What world famous men have said about the Jews. This video is long but speaks the truth from start to finish.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MYP...3791.966893272
Printable View
What world famous men have said about the Jews. This video is long but speaks the truth from start to finish.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MYP...3791.966893272
From the comments below the video above that tell us who the Jews are and who the real Israelites are.The Marks of Israel In the story of Abram, Genesis 12-15 deals with the exploits of Abram and Lot and their travels through the lands of the Canaanites and Egypt. Three covenants are made, two prophetic and one contemporary, within Chapter 15.Verse 5 states: "And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be."
Verses 13 and 14 say: "And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years. And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance."
Verse 18 says: "In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:"
God chose to give that land to Abram at that time. But Verses 13 and 14 give a hint of future bondage for a period of 400 hundred years. Verses 5, 13 and 14, and literally scores of other verses can be adduced as being pertinent to the future trials and exploits of Abraham's seed. Exodus 13:40 states that the tribes stayed in Egypt for a total of 430 years. It is possible that a formal state of bondage began after the 30th year and lasted for the remaining 400 years. The probable date of entry into Egypt was 1710 B.C. and the probable date of the exodus was 1280 B.C., during the reign of Rameses II (circa 1224 B.C.). See These Were God's People, A Bible History by William C. Martin.
Who are God’s people? The Jews claim that they are; and they possess an exclusivist culture that finds its basis in various biblical claims, such as being descended from the tribes of Israel. They also claim that their religion, Judaism, is the same religion that was dictated to Moses by God. They claim to be the originators of monotheism and they claim to be the custodians of the religion of Moses. The point of this article is to show that these claims are false and easily disproved by a simple study of Scripture.
To understand the difference between Israelites and Jews, an analysis of the Marks of Israel must be made. In order to understand the clear Biblical distinctions between Abraham's seed through the line of Jacob/Israel versus Abraham’s seed through the line of Esau/Edom, we must understand the divergence of both the posterity and the history of these two distinct groups of people. The people who are today known as Jews derive both their heritage and their genetic composition not from Jacob/Israel but from Esau/Edom. Contrary to the wishes of his parents, and contrary to Yahweh’s Law against race-mixing, Esau “despised his birthright” by marrying into a Canaanite clan known as the Hittites. “And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite: Which were a grief of mind unto Isaac and Rebekah.” (Gen. 26:34,35.)
This, despite Isaac’s warning: “Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan.” -- Gen. 28:1. In other words, Esau became a race traitor. He joined the enemy. The Jews acknowledge their Edomite heritage in many of their in-house writings; but they do not admit this in their public proclamations for fear that True Israel might catch on to their charade. “Edom is in modern Jewry.”— Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925, Vol. 5, p41.
Jacob’s mother, Rebekah, even went so far as to say that her life will have been in vain if her other son, Jacob, follows in the footsteps of the race-traitor, Esau. “And Rebekah said to Isaac, I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth [Esau’s Hittite/Canaanite wives]: if Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth, such as these which are of the daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me?” (Gen. 27:46.) (In other words, dear men of Israel, DO NOT MARRY OUTSIDE YOUR RACE!) Since Esau was the grandson of Abraham, his offspring can claim descent from Abraham; however, that is the end of their genetic and social relationship with Abraham.
Once Esau despised his birthright, he became a stranger, producing non-Abrahamic offspring among the Hittites and other Canaanites. Just look at a typical Jew and see the marks of the various racial strains that have been mixed into his blood. They are all mamzers (mixed race children)! “The shew of their countenance doth witness against them.” (Isa. 3:9.) They are the physical evidence of the Jewish violation of the Law against intermarriage! How much more evidence do you need?
In my previous JDP Newsletter, The Enmity, Part 1: The Two Bloodlines, I delineated the separate and distinct family trees of the Edomites of Esau’s seed and the Israelites of Jacob’s seed. If these two seedlines are indeed separate and distinct, then both biblical prophecy and history will demonstrate this distinction. The study of the Marks of Israel is the study of these prophecies and the related history. Isaac and his wife Rebekah disowned Esau and embraced Jacob for the clear reasons stated in Genesis, Chapters 24 through 28. (Please take some time out of your busy life and read these chapters so you will understand Yahweh’s displeasure in race-mixing.) From the day when Esau despised his birthright, both the Bible and secular history tell of these two antagonistic nations, as a continuing fulfillment of the Enmity as stated in Genesis 3:15.
Genesis 3:15 is the very first prophetic statement contained in the Bible. In order to emphasize the point, Paul, reiterating Yahweh’s words, in Romans 9:13, states, “Jacob have I loved; Esau I have hated.” The fact is that the prophecies regarding the children of Israel have been fulfilled only by the Jacob/Israel branch of Abraham’s seed. The prophecies concerning the children of Esau have been fulfilled only by the mixed seed of Esau/Edom, today known as Jews. (Read the Book of Obadiah to get a real eye-opening serving of Yahweh’s displeasure with Esau and his descendants.) These prophetic Marks must be analyzed; and it must be shown that the prophetic statements made by God with regard to Israel's descendants cannot have been and were not, in fact, fulfilled by the Jews.
Here follows a list of the identifying Marks as they occur in the Bible. Some will be quoted in their entirety and others will be merely adduced for the reader's own reference. The references are too numerous to be given individual treatment.
The passages referred to as the Marks of Israel are those which are the most obvious references concerning the fate of a distinct group of people. That group of people is the Israelites, but the promises made to Abraham apply to Israel because Israel is a direct descendant and because the promises (covenants) were distinctly remade to Israel.
Already quoted above were Genesis 12:2,3 ("I will make of thee a great nation."), Gen. 15:5, regarding Abram's innumerable offspring, and Genesis 15:13, regarding the four hundred year period of bondage.
The general nature of God's promise to Abraham is given in Genesis 17:2-6. "And I will make my covenant between me and thee, and will multiply thee exceedingly. And Abram fell on his face: and God talked with him, saying, As for me, behold, my covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations. Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee. And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee."
Some very specific promises have been made in this passage. By looking at this small collection alone, we can already see that none of these prophecies have come to pass with regard to that group of people known as Jews. The Jews claim to be the only heirs of the promises made to Abraham, saying that the Lost Ten Tribes have been destroyed, never to be heard from again. The Jews cannot be said to have ever been known as "many nations", unless a case can be made for the internationally scattered ghettoes as "nations".
Also, they have always been a minority within the nations where they have lived. In their modern history, they have had only two nations of their own: 1.) The nation that the Idumeans, through Antipater and his son, Herod, stole from the Tribe of Judah in 150 B.C., and 2.) the so-called State of Israel. Because the Twelve Tribes of Israel were divorced by Yahweh and exiled into the wilderness starting in 745 B.C., True Israel did indeed become lost; but, as you will see, WE’RE BACK!Neither have the Jews multiplied exceedingly. Even today, their numbers, compared to other races and nationalities are very small. Nor can it be said that any number of kings have come from the ranks of the Jews. The Judahite Kings who remained in the land of Judah until the usurpation by Herod were all pure-blooded Davidic Judahites, not Jews. Remember, the Jews pretend to be Judahites, hence their anachronistic use of the word ‘Jew’ falsely applied to Judah.
To add to our list of the Marks of Israel, we will cite first the nature of the Mark and the Scriptural references, which say it either explicitly or in similar words.“And Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebekah to wife…and Rebekah his wife conceived. And the children struggled together within her [Ouch! – Eli]; and she said,…Why am I thus?…And Yahweh said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels…” -- Genesis 25:20-26.
The continuation of the comments above
Here is wisdom: Regarding the descendants of Adam, Seth, Heber, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Israel), as distinct from the descendants of Esau: The Biblical Marks of Israel
1.) The throne of David to be perpetuated forever. (The last king the Jews can lay claim to is Herod Agrippa II. This Edomite/Jewish dynasty consisted of only four kings: Herod the Great, 73 B.C – 1 B.C., Herod Antipas, 1 B.C. – 39 A.D., Herod Agrippa I, 39 – 44, Herod Agrippa II, 44 – 70 A.D.); II Sam. 7:13; I Chron. 22:10; Psa. 89:35-37; Jer. 33:17,20; Gen. 49:10. In contrast, True Israel (the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, and Caucasian peoples) can demonstrate that the ongoing dynasties of monarchic Europe, including the present British monarchy, are directly descended from King David. Charts showing these lines of descent are available from the various British Israel organizations in America, Canada and Britain. The Jews can demonstrate no such heritage.
2.) "A great nation and a company of nations." Genesis 17:4,5,15,16; 18:18; 35:11; 46:2-3; 48:4,19. A nation is defined as a country inhabited by a certain group of people having specific laws and customs. Throughout history the Jews have lived within the national boundaries of other nations, preferring to live in ghettoes or other small groups where their rabbis can keep close tabs on them. From these ghettoes have arisen numerous secretive enclaves conspiring against the very thrones of the Davidic dynasties. Through this parasitic practice of establishing a secretive State Within a State, the Jews have been successful in stealing our nations from us. Marrano Spain is a perfect example. Britain was stolen away from the British people by the House of Rothschild; and now America has been stolen away from us by the Edomites of the Federal Reserve System and the Neocons. The State of Israel is, in fact, the only nation the Jews have ever had; and even this nation was stolen from the Palestinian people and is parasitic in that it relies totally on outside funding for its existence. Pertinent question: Since the Israeli State is not self-sufficient, does it count as a “nation”?
Within Anglo-Saxon Israel, we have three solid representatives of a “company of nations.” These are the British Commonwealth, the Canadian Provinces and the United States of America. The Jews have never had a company of nations.
3.) "A multitudinous seed." Genesis 13:16; 15:5; 22:17; 24:60; 26:4,24; 28:3,14; 32:12; 49:22; Isaiah 10:22; Hosea 1:10; Zechariah 10:7,8. The Jews have always been one of the smallest ethnic population groups. This is still true today. Compare their population to that of the White Christian nations, True Israel.
4.) A leading nation in the world Genesis 27:29; 28:13; Deuteronomy 2:25; 4:8; 7:6; 28:10; Isaiah 43:4; 60:10,12; Jeremiah 31:7. The Israeli State can only be considered a “leading nation” to the extent that the American taxpayer allows it to exist. Certainly, no “great nation”, an alternate meaning, would have to depend on someone else’s money to survive.
5.) A mighty seagoing people Numbers 24:7; Deut. 33:19; Psalms 89:25; Isaiah 60:5. (No chance here for the Jews!)
6.) Israel to have a new language Isaiah 28:11. (The Jews have tried to preserve Hebrew – at least their corrupt version of it -- to this day. This is part of their ongoing cloak of masquerade as Israel.) We Israelites have a new language: English.
7.) Israel to be known by another name. (The Jews still claim the old name, Israel, for themselves.) Isaiah 62:2; 65:15. We are now known as Anglo-Saxons, WASP’s, Caucasians, Christians…take your pick.
8.) Israel to forget its identity as the Covenant people. (NOTE: The Jews have an unbroken historical claim on the promises bestowed upon Abraham's seed; thus, they never could have had the collective amnesia which Scripture says would befall Israel.) Isa. 29:10-12; 42:16,19,20; Hos. 2:1-8; Romans 11:7,8,25. Er, excuse me, Mr. and Mrs. Anglo-Saxon, would you please wake up to your true identity? It is essential that you know who you are if you want to be part of God’s Kingdom.
9.) Israel to be hidden because of its loss of identity Psa. 83:3; Isa. 49:2; Matthew 13:44. The Jews were never hidden. Indigenous populations (host countries) were always aware of their presence and their pretentious claim to being “Israel”. Throughout history, the Jews have made themselves so unwelcome that they have been expelled from virtually every nation that had the misfortune of letting them in. The Jews have always stuck out like a sore thumb.
10.) Israel to have a new covenant (a reference to the Last Supper Covenant) – Jer. 31:31-33. Daniel, Chapter 12. (The Jews deny that this prophecy was fulfilled by the Messiah.) Hebrews 8:10-13; 9:15-17; Luke 1:77; 2:32; 22:20; John 11:49-52; Galatians 3:13. (The Jews still claim to adhere to the Old Covenant (Torah). Just witness their eye-for-an-eye treatment of the Palestinians as opposed to the Christian concept of forgiveness.)
11.) Israel will remember its identity just before the last days Ezekiel 39:7,22-29; Hosea 3:5. (We are returning to Yahweh and have rediscovered our Davidic heritage!) This prophecy is highly significant for us today, especially since we are awakening to our true Identity at this very moment!
12.) A people who would recognize the Messiah. (The Jews, of course, did not and still do not.) – Daniel, Chapter 12 (the 70 Weeks prophecy), Acts 5:27-33; Romans 11:26,27.
13.) A missionary people. (The Jews have historically kept to themselves and have not tried, since the time of the conversion of the Khazars (around 800 A.D.), to convert others to the exclusive faith of "the chosen people". The only exception to this rule is when they convert people who can be very useful, either financially or politically, to their subversive causes). Gen. 22:18; 28:14; Isa. 43:10-12,21; 66:19; Micah 5:7.
14.) Israel to be kind to other people and set slaves free Deut. 15:11-15; Psa. 72:4; Isa. 42:7; 49:9; 58:6. (Actually two Marks in one!)
It was Anglo-Saxon Christianity which set the slaves free. Here, the Jews fail again, as the Rothschilds and other Jewish bankers were the financial agents of the international slave trade up until the Civil War, at which time they supported both the North and the South. Judah P. Benjamin was their highly placed agent in the Confederate government. Even today, the State of Israel has been condemned for its tolerance of white female slaves used for prostitution. According to Christopher Bollyn in the Aug. 20, 2001 issue of the American Free Press, “Israel” is one of the top trafficking nations in the world: “The Trafficking Act calls for economic sanctions in 2003 against those countries that fail to act against traffickers. If Israel fails to take significant steps to end the slave trade it could face sanctions...Estimates range between 2,000 and 3,000 women and children being trafficked into Israel each year, 95 percent of them coming from the collapsed economies of the former Soviet Union. Although most are older, children as young as 12 are also involved.”) Still think the Jews are “God’s Chosen”? I think they work for the other guy. What’s his name, Satan?
15.) Possessing the gates of her enemies Gen. 22:17; Gen. 24:60. The Jews have never had a great military. The one they possess now is courtesy of the extortion extracted from the German people due to the hoaxacaust propaganda and courtesy of the U.S. Taxpayer.
16.) To colonize the world Gen. 28:14; 49:22; Deut. 33:17; Psa. 2:8; Isa. 26:15; 27:6; 54:2,3; Micah 5:7-8. Zech. 10:8,9. The Anglo-Saxons, again, have colonized the world. The Jews have merely followed us wherever we went in order to take advantage of our prosperity. (This is an especially strong fulfillment of Genesis 3:15, which tells us that “It [meaning Adam and Eve’s pure seed] shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his [the seed of Adam and Eve] heel.” Wherever Jacob/Israel has traveled, the Jews have been nipping at our heels. Their head was crushed once by General Titus, a Roman descended from Israelite stock. They recovered from that experience – Serpents don’t give up easily! – only to come back for more. Just wait until the Judgment Day! The proud head of the tares is sticking very high. “Pride comes before a fall.”)
17.) They shall make deserts blossom, an agricultural people. (The Jews are not known for their agricultural talents. A Jewish farmer is virtually unheard of except on an Israeli kibbutz. The Zionist claim to having made the desert bloom is mere propaganda. The Jewish tour guides who make this claim in front of Christian tourists in “Israel” must have a great belly-laugh every time the Christians swallow this joke. The Palestinians have always had rich groves and orchards in Palestine. The Jews have not increased the production of agriculture one whit. Mark Twain, as part of his world-wide travelogue tour a century before the Zionists invaded Palestine, wrote an excellent account of his trip to Palestine in which he describes the beautiful agricultural conditions there). Gen. 27:28; Deut. 8:7,9; 28:11; 33:13,14,28; Isa. 35:1-2 (“The wilderness and the solitary place shall be glad for them.”); 43:19; 58:11,12. Historically, the Jews have never produced farm products at all. It has always been the Anglo-Saxons. Anglo-Saxon farmers have literally fed the world. The “holy” book of the rabbis, the Talmud, says, “No occupation is inferior to that of agricultural labor.” (Yeb 63a., Exh. 161.) Have you ever met a Jewish farmer? – even in “Israel”?
Because Cain murdered Abel, God said to him: “When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield to you her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth.” – Gen. 4:12. This seventeenth Mark is especially damning of the descendants of Cain because Abel’s blood was spilled onto the ground; and his blood cried out for revenge. (Gen. 4:10). Who are the people known the world over for being fugitives and vagabonds? Could it be the “wandering Jew”? This is an undeniable aspect of Jewish heritage. When Esau married the two Hittite women, he married into the Canaanite lineage. Thus, Jews are the descendants of Cain. They possess his genetic material in their blood. Yahweh clearly tells us that He will exact His revenge on them at the Judgment Day. (Read the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares in Matthew, Chapter 13.)
18.) Israel to find a new home away from Palestine Gen. 28:14; II Samuel 7:10; I Chronicles 17:9; Isa. 41:1,5,9; 42:4,10,12; 49:1-3,12; 51:5; Jeremiah 3:18; 31:7-10. (Europe, America, Australia, South Africa! Yes, that includes the Canadians! Let’s not get too inclusive!)
19.) To be the lineage of the Messiah II Samuel 7:13; I Chronicles 22:10; II Chronicles 13:5; Psa. 89:35-37; Jer. 33:17; Luke, Chapter 3, in which the lineage of Jesus Christ is given from Adam to Jesus. (As we all know, the Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah; and the Bible clearly shows Jesus in the line of descent from which he was supposed to come. The Jews rejected Jesus because He was not one of them. He told the Jewish rabbis of His day, the scribes and Pharisees, “Ye are not my sheep.” Both Joseph and Mary are recorded in the Gospels as being descended from King David. The scribes and Pharisees, by that time, were a mixture of Idumean blood plus some Israelite blood. According to the Bible, no half-breed can be considered an Israelite. Therefore, the Jews are of a different genealogy and have no royal blood in them, unless you want to count the Dukes of Edom as royalty.)
20.) "In Isaac shall thy seed be called." (Beth-Sak = House of Isaac = Isaac's Sons = Saxons) Gen. 21:12. When I first read this passage, I said to myself, “This is no reference to the Jews!” The Jews never quote this passage of Scripture because they are not descendants of Isaac through Jacob. It is only True Israel which can lay claim to this genetic heritage: Isaac’s Sons = the Saxons = the Anglo-Saxons. We are named after Isaac. The Jews claim to be named after Judah. It would be impossible for them to explain away the plain meaning of this passage, so they suppress it. The pro-Jewish pastors of “Judeo-Christianity,” to their great discredit, ignore this passage as well. Conclusion The above are a quick scratching of the surface of the evidence which proves that the Jews are not Israel. These are only some of the most obvious references to the future Marks of Abraham's true Adamic seed, Israel. Many more descriptive statements could be adduced, but these should suffice for the moment. The cited list ought to be sufficient for distinguishing between the two different groups of people contending for the designation, "Heirs of the Promise", or "The Covenant People", or "The Chosen People". Score: Anglo-Saxons, 20; Jews, zero…and counting. Would someone care to calculate the odds against all of these prophecies coming true among one group of people? The odds are probably sixty kajillion to one. The odds for the Jews are also zero.
The only identifiable group which can fit the Marks of Israel is the three Houses of Isaac: the House of Israel, the House of Judah, and the House of David. The House of Edom is reprobate. The descendants of all three of these Houses of Isaac, yesterday, today, and forever, fall into the category of the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Caucasian peoples; and NO ONE ELSE.
There is a genealogy chart at this link that is interesting to me because it shows the genealogy from Adam and Eve to Jesus Christ. You can zoom in on it and then scroll around. It helps me to sort of keep all the names in the bible in perspective.
http://www.actscambridge.org/assets/...y_a1_chart.pdf
just the facts:
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/DinJooz
:o
^ That was entertaining reading :-).Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
Bertrand Comparate explains how the Jews are the actual children of Satan. The trouble with the Jews started in the Garden of Eden. It helps me to understand the Jews hatred for the white christians who are the real Israelites and their desire to destroy them.
White people are the descendants of Adam through Seth and the Israelites but they don't realize it. The Jews are the descendants of Satan through Cain and they know it too.
This is long so I'll have to post it in three parts
https://israelect.com/ChurchOfTrueIs...cainsatan.html
THE CAIN / SATANIC SEED LINE
It has been brought to my attention many times, that there are preachers and teachers in the world who don't recognize there are literal children of Satan surviving in the world today. Since this is one of the central themes of the Bible, the fight for supremacy between the children of Yahweh and the children of Lucifer, I wonder what Bible these preachers and teachers are reading and studying.
In these studies we will be using the proper name of our God, which is Yahweh and Yahshua for Christ. For documentation read, "Who Is Your God?”
The battle lines are drawn by Yahweh in Genesis 3:15, where He states he is going to put enmity between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent.
Let's start at the beginning; of course Satan wasn't a serpent. The entity that deceived and seduced Eve wasn't a scaly thing wriggling along on the ground. Serpent was translated from the word nachash, which means enchanter or magician. A fallen angel, still retaining a lot of his angelic powers, no doubt could be very much of an enchanter or magician.
Lucifer's children, and I do mean children not just followers, through the centuries used a serpent as a symbol or emblem of their ancestor, until they attached a secondary meaning of serpent to the word nachash. In Genesis 3:1-3 Satan said to Eve, "Is it really true that Yahweh said, You can't eat of any tree in the garden?" As it reads in the Hebrew, Eve replied to Satan, "And the woman said unto the enchanter, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden". Now I am going to switch to the King James translation and I will correct it as I go.
"Of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." Let's see what it actually said in the Hebrew. Fruit is the Hebrew word pirchach, meaning progeny, brood, children or descendants. Do you talk about the children of a walnut tree or an apple tree? Of course you don't!
Of the pirchach, of the descendants of the tree, which is in the midst of the garden, Yahweh has said, "Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it". That word touch is the Hebrew word naga, which is a more polite expression meaning, to have sexual intercourse with. Do you need to be warned not to have sexual intercourse with an apple? Of course not, it isn't that kind of a tree.
Yahweh had millions of the pre Adamic, Asiatic and African people around. If He just wanted somebody wide between the shoulders and narrow between the eyes to spade up the garden, He had them. He didn't have to create a special being for that purpose.
Satan had been the governor of this planet until he forfeited the right to this position by rebellion. Yahweh sent Adam here and it is recorded in Luke chapter 3 that Adam was the son of Yahweh. It doesn't record that about any of these pre Adamic people mentioned in Genesis chapter 1. Adam was the son of Yahweh and Yahweh sent Adam here to take over by force, kick Satan out and govern this planet. The trees in the Garden of Eden were the family trees of nations and races.
Adam and Eve weren't supposed to intermingle with these people. If Negroes and Asiatics were all that Yahweh wanted, He already had them. What He created was a different and separate being who was to be a different sort of person, whom the Negroes and Asiatics could never produce.
The Hebrew word Awdawm, which we translate Adam, means of a rosy, fair complexion. Adam was the first person of a specifically created new race. Adam and Eve were told not to mongrelize their race with these per Adamic people that were in the world.
When you come to Genesis 3:13, Yahweh has called Adam, Eve and Satan before Him to give an accounting of their misdeeds. According to the King James Bible Eve said, "The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat thereof". Here again is the Hebrew word nachash, meaning enchanter. Then there is the use of the word beguiled; the Hebrew word there is nawshaw, which means seduced.
Beguiled means no more than deceived. Somebody who sells you some mining stock in a mine that doesn't have any good ore in it, beguiles you. The word nawshawmeans seduced, not in any way or sense can it mean beguiled. "And Yahweh God said unto the woman, what is this thou hast done? And the woman said, the enchanter seduced me." This is what it says in the Hebrew and Cain was the product of this seduction.
In reply in Genesis 3:15 Yahweh says to Satan, "I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed". The same word zehra was used for both the seed of Satan and the seed of Eve. Zehra literally means seed; there is no other meaning. It also could be used as grains of wheat but it is used throughout the Bible as meaning the descendants of a person. Satan was to have just as literal children in this world as Eve was to have. The same word zehra is used for Satan's seed and Eve's seed.
The reply of the churchianity preachers is usually to quote Genesis 4:1. "And Adam knew his wife, and she conceived and bare Cain." Notice that what is not said is more significant that what is said, the Bible nowhere says Adam begat Cain. As you have read in the Old Testament, the monotonous regularity with which it always says, and so and so begat whosis and whosis begat what's his name and what's his name begat somebody else, and so on. It was important to know your ancestry in those days, because you didn't get your citizenship for two box tops and a dime. You got citizenship because your ancestors, for over twenty generations, were Israelites and no other way.
So Adam knew his wife and she conceived. I can tell you something and I can prove every bit of it by witnesses. I went to a movie one night and the next morning the sun rose in the east. I didn't say the one caused the other. I said two things happened, one happened first and the other happened second. I never said they were cause and effect. The Bible never says there was cause and effect here. If you want further proof of this, go right on to Genesis chapter 5 where you will find the list of Adam's descendants. Cain's name is nowhere to be found. Neither Cain nor Abel is mentioned among the descendants of Adam.
If you say Abel might have been omitted because he was probably killed before he left any descendants of his own, we don't really know. However, this isn't true of Cain because the Bible traces Cain's descendants for six generations, naming them right down the line. Never once does it record that Cain was a descendant of Adam, never in any way, shape, forms or manner. The first time it records that Adam begat a child is Genesis 5:3. "And Adam lived 130 years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth." This child Adam begat was not named Cain it was named Seth.
The satanic bloodline crept in through Cain, possibly earlier, among the pre Adamic people. There were pre Adamic people who were not necessarily satanic. There were some pre Adamic people into whom the satanic bloodline came, and there were even some of the descendants of Adam who probably mongrelized. In fact, it is evident they did mix their bloodline for the fact that those living around Noah were wiped out by the flood. The Bible tells us that Noah was perfect in his ancestry, with no mongrelization. He and his family were the ones in the area that were still pure in their bloodlines.
This is why the flood wiped out the mongrelized Adamites around Noah. As I documented in "Noah's Flood Was Not Worldwide", this flood did not cover the whole earth as is falsely taught in the churches of today.
The pure descendants of Adam multiplied and then you come to the fact of the satanic bloodline getting in there. Remember, Yahweh had announced His purpose; He was going to take back the world from Satan's domination. Yahweh was going to rule it according to His purposes. He was going to rule it through His children, through the pure descendants of Adam. What would be the obvious move on Satan's part to thwart this plan? The obvious thing to do would be to mongrelize the descendants of Adam, then he could sneer in Yahweh's face and say, "These are my children but where are yours? All these have my blood in them." This is exactly what Satan set out to do.
Genesis 6:2 records, "The sons of God saw the daughters of men (Adam) that they were fair; and they took them wives of all they chose". You don't get the full significance of it in this translation, "the sons of God" (beni-ha-elohim, also means sons of magistrates or mighty men of the earth and angels).
A double race mixing took place here; both the rulers of the pre Adamic races and the fallen angels took wives of the fair Adamic women. It is written with obvious disapproval. The male descendants of Adam were not allowed, by Yahweh's law, to marry anybody but the daughters descended from Adam. If they were marrying within their own racial line in this instance, it couldn't have been spoken of with disapproval. So the beni-ha-elohim are evidently those of the pre Adamic darker races and the fallen angels who followed Satan into rebellion. Greater details of this event are found in the book of Enoch.
Go on to Genesis 6:4 where it is speaking of the same subject, again it is botched up in the King James Bible. "There were giants in the earth in those days, and also after that when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men (enowsh) of renown."
This is what it says in the Hebrew. "There were nephilim (the fallen ones) in the earth in those days." They were fallen angels. That is what the bible calls them in so many places. Jude 1:6 records, "Angels who had not kept their first estate," who had fallen from heaven and from their former powers. "When the sons of God", and again it’s the beni-ha-elohim, "came in unto the daughters of Adam...” so it's the same thing.
Here we have the spreading of the satanic bloodline. Genesis chapter 6 goes on to trace many of these descendants of the fallen angels. You find that all through Palestine, on both sides of the Jordan river, clear down through Mount Seir, the rugged mountain range southeast of the Dead Sea where Esau and his family lived, all through this area there are these various people with the satanic blood in them.
There are two different places, one in Isaiah the other in Ezekiel, where it speaks of what it calls a king or a prince. In the one case it speaks of Babylon and the other case of Tyre. Nevertheless it speaks of him in language, which could not possibly apply, to anybody except Satan. Therefore this indicates that at some time or other, Satan had incarnated in the form of these various kings, one king of Babylon and one king of Tyre.
Don't think this is so impossible because many times the Old Testament tells of these angels appearing in very solid form. They came and talked with Abraham on several occasions, one of them wrestled with Jacob almost all night.
Another of these angels came when the people of Israel were about to cross the Jordan River and take over Palestine. Joshua, making a scouting trip around his camp, saw this armed man standing there in armor and with a sword and Joshua asked, "Are you with us or for the enemy?" And the man said, "I am the captain of the hosts of Yahweh".
Let's take Isaiah 14:12-21 and note that these verses could not possibly apply to anyone except to Satan himself. We will quote from the King James Bible. "How art thou fallen from the heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations: for thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God. I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north." Lucifer then said, "I'm going to be the ruler over Israel (Yahweh's people). I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the Most High".
Yahweh our God then told Lucifer the devil, "Yet thou shall be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee and consider thee saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms? That made the world a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof, that opened not the house of his prisoners? All the kings of the nations, even all of them lie in glory, every one in his own house; but thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcass trodden under foot. Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people; the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned."
You could not say this about any kings of Babylon. The only one, who may possibly have failed to get burial and an elaborate tomb, might have been Belshazzar. Belshazzar was nothing but an incompetent drunkard and nobody ever could say of him that he was the one who shook kingdoms and so on. He didn't even rule Babylon, because he was drunk all the time.
These passages are speaking of none other than Lucifer. Note how it goes on in Isaiah 14:21. "Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities." The word translated as children is from the Hebrew word Beni meaning sons. Satan obviously was to have children who could be slaughtered, to keep them from multiplying to the point where they would take over and rule the world. Old Testament? Of course it is, now let's see what the New Testament has to say about it.
Yahshua plainly says, in a number of places, that the devil has children, not merely followers. Remember the parable of the tares and the wheat. Yahshua spoke of the farmer who sowed good seed in his field and his enemy came along during the nighttime and sowed these poisonous weeds, the tares among the wheat. When the farmer's servants saw the tares growing among the wheat they asked him if they should go and pull them up now.
The farmer said, "No, you might pull up some of the wheat with them. Let them grow together until the time of the harvest, and then the reapers will first gather the tares into bundles to be burned, and then put the wheat in my barn".
Then Yahshua explains this parable to His disciples. In Matthew 13:38-39 Yahshua says, "The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom (the Greek word used here in the plural is huios meaning sons, the good seed are the sons of the kingdom); but the tares are the children (huios) of the wicked one. Satan has just as true children in the world as does Yahweh.
Speaking to the Pharisees, who as you know were Jews, Yahshua said in Matthew 12:34 (the King James Bible botches this up to an extent that seems to me often to be willful), "O generation of vipers, how can ye being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh".
The word is not generation at all. A generation is a number of people of not too different an age, living at the same time. You, for example, constitute one generation. Yahshua wasn't talking just about the people living then. They weren't any more wicked than the generation that lived before them or the generation that lived after them. What Yahshua said was, as we will paraphrase it (it's the Greek word genema which means children or offspring): "O children of vipers... sure all these centuries you Jews have used the serpent as the emblem or symbol for your ancestor. All right, taking you at your word, you children of serpents," right down the line they were vipers. Yahshua knew who they were.
Part 2
In Matthew 23:29-35 it is recorded, "Woe unto you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! Because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchers of the righteous, and say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets." Here again is the Greek word huios. "Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye genema (ye offspring, children) of vipers. How can ye escape the damnation of hell? That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, son of Barachias, whom you slew between the temple and the altar."
Was Yahshua so unjust that He was going to punish these Jews for the murder of Abel, if they weren't descendants of Cain? Of course not. Yahshua was tracing the children of the serpent, the enchanter Satan, down through the centuries. Tracing those who had murdered the righteous, including all the prophets, right down the line. So Yahshua said, "Upon you (upon this race) these descendants of the serpent, will come the responsibility for all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel even unto the blood of Zacharias."
Throughout the Bible it records the two seed lines, Yahweh and Lucifer's. The Bible makes no reference as to what your religious point of view may be; it is talking about literal descendants. Romans 8:16 tells us, "The spirit itself bears witness, that we are the children of God". The word children there, the Greek word teknon, means one born a child, not adopted. Nothing is more fallacious than this church doctrine about being adopted children of Yahweh.
Read what Paul said on this subject and nothing in it can justify the mistranslation of that as adoption. Paul states that before the coming of Christ we were held in bondage under the law. He then says the law just like an heir under age strictly governed us. The heir has inherited from his father, who has died, all the estate but he is still a minor and cannot take control of it.
The heir is under the control of trustees and governors, appointed guardians, appointed by his father, until he comes of age. Paul continues that all the time the heir is owner of it all and yet he is controlled as though he is just a servant. You couldn't say that about anybody who was adopted. If you take somebody else's illegitimate child and decide you are going to adopt him, is he already the owner of your property before you adopt him? Of course not, Paul wasn't stupid enough to think he was. Only the churchmen are stupid enough for that.
What Paul was talking about was the coming of age ceremony by which they marked the fact that the heir had now become of full age and his property was put into his hands to control as an adult. As I said before, Romans 8:16 tells us, "The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit that we are the children of God", teknon, one born a child, not adopted.
Romans 9:26 reads (Paul is quoting from Hosea 1:10), "And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it is said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God". It is the Greek word huioi, meaning sons. We are the born, not adopted, children of Yahweh. As to the born, not adopted or converted, children of the devil, read Acts 13:8-9. This tells about a Jew sorcerer Elymas, who opposed Paul when Paul was trying to make some, converts. "Then Saul (who was also called Paul) filled with the Holy Ghost, set his eyes on him and said, O full of sublimity and mischief, thou son of the devil (the same Greek word huios, meaning son), thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?"
The offspring of a cat is another cat, isn't it? The child of a Negro is a Negro and a child of Yahweh is what? He is not as wise and not as powerful or important as his Father, but nevertheless he partakes. Within his limitations, of a godly nature. This is what the Bible tells us about and this is exactly why we of Yahweh's people Israel are held to so much greater responsibility than other people. After all, you can't expect a Negro to act like anything but a Negro, but a child of Yahweh is expected to act like one.
The child of a devil is what, another devil isn't he? John 6:70-71 is part of a very important passage which began in this manner. Yahshua asked His disciples who were all gathered together, "Whom do men say that I am? And they said, Oh some say that you are this prophet or that one who has been reincarnated and come back here. Then Christ said, Whom do you say that I am? And Peter spoke up and said, Thou are the Christ, the Son of the living God. Christ then said, Blessed art thou Simon, son of Jonah: because flesh and blood didn't tell you that fact: it was My Father in heaven who told you that. And He said, Upon this rock (petra, the solid bed rock of the earth) I will found my church."
Yahshua didn't say He was going to found the church on Simon Peter (petros), a little stone. In Greek petros means a little stone, just barely bigger than a pebble. Was Yahshua going to found His church on a pebble that anybody could kick out from under it? No, Yahshua said, "I will found it upon petra." the solid bedrock of the earth.
Remember the example Yahshua gave, the parable wherein He said one man had built his house on the sand and when the storm came along, the flood washed the sand out from under it and it collapsed. Another man built his house upon the rock (petra, bed rock) and the storm beat upon it and couldn't do anything to it, because it was founded on a rock (petra).
If any of you have ever been to Yosemite Valley and have seen that enormous cliff El Capitan, you have seen a good example of what the Greeks meant by the word petra. You could build a castle on El Capitan and nothing could blow it off or wash it away. "So upon this fact, that you have recognized who I am: the Christ, the Son of the Living God; upon that I will found My church, and the gates of death shall not prevail against it."
John 6:70-71 records, "Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil? He spoke of Judas Escariot, (the son) of Simon, for he it was that would betray Him, being one of the twelve". Our Savior was not just being vulgarly abusive by calling people names He never did that. He denounced these Pharisees, He called them hypocrites and they were. Yahshua wasn't abusing them with lying epithets, they were hypocrites and He was accurate.
When Yahshua called these Jews children of serpents, they acknowledged the statement was true, for that was the emblem they had used from ancient times. When He said that one of them was a devil, He wasn't being abusive, He was speaking the literal truth.
The First Epistle of John again states the existence of these two seed lines. I John 2:29 tells us, "If ye know that he is righteous, ye know that every one that does righteousness is born of Him". I John 3:2 continues, "Beloved, now are we the sons of God". Here we have the Greek word teknon meaning a born child, not adopted, thus a child born of Yahweh. Let's continue with I John 5:9-10."Whosoever is born of God does not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God."
By this John didn't mean that none of us commit any sins at all. If that were the case, we wouldn't have needed the sacrifice of Yahshua on the cross. We all have our sins but people are divided into two classes. There are the one who are only sorry because they don't get a chance to sin more and the others who are sorry because they have sinned only a little. What John means is, whoever is born of Yahweh doesn't habitually sin. So John says in I John 3:10, "In this the children (teknon) of God are manifest, and the children (teknon) of the devil". Remember, John has talked about us as the born teknon of Yahweh and the others as the born teknon of the devil.
I John 3:12 records that as for those that are our brothers, not the children of Satan, we should love them and not be as Cain. The King James Bible says, "...who was of that wicked one and slew his brother." The people that have churchianity rather than Christianity say, "Oh well, you know it doesn't say that he was a son, it just means that Cain was morally associated with Satan and was bad and a reprobate and so on."
There weren't two separate Greek languages in those days. There wasn't one language to write the Gospel according to Luke and a different one to write the First Epistle of John. As you well know, different languages have their different idioms. In many languages one word may have a meaning that can only be expressed by a phrase of several English words. I think nearly all of you have a King James translation of the Bible and you know that in most editions of it, some words are printed in italics. Those words in italics are the words which the translators added because they thought it was necessary to give the English the same meaning the Hebrew or the Greek had, without these added words.
Luke chapter 3 traces the genealogy of Yahshua, starting with Yahshua and going all the way back to Adam. Let's start with Luke 3:23 as it is translated in the King James Bible. "And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli (the words "the son" are in italics showing they were not in the Greek and the translators added them), which was the son of Matthew (the son is in italics), which was the son (italics) of Levi, which was the son (italics) of Melchi, which was the son (italics) of Janna," and so forth. All "the son" were in italics so were added.
Some people would read Luke 3:23-24 as follows: "...the son of Joseph, who was as big a reprobate as Heli, who was morally no better than Matthew, who was as bad as Levi..." Is this the way some people think Luke wrote this? If this is not the meaning of the Greek here in Luke, it is not the meaning of the same Greek phrase in John 3:12. So where it says, "not as Cain who was of that wicked one", in Greek it means he was the son of that wicked one.
In Greek, if you say John was of William, in English it would read, John was the son of William. The better English translations recognize this. For example in the Weymouth translation, this same verse, John 3:12 reads, "We are not to resemble Cain who was a child of the evil one and killed his brother." Phillips' translation reads, "We are none of us to have the spirit of Cain who was a son of the devil and murdered his brother." The New English Bible, a magnificent job of translation reads, "Unlike Cain who was a child of the evil one and murdered his brother".
The verses that people use, as proof positive there isn't any basis for the belief that the Jews are the descendants of Cain and therefore from the devil, is John 8:31-33. Yahshua was talking to the Judeans who were the people we know of as Jews today. It isn't simply that Yahshua was behaving like a petulant spoiled child because somebody didn't believe in Him, because it says, "those Judeans who believed in Him". Check Strong's Concordance, the word Jew is mistranslated from the word meaning Judean. Yes so called converted children of the devil.
Yahshua said to these Judeans (Jews), "If ye continue in My doctrines indeed, then ye shall be My disciples; and you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free. They answered Him, We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man". Anybody that knows their Bible knows that all of Abraham's children had been in bondage at one time or another. Here is evidence that these people weren't descendants of Abraham. Who is it who could say he was descended from Abraham and had never been in bondage to any man?
If these Jews were of any of the twelve tribes of Israel at all, they would have been in bondage the first time in Egypt. If they belonged to the ten tribed northerly kingdom of Israel, they would have been in bondage the second time in Assyria. If they belonged to the two tribed southern kingdom of Judah, they would have been in bondage the second time in Babylon. Yet the Jews admitted they had never been in bondage to any man, thus demonstrating they weren't of Israel or Judah.
Who could say that 1,800 years earlier that Abraham was one of his ancestors, Esau? Remember Esau and Jacob were twin brothers, born with (presumably) the same bloodline. However, Esau married two Canaanite women in violation of Yahweh's law. Esau couldn't leave anything but mongrelized satanic descendants, because among these Hittite Canaanites there was the satanic bloodline.
When the Bible records Esau selling his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of lentil stew, this isn't when he lost his birthright. This was only a formal ceremony by which he gave up any claim to it. Esau lost the birthright when he did the thing that rendered it impossible for him to continue as the head of the clan.
Esau's descendants from then on would be mongrelized. Recognizing he was already out of the line for leadership, Esau sold his inheritance for a bowl of stew. The Bible records that Esau and his two Canaanite wives moved down to Mount Seir, a very rugged mountain range southeast of the Dead Sea. Mount Seir is exactly where some of these people lived who were descendants of the fallen angels. Read Genesis chapter 6, among the people who had the blood line of the fallen angels were these Horites. They were the cave dwellers who were known as Horim.
Suppose a white man married two Negresses here and then moved to the interior of the Congo. For the next 18 centuries his descendants lived there with nobody they could marry except the Negroes around them. Of course the last trace of white blood would have vanished. Nevertheless, after 18 centuries they could still say they had a white ancestor.
These weren't Negroes, they were satanic Canaanites, but the principle is the same. These Jews talking with Yahshua had identified themselves as Edomite Jews. Genesis 36:20-30 lists Esau's descendants. Listed are all the various chieftains among the family of Seir, the Horite satanic line, including his daughter Timna. Genesis 36:12 records that Timna was a concubine to Esau's son Eliphaz and bore him a son Amalek. What a pestilential lot the whole tribe of Amalek was, they all behaved according to their satanic bloodline. You will find a good deal about this in Exodus 17:8-16 and Numbers 20:14-21.
This same satanic conduct, on the part of the Edomites, was repeated as the opportunity arose. Remember when the people of Israel came out of Egypt in the exodus, they wanted to march up to Palestine, they were then attacked by the Edomites. The Israelites were driven back so they had to detour around, down through the wilderness, in the Sinai Peninsula.
When the Babylonians, under Nebuchadnezzar captured Jerusalem, they looted and burned the city and massacred a lot of the inhabitants. Then the Edomites came rushing in to help in the massacre and plunder. The whole book of Obadiah is just one continuous condemnation of the Edomites for the way they acted. This book also predicted their eventual slaughter and punishment for what they did. Obadiah verse 10 records, "For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off forever".
Part 3
Obadiah verse 15 continues, "For the day of Yahweh is near upon all the heathen: as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head". Obadiah verse 18, "And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; for there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for Yahweh has spoken it."
Exodus 17:14-16 continues, "And Yahweh said unto Moses, Write this for a memorial in a book, and rehearse it in the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven. And Moses built an altar, and called the name of it Yahweh Nissi (Yahweh our banner). For he said, Because Yahweh hath sworn that Yahweh will have war with Amalek from generation to generation."
How did these satanic, mongrel, Edomite Jews get up there into Judea? They came in two principle waves. During the time the southern kingdom of Judah was practically empty during the Babylonian captivity, the Edomites were driven out of Mount Seir by a heavy invasion by the Arab people, the Nabateans from the east. So the Edomites were driven westward. They couldn't go southwest or straight west, they would then be getting into Egyptian territory and they weren't strong enough to fight the Egyptians. Consequently they went slightly northwest and took over the southerly half of what had been the kingdom of Judah and settled there.
When the small remnant of Judah came back from the Babylonian captivity, the books of Ezra and Nehemiah record that 42,600, or something like that, came back. It lists them by their families and when you run those down you find that slightly over 8,000 of these people were not from any tribe of Israel or Judah. Only 34,000 of the 42,000 that came back were Israelites of the tribes of Judah, Benjamin and a few Levites among them.
Since they were too few to drive out these numerous and warlike Edomites, all they could do was settle in the little territory left vacant. To give you an idea of the size of this territory, the entire area of the twelve tribed nation of Israel, before it broke up, picture it as follows. If it were set down here in southern California, it would extend from the Mexican border to the southern part of Los Angeles and inland from the coast it was never more than 40 miles wide.
Now divide this into thirds, the northern two-thirds of that comprised the kingdom of Israel, the ten tribed northern kingdom. Only the southerly one-third of that was the kingdom of Judah. Of that one-third, take out the southern half of that now occupied by the Edomites. This little strip of land is all that remained for the true Judaites and Benjamenites to settle in.
Before the captivity, the tribe of Judah had been in the south, the tribe of Benjamin in the north, with the city of Jerusalem lying right on the boundary line between them. They sorted themselves out as well as they could, the way they were before. Judah was in the south and Benjamin pushed to the north. However, Benjamin couldn't just move up to the north a little bit, because north of them was Samaria. Remember I said you divide this twelve tribed territory into thirds, the middle third constituted Samaria.
Isaiah, Kings and Chronicles record that when the Assyrians captured the northern kingdom of Israel and deported its entire people, they brought other people from Assyria and settled them in Samaria. It purposely failed to say the Assyrians settled anybody in Galilee, the northern most portions, because they didn't, they left it vacant. Now the Judahites pushed the Benjamenites to the north, as they returned from the captivity. They couldn't just move up into Samaria that was fully settled. So Benjamin had to leapfrog over Samaria to the vacant land of Galilee, to the north.
In Galilee was Yahshua's own hometown of Nazareth. He was born in Bethlehem, down close to Jerusalem, but His family home was up in Nazareth. Remember, Yahshua got almost all of His converts up in Galilee and of the twelve disciples only Judas was a Jew. In Bible translations Judas is called Judas Iscariot. There is no such word as Iscariot in any language known to man. This is a corruption of the Hebrew word Ish Kerioth, meaning a man of Kerioth. Kerioth was a little village in the southwestern portion of Judea, down in the territory occupied by the Edomites. Judas was an Edomite Jew and the only Jew of the twelve disciples. The other eleven were all Galileans, therefore Benjamenites. If a Jew could walk with Yahshua for three years and still betray Him, is there any Jew we can trust?
When Yahshua was arrested and taken into the high priest's home for illegal questioning, Peter followed Him in. The servant said "Well, you're one of them, you're a Galilean, your accent shows it". You certainly don't have any trouble telling the southerners from a northern Yankee here in this country do you. They speak English with a different accent and the Galileans spoke the Aramaic of the day, with a little different accent from the Judeans down around Jerusalem.
When the people were gathered at Pentecost, and the Holy Spirit came upon the disciples, they were all there except Judas Escariot. The disciples began speaking to this assembled multitude in a multitude of different languages. How astonished the people were when they heard the disciples speaking in all these different languages, which obviously they didn't know. The people said, "Aren't these Galileans?" All the remaining disciples were.
Down to the south of what was left of the territory of Judah, these Edomite Jews settled. They were always a pestiferous people and were constantly raiding the southern boundary of Judea. Their descendants are raiding the Arab's territory the same way today. A leopard doesn't change its spots. For a long time, after the return from the Babylonian captivity, the people in Judea were a conquered province of one empire or another, Syria, Egypt and finally Rome. They got their little flare up of independence under the Maccabee kings beginning about 150 B.C. and about 120 B.C.
John Hyrcanus, one of the Maccabee kings, who had by that time a good disciplined army, got tired of these Edomite Jew raids on his southern border. So, Hyrcanus marched down south and defeated these Jews thoroughly. Saul, the first king of Israel, had been told by Yahweh, "You go down there and absolutely exterminate these Edomites, don't you leave one of them alive". Saul made a big mistake, as it is always a mistake to disobey Yahweh's commands and instructions, he didn't exterminate these loathsome people. When Saul came back the prophet Samuel said, "Because you have disobeyed God, God has deposed you from being king, and He is going to put a better man in your place".
Approximately 900 years later, John Hyrcanus made the same mistake. After he had defeated the Edomites, he then decided he was going to be a missionary; he would convert them to the religion of Judaism. He offered the Edomites a choice; he would spare them if they would accept the religion of Judaism. This was not the religion of the Old Testament ever; it was what was brought back from Babylon with the Babylonian Talmud. The late Rabbi Stephen S. Wise said it briefly and accurately; I have never been able to improve on his words.
The learned Rabbi said, "The return from Babylon and the introduction of the Babylonian Talmud marked the end of Hebrewism and the beginning of Judaism". The people of the Old Testament were real Hebrews and the religion Yahweh had given them could well be called Hebrewism. This Talmud/Judaism began as the Jews destroyed the religion of the Old Testament. In Yahshua's time they had not yet given it the name of the Talmud, they called it "the tradition of the elders". Remember how often Yahshua rebuked them for following their tradition. "Why have ye by your tradition set aside the laws of Yahweh?" Yahshua was referring to the Talmud.
So, John Hyrcanus was going to be the Billy Graham of his day, he was going to make converts. Hyrcanus told them, "If you will adopt the religion of Judaism, I will give you full citizenship in the kingdom of Judea. If you don't, I will cut your throats". As you well know, this is the most effective missionary technique that has ever been developed. Even Billy Graham doesn't make converts that fast. Naturally the converts made by the sword are of doubtful validity. So the Edomites adopted the religion of Judaism and were accepted in full citizenship in the kingdom. You will find this described in great detail in the one reliable history of that period, Josephus in his history, "Antiquities of the Jews", book 13, chapter 9.
The second wave of Edomites came in when the Edomite chieftain Herod conquered and became king of Judea, under the Roman Empire. Herod was a very able and very evil scoundrel. He raised a large sum of money by taxation and by raiding his neighbors. With this money he bribed Mark Anthony, who was over in Egypt with the Roman legions at this time, to lend him a couple of the Roman legions to add to his own Edomite troops, for the conquest of Judea. With the Roman troops and his own, Herod did capture Judea.
In 40 B.C. the Romans recognized Herod as governor with the title Ethnarch. In 37 B.C., Rome formally recognized Herod as the local king of Judea. He was still subject to Roman foreign policy but he had complete self-government at home. Herod had come in with a conquering army and his Jewish Edomite followers came in with him for the sake of the plunder they could get, they overran the area. They have also gone back to Germany for the same reason. You can learn much about these events in Josephus' "Antiquities of the Jews" books 14-18.
In his other history, the "Wars of the Jews", book 4 chapters 4-5, book 5 and chapter 6 and thereafter, Josephus writes of the horrible conduct of these Edomite Jews within the besieged city of Jerusalem while it was undergoing siege by Titus in the year 70 A.D. Their robbery and massacre of the inhabitants inflicted probably more casualties than the Roman army did. In the Jewish encyclopedia, the article "Edom" (in the edition I used to look it up, it was Volume 5, page 41) the article "Edom" concludes with these words: "The Edomites are found today in modern Jewry".
These Edomites had come in the first time when John Hyrcanus gave them full citizenship. The second time they came in was as a wave of conquerors under Herod. This is the same Herod that tried to murder Yahshua as a baby. They had overrun the land. They had control of the entire civil and religious government until the death of Herod.
By will, Herod left the kingdom of Judea to his son Herod Archelaus. The Romans were too wise to trust somebody with the kingdom when they didn't know anything about him. The Romans gave the new Herod a trial period as governor, under the title Ethnarch. For ten years he gave the country the most miserable misrule that any nation ever had. The people finally petitioned Rome to send a Roman to govern them.
The people didn't like the tyranny of Rome at all but conditions were so bad, anything was better than what they had. When a Roman would rather govern the people, you can understand how bad the situation was. The Romans put Herod Archelaus on trial, found him guilty of misrule and banished him to Vienne.
From that time on there were a series of Roman governors called procurators, Pontius Pilate was number 6 in that series. The military government was entirely in the hands of the Roman procurators. They were also in full charge of the tax collections for Rome.
On the other hand, these Herodian Jews had control of the entire religious government and the temple. They also had control of the civil government, in all respects concerning purely local self government, could collect their own taxes and so on.
When the priests were getting greatly upset about Yahshua's teachings they said, "If we let Him alone, all men will believe on Him. The Romans will take this kingdom away from us." The way the clergymen have taught it, this is meaningless stupidity. The clergy picture Yahshua as a whining, cringing milksop, going around whimpering to people they ought to be good. If this was all Yahshua did, these Jews would not have bothered with contempt for Him, much less worry about His teachings.
Yahshua was explaining to the people the utter evil of the Jewish economic and religious system under which they were living. Let's paraphrase what the Jews might have said, based on what is recorded in the Bible. "Look, if we let Him alone, He is going to awaken the people to these controls we have over them. They will petition Rome just as they did about Herod Archelaus and the Romans will kick us out of here. We will lose control of the money and might have to pay fair wages. The people might rebel against the usury we charge them for use of their own money." This is what they were talking about.
Here were these Edomite Jews, who told Yahshua they were descendants of Abraham. However, they revealed they really couldn't be true Israel when they said they had never been in captivity to any man. They might have had some Israelite ancestors but, no alien blood was allowed in those called Israel. As we read in John 8:31-44, we will come to the place where Yahshua tells these Jews they were the children of the devil. They would do the lusts of their father who was a murderer from the beginning.
Yahshua recognized the two seed lines. He didn't say these Jews had only adopted some of the bad principles of the devil, He said they were the children of the devil. The Old Testament as well as the New Testament recognizes the two seed lines. The Adamic seed line, Yahweh's children, came down through a carefully selected best one in each generation from Abraham, Isaac, Israel, then on down through the twelve tribes of Israel. So there are the two seed lines, that of Yahweh's children through Israel and the children of Satan, some of the most pestiferous of which have come through the line of Cain.
People have asked me if I thought the Jews know of their descent from Cain. They certainly do, and here is how they proved they know. The Jews have given the owner of the radio station on which I broadcast, a very bad time. As some of you may know, a radio-broadcasting station license is good for only three years. If it is renewed on a regular basis, you have a going money making business of considerable value. If the license isn't renewed, all you have is some used equipment. It makes a great deal of difference to the owner whether he gets his license renewed or not.
The Jews put pressure on this radio station owner to put two programs off the air. One of the programs was Richard Cotten, a conservative commentator and the other program was mine. Much to the owner's credit, he refused to take us off the air. His reply to the Jews was, "I have no authority to censor any of these programs, besides, this is the United States of America and I believe in free speech." They told him, "You've got to put these programs off the air." The owner of the station answered them, "If either one of them has said anything that you think is untrue, although they are paying for their time, I will give you an equal amount of free time for you to answer them."
Surprise, surprise, the Jews didn't take the station owner up on his offer. Neither Richard Cotten nor I go off the deep end with any statement we can't prove. The Jews still insisted the station owner put us off the air. When he refused, the Jews filed objections to the renewal of his radio station license, which came up for renewal about this time. They kept the matter before the Federal Communications Commission for more than a year so the owner operated his station on a day to day basis, not knowing if his license would be renewed or not.
During this time the Jews terrorized the station owner into to making an agreement. The agreement was the station owner would hire a Jew who would censor my program and Richard Cotten's. This Jew could cut out whatever material the Jews objected to.
I have never sent any cut and spliced tapes to the radio station. When I am paying $100.00 an hour for broadcast time, tape is the cheapest thing you use. While I have never known of one of my splices to come apart, I don't take any chances on it. The tapes I send in for broadcast are complete, without splices. When these tapes are returned to me, they are cut and spliced in a number of places where this Jew censor has cut portions of them out.
I don't like a Jew, to remove matters of essential Christian doctrine, can censor it one bit that a Christian broadcast. However, this station owner doesn't have to carry my program. The owner of the station still has to fight the Jews and this is three years later. He finally won before the Federal Communications Commission. The Jews appealed to the U.S. District Court of Appeals and the station owner won there also. The Jews then appealed to the Supreme Court. This radio station owner undoubtedly has spent somewhere between $50,000 and $100,000 in legal expenses fighting to retain his radio station license and indirectly to preserve my right of free speech. If I make myself too troublesome to him, he may just decide he doesn't want to carry my program any further so I don't argue with him about it.
On one of my broadcast tapes, I quoted the Bible verses telling that after Cain killed Abel, Cain had been a farmer up to that time, Yahweh said, "Cursed is the ground for your sake. I will not hereafter yield you its strength." Cain's reply was, "My punishment is greater than I can bear. You have driven me off the face of the land, and I'll be a wanderer and a vagabond." Then I went on to say that I suppose you have noticed that the children of Cain are not farmers today. You find them in financial and money lending institutions. I didn't use the forbidden word Jew, I just said the children of Cain. Guess what the Jew censor cut out of my tape! As a Jew he knew exactly whom I was talking about. Yes, they know who they are.
The Bible records Cain saying he was being driven out of the land where the descendants of Adam would be. He complained that wherever he went, whomever he met would kill him. In those days there were a lot of places that weren't too hospitable to strangers. If, as the preachers teach, Adam and Eve were the parents of the only people on earth who were these other people? The only other child of Adam and Eve, at this time, was Abel and he was dead.
With Cain driven away from Adam and Eve, out into some other part of the earth, who was Cain going to meet that would kill him? Remember, the Bible records Cain very speedily found enough people that with them he built a city. The Bible records these pre Adamite people. Yahweh told Cain He would put a mark on him so the people would recognize him and not kill him. Just what was that mark? Did Yahweh tattoo something on the sole of Cain's foot or where Cain would sit down on it? No, long before any hidden mark could possibly be seen, Cain would have been killed.
Yahweh had to put this mark where it was the first thing others would see, He put it in the exact geometrical center of Cain's face. This big Jew nose they have borne ever since, as the sculptured monuments of the ancient empires show.
The ancient kings were extremely vain of the conquests they had made. The pharaohs of Egypt, kings of Babylon, Assyria, and Persia, all left elaborately carved monuments telling how they had captured this city or that. They recorded the massacre of so many of its inhabitants and made slaves of the others, plus how much loot they took and so forth.
In addition to the inscriptions, there was almost always a carved panel illustrating this, showing some of the captives. Wherever any of these panels showed an Israelite, it is invariably a straight nose, typical of what we would call an Anglo Saxon, Scandinavian or Teutonic type of face. Where it shows these Canaanite people, it is always a typical hook nosed Jew.
The evidence of the Bible, and the evidence of archaeology all show one thing. There is definitely two different seed lines, the satanic seed line and the other seed line of Israel, Yahweh's own children.
I think I'll post an excerpt from one of the articles above on who the true Israelites are and then a video of them. The descendants of Adam, Seth, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob who's name was changed to Israel.
"20.) "In Isaac shall thy seed be called." (Beth-Sak = House of Isaac = Isaac's Sons = Saxons) Gen. 21:12. When I first read this passage, I said to myself, “This is no reference to the Jews!” The Jews never quote this passage of Scripture because they are not descendants of Isaac through Jacob.
It is only True Israel which can lay claim to this genetic heritage: Isaac’s Sons = the Saxons = the Anglo-Saxons. We are named after Isaac.
The Jews claim to be named after Judah. It would be impossible for them to explain away the plain meaning of this passage, so they suppress it. The pro-Jewish pastors of “Judeo-Christianity,” to their great discredit, ignore this passage as well.
Conclusion The above are a quick scratching of the surface of the evidence which proves that the Jews are not Israel. These are only some of the most obvious references to the future Marks of Abraham's true Adamic seed, Israel.
Many more descriptive statements could be adduced, but these should suffice for the moment. The cited list ought to be sufficient for distinguishing between the two different groups of people contending for the designation, "Heirs of the Promise", or "The Covenant People", or "The Chosen People".
Score: Anglo-Saxons, 20; Jews, zero…and counting. Would someone care to calculate the odds against all of these prophecies coming true among one group of people? The odds are probably sixty kajillion to one. The odds for the Jews are also zero.
The only identifiable group which can fit the Marks of Israel is the three Houses of Isaac: the House of Israel, the House of Judah, and the House of David. The House of Edom is reprobate. The descendants of all three of these Houses of Isaac, yesterday, today, and forever, fall into the category of the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Caucasian peoples; and NO ONE ELSE."
The true descendants of the Israelites
The children of God
<font size="3"><font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: Roboto;">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSk2J3h21YE
Another video here done by Julian Lee where he asks who's trying to destroy the children of God.
The answer is above in the articles I've posted and it's the children of Satan who are working for their destruction.
Very very good Tumbleweed!
Be careful though......some of these jews are remnants of the two tribes that stayed in the area of Palestine. The other ten tribes went over the Caucasus mountains to settle Europe and the America's and hence why we are called Caucasians.
In my late teens I was given a book called the "Marks of Israel". I kept it but since have lost it. It was with my first edition set of "The International Jew" by henry ford.
This is an article on race mixing and that it goes against the will of God.
Esau lost his birthright because of it and so will we if we do the same as Esau.
It was also part of the reason for the destruction of Sodom and Gomorah and the flood that destroyed those living around Noah at that time.
http://comparet.christogenea.org/con...al-segregation
YAHWEH COMMANDS
RACIAL SEGREGATION
by Bertrand L. Comparet
In the Bible Yahweh repeatedly warns us against any mixing of races, and especially against intermarriage and mongrelization. Some of this has been overlooked because of imperfect translation out of the Hebrew and Greek languages, in which the Bible was written. Let us examine some of these passages, carefully noting the exact meaning of the words used in the original tongues.
From the very beginning, the commandment not to permit mongrelization is strongly emphasized. For example:
Exodus 33:16: “So shall we be separated, I and all of Thy people, from all the people that are upon the face of the earth.”
Leviticus 20:24: “I am Yahweh thy God, which have separated you from other people.”
Joshua 23:12-13: “If ye do in any wise go back and cleave unto the remnant of these nations, even these that remain among you, and shall make marriage with them and go in unto them and they unto you: know for a certainty that they shall be snares and traps unto you and scourges in your sides and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish off from this good land which Yahweh your God has given you.”
Deuteronomy 7:3: “Neither shalt thou make marriages with them: thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.”
Many warnings are given in the Bible not to mate with the stranger. The Hebrew words translated stranger in these verses are zuwr, nekar, and nokri, each one means a person of a different race from ours. There are other Hebrew words, ger and toshab, meaning persons who are aliens only in a political sense, but of our race. The warning against race mixing is always against those strangers who arezuwr, nekar or nakri. For example Proverbs 23:27 tells us, “For a whore is a deep ditch; and a strange (zuwr) woman is a narrow pit.”
The reason for the warning is clear, mongrelization is the worst form of genocide. If you kill 99% of a race, but leave the other 1% pure blooded, they will in time restore the race. But, when you mongrelize them, you have destroyed that race eternally. Once mixed with the black or yellow races, the white race would be totally and forever destroyed, hence Yahweh has forbidden it. The following verses illustrate this point.
Psalm 144:11-12: “Rid me and deliver me from the hand of strange (nekar) children, whose mouth speaketh vanity, and their right hand is a right hand of falsehood: That our sons may be as plants grown up in their youth, that our daughters may be as the polished cornices of a palace.”
Jeremiah 2:21,25: “Yet I planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed. How then, art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange (zuwr) vine unto Me? Withhold thy foot from being unshod, and thy throat thirst: but thou saidest There is no hope: no, for I have loved strangers (zuwr) and after them will I go.”
Hosea 5:6-7: “They shall go with their flocks and their herds to seek Yahweh, but they shall not find Him: He hath withdrawn Himself from them. They have dealt treacherously against Yahweh: for they have begotten strange (zuwr) children.”
Noah was saved because he was pure blooded, while those around him were mongrelized. Genesis 6:2,4-5, records the forbidden mixing of races and the evil results thereof. Noah was a different story, he obeyed Yahweh’s law against the mixing of the races.
Genesis 6:9: “Noah was a just man and perfect (taw-meem, without blemish) in his generations (to-led-aw, descent, ancestry).” Hence, Noah and his family were saved while the mongrels were wiped out. Mongrelization is the sin for which Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed!!!
Jude 1:7: “Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.”
Those who seek to force integration in the schools and churches are now beginning to admit that their real purpose is to bring about racial intermarriage. They have even deceived certain well meaning, but ignorant clergymen into helping them. Even without inter-marriage, just allowing negroes into the white churches is disobedience to Yahweh. Do you say you didn’t see that in your Bible, this is only because mistranslation conceals it from you. No doubt you were puzzled when you read the following in Deuteronomy 23:2. “A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of Yahweh: even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of Yahweh.”
You wondered at this, because an illegitimate child is not to blame for the sins of its parents. Why should the penalty extend for ten generations, they might all be legitimately born?
The Hebrew word mistranslated bastard is the word mamzer. It means a mixture, a half breed or mongrel. It has nothing to do with whether a child’s parents were married, but it refers to the forbidden mixture of races. This is why the penalty extends for ten generations, it shows how seriously Yahweh treats this sin. It is true the mulatto child is not to blame for his parents’ sins, but he/she is still a mulatto. The first generation would be a half-breed, the second would have at least a quarter of the black blood. The third at least 1/8th; the fourth 1/1 6th; and so on. In the tenth generation, the negro blood may be as small as one part in 1,024, yet Yahweh says this is too much to be allowed to enter into the congregation of Yahweh.
If you admit that your church is not worthy to be called the congregation of Yahweh, then perhaps this doesn’t concern you. But if your church is, or trying to be the congregation of Yahweh, hadn’t you better obey Yahweh’s own commandment concerning it? Call this to the attention of your minister.
The unfortunate children of such marriages are not the guilty ones, the sin is that of their parents. The fact they cannot help what they are does not change the permanent fact they are what they are. The experience of thousands of years has demonstrated that the dark races do not have what it takes to produce the white man’s high civilization. They have never had it in their own lands and they only have it here because we, the white majority, make it so.
The mixed breed is the same, they do not have in proper measure, those qualities which Yahweh so carefully implanted in the white race to carry out certain purposes which He has assigned to them.
Recognition that Yahweh made the races different does not imply hatred or contempt for any of them.
Difference has its purposes, which must be respected. I do not expect the family cat to sing like a canary, nor the canary to keep mice out of the kitchen. If I went quail hunting, I would not expect a horse to point quail for me, neither would I try to saddle and ride the best hunting dog in the world.
All the family pets are equally loved and none are despised because he can’t do what some other does. Each has his own purpose and trying to mix them up or interbreed them can only harm them.
There are many people to whom these facts are new. There are also many who have learned the evil lesson that they can get more money or more political popularity, by violating these laws of Yahweh than by obeying them.
Some of you might not like being reminded of these things, but remember, I did not write the Bible, Yahweh wrote it through His prophets. His commandments are always right. For our own good, for the very survival of our white race upon the earth and that we may face Yahweh with a better conscience, we had better obey these laws of Yahweh.
I think I'll post this article about what Jesus said on the cross. We've be told he said "forgive them for they know not what they do".
I believe he said "forgive them "not" for they know what they do and this is explained in the article below.
http://www.fathersmanifesto.net/forgivethemnot.htm
Forgive them not for they know what they doAny Greek textus receptus will prove to you beyond the shadow of any doubt that Luke 23:34 SHOULD have been translated as "father_forgive_them_not_for_they-know_what_they-do" rather than "forgive them for they know not what they do". There's no feasible reason why "not" needs to be associated with "know" versus "forgive_them".
Furthermore, as all Christians and jews know, and as Christ Himself taught, and as the Old Testament testifies, forgiveness is based upon repentence, but did these jews ever repent of their sins? Never. So why would the suggestion be made that Christ COULD even TRY to ask God to forgive them? And if Christ DID ask God to forgive them, God must have been sound asleep, because He was still inclined to destroy all of them and the Temple of Jerusalem in 72 AD, not much of an indication that HE was inclined to forgive them Himself. As the son of God, God in the flesh, son of man, king of kings, messiah, Israelite with the courage to send His Twelve Disciples only to the house of Israel, and about the only Christian in 2,000 years willing to take on the jews head on, changing the word structure of this single sentence changed His entire mission statement and made Him appear as a confused little boy.
The jews must be having quite a laugh in the backrooms of their Synagogues, but not for long. What they've done here is beyond forgiveness.
Christ spent His entire ministry preaching against, condemning, and insulting in the most ingenious way, the jews who had polluted the command of God with their traditions of the elders "Jesus replied, "And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? Matthew 15:3". He and His disciples called the jews every name in the book, including "you brood of vipers", they will be "thrown into the fire", "hypocrites!", "babbling like pagans", "wicked", "adulterous", "Ninevah will ... condemn [you]", "you break the command of God", "teachings are but rules taught by men", "will be pulled up by the roots", "blind guides", "blind man", "guard against ... the teachings of the Pharisees and Sadducees", "you yourself do not enter ... the kingdom of heaven", "blind fools", "blind men", "Blind Pharisee", "you are like whitewashed tombs", "you are the children of those who murdered the prophets", "you snakes", "condemned to hell", "Pharisees ... rejected God's purpose for themselves", "you foolish people", "you are like unmarked graves", "you build tombs for the prophets, yet it was your forefathers who killed them", "will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world", "whom you slew between the temple and the altar", "you are not of my sheep", "you are of your father the devil", "a murderer from the beginning", "liar and the father of lies", "break the command of God for the sake of your tradition", "if God were your father, you would love me".
Not only did He make it clear that He did not come for the Canaanite woman, but "He said in reply, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Matthew 15:24", and He willfully insulted the jews by reminding them that they were EXCLUDED from this mission "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me, John 10:26-27". As if though this wasn't enough, He even claimed that the jews were of a different God than He "Jesus said unto them, If God were yourFather, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me, John 8:42" and furthermore that their God was the devil "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was amurderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truthin him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the fatherof it, John 8:44". He also told them that they could NOT be forgiven "Ye serpents,ye race of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell? Matthew 23:33", so for what Godly reason would Christ change His mind at precisely the moment that His crucifixion caused the earth to tremble and the veil to rent?
Though this expression is not found in some manuscripts (Vaticanus, et al), it is popularly accepted as meaning our Lord forgave his tormentors and crucifiers without repentance; in other words, universal, unconditional, blind forgiveness. This is NOT the case. That the actions of His adversaries were wilful, and they were fully cognizant of WHO He was (they knew of His miracles, and even witnessed a few) may be found in verses 35-37:Elsewhere, our Savior said of these who mocked Him:
The people stood looking on. And even the leaders of the synagogue mocked Him, and said, >He saved others; let Him save Himself, if He is the Christ, the chosen one of God. And the soldiers ridiculed Him, and they came near Him and offered Him vinegar, saying to Him, >If you are king of the Jews, save yourself.
A wicked and adulterous generation wants a sign; and no sign shall be given to it, except the sign of the prophet Jonah. And He left them and went away. (Matthew 16:4)
Interesting that He should mention adultery. Nevertheless, in Luke 23, the emphatic Greek text (Emphatic Diaglott, published by the International Bible Students Association) tells us a very different picture (see inset). In it, Jesus Christ intones:
O Father, forgive them; not for they know what they do.Broken into its components, the Greek language assents to the fact that forgiveness is, indeed, based upon repentance, for these accusers were most definitely NOT repentant for their deeds. Some may counter that this was due to the fact they weren't of the Christian Faith, but this is not borne out in the context.
Since Jesus Christ was praying to His Father in the Heavenly, the judgment upon this "wicked and adulterous generation" was sure to follow, and it did, in AD 68-70, when the Old Jerusalem was reduced to rubble by Romans under Cyrus.
Pastor V.S. Herrell"...I go away, and you will seek Me. And you will die in your failures. Where I go,
you are not able to come. ... You are from below; I am from above. You are from this world, I am not from this world. ... If you were the children of Abraham, you would do the works of Abraham. But now you seek to kill Me ... Abraham did not do this. You do the works of your father ... If God were your Father, you would love Me ... you are not able to hear My Word. You are of your father the Diabolical One, and the lusts of your father you wish to do. That one was a murderer from the beginning, and he has not stood in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own, because he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I speak the truth you are not persuaded by Me. ... for this reason you do not hear, because you are not of God."
Now I know what you are thinking. Did Jesus not forgive the Jews on the cross? Did He not say, "Father forgive them, for they know not what they do." Absolutely not! To say this is to blaspheme the
blood of Christ and the Mentality of Separation. To say this is to believe a lie and be damned! Once again,
all honest scholars agree that this verse was not in the original autographs of the New Testament. All
honest translations omit this passage. All honest preachers teach that Jesus never said this. Everyone else is
simply making and helping make a lie, for even if translators accept this spurious passage, then they should
translate it Father forgive them not, for they know what they are doing . (See footnote at Luke 23:34 in the
AST). Instead, these dishonest, Jewish, and Jew-influenced traitors to the White race (if they are white at
all) fall into the category we have already stated, namely,
"...outside [the gates], the dogs and pharmakeia promoters and the whores and the murderers and the idolaters and everyone loving and making a lie" (Rev. 22:15 AST). These people are guilty of the sin or failure described in that same chapter in Revelation, verse 18 (AST):
"For I testify together with everyone hearing the words of the prophecy of this Scroll: If anyone adds to these things, God will add upon him the plagues having been written in this Scroll. And if anyone takes away from the words of the Scroll of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the Book of Life, and out of the Separated city, and of the things having been written in this Scroll."
^ That's a damn fine example of the "Mark of Cain" in the middle of that Jews face :-).
I've been posting articles in this thread that have helped me gain a better understanding of what has happened in the past and what is happening in our lives today and what's behind it.
This article I'll post below is one that I've posted in another thread some time ago. It has been helpful to me and I want to add it to this thread.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/word.htm
The Bible is not a Jewish BookThe statement is commonly made, even by those who should know better, that we Christians owe a debt to the Jews, for we got our Bible and our religion from them. While many people have been deceived into believing this, it is completely false. Part of the mistake comes from the complete confusion in the minds of nearly all people as to just what they mean by Jew. Are they referring to people of a certain race, or referring to a people of a certain religion, for the two are not the same. There are in Africa today, some pure blooded negroes who are Jews by religion; in India today there are some pure blooded Indians who are Jews, and there are in China today, some pure blooded Mongolians who are Jews by religion. Likewise, there are some people today who are racially of the stock we know as Jews, but who have been converted to other religions.
by Bertrand L. Comparet
First let's consider the claim we got our Bible and our religion from the Jews, as meaning Jews by religion. It is certain we didn't get the New Testament from them, for it condemns the Jewish religion throughout all the New Testament. But did we get the Old Testament from them? No, for several reasons: in the first place, no Jew by religion existed before the return from the Babylonian captivity, shortly after 536 B.C. Their great historian Josephus writes, "So the Jews prepared the work. Jew is the name they are called by from the day that they came up from Babylon." The only books of the Old Testament that were written after the return from Babylon are, Kings, Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah (all of them historical, rather than doctrinal) Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi. In none of these do the Jews receive anything but rebuke for their wickedness, for their apostasy from the religion of the Old Testament. The late Rabbi Stephen F. Wise, formerly the Chief Rabbi of the United States said, "The return from Babylon and the introduction of the Babylonian Talmud mark the end of Hebrewism and the beginning of Judaism."
The learned Rabbi was correct in distinguishing the true religion of the Old Testament as Hebrewism for it was the religion of the real Hebrews, who were not Jews at all. Judaism, the religion of the Jews, is as the learned Rabbi says, based upon the Babylonian Talmud, which contains the supposed oral law. It was never reduced to writing as part of the Bible. This oral law gradually gained greater force among the Jews than the written law in the Bible, with which it often conflicted in Jesus' day, the Babylonian Talmud was known as the Tradition of the Elders.
This is why Jesus told the Jews:
"Well hath Esaias prophesied of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoreth Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me. Howbeit, in vain do they worship Me, teaching for doctrines the Commandments of men. For laying aside the commandments of God that ye may keep your own tradition, ye make the Word of God of none effect through your tradition which ye have delivered" (Mark 7:6-13). "Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God" (Matthew 22:29).
"Woe unto you, Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites! for ye pay tithes of mint, anise and cumin and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy and faith" (Matthew 23:23).
This was the religion of the Jews. As the learned Rabbi Stephen F. Wise said, Judaism was distinguished from Hebrewism, the real religion of the Old Testament. Certainly Christianity took nothing from any Jewish religion for we have never taken any part of Christianity from the Talmud.
Well then, can it be said we got our Bible or our religion of Christianity from men of the Jewish race? No, it cannot. I haven't the time in the remainder of this lesson to give the Bible evidence in detail. I will have to reserve that for a later lesson. It can be clearly proven, both out of the historical books of the Bible and out of the only thorough history of the times written by one living when the facts were still well known. Josephus' "Antiquities of the Jews," tells that the Jews were a people distinct and separate from Yahweh's people Israel, although living among them. The Jew were the Canaanite people who lived in Palestine, before Israel entered the promised land and who were not driven out. These Canaanite people, and the mixed offspring from intermarriage with the Israelites, were allowed to remain in the land while paying heavy tribute taxes.
The prophets who wrote the books of the Old Testament, were all of pure Israelite stock, from one or another of the 12 tribes of Israel. Moses, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Habakkuk, Haggai and Zechariah were of the tribe of Levi. Joshua and Samuel were of the tribe of Ephraim. Isaiah, Daniel and Zephaniah were of the house of David, Jonah was of the tribe of Zebulun. Hosea was of the tribe of Issachar.
When the Assyrians conquered and deported the people of the ten northern tribes, the Bible records that the Assyrians brought other people in from the Assyrian empire and settled them in Samaria, in place of the Israelites they had deported. Samaria is only the southern half of the territory occupied by these ten northern tribes. The northern half was Galilee and this was left vacant. When the kingdom of Judah was later deported to Babylon, for their seventy years captivity, their land was left with very little population. While they were gone, the Edomites who were descendants of Esau, mixed with Canaanite people, were forced out of their own land by pressure of invading Arab tribes, and moved westward into the vacant lands of Judah, occupying the southern half of the former kingdom of Judah.
Therefore, when a portion of the two tribes of Judah and Benjamin returned from the Babylonian captivity, they were too few in numbers to drive out the warlike Edomites and had to try to squeeze into the very little territory they had left. It was too small for them, so what was left of the tribe of Judah took the little territory remaining around Jerusalem and Benjamin was pushed to the north. They could not move next door into Samaria, as this area was occupied by the peoples settled there by the Assyrians. Benjamin had to leapfrog over them into the vacant territory of Galilee.
That the apostles and the majority of Christian converts came from the Benjaminites should not surprise us. When the kingdom was split in two upon the death of Solomon, God said He would leave Benjamin with Judah so that the house of David should have a light before them. In Jesus' time the people of Benjamin were still the light bearers. In the New Testament all of the apostles were of the tribe of Benjamin except Judas Iscariot, the only Jew among them. Judas came from the village of Kerioth in southern Judea. Iscariot is a corruption of Ish Kerioth, man of Kerioth. Paul tells us that he was of the tribe of Benjamin and that the other apostles except Judas Iscariot were from Galilee where the tribe of Benjamin settled after the return from Babylon.
This is confirmed by Jesus. In Matthew 15:24 He said, "I am not sent but unto the sheep of the house of Israel." In John chapter 10 Jesus tells the Jews, "I am the good Shepherd and know My sheep and am known of Mine. But ye believe not because ye are not of My sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear My voice and I know them and they follow Me." From the Savior's own lips we have the proof that the Jews are not of the tribes of Israel. Note carefully that He does not say that their unbelief keeps them from being of His sheep. He says the exact opposite, that the reason why they do not believe is that they are not of His sheep, the house of Israel. Christianity and Judaism are completely and irreconcilably inconsistent. Whichever one is right, the other must be wrong for they mutually repudiate each other. A great part of Jesus' reported Words are His denunciation of the Jews for their religion, which He tells them is not that of the Old Testament. In John 5:46 Jesus told them, "Had ye believed in Moses, ye would have believed Me: for he wrote of Me." In Luke 16:31 Jesus said, "If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded through one rose from the dead." He was right, He did rise from the dead, but to this day they are not persuaded.
It is therefore clear, we got neither our Bible nor our Christian religion, either in whole or in part from those who were Jews, either by religion or by race. We owe them no debt, for they gave us nothing.
Supplementary Notes
Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser wrote, "This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression. . . Judaism is not the religion of the Bible" (Judaism and the Christian Predicament, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967, p. 59).
Rabbi Moshe M. Maggal, President, National Jewish Information Service wrote: ". . . you will notice the great difference between the Jewish and Christian religions. But these are not all. We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other. . . we emphasized that there is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian religion. . . . There is not any similarity between the two concepts" (Letter of August 21, 1961).
The London Jewish World of March 15, 1923 declared: "Fundamentally, Judaism is anti-Christian."
Rabbi Martin Siegel: "I am devoting my lecture in this seminar to a discussion of the possibility that we are now entering a Jewish century, a time when the spirit of the community, the non-idealogical blend of the emotional and rational and the resistance to categories and forms will emerge through the forces of anti-nationalism to provide us with a new kind of society. I call this process the Judaization of Christianity because Christianity will be the vehicle through which this society becomes Jewish" (New York Magazine, January 18, 1972, p. 32). word.htm
Another great source:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumbleweed
How the Ashkenazi Jews conquered the West
:)
JESUS WAS NOT A Jew
Benjamin H. Freedman, Jewish Historian - Researcher - Scholar.
From "Common Sense", p. 2-1-53 and 5-1-59
"Christians have been duped by the unholiest hoax in all history, by so-called Jews. This is considered their most effective weapon."
"This 'big lie' technique is brainwashing United States Christians into believing that Jesus Christ was "King of the Jews", in the sense that so-called 'Jews' today call themselves 'Jews'. This reference was first made in English translations of the Old and New Testaments, centuries before the so-called Jews highjacked the word 'Jew' in the 18th century A.D. to palm themselves off on the Christian world as having a kinship with Jesus Christ. This alleged kinship comes from the myth of their common ancestry with the so-called 'Jews' of the Holy Land in the Old Testament history, a fiction based on fable."
"American Christians little suspect they are being brainwashed twenty-four hours of every day over television and radio, by newspapers and magazines, by motion pictures and plays, by books, by political leaders in office and seeking office, by religious leaders in their pulpits and outside their churches, by leaders in the field of education inside and outside their curricular activities, and by all leaders in business, professions and finance, whose economic security demands that they curry the favor of so-called "Jews" of historic Khazar ancestry. Unsuspecting Christians are subjected to this barrage from sources they have little reason to suspect. Incontestable facts supply the unchallengeable proof of the historic accuracy that so-called "Jews" throughout the world today of eastern European origin are unquestionably the historic descendants of the Khazars, a pagan Turko-Finn ancient Mongoloid nation deep in the heart of Asia, according to history, who battled their way in bloody wars about the 1st century B.C. into eastern Europe where they set up their Khazar kingdom. For some mysterious reason the history of the Khazar kingdom is conspicuous by its absence from history courses in the schools and colleges.
"The historic existence of the Khazar kingdom of so-called "Jews", their rise and fall, the permanent disappearance of the Khazar kingdom as a nation from the map of Europe, and how King Bulan and the Khazar nation in about 740 A.D. became so-called "Jews" by conversion, were concealed from American Christians by censorship imposed by so-called "Jews", of historic Khazar ancestry, upon all U.S.A. media of mass communications directed by them. Then in 1945 this author gave nation-wide publicity to his many years intensive research into the "facts of life" concerning Khazars. The disclosures were sensational and very effective but apparently angered so-called "Jews" who have continued to vent their spleen upon this author since then solely for that reason. Since 1946 they have conducted a vicious smear campaign against him, seeking thus to further conceal these facts, for obvious reasons. What have they to fear from the truth?
"In an original 1903 edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia in New York's Public Library, and in the Library of Congress, Volume IV, pages 1 to 5 inclusive, appears a most comprehensive history of the Khazars. Also in the New York Public Library are 327 books by the world's greatest historians and other sources of reference, in addition to the Jewish Encyclopedia, dealing with Khazar history, and written between the 3rd A.D. and 20th centuries by contemporaries of the Khazars and by modern historians on that subject."
Jesus was a 'Judean', not a Jew.
During His lifetime, no persons were described as "Jews" anywhere. That fact is supported by theology, history and science. When Jesus was in Judea, it was not the "homeland" of the ancestors of those who today style themselves "Jews". Their ancestors never set a foot in Judea. They existed at that time in Asia, their "homeland", and were known as Khazars. In none of the manuscripts of the original Old or New Testament was Jesus described or referred to as a "Jew". The term originated in the late eighteenth century as an abbreviation of the term Judean and refers to a resident of Judea without regard to race or religion, just as the term "Texan" signifies a person living in Texas.
In spite of the powerful propaganda effort of the so-called "Jews", they have been unable to prove in recorded history that there is one record, prior to that period, of a race religion or nationality, referred to as "Jew". The religious sect in Judea, in the time of Jesus, to which self-styled "Jews" today refer to as "Jews", were known as "Pharisees". "Judaism" today and "Pharisaism" in the time of Jesus are the same.
Jesus abhorred and denounced "Pharisaism"; hence the words, "Woe unto you Scribes and Pharisees, Hypocrites, Ye Serpents, Ye Generation of Vipers".
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm
JESUS WAS NOT A Jew
by Jason Collett
Many denominational Christians and even church leaders are under the mistaken belief that Jesus was a Jew. But nothing could be further from the truth.
Judea and Galilee were two separate states and political entities, as illustrated on the map of Palestine in the time of our Saviour in your Bible. Jesus Himself was not a Jew (Judean) or resident of Judea, He was a Galilean or resident of Galilee (Matthew 26:69; John 7:41), and a Judahite or descendent of the Tribe of Judah. The Judeans of prominence were not of the Tribe of Judah, but of Edomites. Pilate was being ironic when he wrote the sign "Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Judeans" for the Cross (John 19:19). That is, "the Galilean who was King of the Judeans," as in "Queen Victoria of England, Empress of India." Jesus grew up in Nazareth in Galilee. His disciples were fishermen from the Sea of Galilee. And although He visited Jerusalem, he spent most of His life in his home country of Galilee. John 7:1, "After this Jesus stayed in Galilee; for He could not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him." His followers were constrained "for fear of the Jews" (John 7:13, 19:38, 20:19).
Why was this?
Psalm 83:3 says God's elect are "hidden" or protected ones, and that they are under attack from a coalition of evil groups led by Edom. Who was Edom?
Esau, the brother of the patriarch Jacob, became the ancestor of the people called Edom, or Idumea. The Antiquities of the Jews by Flavius Josephus, XIII ix 1; XV vii 9 instructs us: John Hyrcanus forcibly assimilated the Edomites as a national group and they became "Jews" in about 120BC. The Jewish historian Josephus, who lived just after the time of Christ, wrote, "They [Edom] were hereafter no other than Jews'. The Jewish scholar Cecil Roth in his Concise Jewish Encyclopedia (1980) says on page 154, "John Hyrcanus forcibly converted [Edom] to Judaism. From then on they were part of the Jewish people. In the Talmud the name of Edom was applied to Christian Rome, and was then used for Christianity in general".
Terrible judgements against Edom are made in most of the prophecies of the Old Testament. For instance, Isaiah 34, 63, Jeremiah 49, and the entire book of Obadiah.
Isaiah 63:1-6, "Who is this coming from Edom . . . in garments stained with crimson? It is I [the Lord] who speak in righteousness and am mighty to save."
"Why are your garments red, as if you had trodden the winepress?"
"I have trodden the winepress alone: and of the people there was none to help Me. In My anger I trod them down, trampled them in My wrath. Their blood splattered My garments, and all My clothes are stained. For the day of vengeance is in My heart, and the year of My redeemed has come. . . I will tread down the people in My anger, and bring their blood upon the ground".
These verses refer to Revelations chapter 19:11-21, when the Word of God destroys His enemies: "And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse: and He that sat upon him was called Faithful and True. . . His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns, and He had a Name written that no man knew but Himself. And He was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood, and His Name is called The Word of God. . . and He trod the winepress of God’s fierce anger".
Jehovah of the Old Testament "hated Esau (Edom), against whom He has indignation forever" (Malachi 1:2-4). If Jesus will destroy Edom when He returns, then Edom is present today, and obviously evil, anti-Christian, and anti-Semitic.
The Edomite, Antipater, became the Procurator of Judea in 47BC. Ten years later his son Herod actually became "king of the Jews," initiating the Edomite dynasty which ruled Palestine under Roman authority for over a hundred years. The Edomite assimilation opened the way for the virtual takeover along the lines predicted by Ezekiel and stimulus for an influx of population from the arid country of Edom into the more hospitable environment of Judea, an influx obviously encouraged for political reasons by the ruling Herodian dynasty. Edomites would have been appointed to the most influential positions, in order to extend and consolidate Edomite authority over the land and its people. Herod became notorious for his massacre of infant boys two years old and undger," a supernaturally inspired attempt on the life of Christ (Matthew 2:16). Herod's son Herod Antipas, continuing the work, and was responsible for the gruesome murder of John the Baptist (Matthew 14:6-12).
Christ demonstrated a very real antipathy towards the people called Jews, in Bibles published after about 1776, but who would be more accurately described as Judeans, or residents of the Edomite-dominated territory of Judea. Jesus said to the Jews "You do not believe because you are not of My sheep" (John 10:24-27). "I was only sent to the lost sheep of the House of Israel" (Matthew 15:24). In fact, Christ referred to "those Jews (or residents of Judea regardless of religion, race or color) who believed on him," as "of their father the devil" for although they were children of Abraham, they were not children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and heirs of the blessing of Abraham, nor did they have the faith of Abraham, and were in all probability descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Esau (John 8: 31,44). In contrast, Jesus instructed His disciples - who were from Galilee of the Gentiles, not Judea (Acts 1:11; 2:7) - to pray to And in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9, Jesus speaks of "those who say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan".
The Jews shouted "Crucify Him!" (John 19:15); "His blood be on us and on our children" (Matthew 27:25). In an appropriate turn about, when Jesus returns, their blood will stain His own garments. The spiritual leaders of the Jews were the Pharisees, who not surprisingly were associated with the (Edomite) Herodians (Matthew 22:15-16; Mark 3:6; 12:13). Jesus repeatedly condemned the Pharisees as "hypocrites" (Matthew 15:7; 22:18; 23:13,15,23,25,27-27). He also called them "serpents, the offspring of vipers" (Matthew 3:7; 12:34; 23:33).
"Jesus spoke to the crowds only in parables" (Matthew 13:10-17). Why was this? Many nominal churches and Sunday schools teach that Jesus used parables to make His teachings clearer. But all four Gospels say the opposite. When Jesus was asked why He spoke to them in parables, He replied "Because it is given to you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given" (Matthew 13:10-11; Mark 4:11-12; Luke 8:9-10; John 12:37-44). Brother Branham simply said, Jesus spoke in parables to thin down the crowds.
Jesus told "those Jews who believed in Him . . . You are of your father the devil, and lust for what is forbidden. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him . . . as he is a liar and the father of lies" (John 8:31-44). This characteristic is confirmed by the dictionary definition of the verb jew .
But do Jews ever come up with such brazenly audacious lies, lies so enormous in scope and implication as to qualify as "chutzpah," so admired by Jews?
Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York says:
"The Holocaust has proven to be an indispensable ideological weapon. Through its deployment, one of the world’s most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a ‘victim’ state, and the most successful ethnic group in the United States has likewise acquired victim status. Considerable benefits accrue to this specious victimhood – in particular, immunity to criticism, however justified" (Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry (2000) published by Verso, p. 3).
In other words, Finkelstein exposes the HYPOCRISY.
Some further quotes:
"In an authoritative study, Leonard Dinnerstein reported: Sixty thousand Jews . . . walked out of the concentration camps. Within a week more than 20,000 of them had died." But ‘As it entered into negotiations with Germany [just two years ago, in 1999], the Holocaust industry demanded compensation for 135,000 still living former (camp inmates).’
On page 83 he notes that ‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of "living Holocaust survivors" at nearly a million.’ Finkelstein exposes the LIES.
On page 127 he further notes ‘If 135,000 former Jewish slave laborers are still alive today, some 600,000 must have survived the war. That’s at least a half-million more than standard estimates. . . If Jews only constituted 20% of the surviving camp population and, as the Holocaust industry implies, 600,000 Jewish inmates survived the war, then fully 3 million inmates in total must have survived. By the Holocaust industry’s reckoning, concentration camp conditions couldn’t have been that harsh at all; in fact, one must suppose a remarkably high fertility and remarkably low mortality rate. . . If, as the Holocaust industry suggests, many hundreds of thousands of Jews survived, the Final Solution couldn’t have been so efficient after all – exactly what Holocaust deniers argue" (pp. 127-8).
"Both my father and my mother were survivors of the Warsaw ghetto and the Nazi concentration camps. . . One of my father’s lifelong friends was a former inmate with him in Auschwitz, a seemingly incorruptible left-wing idealist who on principle refused German compensation after the war. Eventually he became a director of the Israeli Holocaust museum, Yad Vashem. Reluctantly and with genuine disappointment, my father finally admitted that even this man had been corrupted by the Holocaust industry, tailoring his beliefs for power and profit. As the rendering of the Holocaust assumed ever more absurd forms, my mother liked to quote (with intentional irony) Henry Ford: "History is bunk." (ibid. p. 7).
"The Holocaust proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel" (ibid p. 30).
"Much of the literature on Hitler’s Final Solution is worthless as scholarship. Indeed, the field of Holocaust studies is replete with nonsense, if not sheer fraud." (p. 55).
"Given the nonsense that is turned out daily by the Holocaust industry, the wonder is that there are so few skeptics". (p. 68).
"Annual Days of Remembrance of the Holocaust are a national event. All 50 states sponsor commemorations, often in state legislative chambers. . . Seven major Holocaust museums dot the American landscape. The centerpiece of this memorialization is the United States Holocaust museum in Washington. . . [This] museum’s annual budget is $50 million, of which $30 million is federally subsidized." (p. 72). (This is in spite of the fact that, as he points out on page 32, per capita Jewish income in the US is almost double that of non-Jews).
"With a reelection campaign looming, Jimmy Carter initiated the [US Holocaust Museum] project to placate Jewish contributors and voters, galled by the president’s recognition of the "legitimate rights" of Palestinians.’ (p. 73).
Finkelstein exposes the SWINDLE, a word formerly most often associated with Jews.
"The Holocaust" is an ideological representation of the Nazi holocaust. Like most ideologies, it bears a connection, if tenuous, with reality. The Holocaust is not an arbitrary, but rather an internally coherent construct. Its central dogmas sustain significant political and class interests." (p. 3). And:
"The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the "greatest robbery in the history of mankind". . . The Holocaust industry has clearly gone berserk." (p. 138-9).
Is this evaluation fair?
Have a look at a typical account by one of the seemingly endless number of survivors: Olga Lengyel’s Five Chimneys: a woman survivor’s true story of Auschwitz (Granada/Ziff-Davis, 1947, 1972).
The blurb on the cover of the book quotes the New York Herald-Tribune: "Passionate, tormenting". Albert Einstein, the promoter of the US construction of the bombs used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is quoted as offering "You have done a real service by letting the ones who are now silent and most forgotten (sic) speak."
Lengyel says:
"After June, 1943, the gas chamber was reserved exclusively for Jews and Gypsies. . . Three hundred and sixty corpses every half-hour, which was all the time it took to reduce human flesh to ashes, made 720 per hour, or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift. And the ovens, with murderous efficiency, functioned day and night. However, one must also reckon the death pits, which could destroy another 8,000 cadavers a day. In round numbers, about 24,000 corpses were handled each day. An admirable production record, one that speaks well for German industry." (Paperback edition, pp. 80-81). [No trace of any remains of or in ‘death pits’ has been found.]
This implies almost 100,000 corpses per four working days, or a million in 40 days, or six million in 240 days (eight months).
Could this claim be a misprint?
Kitty Hart, in spite of her name, a Jewish survivor born in Poland, fully confirms these figures:
"Working around the clock, the four units together could dispose of about 18,000 bodies every twenty-four hours, while the open pits coped with a further 8,000 in the same period." (p. 118; Return to Auschwitz - paperback edition by Granada (1981, 1983).
According to the cover blurb, "The subject of the award-winning Yorkshire television documentary of the same name." "Both engaging and harrowing . . . an important addition to the growing holocaust literature, very little of which conveys so courageously both the daily torment and the will to survive" – Martin Gilbert, The Times.
Martin Gilbert, indefatigable Jewish campaigner on behalf of the ‘Holocaust’ and biographer of Winston Churchill, adds to the rich flavour and makes his own numerical claims, certainly not without chutzpah:
In his book Auschwitz and the Allies (1981) he states:
"The deliberate attempt to destroy systematically all of Europe’s Jews was unsuspected in the spring and early summer of 1942: the very period during which it was at its most intense, and during which hundreds of thousands of Jews were being gassed every day at Belzec, Chelmo, Sobibor and Treblinka." (p. 26).
If we assume a minimum figure of 200,000 per day, this amounts to say one million over a five-day working week, or 6 million in six weeks, and this does not include the truly awe-inspiring claims for Auschwitz put forward by Hart and Lengyel with Gilbert’s blessing.
A detailed forensic examination of the site of the wartime Treblinka camp, using sophisticated electronic ground penetrating radar, has found no evidence of mass graves there.
For six days in October 1999, an Australian team headed by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer, carried out an examination of the soil at the site of the former Treblinka II camp in Poland, where, Holocaust historians say, more than half a million Jews were put to death in gas chambers and then buried in mass graves.
According to the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust (1997), for example, "a total of 870,000 people" were killed and buried at Treblinka between July 1942 and April 1943. Then, between April and July 1943, the hundreds of thousands of corpses were allegedly dug up and burned in batches of 2,000 or 2,500 on large grids made of railway ties.
Krege's team used an $80,000 Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) device, which sends out vertical radar signals that are visible on a computer monitor. GPR detects any large-scale disturbances in the soil structure to a normal effective depth of four or five meters, and sometimes up to ten meters. (GPR devices are routinely used around the world by geologists, archeologists, and police.) In its Treblinka investigation, Krege's team also carried out visual soil inspections, and used an auger to take numerous soil core samples.
The team carefully examined the entire Treblinka II site, especially the alleged "mass graves" portion, and carried out control examinations of the surrounding area. They found no soil disturbance consistent with the burial of hundreds of thousands of bodies, or even evidence that the ground had ever been disturbed. In addition, Krege and his team found no evidence of individual graves, bone remains, human ashes, or wood ashes.
"From these scans we could clearly identify the largely undisturbed horizontal stratigraphic layering, better known as horizons, of the soil under the camp site," says the 30-year old Krege, who lives in Canberra. "We know from scans of grave sites, and other sites with known soil disturbances, such as quarries, when this natural layering is massively disrupted or missing altogether." Because normal geological processes are very slow acting, disruption of the soil structure would have been detectable even after 60 years, Krege noted.
While his initial investigation suggests that there were never any mass graves at the Treblinka camp site, Krege believes that further work is still called for.
"Historians say that the bodies were exhumed and cremated toward the end of the Treblinka camp's use in 1943, but we found no indication that any mass graves ever existed," he says. "Personally, I don't think there was a mass extermination camp there at all."
Krege prepared a detailed report on his Treblinka investigation. He says that he would welcome the formation, possibly under United Nations auspices, of an international team of neutral, qualified specialists, to carry out similar investigations at the sites of all the wartime German camps.
(Sources: "'Vernichtungslager' Treblinka: archaelogisch betrachtet," by Ing. Richard Krege, in Vierteljarhreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung, June 2000 [4. Jg., Heft 1], pp. 62-64; "'No Jewish mass grave' in Poland," The Canberra Times, January 24, 2000, p. 6; "Poland's Jews 'not buried at Treblinka'," The Examiner [Australia], Jan. 24, 2000. Information provided by Richard Krege; M. Weber and A. Allen, "Treblinka," The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1992, pp. 133-158; Y. Arad, "Treblinka," in I. Gutman, ed., Encyclopedia of the Holocaust [New York: 1997], pp. 1481-1488.)
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm
Who was the First Jew?
John Standring
We know that Saul was the first king of Israel and that John was the first man called Baptist, but who was the first Jew? Neither Adam, Seth or Noah are called Jew. Nor were Abraham, Isaac or Jacob. Moses was not called a Jew and neither were Saul, David or Solomon called Jew. In fact you will not find the word Jew in the first eleven books of the Bible. The first time Jews are mentioned in the Bible, is in II Kings 16:6 (and then only in translations revised in the eighteenth century) where we find Israel was at war with the Jews and drave the Jews from Elath. Isn't it interesting that we can read over five hundred pages of the Bible before we find a Jew anywhere, yet those who call themselves Jew today claim the first five books of the bible and call it their Torah. Do you not find it rather strange that those who claim to have written the first five books of the Bible and call themselves Jew, can't find the word Jew written anywhere in the book they call their own bible, and claim to have written? Jesus Christ tells John in Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews and are not, but are the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN". We know that God changed the name of Abram to Abraham in Genesis 17:5, and that He changed the name of Jacob to Israel in Genesis 32:28, but nowhere in the Bible do we find where God changed the name of Israel to Jew! There is therefore no authority by which those who say they are Jews can claim to be Israel!
By the time of Jesus the word Edom or Edomite had been translated by Greek and Latin into Ioudaios and Iudaeus meaning a Judean or person living in Judea. The original King James version of the Bible, 1611, translated Idumaean-Judean into Iewes. It wasn't until the revised editions of the King James Bible, that the word Jew appeared. The word Jew does not mean Israel or Israelite! We must conclude therefore that the first "Jews" were Canaanite-Edomite-Hittite. It is certain, according to the Bible, that Jews are not Israel. jesusjew.htm
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewboo
A quote from that link that I believe speaks the truth of what I see and hear all around me.
"Again, here’s historian Benjamin H. Freedman:“The present generally accepted ‘secondary meaning’ of the word ‘Jew’ is fundamentally responsible for the confusion in the minds of Christians regarding elementary tenets of the Christian faith. It is likewise responsible today to a very great extent for the dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the word ‘Jew’ today, to the preponderant majority of intelligent and informed Christians, is contradictory and in complete conflict with incontestable historic fact. Christians who cannot be fooled any longer are suspect of the Christian clergy who continue to repeat, and repeat, and repeat ad nauseam their pet theme song ‘Jesus was a Jew’. It actually now approaches a psychosis".
They should all be suspect of their clergy, but alas, it's a very small group that has awakened from their deep slumber of programming.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumbleweed
Jewboo posted this video 2 or 3 years ago in another thread and it's a good one. Chuck Smith is speaking directly to the children of Satan. I don't know if Chuck Smith knows their history that goes back to the garden of Eden or if he really knows who he's confronting.
The articles I've posted above put a lot of what's gone on in the past in perspective for me and also what's going on at present in our lives that Chuck Smith is speaking about.
The following article is another one by Bertrand Comparate that I had posted in another thread but I think this is a good place to post it again. We've been led to believe christians should be pacifists but that's not necessarily so in all situations and that's what Comparate does a good job explaining. We must resist and fight against evil.
Chuck Smith has identified a lot of the evil the children of Satan have been up to and we have to resist and fight against them.
http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/nopacifism.html
THERE IS NO PACIFISM IN THE BIBLEIT IS reported that a Hindu recently undertook to rebuke all the Christian nations, by asking "How can you reconcile Jesus' doctrine of non-resistance with your military armament, and with the wars you fight from time to time? Which of you will retum good for evil?" In speaking thus, the Hindu smugly gloated over what he thought was an inconsistency between our religion and our national conduct. Unfortunately, there are even some Christians who are so ignorant of their own religion that they become embarrassed at such accusations, and feel that we must be guilty of inconsistency, even of wrongdoing. The Hindus' ignorance we can forgive, as he knows nothing of our religion beyond a few phrases quoted out of context; but it is time for Christians to learn more about what they claim as their own religion. We could ask the Hindu, in return, how he can reconcile Premier Nehru's aggressive attack upon Portuguese Goa, which Portugal has held since the year 1510 - how can he reconcile this aggressive warfare with Nehru's lofty proclamations of his devotion to peace - that is, whenever "peace" consists of, leaving White Men in slavery.
By
The late Revd Bertrand L Comparet, AB., J.D.(USA)
But we shall not be content to point out inconsistencies in the attitude of the Hindus. I want to prove to you today that our own conduct is not inconsistent with our religion. In the first place, it is false to speak of Jesus' 'doctrine of non-resistance.' In John 2:13-16, the Beloved Disciple reports that the first act of Jesus Christ's ministry in the city of Jerusalem was to make a whip of ropes and flog the moneychangers out of the court of the Temple. Does this look like non-resistance, cringing submission to the triumph of evil? Indeed not! Nor was this all: Matthew 21:12-13 and Mark 11:15-17 both record that He repeated this cleansing of the Temple of the evil antiChristians who infested it, during the last week before His crucifixion. Jesus Christ, Himself, never tolerated evil, never consented that it should be allowed to remain triumphant rather than to resist it. Only in His crucifixion did He allow the forces of evil to have their way: and this was not through any doctrine of non-resistance to evil, but only to fulfil the purpose for which He had assumed a human body. He came here for the express purpose of meeting death to pay the penalty for our sins, in order to save us; if He had not submitted to crucifixion, His purpose to save us would not have been accomplished. For this reason only did He submit, and not because He ever believed in letting evil triumph without resistance.
But someone will say, "What about Matthew 5:38-39?"
"Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also."
No, there is no inconsistency here, either. This advice was never given to the nation, that we should surrender to China and leave the world in slavery. It was given only to individuals - and to particular individuals, at that. Jesus was preaching to bring His truths before all who had the qualities to respond to Him and would become His disciples: these would be that first generation of Christians whose responsibility above all else was to spread His word, without being distracted by petty quarrels with other people.
They were to face ridicule, contempt and hatred; every day they would be given provocation by insults and injuries. If they let themselves react with natural anger, they would be in constant quarrels and fights; they would be constantly arrested and in jail, not as noble martyrs to a great cause, but as brawlers constantly fighting in the streets over personal quarrels - which would not be a good recommendation for the new religion of Christianity. Even if they did not fight, but looked to the law to vindicate their rights, this would make them spend all their time and energy in lawsuits instead of their missionary work. This was not the duty of the early Christians. But that He did not intend that they should tamely let themselves be slaughtered by ruffians is clear: In Luke 22:36, He told His disciples that "he that had no sword should sell his cloak and buy one."
So many erroneous religious doctrines come from the mistake of taking out of context words spoken for a certain time and place, and trying to make universal, eternal rules of them. In Matthew 14:19 and Mark 6:39, when Jesus Christ was about to feed the multitude with a few loaves and fishes, we read that "He commanded the multitudes to sit down on the grass." This certainly doesn't mean that it is a Christian's duty to go around making people sit down on the grass: it was spoken only to meet the special circumstances of a particular time and place and no-one should try to make a doctrine of it. So also with Jesus Christ's instructions to the early Christians to stick to the job for which He had chosen them, and not waste time quarrelling with the wicked. But don't ever think that, if you see some ruffian trying to rape your wife or daughter you should merely stand around murmuring pious platitudes about the desirability of good conduct. Your duty - and I do mean DUTY- as a good Christian is to stop him if you have to kill him to do it.
So much for the individual. But this Hindu was trying to place Christian nations (not Nehru's India, nor China) under the individual's restrictions. God always distinguished between the rules for the individual and the rules for the nation. Particularly is this true of the Laws of War.It is only when we have been guilty of evil conduct and disloyalty to our God that He has allowed wicked nations to oppress us until we repented of our evil ways; then He has Himself used us as His own servant and agent to make war against those wicked nations. He began our training in this early: when our ancestors came out of Egypt in the Exodus, they were attacked by the Amalekites. For this, God said that He would have war with Amalek from generation to generation until He had utterly blotted out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.- and this duty He commanded His people Israel to perform, as we read In Exodus 17:14-16 and Deuteronomy 25:17-19. But that is only the beginning: in Jeremiah 51:20, God Himself said to our ancestors and to us, their descendants,
"Thou art My battle axe and weapons of war: and with thee will I break in pieces the nations; and with thee will I destroy kingdoms."
Is there anything pacifistic about that? Evil must not be allowed to rule the earth in triumph. To those who are good, you can speak in a language they understand, the language of peace and reason. But to those who are utterly evil, you must also speak in the only language they understand. Russia and China can't understand platitudes; they can understand superior force.
Again, we read in the seventh chapter of Judges how God sent Gideon, with but 300 men, to deliver Israel from the huge army of the Midianites; and he routed the Midianites with the slaughter of 120,000 men. We are clearly told that this was by "the sword of the Lord and of Gideon."
Neither let yourself be misled by someone quoting, "they that take the sword shall perish by the sword." Note that this speaks of TWO swords: the sword of the aggressor, who shall perish by the sword of the defender.
Lest anyone should say that this is only a characteristic of earthly men, a relic of the past, and that we should look forward to a higher, nobler character to be attained in the future, let us examine the Book of Revelation, in its description of Jesus Christ when He returns to reign over all the world as King of Kings and Lord of Lords. In Revelation 19:11, it says of Jesus Christ that "In righteousness He doth judge and MAKE WAR." Jesus Christ, Himself, recognizes that there can never be "peaceful co-existence" between good and evil: one must certainly conquer, the other must certainly perish; if good has not the will and the courage to be the conqueror, then evil will rule supreme. So long as evil exists, there will be wars: the wars of evil's aggression against good, until good conquers and exterminates evil; and this last great war to wipe out evil will be led by no less a general than our Redeemer, Jesus Christ.When He comes, let Him find you, not hiding under the bed in abject terror, but marching resolutely in the ranks of His army.
Pope washes feet of "refugees"
USA Refugee Admissions Reception & Placement Program
USA Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration
Washington, DC
[Note: A more recent version of this document can be found at http://www.state.gov/j/prm/releases/...016/251849.htm.]
Each refugee approved for admission to the United States is sponsored by one of nine resettlement agencies participating in the Reception & Placement (R&P) Program under a cooperative agreement with the Department of State. The sponsoring agency is responsible for placing refugees with one of its affiliated offices and for providing initial services, which include housing, essential furnishings, food, clothing, orientation, and assistance with access to other social, medical, and employment services for the refugees’ first 30-90 days in the United States. The R&P Program is a public-private partnership, which anticipates that sponsoring agencies will contribute significant cash and/or in-kind resources to supplement U.S. Government funding for the program.
Although refugees are eligible for public assistance when they first arrive, the U.S. Government emphasizes early economic self-sufficiency through employment to speed their integration into American society. During the refugees’ initial transition period, programs funded by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement and administered either by the states or resettlement agencies provide cash and medical assistance, employment services, English language training, and other support services.
Refugees are admitted to the United States by the Department of Homeland Security. After twelve months of residency, individuals admitted as refugees are required to apply for adjustment of status to that of permanent resident alien. After five years in the United States, they may apply for citizenship. The agencies participating in the R&P Program in fiscal year 2014 are:
Church World Service
Episcopal Migration Ministries
Ethiopian Community Development Council
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society
International Rescue Committee
Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants
:(?? Shami posted some more stuff about "Christians" being passive cucks TumbleweedQuote:
A US religious campaign supporting Central American refugees, the Sanctuary Movement, said it would offer its congregations' churches to families facing deportation from the United States, ahead of a planned government crackdown on illegal immigrants.
"We open our doors to today's Josephs and Marys... The gift we have to offer on Christmas Day is the gift of sanctuary," pastor of Southside Presbyterian Church in Tucson, Arizona, the Rev. Alison Harrington said, as quoted by Reuters.
READ MORE: Jesus was a refugee child: O’Malley reminds voters of Christmas spirit
Congregations supporting the sanctuary network include about 300 parishes in more than 20 states, according to a coordinator for the affiliated Church World Service, the Rev. Noel Anderson.
^ Christians have been misled by Jews who have infiltrated the christian religion. I suspect the pope is a crypto jew and I don't think God will approve of him kissing the Jews asses and the feet of niggers while leading the descendants of the Israelites to destruction.
I've been reading some of Roger Hathaways articles and I think this one is pretty good. He gives his perspective, research and insight into the bible story. A lot of what he writes has been posted above but there are things not included in the posts above so I'll post it.
While reading through this article I bring up the genealogy chart at this link, enlarge it and scroll around on it to the names of the people in the bible he's writing about. It makes it more interesting for me.
http://www.actscambridge.org/assets/...y_a1_chart.pdf
http://israelitewatchmen.com/archive...our_people.htm
OUR PEOPLE
by Roger Hathaway, January 2005
Who are our people? When a White Anglo Saxon Protestant (WASP) asks that question, answers are not quickly offered. Our heritage is not taught in American schools. Scholars, professors, and theologians are quite unconcerned with our ancient roots. Sure, everyone knows that we came to America from Europe in recent centuries, but we did not originate in Europe. Friends, there is a reason that our true origin is ignored, but that knowledge is politically unacceptable. We are the white race, and our history is the history of civilization in this world, while the other races were always tribal primitives who did not make progress on their own. We whites have reason to be very proud of our history, but such pride is forbidden by scholars and religious leaders who insist that all races are equal and that the white race bears guilt for most of the evils of the world. Anyone who studies our history will quickly realize that the truth is just the opposite from what our schools are teaching.
The words Anglo-Saxon mean English and German. The peoples of Germanic race include all the northern European groups, including Scandinavians and French and British and northern Russians. Over a thousand years ago, the Greeks, Spanish, Portugese, and Italians were also white. Except for southern Russia, nearly all of Europe was white race. But, the question of importance still hangs; where did we come from before settling Europe? Anthropologists have traced our origins back to the Pamir Plateau, a high mountainous region just north of Pakistan. Many consider the Pamir to be the Garden of Eden. From there we migrated eastward into the Tarim Pendi Basin of western China, a huge basin surrounded by high mountains. To the north are the Tien Shan mountains where hundreds of perfectly preserved mummies have been found that are many thousands of years old and are white race, blond, blue-eyed, and had woven plaid clothing and felts that were sophisticated beyond anything known to exist at that time in history. China had kept these mummies secret from the west for many years, along with the presence of a white race people in that area who speak Tocharian which is an Indo-European language, like ours. It is likely that our people were nearly eradicated from this basin about four thousand years before Christ when God saved Noah and his family because they were the only family that had not bred with neighboring races: "being perfect in his race." (Genesis 6:10) Their world was flooded and most of the people perished. However, we must keep in mind that the Cain race (the evil counterpart race to Adam) had already migrated from that basin to settle in Sumer (later called Chaldea, then Babylon, and now Iraq).
After the flood, Noah’s descendants settled in the Punjab region of northwest India where the ancient Sanskrit Vedas and Upanishads are their legacy. Next, it was about 2,600 BC that our people migrated to Sumer where Cain’s race had already settled. Besides the archaeological evidence, much of this history is also confirmed by the study of languages and their origins. The white race has always had languages of the Indo-European language tree, which includes Sanskrit and then Phoenician and then Greek and then the Latin and German/English dialects. [Sidenote: the so-called Hebrew language is of the Afro-Asian tree, developed since 800BC as a mongrel mix of Aramaic with Phoenician; it was never a language of the Adamic family or Abraham or Jacob or Jesus. It never had an alphabet until just before Jesus was born, and there was no Hebrew Old Testament until nearly 1,000 AD!] It was from Chaldea that Abraham migrated westward to the Palestine region, and that is where the Bible starts to give us more details of our history.
In order to know the identity of our people, you must learn a little bit of Bible history, for we ARE the descendants of Jacob who was born about 1936 BC. The white race European nations are the lost tribes of Israel of whom Jesus spoke when He said: “I came not except to the lost sheep of the House of Israel.” We are the true Israelites! Most Christians mistakenly believe that the Jews of today are the true Israelites and the chosen ones of God, but they are actually descendants of Jacob’s brother, Esau, who married into the neighboring Cain races. We will discuss their history, also, because they are major players in this history.
Jacob’s name was changed to Israel, and he had twelve sons who became the Twelve Tribes of Israel. While Jacob was still alive, his family moved down into Egypt where they would live for the next four hundred years until Moses led them back to Palestine, their Promised Land. Now, here is where the history of our people gets meaningful. It splits into two lines. One of Israel’s sons was named Judah, who fathered the tribe of Royalty from which God would get the kings of the Bible record, and even to this very day. Judah had two sons, Zara and Phares. Somewhere about 1750 BC, when Israel’s family was going to Egypt, Zara took his family and settled around the Aegean Sea (Greece). The Phares line would stay with the other tribes and provide the kings of the Bible history, which would lead to the birth of Jesus who was of the Judah tribe. Zara had two sons, Calcol and Darda (who founded Troy about 1500 BC). Calcol’s line would lead to the Scotia people of what is now northern Ireland. Darda’s son was Erichthonios, whose son was Tros, whose sons were Ilos, Assarachos, and Ganymede. These names are important because the Nordic and French lines came from Ilos, whose son was Laomedan, whose son was Priam (of Homer’s Iliad), whose son was Hector (made famous in Homer’s Odyssey). The ancient British line came from Assarachos, whose son was Capys, whose sone was Anchises, whose son was Aeneas (of Vergil’s AENEID), whose son was Brutus (who settled Britain in 1103 BC, and named it after himself). The line from Ganymede is unknown, except that he appears in Greek mythology as a cup-bearer to Zeus. Alright, those are the ones of the Zara line who settled Europe and Britain over a thousand years before Jesus was born.
We pick up the Phares line after the Israelites had settled in Canaan and each tribe had its own allotted area. After Joshua led them across the Jordan and they got settled, they were governed by Judges who represented God’s laws which were given to them while they were in the Sinai desert with Moses. The people tired of that Theocracy and wanted kings like the other races had. It was about 1020 BC that God gave them their first king, named Saul. After Saul was the great King David, and then his son Solomon. With Solomon’s two sons, the kingdom was divided into the northern Kingdom of Israel, whose capital was Samaria, and the southern Kingdom of Judah, whose capital was Jerusalem where Solomon’s grand Temple had been built. With a series of kings, things went from bad to worse. The people built golden idols and went to other gods under kings who were very wicked. The northern Kingdom of Israel, often just called Israel, adopted the religion of Paganism which is the mother-goddess religion of Tammuz. God sent many prophets to warn the kings and the people of God’s anger, but they wouldn’t listen. In Leviticus 26 we can read God’s threat to essentially divorce the entire nation of Israel and to scatter them to distant lands where they would forget their God and their origins. It was during the eighth century before Christ that God sent the Assyrians against them, to conquer and defeat them, and send them scattering in many directions. Many were taken captive to Assyria where they lived in the area of northern Armenia at the southern edge of the Caucasus mountains. They eventually crossed the Caucasus mountains to settle in Europe where they were known as Caucasians because they came from the Caucasus. Under the Assyrian assault, many of the Israel tribes had also migrated to Asia Minor, to Greece, to Italy, to Spain, and to Britain where they were at one with the Zara people who were already there. Ancient British historians, like the venerable Bede, Geoffrey of Monmouth, and others tell some of these stories.
Evidence of OUR people’s origins still waves in our faces as the flags of European nations, but Christian historians turn their blind eyes toward that direction so as to not see them. The English sovereign, right now Queen Elizabeth II, flies the flag of the Lion of Judah to proclaim her as the one who sits on the throne of David which God promised would never be vacant. Germany also uses the emblem of the Lion of Judah, along with the Eagle of Dan, which is used in America, too. The Bull of Ephraim signifies the English people. The Man of Ruben has long been Greece’s symbol, also that of Iceland. Those four, the Lion, the Man, the Bull, and the Eagle were the emblems of the Brigade tribes of Israel. Dan’s secondary symbol of Serpent was used by England, Scotland Netherlands, and the Saxons. The Goblet of Asher was used by England and Scotland. The Olive Branch and Arrows of Manasseh were used by England, Scotland, Holland, and America (our Eagle holds arrows in one talon and olive branches in the other). The Sword of Symeon was used by Britain, Ireland, Scotland, Sweden, and Denmark. The Ship of Zebulun was used by Holland, Denmark, England, and Scotland. The Lion of Judah, besides representing the one who sits on David’s throne, was also used by Ireland, Scotland, Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark.
On a wall in Westminster Abbey, in London, there is a genealogy chart which shows the direct lineage of England’s kings and queens back to King David.
An interesting story is that of Jeremiah the Prophet, who, about 586 BC, left Jerusalem with Nebuchanezzar’s permission, carrying several important items. First, let’s look at the situation: Nebuchadnezzar was king of Babylon, and had conquered Jerusaelm in 586 BC, whereupon he destroyed the grand Temple of Solomon and pillaged the gold and other values from it. Because King Zedekiah, of Jerusalem, had defied Nebuchadnezzar (against Jeremiah’s warnings), Zedekiah’s eyes were put out just after his sons were killed in front of him. But, King Zedekiah’s two daughters were allowed to leave with Jeremiah, who took them first to Alexandria, Egypt where they caught a Phoenician ship to go to Spain. One daughter was left in Spain, while Jeremiah took the other princess, named Tea Tephi, by ship to Ulster Northern Ireland (then Scotia). Now, get this: Tea Tephi was a princess of the Phares line of Judah. In Ulster, she married King Eochaid who was of the Zara line of Judah, thereby reuniting the two royal lines. Tea Tephi’s grave is still maintained in northern Ireland today. There is also an ancient statue of Jeremiah near there. Jeremiah also brought from the Jerusalem Temple a stone which represented the Throne of David; it was Jacob’s pillow. Every king or queen of Scotia, Scotland, and England since that time has been crowned while sitting on that stone. Since it was stolen from Scone, Scotland in 1296AD by England’s King Edward I (the same as in the Braveheart movie), it has rested in the coronation throne in Westminster Abbey in London. But, in 1996 it was returned to Scotland, on condition that it can be borrowed for the next coronation in England. You can now see it on display in Edinburgh. Another interesting note is that Ireland has long used as flags, one which shows a hand with a scarlet thread around it, depicting Zara Judah’s hand at his birth, and another flag which has David’s harp as the emblem.
So, you see, the history of our people is not really hidden. It is just ignored! Do you ask why it is so ignored? Simply because so many of our people want to believe 1) that the Jews of today are really God’s chosen people and 2) that WASPs are outsiders who must be grafted in or sneaked in the back door by the false teaching of universal gospel. I’ll try to be brief in addressing this subject.
One is understandably reluctant to give up a belief that the Jews are true Israel in the world today unless there is information about who the Jews really are. Well, they are the Edomite race, descendants from Esau, Jacob’s hateful brother. It happened like this. Esau had sold his birthright to Jacob, and then he married women of neighboring Cain races. Throughout his life, he tried to kill his brother Jacob in order to reclaim the birthright, but he failed. God’s divine pageant on this earth stage is a contest between good and evil, played by two races, one which is born with Godly instincts of kindness and justice and the Golden Rule. The other race is born with wicked instincts of lying, murder (see John 8:44 where Jesus speaks to the Edomites at the Temple), exploitation, fraud, cheating, aberrant sex practices, and violence. Edomite individuals are born with those Satanic instincts, and it is their war against the white race of Israel that makes the pageant. Edom’s descendants settled a region south of the Dead Sea, whose capital was Petra, and whose famous mountain was named Mt. Seir. About 312 BC, the Nabateans evicted the Edomites from that region, so they migrated not very far to the region of Idumea (named after Edom, also) which was in southern Judea (the land of the tribe of Judah). The Edomites created such problems for the Judeans that in 132 BC, the king of Judea, John Hyrcanus, compelled them to be circumcised and join the Jerusalem Temple religion of Judaism. They responded enthusiastically. In less that a century the Edomites had taken political control of Judea under their own Herod (appointed by Rome in 47BC), and they took over the Jerusalem Temple. They oppressed the Israelite Judeans and forced many into suburbs of poverty and small nearby towns. When Jesus was born, it was Edomites who ran the Temple and the priesthood and the entire political scene.
It was the Edomite oppression that the true Israelites from Galilee (Jesus’ home) and Samaria complained about. The word Judean is translated into English Bibles as Jews. The Edomites became the Judeans, and by following Jesus, the true Israelite sheep became Christians, never to be called Judeans again. The Edomites held onto their name of Jews even after they were kicked out of Jerusalem in 70 AD, and again in 132 AD, as they moved to Italy, Spain (as Sephardic Jews) and to Khazaria in southeastern Europe (as Ashkenazi Jews). Today you can buy a book by an Israeli scholar, Arthur Koestler, titled The Thirteenth Tribe, in which he details the history of today’s Jews, claiming that more than 90% of todays Jews are Khazarian; the rest are Sephardim. It is the legend of the Khazars that they came from Mt. Seir, Edom. In the 1925 edition of the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, vol. 5, p. 41, it reads: “Edom is in modern Jewry.”
It is certainly not for lack of information that most Christians believe the lie of the Jews that they are God’s chosen ones. Billy Graham, Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and others have climbed to pinnacles of fame on Jewish owned TV stations because they promote that lie so effectively.
Above, we have covered the history of the white race from Adam, and later from Israel, so we know that the white European race is really true Israel. Does that mean that a Swede or a German or a Brit is absolutely one of God's children? Regrettably, no. Europe has largely rejected Christ to become a secular-humanist society. Very few go to any church. Also, as they have welcomed race-mixing, there are fewer and fewer who are still pure Israel. Britain is only slightly better, with some who do know the truth. America is still regarded to be a Christian nation, but we are rapidly drifting away from Christ as our Lord. Race-mixing is being promoted by preachers across the land, and is the primary presentation on television. The Jewish influence, through the media, school textbooks, the ACLU, and other anti-Christ groups, is boldly trashing our Christian culture Godly values. Truly, God's field of wheat is so full of tares (weeds) that one cannot judge who might be a true Israelite child of God. Those of white race, blond hair, and blue eyes are decreasing in numbers. And even at that, the Satan race of Jews is producing many blonds. Perhaps the only criterion for making a judgment is Jesus' statement, "by their fruits you shall know them."
During this end time period, I am reluctant to attempt judgments regarding white race individuals. I feel strongly that I should not condemn any one, because I can't know how God might be expressing Himself through that person. I simply watch for any person who expresses goodness in relationships with others. I look for a good heart, regardless whether his life is a shambles or not. And I refrain from crusading for Christ because Jesus did not do it; He simply made His information available and then let the Holy Spirit lead others to it. He responded to individual needs, but never pushed Himself on anyone. He let His light shine, and then permitted the Father to use that light as He might wish.
Lastly, Jesus told us to come out from among the unbelievers and be separate from them. In America, racially segregated communities are not permitted. So, it is a real challenge to be an active Christian, today. It may be that this is part of God's plan, whereby the weak get culled from the family and only the strong inherit the Vineyard that is prepared for us. My prayer is that many will stand strong in this faith, to enjoy the victory and the new Kingdom ahead.
Here's another article about christian leaders who are leading the descendants of the Israelites astray. I think the current Pope is one of the Unfaithful Shepards that he is speaking about.
http://comparet.christogenea.org/con...hful-shepherds
UNFAITHFUL SHEPHERDS
by Bertrand L. Comparet
Part 1
A few years ago, the then president of The National Council of Churches warned about what he called the danger that the great religious awakening, which is taking place in our country, might become fanatical and be carried into our political and business life! Perhaps this is a fair example of the leadership of most of our churches. This is no leadership at all, because the leaders have no faith in the religion to which they give empty lip service.
For lack of faith in the Bible, they don’t make it a force in our national life. For lack of faith, they pay no attention to what II Peter 1:19 calls, “A more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place.” To these blind leaders of the blind, all is darkness. They can’t lead because they don’t know where to go. They turn their backs on Yahweh, and tell us to become more liberal. They want us to learn to get along with Russia and to abandon our opposition to Red China!
Never were the words of prophecy, and the laws of Yahweh more needed than today, with all civilization crumbling in the end of the age. Nearly half of the population of the earth has been under communist Jewish occupation. More Christians have been persecuted and murdered under communism, than ever before in history.
These Christians were treated to unimaginable torture. Even the Roman empire at its greatest never treated Christians, murdering and torturing them, the way these communist Jews have done. This evil race, which originated communism, is also plotting the same hideous fate for Christians in all the free countries. At such a time, what is the proper function of the Christian church and of all Christian ministers? Is it to waste all their power in the fatuous effort to save some gin soaked, skid row bum, isn’t their function to try to save Christian civilization? Yahweh has clearly marked out their proper function as that of watchmen, they are to give warning of the approaching disaster.
Yahweh very clearly explained this to the prophet Ezekiel, this explanation is recorded in Ezekiel 33:2-6. “When I bring the sword upon a land, if the people of the land take a man of their coasts and set him for a watchman: if, when he seeth the sword come upon the land, he blows the trumpet and warns the people; then whosoever heareth the sound of the trumpet and taketh not warning, if the sword come and take him away, his blood shall be upon his own head. ... But if the watchman sees the sword come, and blows not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away for his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman’s hand.”
As far back as history goes, periods of apostasy of the churches have always led to judgments. Judgments that were caused by that very apostasy, Yahweh is not to be mocked. The only source of our real strength, to resist invasion from without or corruption and revolution from within, is our character. This is entirely dependent upon our knowledge of Yahweh and His laws. Without this knowledge, it doesn’t matter what terrible new weapons we may have invented. We will be like the nations of southeast Asia, completely lacking in the strength of character to defend ourselves. In our own case, what nations will come to defend us then? No really great civilization of history really was overthrown by forces from outside. When these great nations fell, they had already become so rotten within that it was an easy pushover for the invading armies. This is the way Assyria, Babylon, Egypt, Greece and Rome fell, are we to be next on this list?
Today I condemn our major churches for two unpardonable sins. First, failure to speak the truth which is in the Bible. Second, speaking falsely in the name of doctrine. Yahweh has convicted them on both charges, as we can read in the Bible. Many of you know, by terrible experience, the price paid by those who dare to speak the truth on what are called controversial matters. There is the loss of former friends, who now avoid you, calling you a fanatic or even a crackpot.
There are slanderous rumors, spread at first by those who do know better. Then these rumors are repeated by those who have been deceived and who will not investigate to see for themselves, whether the smear they spread is true or not.
Patriots have been expelled by their churches, because those churches are too corrupted to speak the truth, or even allow truth to be spoken to their members. Finally the loss of a business, or loss of your job, as a result of the anti Christian pressure brought upon those who deal with you. The corrupted clergy lack the courage to face these matters. Far too many of the clergy entered the ministry as a refuge from a competitive world they feared to face. There is no human activity which has such great need of a real man’s man. Yet today, only a pitifully few dare to tell the truth, come what may.
Twenty-six hundred years ago Yahweh spoke through the prophet Isaiah, it is recorded in Isaiah 56:10-11. “His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber. Yes, they are greedy dogs, which can never have enough, and they are shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own way, everyone for their own gain.” Note these two condemnations. First they are ignorant, and second, everyone for his own gain. There is no excuse for their ignorance, every clergyman has assumed the duty to know and to speak the word of Yahweh. The people rely upon them for this, for where else can the people turn for instruction in such things?
The second condemnation is for false teaching for the greater money profit to be had thereby, that is truly unpardonable. However, they do know where the money is to be made. Go into the bigger churches, where the minister is paid very well for his services, and show me just one of them where the unfortunate congregation hears anything but smooth syrupy sermons! They may sermonize in great indignation against the man who drinks an occasional glass of beer, but when do they raise their voices against the Jewish influence which has driven Yahweh out of our schools? They may speak with thunderous condemnation of the man who is losing his soul by smoking a cigarette, but when do they dare name the powerful race who has grown wealthy selling those cigarettes?
When do they dare expose the anti Christian money which controls both of our major political parties, and steers both of them straight down the road to communism and the end of our civilization? These clergymen bemoan the bad morals of our youth, but when have they ever dared to mention the race who makes the salacious movies, which have led our youth into their present demoralized condition. Ah no, they never mention such things, because they know the penalty of offending Yahweh’s enemies. They have less fear of offending Yahweh. How bold they are to denounce anyone who does tell the truth about these evils!
Yahweh knew it and prophesied about it many years ago, in Micah 3:5-7 He said this. “As for the prophets, the Eternal says, who lead My folk astray, and who cry, All’s well! if they get food to eat, and open war on any who deny them: It shall be night for you, and devoid of vision, so dark that you cannot divine; the sun shall set upon the prophets, daylight shall darken over them, till seers are shamed and the diviners blush, in the morning, because no answer comes from Yahweh.” (Moffatt).
Isn’t this true today, into which church can you go and expect to really hear the word of Yahweh? Look in the church page of your Saturday newspapers, and read all the subjects listed for Sunday’s sermons, what do you find? Book reviews, amateur psychiatry on how to relieve the strain of the day’s tensions. There will be sermons on why we should abandon our principles in order to get along with the forces of evil without conflict, both at home and abroad. Not long ago, in one of the largest churches in San Diego, California, the announced sermon was “The Horse That played Baseball.” I have looked through the Bible in vain to find which prophet wrote on that subject.
I am amazed at the number of prophets who spoke Yahweh’s condemnation of the ministers who have refused to teach His word, because it always meets the opposition of the wicked. Instead these ministers have taught false doctrine because it is always popular and profitable. This condemnation is written throughout the Bible, both in the Old and New Testaments, as we shall see. Few matters if any, have received so much mention, because this is the true root of all evil. If the churches never failed to teach Yahweh’s truth, then other evils would never get a foothold. Therefore, the Bible prophesies the eternal doom of these false shepherds, who lead Yahweh’s flock astray.
Another thing worth noting is this. Often the Bible’s condemnation is directed toward those who mislead the people into pacifism in the face of evil attempts to conquer the world, the very situation we face today. Today the ministers tell us that we must neglect our defenses, think only of peace and try to reason with the monsters who rule under the name of communism. We are told to settle everything by treaties, with those whose openly stated policy is that they never make a treaty in good faith. They only sign treaties as a means to deceive their intended victims, and their record is they never keep any treaty when they don’t want to live up to the terms of it.
There cannot be any other result of this but the most terrible disaster for our nation. In Jeremiah 6:13-15 Yahweh has summed it up. “From the least of them even unto the greatest of them, every one is given to covetousness; and from the prophet even unto the priest, every one dealeth falsely. They have healed also the hurt of My people but slightly, saying Peace, peace, when there is no peace. Were they ashamed, when they had committed abomination? Nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore they shall fall among them that fall: at the time that I visit them they shall be cast down.”
Suppose all of the churches had spoken the word of Yahweh. What if they had warned this nation in 1945 to keep out of the United Nations, that palace of strangers cursed by Yahweh. Suppose that they had read to their congregations what the Bible, both Old and New Testaments say against it. If they had reminded our senate, and had all of their congregations join in reminding the senate, that in II Corinthians 6:14-18 Yahweh warns us, “Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? And what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? ... Wherefore, come out from among them and be ye separate, saith Yahweh, and touch not the unclean thing, and I will receive you and will be a father to you, and ye shall be My sons and daughters, saith Yahweh Almighty.”
If these ministers had pointed out that our own nation, which is seeking after righteousness, could have no fellowship with the Soviet Union, the most vile conspiracy against all good in human history. If they had done this could Harry Truman, Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White have prevailed against the united wrath of the two-thirds of our population which are Christian?
Suppose these ministers had read to their congregations the warning given in Isaiah 8:914. “Associate yourselves, O ye people, and ye shall be broken in pieces; and give ear, all ye of far countries: gird yourselves, and ye shall be broken in pieces. ... Take counsel together, and it shall come to naught; speak the word, and it shall not stand. ... for Yahweh spake thus to me, with a strong hand, and instructed me that I should not walk in the way of this people, saying, Say ye not a confederacy! to all them whom this people say, A confederacy! neither fear ye their fear, nor be afraid. Sanctify Yahweh and let Him be your dread. And He shall be for a sanctuary.” If these ministers had done this, we would not now be caught in this death trap, where just the negro cannibals alone out vote us 25 to 1. They out vote all the civilized nations of the world, because of this, the Afro/Asian bloc is rapidly becoming our master.
Let’s go back to these unfaithful shepherd’s still earlier failure to speak the word of Yahweh. Suppose that in the 1920s and early 1940s, the so called Christian ministers had told all their congregations the truth about what is in the Bible. What if they had warned people not to join ourselves with the wicked and help the ungodly? If these ministers had done this, and aroused the nation, then do you think that Franklin Roosevelt and his communist fellow travelers could have built Russia up into the monster which today threatens all civilization with destruction? No indeed, our people would never have allowed it if they had known the truth.
These clergymen were, as the Bible says, covetous, every one for his own gain, and dealt falsely with the word of Yahweh. For the sake of the support of the wealthy anti Christians, these clergymen went eagerly along with President Roosevelt, helping to herd the people down the trail to communist slavery and death. They told the people what great humanitarian policies Roosevelt, Harry Hopkins and Alger Hiss had. They told their congregations the United Nations was the world’s only hope for peace and safety.
Had they never heard of Yahshua, as our one true hope for peace? No, they went along with the conspiracy. Yahweh knew it, and told us of it 25 centuries ago in Ezekiel 22:25-26. “There is a conspiracy of her prophets in the midst thereof, like a roaring lion ravening the prey, they have devoured souls; they have taken the treasure and the precious things; they have made many widows in the midst thereof. Her priests have violated My law and have profaned My holy things: They have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they showed the difference between the unclean and clean.”
This is true, those who joined in this conspiracy of the clergy were prosperous, they have taken the treasure and the precious things. As Ezekiel said, they put no difference between the holy and the profane, between Christianity and the evil schemes of the anti Christians, to bring communism to full power. As a result, these clergy conditioned the minds of the people to follow traitorous leaders into the situation which developed into World War II and the Korean War. As the Bible says, “They have made her many widows in the midst thereof.” Scores of thousands of families of our people have lost a father, son or brother in those wars. These wars would not have occurred if the churches had taught our people the word of Yahweh, and given them the prophetic warnings of these things before they happened. As Yahweh said in Ezekiel 22:25-26 and Zephaniah 3:4, “The priests have violated My law, and have profaned My holy things and they have polluted the sanctuary.”
Yahweh’s condemnation of them on these grounds is well justified, let’s look at the record. You have seen many instances of Jewish rabbis invited to speak in the pulpits of Christian churches, despite all the vile slanders about Yahshua in the Talmud, on which Judaism is based. Likewise I have known of instances where supposedly Christian churches, have allowed Jewish synagogues to use the Christian church auditorium as a meeting place. How will these supposedly Christian ministers, ever answer to Yahshua for doing this? The Bible tells us Yahshua’s own words, recorded in Matthew 7:22-23. “Many will say to Me in that day, Master, Master have we not prophesied in Thy name, and in Thy name cast out devils? And in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from Me, ye that work iniquity.”
Yahweh again condemns them in Ezekiel 22:25-26 because neither have they shown a difference between the unclean and the clean. This is very true. In their churches, they have preached integration and mongrelization, the unpardonable sin for which Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed. Did you know this was the cause of the judgment on these cities? They were immoral, but so were Babylon, Assyria, Greece and Rome, no such judgment fell on them. Jude 1-7 tells us that Sodom and Gomorrah, because of their going after strange flesh, are “set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.” Yet this is exactly what many preachers are urging in their pulpits today, integration and mongrelization of the white and black races!
Truly, by their fruits ye shall know them! Several of the major churches, in their national conferences, have officially decided that their ministers do not have to profess a belief in the divinity or virgin birth of Yahshua. They are now promoting the equality of all religions, and teaching universal brotherhood with the children of Satan, the Jews. By this they are admitting who their own father is. This is happening in churches that claim to be Christian! Psalm 74:2-4 is very clear on this. “Remember thy congregation, which Thou hast purchased of old; the rod of Thine inheritance, which Thou hast redeemed; ... even all that the enemy hath done wickedly in the sanctuary. Thine enemies roar in the midst of Thy congregations!”
Part 2
These churches and ministers lead Yahweh’s people astray by their apostasy. They get the help of the Jews, those whom Yahshua identified as Satan’s children in John 8:31-44. They make it profitable and easy for themselves. The terrible truth is that our people are all too easily led astray, it is really quite popular. We, who tell our people the truth, who give them warning of the terrible judgments which they have earned, are usually feared and hated. We are called hate mongers in the official communist party line, which has been taken up by so many.
This too was prophesied by Yahweh in Isaiah 30:9-10. “This is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the law of Yahweh: which say to the seers, See not!; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto the right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits.” This turning our backs on Yahweh must have its disastrous consequences, as we are warned in Jeremiah 5:31. “The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and My people love to have it so! And what will be the end thereof?”
Each day’s newspapers carry to us the news we are drifting nearer and nearer to the end thereof. This is when we will have to face the consequences of these false teachings which have corrupted most of our churches. Is it any wonder that our golf courses are better attended on Sunday mornings than the churches? If there were only the true spiritual leadership in the churches, people would not be turned away hungry of soul. Yahweh foresaw this, for Jeremiah 23:2 tells it very clearly. “Therefore, thus saith Yahweh, the God of Israel against the pastors that feed My people: Ye have scattered My flock and driven them away. ... Behold, I will visit upon you the evil of your doings, saith Yahweh.”
All of us are responsible to Yahweh for our actions. The ministers have taken upon themselves a far more terrible responsibility than anyone else. They have voluntarily assumed the duty to speak the word of Yahweh, all of it without dilution. Other civilizations have perished because they were not told Yahweh’s truth, so it could become part of their nature. Our civilization will also perish, if we follow down the same path. This is why it is so important to give this warning while there is still time.
Our churches send missionaries to the African and Asiatic heathen, when there is more need that someone send missionaries to the churches! Jeremiah 23:11-12 states it very plainly, “For both the prophet and priest are profane; yea, in My house I have found their wickedness, saith Yahweh. Wherefore their way shall be unto them as a slippery way in the darkness: they shall be driven on, and fall therein: for I will bring calamity on them, even the year of their visitation, saith Yahweh.”
Why do I dwell so much on this theme? Because Yahweh thought it important enough to place it all throughout the Bible. Over a period of many centuries, Yahweh kept insisting on this point. Yahweh knew that so many would preach the doctrines which are popular and financially profitable, leaving out the stern and bitter truths which are necessary to our very survival.
Read what is written in Malachi 2:1-8. “And now, O ye priests, this commandment is for you: if ye will not hear, and if ye will not lay it to heart, to give glory to My name, saith Yahweh, I will even send a curse upon you, and I will curse your blessings: yea, I have cursed them already, because ye did not lay it to heart. ... And ye shall know that I have sent this commandment unto you. ... For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of Yahweh. But ye are departed out of the way: ye have caused many to stumble at the law: ye have corrupted the covenant of Levi, saith Yahweh.”
Isn’t this true of today’s churches? They teach that all of Yahweh’s laws have been abolished, that His promises to His people have been canceled. They also teach that we must not remain separate, but must integrate with all the races and all religions in universal brotherhood. They teach we must find peace in the United Nations, which is dominated by pagan and satanic nations, working for the purposes of Satan!
Have they never heard the only prince of peace is Yahshua? Haven’t they heard He alone can bring peace, righteousness and prosperity? Don’t they realize every time they tell us to recognize all the pagan religions as the equal of Christianity, in order to secure complete harmony with them, they are leading us to turn our backs on the one and only true God, Yahweh? They must pay for this and so must we, if we follow them!
Most of the major churches of today have failed to preach the real word of Yahweh as found in the Bible. Instead, they preach what some call the social gospel, or to be more truthful, the socialist gospel. The things the churches falsely teach their people are Yahweh’s will, are really the direct opposite of what the Bible actually says. The doctrines of Satan are preached in many churches, as being the word of Yahweh.
Yahweh foresaw all this thousands of years ago, and He warned us not to be deceived by it. Jeremiah 23:16-17 is very clear in Ferrar Fenton’s Modern English Translation. “Thus saith Yahweh: Listen not to the message of the preachers who preach to you. They preach nonsense to you, a vision from their own hearts. They do not preach from the mouth of the Ever Living. They say to the despisers of the message of the Ever Living, Peace will come to you; and to all who follow the ideas of their own minds they say, no harm will come upon you.”
The preachers certainly are preaching as Jeremiah said they would. They tell us that peace is to be had from treaties made with Russia, in the United Nations, even though no peace has ever come from that source. Jeremiah 14:13-14 again gives the warning, “Then said I, Ah, Yahweh! Behold, the prophets say unto them, Ye shall not see the sword, neither shall ye have famine; but I will give you assured peace in this place. Then Yahweh said unto me, The prophets prophesy lies in My name: I sent them not, neither have I commanded them, neither spoke to them: they prophesy unto you a false vision and divination, and a thing of naught and the deceit of their own heart.”
Then Jeremiah continues the warning. “I have not sent these prophets: yet they ran, I have not spoken to them: yet they prophesied. But if they had stood in My counsel, and had caused My people to hear My words, then they should have turned them from their evil way, and from the evil of their doings. ... I have heard what the prophets said, that prophesy lies in My name. ... How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? Yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart.”
II Peter 2:1 reminds us, “But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you.” Matthew 7:15-16 gives the same warning. “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits: do men gather grapes of thorns or figs of thistles?”
We have found these ministers and priests to be false teachers, who have taught that the laws of Yahweh have been set aside and nobody need obey them now. They have openly doubted the inspiration of the Bible. They have denied the virgin birth of Yahshua and denied His divinity, honoring Him only as a great teacher among many other great teachers. This includes a minister of a New York church who distributed copies of a pornographic novel to his congregation, he claimed it was no more pornographic than the Bible! These ministers have laughed away all of Yahweh’s warnings about the present time, which is so near the end of this age. They see no danger in communism or in the threatening armies and missiles of Russia and China.
All of these false teachings sound very comforting to those of weak character, who dare not face the realities of this time of crisis. It is so much easier to just stick our heads in the sand and say there is no danger, as long as we just give Russia whatever she wants, and try to show them what good fellows we really are. When these ministers teach these false doctrines, they inwardly realize they must face the stern anger of the indignant Yahweh. The next step is to close their minds to this, and tell themselves that if they just do the best they know how, that is all that Yahweh can require of us. They conveniently forget that if we would only study the Bible, we would know how to do much better, for we would know how to obey Yahweh.
This is all in the Bible, written over 2,500 years ahead of time. It is all recorded in II Timothy in the Moffatt translation of the Bible. “I adjure you to preach the word; keep at it in season and out of season, refuting, checking and exhorting men; never lose patience with them, and never give up your teaching; for the time will come when people decline to be taught sound doctrine; they will accumulate teachers to suit themselves and tickle their own fancies; they will give up listening to the truth and turn to myths.”
New Testament yes, but isn’t this exactly what the Old Testament warned us would happen? Remember what is written in Isaiah 30:9-10, “This is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the law of Yahweh: which say to the seers, See not! and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto unrighteous things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits.” Jeremiah 5:31 also warns us of these things. “The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and My people love to have it so! And what will ye do in the end thereof?”
These unfaithful shepherds must make some pretense of finding some of their doctrines in the Bible. If they didn’t do this, their congregations would finally notice that none of their teachings came from the Bible. For the purpose of deluding their congregations, they like to quote a few words from the apostle Paul, taken out-of-context.
For some reason, Paul chose to write in a style which is difficult to understand. Therefore, it is easily twisted by quoting limited parts out-of-context. This also is nothing new, it was done for the same purpose in Old Testament times. The apostle Peter warned of this, as recorded in II Peter 3:16. Speaking of the writings of Paul, Peter says, “As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard for to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable twist, as they do also the other scriptures unto their own destruction.”
As Solomon said, “There is no new thing under the sun. Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? It hath been already of old time, which was before us.” Yahweh knew from the beginning, and He warned us repeatedly over thousands of years, to beware of these false teachers. Yahweh warned us of these unfaithful shepherds, who would come in these last years of this age.
False doctrines, preached by mere politicians, cannot do as much damage. These false doctrines are always doctrines of expediency, against which men of high principle would stand firm. It is when the unfaithful shepherds are speaking from the pulpit, that the damage is greatest. They undermine the moral fiber of the best part of the nation. As Moffatt translates it, Paul identifies these unfaithful shepherds in II Corinthians 11:13-15. “Apostles? They are spurious apostles, false workmen. They are masquerading as apostles of Christ, No wonder they do, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. So it is no surprise if the devil’s ministers also masquerade as ministers of righteousness.”
To sum it all up, we are confronted with unfaithful shepherds. They have infiltrated and corrupted many of the major churches, teaching false doctrines. They repudiate the divinity and virgin birth of Yahshua, ignoring prophesy, teaching compromise with all the evils of Jewish communism and the world. These unfaithful shepherds teach that we should look to the United Nations, that parliament of evil, as the only hope of peace. Do not be deceived by any of them, look to Yahweh’s word, the Bible, as the test of all truth. Repudiate all who seek to substitute modernism for the great revelations made by the prophets in ancient times. Turn back to the ancient landmarks and then these unfaithful shepherd cannot deceive you.
Another video here about the white race, the descendants of the Israelites. The children of God who don't realize who they really are.
If they did realize who they really are they might more jealously guard their genetics. They've been deceived by the children of Satan and their Lackeys like the unfaithful Shepherds spoken of in the article above.
Am I reading this wrong or is there NO female from after Adam & Eve to Noah?...so....?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumbleweed
You're not supposed to notice that. It ruins the fairy taleQuote:
Originally Posted by Luriya
your are reading it without thinking. Do you know of Eve's lament over Cain marrying with another race?Quote:
Originally Posted by Luriya
Most people, nearly all it seems, hold a misconception about the story.
1st major misconception is that the story of the first days, are days measured as 24 hours. There are multiple types of days and lengths. Just like there are multiple types of years and year lengths. For instance 1 of those years last about 26,000 earth years. We are in fact about to complete 1 of those years, a rotation around the galactic centre.
And the other misunderstanding is that Adam and Eve were the only ones on earth. They were the only children of God on earth at that time. There were others here. Whether they all could be called generally man or whether that is the label for the children of God I don't know. I'm inclined to go with the latter.
There are plenty of women mentioned in the articles posted above and in the Bible. Womens genealogy isn't included in that chart but it was and still is important not to marry outside the white race and to be pure in your generations as Noah was.Quote:
Originally Posted by Luriya
Esau married outside his race and lost his birthright because of it. In post #2 this is spoken about and I'll quote it below.
"To understand the difference between Israelites and Jews, an analysis of the Marks of Israel must be made. In order to understand the clear Biblical distinctions between Abraham's seed through the line of Jacob/Israel versus Abraham’s seed through the line of Esau/Edom, we must understand the divergence of both the posterity and the history of these two distinct groups of people.
The people who are today known as Jews derive both their heritage and their genetic composition not from Jacob/Israel but from Esau/Edom. Contrary to the wishes of his parents, and contrary to Yahweh’s Law against race-mixing, Esau “despised his birthright” by marrying into a Canaanite clan known as the Hittites. “And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite: Which were a grief of mind unto Isaac and Rebekah.” (Gen. 26:34,35.)
This, despite Isaac’s warning: “Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan.” -- Gen. 28:1. In other words, Esau became a race traitor. He joined the enemy.
The Jews acknowledge their Edomite heritage in many of their in-house writings; but they do not admit this in their public proclamations for fear that True Israel might catch on to their charade. “Edom is in modern Jewry.”— Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925, Vol. 5, p41.
Jacob’s mother, Rebekah, even went so far as to say that her life will have been in vain if her other son, Jacob, follows in the footsteps of the race-traitor, Esau. “And Rebekah said to Isaac, I am weary of my life because of the daughters of Heth [Esau’s Hittite/Canaanite wives]: if Jacob take a wife of the daughters of Heth, such as these which are of the daughters of the land, what good shall my life do me?” (Gen. 27:46.)
(In other words, dear men of Israel, DO NOT MARRY OUTSIDE YOUR RACE!) Since Esau was the grandson of Abraham, his offspring can claim descent from Abraham; however, that is the end of their genetic and social relationship with Abraham.
Once Esau despised his birthright, he became a stranger, producing non-Abrahamic offspring among the Hittites and other Canaanites.
Just look at a typical Jew and see the marks of the various racial strains that have been mixed into his blood. They are all mamzers (mixed race children)! “The shew of their countenance doth witness against them.” (Isa. 3:9.) They are the physical evidence of the Jewish violation of the Law against intermarriage! How much more evidence do you need?"
Post # 14 above is on God forbidding race mixing as well.
Ok so I got that wrong. thanks TW.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glass
Because of the invasion of white countries by other races I think this article by Bertrand Comparate is a good one for the true descendants of the Israelites to read.
When he speaks of adultery and the commandment against it he is speaking of miscegenation. I believe in another article he explains how we've been led astray by the translation of what adultery is using Strongs concordance. I'll look for that and maybe post it here later.
http://comparet.christogenea.org/con...migration-laws
YAHWEH’S IMMIGRATION LAWS
by Bertrand L. Comparet
When I first taught you on the subject of Yahweh’s laws, we learned that Yahweh’s laws are divided into four classes, commandments, judgments, statutes and ordinances. The commandments are the major rules governing man’s duties to his God. The judgments are the rules governing man’s relation to other men. The statutes are the general rules for the health, prosperity and peace of the nation. This includes the dietary, agricultural, social and economic laws. Finally, the ordinances are the religious regulations for the various festivals, sacrifices and offerings.
Of these laws, only the ordinances have been set aside by Yahshua in the New Testament. The rituals embodied in them were the expression of the Israelite’s belief that his Redeemer would come, in the future. When Yahshua had come and performed the reality which these rituals symbolized, their usefulness ended. The believer could no longer say that he was waiting for the future coming of his Redeemer. The ordinances must be replaced by new rituals looking back to the fulfilled redemption.
The other laws of Yahweh are still in force. Thou shalt not steal, and thou shalt not commit adultery are still as important today as when Moses carried the stone tablets down Mount Sinai. However, we do not expect to gain our personal salvation by keeping the laws, this was never the purpose of the laws. We do expect to gain the peace, prosperity and good order of the community. We have tried to do this by enforcing the laws of our city, state, and our nation. Let no one be misled into thinking Yahweh’s commandments, judgments, and statutes have been set aside by the New Testament, these are permanent laws. In Matthew 5:48Yahshua tells us that Yahweh is perfect, naturally so are His laws. Psalm 19:7-9 tells us, “The law of Yahweh is perfect, converting the soul; the statutes of Yahweh are right, rejoicing the heart; the commandment of Yahweh is pure, enlightening the eyes, the judgments of Yahweh are true and righteous altogether.”
People say Christianity is all spiritual, so we have abolished the law. Not so! In Romans 7:14, Paul tells us the law is spiritual. In Romans 3:31 Paul says, “Do we then make void the law through faith? Yahweh forbid: yea, we establish the law.” Just as our perfect God exists forever, so do His perfect laws. Psalm 111:7-8 tells us, “The work of His hands are verity and judgment: all His commandments are sure. They stand fast for ever and ever, and are done in truth and uprightness.” Yahshua affirms in Matthew 5:18 that not the smallest part of the law will pass away, until heaven and earth pass away. Revelation chapter 21 shows us that this is not until after the millennium and Yahshua’s triumphant 1,000 year reign.
Let us now consider some of these laws and what they mean to us today. Our political parties have sold Yahweh in an evil deal to get the support of the minority groups. They do this for the sake of temporary power and graft and by this would destroy all our greatness forever.
The politicians demand that we admit indiscriminately, all the world’s overflow. They come from pagan lands whose people hate our God. They come from Asian and African lands, whose people are totally impossible to assimilate, which would be against Yahweh’s laws for Israel. These immigrants must either remain a hostile enemy bloc within our borders, or else mongrelize and destroy our own race if we mix with them. Yahweh expressly forbids this.
While it is recognized that there will be some aliens here as students, merchants, etc., these are to be treated with honesty and justice. The anti Christians, who hate Yahweh, are expressly forbidden to be allowed to live here. In Exodus 23:33 Yahweh says, “They shall not dwell in thy land, lest they make thee sin against me.” No aliens were to be allowed to become too numerous, lest they “devour the land.” Isaiah 1:7 or “the people’s strength” Hosea 7:9, and “fill themselves with the people’s wealth”, Proverbs 5:10. Ecclesiasticus 11:34 warns us that if we “receive a stranger into thine house, he will disturb thee, and turn thee out of thine own.”
Have you ever wondered at the long genealogies of the various people mentioned in the Bible? There was a good reason for this. Their genealogy proved that they were of pure Israel blood and entitled to take part in its affairs. Citizenship was not given for two box tops and a dime, or to all that came along. Those who were of related blood lines, but not actually of Israel, could only be admitted to citizenship in the third generation born in the land.
Today, an immigrant scarcely needs to be off the boat long enough to get over their seasickness, before he can start the process of becoming a citizen. Far too short a time is required for aliens from some parts of the world, to really learn our way of life. They can and do, memorize certain things they must be able to recite on their examination for citizenship. However, these things pertain to the mechanics of our government, not the ideals which led the founding fathers to use these mechanics to make us great. Under Yahweh’s laws, those who were not closely related to us in race could not be admitted to citizenship ever. They could not become citizens even after ten generations, Deuteronomy chapter 23.
By violating Yahweh’s laws, we now have considerable blocs of unassimilable aliens who have been given the vote. They hate all the ideals of this land to which they have come, only to get more money. Now our political parties are selling out the great white American majority, in bidding for the support of the alien minority groups.
Under Yahweh’s laws, nobody of another race is to be allowed to hold public office. Deuteronomy 17:15 says, “Thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, one which is not thy brother.” The word translated stranger, is the Hebrew word nokri which doesn’t mean someone you haven’t met, but one of another race. That persons of another race could reach positions of power is clearly stated to be a curse which comes upon us for our violation of divine law.
Deuteronomy 28:15, 43-45 states, “But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of Yahweh thy God, to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes which I command thee this day, that all these curses shall come upon thee, and overtake thee ... The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high, and thou shalt come down very low. He shall lend to thee, and thou shalt not lend to him; he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail ... because thou hearkenedst not unto the voice of Yahweh thy God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which he commanded thee.”
We have been persistently led away from the laws of Yahweh by certain political groups who don’t even claim to represent the majority of our people, the white Christian Americans. These politicians openly admit they represent only alliances of minority groups. These politicians call themselves liberal. This was also known to Yahweh thousands of years before it happened, Yahweh also told us their true character. In Isaiah chapter 32, the prophet is telling us of that time yet to come, when the kingdom of Yahweh will be fully established and operating as it should be. He tells us that then, “The vile person shall no more be called liberal.” Yahweh speed the day!
For many decades politicians have betrayed us, the great white majority, seeking the support of certain disloyal minorities. The result has been the adoption of policies, both at home and abroad, which have brought us to our present position. We are facing a war in which we must fight for our very existence. If we had obeyed Yahweh in the making of our laws and our national policies, these evils would not have come upon us.
Isaiah 48:17-18, 22 tells the story. “Thus saith Yahweh, thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel: I am Yahweh thy God, which teacheth thee to profit, which leadeth thee by the way that thou shouldest go. O that thou hadst hearkened to my commandments! then had thy peace been as a river, and thy righteousness as the waves of the sea. There is no peace, saith Yahweh, unto the wicked.”
What wickedness? Ours, in letting evil and treacherous political considerations displace the laws of Yahweh. Replacing the laws with platforms written to see who can stoop to the lowest baseness to buy minority votes. When will we learn only by following the righteous laws of Yahweh, can we gain the peace and prosperity of Yahweh’s people?
This is an article by Willie Martin on adultery being miscegenation. This may be the article I was thinking Bertrand Comparate had written and mentioned above.
http://www.thechristianidentityforum...n/Adultery.pdf
ADULTERY
Willie Martin
We know from a study of the Scriptures that the word beast means a race or people who are not Israelites. In other words the Chinese, Jews, Negroes, as well as evil men who are both Israelites and non-Israelites.
From New Unger's Bible Dictionary) (originally published by Moody Press of Chicago,Illinois. Copyright (C) 1988).
BEAST:
Figurative. In a figurative or symbolical sense, the term frequently occurs in Scripture and generally refers to the sensual and groveling or ferocious and brutal natures properly belonging to the brute creation. The psalmist speaks of himself as being "like a beast" before God, while giving way to merely sensuous considerations <Psalm. 73:22>.
THE WORD IS SOME TIMES USED FIGURATIVELY OF BRUTAL MEN. Hence the phrase "I fought with wild beasts at Ephesus" <1 Corinthians 15:32, cf. Acts 19:29> is a figurative description of a fight with strong and exasperated enemies. For a similar use of the word see <Ecclesiastes 3:18; 2 Peter 2:12; Jude10>.
A WILD BEAST IS THE SYMBOL OF SELFISH, TYRANNICAL MONARCHIES. The four beasts in <Daniel 7:3,17,23>, represent four kingdoms <Ezekiel 34:28; Jeremiah 12:9>.
IN THE APOCALYPSE THE BEAST OBVIOUSLY MEANS A WORLDLY POWER WHOSE RISING OUT OF THE SEA INDICATES THAT IT OWES ITS ORIGIN TO THE COMMOTIONS OF THE PEOPLE <Revelation 13:1; 15:2; 17:8>.
The "four beasts" (Gk. zoa, "living creatures," not therion, "beast" in the strict sense) of the KJV of <Revelation 4:6> should be rendered "four living ones" or "four living creatures" (so NASB and NIV). See Cherub, Cherubim. (from New Unger's Bible Dictionary) (originally published by Moody Press of Chicago, Illinois. Copyright (C) 1988.)
From Fausset's Bible Dictionary:
BEAST
SYMBOLICALLY, MAN SEVERED FROM GOD AND RESTING ON HIS OWN PHYSICAL OR INTELLECTUAL STRENGTH, OR MATERIAL RESOURCES, IS BEASTLY AND BRUTISH. He is only manly when Godly, for man was made in the image of God. So ASAPH DESCRIBES HIM SELF, WHEN ENVYING THE PROSPEROUS WICKED,"I WAS AS A BEAST before Thee" (<Psalm. 73:22>).
"Man in honor (apart from God) abideth not, he is like the beasts that perish" (<Psalm. 49:12>).
The multitude opposing Messiah are but so many "bulls" and "calves" to be stilled by His "rebuke" (<Psalm. 68:30>).
Those "THAT WALK AFTER THE FLESH IN THE LUST OF UNCLEANNESS, AS NATURAL BRUTE BEASTS, ARE MADE ONLY TO BE TAKEN AND DESTROYED" (<2 Peter 2:12>).
So persecutors of Christians, as Paul's opponents at Ephesus (<1 Corinthians 15:32>). The "beast"(<Revelation 13; Revelation 15; Revelation 17; Revelation 19>) is the combination of all these sensual, lawless, God opposing features.
THE FOUR SUCCESSIVE WORLD EMPIRES ARE REPRESENTED AS BEASTS coming up out of the sea whereon the winds of heaven strove(<Daniel :7>).
The kingdom of Messiah, on the contrary, is that of "the Son of MAN," supplanting utterly the former, and alone everlasting and world wide.
In <Revelation 4; 5>, the four cherubic forms are not "beasts" (as KJV), but "living creatures" ([zoa]).
The "beast" ([theerion (grk 2342)]) is literally the wild beast, untamed to the obedience of Christ and God(<Romans 8:7>).
THE “HARLOT” OR APOSTATE CHURCH (compare <Revelation 12:1>,etc., with <Revelation 17:1>, etc.; <Isaiah 1:21>) SITS FIRST ON THE BEAST, which again is explained as "seven mountains upon which she sitteth"; probably seven universal God-opposed empires (contrast <Jeremiah 51:25> with <Isaiah 2:2>) of which the seven-hilled Rome is the prominent embodiment, namely, Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Mede Persia, Greece, Rome (including the modern Latin kingdoms), and the Germano-Slavonic empire.
The woman sitting on them is the church conformed to the world; therefore the instrument of her sin is retributively made the instrument of her punishment (<Ezekiel 23; Jeremiah 2:19; Revelation 17:16>).
"The spirit of man," even as it normally ascends to God, whose image he bore, so at death "goeth upward"; and the spirit of the beast, even as its desires tend downward to merely temporal wants,"goeth downward" (<Ecclesiastes 3:21>).
God warns against cruelty to the brute (<Deuteronomy22:6-7>).
He regarded the "much cattle" of Nineveh (<Jonah 4:11>). He commanded that they should be given the sabbath rest. As to the creature's final deliverance, see <Romans 8:20-23>.
(from Fausset's Bible Dictionary)
Exodus 20:3-17
1). Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
2). Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thy self to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God,visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
3). Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
4). Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and
all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
5). Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
6). Thou shalt not kill. (Should have been rendered “murder.”
7). Thou shalt not commit adultery.
8). Thou shalt not steal.
9). Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
10). Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his man servant, nor his maid servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
(KJV)
Now the 7th commandment is to not commit adultery; the 10th commandment is to not covet ones neighbors wife; the two would be the same commandment. Therefore, it is obvious that the 7th is entirely different than the 10th which is to covet anothers wife.
Therefore, the following verses make much more sense when we realize that “Adultery” is the mixing of another race or people other than a brother or sister Israelite.
Leviticus 18:23: “NEITHER SHALT THOU LIE WITH ANY BEAST TO DEFILE THY SELFT HERE WITH: NEITHER SHALL ANY WOMAN STAND BEFORE A BEAST TO LIE DOWN THERE TO: it is confusion.”
Yahweh does not kill just to be killing; and to kill an animal because a woman had intercourse with it would be unfair, unjust and unreasonable because the beast would not know any better than to treat the woman as another animal. Yahweh simply would not do this.
Leviticus 20:15-16: “And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast. And IF A WOMAN APPROACH UNTO ANY BEAST, and LIE DOWN THERE TO, THOU SHALT KILL THE WOMAN, and THE BEAST: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.”
Here again, this states that either the man or the woman that lies down with a beast would be put to death together. Again Yahweh would not kill an animal because it did not know better than to lie with the woman or man. Another thing, if anyone has ever seen an animal copulate with others they can quickly see that the animal would not lie down, as it does its copulating standing up. There are no animals that copulate in a prostrate position, lying down position.
Therefore, common sense, which we realize that few Christians have when studying the scriptures, would tell one that to commit adultery is to mix with the other races which is an abomination to Yahweh, in itself.
This is another article by Bertrand Comparate that gives more insight into who and what the "Beasts" are that are spoken of in the bible.
There are also more reasons why the descendants of Adam should keep themselves separate from the other races and not mix with them as they are now.
There are warnings in the bible against mixing with the other races and we are seeing the consequences of our disobedience now around the world in white nations.
http://comparet.christogenea.org/content/man-and-beast
MAN AND BEASTPart 1
by Bertrand L. Comparet
In these studies, it has been our custom to frequently review current events in detail, because these show the fulfillment of Bible prophecies in our day. However, in covering the subject I now want to discuss, I shall not have much occasion to list these events in detail and this for a definite reason. There are times when it is not so important to count every bead on the string, as it is to see whether they are all strung on the same string. When you learn this, you will know where to look for the next bead. My purpose is to show the existence of certain definite principles, which govern the events which we see happening, as these principles have governed them for thousands of years.
For ages, it was well understood by everyone that various nations and races had certain characteristics, which usually would be demonstrated in the actions of these people. National and racial policies and conduct developed out of national and racial character. There were, the rare exceptions and these, a certain type of mind seizes upon as proof there was no general rule. The exception merely proves the rule. Similarly, we can note that among crows, one bird in every 38 million is white, an albino. But this only emphasizes the rule that all of the other 38 million crows are black. Therefore, reasonably consistent conduct can be identified as the rule, notwithstanding an occasional exception which surprises us when we find it.
Among the ancients, nobody pretended to be ignorant of the characteristics of the Babylonians, Egyptians, Assyrians, or the Romans, or what they were likely to do in order to execute their purposes. Roman military ability in war and harshness in rule over conquered people were well understood and nobody was surprised to meet them. The extreme ferocity and cruelty of the Assyrians was known to all. Centuries of history demonstrated a consistency in these characteristics which only a fool could ignore.
In our own times, everyone understood the Japanese were a warlike people and had been for two thousand years. Therefore, only the ignorant or the stupid were surprised to learn Japan wanted to conquer many other nations. However, we had to learn by terrible, first-hand experience that the Japanese also had the Asiatic characteristics of treachery and senseless cruelty for its own sake. This cruelty was not just typically Japanese, it was typically Asiatic. We see the same traits displayed by the Red Chinese in their treatment of the people of Tibet, as well as their cruelty to our soldiers when they were captured.
During both the first and second world wars, those strange alien people called Jews, who are so busily brain-washing us today to suit their own purposes, then propagandized us into believing many hideous lies about the Germans. From these lies, we were expected to believe that the Germans were so inherently wicked that they were about to invade Beverly Hills or Las Vegas! Then they taught us that inborn racial characteristics would be manifested in conduct whenever the situation called for it. But now this alien minority group of Jews teaches us, by corrupting most of our schools, newspapers, news commentators, even many of our churches, that there are no longer any racial characteristics or tendencies, no fixed long-range national purposes. These Jews now want us to believe all people in the world, white, black, yellow or brown, civilized or savage, are exactly alike, as interchangeable as Ford parts. They have spent many millions of dollars on a high-pressure propaganda campaign, designed to blind us to the racial and national characteristics and purposes which are molding the course of history today, as they have molded history throughout all time. It might be well to ask ourselves, what makes this worth so much money to them? Just how are they planning to get back this enormous investment?
We can get a better perspective on present-day affairs if we view them as a continuation of thousands of years of uninterrupted history. If we look not only for what happened, but also why it happened. Nothing important is a true accident. For every occurrence there is a cause. History is usually written as merely a list of effects, that is why we learn so few lessons from it. We will never really understand history until we list the causes also.
Past history, current events and the coming events of the future, all consist of the actions of people. Whether their actions are good or bad, people do what they do because they are what they are, the kind of people who do good or bad things. Conduct is the product of character. The man who is kind and trustworthy by nature doesn’t become a Jack the Ripper or a kidnapper of children, his own nature prevents it. The man who is by nature cruel or dishonest will, sooner or later, act like what he is. The dull do not become brilliant merely because they receive legal permission to do so. Since nations and races are just great numbers of individual people, they will display those traits which are characteristic of most of their people. Therefore, if we can learn something about what kinds of people there are, this may help us to understand their actions, even to learn what to expect from them in the future.
For their own purposes, men make various classifications of things and of people. But usually, the conclusion they wish to reach dictates the classification which will best support it, wishful thinking vitiates the result. On the other hand, Yahweh, who views all eternity with a single glance, has His other truths revealed to man, so we must look to the Bible. There we will find that Yahweh has classified several different kinds of beings, all of whom we lump together indiscriminately under one term, man. Yahweh distinguishes between them by using distinctive names for the different kinds of beings. Let’s examine them and see if the different words used have any significance as to the kind of people they denote, the level of character and spiritual understanding to be found in the different kinds of beings identified by their different names.
Several different Hebrew words have all been indiscriminately translated man or men in the King James Bible, although some very important differences of meaning show clearly on the face of these words. First, let us consider the word which denotes our white race. The Hebrew word Awdawm, called Adam in your Bible, is from the root word meaning, to be of a ruddy complexion, to show blood in the face, something obviously not applicable to negroes or mongolians, but only to the white race. When used to denote the first white man Adam, the Hebrew always says the Awdawm. When used of his descendants, the Hebrew just says Awdawm, the King James Bible translates it man.
Another word used in contrast to Awdawm is Enosh, which is always used in a derogatory sense. Its root meaning is mortal and implies weakness, physically or morally, wretchedness. It is applied to non-Adamic races, which are of course all pre-Adamic. It should be noted the pre-Adamic races are not limited geographically to just certain parts of the earth, but some of them are found mingled among the Adamites.
A third Hebrew word translated man is ish (eash), literally, it means a male person or a husband. It is used for mankind in general and can be applied to either an Adamite or a pre-Adamite. The feminine form is isha (eesh-shaw), the plural of which is naw-sheem. This is so similar to the plural of Enosh, Anashim, they have often been confused, leading to many mistakes in translation.
There are three other closely related words, gheh-ber, gheb-ar and ghib-bawr, which are all derived from a root meaning to be strong. These are usually translated mighty man or warrior, these last three can cause no confusion, so they need not concern us further.
Now, let’s note a few examples of the use of these words in the Bible, in place of the English word man, I will use the Hebrew word used in the original. Ezekiel 34:31records, “And ye my flock, the flock of My pasture, are Awdawm, and I am your God, saith Yahweh.” Psalm 115:116 states, “The heaven, even the heavens, are Yahweh’s but the earth hath He given to the children of Awdawm”. Note how Yahweh uses Awdawm and Enosh in contrast. Take Psalm 90:93 Enosh to destruction; and sayest, return ye children of Awdawm.” While destruction is visited upon the pre-Adamite Enosh for their persistent wickedness, Yahweh leads the children of Awdawm back to Himself in repentance. for example, “Thou turnest
Yahweh distinguishes between Awdawm and Enosh in many places. For example Psalm 8:4, “What is Enosh, that thou are mindful of him? And son of Awdawm, that thou visitest him?” Note that while Yahweh is mindful of what the Enosh Awdawm Yahshua visited when Yahshua came to earth. Both racial groups must be disciplined, but the distinction is kept clear even there. Isaiah 2:11records, “The lofty looks of Awdawm shall be humbled and the haughtiness of Enosh shall be bowed down and Yahweh alone shall be exalted in that day.” In II Samuel 7:14 we read, “I will be his Father and he shall be My son. If he commits iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of Enosh, and with the stripes of the children of Awdawm.” If these were not distinctly different races, there would be no point in using the different words.
The Enosh were wicked and are so spoken of. Deuteronomy 13:13 warns, “Certain Enosh, the children of Belial, are gone out from among you and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and worship other gods, which ye have not known.” When they gain power, they are brutal oppressors. Psalm 10:17-18 tells us, “Yahweh thou hast heard the desire of the humble: Thou wilt prepare their hearts, Thou wilt cause Thine ear to hear: to judge the fatherless and the oppressed, that the Enosh of earth may no more oppress.”
The Enosh have no spiritual understanding, that is the reason for their continual wickedness. Proverbs 28:5 says, “Evil Enosh understand not judgment: but they that seek Yahweh understand all things.” This distinction is still in effect today. Daniel 12:10, speaking of the time of the end which is our own time states, “None of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.”
This is not all, some races Yahweh classifies as animals, their nations are symbolized as beasts in numerous prophecies. Do you say that this isn’t what you have been taught to believe? Then let’s look into this a little bit and learn what the Bible says about it. When Jonah finally went to Ninevah with his prophecy that Yahweh intended to destroy the city for its people’s wickedness, they believed him. This is not as surprising as it may seem for the people of Ninevah worshipped Dagon, the fish god. Since they had heard that a great fish had delivered Jonah on the shore, they thought he must be a prophet sent from Dagon and they were ready to believe him. Jonah chapter 3 says that the king was worried, “And he caused it to be proclaimed and published through Ninevah by decree of the king and his nobles, saying, Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock taste anything: let them not feed, nor drink water: But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth and cry mightily unto Yahweh; Yea let them turn every one from his evil way and from the violence that is in their hands. And Yahweh said of their works, that they turned from their evil way and Yahweh repented of the calamity that He said that he would do to them and He did it not.” Now what kind of beasts were these, who put on sack-cloth, cried to Yehweh, and turned from their evil way? It says this was the command for man and beast and that they did so. Is your dog that well trained, then who was the Bible calling beasts?
Let’s look into this a bit further. In Genesis chapter 9, Yahweh promises Noah and his family protection. In the 5th verse Yahweh says, “And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it and at the hand of man.” These beasts have hands like a man! But, there were no monkeys in that region, so these beasts with hands must have been men.
In Exodus 19:12-13, when the people of Israel were gathered at the foot of Mt. Sinai while Moses climbed the mountain to receive the ten commandments from Yahweh, Yahweh warned him, “And thou shalt set bounds unto the people round about, saying, Take heed to yourselves, that ye go not up into the mount, or touch the border of it: whosoever toucheth the mount shall surely be put to death. There shall not a hand touch it, but he shall surely be stoned or shot through; whether it be beast or man, it shall not live.” We find, whether it be beast or man, it must not touch the mountain with a hand.
The second chapter of Genesis tells us Yahweh is looking for a suitable wife for Adam and brings in review before him what the King James Bible calls every beast of the field, to see if a good wife for Adam could be found among them. Do you really think that an all wise Yahweh had to carefully look over a female scorpion, female toad, female giraffe or a female elephant, to decide whether one of these would be a suitable wife for Adam? Of course not, Moses didn’t write any such foolishness when he wrote the book of Genesis, this is purely the work of translators. In the original Hebrew, the account makes good sense and tells us much about the other races.
There are two closely related Hebrew words used here, khah-ee and khaw-yaw, each of which means a living creature. The meaning is far too broad to be translated merely beast or animal, for it includes all living creatures, from microbes to men. Where the King James Bible says beast of the field, the word is always either khah-ee or khaw-yah. So a correct translation would be the living beings in the country. That these living beings include men is clear from the same word being applied to Adam, read Genesis 2:7, “And Yahweh formed man of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.” In the Hebrew it reads, “Then Yahweh God formed the Awdawm out of dust from the ground and breathed in his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.” In the Hebrew it reads, “Then Yahweh God formed the Awdawm out of the dust of the ground and breathed in his nostrils breath of life; and the Awdawm became nephesh khaw-yah (a breathing creature having life).” So the beast of the field, the kaw-kaw-yah of the field, or more correctly, the living beings in the countryside, actually included the pre Adamic races.
Now Genesis 2:18-20 makes sense. Yahweh saw that Adam needed a wife and, not condemning anybody without a fair chance to make good, Yahweh carefully looked over the pre-Adamic races (African and Asiatic) to see if one of them could be found who was suitable to be Adam’s wife and the mother of the new race but, he couldn’t find one. In the Hebrew this reads, “And Yahweh said, Not good for the Awdawm to be alone. I shall make him a helper, as his counterpart. And Yahweh formed from the ground every living being of the fields and every fowl of the heavens and bringeth in unto the Awdawm to see what he doth call it; and whatever the Awdawm calleth a nephesh kahw-yaw, (a breathing creature having life), that is its name. And the Awdawm calleth names to all the cattle and to the fowl of the heavens and to every living being of the fields; and to him hath not been found an helper as his counterpart.” Yahweh recognized Adam’s wife must be his counterpart, having the same qualities of spiritual understanding, to be able to transmit to her descendants the same qualities for which Yahweh specially placed Adam in the world. But Yahweh could not find even one out of these pre-Adamic peoples who was Adam’s counterpart, having these necessary qualities.
Before someone gets the idea that I hate other races, let’s look at this thing a little closer. The black race has been on earth at least 40,000 years, for identifiable negroid skeletons have been discovered which can be scientifically dated as that old. Yet in all those 40,000 years there has never been a negro civilization. Yes, I know that a few negro tribal chiefs have conquered other tribes and built themselves up a larger kingdom. But, it takes more than the brutal tyranny of a successful war chief to make a civilization and that was all they had. Don’t speak of Egypt, Egypt was in Africa but never negroid. The beautiful portrait sculptures left by the ancient Egyptians show them to have been clearly a pure white people. In the days of Egypt’s greatness, any negro found north of the first cataract of the Nile river was summarily killed on sight to protect the racial purity of the Egyptians.
We don’t hate negroes, we want them to be well fed, well clothed, comfortably housed and in no danger of being eaten by other negroes, something they have never had except in a civilization created and maintained by white men. Despite all propaganda, every negro in the United States is far better off than those in Africa. Just try to find any who want to go back to any black nation in Africa! But neither negroes nor whites will have the blessings of civilization in a nation reduced to black standards of thinking. If the negroes were capable of producing a civilization at all, 40,000 years is long enough to do it.
Part 2
Yes, I know that in Asia 2,300 years ago, Confucius taught some high ethical principles, but without a word of religion in them. I know the Ming Dynasty saw the production of some nice pieces of porcelain, but what did either of these do for the Asiatic people? Did it ever teach them how to produce enough food to fill those fine porcelain bowls? Shouldn’t 2,300 years of Confucian philosophy be enough to develop something more than poverty, disease and misery? Again, the Asiatic mind lacks the true spiritual understanding which Yahweh saw was needed. Aren’t the Asiatics who live in the United States better off than those who live in Red China, Korea or Southeast Asia? We don’t hate them but, we don’t want them to reduce us to their level. This is what Yahweh was talking about in the Genesis chapter 2, when He said that the other beings living in the country round about could not produce a suitable wife for Adam, as his counterpart.
Because of the spiritual understanding which Yahweh put in the Awdawm, today the white race has the highest civilization, greatest freedom, and the highest standard of living in the world. They are the so-called have nations. We have not hated the other races, we have tried to help them, to show them our ways, in spite of all this, all of them have hated us. In the centuries when we were very few against their many, they repeatedly tried to conquer and destroy us. Yahweh’s watchful care over His people didn’t allow this to happen, although several times they came dangerously close to success.
In lands rich with minerals, they sit in wretchedness and poverty, too lacking in enterprise to mine the enormous wealth beneath their feet. In lands where the fertile soil and ample rainfall cover the land with lush growth, they live in perpetual hunger because they are too dull to clear the land and plant it to food crops. If we provide the capital to pay them for clearing their land for planting and harvesting useful crops, or for digging and refining the minerals in their soil, they curse us for exploiting them. But if we don’t, they curse us for being indifferent to their misery. Now, through the United Nations where they outnumber and out vote us, they plan to rule, plunder, enslave and reduce us to their level. Well did Yahweh classify them as Enosh, lacking utterly in the spiritual understanding necessary to follow Yahweh’s ways?
Perhaps you may say, all these were quoted from the Old Testament, but in the New Testament, Yahweh changed His mind and changed all this. Let’s see what the New Testament says about them. In his epistle to Titus recorded in Titus 1:12 Paul says, “One of themselves, even a prophet of their own said, The Cretans are always liars, evil beasts.” The word beast here is the Greek word therion, meaning a dangerous animal. Jude chapter 10 states, “But these speak evil of those things they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.” II Peter 2:12 continues, “But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be destroyed, speak evil of the things they understand not, and shall utterly perish in their own corruption.”
These Enosh were commonly called dogs, both in the Old and New Testaments. For example, Psalm chapter 22:16 is recognized by all Bible scholars as prophetic of Yahshua’s first coming and crucifixion. In the 16th verse it states, “For dogs have compassed Me: the assembly of the wicked have enclosed Me: they pierced My hands and My feet.” Yahweh is certainly not complaining that some four footed dogs barked at Him, there is no record that any ever did. He is speaking of those who delivered Him up to be crucified the use of this word is common in the New Testament. In Philippians 3:2 Paul says, “Beware of dogs [bad-fig-jews], beware of evil workers.” The four footed dogs are no more evil workers than cats and cows. Paul and those to whom he wrote, knew these dogs were the two footed kind.
If you say, this is discrimination between races, you are exactly right. Has someone told you that monstrous falsehood that, it isn’t Christian to discriminate between races? Let’s see what Yahshua did.
In Mark 7:25-29 we read, “For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an unclean spirit, heard of Him and came and fell at His feet: the woman was a Greek, a Syrophoenician by nation; and she besought Him that He would cast forth the devil out of her daughter. But Yahshua said unto her, Let the children first be filled: for it is not right to take the children’s bread and to cast it unto the dogs. And she answered and said unto Him, Yea master, yet the dogs under the table eat of the children’s crumbs. And He said unto her, For this saying, go thy way: the devil is gone out of thy daughter.” Yahshua certainly did discriminate, not until the woman recognized the righteousness of the discrimination did He help her.
She had first asked help of Him on the same basis as the Israelites, true Awdawm, on that basis she was not entitled to it. Yahshua told her, “Let the children first be filled with the bread of life.” Then they will establish the kingdom of Yahweh on earth and from this Yahweh’s blessings will be extended to such others as can understand and receive them in the proper spirit. Meanwhile, Yahshua did not hesitate to openly call the Enosh dogs. When the woman indicated that she understood the blessings would come to others out of the abundance which Yahweh gave to His own children, then He told her that for this saying, He had healed her daughter.
Yahshua carefully warned His disciples never to make the mistake of failing to discriminate, never to try to bring the Enosh who lack understanding, into the kingdom of Yahweh on the same terms as the Awdawm.
In Matthew 7:6 He warned them, “Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet and turn again and rend you.”
Strong words yes, but the direct command of Yahshua. We have disobeyed Him so now we are facing the tragic penalty. We have tried to treat the other races as equals. We have expected them to learn the same lessons from our religion that we do, we have expected them to behave with some self restraint when they find power in their hands. But this is exactly what Yahshua warned us not to do, “Lest they trample our pearls under their feet and turn again and rend us.” Of our advanced technology, they want only to learn how to make weapons to use against us. In fact, they are even using the very food we send them as a weapon against us, for the surplus food will allow them to take more men off the farms and put them into armies and weapon factories. To thus strengthen our enemies is only a fool’s method of suicide.
To His disciples Yahshua said in John 14:16-17, “And I will pray the Father and He shall give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you forever: even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth Him not, neither knoweth Him: but ye know Him; for He dwelleth with you and shall be in you.” Therefore, it was logical to speak of those whose minds lacked the spiritual understanding as beasts, because of their nature.
In the Book of Daniel, the prophet traces the rise and fall of four great world empires ruled by these people. First he interprets Nebuchadnezzar’s dream of the great image, whose head was of gold, his breast and arms of silver, his belly and thighs of brass, his legs of iron, as prophesying the successive dominance of four great empires.
Nebuchadnezzar’s Babylon was the first of these, the golden head and the others being Medo-Persia, Alexander’s and Rome.
In Daniel chapter 7, Daniel had a vision of four remarkable beasts, rising one after the other out of the sea. We know that in prophecy, the sea is symbolic of mankind in general, all people, the great majority of whom are the Enosh, the pre-Adamic races. Out of them came the four beasts. The first a lion symbolized Babylon, like the golden head of the image, the second a bear, symbolized the great empires of Media and Persia. The third a leopard, for the swift striking empire of Alexander the Great, and the fourth a very terrible beast with iron teeth, ten horns [provinces] and great strength, symbolized Rome. This was exactly the same series, in the same order as the image of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream. Its repetition was to confirm the first one as true prophecy.
As further confirmation, in the book of Revelation we again find a beast, representing these world empires, rising out of the sea. In Revelation chapter 13, we are told this strange beast had the mouth of a lion, the feet of a bear, yet was otherwise like a leopard, but it had ten horns, like the fourth beast which Daniel saw. The fact that the qualities of all four are now combined in one beast is to show that the four great world empires were all of one origin, all manifestations of satanic power, all arising out of the sea of non-Adamic races. They came to power in secession, each gained enormous power over the people who lived in great areas. The rule of each was harsh, tyrannical, brutal, each one more so than those before it. Man’s planning, man’s skill in putting his plans into effect, man’s ability to judge what was needed in ruling an empire, these they had. But the spiritual understanding, the capacity to receive the thoughts of Yahweh, the capacity to organize and rule a nation under Yahweh’s laws, this they lacked.
Revelation chapter 13 shows this composite beast gained its power from the dragon, Satan. Surely, these empires demonstrated their satanic character. Finally, to make sure that the symbolism of the vision would not be misunderstood, Revelation 13:18concludes, “Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man.”
If these beasts were nations of men, why symbolize them as beasts? We have seen that Yahweh’s prophets and even Yahshua, bluntly called certain races beasts. A nation made up of Chinese people must be a Chinese nation, a nation made up of negroes must be a negro nation. Then a nation made up of those whom the Bible calls beasts, must be a beast nation and it is so stated.
The fall of the Roman empire ended only the vast extent of power in the hands of those who served Satan. It has not ended their desire to regain that power, nor their struggle for it. So the book of Revelation shows a continuation of the struggle for power, carried on by a new beast, right down to the time of the second coming of Yahshua, the beast makes war against Him, but is conquered by Yahshua. We see this struggle for power going on in the world today. The nonAdamic people, now organized into many nations so as to multiply their voting power in the United Nations, where just the cannibal tribes of Africa alone are recognized as about 30 nations, having 30 votes to our one!
There is not one of them that stands reliably on our side. Once in awhile, they find it to their advantage to seek something which we also want to accomplish and on that one issue they vote with us. But the next day, they either proclaim their neutrality in our struggle for the survival of the free world, with which they have no sympathy, or they actively support Russia against us. It is inevitable that those who are of the same race, the same origin, having the same qualities, the same ambitions and ideals, should align themselves together, working for their common purpose. In the great world empires of the past, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Alexander’s short lived empire and finally Rome, they had what they wanted, a system which expressed their own true character.
They want to restore this system and the United Nations is made to order for their purpose, as Yahweh prophesied. In Revelation 13:14, we are told that the new beast, “deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by means of the miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth that they should make an image of the beast which has the wound by the sword and did live.” They seek to make the United Nations a worldwide empire, like that of Babylon and Rome, only greater. An empire which crushes and dominates all nations, enforcing its will by bestially brutal forces, as we have seen in the Congo. An empire which repudiates the one true God, where the name of Yahshua cannot be mentioned because it offends those who hate Him and where the only reference to any divinity is the statue of the pagan god Zeus, in the lobby.
An empire ruled by those whom the Bible calls beasts, for they now outnumber the whole white race by 8 to 1 in voting strength. Though we have 1/6th of the world’s population, by this juggling of voting power we are reduced to 1/9th of its voting strength. When we see their plans for world rule developing, we can begin to understand the dreadful prophecy of the coming day when no man might buy nor sell, save he that has the mark or the name of the beast.
Nevertheless, the return of Yahshua will overthrow their plans, their power will be destroyed and they will be put in their proper place. This place emphatically does not include rule over the nations, that has brought too many thousands of years of misery and sorrow. In the final end, when Yahweh’s New Jerusalem is set up on earth, we are told in Revelation 22:14-15, “Blessed are they that do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life and may enter in through the gates into the city, for without are dogs.” This doesn’t mean you can have your pussycat, canary and goldfish but faithful fido is excluded, these dogs Yahshua names are humans.
Discrimination, do you say? Yes, indeed! But from start to finish, from Genesis to Revelation, Yahweh has commanded discrimination. I would not oppose it if I could.