Most of us never thought we would see people groveling for slv like this. Its cathartic.
Printable View
Most of us never thought we would see people groveling for slv like this. Its cathartic.
I've been listening to this guy and it's been interesting, educational and pretty exciting too!
I think this asian guy is Chinese and he's enjoying watching the US Bankers panic.
Sounds like the shit is hitting the fan and this country is screwed.
I think I'll hold what little silver I have left until it's the same price per ounce as gold.
Hmmmm....something more to think about these bankers are sons a bitches and are always screwing the working people. Liars and thieves!
Not so sure that the tech and industrial players are going to be negatively impacted by JPMorgans enormous stash of silver. The producers will pass on the elevated costs to the consumer and perhaps the trivial amounts of silver in each individual product will not be that severe. We will see.
I'm seeing a 7 dollar swing (high/low) tonight. Currently below Friday's close. Anyone have a link to the Shanghai prices?
shanghai was upwards of 88 i believe
Up and down and bouncing around worse than my Labrador retriever. I think maybe the Shanghai exchange is the one to watch.
https://open.substack.com/pub/xrpman...utm_medium=ios
I enjoy this fellow’s commentary.
Here's a site with the Shanghai pricing. Currently about a 10% difference with COMEX.
Pt and Pd are having even bigger swings that Ag.
https://goldsilver.ai/metal-prices/s...i-silver-price
It appears someone came back from Christmas break and decided a correction was in order.
At this moment the banking elite is sitting at their round table discussing which rabbit they should pull out of their hat. They have plenty of rabbits but they all have consequences. In 1980 they changed the COMEX rules. What will it be for 2025-2026?
My bet is on government intervention.....because nothing else could work. JMO.
They will have to delay their plans for a cashless society another decade or two because this will generate lots of distrust of bankers. Their damage control experts are discussing how the news will be presented....putting the blame on greedy gold and silver bugs.
China is still at 80 dollars per ounce, since China needs actual physical metal.
https://en.sge.com.cn/h5_data_SilverBenchmarkPrice
According to reports...
The strategy is to have there be a glut/surplus of silver in the US (COMEX stocks high due to COMEX rigging the game and telling big buyers to not take delivery according to rumors, refineries having too much silver, and stackers selling their silver to refineries). Have the London exchange be the warning of low silver supplies, and Asia be deficient in silver.
The US is trying to undercut China from Latin American silver. China gets much of that silver shipped to Asia before it goes to the exchanges.
January is going to be interesting because of export limitations from China.
JP Morgan in Asia is there to manipulate the price for Asia.
The hammering of the price could be to punish long positions away from silver. The new shorts could develop greater than 80.
The long term goal is to destroy demand, this has been the strategy since before the 1980s. Make bitcoin into free casino money, hammer silver investors, change rules, 100 to 1 ratio of paper to silver, massive short positions, deny metal to where it is demanded. These are the tools to suppress the price of silver.
If not for Asian/industrial demand, we would be at 15 dollar silver. This was not the case in 2011, that was Western retail demand trying to end the paper rigging game.The Ron Paulers went maga and forgot about defeating the banksters with gold and silver, according to banker script. Trumpstein is your banker candidate. Soros and psyops are the distractions. Jews and masons cannot send stupid psy-ops to Asia telling industry that Soros is gonna eat their cats to make them stop focus on buying silver and gold. Industries need silver to make money.
Here is more destroying of demand in Asia for investment silver:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcfaiwCfNhA
Not by stupid psy-ops of cat eating dogs. As Asians are not brain dead.
Banksters: "Gays are gonna invade your town if silver goes above 90, FEAR! Distractions. Sideshows."
The cia news does not want to report the rise of gold was from China and BRICS vs the US bullying. The cia media did not want the 2011 news about silver reported on the banks shorts failing against those against the bankers. The cia media do not want the 2025 news reporting the shortage of silver and that silver prices are totally detached from inflation data, us economic data, and other government manipulated data. The cia media is completely hiding that massive shortages in silver are the only cause of precious metal pricing, after China submitted totally to the US in October crashing the prices of precious metals. It went from Ron Paulers/gold is money leading the charge of precious metals. To China and BRICS leading the charge of precious metals to industry leading the charge of precious metals. This is rarely mentioned in the cia media because the public are to be stupid, ignorant and manipulated by gays on TV or social media.
The entire goal of the deep state is to get the public to deny reality.
Before technology 1984 of bitcoin, the deep state criminal elite want to tame gold and silver, so they only operate and are respond to government data. Totally manipulated on a worse scale than before.
