system in children (the first line of immunological defense). It is critical that you as parents understand this.

Parents must understand that when the COVID injection is given to young children, this (the vaccinal antibodies that are induced due to the vaccine) prevents the child’s innate antibodies from eliminating the virus confronted with now, and prevents the active training and teaching of the innate immune effector cells on how to recognize (glycosylated) viruses and distinguish them from “self” antigens (i.e., distinguish between “self” and “non-self.”). There is a critical window of training for any immune system to learn at an early stage of life (once passive maternal immune protection is no longer available e.g., at about 4 to 6 months post birth) to provide for a healthy and appropriate immune response, immediate and life-long. This interference with the initiating foundational education of a child’s developing innate immune system can cause a COVID-vaccinated child to be less capable of handling glycosylated viruses (and glycosylated pathogens in general, as well as a range of pathogen). This predisposes such children to immune pathology (e.g., autoimmune disease).

I end by appealing to parents that under no condition, do you vaccinate your healthy child with these non-neutralizing COVID injections since your child brings near zero risk to the table, and the vaccine has failed and is ineffective. It also skews to harm. Thus, please do not inject your healthy child with these COVID gene injections. Dr. Francis Collins, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Walensky, no one, no NIH, FDA, CDC or NIAID or PHAC or Health Canada or SAGE official or government official has made the case as to why your healthy child is to be vaccinated with these failed, harmful COVID gene injections. Not one! Do not do it!

__________

Dachsie comment:

Same song, second verse. Nevertheless, a life-or-death important message.

IF these COVID injections being offered for the Coronavirus and the COVID 19 disease are indeed "failed, harmful gene injections", why are they not officially contraindicated or advised against for ALL human beings, young or old, healthy or not healthy?

To read any of the articles listed below, click on HERE to get links to each article.

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3


Exclusive: Healthy Police Officer Contemplated Suicide After Pfizer Booster Injuries

Men Under 40 at High Risk of Cardiac-Related Death After mRNA COVID Vaccines, Florida Analysis Shows

Even Kaiser Admits It — Your Risk of Getting COVID Increases With Each Shot


Government’s ‘Privatized Censorship Regime’ Violates First Amendment, Legal Expert Says


How to Prepare for the Coming Water Wars


GMO Purple Tomatoes Just Moved One Step Closer to Grocery Shelves — Should You Buy Them?


We Can Win This ... But Only If We Step Up Our Game. Donate Today!

Antiviral Purchased by U.K. Government Does Not Lower Risk of Hospital Admission, Trial Shows + More


Amazon ‘Suicide Kits’ Led to Teen Deaths, According to New Lawsuit + More

Dachsie comment:

I posted a few days ago on this but here is the original video on this.
I think the expression is...

This is rich!

_______________________

https://www.bitchute.com/video/TXX0acEIUPcc/

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...cc_320x180.jpg

Pfizer director admits vaccine was untested at time of introduction - FULL RESPONSE

2:27 video runtime

Banned Youtube Videos

specializedtom

38699 subscribers



Here is the full response to the question posed to the Pfizer director. As you will see, it not only doesn't change the context of the answer in the previous video, she also incriminates Dr. Bourla (the CEO of Pfizer) in her statement.
Category Health & Medical

______________

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.c...m_source=email

Oct 12, 2022

So all that blather about "doing it for others," and getting "vaccinated" as "an act of love," was just one more Big Lie. Now, will "our free press" report this, or keep lying?

Mark Crispin Miller


______________________

https://twitter.com/Rob_Roos/status/1579759795225198593

Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Rob Roos MEP ����
@Rob_Roos
�� BREAKING:

In COVID hearing, #Pfizer director admits: #vaccine was never tested on preventing transmission.

"Get vaccinated for others" was always a lie.

The only purpose of the #COVID passport: forcing people to get vaccinated.

The world needs to know. Share this video!

2:01 embedded video runtime (same as Bitchute vdeo above)
https://twitter.com/i/status/1579759795225198593