Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 107

Thread: January 6th in DC: "Be there, will be wild!" -- Trump

  1. #81
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    3,056
    Thanks
    2,389
    Thanked 4,766 Times in 2,191 Posts

    Re: January 6th in DC: "Be there, will be wild!" -- Trump

    Of course, we're not surprised by this--total set up by the FBI and dirty treasonous scumbags in criminal.gov Article is very long, even gets it the fake kidnapping set up of that nasty Whitmer lady

    Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge

    https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/federal-foreknowledge-jan-6-unindicted-co-conspirators-raise-disturbing-questions/

    Of all the questions asked, words spoken, and ink spilled on the so-called “Capitol Siege” of January 6, 2021, none hold the key to the entire event quite like what Sen. Amy Klobuchar asked of Christopher Wray.

    The Democrat from Minnesota asked the Trump-appointed FBI Director: Did the federal government infiltrate any of the so-called “militia” organizations claimed to be responsible for planning and executing the Capitol Siege?

    The full segment is available on YouTube.

    Christopher Wray is able to uncomfortably weasel his way out of answering the question directly, partially because Klobuchar does him the courtesy of not asking him the question directly. Klobuchar instead asks the FBI director if he wishes he had infiltrated the militia organizations allegedly involved in 1/6 — assuming from the outset that there was in fact no infiltration, thereby providing the FBI director an easy way to avoid addressing the question one way or another.
    Revolver News is willing to address the matter directly in the following three questions:


    • In the year leading up to 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) that the FBI, DOJ, Pentagon and network news have labeled most responsible for planning and executing a Capitol attack on 1/6 infiltrated by agencies of the federal government, or informants of said agencies?
    • Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the Capitol or in the Capitol during the infamous “siege” and what roles did they play (merely passive informants or active instigators)?
    • Finally, of all of the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)?


    From now on, all discussion of 1/6 must give way to a laser-like focus on the questions above, with an unwavering persistence at obtaining the answers.

    If the narrative about 1/6 does not conform to the questions above, the American people will never learn the most important truth about what 1/6 is, and what kind of country they’re really living in.

    If it turns out the federal government did in fact have undercover agents or confidential informants embedded within the so-called militia groups indicted for conspiring to obstruct the Senate certification on 1/6, the implications would be nothing short of seismic. Especially if such agents or informants enjoyed extremely senior-level positions within such groups.

    One of the key consensus points among the FBI-DOJ and the regime media is the idea that, while 1/6 is primarily the fault of Trump-supporting QAnon-infused “domestic terrorists,” it is secondarily the fault of so-called “intelligence failures.”

    Klobuchar’s own question at the March 2, 2021 FBI hearing (above) reinforces this “intelligence failure” narrative, but she is not alone. A five-month “bipartisan” Senate investigation recently arrived at the very same “intelligence failure” narrative to explain the breach of the Capitol and associated events on 1/6:
    A bipartisan Senate investigation of the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection found security and intelligence failures at every level of government that led to the breach of the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob as lawmakers in a joint session were certifying the 2020 election.

    The 95-page report, a product of a roughly five-month, joint probe by the Senate Homeland Security and Rules Committees, found significant breakdowns ranging “from federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence to a lack of planning and preparation by (U.S. Capitol Police) and law enforcement leadership.” There was no overall operational or staffing plan for that fateful day, a total failure of leadership, according to the committees. [ABC News]
    If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.

    Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.

    It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?

    A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.

