Originally Posted by
Neuro
To tell the truth, I don't think the cop handled it very well, but it appeared as the woman did disturb the peace, and allegedly she tried to knee his balls, she didn't appear to have gotten any visible physical injuries from the strike, on the other hand it didn't look like she calmed down either, so what he did wasn't very effective.
Compare this with the McDonalds chimp out incidence a couple of months ago, where the employee beat up two small black women with an iron rod when they were already down, and just continued beating on them. At that time many of those that supported that mans excessive force against the women are now against this police's rather mild blow?
The women in both instances were crazy, and they were a potential threat, but the force used was greatly different. One was convicted earlier for manslaughter and used great force, the other one was hired to protect the peace and used very small force. And people here seems to think that the Manslaughter convict was right while the Cop wasn't?