Coronavirus

[monty]

Max Igan "Covid is a cover story for a massive human cull"


https://odysee.com/@thecrowhouse:2/C...e-Human-Cull:f

Dec. 3 1 hr. 6 min. runtime

[Dachsie]

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/12/...jr-s-new-book/

The Most Striking Fact in Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s New Book

By Thomas DiLorenzo


I just got my copy of RFK Jr.’s The Real Anthony Fauci. Flipping through the first couple of chapters, one thing really stood out — that Fauci dispenses some $7 billion in research grants to “public health” researchers all over the world. He has held that position for 30 years. This means that for thirty years there has been one-man monopoly control over virtually all public health-related “peer review.” This proves in spades what a clownish, lying, incompetent, corrupt stooge Fauci is when he responds to criticism with statements like “everyone I know agrees with me on this.” Yeah, everyone who works for him and is paid by him, or wishes to work for him and be paid by him (with taxpayers’ money). This means that “public health” peer review is a joke and a fraud. No other profession in the world would be taken seriously if one single government bureaucrat was effectively in charge of all the professional publications in the entire field.

And what Fauci doesn’t control through government funding, other government bureaucrats at NIH and elsewhere do. They are Fauci wannabes in this corrupt, stinking, fraudulent field of “public” health. No wonder Dr. Scott Atlas, a real doctor and medical researcher, was so shocked at the immense incompetence he was exposed to while serving on President Trump’s COVID task force and sitting through meetings with dopey Fauci and that goofy scarf woman. He told Tucker Carlson that the two of them seemed 100% detached from and unaware of the relevant science and did nothing but repeat leftist lockdown/masking/you-must-obey/jab-every-child/shut-down-all-the-schools-and-churches talking points without even discussing any scientific basis for any of it.
December 1, 2021

[Dachsie]

Another bombshell interview of Dr. Elizabeth Eads.

__________________________________

https://usawatchdog.com/vax-causes-v...lizabeth-eads/



»
Vax Causes Variants, Hospitals Murder CV19 Patients – Dr. Elizabeth Eads

By Greg Hunter On December 4, 2021 In Political Analysis 4 Comments

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com (Saturday Night Post)

Dr. Elizabeth Eads is back to update us from the front lines of medicine. Dr. Eads is treating patients who have been injected with the experimental CV19 so-called “vaccines.” Dr. Eads is witnessing the horror stories of treating the unvaxed who have been made sick by the “Fully Vaccinated.” The carnage continued after the vaxed and unvaxed got together for Thanksgiving. They showed up in her North Florida emergency rooms the next day with all sorts of trouble from the injections that Eads simply calls “bioweapons.” Eads explains, “The day after Thanksgiving and through the weekend in the ER, we saw all kinds of symptoms of unvaxed people. We saw chest pain, heart attack . . . head to toe . . . rashes, and in the first time in my 25 year career, I saw a patient come in with a ruptured left ventricle. That’s a ruptured heart muscle, and he had to immediately go to open heart surgery. That patient happened to be “Fully Vaccinated” and also had the (CV19) booster within a week before traveling. This is very concerning. We are seeing an uptick across the country with chest pain, sudden cardiac deaths. We are seeing myocarditis and pericarditis, whether you are vaccinated or not vaccinated, with the Covid vaccines. This rupture, we believe, was from a fully boosted patient who had the rupture because of the synthetic spike protein in the booster. This is all very concerning. There are also concerns for transmission of the spike proteins. . . . Pfizer had in their studies that there was transmission happening. That is true, it is in the documents. You can pull the FDA approval and see that there was transmission.”

So, this is transmission from the vaxed to the unvaxed? Dr. Eads says, “Correct.”

Are the “Fully Vaxed” getting boosters turbocharging their shedding and increasing the spread to the unvaxed? Eads says, “Correct because we know the boosters have 100 micrograms, which equates to about a billion synthetic spike proteins being produced in the body. The initial Covid shots were 30 micrograms, then 50 micrograms, and the boosters are 100 micrograms. So, you are getting twice as much of the synthetic mRNA, and you are making twice as much of the synthetic spike protein. We are estimating it is in the billions. . . . This is very concerning. These blood clots are being caused by both the graphene oxide, which acts as a razor blade in the blood vessels. It’s slicing up blood vessels causing blood clotting, and the synthetic spike protein in the mRNA envelope that is making intraocular is circulating through the body and causing . . . myocardial heart damage. These antibodies and macrophages that are surrounding these spike proteins are actually boring through cardiac muscles cells and causing damage.”

Dr. Eads also contends, “You are setting up the patients who got the shots to have an immune deficiency and get viruses. By definition, those are the mutations. It’s the people who have been vaccinated.”

Dr. Eads also says there are elements of AIDS and HIV in some of the so-called vaccines that Dr. Eads says is really a bioweapon. Dr. Eads warns of a “huge increase of cancers across the board” as a result of the so-called vaccines. Dr. Eads also says that doctors are being incentivized to make decisions that are killing patients in hospitals. The hospitals are incentivized as well to not make sure patients get well, but to basically “murder patients” to collect government money, according to Dr. Eads’ firsthand experience.

Now, the globalist Deep State is frantically pushing a third CV19 “booster” injection. Eads’ advice, “Don’t get the booster, absolutely not, and I do not recommend a flu shot because Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) will be worsened by getting a flu shot.”

Join Greg Hunter as he talks to 25 year veteran Dr. Elizabeth Eads, DO, who is continuing to expose the lies being told to the public about the deadly jabs. Dr. Eads will highlight the real unreported effects of the CV19 injections and tell you who is cashing in on all the pain and death. (12.4.21) (There is much more in the 54 min. interview)

embedded video in article

54:06 video runtime

video also viewable on Rumble

https://rumble.com/vq873s-vax-is-var...beth-eads.html

https://rumble.com/vq873s-vax-is-var...beth-eads.html

[Dachsie]

I tried several searches on the American Hospital Association website for the " Patient's Bill of Rights"
at https://www.aha.org but I could not find it on page 1 of hits. If anyone finds it and cares to post it, thanking you in advance.

The AHA 15-item document referred to by Dr. Eads is obviously being hidden by the AHA. Disgusting.

The downloadable pdf file document below has 17 items and is from AmericasFrontlineDoctors.org is not the ome one that Dr. Eads referred to.


__________________________




https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/4-MA-Patient-Bill-of-Rights.pdf

AHA Patient’s Bill of Rights Your guide to advocacy

These rights can be exercised on the patient’s behalf by a designated surrogate or proxy decision-maker
if the patient lacks decision-making capacity, is legally incompetent, or is a minor.

1. The patient has the right to considerate and respectful care. Your well-researched, safe, and effective
treatment wishes should be met and respected.

2. The patient has the right to and is encouraged to obtain from physicians and other direct caregivers
relevant, current, and understandable information concerning diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.
All the information provided regarding your Covid19 diagnosis should be explained using sound
science and ethical protocols. Many of the protocols and studies they base decisions on are not
backed by solid science, and you have the right to that information and how they came to their
decisions.
3. Except in emergencies when the patient lacks decision-making capacity and the need for treatment
is urgent, the patient is entitled to the opportunity to discuss and request information related to the
specific procedures and/or treatments, the risks involved, the possible length of recuperation, and
the medically reasonable alternatives and their accompanying risks and benefits. It is essential to
have an AD (Advance Directive) and Healthcare Proxy in place that lays out your wishes as a patient.
Before you lose your decision-making capacities, make it known upfront what treatments you are
refusing (i.e., biologics, EUA products, vaccines, ventilators, etc.).
4. Patients have the right to know the identity of physicians, nurses, and others involved in their care,
as well as any students, residents, or other trainees. Keep consistent records, logs, videos,
documentation, etc., of all of your interactions with care staff. Every person involved in the violation
of your rights needs to be documented so that they can eventually face accountability for their
neglect.
5. The patient also has the right to know the immediate and long-term financial implications of
treatment choices, insofar as they are known. Demand to see the costs associated with the Covid-19
treatment protocol the hospital is recommending. The in-hospital protocol likely far exceeds the costs
of the alternative treatments you are requesting and is a valid argument as to your refusal. The costs
of your requested protocol will compare favorably to the NIH experimental and branded offering
they are peddling.
6. The patient has the right to: make decisions about the plan of care prior to and during treatment,
refuse a recommended treatment or plan of care to the extent permitted by law and hospital policy,
and be informed of the medical consequences of this action. In case of such refusal, the patient is
entitled to other appropriate care and services that the hospital provides or the transfer to another
hospital. The hospital should notify patients of any policy that might affect patient choice within the
institution. The hospital cannot force you to accept any treatment. If they refuse to acknowledge
your wishes, they are required to offer alternatives or transfer. For any refused treatment, demand a
printout of the exact policy dictating this decision to confirm that their refusal is legitimate.


7. The patient has the right to have an advance directive (AD) (such as a living will, health care proxy,
or durable power of attorney for health care) concerning treatment or designating a surrogate
decision-maker with the expectation that the hospital will honor the intent of that directive to the
extent permitted by law and hospital policy. Health care institutions must advise patients of their
rights under state law and hospital policy to make informed medical choices, ask if the patient has
an advance directive, and include that information in patient records. The patient has the right to
timely information about hospital policy that may limit its ability to implement fully a legally valid
advance directive. Many hospitals now have policies that nullify the wishes laid out in your Advance
Directive. Therefore, it is important that when they deny your wishes, you are supplied a hard copy of
the exact hospital policy they are acting under. These policies are essential for the legal arguments
you will face, so both the patient and the staff must understand them well.
8. The patient has the right to every consideration of privacy. Case discussion, consultation,

examination, and treatment should be conducted to protect each patient's privacy.
9. The patient has the right to expect that all communications and records pertaining to his/her care
will be treated as confidential by the hospital, except in cases such as suspected abuse and public
health hazards when reporting is permitted or required by law. The patient has the right to expect
that the hospital will emphasize the confidentiality of this information when it releases it to any
other parties entitled to review information in these records. Some states offer opportunities to
"opt-out" of sharing personal medical information, such as vaccination status. Discuss with the

hospital any possible option you must opt-out of sharing your medical information and take
advantage of those programs ASAP. Ensure to obtain a copy of the hospital policy. They may share

your information under certain circumstances, so it is crucial to understand their policies.

10. The patient has the right to review the records pertaining to his/her medical care and to have the
information explained or interpreted as necessary, except when restricted by law. What is the
science behind their medical decisions? Can they provide ample scientific support for their treatment
choices? You have a right to know how and why they do what they do.
11. The patient has the right to expect that, within its capacity and policies, a hospital will make
reasonable response to the request of a patient for appropriate and medically indicated care and
services. The hospital must provide evaluation, service, and/or referral as indicated by the urgency
of the case. When medically appropriate and legally permissible, or when a patient has so
requested, a patient may be transferred to another facility. The institution to which the patient is to
be transferred must first have accepted the patient for transfer. The patient must also have the
benefit of complete information and explanation concerning the need for, risks, benefits, and
alternatives to such a transfer. When refusing treatment, make sure that the facility you are
transferred to agrees to treat you according to your wishes. The hospital will be required to arrange

this hand-off. Each hospital will have policies established that dictate determining if a patient is
suitable for discharge and transfer. Have these policies presented to you in hard copy form to fully
understand how your wishes for discharge and transfer are determined or why you are refused.
12. The patient has the right to ask and be informed of the existence of business relationships among the
hospital, educational institutions, other health care providers, or payers that may influence the
patient’s treatment and care. Many of these hospitals and institutions currently engaged in false


imprisonment have financial ties that incentivize them to follow specific Covid-19 protocols and
neglect all other treatment options. Achieving this information from the hospital's administration
can be vital in understanding the hospital's motives and providing evidence for their neglect of well-
founded, safe, effective, and life-saving treatments.

13. The patient has the right to consent to or decline to participate in proposed research studies or
human experimentation affecting care and treatment or requiring direct patient involvement and to
have those studies fully explained prior to consent. A patient who declines to participate in research
or experimentation is entitled to the most effective care that the hospital can otherwise provide.
Many of the protocols and medications used for Covid-19 in hospitals involve EUA

medications/treatment modalities considered experimental. If the hospital's protocol is attempting
to provide is part of novel research or involves EUA, experimental products, you have every right to
refuse these treatments and request effective alternatives. For example, Remdesivir, a staple in NIH's
Covid-19 protocol, is still a EUA product, as is the PCR test. You have a right to refuse either of those
or request effective alternatives.
Remdesivir EUA document:
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugs...mdesivir_05012
0.pdf

PCR Tests EUA Document: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/...se-2019-covid-
19-emergency-use-authorizations-medical-devices/in-vitro-diagnostics-euas-molecular-diagnostic-
tests-sars-cov-2

14. The patient has the right to expect reasonable continuity of care when appropriate and to be
informed by physicians and other caregivers of available and realistic patient care options when
hospital care is no longer appropriate. The hospital has the responsibility to ensure that your care
needs are being met when hospital care is no longer needed. Since the hospital is denying your
treatment requests, they should help you locate possible alternative options.
15. The patient has the right to be informed of hospital policies and practices that relate to patient care,
treatment, and responsibilities. All policies that the hospital cites regarding your case should be
gathered as hard copies and reviewed.
16. The patient has the right to be informed of available resources for resolving disputes, grievances,
and conflicts, such as ethics committees, patient representatives, or other mechanisms available in
the institution. You must understand what policies the hospital is acting under to ensure that they
are being enacted appropriately and honestly. Many hospitals have committees dedicated to patient
advocacy, procedures, ethics, etc. Make sure to take advantage of every service offered and

document all interactions with staff in the process.
17. The patient has the right to be informed of the hospital’s charges for services and available payment
methods. Your Healthcare Proxy is an excellent source for reviewing the hospital's policies and
engaging with the committees and services offered.

Source: https://www.americanpatient.org/aha-...ill-of-rights/


An example of state and hospital specific Patient Bill of Rights can be found below:
MA General Laws - Patients' and Residents' Rights
https://malegislature.gov/laws/gener...111/section70e

Beth Israel Lahey Health – Patient Rights
https://www.lahey.org/lhmc/your-visi...atient-rights/

[Dachsie]

(There will be a Part 2 to this video but it is not posted yet on Bitchute.)
________________________________



https://www.bitchute.com/video/HZT2I3U952vK/

"THIS IS JUST PURE EVIL" - Karen Kingston & Clay Clark

49:56 video runtime


"THIS IS JUST PURE EVIL" - Karen Kingston & Clay Clark

First published at 23:13 UTC on December 4th, 2021.

SGT Report

Former Pfizer employee pharmaceutical, medical device business analyst and big pharma drug trials expert Karen Kingston and Thrivetime founder Clay Clark join me to expose the Covid mRNA injections agenda which Kingston describes as "just pure evil". Thanks for tuning in to part one of this two part interview.

Support Karen!!
https://www.givesendgo.com/miFight

[Dachsie]

WARNING Dachsie rant:

THEY are now going after our children. We have to raise hell in every way we can and make sure we do not keep silent to keep our jobs. Jesus made it clear what He will do with every person who fails to protect the children, the least of these. Whatever you fail to do to protect these children, you do TO our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, the Son of the Living God.
_______

The Final Judgment

Matthew: 25: 31-41

31When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the angels with Him, He will sit on His glorious throne. 32All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate the people one from another, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33He will place the sheep on His right and the goats on His left.

34Then the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. 35For I was hungry and you gave Me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave Me something to drink, I was a stranger and you took Me in, 36I was naked and you clothed Me, I was sick and you looked after Me, I was in prison and you visited Me.’

37Then the righteous will answer Him, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry and feed You, or thirsty and give You something to drink? 38When did we see You a stranger and take You in, or naked and clothe You? 39When did we see You sick or in prison and visit You?’