    We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted. (Read rest at link)

    ***

    And here's Tucker Carlson covering this revolver.org story with Darren Beattie:

    Tucker Carlson FBI Involved With Capitol Insurrection
    https://rumble.com/vilkx3-tucker-car...urrection.html

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Amanda For This Useful Post:

    monty (16th June 2021),Tumbleweed (16th June 2021)

  3. #82
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,142
    Thanks
    7,048
    Thanked 7,655 Times in 4,641 Posts

    Re: January 6th in DC: "Be there, will be wild!" -- Trump

    Quote Originally Posted by Amanda View Post
    Of course, we're not surprised by this--total set up by the FBI and dirty treasonous scumbags in criminal.gov Article is very long, even gets it the fake kidnapping set up of that nasty Whitmer lady

    Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge

    https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/federal-foreknowledge-jan-6-unindicted-co-conspirators-raise-disturbing-questions/

    Of all the questions asked, words spoken, and ink spilled on the so-called “Capitol Siege” of January 6, 2021, none hold the key to the entire event quite like what Sen. Amy Klobuchar asked of Christopher Wray.

    The Democrat from Minnesota asked the Trump-appointed FBI Director: Did the federal government infiltrate any of the so-called “militia” organizations claimed to be responsible for planning and executing the Capitol Siege?

    The full segment is available on YouTube.

    Christopher Wray is able to uncomfortably weasel his way out of answering the question directly, partially because Klobuchar does him the courtesy of not asking him the question directly. Klobuchar instead asks the FBI director if he wishes he had infiltrated the militia organizations allegedly involved in 1/6 — assuming from the outset that there was in fact no infiltration, thereby providing the FBI director an easy way to avoid addressing the question one way or another.
    Revolver News is willing to address the matter directly in the following three questions:


    • In the year leading up to 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) that the FBI, DOJ, Pentagon and network news have labeled most responsible for planning and executing a Capitol attack on 1/6 infiltrated by agencies of the federal government, or informants of said agencies?
    • Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the Capitol or in the Capitol during the infamous “siege” and what roles did they play (merely passive informants or active instigators)?
    • Finally, of all of the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)?


    From now on, all discussion of 1/6 must give way to a laser-like focus on the questions above, with an unwavering persistence at obtaining the answers.

    If the narrative about 1/6 does not conform to the questions above, the American people will never learn the most important truth about what 1/6 is, and what kind of country they’re really living in.

    If it turns out the federal government did in fact have undercover agents or confidential informants embedded within the so-called militia groups indicted for conspiring to obstruct the Senate certification on 1/6, the implications would be nothing short of seismic. Especially if such agents or informants enjoyed extremely senior-level positions within such groups.

    One of the key consensus points among the FBI-DOJ and the regime media is the idea that, while 1/6 is primarily the fault of Trump-supporting QAnon-infused “domestic terrorists,” it is secondarily the fault of so-called “intelligence failures.”

    Klobuchar’s own question at the March 2, 2021 FBI hearing (above) reinforces this “intelligence failure” narrative, but she is not alone. A five-month “bipartisan” Senate investigation recently arrived at the very same “intelligence failure” narrative to explain the breach of the Capitol and associated events on 1/6:
    A bipartisan Senate investigation of the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection found security and intelligence failures at every level of government that led to the breach of the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob as lawmakers in a joint session were certifying the 2020 election.

    The 95-page report, a product of a roughly five-month, joint probe by the Senate Homeland Security and Rules Committees, found significant breakdowns ranging “from federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence to a lack of planning and preparation by (U.S. Capitol Police) and law enforcement leadership.” There was no overall operational or staffing plan for that fateful day, a total failure of leadership, according to the committees. [ABC News]
    If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.

    Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.

    It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?

    A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.

    We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted. (Read rest at link)

    ***

    And here's Tucker Carlson covering this revolver.org story with Darren Beattie:

    Tucker Carlson FBI Involved With Capitol Insurrection
    https://rumble.com/vilkx3-tucker-car...urrection.html
    After the corruption of the DOJ & FBI exposed in the Bundy Ranch standoff and Malhuer Protest this is no surprise.
    "It can never happen here.” “It won’t get that bad.” “This is America.” Such foolish words. Such blind people. When the country had long passed the point of no return, they still believed that with the next election cycle things would turn around. Moral character and moral fiber were no longer requirements for those who ran for public office, but such ideas were openly mocked.”
    LaVoy Finicum

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to monty For This Useful Post:

    Amanda (16th June 2021),Tumbleweed (16th June 2021),woodman (16th June 2021)

  5. #83
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,377
    Thanks
    4,662
    Thanked 4,581 Times in 2,121 Posts

    Re: January 6th in DC: "Be there, will be wild!" -- Trump

    Quote Originally Posted by monty View Post
    After the corruption of the DOJ & FBI exposed in the Bundy Ranch standoff and Malhuer Protest this is no surprise.
    Obama's administration threw the corruption and intrigue into high gear. Fast and Furious was another act of malfeasance.
    " If you are on the wrong road progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road and in that case the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive man. There is nothing progressive about being pig-headed and refusing to admit a mistake. And I think if you look at the present state of the world it's pretty plain that humanity has been making some big mistake. We're on the wrong road. And if that is so we must go back. Going back is the quickest way on.” ---C. S. Lewis

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to woodman For This Useful Post:

    Amanda (16th June 2021),monty (16th June 2021),Tumbleweed (16th June 2021)

  7. #84
    Unobtanium PatColo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    15,624
    Thanks
    3,935
    Thanked 6,602 Times in 4,198 Posts

    Re: January 6th in DC: "Be there, will be wild!" -- Trump

    great Anglin article, full of images/clips so read @ link https://gab.com/MuhRona/posts/106497583156988672

    Donald Trump Joins Rumble – Rumble Bans Criticism of the Jews!
    ANDREW ANGLIN • JUNE 28, 2021 • 1,700 WORDS • 40 COMMENTS
    https://www.unz.com/aanglin/donald-t...m-of-the-jews/

    The real president Donald Trump was banned from most of the internet after the FBI organized a fake riot at the Capitol on January 6.
    FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"

    "If telling the truth marginalizes you, then that is the place to be. After all, if enough people are willing to be marginalized, then before you know it, society has developed a different center. This is the politics of truth." -- E. Martin Schotz

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to PatColo For This Useful Post:

    woodman (30th June 2021)

  9. #85
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,024
    Thanks
    196
    Thanked 603 Times in 400 Posts

    Re: January 6th in DC: "Be there, will be wild!" -- Trump

    Quote Originally Posted by PatColo View Post
    Donald Trump Joins Rumble – Rumble Bans Criticism of the Jews!
    Nationalfile.com: Andrew Torba revealed that Jared Kushner would not allow President Trump onto Gab unless the free speech platform banned criticism of Jewish people and Israel.
    June 8, 2021
    “All I wanted to do was to give him his voice back, because there’s a hundred million people or more that want to hear what he has to say,” Torba told Witzke..

    Torba said Kushner and his cronies tried to get Torba to “sell out” and “compromise on Gab’s free speech policies,” suggesting that Gab “clean up [their] image,” before President Trump was allowed on. Witzke queried Torba into exactly what people Kushner wanted banned, and Torba revealed that he “specifically had problems with people criticizing Jewish people and Zionism and policies related to Israel”:

    “That’s specifically what I was told, in that you have to do something about these people. He called them Jew-haters, I call them Jew-criticizers,” said Torba...

    “All I wanted to do was to give him his voice back and all that the people around Trump were interested in was grifting,” he continued, claiming that they told him that they were in “make money mode.”
    They went to war with Human Nature, Cold and Flu Season and the Weather!
    Corporation, a fiction legitimized by government, is part of big government.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to keehah For This Useful Post:

    Dachsie (2nd July 2021),PatColo (30th June 2021)

  11. #86
    Great Value Carrots Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    4,683
    Thanks
    1,109
    Thanked 2,127 Times in 1,525 Posts

    Re: January 6th in DC: "Be there, will be wild!" -- Trump

    Vincent James summarizes this bombshell news

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZOef5ht6E58U/
    The Feds Who Planned the Capitol Siege EXPOSED?

    14:29 video runtime
    _________________________



    revolver.news - Darren Beattie

    go to website and watch embedded video-

    https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/st...o-conspirator/



    Federal Protection of “Oath Keepers” Kingpin Stewart Rhodes Breaks The Entire Capitol “Insurrection” Lie Wide Open - Revolver


    https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/st...o-conspirator/

    Federal Protection of “Oath Keepers” Kingpin Stewart Rhodes Breaks The Entire Capitol “Insurrection” Lie Wide Open - Revolver
    71-91 minutes

    Federal Protection of “Oath Keepers” Kingpin Stewart Rhodes Breaks The Entire Capitol “Insurrection” Lie Wide Open
    Experience Revolver without ads

    Hide ads now

    Support Revolver By Going AD-FREE

    CHECK OUT THE NEWS FEED — FOLLOW US ON GAB — CHECK OUT THE MERCH STORE

    Hey Republicans, you can crack open the entire story of January 6, 2021 (“1/6”) with one simple, relentless question: what is the FBI and Army Counterintelligence’s relationship with Stewart Rhodes?

    Yale Law School ‘04 graduate Elmer “Stewart” Rhodes, III.

    Stewart Rhodes is the founder, boss and kingpin of the Oath Keepers.

    The Oath Keepers, we are told, are America’s largest militia, the most prominent antigovernment group in the United States, and the preeminent right-wing domestic extremist insider threat to the entire U.S. military.

    Whatever the truth of these hyperbolic claims, the fact remains: the Oath Keepers are the most extensively prosecuted paramilitary group alleged to be involved in 1/6. Indeed, it was the alleged “pre-planned assault” on the Capitol by Stewart Rhodes’s alleged Oath Keepers lieutenants that was used as the key talking point to try to convert the day’s events from a protest into an “insurrection.”

    But Stewart Rhodes is not simply a key figure in the Oath Keepers. Stewart Rhodes is the Oath Keepers, according to Oath Keepers board member Richard Mack.

    Elmer Stewart Rhodes III — a one-time Army paratrooper, disbarred Yale lawyer, constitutionalist, gun enthusiast, and far-right media star — founded the group called the Oath Keepers in 2009. Since then, he has ridden crosscurrents of American anger and strife that ran from scrubby Western deserts to angry urban protests right into the Capitol rotunda.



    Mack said he and others also raised concerns about the Oath Keepers’ participation in violent protests…

    He said it had become clear that the board had no real power. “[Stewart Rhodes] is the Oath Keepers. It’s hard to separate the two,” Mack said. “It’s his organization, and he can do what he wants to do.”

    Other dissenting voices found that they were no longer welcome. Jim Arroyo, the vice president of the Arizona chapter, said relations began to fray over Rhodes’ insistence on total control... [Buzzfeed]

    WATCH: Check out Darren Beattie's latest interviews

    A mere indictment of Stewart Rhodes, today, for the same conspiracy charges alleged against his underlings, would collapse the entire “threat” of the Oath Keepers that the country has heard so much about. From NPR:

    Rhodes is the central figure of the organization. He is the founder, leader and center of gravity for the group. In theory, then, an indictment against Rhodes could lead to the group’s collapse.

    The Justice Department argues that Stewart Rhodes both substantially organized and activated an imputed plan to use violence, on 1/6, in real-time, through a series of encrypted Signal messages beginning at 1:38 p.m., as Trump concluded his rally speech on the National Mall, and 62 minutes before Oath Keepers lieutenants allegedly formed a “military stack” to rush the Capitol doors.

    These facts alone, as alleged, are more than legally sufficient to secure an indictment of Stewart Rhodes. We will walk you through the mountains of direct and circumstantial evidence built on top of these allegations, but readers must understand this: the only reason Stewart Rhodes is not in jail *right now* is because of a deliberate decision by the Justice Department to protect him.

    Indeed, it is unclear whether the FBI has even sought to search Stewart Rhodes’s residence, personal belongings, or electronic devices, other than a single iPhone allegedly seized on the streets from agents in unmarked FBI vehicles in late April (since returned). For reasons discussed below, there is good reason to suspect the FBI will pursue a tightly controlled and very limited scope of investigation into Stewart Rhodes,. Beyond that narrow scope, they may not want the information they are likely to find.

    Why doesn’t anyone at the FBI or DOJ want him?

    If 1/6 was an “insurrection,” why protect the one man who, more than any other individual referenced in the charging documents of the 530+ open criminal cases, comes closest to the media’s ravenous description of a “lead insurrectionist?”

    Is it possible that the Oath Keepers, the most prominent antigovernment group in the United States, has been run, in effect, by the United States government itself — and nobody has mentioned it until now?

    Revolver News generated tremendous discussion and controversy with our previous piece exploring the possibility that some of the unindicted individuals referred to in the 1/6 charging documents may be undercover agents or informants.

    With this piece, we intend to focus this discussion on a single individual, Person One; i.e., Stewart Rhodes — the leader of the Oath Keepers.

    If it turns out that Stewart Rhodes has had a relationship with the federal government, the implications would be nothing short of staggering.

    For Stewart Rhodes is not just a senior member of the Oath Keepers, he is the Oath Keepers. Given the fact that the Oath Keepers are the major paramilitary organization imputed (by government and media alike) to be responsible for the most serious and egregious elements of the so-called 1/6 insurrection, it follows that it would not only be fair, but necessary to conclude that in an essential respect the 1/6 event was planned and orchestrated by elements of the government itself.

    In other words, 1/6 was not the result of an intelligence failure as FBI Director Christopher Wray, the US Senate, and the media tells us. Rather, 1/6 was the result of an intelligence set-up.

    The following questions should be shouted from every megaphone, every street corner, and every Congressional lectern until the American people get full and complete answers:

    Does the FBI now, or has it ever, maintained a formal or informal relationship or point of contact with Stewart Rhodes, whether directly or indirectly, including through intermediaries?
    Do any other Federal counterintelligence equities, whether in military, intelligence or law enforcement, including but not limited to Army Counterintelligence, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), or otherwise, maintain or have they ever maintained a formal or informal relationship with Stewart Rhodes, whether directly or indirectly, including through intermediaries?
    If such a confidential relationship did exist between Stewart Rhodes and one or more U.S. counterintelligence equities, how do the FBI and other responsible agencies reconcile the enormous gravity of this omission from their previous deflections, non-answers, and boilerplate that they had “no actionable intelligence” before 1/6?
    If such a confidential relationship did exist between Stewart Rhodes and one or more U.S. counterintelligence equities, does this explain the FBI and Justice Department’s failure to pursue criminal actions against Stewart Rhodes in similarly high-profile “right-wing conspiracy plots” in which Rhodes appears to have played a similarly driving role?
    More specifically, did the FBI or any other U.S. counterintelligence equities maintain a discrete or confidential relationship with Stewart Rhodes during the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff? Was this fact dispositive in the Justice Department’s decision to charge 19 defendants — including certain of Stewart Rhodes’s alleged Oath Keepers underlings — for conspiracy to obstruct a legal proceeding, and to spare Rhodes of similar charges?
    Has the FBI even procured a search warrant for Stewart Rhodes’s personal residence and home electronics? If so, on what dates and what specific categories of evidence were sought?
    If Stewart Rhodes is subsequently arrested after the date of this report (given the pressure these revelations are likely to generate), how does the Justice Department explain its failure to indict Stewart Rhodes on conspiracy charges for nearly six months, when its declared purpose for seeking bail denial for simple trespassers was the DOJ’s stated need to prevent “the immediate danger to the community” defendants allegedly posed? Given that multiple Oath Keepers were charged before the January 20th inauguration citing the need to stop their “immediate danger,” why did the DOJ not file immediate charges against Rhodes, and then make a superseding indictment later in time, as is their routine practice in 1/6 cases?

