Coronavirus

[PatColo]

United Airlines believes in Covid-19,

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/un...6000-jobs-risk

JULY 8, 2020 / 8:46 AM / UPDATED 3 HOURS AGO
United Airlines sending 'gut punch' furlough warnings to 36,000 workers

[Dachsie]

Heck, the same airlines that were part of the 9-11-01 perp team are the same airlines that are doing the virus scam - United and American, and they are rewarded for their co-perping with not-so-gradual bankruptcy of their airlines. Probably does not much bother the top stock holders of these failing corporations because they are internationalist greedy scumsters who are stealing everyone's livelihood and money while they laugh all the way to their underground hiding places.

[PatColo]

Patrick Timpone today, haven't listened yet

Dr. Dessie Andrews


Taking on our lawmakers over COVID-19 mandates

Dr. Dessie Andrews has filed suit against Governor Greg Abbott, Travis County Judge Sarah Echkart and Austin Mayor Steve Adler. She has charged them with civil RICO, Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act. She has claimed that they have committed domestic terrorism against the People of Texas by intimidating and coercing a civilian population.
Dr. Andrews holds a PhD in constitutional study and law and has long been attempting to remove from public office any person who holds the position under color of law. To this end, she has continually researched and studied the Supreme Law of the Land and has worked diligently to aid and assist victims of bank abuse and tyranny.

Download

[Dachsie]

"She has charged them with civil RICO, Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act. She has claimed that they have committed domestic terrorism against the People of Texas by intimidating and coercing a civilian population."


Please see post number 309 on page 31 of this Coronavirus thread by Dachsie a few days ago.

"I think there ought to be a class action lawsuit against each of the individual states who have adoped these NIH and CDC "guidelines" and their definition that a state is an "endemic" location for "the virus."

This is unconstitutional and this is fraud and I believe it is based on coercion that the CDC and NIH are able to impose on a state to make them adopt their guidelines. Cannot say what exactly that coercion consists of but we know the state of Texas felt they "had" to adopt these guidelines. This was carrot and stick extortion and the carrot must have been mighty big and tasty looking to Texas governor and Texas agency bureaucrats."

__________

Alex Jones made the illogical statement in his good video that the reason Texas bureaucrats with the Texas Dept of Health and Human Services revised their definitions of "cases" and "probable cases" was that they just were kind of dumb-dumbs who were all impressed by all the big scientists at the CDC and NIH so they just adopted those entities' ever-changing guidelines and accepted that without even suspecting those entities of being propaganda entities promoting world government. (I have never been able to verify that the CDC is an agency of the U S federal government and I do not believe, though have not checked thoroughly , that the NIH is US federal agency either. Both are privately funded with grants from the federal government but are just NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations) operating under the auspices of the United Nations.)

I take the position that some entity had the power to force or coerce or extort the Texas health agencies and the governor to make all these fake surge / outbreak B S (Bad Science) statistics that have locked us down with masks and threats of jail time and fines for not wearing them. The Republicans are all on board with this B S.
That suspicion of mine makes Dr. Dessie Andrews' lawsuit most appropriate. We have RICO racketeering and maybe money laundering happening in this, and this modus operandi probably explains the other states' adoption of these unconstitutional mask mandates. Remember Fauchi and team are closely connected to the NIH and the WHO and the United Nations. Alex Jones gives a softball interpretation of what motivated Texas bureaucrats and politicians. I do not.

P.S. I think I remember Dessie Andrews from way back in the local 1990s patriot scene when I was in the early part of my journey to find the truth and try to make sense of what I was seeing all around me.

[PatColo]

cover for 5G...


BRAIN BUSTER Fears coronavirus will spark brain damage ‘epidemic’ as even mild cases cause inflammation

• Terri-Ann Williams, Digital Health & Fitness Reporter

• 8 Jul 2020, 9:37
• Updated: 8 Jul 2020, 9:39

PEOPLE who have contracted the (((coronavirus))) could also suffer brain complications, (((experts))) have revealed.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/120618...-inflammation/

[Dachsie]

"cover for 5G..."

Right On!

5G is really the new "war on oxygen".

lots of complications in the brain and the whole body when oxygen access and flow gets messed with.

P.S.
"PEOPLE who have contracted the (((coronavirus))) "

Dear Experts,

There is NO SUCH THING AS PEOPLE CONTRACTING CORONAVIRUS.

[Dachsie]

...https://thefreedomarticles.com/buste...fear-not-fact/...

Busted: 11 COVID Assumptions Based on Fear not Fact
Published 1 week ago on July 2, 2020
By Makia Freeman

Last Updated on July 8, 2020



AT A GLANCE...

THE STORY:

So many people are walking around with their head full of unfounded COVID assumptions.
THE IMPLICATIONS:

Flaw after flaw, assumption after assumption, official COVID testing and the official COVID narrative are just a house of cards.