40And the King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of Mine, you did for Me.’

41Then He will say to those on His left, ‘Depart from Me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42For I was hungry and you gave Me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave Me nothing to drink, 43I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, I was naked and you did not clothe Me, I was sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’
[/B]


[/SIZE]

[Dachsie]

Although this over one year old video report does not mention "the virus" or COV|ID at all,
it does very much connect the dots a little to show how all of this evil upon the world is very much about controlling human behavior with money to install a One World Death and Slavery System for ALL. It looks like that we need at least one state to file a lawsuit on behalf of the wave of murder that has yet to go unconvicted. There appears to be not one decent honest state that will get serious about doing their job of protecting the "health and safety" of its citizens.



Saagar Enjeti: Wall Street Billionaire CAUGHT Paying Epstein Millions After Visiting Private Island

2,261,971 views

11:32 video runtime

Oct 13, 2020


The Hill


Saagar Enjeti discusses recent developments concerning Jeffrey Epstein's alleged ties to Wall Street billionaires.

[Dachsie]

This Part 2 of 2 related to Part 1 - posting # 2335 This is just pure evil




https://www.bitchute.com/video/8H8fqgJfsfQb/

"THIS IS DEMONIC" -- Kingston & Clark [part 2]

34:17 video runtime

"THIS IS DEMONIC" -- Kingston & Clark [part 2]

First published at 21:34 UTC on December 5th, 2021.

SGT Report


This is part two of my interview with former Pfizer employee, pharmaceutical and medical device business analyst Karen Kingston and Thrivetime founder Clay Clark. Please support Karen who has sacrificed so much to tell the truth:

Support Karen Kingston here...

https://www.givesendgo.com/miFight

Here's Part ONE of this interview:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HZT2I3U952vK/

________

Dachsie Comment:

I think Part 1 is where you will find the most interesting Karen Kingston comments. This Part 2 was not so great. I do hope Karen K. is able to get some donations because she needs support and she has the most valuable insights from her experience.

For example, she said in Part 1 why she thinks that 500 page first release elease of documents that we at first thought was so bombshell was something that she feels could kind of be a manipulated selected release of certain information that really is not as significant as it at first seems. She gave her reasoning how our misinterpretation and over-hopefulness could be turned against us. That was good information from Karen.

[Dachsie]

The CDC has been planning the kind of concentration camps we are seeing in Australia for the USA and these are planned for places all over the world. This is how communist takeover works. Many of our doctor groups are telling us they are choosing to obey the CDC rules rules and plans formulated by the CDC, I pray that the U S Constitution prevails over all of these unconstitutional actions by the private corporation, the CDC..

_______________________


https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...anitarian.html

Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings

Updated July 26, 2020

Excerpt

"This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings.1,2 This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings. The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available. Please check the CDC website periodically for updates.

What is the Shielding Approach1?

"]The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.1,2 They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.

Current evidence indicates that older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19.3 In most humanitarian settings, older population groups make up a small percentage of the total population.4,5 For this reason, the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.

In theory, shielding may serve its objective to protect high-risk populations from disease and death. However, implementation of the approach necessitates strict adherence1,6,7, to protocol. Inadvertent introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission among the most vulnerable populations the approach is trying to protect.

A summary of the shielding approach described by Favas is shown in Table 1. See Guidance for the prevention of COVID-19 infections among high-risk individuals in low-resource, displaced and camp and camp-like settings 1,2 for full details." SNIP

[Dachsie]

I heard this on the 12-05-21 edition of x22Report on Bitchute yesterday.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5EsckwAad6Za/ at 30:43
__________________________________________________ _____________


"Why anybody could imagine a reason for vaccinating a child to protect them from a .003 percent chance of death, if they even get the virus, is enough evidence that they have serious mental issues."

Reply by Patrick Kirby...

You're a pilot. This airplane has a 99.8 percent chance of landing safely, but we have this parachute that is mostly untested here. Would any of you like to strap it on your kid and push them out of the plane?

When a bunch of hands go up, my faith in humanity wanes.

Make that 99.995 percent chance for kids.