![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/sp_en_6.gif)
For the record, this issue that “the virus” has never been scientifically isolated and identified needs to be stressed and documented again. It shows the lying nature of all the rhetoric leading up to the beginning of the early-2021 big push for everyone being vaccinated.
________
I watched this inspiring interview of Peggy Hall and set out to search for the proof citations that the FDA and the CDC admitted in writing that COVID-19 was never isolated.
[ Here is that interview video of Peggy Hall by Clay Clark done a few days ago. I think PatColo introduced this forum tp Peggy Hall’s early work against masks over a year ago.
https://rumble.com/vi71yd-peggy-hall...ut+the+BS&ep=2
Here is Peggy Hall’s impressive website with everything we the people need to fight the fake “pandemic.” She even offers reasonably priced classes on how to protect your Constitutional rights.
thehealthyamerican.org ]
I requested the information from Peggy Hall and she promptly and graciously provided it to me.
_______
IMPORTANT NOTE:
Originally more clear language of this” non-isolation” of COVID-19” was on page 39 of an earlier iteration of this CDC document, cited also by Jon Rappport I think. See this…
…https://static1.squarespace.com/stat...ted.pdf…
FDA --CDC virus not isolated
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/downloadpg. 39
The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1 Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the ThemoFisher Scientific TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV RealTime RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use"
_______
Then the CDC put out a later iteration of this document and moved it to Page 41 and changed the wording to be more vague.
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only Instructions fo
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
Page 41 of this FDA document refers to “pooling”.
If I understand this correctly, “pooling” is the FDA’s way of admitting that “COVID 19” has never been scientifically isolated and identified.
“
Authorized laboratories using specimen pooling strategies when testing patient specimens with your product will include with negative test result reports for specific patients whose specimen(s) were the subject of pooling, a notice that pooling was used during testing and that “Patient specimens with low viral loads may not be detected in sample pools due to the decreased sensitivity of pooled testing.”
Authorized laboratories implementing pooling strategies for testing patient specimens must use the “Implementation and Monitoring of Pooled Specimen Testing” available in the authorized labeling to evaluate the appropriateness of continuing to use such strategies based on the recommendations in the protocol. •
Authorized laboratories will keep records of specimen pooling strategies implemented including type of strategy, date implemented, and quantities tested, and test result data generated as part of the Protocol for Monitoring of Specimen Pooling Testing Strategies. For the first 12 months from the date of their creation, such records will be made available to FDA within 48 business hours (2 business days) for inspection upon request, and will be made available within a reasonable time after 12 months from the date of their creation.
•Authorized laboratories will report adverse events, including problems with your products performance or results, to MedWatch by submitting the online FDA Form 3500 (https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scrip...reporting.home) or by calling 1-800-FDA-1088. “
_________
Here is an interview of Richard M. Flemming PhD, MD, JD, Physicist and nuclear cardiologist and lawyer
[Dr. Flemming is focusing on "the origin of the virus", that is, where the virus came from. The Highwire has decided that from now on they are going to proceed with their seeking of objective information about "the virus" as definitely the product of "gain of function" research and is therefore a man-made "virus.
No thanks to Dell Bigtree -- I unsubscribed from Dale Bigtree’s The Highwire site because my comment questioning Dr. Flemming stating that SARS CoV-2 was definitely scientifically isolated and identified in this video at about 0:31:20…] SARS CoV-2 is used to be the same thing as COVID-19, though that is dodgy language manipulation in my opinion.]
https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-d...-a-bio-weapon/
2”11:08
THE DEFINITION OF A BIO-WEAPON
THE DEFINITION OF A BIO-WEAPON
Fauci Denies NIH Funding; Defining a Bioweapon; CDC Stops Looking for Vaccine Failure; The Growing Toll of Vaccine Injury; Eric Clapton’s Powerful Message
#TheHighWire #EricClapton #StandAndDeliver #NIH #GainOfFunction
(Thanks also to Amanda for links to Dr. Sam Bailey’s video that explained that the SARS CoV-1 electron microscope photo I referenced from Wikipedia is really nothing but possible the exterior coating of some corona genetic material in the soup under the microscope. Dr. Tom Cowan said something similar regarding the electron micro scope images on the web that are represented as SARS CoV 2 images.)
Reply With Quote
That point right there was when her DOGMA ate my KARMA! 
Originally Posted by Dachsie
wasn't invented for The MuhRONA! 
