150 Militia Take Over Makhuer National Wildlife Preserve Headquarters

Details are sketchy, probably a lot of disinformation at this time.




http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative...s-3270032.html


150 Militia Take Over Forest Reserve HQ In Oregon, Call US Patriots To Arms! (Videos)

(Before It's News)
https://img.rt.com/files/static.en/o...l/breaking.jpg
150 Militiamen including 3 of Cliven Bundy’s sons have taken over the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters in Oregon and are calling upon militias around the country to rise up in arms and join them in their zone of liberation to continue the fight. The occupation started over a local court case involving ranchers and the federal government. One of the militiman posted a video earlier today that basically tells you that he is in this for the long haul. In fact, what he says makes you think he isn’t going to come out of this alive. Check it out:





You can also watch the video of the leader of this uprising explain what has happened and why they are doing it:



Keep an eye on this folks. This could be potentially explosive.. Stay tuned..

http://youtu.be/HDvUVl96y9g

http://youtu.be/sbGdMKpHDDE

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/4001
(a)No citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress.

Building on this theme, we now add a corroborating citation from the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 26, Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules, paragraph 2, in the middle,

"On the other hand since all Federal crimes are statutory [ see United States v. Hudson, 11 U.S. 32, 3 L.ed. 259 (1812)] and all criminal prosecutions in the Federal courts are based on acts of Congress, . . ."

2. TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION:

In order to define the jurisdiction of the Federal courts to conduct criminal prosecutions, one would have to find out what the specific definition of "Act of Congress," is. We find such a definition in Rule 54(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure prior to Dec. 2002, wherein is defined "Act of Congress." Rule 54(c) states:

"Act of Congress" includes any act of Congress locally applicable to and in force in the District of Columbia, in Puerto Rico, in a territory or in an insular possession."

http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawA...20JURISDICTION

The Supreme Court rewrote the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and "conviently" omitted the above statement. You will need to find a copy dated before Dec. 1, 2002 that includes the above definition.

2016 is starting out as a wild year...

What is the "III" or "111" in John Ritzheimer's rear window?

Story is getting legs:
Militiamen take over federal wildlife refuge in Oregon after anti-government rally to protest jail time for two ranchers

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnQPublic

Story is getting legs:
Militiamen take over federal wildlife refuge in Oregon after anti-government rally to protest jail time for two ranchers

---

I am unable to get this link to work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cebu_4_2

I am unable to get this link to work.

---

Try this link Cebu

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/p...ction-36061121


The the feds broke the law USC Title 18 Part III Chapter 301 Part 4001(a) by putting the Hammonds in prison.

(a)No citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress.


Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Pre Dec. 1, 2002:

"Act of Congress" includes any act of Congress LOCALY APPLICABLE TO AND ENFORCEABLE IN the District of Columbia, in Puerto Rico, in a territory or in an insular possession.

http://www.mindserpent.com/American_...rp/rule_54.htm

seen on the news this morning a preacher telling the Militia go home that they had no place being there let the laws work . I all most got sick when he said let the laws work , hey dumb shit the laws have not worked so far . only thing this government knows is force preacher man .....................