Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineligibi

  1. #1
    Unobtanium Serpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    17,879
    Thanks
    3,459
    Thanked 4,437 Times in 2,790 Posts

    Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineligibi

    Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineligibility Damage ControlObama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineligibility Damage Control

    More articles by Toria »
    Posted by: Toria
    Categories: Breaking News, Featured, The President

    A recent ballot challenge hearing in New Jersey exposes a desperate strategy by Obama to distance himself from his forged certificate and induce the contrived value of his transient political popularity as the only “legitimate qualification” needed to hold the office of the presidency.

    By Dan Crosby of THE DAILY PEN
    Editor: Penbrook Johannson

    Thursday, April 12, 2012

    NEW YORK, NY – After a Maricopa County law enforcement agency conducted a six-month forensic examination which determined that the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 Certificate of Live Birth posted to a government website in April, 2011 is a digital fabrication and that it did not originate from a genuine paper document, arguments from an Obama eligibility lawyer during a recent New Jersey ballot challenge hearing reveals the image was not only a fabrication, but that it was likely part of a contrived plot by counterfeiters to endow Obama with mere political support while simultaneously making the image intentionally appear absurd and, therefore, invalid as evidence toward proving Obama’s ineligibility in a court of law.

    Taking an audacious and shocking angle against the constitutional eligibility mandate, Obama’s lawyer, Alexandra Hill, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot”.

    Hill went on to contort reasoning by implying that Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in order to be a candidate.

    At the hearing, attorney for the plaintiffs, Mario Apuzzo, correctly argued that Obama, under the Constitution, has to be a “natural born Citizen” and that he has not met his burden of showing that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot by showing that he is indeed a “natural born Citizen.” He argued that Obama has shown no authenticate evidence to the New Jersey Secretary of State demonstrating who he is and that he was born in the United States. Apuzzo also argued that as a matter of law, Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” because he was born to a father who was not a U.S. citizen.

    As Obama’s legal argument becomes more contorted, he is being forced to avoid an ever shrinking legal space, and an increasing weight, of his failure to meet constitutional eligibility requirements.

    Hill, of Genova, Burn & Giantomasi Attorneys in Newark, made a desperate motion to dismiss the ballot objection arguing that Obama’s lack of natural-born citizenship status was not relevant to being placed on the New Jersey presidential ballot because no law exists in New Jersey which says that a candidate’s appearance on the ballot must be supported by evidence of natural born citizenship status. Only the U.S. constitution restricts eligibility to hold the office of president to natural born citizens.

    Judge Masin denied the motion to dismiss and the case proceeded to trial.

    “Sadly, regardless of her moral deficiency, Hill is legally justified,” says TDP Editor, Penbrook Johannson, “Obama’s eligibility is a separate matter than the charges of forgery and fraud. Of course, we have evidence that he is not eligible. But, evidence of forgery by as yet unidentified counterfeiters working on behalf of Obama is not what legally excludes Obama from appearing on a ballot, by itself, until some authority is willing to consider this as evidence of forgery on its merit as an indication of actual ineligibility in a court of legal authority. Until some court of competent jurisdiction is willing to hear evidence of forgery and fraud, you can’t legally punish a political candidate for that crime which has not been proven that they committed. However, since Obama is not eligible because of a lack of authenticated evidence to the contrary, he could be held off the ballot for that reason.”

    According to Johannson, there is an overwhelming level of moral certainty that Obama is a usurper, but until a court with jurisdiction considers this case, Obama’s status as a legitimate president is in limbo.

    “He does not exist as a president except in the imagination of those who blindly support him. Whereas he is politically desired by a transient consensus, his legality is unresolved until a responsible court makes a determination. This is the essence of our crisis. Our nation exists in a state of non-authorized identity. Obama is just some guy calling himself a president and living in the White House without the confirmative authority to do so.”

    Obama’s document forgery and fraudulent presidency have now forced him to flee to a “strange twilight zone” between political popularity and legal legitimacy where poorly counterfeited records are apparently allowed to be published by Obama using government media resources for political purposes, yet those same records are held by the courts as irrelevant for determining Obama’s legal eligibility status because they are, according to judges, “so poorly forged” they are obviously meant to be satirical and not to be taken seriously as evidence.

    Shockingly, parting from widespread public ignorance, Hill actually acknowledged two of the three necessary components of determining natural born citizenship as being place of birth and citizenship status of both parents. However, she argued that, “No law in New Jersey obligated him (Obama) to produce any such evidence in order to get on the primary ballot.”

    The third component of natural born eligibility is maintenance of natural born citizenship status from birth to election without interruption, involuntarily or voluntarily, due to expatriation, extradition, renouncement or foreign adoption.

    “Obama is mocking our constitution,” says Johannson, “His position is that he never claimed the image was an indication of his natural born status, just that it was information about his birth. Whether it is forged or authentic is irrelevant to Obama because plausible deniability affords him the security in knowing that no legal authority is willing to hang him with it.”

    Of course, Johannson adds that it makes Obama look like a willing accomplice and a liar, but, he says, “…show me a politician who cares about being seen as a liar by the public. If people who support him want to vote for a person like that, it reveals more about the reprobate character of Obama supporters than competency of any legal determination about his lack of constitutional eligibility. Degenerates will vote for a degenerate while patriots will exhaust all civil means to remove him…until those civil means are exhausted. Then things get ugly for government.”

    “However, Hill is also essentially admitting that Obama is not a legitimate president and that Obama believes that his illegitimacy does not matter to his legal ability to hold the office. Obama holds to a political tenet, not a legal one with respect to his views on his eligibility. That’s what corrupt, criminal politicians do. When the law convicts them, they run to public favorability for shelter with the hope that their supporters will apply pressure to disregard law in their case.”

    Obama is now arguing that because he is politically popular, as he points to as being indicated by his so-called ‘election’, despite accusations of eligibility fraud and election fraud, the constitutional eligibility mandate is not relevant, in his view. Until a courageous authority is willing to disagree and hold Obama to an equally weighted legal standard, civil remedies for the Obama problem are limited.

    Johannson adds that Obama is making the same argument on behalf of Obamacare.

    “If he had the gall to actually tell the Supreme Court that they have no authority to determine the unconstitutionality of his illegitimate policies, what makes anyone think he believes they have the authority to disqualify him due to his lack of constitutional eligibility? Obama believes he holds preeminent power over all branches of government because of his delusions of political grandeur.”

    He correctly points to a lifetime pattern of behavior and testimony by Obama which indicates a complete lack of regard for the U.S. Constitution when it restricts Obama’s political agenda and lust for power.

    “This is a guy who illegally defaced public property when he scribed his aspirations to be ‘king’ in a concrete sidewalk at the age of ten, for God’s sake. Now, his ‘majesty’ wants to put his illegal ‘graffiti’ into American law books. However, his problem is that he has to face the fact that he is an abject failure in his capacity to meet any standard required by the 250-year-old U.S. Constitution, in everything he tries to do. The Constitution owns him and he can’t stand it. He hates it. Therefore, instead of admitting his lack of constitutionality, he simply breaks the rules and proceeds to illegally scribe his fake authority on everything until someone is willing to physically stop him. Obama is not just an illegitimate politician, he is a rogue outlaw without regard for the divine providence of American law.”

    Apuzzo submitted that New Jersey law requires Obama to show evidence that he is qualified for the office he wishes to occupy and that includes showing that he is a “natural born Citizen,” which includes presenting evidence of who he is, where he was born, and that he was born to two U.S. citizen parents. Apuzzo added that the Secretary of State has a constitutional obligation not to place any ineligible candidates on the election ballot.

    The account of the trial can be read at:

    http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/...earing-update/
    ###http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/...amage-control/

  2. #2
    Unobtanium Twisted Titan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,875
    Thanks
    8,104
    Thanked 5,082 Times in 2,712 Posts

    Re: Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineli

    Taking an audacious and shocking angle against the constitutional eligibility mandate, Obama’s lawyer, Alexandra Hill, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status. Therefore, she argued, it is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot”.



    Dude this is a article from the onion ....right??
    Honor The Most High, Keep His Commandments and all will go well with you.

  3. #3
    Platinum mightymanx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Land of Mossbacks and Sasquatch.
    Posts
    1,651
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts

    Re: Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineli

    Now that is some spin master bull shit right there!!!!!

    Most of the Sheople will not even be able to comprehend what that article said, or how it impacts their Dancing With the Stars.
    Please remember.... once the pin is removed, Mr. Grenade is no longer your friend.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNocturnalEgyptian View Post
    The main thing I learned from history is that most men fail to learn from history.

  4. #4
    Dangerous Donald Neuro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Absurdistan
    Posts
    21,138
    Thanks
    8,749
    Thanked 7,717 Times in 4,952 Posts

    Re: Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineli

    This shit is banana republic material. He himself via his lawyer admits that he hasn't fulfilled the legal requirements to be president. What will get him out of the white house? Would he regard an election loss? End of second term? Would El Presidente declare that his power would be inherited by his next of kin? The failure of supreme court to even investigate his natural born status exposes them as puppets to him... It appears the only way of getting him out of the white house is to physically remove him by force...

  5. #5
    Great Value Carrots iOWNme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Wise and Prepared
    Posts
    4,327
    Thanks
    1,658
    Thanked 2,086 Times in 925 Posts

    Re: Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineli

    A BAR certified Attorney uses this rationale as their foundation to their argument:

    Hill went on to contort reasoning by implying that Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in order to be a candidate.
    My Etsy store: https://twitter.com/xIOWNMEx

  6. #6
    Unobtanium palani's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    10,510
    Thanks
    512
    Thanked 2,724 Times in 1,852 Posts

    Re: Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineli

    Quote Originally Posted by Neuro View Post
    What will get him out of the white house?
    I used to maintain a residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue until the costs became excessive. I suppose when it fails to stop the weather the homeless people will leave.
    Make me one with everything.
    -- Zen Master to the hot dog vendor

  7. #7
    Unobtanium gunDriller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,592
    Thanks
    5,778
    Thanked 2,058 Times in 1,395 Posts

    Re: Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineli

    Quote Originally Posted by Neuro View Post
    This shit is banana republic material. He himself via his lawyer admits that he hasn't fulfilled the legal requirements to be president. What will get him out of the white house?
    A/ Israel is struck by an asteroid.

    B/ A return to 1776 era vote counting methods. No computers, all paper.

    C/ A law forbidding Jews from participating in the vote-counting process.
    Retired Director Morris Waxler says the FDA did not do their job for 15 years - and is not now.

    HelpStopLASIK.com

  8. #8
    Banproof. General of Darkness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    9,070
    Thanks
    826
    Thanked 2,782 Times in 1,378 Posts

    Re: Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineli

    Bump

  9. #9
    Great Value Carrots Silver Rocket Bitches!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    SE MI
    Posts
    2,948
    Thanks
    311
    Thanked 1,121 Times in 589 Posts

    Re: Obama Lawyer Admits Forgery but disregards “image” as Indication of Obama’s Ineli

    What kinda shit is this I'm reading now? Why doesn't it ever make any sense?


    Attachment 2661
    everything we learn changes that which we know to be true

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •