Search:

Type: Posts; User: Dogman

Search: Search took 0.08 seconds.

  1. Re: DOD ditching 7.62 NATO (.308) and 5.56 NATO (.223) and going to...

    Yup ! to all.
  2. Re: DOD ditching 7.62 NATO (.308) and 5.56 NATO (.223) and going to...

    ?

    9895
  3. Re: DOD ditching 7.62 NATO (.308) and 5.56 NATO (.223) and going to...

    Had to log in again just for ur post, very long day... once I saw ur post u older than me , but not much overall .

    Yes there is a diff, but minor , for peak performance no, but safe to fire,...
  4. Re: DOD ditching 7.62 NATO (.308) and 5.56 NATO (.223) and going to...

    sum of the hottest round were in the 6 range, but bore erosion was huge, mostly in the throat along with other issues

    Think 22-250 or ..

    Same hot rounds that do amazing things but barrels...
  5. Re: DOD ditching 7.62 NATO (.308) and 5.56 NATO (.223) and going to...

    No thank u...

    Be well
  6. Re: DOD ditching 7.62 NATO (.308) and 5.56 NATO (.223) and going to...

    Understand the whys , mostly because of weight = more bang for the buck. Being hit by a 7.62 NATO (.308) is no laughing matter. But I can understand if the ballistic sorta reasons, (still boils down...
Results 1 to 6 of 6