biden EO canceled white women

[cheka.]

this makes sense with the communist coup of kill whitey

EO just canceled women being part of affirm action

white women reduced to zero affirm action value

all other flavors of women keep their minority and/or gay affirm action values

white women can fck off and die penniless

[woodman]

Clown World. Sounds like an amusement park doesn’t it? Are we amused?

[Shami-Amourae]

Whose going to protest at Black Lives Matter protests if White women aren't allowed?

The Left is 90% supported by White women wanting to destroy White men.

[ziero0]

What does a "white women" look like? I've never met one.

Is this where two or more females are surgically bonded? Or are they legally joined into a singular entity (similar to what happens when a man and woman say words to become husband and wife)?

Buck and doe are genders within the deer family. The king of England created hart and hind because he proclaimed buck and doe protected in his forests. Harts and hinds received no such sovereign guarantee. In fact to be considered a hart or hind the king must have developed an intent to kill (and eat).

Maybe Joe plans on eating white women?

[cheka.]

practically all of media is only covering the fags playing girls' sports angle of this EO -- hiding the much MUCH heavier implications in the job market

here is one article that gets close to figuring it out - but doesnt hit the target

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...301212879.html

WASHINGTON, Jan. 21, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Feminist organization, Women's Liberation Front (WoLF), is denouncing an executive order signed by President Biden on his first day in office which takes steps to end female-only spaces and sports. Biden signed the controversial "Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation" despite the objections from many women's organizations.

While WoLF supports protecting LGB Americans from discrimination based on same-sex attraction, this must be done without harming women's rights. The policy will require federal agencies to interpret every regulation, including both Title VII and Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, that prohibits "sex discrimination" as also prohibiting discrimination on the basis of "gender identity." According to Lauren Adams, Legal Director for WoLF, this policy will likely prohibit female-only student athletics and sex-segregation in intimate spaces such as domestic violence shelters and prisons.

Feminists and LGB activists decry the order as a threat to women's rights and American civil liberties.

The hashtag #BidenErasedWomen is now trending on Twitter as feminists, the LGB community, and civil liberties advocates are speaking out against the policy.

Another executive order Biden signed yesterday addressing equity for "underserved communities" also left out sex discrimination, ignoring the history of oppression and inequality faced by women and girls in the United States.

"Both executive orders send a heartbreaking message to women and girls that their government does not view them as worthy of consideration and is not willing to recognize female people as a discrete class," said Adams. The orders also seriously weaken the ability of federal agencies to even consider the needs of women and girls.

Natasha Chart, WoLF Executive Director, said, "This executive order is death by a thousand cuts for women's rights, as well as a threat to civil liberties for all Americans. Our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and conscience must be upheld alongside common-sense protections for vulnerable populations such as women, girls, and LGB Americans."

While policies protecting individuals from discrimination based on same-sex attraction are widely supported, "gender identity" policies are unpopular. Polling of American voters in October revealed cross-partisan disapproval of policies that would allow violent male sex offenders to be housed in women's prisons and emergency shelters, or allow boys to compete in girls' athletics. These policies are particularly unpopular with marginalized groups, such as black and Hispanic voters, who tend to be disproportionately affected by them.

[midnight rambler]

Project Destruction of the Family now in high gear. Orwell nailed it.

[monty]

practically all of media is only covering the fags playing girls' sports angle of this EO -- hiding the much MUCH heavier implications in the job market

here is one article that gets close to figuring it out - but doesnt hit the target

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...301212879.html


WASHINGTON, Jan. 21, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Feminist organization, Women's Liberation Front (WoLF), is denouncing an executive order signed by President Biden on his first day in office which takes steps to end female-only spaces and sports. Biden signed the controversial "Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation" despite the objections from many women's organizations.

While WoLF supports protecting LGB Americans from discrimination based on same-sex attraction, this must be done without harming women's rights. The policy will require federal agencies to interpret every regulation, including both Title VII and Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, that prohibits "sex discrimination" as also prohibiting discrimination on the basis of "gender identity." According to Lauren Adams, Legal Director for WoLF, this policy will likely prohibit female-only student athletics and sex-segregation in intimate spaces such as domestic violence shelters and prisons.

Feminists and LGB activists decry the order as a threat to women's rights and American civil liberties.

The hashtag #BidenErasedWomen is now trending on Twitter as feminists, the LGB community, and civil liberties advocates are speaking out against the policy.

Another executive order Biden signed yesterday addressing equity for "underserved communities" also left out sex discrimination, ignoring the history of oppression and inequality faced by women and girls in the United States.

"Both executive orders send a heartbreaking message to women and girls that their government does not view them as worthy of consideration and is not willing to recognize female people as a discrete class," said Adams. The orders also seriously weaken the ability of federal agencies to even consider the needs of women and girls.

Natasha Chart, WoLF Executive Director, said, "This executive order is death by a thousand cuts for women's rights, as well as a threat to civil liberties for all Americans. Our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and conscience must be upheld alongside common-sense protections for vulnerable populations such as women, girls, and LGB Americans."

While policies protecting individuals from discrimination based on same-sex attraction are widely supported, "gender identity" policies are unpopular. Polling of American voters in October revealed cross-partisan disapproval of policies that would allow violent male sex offenders to be housed in women's prisons and emergency shelters, or allow boys to compete in girls' athletics. These policies are particularly unpopular with marginalized groups, such as black and Hispanic voters, who tend to be disproportionately affected by them.

People need to wake up and understand that a president's executive orders only apply to the executive branch of the government. Presidents, governors and mayors do not make law.