Ukraine info

[monty]

EE

It doesn’t mention them in the Pilgrims Society research as jews but the majority are zionist jews. On the home page is a list of zionists.

https://www.isgp-studies.com/index

site owner Joël van der Reijden says he has put over 20,000 hours into research

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Joël_van_der_Reijden

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/ISGP


https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/134354858/

[Amanda]

Amanda frequently links us to Conservative Tree House so I bookmarked it and scan it daily now. Here is what they linked to as the source for their recent jaw-dropping thread:

Hunter Biden’s Ukraine gas firm pressed Obama administration to end corruption allegations, memos show


We won't see this on the (((MSM)))

Yes, Conservative Treehouse has definitely been good on the coup, but generally brain-dead on everything else.

Thought this was good (Steve Hilton explains the Biden Ukraine corruption, includes Kerry, and then this LYING WHORE from the US Dept of State tries to say there's nothing there, so Steve Hilton to her face, says she's part of the coverup!!!

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...vs-marie-harf/

Ukraine, Kerry and Quid-Pro-Joe: Steve Hilton -vs- Marie Harf


Oh, this is funny. Fox News host Steve Hilton is well versed in the issues where U.S. government officials sent money to Ukraine and then received personal financial benefit from a return of those funds to their own interests. A circle of corrupt money.
As Mr. Hilton expands on the issues of corrupt U.S. officials using Ukraine as a piggy-bank for their own affluence, he highlights examples of both Joe Biden and former Secretary of State John Kerry. Former State Dept. Spokesperson Marie Harf, is shocked, s.h.o.c.k.e.d, at the allegations…. and then, they are all saved by the bull-Shiff bell. WATCH:

quick clip
https://videopress.com/v/2kz47NeD




https://theconservativetreehouse.com...vs-marie-harf/

[Jewboo]

It doesn’t mention them in the Pilgrims Society research as jews but the majority are zionist jews.

Exactly.

[Jewboo]

Yes, Conservative Treehouse has definitely been good on the coup, but generally brain-dead on everything else.

Thought this was good (Steve Hilton explains the Biden Ukraine corruption, includes Kerry, and then this LYING WHORE from the US Dept of State tries to say there's nothing there, so Steve Hilton to her face, says she's part of the coverup!!!

You live in real time Amanda. The literal "here and now".

[Amanda]

Thought this was good from Rand:

Rand Paul: 'Subpoena Whistleblower, He May Be Involved In Corrupt Ukraine Dealings'

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rand-paul-subpoena-whistleblower-he-may-be-involved-corrupt-ukraine-dealings

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) has called on Congressional Republicans to subpoena the anti-Trump whistleblower, suggesting he may be involved in corrupt business dealings in Ukraine.
https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b...d%20paul_0.jpg
In a Tuesday interview, Paul said that the whistleblower - reported to be CIA officer Eric Ciaramella - "is a material witness to the possible corruption of Hunter Biden and Joe Biden," and that Congress should investigate the whistleblower's ties to the Biden family and Burisma holdings, the Ukrainian gas company that paid Hunter Biden to sit on its board, according to BuzzFeed.


"[The whistleblower] might have traveled with Joe Biden to Ukraine for all we know. We should look at his writings. We should know all of this stuff to see whether or not he has any intersection with Burisma and with Hunter Biden," said Paul.

The president’s most ardent supporters in Congress have long insisted the real corruption in Ukraine was done by former vice president Joe Biden and his family rather than by President Donald Trump. Many have also called for outing the anonymous intelligence official who filed a whistleblower complaint alleging Trump demanded a political quid pro quo from the Ukrainian government — an investigation into the Biden family in exchange for hundreds of millions of dollars in military aid. But, until now, they had not brought those two lines of attack together. -BuzzFeed

When asked if he has any evidence for his suppositions, Paul said "We don't know unless we ask."


Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was surprised at Paul's comments, saying "He needs to tell us. You can’t ask a judge. You can’t ask members [of Congress], 'Do you want to subpoena this guy?' He might be this, he might be that."


Both Graham and Paul do agree, however, that the whistleblower's identity should be officially made public, with Paul telling reporters that he "probably will" disclose his name.


"I'm more than willing to, and I probably will at some point. ... There is no law preventing anybody from saying the name," said Paul.




Other lawmakers such as Sen. Mitt Romney, Roy Blunt, John Cornyn and Lisa Murkowski say he should remain anonymous.


The whistleblower's attorney, Mark Zaid, said that Paul and others are using disinformation to distract from the substance of the allegations.


"I imagine at some point soon our client will be accused of masterminding JFK's assassination as well," he said. "Any Member of Congress who pushes to expose the whistleblower will not only undermine the integrity of the system but will be disgracing their office and betraying the interests of the Constitution and the American people."

*********

Thought this was a good comment from over there:

The whistleblower's attorney, Mark Zaid, said that Paul and others are using disinformation to distract from the substance of the allegations.
"I imagine at some point soon our client will be accused of masterminding JFK's assassination as well," he said. "Any Member of Congress who pushes to expose the whistleblower will not only undermine the integrity of the system but will be disgracing their office and betraying the interests of the Constitution and the American people."

The substance of the allegations? The "whistleblower" is not really a whistleblower. Let's stop pretending, he's Eric Ciaramella, a DNC operative and ardently anti-Trump. He worked with Joe Biden, was with Biden in Ukraine in March 2016, he work with John Brennan at the CIA and he worked under Susan Rice, Obama's NSA.


The Whistleblower Act wasn't designed for hearsay complaints to be marked "urgent" 18 days after an alleged incident is reported to the IG and AFTER consulting with a member of Congress and his staff first, who happened to have worked with Eric Ciaramella at the WH NSC. Ciaramella left the WH in the summer of 2017 because of leaking. He's a weasel.


Mark Zaid is a shyster Democrat lawyer who said.... "I would at some point soon will be accused of masterminding JFK's assassination as well"?? Your logical fallacies, namely appeal to ridicule, needs to be more plausible shyster Zaid. Do you know the members of Lawfare?


This is what shyster Mark Zaid was and is a part of. You should be disbarred Zaid.


Ukraine whistleblower’s lawyers work for group that offers to pay officials who leak against Trump


Whistleblower Aid was launched in September 2017 — eight months after Trump's inauguration — with an advertising blitz that involved mobile billboards being driven close to the White House, Congress, outside the Pentagon, and around the headquarters of the CIA and National Security Agency.


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/ukraine-whistleblowers-lawyers-work-for-group-that-offers-to-pay-officials-who-leak-against-trump


Lawyer Victoria Toensing sent this out in a tweet earlier today


"FYI. Intell law that provides for whistleblowers to come forward does NOT provide for anonymity. It protects against retaliation. Law only applies to intell conduct by an intell person. @realDonaldTrump not intell person. Talking to Ukraine Pres not intell conduct. #MAGA2020
https://twitter.com/VicToensing/stat...34001608986624

[Amanda]

Good for him!!

Trump Jr. Outs CIA Whistleblower Over Twitter

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...r-over-twitter

Drama ensued on Wednesday after Donald Trump Jr. tweeted a Breitbart News article which contained the name of the alleged Trump-Ukraine whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella.

The article, written by Breitbart senior investigative reporter New York Times bestselling author and Aaron Klein, details how Ciaramella was central to the Obama administration's Ukraine policy - including the eventual signing of a $1 billion US loan guarantee after former VP Joe Biden pressured them into firing the guy investigating an energy company paying his son to sit on their board, Burisma Holdings.


In response to Trump Jr. tweeting Ciaramella's name, journalist Yashar Ali (who worked for Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign) contacted Don Jr., who told him "The outrage on this is BS. And those pretending that I would coordinate with The White House to send out a Breitbart link haven’t been watching my feed for a long time."


Don Jr. then tweeted "The entire media is #Triggered that I (a private citizen) tweeted out a story naming the alleged whistleblower. Are they going to pretend that his name hasn’t been in the public domain for weeks now? Numerous people & news outlets including Real Clear Politics already ID’d him."

**************

also, thought this from the comments over at zerohedge was interesting:

Back on Oct 11th Ciaramella's name was widely published on multiple forums as Anons found he was a Susan Rice protege, caught the eye of Brennan and soon was to lead the unmasking effort using Rice's and Samantha Power's ID/classification clearances. That's a felony for all three inclukding the entire team engaged in unmasking.
The Anons also reported Brennan brought Ciaramella into the CIA and dispatched him to the White House as a spy.
We already know he was not on the call by his own admission but filed an "urgent" whistle Blower complaint against the President. A ruse already planned and held in the wings for an opportune moment.
There are NO protections for this traitor much less anonymity. Time to get him in front of the Senate Intel Committee along with Schitt for Brains.

Here's the article Trump Jr. tweeted out:
Alleged ‘Whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella Worked Closely with Anti-Trump Dossier Hoaxer

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/06/alleged-whistleblower-eric-ciaramella-worked-closely-with-anti-trump-dossier-hoaxers/

*********

Also, connecting more dots, Bongino questions whether fake whistleblower, Ciaramella was the co-conspirator "Charlie" mentioned in texts between Lisa Page and Peter strozk:

Ep. 1100 Was “Charlie” Spying on the Trump White House?

https://bongino.com/ep-1100-was-charlie-spying-on-the-trump-white-house/

[Jewboo]

Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was surprised at Paul's comments, saying "He needs to tell us. You can’t ask a judge. You can’t ask members [of Congress]...

THESE TWO SANDBAGGERS don't "ask" either and it is literally their job to ask.

<-----My avatar is our only mentally-healthy response to this current Clown World. Stop caring fellow goyim.

[Amanda]

THESE TWO SANDBAGGERS don't "ask" either and it is literally their job to ask.

<-----My avatar is our only mentally-healthy response to this current Clown World. Stop caring fellow goyim.

Yes, Lindsey Graham has been WORTHLESS as Chair of Sen Judiciary committee--there was so much he was supposed to look into, like the players in the Russia hoax coup, and what about all of those lying psycho/hoaxers, like Dr. Chrissy Blasey FRAUD and nutjob Julie Swetnick, who made up the BS about Kavanaugh and the gang rape parties. Grassley made a criminal referral to DOJ on Swetnick and nothing has happened, and Lindsey should have looked into it.

He's obviously dirty and controlled -- a total WHORE for the MIC and Israhel.

Agree on Barr--don't trust him at all...Where's the declass IMO, as soon as the Mueller Investigation (aka Clinton revenge lawyer investigation) ended, they should have made all of that public. But instead, it was delayed, in time for the coup plotters to start Coup- Part 2.

Also, pretty sure Ron Paul just put out a video on the Trump DOJ pushing something on pre-crime, so I guess that's what once-CIA-always-CIA Barr as been working on...

**************

And there's this:

Whistleblower's Attorney Vowed To 'Get Rid Of Trump' In 2017

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...rid-trump-2017

The Democratic operative attorney representing the anti-Trump whistleblower vowed to "get rid of Trump" in 2017.
https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b...s/zaid%201.jpgWhistleblower attorney Mark S. Zaid Mark Zaid, the John Podesta, Clinton and Schumer-linked attorney who founded the anti-Trump nonprofit 'Whistleblower Aid' in 2017, tweeted "It's very scary. We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters. We have to."

Sean Davis ✔ @seanmdav · 2h
Interesting that the anti-Trump complainant's lawyer (not the one who worked for Clinton or Schumer--that's a different one!) vowed to "get rid" of Trump ahead of his client secretly coordinating with House Democrats to go after Trump.

https://twitter.com/MarkSZaidEsq/sta...27979917438976

Mark S. Zaid‏Verified account @MarkSZaidEsq
Replying to @Vbarnett323 @realDonaldTrump
It's very scary. We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters. We have to.


Robert Barnes @Barnes_Law
He also bragged about his connections to John Podesta with an organization he set up for litigation.


Hilariously, Zaid describes himself as a "non-partisan" attorney "handling cases involving national security, security clearances, govt investigations, media, Freedom of Information Act, & whistleblowing, according to Breitbart's

Aaron Klein, who noted that Zaid's "Whistleblower Aid" organization is heavily tied to far-left activist organizations and Democratic policies.

Whistleblower Aid was founded in September 2017 in the wake of Trump’s presidency to encourage government whistleblowers to come forward.
The group did not sit around waiting for whistleblowers. Upon its founding, Whistleblower Aid actively sought to attract the attention of Trump administration government employees by reportedly blasting advertisements for its whistleblower services on Metro trains, using mobile billboards that circled government offices for 10 hours a day, and handing out whistles on street corners as a gimmick to gain attention.
When Whistleblower Aid was first formed, the main banner for the mission statement of its website contained clearly anti-Trump language.
“Today our Republic is under threat. Whistleblower Aid is committed to protecting the rule of law in the United States and around the world,” read the previous statement which can still be viewed via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. -Breitbart

Zaid is also founder and director of the James Madison Project, which still lists Democratic operative John Podesta as a member of its board in a hidden area of the website (archive here).

https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b...odesta%201.jpg

"Non-partisan" indeed.

[Amanda]

Thought this was interesting...
Curiouser and Curiouser…

Posted on November 6, 2019 by sundance
According to several media reports AG Bill Barr is scheduled to have a meeting today with Senator Lindsey Graham for an update on the Horowitz and Durham investigations:

[…] Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, plans to meet Wednesday with Barr to talk about the report’s planned rollout, according to people familiar with the matter. (link)

Then, moments ago, this little innocuous sighting popped up amid the DC media:

(a tweet saying Dana Rohrabacher was in the Capitol--he's the guy who met with Assange, and said he can prove DNC NOT hacked by Russia)

***
Article is too long for me to bring the whole thing over, but here's some of it:

Why the delay?

What was the DOJ waiting for?

Here’s where it gets interesting….

The FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”

(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.

Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.

“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”

Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)

Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative, it would make sense for the FBI to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange; and why the FBI would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.

Within three months of the grand jury the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018. The EDVA sat on the indictment while the Mueller probe was ongoing.

As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).

As a person who has researched this three year fiasco; including the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking/interference narrative: “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16; and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17; this timing against Assange is too coincidental.

It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned Deep State motive to control Julian Assange because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes.

This is critical. The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record statements.

The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election. The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is the intelligence community assessment; and the only factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from Crowdstrike, a DNC contractor.

The CIA holds a massive conflict of self-interest in upholding the Russian hacking claim. The FBI holds a massive interest in maintaining that claim. All of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and Strzok also have a vested self-interest in maintaining that Russia hacking and interference narrative.

Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack.

This Russian “hacking” claim is ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K intelligence apparatus…. Well, right there is the obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be public.

Now, if we know this, and you know this; and everything is cited and factual… well, then certainly AG Bill Barr knows this.

The $64,000 dollar question is: will they say so publicly?

[Jewboo]

The CIA holds a massive conflict of self-interest in upholding the Russian hacking claim...

CIA has been infiltrated and controlled by Mossad for decades.

Ukraine "President" and all of those Ukrainian oligarchs are JEWS.