COVID



The following 11 COVID assumptions are based on fear and ignorance, not evidence. Operation Coronavirus is a battle of perception.

assumptions –

the assumptions people make about COVID, how dangerous it is, how it spreads and what we need to do to stop it – are running rampant, running far more wildly than the supposed virus SARS-CoV2 itself. The coldly calculated campaign of propaganda surrounding this ‘pandemic’ has achieved its aim. Besieged with a slew of contradictory information coming from all angles, people in general have succumbed to confusion. Some have given up trying to understand the situation and found it is just easier to obey official directives, even if it means giving up long-held rights. Below is a list of commonly held COVID assumptions which, if you believe them, will make you much more likely to submit to the robotic, insane and abnormal conditions of the New Normal – screening, testing, contact tracing, monitoring, surveillance, mask-wearing, social distancing, quarantine and isolation, with mandatory vaccination and microchipping to come.
Assumption 1: The Method of Counting COVID Deaths is Sensible and Accurate

A grand assumption of the COVID plandemic is that the numbers are real and accurate, especially the death toll. Yet, nothing could be further from the truth. We have had confirmation after confirmation after confirmation (in nations all over the world) that authorities are counting the deaths in a way that makes no sense. Well, it makes no sense if you want to be sensible or accurate, but it makes perfect sense if you are trying to artificially inflate the numbers and create the impression of a pandemic where there is none. The sleight of hand is achieved by counting those who died with the virus as dying from the virus. This one trick alone is responsible for vastly skewing the numbers and turning the ‘official’ death count into a meaningless farce devoid of any practical value.
Assumption 2: The PCR Test for COVID is Accurate

As I covered in previous articles, the PCR test (Polymerase Chain Reaction) was invented by scientist Kary Mullis as a manufacturing technique (since it can able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times), not as a diagnostic tool. COVID or SARS-CoV2 fails Koch’s postulates. The virus which shut the world down has still to this day never been isolated, purified and re-injected, or in other words, has never been 100% proven to exist, nor 100% proven to be the cause of the disease. When used to determine the cause of a disease, the PCR test has many flaws:

1. There is no gold standard to which to compare its results (COVID fails Koch’s postulates);
2. It detects and amplifies genetic code (RNA sequences) but offers no proof these RNA sequences are of viral origin;
3. It generates many false positive results;
4. The PCR test can give a completely opposite result (positive or negative) depending upon the number of cycles or amplifications that are used, which is ultimately arbitrarily chosen. For some diseases, if you lower the number of cycles to 35, it can make everyone appear negative, while if you increase them to above 35, it can make everyone appear positive;
5. Many patients switch back and forth from positive to negative when taking the PCR test on subsequent days; and
6. Even a positive result does not guarantee the discovered ‘virus’ is the cause of the disease!
In summary, the PCR test doesn’t identify or isolate viruses, doesn’t provide RNA sequences of pathogens, offers no baseline for comparison with patient samples, and cannot determine an infected from an uninfected sample. That is staggeringly useless! Here is a quote from the article COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless:

“Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity” and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available. As an example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?”:

If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”

Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University confirms this. In her paper “Interpreting a COVID-19 test result”, published recently in The British Medical Journal, she writes that there is a “lack of such a clear-cut ‘gold-standard’ for COVID-19 testing.”“

Here is the admission about the PCR test by the CDC and FDA:

“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms …this test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”

Accurate would be about the last word I would use to describe COVID PCR testing, yet it is currently the standard test worldwide for COVID. Another magnificent example of many COVID assumptions. Go figure.
Assumption 3: The Antibody Test for COVID is Accurate

If you realized by reading the last section that the COVID PCR tests are flawed and meaningless, get ready for more absurdity with the COVID antibody tests. As I covered in the article COVID Antibody Tests: Here Comes More Trickery and Fakery, there are numerous reasons why the antibody tests don’t really work and can be interpreted any way you want:

1. Old blood samples contain COVID antibodies, so if a test find antibodies, they may have been there for years or decades. There is no way to tell if they were recently acquired;
2. Like the COVID PCR test, they generate many false positive results;
3. They test for antibodies which may not even be specific for COVID;
4. Antibodies don’t actually prove immunity, since there are people who fight off disease with little or no antibodies, and conversely, there are those with high antibody titers or counts, but who still get sick; and
5. The results can be interpreted any way you want. The presence of antibodies could mean you’re safe and immune to future COVID waves, or conversely, it could mean you’re dangerous (sick and infected right now). It’s all about the interpretation.

Hhmmm … all these COVID assumptions are not exactly reassuring, are they?
Assumption 4: The COVID Case Count is Rising

Someone skeptical of the alternative view I am painting here may ask at this point: well if COVID is not that dangerous, how come cases keep rising? The answer is simple: because there is more testing. The more we test, the more cases we will find, because this ‘virus’ (really an RNA sequence) is far more widespread than we have been told, and there are far more asymptomatic people than we have been told (which shows it’s not that dangerous). As discussed in previous articles, there is really no proof that people didn’t have this particular RNA sequence for years or decades before the test, so the test results are quite meaningless.
Loading...