The usual paper shenannigans, but now international demand is too high. It will go to 100 , then get knocked back and if it blows past that? to da moon (finally)
Yep! Silver has become this strategic metal in the AI related electronics. International investment demand will only get stronger the more expensive it becomes (until now it has been too cheap to be taken seriously). Right now the silver in an iphone or any other smartphone is less than a dollar? At what price will they seriously consider redesign? Probably way more than $10/set which translates to $1000/toz. Even less price sensitive is the chips for AI… The CME raised the margin requirements for their contracts on silver 2 times last week. LOL like that will reduce demand for physical silver. They will just push out speculators from their exchange and make themselves totally irrelevant for price discovery. Meanwhile China banned export of silver. We will see $100 silver soon, yeah probably with a short and deep pushback. But then we go to the moon perhaps $1k in a couple of years?
Happy new year!
The Asian AI dude on youtube is doing predictive programming for the silver investors. Those channels are from the banksters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrGiVVhZFUs
You can watch them to learn the banker agenda, though know that is where the banksters want the public watching that Asian AI dude and expect those things to happen, so it is easy when the government or banksters do those things. As the public expects it and does not organically respond.
So Yawn.
https://open.substack.com/pub/no01/p...ariant=overlay
interesting discussion concerning Venezuela and the Chinese silver squeeze.
Sounds to me like the article is selling the idea that "China" is at odds with Comex. Conflicts can be staged.
In Hollywood, they write the script, the choose the actors and the actors play out the parts. Why would we think it's any different in the international metals markets?
Personally I think the Comex and China have the same owners.
agreed. The world is a stage. Mostly theater just as Trumps magic ear. I believe there is a cabal behind it all, but I also believe they let their puppets (dogs, boot licking bitches) play their own games on a loose leash to quite an extent. Have you read Coleman’s book on the Committee of 300?
of course tyrants and billionaires can have their differences but the one thing they agree on is the subjugation of the human spirit.
The appearance of adversity between those who work together has many strategic benefits.
It makes the Goyim think they aren't conspiring.
It confuses the Goyim.
It gives the "anti-semites" false hopes...makes them think the Master Race will self-destruct if they do nothing.
It encourages the Goyim to "take sides" when both sides are their enemy.
Even in Hollywood, actors are given some leeway from the script, but they're acutely aware of what the script says.
The information providers have conditioned me to send up red flags every time they play the game of "conflict".
Random year Eagles are over $90/oz on APMEX.
I have to admit, silver price rising just isnt as fun without ponce and silver sammy around.
trumpstein at it again. As Asian buyers of silver were driving up the price of silver and taking silver from Latin America to cause silver shortages in the LBMA and dwindling supplies at the comex. The cia run Mexican drug cartels took over mines to have a reason for trump to perhaps steal the Mexican silver mines and send it to the US for stockpiling.
Once I read the Mexican drug cartel (cia run) move into silver mine areas weeks ago, I knew trump would use this as a possible pretext to steal silver in Mexico and it is reported in the news:
Trump’s Mexico War Talk Is a Disaster Warning for Investors in Mexican Silver Miners
The new U.S. land‑strike doctrine and Mexico’s pending resource nationalism make silver miners operating in Mexico a jurisdictional time bomb
The Silver Academy
Jan 09, 2026
by Jon Little intern Mr. Niko Moretti
Foreword:
Trump’s new policy of attacking Mexico is bad news for anyone invested in silver miners operating there. Between his talk of “land strikes” and Mexico’s tightening resource nationalism, silver operations face rising risks of disruption, taxes, and even de facto expropriation
A U.S. “land‑strike” doctrine turns Mexico from a high‑beta mining story into a live jurisdictional hazard for oil, gold, silver, and copper investors. Once Washington normalizes cross‑border strikes on “cartel‑linked” assets, any operation in contested states can be reclassified as security‑exposed infrastructure, with sanctions, insurance cancellations, and forced shutdowns to match. Combine that with Morena’s hard resource nationalism and “no new concessions” stance, and investors face a double bind: a tightening host state from within and arbitrary U.S. force projection from without. Under that pincer, institutional capital treats Mexico as a war‑zone, not a portfolio core
Washington is about to do to Mexican mining what it already did to Middle East oil: turn a lucrative sector into a live‑fire geopolitical experiment, just as institutional money finally starts sniffing around the space. At the exact moment pension funds and sovereign wealth desks are preparing to rotate into hard assets and mining, the Trump regime is dangling “land strikes” in Mexico and importing a Venezuela‑style metals war template across the Rio Grande. This is not risk; this is sabotage disguised as policy.
Turning Silver into a War Asset
The trajectory is brutally clear: first, Maduro is snatched off the board and Venezuela’s resources are shoved under U.S. “stewardship”; then, within 24 hours, Washington backs an $8 billion, defense‑linked smelter complex to refine Latin American silver under the watchful eye of the Department of War and its banking partners.
The message to capital is not subtle—silver is no longer just a commodity, it is a strategic feedstock to be captured, concentrated, and securitized in the service of U.S. foreign policy. Nobody running institutional money into mining wants to wake up and realize their exposure now sits downstream of a Pentagon‑adjacent smelter complex whose output can be redirected at the stroke of a pen.
