Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
In a little-known 2006 speech (in the US, though widely known around the world), entitled "The End of Dollar Hegemony," Ron Paul discusses the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system - which most people know about - and the de-facto system that replaced it - which most people do not know about. As Casey Research's Nick Giambruno notes it is a must listen with the most important part of the speech where Paul discusses the petrodollar system, a primary factor in maintaining the dollar's role as the world's premier currency after the breakdown of Bretton Woods.
The End of Dollar Hegemony Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44wo8...layer_embedded
The End of Dollar Hegemony Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUacN9pRWII&feature=player_embedded
The End of Dollar Hegemony Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gl1EE2-z5C8&feature=player_embedded
Via Nick Giambruno of Casey Research, The speech is an absolute must-listen...
...
The most important part of the speech is where Paul discusses the petrodollar system, a primary factor in maintaining the dollar's role as the world's premier currency after the breakdown of Bretton Woods.
"It all ended on August 15, 1971, when Nixon closed the gold window and refused to pay out any of our remaining 280 million ounces of gold. In essence, we declared our insolvency and everyone recognized some other monetary system had to be devised in order to bring stability to the markets.
Amazingly, a new system was devised which allowed the US to operate the printing presses for the world reserve currency with no restraints placed on it—not even a pretense of gold convertibility, none whatsoever! Though the new policy was even more deeply flawed, it nevertheless opened the door for dollar hegemony to spread.
Realizing the world was embarking on something new and mind-boggling, elite money managers, with especially strong support from US authorities, struck an agreement with OPEC to price oil in US dollars exclusively for all worldwide transactions. This gave the dollar a special place among world currencies and in essence "backed" the dollar with oil. In return, the US promised to protect the various oil-rich kingdoms in the Persian Gulf against threat of invasion or domestic coup. This arrangement helped ignite the radical Islamic movement (Al Qaeda) among those who resented our influence in the region. The arrangement gave the dollar artificial strength, with tremendous financial benefits for the United States. It allowed us to export our monetary inflation by buying oil and other goods at a great discount as dollar influence flourished.
This post-Bretton Woods system was much more fragile than the system that existed between 1945 and 1971. Though the dollar/oil arrangement was helpful, it was not nearly as stable as the pseudo—gold standard under Bretton Woods. It certainly was less stable than the gold standard of the late 19th century.
The agreement with OPEC in the 1970s to price oil in dollars has provided tremendous artificial strength to the dollar as the preeminent reserve currency. This has created a universal demand for the dollar, and soaks up the huge number of new dollars generated each year.
Using force to compel people to accept money without real value can only work in the short run. It ultimately leads to economic dislocation, both domestic and international, and always ends with a price to be paid.
The economic law that honest exchange demands only things of real value as currency cannot be repealed. The chaos that one day will ensue from our 35-year experiment with worldwide fiat money will require a return to money of real value. We will know that day is approaching when oil-producing countries demand gold, or its equivalent, for their oil rather than dollars or euros. The sooner the better."
Ron Paul told me that although this speech is relatively unknown in the US, it was widely received around the world. As we discussed the implications of these issues, Paul said that the premise of this speech still applies today.
I believe that once the dollar loses its status as the world's premier reserve, the US will start to implement the destructive measures we frequently discuss: capital controls, people controls, price controls, currency devaluations, confiscations, nationalizing pensions, etc.
Such things have happened recently in Poland, Cyprus, Iceland, Argentina, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, and a number of other countries.
Take a glance at history and you will quickly notice these measures are the norm when a government gets into serious fiscal trouble. Many nations have made the mistake of thinking they were somehow "exceptional" and that these kinds of things couldn't happen to them.
There is no question the US is and will continue to be in serious fiscal trouble unless it implements drastic (and politically impossible) changes. The only saving grace for the US has been its ability to print the world's reserve currency. But once that special privilege is lost, it will revert to the measures all other governments throughout history have taken.
You absolutely want to be internationalized before the US dollar loses its status as the world's premier reserve currency. I truly believe the window opportunity to take protective action will slam shut at that time. You can find our specific guidance on how to do that here."
http://sufiy.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/...of-dollar.html#
Re: Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
China Calls for NWO & Moves to Replace U.S. as World’s Reserve Currency!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Z22Vr722o1E
Re: Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
back up .......... thanks
Re: Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
I think though calling it Petro-Dollar is not entirely correct. The dollar isn't ultimately backed by oil, it is backed by US military might. And as long as US keeps its military leadership/advantage, it will remain the worlds reserve currency. It seems like the dollar gets a bump up whenever US invades someone that tries to break out of dollar hegemony, despite the long term consequence of the war, ruined US finances...
Re: Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Neuro
I think though calling it Petro-Dollar is not entirely correct. The dollar isn't ultimately backed by oil, it is backed by US military might. And as long as US keeps its military leadership/advantage, it will remain the worlds reserve currency. It seems like the dollar gets a bump up whenever US invades someone that tries to break out of dollar hegemony, despite the long term consequence of the war, ruined US finances...
Yes, US likes to start wars to remind the world that they better use the dollar...or else. We all know why Saddam Hussein and Khaddafi were dispatched by US military invasions - the former starting selling oil in EUROs and the latter was going to sell oil for gold dinars. This is why Iran is now in the cross hairs of American hegemony. But as with Rome before, you can only continue this game of Ponzi militarism for so long. I'd say the days of American Hegemony are near an end.
Re: Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mamboni
Yes, US likes to start wars to remind the world that they better use the dollar...or else. We all know why Saddam Hussein and Khaddafi were dispatched by US military invasions - the former starting selling oil in EUROs and the latter was going to sell oil for gold dinars. This is why Iran is now in the cross hairs of American hegemony. But as with Rome before, you can only continue this game of Ponzi militarism for so long. I'd say the days of American Hegemony are near an end.
Possibly! But Rome actually took several hundred of years to collapse, there was no military that could challenge its armies, what changed was the political entities controlling the Roman army. It went from Republic, to Monarchy, to Monarchs insane enough to consider themselves gods, to periods of anarchy, followed by dictators. One could argue that the Roman Empire continued even after its armies was gone in the Roman Catholic Church, apart from the East Roman/Byzantine Empire that was finally conquered by the Ottomans in 1453. But the Ottomans pretty much took over the East Roman power structure and policies...
I think it is likely that current political structure of USA will collapse within not too far future, and unless it decides to take the world down with it in Third World War, it is going to morph into something different....
Re: Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Neuro
Possibly! But Rome actually took several hundred of years to collapse, there was no military that could challenge its armies, what changed was the political entities controlling the Roman army. It went from Republic, to Monarchy, to Monarchs insane enough to consider themselves gods, to periods of anarchy, followed by dictators. One could argue that the Roman Empire continued even after its armies was gone in the Roman Catholic Church, apart from the East Roman/Byzantine Empire that was finally conquered by the Ottomans in 1453. But the Ottomans pretty much took over the East Roman power structure and policies...
I think it is likely that current political structure of USA will collapse within not too far future, and unless it decides to take the world down with it in Third World War, it is going to morph into something different....
Centuries then equal years today - things happen alot faster now. Also, the Roman legions were not invincible on all fronts. They got their asses handed to them by the Germanic tribes at the Teutenberg forest; and Rome never defeated Persia on the battlefield. Just ask Crassus what happens when a Roman legion engages in military adventurism in Persia.
Re: Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
In 1944 The US Dollar was made the global trade medium of exchange...and all the rest of the currencies became a derivative of the US Dollar.
The only way to escape is to collapse the entire global civilization.
Re: Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hypertiger
In 1944 The US Dollar was made the global trade medium of exchange...and all the rest of the currencies became a derivative of the US Dollar.
The only way to escape is to collapse the entire global civilization.
No, there is another way. Remonetize gold at fair par value, say 40% backing of M2. So dollar is pegged at gold price of about $14,000 per ounce. This works OK the first budget year. After that, gold peg forces US to reduce it's budget and account deficits - painful but doable. Yeah, all the social welfare programs would have to be cut back substantially. Welcome to "there is no free lunch" reality.
Re: Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mamboni
Does the Chinese statement have its own thread?
Combined with statements from Sparky and others over the years that China should explode directly before the U.S., it could be significant as a "De-Americanised World" is the end of the world.
So long as London goes with it.
Re: Ron Paul Redux: "The End Of Dollar Hegemony"
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mamboni
Centuries then equal years today - things happen alot faster now. Also, the Roman legions were not invincible on all fronts. They got their asses handed to them by the Germanic tribes at the Teutenberg forest; and Rome never defeated Persia on the battlefield. Just ask Crassus what happens when a Roman legion engages in military adventurism in Persia.
Yes things happen faster today, apart from change of power... A century since creation of Federal Reserve Bank, two since battle of Waterloo!
