Coronavirus

[Dachsie]

https://usawatchdog.com/fda-cdc-lyin...mark-skidmore/

https://usawatchdog.com/fda-cdc-lyin...mark-skidmore/

https://mark-skidmore.com/2022/02/15/how-many-people-died-from-the-covid-19-inoculations/

Greg Hunter USAwatchdog.com embedded video

56:41 video runtime

This video is also viewable on Rumble...

https://rumble.com/vxihkd-fda-cdc-lying-about-vax-deaths-and-injuries-mark-skidmore.html

also now on a Bitchute channel

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EvQjVnhDMcaP/



How Many People Died from the Covid-19 Inoculations?

How Many People Died from the Covid-19 Inoculations?
Posted bymarkskidmoreFebruary 15, 2022
Posted inUncategorized

How Many People Died from the Covid-19 Inoculation? An Estimate Based on a Survey of the United States Population (Working Paper)

Mark Skidmore

Executive Summary

This paper examines potential fatalities and injuries from the Covid-19 inoculation using an online “Covid-19 Health Experiences Survey” administered to a representative sample of the US population. The sample is composed of 3,000 respondents balanced on age, gender, and income to the extent possible. The survey was administered in December 2021, collecting information regarding respondents’ experiences with the Covid-19 illness and the Covid-19 inoculations as well as Covid-19 health experiences within respondents’ social circles. The survey also collected respondent economic and demographic information. Using these data, I find the following:

Covid-19 inoculation-related fatalities:

Assuming that all the respondents who know somebody who they believe died from the inoculation actually died from the inoculation, estimated fatalities are about 308,000.
Subtracting out those who may have died regardless of inoculation yields an estimated 294,000 inoculation-induced fatalities. This is an initial first pass estimate—more evaluation is needed.

Factors associated with being inoculated:

The likelihood of being inoculated is significantly less for those who identify themselves as African American, Hispanic, and Asian, and Republican or Independent. Democrats, Caucasians, and more the highly educated are more likely to be inoculated.
Those who indicated that they obtain information about Covid-19 from alternative news sources were less likely to be inoculated. Those who obtain information from mainstream news and official government source are more likely to be inoculated.
Knowing someone who experienced a significant health problem from the Covid-19 illness increased the likelihood of being inoculated.
Knowing someone who had been injured by the Covid-19 inoculation substantially reduced the likelihood of being inoculated.

The official position of the US government is that the Covid-19 inoculations have resulted in nine fatalities (CDC, 2022). The experiences shared by hundreds of respondents in this survey suggests that many people died or were injured following inoculation. Which data are more believable—nine fatalities or as many as 300,000 fatalities? Surveys have limitations in assessing the impacts of health interventions. However, this type of evaluation offers an important point of triangulation. The experiences of people captured in surveys generally should be consistent with official government data. In the case of Covid-19 inoculations, there is a tremendous divergence which should be cause for further inquiry. My hope is that this research will motivate a full and transparent examination by independent health and medical scholars to ascertain the degree of harm being caused by the Covid-19 inoculations.

The full paper can be accessed at: How Many People Died from the Covid-19 Inoculations? An Estimate Based on a Survey of the United States Population


Published by markskidmore

Mark Skidmore is Professor of Economics at Michigan State University where he holds the Morris Chair in State and Local Government Finance and Policy. His research focuses on topics in public finance, regional economics, and the economics of natural disasters. Mark created the Lighthouse Economics website and blog to share economic research and information relevant for navigating tumultuous times. View more posts


Dachsie comment:

81
Appendix 3: Reported COVID-19 Inoculation Deaths and Injuries in Social Circles

Suggest go to Appendix 3 word cloud

of Dr. Skidmore's full study in pdf file format

https://mark-skidmore.com/wp-content...es-Final-4.pdf

on Page 81 of study

[Dachsie]

Kelly: March 16, 2020 marked beginning of a 2-year ‘crime against humanity’ [/URL]

• by: WorldTribune.com
• 03/16/2022
• Source: WorldTribune.com



https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1647412254

'This is what the Left wants. They want people stripped of wealth, isolated, and terrified.'

by WorldTribune Staff, March 15, 2022

It was on March 16, 2020 that the Covid overlords proclaimed "15 days to slow the spread."

It was the day that "once-free citizens around the world surrendered their liberty and livelihoods in a futile attempt to 'stop' a virus," Julie Kelly noted in a March 15 op-ed for American Greatness.

"The most technologically advanced civilization in the history of mankind quickly adopted medieval fixes that bordered on quackery, sold by snake oil salesmen in the credentialied class and news media, codified through executive fiat by elected leaders of both parties."

What the Covid overlords constructed "worked, far better than the original architects probably anticipated," Kelly added.

It was on March 16, 2020 that Kelly posted the following on Twitter after her daughter left her college dormitory in upstate New York, not to return to a normal campus life for two years: "This is what the Left wants. They want people stripped of wealth, isolated, and terrified. They want sources of joy—church, sporting events, vacations, large social gatherings—eliminated. This is how they get control. And it’s far scarier than any virus."

"To say that was a very unpopular view at the time would be an understatement. But having covered the climate change movement for years, I recognized a familiar approach to the spread of COVID-19 hysteria: use flawed data to whip up a public frenzy and shut down all debate in fealty to 'science!' " Kelly wrote.

In March of 2020, President Donald Trump made the biggest mistake of his presidency, Kelly noted, when he acquiesced "to the demands of Drs. Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx — the former a charlatan, the latter a dunce — and shut down the country."

Trump’s "first instinct (the one he suppressed to appease those demanding we honor The Science™) was the right one. The cure should not be worse than the disease, he fretted. He knew it, but he listened to the quacks anyway," Kelly wrote.

That is why, Kelly noted, "the Left will try this again. Pandemic lockdowns produced all sorts of benefits for Democrats, including outcomes the environmental movement had been dreaming about for five decades: fossil fuel use plummeted as airline and vehicle traffic screeched to a halt; meat prices soared; commercial buildings in large energy-consuming cities sat vacant."

Russia's invasion of Ukraine "presented an ideal opportunity to institute a soft form of lockdowns; with gas prices rapidly rising to historical highs, Americans are voluntarily limiting their own energy use," Kelly wrote.

Team Biden readily admits the Russia-Ukraine war "will accelerate plans to move the country’s energy independence from gas and oil to wind and solar, achieving Biden’s pledge to cut carbon emissions in half by 2030," Kelly wrote.

The Build Back Better plan, intended to “reset” U.S. priorities post-pandemic, boasts that it devotes at least $550 billion for “a once-in-a-generation investments in clean energy and infrastructure that can help tackle the climate crisis.”

The biggest score Democrats got from the lockdowns was the "stealing the presidential election," Kelly wrote.

"In May 2020, the CDC issued guidance that gave a scientific imprimatur to Democrats’ long-desired changes to voting laws including lax use of absentee ballots. A record number of mail-in ballots, millions of which were unlawfully handled before Election Day, resulted in Trump’s purported defeat."

Since they are expected to lose heavily in this November's midterms, "Democrats will try election-related lockdowns again," Kelly wrote. "The weeks leading up to Election Day happen to coincide with the annual flu season, so Democrats, including incumbent governors in tight races, will likely attempt the winning 2020 formula once more."

Will Americans fall for it?

"Given what we’ve witnessed over the past two years, unfortunately, the answer might be 'yes,' " Kelly wrote. "Millions of our countrymen have revealed themselves to be miserable sociopaths gratified by human suffering, especially that of children. These ghouls still rage at the sight of unmasked kindergarteners and college football stadiums filled with joyous students."

Kelly continued: "A healthy, or rather, unhealthy, portion of the American public will gladly do this all over again. They now mourn the fact that life is slowly returning to normal, continuing to wear two face masks in a sign of defiance and solidarity with their fellow nutcases. For its part, the Biden regime is keeping the re-entry door to lockdowns open just enough to blow it wide open again months from now if necessary; the useless face mask mandate on airplanes and mass transit, for example, has been extended until at least April 18."

The date of March 16, 2020 "isn’t just a day that will live in infamy — it marked the beginning of the largest crime against humanity since the last world war," Kelly noted. "And the perpetrators aren’t finished yet."


______

[Dachsie]

https://rumble.com/vwv9zj-offshore-biolabs-with-meryl-nass-md-unrestricted-truths-ep.-65.html

Offshore Biolabs with Meryl Nass, MD | Unrestricted Truths Ep. 65


American Media Periscope Published March 8, 2022 1,445 Views

59:41 video runtime


About the last half of this interview found Dr. Nass sharing her expertise in the subject of biological research laboratories and "bioweapons" laboraories.

She said, my rough paraphrase, that until we, meaning all the countries participating in the relevant treaties and agreements and sponsorship of all these laboratories around the world, can regularly and expertly monitor and inspect these laboratories, and until we have complete knowledge of exactly what the labs are doing and with what exact pathogens, every one of the labs should be completely shut down immediately. She does recognize the legitimate need for biological research laboratories but I got the impression she does not condone biological weapons.

Dr. Nass appears to know a great deal about "the Prep Act" and other U S laws that impact the vaccine and pharmaceutical industry. I would really like her to give her opinion of what was the motivation of the pharmaceutical companies for creating and getting FDA full approval and licensure for Pfizer–BioNTech's Comirnaty and Moderna's SPIKEVAX * vaccines, when neither vaccine is avalilable to be used in the USA. These big corporations obviously see some advantage for their financial security in creating and getting FDA approval. I would really like to know what trick or use for deception is involved here.


Dr. Nass said the public health professionals ought to be "going nuts" about the data we have now and ought to call a halt immediately to these vaccinations until what is going on is fully known and understood. She said these professionals are not doing their job.

Dr. Nass spent the last one minute mentioning the spike proteins that do such serious damage to the blood vessels from the "vaccines" resulting in serious injury and death.

*
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/spikevax

Regulated Product(s)

Biologics
Vaccines

STN: 125752
Proper Name: COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA
Tradename: SPIKEVAX
Manufacturer: ModernaTx, Inc
Indication:

Active immunization against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the SARS‑CoV-2 virus in persons 18 years of age and older.

Product Information

Package Insert - SPIKEVAX
Patient Package Insert - SPIKEVAX
Demographic Subgroup Information – COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA (SPIKEVAX).
Refer to Section 1.1 of the Clinical Review Memo for information about participation in the clinical trials and any analysis of demographic subgroup outcomes that is notable.

Supporting Documents

January 31, 2022 Approval Letter - SPIKEVAX
https://www.fda.gov/media/155815/download
January 30, 2022 Summary Basis for Regulatory Action - SPIKEVAX
Approval History, Letters, Reviews, and Related Documents - SPIKEVAX

ALSO

[Dachsie]

Dachsie random therapeutic rant.


1.
The US Department of Defense messes with extremely lethal pathogens under the guise or excuse that it is necessary to have specialized (BSL 3 and BSL 4) labs to study and research the "threat" of biological weapon attack on the USA. "Threat" is the justification or excuse word that makes the "study" of killer pathogens completely legal and appropriate within the mission and purpose of the U S Department of Defense.

Of course, the words "study" "research" and "pathogens" have very specific legal definitions or should have.

There is a very vague and thin-line distinction between "research" and "creation" of a new man-made, not in nature, entity or pathogen. They have to create dangerous contagious pathogens that will kill human beings in order to study and learn how to recognize and stop the spreading of such biological weapon should they ever be dropped on the USA or USA soldiers.

____________________

2.

All of this Federal Drug Administration ( FDA ) classification of drugs and medicines and "vaccines" ia an equally legally vague word and definition game as far as what is a legally approved drug or vaccine in the United States of America.

We are just beginning to get a more clear picture of just how vague and sketchy and questionable the entire FDA operation is. A big part of this increased understanding of the FDA and its operation is learning for the extensively documented / referenced content of this book...

The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health

(Children’s Health Defense) Hardcover – November 16, 2021
by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Author)

_______________

3.
The full FDA approval of mRNA "COVID-19 vaccines" named Comirnaty and SPIKEVAX are some kind of legal trick that makes it easy for these pharmaceutical manufacturing companies to achieve some kind of large future sales and/or to make more secure the sales, secure the market, of same kind of vaccine products by these same companies but that are not "legally" the same exact product. I do not completely understand the trick that is being played here but neither of these new fully FDA approved products are now or ever have been sold and distributed and legally administered to human recipients here in the USA. The trick is played to accomplish some huge financial advantage for these drug companies, but I think some true USA governmental regulatory investigation ought to be able to explain this trick. We do not now have benefit of that governmental investigation and oversight of this maneuver.

___________________

4: It appears that there are some ends-justifies-the-means actions of FDA and BigPharma so as to get certain COVID 19 vaxxinw peosuxra offcially authorized and approved to be on the list of young children in the USA are required to have as part of scheduled of vaccines for newborns as well as what is required to be allowed enrollment and entry in to a public school. These kind of murky sketchy "legal" governmental actions are why there are references by certain alternative news commentators to "child sacrifice" in the Old Testament of the bible. Using every younger children, like at age 6 months, to do some kind of vaccine trials that are necessary to get that governmental listing of the a vaccine product on that official list of vaccines that a young child must have on a certain time-schedule and for certain permissions or "passports" for entry.

___________________

5. Thomas Renz, attorney with a growing group of helping attorneys are filing important lawsuits regarding how the US Department of Defense forced our soldiers to take a vaccine that was not a fully FDA approved and licensed vaccine under threat of not being allowed to be deployed for any military mission and just being held and "put on hold" and possible dismissed from the military.

_________________________

6.
Also there are fully verified DMED data, that is highest quality careful data for that DMED data base. Now it appears that the part of the US DOD that oversees that database is part of another lawsuit by Thomas Renz and associates that shows that there are extremely increased and high numbers of our military enlistees suffering very severe side effects from having been forced to take these experimental unapproved vaccines.

________________

7.

Also it now appears that the relevant part of the DOD is going back several years. like to 2016 or so and "cooking the books" or tweaking or altering the data to show that there were not those awful looking high numbers of disease and death from those experimental vaccines. That should be another lawsuit in my opinion.
______________________

8.

All of these US government health agencies have demonstrated very questionable and illegal looking actions, actions that hurt and kill people and destroy our constitutional republic and its entire medical system. The trust is gone.

9.

Another questionable ends-justifies-the-means action of these health agencies was to completely suppress the ready precribe-ability and availability over the counter of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine HCQ kinds of medicines. The reason, it appears, that these drugs were made almost universally unavailable in the USA is because FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA for a COVID-19 vaccine product administration in the USA is not possible if there are other available treatments fot the "virus". So the government took the action of making them first unavailable, under all kinds of threats, loss of license etc., to doctors and drugstores and medical institutions.

The EUA FDA authorization (not approval) is a valuable dollar prize to pharmaceutical companies because of the liability shield it gives to the product makers should the product kill or maim the vaccine recipient. It is important of part of the drug making strategies to get that EUA classification and status AT ALL COSTS including the cost to life and limb of we the defenseless people.
_________________________

10.
Just remember the strong evidence of many instances of actions to hide, cover-up data and delay disclosure of the data. Those actions in and of themselves are very illegal and "actionable liegally" looking to Dachsie.

_______________________

11.

Much of the coverup and delays of quality data about the drugs hurts young children the most, but the resultant maiming and killing people of all ages all over the world is equally heinous and evil.

__________________________

I would like all of this to be set as right as is possible now under "the rule of law" if, pray God, we still have such a thing.

[ImaCannin]

[Dachsie]

https://usawatchdog.com/800000-lives...r-pierre-kory/

800,000 Lives Could Have Been Saved with Ivermectin and HCQ – Dr. Pierre Kory

By Greg Hunter On March 19, 2022 In Political Analysis No Comments



By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com (Saturday Night Post)


In October, Dr. Pierre Kory, a world renowned pulmonary and critical care Covid expert, warned, “The suppression of early treatment in this country is one of the most historically calamitous actions, and history will not be kind here.” Sadly, Dr. Kory was right and explains, “If you look at us now, we are over 900,000 deaths, and a huge proportion could have been saved. If you look at Dr. Peter McCullough’s protocol, it was published in August of 2020. He argued for combination therapy protocols . . . a combination of Ivermectin (IVR) and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). We know the vast majority, 85% to 90% of the hospitalizations and deaths, would have been prevented. You apply that to, let’s say, 800,000 excess deaths, and you are talking about a massive humanitarian crisis that resulted from the suppression of early effective repurposed drug treatments.” (IVR & HCQ)

Dr. Kory goes on to say, “We are in a war of information. They call us ‘misinformation-ists.’ They are ‘disinformation-ists.’ They are actually employing disinformation. They want everyone to be convinced that Ivermectin is a horse dewormer, and only uncredible people would take it for a viral syndrome. They have never shown it is an anti-viral, and it’s been shown for 10 years to work on a number of viruses. . . . So much of the medical establishment and doctors have been propagandized to have bizarre behaviors. They are still pushing vaccines because they have been told lies. They are still attacking Ivermectin based on lies and wrong information. It’s the same thing with Hydroxychloroquine.”

When it comes to the so-called vaccines, Dr. Kory says it all should have come to a grinding halt with all the deaths from the inoculations very early on. Dr. Kory explains, “The stopping point for an experimental intervention, therapy or vaccine, that stopping point was exceeded within weeks of the rollout. The scale of what we are talking about now is almost indescribable. The traditional stopping point with deaths associated, that was exceeded in January of 2021, and the agencies (FDA & CDC) ignored it. The VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data just kept climbing and climbing and climbing. I can’t even keep up. Last I checked, there were over 24,000 death reports in VAERS.”

Dr. Kory goes on to talk about the unvaxed and vaxed patients he is treating. Dr. Kory talks about the deaths and injuries from the vaccines and thinks they will keep climbing as he predicted at the beginning of 2022. Dr. Kory will also tell you how you can help yourself no matter if you are vaxed or unvaxed.

Dr. Kory tells people to go to the FLCCC Alliance website and get information for treating Covid19 and vax injuries for free.

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Dr. Pierre Kory, one of the top Pulmonary and Critical Care experts on the planet, who is co-founder of the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance. (There is much more in the 1 hour & 15 min. interview.)




(To Donate to USAWatchdog.com Click Here)

embedded video

1:15:49 video runtime

video also viewable on Rumble

https://rumble.com/vxw7x1-800000-liv...erre-kory.html


After the Interview:

All the information is free on the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance website.

If you want to follow Dr. Kory on his Substack, click here.

Dr. Kory has a new book about his battle to save people in this age of medical disinformation. The book is called “The War on Ivermectin.” Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize in medicine in 2015, and yet it was villainized and discredited by the medical community when used for treating Covid.

If you want to donate to the FLCCC Alliance click here. The Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC Alliance) is a 501c3 non-profit organization.

[Dachsie]

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-bb91bb4d0212


03/17/22
•

COVID › News

New Hampshire House Votes to Allow Over-the-Counter Sales of Ivermectin



The New Hampshire House on Wednesday passed a bill allowing the state’s pharmacists to dispense ivermectin over the counter, without a prescription.

HB 1022 also prevents New Hampshire medical licensing boards from disciplining doctors for prescribing the drug.

The bill, which passed by a 183-159 vote, now moves to the Senate.

Representative Leah Cushman (R-Weare) provided the following statement to The Defender:

“HB1022 permits ivermectin to be dispensed by a pharmacist via a standing order, effectively making it available over the counter. The evidence is growing regarding ivermectin’s effectiveness in reducing severity and duration of COVID-19. When people want access to ivermectin because they or their loved ones are ill, they will get it by any means they can.

“Since many doctors are afraid to prescribe anything off-label for the treatment of COVID-19, patients have turned to foreign pharmacies, buying it on the black market, or buying ivermectin formulated for animals. We need to pass this bill to expand access to pharmacy-grade ivermectin for the people of New Hampshire.”

Dr. Meryl Nass, a Maine physician and member of the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Scientific Advisory board, praised New Hampshire lawmakers for passing the bill. She told The Defender:

“Yesterday, legislators in the New Hampshire House did something amazing for COVID patients … In order to save their lives using a safe and effective drug, New Hampshire residents will be able to buy human ivermectin from drug stores without a prescription.”

If the bill passes the Senate, patients will “no longer need to dread developing COVID with little prospect of early treatment,” Nass said.

She added:

“CHD still advises that it is always preferable to get care from a medical professional, whenever possible. But when it isn’t, being able to self treat should make a huge dent on COVID mortality and morbidity.”

Nass advised people to read the warnings on ivermectin, avoid drug interactions (especially with coumadin) and take the proper dose by weight. “Most importantly, start treatment early,” she said.

Nass, who supports the use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for treating COVID patients, on Jan. 12 was suspended by the Maine medical licensing board, which accused her of spreading “misinformation regarding the SARS CoV-2 pandemic and the official public health response calling for vaccinations.”

BUY TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s New Book — 'The Real Anthony Fauci'

FDA ignores evidence, won’t approve ivermectin for COVID

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not authorized the use of ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19 and has published documents on its website intended to discourage people from using the drug as a treatment for COVID.

Ivermectin is on the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines. It has been used safely in pregnant women, children and infants.

Ivermectin was developed and marketed by Merck & Co. Dr. William C. Campbell and Professor Satoshi Omura were awarded the 2015 Nobel Prize for Physiology of Medicine for discovering and developing avermectin, later modified to create ivermectin.

Ivermectin is an antiparasitic, but it has shown, in cell cultures in laboratories, the ability to destroy 21 viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19.

Ivermectin has been shown to speed recovery from COVID, in part by inhibiting inflammation and protecting against organ damage. This pathway also lowers the risk of hospitalization and death. Meta-analyses have shown an average reduction in mortality that ranges from 75% to 83%.

A meta-analysis in the American Journal of Therapeutics showed ivermectin reduced infection by an average of 86% when used preventively. A more recent study suggested preventive use of ivermectin reduced mortality by 90%.

The 10 doctors who are in the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance call ivermectin “one of the safest, low-cost, and widely available drugs in the history of medicine.”

Some doctors have speculated that tens of thousands of deaths could have been prevented if repurposed drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin had been more deeply explored and promoted at the outset of the pandemic, instead of suppressed.

26 states weighing similar laws to protect physicians

New Hampshire is not the only state attempting to address the use of off-label treatments for COVID by making it easier for people to obtain the drugs and by protecting those who prescribe and dispense them.

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum on Nov. 12, 2021, signed into law HB 1514, a bill that prevents licensing boards from taking disciplinary action against doctors, nurses and pharmacists for the “off-label treatment or prevention of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 identified as SARS-CoV-2, or any mutation or viral fragments from SARS-CoV-2.”

Here is a list of 26 states
https://track.govhawk.com/reports/2lWe3/public

that have introduced legislation either restricting board authority, explicitly allowing for the off-label treatment of COVID, or both.

While most of these bills are still in the introductory stages, several have made it out of subcommittee and are ready for a general vote.

_____



Suggest a Correction
Nolan E. Bowman's avatar

Nolan E. Bowman

Nolan E. Bowman is a freelance science reporter for The Defender.


The New Hampshire House on Wednesday passed a bill allowing the state’s pharmacists to dispense ivermectin over the counter, without a prescription. HB 1022 also prevents New Hampshire medical licensing boards from disciplining doctors for prescribing the drug.

By
Nolan E. Bowman

[Dachsie]

Dachsie comment:

"AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly wrote in this amicus brief that “vaccine mandates are an alarming gateway” to advance a political agenda that includes negating freedom to practice one’s religion, infringing on parental rights, violating the patient-physician relationship, and limiting the ability to earn a living.

In addition to this laudable statement by General Counsel Andrew Schlafly, it is important to keep in mind that all of the major commercial airlines in the USA now have many pilots flying their planes who have had the "clot shot." That could mean heart attack or stroke while piloting one of these planes. We need to hear news that stringent comprehensive standards of medical clinical testing and screening for early signs of cardiovascular injury in "vaccinated" pilots are in place and carefully and honestly administered and monitored.

_____________________________




Don't fly the unfriendly skies of United

______________

https://aapsonline.org/aaps-amicus-b...ccine-mandate/

AAPS Asks Court to Uphold Good Ruling Against COVID Vaccine Mandates



On Thursday the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed its amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the lawsuit against United Airlines over its Covid vaccine mandate. United removed from their positions pilots and flight attendants who obtained religious exemptions from the Covid vaccine, and employees sued in Sambrano v. United Airlines.

United lost its appeal, and on March 10 filed an unusual motion to vacate the panel opinion against it. On the same day United abruptly announced that it will allow the employees who have religious exemptions to return to work, saying that moots this lawsuit.

AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly wrote in this amicus brief that “vaccine mandates are an alarming gateway” to advance a political agenda that includes negating freedom to practice one’s religion, infringing on parental rights, violating the patient-physician relationship, and limiting the ability to earn a living.

AAPS requested that the Fifth Circuit fully publish its superb opinion on the side of employees, instead of dropping it down the memory hole.

“In essence, United booked a ticket on this flight to tyranny, whether intentionally or not,” AAPS’s amicus brief states. “Fortunately, United’s flight landed before its ill-fated destination.”

“By abruptly reversing its position in this case, United has done the equivalent of a U-turn on the runway and this Court should have a healthy skepticism about its explanation from its cockpit,” states Andrew Schlafly in this filing. “Are we taking off or landing?” he asks rhetorically about United oddly trying to erase an appellate panel’s opinion while also seeking to get it reconsidered by the full court.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a national organization representing physicians in all specialties since 1943. Its motto is omnia pro aegroto (everything for the patient).

[Dachsie]

Donald Trump Jr.
@DonaldJTrumpJr

You mean the people hit by busses who may have had it shouldn’t have been considered COVID deaths after all?

Image
6:51 AM · Mar 20, 2022
25K
See the latest COVID-19 information on Twitter

[Dachsie]

Brian Cates - Political Columnist ⭐️⭐️⭐️

People are going to wake up to the full horror of it now.

They killed people in the hospitals.

Why ?

MONEY.

They diagnosed people who didn't have COVID as being COVID infected. They said thousands upon thousands of people died of COVID when they didn't.

Why?

MONEY.

They stuck people on ventilators and pumped full of poisonous Remsdivir.

Why?

MONEY.

They closed businesses and churches, causing many business to fail.

Why?

MONEY.

They killed thousands of elderly people in the nursing homes.

Why?

MONEY.

They suppressed real early drug treatments that prevented/cured COVID infection.

Why?

MONEY.

And they're still determined to keep those f**king masks on all your kids.

Why?

TAKE A WILD GUESS.

This evil man directed an insane and evil system that was chock-full of financial incentives that rewarded hospitals and doctors and gov't bureaucrats for doing all of this financially-driven policy.


t.me/drawandstrikechannel/34381
44.8K viewsBrian Cates, edited
Mar 20 at 11:49