When Cartel Rhetoric Becomes Mining Risk
Trump’s latest pivot—“we’re going to start now hitting land” in Mexico to go after cartels allegedly “running” the country—is not law‑enforcement tough talk, it is jurisdictional demolition. Once the U.S. normalizes land strikes on Mexican soil, every industrial asset inside cartel‑adjacent states becomes conceptually fair game, no matter how clean the ownership register looks. Tie that to foreign‑terrorist designations and “material support” statutes, and a mine operator’s routine dealings—security contractors, trucking routes, local gatekeepers—can be retrofitted into a legal pretext to freeze assets, void contracts, or choke off financing under the banner of anti‑cartel warfare.
Mexico Slams the Door While Trump Lights a Match
On the other side of the border, Mexico itself is not exactly rolling out the red carpet. President Claudia Sheinbaum has already declared, with no ambiguity, “no new mining concessions will be granted,” fully embracing Morena’s resource‑nationalist doctrine. New exploration is halted, existing concessions are dragged through environmental and social reviews, and silver is being repositioned rhetorically in the same category as oil, lithium, and strategic energy infrastructure. Mexico is telling investors that subsoil wealth belongs to the state first and the people second; foreign capital, at best, is a temporary instrument of convenience.
Now add Trump’s land‑strike fetish to that framework. You have a host government intent on tightening control over mining and a U.S. president telegraphing the right to project force into the very states where many silver operations sit. That is not diversification; that is a cross‑border pincer where your asset is squeezed by nationalist regulators indoors and erratic U.S. militarism outdoors.
The Worst Possible Timing for Institutional Flows
This is happening at precisely the wrong time in the cycle. Institutions that ignored miners for a decade are finally waking up to structural deficits in silver, copper, and critical minerals, quietly drafting mandates to increase exposure to real assets. They need stability: jurisdictional clarity, predictable permitting, and the assurance that their ESG narratives will not be blown up by drone strikes or paramilitary “advisors” showing up on the perimeter fence. Instead, they are being offered:
A zealous, scandal‑soaked U.S. president dragging around Epstein‑file baggage, desperate to change the channel from domestic rot—ugly job prints, 39 trillion in public debt, and a militarized deportation machine whose enforcers have already been caught killing innocent “soccer moms” on U.S. soil.
A White House eager to rebrand its failures by launching proxy crusades abroad: bomb Venezuela, threaten Colombia, and now talk openly about sending troops or “hit teams” into Mexico in the name of a perpetual war on cartels.
A security apparatus that increasingly sees metals as munitions—inputs to be controlled, not markets to be respected—while regulators and prosecutors sharpen enforcement tools that can turn ordinary operating risk into terrorism‑adjacency overnight.
This is exactly the environment in which institutional committees pull the plug. They do not brave “headline risk” around soccer moms shot by ICE and presidential sex‑blackmail files just to pile into a jurisdiction now flagged by the commander‑in‑chief as a legitimate theater for land strikes.
A Regime Unfit to Steward Capital
At root, this is a regime problem. You have a U.S. president with collapsing moral authority, haunted by sealed lists and corruption scandals, flanked by agencies whose domestic conduct already looks like a low‑grade internal war against their own population. You have 39 trillion in debt, rotting infrastructure, and labor markets that cannot deliver dignified jobs—conditions that usually call for domestic reform, not foreign adventurism. The Trump solution is to externalize the crisis: blame Mexico, blame Venezuela, blame cartels, and in the process transform critical mining jurisdictions into unstable extensions of America’s internal neurosis.
For mining investors, the conclusion is not philosophical; it is practical. A U.S. foreign policy that treats Mexico as a bombing range and Venezuela as a metals farm is fundamentally incompatible with the long‑term capital, deep technical expertise, and stable planning horizon mining actually requires. Call it what it is: a horrendous, unserious foreign policy, weaponizing the very jurisdictions global capital needs to remain boring, predictable, and investable.
If this is the political backdrop to Mexico’s already‑hardening mining nationalism, then institutional flows into Mexican silver are not just mispriced—they are misdiagnosed. Under a Trump regime addicted to theatrics, repression, and distraction, mining operations in Mexico are not being “supported” by American power; they are being marched, step by cynical step, into the blast zone.
Holy smokes! I did call it.
two days ago I called it:
For example: "We need to invade Mexico, steal the silver and send it to the COMEX to crash the price of silver".
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...l=1#post996958
Kiddos, for those that were not on the legendary GIM and did not get taught the cia is heavily linked to drug cartels, watch here:
https://odysee.com/@TheAgeofAquarius...(19.05.2019):e
You don't get taught from cia Faux News that the cia runs the drug industry.
charlie get the fvk off my thread your spamming is pissing us off.
If only Silver Sammy, and Ponce were still around to see the beat down dog have its day in the sun.
remember silver sammy would post, and immediately silver would tank? lol
Link to the story
https://substack.com/home/post/p-184030959