Page 316 of 403 FirstFirst ... 216266306314315316317318326366 ... LastLast
Results 3,151 to 3,160 of 4030

Thread: Coronavirus

  1. #3151
    Iridium Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    7,982
    Thanks
    1,301
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,857 Posts

    Re: Coronavirus

    Dachsie comment:

    This experimental non-approved mRNA technology has just about killed or injured all the people it can in the USA and the rest of the world so now its time to pawn off this lethal stuff on to Africa.

    The obscene money profits is not the real story here. It is about imposing the One World Death and Slavery System for ALL on the WHOLE world. Africa was one of the lat country holdouts against this evil.


    ________________________


    Pfizer and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced on Wednesday that they have entered a partnership to bring mRNA to Africa. The announcement was made at the World Economic Forum (WEF), the gathering in Davos, Switzerland of political and business elites, many of whom reaped a cash windfall from the Covid pandemic.


    https://trib247.com/articles/match-m...ign=Newsletter

    'Match made in Hell': In Davos, Gates and Pfizer announce partnership targeting Africa


    by: WorldTribune.com 05/27/2022 Source: WorldTribune.com


    Bill Gates

    by WorldTribune Staff, May 27, 2022

    Pfizer and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced on Wednesday that they have entered a partnership to bring mRNA to Africa.

    The announcement was made at the World Economic Forum (WEF), the gathering in Davos, Switzerland of political and business elites, many of whom reaped a cash windfall from the Covid pandemic.

    "The issue is that Africa doesn't want their product, and many African leaders are well aware of the nefarious activities of Gates Inc. These doses will probably end up disappearing and being used as tax write offs. Pfizer and Gates will celebrate the 'donation,' " noted independent journalist Jordan Schachtel, who dubbed the Gates-Pfizer partnership "a match made in Hell."

    Related: ‘Nobody wants them’: Moderna throwing out 30 million vaccine doses, May 25, 2022

    In November, South Africa's leadership turned down Team Biden's offer to send Pfizer vaccine doses.

    "Pfizer says they're not taking profits on these shots. With record profits already, they prefer to rob the U.S. taxpayer blind instead, " Schachtel tweeted.

    Elsewhere in Davos on Wednesday, George Poe Williams, a nurse from Liberia, protested the profits made by Big Pharma, including Pfizer, who refuse to waive patents on Covid-19 vaccines.

    Williams said: “If I wanted to earn what Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla made last year, I would have to work every single day until 6100 AD. But what makes me really furious is that Bourla and many of his billionaire buddies here at WEF are doing all they can to block our demands for a patent waiver – just so they can make even more money.”

    Bourla received $24 million in pay, perks and stock options for 2021 when the company’s full-year profit more than doubled.

    embedded Tweet with embedded video

    On Thursday, former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark implored the gathering of elites not to let Covid die lest the WEF lose its grip on transforming the world.

    https://twitter.com/apexworldnews/st...rgeting-africa

    Apex World News
    @apexworldnews
    Former New Zealand PM Helen Clark said covid is not over adding: "We are in danger of losing this moment for transformative change..."

    embedded video in this Tweet

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1529735395168161793




  2. #3152
    Iridium Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    7,982
    Thanks
    1,301
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,857 Posts

    Re: Coronavirus

    https://twoplustwoequalsfournews.wor...inst-covid-19/

    TWO PLUS TWO EQUALS FOUR

    A Review of Potential Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19



    A comprehensive description of the many possible consequences of the mRNA gene transfer technologies incorrectly referred to as “COVID vaccines.”

    ...
    https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/...load/23/51/107...



    The Epoch Times – Mar 03 2022

    BY Joseph Mercola

    MIT scientist Stephanie Seneff’s paper, “Worse Than the Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research in collaboration with Dr. Greg Nigh, is still one of the best, most comprehensive descriptions of the many possible unintended consequences of the mRNA gene transfer technologies incorrectly referred to as “COVID vaccines.”
    https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/...load/23/51/107

    December 9, 2021, their paper was reprinted in the Townsend Letter, the Examiner of Alternative Medicine. Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT who has been conducting research at MIT for over five decades, has spent a large portion of her career investigating the hazards and mechanisms of action of glyphosate.

    Her attention was diverted to the science of mRNA gene transfer technologies in early 2020, when Operation Warp Speed was announced. As noted in her paper, many factors that lacked precedent, yet were being implemented at breakneck speed, included:

    The first-ever use of PEG in an injection
    The first-ever use of mRNA gene transfer technology against an infectious agent
    The first-ever “vaccine” to make no clear claims about reducing infection, transmissibility or death
    The first-ever coronavirus vaccine ever tested on humans (and previous coronavirus vaccines all failed due to antibody-dependent enhancement, a condition in which the antibodies actually facilitate infection rather than defend against it)
    The first-ever use of genetically modified polynucleotides in the general population

    Calculations performed by Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, and his team of statisticians suggest VAERS COVID-related reports are underreported by a factor of 41.

    An Insanely Reckless Process

    In a May 2021 interview with me, Seneff said:

    “To have developed this incredibly new technology so quickly, and to skip so many steps in the process of evaluating [its safety], it’s an insanely reckless thing that they’ve done. My instinct was that this is bad, and I needed to know [the truth].

    So, I really dug into the research literature by the people who’ve developed these vaccines, and then more extensive research literature around those topics. And I don’t see how these vaccines can possibly be doing anything good …”

    At the time, just five months into the mass inoculation campaign, Seneff suspected the COVID shots would end up killing far more people than the infection itself. Today, a full year into it, the statistics are grim beyond belief, proving her educated prediction to have been an astute one.
    mRNA Jabs Are Shockingly Hazardous

    As of December 3, 2021, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has logged an astounding 927,738 COVID jab related adverse events, including 19,886 deaths. VAERS can receive reports from vaccine manufacturers and other international sources, and if we exclude those, the death toll reported in U.S. territories exclusively stands at 9,136.

    Of the total death reports, Pfizer — the only company that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has granted full licensing for an as-yet unavailable COVID shot — accounts for the vast majority: 13,268, compared to 4,894 for Moderna, 1,651 for Janssen and 73 for an undisclosed brand.

    Pfizer also accounts for the vast majority of hospitalizations post-injection, and while those over the age of 66 make up the bulk of deaths, the 25-to-50 age group accounts for most of the hospitalizations. Key side effects that are now being reported in massive numbers include:

    Miscarriages
    Heart problems such as heart attacks and myopericarditis
    Thrombocytopenia (low platelet count)
    Shingles
    Bell’s palsy
    A variety of permanent disabilities, many of which involve neurological dysfunction

    All of these consequences were predicted by Seneff and Nigh in their paper, which makes the events all the more tragic. Importantly, VAERS is notoriously underreported, so the real-world impact of these shots is far greater than what those data suggest.
    The Cure Is Indeed Worse Than the Disease

    Calculations performed by Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, and his team of statisticians suggest VAERS COVID-related reports are underreported by a factor of 41. This is a conservative estimate, supported by calculations using a variety of sources besides VAERS itself.

    That means that in the U.S. alone (using the data for U.S. territories only), the actual death toll may be closer to 374,576 (including international deaths reported to VAERS would put the death toll at 815,326), and those are deaths that occurred within days or weeks post-injection.

    As Seneff and Nigh explain in their paper, there’s overwhelming reason to suspect that these gene transfer injections will have devastating impacts in the long term, resulting in excess deaths over the next decade.

    What’s more, it’s clear that the death toll from the COVID-19 infection itself in the U.S. has been vastly exaggerated, as it’s based on positive PCR tests and even mere suspicion of COVID in the absence of testing. Many died from other causes and just happened to have a positive COVID test at the time of death.

    Kirsch estimates the real death tally from COVID-19 to be about 50% of the reported number (which is likely conservative). This means about 380,000 Americans died from COVID-19 (rather than with COVID), whereas the COVID shots may have killed more than 374,570 in the first 11 months alone.
    “Seneff suspects that in the next 10 to 15 years, we’ll see a dramatic spike in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure.”

    As predicted in the title of Seneff’s paper, it seems the cure may indeed end up being worse than the disease. This is particularly true for children and young adults, who have either died or been permanently disabled by the shots by the thousands, while having an extraordinarily low risk of dying from or being seriously harmed by the infection itself.

    Seneff suspects that in the next 10 to 15 years, we’ll see a dramatic spike in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure.
    The Spike Protein Is the Most Dangerous Part of SARS-CoV-2

    The reason we’re seeing all these problems from the COVID shots is because they program your cells to continuously produce SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which we now know is the most dangerous part of the virus. Many experts noted this from the start, wondering what the vaccine developers could possibly be thinking, selecting this as the antigen for their shots.

    While the mRNA injections can cause harm in many different ways, one basic problem is that they can overstimulate your immune system to the point of failure. In summary, as your cells start producing the viral spike proteins, your immune cells rally to mop up the proteins and dump them into your lymphatic system. (This is why many report swollen lymph nodes under the arms.)

    The antibody response is part of your humoral immunity. You also have cellular immunity, which is part of your innate immune system. Your innate immune system is very powerful. If you’re healthy, it can clear viruses without ever producing a single antibody. Antibodies are actually a second-tier effect when your innate immune system fails.

    The problem is that your innate immune system will not be activated and likely will fail to protect you if you get a COVID-19 shot, because it’s bypassing all of the areas where your innate immune system would be brought to bear.

    Normally you breathe the virus in and stimulate the production secretory IgA antibodies that protect your respiratory system. When you bypass that route of exposure with a jab in the arm, no secretory IgA antibodies are produced, leaving you susceptible to the infection.

    As explained by Ronald Kostoff in an excellent December 8, 2021, Trial Site News article, “COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’: The Wrong Bomb Over the Wrong Target at the Wrong Time”:

    “An effective vaccine would focus on cellular immunity in the respiratory and intestinal tract, in which secretory IgA is produced by your lymphocytes that are located directly underneath the mucous membranes that line the respiratory and intestinal tract.

    The antibodies produced by these lymphocytes are ejected through and to the surface of the linings. These antibodies are thus on site to meet air-borne viruses and they may be able to prevent viral binding and infection of the cells.

    Unfortunately, the main inoculants used presently for COVID-19 focus on antibodies (IgG and circulating IgA) that occur in the bloodstream. These antibodies protect the internal organs of the body from infectious agents that try to spread via the bloodstream.”

    When you are injected with the COVID jab, your body will only induce IgG and circulating IgA — not secretory IgA, and these types of antibodies do not effectively protect your mucous membranes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. So, as noted by Kostoff, the breakthrough infections we’re now seeing “confirm the fundamental design flaws” of this gene transfer technology.

    “A natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) will in most individuals remain localized to the respiratory tract,” Kostoff writes. “The vaccines used presently cause cells deep inside our body to express the viral spike protein, which they were never meant to do by nature.

    Any cell which expresses this foreign antigen on its surface will come under attack by the immune system, which will involve both IgG antibodies and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. This may occur in any organ, but the damage will be most severe in vital organs.

    We are seeing now that the heart is affected in many young people, leading to myocarditis or even sudden cardiac arrest and death. In other words, we are dropping the wrong bomb on the wrong target at the wrong time!”

    In the end, your body will essentially believe that your innate immune system has failed, which means it must bring in the backup cavalry. In essence, your body is now overreacting to something that isn’t true. You’re not actually infected with a virus and your innate immune system has not failed, but your body is forced to respond as if both are true.
    Effects Likely to Persist Long Term

    What’s more, the synthetic RNA in the mRNA vaccines contains a nucleotide called methyl-pseudouridine, which your body cannot break down, and the RNA is programmed to trigger maximum protein production. So, we’re looking at completely untested manipulation of RNA.

    It is very important to recognize that this is a genetically engineered mRNA for the spike protein. It is not identical to the spike protein mRNA that SARS-Cov-2 produces. It’s been significantly altered to avoid being metabolized by your body.

    The spike protein your body produces in response to the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA locks into your ACE2 receptor. This is because the genetically engineered new spike protein has additional prolines inserted that prevent the receptors from properly closing, which then cause you to downregulate ACE2. That’s partially how you end up with problems such as pulmonary hypertension, ventricular heart failure and stroke.

    As noted in a 2020 paper, there’s a “pivotal link” between ACE2 deficiency and SARS-CoV-2 infection. People with ACE2 deficiency tend to be more prone to severe COVID-19. The spike protein suppresses ACE2, making the deficiency even worse. According to Seneff, the gene transfer injections essentially do the same thing, and we still don’t know how long the effects last.

    Manufacturers initially guessed the synthetic RNA might survive in the human body for about six months. A more recent investigation found the spike protein persisted in recovered COVID patients for 15 months.

    This raises the suspicion that the synthetic and more persistent mRNA in the COVID shots may trigger spike protein production for at least as long, and probably longer. What’s more, the number of spike proteins produced by the shots is far greater than what you experience in natural infection.

    As explained by Dr. Peter McCullough, this means that after your first shot, your body will produce spike protein for at least 15 months. But, when you get shot No. 2 a few weeks later, that shot will cause spike protein production to go on for 15 months or longer. With shot No. 3 six months after that, you produce spike protein for yet another 15 months.

    With regular boosters, you may never rid your body of the spike protein. All the while, it’s wreaking havoc with your biology. McCullough likens it to “a permanent install of an inflammatory protein in the human body,” and inflammation is at the heart of most if not all chronic diseases. There’s simply no possible way for these gene transfer shots to improve public health. They’re going to decimate it.
    Long-Term Neurological Damage Is To Be Expected

    In her paper, Seneff describes several key characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that suggests it acts as a prion. This could help explain why we’re seeing so many neurological side effects from the shots. According to Seneff, the spike protein produced by the COVID shot, due to the modifications made, may actually make it more of a prion than the spike protein in the actual virus, and a more effective one.

    For a detailed technical description of this you can read through Seneff’s paper, but the take-home message is that COVID-19 shots are instruction sets for your body to make a toxic protein that will eventually wind up concentrated in your spleen, from where prion-like protein instructions will be sent out, radically increasing your risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases.
    Lung, Heart and Brain Diseases Are Predictable Consequences

    Seneff also goes into great detail describing how the spike protein acts as a metabolic poison. While I recommend reading Seneff’s paper in its entirety, I’ve extracted some key sections below, starting with how the spike protein can trigger pathological damage leading to lung damage and heart and brain diseases:

    “The picture is now emerging that SARS-CoV-2 has serious effects on the vasculature in multiple organs, including the brain vasculature … In a series of papers, Yuichiro Suzuki in collaboration with other authors presented a strong argument that the spike protein by itself can cause a signaling response in the vasculature with potentially widespread consequences.

    These authors observed that, in severe cases of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 causes significant morphological changes to the pulmonary vasculature … Furthermore, they showed that exposure of cultured human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit was sufficient to promote cell signaling without the rest of the virus components.

    Follow-on papers showed that the spike protein S1 subunit suppresses ACE2, causing a condition resembling pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a severe lung disease with very high mortality … The ‘in vivo studies’ they referred to … had shown that SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury was primarily due to inhibition of ACE2 by the SARS-CoV spike protein, causing a large increase in angiotensin-II.

    Suzuki et al. (2021) went on to demonstrate experimentally that the S1 component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, at a low concentration … activated the MEK/ERK/MAPK signaling pathway to promote cell growth. They speculated that these effects would not be restricted to the lung vasculature.

    The signaling cascade triggered in the heart vasculature would cause coronary artery disease, and activation in the brain could lead to stroke. Systemic hypertension would also be predicted. They hypothesized that this ability of the spike protein to promote pulmonary arterial hypertension could predispose patients who recover from SARS-CoV-2 to later develop right ventricular heart failure.

    Furthermore, they suggested that a similar effect could happen in response to the mRNA vaccines, and they warned of potential long-term consequences to both children and adults who received COVID-19 vaccines based on the spike protein.

    An interesting study by Lei et. al. (2021) found that pseudovirus — spheres decorated with the SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein but lacking any viral DNA in their core — caused inflammation and damage in both the arteries and lungs of mice exposed intratracheally.

    They then exposed healthy human endothelial cells to the same pseudovirus particles. Binding of these particles to endothelial ACE2 receptors led to mitochondrial damage and fragmentation in those endothelial cells, leading to the characteristic pathological changes in the associated tissue.

    This study makes it clear that spike protein alone, unassociated with the rest of the viral genome, is sufficient to cause the endothelial damage associated with COVID-19. The implications for vaccines intended to cause cells to manufacture the spike protein are clear and are an obvious cause for concern.”

    The COVID Shots Activate Latent Viruses

    As mentioned earlier, shingles infection is turning out to be a rather common side effect of the COVID shot, and like the neurological, vascular and cardiac damage we’re seeing, activation of latent viral infections was also predicted.

    One reason why latent viral infections are cropping up in response to the shots is because the shots disable your type I interferon pathway. A second reason is because your immune system is overburdened trying to deal with the inflammatory spike proteins flowing through your body. Something’s got to give, so latent viruses are allowed to break through.

    That’s not the end of your potential troubles, however, as these coinfections may worsen or accelerate other conditions, such as Bell’s Palsy, myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome.

    Herpes viruses, for example, have been implicated as a trigger of both AIDS and chronic fatigue syndrome. Some research suggests these diseases don’t appear until viruses from different families partner up and the type 1 interferon pathway is disabled.

    With all of that in mind, it seems inevitable that, long term, the COVID mass injection campaign will result in an avalanche of a wide range of debilitating chronic illnesses.


    References

    International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research May 10, 2021; 2(1): 38-79

    Townsend Letter December 9, 2021

    OpenVAERS data as of December 3, 2021

    OpenVAERS data as of December 3, 2021. For US only data, flip the selection switch at top

    OpenVAERS Adverse Event Reports Breakdown

    SKirsch.io/vaccine-resources

    Trial Site News December 8, 2021

    Trial Site News December 8, 2021

    European Heart Journal July 20, 2020: ehaa534

    Circulation Research 2021; 128: 1323-1326

    European Journal of Internal Medicine June 2020; 76:14-20

    Circulation Research 2021; 128: 1323-1326

    bioRxiv June 25, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.25.449905

    New American November 8, 2021 , video at circa 8 minutes

    New American November 8, 2021 , video at circa 8 minutes

    International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research May 10, 2021; 2(1): 402-444

    International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research May 10, 2021; 2(1): 402-444

    Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1996 37. Suppl B, 87-95

    ImmunoHorizons April 1, 2020

    Also watch embedded video here...

    https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/doctors-and-scientists-with-brian-hooker-phd/BNRAGEYxsF

    at 34:26 for discussion with Dr. Seneff by Dr. Brian Hooker of Children's Health Defense

  3. #3153
    Iridium Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    7,982
    Thanks
    1,301
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,857 Posts

    Re: Coronavirus

    refer to previous post number


    Join host Dr. Brian Hooker as he interviews guest Dr. Stephanie Seneff on all things glyphosate — in vaccines, in food, in every aspect of our lives. How does toxic glyphosate affect development of the brain and body? Can we heal ourselves from this poisoning? Who is profiting off of our deterioration in health? Watch to find out!

    https://live.childrenshealthdefense....phd/BNRAGEYxsF

    May 26, 2022

    ‘Doctors & Scientists’ With Brian Hooker, Ph.D.


    ‘Doctors & Scientists' Episode 30: Glyphosate’ Effect on the Microbiome, mRNA Entering the Human Genome + More Interview with Dr. Stephanie Seneff

    52:34 video runtime





    Join host Dr. Brian Hooker as he interviews guest Dr. Stephanie Seneff on all things glyphosate — in vaccines, in food, in every aspect of our lives. How does toxic glyphosate affect development of the brain and body? Can we heal ourselves from this poisoning? Who is profiting off of our deterioration in health? Watch to find out!

    https://live.childrenshealthdefense....phd/BNRAGEYxsF

    May 26, 2022

    ‘Doctors & Scientists’ With Brian Hooker, Ph.D.


    ‘Doctors & Scientists' Episode 30: Glyphosate’ Effect on the Microbiome, mRNA Entering the Human Genome + More Interview with Dr. Stephanie Seneff

    52:34 video runtime


    Please pay particular attention beginning at

    34:26

    mRNA used in the "COVID 19 vaccines" changes the mircobiome and the DNA permanently.

    the mRNA used in the vaccines is not the exact RNA that is in the "COVID 19 virus."

    Way too many spike proteins being manufactures depositing all over the body especially starting in the lymph nodes and then on from there.


    ___

    Dachsie comment:

    I could not find the "show notes" that go with this episode of Dr. Hookers show on CHD platform. Will keep looking as he gives links to Dr. Seneff's journal articles.

    This is a very important matter.

    The net take-away is that

    All of these Covid 19 vaccines should be stopped immediately.

    DO NO HARM

  4. #3154
    Iridium Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    7,982
    Thanks
    1,301
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,857 Posts

    Re: Coronavirus

    https://jamesfetzer.org/2022/05/as-monkeypox-cases-spread-report-shows-gates-foundation-who-pharma-execs-took-part-in-monkeypox-pandemic-simulation/

    As Monkeypox Cases Spread, Report Shows Gates Foundation, WHO, Pharma Execs Took Part in Monkeypox Pandemic ‘Simulation’

    May 29, 2022 James Fetzer





    Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

    The World Health Organization on Friday held an emergency meeting to discuss the outbreak of monkeypox after more than 100 cases were reported across 12 countries, as a report surfaced showing the Gates Foundation, WHO and Pharma execs in March 2021 conducted a monkeypox pandemic “simulation.”

    The World Health Organization (WHO) on Friday held an emergency meeting to discuss the outbreak of monkeypox after more than 100 cases were reported across 12 countries.

    Days before the WHO convened, the Biden administration placed a $119 million order for monkeypox vaccines after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed six people in the U.S. were being monitored for the viral infection, and one person had tested positive.

    Belgium on Sunday became the first country to introduce a compulsory 21-day quarantine for monkeypox patients after reporting four cases of the disease in the last week, Politico reported.

    The 100 newly reported cases, or suspected cases, garnered attention because many of them do not appear to be linked to travel to Africa, where in some regions, monkeypox is endemic.

    Cases were reported in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the U.K. No deaths are reported as of yet.

    The number of identified cases in Europe is a record, described by Germany’s armed forces medical services as “the largest and most widespread outbreak … ever seen in Europe,” while its spread in the U.K. was described as “unprecedented.”

    U.K. public health officials warned more monkeypox cases are being detected “on a daily basis” and that there “could be really significant numbers over the next two or three weeks,” though they did not specify what “numbers” would be considered “really significant.”

    The manner in which monkeypox may have spread — through sexual health services and sexual contact between men — also may have helped to heap attention on this new outbreak.

    Many of the recent cases were traced to two “superspreader” events that involved situations in which men came into close physical contact, including 30 monkeypox cases in Spain traced to a single adult sauna in Madrid.

    Monkeypox cases reported in Belgium appear to be connected to a recent gay “fetish festival.”

    For some, these developments may bring to mind the early onset of HIV, which at the time was connected to sexual contact among males, and to remarks by Dr. Anthony Fauci that he visited gay saunas and bars during the early years of the HIV outbreak to understand how the virus was spreading.

    WHO Europe regional director Hans Kluge last week expressed concerns about transmission at “mass gatherings, festivals, and parties.”

    However, other public health professionals said there is a low risk to the public and a low likelihood that the epidemic will last long.

    Meanwhile, questions are popping up about the similarity between a March 2021 tabletop “simulation” of a monkeypox outbreak and a similar simulation in 2019 — Event 201 — which correctly “predicted” the COVID-19 pandemic
    Monkeypox — what is it?

    Monkeypox was first discovered in 1958 in monkeys, although they are not the source of the virus. It was first identified in humans in 1970.

    The virus is particularly prevalent in Central and West Africa and is considered a rare zoonotic disease, which means that it is caused by germs that spread between animals and people.

    Monkeypox typically is spread by wild animals, such as in instances when a human is bitten or comes into contact with animal blood or bodily fluids. However, human-to-human transmission, while rare, is possible.

    The virus is known to enter the human body through broken skin, the respiratory tract, or the eyes, nose or mouth, for instance through large respiratory droplets or through contact — including sexual contact — with bodily fluids or lesions, or indirectly through contaminated clothing or linens.

    However, “common household disinfectants can kill it.”

    A prior outbreak — the first to occur outside of the African continent — occurred in the U.S. in 2003, linked to animals shipped to Texas from Ghana.

    And in July 2021, monkeypox was confirmed in a Texas individual who had returned to Dallas from Nigeria, according to the CDC.

    Symptoms of monkeypox infection tend to be mild, and include fever, rash and swollen lymph nodes, and occasionally intense headache, back pain, muscle aches, lack of energy and skin eruptions which can cause painful lesions, scabs or crusts.

    There are two strains of monkeypox: the West African and Central African strains. The latter is known as the deadlier of the two, but the cases identified in the recent outbreak all appear to have been caused by the milder West African strain.
    Did March 2021 ‘pandemic exercise’ predict monkeypox outbreak?

    In October 2019, just weeks before the outbreak of COVID-19, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, along with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, organized “Event 201,” a “high-level pandemic exercise” that mirrored what later followed with COVID-19 pandemic.

    In March 2021, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), in conjunction with the Munich Security Conference, held a “tabletop exercise on reducing high-consequence biological threats.”

    This “fictional exercise scenario” involved the simulation of “a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that first emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months.”

    According to NTI, this exercise, which was “[d]eveloped in consultation with technical and policy experts,” brought together “19 senior leaders and experts from across Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europe with decades of combined experience in public health, biotechnology industry, international security, and philanthropy.”

    The exercise culminated in a report, published November 2021, titled “Strengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats: Results from the 2021 Tabletop Exercise Conducted in Partnership with the Munich Security Conference.”

    This report contains key findings from the exercise, as well as “actionable recommendations for the international community.”

    The outcome of this “exercise scenario” found the fictional pandemic, “caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate biosafety and biosecurity provisions and weak oversight,” led to “more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide.”

    The fictional start date of the monkeypox pandemic in this exercise was May 15, 2022. The first European case of monkeypox was identified on May 7, 2022.

    Key findings from the report included:

    The “need” for “a more robust, transparent detection, evaluation, and early warning system that can rapidly communicate actionable information about pandemic risks.”
    “Gaps in national-level preparedness,” which will require national governments to “improve preparedness by developing national-level pandemic response plans built upon a coherent system of ‘triggers’ that prompt anticipatory action, despite uncertainty and near-term costs,” described as a “no-regrets” policymaking basis.
    “Gaps in biological research governance” in order to “meet today’s security requirements” and be “ready for significantly expanded challenges in the future.”
    “Insufficient financing of international preparedness for pandemics,” and a lack of financing for countries to “make the essential national investments in pandemic preparedness.”

    Key recommendations included:

    Bolstering international systems “for pandemic risk assessment, warning, and investigating outbreak origins,” calling upon the WHO to “establish a graded, transparent, international public health alert system” and the United Nations system to “establish a new mechanism for investigating high-consequence biological events of unknown origin.”
    The development and implementation of “national-level triggers for early, proactive pandemic response,” including the adaptation of the “no-regrets” approach to responding to pandemics via “anticipatory action” based on “triggers” that would automatically generate a response to “high-consequence biological events.”
    The establishment of “an international entity dedicated to reducing emerging biological risks associated with rapid technology advances,” that would “support interventions throughout the bioscience and biotechnology research and development life cycle — from funding, through execution, and on to publication or commercialization.”
    The development of “a catalytic global health security fund to accelerate pandemic preparedness capacity building in countries around the world,” which would include “[n]ational leaders, development banks, philanthropic donors, and the private sector” with the aim of establishing and funding “a new financing mechanism to bolster global health security and pandemic preparedness” and that would incentivize “national governments to invest in their own preparedness over the long term.”
    The establishment of “a robust international process to tackle the challenge of supply chain resilience,” based on a “high-level panel’ that would be convened by the UN secretary-general “to develop recommendations for critical measures to bolster global supply chain resilience for medical and public health supplies.”

    The above recommendations were borne out in practice during the simulated monkeypox pandemic scenario.

    As stated in the report:

    “In national pandemic response plans, specific readiness measures would be ‘triggered’ based on factors related to the potential severity of the outbreak, expected delays in situational awareness, and the time it would take to implement response measures and see results.”

    What would be “triggered” bears a remarkable similarity to the COVID-19-related measures of the past two-plus years.

    The report states:

    “Although triggered actions would vary depending upon the particular needs of the country, in most cases the goals are the same: slow the spread of disease to buy time and flatten the epidemiological curve, while using that time to scale up public health and medical systems to keep up with growing caseloads and save lives.

    “NPIs [non-pharmaceutical interventions] such as mask mandates and ceasing mass gatherings were deemed to be critical for blocking chains of disease transmission.

    “Participants generally did not endorse travel restrictions such as border closures, but travel health screening measures [i.e., vaccine passports] were viewed as valuable.”

    According to the results of the simulated scenario, the fictional countries that “prioritized keeping their economies open, undertaking little-to-no NPIs, and downplaying the virus and its potential impacts … have experienced much worse outcomes in terms of illness and mortality” than those fictional countries that “promptly adopted aggressive measures to slow virus transmission,” such as “shutting down mass gatherings, imposing social-distancing measures, and implementing mask mandates,” in addition to establishing “large-scale testing and contact-tracing operations.”
    Gates Foundation, pharma execs, WHO participated in monkeypox pandemic simulation

    Who took part in the NTI’s monkeypox pandemic simulation?

    Key participants included:

    Dr. Ruxandra Draghia-Akli, global head of Johnson & Johnson Global Public Health R&D and Janssen Research & Development.
    Dr. Chris Elias, president of the global development division of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
    Dr. George Gao, director-general of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (the Chinese CDC).
    Dr. Margaret (Peggy) A. Hamburg, interim vice president for global biological policy and programs at NTI, a member of the global health scientific advisory committee for the Gates Foundation and a member of the board of GAVI-The Vaccine Alliance.
    Sam Nunn, a former U.S. senator who is the founder and co-chair of NTI.
    Dr. Michael Ryan, executive director of the WHO Health Emergencies Program and a highly visible figure during COVID-19 times.
    Dr. Petra Wicklandt, head of corporate affairs for Merck.

    Several of the participants listed above also “participated” in Event 201.

    The authors of the report also stand out for their background.

    For example, Dr. Jaime M. Yassif, vice president of NTI global biological policy and programs, holds a Ph.D. in biophysics from the University of California-Berkeley and a master’s degree in science and security from the King’s College, London, war studies department.

    Yassif previously led the initiative on biosecurity and pandemic preparedness at the Open Philanthropy Project, including the management of nearly $40 million in biosecurity grants, the “initiation of new biosecurity work in China and India,” and “establishment of the Global Health Security Index.”

    She also previously advised the U.S. Department of Defense on science and technology policy and worked on the Global Health Security Agenda at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Co-author Chris Isaac, program officer for NTI’s Global Biological Policy and Programs team, “has been involved with synthetic biology through the Internationally Genetically Engineered Machines Competition since the start of his scientific career” and “is an alumnus of the Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity Fellowship at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.”

    The report is the product of a partnership between NTI, co-founded by Nunn and Ted Turner, and the Munich Security Conference.

    Both NTI ($3.5 million, for “vaccine development”) and the Munich Security conference ($1.2 million) received funding from the Gates Foundation.

    The report itself was funded by the Open Philanthropy project, one of whose main funders is Dustin Moscovitz, co-founder of Facebook along with Mark Zuckerberg.

    Open Philanthropy, over the past decade, has provided donations and grants to the following entities and for the following purposes:

    $166.9 million for “global health.”
    $90.2 million for “biosecurity and pandemic preparedness.”
    $18 million for “global catastrophic risks.”
    $40.2 to Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
    $17.9 to NTI.
    $2.2 to The Guardian.
    $1.6 to Rockefeller University.

    Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at center of multiple tabletop exercises

    NTI and the Munich Security Conference are not new to “tabletop exercises” — their report highlights previous simulations, including a 2019 report titled “A Spreading Plague,” and a 2020 report titled “Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological Risks.”

    Other simulations in the recent past, in addition to Event 201, include:

    Operation Dark Winter (June 2001, less than three months before the 9/11 attacks and subsequent anthrax scare, “examining the national security, intergovernmental, and information challenges of a biological attack on the American homeland”).
    Operation Atlantic Storm (January 2005, “designed to mimic a summit of transatlantic leaders forced to respond to a bioterrorist attack”).
    The Clade X exercise (May 2018, “to illustrate high-level strategic decisions and policies that the United States and the world will need to pursue in order to prevent a pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail”). Yassif helped develop the Clade X exercise.

    The common denominator among all of these simulations? The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, which published a document titled “The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028,” comprising “a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future.”

    Predictions for the future don’t end there, however. For instance, in September 2017, NTI and the WEF organized a roundtable discussion on the current state of biological risks presented by technology advancement in light of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

    And in January 2020, NTI and the WEF again joined forces, issuing a report titled “Biosecurity Innovation and Risk Reduction: A Global Framework for Accessible, Safe and Secure DNA Synthesis.”

    According to the report:

    “Rapid advancements in commercially available DNA synthesis technologies — used for example to artificially create gene sequences for clinical diagnosis and treatment — pose growing risks, with the potential to cause a catastrophic biological security threat if accidentally or deliberately misused.”

    Merck, whose head of corporate affairs participated in the monkeypox simulation, was the subject of an FBI and CDC investigation in November 2021 regarding 15 suspicious vials labeled “smallpox” at a Merck facility in Philadelphia.
    Bill Gates no stranger to predicting the future

    Bill Gates has himself been remarkably prescient with his predictions of future events.

    Here are some of Gates’ predictions:

    In a November 2015 TED talk, he stated “[i]f anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes.”
    In a 2017 speech at that year’s Munich Security Conference, he said “the next epidemic could originate on the computer screen of a terrorist intent on using genetic engineering to create a synthetic version of the smallpox virus,” arguing in favor of the merger of “health security” and “international security.”
    In May 2021, Gates said “[s]omebody who wants to cause damage could engineer a virus so that the cost, the chance of running into this is more than that of naturally-caused epidemics such as the current one … [t]he ways the humans interact with other species, these viruses are coming across the species barriers whether it’s bats or monkeys.”
    In November 2021, Gates publicly pondered, “[y]ou say, OK, what if a bioterrorist brought smallpox to 10 airports? You know, how would the world respond to that? There’s naturally-caused epidemics and bioterrorism-caused epidemics that could even be way worse than what we experienced today.”
    In February 2022, Gates warned that the next pandemic “… won’t necessarily be a coronavirus or even the flu. It is likely to be a respiratory virus. Because, with all the human travel we have now, that’s the one that can spread in such a rapid way,” emphasizing the significance of providing sufficient funds to the private sector and academia to build better vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics.
    Earlier this month, Gates called for the development of a so-called “Global Epidemic Response and Mobilization” (GERM) initiative, stating that present WHO funding was “not at all serious about pandemics” and that $1 billion a year would be needed to operate this initiative.
    Also this month, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced “a new financial commitment of up to US$125 million to help end the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future pandemics,” with much of the money going toward “strengthening health systems in low-income countries, enhancing integrated disease monitoring, expanding access to pandemic tools, and helping countries manage COVID-19 alongside other pressing health needs.”
    In his new book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic,” Gates argues that, despite COVID fatigue, the world must focus on preparing for future pandemics, regardless of whether a disease is circulating.


    Tweet
    See new Tweets
    Conversation
    Robert F. Kennedy Jr
    @RobertKennedyJr
    Thanks #JamesCorbett for reading Bill Gates’ new book so we don't have to!




    8:07 AM · May 13, 2022

  5. #3155
    Iridium Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    7,982
    Thanks
    1,301
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,857 Posts

    Re: Coronavirus

    https://jamesfetzer.org/2022/05/as-monkeypox-cases-spread-report-shows-gates-foundation-who-pharma-execs-took-part-in-monkeypox-pandemic-simulation/

    As Monkeypox Cases Spread, Report Shows Gates Foundation, WHO, Pharma Execs Took Part in Monkeypox Pandemic ‘Simulation’

    May 29, 2022 James Fetzer





    Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

    The World Health Organization on Friday held an emergency meeting to discuss the outbreak of monkeypox after more than 100 cases were reported across 12 countries, as a report surfaced showing the Gates Foundation, WHO and Pharma execs in March 2021 conducted a monkeypox pandemic “simulation.”

    The World Health Organization (WHO) on Friday held an emergency meeting to discuss the outbreak of monkeypox after more than 100 cases were reported across 12 countries.

    Days before the WHO convened, the Biden administration placed a $119 million order for monkeypox vaccines after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed six people in the U.S. were being monitored for the viral infection, and one person had tested positive.

    Belgium on Sunday became the first country to introduce a compulsory 21-day quarantine for monkeypox patients after reporting four cases of the disease in the last week, Politico reported.

    The 100 newly reported cases, or suspected cases, garnered attention because many of them do not appear to be linked to travel to Africa, where in some regions, monkeypox is endemic.

    Cases were reported in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the U.K. No deaths are reported as of yet.

    The number of identified cases in Europe is a record, described by Germany’s armed forces medical services as “the largest and most widespread outbreak … ever seen in Europe,” while its spread in the U.K. was described as “unprecedented.”

    U.K. public health officials warned more monkeypox cases are being detected “on a daily basis” and that there “could be really significant numbers over the next two or three weeks,” though they did not specify what “numbers” would be considered “really significant.”

    The manner in which monkeypox may have spread — through sexual health services and sexual contact between men — also may have helped to heap attention on this new outbreak.

    Many of the recent cases were traced to two “superspreader” events that involved situations in which men came into close physical contact, including 30 monkeypox cases in Spain traced to a single adult sauna in Madrid.

    Monkeypox cases reported in Belgium appear to be connected to a recent gay “fetish festival.”

    For some, these developments may bring to mind the early onset of HIV, which at the time was connected to sexual contact among males, and to remarks by Dr. Anthony Fauci that he visited gay saunas and bars during the early years of the HIV outbreak to understand how the virus was spreading.

    WHO Europe regional director Hans Kluge last week expressed concerns about transmission at “mass gatherings, festivals, and parties.”

    However, other public health professionals said there is a low risk to the public and a low likelihood that the epidemic will last long.

    Meanwhile, questions are popping up about the similarity between a March 2021 tabletop “simulation” of a monkeypox outbreak and a similar simulation in 2019 — Event 201 — which correctly “predicted” the COVID-19 pandemic
    Monkeypox — what is it?

    Monkeypox was first discovered in 1958 in monkeys, although they are not the source of the virus. It was first identified in humans in 1970.

    The virus is particularly prevalent in Central and West Africa and is considered a rare zoonotic disease, which means that it is caused by germs that spread between animals and people.

    Monkeypox typically is spread by wild animals, such as in instances when a human is bitten or comes into contact with animal blood or bodily fluids. However, human-to-human transmission, while rare, is possible.

    The virus is known to enter the human body through broken skin, the respiratory tract, or the eyes, nose or mouth, for instance through large respiratory droplets or through contact — including sexual contact — with bodily fluids or lesions, or indirectly through contaminated clothing or linens.

    However, “common household disinfectants can kill it.”

    A prior outbreak — the first to occur outside of the African continent — occurred in the U.S. in 2003, linked to animals shipped to Texas from Ghana.

    And in July 2021, monkeypox was confirmed in a Texas individual who had returned to Dallas from Nigeria, according to the CDC.

    Symptoms of monkeypox infection tend to be mild, and include fever, rash and swollen lymph nodes, and occasionally intense headache, back pain, muscle aches, lack of energy and skin eruptions which can cause painful lesions, scabs or crusts.

    There are two strains of monkeypox: the West African and Central African strains. The latter is known as the deadlier of the two, but the cases identified in the recent outbreak all appear to have been caused by the milder West African strain.
    Did March 2021 ‘pandemic exercise’ predict monkeypox outbreak?

    In October 2019, just weeks before the outbreak of COVID-19, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, along with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, organized “Event 201,” a “high-level pandemic exercise” that mirrored what later followed with COVID-19 pandemic.

    In March 2021, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), in conjunction with the Munich Security Conference, held a “tabletop exercise on reducing high-consequence biological threats.”

    This “fictional exercise scenario” involved the simulation of “a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that first emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months.”

    According to NTI, this exercise, which was “[d]eveloped in consultation with technical and policy experts,” brought together “19 senior leaders and experts from across Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europe with decades of combined experience in public health, biotechnology industry, international security, and philanthropy.”

    The exercise culminated in a report, published November 2021, titled “Strengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats: Results from the 2021 Tabletop Exercise Conducted in Partnership with the Munich Security Conference.”

    This report contains key findings from the exercise, as well as “actionable recommendations for the international community.”

    The outcome of this “exercise scenario” found the fictional pandemic, “caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate biosafety and biosecurity provisions and weak oversight,” led to “more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide.”

    The fictional start date of the monkeypox pandemic in this exercise was May 15, 2022. The first European case of monkeypox was identified on May 7, 2022.

    Key findings from the report included:

    The “need” for “a more robust, transparent detection, evaluation, and early warning system that can rapidly communicate actionable information about pandemic risks.”
    “Gaps in national-level preparedness,” which will require national governments to “improve preparedness by developing national-level pandemic response plans built upon a coherent system of ‘triggers’ that prompt anticipatory action, despite uncertainty and near-term costs,” described as a “no-regrets” policymaking basis.
    “Gaps in biological research governance” in order to “meet today’s security requirements” and be “ready for significantly expanded challenges in the future.”
    “Insufficient financing of international preparedness for pandemics,” and a lack of financing for countries to “make the essential national investments in pandemic preparedness.”

    Key recommendations included:

    Bolstering international systems “for pandemic risk assessment, warning, and investigating outbreak origins,” calling upon the WHO to “establish a graded, transparent, international public health alert system” and the United Nations system to “establish a new mechanism for investigating high-consequence biological events of unknown origin.”
    The development and implementation of “national-level triggers for early, proactive pandemic response,” including the adaptation of the “no-regrets” approach to responding to pandemics via “anticipatory action” based on “triggers” that would automatically generate a response to “high-consequence biological events.”
    The establishment of “an international entity dedicated to reducing emerging biological risks associated with rapid technology advances,” that would “support interventions throughout the bioscience and biotechnology research and development life cycle — from funding, through execution, and on to publication or commercialization.”
    The development of “a catalytic global health security fund to accelerate pandemic preparedness capacity building in countries around the world,” which would include “[n]ational leaders, development banks, philanthropic donors, and the private sector” with the aim of establishing and funding “a new financing mechanism to bolster global health security and pandemic preparedness” and that would incentivize “national governments to invest in their own preparedness over the long term.”
    The establishment of “a robust international process to tackle the challenge of supply chain resilience,” based on a “high-level panel’ that would be convened by the UN secretary-general “to develop recommendations for critical measures to bolster global supply chain resilience for medical and public health supplies.”

    The above recommendations were borne out in practice during the simulated monkeypox pandemic scenario.

    As stated in the report:

    “In national pandemic response plans, specific readiness measures would be ‘triggered’ based on factors related to the potential severity of the outbreak, expected delays in situational awareness, and the time it would take to implement response measures and see results.”

    What would be “triggered” bears a remarkable similarity to the COVID-19-related measures of the past two-plus years.

    The report states:

    “Although triggered actions would vary depending upon the particular needs of the country, in most cases the goals are the same: slow the spread of disease to buy time and flatten the epidemiological curve, while using that time to scale up public health and medical systems to keep up with growing caseloads and save lives.

    “NPIs [non-pharmaceutical interventions] such as mask mandates and ceasing mass gatherings were deemed to be critical for blocking chains of disease transmission.

    “Participants generally did not endorse travel restrictions such as border closures, but travel health screening measures [i.e., vaccine passports] were viewed as valuable.”

    According to the results of the simulated scenario, the fictional countries that “prioritized keeping their economies open, undertaking little-to-no NPIs, and downplaying the virus and its potential impacts … have experienced much worse outcomes in terms of illness and mortality” than those fictional countries that “promptly adopted aggressive measures to slow virus transmission,” such as “shutting down mass gatherings, imposing social-distancing measures, and implementing mask mandates,” in addition to establishing “large-scale testing and contact-tracing operations.”
    Gates Foundation, pharma execs, WHO participated in monkeypox pandemic simulation

    Who took part in the NTI’s monkeypox pandemic simulation?

    Key participants included:

    Dr. Ruxandra Draghia-Akli, global head of Johnson & Johnson Global Public Health R&D and Janssen Research & Development.
    Dr. Chris Elias, president of the global development division of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
    Dr. George Gao, director-general of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (the Chinese CDC).
    Dr. Margaret (Peggy) A. Hamburg, interim vice president for global biological policy and programs at NTI, a member of the global health scientific advisory committee for the Gates Foundation and a member of the board of GAVI-The Vaccine Alliance.
    Sam Nunn, a former U.S. senator who is the founder and co-chair of NTI.
    Dr. Michael Ryan, executive director of the WHO Health Emergencies Program and a highly visible figure during COVID-19 times.
    Dr. Petra Wicklandt, head of corporate affairs for Merck.

    Several of the participants listed above also “participated” in Event 201.

    The authors of the report also stand out for their background.

    For example, Dr. Jaime M. Yassif, vice president of NTI global biological policy and programs, holds a Ph.D. in biophysics from the University of California-Berkeley and a master’s degree in science and security from the King’s College, London, war studies department.

    Yassif previously led the initiative on biosecurity and pandemic preparedness at the Open Philanthropy Project, including the management of nearly $40 million in biosecurity grants, the “initiation of new biosecurity work in China and India,” and “establishment of the Global Health Security Index.”

    She also previously advised the U.S. Department of Defense on science and technology policy and worked on the Global Health Security Agenda at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Co-author Chris Isaac, program officer for NTI’s Global Biological Policy and Programs team, “has been involved with synthetic biology through the Internationally Genetically Engineered Machines Competition since the start of his scientific career” and “is an alumnus of the Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity Fellowship at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.”

    The report is the product of a partnership between NTI, co-founded by Nunn and Ted Turner, and the Munich Security Conference.

    Both NTI ($3.5 million, for “vaccine development”) and the Munich Security conference ($1.2 million) received funding from the Gates Foundation.

    The report itself was funded by the Open Philanthropy project, one of whose main funders is Dustin Moscovitz, co-founder of Facebook along with Mark Zuckerberg.

    Open Philanthropy, over the past decade, has provided donations and grants to the following entities and for the following purposes:

    $166.9 million for “global health.”
    $90.2 million for “biosecurity and pandemic preparedness.”
    $18 million for “global catastrophic risks.”
    $40.2 to Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.
    $17.9 to NTI.
    $2.2 to The Guardian.
    $1.6 to Rockefeller University.

    Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at center of multiple tabletop exercises

    NTI and the Munich Security Conference are not new to “tabletop exercises” — their report highlights previous simulations, including a 2019 report titled “A Spreading Plague,” and a 2020 report titled “Preventing Global Catastrophic Biological Risks.”

    Other simulations in the recent past, in addition to Event 201, include:

    Operation Dark Winter (June 2001, less than three months before the 9/11 attacks and subsequent anthrax scare, “examining the national security, intergovernmental, and information challenges of a biological attack on the American homeland”).
    Operation Atlantic Storm (January 2005, “designed to mimic a summit of transatlantic leaders forced to respond to a bioterrorist attack”).
    The Clade X exercise (May 2018, “to illustrate high-level strategic decisions and policies that the United States and the world will need to pursue in order to prevent a pandemic or diminish its consequences should prevention fail”). Yassif helped develop the Clade X exercise.

    The common denominator among all of these simulations? The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, which published a document titled “The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028,” comprising “a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future.”

    Predictions for the future don’t end there, however. For instance, in September 2017, NTI and the WEF organized a roundtable discussion on the current state of biological risks presented by technology advancement in light of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

    And in January 2020, NTI and the WEF again joined forces, issuing a report titled “Biosecurity Innovation and Risk Reduction: A Global Framework for Accessible, Safe and Secure DNA Synthesis.”

    According to the report:

    “Rapid advancements in commercially available DNA synthesis technologies — used for example to artificially create gene sequences for clinical diagnosis and treatment — pose growing risks, with the potential to cause a catastrophic biological security threat if accidentally or deliberately misused.”

    Merck, whose head of corporate affairs participated in the monkeypox simulation, was the subject of an FBI and CDC investigation in November 2021 regarding 15 suspicious vials labeled “smallpox” at a Merck facility in Philadelphia.
    Bill Gates no stranger to predicting the future

    Bill Gates has himself been remarkably prescient with his predictions of future events.

    Here are some of Gates’ predictions:

    In a November 2015 TED talk, he stated “[i]f anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes.”
    In a 2017 speech at that year’s Munich Security Conference, he said “the next epidemic could originate on the computer screen of a terrorist intent on using genetic engineering to create a synthetic version of the smallpox virus,” arguing in favor of the merger of “health security” and “international security.”
    In May 2021, Gates said “[s]omebody who wants to cause damage could engineer a virus so that the cost, the chance of running into this is more than that of naturally-caused epidemics such as the current one … [t]he ways the humans interact with other species, these viruses are coming across the species barriers whether it’s bats or monkeys.”
    In November 2021, Gates publicly pondered, “[y]ou say, OK, what if a bioterrorist brought smallpox to 10 airports? You know, how would the world respond to that? There’s naturally-caused epidemics and bioterrorism-caused epidemics that could even be way worse than what we experienced today.”
    In February 2022, Gates warned that the next pandemic “… won’t necessarily be a coronavirus or even the flu. It is likely to be a respiratory virus. Because, with all the human travel we have now, that’s the one that can spread in such a rapid way,” emphasizing the significance of providing sufficient funds to the private sector and academia to build better vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics.
    Earlier this month, Gates called for the development of a so-called “Global Epidemic Response and Mobilization” (GERM) initiative, stating that present WHO funding was “not at all serious about pandemics” and that $1 billion a year would be needed to operate this initiative.
    Also this month, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced “a new financial commitment of up to US$125 million to help end the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future pandemics,” with much of the money going toward “strengthening health systems in low-income countries, enhancing integrated disease monitoring, expanding access to pandemic tools, and helping countries manage COVID-19 alongside other pressing health needs.”
    In his new book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic,” Gates argues that, despite COVID fatigue, the world must focus on preparing for future pandemics, regardless of whether a disease is circulating.


    Tweet
    See new Tweets
    Conversation
    Robert F. Kennedy Jr
    @RobertKennedyJr
    Thanks #JamesCorbett for reading Bill Gates’ new book so we don't have to!




    8:07 AM · May 13, 2022

  6. #3156
    Iridium Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    7,982
    Thanks
    1,301
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,857 Posts

    Re: Coronavirus

    https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/pf...-data-dump?s=r

    Pfizer's New 80,000-Page Data Dump Is A Nightmare

    Pfizer tested their COVID vaccine on rats and then let pregnant women take it

    Emerald Robinson

    May 5 2022


    You probably didn’t know that Pfizer dumped 80,000 pages of documents this week.

    That’s because the American corporate media refused to cover it — and that’s because almost all of them took money from the Biden regime to promote the experimental vaccines and kill any critical coverage of them.

    Anyway, it turns out that Pfizer’s COVID vaccine was not 95% effective: the data shows it has a 12% efficacy rate.




    Let me repeat: 12%. That’s a “1” followed by a “2.”

    But wait: it gets worse.

    There were no human clinical trials to determine if the experimental COVID vaccines were safe for pregnant women. They were excluded from all the trials.

    None. Zero. Zilch. Nada.

    Instead, they tested it on 44 rats.


    Twitter avatar for @seancondevSean Conway - UAP ���� ACT Bean Candidate @seancondev
    What was the basis for Pfizer and the FDA to declare the mRNA vaccine ‘safe and effective’ for pregnant and breastfeeding women?


    Just 44 rats.

    May 4th 2022
    2,203 Retweets3,271 Likes

    Pfizer deliberately cut off the clinical data trial before the bad news could be collected. We already know that Pfizer vaccine’s RNA is reverse-transcribing itself into your DNA. We already know that the vaccines increased the risk of getting COVID in children, the CDC intentionally withheld clinical data from the public, and a Moderna gene sequence patented in 2017 was found in the COVID virus spike protein.
    Twitter avatar for @CramerSezCramerSez @CramerSez
    #PfizerDump #Pfizer #BREAKING #BreakingNews

    PFIZER DATA DUMP PROVES THEY KNEW DRUG WAS ONLY 12% EFFECTIVE, AT BEST.

    embedded video in tweet

    They also knew it could cause harm to the unborn.

    May 3rd 2022
    200 Retweets304 Likes

    Pregnant women in the U.S. military who were coerced into taking the jab have suffered horrific side effects and “congenital malformations” in their babies. There were more than 18,900 babies born with abnormalities in 2021.

    We know this because a few brave whistleblowers got their hands on the Deparment of Defense’s medical database.

    Twitter avatar for @seancondevSean Conway - UAP ���� ACT Bean Candidate @seancondev
    What was the basis for Pfizer and the FDA to declare the mRNA vaccine ‘safe and effective’ for pregnant and breastfeeding women?

    Just 44 rats.

    May 4th 2022
    2,203 Retweets3,271 Likes

    More than 18,900 babies. Just think about that.

    There’s much more news to come out about the COVID vaccines — and all of it is bad. For example, doctors around the world are starting to notice an explosion in the cancer rates among the vaccinated.

    Twitter avatar for @Psu10231Psu1023 @Psu10231
    Covid Vaccines are causing cancer.

    embedded video

    May 3rd 2022
    1 Retweet1 Like

    Like I said: lots of doctors are noticing that cancers are increasing dramatically. Here’s a chart with data pulled from VAERS that will make your heart sink.



    Let me finish with this thought: perhaps it wasn’t a good idea to re-program the DNA of half the world to produce spike proteins to “fight” a virus with a 99% survival rate?

  7. #3157
    Iridium Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    7,982
    Thanks
    1,301
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,857 Posts

    Re: Coronavirus

    https://vaticancatholic.com/after-mo...-new-pandemic/

    "After monkeypox, leopardpox simulation – G7 health ministers simulate new pandemic"

    detv.usMay 27, 20220 Comments



    The German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (SPD) is hosting the meeting of the health ministers of the G7 countries for two days. The “Leopard Pox” scenario is intended to simulate the outbreak of a pandemic at the conference. The Bild newspaper came into possession of the “documents for the exercise of the ministers”... The text says:

    “On Thursday, the seven ministers will meet with Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (59, SPD) in Berlin and play through the course of a smallpox pandemic in 2023.”

    Karl Lauterbach formulated in a press conference on May 18:

    “My colleagues and I are promoting that we conclude a pandemic pact, this pandemic pact should be able to identify future outbreaks more quickly and react to them more effectively.”

    The results of this upcoming “pandemic pact” require a separate and thorough analytical work-up. So-called business games have already been carried out regularly over the past few years by interested groups from the world of politics, science, money and philanthropy. However, rather unnoticed by the public. Due to the corona crisis and the constantly growing need of many people to understand the connections, the reasons and motivations of the politically prescribed catalog of measures, they became the focus of attention. So investigative journalists could proven pandemic simulation games of the above groups. These had names like:

    Dark Winter (2001), Global Mercury (2003), Atlantic Storm (2005), Clade X (2018), the pivotal Event 201 (October 2019), based on the events of the previous two years and SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028 (May 2020)

    The name of the current simulation game in Berlin is “Scenario ‘Leopard Pox'”. The script reads: “The organization announces a ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern'”. “The Organization” can only mean the World Health Organization (WHO).

    The scenario begins with the event “a leopard bites a human, transmits a dangerous smallpox virus to him”. Unfortunately, since the picture article does not reveal where the encounter between animal and human took place (in the zoo, on a safari hunt, by a Bundeswehr mascot, a Animal Armor Unit?), research shows that most leopards today live in sub-Saharan Africa. According to estimates, only about 14,000 of these assumed smallpox carriers still live in India.

    The “infection caused by the bite then spreads extremely quickly and from person to person worldwide. In three short videos, the ministers are given a description of possible developments in the pandemic. Then they each have around 25 minutes to discuss,” according to further details from the Scenario Paper. At the one mentioned event 201 it sounded like this in 2019:

    “The disease starts on Brazilian pig farms, quietly and slowly at first, but then spreads faster and faster in healthcare facilities. If it spreads efficiently from person to person in the low-income, densely populated neighborhoods of some South American megacities, the epidemic will explode. It will initially exported by air to Portugal, the United States and China, and then to many other countries.”

    The cited paper then goes on to say:

    “The World Health Organization (WHO) names the new disease in the scenario ‘Leopard Pox’. The organization announces a ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern'”.

    Leopard pox is not real. They’re a fiction, they don’t exist. On the other hand, the monkeypox that has just surfaced in the media certainly does. How did the scriptwriters of the scenario come up with the idea of ​​naming it?...

    The image article spoils the end of the “leopard pox” scenario. It is not really innovative or surprising in the solution model, but it reflects the attitude of the authors of the G7 paper:

    “Twelve weeks after the virus was discovered, there is hope in the scenario: A vaccine is being developed. But: The “leopard pox” apparently causes long-term damage, and many people continue to die from the virus.”

    embedded video

    6:23:47

    Australia Enslaved & The Plan for the World



    Video also on Rumble here


    G7 Health Ministers will launch their next pandemic after completing simulation exercises.

  8. #3158
    Iridium Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    7,982
    Thanks
    1,301
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,857 Posts

    Re: Coronavirus

    New VAERS Data as of May 20, 2022 (posted May 27, 2022)

    30,749 Deaths and 1,365,996 Adverse Events

    28,312 Pfizer/Moderna and 2,437 J&J Deaths

    PLUS 1,277,980 Pfizer / Moderna and 88,016 J&J Adverse Events


    _____

    Source:
    https://www.drtenpenny.com/newslette...comp-l3rz734w1

  9. #3159
    Iridium Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    7,982
    Thanks
    1,301
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,857 Posts

    Re: Coronavirus


    Dachsie comment:
    Sorry for long comment but just thought my thoughts should be posted. I respect Dr. Mikovits and I did not like the video channel's negative commentary.

    I am posting this just to allow for videos displaying many different perspectives on this topic, kind of a library thread here.
    I only listened to the first few minutes of this and noticed there were snarky commentary words displayed on top of the actual video.

    My personal main concern is what doctors are doing the most to help very sick people right now. Most of those doctors are okay with the whole concept of vaccines and vaccines are always for viruses.

    But most of those doctors who are actually helping to save sick people's lives right now are, though not "anti-vax", are not in favor at all of the current COVID-19 vaccines, none of them, all of them.

    Dr. Kaufman, from the few minutes I listened appears to know exactly what questions and how to ask them of Dr. Mikovits. Dr. Kaufman is a psychiatrist who is no longer in practice as I understand it. He and Dr. Thomas Cowan are very focused on whether the SARS-COV-2 / COVID-19 pathogen has been scientifically isolated. Their work so far has led them so far to conclude that this pathogen has never been isolated from a sick human being's bodily samples.

    They also do not believe there is such a thing as a virus at all. They do not accept the Edward Jenner "Germ theory". Though these two M.D.s do not say much about vaccines, I would say it follows that if they do not believe in the "germ theory" and in the existence of any virus then they do not believe in vaccines because vaccines to my knowledge are only for the immunization against viruses.

    While the many articles and videos I've taken in over the last two years have made me keep coming down to the questions of what basically is the "pathogen" referred to as SARS-COV-2 and COVID-19, so naturally I find Dr. Kaufman's and Dr. Cowan's work very interesting.

    My study also so far has made it clear to me that there are very few "sure" disease diagnoses with sure clear treatment protocols. The practice of medicine very much depends on the research and publications of medical and science journals. That was also enlightening to me.

    I just have to take what sounds right to me, no matter what the position of the author or doctor or scientist, and leave aside what does not sound right to me. Again, I care about those doctors who are working directly with patients to try to save their lives and make them well and do no harm.

    The reality is that many unvaccinated people got very very sick with a respiratory illness.
    We can't go by the book on this illness because it is not acting like how we have been taught a bad virus acts.
    The new hospitalist doctors and hospital treatment protocols have made it very difficult for the good caring doctors to practice medicine in my opinion.
    There is increasing evidence that if there is one pathogen at the basis of all of this that it is a pathogen created in a laboratory and not a natural pathogen and contagion that a human contracts in any of the known ways.
    There is something very odd and irregular about this pathogen.

    We have experienced extreme totalitarian dictates and rules and censorship from our government which have greatly hindered the saving of lives, and of course, as always, the mainstream media plays the same old "presstitute" role it has for nigh unto a century in the USA, offering no helpful reliable information at all to the public.

    ____________________________





    https://www.bitchute.com/video/HOo7mnMgVw2g/

    Judy Mikovits Is Discredited

    First published at 17:55 UTC on May 29th, 2022.

    25:44 video runtime


    channel image

    XANDREWX

    One of the United States Minor Outlying Islands

    24611 subscribers

  10. #3160
    Iridium Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    7,982
    Thanks
    1,301
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,857 Posts

    Re: Coronavirus



    https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/solvi...urce=email&s=r

    See original source for full hyperlinks.

    Solving the World's Problems Over a Beer (PBR?)

    Yes, I am being sarcastic and obnoxious here




    Tom Renz
    May 30

    So how is it going for you? I’m a bit annoyed. Over the last several weeks the O’Biden war on America has escalated. Clearly, I am not suggesting the nearly universal attacks on all traditional American values and institutions are intentional (insert eye-roll here), but there are just a few minor issues that seem to make that possible. Things like pushing gender identity garbage on kids so young they shouldn’t even know what sex is, the COVID death jabs, the demonizing of masculinity, school shootings, gas prices and inflation in general, the upcoming food crisis, massive election fraud, censorship, and dozen other issues are clearly all Russia’s fault but they do constitute negatives. So, given these little speedbumps our nation is facing I decided to put on my beer dispensing cap (a red one with a beer can on each side and straws running to my mouth) and figure out some real clever solutions… stuff that O’Biden and the numerous PhD level advisors he has must be overlooking.

    I want to start out with one of the toughest problems to solve - gas prices. It’s obvious to anyone watching that the high gas prices in America are solely because of the Russian/Ukrainian conflict and that this is completely out of O’Biden’s hands. Clearly, we the people cannot fathom the complexity of this situation (you know - we do not have enough oil but to get more we need to drill), but I think I have a solution. What if, instead of doing everything possible to put regulatory hurdles in front of oil companies we drilled for American oil? I know that probably sounds silly because even though we have the largest oil reserves in the world (look here), they are way under the ground so that makes them hard to get but who knows what would happen if we tried.

    One of the other issues that seems to have come out of nowhere is the mental health problems that keep arising in kids. I simply cannot understand where these issues are coming from. With all that we have done to introduce transgender studies to kindergartners, teaching all kids that they are racist with CRT, and telling all male kids that they are evil because they are male, I would think kids would be doing great. This combined with telling kids that there is no right and wrong and destroying families seems like it should make life great for kids. But, since we still have these baffling issues I will propose a - slurp (sorry taking a drink from my beer dispensing cap) solution. What if, slurp - sorry another drink, what if we let kids be kids and avoided grooming them, let parents teach kids about sex in whatever way they chose, stopped telling boys they should not be boys, and avoided teaching kids to be racists? If we really wanted to be crazy, maybe we could even tell kids that some things are right and some are wrong (you know, like slavery is wrong and helping people in need is right).

    You know, this beer dispensing cap may be making me crazy, but what if along with my crazy ideas above, we also took some steps to stop these school shootings? Clearly the only smart way to do that is with gun control, but I have my hat on and am leaning a different direction. What if we did something radical and secured the entrances to the schools? We could go all in and hire armed vets as guards or maybe we lock the doors and not buzz people in that are carrying guns. I know leaving the doors open and implementing gun control would work better, but I am just throwing it out there.

    Going back to money issues, this inflation thing is a real problem. Obviously, we need to keep printing money we don’t have so we can send money to Ukraine and fund other programs that have nothing to do with helping Americans but what if we didn’t? Is it possible that not printing and not giving more to foreign nations than American states (see here) could lessen inflation? I could be wrong but printing money seems like one of the quickest ways to facilitate inflation.

    So what about COVID and the death jabs? We know that the jabs do not stop the spread of COVID (this article mentions that) and that the government is covering up all sorts of side effects (I did some work on this). We also know that COVID has a 99%+ recovery rate for most of the population and that cases spiked when the jabs came out (take a look here). So what if we got rid of these jabs and tried treatments that work (you can find a few here) rather than experiments that don’t?

    My beer-cap is running out of juice so I will now endeavor to solve the unsolvable problem- election fraud. Obviously, the elections are safe and secure but let’s pretend they are not, and we need to fix the issues because there are some crazy people (here goes my last slurp) that just don’t know that O’Biden clearly got the most votes in American history despite not being able to get more than 7 people to show up at a rally. Here is my suggestion, what if we had paper ballots that were counted by real people (instead of machines connected to the internet).

    Also, what if we made people vote in person where they are registered and show an ID that would verify who they are?

    My beer dispensing cap is now empty and so I am out of silly ideas. It seems obvious to me that most of these issues are unsolvable and that there are no common-sense ways to help our country, so I am going to refill my cap and watch some CNN while I contemplate how much smarter the Biden crew-members are than the rest of us.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •