Jesus Christ, The Way, The Truth, and The Life

[Dachsie]

*CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE VIDEO*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwfI0GDv7ps



Screen Shot 2022-09-26 at 5.01.36 PM.png



Seymour Hirsh ‘misrepresented’ himself when he represented himself to be a lawyer in an army barracks while reporting on the My Lai massacre.

Woodward lied to his source saying Haldeman was the fifth person in control of disbursements while reporting on Watergate.

Diane Sawyer’s team at ABC News ‘misrepresented’ themselves when getting jobs at Food Lion Grocery to expose rotten meat.

Upton Sinclair ‘misrepresented’ himself in the meatpacking yards when he wrote The Jungle.

If an informed citizenry is to be given truthful information, not the information the powerful want you to see, investigative journalists must have a constitutional right to ‘misrepresent’ themselves with the subjects they are investigating.

This Verdict against Veritas for ‘breach of fiduciary duty’ and ‘misrepresentation’ must be overturned on Directed Verdict or on appeal either in the DC Circuit Court, or the United States Supreme Court.

I’ll quote the Federal Judge who granted us a Directed Verdict on a portion of this very Democracy Partners video in 2019 in Teter v. Project Veritas, et al., saying “…if citizens and the media are handcuffed by a fear of liability, that’s detrimental to political discourse, it is detrimental to society as a whole, and it is detrimental, really, to our fundamental freedom….If I've gotten this wrong, and the Circuit says that this is not what the law is, I hesitate to think where the First Amendment is going in this country.

I will never stop fighting to protect the First Amendment and I need your help now more than ever.

The time for sitting on the sidelines is over.

Simply put, if you support my work, and wish to see it continue, I am requesting that you pledge a tax-deductible donation right now and stand with us by helping to support Project Veritas’ defense costs as we take this case all the way to the Supreme Court if needed.

This will cost us millions.

BE BRAVE. DO SOMETHING.

In Truth,

James O’Keefe

[Dachsie]

https://5g34l.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk...O1gfd4NfA5JwVJ




ELEISON COMMENTS DCCXCIII (September 24, 2022) : ROSARY WEAPONISED ?

On the eve of the Feast of the Assumption appeared in “Atlantic” magazine in the USA an article which caused a little stir by associating the Rosary with right-wing violence and terrorism. Written by a certain Daniel Palleton based in Toronto, Canada, it was entitled “How Extremist Gun Culture Is Trying to Co-opt the Rosary”, and it was sub-titled “Why are sacramental beads suddenly showing up next to AR-15s online?” (The AR-15-style rifle is a popular lightweight semi-automatic rifle.) Here is a summary of the 13 paragraphs of Panneton’s article :--

1 Rad-Trad (i.e. radical-Traditional) Catholics are turning the Rosary into a weapon of violence. 2 It shows on the Internet in their social-media pages, where they have thousands of followers. 3 Thus associated with extreme right-wingers’ violence and racism, the Rosary prepares for real-world terrorism. 4 Indeed the Rosary has long been associated with the fight of the Church Militant against its enemies. 5 In mainstream Catholicism the Rosary is no threat, but rad-trad Catholics are not mainstream. 6 They are militia-minded masculinists, playing at war-games, 7 with their own cottage industry of services and goods for sale, including “combat rosaries”. 8 They have masculine fantasies of resorting to violence in defence of their families or churches. 9 Formerly distrusted by Christian nationalists, they are now increasingly accepted among them. 10 Indeed Rad-trads and Christian nationalists are coming to share an ideal of “righteous violence.” 11 These two sides may still be divided in matters of doctrine and religion, 12 but they can and do make common cause, for instance in their homophobia and hostility towards abortion. 13 Rad-Trads are meant to love and forgive, but today they are turning the Holy Rosary into a weapon of violence and physical war.

Where Panneton is right is that there is a huge war going on between “left” and “right” warriors all over the world. It is a huge war because for both sides it is a sacred crusade. This is because it is in fact a war for or against God. Because Almighty God is today so widely discounted and discredited, normal “lefties” may not understand why their own fight is such a crusade to destroy the last remains of Christendom, but crusade it is for them. As for “right-wingers”, they cripple their own crusade to defend or conserve post-Christian decency if they do not base it on God, who is their basic strength. A notable example is their fight against abortion. If these right-wingers go on preferring to do without God, their reversal of “Roe v. Wade” will be reversed once more. Sharing the “lefties’” unconcern for God makes many “right-wingers” hardly any better.

Therefore if the Rosary has always truly been a great means of defending Christendom as in 1571 at Lepanto, in 1683 at Vienna, in 1955 in Austria, that is because it is so centred on God, on Our Lord and Our Lady. Only if today’s Rosary warriors are truly turning away from God to fight left-wingers with the weapons used by left-wingers to fight God, is Panneton right. But if those praying the Rosary forget all about right- or left-wingers when they use it to fill themselves with the interests of God, then certainly, once more, the Rosary can save Christendom.

Kyrie eleison.

God is not served by merely human fights,
But only by the drive to serve His rights.

[Dachsie]

Good revolution in Italy

Tucker Carlson: People are upset about this
144,699 views
Sep 26, 2022
13K
Dislike
Share
Save
Fox News
9.92M subscribers
Fox News host Tucker Carlson reacts to the election of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VzT4n27AC8

[Dachsie]

Dahsie comment:

This is an important teaching.
This video is Part 1 of 2 parts (will post Part 2 YouTube video in a few days, if I remember.)

Cut from the Novus Order!

Listen to the invitation list of names of people who will be in attendance at some One World Death and Slavery System for All "Health" Conference to be held at the Vatican. I guess this conference will be held in the hall that is built to resemble that serpent of old.


And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

Mathew 16:18
Douay-Rheims Bible
_______________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMlor98R9I0



Viganò: Rome Will Lose the Faith, Church is in Eclipse, Counter Magisterium
55:44 video runtime

Dr Taylor Marshall

Speaking about the upcoming Vatican Conference on Health, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò reaffirmed that "Rome will lose the Faith," and the Church is currently in Eclipse will a Counter-Magisterium is in place. One might ask, how can this be the case of the Catholic Church and the Apostolic See of Rome is indefectable?

[Dachsie]

https://myemail.constantcontact.com/Reminder--Kolbe-Report-2-5-22.html?soid=1104055316121&aid=hO6WRVPvlDc

Reminder: Kolbe Report 2/5/22

Dear Friends of the Kolbe Center,

Pax Christi!

In our last two newsletters we saw how the gifted author Flannery O’Connor was deceived by the errors of Teilhard de Chardin and his “new Christianity,” based on evolution. In this newsletter, we would like to give one more example of a gifted servant of God who also fell under the spell of Teilhard de Chardin, the Venerable Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen. We trust that the Venerable Archbishop would be the first to want us to bring his deception to light, as a warning to all of us to be on our guard against the seductive errors of theistic evolution.





Venerable Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen (1895-1979)

The Young Fr. Fulton Sheen Rejects Theistic Evolution

Archbishop Sheen’s eventual embrace of Teilhardian errors is all the more astonishing in view of his earlier writings in which he thoroughly rejected them. As a young theologian, he wrote an extensive review of modern philosophy which had had seen “the birth of a new notion of God”:

It is God in evolution . . . God is born by successive creations. As the world progresses, He progresses; as the world acquires perfection, He acquires perfection. [Moreover,] man is a necessary step in the evolution of God. Just as man came from the beast, God will come from man.

In one of his early works, Love One Another, Sheen mocked the notion that one could derive the great commandment of Christ to “Love one another as I have loved you” from an evolutionary struggle for existence over millions of years:

“Man came from the beast; therefore, he ought to love his fellowman.”

How silly that sounds! Everyone knows that the law of the survival of the fittest can never evolve into love, nor can the struggle for existence develop into human brotherhood. If we come from the beasts, then we may appropriately be expected to act like beasts.

After completing a 300-page survey of modern philosophy, the young Fr. Sheen concluded:

The wisdom of the ages and the epitome of our experience is given in the simple truth understood by the simple and forgotten by many a philosopher, that we are not “God-makers but God-made."

Archbishop Sheen and “Evolution’s Greatest Triumph”

Archbishop Sheen’s “conversion” to theistic evolutionism must be understood as part of what the German anatomist and Darwinian apologist Ernst Haeckel called “evolution’s greatest triumph,” the conversion of the Catholic intellectual elite to the conviction that they had to reconcile the microbe-to-man evolutionary hypothesis with the Catholic Faith—in spite of the clear condemnation of the thesis that “evolution can be reconciled with Christian doctrine” by the Congregation of the Index in 1878, the decrees of the Pontifical Biblical Commission upholding the special creation of Adam and Eve and the literal historical truth of Genesis 1-3, and the condemnation by Pope St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane in 1907 of the proposition that the condemnations of the Congregation of the Index could be taken lightly.



Darwin had argued that similarities in structure among diverse life forms proved that they had all evolved from a common ancestor. According to Haeckel, the existence of similarities in embryos of various kinds of organisms proved that the higher life forms “recapitulated” their evolutionary history before birth and that they had all descended from a common ancestor. To make this “proof” more compelling for his contemporaries, Haeckel doctored drawings of the embryos of fish, salamanders, chickens, turtles, rabbits, pigs, and human beings to exaggerate their similarities and minimize their differences. Although Haeckel’s fraud was discovered and exposed during his lifetime, the evolutionary hypothesis demanded common descent, and the concept of embryonic recapitulation continued to exert a profound influence on the study of embryology for many decades. In the United States, the renowned scholar Fr. John Augustine Zahm at Notre Dame University, devoted more pages of his influential book Evolution and Dogma to “embryonic recapitulation” than to any other “proof” for Darwin’s hypothesis.

When, on the centenary of the publication of Origin of Species in 1959, the world’s leading evolutionist scientist Sir Julian Huxley pontificated that “embryology” as displayed in Ernst Haeckel’s drawings provided “the most striking proof of evolution,” his evolution-believing colleagues had enjoyed control of almost all of the universities and research centers in the Western world for more than half a century. Yet “embryonic recapitulation” was, by his own admission, the best proof that they could come up with. In 1950, Pope Pius XII in Humani generis had exhorted Catholic experts to “examine” the evidence for and against the evolutionary hypothesis, but it was apparent that hardly any Catholic scholars subjected Huxley’s pontifications to rigorous examination. For example, in Germany pro-abortion activists:

skillfully exploited the disunity of the German Catholic intellectuals to bring their demands for the legalization of abortion to the legislature. … Karl Rahner, who was in the forefront of the fight over [the loosening of] paragraph 218, wrote in Naturwissenschaft und Theologie (brochure 11, page 86, 1970): “I think that there are biological developments which are pre-human, but these developments are still aimed in the direction of man. Why cannot these developments be transferred from phylogeny to ontogeny?” (emphasis added)

With these words, the most influential Catholic theologian in the German-speaking world formulated an Haeckelian evolutionary rationale for abortifacient contraception and abortion by affirming that human beings passed through all the stages of evolution in their mothers’ wombs. To this day, biology textbooks all over the world argue that similarities between embryos of fish, amphibians, reptiles, humans and lower mammals constitute evidence for the evolutionary hypothesis. Typical of examples too many to cite is the caption that accompanies drawings of embryos of various life-forms from a widely used American biology textbook published in 2002. Entitled “Embryonic development of vertebrates,” it states:

Notice that the early embryonic stages of these vertebrates bear a striking resemblance to each other, even though the individuals are from different classes (fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals). All vertebrates start out with an enlarged head region, gill slits, and a tail regardless of whether these characteristics are retained in the adult.





Haeckel’s Embryos Compared with Actual Photographs

The statement gives the impression that human embryos—as members of the vertebrate phylum—possess gill slits. But this is patently false. The pharyngeal arches in human embryos have no connection with gill slits whatsoever but develop into the outer and middle ear, and into the neck bones, muscles, nerves, and glands. Moreover, after the discovery of DNA, confidence in the truth of the evolutionary hypothesis led many evolutionary biologists to predict that similar body parts in diverse organisms would be controlled by the same genes. This, however, proved to be false, as embryologists have discovered that the realization of the same body plan—such as five digit extremities—in diverse organisms (such as whales and humans) is controlled by different genes and is achieved through totally different embryonic pathways. In spite of the fact that the myth of “embryonic recapitulation” had no scientific basis, however, it would appear that Archbishop Sheen was as badly deceived as Fr. Rahner—because we find him eight years after Humani generis rhapsodizing confidently about Teilhard’s writings on the evolution of life from non-life:

For Teilhard there is a continuity between an animal seeking food and a magnet pointing to the north; between a male and a female uniting in the act of generation and two atoms uniting to form a chemical compound. The meaning is not the same in each instance, but there is more than a mere figure of speech in this unification. Atoms are not alive, it is true, but they have what might be called pre-life.

The Deadly Deception of Archbishop Sheen

Without knowing all the inner workings of Archbishop Sheen’s mind, it is easy to see that his conviction that molecules-to-man evolution was no longer an absurdity but a “fact of science” must have had terrible consequences. His apparent belief that the Church’s traditional doctrine of creation could be replaced by theistic evolution in light of the new “science” of evolution certainly helps to explain his enthusiasm for the ideas of John Courtney Murray at the Second Vatican Council and for the replacement of the traditional vision of a Church-centered Catholic society with the ideal of religious liberty as practiced in the United States. In reality, it is no more possible to “evolve” the ideal of American-style religious liberty with its separation of Church and state from the traditional ideal of the Catholic union of Church and state than it would be to evolve the life of a one-celled organism from the “pre-life” of atomic particles.
Writing in 1967, Sheen echoed and embraced the Teilhardian vision of matter evolving to the Omega Point. He wrote:

The whole world is ascending towards Christ the King, even the irresistible surge of the ocean tides under the Pull of the moon and sun . . . His [Teilhard de Chardin's] fundamental orientation was to attain heaven through the fulfillment of earth. Christify matter.

An elderly priest friend of mine whose life overlapped with Teilhard’s commented on Fr. De Chardin’s reputation for kindness, and it is true that a belief in the Christification of matter might motivate a person to show kindness to all people and to all things because of the divine element within all of them. But this is a false kindness if it fails to acknowledge the divinely-created hierarchy of goods in the universe—the transcendence of God; the creation of man in God’s image and likeness; man’s dominion over creation; the infinite superiority of supernatural goods to natural ones; and the moral imperative to do good and avoid evil.





Dr. Dietrich Von Hildebrand (1889-1977)

In Teilhard’s system, as revealed in his pivotal spiritual experience as a young man, when he encountered “a presence” he described as “the combined essence of all good and all evil,” the divine energy drives all of the activity in the universe, thus making it impossible to distinguish between the natural and the supernatural, the good and the evil, insofar as Teilhard’s divinity manifests through them all. The conflation of the order of grace with the order of nature occupied so central a place in his “new Christianity” that the kindly Teilhard forgot his manners when Dietrich Von Hildebrand cited the writings of the Doctor of Grace, St. Augustine, against his evolutionary doctrine. “Don’t speak to me of that unfortunate man,” he protested violently. He “spoiled everything by introducing the supernatural.” True to their master, the Teilhardians of today find the “divine element” even in pagan religions and in immoral sexual behavior which objectively separates souls from communion with the living God. Yet Archbishop Sheen was so convinced of the fact of molecules-to-man evolution and of the credibility of Teilhard’s doctrine that he predicted the eventual elevation of Fr. De Chardin to the honors of a Doctor of the Church by 2017:

It is very likely that within 50 years when all the trivial, verbose disputes about the meaning of Teilhard’s ‘unfortunate’ vocabulary will have died away or have taken a secondary place, Teilhard will appear like John of the Cross and St. Teresa of Avila, as the spiritual genius of the twentieth century.

Conclusion

It is not my intention in this newsletter to deny the many good things that Archbishop Sheen accomplished in his life as a Bishop, writer, and preacher, especially through his promotion of Eucharistic Holy Hours for priests. But it would be a grave dereliction of duty on my part if I were to fail to point out the incoherence that his embrace of Teilhard’s evolutionary doctrine introduced into his thinking—just as it continues to introduce incoherence into the thinking of so many Catholic intellectuals and Church leaders today. To recognize and reject the negative influence of Teilhardian theistic evolutionism is especially necessary now when so many Church leaders are actively collaborating with their secular counterparts to build a godless New World Order, with a one-world religion, a “new Christianity,” based on evolution.



The Tower of Babel

In Teilhard’s “new Christianity,” it is easy to believe that “the end justifies the means” because the god of evolution deliberately uses spiritual and material evils to achieve his ends. Thus, Teilhard could not bring himself to condemn totalitarian governments that imposed beneficial changes on the population that would hasten man’s evolution. Indeed, he foresaw and favored the rise of a one world government that would impose “beneficent” laws upon mankind that would hasten man’s evolution to the Omega point. The Vatican’s enthusiasm for vaccine mandates imposing abortion-tainted vaccines on the entire world’s population is Teilhardian to the core, as it rationalizes its complicity in a global industry of child trafficking, abortion, and fetal experimentation for the sake of a notion of the “common good” that has been emptied of its primary supernatural dimension and reduced to the level of merely natural, material goods.

Through the prayers of Our Lady of Fatima on this First Saturday, may the Holy Ghost inspire us all to live our consecration to Jesus through the Immaculate Heart of Mary in every moment, so that we can help to obtain the grace for the consecration and conversion of Russia, an era of peace, and the social reign of Christ our King throughout the world!

Yours in Christ through the Immaculata in union with St. Joseph,

Hugh Owen

[Dachsie]

There is a photo of a father and mother and their children a few posts back in this thread.
The FBI is acting like criminal thugs, so this indeed is a turning point in our country,
__________________

https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxUHe...cL21EJ0lN3jWvx

The John-Henry Westen Channel
The John-Henry Westen Channel
13 hours ago
This is a turning point in US history. The FBI just raided the house of a regular pro-life father in front of his kids.

[Dachsie]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLb0QeCQF_I



Tucker Carlson: This is an atrocity

11:22 video runtime


Fox News

Fox News host Tucker Carlson reacts to the possibility of sabotage to the Nord Stream pipelines on 'Tucker Carlson
______
Dachsie comment:
I notice Victoria Nuland is popping up in more and more recent news stories about Ukraine as in this video.
Although the topic of this video is sabotage of Nord Stream 2 by the USA and the Victoria Nuland -related entities, I hope to focus on the connections of Victoria Nuland and crime gang to the PLANdemic.

I have been following Victoria Nuland for many years, since before her husband, Robert Kagan joined with William Kristol to form the "Project for a New American Century (PNAC). I read the PNAC position paper back when it first came out in 1999. I was appaled at what I was reading. These people of this group were then called "neocons" but now it is the same group of people and they are now primarily associated with the descriptor, neoNAZIs.

I will post later today in this thread and I will show the connections to the PLANdemic and the Ukraine Bio-Weapons laboratories and "genotypes used for political purposes" mass death and disability and Wars Wars and More Wars, and the One World Death and Slavery System for ALL.

I read about two years ago that Victoria Nuland and her husband were residing in Belgium. I wonder if there official residence is back in the USA since she was appoint assistance secretary of state..

The agenda of Victoria Nuland et al. has always been the same as what is coming to crystal clear light now as their same long-abiding goal now. The DESTRUCTION of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline was an option always on the table for these evil entities. Do not over-react to this evil. Move forward in exposing evil for the true common good of the people, the people of all countries of the world.

[Dachsie]

Follow-up to previous post about

Victoria Nuland (nee Nudelman)

married to Robert Kagan, one of the foundeers, along with William Kristol, of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) group, founded in 1997.

The main important position of the PNAC group is found at

xxxxxhttps://archive.org/details/ProjectForANewAmericanCenturyRebuildingAmericasDef ensesxxxxx

Please delete leading and trailing xxxxx before copying and pasting. I wanted the full URL to show in this document on Archive.org, a site also known as the "wayback machine."



The official full name of this document is
Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century

is shown on the photo above but it is generally known as

Project for a New American Century - Rebuilding America's Defenses

The name of the project entity, which is now defunct, is

Project for a New America Century (PNAC).

Victoria Nuland's husband is Robert Kagan along with William Kristol were the founders of this project group entity.

I had to search a bit but I found several of the names of the original people who started and led this PNAC group and who wrote and produced this famous position paper. Here are the names I could find but I could not find an official full list of the original board of directors.

William Kristol
Robert Kagan
Devon Gaffney Cross
Bruce P. Jackson
John R. Bolton
Donald Kagan
Thomas Donnelly
Gary Schmitt

_________________

Project Participants (this list found in the PNAC dcument at the very end.

The following list of individuals participated in at least one project meeting or contributed a paper for discussion. The report is a product solely of the Project for the New American Century and does not necessarily represent the views of the project participants or their affiliated institutions.

Roger Barnett

U.S. Naval War College

Alvin Bernstein

National Defense University

Stephen Cambone

National Defense University

Eliot Cohen

Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University

Devon Gaffney Cross

Donors' Forum for International Affairs

Thomas Donnelly

Project for the New American Century

David Epstein

Office of Secretary of Defense,

Net Assessment

David Fautua

Lt. Col., U.S. Army

Dan Goure

Center for Strategic and International Studies

Donald Kagan

Yale University

Fred Kagan

U. S. Military Academy at West Point

Robert Kagan

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Robert Killebrew

Col., USA (Ret.)

William Kristol

The Weekly Standard


Mark Lagon

Senate Foreign Relations Committee

James Lasswell

GAMA Corporation

I. Lewis Libby

Dechert Price & Rhoads

Robert Martinage

Center for Strategic and Budgetary
Assessment

Phil Meilinger

U.S. Naval War College

Maekubin Owens

U.S. Naval War College

Steve Rosen

Harvard University

Gary Schmitt

Project for the New American Century

Abram Shulsky

The RAND Corporation

Michael Vickers

Center for Strategic and Budgetary
Assessment

Barry Watts

Northrop Grumman Corporation

Paul Wolfowitz

Nitze School of Advanced International
Studies, Johns Hopkins University

Dov Zakheim

System Planning Corporation

________________
PNAC is strongly associated with the event of 9-11-01 and the U S presidential administration of George W. Bush.

Here is a very famous quote within the PNAC document.

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a
new Pearl Harbor.

David Ray Griffin wrote one of the first 9-11 truth books and it was titled


The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 Paperback – April 5, 2020
by David Ray Griffin (Author)



________________

However, I am primarily interested in showing connections to incitement of world war strategies of today and how they relate to bioweapons laboratories and how they relate to bioweapons laboratories in the Ukraine as well as to bioweapons laboratories in the USA, also referred to as U S National Laboratories, and the famous Wuhan, China laboratory.
_______________________
Jeff Childers in the Sept. 28, 2022 Coffee & Covid report references Nuland twice.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/c-and-c-news-wednesday-september?utm_source=email

" Miss Scarlet: Around the same time as Biden’s comments, Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, who engineered the 2014 color revolution in Ukraine, and is all messed in with the Ukraine biolabs somehow, also threatened the pipeline:

Twitter avatar for @KimDotcomKim Dotcom @KimDotcom

From the mouth of the 2014 Ukraine coup d'etat manager:

“If Russia invades Ukraine >ONE WAY OR ANOTHER< North Steam 2 will not move forward. "
watch 20 second video at the C&C above and
.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...4HLbaCJ15A--~D

Lastly and importantly there is this quote from the PNAC documnet.


"And advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may
transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool. "

I have posted about the Nuland / PNAC connections to the PLANdemic for some time in this thread. More and more the Nuland and old PNAC gang is in the news now with Ukraine and Nor Stream 2 sabotage event.

Biological research laboratories in the USA and China and Ukraine and all around the world know how to make weapons that target specific ethnic "genotypes." I posted but now cannot find in this thread a clipping text photo of Putin expressing vexation at Russian citizens having bodily specimens samples taken and then taken away by unknown entities.

Dr. Lee Merritt and a few others have discussed this in relation to the "Coronavirus PLANdemic.

Scientists can create weapons that destroy whole specific genotype groups and there could be a specific Russian genotype group.

This is all very evil but we cannot avoid speaking of this specific evil because these entities like Victoria Nuland and her group and NATO and the Biden administration are doing everything they can to LIE KILL STEAL and DESTROY the USA and the World by inciting a nuclear world war and establishing a One World Death and Slavery System for ALL.

[Dachsie]

Economy Equity Environment

The 3 E's of Sustainable Development of Agenda 21 / 2030

""The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. What is needed is recognition of the reality that in so many fields, and this is particularly true of environmental issues, it is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation-states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.”

Maurice Strong United Nations"

________________________________

Eugenics, Eviction, Enslavement

The three Es of Agenda 21/2030: Eugenics, Eviction, Enslavement



Agenda 21/2030 use interlocking 3 Es – Economic Prosperity, Ecological Integrity, and Social Equity (or in ethical language Eugenics, Eviction, and Enslavement) to define the goal of Sustainable Development.

Economic prosperity

To achieve the so-called Economic Prosperity required carry out the plan requires that those who control the world, in the words of the late Rosa Koire, they must first “inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world.”

To be able to control all human beings in the world means they will first have to reduce the population. There is no way the global elites would be able to control 8 billion people And, there is no way they could feed that many. But they have no plans to feed even half that many. To “cure starvation” their answer is to get rid of those who are starving along with most of the middle class. We are no longer needed nor wanted. And, we are the class that will not go willingingly.

Overpopulation is a root problem of all the environmental issues. If you can control the population, you can control almost anything. Rinkesh Kukreja, Founder – Conserve Energy Future

It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. Jacques Cousteau speaking at UNESCO, Nov. 1991

A 2009 study titled “Reproduction and the carbon legacies of individuals,” looked at the relationship between population growth and global warming. It determined that the “carbon legacy” of just one child can produce 20 times more greenhouse gas than a person will save by driving a high-mileage car, recycling, using energy-efficient appliances and light bulbs, etc. “Clearly, the potential savings from reduced reproduction are huge compared to the savings that can be achieved by changes in lifestyle,” Global Population SPEAKOUT, Paris 2015

The preamble to Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development reads:

This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognize the eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimension, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development. (emphasis mine).

The global elite feel quite certain that they will attain all 17 goals of Agenda 2030 in the allotted time. How do they plan to have poverty in all its forms and dimension, including extreme poverty, eradicated worldwide by 2030? We are watching it before our eyes.

The annual abortion rate worldwide is 73 million.

The UK Medicine Regulator has confirmed that over a period of nineteen months the Covid-19 Vaccines have caused at least 5.5x as many deaths as all other available vaccines combined in the past 21 years.

This means, that when compared side by side, the Covid-19 injections are a shocking 7,402%/75x more deadly than every other vaccine available in the UK.

Bill Gates, China, and other globalist parties (including BlackRock and Vanguard are buying up U.S. farm and ranch land.

China has bought over 1 million hectares (over 2 ½ million acres) of ranchland in South and Central America.

(What does buying up ranch and farm land have to do with population reduction? That land is now no longer and will not be producing for the general population.)

Food production plants and agricultural operations are being burned down, almost daily.

The World Economic Forum’s agenda is to stop growth and decide what industries to shut down. People out of work will starve sooner, but the rest of us are slated to be ashes, fertilizer for forests, or perhaps even soylent green for those not yet taken out.

87,000 new IRS agents are being sought who were to “carry a firearm and be willing to use deadly force” (yes, those words were on the IRS jobs webpage until the backlash spurred the IRS to remove the words (but is the requirement still there?). We should not be surprised that an unconstitutional amendment must be backed up by force.

Because our country is being run by immoral liars and wannabe world tyrants, we, (mostly the middle class) are the only ones still ruled by a moral compass. Thus, we are the targets.

Quotes re eugenics:

The most important question in 21st-century economics may well be, ‘What should we do with all the superfluous people, once we have highly intelligent non-conscious algorithms that can do almost everything better than humans?‘ Yuval Noah Harari, assistant to Klaus Schwab

In order to arrest or reverse Climate Change you’ve got to stabilize the population, and hopefully, reduce the population by having a one child family for a hundred years. Get population back down to about two to two and a half billion people. Ted Turner

If you haven’t given voluntary human extinction much thought before, the idea of a world with no people in it may seem strange. But, if you give it a chance, I think you might agree that the extinction of Homo sapiens would mean survival for millions, if not billions of Earth-dwelling species. . . . Phasing out the human race will solve every problem, on earth, social and environmental” Les U. Knight, Wild Earth, Vol. 1, No 2 (Summer1991), p.72

The Earth as we know it will not survive without drastic measures. . . .the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number. Professor Pianka, University of Texas, 2006

So, Economic Prosperity is not for the poor, or the middle class. And it probably isn’t for a lot of the upper class. With the few useful idiots the Global Elite need, combined with their robots and artificial intelligent, they expect to live happily ever after. They haven’t read the end of the book: Marxism only destroys. It can only destroy them, also. But I have hopes that they won’t get that far.

Ecological integrity

Try to nail down the definition of Ecological Integrity. The closest I got is from Conservation Science and Practice, Volume 3, Issue4/e411”The integrity of ecosystems is a property that contemporary conservation biologists and restoration ecologists believe that they can observe and measure, and integrity is often cited as a good reason for taking specific actions, including protecting high-integrity areas and intervening to increase integrity by reintroducing lost species, removing non-natives, and adjusting abiotic elements.”

Under this label lies an enormous amount of anti-human action. The framework for “Ecological Integrity” is the Wildlands Project (brainchild of Dave Foreman[1] and Reed Noss), now the Wildlands Network. Under the guise of saving endangered species. The legal framework for the plan is found in Article 8a-e of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Working in tandem with the Biosphere Reserve Program, a 1971 creation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, Cultural Organization (UNESC0), the Wildlands Project gained an instant international position and became the basis for the U.N.’s Convention on Biodiversity.

Like the two parts of Agenda 21 — ?? and Reinventing Government, The Wildlands Project laid down the blueprint for the reorganization of human society, and the other Convention on Biodiversity detailed how it was to be done.

Simply put, the Wildland Project is divided into 21 Bioregions, which then were divided into three zones:

Wilderness area, designated as habitat of plants and animals; human habitation and use or intrusion is forbidden.

Buffer zones surrounding the wilderness areas. Limited, and strictly controlled, human access is permitted within this zone.

Cooperation zones, the only zones where humans are permitted to live.

The late Dr. Michael Coffman noted the strategy to implement such reserves and corridors would include:

Start with a seemingly innocent-sounding program like the “World Heritage Areas in Danger”. For example: Bring all human activity under regulation in a 14-18 million acre buffer zone around Yellowstone National Park.

Next, declare all federal land (except Indian reservations) as buffers, along with private land that is within federal administration boundaries.

Next, extend the U.S. Heritage corridor buffer zone concept along major river systems. Begin to convert critical federal lands and ecosystems to reserves.

Finally, convert all U.S. Forest Service, grasslands, and wildlife refuges to reserves. Add missing reserves and corridors so that 50% of the landscape is preserved.

Each of the 21 bioregions will be governed by a bioregion council.

“When the councils come into play, local, state, and national government will not be able to interfere with their governance. It will be under the strong arm of the UN Environmental organizations such as the Sierra Club, Nature Conservancy or other Green organizations which will be given the green light (to be) the enforcement arm of these councils at the local level.” (Karen Lee Bixman, “The Takings of America)

Other asymmetrical warfare means of taking land are:

by denying water and/or grazing rights to farmers and ranchers or limiting their use of pesticides and herbicides, which in turn will force the farmers and ranchers out of business, causing the land to possibly fall into the hands of the federal gov’t.

when Wilderness Areas, Parks, etc. are established. Not only the land is out of production, but, the mineral resources underground or forest above can also be made off-limits for development.

by expanding the legal definition of a wetland. By making any trickle of water or puddle a wetland, the EPA can prevent the development of the land and all the land around it. This makes the land worth less and easy to acquire by sundry entities including the gov’t.

when an endangered species is located within a forest. Then large areas around this area are made off-limits to development, and once again, the land loses its value and is easily acquired by gov’t.

by the direct taking of land through eminent domain.

… when Road RIP, a non-governmental organization, was created for the sole purpose of removing existing roads and preventing the construction of new roads into wilderness areas. Then humans are locked away from land that was once served by roadways.

… when urban boundaries are created around a town, beyond which development may not occur and/or utilities may not be provided. This will destroy the economic value of the rural lands around the town. Comprehensive Land Use Plans in existence today and their policies are creating this scenario.

… when the government declares land part of a flood plain, then forces the homeowners to give up their homes. The homes are then destroyed and the land is not allowed to be developed. The government gets a 2-fer if the land is along a river. Then, not only is the land off-limits to development, the government has total control of the river and the priceless water it contains.

… when a land trust purchases private property rights from a land owner for promises from the land owner to do certain environmentally friendly things. In return the land owner and his heirs are then able to stay on this land in perpetuity.

Social equity

“The social equity dimension of sustainability refers to how burdens and benefits of different policy actions are distributed in a community. The more evenly they are distributed, the more equitable the community is, and this even distribution is reflected in economic, ecologic, and social outcomes.” Google

That definition is communism. And the global elite wish us to see it more in that light than what they are doing under the sobriquet of social justice.

As I see equity as it is now being used as a whipping tool against, depending on the day, anything that doesn’t line up with the Marxist, Cancel Culture neo-shibboleth of the day. So, every day, white, male, Christians, children who are still the sex they were born are unacceptable. For a while, it was the founding fathers and other heroes who helped form America. Those are, mostly, on the trash heaps and in the burned book piles.

It is also being used to attempt to order that in every business and field of endeavor, be filled by the proportional equivalent of the general population. Has anyone checked the proportions of those classes in the Global Elite?

Plus, somehow equity has become the definition of “if you are anti-free market economics you can plunder businesses; if you are an illegal alien, you can be set free (because it was racist to put you in jail for murder), and you can go murder some more. Keep in mind, this helps on the E for Eugenics.

Once we are all equal – equally stupid, equally poor, equally non-property owners, we are slaves – owned by the Global Elite.

Washington State Supreme Court Justice Richard B. Sanders said it best:

Property in a thing consists not merely in its ownership and possession, but in the unrestricted right of use, enjoyment, and disposal. Anything which destroys any of the elements of property, to that extent, destroys the property itself. The substantial value of property lies in its use. If the rights u use be denied, the value of the property is annihilated, and ownership is rendered a barren right.

What we are seeing in social justice is being made into slaves by our fellow citizens who are going right down that road with us – they just don’t realize it. Don’t pity them, they deserve it. We don’t.

If, as Mattias Desmet says in The Psychology of Totalitarianism, it takes no more than 30% of the population to fall sway to “mass formation spurred by a singular, focused, crisis narrative that forbids dissident views and relies on destructive groupthink.” Ponder that as you recount the past two years.

Then, please, let’s hear the lion roar – all 60+% of us.



[1] Dave Foreman was founder of EarthFirst! a radical environmental group that in invented Monkeywrenching – destroying forest and industrial equipment, spiking trees to maim or kill workers, sabotaging dams, ski lifts, and electrical towers.

By Tom DeWeese
September 14, 2022
Written by Kathleen Marquardt, an associate of Tom DeWeese
also HERE

https://www.renewamerica.com/columns/deweese/220916

[Dachsie]

Just marveling at how big the Pentagon must be in person. The cars are so tiny compared to the building.

Neat the way there are gardens growing on top of the building.