    Stewart Rhodes and the “Shock and Awe” Standard

    Before we turn to Stewart Rhodes’ statements and behavior leading up to and during 1/6, it is important to keep in mind the so-called “shock and awe” standard of prosecution applied to those actually indicted for 1/6 related crimes.

    Lead 1/6 prosecutor Michael Sherwin explains this “Shock and Awe” standard in his own words:

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Dachsie For This Useful Post:

    monty (1st July 2021)

  13. #87
    Iridium monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    8,142
    Thanks
    7,048
    Thanked 7,655 Times in 4,641 Posts

    Re: January 6th in DC: "Be there, will be wild!" -- Trump

    ^ . . . Advance video to 3:41
    before we turn to stewart rhodes’ statements and behavior leading up to and during 1/6, it is important to keep in mind the so-called “shock and awe” standard of prosecution applied to those actually indicted for 1/6 related crimes.

    lead 1/6 prosecutor michael sherwin explains this “shock and awe” standard in his own words:
    "It can never happen here.” “It won’t get that bad.” “This is America.” Such foolish words. Such blind people. When the country had long passed the point of no return, they still believed that with the next election cycle things would turn around. Moral character and moral fiber were no longer requirements for those who ran for public office, but such ideas were openly mocked.”
    LaVoy Finicum

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to monty For This Useful Post:

    Dachsie (1st July 2021)

  15. #88
    Great Value Carrots Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    4,683
    Thanks
    1,109
    Thanked 2,127 Times in 1,525 Posts

    Re: January 6th in DC: "Be there, will be wild!" -- Trump



    The latest news is that Ashley Babbit was alegedly shot by Mike Pence's personal security detail person.

    Do not know person's name but think that is out there now too.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...arly-6-months/

    thegatewaypundit.com
    Report: Ashli Babbitt Shooter Is Member of Mike Pence's Security Detail -- Officer Still Not Named After Nearly 6 Months
    Jim Hoft
    7-8 minutes


    If true, shows Pence was in with Pelosi to set up the President via setting up "Trumpsters"

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Dachsie For This Useful Post:

    PatColo (2nd July 2021)

  17. #89
    Unobtanium PatColo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    15,624
    Thanks
    3,935
    Thanked 6,602 Times in 4,198 Posts

    Re: January 6th in DC: "Be there, will be wild!" -- Trump

    ^ I expect yidtube long since gassed their instance of this vid where I first saw it, but yawl remember a clip of congress floor last Dec, shortly after Pence 'failed' to do that delay-maneuver available to him & instead certified the elec college vote count, & all the congressperps were socializing -- some fat cat judeo-mason shmoe was seen handing pence some kind of medal/coin/whatever; meanwhile pelosi was nudging pence from behind trying to get his attention; when he turned around, he & pelosi elbow bumped in knowing gratitude!
    FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"

    "If telling the truth marginalizes you, then that is the place to be. After all, if enough people are willing to be marginalized, then before you know it, society has developed a different center. This is the politics of truth." -- E. Martin Schotz

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PatColo For This Useful Post:

    Cebu_4_2 (2nd July 2021),Dachsie (2nd July 2021),woodman (2nd July 2021)

  19. #90
    Great Value Carrots Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    4,683
    Thanks
    1,109
    Thanked 2,127 Times in 1,525 Posts

    Re: January 6th in DC: "Be there, will be wild!" -- Trump

    My "new hero" reporter is Darren Beatie of Revolver.news.

    I do not find that he has mentioned alleged shooter of Ashley Babbit but his main bombshell issue is his alone and he says if we don't blow this wide open right now, we don't have a country.

    https://rumble.com/vj9atz-evidence-j...operation.html

    Evidence Jan. 6 ‘Insurrection’ May Have Been An Intelligence Operation
    Bannons War Room
    Published June 30, 2021 179,468 Views

    I do not know how to embed the video here that is on Beatie's Rumble account

    https://rumble.com/embed/vgn4op/?pub=d4udp


  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dachsie For This Useful Post:

    monty (23rd July 2021),woodman (3rd July 2021)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •