https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEYdsZFNOrE
Printable View
IMHO, if the earth is 93,000,000 miles from the sun, yet maintains stable orbit around the latter, so that gravity must act virtually instantaneously for this to be possible. However, modern physics tells us that all natural phenomena are bound by the speed of light, fixed and constant in all directions, places and ...speeds! Ponder that.
I haven't read much into Electric Universe theory. But from what I do understand about it, the electric universe claims that the sun is powered by the universe and accounts for the corona being hotter than the sun itself.
However it doesn't explain how a star will go super nova, or turn into a red giant when it's fuel supply of hydrogen is used up, or how a star will get brighter as it ages. It also doesn't touch upon the stars birth.
I watched the video, and always felt that the theory of relativity had some holes in it regarding gravity. The video makes a good point about the suns pull on Earth and the time it takes for light to get to the Earth. That speaks to the obvious that something is acting upon the Earth that is faster than light.
Regarding the time delay, unless the orbiting planet was also acting on the sun (they were comparable size), I don't see how it would be flung out of orbit. If the sun is assumed to be immovable because it is so big, does it really matter whether a planet is orbiting the past, present, or future sun? The sun doesn't care, it won't move any differently because of the planets.
Also, here is something to consider. The speed at which a body orbits is directly determined by he distance it is orbiting. Hence, as you get farther away (more time delay) you will be orbiting slower. Therefore, the issue doesn't get worse as you orbit farther away. (see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbita...a_central_body)
I agree, there is more than just the corona to explain. If the fusion explanation explains everything, then its pretty compelling. I haven't studied this field so I don't know how solid it really is, but those things have to be kept in mind.
It doesn't really matter if earth is kept in orbit by suns gravity 8 minutes later if suns gravity is constant, but I wouldn't be surprised if gravity fields are instantaneous. I do think a lot of the theoretical physics that has evolved during the last 100 years are ridiculous, but perhaps all physics since renaissance isn't suspect because some is?
This assumes that those things, about traditional solar explanations, are true which wouldn't be the case if the universe were actually electric.
The forces of Gravity and speed of light are claimed to be inversely proportional. According to Einsteins theories.Quote:
I watched the video, and always felt that the theory of relativity had some holes in it regarding gravity. The video makes a good point about the suns pull on Earth and the time it takes for light to get to the Earth. That speaks to the obvious that something is acting upon the Earth that is faster than light.
Don't forget that "science" introduced the theory of Dark Matter to deal with the anomaly of forces that cannot be accounted for based on the "visible" assessment of observable mass in the universe. Scientists look for the mass that makes this strange gravitational anomaly occur and could not see it. So they created a variable called "Dark Matter" to take up the slack in their models.
Interestingly the Electron has an unusual orbit about the nucleus which has puzzled scientists for a long time. It would seem that when tracking an electron or "trying to see one" They always seem to appear in a place that is unexpected. They seem to rotate further (or less far depending on your frame of reference) than expected when observed. I don't recall the exact numbers but it is something like 270 degrees i.e. less than 360 degrees in the time expected or 630 degrees or more than the 360 degrees i.e. 1.75 rotations when 1 rotation was expected.
To take up the slack of these unexpected observations science introduced the concept that the act of observation changes the outcome.
Another possible explanation is, that the path of the electron is not always within the same physical space or realm. That the electron passes through some different space during it's rotation. Where that is another plane/realm or state such as "dark matter" would need to be investigated.
Interestingly, CERN scientist have been able to observe Anti Protons from Hydrogen. https://home.cern/about/updates/2016...first-birthday
Have they found and captured an opposite entity or material or have they trapped something as it moves through a different time or space? I'm not sure what longer term questions they are trying to answer. But those would be my questions.
Throwing out some numberology. Saturn = 93. Sun is 93 million miles away. Coincidence? Saturn is considered keeper of time by some. Strong December 22 - 25 influences. Sol/Sun is considered keeper of time by others. Time = 144. 12 day hours 12 night hours, 12x14 = 144. 1440 minutes per day. 144,000 saved in Revelations. 144,000 sheep in the book of Jacob. Sum of the 1st 144 decimals of pi = 666. stop. enough.
If one agrees that electricity is the cause/drive behind every molecular and sub-particle interaction and very existence, then such a question does need to beQuote:
However it doesn't explain how a star will go super nova, or turn into a red giant when it's fuel supply of hydrogen is used up, or how a star will get brighter as it ages. It also doesn't touch upon the stars birth.
electricity determines compatibility. Each atom being electrically charged. Electricity also explains the duality of Light.
Electricity/light is the blood of the universe and released by the Aether/hidden. Walter Russell asserts that matter is light compressed at different levels, and this makes sense since life is caused by electricity.
Let there be Light, says the bible.
So when new agers say that we are "beings of light", it does makes sense too.