Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Silencing Doctors - looks like Communism to me

  1. #1
    Great Value Carrots Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    4,669
    Thanks
    1,109
    Thanked 2,124 Times in 1,522 Posts

    Silencing Doctors - looks like Communism to me

    This is a spiritual battle of good versus evil. We must resist, and expose evil, and having done all to stand.





    https://rumble.com/vmmx8b-hospital-a...om-hcqivm.html

    HCQ and Ivermectin Banned

    HCQ and Ivermectin Banned


    14:52 video runtime

    Our next guest is Steve. It’s just Steve, no last name given because that’s the era we live in. It’s very dangerous to hold an unapproved opinion in these times, and it can be nearly as dangerous for one’s family members. Hold the wrong opinions and you can lose your friends, your job, your house, your life. So yes, we can hardly blame Steve for wanting his last name kept anonymous.

    Anyway, Steve works in health care administration, and his wife is a doctor. In the past week, Steven has received three emails, from the American Board of Family Medicine, the American Board of Internal Medicine, and the American Board of Pediatrics. Each of these emails states, unequivocally, that doctors should not be prescribing the drugs ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine for coronavirus patients. Now, a lot of doctors believe pretty sincerely that these drugs can be helpful for coronavirus patients. At a minimum, they’re both extensively tested drugs that are very unlikely to cause any harm if prescribed in safe amounts. Doesn’t matter. Doctors in Steve’s hospital are being prohibited from prescribing either drug, he says, and if they defy that order, they could be putting their medical licenses at risk, and by extension their very livelihoods.

    Steve’s message shows just how remarkably dangerous it is these days for a medical professional to voice an alternative perspective, but Steve is a brave person and he believes the well-being of the public outweighs his own personal safety. I’m very glad to have him on this program.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Dachsie For This Useful Post:

    woodman (20th September 2021)

  3. #2
    Great Value Carrots Dachsie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    4,669
    Thanks
    1,109
    Thanked 2,124 Times in 1,522 Posts

    Re: Silencing Doctors - looks like Communism to me

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/Chf8zg6Fl1fS/

    Dr. Ardis: The Medical Industry Is Responsible For ‘Covid’ Deaths, Not Virus



    video runtime 45:00

    Sep 21, 2021
    Dr. Ardis: The Medical Industry Is Responsible For ‘Covid’ Deaths, Not Virus

    Dr. Bryan Ardis joins Owen Shroyer live in studio to break down how the medical industry in killing more people through toxic treatments and vaccines than the COVID virus itself.

    Dr. Bryan Ardis is not an M.D., but is a medical professional. I posted his credentials in the Coronavirus thread. There are many different kinds of "doctors" and I think it is important to show what kind they are.


    https://www.thedrardisshow.com/

    Dr. Ardis is really helping people deal with this illness. However, I have come to the conclusion that we have to take care of ourselves as we are under attack by the entire USA medical establishment and regarding "this illness" all we have had is big lies upon big lies and the trust is gone.


    ___________________________

    I have located Table 2e on the NIH website. Not an easy task - governmental agencies are great at hiding and witholding documents.

    Ivermectin is an FDA approved medicine and there have been several clinical studies.



    The dosing recommendations for Ivermectin are show in last part of this posting. Good luck in printing these studies and getting your doctor and hospital to administer this medicine. The hospital protocols are dictating to the sold-out doctors how to treat their patients. The goal is to kill the patient.
    There are things you can do at home to keep your lungs open for breathing. We should be sharing these things in a separate thread.

    Stay out of hospital. They want to kill you, not care for you.


    (Regeneron, the ant-clonal antibodies medicine, is also a non-approved by FDA medicine. It has NOT been judged officially for " Safe and Effective " designation. A patient has to qualify for the treatment that is administered by IV drip and can be done at a medical facility on an outpatient basis.. I think you have to have some other medical condition in your history to qualify to get the medicine, unless you are the president.. It is said to be effective and gets the patient out of the woods and maybe kept from having to be admitted to the hospital.


    _________________

    Antiviral Drugs That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19



    Antiviral Drugs That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19

    Last Updated: July 8, 2021

    full url

    xxxxxxhttps://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/summary-recommendations/xxxxxx


    "Antiviral Drugs That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19

    Last Updated: July 8, 2021
    Summary Recommendations

    Remdesivir is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for the treatment of COVID-19. In this section, the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) provides recommendations for using antiviral drugs to treat COVID-19 based on the available data. As in the management of any disease, treatment decisions ultimately reside with the patient and their health care provider. For more information on these antiviral agents, see Table 2e.
    Remdesivir

    See Therapeutic Management of Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19 for recommendations on using remdesivir with or without dexamethasone.

    Ivermectin

    There is insufficient evidence for the Panel to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. Results from adequately powered, well-designed, and well-conducted clinical trials are needed to provide more specific, evidence-based guidance on the role of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19.

    Nitazoxanide

    The Panel recommends against the use of nitazoxanide for the treatment of COVID-19, except in a clinical trial (BIIa).

    Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine and/or Azithromycin " SNIP

    Here is
    __________________________________

    xxxxxxhttps://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/table--characteristics-of-antiviral-agents/xxxxxx

    Table 2e. Characteristics of Antiviral Agents That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19

    Last Updated: July 8, 2021

    click here to view this table

    xxxxxxhttps://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/tables/table-2e/xxxxxx

    https://www.covid19treatmentguidelin...bles/table-2e/

    Table 2e. Characteristics of Antiviral Agents That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19

    Last Updated: July 08, 2021



    Ivermectin
    Adults:
    • The dose most commonly used in clinical trials is IVM 0.2–0.6 mg/kg PO given as a single dose or as a once-daily dose for up to 5 days. • Generally well tolerated
    • Dizziness
    • Pruritis
    • GI effects (e.g., nausea, diarrhea)
    • Neurological AEs have been reported when IVM has been used to treat parasitic diseases, but it is not clear whether these AEs were caused by IVM or the underlying conditions. • Monitor for potential AEs. • Minor CYP3A4 substrate
    • P-gp substrate • Generally given on an empty stomach with water; however, administering IVM with food increases its bioavailability.2
    • A list of clinical trials is available here: Ivermectin

    xxxxxhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=COVID-19&term=ivermectin&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=&Searc h=Searchxxxxx

  4. #3
    Great Value Carrots
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,645
    Thanks
    417
    Thanked 1,307 Times in 893 Posts

    Re: Silencing Doctors - looks like Communism to me

    Organon of Medicine by Hahnemann

    The orthodox school has witnessed for centuries that nature itself has never once cured any existing disease with another dissimilar one, however intense.

    What we must think of this school, which nevertheless has continued to treat chronic diseases allopathically, with medicines and formulas that can only cause a disease condition - God knows which - dissimilar to the one being treated? Even if these physicians have not hitherto observed nature attentively enough, the miserable results of their treatment should have taught them they were in the wrong road. Haven't they seen that their usual practice of employing violent allopathic means to treat chronic disease only creates a dissimilar artificial disease, which, as long as it is maintained, merely silences, suppresses and suspends the original trouble? Haven't they seem that the original disease reappears, as soon as the decline of the patients strength no longer permits the allopathic attack on his life to continue?
    Does this strike a chord? It was first published in 1810.

    This is Law of Necessity material. It is one thing to voluntarily seek the aid of any physician (this even applies to seeking legal aid from an attorney) and quite another to have an Allopath dictate his chemical concoction through government mandate.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •