Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Question and Answer Forum
Updated May 4, 2010
Most Recent Question: We met in the summer of 2005 when you brought William Rodriquez [9-11 survivor from the World Trade Center] to speak at the Schaumburg Library [Illinois]. You mention in your notice to Eric Hufschmid that you categorize him with Mike Piper and Darrel Bradford Smith – why? You also referred to Victor Thorn who seems to have lifted some of your ideas about Zionist involvement in 9/11. Are Piper and Smith disinformation agents?
I have Piper's Final Judgment. I think your research is impeccable and felt badly when you "left" AFP. Your online 9/11 book is amazing. I hope that you and your family are happy and secure. I have noted that people who divulge too much truth, like Sterling, Peggy Seagrave, and yourself receive similar treatment and have to flee.
Bollyn Responds: This is a good question about a subject that I don't usually delve into, but which certainly deserves to be discussed because it concerns the role of the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) as the source of much of the deception and evil that afflicts our world today.
The people you ask about: Hufschmid, Piper, Smith, and Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn), are four detractors who have spent years attacking me and waging a vicious campaign of slander and libel against me and my family. What these agents of deception have done is spread lies and calumnies about me, my wife and children in an effort to discredit me and damage my credibility and reputation. Smith revealed how this vicious slander campaign works in a taped telephone conversation with Eric Hufschmid. I have written about this in an article entitled "Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can", which is exactly what Smith told Hufschmid to do. Why would Smith want to "slam" me, an honest journalist and leading 9-11 researcher?
While Hufschmid has not attacked me as maliciously as the others, he has made the ridiculous claim since the summer of 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Mossad. Using this bizarre claim (which he stubbornly maintains despite abundant proof to the contrary) he says that my writing is "bait" approved by Israeli intelligence. Although he employs a different method, Hufschmid's slander against me has achieved the same result. He has successfully sown suspicion about my credibility and drawn attention to me as a person while completely marginalizing my 9-11 research, which he has ignored since 2007.
To understand what this slander campaign is really all about, and who is behind it, we need to employ some Socratic dialectic. We will start by asking a simple question: Are these people attacking me as a defensive tactic because I have attacked them or treated them badly?
No. I have not wronged any of these people and not even discussed them until after they began attacking me. As a matter of fact, I have helped all of them a great deal. I helped Piper, for example, with his RBN radio show when I filled in for him for several weeks in a row, while on the road with my family in the West during the summer of 2006. This required a great deal of time and effort on my part - with absolutely no compensation. Does Piper do his daily show from free?
I also helped Piper by appearing several times as a guest on his show, as I did for Hufschmid and Smith's "French Connection" show. While I agreed to be interviewed by Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith, I have always worked as an independent journalist (for Spotlight and AFP from 2000 until October 2006) and was never affiliated with any of them in any way. I have been interviewed by many people. Being interviewed by a person or having my material posted on somebody's website does not indicate any deeper association than that. The attempts to link me with Hufschmid and Smith are part of an intel trap to discredit my work by connecting me with them. Piper always introduced me with fulsome praise, calling me "America's best journalist, bar none." Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith have, as a matter of fact, all greatly relied on and gained from the original 9-11 research I have done. None of them can say that they have suffered because of knowing me. So why do they attack me?
Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) wrote a book about Israel's role in the 9-11 attacks (that I have not read), which must contain a great deal of my research. Thorn's book was published by American Free Press, where I worked from 2000 until October 2006.
Although I was the first journalist to write about the Israeli role in the 9-11 attacks and have done far more research (for eight years) than any other writer on the subject, AFP was never interested in doing a book about 9-11 with me. This is an intelligence tactic called "stealing the thunder." If AFP were truly interested in exposing the Israeli role in 9-11, why have they not asked to publish my ground-breaking book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World?
So, what have I done to deserve being subjected to the vicious and concerted campaign of calumny, slander, and libel? What is it that I have done that bothers them so much that they spend time attacking me?
This is easy. Apart from raising my family, for the past eight years my only vocation has been to research and write about the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. As an investigative journalist I have led the way in investigating the role of Israeli intelligence and Zionist agents in the United States in the terror attacks of 9-11.
