-
Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
- Killer (allegedly) has body armor "from head to toe" - as if he's going to encounter a CCW licensee in the theater or expects to have a shootout with the cops directly after the assault
- Killer brings more than amble firepower to the assault (over the top firepower in fact)
- Killer goes to great effort to booby trap his apartment so that the first party that enters (certainly most likely a cop) gets "seriously injured or killed"
Which doesn't square with -
- Killer immediately surrenders to the cops when they spot him - he's got the body armor on, wtf? (btw, he left the shotgun in the theater and apparently dropped the AR just outside the exit door)
- Killer IMMEDIATELY advises cops that his apartment is booby trapped, thereby negating the purpose of booby trapping his apt., again, wtf??
- Killer has to realize that he will never see beyond the prison walls EVER and will likely get the death penalty, again, why not suicide by cop after his heinous acts?? ???
If his intent, as it *appears*, was to take out cops, why did he immediately surrender (when faced with the absolute prospect of never being out of prison in this lifetime) and why did he betray his booby trap plans??
Something wrong with this picture.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Maybe a set-up. 'Here wear this costume and meet us at the back of the theater. We are going to scare some kids. It will be fun, really! Oh, and can my girlfriend and her sister stay at your place today. They have no where to go, and they don't want to be part of the fun prank.'
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Sudden attack of conscience? I've heard it's really hard to kill another human, even when they deserve it. Maybe killing all those innocent people was too much for his system and he just gave up.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Not to mention that initial reports said there was a "bomb" found in the theatre but it never ignited.
For being a supposed genius he seems like half a tard.
Not to sound callous, again, but the fact that he only killed 12 people is somewhat amazing, especially when he had the gas mask on and walked up the aisle shooting at will. Seems like an awful low body count in the scheme of things.
If he ordered 6000 rounds in the last 4-6 months why not be prepared to use them all? He used just a pittance of what they said he ordered.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
And another thing - if one is going to 'end one's own life' (which he has effectively done even though he's still breathing atm) by making such an assault, wtf purchase 3,000 rounds of .40 ammo, 3,000 rounds of .223 ammo, and 300 rounds of 12 ga. ammo?? ??? Another great big WTF. There's no way he could have carried all that ammo in magazines on himself.
Hollyweird has done a fine job of brainwashing people regarding guns with their filth.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JohnQPublic
Maybe a set-up. 'Here wear this costume and meet us at the back of the theater. We are going to scare some kids. It will be fun, really! Oh, and can my girlfriend and her sister stay at your place today. They have no where to go, and they don't want to be part of the fun prank.'
That's an angle I hadn't considered. It answers all of the contradictions.
I still think it's mind control OR . . . after watching the video of that really strange interview with the lesbian-looking witness chick . . . even weirder . . . like it didn't even happen. (That was a hard sentence to type and even harder to post.)
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
k-os
That's an angle I hadn't considered. It answers all of the contradictions.
I still think it's mind control OR . . . after watching the video of that really strange interview with the lesbian-looking witness chick . . . even weirder . . . like it didn't even happen. (That was a hard sentence to type and even harder to post.)
WTF was up with that lesbo looking woman availing herself ALL day to the nooz media the following day, as in no time to sleep apparently, all to eager to get in front of the cameras?? I mean, that was a hell of an event to witness, yet there she is hanging in there ALL day - normal people would have gone somewhere peaceful and unwound just want to be left the fuck alone, but no, this woman is like the Energizer rabbit.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
midnight rambler
WTF was up with that lesbo looking woman availing herself ALL day to the nooz media the following day, as in no time to sleep apparently, all to eager to get in front of the cameras?? I mean, that was a hell of an event to witness, yet there she is hanging in there ALL day.
Not just that but her answers were . . . off . . . just strange. Her facial expressions were odd, and her sign-off was really jubilant for having just discussed a massacre. The whole thing stunk. My gut reaction to her was: lesbian, military, and lying
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
remember his Mom's first comment.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
osoab
remember his Mom's first comment.
Yeah, that was really weird too!
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
No can really identify a guy with a mask dressed in black armor as this guy.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Libertytree
Not to sound callous, again, but the fact that he only killed 12 people is somewhat amazing, especially when he had the gas mask on and walked up the aisle shooting at will. Seems like an awful low body count in the scheme of things.
I said this on another thread but I think there was someone he was supposed to kill specifically among the 12. Similar to the Giffords shooting, the real target was the Federal Judge..
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Actors and I'm leaning towards MK ULTRA shit of something more advance.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
General of Darkness
Actors and I'm leaning towards MK ULTRA shit of something more advance.
MKULTRA for the trifecta--gun control, TSA increased presence beyond transportation venues, 'the target'..
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
horseshoe3
Sudden attack of conscience? I've heard it's really hard to kill another human, even when they deserve it. Maybe killing all those innocent people was too much for his system and he just gave up.
Following the mind control/detached from reality theme, if he was on some sort of psychotropic drug that was altering his mind, I could certainly see something as brutal as what he was doing made him sober up pretty quick, so he turned himself in.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Definite Manchurian candidate. Makes you wonder how many they have lined up while they back us all into a corner.
I know one thing for sure. They will need oven mitts to get my gun!
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
The purpose of the body armor and tear gas was to defeat the argument "well if people in the audience had been armed, this would have never happened". It wasn't for the cops.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Whats that quote about fooling some of the people all of the time?
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
old steel
Whats that quote about fooling some of the people all of the time?
If you can fool some of the people some of the time why not fool all the people all of the time.....................
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Witness: Someone let gunman inside Colorado movie theater
http://www.wkyc.com/news/article/252...movie-theater-
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Large Sarge
Last year Derren Brown hypnotized a fellow to become an assassin who actually carried out an 'assassination' with a 'loaded' handgun.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oC9J6O6soHA
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
MNR, you are right. His actions are not in accordance with his self-proclaimed goal of "Killing everyone."
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Aurora Massacre: What Does the Location of the Gas Mask Tell Us? What About Security Cameras? Are They Related?
Posted on July 22, 2012 by willyloman
by Scott Creighton
As I was scanning through a number of heart breaking photos from the aftermath of the Dark Knight massacre in Aurora Co. this morning, I noticed something very interesting; actually a couple of interesting things stood out.Primarily I noticed that the gas mask was found a long way away from where James Holmes was arrested and the other equipment was found. I also think I found an image of a security camera mounted on the back of the theater pointing down toward where the car was parked and the theater exit was. And as luck would have it, that is the exact same location the gas mask was found as if the assailant traveled the length of the building and dropped the mask once he was out of the view of the camera.
I have done my best to compile photos and the layout of the scene at the back of the theater for your consideration.
——— The first was the fact that early reports had claimed the shooter was still wearing his equipment when the cops first found him next to his car and he was still carrying all of his weapons except for one Glock 40 which was found in his car. This is an important aspect of the case because how else would they have known he was the shooter amid all that chaos. Also interesting is the fact that they didn’t just shoot the guy. He was apparently still carrying an assault rifle and a shotgun and decked out in tactical armor… so how did he just end up surrendering “meekly” as some reports claim?
The answer is simple: he wasn’t carrying the guns and he wasn’t still wearing the armor. So, how did they know they had the right guy?
“Holmes was apprehended within minutes of the 12:39 a.m. shooting at his car behind the theater, where police found him in full riot gear and carrying three weapons, including an AR-15 assault rifle, which can hold upwards of 100 rounds, a Remington 12-gauge shotgun, and a .40 Glock handgun. A fourth handgun was found in the vehicle.”
ABC News
http://willyloman.files.wordpress.co...pg?w=281&h=258
From the above photo you can clearly see he had striped off his armor on the way to his vehicle and in fact, the AR-15 was found just inches outside the exit door, meaning he could not have still had it when the cops found him unless they let him walk back the 30 or so feet to the door to lay the weapon down there.
http://willyloman.files.wordpress.co...pg?w=281&h=410
It’s important to understand the layout of the location where the assailant left the building to return to his car. Let’s put that into perspective right off the bat.
http://willyloman.files.wordpress.co...pg?w=468&h=262
As you can see from the compilation of crime scene photos below, the assailant left the building from the door between the two sections and next to the utility area beside where he parked. He could not have found a parking space closer to that door if he tried. As you can see, his Ar-15 was found right beside the door where he apparently dropped it upon leaving the theater. The blood makes it clear that was the exit to the theater where the massacre took place.
http://willyloman.files.wordpress.co...pg?w=468&h=339
So if he did indeed drop his primary weapon at the door when he left, how did the cops know he was the assailant? It’s possible he was still carrying the shotgun and wearing the body armor and the gas mask, but that seems to be contradicted by other photos with one VERY interesting piece of evidence…
Notice where the gas mask location is, at the end of the building. That’s VERY important…
http://willyloman.files.wordpress.co...pg?w=468&h=354
When I first started researching this article, I was consumed by the question of locating the security cameras covering this business’s parking and access areas. I had wondered why there has been literally no discussion of the security camera footage from that night.
What I found may be more damning than I could have imagined: yes there are security cameras mounted on the building on the front and apparently on the back shooting down the length of the rear of the building and if someone were walking down that sidewalk after leaving that exit, then their face would be clearly visible on that camera because they would have been walking directly toward it.
http://willyloman.files.wordpress.co...pg?w=468&h=246
So, if an assailant were to leave the theater via that exit and head in that direction, then obviously he would want to leave his mask on until he was out of the viewable area of the camera.
As it turns out, the gas mask seems to have been dropped directly under the camera itself.
But why head in that direction? Because it is the closest access to the main road right next to the theater and a waiting vehicle and escape. It wouldn’t do to try to blend in with the crowd because the police may detain witnesses and start asking questions they might not want to answer. Plus then there would be a record of the individual on site and that might not be good in the future. The best bet would be to get off property as soon as possible and that exit path provides the fastest way to do that.
http://willyloman.files.wordpress.co...pg?w=468&h=351
Is it possible that James Holmes was set up? Think about this:
- James Holmes goes out Tuesday night drinking and someone doses him. They do it early Wed morning so they have time in his apartment to set up those elaborate traps (how would James have known how to construct those anyway?)
- They keep him drugged and off the radar till Thursday night when they go to the theater. They make sure to park in that spot, right next to the exit of the theater.
- The assailant goes in, fakes the phone call, comes out, goes to the car where James is still drugged, gets the gear on, goes in and attacks the innocent civilians.
- Then the assailant comes out the exit door, leans against it while dropping the gun and removing almost all of his gear with the exception of the mask.
- He runs past the car dropping the gear next to it in a heap, opens the door with James inside, tosses the guns into the car, the shotgun has been there all along, and goes straight down the length of the building toward the corner, toward the camera, drops his mask directly under the camera, and heads off to the nearby street where a car is waiting (cruising slowly) to pick him up.
- Holmes is reported to have been “meek” when arrested. This might also explain why he wasn’t shot by police… he was incapacitated, incoherent, or generally not a threat.
- Holmes, who is being held under suicide watch in solitary confinement, remained in his murderous “Joker” persona after his arrival, a jailhouse worker told the Daily News.“He thinks he’s acting in a movie,” a prison employee told the Daily News.
There is no way of telling if this is actually what happened but we have to take all of the evidence, including the physical evidence into consideration and part of that evidence is the apparent lack of anyone talking about the security camera videos. Those cameras on the front of the building should show James Holmes entering the building at the very least so where are they?
And what other explanation is there for that gas mask to be located so far from the rest of the equipment and James and his car? Clearly the police didn’t carry it down there and drop it on the ground for the fun of it?
I am still searching for more pictures of the rear of that building and specifically anything that shows the roof section where I think that camera is.
While it is possible that Holmes did this, it is also possible that the same thing happened here that happened at the recent Kandahar Massacre where a man was drugged and set up for an atrocity he had nothing to do with. Considering the nature of the world we live in, I think it would be irresponsible for me not to report this information as I found it and to not question the “official story” of the “crazed lone gunman” that we see over and over again especially when unpopular landmark legislation is waiting in the wings.
Billionaire New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is using this tragedy to push for stricter gun control laws. I wonder if he is one of the financial elites who have just been outed for hording 32 trillion dollars in off shore accounts? Can you imagine why someone like him would want to disarm the citizens of this country?
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
The reason he's still alive is because they need him for a phony trial which will limit your gun-laws.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Did not know the gas mask was so far away from the exit door where the AR was ditched. That is a glaring problem. One report has him ditching the 870 in the theater. This would have left Holmes with no long arm and only one pistol, which btw, if you have two sidearms why leave one in the car?? ??? And why ditch the long arms if one is covered with body armor 'head to toe' expecting incoming fire?? Only a long arm would be effective against arresting officers wearing body armor only rated for handguns. This story continues to grow more bizarre.
I think the location of the gas mask relative to all the other ditched gear tells it all - why would someone not ditch the gas mask first (or directly after the helmet) unless it served some other purpose than for the tear gas?? And why was the gas mask so far away from his means of escape (his car)? The gas mask was roughly 200 ft. from his car...
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
And why weren't cops already at his car waiting for him? Presumably they were on the scene but weren't ready to go in against an enclosed tear-gased area.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
FBI theater attack warning issued on May 17, 201
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9aVMfYR8to&feature=player_embeddedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9aVMfYR8to&feature=player_embedded
Colorado Batman shooting shows obvious signs of being staged
http://www.naturalnews.com/036536_Ja...alse_flag.html
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Something else which has bothered me - at least one wounded party exited the exit door and left bloody footprints from only one leg - for them to have proceeded the distance they did along the sidewalk in front of Holmes' car the scene would have had to have been secured at the point in which the wounded party ambled along the sidewalk...if the wounded party had spotted Holmes' outside prior to the cops grabbing him I seriously doubt the wounded party would have proceeded to walk down the sidewalk...this indicates to me that the cops had already apprehended Holmes prior to the wounded party making his/her way down the sidewalk in front of Holmes' car, which leads to the conclusion that Holmes was arrested directly after the shooting ended, like within 3-5 minutes...
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Serpo
Same with Utøya. Before the press got syncronized there were several dozen articles about a second shooter. It's more beneficial for the conspirators to have this seem like a lone psycho in order to restrict individual rights.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Note that exit door has no door pull of any kind on exterior, so there's no *positive* way to open from the outside UNLESS it's fully ajar so that one can get one's fingers to the interior side OR some device was placed on it as some sort of handle...simply blocking the latching mechanism would not work if the door is not fully ajar anyway.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
A psychological perspective:
Dave Hodges
Common Sense Radio Show
I went to high school in Aurora, Colorado, about two miles from the scene of the Dark Night movie massacre. My late parents’ home was a mile away from the scene of the crime. My immediate family and I have attended several movies at the now infamous Aurora Mall theaters. Therefore, this recent tragedy is somewhat personal for me.
A part of me wants to ignore this tragedy and go on with my life because this is so very painful to look at this event. Several families and untold numbers of friends have lost a loved one in a seemingly senseless tragedy. Someone’s husband and father is not coming home tonight and someone’s child won’t be there to open presents next Christmas. It’s extremely hard for me to write these words without being overcome by emotion.
I have struggled on whether or not I should share my personal and professional observations about the facts related to this tragedy in the media because I strongly believe that the grieving loved ones, should be prayed for, comforted and then left in peace. The last thing I want to do, or to be accused of doing, is to engage in idle speculation at the expense of the victims, their families and their friends. However, based upon my experience and training as a mental health counselor, I also know that the mental health scenario being universally painted by the mainstream media is implausible from a psychopathological frame of reference. Further, the described background of the perpetrator, James Holmes, and his insanely violent act were grossly inconsistent with regard to means, motive, personal background, professional experience and current lifestyle and living conditions necessary to have carried out this heinous act to the demonstrable degree of skill witnessed in this event.
Conspiracy theories are often the default position for people in mourning who are seeking meaningful answers on why a particular tragedy took place. It is very important not to confuse emotionality with logic and facts in cases such as the recent movie massacre tragedy. However, when the released facts related to the crime and the perpetrator don’t add up, serious questions must be asked and truthful answers must be demanded!
As I weighed my options on whether or not to write this piece, I’m all too aware that when the profound sense of loss and grieving begins to dissipate, the victims’ loved ones will want truthful answers on why this tragedy took place. The lens of history clearly points to this fact as the Pat Tillman family still wants answers, thousands of 9/11 victims loved ones still want answers, and families and friends of the Oklahoma City Bombing victims still want answers and people profoundly impacted by the Columbine High School tragedy are still asking questions about why their loved ones had to die. Families and friends of the Dark Knight movie massacre victims deserve the truth and I do not believe, from the early media returns, that the real truth is going to be forthcoming. In that spirit, I add my voice to the chorus of voices in saying that the public explanations, related to this unspeakable tragedy, do not add up.
The Background
PhD candidate, James Holmes, 24, residing in Aurora, Colorado, acting with the precision and sophistication of a well-trained, killing-machine commando killed 12 people and wounded 59 as he opened fire at a Batman movie premiere The Dark Night Rising. Yet, as many mainstream media outlets, including the BBC, are reporting that James Holmes had no criminal arrest record and had absolutely no military training in his known background, yet, Holmes had every detail of “what the police call tactical equipment. He wore a ballistic helmet, a flak jacket and gas mask, but also the gloves and breeches you would expect from a Swat team.”
Many More Questions Than Believable Answers
Where would an incredibly busy PhD student find the time to learn how to booby trap his apartment?
Why would a mass murderer randomly shoot dozens of innocent people and then mysteriously warn authorities that he had meticulously booby trapped his apartment if his intention was to commit mass murder?
Where did a 24 year-old, PhD student who has spent his entire young adulthood in academia, with absolutely no military training, develop sophisticated commando tactics and applicable skills with very elaborate and very expensive military grade equipment?
Why was the mainstream media so quick to learn and subsequently tell the viewing public the name of the perpetrator and then subsequently blame the Second Amendment for the event before any of the facts could possibly have been known? How was it that the swarms of FBI agents appeared almost immediately at the scene of the crime as well as the mass murder’s apartment?
What do you think any knowledgeable construction worker would say about how those theatre grade, fire-rated security doors, equipped with fire inspected alarms, which would have sounded if the door was opened in the rear of the theatre?
Why is the media so intent on painting Holmes as a mentally ill mass murder when a professional psychological examination has not even been performed and the results released to the media and the public?
The most common second-hand diagnosis being offered for Holmes mental health condition is paranoid schizophrenia in which the afflicted person can potentially hear voices, or act on delusional beliefs devoid of logical connection with reality which commands or compels the sufferer to commit random acts of violence. On the night of the mass murder, was Holmes behavior consistent with classic symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia?
What Is Known
One of the most unbelievable explanations that I heard regarding this crime is the fact that this college student with no military training was able to booby trap his apartment, to such a degree of sophistication, that the ATF and FBI took several hours to gain entrance to his apartment. It has been suggested that this bright graduate student learned how to construct booby traps from the Internet. As implausible as it seems to me, I have to wonder if the Internet also taught this young terrorist how to shoot straight and master a multitude of weapons as well as the learning and the execution of advanced commando skills? Where did Holmes practice to learn the skills and more importantly, how did this PhD student find the time to train to such a level of sophistication that the Israeli commandos at the raid on Entebbe would be envious at the skill and precision displayed by Holmes in this gruesome attack? How did Holmes gain entrance into the highly secured rear doors of the movie theater, armed with alarms, without inside help? The short answer to all of these questions is that he couldn’t and he didn’t.
I find it interesting that a starving graduate student, living in a modest apartment, could afford very expensive weaponry, a bulletproof vest, a modern gas mask, groin and neck protectors, complicated bombs and tear gas. This was a well-funded operation and there doesn’t seem to be any plausible explanation as to how this very expensive operation was funded and the goods ended up in the hands of such a person of meager means.
The media has hung its hat on two analyses and subsequent explanations for Holmes’ actions: (1) Holmes is a mentally ill mass murder who was suffering from paranoid schizophrenic delusions; and, (2) this horrible tragedy could have been averted if only effective gun control measures were in place. First of all, there doesn’t seem to be any history of serious mental illness with regard to what the media is stating that Holmes most likely suffers from. Secondly, the paranoid schizophrenic argument loses steam because the killer abruptly stopped killing when he got outside the theatre where the perpetrator calmly sat down and peacefully surrendered to authorities as if to say “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!” Are these actions consistent with a crazed mass murderer? I do not believe so. If the murderer’s intent was to kill as many innocent people as possible, then it appears likely that this rage would have continued outside the movie theater. Adrenaline alone would’ve accounted for several more minutes added on to the killing rampage unless, of course, someone literally or metaphorically flipped a switch, MK Ultra style, which caused Holmes to shut down and passively surrender. Thirdly, the delusional beliefs and subsequent behavior of paranoid schizophrenics does not follow a calm, rational, predictable and methodical pattern of behavior which is exactly what we see in Holmes’ homicidal actions on that fateful night. The manifested behaviors of paranoid schizophrenics is normally preceded by disorganized and delusional thinking which causes the person to appear and act in an illogical and irrational manner. This is the opposite behavioral pattern of what we saw from James Holmes who carried out his act with the precision of a well-trained professional killer.
Amazingly, the FBI was warned two months ago about terrorism coming to American movie theaters. Yet, they seem to have mysteriously ignored these warnings. I suggest visiting the preceding URL as soon as possible as this link most assuredly will disappear from the net courtesy of the police state surveillance grid. Why wasn’t this warning acted upon? And why do several URL’s keep disappearing from the net, related to this FBI warning, causing truth-seekers to continually repost this information? Many people have been puzzled by the rapidity of the FBI’s presence on the crime scene which even preceded many of the Aurora police officers arriving on the scene, despite the fact that the Aurora police maintain a substation in the mall less than 100 yards away from the crime scene. A reasonable person might be inclined to ask, what did the FBI know that the Aurora police did not?
If this was a plot, why would anyone do such a thing? Ironically, on July 27, 2012, President Obama and Hillary Clinton are going to sign the UN gun control treaty. Obama only needs a few more senators to sign the treaty to make it the law of the land. Of course, the public is supposed to believe that this tragedy and the immediate media calls for more stringent gun control, and the coincidence with the UN gun control treaty signing date, following this tragedy, is merely one big coincidence!
Gun control and undermining the Second Amendment was what FAST and FURIOUS was all about as Obama and Holder shipped guns into Mexico resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands of Mexicans and over 200 Americans including Border Patrol agent Brian Terry. The covert FAST and FURIOUS program blew up in the administration’s face as Holder is facing potential criminal prosecution for his related actions. Therefore, it seems logical that the Obama administration would invoke Plan B. If these globalist minions would stage FAST and FURIOUS, then why should it be hard to believe that the same thugs would stage the Aurora, Colorado movie massacre at the showing of theDark Knight Rising? It’s interesting to note that Michael Savage, Glenn Beck, myself as well as many other awake Americans have been predicting a major false flag attack which would lead to the justification for Obama to enact draconian, UN-sponsored gun control legislation.
JFK, RFK, 9/11, Oklahoma City, Ruby Ridge, Waco; We won’t get fooled again!
Investigating the Administration Which Seeks to Fundamentally Transform America
It is also both interesting and highly disturbing that members of the Obama administration are on record of having said that the only way that the Obama presidency survives into a second term is if the country will unite behind an Obama candidacy following a series of terrorist events which will culminate in a second term. Part two of this series will explore the possible motives of the Obama administration, including his handlers (e.g. Bill Ayers and Valerie Jarrett), related to the possible carrying out of this event as well as a series of possible false flag events coming in the future (e.g. in Chicago and at the London Olympics). Part two of this series will also explore what an ill-gotten Obama second term will mean for millions of future victims in this country.
Dave Hodges
from here:
http://farmwars.info/?p=8842
the link to Dave Hodge's website doesn't seem to be working from the blog; here it is:
http://thecommonsenseshow.weebly.com/
He's on RBN Sunday evenings.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BabushkaLady
Where would an incredibly busy PhD student find the time to learn how to booby trap his apartment?
Where did a 24 year-old, PhD student who has spent his entire young adulthood in academia, with absolutely no military training, develop sophisticated commando tactics and applicable skills with very elaborate and very expensive military grade equipment?
These are two very good questions.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
things we KNOW;
1.IMMEDIATLY after his arrest, and without so much as a moments investigation the police were "certain" it was 1 lone man acting ALONE.
2. witnesses SAW a man answer a cell phone and open the locked door by the front.
3. of course he has ties to jews via being a counsellor at one of their camps...(yeah riiight they ley goyim counsel their kids)
4. he had access to tear gas!
5. the abnormally long response time for the police.
-
Re: Incongruent aspects of the movie massacre
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JDRock
...
3. of course he has ties to jews via being a counsellor at one of their camps...(yeah riiight they ley goyim counsel their kids)
The camp is for anyone, but sponsored by a jewish group.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JDRock
5. the abnormally long response time for the police.
90 seconds?