That aside, a general rule of thumb is that wherever there are people trying to gain power, there will be fraud, and COVID testing is no exception. It has been exposed that tens of thousands of coronavirus tests have been double counted (in the UK, but probably happening in many places). This article explains that the “discrepancy is in large part explained by the practice of counting saliva and nasal samples for the same individual twice.” Additionally, the COVID tests are using the PCR method as discussed above in COVID Assumption 3, which has many flaws, including the flaw of results flipping back and forth depending on the number of cycles, as this previously quoted article states:

” … it is hardly surprising that there are several papers illustrating irrational test results. For example, already in February the health authority in China’s Guangdong province reported that people have fully recovered from illness blamed on COVID-19, started to test “negative,” and then tested “positive” again.

A month later, a paper published in the Journal of Medical Virology showed that 29 out of 610 patients at a hospital in Wuhan had 3 to 6 test results that flipped between “negative”, “positive” and “dubious”.

A third example is a study from Singapore in which tests were carried out almost daily on 18 patients and the majority went from “positive” to “negative” back to “positive” at least once, and up to five times in one patient.

Even Wang Chen, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, conceded in February that the PCR tests are “only 30 to 50 per cent accurate”; while Sin Hang Lee from the Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory sent a letter to the WHO’s coronavirus response team and to Anthony S. Fauci on March 22, 2020, saying that:

“It has been widely reported in the social media that the RT-qPCR [Reverse Transcriptase quantitative PCR] test kits used to detect SARSCoV-2 RNA in human specimens are generating many false positive results and are not sensitive enough to detect some real positive cases.” ”

Assumption 5: Thermal Imaging/Screening for COVID is Effective

Taking people’s temperature by pointing a gun at their head is blatant conditioning. It sends the subliminal message that the State is all powerful and can aim a gun-like device at your head, and you are powerless to do anything but submit. On a practical level, taking people’s temperatures has no effect in stopping viral spread. Even if someone has an elevated temperature, what does that mean? There is a natural variation in human body temperatures; everyone operates at a slightly different temperature. Besides, even if your temperature is elevated, that could be because you were just exercising, running to catch a flight, just had an angry conversation with someone, just got the phone after a stressful call, had to discipline a disobedient child, etc. Think about all the things that make you stressed and irritated, or raise your blood pressure, which could lead to an elevated temperature!

In this way it is similar to the antibody test; it can show a result, but the result can be interpreted in so many ways that it renders the result pointless in terms of science (although there is a very much a point in terms of control).
Assumption 6: Asymptomatic People Can Spread the Disease

One particular piece of propaganda hammered in hard to people’s brains which is still doing great damage is the idea that anyone could be a carrier and could therefore infect anyone else. This has the effect of making people anxious, scared and even paranoid in just going about their daily life. However the idea that asymptomatic people can spread the disease is not something to worry about. This Chinese study A study on infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers published in May 2020 exposed 455 subjects to asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV2. None of the 455 were infected!

WHO (World Health Organization) official Dr. Maria van Kerkhove was reported by MSM CNBC saying the following last month in June (though she later backtracked her comments):

““From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual,” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said at a news briefing from the United Nations agency’s Geneva headquarters. “It’s very rare.””



Assumption 7: Making Schools Adopt Insanely Restrictive Measures Will Stop COVID Spread

Of the many COVID assumptions floating around, these next two are based on the idea that children are a significant source of COVID spread. They are not! The figures from WorldOMeter state that children aged 0-17 years have 0.02-0.06% share of world COVID deaths, which is essentially zero. Meanwhile, CDC stats show that “among 149,082 (99.6%) cases for which patient age was known, 2,572 (1.7%) occurred in children aged <18 years” which is likewise a tiny fraction. With this in mind, why on Earth would the CDC issue these draconian guidelines (pictured above and also found at this link in full) for American schoolchildren, if not to condition and dehumanize them?
Assumption 8: It’s a Good Idea for Government to Take Abduct Kids from COVID-Positive Parents

Governmental abduction of children using COVID as a pretext has begun. This article from June 17th 2020 reports how the “LA County Dept. of Children and Family Services (DCFS) recommended that the court remove [a] child from their physical custody after the parent tested positive for COVID-19. This is a non-offending parent. The judge ruled in favor of DCFS and detained.”

Let that sink in for a minute. The State stole a child from his/her parents just because a parent showed a COVID-positive result on a (deeply flawed) test! Can anyone spell T-Y-R-A-N-N-Y? This is the outcome of the sinister and oxymoronic warning given by WHO official Michael Ryan in March, that people would be removed from their families in a “safe and dignified” way. Ryan said:

“In some senses, transmission has been taken off the streets and pushed back into family units. Now we need to go and look in families to find those people who may be sick and remove them and isolate them in a safe and dignified manner.”

Mercola.com reports that the CDC is recommending newborns be separated at birth from their parents for COVID testing.

How bad does it have to get before people wake up to what is happening?
Assumption 9: Social Distancing is Backed by Solid Scientific Evidence

Another of the baseless COVID assumptions is that all this social distancing or physical distancing is backed by solid scientific evidence. It’s not. Whether it’s 6 feet, 1.5 meters or 2 meters, the virus seems to be able to jump different distances depending upon what country it is in. The article There is no scientific evidence to support the disastrous two-metre rule states:

“The influential Lancet review provided evidence from 172 studies in support of physical distancing of one metre or more. This might sound impressive, but all the studies were retrospective and suffer from biases that undermine the reliability of their findings.”

Meanwhile UK governmental advisor Robert Dingwall said:

“We cannot sustain [social distancing measures] without causing serious damage to society, to the economy and to the physical and mental health of the population …I think it will be much harder to get compliance with some of the measures that really do not have an evidence base. I mean the two-metre rule was conjured up out of nowhere … Well, there is a certain amount of scientific evidence for a one-metre distance which comes out of indoor studies in clinical and experimental settings. There’s never been a scientific basis for two metres, it’s kind of a rule of thumb. But it’s not like there is a whole kind of rigorous scientific literature that it is founded upon.”

Of course, the assumption that social distancing works is based on the underlying assumption that there is a distinct and isolated virus SARS-CoV2 which is contagious and is the sole cause of all the disease – which has not been proven.
Assumption 10: Mask Wearing for Healthy People is Backed by Solid Scientific Evidence

The penultimate assumption for today is the wonderful topic of masks, or face diapers and face nappies as many have started calling them. One of the COVID assumptions that many are still clinging to is that it is ‘respectful’ to wear masks because masks protect healthy individuals from getting sick from viruses. This is patently false. As covered in the previous article Unmasking the Truth: Studies Show Dehumanizing Masks Weaken You and Don’t Protect You, masks are designed for surgeons or people who are already sick, not for healthy people. They stop sick people spreading a disease through large respiratory droplets; they do nothing to protect well people. In fact, they restrict oxygen flow leading to under-oxygenation (hypoxia), which in turns leads to fatigue, weakness and a lower immunity. With a lower immunity comes … more susceptibility to disease. As I previously wrote, the masks many people are wearing – homemade from cloth – are a joke if you think they will stop a virus which is measured in nanometers (nanometer = 10–9 meters, or 0.000000001 meters). They won’t stop a virus but they will assuredly become a hotbed for microbes to develop due to the warm and humid conditions. For the scientifically minded, here’s what Dr. Russell Blaylock had to say:

“The importance of these findings is that a drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) is associated with an impairment in immunity. Studies have shown that hypoxia can inhibit the type of main immune cells used to fight viral infections called the CD4+ T-lymphocyte. This occurs because the hypoxia increases the level of a compound called hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which inhibits T-lymphocytes and stimulates a powerful immune inhibitor cell called the Tregs. This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19 and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so, having a much worse outcome.”

Assumption 11: We Live in a World of Indiscriminate Killer Viruses
The biggest assumption of this entire scamdemic is that viruses are indiscriminate killers which can cross species and jump bodies through the air to infect people. In fact, the nature of the humble virus has been totally misunderstood by mainstream science, fueled by the Medical Industry which promotes germ theory and the myth of contagion to keep you in fear and to raise demand for its toxic products (Big Pharma petrochemical drugs and vaccines). Viruses have been demonized. As discussed in earlier articles such as Deep Down the Virus Rabbit Hole – Question Everything, virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka exposed the truth that viruses do not cause disease. Lanka famously won a 2017 Supreme Court in Germany where he proved that measles was not caused by a virus. Lanka writes:

“Since June 1954, the death of tissue and cells in a test tube has been regarded as proof for the existence of a virus … according to scientific logic and the rules of scientific conduct, control experiments should have been carried out … These control experiments have never been carried out by official science to this day. During the measles virus trial, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform this control experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells die due to the laboratory conditions in the exact same way as when they come into contact with allegedly “infected” material.

In other words, the cells die of starvation and poisoning (since they are separated from energy and nutrients from the body, and since toxic antibiotics are injected into the cell culture), not from being infected by a virus. This great video presentation entitled Viral Misconceptions: The True Nature of Viruses is well worth watching. It outlines many stunning truths about the nature of viruses, such as:

– Viruses are created from within your cells; they do not come from outside the body

– They arise as a result of systemic toxicity, not because the body has been invaded by an external threat

– Viruses dissolve toxic matter when body tissue is too toxic for living bacteria or microbes to feed upon without being poisoned to death. Without viruses, the human body couldn’t achieve homeostasis and sustain itself in the face of systemic toxicity

– Viruses are very specific. They dissolve specific tissues in the body. They do this with the assistance of antibodies

– The more toxicity you have in your body, the more viral activity you will have

– The only vector transmission of a virus is through blood transfusion or vaccines; otherwise, viruses cannot infect you by jumping from one body to another

– Viruses are discriminatory by nature, made by the body for a specific purpose. They are not indiscriminate killers

– The RT-PCR test (PCR test for short) observes genetic material left over by the virus, not the virus itself (see assumption 2)
Conclusion: Time to Question all Your COVID Assumptions

The good news is that these are assumptions not facts. When you look closely, you will realize the entire official narrative on COVID is a house of cards built on sand. It cannot stand up to close scrutiny. This knowledge is the key to remaining sane and free in a COVID-crazed and brainwashed world. Spread the word. Evidence, information and knowledge will dispel assumptions and ignorance.

*****

Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit and FB.

Sources:

*https://www.bitchute.com/video/9GWhQ4v9H53E/

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5f_6ltv7oI

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Fic2dlKlhw

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid...disease-cause/

*https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/...y-meaningless/

*https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid...ickery-fakery/

*https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-h...ted-officials/

*https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219423/

*https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/08/asym...-who-says.html

*https://www.worldometers.info/corona...-demographics/

*https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6914e4.htm

*https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...e/schools.html

*https://parentalrights.org/it-finall...e-to-covid-19/

*https://www.bitchute.com/video/CMPsWxDDTwMo/

*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...ronavirus.aspx

*https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...wo-metre-rule/

*https://metro.co.uk/2020/04/25/two-m...aims-12609448/

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/unmas...t-protect-you/

*https://thefreedomarticles.com/deep-...on-everything/

*https://davidicke.com/wp-content/upl...-Lanka-002.pdf

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWYQS3LFlE

[PatColo]

as posted in my Best Of Joovid19 pods/tubes thread,

Barrett; Monika should be good at least!


Truth Jihad radio with Kevin Barrett 2020.07.03

Monika Schaefer on COVID-NWO Agenda; Labeeb Uqdah and Rashid Dawud on BLM and Islam


Info page

64k CF Download

^ Barrett pub'd this article @ veteranstoday today, BLOCKBUSTER, asks the Question of the Decade (Century?) to which everyone @ GSUS & like minds worldwide, intuitively know the answer to. Kudos to KB for turning this feedback to his Monika Schaefer interview above, into a feature article where "EstherWatcher" article gets greater circulation! Unz.com (a little less tainted/stigmatized than Duffy's Vets Today) need to feature this @ top!

---

Are Elite Jews Responsible for COVID-NWO?

And Why Are Such Questions "Unspeakable" Even Though "Were Muslims Responsible for 9/11?" Is Acceptable? DOUBLE STANDARD OR WHAT?!

By
Kevin Barrett - July 10, 2020

Above video: E. Michael Jones speaks truth to YouTube power, live on YouTube! List of stories we covered

According to the censors who rule American mainstream media and academia, it is perfectly OK to ask “were Muslims responsible for 9/11?” And it’s obligatory to answer “yes.” Which, of course, is a genocidal Big Lie.

Yet one cannot even ask, as Esther Watcher does in the story below, “Are Elite Jews Responsible for COVID-NWO?” (Or the JFK coup, or 9/11, or the NWO world takeover by a usury banking cabal, or Hollywood’s ongoing attack on manners and morals, or anything else.)

Unlike the aforementioned mendacious rhetorical question about Muslims and 9/11, Esther’s question does not inquire about all Jews, just (some) elite Jews. If Jews and Muslims were treated equally in our discourse, Esther’s question would not be problematic.

But as we all know, there is a massive double standard: Don’t say anything negative about Jews, no matter how well-founded; but feel free to bash Muslims all you want, brandishing as many outrageous lies as your imagination can conceive.

That double-standard was likely the reason Amazon digitally burned E. Michael Jones’ books, and YouTube nuked his videos—while vast libraries of lying Islamophobic trash still permeate the big internet monopolies’ discourse on Islam and Muslims.

In the above video, E. Michael Jones speaks truth to YouTube power, live on YouTube. And in the article below, Esther Watcher takes me to task for my supposedly pro-Jewish bias, offering her own view of what’s going on at the top of the world’s power pyramid.

Though I don’t agree with all of E. Michael Jones’ and Esther Watcher’s views, I think they are worthy of discussion, debate, and attempted refutation. Those who would censor and silence such arguments are implicitly admitting that they can’t refute them.

–Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

---

Are Elite Jews Responsible for COVID-NWO?

A Listener Response to Kevin Barrett’s July 4, 2020 Interview: Monika Schaefer on COVID-NWO Agenda

By EstherWatcher

In listening to Monika Shaeffer’s interview with Kevin Barrett I was struck by how difficult it is even in friendly precincts to discuss Jews in society today. One must constantly qualify the term “the Jews” by always explaining it refers to elite Jews, not your average, everyday Jew. It’s like whenever one discusses Jews, one needs a long list of caveats before even opening your mouth.

That said, however — among cognoscenti — I concur with Monika that at some point most Jews will go tribal on you, forever siding with their brethren, even though wealthy Jews will throw the rank and file among them under the bus whenever it suits them. Kevin said he had Jewish friends and seemed to imply Monika’s references to “the Jews” were overly broad brush strokes. I, too, have a good number of Jewish friends whom I love and trust, but these “noble Jews” if you will are I believe few and far between. Monika’s direct experience of years-long Jewish “friends” who when push came to shove turned on her would seem to be more the norm.

Qualifiers presented, I now ask: Are Jews responsible for this breakdown of society through which we’re suffering now? As diasporans, Jews have globalism in their DNA. New world order is exactly what they would concoct. That right there gives you a clue they’re behind the globalist Agenda 21/Agenda 30 dystopian plans. Maybe they didn’t initiate them, but they have certainly usurped them for their own purposes — like they do with so many of the controlling levers of power.

Let me first say that I believe the Jewish wing of the 1% has thoroughly eclipsed the 1% WASP wing. Starting with 1963, then 1967, and certainly ever since September 11, 2001, the US is now a pure ZOG. Similar to how tiny Britain once ruled India (if not most of the world), it’s not about size or numerical superiority. It’s about having a focused agenda capable of disproportionate domination. That is why and how they’ve wrested control of the 1%, Davos, Bilderberg, CFR, Skull, and Bones, etc.

The 1% WASPs don’t have a higher agenda, tribal or otherwise. They’re just punch drunk on being wealthy Masters of the Universe. They haven’t grokked that the 1% Jews are now ultimately in control of the entire 1% space, including the Deep State. For example, BlackRock owns their WASP butt and yet non-Jews still think gentiles are calling the shots.

Unfortunately, their cryptic actions are rarely documented. Even with a lack of substantial evidence, though, I agree with Monika that Jews are behind the global plandemic / plandemonium and that Covid-BLM is a bona fide psyop. Heaven help us if they decide to reassert their Bolshevik roots and unleash a holodomor on us.

I appreciate outlets like Renegade, Fash the Nation, E. Michael Jones, Adam Green’s Know More News, and Red Ice who openly, bravely say Jews are behind the tearing down of our society. Andrew Joyce’s essay on the politics of evil brilliantly makes the point as well. There have also been some really good articles finally exposing the critical race theory underpinnings of Black Lives Matter — see here, here, here, here, and here. Yet almost no one besides Gilad Atzmon speaks openly about the Frankfurt School Jews who are the founders of these cultural Marxist theories that have now become highly weaponized.

The media can’t hide the cultural Marxist indoctrination of BLM and antifa because George Soros (a Jew) openly funds those two groups. But Covid is a different sort of psyop. Unlike 911 where Jews left sloppy fingerprints all over for a Chris Bollyn to find years later, with the virus they’re being very careful to leave almost no mark.

Even as they come out from the shadows and openly flaunt Jewish Power (e.g., running for president, holding high offices like governors and big-city mayors), orchestrating a highly destructive global coup d’etat is a lot higher order of magnitude in risk. Because of the exposure of being seen as the emerging totalitarian/fascists, in this greatest feat of all for elite Jews, they’re being supremely cryptic. Hence, at this stage even for astute students of false flags, the clues are well hidden.

Nonetheless, let’s turn to Laurent Gueynot’s Jewish hijacking theory. Just like the JFK assassination and 911 hijacks of which he writes, clearly Stuxnet and the Suliemani assassination were also Jewish hijackings. Given this history, I believe Jews hijacked the coronavirus hit on China. Mossad was working hand in glove with the US on doing the Chinese bioweapon attack. The Chinese got spritzed with the virus, but the arrogant, sneaky Zionists took it further and let the virus go for broke worldwide ahead of schedule.

They hijacked Wuhan, in part knowing Israel had the vaccine and could preempt everyone else with it. (Remember at the beginning Israel said in 2-4 weeks they had the vaccine ready to go?) So they released the virus worldwide, blatantly targeting Iran (a telltale sign if there ever was one) in order to beat everyone to the punch and make hay, financially and otherwise, from the chaotic fallout. These people love to “rise and kill first.”

Knowing profound global changes were in the offing in the upcoming year (Agenda 21 = 2021), their Massada-centric mentality was to just let it rip early, come what may, and leave everyone behind the 8-ball. The Israelis are likewise scrambling because an early release was not part of the planned Agenda 21 and nobody, even them, knew how it would turn out.

James Corbett mused how there seemed to be an “unpreparedness . . . like someone has pulled the trigger a little too early” in rolling out the “scamdemic.” Ya think?! In speeding up the clock with their fore-knowledge, the Jews were at an advantage whereas every other country, including the US, was caught off-guard by a full year. They were all surely screaming the famous 911 curse: “Those damn Israelis!”

Everyone from the World Economic Forum on knows what the Agenda 21/30 go-to plan is more or less. So after being temporarily dazed and confused, they all knew the basic script and began floundering toward it. But who is really in charge? The Elders! Who else would be grounded enough early on to ensure the looting of the US Treasury of trillions of dollars right off the bat out from under everyone’s masked noses?

In a chaotic situation, who stands to benefit most? a) Those who released the virus and can thereby better anticipate the results, and more importantly, b) Those who own the Trifecta and can best manipulate the massive fallout.

So what’s the Trifecta? To do a world takeover you need to control three primary domains — and elite Jews predominate all three of them in spades.

1. Money — Wall Street, IBS, Federal Reserve banks, insurance, white-collar crimes, “philanthropy”

2. Narrative/propaganda — News media, Hollywood, the academy, art, publishing, music business, advertising, fashion, psychology, public relations

3. Technology — surveillance/security/contact tracing, cloud contracts (US military, Microsoft), nuclear codes, widespread back-door OS access, Silicon Valley social media/censorship/algorithming, AI-bio-nanotechnology, mind control/transhumanism

Its undisputed Jews have long dominated global finance and the narrative. With technology now in the mix, finally!, after all these centuries, they are now in full control of all the key choke points. You can just see them rubbing their hands. The Protocols may be officially a “fraud,” but just like the fictitious 1984, it couldn’t be more spot-on about reality today.

Curious, I wonder if the Protocols address the clincher requirement: technocratic control.

The elite gentiles act like the elite Jews are either junior partners or at most equal partners, as if it were still the old days when Jews faced country club quotas. What gentile oligarchs don’t get is that Jews have not only long surpassed the “restrictions” phase, they have leapfrogged over the traditional WASP elite and now have the front-facing Empire by the balls because behind the scenes they dominate the Trifecta. To paraphrase Meyer Rothschild, “I care not who makes the laws — or thinks they’re the reigning elite — give me control of a nation’s money, propaganda, and technology and I’ll rule the world.”

Let’s also remember they judaicize everything they touch — turn it into warped versions of itself. Banking is not necessarily bad. My grandpa was a banker. Bankers used to be upstanding members of the community. Not after Jews entered the capitalist space in full force, however, and turned it into a rapacious den of vipers. The same, for example, with TV and movies. Everyone decries sex and violence, but never cite who controls the programming. Our entertainment got judaicized with crassness. Everything they touch, they pervert because they don’t care about their fellow citizens. They only want to debase, defile, and demoralize. Going forward, I suggest people always consider the judaization factor.

The Jews play Frankfurt School politics perfectly since they invented identity politics and know that destroying a culture (as they did to the German people) is needed for takeover. The clueless BLM thinks they are re-making US culture to have a more black infusion of power. Yeah, right. The entire BLM play is to use blacks to take down American white culture. From the creation of the NAACP on, this has been the Jewish M.O. with people of color, especially blacks. Once their agenda is accomplished, Jewish power will push BLM aside like roadkill.

According to research by Jim MacGregor (who wrote two recent game-changer WWI books), the Rothschild forte is to take over companies on the verge of bankruptcy (e.g., the House of Morgan in the early 1900s), but forever remain in the background so it looks like gentiles are still in charge. It’s simply hoodwinked window dressing. Rockefellers learned early on to play ball as half-way equal partners. Although truth be told, Rothschilds and their brethren had multi-generational wealth long before the first Rockefeller mogul was even born.

When the anti-elite pitchforks come out, plutocratic whites will be the obvious, visible scapegoats thanks to the heightened racialized propaganda. Bill Gates in particular is being set up as the front-facing evil, white supremacist, nazi, eugenist Master of the Universe. Meanwhile, the invisible Elders will have everything in place to proceed with the takeover. They will ensure a WWIII China-West hot war which as usual they’ll finance both sides. After an inevitable Chinese win, the Jews will then flip them and take unipolar world control for themselves.

So bottom line, are elite Jews running the current destruction of society? All you need to know is who owns, controls, or influences the Trifecta, and there’s your answer, evidence be damned.

When will gullible, naive white people wake up and realize a pandemic and race wars are just the jews pilpulling our leg. With these opening shots, they’re leading us like sheep to slaughter to a Brave New 1984 Animal Farm World where dissidents who don’t take the happy pills will be banished to a hyper Gaza Strip on the perimeters of our Panopti-conned cities.

Don’t be silent, Monika! Keep speaking out. We’ll never have all the evidence. The proof is in the pudding. Once they are in full control, the Chosen People will ditch Agenda 21/30 and implement their own long-awaited Messianic technocratic Sanhedrin. When that day comes, beware the Noahide Laws!

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/07/10/esther/

[Dachsie]

Thank you, PatColo, for posting this, and for posting this in the Coronavirus thread.

I see good insights and contributions to truth.

However, in regard to the "coronoavirus" issue alone, I see the same tragic flaws in seeking highest and best truth.

I look at all the big issues of our day from a traditional Catholic viewpoint and I am still learning exactly what the "traditional" part means.

I also use 9-11 as the yardstick in studying these latter-day psyops and specifically now the "coronavirus."

No one is looking at the basic foundational official narrative of the "coronavirus" and no one is pointing out the errors and falsehoods of the official narrative in relation to basic scientific facts about "coronavirus."

I stated in another thread that we do not have one independent authoritative source for the scientific facts of the "coronavirus."

Dr. James Fetzer was very good in helping me to understand and "unpack" the official narrative of 9-11 and that relates to the truth of "no-planes theory. [NPT]" Only after understanding that foundational truth about that event was I able have a good lens to study what exactly happened physically to the buildings and four sites of the 9-11 event. That foundational NPT knowledge also gave me the correct lens to come to the most correct conclusions regarding WHO were the perpetrators of 9-11.

Unfortunately I do not have good clear basic scientific knowledge of the medical / scientific aspect of the "coronavirus" official narrative which is...

"SARS=C0V-2, the coronavirus that causes Covid-19."

I am still seeking those basic foundational facts and assumptions. I see errors and falsehoods mixed in with the ideas of all of the people mentioned in the two articles of your posting here. I have not listened to the video interview yet.
I am quite familiar with the ideas put forth by Dr. Barrett and James Corbett and Christopher Bollyn regarding 9-11 and I believe I have solidly identified the errors and falsehoods in their way of thinking about 9-11.

I think E. Michael Jones and Adam Green have given us wonderful insights regarding the "Jews" as has Dr. Lorraine Day and a few other medical doctors. So far there is no individual or entity that describes itself as "Catholic" or "traditional Catholic" that has come forward with more much-needed basic foundational facts about the "coronavirus" psyop. I know quite a bit about how psyops work and I know there is a predominant psyop nature associated with the "coronavirus" event. What I do not know enough about is if there is some kind of REAL "pathogen" spreading contagiously or whether there is any solid information about such a real contagious illness affecting some people. I so far know that any such real illness going around is NOT one and the same as "coronavirus" and not the same as "Covid-19." I also know about the tool of twisting words and their meaning and usage and that is all over this "coronavirus" official narrative. I was forced to put almost every word I posted about 9-11 in quotes and am likewise forced to do so in discussing the "coronavirus."

One other quality I have that has served me well is that I seem to have a finely tuned and well functioning B S - O - Meter.

[woodman]

Thank you, PatColo, for posting this, and for posting this in the Coronavirus thread.

I see good insights and contributions to truth.

However, in regard to the "coronoavirus" issue alone, I see the same tragic flaws in seeking highest and best truth.

I look at all the big issues of our day from a traditional Catholic viewpoint and I am still learning exactly what the "traditional" part means.

I also use 9-11 as the yardstick in studying these latter-day psyops and specifically now the "coronavirus."

No one is looking at the basic foundational official narrative of the "coronavirus" and no one is pointing out the errors and falsehoods of the official narrative in relation to basic scientific facts about "coronavirus."

I stated in another thread that we do not have one independent authoritative source for the scientific facts of the "coronavirus."

Dr. James Fetzer was very good in helping me to understand and "unpack" the official narrative of 9-11 and that relates to the truth of "no-planes theory. [NPT]" Only after understanding that foundational truth about that event was I able have a good lens to study what exactly happened physically to the buildings and four sites of the 9-11 event. That foundational NPT knowledge also gave me the correct lens to come to the most correct conclusions regarding WHO were the perpetrators of 9-11.

Unfortunately I do not have good clear basic scientific knowledge of the medical / scientific aspect of the "coronavirus" official narrative which is...

"SARS=C0V-2, the coronavirus that causes Covid-19."

I am still seeking those basic foundational facts and assumptions. I see errors and falsehoods mixed in with the ideas of all of the people mentioned in the two articles of your posting here. I have not listened to the video interview yet.
I am quite familiar with the ideas put forth by Dr. Barrett and James Corbett and Christopher Bollyn regarding 9-11 and I believe I have solidly identified the errors and falsehoods in their way of thinking about 9-11.

I think E. Michael Jones and Adam Green have given us wonderful insights regarding the "Jews" as has Dr. Lorraine Day and a few other medical doctors. So far there is no individual or entity that describes itself as "Catholic" or "traditional Catholic" that has come forward with more much-needed basic foundational facts about the "coronavirus" psyop. I know quite a bit about how psyops work and I know there is a predominant psyop nature associated with the "coronavirus" event. What I do not know enough about is if there is some kind of REAL "pathogen" spreading contagiously nor any solid information about such a real contagious illness affecting some people. I so far know that any such real illness going around is NOT one and the same as "coronavirus" and not the same as "Covid-19." I also know about the tool of twisting words and their meaning and usage and that is all over this "coronavirus" official narrative. I was forced to put almost every word I posted about 9-11 in quotes and am likewise forced to do so in discussing the "coronavirus."

One other quality I have that has served me well is that I seem to have a finely tuned and well functioning B S - O - Meter.

I am not well versed in the NPT theory regarding 9-11. I always figured it to be misinformation i.e. 'poisoning the well' to discount the truth movement. Are there not trustworthy people who saw jets hitting the towers? I do believe the video evidence could have easily been manipulated to show planes hitting the towers even if there were none.