-
Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Question and Answer Forum
Updated May 4, 2010
Most Recent Question: We met in the summer of 2005 when you brought William Rodriquez [9-11 survivor from the World Trade Center] to speak at the Schaumburg Library [Illinois]. You mention in your notice to Eric Hufschmid that you categorize him with Mike Piper and Darrel Bradford Smith – why? You also referred to Victor Thorn who seems to have lifted some of your ideas about Zionist involvement in 9/11. Are Piper and Smith disinformation agents?
I have Piper's Final Judgment. I think your research is impeccable and felt badly when you "left" AFP. Your online 9/11 book is amazing. I hope that you and your family are happy and secure. I have noted that people who divulge too much truth, like Sterling, Peggy Seagrave, and yourself receive similar treatment and have to flee.
Bollyn Responds: This is a good question about a subject that I don't usually delve into, but which certainly deserves to be discussed because it concerns the role of the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) as the source of much of the deception and evil that afflicts our world today.
The people you ask about: Hufschmid, Piper, Smith, and Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn), are four detractors who have spent years attacking me and waging a vicious campaign of slander and libel against me and my family. What these agents of deception have done is spread lies and calumnies about me, my wife and children in an effort to discredit me and damage my credibility and reputation. Smith revealed how this vicious slander campaign works in a taped telephone conversation with Eric Hufschmid. I have written about this in an article entitled "Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can", which is exactly what Smith told Hufschmid to do. Why would Smith want to "slam" me, an honest journalist and leading 9-11 researcher?
While Hufschmid has not attacked me as maliciously as the others, he has made the ridiculous claim since the summer of 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Mossad. Using this bizarre claim (which he stubbornly maintains despite abundant proof to the contrary) he says that my writing is "bait" approved by Israeli intelligence. Although he employs a different method, Hufschmid's slander against me has achieved the same result. He has successfully sown suspicion about my credibility and drawn attention to me as a person while completely marginalizing my 9-11 research, which he has ignored since 2007.
To understand what this slander campaign is really all about, and who is behind it, we need to employ some Socratic dialectic. We will start by asking a simple question: Are these people attacking me as a defensive tactic because I have attacked them or treated them badly?
No. I have not wronged any of these people and not even discussed them until after they began attacking me. As a matter of fact, I have helped all of them a great deal. I helped Piper, for example, with his RBN radio show when I filled in for him for several weeks in a row, while on the road with my family in the West during the summer of 2006. This required a great deal of time and effort on my part - with absolutely no compensation. Does Piper do his daily show from free?
I also helped Piper by appearing several times as a guest on his show, as I did for Hufschmid and Smith's "French Connection" show. While I agreed to be interviewed by Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith, I have always worked as an independent journalist (for Spotlight and AFP from 2000 until October 2006) and was never affiliated with any of them in any way. I have been interviewed by many people. Being interviewed by a person or having my material posted on somebody's website does not indicate any deeper association than that. The attempts to link me with Hufschmid and Smith are part of an intel trap to discredit my work by connecting me with them. Piper always introduced me with fulsome praise, calling me "America's best journalist, bar none." Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith have, as a matter of fact, all greatly relied on and gained from the original 9-11 research I have done. None of them can say that they have suffered because of knowing me. So why do they attack me?
Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) wrote a book about Israel's role in the 9-11 attacks (that I have not read), which must contain a great deal of my research. Thorn's book was published by American Free Press, where I worked from 2000 until October 2006.
Although I was the first journalist to write about the Israeli role in the 9-11 attacks and have done far more research (for eight years) than any other writer on the subject, AFP was never interested in doing a book about 9-11 with me. This is an intelligence tactic called "stealing the thunder." If AFP were truly interested in exposing the Israeli role in 9-11, why have they not asked to publish my ground-breaking book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World?
So, what have I done to deserve being subjected to the vicious and concerted campaign of calumny, slander, and libel? What is it that I have done that bothers them so much that they spend time attacking me?
This is easy. Apart from raising my family, for the past eight years my only vocation has been to research and write about the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. As an investigative journalist I have led the way in investigating the role of Israeli intelligence and Zionist agents in the United States in the terror attacks of 9-11.
If my 9-11 research and writing is the reason these detractors are attacking me with slander and libel, who are they doing it for?
It stands to reason that these four are working as agents of an agency that is interested in my research being discredited and marginalized. Because my thesis is that the state of Israel and Zionists in the U.S. are behind 9-11, these must be the same entities behind the anti-Bollyn slander campaign. This makes sense because well-known Zionist entities such as Rupert Murdoch's FOX News, CNN, and the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz have all tried to smear me as an anti-Semite
Are these four detractors connected with a Zionist agency or the state of Israel?
Eric Hufschmid's father, with whom he works closely, is the father of the wife of Rupert Murdoch's son James, heir apparent of the Murdoch media empire. Smith is a former narcotics user who has several felony convictions that were suddenly cleared up immediately before he began his career with "The French Connection" in early 2005.
Piper and Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) work for a newspaper called American Free Press, where I worked as an independent contractor (since the fall of 2001) after being hired in the spring of 2000. AFP claims to be an employee-owned newspaper, which is a deception meant to fool readers. AFP has no assets to own. Everything of value associated with the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press is held by a host of shell companies with names like "The Committee to Expose Bunk", which issued my paychecks, for example. Michael Piper is one of the people allowed to sign checks from these entities.
The person who is the mastermind of the shell game involving the assets of the Liberty Lobby is Mark Lane, the Jewish lawyer who played a crucial role in the massacre at Jonestown, Guyana.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Lane_in...wn_cropped.JPG
Mark Lane was present at Jonestown during the massacre. He is considered to
have played a key role in provoking the massacre by playing on the fears of Jim
Jones. This photo with Jones (left) was taken shortly before the mass
suicide/massacre. How odd that Lane became the lawyer, and then owner of the
Liberty Lobby several years later.
Lane has been the lawyer of the Liberty Lobby since the mid-1980s and received some $5 million in legal fees, according to a veteran Liberty Lobby insider. Lane, who served in U.S. Army Intelligence in Germany at the end of the war, acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1993 or 1994, according to L.T. Patterson (owner of Criminal Politics), who discovered this fact during a court process in which Lane was suing Patterson.
Who does Lane work for?
Lane must work for the C.I.A. Having worked for Army Intelligence in the mid-1940s, it stands to reason that Lane became one of the head honchos in the Jewish intelligence cabal in Army Intelligence that became the C.I.A. in 1949. This would explain Lane's role in his writings on the Warren Report, the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, Jonestown, and the so-called patriot movement at the Liberty Lobby.
But isn't the C.I.A. working to protect the nation and the people of the United States?
Obviously not. The C.I.A. was criticized for being asleep at the switch on 9-11, but it is really much worse than that. The C.I.A. actually works against the interests of the republic and the American people. The C.I.A. is obviously deeply involved in the commission of the terrorism crime of 9-11. Rather than preventing 9-11 or finding the culprits of the atrocity, the C.I.A. has been exploiting the 9-11 deception to wage war using drone warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Asked about the C.I.A. attacks in Pakistan, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded as if she had no legal authority or control over the C.I.A., which was a remarkably candid response from a U.S. Secretary of State. Her response indicated that the C.I.A. is a rogue agency that acts outside the control of the U.S. administration. How can that be?
What is the C.I.A.'s interest in Afghanistan and Pakistan?
The C.I.A. is clearly not interested in solving 9-11 or finding the culprits. We know that the Twin Towers were demolished using an advanced form of super-thermite (produced using nano-technology) and that the official version that Osama Bin Laden carried out 9-11 from a cave in Afghanistan is nothing but a pack of lies. The C.I.A. is involved in Afghanistan because that's where most of the world's opium is produced. George H.W. Bush, the former director of the C.I.A., was also a director of the Eli Lilly Company, the pharmaceutical giant that manufactures Prozac. Bush was also one of the first students at Israel's Yonatan [Netanyahu] Institute of terrorism in 1979. Since the production of opium has skyrocketed since the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, we can assume that opium production is one of the purposes of the war and occupation. Prior to the invasion of 2001, the Taliban regime, which the U.S. is fighting against, had succeeded in eradicating nearly all opium production in Afghanistan.
This explains why American Free Press was so strongly opposed to my articles about the dangerous effects of Prozac and similar drugs. When Ellen Mariani, a 9-11 widow, told me that the grieving relatives had been sent to Red Cross doctors who had prescribed Prozac – the editor at AFP cut it out of the story. My subsequent articles about serotonin-affecting drugs and school shootings were rejected out-of-hand. This was clearly a subject that the American Free Press did not want to take up.
One has to remember what Andreas von Bülow said about intelligence agencies in December 2001: "Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation." The first target of the deception and disinformation of the C.I.A. is the people of the United States. This is a rogue agency that must be disbanded if the American republic is to survive. The C.I.A. is no sacred cow, some sacrosanct institution that can be allowed to carry out its own agenda, wage war, and maintain secret prisons, all in the name of our democratic American republic. The C.I.A. is a rogue agency that is obviously an enemy of American democracy. The United States of America cannot survive as a democratic republic with the C.I.A. operating as the shadow government. The C.I.A. is nothing but a band of organized criminals operating under the guise of the United States. By dissolving the C.I.A. we would obtain answers to many of the crimes committed in the past 60 years.
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
thats interesting reading
I can only speak of what I remember, and DBS and Bollyn had there falling out after they finally met, Bollyn traveled to France.
DBS made the comment that Bollyn got "snookered" at their meeting
Bollyn made the comment that DBS's wife was Black and a "hip hop dancer" /instructor
Things went downhill from there, mud slinging, etc
Bollyn is not as innocent as he portrays himself IMO
they had personal issues between them
DBS has even posted some of Bollyns articles (only recently)
perhaps an olive branch?
anyway it all came apart after they met in France.
and then Bollyn posted that picture of DBS (which apparently DBS had said "please do not post it")
and then Bollyn started calling DBS a fake, because his dad was a marine fighter pilot, and died in service, and then his mom remarried.
Well DBS changed his name late in life, to keep his fathers sur name, Bollyn latched onto that, called DBS a phoney, etc
Bollyn is not lily white,
but the main point is that all of their issues are personal, has nothign to do with the quality of their research/ work
Hufschmidt is a different issue IMO
he is a plant/ tool
I think he instigated some of the infighting between smith and bollyn, whispering in their ears....
Bollyn and Smith should just make a phone call, or do a visit sweden and france are not that far, thery could certainly develop a professional relationship (supporting each others works) if not a personal relationship
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
It's a tangled web they all weave that's for sure.
Mark Lane of AFPress is sure a curious operator. Bollyn says Lane was in Army Intelligence in Germany in the mid-40s after the war? I'm thinking how old is Lane? I look at Lane's wiki entry, they say he's born 2/24/1927 making him 83 now, & meaning 2/24/45 he'd have just turned 18, which is around when Bollyn claims Lane served in Army intel... ?!? Of course wiki's "early career" info begins in 1959, when Lane would've been ~32, nothing about Lane before that. To read wiki's spin about Lane's "innocent" role in Jonestown is almost funny, when you assume that Lane was (is) indeed a CIA asset. Lane's central role in Liberty-Lobby/Spotlight/AFP lends credence to Bollyn's assertion that the enterprise is ultimately a sticky-flypaper op.
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Large Sarge
Hufschmidt is a different issue IMO
he is a plant/ tool
I think he instigated some of the infighting between smith and bollyn, whispering in their ears....
Hufschmidt caused the whole thing. His tribe are pros at doing that kind of mindgame thing on goyim.
DBS and Bollyn should realize this and now reconcile.
:oo-->
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Book
Quote:
Originally Posted by Large Sarge
Hufschmidt is a different issue IMO
he is a plant/ tool
I think he instigated some of the infighting between smith and bollyn, whispering in their ears....
Hufschmidt caused the whole thing. His tribe are pros at doing that kind of mindgame thing on goyim.
DBS and Bollyn should realize this and now reconcile.
:oo-->
You may feel differently about Huffy instigating the DBS/Bollyn rift if you listen to the couple of recorded phone calls DBS made to Huffy, DBS drunk & cussing like a sailor about the need to destroy Bollyn.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-p...-8Sep2007.html
(mp3s about 2/3 down that page)
Huffy's compromised himself though, I agree with Bollyn that Huffy's stubborn insistence that Bollyn/family are kidnapped by Mossad etc, providing no evidence, just repeating it over & over even in recent interviews-- very "strange".
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
You may feel differently about Huffy instigating the DBS/Bollyn rift if you listen to the couple of
recorded phone calls DBS made to Huffy, DBS drunk & cussing like a sailor about the need to destroy Bollyn.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-p...-8Sep2007.html
(mp3s about 2/3 down that page)
Huffy's compromised himself though, I agree with Bollyn that Huffy's stubborn insistence that Bollyn/family are kidnapped by Mossad etc, providing no evidence, just repeating it over & over even in recent interviews-- very "strange".
Gee...I dunno PatoColo: Huffy made those silent secret phone recordings of DBS being drunk bad-mouthing Bollyn then posted those embarrassing recordings on the internet. After Huffy did the usual jew divide-and-conquer-the-goyim headgame on drunkard DBS. Bollyn was Huffy's target all along and so he used the drunkard goyim DBS as his dupe character-assassin.
Didn't you just make my point for me buddy?
:D
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Book, what specific content of the article(s) linked, or the DBS/Huffy phone call mp3s, leads you to believe Huffy was the central instigator?
As far as I can gather, DBS appeared to be the aggressor in seeking to discredit Bollyn by any (dishonest) means necessary-- for "reasons" I never saw evidenced (IE alleged Bollyn "lies" about DBS).
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
Book, what specific content of the article(s) linked, or the DBS/Huffy phone call mp3s, leads you to believe Huffy was the central instigator?
As far as I can gather, DBS appeared to be the aggressor in seeking to discredit Bollyn by any (dishonest) means necessary-- for "reasons" I never saw evidenced (IE alleged Bollyn "lies" about DBS).
I dunno anymore then you do PatColo. The fact that Huffy secretly recorded the phone calls then publicly posted those recordings on the internet is evidence to me. DBS was obviously drunk and he reasonably assumed that his "friend" Huffy was not recording their phone conversations.
I think Huffy head-played DBS like a goy violin. Since then Huffy shriveled up and his website died. DBS and Bollyn are still going strong and have many fans. OK with me if you still see it differently buddy.
:)
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Interesting.... Dont want to derail the conversation but how does Piper fit into all this? ???
What do you guy's think???
:dunno
Also, and why did DBS leave RBN....?
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Book
I dunno anymore then you do PatColo. The fact that Huffy secretly recorded the phone calls then publicly posted those recordings on the internet is evidence to me. DBS was obviously drunk and he reasonably assumed that his "friend" Huffy was not recording their phone conversations.
I think Huffy head-played DBS like a goy violin. Since then Huffy shriveled up and his website died. DBS and Bollyn are still going strong and have many fans. OK with me if you still see it differently buddy.
:)
Book: seems like you assume Huffy orchestrated the DBS/Bollyn rift mainly coz you assume Huffy to be a crypto-joo/zio-agent. I certainly allow for this possibility, as for one thing, Huffy's 'evil jooz' schtick is just over the top enough that it smells to me like chutzpah-maneuver-101 bunk. For that matter, ditto for DBS. And Huffy's long since needed to put out or shut up re Bollyn/family being kidnapped & held...
But in this instance, Huffy 'splains his decision to record the calls (first call's a partial recording coz Huffy didn't initiate it, but did grab the recording equipment during the call), and then his decision to post them on the internet, within the article:
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-p...-8Sep2007.html
To me, the weightier evidence as to "who's guiltiest?" is the content of the calls, which definitely don't reflect well on the nature/agenda of DBS.
Judging by some of his "fruits", I know Huffy's compromised in some way so I'm not about defending him, but his site is still up, http://www.erichufschmid.net, and he does an article or audio monologue or radio interview now & then, but from what I've seen, he's the lowest profile/traffic/etc compared to DBS, Bollyn, or Piper.
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by KumbayaMan
Interesting.... Dont want to derail the conversation but how does Piper fit into all this? ???
What do you guy's think???
:dunno
Also, and why did DBS leave RBN....?
The Piper thing is addressed in the OP.
On DBS history with RBN, & GCN, I can't keep the details straight & it's been years that DBS has been "independent" anyways, but I know DBS has bad mouthed the owners of... at least GCN (T.Anderson?), of being a double crossing agent or some such. Seems like DBS doesn't like RBN's Stadtmiller either, can't remember why.. maybe search iamthewitness for something explaining. DBS is so full of piss & vinegar, it's easy to imagine he just doesn't play well with others, "not a joiner", yada yada. dyodd.
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Why would I put personal phone calls on the Internet?
These are not personal phone calls. I only extracted the sections that did not have the personal information. I would not refer to these as "personal" phone calls. I would refer to them as evidence that an organized crime network is desperately trying to manipulate me.
Huffy rationalizing that their phone calls were not "personal" phone calls...lol.
:oo-->
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsYHVHm3Y20
Huffy looks like Chertoff's cousin...lol.
:oo-->
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Thanks Pat...
guess I need to look into it...
Been listening to Piper on and off for a few years and just started listening to DBS's podcast a few months ago.
He does seem to not play well with others but I think his show is good and could never understand why these guy's werent more "together" on point... I only recently learned DBS started out on RBN so that's why I asked. Anyway, I have my thoughts about RBN... Stadtmiller seems to do some bone head things with the network sometimes...
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
The Piper thing is addressed in the OP.
I understand, what I meant was what did you think about the whole Mark Lang / AFP thing w/ Piper, is there another angle to this?
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
PatColo: Proof in the pudding is how DBS's website flourished since he canned Huffy.
:)
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Book
Quote:
Why would I put personal phone calls on the Internet?
These are not personal phone calls. I only extracted the sections that did not have the personal information. I would not refer to these as "personal" phone calls. I would refer to them as evidence that an organized crime network is desperately trying to manipulate me.
Huffy rationalizing that their phone calls were not "personal" phone calls...lol.
:oo-->
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsYHVHm3Y20
Huffy looks like Chertoff's cousin...lol.
:oo-->
Quote:
Originally Posted by Book
PatColo: Proof in the pudding is how DBS's website flourished since he canned Huffy.
:)
Huffy edited out "personal" parts of the calls (as he stated in the article); you're correct that Huffy's not pretty to look at; & Huffy's site is not intended as a "daily news pitstop" like DBS' site is. Book, if you're making the case that Huffy=BAD (crypto/agent/etc), & DBS=GOOD (honest/non-compromised/etc), you're not making a very convincing case so far, "lol". :oo-->
I listened to this Huffy interview a few weeks ago, interesting throughout:
Quote:
Tuesday, 2 Feb 2010
I was interviewed by "Botrax" in Canada. He is familiar with the corruption, so this is not an introduction for beginners. We talk about Zionism, Bollyn, and how Zionism is failing.
Click here MP3
Huffy keeps sowing seeds of doubt about the true status of the Bollyns, providing no evidence to substantiate: How can so many people be certain that the Bollyns are free?
Huffy was also interviewed last Nov by Mike Delaney/Prothink, which to me is an obvious FBI/ADL op,
Quote:
Thursday, 12 Nov 2009
I am a guest on the show hosted by Mike of ProThink.org We talk about how I got involved with 9/11, and what I think is happening to the crime network today. A direct link to it is
here.
...so Huffy who ostensibly doesn't trust anyone, says everyone must be investigated; apparently thinks "prothink" is legit? LOL another arrow through Huffy's cred.
Huffy 5/3 on the gulf oil disaster & more,
How many accidents
are actually diabolical crimes?
again not vouching for Huffy, just look at his stuff with your brain kept in the "ON" position. :-*
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
...so Huffy who ostensibly doesn't trust anyone, says everyone must be investigated; apparently thinks "prothink" is legit? LOL another arrow through Huffy's cred.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/img/Eri...hmid-small.jpg
PARANOIA GUY
I never went back to Huffy's website after reading his insane SHRILL accusations that everyone, and he means everyone, is a Crypto except him. It got old PatColo.
And yes...I still visit http://www.iamthewitness.com/ occasionally and think it is 100 times better without Huffy.
:-*
-
Right out of the Protocols,
out of the whole thing Bollyn is the only one trustworthy.
-
Hufschmid's sister is married to Rupert Murdoch's son.
-
I just read this entire thread for the first time. There is a ton of good info here. I never got deep enough into any of these guys either way.
I cant believe Hufschmid's sister married Murdoch's son. Amazing. As if this was some type of 'coincidence'. Give me a break.
We must keep in mind that Zionist probably started the 9/11 truth movement.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sui Juris
We must keep in mind that Zionist probably started the 9/11 truth movement.
This nut case never went away. Who remembers this guy, this is a job for PatColo.
Inside Job: Seven Questions About 9/11 | BobTuskin.com
Is Jim Fetzer making a comeback ? LOL
This is how they operate, do some good and become leaders after building up
some credibility, then they do some sort of damage, even as subtle as making
sure the movement makes no progress, many examples of this, you may hear
the total truth from them but it will never go anywhere, then there's the blatant
outright damage. And remember, never ascribe malice where incompetence rules,
incompetence is their excuse, so say the head Masons. : boxing smiley :
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MAGNES
I still don't trust Fetzer. It seems he went through a rehab/reinvention of his former discredited "truther" image, even pointing the finger at the perps of 911 - the zionists. He was for a time on the "development group" of this otherwise very credible ZIHOP 911 Truth site:
http://rediscover911.com/
... but I notice Fetzer is no longer displayed in that list (top right). His article- Is 9/11 research ‘anti-Semitic’? - still appears at the site.
Fetzer is still peddling "no planes at WTC/ video fakery" which insults the intelligence of real truthers & noobs alike-- the exact point of such a ploy- sow division in the movement and turn away noobs before they get around to reviewing any of the real issues.
Fetzer was on Kevin Barrett's radio show recently, MP3 here: 06/27/2011 Monday - 1st Hour: With Jim Fetzer. 2nd Hour: With Stephen Lendman.
Barrett gives him general respect but also asks good questions about the problems with Fetzers "no planes @ WTC" noise.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
I still don't trust Fetzer. It seems he went through a rehab/reinvention of his former discredited "truther" image, even pointing the finger at the perps of 911 - the zionists. He was for a time on the "development group" of this otherwise very credible ZIHOP 911 Truth site:
http://rediscover911.com/
... but I notice Fetzer is no longer displayed in that list (top right). His article-
Is 9/11 research ‘anti-Semitic’? - still appears at the site.
Fetzer is still peddling "no planes at WTC/ video fakery" which insults the intelligence of real truthers & noobs alike-- the exact point of such a ploy- sow division in the movement and turn away noobs before they get around to reviewing any of the real issues.
Fetzer was on Kevin Barrett's radio show recently, MP3 here:
06/27/2011 Monday - 1st Hour: With Jim Fetzer. 2nd Hour: With Stephen Lendman.
Barrett gives him general respect but also asks good questions about the problems with Fetzers "no planes @ WTC" noise.
Thread: Lawson Video on Absurdity of "No Planes Hit WTC" Theory
OP of that thread includes Bollyn's 8/5/11 post, Lawson Video on "No Planes" Theory
-
also new from Bollyn:
Debunking the Lies of Michael Piper
Updated August 4, 2011
Have patience awhile; slanders are not long-lived. Truth is the child of time; ere long she shall appear to vindicate thee.
- Immanuel Kant
The worthiest people are the most injured by slander, as is the best fruit which the birds have been pecking at.
- Jonathan Swift
For the past five years I have been subjected to an incredible amount of slander and defamation. Oddly, most of the defamation comes from two people with whom I was formerly associated, namely Eric Hufschmid and Michael Piper. Both of them lie about me with impunity with orders to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. They have both clearly been given orders to attack my credibility and kill me with ignominy.
In this respect Hufschmid and Piper act in the same way as Daryl Bradford Smith, who was recorded threatening Hufschmid and ordering him to "Slam Bollyn every way you can" in 2007. The similarity of their efforts indicates they are working under the same orders and most likely for the same agency. A sure indication of an agent is his ability to lie with impunity. It seems logical that it is not because my 9/11 research is flawed or incorrect that these three disinformation agents have been ordered to attack me -- but because it is correct and true.
The following is from the beginning of the 2007 conversation in which the agent Daryl B. Smith (DBS) rudely threatens and orders Eric Hufschmid (EH) to attack me every way he could. To listen to Smith screaming and swearing like a complete madman gives the listener some idea of the intensity of the vile and malicious effort to defame me. Smith, who is supported by Michael Piper as "a genuine anti-Zionist", is obviously under the influence of a very evil power.
DBS: Well, here's a deal. And this is between you and me, because we've been doing this a long time together. You have to come out and, and slam Bollyn every way you can, in my, in support of me. Every way you can. No compromise. If you don't, I want parting from our, from our relationship.
EH: But what do you mean, slam him?
DBS: I, whatever the f--k you need to do to make this son-of-a--- be crippled by the s--t he's doing. I'm talking about a full court press on this guy. I'm talking about whatever it is you know about him, whatever it is you can say about him, whatever it is you can do about him, you need to do now. And if you can't do that, Eric, we gotta go. I gotta go.
Although they have also attacked each other, Hufschmid, Smith, and Piper work in harmony in their attacks against me. Hufschmid and Piper both claim, for example, that I am under the control of Zionists and that they are the only true anti-Zionists. Hufschmid, for example, has claimed since 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Israeli Mossad. Based on this ridiculous claim, Hufschmid has ignored my 9/11 research for the past five years, such as my book Solving 9/11, saying that I am writing "Zionist bait" under the control of my kidnappers. I dealt with Hufschmid in an article entitled "Eric Hufschmid and Rupert Murdoch - Agents of Deception" written in October 2010.
Michael Piper, on the other hand, goes further and fabricates malicious lies about me and my wife in his relentless effort to defame me. As a veteran writer and senior officer at American Free Press, however, Piper's defamation is much more serious because he represents a newspaper and organization which many patriotic Americans believe in and support. It is for this reason that it is absolutely imperative for me to debunk and expose the falseness of the vicious lies of Michael Piper. By seeing how he is lying about an honest 9/11 researcher, one is able to understand Piper's role as an agent of the other side. A silver lining of the undercover police attack and malicious prosecution that I suffered in the corrupt courts of Cook County in 2007 is that through this ordeal Michael Piper and American Free Press were fully exposed as controlled opposition agents under the thumb of the Jewish lawyer, Mark Lane.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Piper.JPG
Michael Piper of
American Free Press is paid to defame me with lies and disinformation. Exposing Piper's defamation is essential to understanding his role as a controlled disinformation agent.
As an independent journalist since June 2000, I have written about a number of significant and sensitive subjects. As a journalist with American Free Press, a weekly paper based in Washington, D.C., I wrote a great deal about the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 from the day of the attacks until October 2006. Then, suddenly, I was fired from AFP in early October 2006 after being attacked by three heavily-armed undercover police at my home in mid-August 2006.
Our police departments are being made adjuncts of the ADL's efforts to suppress dissent in America. Outspoken journalists such as Bollyn are the frontline targets. Don't let it happen in your town.
- Michael Piper, "ADL Link to Bollyn Case", American Free Press, 27 August 2006
After the assault by the three-man tactical squad, which left me TASERed with a broken elbow, the populist paper I wrote for suddenly turned against me. This change was most obvious in the behavior of Michael Piper, a corporate officer of American Free Press. Two weeks after the assault on their star journalist, Piper demanded that the publisher, Willis Carto, refuse to allow me to attend the paper's annual conference, held in Washington D.C. over the Labor Day weekend. During 2005 and 2006, however, Piper had always introduced me to his radio audience as "America's best investigative journalist, bar none." Now, days after being attacked by a tactical team of undercover cops, Piper was demanding that "America's best investigative journalist" be barred from attending AFP's annual conference. How much sense does that make?
This was very odd to say the least and speaks volumes about the real nature of American Free Press. There I was, an American journalist who had done a great deal of original research on 9/11, beaten and TASERed at his home by a corrupt police force. There is a huge and very important story there. All of the things AFP warns its patriotic readers about had actually happened to their star reporter in the middle of the United States, but they did not want me talking about it at their annual conference. How very odd. Although I was not allowed to attend the conference this did not stop AFP from collecting thousands of dollars from their readership for my legal defense fund.
Michael Piper has continued to wage a relentless campaign of defamation against me ever since. Defamation is the act of damaging a person's reputation by saying or writing bad or false things about them. Today, nearly 5 years after I was fired from American Free Press, Piper continues to defame me. The first question is why? Why would an officer of a so-called patriotic newspaper go to such lengths to defame an independent 9/11 researcher? Piper is one of the controlling people at American Free Press. When I began working at the Liberty Lobby in the summer of 2000, Michael Piper would eat lunch at a local restaurant with Willis Carto, Mark Lane, and the accountant, Blayne Hutzel. As one of the corporate officers, Piper is allowed to sign checks from the various companies that control the funds for the organization.
Piper seeks to defame me by using lies to portray me as a Zionist agent who has sabotaged the 9/11 "movement". A Google search of my name, for example, brings up a webpage entitled "Christopher Bollyn - Agent Saboteur", just below the link to my own website Bollyn.com. The "Agent Saboteur" link brings the reader to a website called takeourworldback.com, which has a very large section devoted to defaming me and my investigative research on 9/11.
The most recent defamation on this site is called The Bollyn - Hufschmid - Murdoch "Coincidence", revised on July 17, 2011. This page begins by saying that I am a "suspected Zionist infiltrator" and a "proven liar" who uses a "a standard COINTELPRO tactic from the 1960s of smearing genuine activists as 'agents'."
The introduction, or Executive Summary, is very short but reveals a great deal about what is really going on at TakeOurWorldBack.com:
Two suspected Zionist infiltrators come on to the anti-Zionist 9/11 truth scene within a year of 9/11, both collaborate for years after 9/11 - from 2002 to 2007 at least, and both are using a standard COINTELPRO tactic from the 1960s of smearing genuine activists as "agents". Both of them are proven liars who promote disinformation and are a liability to the truth movement. And it turns out that both of these Judas Goats are connected to billionaire Zionist media mogul Rupert Murdoch.
According to attorney Brian Glick, the FBI used four basic methods for their COINTELPRO of the 1960s: Infiltration by agents and informers, psychological warfare from the outside, harassment through the legal system, and extralegal force and violence. His book, War At Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists and What We Can Do About It, has the following description for infiltration (page 10):
1. Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents.
[The next 3 paragraphs describe what I also call the CHUTZPAH MANEUVER... -PC]
Glick points out how agents accuse genuine activists of the very deceptions that agents are themselves guilty of.
Covert Manipulation to Make A Legitimate Activist Appear to be an Agent: An actual agent will often point the finger at a genuine, non-collaborating and highly-valued group member, claiming that he or she is the infiltrator.
Although the author of takeourworldback.com is not known, Michael Piper is clearly the source and author of most of the material about me. He has crafted these lies about me, my wife, and others in an effort to discredit and defame me. Reading through the document, which I call "the Piper piece", it is clear that he is using projection, just as Brian Glick says agents will do. Agents accuse genuine activists of the very deceptions that agents are themselves guilty of.
GENUINE ACTIVIST vs AGENT
People who don't know me might be fooled into believing the lies of Michael Piper. This is, after all, what the people who control Piper want. He works very hard at spreading lies and disinformation about me because he is ordered to do so -- and is being paid for it. Using bald-faced lies mixed with facts, Piper spins a web of disinformation which he hopes the gullible reader will believe. Sowing suspicion about me and my work is the goal.
It needs to be said that this response is not a personal attack on Michael Piper. This is simply a much-needed response to his campaign of disinformation and defamation against me. There is nothing personal between me and Mike Piper. He is simply an agent of disinformation who poses as an American patriot. By attacking me Piper hopes to create suspicion and doubt in the reader's mind about me and my 9/11 research. The purpose is "to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters", as Glick says. This is what agents and informers do. I am the genuine activist and Piper is the agent seeking to smear me as an agent. There are so many lies in the Piper piece that I can't address each of them individually. I will try to expose the key lies in his tangled web of deception so that the reader can see who is telling the truth, and who is lying.
Piper claims that my wife and I were spying on him in Mexico in 1997. "In April of 1997, the Bollyn couple were tailing Mike Piper in Cancun, Mexico," the webpage says. Piper goes on to say that when he met us in May 2000 he realized that we were "the same couple" that had tailed him in Cancun in 1997. If Piper truly realized in 2000 that Helje and I had been trailing him in Mexico, why did he promote me to his listeners in 2006 as "America's best investigative journalist, bar none"? Piper was either deceiving his listeners in 2006, or he is lying about us having trailed him in Mexico. In either case, he is trapped in his own lies.
The idea that we were following Piper in Mexico is a complete fabrication. My wife Helje has never even been to Mexico, and I have not been there since the 1980s. My wife, who was pregnant for most of 1997, had her hands full raising our two-year old son. She certainly was not interested in following Michael Piper. After all, we did not even know who Michael Piper was in 1997. If he really believed that we had been tailing him in Mexico in 1997, why did he never mention this to me during the 6 years we worked together at AFP?
Piper also claims that my wife was a "nude model" and that we had shown him "her nude modelling photos". This is another lie. Helje worked as a professional model in Stockholm and Chicago, where we lived, but none of her work can be called nude modelling. The only photo that he could be referring to is one of Helje and our 10-month old son for a Stockholm traffic safety campaign billboard that encouraged drivers to use proper baby car seats for their children. This campaign was quite unusual because Sweden does not allow billboards along the highways. This photo was part of an official child safety campaign that used special billboards on 14 highway ramps around Stockholm in 1996 and 1997.
The document claims that Helje has two Jewish names, Brand and Kaskel. Firstly, Brand is not Helje's name at all. Brand is the name of my mother's Swiss-born foster father. Kaskel may be a Jewish name but in the case of Helje's family they only took this name in 1938 during a campaign in the Republic of Estonia to encourage people with foreign-sounding names to take names that sounded more Estonian. Helje's father's family name was Klaassen, a name of Scandinavian origin. Her grandfather received 5 crowns for choosing the name Kaskel from a list of names.
Piper's disinformation piece also claims that my first wife was an "Israeli intelligence officer." This baseless claim is repeated throughout the piece as if it were a proven fact. The fact of the matter is that when she was drafted into the army, like all Israeli girls at age 18, Bosmat was assigned to work as a secretary, which was normal for a girl with her profile. She did not like working in the army and got married to get out. To call her an intelligence officer when there is absolutely no evidence to support this claim is dishonest.
The Piper piece also claims that I worked with Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith. This is not true. I have always worked as an independent journalist. Hufschmid and Smith invited me to speak on their "French Connection" podcast as did many others. I was reluctant to speak with Smith because I had seen that he had already begun defaming me after I had visited him at his home in France.
Piper also takes rather normal things and spins them in a way to make me look suspicious. The fact that I travelled via Germany to go from Brussels to Smith's house in France leads Piper to all kinds of speculation. The simple fact of the matter is that there was a French rail strike at the time. I decided to use the German trains, which give extremely good value for travelling families, and then rent a car from Geneva. I also travel to Switzerland when I can because I enjoy visiting the country where some of my ancestors came from.
The Piper piece also makes a big deal of the fact that I met Rupert Murdoch when I was a ski guide at the Pine Creek Cookhouse near Aspen, Colorado. What Michael Piper or his fellow agent don't seem to understand is that the Pine Creek Cookhouse is a place that is frequented by many people like Murdoch. It was not at all unusual to see Hollywood stars and politicians in the dining room. Once I saw a short fellow at the workbench in the ski shop and wondered what he was doing. It turned out to be Michael Douglas. One of our regular visitors was Robert McNamara, who enjoyed back country skiing in the peaks above Aspen.
[cont'd next post...]
-
[...cont'd from previous]
It is important to note that the Piper piece, which claims I am a "proven liar", promotes Piper and Smith as "genuine anti-Zionists". Smith revealed himself as an agent in 2007 when he was taped telling Hufschmid to "slam Bollyn every way you can." It is obvious that Piper and Smith are controlled by the same people and have the same orders -- "Slam Bollyn."
I only went ahead and spoke on the "French Connection" because I believed it was more important to get the information out about 9/11 than to refuse to participate. It is, however, utterly false to say that I was working with Hufschmid and Smith. It is more correct to say that they were using my research to bring attention to their show. Hufschmid did tell me about Sam Danner, who turned out to be a 9/11 hoaxer.
The Piper defamation piece says that I am responsible for the deception of Sam Danner, a person who apparently lied when he said that he had been at the Pentagon on 9/11. I had interviewed Sam Danner at length and found his testimony to be interesting and credible. I wrote two articles about Danner's testimony for American Free Press. Both articles included the necessary caveats, such as "if true" and "if accurate", etc. to warn the reader that the article was based on eyewitness testimony. "If his account is true" is how I introduced Danner's material. This lets the reader know that this is not factual, but a person's recollection. The reader is warned and can decide how credible he sounds.
Apart from outright lies, the Piper document claims that I am a "proven liar" because I have reported people saying things that were later challenged by another person or through another source. In these cases, however, Piper or his partner readily accept the veracity of the claim made by the other party and say this proves that I am lying. My report that Benjamin Chertoff, for example, who worked on Popular Mechanics "9/11 debunking" article, was related to Michael Chertoff, is said by Piper to be a lie because Benjamin has disputed what his mother told me on the phone. The Piper piece also misrepresents the Chertoff connection to 9/11 by completely ignoring the fact that Michael Chertoff, as Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division, played the key role in the 9/11 cover-up by supervising the federal non-investigation of 9/11 and the destruction of the crucial evidence. In this way the Piper piece seeks to protect Michael Chertoff. How odd.
When asked about the relationship with Michael Chertoff, Benjamin's mother told me "they are cousins", which is how I reported it. The Piper piece says that Benjamin said his mother had said "they might be distant cousins." This is certainly not what she told me, but the Piper piece takes the words of Benjamin Chertoff as true in order to present me as a liar. He does the same with the account of my arrest at the hand of the corrupt police of Hoffman Estates. By accepting the words of the police who attacked me as the complete truth, the Piper piece seeks to portray me as a liar, even when the dispatch timeline clearly supports my statements about the police conspiracy to injure me.
MOLTEN METAL
Another example is what I reported having been told by Mark Loizeaux about the discovery of molten metal at the base of the three collapsed towers of the World Trade Center:
AFP [Bollyn] asked Loizeaux about the report of molten steel on the site. "Yes," he said, "hot spots of molten steel in the basements." These incredibly hot areas were found "at the bottoms of the elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven [basement] levels," Loizeaux said. The molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed," Loizeaux said. He said molten steel was also found at 7 WTC, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon.
This is exactly what Mark Loizeaux told me during our telephone conversation in 2002. The Piper piece says that I have deliberately misquoted Loizeaux, which is a lie. I reported what Loizeaux told me in his own words. How would anyone know what Loizeaux said to me, other than myself and Mark Loizeaux? Furthermore, Loizeaux has never complained or claimed that what I reported about his comments was in any way incorrect. If I had misquoted Loizeaux I would expect to hear from him.
There are many lies about my arrest following the undercover police assault on me at my home in August 2006. The Piper piece, for example, claims that I lied when I said that I was thrown into a cell with no water and told to drink from the toilet. To prove that I am lying, the Piper piece shows a jail cell in Hoffman Estates with a toilet and sink. In my case, I asked for water because I was very thirsty and no water came from the tap when the button was pushed above the sink. The water flow had evidently been turned off. The Hoffman Estates police lied in court about everything that happened when they assaulted me at my home in August 2006.
One point that the Piper piece brings out is the fact that the ambulance and fire department were dispatched to my house about three minutes before the plain clothes tactical unit even arrived on the scene. This is supported by the official dispatch timeline and the fact that my wife saw the ambulance parked near our house when she stopped the undercover police coming up our driveway. The ambulance had been sent to my home to be prepared for an unknown medical emergency nearly three minutes before the undercover unit arrived.
My wife, who confronted the three plainclothes men wearing body armor coming up our driveway, saw the ambulance and fire truck in front of a neighbor's house, about 100 feet away. The fire department vehicles had been dispatched to our home at 20:01:06 while the undercover tactical unit only arrived on the scene at 20:03:56. The fire department vehicles were logged in as being on the scene at 20:03:57, only one second after the arrival of the undercover cops. This is due to the fact that the ambulance, which had been dispatched for an "unknown medical emergency", only had to travel two blocks from its station to my house.
The Piper piece also misrepresents the police response to my 911 call. I had called 911 because I had seen a suspicious vehicle with three heavily-armed men prowling around my house for two nights in a row. I pondered calling the police for a while after I had discussed the situation with my wife. What was so alarming to us was the fact that the three plainclothed men approached our house in a threatening manner. As we found out later, the tactical squad had hijacked the response to the 911 call and ordered the uniformed officer not to respond.
"Something is obviously wrong", the Piper piece says about the ambulance being dispatched before the arrival of the police:
Has there ever been a single example in human history where bent cops planned to attack someone, and helpfully called the paramedics to come to the aid of their victim in advance - thereby voluntarily providing evidence that would incriminate themselves and could be used to prove their victim's innocence in a court of law?
Yes indeed, there is something very, very wrong with the undercover police assault on Christopher Bollyn, an American journalist, at his home in August 2006.
What I discovered is evidence of a police conspiracy to injure or kill an American for exercising his Constitutional rights, which is a serious federal crime. This is why I realized that my chances of winning in the Zionist-controlled courts of Cook County were extremely slim. Had I won and been found not guilty, I would have been in an excellent position to sue the police and expose their crimes and the people who were behind their attack on me. With his lies, Piper is obviously protecting the corrupt police.
The police report claimed that they smelled alcohol on my breath -- from a distance of three meters. If there was any suspicion that I was intoxicated why did the police not do a simple breath analysis like they do for drivers? They were, after all, traffic police. The only reason I was not tested for alcohol is because there was no indication of intoxication. Rather than test me, the police used lies to try and defame me. They certainly had the means to test me, given the presence of 7 police cars, one ambulance, and a fire truck at my house that evening. Why didn't they?
The entire incident was recorded on police videotapes in the 7 police cars that came to my house. Like the crucial steel from the World Trade Center, the video evidence of the police action at my home was "recycled" by the police department in clear violation of their own regulations and my written request to preserve all the evidence. Why would the police destroy the evidence? Why was the steel from the World Trade Center destroyed?
Why has Michael Piper taken the side of the corrupt police and engaged in a defamation campaign against me for the past five years? It is certainly not because what I have written about 9/11 is wrong. If my analysis and reporting about 9/11 were inaccurate and flawed why would Piper spend so much time attacking me and my wife rather than arguing the facts about what really happened on 9/11?
I trust in the intelligence of my readers to be able to discern what is true and what is false. Michael Piper is clearly involved in spreading malicious lies and disinformation about me. More importantly, what does this say about the integrity of the outfit he is working for?
Sources:
Bollyn, Christopher, "Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can - Understanding the Purpose and Methods of Defamation", 9 December 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/slam-bollyn-every-way-you-can-daryl-b-smith-2
Bollyn, "Bollyn Responds to Malicious Slander of Daryl B. Smith", 7 September 2007
http://www.bollyn.com/bollyn-responds-to-malicious-slander-of-daryl-b-smith
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/109301
Hufschmid, Eric, "Smith's weird phone call on 8 September 2007" (with mp3 files of Smith's extremely rude and threatening phone calls to Hufschmid)
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Smith-phone-call-8Sep2007.html
Hufschmid, Part I of D.B. Smith's threatening and obscene call
http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/smith-angry-1-8sep2007.mp3
Hufschmid, Part II of DBS call
http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/smith-angry-2-8sep2007.mp3
Hufschmid, Part III of DBS call
http://www.erichufschmid.net/mp3/smith-angry-3-8sep2007.mp3
Piper, Michael, "ADL Link to Local Police Agencies Uncovered in Chris Bollyn Affair", American Free Press, 27 August 2006
http://www.bollyn.com/adl-link-to-bollyn-case-by-mc-piper
-
I am left wondering on this whole thing....
Hufschmidt I think is compromised in some way...,.
He just did a lot to sow discord
DBS has a whole library, for free,
Anyway the whole saga of "the mossad has kidnapped bollyn" when he disappeared for awhile, was strange...
then after that DBS and Huffy both were saying "bollyn is now an impostor", because he will not come out of hiding....
So some of what bollyn says corroberates that
Some of it might just be personality issues, general level of paranoia (dealing with conspiracies, etc)
to give Bollyn credit, he did pretty much solve 9/11, and he posted that book for free online.... that is the seminal work on 9/11.
I have sent DBS a number of notes urging him to "kiss and make up" with bollyn, he shows no interest in it....
-
It's a tangled web Sarge, no doubt. Past year or so I've been making Mark Glenn's The Ugly Truth blog a regular news stop, and I enjoy his podcasts. Only problem I've found with MGlenn is, he's aligned with Piper in slandering & seeking to discredit Bollyn. Glenn is much less active in this endeavor than Piper though; first and last I heard Glenn badmouth Bollyn was perhaps a year or so ago, and I'd have to find it but I recall it amounted to Glenn's taking the Police's word re the Bollyn tazering incident as gospel, and Glenn was somehow using that as the core for his effort to discredit Bollyn.
Piper's a much more toxic character than his buddy Glenn, with Piper "slamming Bollyn" in virtually every one of his podcasts I've heard- even this most recent 8/5 one, which Piper spends part of responding to this 8/4 Bollyn piece above. Piper's approach being mainly childish name calling (referring to Bollyn as "kinky balloon" ~10x per podcast) and repeating "proven liar!" over and over with only ambiguous and paper thin claims to back this up. When I'm really bored I'll listen to a Piper podcast, just to see what he's saying these days, but I can't say I enjoy or learn anything from his shtick- most of the time he's obviously full of scotch.
I do believe Bollyn about Piper being an agent, as Piper's attacks on Bollyn are just too thin yet too incessant and ongoing, esp in contrast to Bollyn's ignoring them (with Bollyn's 8/4 Piper-debunking piece above being a rare exception) and not picking fights generally, for Piper's tireless, endless Bollyn-slander-campaign to be anything but a spook disinfo op. And AFP's background with Mark Lane etc taint their trustworthiness indeed... they're surely compromised at best...
DBS' act has really cleaned up these past couple years, much less of his former piss & vinegar personality, seldom does he spend time on attacking other patriots like he used to spend way too much time doing several years ago, and lately he's just been pumping out good interviews & news links, besides his free audio/book libraries.
Hufschmid's been a joke and off the radar of real truth seekers for years already, his silly "Bollyn's been kidnapped!" campaign is only part of the reason why, next case.
I just now noticed this Mar '11 Piper podcast as I was searching his podcast page for "Bollyn"- I haven't listened, might later, anyways check it out if you're curious:
Special Broadcast
March 17th, 2011
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
this post is just about huffy- didn't want to start a thread for it.
Don't know what reminded me of him, but it had been months since I'd visited http://erichufschmid.net - which in recent years hasn't been updated very often anyways. But I went by and, see he's as erratic and weird as ever, a mix if both interesting/insightful social commentary, and disturbing perspectives.
I'm not up for writing up a whole tome on his stuff now; I'll just say check it out.
On the "disturbing" side of things, look for where he suggests that cameras everywhere, including inside hotel rooms, with video saved somewhere centrally "for awhile", would really help us know how Whitney Houston really died, and what happened with D.S.Kahn & the maid, etc. In his otherwise interesting low-functioning thyroid discussion, he posts 3 pic of his bare backside, sack & all, just so we can see how his thyroid hormone therapy has helped turn around his morbid underweight-ness.
I'm still going through his other recently added stuff, above are just some teasers, if you're curious to check the latest on this character.
edit, here's a little ditty: from Nov '10, just 1.25 year ago, long after Huffy & DBS fell out, apparently DBS called Huffy drunk again, and...
http://erichufschmid.net/Desperate-R...ate.html#Smith
Quote:
Daryl Smith called me on 2 November 2010http://erichufschmid.net/img/Daryl-Smith-tiny.JPG I didn't get the beginning of the conversation but here is most of it. His main topic was
farts! He hung up the phone when I asked,
Perhaps he was going to hang up at that time, anyway, but it's possible that I made him realize that we are going to take a
close look at his family members, including his two sons. Imagine having Daryl Smith as
your father! If his kids aren't
ashamed, something is seriously wrong with them.
More information about Smith is here, if you're not sure who he is.
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
In his otherwise interesting low-functioning thyroid discussion, he posts 3 pic of his bare backside, sack & all, just so we can see how his thyroid hormone therapy has helped turn around his morbid underweight-ness.
I see Piper picked up on the above "nude huffy pics", and pokes fun at huffy near the top of the following podcast he just posted. His comments amount to, "I told you years ago what a nut this huffy is!",
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Bump, I need to re-read this thread.
Related:
Fake Patriots thread
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Bollyn has this article up, scorning American Free Press for publishing 2 articles endorsing both leading zio-puppet prez candidates. Then he rehashes his thoughts on why AFP is controlled opposition.
AFP and Disinformation: How it works
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
The above Bollyn article sparked a couple MCP podcasts flaming Bollyn. MCP's flame efforts are quite void of substance- really boiling down to calling Bollyn silly names like "kinky balloon", and saying he's a big dummy head.
Mami's shit blog has been posting all (?) of MCP's podcasts, recently with this graphic,
The Piper Report 2012.09.09
http://i49.tinypic.com/35m432a.jpg
LOL ;D
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
latest in Piper's ongoing pedantic smear campaign against bollyn (& other topics too), haven't listened... off hand I say shame on any "patriot" who props up the cruel hoax that our vote counts whatsoever... FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"
The Piper Report 2012.09.16
Piper's official endorsement of Obama for the next presidency of the USA, some stuff about kinky balloon again. Mark Glenn shows up and much much more!. LMAO
Mike Piper Report.com
AFP
RBN
Download MP3 (at link)
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
This discussion MP3, a recorded phone conversation between Eric Hufschmid and some Israeli operative supposedly named "Hogarl", took place in Aug '09 but I just stumbled upon it. Eric describes it this way:
Quote:
In this conversation, Hogarl tries to convince me over and over that the Jews are beating us. I responded with some issues that I think are very important for you to understand, and I suppose the criminal Jews don't want to hear this. Namely, that I think the Jewish crime network is losing, and that they suffer from two
fatal flaws that will cause them to lose time after time. Here is that phone conversation, missing the first minute or so. He hangs up on me at the end, or his phone disconnected by accident.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/img/audio_icon.gif Hufschmid-Hogar-2Aug2009.mp3 7.1 mb, 60 mins
To download, click your right mouse button and select Save Target As
So it's an hour long, where the two are arguing round and round about whether the zionist crime network is "winning" or not in their goal of taking over the world.
Early in, "Hogarl" is asked what country he's from, and he vaguely identifies himself as "European", declining to be more specific. His Israeli accent is conspicuous. While Hogarl's Israeli-Jewishness is obvious, it's never said openly. Within just a few minutes though, Hogarl stops referring to Jewry as "they/them/their", and openly refers to them as "we/us/our".
The rest of the hour is all Hogarl trying to convince Eric that djooz are winning in their joo world order agenda, and Eric pointing out all their failures and how quickly people are waking up to djooz' big lies and to the JWO conspiracy, and insisting that djooz' trans-generational organized crime network's centuries long demonstrated talent in swindling money is different from "taking over the world". Hogart counters that with all their swindled money, they can (and obviously DO) buy politicians, armies etc. They talk openly about the holohoax (@ 23:00) and 9/11 being zio-crime network scams.
The fact that this conversation is from 3 years ago makes it at least as interesting, because we have the past 3 years history to review now, and see how some of each of their points have played out. Consider that the zio crime network has still not been successful in their ordering USA to holocaust Iran.
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
I was just poking around Bollyn's site. It's been a gripe about his site that the most recent articles posted on the main page, eventually drop off that page some months later, and have a permalink which is different from the "anchor link" which they originally had while they were main-paged. But he does have them organized by subject; here's one:
Articles by Subjecthttp://www.bollyn.com/next.gif The Cure for Disinfohttp://www.bollyn.com/next.gif http://www.bollyn.com/grey.gif
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
from a less appropriate thread:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
learn2swim
I'm sure most people here have heard of "Christopher Bollyn", and his exposure of Zionism and 9-11.
http://www.bollyn.com/about-christopher-bollyn/ I was researching the "Rockefellers" came across this: He's related ,Royal bloodline, to "Anne Boleyn" the Queen of England
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Boleyn The Rockefellers are also related to her:
William Avery "Bill" Rockefeller, Sr. (November 13, 1810 – May 11, 1906) was the father of American oil tycoon and billionaire, John Davison Rockefeller (July 8, 1839 – May 23, 1937) and William Avery Rockefeller, Jr. (1841–1922), who both founded the Standard Oil company.
The Rockefellers trace their patrilineal line to Goddard (Gotthard) Rockenfeller (1590) of Fahr, today part of Neuwied, Germany. The first Rockefeller to settle in America (1723) was Johann Peter Rockenfeller (1710, Segendorf, Neuwied; 1787, Amwell Township, New Jersey), who changed his name to Rockefeller. Godfrey Lewis Rockefeller was a son of William and Christina Rockefeller.
Lucy Avery was born to Miles Avery and Malinda Pixley, New England Yankees of mostly English descent. She was descended by her father from Edmund of Langley's first marriage (through 5th Baron Audley's second marriage)[1] and from Mary Boleyn's first marriage (through the 2nd Barons de la Warr).[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Rockefeller,_Sr.
Mary Boleyn:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Boleyn
I'm not sure if he ever mentioned his connections to the Rockefellers....
MCPiper was trying to make hay of the above allegations a couple years ago when they started feuding. With those 4 links you provided, you oddly didn't cite above WHERE you came across all that-- wasn't something with an MCPiper byline was it?
I see now what you're likely referring to in the bollyn.com link-:
The Boleyns and the English Bible
February 3, 2011
I'd say Bollyn prolly posted that in response to Piper's trying to make hay of the ancestry as being somehow discrediting of Bollyn. I dismiss it personally, Bollyn's "fruits" speak for themselves.
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
I still listen to Piper podcasts when Mami's Shit posts them, and I've run out of more interesting podcasts. It's worth linking into this thread, how MCP was part of the MGlenn/HTillawi/MCP team which launched an offensive campaign against Sandy Hook skepticism, then later against Boston skepticism. This untenable campaign which MCP and GlennCo @ TUT launched & persisted with ultimately caused me to publicly abandon support of them all.
So Piper's still at it in this latest podcast... posturing himself as the big 'anti-shill', whilst shilling away through the show about a variety of people & topics:
this 3rd commenter @ Mami's got it about right:
Quote:
Christopher Marlowe said...Piper keeps making this same stupid argument:
1. People who are lazy conspiracy theorists believe in stupid theories without checking them.
2. Critics make fun of these couch potatoes, and they make all conspiracy theorists look bad.
3. Some people believed crazy ideas about crisis actors.
4. Therefore the Sandy Hook and Boston bombing conspiracy theorists are wrong.
But there are people on Sept Clues who think that the JFK conspiracy was a hoax, and that no one was killed. People can come up with foolish theories about anything.
Piper knows that kids were killed at Sandy Hook because he has some "well-known names" that saw them. He doesn't have any death certificates.
It's sad that Piper and Mark Glenn have lost any sense of reason when it comes to Sandy Hook and Boston. They made their minds up long ago, and have stopped thinking about the matter.
August 27, 2013 at 5:55 PM
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Bollyn in response to a reader comment, http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_11686 :
Question: Do you receive the American Free Press (AFP) newspaper? There are two copies in September 2010 that try to convey that they are right on top of the 9/11 issue, which makes me annoyed, as you are the one who has done all the serious research.
Bollyn Responds: This question came from a person who has been reading my work for a long time. No, I don’t read AFP, which is a newspaper I wrote for from 2000 until October 2006. The newspaper is run by Willis Carto and his lawyer friend Mark Lane. According to information gleaned during a lawsuit in which Lane was suing L.T. Patterson of Criminal Politics, Mark Lane acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1994. This indicates that AFP is nothing but an asset of the C.I.A., which runs it as a controlled opposition mouthpiece.
Mark Lane is an old Army intelligence agent from WWII in Germany. Lane played a key role in the Jonestown massacre, which he witnessed and is said to have instigated by using fear tactics on the paranoid Rev. Jim Jones. This is similar to what AFP does to its readers.
Lane’s relationship with AFP explains the paper’s bizarre actions I observed as I got closer to the truth about 9/11.
AFP is now publishing articles about 9/11 that suggest that there were no planes on 9/11 (see “Absence of Real Photo Evidence Leads to Video Fakery Speculation”, October 11, 2010). In an article from September 20, 2010, Makufka asks whether “mini-nukes” were used to bring down the WTC. These “disinfo” articles are written by Scott R. Makufka who writes under the name “Victor Thorn”.
Makufka and his girlfriend Lisa Giuliani teamed up with Michael Piper after I was attacked by undercover police. They sought to impugn my credibility and claim my research as their own in a concerted Zionist effort to marginalize my work, and have me prosecuted and thrown in jail.
It is very clear from the evidence that Boeing airplanes hit the Twin Towers, the only question is exactly which planes they were. Photographs reveal that more durable parts, such as landing gear and engines from the aircraft, landed on the streets of Manhattan.
Why would Michael Chertoff, an Israeli national and the son of an Israeli Mossad agent, allow such critical criminal evidence to be treated like garbage? Why wasn’t this engine taken to a high-tech FBI crime scene lab (like we see on television) and its time-tracked parts compared with the maintenance records for the planes said to have been involved? There is only one logical answer to these questions: the aircraft parts were not examined and shown to the public because they are not from the planes that are said to have hit the Twin Towers. The FBI and U.S. military only solve such crimes on TV shows, not in real life. That’s part of the deception.
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
I'm only a few minutes into this podcast (far enough for MCP to have already worked in his requisite, vacuous "kinky balloon" dig), but description suggests Piper's going to school us about the shills & frauds we need to be leery of.... :D
My skepticism of MCP has only grown this year since he's been the most persistent barker of the Tillawi/Glenn/Piper trio who absurdly maintain that Lanza really did Sandy Hoax as .gov tells us, and also that the Boston charade is as zio.media.gov have presented... and that suspecting/investigating/discussing otherwise is harmful to "our movement"... :o
1h 20m:
The Piper Report Oct 28, 2013
Michael Collins Piper discusses: Agents within the movement, literally under every bed, some of them knowing who they are and what they are doing, others who simply do the enemy’s dirty work while believeing they are doing something good.
Show-page FINAL JUDGEMENT lecture [Mossad connection to JFK]
The Barnes Review
32k CF Download
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
I'm only a few minutes into this podcast (far enough for MCP to have already worked in his requisite, vacuous "kinky balloon" dig), but description suggests Piper's going to school us about the shills & frauds we need to be leery of.... :D
I've since heard this whole thing ^. At 1:09:00, Pied Piper (< like "kinky balloon", only funnier) says:
"[...] You know, someone can be an AGENT, working for somebody or some intelligence agency, or some force, and genuinely be anti-zionist, or genuinely be a critic of Israel. But they may still have another AGENDA. Because even some of these intelligence agencies have, how can I put this; you know, the left hand doesn't always know what the right hand is doing. [...]"
Heh, surely a coincidence that MCP seems to be describing MCP there ^... :D
I mean, a shill or a con artist would NEVER have the AUDACITY to aggressively posture themselves as "#1 shill/con watchdog", would they?!? ???
Which brings us to:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
Pied Piper & John Friend have been at odds over Sandy Hoax. On Wednesday Sept 26, JF had MCP scheduled to come on JF's show to discuss their diverging opinions on the subject [ref: last paragraph here]. That MCP/JF discussion didn't take place as scheduled, and I asked JF in the comments in his next blog, for some clue as to why? Click on the date links below for originals:
Quote:
PatColo September 27, 2013 at 10:24 PM
John, anything juicy you feel at liberty to share with us as to why the formerly planned podcast with M.C.Piper to discuss Sandy Hoax (ref: end of you 9/21 "A few quick notes" entry), didn't take place? It was apparently up in the air at the end of your recent DeNugent podcast, when you mentioned that you weren't sure whether or not the Piper discussion would happen the following day as planned.
I realize you need to walk on egg shells a bit given that you & Piper are currently AFP colleagues. But I was really pining to hear that Sandy Hoax discussion, given how completely alienated I was by Piper/Glenn/Tillawi's anti-S.Hook-skepticism campaign introduced last January. Again, see my essay: "Abandoning support for The Ugly Truth podcasts":
http://tinyurl.com/afh5gl7
And of that TUT-trio, Piper was disappointingly the most virulent in his subsequent months' podcasts in employing the joowey "ridicule" disinfo gambit in seeking to discourage/mock S.Hook skepticism; which he then carried forward in also seeking to discourage Boston skepticism.
Also see: "Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA":
http://tinyurl.com/mtgphxb
Reply
Replies
- http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-hRs0x_a8Jl...5/IMG_1701.JPG
John Friend September 28, 2013 at 12:04 AM
Well, there's not much I can share. It was scheduled to take place this past Wednesday at 10am PST, then it was cancelled pretty much last minute. I don't know what's up. I hope it will take place, but something tells me it won't... Piper's position is simply untenable, and I think that's why! LOL, Mike Piper is easily one of the best journalists and writers in the independent media, but he is just wrong on this, in my view. We'll see what happens, but I doubt the discussion will take place.
So Pied Piper apparently penned another hit piece, published in AFP, condemning skepticism of only certain "events", presumably including Sandy Hoax and Boston-- but only AFP subscribers can read it presently, so I'm speculating.
John Friend, who's also an AFP staff writer, wrote a rebuttal piece which he submitted to AFP for publication, but they declined to publish it in their print or online editions. Yesterday JF published it instead at his own blog:
Note: this article was written and submitted to American Free Press for review, however, it appears it will not be published in the newspaper or on the website. Therefore, I have decided to publish it here. I ask readers to provide feedback in the comments section. -JRF
The alleged shooting at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut in December of last year has caused quite a bit of friction and disagreement amongst the staff at
American Free Press. Here I will attempt to explain my views on this controversial subject, which stand in stark contrast to the position taken by Michael Collins Piper in his recent article entitled, "Internet Rife with Disinformation: "Cyber Shills" working to misdirect, embarrass legitimate conspiracy researchers," published on page 18 in issue number 43 of AFP’s print edition.
I took a keen interest in the alleged Sandy Hook shooting from the very beginning. The Connecticut State Police and news media reported that on December 14, 2012, a 20-year-old young man named Adam Lanza first shot and killed his mother, Nancy Lanza, in their Newtown, Connecticut home before driving to the Sandy Hook Elementary School and going on a shooting rampage, murdering 20 children and 6 adults at the school – truly an amazing, and highly implausible, feat allegedly accomplished by a young man with no known military training. According to
the official narrative of the alleged shooting, Adam Lanza – the “lone gunman” – shot all but two of his victims multiple times, firing 154 total rounds in a matter of minutes. Many have questioned the plausibility of such a scenario.
The alleged Sandy Hook shooting scenario conveniently aligns with the hysterical anti-gun agenda and planned destruction of the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution long promoted by
certain organized political factions.
more: http://www.john-friend.net/2013/10/s...res-proof.html
-
Re: Bollyn on DBS, Hufschmid, Piper, Thorn, CIA
Note above ^ that AFP reconsidered, and did post JFriend's article above. :)
So MCPiper's latest podcast is one of his most nauseating yet in his beating the "agents everywhere!" drum (projection? it's my guess!), and denigrating SH, Boston & now LAX skeptics.
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2013/11/...ov-4-2013.html
It goes roughly like this,
"[inane strawman] fake HUH-HUH-HUH, [inane strawman] fake HUH-HUH-HUH, [< repeat ad nauseum]"
His bombast reminds me of AJ! Were JFriend to challenge him to actually address, point by point, his excellent SH-Proof? essay above, I guarantee MCP will run not walk, same as he did with John's formerly scheduled podcast with him to discuss SH.
To read an alt perspective on AFP, Piper, Carto, Lane & others, from former AFP reporter Chris Bollyn-- go to his homepage,
http://www.bollyn.com/index.php
and use your browser's CTRL-F word search function for any of those names above, to jump to his fairly recently posted recollections of his experience there. His homepage is a mile long and takes a couple mins to load even with a broadband connection.
