Coronavirus

[Dachsie]

New VAERS Data as of Feb 25, 2022 (Posted Mar 4, 2022)

27,036 Deaths and 1,233,450 Adverse Events

24,827 Pfizer/Moderna and 2,209 J&J Deaths

PLUS 1,151,450 Pfizer / Moderna and 82,528 J&J Adverse Events

Source: https://www.drtenpenny.com/newslette...#comp-l0d87ewd

[Dachsie]

Dahsie comments:

We will not be hearing much from Tony the Rat Fauci in the near future. He is in the witness protection program.
His many lies have become too apparent to too many. The science has been a big lie from the beginning. His lies have killed and made deathly ill many, including many children.

______________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bnkIqQRjbg



'Fauci Is In The Witness Protection Program Now': DeSantis Highlights Lower Profile For Dr. Fauci

9:41 video runtime

Mar 6, 2022

Forbes Breaking News

At a press event on Wednesday, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis spoke about Dr. Fauci.

[Dachsie]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BXrz91nHms

published two weeks ago from3-7-22



EXCLUSIVE: Pfizer Clinical Trial Whistleblower's Lawsuit Presses Ahead Without Government’s Help

16:14 video runtime

Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
754K subscribers
�� Try #EpochTV ��https://ept.ms/3raGlBg

⭕️ Sign up for our NEWSLETTER and stay in touch �� https://ept.ms/3wWdBwe
------------------
Resources:

�� American Hartford Gold (866-242-2352):

https://ept.ms/3biH9MN

�� Whistleblower:

https://ept.ms/3uVoBfn

https://ept.ms/3rTwX5m

�� Pfizer Financials:

https://ept.ms/34RmZZs

https://ept.ms/3JsSc3U

https://ept.ms/351MGXg

https://ept.ms/34ZS90A

https://ept.ms/3LISztk

�� Children Under 5:

https://ept.ms/3LF4ecf

------------------
Content:

[Dachsie]

Most Recent Episode - March 7

Tea Time Episode 24

https://live.childrenshealthdefense....ime/a_DsZCqfqE

1:07:41 video runtime

Having trouble viewing this email? View it in your web browser

March 7, 2022

TODAY'S LINEUP

Tea Time - @ 9:00 a.m. PT // 12:00 p.m. ET Breaking Down The Pfizer Data With Dr. Meryl Nass, Dr. Brian Hooker + Dr. Liz Mumper

Dr. Nass and Dr. Mumper outstanding medical doctors and communicators.

[Dachsie]

https://endtimes.video/bill-gates-au...next-pandemic/

Bill Gates recommends Australia-style martial law to “prevent the next pandemic”

March 4, 2022

[Dachsie]

https://endtimes.video/t/covidhoax/

CovidHoax - What They Are Not Telling You

Several very short videos related to Covid 19 trurh

[Dachsie]

Dr. Ryan Cole on the Increase in Unusual Cancers in His Practice


Chief Nerd Published October 30, 2021 33,342 Views

Dr. Ryan Cole, who runs the largest pathology lab in Idaho:

“[We’re seeing] inexplicable cancers at really unusual ages that are really thick cancers and aggressive cancers compared to what we are used to seeing in a lab.”

Full interview on The Highwire:
https://thehighwire.com/videos/episo...he-resistance/

EPISODE 234: RISE OF THE RESISTANCE


___________________

related article


03/07/22
•

COVID › Views
COVID-19 Spike Protein Sequence ‘100% Match’ to Sequence Patented in 2016 by Moderna, Study Shows

A study published last month in Frontiers in Virology claims to have discovered that a sequence of the COVID-19 virus’ spike protein is a 100% match to a modified mRNA sequence patented by Moderna in 2016, and last month, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel proposed the COVID pandemic may have been the result of a lab leak.
By
Dr. Joseph Mercola


https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...4-2e5e0de4ebe2

[Dachsie]

MORE WALENSKY WANTON MURDEROUS DRAGON-SPEAK





https://clashdaily.com/2022/03/watch...t-the-vaccine/


CDC Director Rochelle Walensky Says That The Experts Were ‘Overly Optimistic’ About The Vaccine (VIDEO)

Written by K. Walker on March 5, 2022



Ya think? Public health officials have absolutely beclowned themselves with the singular fixation on vaccines at the expense of treatment or acknowledgment of natural immunity. Never forget that.

A clip of CDC Director Rochelle Walensky was making the rounds on Friday and it’s quite telling.

In it, she admits that the “experts” might have been a bit too optimistic on the efficacy of the vaccines and off-handedly said that she remembers where she was when she saw “the CNN feed” that said that the vaccine was 95% effective. She then tries to dismiss the singular focus on vaccines by saying, “nobody said ‘waning’ when the vaccine is going to work” subtly admitting that the “experts” viewed the vaccine as a traditional one that is effective at preventing illness and transmission.

__________________________________

https://twitter.com/AlexThomp/status/1499808632443224068?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5 Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1499808632443224068%7Ctwgr% 5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fclashdaily. com%2F2022%2F03%2Fwatch-cdc-director-rochelle-walensky-says-that-the-experts-were-overly-optimistic-about-the-vaccine%2F

https://twitter.com/i/status/1499808632443224068

video

45 second video

Alex Thompson
@AlexThomp
Strikingly frank answer from CDC director Walensky on them being too bullish on vaccines early on
“Nobody said ‘waning’ when this vaccine is going to work, ‘oh well maybe it’ll wear off.’ Nobody said ‘well, what if…it’s not as potent against the next variant’”
H/t @adamcancryn


________________________

Also see

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/health-officials-vaccines-cure-all-cdc-rochelle-walensky/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=3386 d740-a35d-4955-9f54-2e5e0de4ebe2


03/07/22
•

COVID › News
Health Officials Relied Too Heavily on Vaccines as ‘Cure-All,’ CDC Director Says

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, admitted health officials relied too heavily on vaccines as a “cure-all” of sorts for COVID, and said vaccine makers didn’t warn the agency that the vaccines would be less effective against potential variants.
By
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.


Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), became the latest prominent official to contradict key aspects of the official COVID-19 narrative of the past two years.

In a March 3 appearance at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, Walensky was interviewed by Dr. William G. Powderly, co-director of the institution’s Division of Infectious Diseases.

During the interview, Walensky said she learned COVID vaccines were effective from watching CNN. She also admitted health officials relied too heavily on vaccines as a “cure-all” of sorts for COVID, and said vaccine makers didn’t warn the agency that the vaccines would be less effective against potential variants.

She also admitted that the science, far from being “settled,” is “gray” instead of “black and white.”

Walensky said:

“I can tell you where I was when the CNN feed came that it was 95% effective, the vaccine. So many of us wanted to be hopeful, so many of us wanted to say, okay, this is our ticket out, right, now we’re done. So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism for some good things that came our way. I really do. I think all of us wanted this to be done.

“Nobody said waning, when you know, oh this vaccine’s going to work. Oh well, maybe it’ll work — (laughs) it’ll wear off.

“Nobody said what if the next variant doesn’t, it doesn’t, it’s not as potent against the next variant.”

Walensky’s statement that she learned about vaccine effectiveness from “the CNN feed” followed just days after it was revealed President Joe Biden and other key political figures received COVID-related “talking points” from the polling and public relations firm, Impact Research, which also conducted polling for Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign.

Some of the talking points recently made their way into Biden’s State of the Union address.

In response to Walensky’s statements, writer and commentator Alex Berenson, a former New York Times reporter, wrote, “[n]obody could possibly have known variants might be a problem,” referencing a tweet he posted on Jan. 20, 2021, where he stated:

“The vaccines probably don’t work against at least one new variant and they’re going to want you to get vaccinated against next fall.”

Twitter banned Berenson later in 2021 for publishing “COVID misinformation,” leading him to file a federal lawsuit against the platform.

In April 2021, The Atlantic characterized Berenson as the “pandemic’s wrongest man,” stating “[i]n a crowded field of wrongness, one person stands out: Alex Berenson.”

Now, key public health officials are openly making the same type of statements for which Berenson — and many other journalists and individuals — were suspended or banned from social media platforms and news organizations.

Subscribe to The Defender - It’s Free!

Name*
Email*

From ‘follow the science’ to the science is ‘gray’

In another startling admission, Walensky claimed “the science” is, in fact, not foolproof — a statement that contradicts the prevailing narrative of “follow the science” uttered repeatedly by public officials and numerous media outlets over the past two years.

Walensky said:

“I have frequently said we’re going to lead with the science, science is going to be the foundation of everything we do. That is entirely true.

“I think the public heard that as the science is foolproof. Science is black and white. Science is immediate, and we get the answer and we make a decision based on the answer.”

Instead, according to Walensky, “science is gray.”

Walensky added:

“[a]nd science is not always immediate. And sometimes it takes months and years to actually find out the answer. But you have to make decisions in a pandemic before you have that answer.”

This statement contradicts the prevailing “the science is settled” narrative heard frequently since 2020, which left no room for any questioning of “the science” within the public sphere.

In fact, in June 2021, Walensky’s colleague, Dr. Anthony Fauci, told the media:

“A lot of what you’re seeing as attacks on me quite frankly are attacks on science, because all of the things that I have spoken about consistently from the very beginning, have been fundamentally based on science.”

Notably, Walensky’s statement closely paralleled statements made recently by political blog Axios, which wrote:

“The idea of ‘following the science’ has oversimplified what’s actually a complex array of factors that policymakers must weigh in formulating a response.

“Science has been weaponized time and again to justify or defend positions held by both policymakers and public health experts … Science isn’t absolute — data can come with uncertainties and unknowns.”

This unilateral “follow the science” narrative coming from public health agencies and corporate media over the past two years was described by Johns Hopkins University professor Dr. Marty Makary as “using science as political propaganda.” Makary said, “the absolute worst” studies came from the CDC.

Walensky also referenced the myriad health consequences stemming from COVID-related restrictions, such as mask and vaccine mandates and lockdowns, admitting public health officials didn’t sufficiently acknowledge or emphasize them.

As Walensky stated, there are “so many other things we are counting that don’t make the headlines,” including “opioid deaths, mental health challenges, cancer screenings, deferred elective surgeries.”

These adverse effects were also frequently cited by critics of draconian COVID-related restrictions and mandates, including, notably, by the signatories of the Great Barrington Declaration — which had previously been described as “dangerous,” “fascistic,” and an “ethical nightmare,” along with the added implication that it placed economics ahead of public health.

Walensky touts transparency, despite recent examples to the contrary

Walensky also stated during her appearance at Washington University that she was “proud of our ability to get data out,” referring to getting vaccine-related data out to the public.

According to Walensky, the CDC operated a “pedal-to-the-metal” system of data analysis and assimilation, leading to data on vaccine effectiveness being published, on average, every 48 hours.

Walensky said:

“[B]ecause of that we can now, within four weeks, look at vaccine effectiveness for cases and deaths for two-thirds of America.

“We can stratify by age, we can stratify by date of vaccine, we can stratify by which vaccine you got.”

These comments, however, contradict several recent revelations concerning the CDC and vaccine data transparency.

BUY TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s New Book — 'The Real Anthony Fauci'

As reported by The New York Times on Feb. 28, the CDC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were aware that COVID vaccines were only 12% effective in children under the age of 5, but withheld this information from the public in advance of an expert meeting that had been scheduled for Feb. 15. The FDA canceled the meeting at the last minute.

According to the Times:

“Experts worried that the news would further dissuade hesitant parents from immunizing their children.

“Some federal scientists pushed for the data to be made public ahead of the F.D.A. expert meeting scheduled for Feb. 15, viewing it as highly relevant to the discussion about dosing in children under 5, federal officials and others familiar with their responses to it said.”

In another New York Times report from just a few days prior (Feb. 20), CDC spokesperson Kristen Nordlund responded to revelations that the CDC had frequently withheld a myriad of data, including statistics pertaining to the effectiveness of boosters, figures stemming from wastewater surveillance, and COVID-19 hospitalizations by age, race, and vaccination status.

Nordlund said one reason such information was frequently withheld from the public is that it “might be misinterpreted” and “because basically, at the end of the day, [the data is] not yet ready for prime time.”

According to a federal official anonymously quoted by the Times, “[t]he agency has been reluctant to make those figures public … because they might be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective.”

The same Times report referenced similar concerns, which had previously been expressed by public health officials in Scotland, who announced that they would no longer publicize data on COVID hospitalizations and deaths by vaccination status “because of similar fears that the figures would be misrepresented by anti-vaccine groups.”

However, according to epidemiologist Jessica Malaty Rivera, who helped operate the Covid Tracking Project until it ceased operations in March 2021, “[w]e are at a much greater risk of misinterpreting the data with data vacuums, than sharing the data with proper science, communication and caveats.”

[Dachsie]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/78Q4EFcSS8wS/

Dr. Lee Merritt on "Unrestricted Truths": March 2, 2022

1:01:14 video runtime

First published at 16:31 UTC on March 8th, 2022.


channel image

Jim Fetzer

REQUIRED VIEWING! Starts at the 15-minute mark. Lee Merritt joins James Grundvig of American Media Periscope. This is one of the best sessions of truth-telling that you're going to hear. They cover the Putin strategy to take over the bio-weapons labs in Ukraine, the fact that war is being waged on the people of the world thru the GIANT DECEPTION of the Covid-19 pandemic, the issue of "shedding" from vaxxed to non-vaxxed and the agenda for drastic population reduction -- especially of the White, Christian world.

From: https://rumble.com/vwajh3-dissecting...hs-ep.-63.html

__________________
Saint Paul's epistle to the Ephesians, Chapter 6, verse 13

Therefore take up the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you will be able to stand your ground, and having done everything, to stand.
King James Bible

Therefore take unto you the armour of God, that you may be able to resist in the evil day, and to stand in all things perfect.
Douay-Rheims bible

[Dachsie]

Dr. Merritt gave attention in this video to bioweapons having the capability to target certain genotypes.

(See my posting 2nd October 2021, 08:57 AM #2008 in this thread.)
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...NAC#post983766

So also did Archbishop give attention to this subject in his recent 24-page letter.

https://www.yorechildren.com/blog/20...hbishop-vigano

The Ukraine Manifesto from Archbishop Vigano

March 6, 2022

excerpt

We should also remember the complaint made by Putin regarding the collection of genomic data about the population, which can be used for bacteriological weapons with genetic selection (here, here and here).

Here are the hyperlinks for here, here, and here.

1.
https://www.renovatio21.com/i-vaccin...rra-biologica/
Armi biologiche
I vaccini come guerra biologica?

Vaccines as biological warfare?


2.

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2017/...weapons-a59464

Is the U.S. Really Targeting Russians With Bio Weapons?
One expert says there are easier ways to kill off a population

By Evan Gershkovich
Nov. 3, 2017

Excerpts...

“But that was no concern of Putin’s. He brushed the question aside to pivot to an altogether more unexpected concern: That foreigners are collecting biomaterials across Russia — “purposefully and professionally.” This, the president seemed to suggest, was the more nefarious affair.
“Why are they going to different ethnic groups and to people living in different geographical locations across Russia?” the president asked. “Why are they doing this?”
“
…
““I’m not saying that this is about preparing a biological war against Russia,” he wrote on his Facebook page. “But those scenarios, without a doubt, are being developed. That is to say, in case the need suddenly arises.”

It wasn’t long until some of Russia’s most infamous officials were adding to the charged rhetoric. The collection of Russian fluids, organs and tissues, said Gennady Onishchenko of the Duma’s committee on education and science, is “nothing other than proof that the United States has not ceased its offensive military program."

To cap it off, Onishchenko claimed there was a "belt of biological warfare facilities" surrounding Russia in neighboring Georgia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Ukraine.


3.

https://thebulletin.org/2022/02/us-o...ous-pathogens/
US official: Russian invasion of Ukraine risks release of dangerous pathogens
By Matt Field | February 25, 2022