Agenda 21 For Dummies (incl: abolition of private property)

[PatColo]

aka "sustainable development".

10 mins:


@ 2:10, "The focus of Agenda 21 is the abolition of private property, [...]"

found that video embedded in this article,
Censored Gulf news: State-sponsored terrorism targets Deep South for Agenda 21 <<< if you open this page, know that a little "blogtalkradio" begins auto-playing, hate that! Console is located about 2 page-downs, in the article text, just hit pause to shut it up. But it is a pretty interesting 2 hour interview with AC Griffith, among a few others, commercial-free except for one commercial at the opening.

[PatColo]

"U N Agenda 21 quote There Will Be No Private Housing Peter Schiff John Stossel Judge Napolitano"

@ 2:00 Napolitano: Is it true the government has come up with some new program whereby you give the deed of your house to the government, the government owns it, and you rent from the government?

Stossel: You bet. Fannie and Freddie are going to be in the rental business. They don't want to foreclose on so many people and dump the houses on the market, as they should to try to shrink these monsters, so they're going to rent. And what kind of record does government have of running public housing? [...more]

I think as they let the banksters' controlled demolition of real estate values progress, this "gummit holds the deed & rents to former/insolvent owners" program will be a calculated transitional step towards the eventual abolition of private property.

Don't you just love NWO "incompetence",

34 secs:

[PatColo]

Read @ link for many embedded links,



Agenda 21 sustainability violates rights, Gulf region and beyond (video)

* November 23rd, 2010 5:53 pm ET

Deborah Dupré

Moments before Austin City Council passed its so-called 'Energy Efficiency Upgrades Ordinance' supporting globalists' Agenda 21 for New World Order, John Bush testified, presenting Agenda 21's history evidencing the evil plan for removing human and civil rights, including right to property under the guise of protection and sustainability. Forced removal and depopulation are part of the globalists' agenda.

Widespread public denial about Agenda 21 being played out in the Gulf Coast region is due to suppressed information about Agenda 21 and the unprecedented petrochemical-military-industrial-complex (PMIC) cover-up of the continuing U.S. crime against humanity for its ultimate "Full Spectrum Dominance."

"Agenda 21's written goals are the same as the outcome of their actions in the Gulf of Mexico," said A.C. Griffith.

Hugh Kaufman has stated that "Americans can't handle truth" about the Gulf.

The truth, according to researches such as AC Griffith, is that Agenda 21's depopulation aided by a chemical warfare attack on Southerners has occurred. It is naive or deadly denial leading people to think Corexit dispersant was used without knowledge of its lethal effect. Calling the operation an "experiment" legalizes it according to PUBLIC LAW 95-79 [P.L. 95-79] TITLE 50, CHAPTER 32, SECTION 1520 “CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM” that states:

“The use of human subjects will be allowed for the testing of chemical and biological agents by the U.S. Department of Defense, accounting to Congressional committees with respect to the experiments and studies. The Secretary of Defense [may] conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological [warfare] agents on civilian populations [within the United States].”

Properties of people in the Gulf Coast Region are vulnerable, as Bush explained in relation to Austin's new ordinance furthering Agenda 21.

Attack on private property rights

Countering suppression of information in best interest of humanity, John Bush presented a history lesson on Agenda 21 at the recent Austin City Council meeting. Bush exposed how the “Energy Efficiency Upgrades Ordinance" ties in with Agenda 21, the UN sustainable development program enacted in 1992 after globalists' secret planning, "all part of the “climate protection agreement.” His presentation in the Youtube video below was posted by Blacklisted News. (www.blacklistednews.com/index.php?news_id=11611)

Bush represents a political action committee, Texans for Accountable Government that opposes Agenda 21, including the city's Energy Efficiency Ordinance.

Prefacing his testimony, Bush stated, "If the links I’m about to present allude to thoughts of an international conspiracy, that’s OK. They’re suppose to."

He admitted not believing Agenda 21's sinister world-wide goal until reading the UN plan about it.

Addressing the Austin City Council, Bush highlighted that a "long chain of events, policy papers, closed door meetings and international agreements that began long ago" are what has resulted in local approval of New World Order control by the ruling elite.



"Before carbon was thought of the most evil thing in the world, there were internationalists hashing out a plan to further their scheme for world government through the means of excessive environmentalism." (See: Real problem with oil is not carbon Dupré, D. Examiner, 2010)

Agenda 21 was first publicly revealed at the June 14, 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro where climate disinformation was applied to influence public opinion.

The comprehensive Agenda 21 plan of action globally, nationally and locally cannot succeed without the local support it is obtaining through what Bush refers to as "excessive environmentalism" such as Austin City Council has passed.

The Wildlands Project, "Rewilding America" under the title of "Smart Growth" is the part of Agenda 21 that removes property rights, according to Bush, referencing the Agenda 21 document. This involves: forcible removal of human beings from half of the US and deeming the new unhabited areas as core wilderness zoes.

"Humans will not allowed to set foot in those areas" and the areas are to be highly monitored buffered zones.

Humans would be allowed to live in futuristic sky scrapers under surveillance control.

In esssence, under the UN, the government is intruding on the free market and right to private property.

"Localism turns to state, then to national and than global through the UN," explained Bush.

Instead of renewable energy solutions that the UN Renewable Energy Ambassador of Goodwill, Josh Tickell documents in his move, FUEL, "sustainable development" - including eugenic depopulation - is promoted, as witnessed in the controlled Gulf of Mexico region operation. (See: Hitting oil addiction rock bottom calls for intervention Dupré, D. Examiner, May 9, 2010; and Oil 'spill' Louisiana genocide (Gassed in the Gulf Part IV), Dupré, D. Examiner, June 24, 2010: http://www.examiner.com/human-rights...e-gulf-part-iv)

The Gulf operation is a giant Agenda 21 step toward New World Order's "Full Spectrum Dominance" spearheaded by the petrochemical-military-industrial- complex, including the US Coast Guard and BP according to AC Griffith.

All the plan needs to succeed is continued support of "excessive environmentalists" who learned that people are no longer as important as other creatures - as NWO globalists have covertly taught, plus induced pacification and passivity of the rest of the public.

Tickell states that "we are going to have to stand strong and stand as a unified force for change."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3h-lT...layer_embedded

[Hatha Sunahara]

I'm not worried about Agenda 21. Quantitative Easing will stop it in its tracks. When the money becomes worthless, the people who own all the money will be powerless, unless they use their gold to pay people to do their bidding. When the money becomes worthless, they will have to use gold to pay for everything, and I doubt that Agenda 21 will be that high on their list of priorities.

I'm more worried about nuclear war and other depopulation schemes.


Hatha

[Twisted Titan]

No nukes Hatha

Maybe something else but DEFINATELY no nukes.

If a States nukes launches THEY ALL LAUNCH because nobody in their right mind is gonna sitt on on there hands when they have abilty to defend themself.

No Body will be calling other nations to verify actions. It will be swift action by retaliating parties or those who assume they will be struck first.

It is the premise of M.A.D. ( Mutually Assured Destruction) that keeps the ball of wax that we call life together

[PatColo]

I'm not worried about Agenda 21. Quantitative Easing will stop it in its tracks. When the money becomes worthless, the people who own all the money will be powerless, unless they use their gold to pay people to do their bidding. When the money becomes worthless, they will have to use gold to pay for everything, and I doubt that Agenda 21 will be that high on their list of priorities.

I'm more worried about nuclear war and other depopulation schemes.


Hatha

You seem to be saying you believe that the descent to worthlessness of the current crop of fiat paper currency will be "unforeseen" by TPTB.. foiling all their diabolical plans (agenda 21, NWO etc)... where to begin on this?

The [engineered] decline to zero of paper currencies will be a component of their master plan in moving to NWO etc. The exact chain of events between here and there, us plebs can only speculate on, connect dots etc.

I'm with you on the depopulation component of their agenda. Look no further than the current Gulf Op.

[VX1]

I'm not worried about Agenda 21. Quantitative Easing will stop it in its tracks. When the money becomes worthless, the people who own all the money will be powerless, unless they use their gold to pay people to do their bidding. When the money becomes worthless, they will have to use gold to pay for everything, and I doubt that Agenda 21 will be that high on their list of priorities.

I'm more worried about nuclear war and other depopulation schemes.


Hatha

You seem to be saying you believe that the descent to worthlessness of the current crop of fiat paper currency will be "unforeseen" by TPTB.. foiling all their diabolical plans (agenda 21, NWO etc)... where to begin on this?

The [engineered] decline to zero of paper currencies will be a component of their master plan in moving to NWO etc. The exact chain of events between here and there, us plebs can only speculate on, connect dots etc.

I'm with you on the depopulation component of their agenda. Look no further than the current Gulf Op.

I agree, this is certainly not unforeseen. Remember, the FRN is simply a product of the corporate banking cabal (and hence, one reason you pay a fee tax for usage of their product). As with any product, it adheres to a Product Life Cycle (introduction, growth, maturity, decline) that has an ending, and any successful business will be working on a new and improved product, before the decline of the last one. The last “improvement” to the product was when Kissinger made the petro-dollar deal with the Saudis. Have no doubt that their new product has not only been conceived, but complete, and is surely about to go to User Acceptance Testing. They will even allow one arm of their octopus to be sacrificed (FED), while another arm swoops in with the new product to save the day.

[PatColo]

Rense links to a few Agenda 21 stories,

Agenda 21 Terms & Definitions De-Coded

States Engage In UN Agenda 21 Cap And Trade Schemes

... and this following one, Rense re-titles "Locals Outraged - Agenda 21 Stealth Evil In City Council ", go Edmond OK! 8)


December 6, 2010
Protesters cut short Edmond sustainability forum

James Coburn The Edmond Sun The Edmond Sun Mon Dec 06, 2010, 11:31 PM CST

EDMOND — A City Council Workshop to share ideas about sustainability was abandoned midstream Monday night amid protests about the City of Edmond’s involvement in sustainable conservation efforts.

The Edmond Sustainability Forum was created by the Planning Department and designed for Edmond residents to share their ideas and priorities for sustainable conservation efforts in their community, said Shannon Entz, community development manager. Police at the event estimated the audience to number about 200 people.

“It’s about saving money, saving energy, reducing waste, which the City of Edmond and many of you have been doing for many, many years,” Entz said.

Forum participants were asked to form discussion groups to share ideas regarding water conservation, greenspace parks and energy efficient buildings to save money. City staff would then take those recommendations to implement in a grass roots community plan, Entz said.

“We’re telling you we don’t want to do that. We want to talk about sustainability — its history — where it comes from,” Edmond resident Robert Semands said amid widespread applause.

Dr. David Newsome asked if a preliminary discussion about sustainability with the entire audience could occur before the groups were formed.

“I’m a little confused about it, and what I do know, I’m a little worried about it,” Newsome said. “And if the unknowing are going to be leading the groups, we’re not going to get anywhere fast.”

Environmental planning or sustainability can be applied to water conservation, land use and transportation planning, green jobs, waste management, energy consumption, parks and green space, public and alternative transportation, green infrastructure, building retrofits, alternative fuels and education programs, according to the Planning Department.

Sustainability planning is funded by nearly $1 million in Recovery Act funds from the U.S. Department of Energy and the Oklahoma Department of Commerce, Entz said. Funding also helps develop energy-saving technologies for city facilities and water wells, CNG conversion kits, energy building code training and equipment for inspectors, she added. The CityLink bus service is an example of stimulus money put to use by the city.

Handouts titled “Why Edmond is concerned about U.N. Agenda 21/sustainable development” were handed to participants entering the Downtown Community Center.

The reading material states, “U.N. Agenda 21 is a 1,000-plus page, 40-chapter document spelling out how all activities on the planet, including in the USA, are to be brought under the control of the United Nations.”

Breaking into groups to discuss sustainability is about controlling what is said, one man in the audience said.

“We don’t even know what you’re talking about with Agenda 21,” Entz said. “This isn’t part of our conversation at all. It’s absolutely not. We’re not part of that; we’re not interested in that.”

Semands said the language of sustainability comes from Agenda 21 which is a U.N. agenda.

“Edmond did not sign off with any international agenda,” former Mayor Dan O’Neil said.

Newsome told The Edmond Sun that the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) is a sub-group of the United Nations. The reading material provided by the group protesting the forum compared ICLEI to a Marxist document. He said the city is implementing Agenda 21 plans that have never been ratified at the national level.

“We feel like we’ve been essentially ambushed by all this,” Semands told The Edmond Sun. “We just found out about it a few days ago. When they post meetings it’s kind of hard to find out about them.”

City of Edmond meetings are posted at www.edmondok.com.

“My concern is ‘sustainability’ and ‘sustainable development,’ the words come from UN Agenda 21,” Semands said. He said former President George H. W. Bush signed the U.S. up for U.N. Agenda 21 at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janerio in 1992.

“Bill Clinton with an executive order created a governmental infrastructure to push this stuff as far as they could push it from a government level,” Semands said.

Local homeowner John Springman said conservation is fine, but he’s concerned the ICLEI movement is tied to the U.N.

“Who is the U.N. and ICLEI to tell we the people in the U.S.A. what to do?” Springman asked.

The City of Edmond has been working on a sustainability plan for better land use practices and energy conservation, Assistant City Manager Steve Commons told The Edmond Sun.

“Most of it’s about education and what areas we should emphasize to make people more aware of how they can have a positive impact at their homes and their businesses, and find ways to save money,” Commons said. “We’re trying to find out where we should put our emphasis in our planning process.”

City Manager Larry Stevens said he was pleased by the sizable crowd indicating a lot of interest in the subject of sustainability. The magnitude of differing opinions among the audience led him to set up more discussion on the topic in January.

“We’re going to cancel for tonight and after the first of the year, we’re going to have a general forum to discuss and answer some of your questions,” Entz announced.

Heath Hartman came to the forum to support sustainability, he said. The word “sustainability” is not owned by a particular group and is being “thrown around by a lot of different organizations,” he added.

“By sustainability we can survive and keep our quality of life up to the standard we’ve gotten it without destroying the world — without polluting our rivers — without killing the animals and the trees.”

He said he is more weary about large corporations using sustainability as a false facade to make people think they’re making a difference.

“I feel like this is awesome that they’re just inviting people to talk about it,” Hartman said of the City of Edmond. “If it was the city saying here’s what we’re going to do and this is how it’s going to be — that would make me weary. But they’ve just invited us to come talk about it. I think that’s awesome.”

Andrea Palmer said she wanted to learn about code requirements the city could mandate for making buildings more energy efficient.

“My agenda was to come and try to move Edmond forward so I volunteered to talk more about energy efficiency,” Palmer said.

Palmer said she came to the forum because she wanted to improve the quality of life for Edmond citizens and future generations.

“Long-term durability and being responsible for our resources — that’s what I came here for,” she said. “I feel ideas were twisted and turned the moment opinion was spoken to bring it back to the sustainability issue and no progress was made whatsoever.

“My voice wasn’t heard at all and it’s no fault to the City of Edmond.”

[Ponce]

Agenda 21 is alive and doing just great in Cuba........I wrote about this long ago.......there is no private property in Cuba and the governent owns all the houses and given to the people as needed, those who were living in a house (wheather they own it or not) stayed there till the las member of the family die and then the government would give it to another family.

You say that the US government will take over private property (unless you already own it) and rent them to those in need?.....those people lost their homes because they could not affort payment on the mortgage so what makes the government believe that they will be able to affort the rent?.......the end will be the same as it is in Cuba.

First post of the day............good morning to one and all.

[RJB]

good morning to one and all.

Good morning.