Don't Take the Vaccine!

[dys]

Better off dead than red.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVwTEy86-rs

[EE_]

WAYNE ROOT: If the Vaccine is So Great, Why are So Many People Dropping Dead? Heart Attacks Skyrocket, Children Suffer Heart Problems, Soccer Players Dropping on Fields, ICUs Overwhelmed From Coast to Coast

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...from-coast-to/

[monty]

Freedom of information request to the British government asking if the spike protein remains in the shoulder muscle at the site of the injection

https://www.gov.uk/government/public...ine-foi-21-611

1st July 2021 FOI 21/611 Dear [redacted]
REG 174 for Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 to be corrected Thank you for your information request, dated 02 June 2021, where you asked the following: In REG 174 for Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2; under 5.2 Pharmacokinetic properties it states “Not Applicable”.
Herewith does MHRA suggest that the novel mRNA COVID vaccines behave like “traditional” vaccines and the vaccine spike protein — responsible for infection and its most severe symptoms — would remain mostly in the vaccination site at the shoulder muscle.

However, there is a Pharmacokinetic property study done “2.6.5B Pharmacokinetics: Organ distribution. Test Article Labelled LNP mRNA formulation containing ALC-0315 and ALC 0159. Report number 185350” see:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2...fgwmm9qExIk&e=

This Japanese data shows that the spike protein of the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ gets into the blood where it circulates for several days post-vaccination and then accumulated in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands, and in the ovaries.

Once in circulation, the spike protein can attach to specific ACE2 receptors that are on blood platelets and the cells that line blood vessels. This can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting. It can also lead to bleeding.

This study looked at the vaccine distribution (as of ALC 0315/0159 plasma level) in about 45 organs were measured over time intervals of 15 min, 1hr, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 24hr and 48 hr. Pharmacokinetic studies have also been done over the days up to a 9 days period.

The study shows that in many organs the vaccine plasma level keeps rising after 2 days (concentration (ug lipid equivalent/g [or mL]: males and females combined) (ranking) Liver (24.3); Spleen (23.4); Adrenaline glands (18.2); Ovarium (12.3); Bone marrow (3,77); Pancreas (0.6); Uterus (0.5); Testes (0.3); Eyes (0.1) To note is that the Adrenaline glands being affected by high plasma levels will cause an overall organ stress; which in turn affects particular the immune and the nervous system. Compare that to Pfizer vaccine’s Adverse Drug Reaction (see yellow cards of 21 May) in related organs (ranking in % of vaccine doses): Nervous system disorders 0.14%; Muscle & tissue disorders 0.1%; Gastrointestinal disorders 0.08%; Skin disorders 0.06%; Respiratory disorders 0.035%; Eye disorders 0.012%; Blood disorders 0.026%; Infections 0.02%; Cardiac disorder 0.01%; Reproductive & breast disorder 0.0116% Further it is shown that the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk: babies got Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and died.

Moreover, there is a coloration between the Pharmacokinetics and the vaccine injuries. Therefor significant changes have to be made in Reg 174 or better due to the seriousness of the found injuries; it should be withdrawn.

Question: In case MHRA does (according to the above findings) not amend or withdrawn its current version: please state why and which study supports such reasoning You also commented. Please do integrate in our Ref: FOI 21/611 the following information: European Medicines Agency (EMA) reviewers revealed Pfizer didn’t thoroughly examine biodistribution and pharmacokinetics issues relating to its vaccine before submitting the vaccine to the EMA. Its reviewers shared with the HMRA this explicit admission: “No traditional pharmacokinetic or biodistribution studies have been performed with the vaccine candidate BNT162b2.” In fact, in key studies — called biodistribution studies, which are designed to test where an injected compound moves throughout the body — the time course of its absorption, bioavailability, distribution, metabolism and excretion travels in the body, and which tissues or organs it accumulates in — Pfizer did not use the commercial vaccine (BNT162b2) but instead relied on a “surrogate” mRNA that produced the luciferase protein. Regulatory documents also show Pfizer did not follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies of its vaccine, as key studies did not meet good laboratory practice (GLP). GLPs, are of paramount importance for quality and ultimately for patient safety. If such important steps are skipped, the risk-benefit analysis would need to be compelling.” Additionally, the EMA document states, “Biodistribution: Several literature reports indicate that LNP-formulated RNAs can distribute rather non-specifically to several organs such as spleen, heart, kidney, lung and brain. In line with this, results from the newly transmitted study 185350 indicate a broader biodistribution pattern.” This EMA observation corresponds with a growing number of adverse events and aligns with data TrialSite obtained through FOIA showing concentrations of LNP-formulated RNAs in the spleen, ovaries, other tissues and organs. A quick review the Toxicology Section (2.3.3) of the EMA Assessment Report on Comirnaty (BNT162b2) issued on 19 Feb. 2021, raises concerns about data applicability of preclinical study findings to clinical use: “To determine the biodistribution of the LNP-formulated modified mRNA (modRNA), the applicant did study distribution of the modRNA in two different non-GLP studies, in mice and rats, and determined the biodistribution of a surrogate luciferase modRNA. Thus, one might question the validity and applicability of non-GLP studies conducted using a variant of the subject mRNA vaccine. “In addition, no genotoxicity data were provided to EMA [& to MHRA].”

Pre-clinical studies showing BNT162b2’s active part (mRNA-lipid nanoparticles) — which produce the spike protein — did not stay at the injection site and surrounding lymphoid tissue as scientists originally theorized, but spread widely throughout the body and accumulated in various organs, including the ovaries and spleen. Research suggests this could lead to the production of spike protein in unintended places, including the brain, ovaries and spleen, which may cause the immune system to attack organs and tissues resulting in damage, and raises serious questions about genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity risks associated with the vaccine. Whilst MHRA REG 174 (on BNT162b2) states that the studies performed and submitted by Pfizer all fulfilled the GLP standards: they were actually non-GLP. Moreover, MHRA provided Pfizer an exception to this GLP regulatory rule: despite that BNT162b is based on a radically new life science-based technology, and that Pfizer having been fined several times for being dishonest in the data they supplied. Now that the MHRA is explicitly informed about Pfizer having withheld, forged and frauded essential GLP data concerning its vaccine biodistribution and pharmacokinetics; MHRA’ conclusion that BNT162b is safe is false. The MHRA should interpretate that its Adverse Drug Reaction results on its yellow card report to be related to BNT162b2’ biodistribution and pharmacokinetics. Whereas Pfizer’s vaccine BNT162b’s risk-benefit analysis is negative; therefor should BNT162b’ Emergency Use Authorization approval be withdrawn. Yet if the MHRA does not do make such interpretation and withdraw: then what are MHRA’ reasons

Please see below our responses to your question.
Distribution of the vaccine The first part of your enquiry concerns the distribution of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies are generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensing of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO guidelines on nonclinical evaluation of vaccines, 2005). However, specific studies can be considered on a case by case basis. For the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine the adsorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME) profile of BNT162b2 included an evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of two lipid excipients (ALC-0315 and ALC-0159) and the potential in vivo biodistribution of the vaccine using luciferase RNA expression as a surrogate reporter.

The downloaded report from the link you provided appears to be from the common technical document (CTD) presumably submitted to Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. The document is in Japanese and has not been evaluated but based on the tables/figures in the document it appears to be an amalgamation of different reports the MHRA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have previously reviewed. These studies are summarised in the MHRA and EMA public assessment reports which provide the basis for approval of the vaccine. Links to these are provided below:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19 https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf
The study you highlight in your question is a tissue distribution study using a [3H]-labelled lipid nanoparticle-mRNA formulation containing the lipids ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 following intramuscular administration in rats. In this study the greatest concentration of radioactivity was found remaining in the injection site at each time point, with low levels of radioactivity detected in most tissues. It should be noted that the distribution of the lipid nanoparticles was measured using a radioactive label (tritium) in a lipid component. The data do not allow a judgment on the distribution of the mRNA component or expression and distribution of the encoded COVID-19 spike protein. Whilst the lipid was widely distributed, the amounts outside the injection site and liver were small and were not associated with any adverse effects. In the repeated dose preclinical toxicity studies, no adverse effects outside of the expected inflammation associated with an immune response were detected.

Safety of breast-feeding In your letter you suggest “that the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk: babies got Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and died”. We are not aware from UK Yellow Card data of any similar reports with breastfed infants. We are also not currently aware of any evidence that the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 or other approved COVID vaccines are transferred to human breast milk. Recent published data suggest that mRNA from COVID-19 BNT162b2 (Pfizer) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines are not detected in human breast milk samples collected 4-48 hours post-vaccination(Golan et al 2021 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....05.21252998v1).

The current Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advice is that women who are breastfeeding can be given the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 (this advice is also in line with breastfeeding advice for the COVID-19 AstraZeneca vaccine).

Adverse event profile of the vaccine The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was evaluated in clinical trials involving more than 44,000 participants. The most frequent adverse reactions in trials were pain at the injection site, fatigue, headache, myalgia (muscle pains), chills, arthralgia (joint pains), and fever; these were each reported in more than 1 in 10 people. These reactions were usually mild or moderate in intensity and resolved within a few days after vaccination. The MHRA continually monitors the safety of COVID-19 vaccines available in the UK. A weekly summary of Yellow Card reporting is published by the MHRA. These reports can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/public...card-reporting

Question: In case MHRA does (according to the above findings) not amend or withdrawn its current version: please state why and which study supports such reasoning As of 16 June, an estimated 16.8 million first doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and around 10.9 million second doses have been administered. As of 16 June 2021, for the UK, 73,944 Yellow Cards have been reported for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. For all COVID-19 vaccines, the overwhelming majority of reports relate to injection-site reactions (sore arm for example) and generalised symptoms such as ‘flu-like’ illness, headache, chills, fatigue (tiredness), nausea (feeling sick), fever, dizziness, weakness, aching muscles, and rapid heartbeat. Generally, these happen shortly after the vaccination and are not associated with more serious or lasting illness. In clinical trials, the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine has demonstrated very high levels of protection against symptomatic infection. Data is now available on the impact of the vaccination campaign in reducing infections and illness in the UK (https://www.gov.uk/government/public...19-vaccination ). All vaccines and medicines have some side effects. These side effects need to be continuously balanced against the expected benefits in preventing illness. As with all vaccines and medicines, the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is continuously monitored and benefits and possible risks remain under review. Thank you for your inquiry and please contact us should you have further questions.

Yours sincerely FOI Team, Vigilance and Risk Management of Medicines Division

[midnight rambler]

If you're happy and you know it stomp your feet!

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jUjL2hts2xZI/

[keehah]

https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/sta...37916350500869

@RepMattGaetz
.
@RepThomasMassie
on
@Firebrand_Pod
: Do Not Trust Pro-Vax Mandate Republicans

"You shouldn't trust them with your life or your vote in my opinion.”

[video 4:23]
WATCH: https://rumble.com/vqw0cd-episode-20...ith-matt-.html

Coerced vaccination is a racket.

Thomas Sheridan: Every Hundred Years
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cllwRckIGMQ&t=720s
40:00

[keehah]

thegrayzone.com: Leaked files expose Syria psyops veteran astroturfing BreadTube star to counter Covid restriction critics

DECEMBER 24, 2021
Leaked documents have revealed a state-sponsored influence operation designed to undermine critics of the British government’s coronavirus policies by astroturfing a prominent founder of the BreadTube clique of “anti-fascist” YouTube influencers.

The project aims to conduct psychological profiling on British citizens dissenting against policies such as mandatory vaccination and lockdowns, then leverage the data to establish a YouTube channel that portrays these critics as dangerous “superspreaders” of “disinformation.”

Designed “to curb the influence of pseudoscience material online, with specific emphasis on Coronavirus-related ‘anti-vaxxing’ sentiment,” the operation is run by the UK’s Royal Institution, and dubbed “Challenging Pseudoscience.”

Its top patron is Charles, the Prince of Wales, next in line to the British throne, who recently hit out at supposed “conspiracy theories” surrounding COVID-19 vaccines. The organization received a substantial cash injection in 2020 from the UK government’s Culture Recovery Fund earmarked for video production.

Leaked files obtained by The Grayzone indicate that the Royal Institution has enlisted the services of Valent Projects, a “social change” communications firm founded by a public relations operative previously involved in the UK Foreign Office’s campaign for violent regime change in Syria. Valent has also been sponsored by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), a US intelligence cut-out, for a project aimed at “investigating disinformation.”...

linkedin.com: Valent Projects

214 followers
4mo

The first stage of our analysis of 25,000 UK people posting/sharing anti vax content online has thrown up some interesting findings:

- By far most anti-vax content sharers (about 80 percent) are "flirters" rather than committed conspiracy obsessives
- There are as many people with social liberal/left wing anti vaxx views in the UK as those with conservative/hard right views
- However, more than half of those being drawn into anti-vax online eco chambers are politically agnostic (i.e not left or right wing) and will share content from a Labour MP (Dawn Butler) as willingly as (right wing populist) Nigel Farage
- New Age spirituality and self improvement (fitness and entrepreneurship) are often gateways into hard anti-vax conspiracy eco chambers

The findings came about due to a project Valent is conducting for Countering Pseudoscience at the Royal Institution. They will now be used to inform ethnographic research designed to understand "why" people hold these views.

https://www.valent-projects.com/

Valent Projects counters disinformation campaigns.

LOL!

Leaked Valent Project document:
https://ufile.io/fak5xdbu

Phase 2:
During the second phase, the project will leverage the insights from the research to:
● Identify key audiences (superspreaders) contributing to the spread of anti vaxxer narratives in the UK
● Understand the psychological drivers behind the actions of those superspreaders
● Create content that is psychologically attuned to key audiences psychological drivers
● Deliver content through channels and mediums that is most accessible and credible to those key audiences
● Monitor audience reactions in order to refine delivery and evaluate performance

[keehah]

reuters.com: False claim: the 1918 influenza pandemic was caused by vaccines

APRIL 1, 2020
The claim that the influenza pandemic of 1918 “was the after-effect of the massive nation-wide vaccine campaign” is unfounded. A vaccine against the flu did not exist at the time...

It is true that U.S. soldiers during World War I were subject to immunization requirements....

During World War I, soldiers were given live smallpox and whole cell typhoid inoculations, as well as therapeutic tetanus and diphtheria antitoxins..

Killing an estimated 675,000 Americans ( virus.stanford.edu/uda/ ), the 1918 H1N1 flu pandemic (also referred to as the “Spanish Influenza” or “Spanish flu”) was indeed the deadliest flu pandemic in modern history.

reuters.com: Fact Check-A meningitis vaccine trial at a U.S. military camp did not cause the 1918 Spanish Flu

APRIL 13, 2021
While a meningitis vaccine trial did take place, experts contacted by Reuters said a meningitis vaccine could not have caused a flu pandemic...

It is true that in early 1918, before the first cases of Spanish flu were reported at Camp Funston at Fort Riley in Kansas in March 1918, a trial of a vaccine made with inactivated strains of the meningococcus bacteria was conducted on military volunteers at the same location...

An article entitled “The 1918 “Spanish Flu”: only the vaccinated died” has been shared over 61,119 times on Facebook since its publication May 29, 2020

rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com: THE 1918 “SPANISH FLU”: ONLY THE VACCINATED DIED

Autopsies after the war proved that the 1918 flu was NOT a “FLU” at all. It was caused by random dosages of an experimental ‘bacterial meningitis vaccine’, which to this day, mimics flu-like symptoms. The massive, multiple assaults with additional vaccines on the unprepared immune systems of soldiers and civilians created a “killing field”. Those that were not vaccinated were not affected.

SO… HOW DID CIVILIANS DIE?

1. WW1 ended sooner than expected, leaving HUGE quantities of unused experimental vaccines.
2. Fearing that soldiers coming home would spread diseases to their families, The U.S. government pushed the largest vaccine ‘fear’ campaign in history. They used the human population as a research and development lab to field test experimental vaccines.
3. Tens of millions of civilians died in the same manner as did the soldiers.
4. Instead of stopping the vaccines, doctors intensified them, calling it the great “Spanish Flu of 1918”. As a result, ONLY THE VACCINATED DIED.

WW1 U.S. soldiers were given 14 – 25 untested, experimental vaccines within days of each other, which triggered intensified cases of ALL the diseases at once.

newscientist.com: Bacteria were the real killers in 1918 flu pandemic

4 August 2008
Brundage’s team culled first-hand accounts, medical records and infection patterns from 1918 and 1919. Although a nasty strain of flu virus swept around the world, bacterial pneumonia that came on the heels of mostly mild cases of flu killed the majority of the 20 to 100 million victims of the so-called Spanish flu, they conclude.

“We agree completely that bacterial pneumonia played a major role in the mortality of the 1918 pandemic,” says Anthony Fauci, director of National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease in Bethesda, Maryland, and author of another journal article out next month that comes to a similar conclusion...

That pneumonia causes most deaths in an influenza outbreak is well known. Late 19th century physicians recognised pneumonia as the cause of death of most flu victims. While doctors limited fatalities in other 20th-century outbreaks with antibiotics such as penicillin, which was discovered in 1928, but did not see use in patients until 1942.

This is not to say that flu viruses do nothing, says Jonathan McCullers, an expert on influenza-bacteria co-infections at St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

McCullers’ research suggests that influenza kills cells in the respiratory tract, providing food and a home for invading bacteria. On top of this, an overstressed immune system makes it easier for the bacteria to get a foothold...

Military health records for barracks and battleships also painted a different picture. New recruits – men unlikely to have been exposed to resident bacteria – died in droves, while soldiers whose immune systems were accustomed to the local bugs survived.

And most compelling, Brundage says, medical experts of the day identified pneumonia as the cause of most deaths.

educate-yourself.org: Chap. 2: Vaccination Condemned
Book by Eleanor McBean ISBN:1110000060058. (1981)

I WAS AN ON-THE-SPOT OBSERVER OF THE 1918 INFLUENZA EPIDEMIC

All the doctors and people who were living at the time of the 1918 Spanish Influenza epidemic say it was the most terrible disease the world has ever had. Strong men, hale and hearty, one day would be dead the next. The disease had the characteristics of the black death added to typhoid, diphtheria, pneumonia, smallpox, paralysis and all the diseases the people had been vaccinated with immediately following World War 1. Practically the entire population had been injected "seeded" with a dozen or more diseases — or toxic serums. When all those doctor-made diseases started breaking out all at once it was tragic.

That pandemic dragged on for two years, kept alive with the addition of more poison drugs administered by the doctors who tried to suppress the symptoms. As far as I could find out, the flu hit only the vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots escaped the flu. My family had refused all the vaccinations so we remained well all the time. We knew from the health teachings of Graham, Trail, Tilden and others, that people cannot contaminate the body with poisons without causing disease.

When the flu was at its peak, all the stores were closed as well as the schools, businesses — even the hospital, as the doctors and nurses had been vaccinated too and were down with the flu. No one was on the streets. It was like a ghost town. We [who didn’t taken any vaccines] seemed to be the only family which didn’t get the flu; so my parents went from house to house doing what they could to look after the sick, as it was impossible to get a doctor then. If it were possible for germs, bacteria, virus, or bacilli to cause disease, they had plenty of opportunity to attack my parents when they were spending many hours a day in the sick rooms. But they didn’t get the flu and they didn’t bring any germs home to attack us children and cause anything. None of our family had the flu — not even a sniffle— and it was in the winter with deep snow on the ground.

It has been said that the 1918 flu epidemic killed 20,000,000 people throughout the world. But, actually, the doctors killed them with their crude and deadly treatments and drugs. This is a harsh accusation but it is nevertheless true, judging by the success of the drugless doctors in comparison with that of the medical doctors.

While the medical men and medical hospitals were losing 33% of their flu cases, the non-medical hospitals such as BATTLE CREEK, KELLOGG and MACFADDEN’S HEALTH-RESTORIUM were getting almost 100% healings with their water cure, baths, enemas, etc., fasting and certain other simple healing methods, followed by carefully worked out diets of natural foods. One health doctor didn’t lose a patient in eight years. The very successful health treatment of one of those drugless doctors who didn’t lose any patients will be given in the other part of this book, titled VACCINATION CONDEMNED, to be published a little later.

If the medical doctors had been as advanced as the drugless doctors, there would not have been those 20 million deaths from the medical flu treatment.

There was seven times more disease among the vaccinated soldiers than among the unvaccinated civilians, and the diseases were those they had been vaccinated against. One soldier who had returned from overseas in 1912 told me that the army hospitals were filled with cases of infantile paralysis and he wondered why grown men should have an infant disease. Now, we know that paralysis is a common after-effect of vaccine poisoning. Those at home didn’t get the paralysis until after the world-wide vaccination campaign in 1918.

End of excerpt

[monty]

reiner füllmich: “new findings… enough to dismantle the

entire (vax) industry!”

First published at 01:57 UTC on January 1st, 2022.
Views 83891 20 minutes


https://www.bitchute.com/video/M0vmjVc5mkQM/


The full 4 hour session, advance to 1:10 to see the above presentation

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investiga...ession-85-en:f

[Amanda]

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/u...in-indiana-for
Unprecedented: Deaths in Indiana for ages 18-64 are up 40%

This is huge. Something is killing healthy people at an unprecedented rate. It isn't COVID. Could it be the "safe and effective" COVID vaccine? I think so. Here's why.

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch...5_395x377.jpeg

Steve Kirsch 4 hr ago

379

480

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch...d_800x450.jpeg
Start by reading this story, “Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64.” Read the whole thing now.
Note: In the event this story “disappears” from view, I kept a backup. You can’t be too careful nowadays.
This is big. Really big. And I’m not the only one that thinks so.
Key points:

1. Deaths among 18-64 year-olds (who don’t normally die) are up by 40% in 2021 vs. pre-pandemic levels
   
2. This is huge. HUGE. They’ve never seen anything like this before in their history. Normally death rates don’t change at all. They are very stable. It would take something REALLY BIG to have an effect this big.
   
3. Others in the industry are seeing it too.
   
4. It isn’t COVID. COVID deaths are down this year.
   
5. Whatever it is that is causing this, it is bigger and more deadlier than COVID and it’s affecting nearly everyone.
   
6. The CDC is totally on top of this… ok, just kidding… the CDC is clueless as usual.

All of this means that “something” is causing MASSIVE numbers of excess deaths in 2021.
I wonder what is killing all these people?
Here are the clues we have, so we need someone really smart to piece this mystery together:

1. These deaths started only after the vaccines rolled out
   
2. The deaths are “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who are the employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through OneAmerica. That’s not to say 65 and over aren’t affected as well. What’s key is that we’re seeing effects in young people.
   
3. There are more excess deaths than anytime in history, so it is likely caused by a new threat, never seen before in history, like a novel vaccine that has never been used before or something new like that that a huge number of people would be exposed to (such as by a state that pushes vaccination).
   
4. Not due to COVID (COVID deaths are way down).
   
5. They are dying from a variety of causes, not just a single cause. So this rules out food or air-based pathogens. I note that the variety of causes of death is consistent with the wide range of adverse events caused by the COVID vaccines, for example.
   
6. It has to affect massive numbers of people to get an effect size that high. So it is something new affecting at least half the population, like a new mandated vaccine for example.
   
7. There is a huge push for vaccines by the Indiana governor, he wants to have everyone vaccinated. Interesting. “Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb doubled down on the drive to get everyone in the state vaccinated.”
   
8. Useful fact: Adults 65 and older account for 16% of the US population but 80% of COVID-19 deaths in the US, somewhat higher than their share of deaths from all causes (75%) over the same period. We’ll use that 75% stat later.
   
9. It isn’t just the one life insurance company, they are all seeing this huge rises at other insurance companies. So this is something huge and national in scope, like a vaccine mandate in the entire US, or something like that.
   
10. “Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be a 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.” This suggests it has to be a novel pathogen (like a novel vaccine, for example). It has to be something first introduced in 2021, you know, like a new COVID vaccine.
    
11. The company is seeing an “uptick” in disability claims, saying at first it was short-term disability claims, and now the increase is in long-term disability claims. So whatever it is is killing people and those that aren’t killed are disabled. You know, like what the COVID vaccines are proven to do (since I believe VAERS).
    
12. Brian Tabor, the president of the Indiana Hospital Association, said that hospitals across the state are being flooded with patients “with many different conditions,” saying “unfortunately, the average Hoosiers’ health has declined during the pandemic.” In a follow-up call, he said he did not have a breakdown showing why so many people in the state are being hospitalized – for what conditions or ailments. But he said the extraordinarily high death rate quoted by Davison matched what hospitals in the state are seeing. So this could all be caused by the COVID vaccines.
    
13. The number of hospitalizations in the state is now higher than before the COVID-19 vaccine was introduced a year ago, and in fact is higher than it’s been in the past five years, Dr. Lindsay Weaver, Indiana’s chief medical officer, said at a news conference with Gov. Eric Holcomb on Wednesday. So again, whatever is killing people is worse than COVID. It can’t be COVID since we have so many vaccinated people with our safe and effective vaccine that prevents COVID deaths.
    
14. The CEO of the insurance company doesn’t think the vaccines are causing the deaths and disability. Check out this tweet: he is requiring his employees to be vaccinated! So it cannot be the vaccine, even though it fits all the facts! Darn! The CEO knows that the vaccines are safe and effective. He has no evidence to back that statement up, but we should believe him since he’s an authority figure (you know, like the CDC). We can always trust authority figures, and even more so when they have no evidence. Who needs evidence? Science has been displaced in 2021.
    
    More at the link: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/u...in-indiana-for
    
    
    I know this Kirsch guy is a jew, but I have to say, he's been working hard at exposing these poison kill shots. Even did a presentation trying to stop the FDA from approving the kill shots for kids.
    

[Neuro]

That is what should happen. That same CEO said though that he will fire all his unvaxxed minions and raise the premiums for companies in counties with low vax rate. The good thing about that though is that the reinsurers will go bankrupt and probably cause a system collapse through the derivative market. This is the same reason why the mortgage crisis of 2008 happened. Niggas mortgage got repackaged into AAA rated debt bonds. Now vaxtards life insurance got a AAA while their average life expectancy probably was reduced by a decade or so. Venture capitalists are going to buy derivatives on life insurance on 25-44 year old white middle class in democrat counties hand over fist, and start cashing in as they die of heart attacks, strokes and Creutzfeld Jacobs disease in droves.