FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul Can't "Win"

[PatColo]

I just started listening to this, recorded 11/6 aka 2 days before the fake election. Bev comes on after 11 min mark.

Sunday, November 6, 2016
Battle Of New Orleans Bev Harris/Rhonda Sheer
Mp3 https://gwking.podbean.com/mf/web/vf...leans_11_3.mp3


My take on this recent election is basically it WAS rigged, for TRUMP-- in a relatively last minute change of horses by (((tptb))). Again see
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/1...rt-of-the-deal
for the likely back story.

[PatColo]

At http://blackboxvoting.org/the-brakey-method/

Actions: The Brakey Method

Put the brakes on “mystery elections” once and for all. A simple 3-step method places public elections back under public control.

THE BRAKEY METHOD

http://blackboxvoting.org/wp-content...llot-image.png

Preserve and make public the “ballot images” — Modern voting systems take a picture of every ballot, called a “ballot image.”
Peg the ballot image to the actual ballot using a unique ID number (not connected to any voter identifier in any way).
Make sure ballots are a public record so that any person can arrange to inspect the actual ballots at any time.

Ballot images can be released electronically, either upon request or — better — by placing them on the Web, allowing any person to examine pictures of any or all ballots. These electronic images can be authenticated by any person by checking any ballot, which must contain same unique ID number.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Q. Do all voting systems make ballot images?

A. Most of them do. The best ballot images are actual photographic images of voter-marked paper ballots, but even the paperless DRE machines are capable of, and usually do, automatically make ballot images.

Q, Where do I go to ask to see ballot images?

A. Public records and freedom of information laws direct persons to the “custodian of the records.” For most locations, the custodian of the records for ballot images is the county elections office. In some locations, primarily in New England, the custodian of the records is a municipality.

Q. How do I ask for the ballot images?

A. You can go to the elections office with a USB stick in hand and ask for a copy as a public records request.

Q. What if they tell me the ballot images don’t exist?

A. There are two possible reasons this could be the case: (1) They destroyed the ballot images, which violates records retention requirements and destroys a crucial audit record, and, in some states, constitutes a felony. (Note that one case, in Alameda County Calif, required an election official to re-run an election after she destroyed audit records.) Or (2) They are using old, out of date voting machines, some of which do not produce a ballot image. If they destroyed the ballot images, seek out a qualified attorney to take appropriate legal action, or focus on obtaining legislation to require preservation of ballot images and making them public. If they are using machines which do not produce the images, focus on public pressure to purchase the right kind of voting machines next time, and/or on getting legislation requiring the use of machines that produce ballot images, plus public release of the images.

Q. What if they won’t let me see anything at all?

A. Some states, like Kansas, Utah, and Nevada, have passed exceptionally undemocratic laws which prohibit any inspection of key election audit documents. If this is the case, litigation or change of legislation will be the appropriate action.

Q. How does the Brakey Method address issues like voter purges or voter ID?

A. It doesn’t. The Brakey Method solves transparency problems with the counting of the vote. There is no magic wand that solves all types of election integrity issues in one swoop. It helps to parse election integrity into four components:

– Who can vote (voter lists)

– Who did vote (participating voter lists)

– Counting of the vote (The Brakey Method produces transparency and auditability of the count).

– Chain of custody (Are the ballots and images the real ballots? Have any gone missing or been added?)

Q. Why is it called The Brakey Method?

A. Actually it has a lengthier pedigree. The first election integrity advocate to propose using ballot images to authenticate the count was Harri Hursti, in 2006. Hursti is the computer security expert who demonstrated hacking voting machines in the film Hacking Democracy. (See http://hackingdemocracy.com). Black Box Voting promoted this concept in 2006, working with Hursti to produce a prototype to allow public, open source, automated counting of ballot images if desired. A commercial fisherman named Kevin Collins, from Humboldt County California, together with Carolyn Crnich, a Humboldt County election official, met with Bev Harris to discuss actually implementing the use of ballot images to authenticate the count. Humboldt County purchased an off-the-shelf scanner and began making its ballot images available to the public in 2008. A Humboldt County citizen named Mitch Trachtenberg developed free open source software which improved on the original Hursti prototype. The first time Humboldt County allowed public authentication of the count using ballot images, it was discovered that the central tabulator had miscounted. A Colorado citizen named Marilyn Marks filed, and won, a succession of lawsuits establishing that both ballots and ballot images must be treated as public records in Colorado. But it was in 2016, under the relentless and strategic efforts of Arizona election integrity advocate John Brakey, that the ballot image concept really began to take off.

Brakey requested ballot images from Pima County, was told they were being destroyed. He sought and obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to prohibit Arizona officials from destroying the images. His work mushroomed out into many other U.S. states, generating cooperation from some and obstruction from others. It is Brakey who boiled this important transparency measure down into a simple three-part method (images, connector ID, right to examine actual ballots). It is Brakey who has been most effective at propagating this excellent solution. We need a name for it. Bev Harris started calling it The Brakey Method to make it easy to say and easy to explain as a 1-2-3 process that:

a. Is already available with most voting systems

b. Is already pinned into Freedom of Information rights in most places

c. Costs little or nothing to implement

OBJECTIONS

“This might allow voters to sell their vote.” — No, it won’t, and if you are concerned about that you are against vote-by-mail right? Because it is far easier to sell a vote by just taking a picture of an absentee ballot than by trying to identify an anonymous ballot image.
“This might jeopardize secrecy of the ballot.” — No, it doesn’t, unless your election administration is permitting an identifier on the ballot which ties back to the voter. One state, Colorado, was caught doing this, embedding a QR code on each ballot which connected to vote ID number, permitting election officials and vendors to see how you voted. The solution is to prohibit printing identifying information on the ballot. There is no special class of persons such as election officials or vendors who have a right to see how you voted.

Using The Brakey Method, it doesn’t matter if Attila the Hun owns the voting machines, the public will once again own its elections.

Work on getting The Brakey Method going in your location. It is, at this time, the most important thing you can to do protect the counting of the vote.

http://blackboxvoting.org/the-brakey-method/

Also see: Ballot Images – A new way to verify that results are true
http://blackboxvoting.org/ballot-images/

[PatColo]

JFriend has up this article:

http://therealistreport.com/wp-conte...ry-420x240.jpg
Owner of Servers Implicated in DNC Hacks Says No One Is Interested in Truth Behind Computer Crimes

December 16, 2016 4 comments
The mainstream media argues with no real evidence that the Russian government has been behind computer hacking targeting top Democrats and U.S. elections systems. However, the man who runs the servers implicated in the crime said no U.S. law enforcement or intel agency is interested in speaking with him to gather evidence on the perpetrators.

to which I just commented:

PatColo December 20, 2016 8:08 am

http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/ce2f23d...?s=72&d=mm&r=g Your comment is awaiting moderation.

The (((Legacy Mockingbird Media’s))) orchestrated, synchronized rollout of their “Russia hacked the sacred US election, OH MY!!” psyop is also designed to enshrine the myth that the USA’s fake blackbox elections have any integrity in the first place, & that said US election “results” aren’t already completely fraudulent & (((CIA/MSM))) controllable. The same CIA who’s been neck deep in rigging elections worldwide since their WW2 inception, and whose expertise in election rigging was surely brought to bear in designing USA’s current “perfect fake election” system, in accordance with the mockingly named “Help America Vote Act.”

I maintain that (((TPTB))) were planning to rig the recent “election” to hand it to Killery, right up until late Oct, as surely as their weaponized (((MSM))) gaslighted the public all Fall about how a Killery “win” was virtually assured. But the Podesta emails, where the tip of the #Pizzagate iceberg appeared, threatening to illuminate the DC elite’s whole Ritual Satanic Child Abuse underbelly which binds them… had (((TPTB))) scrambling like cockroaches to keep the lid on that. They figured a Crooked/Sick-Killery “win”, and the vast scrutiny which would follow such a grand fraud against the public (guessing Trump’s real popular vote lead was 20+ percent), would be bad for their sudden new highest agenda: snuffing out their #Pizzagate Ritual Satanic Child Abuse uber-scandal.

So they rigged the election “results” to properly give it to “wildcard” Trump; but to erase his real 20+ percent popular vote advantage & likely 50 state electoral college sweep– and rather rigged it to appear like it was a thin “technical win”, with a pop vote loss, giving wildcard Trump “no mandate,” which would hopefully make him & the still-deceived public, more controllable.

And (((they))) also hoped to appease the 60+ percent of the public who actually voted Trump, and thus help turn the bloodhounds away from #Pizzagate. Post fake-election, we’ve also seen (((their weaponized MSM))) roll out their fake “Fake News Crisis” psyop against the alt-media, with (((goog/YT/FB/twit/reddit/etc))) instantly jumping on board… all in a further (futile!) effort to snuff out #Pizzagate.

So we rightfully got our Trump, albeit robbed of (the wide perception of) his “landslide mandate”; but the alt-media bloodhounds are STILL all over #Pizzagate, to (((TPTB’s))) obvious frustration. Oh look, look over here, “Ruskies tried to hack our sacred already fake election, OH MY!!!” lolz; interesting times.

[Horn]

Diversity includes diversion...

[PatColo]

New Sofia Smallstorm interview;

Laura Pressley 10/6/17

---

http://aboutthesky.com/images/storie...ssley_crop.png

Dr. Laura Pressley ran for City Council in Austin, Texas in 2014, intent on cutting waste from the city budget and fixing problems. She was an extremely popular candidate whose grassroots campaign was boosted by scores of dedicated volunteers, and given her expertise with numbers and lifelong activism she was thought by nearly all to be perfect for the job. However, two weeks before the election-entry deadline, a 24-year-old ethnic Mexican (Gregorio Casar) moved into town, signed up to run and beat Laura Pressley 2 to 1. With her mathematical skills, Dr. Pressley began to analyze the election results, saw odd patterns, and decided to file a lawsuit to decertify her opponent's victory. Her case -- the first in the country to produce direct evidence of electronic vote fraud -- has reached the Texas Supreme Court, and if she prevails, EVF will be blown open in America as never before. Please hear this amazing woman's story and support her ($15K of donations are needed!!) at PressleyForAustin.com. Read more here and here.

Listen here

To understand how EVF is done today, watch this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezmpqwVEnM

[PatColo]

another interview with Laura Pressley who was blatantly robbed of an Austin TX city counsel seat; Sean/SGT Report:
http://pressleyforaustin.com

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/B7bJgugoZfw/h...9cWKsewvW5tfkw 41:07
This HEROIC PATRIOT Needs Our Support -- Dr Laura Pressley

• 903 views
• 55 minutes ago

[PatColo]

Interesting little story today, what's going on? Esp CIA has been 'meddling' in foreign elections since their inception; and surely have a hand in the pretend 'outcomes' of US elections, esp post-HAVA. JAssange tweeted about it,
https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/st...90598219292672

______________


The CIA Democrats

Introduction

By Patrick Martin
7 March 2018

PART ONE | PART TWO | PART THREE

This is the first part of a three-part article.



An extraordinary number of former intelligence and military operatives from the CIA, Pentagon, National Security Council and State Department are seeking nomination as Democratic candidates for Congress in the 2018 midterm elections. The potential influx of military-intelligence personnel into the legislature has no precedent in US political history.


If the Democrats capture a majority in the House of Representatives on November 6, as widely predicted, candidates drawn from the military-intelligence apparatus will comprise as many as half of the new Democratic members of Congress. They will hold the balance of power in the lower chamber of Congress.


Both push and pull are at work here. Democratic Party leaders are actively recruiting candidates with a military or intelligence background for competitive seats where there is the best chance of ousting an incumbent Republican or filling a vacancy, frequently clearing the field for a favored “star” recruit.


A case in point is Elissa Slotkin, a former CIA operative with three tours in Iraq, who worked as Iraq director for the National Security Council in the Obama White House and as a top aide to John Negroponte, the first director of national intelligence. After her deep involvement in US war crimes in Iraq, Slotkin moved to the Pentagon, where, as a principal deputy assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs, her areas of responsibility included drone warfare, “homeland defense” and cyber warfare.


https://www.wsws.org/asset/39fdc4e9-...ition=image480

Elissa Slotkin



The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) has designated Slotkin as one of its top candidates, part of the so-called “Red to Blue” program targeting the most vulnerable Republican-held seats—in this case, the Eighth Congressional District of Michigan, which includes Lansing and Brighton. The House seat for the district is now held by two-term Republican Representative Mike Bishop.


The Democratic leaders are promoting CIA agents and Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. At the same time, such people are choosing the Democratic Party as their preferred political vehicle. There are far more former spies and soldiers seeking the nomination of the Democratic Party than of the Republican Party. There are so many that there is a subset of Democratic primary campaigns that, with a nod to Mad magazine, one might call “spy vs. spy.”


The 23rd Congressional District in Texas, which includes a vast swathe of the US-Mexico border along the Rio Grande, features a contest for the Democratic nomination between Gina Ortiz Jones, an Air Force intelligence officer in Iraq, who subsequently served as an adviser for US interventions in South Sudan and Libya, and Jay Hulings. The latter’s website describes him as a former national security aide on Capitol Hill and federal prosecutor, whose father and mother were both career undercover CIA agents. The incumbent Republican congressman, Will Hurd, is himself a former CIA agent, so any voter in that district will have his or her choice of intelligence agency loyalists in both the Democratic primary and the general election.


CNN’s “State of the Union” program on March 4 included a profile of Jones as one of many female candidates seeking nomination as a Democrat in Tuesday’s primary in Texas. The network described her discreetly as a “career civil servant.” However, the Jones for Congress website positively shouts about her role as a spy, noting that after graduating from college, “Gina entered the US Air Force as an intelligence officer, where she deployed to Iraq and served under the US military’s ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy” (the last phrase signaling to those interested in such matters that Jones is gay).


According to her campaign biography, Ortiz Jones was subsequently detailed to a position as “senior advisor for trade enforcement,” a post President Obama created by executive order in 2012. She would later be invited to serve as a director for investment at the Office of the US Trade Representative, where she led the portfolio that reviewed foreign investments to ensure they did not pose national security risks. With that background, if she fails to win election, she can surely enlist in the trade war efforts of the Trump administration.
How this article was prepared

The House of Representatives is currently controlled by the Republicans, with a majority of 238 compared to 193 Democrats. There are four vacancies, one previously held by the Democrats. To reach a majority of 218 seats in the next Congress, the Democrats must have a net gain of 24 seats.


The DCCC has designated 102 seats as priority or competitive, including 22 seats where the incumbents are not running again (five Democrats and 17 Republicans), and 80 seats where Republican incumbents could be defeated for reelection in the event that polls predicting a sizeable swing to the Democrats in November prove accurate.


The World Socialist Web Site has reviewed Federal Election Commission reports filed by all the Democratic candidates in these 102 competitive districts, focusing on those candidates who reported by the latest filing date, December 31, 2017, that they had raised at least $100,000 for their campaigns, giving them a financial war chest sufficient to run in a competitive primary contest. In addition, there a few cases where a candidate had less than the $100,000 cutoff, but was unchallenged for the nomination, or where last-minute retirement or resignation has led to late entry of high-profile candidates without an FEC report on file. These have also been included.


The total of such candidates for the Democratic nomination in the 102 districts is 221. Each has a website that gives biographical details, which we have collected and reviewed for this report. It is notable that those candidates with a record in the military-intelligence apparatus, as well as civilian work for the State Department, Pentagon or National Security Council, do not hide their involvement, particularly in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They clearly regard working as a CIA agent in Baghdad, an Army special ops assassin in Afghanistan, or a planner for drone missile warfare in the White House or Pentagon as a star on their résumé, rather than something to conceal.
One quarter of all the Democratic challengers in competitive House districts have military-intelligence, State Department or NSC backgrounds. This is by far the largest subcategory of Democratic candidates. National security operatives (57) outnumber state and local government officials (45), lawyers (35), corporate executives, businessmen and wealthy individuals (30) and other professionals (19) among the candidates for Democratic congressional nominations.


Of the 102 primary elections to choose the Democratic nominees in these competitive districts, 44 involve candidates with a military-intelligence or State Department background, with 11 districts having two such candidates, and one district having three. In the majority of contests, the military-intelligence candidates seem likely to win the Democratic nomination, and, if the Democrats win in the general election, would enter Congress as new members of the House of Representatives.


There are some regional differences. In the Northeast, 21 of the 31 seats targeted by the Democrats have military-intelligence candidates. This area, not the South or Midwest, has the highest proportion of military-intelligence candidates seeking Democratic nominations.


In the West, only 7 of the 23 targeted seats have military-intelligence candidates, while in a half dozen seats the leading candidates are self-funded millionaires, mainly from the IT industry. There has been a wave of Republican retirements in California and wealthy people are bidding for these seats.


The military-intelligence candidates are disproportionately favored by the party apparatus, encouraged to run in districts that are the most likely takeover targets. Military-intelligence candidates account for 10 of the 22 districts selected for the most high-profile attention as part of the “red-to-blue” program, or nearly half. In some cases, military-intelligence candidates have amassed huge campaign war chests that effectively shut out any potential rivals, an indication that the financial backers of the Democratic Party have lined up behind them.


To be continued
PART TWO | PART THREE

[PatColo]

47 mins:
Election Rigging and Corruption? Bev Harris - May 24, 2018

[PatColo]

MUST WATCH: Tim Canova - A Fight for FL District 23

12,080 views
1.2K 5 Share Save
https://yt3.ggpht.com/a-/AN66SAyq7DQ...ffffff-rj-k-noTracy Beanz
Published on Nov 23, 2018

This interview will definitely go down as one of the most important pieces I have done. Tim Canova has been fighting corruption and election fraud in earnest against Brenda Snipes and the machines of BOTH parties for three years. PLEASE watch and share this interview to raise awareness about what this amazing man has been doing to ensure elections with integrity for ALL of us.

52m: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq4qGnL-zGc

[PatColo]

new Whitney Webb, who did an exhaustive series on Epstein last Summer/Fall:

Why a Shadowy Tech Firm With Ties to Israeli Intelligence Is Running Doomsday Election Simulations

A shadowy tech firm with deep ties to Israeli intelligence and newly inked contracts to protect Pentagon computers is partnering with Lockheed Martin to gain unprecedented access to the heart of America’s democracy.

by Whitney Webb