If my 9-11 research and writing is the reason these detractors are attacking me with slander and libel, who are they doing it for?
It stands to reason that these four are working as agents of an agency that is interested in my research being discredited and marginalized. Because my thesis is that the state of Israel and Zionists in the U.S. are behind 9-11, these must be the same entities behind the anti-Bollyn slander campaign. This makes sense because well-known Zionist entities such as Rupert Murdoch's FOX News, CNN, and the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz have all tried to smear me as an anti-Semite
Are these four detractors connected with a Zionist agency or the state of Israel?
Eric Hufschmid's father, with whom he works closely, is the father of the wife of Rupert Murdoch's son James, heir apparent of the Murdoch media empire. Smith is a former narcotics user who has several felony convictions that were suddenly cleared up immediately before he began his career with "The French Connection" in early 2005.
Piper and Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) work for a newspaper called American Free Press, where I worked as an independent contractor (since the fall of 2001) after being hired in the spring of 2000. AFP claims to be an employee-owned newspaper, which is a deception meant to fool readers. AFP has no assets to own. Everything of value associated with the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press is held by a host of shell companies with names like "The Committee to Expose Bunk", which issued my paychecks, for example. Michael Piper is one of the people allowed to sign checks from these entities.
The person who is the mastermind of the shell game involving the assets of the Liberty Lobby is Mark Lane, the Jewish lawyer who played a crucial role in the massacre at Jonestown, Guyana.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Lane_in...wn_cropped.JPG
Mark Lane was present at Jonestown during the massacre. He is considered to
have played a key role in provoking the massacre by playing on the fears of Jim
Jones. This photo with Jones (left) was taken shortly before the mass
suicide/massacre. How odd that Lane became the lawyer, and then owner of the
Liberty Lobby several years later.
Lane has been the lawyer of the Liberty Lobby since the mid-1980s and received some $5 million in legal fees, according to a veteran Liberty Lobby insider. Lane, who served in U.S. Army Intelligence in Germany at the end of the war, acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1993 or 1994, according to L.T. Patterson (owner of Criminal Politics), who discovered this fact during a court process in which Lane was suing Patterson.
Who does Lane work for?
Lane must work for the C.I.A. Having worked for Army Intelligence in the mid-1940s, it stands to reason that Lane became one of the head honchos in the Jewish intelligence cabal in Army Intelligence that became the C.I.A. in 1949. This would explain Lane's role in his writings on the Warren Report, the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, Jonestown, and the so-called patriot movement at the Liberty Lobby.
But isn't the C.I.A. working to protect the nation and the people of the United States?
Obviously not. The C.I.A. was criticized for being asleep at the switch on 9-11, but it is really much worse than that. The C.I.A. actually works against the interests of the republic and the American people. The C.I.A. is obviously deeply involved in the commission of the terrorism crime of 9-11. Rather than preventing 9-11 or finding the culprits of the atrocity, the C.I.A. has been exploiting the 9-11 deception to wage war using drone warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Asked about the C.I.A. attacks in Pakistan, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded as if she had no legal authority or control over the C.I.A., which was a remarkably candid response from a U.S. Secretary of State. Her response indicated that the C.I.A. is a rogue agency that acts outside the control of the U.S. administration. How can that be?
What is the C.I.A.'s interest in Afghanistan and Pakistan?
The C.I.A. is clearly not interested in solving 9-11 or finding the culprits. We know that the Twin Towers were demolished using an advanced form of super-thermite (produced using nano-technology) and that the official version that Osama Bin Laden carried out 9-11 from a cave in Afghanistan is nothing but a pack of lies. The C.I.A. is involved in Afghanistan because that's where most of the world's opium is produced. George H.W. Bush, the former director of the C.I.A., was also a director of the Eli Lilly Company, the pharmaceutical giant that manufactures Prozac. Bush was also one of the first students at Israel's Yonatan [Netanyahu] Institute of terrorism in 1979. Since the production of opium has skyrocketed since the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, we can assume that opium production is one of the purposes of the war and occupation. Prior to the invasion of 2001, the Taliban regime, which the U.S. is fighting against, had succeeded in eradicating nearly all opium production in Afghanistan.
This explains why American Free Press was so strongly opposed to my articles about the dangerous effects of Prozac and similar drugs. When Ellen Mariani, a 9-11 widow, told me that the grieving relatives had been sent to Red Cross doctors who had prescribed Prozac – the editor at AFP cut it out of the story. My subsequent articles about serotonin-affecting drugs and school shootings were rejected out-of-hand. This was clearly a subject that the American Free Press did not want to take up.
One has to remember what Andreas von Bülow said about intelligence agencies in December 2001: "Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation." The first target of the deception and disinformation of the C.I.A. is the people of the United States. This is a rogue agency that must be disbanded if the American republic is to survive. The C.I.A. is no sacred cow, some sacrosanct institution that can be allowed to carry out its own agenda, wage war, and maintain secret prisons, all in the name of our democratic American republic. The C.I.A. is a rogue agency that is obviously an enemy of American democracy. The United States of America cannot survive as a democratic republic with the C.I.A. operating as the shadow government. The C.I.A. is nothing but a band of organized criminals operating under the guise of the United States. By dissolving the C.I.A. we would obtain answers to many of the crimes committed in the past 60 years.
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
thats interesting reading
I can only speak of what I remember, and DBS and Bollyn had there falling out after they finally met, Bollyn traveled to France.
DBS made the comment that Bollyn got "snookered" at their meeting
Bollyn made the comment that DBS's wife was Black and a "hip hop dancer" /instructor
Things went downhill from there, mud slinging, etc
Bollyn is not as innocent as he portrays himself IMO
they had personal issues between them
DBS has even posted some of Bollyns articles (only recently)
perhaps an olive branch?
anyway it all came apart after they met in France.
and then Bollyn posted that picture of DBS (which apparently DBS had said "please do not post it")
and then Bollyn started calling DBS a fake, because his dad was a marine fighter pilot, and died in service, and then his mom remarried.
Well DBS changed his name late in life, to keep his fathers sur name, Bollyn latched onto that, called DBS a phoney, etc
Bollyn is not lily white,
but the main point is that all of their issues are personal, has nothign to do with the quality of their research/ work
Hufschmidt is a different issue IMO
he is a plant/ tool
I think he instigated some of the infighting between smith and bollyn, whispering in their ears....
Bollyn and Smith should just make a phone call, or do a visit sweden and france are not that far, thery could certainly develop a professional relationship (supporting each others works) if not a personal relationship
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
It's a tangled web they all weave that's for sure.
Mark Lane of AFPress is sure a curious operator. Bollyn says Lane was in Army Intelligence in Germany in the mid-40s after the war? I'm thinking how old is Lane? I look at Lane's wiki entry, they say he's born 2/24/1927 making him 83 now, & meaning 2/24/45 he'd have just turned 18, which is around when Bollyn claims Lane served in Army intel... ?!? Of course wiki's "early career" info begins in 1959, when Lane would've been ~32, nothing about Lane before that. To read wiki's spin about Lane's "innocent" role in Jonestown is almost funny, when you assume that Lane was (is) indeed a CIA asset. Lane's central role in Liberty-Lobby/Spotlight/AFP lends credence to Bollyn's assertion that the enterprise is ultimately a sticky-flypaper op.
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Large Sarge
Hufschmidt is a different issue IMO
he is a plant/ tool
I think he instigated some of the infighting between smith and bollyn, whispering in their ears....
Hufschmidt caused the whole thing. His tribe are pros at doing that kind of mindgame thing on goyim.
DBS and Bollyn should realize this and now reconcile.
:oo-->
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Book
Quote:
Originally Posted by Large Sarge
Hufschmidt is a different issue IMO
he is a plant/ tool
I think he instigated some of the infighting between smith and bollyn, whispering in their ears....
Hufschmidt caused the whole thing. His tribe are pros at doing that kind of mindgame thing on goyim.
DBS and Bollyn should realize this and now reconcile.
:oo-->
You may feel differently about Huffy instigating the DBS/Bollyn rift if you listen to the couple of recorded phone calls DBS made to Huffy, DBS drunk & cussing like a sailor about the need to destroy Bollyn.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-p...-8Sep2007.html
(mp3s about 2/3 down that page)
Huffy's compromised himself though, I agree with Bollyn that Huffy's stubborn insistence that Bollyn/family are kidnapped by Mossad etc, providing no evidence, just repeating it over & over even in recent interviews-- very "strange".
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
You may feel differently about Huffy instigating the DBS/Bollyn rift if you listen to the couple of
recorded phone calls DBS made to Huffy, DBS drunk & cussing like a sailor about the need to destroy Bollyn.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-p...-8Sep2007.html
(mp3s about 2/3 down that page)
Huffy's compromised himself though, I agree with Bollyn that Huffy's stubborn insistence that Bollyn/family are kidnapped by Mossad etc, providing no evidence, just repeating it over & over even in recent interviews-- very "strange".
Gee...I dunno PatoColo: Huffy made those silent secret phone recordings of DBS being drunk bad-mouthing Bollyn then posted those embarrassing recordings on the internet. After Huffy did the usual jew divide-and-conquer-the-goyim headgame on drunkard DBS. Bollyn was Huffy's target all along and so he used the drunkard goyim DBS as his dupe character-assassin.
Didn't you just make my point for me buddy?
:D
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Book, what specific content of the article(s) linked, or the DBS/Huffy phone call mp3s, leads you to believe Huffy was the central instigator?
As far as I can gather, DBS appeared to be the aggressor in seeking to discredit Bollyn by any (dishonest) means necessary-- for "reasons" I never saw evidenced (IE alleged Bollyn "lies" about DBS).
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
Book, what specific content of the article(s) linked, or the DBS/Huffy phone call mp3s, leads you to believe Huffy was the central instigator?
As far as I can gather, DBS appeared to be the aggressor in seeking to discredit Bollyn by any (dishonest) means necessary-- for "reasons" I never saw evidenced (IE alleged Bollyn "lies" about DBS).
I dunno anymore then you do PatColo. The fact that Huffy secretly recorded the phone calls then publicly posted those recordings on the internet is evidence to me. DBS was obviously drunk and he reasonably assumed that his "friend" Huffy was not recording their phone conversations.
I think Huffy head-played DBS like a goy violin. Since then Huffy shriveled up and his website died. DBS and Bollyn are still going strong and have many fans. OK with me if you still see it differently buddy.
:)
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Interesting.... Dont want to derail the conversation but how does Piper fit into all this? ???
What do you guy's think???
:dunno
Also, and why did DBS leave RBN....?
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Book
I dunno anymore then you do PatColo. The fact that Huffy secretly recorded the phone calls then publicly posted those recordings on the internet is evidence to me. DBS was obviously drunk and he reasonably assumed that his "friend" Huffy was not recording their phone conversations.
I think Huffy head-played DBS like a goy violin. Since then Huffy shriveled up and his website died. DBS and Bollyn are still going strong and have many fans. OK with me if you still see it differently buddy.
:)
Book: seems like you assume Huffy orchestrated the DBS/Bollyn rift mainly coz you assume Huffy to be a crypto-joo/zio-agent. I certainly allow for this possibility, as for one thing, Huffy's 'evil jooz' schtick is just over the top enough that it smells to me like chutzpah-maneuver-101 bunk. For that matter, ditto for DBS. And Huffy's long since needed to put out or shut up re Bollyn/family being kidnapped & held...
But in this instance, Huffy 'splains his decision to record the calls (first call's a partial recording coz Huffy didn't initiate it, but did grab the recording equipment during the call), and then his decision to post them on the internet, within the article:
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-p...-8Sep2007.html
To me, the weightier evidence as to "who's guiltiest?" is the content of the calls, which definitely don't reflect well on the nature/agenda of DBS.
Judging by some of his "fruits", I know Huffy's compromised in some way so I'm not about defending him, but his site is still up, http://www.erichufschmid.net, and he does an article or audio monologue or radio interview now & then, but from what I've seen, he's the lowest profile/traffic/etc compared to DBS, Bollyn, or Piper.
