Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Fraudulent Court system exemplified on a traffic ticket case

  1. #1
    Platinum
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,205
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Fraudulent Court system exemplified on a traffic ticket case

    Marc Stevens is a genius.

    Part 3 is especially good.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL70LQPHiQA

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcVnzaUduZU

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xz4bfPc4xJM

    ( I found his videos after I've heard people talking about his "adventure" book, which they say is brilllant)
    http://gold-silver.us/forum/index.php?topic=1248.msg13086#msg13086

  2. #2
    Gold
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    816
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Re: Fraudulent Court system exemplified on a traffic ticket case

    Thank you!

    CC
    If your are engaged in a fair fight, your tactics SUCK!
    Shot placement is important! But when the world turns to shit------An A10 Warthog beats a feather duster every time! .50 BMG vs .308 vs .22 * anything
    Incoming fire has the right of way!

  3. #3
    Great Value Carrots willie pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Posts
    2,954
    Thanks
    212
    Thanked 270 Times in 177 Posts

    Re: Fraudulent Court system exemplified on a traffic ticket case

    is contesting a traffic citation considered a trial though?
    If you don't think to good, don't think too much

  4. #4
    Unobtanium
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    19,045
    Thanks
    1,368
    Thanked 3,159 Times in 1,916 Posts

    Re: Fraudulent Court system exemplified on a traffic ticket case

    Yes Pete, it is supposed to be a regular trial, like if you were there for killing someone......nothing is to big or to small......a trial is a trial.

    On the 11 I am going to court on a summons.....I will not call it a "speeding ticket" or "a traffic violation" because by saying that you are saying that you are guilty".

    If all that the sheriff has is a radar reading and his word then as far as I am concern he already lost the case because thre was NO VIDEO OR PHOTO with the date and hour stamped with the photo or video (if there is one).

    I will try the part about "Who do you represent here your honor".....that one alone is a conflict ot interest.
    "If you don't hold it, you don't own it"... Ponce

    "I'll never stop learning because I'll never stop reading"... Ponce

  5. #5
    Palladium
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    353
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Fraudulent Court system exemplified on a traffic ticket case

    The problem with the "Traffic" issue is that personal liberty is a right. However, thanks to national socialism, most Americans have surrendered that right. Without personal liberty, one trespasses upon the public ways unless one has permission (license).

    After doing a little bit of digging around his site, I cannot find any corroboration that his tactics have proven successful. But I haven't opened all links nor read all postings.

    Caveat emptor.


    "Free" info:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NASP/message/951




  6. #6
    Gold
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    816
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Re: Fraudulent Court system exemplified on a traffic ticket case

    I wish you good luck with the effort. Really mean that. Years ago I contested two tickets for one of my lowbeds. It was carrying one of our cranes and this Trooper decided to stop it for a safety check. The crane was fifteen feet wide, and had the needed permits. The shoulder wasn't wide enough to get all the way off the road AND the shoulder was soft. Truck got stuck. Traffic was tied up for hours. Got tickets for "loading as to spill" and "delaying traffic". The loading as to spill because when the trailer tires on the downhill side sunk the crane was "over center". Case went on for two hours with a whole bunch of pictures from me. Worth all the time. The tickets were thrown out and the Trooper admonished.,

    GO GET 'EM!

    CC


    Quote Originally Posted by Ponce
    Yes Pete, it is supposed to be a regular trial, like if you were there for killing someone......nothing is to big or to small......a trial is a trial.

    On the 11 I am going to court on a summons.....I will not call it a "speeding ticket" or "a traffic violation" because by saying that you are saying that you are guilty".

    If all that the sheriff has is a radar reading and his word then as far as I am concern he already lost the case because thre was NO VIDEO OR PHOTO with the date and hour stamped with the photo or video (if there is one).

    I will try the part about "Who do you represent here your honor".....that one alone is a conflict ot interest.
    If your are engaged in a fair fight, your tactics SUCK!
    Shot placement is important! But when the world turns to shit------An A10 Warthog beats a feather duster every time! .50 BMG vs .308 vs .22 * anything
    Incoming fire has the right of way!

  7. #7
    Unobtanium
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    19,045
    Thanks
    1,368
    Thanked 3,159 Times in 1,916 Posts

    Re: Fraudulent Court system exemplified on a traffic ticket case

    I really don't care about the ticket one way or another, what I am looking forward is to raise hell, specially when I know that the sheriff made a booboo up.........all that the judge will have will be his word and a piece of paper saying that the radar gun is accurate.........but then you have the problem.....the machine that they use to check the accuracy of the radar? when was it last check for accuracy?

    The cop did not "paced" me.......and I was parked on a private driveway when he flew by me a 100 mph with all his Christmas lighs on..............he even asked me (when he came back)"Did you stopped to take a piss".....also, he never had direct visual contact with me..........he will have no video or photo of THE CHASE

    Also, they have to go to class in order to learn how to use a new radar gun, if he doesn't come up with a diploma or a card or something saying that he did take the class then that's only heresay.......meaning that he does not qualify to use it

    PS: Next day I did go back to take a "piss" and it took me 8.43 minutes.....that means that "he thinks" that he was AT LEAST 8.43 minutes behind me hahahahahahahah.


    First post of the day................good morning to one and all.
    "If you don't hold it, you don't own it"... Ponce

    "I'll never stop learning because I'll never stop reading"... Ponce

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •